HomeMy WebLinkAbout31-Mayor's Office
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
From: Mayor Patrick Morris
Subject: COUNCIL REVIEW OF THE
PROPOSED ADDITIONAL FOCUS
AREAS FOR POSSIBLE EXPANSION
OF THE OPERATION PHOENIX
NEIGHBORHOOD INITIATIVE
Dept: Mayor's Office
Date: June 1, 2007
Meeting Date: June 4, 2007
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
March 5th and 27th, 2007 - Mayor and Council received a status report regarding the
initial eight months of the Operation Phoenix crime-fighting strategy launched by the
Mayor in June 2006. The report listed the various city-wide crime suppression,
intervention, and prevention initiatives that had been deployed during the eight months
since June 2006, and detailed the Neighborhood Initiative component of Operation
Phoenix, explaining the various crime-fighting efforts that had been focused in the 20-
block area of most crime-ridden neighborhood in San Bernardino.
Recommended motion:
That the Council approve in concept the five focus areas for expansion of the Operation
Phoenix Neighborhood Initiative, and direct city staff to work with the county and school
officials to bring back for Council review, recommended crime-fighting strategies for each
focus area, including a draft budget for implementation of the str~~i~ ~
t :i'" ~
nature
Contact person: Jirn Morris
Phone: 384-5133
Supporting data attached: staff report and map
Ward: All
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount: $0
Source: N/A
Finance:
Council Notes:
Agenda Item No. S I
u/If/(jr
STAFF REPORT
Subiect:
Council review of the proposed additional focus areas for possible expansion of the Operation
Phoenix Neighborhood Initiative.
Background:
On March 5"1 and March 21st, 2007, officials from the city, county, and California State
University San Bernardino (CSUSB) provided a status report to the Council and Mayor
regarding the initial eight months of the Operation Phoenix crime-fighting strategy launched by
the Mayor in June 2006. The report listed the various city-wide crimc suppression, intervention,
and prevention initiatives that had been deployed during the eight months, and found that overall
crime in the city had decreased almost 15% in 2006 compared with 2005, and that overall city
crime in the last six months of 2006 had decreased more than 21 % compared to the previous
year.
The report also dctailed the Neighborhood Initiative component of Operation Phoenix,
explaining the various crime-fighting efforts that had been focused in the 20-block area of most
crime-ridden neighborhood in San Bernardino. The report provided details regarding the efforts
of police, code enforcement, parks and recreation, public services, the district attorney, probation
department, county social agencies, and the school district to work collaboratively toward
permanently reducing crime in the focus area by immediately suppressing crime through law
enforcement actions, intervening in the lives of at-risk families and youth, and creating programs
to prevent crime in the neighborhood by attacking the social and environmental factors that
contribute to criminal activity.
The Operation Phoenix report on the Neighborhood Initiative found that as a result of the
focused crime-fighting efforts, overall crime in the neighborhood had decreased almost 38% in
the first seven months of the initiative. A quality of life survey of residents in the focus area
conducted by CSUSB found that in eight months, the percent of residents who perceived the
neighborhood as unsafe declined by 38%. In the four months ofthis year, crime has continued to
decline in the focus area by another 5% compared to the prior year.
At the end of the Operation Phoenix report, city and county officials noted that the selection of
the initial focus area had been a data driven selection process to ensure scarce public resources
were spent in an area that would havc the greatest impact in reducing crime. In the selection of
the initial focus area, the following process was utilized:
. Began with crime data - looked at Police Reporting Districts with highest Part I crimes.
. Cross referenced five highest Part I crime Reporting Districts with code enforcement
data, caseload data from all relevant county service agencies (Probation, District
Attorney, Public Ilealth, Behavioral Ilealth, Children's Services), and data from public
schools that scrve the identified Reporting Districts.
. Based on all data, the Reporting District with the highest Part I crimes, was also the area
identified by code enforcement, the county agencies and the school district as the area
where they have the highest caseload demand, calls for service, and problems.
-1-
The rcport concluded that any expansion of the Operation Phoenix Ncighborhood Initiative
should also be data driven and follow the same basic process, to ensure continuation of our
succcssful partnerships with other agencies and to leverage our scarce city tax dollars. Finally,
the report noted that the Neighborhood Initiative is not a "one-size-fits-all" strategy, and that the
crime-fighting stratcgy for any additional focus areas should be tailorcd to the particular
characteristics, cnvironment, and assets of the focus area.
Proposed Additional Focus Areas for Opcration Phoenix:
Consistent with thc criteria identified in thc March 2007 Operation Phoenix report, city and
county ofIicials have revicwcd the crime data across thc city to determine thc areas with the
highest Part I crimes. The Part I crime data from the past two years was geographically mapped
based both on reporting districts and individual crime locations in order to determine which areas
in the city had the highest concentration of Part I crimes. After thc initial data-identificd "crime
hot spots" were determincd, the police chief reviewed these areas with thc police command staff
to confirm that the data-idcntified "hot spots" corrclated with the officcr's understanding of thc
problematic crimc areas within the city. The crime data focus arcas were then ovcrlaid with the
social servicc and caseload data from the County, to ensurc the County data would support the
County agencies being partners in the focus arcas. Additionally, codc cnforcement, parks and
rccreation, and public services also surveycd the areas to concur that these areas also needed
focused attention trom the city departments.
As a rcsult ofthe above analysis, five focus areas wcrc identified for review by the Council. Thc
five fCJCUS areas are morc spccifically identified in the attached map, with the crime data fClr the
corrcsponding reporting districts that are gencrally encompassed by thc focus areas. To ensurc
the focus areas encapsulatc, to the greatest extcnt possible, the fClctors contributing to thc focus
arcas' crime problem, specific boundaries for the focus areas wcrc not identified at this time.
Instead, a centcr point for the focus area was mapped, and a mile radi us was drawn around that
center point to create the initial general focus area for further study.
If the Council concurs with the general five focus areas, thcn city, county, and school officials
will undertake a detailed assessment of the focus areas and devclop a set of recommcnded
collaborative strategies for attacking crime in and around thc focus areas, based on the particular
charactcristics, environmcnt, and assets of the area. Recognizing that thc five proposed focus
areas cncompass more geography than the initial 20-block focus area, the stratcgics developed by
staff will [(JCUS on the spccific crime-contributing locations, conditions, and f(letors within and
around thc focus areas.
Financial Impact:
There is no financial impact for thc continued study and dcvelopment of stratcgies for the
proposed five focus areas. When city and county staff brings back a draft set of rccommended
crime-fighting stratcgy for each focus arca, a draft budget for thc rccommended stratcgies will be
included.
Recommendation:
That the Council approve in concept the five focus areas for expansion ofthc Opcration Phoenix
Ncighborhood Initiative, and direct city staff to work with thc county and school ot1icials to
bring back for Council review, recommended crime-fighting strategies for each focus area,
including a draft budget for implementation of the stratcgies.
-2-