HomeMy WebLinkAboutS3-City Attorney
1 CITY OF SAN BERNttDINO - REQUEST FIR COUNCIL ACTION
'From:
Jl\MES F. PENMAN
Subject: PERMISSION TO RECRUIT FOR AND
FILL DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY POSITION
Dept: City Attorney
Date: February 17, 1992
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
Recommended motion:
1) That the City Attorney be permitted to advertise and fill
a vacant Deputy City Attorney position.
2) That the City Attorney grant a two-month leave of absence
without pay, as requested.
(i
'f,A~~
{J
'I
-:l ;/ .
/" ~'-
Signature
Contact person:
JAMES F. PENMAN
Phone:
(714) 384-5255
1-7
Supporting dati Ittached:
Ward:
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Source: (ACCT. NO.)
(ACCT. DESCRIPTION)
Finance:
Council Notes:
1!l.oa2
Agenda Item No. ,:) -3
CITY OF SAN BERNrDINO - REQUEST FiR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
When John Wilson resigned as Senior Deputy Ci ty Attorney in
October of 1990 to accept the position of City Attorney of Banning,
we were asked not to fill his position as a means of boosting the
morale of the various department heads throughout the City. We
also laid off a secretary and left that position vacant.
This action has been extremely costly to the taxpayers of
San Bernardino. A number of the lawsuits assigned to Mr. Wilson
had to be "farmed out" to outside counsel. The cost of employing
private firms to represent the City on cases assigned to Mr Wilson
has exceeded the combined salaries (with benefits) of both
Mr. Wilson's position and the legal secretary position left vacant.
Additionally, we had to employ an outside firm to give legal advice
to certain City boards and committees previouSly advised by
Mr. Wilson.
Finally, we took the remainder of Mr Wilson's assignments and
redistributed those to other attorneys in the office who were
already carrying loads requiring investments of time far in excess
of their work week. We resolved this problem temporarily by
requiring the attorneys to work overtime without additional
compensation. All agreed to do so.
The dam, at last, has given way. One of our best attorneys has
requested a two month leave of absence from April 6, 1992 to June
17, 1992. Depending on developments in that individual's personal
situation, the attorney might or might not return at the end of the
leave of absence.
Due partially to the uncertainty of the future plans of the
attorney in question, but primarily done to the inability of the
remainder of the lawyers to absorb the departing attorney's
assignments (approximately eighteen litigation cases, 16 pending
filings on nuisance abatement cases, seventy-four (74) bankruptcy
cases, [on one recent bankruptcy case, the attorney secured
$10,000.00 for the City. On another, $2,923.95, far less than the
cost of the attorney at $30.66 per hr., including benefits] 96
active criminal files, 46 pending [cited but not yet filed]
criminal cases, 345 active bench warrant cases, four (4) City
department assignments and one ( 1) committee assignment) I am
constrained to approve the leave of absence.
Consequently, I believe we have the following options:
Option 1: Deny the leave of absence, farm out eighteen
civil lawsuits and approximately 40 of the
bankruptcies, withdraw from the remaining 34
bankruptcies, dismiss 441 active criminal
cases, do not file 46 pending criminal cases,
and discontinue legal services to Public
1
75-0264
.
.
Works/Engineering, Code Enforcement, Building
and Safety, Data process~ng, the Board of
Building Commissioners and eliminate backup
for Planning and Facilities Management.
Positive results: Some Department Heads will
feel good, fewer complaints of favoritism to
other City officials by some Department Heads
(al though other Department Heads will still
complain that the City Attorney's office gets
whatever it asks for, staff morale of these
Department Heads will suffer, they will
complain to elected and appointed Ci ty
Officials).
Negative results:
1) Cost of farming out litigation cases
estimated at 920 hours x average of $100.
per hr. = $92,000. in additional outside
attorney fees over the next 12 months.
2) Cost of farming out some bankruptcy cases
(and withdrawal from others) estimated at
approximately 100 hrs. x average of $100.
per hr. = $10,000. over the next 12
months.
3) The dismissal of 441 active criminal
cases and 46 pending criminal cases (plus
future new cases averaging 10 to 15 each
week) will violate the mandatory
prosecutorial requirements of the City
Charter, will undermine the efforts of
Police Officers who use loi tering,
drinking in public, etc. statutes as the
only legal way to deal with suspicious
subjects loitering around schools, parks,
business areas, residential
neighborhoods, etc., undermine code
enforcement, Building and Safety, Animal
Control, and Business License Enforcement
activities.
4) Leave four (4) City departments and one
(1) Commission without legal direction.
This will probably result in a number of
successful lawsuits against the City in
the areas of Code Enforcement, Building
and Safety and Board of Building
Commissioners' decisions. These three
areas are the subject of much litigation,
2
.
.
mostly unsuccessful due to analysis on a
case-by-case basis and application of the
correct legal procedures as advised. In
the Public Works/Engineering Department,
where we battle on an almost daily basis
to convince certain staff members that we
must follow the law, the actions contrary
to law will be so great without legal
direction ( based on past and current
experience) that it is impossible to
predict the amount of damages in the
first year alone.
Option 2: Deny the leave of absence, begin recruitment
of aqualified Deputy City Attorney.
Positive results: The negative results of
option 1 will be avoided.
Negative results: Some Department Heads will
complain that the City Attorney's Office gets
whatever it asks for, staff morale of some
Department Heads will suffer, elected and
appointed City Officials will receive more
complaints from these individuals.
Option 3: Grant the leave of absence, fill John Wilson's
vacant attorney position.
Posi ti ve resul ts: The negative resul ts of
Option #1 will be avoided. Fewer cases will
have to be farmed out in the coming 12 months,
resulting in a savings in excess of the cost
of the position; decreased cost of use of
outside law firm to handle in-house hearings,
return of ability to aggressively fight many
cases that we are presently, at best, only
"keeping up" with.
Negative results: Some Department Heads will
complain that the City Attorney's office gets
whatever it asks for, staff morale of some
Department Heads will suffer, elected and
appointed City officials will receive more
complaints from these individuals.
If Option #1 is selected no other immediate action is necessary.
A list of cases to be farmed out will be presented at the next
Council meeting.
If Option #2 is selected, motion number one (1) on the request for
Council Action is appropriate.
3
.
.
If Option #3 is selected, motion numbers one (1) and two (2) are
appropriate.
The annual cost of the salary and benefits (at $38.66 per hour) for
the attorney requesting the leave of absence is: $80,413.59 (amount
supplied by Finance Department).
The estimated cost for the first 12 months of the cases to be
farmed out is approximately $102,000.00. This amount does not
include the cost of increased litigation due to lack of legal
advice to certain City Departments nor the cost, in dollars or
crime, of dismissing 441 active criminal cases.
It will, therefore, cost (subtracting the attorney salary from the
cost of farming out the cases) approximately $21,586.41 more in the
first twelve months to fill the position than it will cost to leave
it vacant.
Respectfully submitted,
)
~ ~
4