HomeMy WebLinkAbout44-Mayor's Office
CITY. OF SAN BERN.DINO - REQUEST 'WR COUNCIL ACTION
From: Mayor W. R. "Bob" Holcomb
Subject: Request to LAFCD to conduct a special
study to identify areas of possible boundar)
reorganization between the cities
of Highland and San Bernardino
Dept:
Date: February 7, 1992
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
Recommended motion:
That a formal request be submitted to LAFCD requesting a special study to
identify areas of possible boundary reorganization between 'the cities of
Highland and San Bernardino.
Contact person: Mavor Holcomb
Phone:
~111
Supporting data attached:
yes
Ward:
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Source: (Acct. No.)
(Acct. DescriPtion)
Finance:
Council Notes:
75-0262
Agenda Item No.
1./1
COMMISSIONERS
ELMER J. otGNEO
Clty_
ROBERT L. HAMMOCK
BoW of SI4*viIon
WILLIAM KRAGNESS
C.,_
HUMSERTO (BERT) LUGO
SpecialDiIaricIs
JON MIKELS. Chair
-"'-
OlIVER P. ROEMER
--
ERNA I. SCHUIUNG. va CMIr
PubliC Membef
ALTERNATU
WILLIAM KAlONA
PubliC Member
DONNA KELSEY
SpedaI DiItricIs
HEiDt K. LARKIN
CIty-
BARBARA CRAM RIOADrAN
80M! of SUI*YiIorI
--
.MMES M. FIOODV
_.. 0Ib<
(\jI\CANCY)
LAFCO_
KATHLEEN ROLUNGSMcOONALD
elM 10 the CommiIIion
CECILIA LOPEZ~ENDERSON
.... ...-
LEGAL COUNSEl
ClARK H. AlSOP
.
.
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
175 West Fifth Street, Second Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92415-0490 . (714) 387-5866 . FAX (714) 387-5871
Established by the State of California to serve the Citizens. Cities, Spt'cial Districts
and the County o{ San Bernardino
January 30, 1992
W.R. "Bob" Holcomb
Mayor, city of San Bernardino
300 North "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92402
Dear Mayor Holcomb:
Several weeks ago, we had a telephone conversation
concerning a possible study of boundary issues
between the Cities of San Bernardino and Highland.
As part of that discussion, you inquired if the
LAFCO staff would be willing to undertake such a
study.
I will need formal consent from the Commission to
begin the review; however, I can assure you that I
will enthusi~stically recommend Commission
initiation of a special study to identify areas of
possible boundary reorganization. Obviously, the
Commission played an important role in creating the
illogical boundaries which now exist, and I firmly
believe that we should play an important role in
resolving the service problems caused by those
boundaries.
I suggest that the process can begin upon receipt
ot written requests from the City of San Bernardino
and the city of Highland, and I envision a need for
at least the fOllowing steps in the process:
1. The Commission will need to agree to undertake
the study. I will present your request (if you
agree to submit one) to the Commission at our
March 19th hearing and I will ask that you and
Mayor Johnson attend that meeting to endorse
the staff recommendation to initiate the
review.
2. No matter how artful a LAFCO staff study might
be, and no matter how compelling its results
might be for one city or another, nothing can
']:.\a...-- C -c
~t~~
--1~
~~
.
.
Mayor Holcomb
Page 2
be accomplished in terms of city boundary
reorganizations unless both cities agree to the
changes.
I do not intend to bury myself or the
Commission in data concerning hypothetical
boundary options without some hope that actual
reorganizations can be accomplished. I can
safely predict that neither city will achieve
100% of its desires, and my hunch is that
neither city will emerge from this study
without being encouraged to consider
annexations and detachments from its
boundaries. It is vital, then, that we all at
least begin this process with the same set of
expectations and understandings.
The second step, therefore, will entail
preparation and joint adoption of goals and
procedures for the study. These goal
statements, among other things, will help to
establish "groundrules" for the study, and they
will be helpful in establishing a foundation of
inter-city cooperation and participation in the
review.
J. If an inter-city concensus can be reached on a
statement of goals and objectives for the
study, the LAFCO staff will begin to prepare
basic information concerning boundary options.
Tentatively, I would suggest that the study
should take the form of a sphere of influence
review, and it should include at least the
following components prepared on an area-by-
area basis:
a. Present and probable land uses.
b. Adequacy of current services.
c. Comparative service capabilities of the
two cities.
d. Socio-economic community relationships.
e. Financial analysis of boundary options,
including a review of revenue/service cost
implications of each boundary change.
.
.
Mayor Holcomb
Page 3
f. Identification of boundary options which
are--to the degree possible--neutral in
terms of overall financial impacts.
g. Environmental assessment of possible
boundary changes.
Please bear in mind that this list of study
components is only a "rough draft" which can be
modified based on the expressions of the cities
and the Commission.
4. Upon conclusion of the LAFCO staff study, and
after initial review by both cities and their
staffs, a LAFCO hearing will be scheduled to
evaluate the sphere of influence implications
of the staff findings.
5. After the LAFCO hearing, and depending on
whatever sphere changes are approved by the
Commission, either or both cities may initiate
proposals for actual jurisdictional change. By
this point of the study, it should be clear to
both cities that no purpose will be served if
one city proposes a change which it knows will
be opposed by the other city.
Thus, the implementation of the results of the
study will be up to you and the council.
As to the cost implications of this proposal, my
initial thought is that each city should submit the
normal filing fee for a sphere of. influence review.
Under our current fee schedule, the cose to the
city of San Bernardino and to the city of Highland
would be $2,000 apiece.
I have not yet shared these thoughts in any detail
with the city of Highland because I wanted to get
your initial impression of the plan I have
outlined. I am hopeful that you and I will be able
to review this proposed strategy in a few days,
after you have had a chance to review the basic
steps which I have outlined.
.
Mayor Holcomb
Page 4
.
In the meantime, thank you for taking the time to
consider this important issue. I will be happy to
respond to any questions you might have ,concerning
these suggestions.
Sincerely,
n~%~
JAMES M. RODDY
Executive Offi
JMRI