HomeMy WebLinkAboutR02-Minutes
e
e
~
e
-
-
.
.
IIDJlv.u.GPIIDT COIMITDB
IIINUTBS
ADJOUUBD RBGlJI.U IIDTIBG
Jaauar,r 16, 1991
3:00 p...
The Regular Meeting of the Redevelopment Committee was called to order
by Chairwoman Bsther Bstrada at 3:15 p.m., in the Development Department
Conference Room, Fourth Floor, City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino.
ROLL r.AT.T.
Roll call was taken with the following members being present:
Chairwoman Bsther Bstrada, Committee Member Jess Flores and Committee Member
Mike Mauds1ey.
STA"" PRESENT
Mayor W. R. Holcomb; Robert J. Temple, Acting Administrator, Bconomic
Development Agency; Kenneth J. Henderson, Executive Director, Development
Department; Dennis A. Barlow, Senior Assistant City Attorney; John Hoeger,
Development Manager, Development Department; Lorraine Velarde, Executive
Assistant to the Mayor; Phil Arvizo, Executive Assistant to the Council;
Deborah Marez, Recording Secretary, Development Department.
OTHERS IN ATTKIIDA_a
Gene Wood, Wood-Husing Associates.
1.
DISPOSITION OF 11&- BBVIIARnIBO BCOllOlIIC DBVBLOPIIDT C01IIICIL (SBBDC)
ASSETS
Kenneth J. Henderson, Executive Director, requested this item be
continued due to the absence of Mr. Sam Henley who was not able to attend
because of a meeting previously scheduled with the Base Commander at Norton
Air Force Base.
UCCMmmATION
The Committee recommended this item be continued to the next
Redevelopment Committee meeting.
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
REGULAR MEETING
- 1 -
JANUARY 16, 1991
5290R(d1m)
el-
e
e
'"
e
-
-
.
.
2.
IlIDUSTRTAI. DBVELOl'ImBT BOIID FBB (COMhunJ.fi HOSPITAl.)
Kenneth J. Henderson, Executive Director, stated that the Development
Department was previously authorized to transfer the Industrial Development
Bond (IDB) Fee proceeds to the Economic Development Council with respect to
the Community Hospital industrial development bond, a total of $218,750 had
been paid to date, leaving a remainder of $131,250; however, since the
Economic Development Council is not a functioning entity and no longer
receives funding, staff is requesting direction by the Committee as to the
disposition of said funds.
Mayor Holcomb mentioned that a number of cities are restoring
historical landmarks by reinvesting funds in orange groves and indicated that
the Water Department presently owns one-hundred, sixty (160) acres along the
foothills, which would be an excellent location for an orange grove. He
further recommended setting aside a portion of the $43,750.00 to conduct a
feasibility study relative to this possibility. The Mayor estimated the study
would cost approximately $6,000 to $7,000, which would include the hiring of
an engineer to prepare a layout of the land for the purpose of preliminary
planning activities. The plan could then be presented to the Orange Show
Board of Directors for possible negotiation and agreement. He further
indicated that perhaps the cost of the study could be divided between the City
and the Orange Show.
Lengthy discussion ensued regarding the geographical region of the
land; soil conditions; specific commitment on the part of the City and the
Orange Show; potential profits resulting from the crops; capital costs and
expenditures; ongoing maintenance, and; related items.
Chairwoman Estrada inquired as to what restrictions, if any, govern the
use of these funds. Mr. Henderson explained the money is unrestricted and, as
such, could be used for broad economic development purposes as set forth in
Ordinance 3814; however, since the bonds were issued prior to the 1986 Tax
Reform Act, equipment could not be purchased with the money. Mr. Temple,
Acting Agency Administrator, indicated the money does not have the same
restrictions as those applicable to tax increment funds.
REClMmIIDATIOB
The Committee recommended approval of the appropriation of $10,000.00
from Industrial Development Bond fees to finance the conducting of a
feasibility study regarding the preservation of orange groves and the
development of open space on one-hundred, forty (140) acres of property
owned by the Municipal Water Department.
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
REGULAR MEETING
- 2 -
JANUARY 16, 1991
5290R(dlm)
.
.
.
.
.
-
-
.
.
3.
IBSJClfATtOIl OF 1Ir. VD1mW COIIIITIIOR PROJECT AIIIlA COIMInBE IIBImBR
R. WlDB RYAII~. SR.
Dt'.o...IUIIIAT'IOIl
The Committee recommended accepting the resignation of R.
Sr., from the Mt. Vernon Corridor Project Area Committee.
will be forwarded to Commission.
Wade Byars,
This item
4. r.nTIIAT. CITY SOUTH WATER TIIDUI: PA1l1!' PROPOSAL (stlRF CITY USA)
IBCOIIomnIlATtOIl
The Committee recommended this item be continued to the next
Redevelopment Committee meeting.
5. ST1ICf.1l ROOM OCCUPAIICY COllSULtiRT ~mn."",,,,....
The Committee was apprised that Judith Lenthall, President and Chief
Executive Officer of HomeAid, Inc., gave a presentation to the Community
Development Commission at a luncheon workshop conducted January 7, 1991, which
included the viewing of two (2) videos in connection with HomeAid's work in
San Diego. The Community Development Commission also discussed the City's
proposed Single-Room Occupancy (SRO) program.
The Mayor briefed the Committee members as to Ms. Lenthall's
qualifications and achievements and praised her vision, imagination and
understanding of current housing needs. He stated that Ms. Lenthall has an
influential list of business contacts comprised of developers, architects and
engineers. He recommended retaining the services of HomeAid, primarily for
SRO development purposes, but also for the development of a comprehensive
strategy to assist the City in leveraging current housing resources, inclusive
of land development and the utilization of twenty percent (20%) set-aside
funds.
Mr. Henderson said staff received a fax of the proposed agreement
between HomeAid and City which has been reviewed by staff and provided to
Agency Counsel. The proposed agreement is undergoing legal review and will be
completed prior to the scheduled Community Development Commission meeting.
Based upon the above discussion, staff recommends adoption of the form motion.
Lengthy discussion ensued regarding the benefits of hiring an outside
consultant as opposed to utilizing available Development Department staff.
Mr. Henderson said that future plans and reorganization efforts include
provisions for a housing division, which provides for staff required to
implement and monitor production and preservation. At the present time,
however, no person andlor staffing is available or experienced to address the
issues as that of Ms. Lenthall. The Mayor reminded the Committee of the
benefits and success of using consultants in the past, specifically as it
related to the Central City Redevelopment plan.
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
REGULAR MEETING
- 3 -
JANUARY 16, 1991
5290R(dlm)
.
.
,
.
.....
-
.
.
The Committee members expressed concern regarding the $98.600 fee to be
paid over a five (5) month period. Mr. Henderson atated that the agreement
negotiated with Ms. Lenthall was for a lump sum and that. after further
diSCUSSion. she agreed to submit invoices detailing services provided for each
month. hours apent on individual activities. hourly rate for aame and the
total amount billed. Which cannot ezceed $98.600 and will not be less than
$75.000. He noted some projects will obviously require eztensive time and
effort on behalf of HomeAid. but the Development Department would be
responsible for managing contract compliance and indicated it will be easier
to monitor same with monthly detailed statements of services rendered.
Chairwoman Estrada recommended that the agreement outline apecific
goals to be accomplished during the five (5) month period and suggested
targeting specific issues such as Single Room Occupancy (SRO). Seccombe Lake.
the blighting affect of Arden and Guthrie area and related items. In this
way. the City would be assured specific issues were being addressed.
IECOhoJDJuATIOR
The Committee recommended approval of the agreement for Housing
Consultant Services between the Commission and HomeAid. Inc.. in an
amount not to ezceed $98.600.00. Further. the Committee requested that
a list of priority goals and issues be included in the agreement. This
item will be forwarded to the Commission.
6.
CLOSED SESSIOR
The Redevelopment Committee recessed to Closed Session at 4:08 p.m to
discuss the following:
a. Pursuant to Government Codes Section 54956.8. the Redevelopment
Committee of the Community Development Commission/Development
Department of the City of San Bernardino will now convene in Closed
Session to discuss with its negotiator the purchase. sale. ezchange
or lease of real property. and give instructions to is negotiator
concerning the price and terms of payment for the purchase. sale.
exchange or lease of real property.
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
REGULAR MEETING
- 4 -
JANUARY 16. 1991
5290R(d1m)
.
.
.
.
-
-
.
.
b. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9c, the Redevelopment
Committee of the Development Department of the City of San
Bernardino will convene in Closed Session to discuss possible
litigation.
c. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 the Redevelopment
Committee of the Development Department of the City of San
Bernardino will convene in Closed Session to consider personnel
matters.
7 . & n.TOtIbIPuYo:
There being no further business, the meeting of the Redevelopment
Committee was adjourned at 5:00 p.m., to January 24, 1991.
APPROVED BY:
~~~
Esther Estrada, Chairwoman
Redevelopment Committee
5290R
REDEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE
REGULAR MEETING
- 5 -
JANUARY 16, 1991
5290R(d1m)