HomeMy WebLinkAbout21-Police Department
. .
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
From: Garrett W. Zimmon, Chief of Police
Dept: Police Department
0,..,,.. ""L
11/ .... I . J r1
Subject: Resolution authorizing the Mayor,
or her designee, to sign a Memorandum of
Understanding between the City and AFE-
Pioneer Associates, L.P.
Date: March 8, 2002
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
None
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution
~~h~
Michael Billdt, Assistant Chief of Police
Contact person:
Lt. Mark Garcia
Phone: (909) 384-5688
Supporting data attached: Grant application / MOD Ward: First
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount:
$ 128,500
Source: (Acc!. No.) 123-588-xxxx
(A,d O,",rip""o) ~~~
Fmance: . 'L
Council Notes:
12b"i;6 ~t\..',.;;L -\,'\ 1-
5' {, / lJa-
I- ,
Agenda Item No. ~
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Staff Report
SUBJECT
Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino authorizing the
Mayor, or her designee, to sign a Memorandum of Understanding between the City and AFE-
Pioneer Associates, L.P.
BACKGROUND
The San Bernardino Police Department is partnering with AFE-Pioneer Associates, L.P, the San
Bernardino County District Attorney's Office and St. Bernardine Corporation to create a drug
free and crime free environment in the downtown neighborhood that includes St. Bernardine's
Plaza and Pioneer Plaza Retirement homes through the New Approach Anti Drug (NAAD)
Grant, which the AFE-Pioneer Associates, L.P. is being awarded. AFE-Pioneer Associates, L.P.
is a property management company that manages the Pioneer Plaza Retirement Home at 560
North 'F' Street. The grant is being awarded to AFE-Pioneer Associates by the Department of
Housing and Urban Development. The AFE-Pioneer Associates as contracted through the MOU
with the Police Department to provide overtime patrols within the target area (which is outlined
in the attached notebook, under Action Plan). The Police Department's 'D' Area command will
institute these directed patrols, which are above and beyond baseline service delivery, within this
twenty square block area from "E" Street west to "H" St., from 9th Street south to 4th Street to
lower crime and drug activity (page 27A). The San Bernardino County District Attorney's
Office's sole participation in this grant will be to provide appropriate staff to prosecute the
increase of arrests made by the officers participating in these directed overtime patrols.
The patrols will consist of a two-man team consisting of police officers on an overtime basis
being deployed for four hours, three times per week for the first month and twice per week
during the balance of the grant period. The directed patrols will total approximately 60 hours per
month. The NAAD Grant will reimburse the City ,of San Bernardino up to 60 hours per month
for overtime expended for this project (starting 011 Page 19A). The NAAD Grant will not
reimburse the City of San Bernardino for services routinely provided to the St. Bernardine's
Plaza and the Pioneer Plaza Retirement homes. It will reimburse the City for all overtime up to
60 hours per month expended to provide additional, directed police presence to these two
retirement homes and the surrounding areas. In addition, the NAAD Grant pays police
administrative costs and provides police equipment for the project, specifically two police
bicycles and two police HT radios. Administrative costs will include scheduling, monthly
reporting, billing, and ensuring the provisions of the grant are fulfilled. The total monies
budgeted for reimbursement to the City of San Bernardino, through the NAAD Grant, will be
$128,500. The duration of the grant is two years beginning May 2002.
AFE - Pioneer, L.P. in cooperation with the San Bernardino Police Department has prepared the
attached MOU that defines the operating agreemeilts,b,etween the two organizations as they
administer the NAAD Program. '
. I
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The City of San Bernardino will be reimbursed for alLcosts related to the NAAD Grant. AFE-
Pioneer Associated will reimburse the City for all overtime costs incurred during this program.
No City of San Bernardino general fund monies will be expended for this project.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt resolution.
; ~. '.' '"''
"
e
e
26 III
e 27
28
. p:;c, Pc c-
:~ ~/ u--/ U
C
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR, OR HER DESIGNEE, TO
SIGN A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY AND AFE-
PIONEER ASSOCIATES, L.P., FOR THE PROVISION OF POLICE DEPARTMENT
OVERTIME PATROL SERVICES IN THE AREA THAT INCLUDES SAINT
BERNARDINE'S PLAZA AND PIONEER PLAZA RETIREMENT HOMES
THROUGH A NEW APPROACH ANTI DRUG (NAAD) GRANT.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino
authorizing the Mayor. or her designee, to sign an MOU between the City and AFE-Pioneer
Associates. LP,
SECTION 2. This resolution is rescinded if the parties to the agreement fail to execute
it within sixty days of the passage ofthis resolution.
III
/1/
/1/
III
III
III
III
III
e
e
e
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR, OR HER DESIGNEE, TO
SIGN A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY AND AFE-
PIONEER ASSOCIATES, L.P., FOR THE PROVISION OF POLICE DEPARTMENT
OVERTIME PATROL SERVICES IN THE AREA THAT INCLUDE.S. SAINT
BERNARDINE'S PLAZA AND PIONEER PLAZA RETIREMENT HOMES
THROUGH A NEW APPROACH ANTI DRUG (NAAD) GRANT.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor
and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a
meeting thereof, held
on the _ day of
, 2002, by the following vote, to wit:
Council Members:
AYES
NAYS
ABSTAIN ABSENT
ESTRADA
LIEN
MCGINNIS
DERRY
SUAREZ
ANDERSON
MCCAMMACK
City Clerk
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this _ day of
,2002.
Judith Valles, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Approved as to
Form and legal content:
e
e
e
POLICE DEPARTMENT
La: I>E.ul . CiuEr OF POUCE
P.O. Box 1559. San Bernardino. CA 92401-1559
90'.384.5742
WWW.ci.S8D-bernardino.ca.us
..
June 18,2001
William F McClure, Senior Vice President
AFE - Pioneer Associates, LP
2000 Crow Canyon PI Sle 130
San Ramon CA 94583
RE: HUD Funded New Approach Anti-Drug Program
Dear Mr. McClure:
The San Bernardino Police Department agrees to work in partnership with AFE _ Pioneer
Associates in a cooperative program known as the Downtown NAAD (New Approach Anti-
Drug) Program. We support the program objectives and agree to supplemental baseline police
services in the area in the form of increased patrols and educational services with funding from
the HUn NAAD Grant. All additional services performed above the baseline activity level will
be supplemented by these grant funds.
This letter signifies our interim agreement to this partnership pending finalization of a
Memorandum of Understanding between the City of San Bemardino and AFE _ Pioneer
Associates.
Very truly yours,
Lee Dean
Chief of Police
Irm
LEADERS IN SEITING 11ll! STANDARD OF ExCELLENCE
e
e
e
Memorandum of Understand/ne between
tile San Bernardino Police Department and AfE.PJoneer -"oclate&, L P.
1. IDENnFlCA110N
The agreement contained in this Memorandum of Understanding ( "MOU" herein), effec-
tive as of the date spec/fied in Section 3 below, is enterad into by the CIty of San Bemar-
dino Police Department ("SBPO" hera/n) and AFE-Pioneer AssocIates, L P. (PIONEER AS-
SOCIATES herein).
2. RECn'AlS
2.1 PIONEER ASSOaATES is the lead lIIIBnt for aU. S. Department of housing and
Urban ("HUO" herein) funded N_ Approach Anti-Drug Program (Program
hera/n) for the benefit of residents of, workers in, and vlsl1Dts to the Downtown
neighborhood ('Downtown" herein) of the CIty of San Bemardlno. This collabo-
rative program shall be known as the Downtown NAAD Program ('Program"
herein).
2.2 Downtown Is herein defined as that area of the CIty of San Bernardino
bounded by Baseline Street on the North, N. SIerra Way on the West. Rialto
Avenue In the South, and Highway 215 on the West.
2.3 The goals of the Downtown NAAo Program are to:
(I) create a drug- and crime-free environment at the Subject Properties; (n)
provide for the safety and Protec:tion of residents of the Subject Properties;
(ili) enhance a drug.free and crirne.free environment for the residents of, work-
ers of, and visitors to the Downtown neighborhood; (iv) educate the residents
of, workers of, and visitors to the Downtown neighborhood In personal safety,
crime prevention, and drug abuse awareness; and (v) provide computer learn-
ing centers to enhance the welfara and welHlelng of residents of and visitors
to the Downtown neighborhood.
2.4 PIONEER ASSOaATES owns 8 HUD funded !lousing comllleK for senior and
disabled persons within the boUndaries of San Bernardino: PIoneer Park PlIIZa.
Pioneer Park Plaza's two buildings are loc:ated at 560 N. F Street and at 555
N. G Street. .
2.5 The A. F. Evans Company, Ine. Is the general partner of PIONEER ASSOcIATES
and, as such, has the aUthority to make contracts and 5ign MOU's on behalf of
PIONEER ASSOCIATES.
MOU Between s... a.........ln. Police Deputm.nt
ond "FE"'lon... "-'at... L P.
POC.1of.
e
e
e
2.6
Evans Property Management, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the A. F.
Evans Company, Inc, ("EPMI" herein) Is the managing agency for Pioneer
Park Plaza.
2.7 In order to cany out the goals of the Program, PIONEER ASSOCIATES has en-.
terec:I into a partnership with SL Bernardine Corpol1ltlon, owners of another
HUD funded housing complex for l18nior and disabled P8f&OflS within the
boundaries of San Bernardino: SL Bemardine Plaza located at 584 W. 5th
Street. The SL Bernadine Corporation wUI contribute to the Program by
making ImPlOWlments to the 118CU~ equipment at SL Bernadine Plaza.
2.8 Pioneer Park PIam and SL Bernardlne Plaza together ale the "Subject Pro~
erties" to which this Acreement refer&. The Subject Prope,1/es ant located
within the San Bernardino PolIce Department's ArelI 0 and in the Dowr.h.wll
neighborhood of San Bernardino, CA.
2.9 For the PUIJlOS8S of achieving the goals of the Downtown NAAD Program,
EVANS has also entered into an Infonnal PBrtnershIp the Cl1y of San Bernar-
dino Adult School ("Adult School" herein) whereby a member of its staff will
co-teach and COOrdinBta the Educational Workshops. Staff of the Adult
School will also teach computer classes to enhance the welfare and well-
being of its class members.
2.10 For the PUIJlOS8S of COnducting the Downtown NAAD Program, PIONEER AS-
SOCiATES has also entered into an Informal partnelShlp the City of San Ber-
nardino's Parks, Recreation, and Communi1y Services Department's Rfth
Street Senior Center ("Sanlor Center" heraln) located in the Downtown
Neighborhood of Sen Bernardino, whereby it will host the Educational w0rk-
shops. The Senior Center will also house an enhanced Computer '--mlng
Center to add to the welfare and well-being of residents of and visitors to
the Downtown neighborhood.
2.11 Collectively, PIONEER ASSOCIATES, SBPO, the D. A. 'S OFFICE, SL Bernadine
Corporation, the Adult School, and the Senior Center are collaborators in the
Program.
2.12 PIONEER ASSOCiATES desires to obtain SUpplemental police senrice in the
form of increased patrols and educational senlices from SBPD In order to
achieve the goals of the Program.
2.13 PIONEER ASSOCiATES AND SBPO agree that the patrol senrices rendered by
SBPO under this MOU are in addition to SBPO's baseline level senlices In
Police Area O. SBPO and PIONEER ASSOCIATES ilso agree that SBPO wUI
not reduce its baseline IlMll of senrices in Area 0, particularly in the areas of
community policing, patrol, and investigations.
MOU 8etw_ 5IIn BerM"'lno........ ~ftt
alNl AFE-Pi&"_I AMoc~ L P.
Papzar.
e
5. SCOPEOFSER~CES
5.1 SERVICES PROVIOED BY SBPO
5.1.1 Swom officers of the Assigned Personnel shan conduct, In one or two
person units, specialized petroIs of a ~uare block area sur-
roundin. the Subject properties for the purpose ofenforclng appllc8ble
State statua, local ordinances and reautatIons. The SBPD Bnd PlO-
NEER ASSOCIATES have &greed that the units will PBlmI the area of San
Bernadino bounded by 9th Street on the North, E Street on the East. 4th
Street on the South, Bnd H Street on the West ("the Patrol Area"
.herein) three d~ per week for four (4) _ks and two ~ per week
for one-hundred (100) -'cs, during the hours of 7 PM to mlckllght. by
car or by blcyc/e, depending on the weather.
5.1.2 AssIgned Personnel patrolling the Area on biCYCles wRl be trained In bicy-
cle patrol.
5.1.3 All the AssIgned Personnel shan be trained In community relations, will
poss-rs interpersonal communication skills, and win employ community
policing concepts.
e
5.1.4 Trainings in personal safely, crime prevention, and drug abuse awareness
will be provided, In part, by the SBPO Crime Prevention Specialist
("Specialist" herein). The educational services of the SpeciaHst will be
provided during that Specialist's usual work hours and win, therefore,
be provided at no cost to PIONEER ASSOCIATES.
5.1.5 SBPD shall designate a member of its PoUce Department to be the SBPD
liaison Otricer for the purposes of this Agreement. SBPO's Ualson 0ffI-
cer shall work In concert with resident leadership and management rep.
resentatives of the Subject Properties on a quarterly basis for the pur-
poses of (I) reviewllll SBPO's perfOrmance under this Agreement and (Il)
planning for future changes or modifications of this Aereement
("Quarterly Plannilll Meetings" herein).
5.2 SERVICES PRO~OEO BY PIONEER ASSOCIATES
Under the terms of the DoWntown NAAD Program:
5.2.1 PIONEER ASSOCIATES &hall commit staff time to coordinating, monltorlna.
accounting, racord-keeping. and reporting for the Downtown NAAD Pro-
~m. .
MOU Between San Bernardino Police Department
and AFE-Pioneer 6"$OCillles, L P.
e
PlIge4dS
. .
e
5.2.2 PIONEER ASSOCIATES will provide funding for the security related Improve-
ments under the Downtown NMD Program to be made to St. Bernardine
Plaza and to Pioneer Park Plaza.
5.2.3 PIONEER ASSOCIATES shall provide funding for inaeasect police patrols In
and around St. Bernadine Plaza and Pioneer Park Plaza. .
5.2.4 PIONEER ASSOCIATES will collaborate with the San Bernardino Police ~
partment and with the San Bernardino D. A.'s Office In ensuring continued
diligent prosecution and/or referral to treatment of persons committing
drultfll/atBd and nOfHlrug related crI~ In the Downtown neighborhood at
San Bernardino and, especially, of persona committing drug.fe/ated and
norHjrug reIatBd cri~ In or around St. Bernadine Plaza and Pioneer Park
Plaza.
5.2.5 PIONEER ASSOCIATES shall collaborate with the San Beman:lino Adult
School and the San Bernardino PoHce Department In developing bI-monthiy
educational WOrkshops In personal safety, crime prevention and drug 8bu&e
awareness.
e
5.2.6 PIONEER ASSOCIATES shall commit staff time to OlJllIIlzing and advertise
bl-monthly training WOrkshops in personal safety, crime prevention, and
drug abuse awareness for persons Interested In helping to achieve the
goals of the Downtown NMD Program.
5.2.7 PIONEER ASSOCIATES shall commit funds to enhancing a neighborhood
5efVing computer center located within the fifth Street Senior Center and
funds to dlMliop computer stations within Pioneer Park Plaza and St. Berna-
dine Plaza, for the use of their respective residents.
5.2.8 PIONEER ASSOCIATES shell designate a Senior Member of its Managemem
Company's, EPMI's, staff to be its liaison ("Ualson" herein) who wilt (I) coor-
dinate the dorts of all the staff and residents of Pioneer Park Plaza; and (U)
to arrange quarterly meetings of the Prog,am partners and residents of the
Downtown neighborhood, In order to monitor the procress of the program
and to plan for any future changes In or modlf'lCIItlons to the Program.
.-
e
MOU BetwHn San Bernardino PoUce Department
MId AFE.plon_ A"ocln... L P.
Pa,. Sofs
e
e
e
M~R.2".2a02 12:42P~
I
A.F. EVANS
NO.52:
~.1/2
: I,
2000 Crow C.l1yen Plact, Stt , 30
Sin ~mon. CA ,..583.1367
F1t'onc. 525.244.1600
Facfmile: 925.244, '!I~
I I,
EVANS
March 19.2002
Lt. Mark Garcia
City of San Bernardino Police Department
PO Box 1559
San Bernardino. CA 92401-1559
Via Fax 909.384.5739
No Hard Copy to Follow
Re: Grant Amendment
Dear Lt. Garcia:
We received your latest adjustment to the New Approach Anti Drug Grant. As I
had mentioned to you yesterday, HUD finds it acceptable to make whatever
adjustments we deem necessary, however the amount given to each agency
cannot be altered. In light of that I have a breakdown below of what your
department originally proposed and what would be acceptable for us to remain in
compliance with our grant.
Originally requested for SBPD $127,200.00
2,000.00
8.900.00
Total $138,100.00
Patrol
Equipment
Administrative Service
Amended MOU should read
Total
$128.500.00
7.424.51
2.175.49
$138,100.00
Patrol
Equipment
Administrative Service
We have made this change to our copy of the MOU and initialed the change. A
copy of which is attached.
If you have any further questions, please contact me directly at 510.465.6996.
Sincerely.
~ttUl~~
Patricia Rasheed ~
MAR-21-20e2 12:16
510 244 1804
98%
~----
Hpr ~~ U~ l~;~U~
. A p'r' 25 02 01:36",
. Ht-'k'-(:,".r2002 12: 38
.
.
.
"CO... .......,....~i .L ':1- ..._~.
Oak Cente~ I A",tB3~-7S52
SBPD AREA D
9a9 3Bq 5739 P.B2/B2
1".2
6. COMPENSA110N
PIONEER ASSOCIATES .IV.... to p.Y SBPD. a~d SBPO 'I'"l!! 10 ~e.ePl in full salisf.c'
tion Ivr the .....Iees provided hereunder, compvns.tlon IS follows:
PIONEE~ ASSOCIATES shill NY SBPO the amount or the actual ..ertime sarary 01
aach individual mllfl1b,r of"'e Assill/l8d Personnel palfol units per hour spent lIy such
memllel$ in t/le petfOITn,nc;e 01 U.e OIlfVlta requl.w by. \hI. acreement. and th.. C'O~
01 two hlndheld 1rlIncmiltl,.. e~d of \1110 biq<:les 10' the uoe of the ,\wign'" relSo'"
"el provided, "_or, lIl;t piONEER ASSOCIATES shell not pay the SBPO more than,.ll ~jj
one-"unclnMl Ind lW.n~en thousand, lWo-hundnMl dollalll (~alllllln IhO elt- ;Z J . CO
IV"..te. lor SSPO'. ""lral services. not more then _\hoUSlna ~'i;~ fO, &quip, .J .1
monl. Bnd nol more Ihl' elghl-thousand, ninNlundred danl", ~.s-!llI under Ihi/ ~f,J~S.
Acreement for .dministrwtive _rvIoes. 6."1 shall rMUII" '".SI. Oft a man'"l)' D'_IS ,'1. . '1
or I,," lrequently. fo, se",ll'e5 rendered. InvolOl!$ Issuod by &IllIa shill be mlde .
wIthin thirty days Dr PIONEER ASSOCIATES' _ipt of th. fu.da Iii. .Ich speeinc i.. '
vole. frum HUt). 'nvolDl'l shall &pecily tt'lo Mrv&eeS DrO'tllded. the _mount due under
the invoiCe, and \lie Ircacale emounl 0' peyments to be made by piONEER ASSOCI. ~
AlES under this Agreement All invoices will be issued by the City of
San Bl!tnardino Finance llepartment.
7. ~ELATIONSHIPOf PARTIES -1" ...;ril/ J
The assigned Personnel &!taU at all tim.. rem.'n part of. s.ubJect to .rld tn direct: ret..
uon.hip willllhe S8PO', Chain of commend. Additionally, SBPO Shill aT 8N II_ pro.
v... sole .upervts'on. oonllOl, and dlrectlo" 01 work IClMtles Ind lso'enme"'s of '"e
Assilned ~lSOn"el. indudi", dlSClplinery Icllo",. S81'O ahlll be colely resllDnslble
fOr tne tomPl...t/on ond .mplo,..,llenenlS of the Ass11"Oa P.....~nel. ., '
8.
INOEMNIFlCAnON
8.1
To the fllll ""'end Ill'Ihorized by law, PIONCER ASSOCIAnS; ':'n, delend. ;"de....
nlf)', and hold hermless SSPO, Its emplllY"es, i1cenlS i1nd omce.... from any Ii-
Ibill1y, claiftl$. sviti, lIC1lons, IrtlilJ'8\lon PIV~eedlnr.s. admln'stratl... Proceed-
"&S, r..gul.lory proceedlnCl. 1_. ""pen_ ar ClaSts or any kind. WhBt".'
aCtual. IlIeged, .r t,,"!lIlenea. es weQ "' iIIlomey'. I..., co~"t eas1s, Inleres1,
del.n.e east Clneludinl e.pert wilnl!S$ r_lll\d any ou.a. ~ Dr olpenses 01
~"Y kind wt.....oe-.r IneuPftNlln ..'.lIon to. ... canMquelto-' aft artcina aut ar.
or in any WBY attlibullble 10. in whole 0' in pal\, PIONEER 'ASSOCIATES' PO!'-
fo,man.. of the Ie""'" ""lulred by this AlteemonL
:'
@ ~,.Q7
~{p~ V(}
MOY '"tw... SI. '".aldln. Petl.. lI8..lImlllt
In- An.Plene., A._I_lV, L "
'.f. f: .. 8
. tf~Pftrlfj
P tI.~'1'tot Z/
TOTAL P.02 q~/ CJ,2
..~...................
..,,..,
APR-29-2002
96::
13: 14
P.02
e
8.2 To the full extend authorized by law, SBPD, will defend, indemnify, and hold
harmless PIONEER ASSocIATES, Its emp/o)"lIllS, asents and officers, from
any liabil~, claims, suits, actions, arbitration Pl'OCeedings, administrative
1lfOClled1np. regulatory PfOCelld/ngs, 1011 n. ~ or costs at any kind,
whether actual, alleged, or threatened, as well as attorney's fees, court
costs, Intenlst, defense ClIIIt (InclUding SIpert witness fees) and any Other
costs or llJlpel'TlII of any kind w/uItsQ ever Incurred in relation 10, as a con-
seqience of, arising out of, or in any way 8t1r1butable 10, In whole or In part.
SBPD's performance of the S81V1ces reqUired by this Agreement.
&3 The obligations imPClS8d by this SectIon 8 shall survive the termination of
this agreement.
9. NOTICes
All notices required or desired to be lIeMld by either party hereunder upon the
other party shall be In writing and may be served by registered or certified United
States mall retum receipt requested. Service by mall shall be deemed completa
on the expiration of the fourth day alter mailing and shall be addrllSS8d as fol-
lows:
1)
If served upon PION~ ASSOCIATES, notice shall be addressed as
follows:
e
William F. McClure, PresIdent
Evans Property Management. Inc.
2000 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 130
San Ramon, CA 94583.
2)
If served upon SBPO , notice shall be addressed as follows:
Chief of Police
CIl;y of SIn Bernardino Police Department
P. O. Box 1559
San Bernadino, CA 92401
e
MOU Between 58n ...,.....lJno PoUce DelNlrtment
end AFE.pIon.., A..UC"t... L P.
P... 7 of .
e
1'0 EFFECT THIS AGREEMENI', the parties have caused by their duly authorized
representatives to execute this Agreement on the dates set forth below.
"SBPD" ;-
CHIEF OF POUCE
CRY OF SAN BERNADINO
'PIONEER A~TES"
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
A.F. EVANS COMPANY, INC
Date:
~ !,,- j
(/11 !l//ltl~
IIlam F. McClure
Senior VICe PresIdent
A. F. EV81ll1 ny, General Partner
Date:
By:
lee Dean, Chief of Police
San Bernadino Police Department
e_-------
Judith Valles, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
e-
MOU Between 58n Bernardino Police Dep_ent
.nd AFE.Plon_r Auoc:...... L P.
P.... of.
~~
Downtown New Approach Anti-Drug Program
For San Bernardino, CA
Line Item Budget
P.19a
Personnel:
Consultant salary .........................................................................
Fringe benefit .............................................._..............................
(@25%)
Travel:
~
Consultant's travel .....................................................................
(include airfare from Northem to Southern CA & rt,
Hotel stay, meals)
Supplies ......................................................................................
( Misc. office supplies & copy services, and telephone
Charges for Consultant)
Equipment ...............................__..............................
(Includes: computers, peripherals, S-station computer
leaming center at Senior Center; fencing, lighting.
and security camera systems at Pioneer Park
Plaza; & lighting & security camera system at
St. Bernardine Plaza)
Sub-Contract for Supplemental Police Services ...................
Other: wiring for computer center & Internet charges ......
Two Year Total
~
$ 1,487.58
$ 407.42
$ 2,800.00
$ 2,200.00
$112,849.00
$128,500.00
$ 1,756.00
$250,000.00
e
First Quarter:
Activities:
P.19b
Expected Expenditures:
SBPO:
. begins patrolling
three times per week for the first month ....................................
($1,8OO/wk far 4 wks)
. continues to patrol two times a week for
the next two months .....................................................................
($1.2OOIwk fur 8 wks)
. administrative charge ................................................................
. purchases two bicycles ............................................................
two hand-held transmitters. + mise.
(2 b1.... $500 EA, 2HTs. $400 EA + $200 misc.)
AFE-Pioneer Associates obtain bids
for securily equipment and schedule appts.
.
Adult School obtains bids for equipment ............................................
orders equipment. and has wiring for Internet
installed
Dept Parks & Rec. Senior Center . AFE-Pioneer Associate
& St. Bemardine Corp. start advertising & recruiting for
educational crime prevention workshops
Staff of Adult School & SBPB
meet to develop a joint curriculum, to
coordinate teaChing schedules. and
to teach the first class
AFE-Pioneer Associates'
consultant makes three trips to San Bernardino:
Salary ........................................................................c..............
Fringe ................................................................................
Travel .......................................................................................
Misc. Office supplies & telephone expenses ......................
First of Quarterly Planning Meetings commences
First Quarter Total
e
$ 7,200.00
$ 9.600.00
$ 1,112.50
$ 2.000.00
N/A
$ 1,000.00
N/A
N/A
$ 454.80
$ 113.70
$ 350.00
$ 100.00
N/A
$ 21,931..00
.
P.19c
Second Quarter:
Activities:
Exoected Exoenditures:
SBPD continues patrols ........................................................................... $ 14.400.00
twice a week
SBPD administrative charges .................................................................. $ 1.112.50
AFE-Pioneer AssocIates. L P. Installs
security equipment at Pioneer Park Plaza
Fencing ..............................................................................
Ughting ...............................................................................
Security cameras and monitors .........................................
-
I
!
, St. Bemardine Corporation installs
security equipment at St Bernadine Plaza
Lighting .............._.....................................................................
Security cameras & monitors _................_...........................
I Adult School installs eq~iPment for up.graded
I Computer Center ..................................................................
I
! Classes in up.graded Computer Center start
Crime Prevention Workshops continue
Consultant makes one trip:
Salary ...............__.................__.._._..._....._.............
Fringe ..........................................................._.....................
Travel ...........__..........................._..._..............._..............
Misc. office supplies & telephone (3 mos.).._.......................
Second Quarterly Planning Meeting is held
Six month evaluation is presented and considered
Second Quarter Total
.
$ 60.907.62
$ 7.200.00
$10.764.26
$ 6.600.00
$ 13.645.18
$ 13,731.94
N/A
N/A
$ 151.60
$ 37.90
350.00
$ 300.00
N/A
$ 129.201.00
-
P. 19d
THIRD QUARTER:
Activities: Exoected Exoenditures
SBPO continues ............................_............._._........._......... $ 14,400.00
twice a week patrolling
SBPO administrative charges .........._........._.........._......_.... . $ 1.112.50 X
Crlme prevention wor1\shops continue N/A
Computer classes continue N/A
Intemet charges
............-.................-.-...............-.....
$
126.00
Consultant makes one trip to San Bernardino
To assist with implementing & evaluating program
.
Salary .....................................................................................
Fringe ..........................................c......................................
Travel .....................................................................................
Office supplies. telephone for 3 mas ..................................
$ 189.50
$ 37.90
$ 350.00
$ 300.00
Third Quarterly Planning Meeting is held
NfA
Third Quarter Total
16,478.00
e
~
P.1ge
FOURTH QUARTER:
SBPO continues ...................................................................
twice a week patrolling
Exoected Exoenditures
$ 14,400.00
Activities:
SBPO administrative costs .................................
$ 1,112.50
Crime prevention workshops continue
N/A
N/A
Computer classes continue
Internet charges
$
126.00
Consultant makes one trip to San Bernardino
To assist with implementing & evaluating program
e
)
Salary .......................................................................
Fringe....................................................................
Travel .......................................................................
Office supplies, telephone for 3 mos ....................
$ 151.60
$ 37.90
$ 350.00
$ 300.00
Fourth Quarterly planning meeting Is held N/A
One Year Evaluation is presented
Fourth Quarter Total $ 16,478.00
~
.
P. 19f
FIFTH QUARTER:
Activities:
Expected Expenditures
SBPO continues ............................._................................
twice a week patrolling
$ 14.400.00
SBPO administrative charges ............................
$ 1.112.50
Crime prevention workshops continue
N/A
Computer classes continue
N/A
Internet service charges ........................._......
$ 126.00
Consultant makes one trip to San Bemardino
To assist with implementing & evaluating program
.
Salary ..........................................................._........
Fringe ..................................................................
Travel ......................................................................
Office supplies. telephone for 3 mos ..................
$ 151.50
$ 37.90
$ 350.00
$ 300.00
Rfth Quarterly planning meeting is held
N/A
Rfth Quarter Total
$ 16.478.00
.
.
. P.19g
SIXTH QUARTER:
Activities: Expected Expenditures:
SBPD continues ......................................._......._...... $ 14.400.00
twice a week patrolling
SBPD administrative costs...................._........... $ 1.112.50
Crime prevention workshops continue N/A
Computer classes continue N/A
Internet service charges....................._......._.. $ 126.00
Consultant makes one trip to San Bernardino
To assist with implementing & evaluating program
Salary ......................._.........................__......"'_" $ 189.50
Fringe ..............................................................._ $ 37.90
Travel ......................................_......._..._.._.......... $ 350.00
~ Office supplies, telephone for 3 mos ........_........ $ 300.00
-
Sixth Quarterly planning meeting is held N/A
Year & one-half evaluation is presented
.
-
e
P.19h
SEVENTH QUARTER
Activities:
Expected Expenditures:
SBPD continues to ..............................._..... ........................
twice a week patrolling
$ 14,400.00
SBPD lidministrative costs ........................._.........
$ 1.112.50
Crime prevention workshops continue
N/A
Computer classes continue
N/A
Internet service charge .....................................................
$
126.00
Consultant makes one trip to San Bernardino
To assist with implementing & evaluating program
--
Salary ..............................................................................
Fringe ........................................._..............................
Travel ..............................................................................
Office supplies, telephone for 3 mos ...........................
$
$
$
$
151.60
37.90
350.00
300.00
Seventh Quarterly planning meeting is held
N/A
Seventh Quarter Total
$ 16,478.00
.
e
P.19i
EIGHTH QUARlER
Activities:
SBPO continues ............................._......._.__._..........._..
twice a week patrolling
SBPO administrative charges .....___................
Crime prevention workshops continue
Computer classes continue
Intemet service charge _.......__..........._..............._.....
e
Consultant makes one trip to san Bernardino
To assist with implementing & evaluating program
salary ._........____........__......__........_..
Fringe ...........__..................._................................_.
Travel .............._...................................._..............._....
Office supplies, telephone for 3 mas ...._.................
Eighth Quarterly Planning Meeting is. held
On~r evaluation is presented
Eight Quarter Total
Expected Expenditures:
$ 14.400.00
$ 1,112.50
N/A
N/A
$ 126.00
$ 151.60
$ 37.90
$ 350.00
$ 300.00
N/A
$ 16,478.00
e
~
,
P.19j
Downtown New Approach AntI-Drug Program
For San Bernardino, CA
Budget by Activity
Increase Patrols around the two tar)(et
Housing Developments: .
Cost of patrol units over 2 years ......................................................
Cost of equipment for patrol units ...................................................
Administrative costs ( scheduling. record keeping, .........................
payroll)
~
AUlUnent security equipment around two tal'l!et buildings:
Pioneer Park Plaza:
Fencing ..........................................................................................
Ughting ..........................................................................................
Security cameras & monitors .......................................................
st. Bemardine Plaza:
Ughting ...........................................................................................
Security cameras & monitors .......................................................
$117 .600.00
$ 2.000.00
$ 8,900.00
$ 60.907.62
$ 7.200.00
$10.764.26
$ 6,600.00
$ 13,645.18
Educational WOrkshopS in personal safety. crime prevention, ......... $ N/A
and drug abuse awareness
(all in-kind donation)
UplUBdinl!: an exist/nJ!: compUter center ............................................... $ 13.645.18
Other Computer related Wiring for Intemet & Internet service ..... $ 1,756.00
~
Consultant to assist in coordinating and evaluating program ....... $ 1,895.00
Accumulated Two Year Total $250,000.00
.
Rating Factor 4.
~
.
P. 20
leveraging Resources
I-
i
bon
oni
in
alii
~ij
~lg
g!J
lit
I~I
!i~
~.~
~.!!
'.~
~5.
r:1:
"!l
Ii
z~
if
8'
II
SS
ii~
.'"
>i
=.
,5ii
~
~
.
.
&
~i
t
.
0:
o
3
.
g
i
.
,
.
s
v
.
3
:-
0;
,
~
o
!
~
.
,
.
c
~
:-
o
~
.
~
.!!
.
~
S
.
o
:;
.
,
S
"
~i
~
'liJ
~
..
"
o
2,
: j l___;':=..,~$' '.a;,'I>:~::_-,i ,-' _j~.E.~=:~'~~_
. f--.-----... ~i-" ;~ I:, ,-::, ~:. : Mecical, Clnrer.Dr-- ~'!il-~'~;- ____
. ~::.~--= roe: I :; ,ft:;:.. :..: "n i ! .-::..:::;: .:;; if <: is .:.. '; ,
' ;.! L-<=_-::.:i ~'-:-SlJji'~:'::--'-' 3 "fir, 51! i" :~__
~ '!:... ![--'=--:-c.F . ;: C:-:', -:'. c' \'!'i.)>:r ,'c c'"
~ " " . c; - " C )0. '" ""C c::
~.::~- ~- -'i'-::';~ ~.~!Q=-~:'-:;::-=r: l "':~~~'~m.':"",_.
~. ;! 1~~ '~=:m-ci':'?II' c~:--;:; n '" '.;;, "'coL. __-.-J~~ " ~ t~-;.
)> · ~ -,-=:::..' fi--':::E sa;;.; 'I' ~ : '; ;---~; i: ... .. sa .
Ii _ . ...: _"~Ii :>1;: =. :.S/J..___.J ! Ii I: : .~. ' ,. ! l5"~Ptee-AYe"-:JQ . ~ , .
., -"'--0"'" :'~';"" '.: !lII'II :::'----1: .:r 'i'L-:~~1 ~A9'~. ii I~.n,! i'i .1: ': , (")
"I't~""'" ...~ 1_-1!~ .,''''''1"_:,, "I ',1;."'1 CD
l " ,-{i: '.' ,. ~." ,,. 'I I, . !' 'V.l......-
': ,; Iri' '!: ',',:' [J'T Ii Ii ,i "" J:...Jl.;.;. : L':..J I 'iP~h.ie'.-'-; ;:;.
- ---. -.., '''~--N--MlV8moiiiv'i'- ,,,' --g;--; :=Jr1t1LV~~ ~ _,., , II, __ ....
---..-.-.-. ."ri". .... ". '-~~'-. .....-....--.. '.'. '.' 'J' ....::Ii. ":, i<-lL- :W,:......... 'i.. III
-::: ~ .: j \ ;: f, :; i i In " ii ;: ~- ~! ; i ;./k lj I! 1:-- L-tlWfttlf"f"\vtt, ~i _
-~'i=O t:':::~l.~~ ~ :~~G1~:-'Cd :~!i r:-~~ ~~mm: il "i~; I: ~
lI'--~~' .' . " , ,. '1' i' ".,-._.-~ ,i; I' -- : l ...' /; 1-' -- S
- -5. ii', . Co> " I:E '~~'-!Ii "',", -0:: . r :;
'~.t=:- ~l:;'; ~ ~ -- ...':m..:N~ ~ >_:=::-. ._-=~; "rt-~': r .... ~. . 0'
'--f(n~ ~...!l.t:., ~ ;!~...-~~ "r~U-1 'i i ~ &I _ S
----.....-.-,.........,~'-j\ Ii ~ . , 'L,' i; I . :;
--- ---. -''"1 ' ''t c- i I . L.--_ ~*" rS" I'
I,:. :,' ': 1:;'--::'.':::,.; 'I'! Ir--; '~. ,nl..!1 :=;....: ....' en
N._'alI ' it :), -J ~L......i~l.-O, 1,1 iii .
=S ~'Sr:; :==; ~~; ft. '-1 n j=-----:l i ,;"'-01 r-~'I ri i d i '~ ;- ~
,----;::;' , F1; ~. .1 !~..::MlI :::---::> I ", \:': . ~
....
:3
III
;1 e:
i! i: :J
L-''-__ 0
r~-:: --
11 .... 'I CJ)
I LSL.: 1... ::T
r---"" 0
~~~~.
If i! ~~ ~
01 '~.i m
I,; 0
j j i I __J r--; r ~
,[ ; " 5"
... __~ I (')
. , ,-~-'J C~= CD
~ ~.-:-:~;, i I .--; ;'- m
Ul
!!N_" il (I)
'l'" ii .\.~. - '""- i.--- ~
c:;: '!'. rin i r.rr---J l . ~ : L
'.i.if :. .1,. ~~ r ~; ii ~
;~ -<:r=, ~lIlt~J -liT-- - ....
,i r.i '.'. !!fl'I' i . ': . .j-- 0
~ ':' I' I' "---;J :=8ehe- ---=. L: ,r- en
Ii ',' iI. ;i :'. ,i 11----" --m-
..,., ...--go
- '. -'.' --g---. -
-..nr.:"::~!Oi: :.. '. :r
l"1 ...... ",i :1 "' en
~, ' . ~ ::== ~f~f(J;c-: CD'
''':.,..co .. --' " i . :1 ,.
... .' ..--.---." -"'-" .~ . . :::0.
;. ^ ~.sa:'::=::-~~'~-f!"- ~H ~
__ ._-:.~.c"'__c:=~:~~_~~ '. _ _::=;( ~
--.--1. llJ - ,
',~:::::::-~=-=. ~:1i:=' _'.~~~l-'. -;',.' ~;
.' '- ...._.~".....~
~-. .Bobb~~~.::_ ~. .:~;;;.st-:: _'
".
-canyon Rd---- '..
".-..-..lS~~:;.
. ~...,
0- :;
---- .....'i> . :_..._'
. :-'--~- (! : ,-. \-.
:;E.__.~..: .
'~---~,,::.'
...: illJ
j~1I
--.-.".-. .
:.;
'"
<>,
.'-_:~
o :"'7.~t.,;-
N /i
_..~
. 1':.! _. _._
;:::: -:; N::SIetta:W.9----.
m' ;~--::-'! :i It oLJ
i!",m;,~ :'r'n--~ ~
. .....li ~---5!'.-:A :.::::!: :,!.!l .
-O-1Q,~. ::r ,..!:f, ,...
--"';,!!J~.~ ~~ i
____..iii:. " i,,,' ':..' _~.
, ;j iJ U ~' ;,
Mil
.~:~l
o
:.
o
'"
..
a
:~~'
.,
o
'"
m
:lll
ii~
-
0.____
)0--'-
<
co
m,
a
!!1
.,
m
~
:r
S'.!
i!
m
--.----~
d,.....~
sa
~.,.:, !.!l
.; ;r:
,'.::r- : ~
_mill'~~i :. !.
. 1I;',.!i : 1Il . .
~.:.:sac-: ~~: :. ----- .
: l". . ' ~
WhIlIock'Ave;:' FJ
-
N
-s,
~
.~.
C! m
~ ~
)> "
~ !/J
:'.Pedley Rd
n
fa
:..
POLICE DEPARTMENT
LEE DEAN . CIIIEr OF POUCE
s.
P.O. Box 1559. San Bernardino' CA 92401-1559
909.384.5741
www.ci.san-bernardino.ca.us
June 18,2001
William F McClure, Senior Vice President
APE - Pioneer Associates, LP
2000 Crow Canyon PI Ste 130
San Ramon CA 94583
RE: HUD Funded New Approach Anti-Drug Program
Dear Mr. McClure:
The San Bernardino Police Department agrees to work in partnership with APE _ Pioneer
Associates in a cooperative program known as the Downtown NAAD (New Approach Anti-
Drug) Program. We support the program objectives and agree to supplemental baseline police
services in the area in the form of increased patrols and educational services with funding from
the HUD NAAD Grant. All additional services performed above the baseline activity level will
be supplemented by these grant funds.
This letter signifies our interim agreement to this partnership pending finalization of a
Memorandum of Understanding between the City of San Bernardino and APE _ Pioneer
Associates.
Very truly yours,
Lee Dean
Chief of Police
/rm
LEADERS IN SE1TING TIlE STANDAIlD OF ExCELLENCE
May 13, 2002
William F. McClure, Senior Vice President
APE - Pioneer Associates, LP
2000 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 130
San Ramon, CA 94583
RE: HUD Funded New Approach Anti-Drug Program
Dear Mr. McClure,
Enclosed is a certified copy of City of San Bernardino Resolution No. 2002-134 and the
Memorandum of Understanding between the City of San Bernardino and APE - Pioneer
Associates.
If you have any questions, please call me at (909)384-5002.
Sincerely,
Michelle Taylor
Senior Secretary
Enclosure
,.
:-
** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - NOT A PUBLIC DOCUMENT **
RESOLUTION AGENDA ITEM TRACKING FORM
Meeting Date (Date Adopted): 5- '" -Od- Item # d \
Vote: Ayes I-J,4-'1 Nays-e-
Change to motion to amend original documents:
Resolution # JC(:bL - \34-
Abstain -& Absent 3
Reso. # On Attachments: ,/' Contract term: -
Note on Resolution of Attachment stored separately: -=-
Direct City Clerk to (circle I): PUBLISH, POST, RECORD W/COUNTY
Date Sent to Mayor: 5 - '1 -() d-
Date of Mayor's Signature: 5 -l(-o:;;l-
Date of Clerk/CDC Signature: 6 -q -Cd-
NullNoid After: 60 D~ I) -5 -()d-
By: -
Reso. Log Updated:
Seal Impressed:
y"'"
V
See Attached: ~ Date Returned: ~
See Attached:
See Attached:
'-.
Date Memo/Lett
60 Day Reminder Letter Se
90 Day Reminder Letter Sent on 45th day:
Request for Council Action & Staff Report Attached:
Updated Prior Resolutions (Other Than Below):
Updated CITY Personnel Folders (6413, 6429, 6433, 10584, 10585, 12634):
Updated CDC Perso,nnel Folders (5557):
Updated Traffic Folders (3985, 8234, 655, 92-389):
Copies Distributed to:
City Attorney v' Code Compliance
Dev. Services
Parks & Rec.
Police V Public Services
Water
Notes:
es ,/ No By
Yes No V By
Yes No V By
Yes NO+ By
Yes No By_
EDA
Finance
MIS
Others:
BEFORE FILING, REVIEW FORM TO ENSURE ANY NOTATIONS MADE HERE ARE TRANSFERRED TO THE
YEARLY RESOLUTION CHRONOLOGICAL LOG FOR FUTURE REFERENCE (Contract Term. etc.)
Ready to File: _
Date:
Revised 01/12/01
.
New AJlProach Anti-Drug Program
Grant Application
June 19, 2001
Submitted by
.
AFE-Pioneer Associates, L P.
Contact Person:
Angela Robinson-Spencer
AFE-Pioneer Associates, l.P.
A. F. Evans Company, Inc.
(925) 244-1600
aspencer@afevans.com
.
6/G/O')
=f:*- d /
.
1) Cover Letter
.
.
2000 Crow Canyon Place, Ste 1;0
San Ramon, CA 94583-1367
Phone: 925.244.1600
Facsimile: 925.244.1804
.
William F. McClure, Vice President
A. F. Evans Company, Inc.
2000 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 130
San Ramon, CA 945~1367
Donald Freeman, Grants Coordinator,
MUlti-Family Housing
U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
611 W. 6th Street, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Dear Mr. Freeman:
June 15, 2001
.
On behalf of AFE-Pioneer Associates, L P. and its other partners, I am pleased to submit an
application to the New Approach Anti-Drug grant program of the U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development. AFE-Pioneer Associates are the owners of a HUD assisted hOUsing
development for seniors and disabled persons, Pioneer Park Plaza. In San Bernardino. Califor-
nia. We have spearheaded the formation of a collaborative program, entitled the "Downtown
New Approach Anti-Drug Program" (Downtown NAAD Program).
Downtown NAAD Program's goals are to:
1) create a drug- and crlme-free environment at two HUD assisted housing devel-
opments:
2) provide for the safety and Protection of residents these developments;
3) enhance a drug-free and crime-tree environment for the residents of, workers
of, and visitors to the Downtown neighborhOOd;
4) educate the residents of, workers of, and visitors to the Downtown neighborhood
so that they may Protect themselves; and
5) prOvide acoess to the latest computer technOlogy for residents of and visitors to
the Downtown neighborhOOd in order to enhance their the welfare and well-
being.
Our partners In carrying these goals are: the Cl1y of San Bernardino Police Department; The City
of San Bernardino District Attorney's Office; St. Bernadine Corporation. owners of St. Bernardine
Plala; the City of San Bernardino Adult School; the City of San Bernardino's Department of
Parks, Recreation, and Community Services-F"1fth Street Senior Center.
.
., hWll~\~'i.fi.';;.~ij~ill~"i;f;;;~;:"ii~r;~~,:w;~; ,':~{;\":~f;:";"':':;r"...,;";.,,,:;,J,,_. " ", ",. '""
.
.
.
-2-
Each of these partners is finnly committed to our goals and each will contribute to one or more
of the follOWing action steps:
Step 1) Install protective fencing. security cameras, and lighting around two HUD
funded senior and younger disabled persons' residences;
Step 2) increase both bicycle and police car patrol in the Downtown neighborhood in
general, but especially in a 2().square block area around the two target HUD
funded buildings;
Step 3) augment the Joint effort of the police and District Attomey to prosecute and/
or refer to treatment (as Is appropriate) offenders committing crimes, espe.
cially drug.related crimes, In the Downtown neighborhOOd;
Step 4) develop and implement a series of educational workshop on personal safety,
crime prevention, drug abuse awareness, and drug abuse prevention;
Step 5) provide seniors living In HUD assisted buildings and the neighborhOOd in gen-
eral with acoess to the latest comPuter resources for improving their health
and well-being.;
Step 6) develop community coordination of the Program via quarterly meetings at-
tended by representatives of the Program partners and other interested
community members, inclUding residents and staff of the two target build-
ings.
We are requesting $250,000 to carry action steps to meet goals 1 to 6 above.
Please note that the A. F. Evans Company, Inc. is the general partner for AFE-Pioneer Associ-
ates, L P. As the Senior Vice President of A. F. Evans Company, Inc., I am the official author-
ized to sign applications, contracts, and MOUs for Pioneer Associates. Thank you for your con-
sideration of this application.
Sincerely, .- . ,
'.'. ..," '. ill'
/'. / M
\:..L</) z/}?;// 21 'h.-
William F. McClure
SenlorVlce President
the A. F. Evans Company, Inc.
for AFE-Pioneer Associates, LP.
.
New Approach Anti-Drug Program 001 Data Input Form
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
u.s.
Project Number 14335027
IRS Employer Identification Number (EIN) 68-0453130
424)
(from Item 6. of the SF-
Lead Applicant
ME-Pioneer Associates, L. P.
Lead Applicant.Type (Please Check One)
Owner !I PHA D Local Government D
D
Lead Applicant Address
Indian Tribe D TDHE
.
A. F. Evans Canoany. Jnc6 for r-.FF.-PT~ aQanro;;:a"'~C!
2000 Crow Canyon Place, SUite 130
San Ranon, CA 94583
Lead Applicant Official William F. M::Clure
Phone (925) 244-1600
Total Grant Amount Requested $ ~ 2sn OOQ nl)
.
Project to be funded
Pinnt:lOY" '0.:::"""1,. 'Dl:a"7::1 {~lA'9t' ~ , B}
Project Address
Building A: 560 N. F St., san Bernardino, CA 945
Buildinq B: 555 N. G St.. San Rernarilino. CA 92410
Project Owner
ME-Pioneer Associates. L.P.
Neighborhood to be funded
Downtown San Bernardino, ell.
Sub-Applicant Name (If applicable)
San Bernadino Police Dept" O.A. 's Office, Jldult School, & Fifth St. Senior Center
HUD Field Office or AONAP
. Pi'l";f;"IH""""ii -- Tn" ~n'J!"'~" Field .q;ffice
.
\
.
.
7,~. ~.
I PRODCl'SIJMMBY Coap '~.'1f:1.t-
.. .... At,! I 1fII AaH,,_ r......
HOUSING ANDvalUfD.&VD.Ol'JtllBl
1t.1I /I.A. .........Uy
1J.L18'A1m8.In'OY
AJllud6YC(OIIOJllII~"'lIItItboN-'" I tlbJ"'~" BUDd.dJis
..u6te..~ lfi~H"'Z"":'..
PI.... ,.~....... JOIII' ---.....1...
1) Co..,.a)L-_~. or [II ..... of.",. Cflup~~. pJa
2) M8,joI' 8CtMdea 11III1I_ ~ .
3) U_~~-of. kJdcn_..-._d--.....,Jt>....."lIlof..._..A.....
4) Jd.--..tt; poy-~;...1O .. r I hJ", ~~., .--........ 01. Li.lents sawcI (If
applicable).
The Downtown N_ Approach AntI-Orug Pro(p'am (Prooam) Is a PUblil>prlvate wnture c:IedIcalI!d to c0m-
bating drug.n,lated c:rilllll and dewlopIng a IlIOnIIICI8ItIw community envInlnment In the ta/'Illt 1lllIChbor-
hood at San BernaRlIno. California. Two HUD ..... ""'II housing del.Blaph_ In the ..... nel8/lbor-
hood-f>ione.- Park PIam and lit. Bernadine PI&m, _ bath ac8awntto a bus depat weJI.lcnown as a cen-
ter at drugdealing and prost/tut/an. The PmtDam COIlSIsls of six main CDmpcll-m and actMtIes: (l) au,.
mentlng cammunlty pallc1nC (II) 8UI/I1lKIlIng jalnt police and DllItrIct AlI:omey actMtIes to PRl8ElCUte
criminals or refer them to d~ treatment, as Is aPPl~ (III) making physk:allrrlJlRMlmenlB to
ina e " e e, securiI;y at the two HUD _'~'"<l ~(lIt) uliIIzlng the expertise of law ....r"'....ment ClfIi.
cials and the San Bernardino Adult SchoaI traInenI to teach neIgIlbuihood mernbenI to PIUl8ct them-
selves; (v) uptpadlng an eocIstIng neI&hbomoad CCllIIputer center; and vi) dlMlloplng a forum for c0mmu-
nity forum for oversight, COOrtIinatlan and lMIIu8lIon of the Plugram. The Program wID _ 345 wlner-
able Iow-Incame and very Iol!Mncame MI1IonIand you,..., cll8ablad peapIe living In 307 housIn& unlls at
at the two PIDP8fIIas. In addIlIu.~ aur PI'D(I8m wID ..",. the mare than 8,950 011.- resIdant& of the
Downtown San Bernardino nelg/lborhooc:l, as waII'as the Innumerable WOrkens In and vlsltDls to that area.
I ~~f!~ Of COD<<I
m.1d.
Lk...Ccngr, -.. .To!
:::'ir~lie.u m..bdw@
.-
lioDaI
Ce8e1
j. ......
-
42Id 0........ -f'"4lil1 Ilfstriot
L2
t~_.._...__
-1
14.
..J
____.I
.
3) Description of the Neighborhood:
P.1
Geographical local:
The City of San Bernardino is located 60 miles East of the City of Los Angeles,
at the Southern base of the San Bernardino Mountains. Within a sixty mile ra-
dius of San Bernardino are ocean beaches, desert playgrounds, and mountain
resorts, making it an appealing home for its 1,709434 residents.
Historical Background:
The City of San Bernardino was incorporated in 1866, about 15 years after it
was founded by the Mormons. The original town actually lies Within our target
neighborhood and includes Pioneer Park-which was named for the original
Mormon pioneers-and the Historic St Berdardine Catholic Church. The HUD
assisted hOUSing developments, Pioneer Park Plaza and St Bernadine Plaza,
were named after these historic sites.
.
DESCRIPTION OF THE TARGET NBGHBORHOOD
. The San Bernardino neighborhood to be Impacted by Our Program is known simply
as the Downtown area. It is:
as most downtowns, an area of diverse uses and functions that set
it off from other more homogenous sections of the City. It con-
tains government, cultural retail, offICe and a wide range of resi-
dential uses. The ages and des/gn styles of downtown buildings
vary greauy, as does the scale, landscaping quality, and site COVer-
age from block to block, This general diversity in all aspects of ur-
ban design Is what makes downtown an identifiable district (City of
San Bernardino General Plan, 1989, Pg. 5-5).
'.
This particular Downtown neighborhOOd is clearly defined in the General Plan of
City of San Bernardino (pUblished in 1989 by the Development Services Depan-
ment of the City of San Bernardino, pg. 5-5) as bounded by Baseline Street on the
North, Sierra Way on the East, Rialto Avenue on the South, and Interstate Highway
215 on the West (See maps pages 3a & 3b). The neighborhood is rectangular In
shape and is approximately 1.9 miles long, North to South, and 1.3 miles. wide,
East to West It includes US square blocks of varying sizes. Within this area are
the main branch of the City Ubrary, a large shopping mall, the St Bemardine
Catholic Church, Pioneer Park, City Hall, and numerous places of business.
.
P.2
CENSUS DATA
Census tracts 56 and 57 make up nearly the whole of the Downtown neighbor-
hOOd. Since Census data by Census tract is not yet available for Califomia, we will
refer to the 1990 data. We fully expect that the general configuration of housing
data and population characteristics data for tracts 56 and 57 In the 2000 cen-
sus-eleven years later-will be similar, althoUgh the population has grown some-
What .
Housing Units:
In 1990, the neighborhOOd contained 2,635* occupied units of housing (1990
Census data).
.
Total PoPUlation and Ethnicity:
According to the 1990 Census data, approximately 8,951 people made the Down-
town Area their home. Of these, 66% were Hispanic in origin; 1,183 16% were
Non-Hispanic Whites; 12% were African In origin; 3% were Asian; 2% were two or
more races; 1% were American or Alaskan Indian; >1% were Native Hawaiians or
other Pacific Islanders; and >1% were some other race. From these percentages,
we can see that fully 84% of the population were minority group members.
Family Make-Up and Household Type:
47% of the neighborhOOd POPUlation lived in families; 29% lived in non-family cou-
ples or groups; 23% lived alone; and none lived in institutions. 53% of the total
families were headed by married COuple, while 32% of the total families were fe-
male headed with no husbands present 15% of the families had other structures.
66% of the total families had children under 18 year of age, as compared to 76%
of the female-headed families.
Age:
10% of the total neighborhood population were seniors (aged 60 to 85+),53%
were adults (aged 19 to 59), and 37% were children aged (< 1 year to 18 years).
*
Note: numbers are approxinuue, tIS the Census tract dalll includes a few blocks
outside the boundaries of the downtown area.
.
.
P.3
Economic Status by Households and By Families:
Households in census tract 56 had a median household income of $14, 425 and cen-
sus tract 57 (the tract within which our target bundings lie) had a median income of
$11,875. These Income levels were, at that time, below 50% of the median Income
for the City as a whole.
44.3% of the families in tract 56 were below the Federal poverty level and 45.6% of
the families In tract 57 were below the Federal poverty level. Despite the passage of
time, we expect that the Income levels for this area are stili welHlelow the median in-
come level of the city as a whole. The data on ethnicity shOwed that the vast majority
of persons in the Downtown area are minority members and, as The ConsnJlda~
Plan for the Citv of San Bernardino. 2000-~005_ notes. areas populated by minorities
tend also tend to be POpulated by people earning 50-80% of the median family in-ecome (Consolidated Plan, 200-2005, pg. 26).
.
(See maps on the NEXT TWO PAGES
· San Bernadino, California
· Downtown San Bernardino]
]
.
""n
~~.g
3:!l~
::i;:.lD
~~~
---
18;~
.~~i
3if"
"2 -
. 9
=...9.
~ii';;
1;1i'~
9 ,...
3~~
~I~
~fi;r
~. .
~~~
.~,
i!. =.
",,~
iiii
3:;;
;:'ii
,,=:
!~
!;..
z~
,I~
o~
g3
~i
5ll.
O~
U
=0;
~i
~ii
;;;
.
;
.
=
g
.f
"-
!
i
.
g
..
il"
,
.
S
l:
3
.'
~
~
n
.
~
.
,
.
.
,.
~
::
"
'"
,
"
..
~
"
.
o
:
,
,
'"
.0
'"
a
,
-U
III
co
CD
~
ierra
II
.
I
."
~ I
I
j
\ f
__..f
o
11.
j
f
'll
a:
'"
/
,
,
fa'"
gfl
'" /
~
.. 51
~
f
...
.,
N
I
~.
N
IlNe
N
a
/~~~-~
/'
x'
/,/"
"
/
j
.,--...../
-
""
f
.
o~
./
n en
> Dl
.. ::J
.. OJ
0 CD
3
:Ill Dl
z a
S"
SJ
~
~
f
.
.
o
I
"
".
!
It
/rPmllNe
000
b'Q~
!ia-
~~~
iU
. ~~~
II~
_~s
=8'g
!Jli'o
!!;~~
sr!
h~
g:i~
hi
~~f
!f~
IJf
~li
~!I
!!l
If
go
rf
l~
~~
--
-..
i..
=-
~~
~
i!
I
;;j
.1
e
~
a:
~
,
I
t
"
l
g
:-
"
,
ii
3
n
i
"
,
~
~
:
..
z
.
"
-
..'
.
~
"
-
o
li,
-
,
3
~
..
2
e
.
~
~
~
J I I JI W
,'--
CD
::J
" J iiJ
.~.. -. U '--
",
'" " " ',- , "
," '^ " ''', , " ,~ " ',.miit; ;..t.;..I,. ,
~ " " "
" ~,:,-., , " .'" 'r.~ """~" ,~,"", \ ~ 'j.._ ....,.J>. , "
."', ," ',,~ ,." ,';"
".,'.'.,:;;~.,;.;""..".,.,..,,,,.. .' ".',
., ' ,~
I , . "
, .,~ .....
~ '!J
~ Ii J~ i
, 14,
Sl L.fjj Sl ,. -
~ '-- ~ I
5 :Z~ 'b 5 ,;
" ,,~
:.~
-:..r U
i~ ~
r
" 1'. ~I'
~
c Sll
~ ,
5
~f~ l.i'.'
U~ ~. ;i~~
0 r " ~~
l !J ,
14
Sl , l-
i "
8
~
Rr ';; ....... 0,
[I' E
8 'I
I
~ ~
~
i
~ ~I Cl LlJ J1 I
n
-
o
~
f
(J)
Q)
::J
OJ
CD
3
Q)
a.
:r
o
en
=r
o
;So
::J
(Q
)>
@
Q)
a
S"
~
~
"'0
Q)
a-
lii"
Qo
OJ
6.
a:
~.
z
Q)
3
m
.
4) DescrIptIon of AssIsted HousIng In the NeIghborhood
.
.
.
New A roach Anti-Dr Pro
Housing Information Form
AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
You must provide the following information. For Darratives and other submission
requirements please attach pages direetJy behind this form.
Provide a description of the neighborhood.
I. A basic description of the neighborhood (i.g. boundaries and size).
a) Populatiod..' 11 , III
b) Number of Housing units in neighborhood 5,846
Please also attach a map showing the location of these housiJ)g units.
c. Population profile (e.g. relevant census data on socio-economic, ethic and family
makeup of neighborhood.
d.
.
Describe how the area meets the definition of "neighborhood" (i.e. describe and
include a copy of the comprehensive plan, ordinance or other official local
document which defines the area as a neighborhood, village, or similar
geographical designation). J f the entire jurisdiction is defined as a neighborhood
by virtue of having a population at less than 25,000, indicate the jurisdiction's
population under the 1990 census and describlllincJude more recent information
which gives the best indication as to the current population (please attach).
2. Provide a description of the Assisted housing developinent(s) in the neighborhood.
a. Name of Project Pioneer Park Plaza I St. Bernadine Plaza
b. Name of the Project Owner APE-Pioneer ASSOCiates, L. P. I St. Bemacline
c. Nature, source, and program titles of all project based subsidies or other assistance Corporation
provided to he projects by units of government or private nonprofit entities (any names
of public or nonprofit programs other than programs sponsored by HUD should be
accompanied by a description of the program and the name and business phone number
of a contact person responsible for administering the program for the subsidy provider);
d. The number of housing units in the project and the number of housing units in the
project that meet the definition of "assisted housing units" in this NOFA, and a
description of the restrictions on rents and resident incomes that, in combination with
the subsidy provided to the project, quality the units as assisted/affordable in
accordance with the definition in this NOF A.
e) The number, geographic proximity (adjoining, adjacent, or scattered site, and if
scattered site, the distance betwC!lD the two buildings which are furthest apart),
and type (single family detached, townhouse, garden, elevator) ofbuiIdings in
the project. . .
.
.
P.4
4) DescrIption of the AssIsted HousIng Developments In the neIghborhood:
HUD assisted housing developments within the Downtown San Bernardino
neighborhood, as we have defined it, include:
a) & b)
· Pioneer Park Plaza owned by AFE-Pioneer Associates, L P., a for-
profit corporation; and
. St 8emardine Plaza owned by the St Bernardine Corporation, a
non-profit corporation.
. c) In both housing developments rents are subsidized by funds from
HUD under the its Section 8 program. Both buildings house seniors
and younger disabled persons.
.
d) & e) Pioneer Park Plaza has 160 units, 159 of which are assisted house-
ing units; one unit has been converted to use as an office. St
Bernardine Plaza has 150 units, 148 of which are assisted housing
units; two units have been converted for management use.
f) Pioneer Park Plaza is comprised of two garden walk-up buildings,
52' apart, while St Bemardine Plaza Is a 12 sto'Y high-rise with two
elevators.
[See summalY table NEXT PAGE]
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I.
I
OIf1l
l!lW
~3
Uw~
.. _.
::r"
!I11!)
i'
flf'J
~i'
il ~
<!a
0_
" i
"tl
01 010
~ g$
z ;z..
c,flo"TIl
!11 ~""
i l'
[~
!:p.
jl g
rm
;a
~~
g~
IX) I
!
~ i
I
-I
& I
f
J
IX)
!
... I
I
.~ I
)>i
,
,
,
I ~ !
i
I I
I
.
z
..
3
:~
~a
ll.
i
"tl
.2-
a
i
i~
=II
Il/).!!.
C !P
lil.l
li5:m
1-. aJ
III ll!
I is.
I i!l.~
... 'C: 3
~ I=. i
flit ..
+--
I z
'c: ~ ~
~ I~(~
,
I
10 Z
'.... c
'Ill 3
~ 11: i
~..
i
~
3
it
~
..
lil
a
4a
~
-
i
I
,
I
f
-J
I
i
I
I
I
00
CD CD
< en
CD (')
- ..,
o -.
"C"S
3 o.
CD ::J
;ao
en -t\
-. :c
::J C
00
o )>
:E en
::J en
1"'+ _.
o ~
:E CD
::J C.
CI>:c
Q) 0
::J c:
en
OJ _.
CD ::J
..,~
::J
Q)
C.
-.
::J
o
..
~
01 ~f~
"2 ~ "
!i!l=S
a.
,,\>>
.
BUDGET SUMMARy
Federal Funds Requested
HOUSING
FY 1001 New Approach Anti-
DEVELOPMENT
Drug Program
Name and Address of AppIIcaJt:
William F. ~1ure, Senior Vice President
u.s. DEPARTMENT OF
AND URBAN
A. F. Evans Q:mpany, for AFE-Pioneer Associate, L. P.
- san Rancn, CA 94583
.
Program: New- Approach Anti -Drug Program
AeldOffice:HUD, IA Office, ~ti-Fami.1y Housing
Detailed DescrlpUon of Budget
I Budget Une I~ No.
AcIIvitIeI
uested
9160 ~dlocal_.."_,,,ol
0180 1\._.....
1. fI f\._.~
2.c....-w Gl8do
SlD-TCllIl: 1-
d allldlor
CMI' and 1bcMt......w:as
9170
9180
HUO
.
$
$
$
$
$ 12,849.00
$ 50,000.00.
$,651.00
.
2) Congressional Summary
.
.
Application for Federal
Assistance
Pre.appllcatlon
[j ConstluctJon
o Non-CanstruclJon
i 2. Date Submi'USd (mmlddlyyyy)
1 6/18/01
13. Date Received by Stale (mmlddlyyyy)
I
14. Date Received by F_ Agency (mnVddlyyyy)
I
I
ae Approval No. 0348-0043
Appncant Identifier
. 1. Type of Subml.slon
Application
LJ Construction
~ NOIl-Canstrucllon
5. AppllCllnt InfonMtfon
Legal Name
ME-Pioneer Associates. L.P.
Address (give city, county, State. and zip code)
State AppUceuon ldentlfJ8r
Federelldentifl8r
.
I
i
;
1
I' 7. Typ. of AppllCllnt (enter appropriate letter In box)
A. stat. J. Private University
B. County K. Indian T~be
C. Munlclpel l. Individual
D. Township M. Proltt 0Igan1zation
E. Int.rstat. N Nonprofit
F. Inter-municipal 0 Public Housing Agency
I' G. Special DI.trIct P. Oth.r (Speclty)
C. IncrealO Duration H. Independent School Dill.
: I. Stat. Controlled Institution of Higher leaming
I 9. Ham. of Fad.... Agency
: ~rhno.n'" n-F U'1"\11sin'J I, r1rhan De'J.elopnent.--
10. Catalog of Federal Dom.stfcAlial.tanC8 Number (xx-,") 111. Oeecrlpt'V8 TIll. of Appl5c.nrs Project
I. J'
-- I , I
Tille: 1 4 . -_-1..9.1___ I
New Approach Anti -Drug Program
APE-Pioneer Associates, L.P.
A. F. Evans Oampany, Inc.
2000 CrowCanyon P., Ste. 130
San RaIron, CA 94583
I Organizational Unit
: T.imit:Frl PRrt-nprQhip
I.. Name and telephone number of the penlon to be contacted on matlerllnvolving thit
, appUCloon (give lrel code)
Angela Robinson-Spencer
(925) 244-1600
6. Employer IdlntiflCllUon Number(E1N) (xx-Ynnn)
,68 i---- i 0453130
~
8. T,pe of Application:
~ New n Continuation
o Revision
If Revi.lon, .nter appropriate IeUer(s) in box(es): 0
i
A. Increase Award B. Decrease Award
D. Decrease Duration Other (lIpeC/fy)
12. Are.. A"'cte4 by Project (cities. counties, States. etc.)
Downtown New Approach Anti-Drug Program
for San Bernardino, CA
San Bernardino, CA
13. Propoaed Project ! 14. Coni........' DI.trlet8 of
51art Date (mm/ddlyyyy) 1 Ending Date (rnrnlddlyyyy) i e. Applicant ! b. ProJect
;5?E~~~t..s Fundln~ \h~Q-OJ--- --------Sth-f)~~IIC11l1on SubJ.ct ~ Re;i;w by Sla~~..W~W.i-ct:-----,
, , Order 12372 Proc...?
a. V.. This pra-appUcationlappllcetion was made available to the
Stet. Executive Order 12372 PI'OCOI8 for review on:
1
Complet8fClrll\HUD~2""M.F,~rjd;i1g Matrix.
Date (mm/ddIyyyy)
b. No !Xl Program fa not covered by E.O. 12372
or 0 Program has not be.n IOlected by state for ravIew.
17. Is the AppllCllnt Dellnqu.nt on Any F.deral Debt?
o V.. II -V.... attach an expl.nallon rn No
lB. To the best of my knowledge and beilef, ell deta In this appilcation/Pre-appilcation ere true and correct, !he document has been duly
authorized by the governing body of the applicant and the app)!cant will comply with the attached assurances lithe assistance Is awarded.
a. Typed Nairne of Authorized Rep-nentative lb. TIll, ! c. Telephone Number (Include Are, Code)
----------'---- Sr. "ice Pr<;!!;i~~I}~___------,......lil25 244-1600 _____
nlltt t..--- e. Date Sl ed ( 1nIdd/yyyJ)
"v ~ {-, 4/
fonn SF-424 (7/97)
Prescribed by OMB Circular A-102
.
Federal Assistance Pundlng Matrix
The Ippliclllllm1.tl;it provide the ftulIlllllllllatlilt IboWII below, U,~ 'lob prolll'dItl far which JI.4etalllmdilli is boinr r.qllestod, Il1d
. complo!. It. c~rl!f1clllall&.
otoAa Appl'O\l~ (peJldlng)
Phlgr.tn" A!lpllclont F'dlrll Stat. 1.aClI' otMt PIog~ TIlIaI
811.,. Shlle S~.N Ihcoln.
HUe N.... Ajlpl'Oicl1io A/ld.oIug 0 $250,500 00 0 0 0 0 $250,000
PIugroIn ,
Grand Total. 0 $250,00b ,00 0 0 0 0 $250,00
. Flit r.lW'l, .....,.. bcim IUln""v. 1I1c1 oompollClll
.00
0.00
.
lllBthlctlon. forb HUl).4Z"M
public tajlorlJhg bllrd.h tDtthf. eollacllonOflNraI'lnallo/l" IIIJn1ated
loeverage 40 tnlllUtla PltntepQl'lS"lnoIUdInG ....hfol'r.vIeWlhg
IhalrucllMe. _hlhg exl8ffn; dIIllIllU_, 1l8llltrlng III1d l1l.I111-
f8ln/no ihe dilll hHded, .Ild CIlIlIJlfIllI1g and Nllle\IiIl1Illh. colltcllon
Of InfOt'lt1llltlll. ThII IOatloY li1il~ naI COIltIUcl or IPOhIar. Ihd .
llel'llon la not r.qu/1Id to t'llpohd /0, . coIlaot1oh Of .,'atln.tloh
u~I"..lhlt eel/KIIoh d/aj:llll~ . wnd oMs CI>nIAII hUlIlbal.
Thla f1lf'II1 Is 10 be aNd by '~m. IWclUalll1QlUndll1lllillln Iht
O.IlIrtJ'Mn1 of HOUsing and UrbIh D.\'Wlollnlant tot .ppllqallah
aubmlsslona lat Fad.ral....llhdll.
Ehler I'" foI/ow1r.sllnfctm1lllon:
Prolllaln: The HUO IUhdlng PI'Og~ ~bU Ira .JlP/yIng Under.
a:~PIIDllllt 'hate; Enter tn, .1l1O</n1 01 ftJod, or ....h oqU"'""tnt 01
~'no Cbt1Inbutkln, !Iou... conlnbullhg 10 }'<lit P"'I'Clt or program
.r sOllvillas.
"tdlrll.h.r.: EIller 11:, ItnbUIit at HUD IUndll'llU.re reejllnllng
with }'<lilt llPpllOlIlan.
8tat..hate: Elllelllll amoUr.tot~1 or oa.h '~ItIv.'entoll","klnd
l.rvIcaa lhe 8ltla II conlrlb~ to ~Ur proJlct 01 proQIIm 0'
acivItI...
Local 'hate: lint" the amount of funda or _h aqlllv._nlll! lit-
idhd _rille.. your local govemtnllll" conlIIbU~nlllO your ,",OJIQ 01
ptogl'l/n of ..uvlll".
OlIltt: Enle~ the IIl1O~ht of olhI~ IOUl'CIf of Pt1v_, hch'plllnt of
oth.~ futld, 01' oa", IllUI.","l fllI\.Jdhd all'Yk:N b,Ihg OOl1lrlbUlld
III )<Gbr proJ.ot or Ptogrorri of aclMlIea.
PIOlllm Inaom" Enl" tho ~ 01 ptogll/n It-.", you """,.t
to a....llt. .nd conllfbUto t.lhl'llIogtilhl DYtrlheUIII DfYOU'eWIII'd.
rolll: PI- lolIl '" eolumna .nd nIl In the .mount..
AUlf1"'''''d for Iotel r.producl'on
~.'
tDrlr. HUD-4%40M C1l2lXlOj
rof,OM. CI""",t A.ll12
.
.
.
g
~
~J
l:l)
~~
C J.<
.2.8
-
U
'18
Cgj
0,
ZH
I~
~g
IlIre
E~
.e
.E~
-
Ii
.
i
!II
..
o
~
J
III
~
o
~~
o
o
.
o
0'
of
"
ffii
<'II
;
tit!
,
5
&1 I
! I i
IIiE,1
ZI
I I
,
I '
i I gi
IJ~I ~,
' 'I 01
lfl'
! N!
i
I
I
i
1
-I
..,
I
'i :
~! ~!
ell
~ i !
j I i
~I I..
il. ,
5: !
i: .
ii,
~ lief
j
j
I
'I !
f.!! i
~~hi
.r~~-i
!! :
u '
!
I
,
,
,.
I'
'.-i ,
i I~ i
~ ! !fj~ ~
i IIf~l! ~ k
" ,,;: ~ 8:p.
'!' ~ 1.0:
i I~~
c: J .: j
I '
I ,
, !
I I
I :
N ; .; I
o
o
.
0'
o
o
.
o
lfl
N
,
gl g
. .
o 0\
o '<I'
co ~
N '"
.-i
.-i
<I>
..
co
lfl
.
I"-
<Xl
....
...il
I '
I .. I
'"
'<I'
.
I"-
o
'<I'
Ii
..
1
i
i
,
I
I
!
~I ..
~ I ~I ~
~f I ~I ~
~ . I .-il
.. le"l
i I I
.. I
I !
I
i
..
;
! '
~I ~I
~! ~:
"II "'I"
1;:1
,;
i '(1)-:
..
i
I,
I
I
..
i
I I
s/ ..I
I I
I I
I I
I I
I I
o
o
.
o
~I
Nj
i
i
I
. I
J I I 'I I
Ii! ill III II!
~ i lltll!!I,'JI~!
1i~llIij.dld 'd .1,..;1
.ilricXtd, Ii: I
c
o
.
o
~ ~
. z
co
'"
.-i
<II;
i
I
I
I .
i I
l j
./
~ I
o I
o
Ln ~l
ai z I
'" ,
.-i
(/);
I
;
,
~I ~I
It'll 0
,....: 0
w .
~l ~I
I 0,
i
I
I
I
! 01
01 01
ql 01
\Oi 01
It)l OJ
f'; ...
.',. 01
lfl'
.-i! ",I
<1>1
I
.
~
.'2
81
~I ~
.....1 ~
~; ~
l/JI . s
~I Ii E
~! ~ I 8,
'.-i! ~ I '0 I
; ..1~ldPli'
! ~I ~ llfl; !
J I :~i ill i i
I l! Iii i I i
~L .... I ~ I ....
'1' . I I . oJ
l1:li ~'...:: _ .-
I ;
i
j
j
I
I
!
!
~
i
~
r
!
i
..
11
~
I
""
is
,-
~c
~t
'0
...!
..0
~
.. I
!
11.
..
,
o
I
..
..
J
!J
h
j
OJ
~
.
J5
.
:!l
I
!l
I
.
~
.
~
~
o
85
~
~
~
.
6
, I I I
,
, '8~ i
,
I ! I 0
! !
0' i ....
! .
!\ .....~ I i I IX)
lfib i .....
\D
c: j... I I .
I H..... i .....
"" '"
; i
, , I
I .. , ..
, , !
,
II d> 1 '0
'81 I !....
i<!~ I :"c:O !':-,
~1 I 1 f"'o. .
....,. '...,.
<:: . I .
i:1 Hu!l I Ilt'l
1 I ,...,.
! .. ! ..
,
! , i !
i I
i i I
Ii ; I I I
I I
'" i I ! I
~! ! I I
I I
I , :
i , ! i
I
I .. 1 , i \ ..
;
, I I I i
, I
i '8~ i I
I I ; 0
'Ei i 0
II I .
.....0 I i 0
:'::0 J I 0
b"l I I , It'l
e; I , .
I HN I I I N
...,. ; ...,.
I !
I .. ! i I i ..
I I i i
; i I
I i
, ,
; I i
I J i
I I \ i
I , I j ,
, I [
, , i
i , i
, i
I I ,
! , I
i ;
, ,
i : I I
: , I
i , I I
I fa! I
,
i I
e, k' , I
f! 8! ,
, I
,
0.' &: !
~i , , I
,
I ! i J
ctj e1 1 I
~! I
01 ! i I
, .: i ; i
: ; :;j! I
; ~
II '8 -
0 -
a: -
B i .
! ! ...
i i ,..' I J
~
'lI
0 I ~, i !
z ! I
. I
u J
Ii I i
II i ,
I i I !l!
.!! ~ , ~ 2 ,,;
.
g
i
~
~
.
1
I
!
J
:.
.
Q
j
..
I I
I
. ~I
81
~I I
I .. N -, ../
~
J
.. J
'&
I
..!!
i fa
) J II
I J 0>
II. :!:l ~
I ! h
.. 11 ~
1 f '8
j ~ ~
J J if i'
i J i
!!:i !!!.ll
J
,
I
!
..
J
Jl
J
J
....
IX)
...,.
..
l!
-:2
Iii I
! ..,
....{i I 01
.. 01
J! ~I
It'll
",I
I
I
I
!
..
~
..I
I I
I J
I
!! I ...: I cD
I
!
!
i
I
I
I
:
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I! j
I ~ I
J .
i ~I I
~I!i! !
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
i
I
,
,
I
I
I
,
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
,
!
I
I..
!
i
i
!
i
,
,
I..
I
I
..
I
i
I
,
1
I
i
,
,
,
i
,
o
o
.
'"
...,.
'"
.
It'l
'"
..
~
~
~
.....
dO
It'l
~
:d
:3\
~
~
Ill.
"rol:
~:
{Il' 0>
.0;.<::
.....
~I~
~~,~
tl Ii,..
j~:.a
~ .
l::t I
'I
I
,
i
~i
~j
b
J
is
~-
...
,p
-!
$0
~lD
...:::Ii
",0
];
i
.g
.
l
o
o
.
o
o
o
.
o
It'l
'"
<I>
-I
.
:!l
I
j
l
Assurances-Nan-Construction Programs
OMBApprovaJ No. 0348-0040
Publicreportlng burden forthls collection ofinformation is ostimatad 10 ."""'ge 15 minulas per responsa. includinglhatimeforreviewing Inslnlctions, searching
existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the dats needed. and completing and reviewing Ule collection of information. Please do not return your
compl9lad form to the OffICe of Management and Budget; send it tu tho add...s provldad by the sponsoring agency .
Note: Certain of these assurances may not be applicable toyour project orprogram. If you have questions, please contact the awanling agency.
Further, certain Federal awarding agencies may require appli",nts to certify to additional assurances. If such is the case you will be notified
As the duly aulhorized representative of the applicant I ,', ,'ify that the applicant:
I. Has the legal authority to apply for Federal assistance,"e.! the (g) ~~ 523 and 527 of the Public Health Service Act ofl 912
institutional, managerial and financial capability (inck"ing (42 U.S.C. 290 dd-3 and 290 ee-3), as amended, relating to
funds sufficient to pay the non-Federal share Ofprojecl "J'IS) confidentiality of alcohol and drug abuse patient records;
to ensure properpJanning, management and completion ,Cthe (h) Title vm of the Civil Rights Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. ~
project described in this application. 3670] et seq.), as amended, relating to nondiscrimination
in the sale, rental or fmancing of housing; (i) any other
nondiscrimination provisions in the specific statute(s) un-
der which application for Federal assistance is being made;
and (j) the requirements of any other nondiscrimination
statute(s) which may apply to the application.
7. Will comply, or has already complied, with the require-
ments of Titles II and III of the Uniform Relocation
. Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of
]970 (P.L. 91-646) which provide for fair and equitable
treatment of persons displaced or whose property is ac-
quired as a result of Federal or federally assisted programs.
These requirements apply to all interests in resl property
acquired for project purposes regardless of Federal partici-
pation in purchases.
.
2. Will give the awarding agency, the ComptrollerGenof'~: of
the United States, and ifappropriate, the State, througl; ',ny
authorized representative, access to and the right to ex"",ine
all records, books, papers, or documents related to the
award; and will establish a proper accounting sysk", in
accordance with generally accepted accounting stanJJlds
or agency directives.
3. Will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using
their positions for a purpose that constitutes or presents (he
appearance of personal or organizational conflict of interest,
or personal gain.
4. Will initiate and complete the work within the applic.ole
time frame after receipt of approval of the awarding
agency.
.5.
Will comply with the Intergovernmental Personnel Act of
1970 (42 U.S.C. ~~ 4728-4763) relating to prescribed stan-
dards for meri[ systems for programs funded under one of [he
nineteen statui" or regulations specified in Appendix A of
OPM's StanwllCS for a Merit System of PeDlonnel Adminis-
tration (5 C.F.K. 900, Subpart F).
6. Will comply with all Federal statutes relating to nondis-
crimination. These include but are not limited to: (a) Tille
VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (P.L. 88-352) which
prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color or
national origin; (b) Title IX of the Education Amendments
of 1972, as amended (20 U.S.C. ~~ 1681-1683, and 1685-
1686), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex;
(c) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended (29 U.S.C. ~ 794), which prohibits discrimina-
tion on the basis of handicaps; (d) the Age Discrimination
Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. ~~ 6101-6107), which
prohibits discrimination on the basis of age; (e) the Drug
Abuse Office and Treatment Act of ] 972 (p.O. 92-255), as
amended, relating to nondiscrimination on the basis of
drug abuse; (I) the Comprehensive Alcohol Abuse and
Alcoholism Prevention, Treatment and Rehabilitation Act
of 1970 (P.L. 91-616), as amended, relating to nondis-
crimination on the basis of alcohol abuse or alcoholism;
PrevioUs Ecfitions Usable
8. Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the
Hatch Act (5 U.S.C. ~~ 1501-1508 and 7324-7328) whicb
limit the po]itical activities of employeea whose principal
employment activities are funded in whole or in part with
Federal funds.
9. Will comply, as applicable, with the provisions of the
Davis-Bacon Act (40 U.S.C. ~~ 276a and 276a-7), the
Copeland Act (40 U.S.C. ~ 276c and 18 U.S.C. if 874), and
the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40
U.S.C. U 327-333), regarding labor standards for feder-
ally assisted construction subagreements.
10. Will comply, if applicable, with flood insurance purchase
requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Pro-
tection Act of 1973 (p.L. 93-234) which requires recipients
in a special flood hazard area to participate in the program
and to purchase flood insurance if the total cost of insur-
able construction and acquisition is $10,000 or morc.
II. Will comply with environmental standards which may be
prescribed pursuant to the following: (a) institution of .
environmental quality control measures under the Na-
tional Environmental Policy Act of1969 (P.L. 9] _ I 90) and
Executive Order (EO) 11514; (b) notification ofvio]ating
facilities pursuant to EO I 1738; (c) protection of wetlands
pursuant to EO I] 990; (e) evaluation of flood hazards in
flood plains in accordance with EO I 1988; (e) assurance of
Page 1 of2
Authorized for Local ROProductlon
SF-424B (Rev. 4/92)
Prescribed by OMB Clrt:ular A-I 02
.
project consistency with the approved State management
program developed under the Coastal Zone Management
Act of 1972 (16 U.S.C. ~~ 1451 et seq.); (f) conformity of
Federal actions to State (Clear Air) Implementation Plans
under Section 176(c) of the Clear Air Act of 1955, as
amended (42 U.S.C. ~ 7401 et seq.); (g) protection of
underground sources of drinking water under the Safe
Drinking Water Act of 1974, as amended, (P.L. 93-523);
and (h) protection of endangered species under the Endan-
gered Species Act of 1973, as amended, (P.L. 93-205).
12. Will comply with the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 1968
(16 U.S.C. ~~ 1271 et seq.) related to protecting compo-
nents or potential components of the national wild and
scenic rivers system.
13. Will assist the awarding agency in assuring compliance with
Section 106 of the national Historic PreservationActof1966,
as amended (16 U.S.C. 470), EO 11593 (identification and
protection of historic properties), and the Archaeological and
Historic Preservation Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. 469a-1 et seq.).
S~Mtu;.Tt--d~7!_O~~-
~r!dl~LffJ1f .~"-
Applicant Organization --.-----------.......-
14. Will comply with P.L. 93-348 regarding the protection of
human subjects involved in research, development, and
related activities supported by this award of assistance.
IS. Will comply with the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of
1966 (P.L. 89-544, as amended, 7 U.S.C. 2131 et seq.)
pertaining to the care, handling, and treatment of warm
blooded animals held for research, teaching, or other
activities supported by this award of assistance.
16. Will comply with the Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Preven-
tionAct(42 U.S.C. ~~4801 et seq.) wbichprohibits the use
of lead based paint in construction or rehabilitation of
residence structures.
17. Will cause to be performed the required financial and
compliance audits in accordance with the Single Audit Act
of1984 or OMB CircuJarNo. A-133, Audits oflnstitutions
of Higher Learning and other Non-profit Institutions.
18. Will comply with all applicable requirements of all other
Federal laws, executive orders, regulations and policies
governing this program.
Title
g~. 1/. P.
. /-t-FI'Z.
t:::>JONfJt!rt. ~,~
Dille Submitted
o If '/&1
.
Previous Editions Usable
Page 2 of2
Authorlzod for Local Reproduction
SF-G4B (Rev. 4192)
Prescribed by OMB Circular A-l02
Applicant/Recipient
Disclosure/Update Report
U.S. Departmenl ci Housing
and Urban Development
C,,:O:' . 'i', 'Jval No. 2510-0011 (exp.3/3112003)
.
Instructions. (See Public Reporting Statement and Privacy Act Statement and detail." :"! ,!\Jctlons on page 2.)
Applicant/Recipient Information Indlcaie whether this Is an Inlll.; R, ,."rt 0 or an Update Report 0
,. AppUcanl/Reciplent Name, Ad-', and Phone (i1c1ude area code): 2. SocIal SeaJrtty Number or
W'll' F McCl S V' Pre' 'd t 925-244-1600 Employ8rlDNumber.
1 1am. ure, r. 1ce S1 en
(A, F..Evans Ccmpany, Inc. for APE-Pioneer AsSOCiates, L.P. 68-0453130
3. Huop2J~~i GaayeR PI., Ete. 149, ban RameR, 0'. 94583 4. AmountofHUDAssIstance
RequestedIRece/ved
,~..--..~.,.""
New Approach Anti -On ug Program
'~
5. State the name and location <_I a dress, City and Statal of the projector activity:
Pioneer Park Plaza, 560 N. F St. & 555 N. G st., San l3emardinS.
Part I Threshold Determinations
1. Are you applying for a..lslanes for a specif'oc project or acllvUy? The
tenns do nol Include fonnula grents, such as public housi1g operaUng
subsidy or CDBG block grants. (For further Inlonnation sea 24 CFR
Sec. 4.3).
[;I Vea
CA 92410
DNo
2. Have you received or do you expecllo receive asslalanes wUhln the
jUrisdiction of the Department (HUD) ,involving the project or activity i1
this application, in exce.. or $200,000 during this fiscal year (Oct. 1 .
Sap. 30)? For further Information, see 24 CFR Sec. 4.9
Dyes Q No.
If you answered 'No' to either question 1 or 2, Stop! You do not need to complete the remainder of this fonn.
However, you must sign the certlllcation at the end of the report.
Part II Other Government Assistance Provided or Requested I Expected Sources and Use of Funds.
Such esslstance Includes, bulls not IImltad 10, any grant, loan, subsidy, guarantee, Insurance, payment, credit, or tax benefit
DepartmenllSlate/local Agency Name and Address Type of Assistance Amount Expected Uses of the Funds
ReouastadlProvided
. (Note: Use Addlllonal peges hecessary.) ....
Part III Interested Parties. You must disclose:
1. All developers, oontractors, or consultants Involved In the application for the assistance or In the planning, development, or Implementation of the
project or ectivlty end
2. any other person who has a flnenclallnlareatln the project or activity for which the a..lstance Is sought that exceads $50,000 or 10 percent of the
assistance (whichever Is lower).
Alphabetical list of an persons _ a reportable financial Type of Participation In -
Social Security No. AnancIaJ Intarest In
inte...t in the project or ecUvUy (For Individuals. give the last or Employee 10 No. ProjecVActivUy ProjectlAcllvlty ($ and %)
nameflrst)
I
I
I
,
i
,
.--..
(Note: Use Addlllonal pages n necessary.)
Certification
Warning: n you knowingly make a fal.. slatement on this form, : ,',' may be subject.., civil or criminal ponalllee under SectIon 1001 of Title 18 01 the
Untted States Code. In addtuon. any person who knowingly and i!, :,; .>fisHy vi:)lates any required disclosures of Informatlon,lnduding Intentional non.
dlsciosure, Is subject 10 civil money peneUy nollo exceed $10,OC'.. '-' each violation.
I cartIfy that th etion Is lrue end complete.
Signature:
I Oata~ (7;~ /
.
Form HUD-2880 (3/99)
.
,
Rating Factor.
.
.
P.5
.
P.6
Rating Factor 1.
.
.
.
P. 7
TIle AFE.ploneer Asaocl.. LP. and Partne..'
Downtown NAAD Program for San Bernardino, California.
RAnNG FACTOR :t. Capacity of Applicant and Relevant Organizational Experlenca
(1) The epplicant's 8dmlni&tnlUw ~ lD Implemont 1helVent (5 pIS)
.
AFE-Pioneer Associates, owners of Pioneer Park Plaza, a HUD assisted residence
for seniors and disabled persons in Downtown San Bernardino, is the lead agent
for the proposed Downtown New Approach Anti-Drug Program. AFE-Pioneer AssJ;
ciates is a limited partnership, the general partner of which is the A. F. Evans
Company, Inc. (EVANS). As the general partner EVANS has the authority to make
contacts and applications on behalf of AFE-Ploneer Associates, L P. (See organ-
izational chart next page). .
EVANS develops and manages residential communities that provide exceptional
living environments. Evans Property Management, Inc. (EPMI) a wholly owned
subsidiary of EVANS, manages most of Its properties (See organizational chart
next page). EVANS has market value assets of $48,272,033. Its operating
budget is $ 5,513,900. The operating budget of Its management branch, Evans
Property Management, Inc. is $1,612,447. As of April 30, 2001, the A. F. Evans
Company, Inc. had 452 employees, including staff from Evans Property Manage-
ment, Inc. The A. F. Evans Company, Inc. has ownership interest in a total of 30
properties in California, Washington, and Nevada with a total of 4,802 units. Ap-
proximately, 1,818 are market rate units and 2,063 are subsidized in some form.
Of the subsidized units, 931 are subsidized by HUD and 2,063 are subsidized un-
der the Federal Tax Credit Program and/or the Califomla Regional Housing Con-
struction Program.
In addition, our management division, EPMI, administers funds for 40 properties,
including 19 properties subsidized by HUD. The Accounting Department of Evans
Property Management, Inc.-the entity that would administer the Downtown New
Approach Anti-Drug Program funds-ronsists of a ChIef Financial Officer and 11
accountants or accounts payable managers.
.
Two main staff members will be assigned to the Program to see that spending is
kept within the program budget, that funds are properly allocated to the program
partners, that draw-down is carried out correctly and in a timely fashion, and that
accounting for grant funds and any matching resources are in accordance with
OMS administrative requirements. These are: the Chief Financial Officer; and the
Accountant for Pioneer Park Plaza.
.
P.9
AFE-Pioneer Associates
Limited Partnership
A. F. Evans Company
General Partner d
AFE-~ AssocIates
Art Evans, PlesIdent
Lend Lease Corpondjon
Umlted Partner
Evans Property Management, Inc.
Bill Mcaure, PresIdent
Acaluntlng Department
Joe Goralka, Chief financial OtIlcer
Property Supervision Department
Angela Spencer, Ass't General Manager
.
Accountant
Meaghan Gum
Property SuP8lVlsor
Kathl Breeden
Proc/am D1nlClDr
Susan L Phillips
AFE-Ploneer Associates, Limited Partnership:
Organizational Structure
Three main staff members will ensure that the program is carried out correctly and
that evaluation is properly Implemented: the Assistant General Manager, Property
Supervisor; and the Regional Program Director.
.
AFE-Pioneer Associates, in conjunction with the A. F. Evans Company, Inc. and Ev-
ans Property Management , Inc. anticipates that Its usual internal systems--
including budgeting; drawing down; allocating funds; and accounting for grant
funds and matching funds-will be both effective and In total accordance with OMS
administrative requirements. Our internal communication system Includes: regu-
lar monthly written reports by property and building program staff on the o~olng
activities and regular meetings for the coordination of partnerships. Oversight of
weekly check requests and disbursement of funds by higher levels of management
.
P.lO
assures proper expenditure of grant funds according to grant budgets. Our sys-
tem of coordination amongst property, program staff and fIScal staff ensures the
timely completion of fIScal and program reports. Regular communication amongst
program partners, residents, and HUD will be In effect to report progress, to fur-
ther develop programs, and/or to make budget revisions. In addition to sound fIS-
cal management, EMPI's property supervisors monitor grant funds, in conjunction
with the Property Manager and the Program Director, to assure that the company
consistently meets or exceeds its grant objectives.
2. a. (5 pts) & b. (4 pts) Identlfy~urperticlpatlon In HUD grants In the 1ast3~rs.
.
The A. F. Evans Company, the general partner of AFE-Pioneer Associates, has suc-
cessfully participated In the following HUD grant programs in the past three years:
2()()(}.2001-A $283,000 award to Mercy Housing California to develop 7 inter-
connected two of our Properties-201 Turk Street Apartments and O'Farrell Tow-
ers. The planned grant activities for the NAAD grant in San Francisco are similar
in nature to the proposed grant activities for San Bernardino. The NAAD grant for
the Tenderloin neighborhood of San Francisco grant is in its first half-year; the
company is in good standing in terms of gathering bids for expenditures and r&-
porting for this grant No money has as yet been drawn down.
AFE-Associates, L P., having only acquired Pioneer Park Plaza In November of
2000, has not yet, until this this application, requested nor been awarded a
grant
Note that two of our partners in the Proposed Downtown San Bernardino New Ap-
proach Anti-Drug Program have partnered extensive/y-the San Bernardino Police
Department and the San Bernardino District Attorneys Office. The A. F. Evans
Company has been a partner in a New Approach Anti-Drug Program along with
the Police Department and the District Attorney's OffIce in San Francisco.
3. (6_pts)
Strength at _roe commitment (staff time, money, or other lISSels); skills each perty wUI bring
to help SUccessfully Implement prog,am & firmness at commitment
(8) Identllication of skIll8l18C1l MOll perw will bring 10 the prOll/1lm
AFE-Pioneer Associates, L P. will bring its program development skills to the pro-
gram, its ability to allocate funds to the various partners, and its ability to report
in a timely fashion. .
.
The San Bernardino Police Department will bring its experience in working di-
rectly with crime in the target neighborhood, and its experience in working with
.
P. 11
Pioneer Park Plaza
A. F. Evans Company, Inc.
St. Bernadine Plaza
St. Bernadine Plaza. Inc.
San Bernardino
Police Department
San Bernardino
District AtIomey's Offlce
San Bernadino Park, Recreation
and Community Services,
FIfth Street Senior Center
San Bernardino Unified
School District,
San Bernardino Adult School
.
Adult Education Teacher
San BemardlnoAdult School
San Bernardino Police Dept.
Crime Pm.entIon SpecIalist
Une. of Authority Amongst Partners In the
San BernardIno Downtown New Approach AnU-Drug Program
2. a. (5 PIS) " b. (4 PIS) Identify ~ particlP8llcn In HUD.,.,...1n the Ia&t 3 years.
The A. F. Evans Company, the general partner of AFE-Pioneer Associates, has
SUccessfully participated in the following HUD grant programs In the past three
years:
2000-2001-A $283.000 award to Mercy Housing Califomia to develop 7 inter-
connected Neighborhood Network Centers. Approximately $30,000 of this over-
all award was assigned to the Tenderloin CQllaborative Technology Center of
which A. F. Evans is a member. We are in good standing with our collaborative
partners in expenditures and funding for this grant
.
.
P.12
2oo1-2oo1-A $250.000 award to Chinatown Community Development Center for
a New Approach Anti-Drug grant for the Tenderloin Neighborhood of San Francisco.
CA. $29,500 of this total award was designated to security-related capital expendi-
tures for two of our Propertielr-201 Turk Street Apartments and O'Farrell Towers.
The planned grant activities for the NAAD grant in San Francisco are similar in na-
ture to the proposed grant activities for San Bernardino. The NAAD grant for the
Tenderloin neighborhood of San Francisco grant Is in its first half-year; the com-
pany is in good standing in teRnS of gathering bids for expenditures and reporting
for this grant No money has as yet been drawn down.
AFE-Pioneer Associates, LP.. having only acquired Pioneer Park Plaza in November
of 2000, has not yet requested nor received a grant
Note that two of our partners in the proposed Program-the San Bernardino Police
Department and the San Bernardino District Attorney's Office-have partnered ex-
tensively. The A. F. Evans Company has been a partner in a New Approach Anti-
Drug Program. along with the San Francisco Police Department and the San Fran-
cisco District Attomey's Office.
.
3. (6 PIS) Strength of commitment staff time, money or other assets; skills each parl;y wDI bring ...
(s) Identification of skill each MOU party will bring to the prog,am.
AFE-Pioneer Associates, L P. will bring its program development skills to the pro-
gram. Its ability to keep accounts of funds allocated to the various partners, and its
ability to report in a timely fashion.
The San Bemardino Police Department will bring its extensive experience in work-
ing with crime prevention in the target neighborhood and its experience in working
directly with the management of the Greyhound Bus Depot, which Is a center of
criminal activity In the area around the two target properties.
The San Bemardino District Attomey's Office will bring its many years of experi-
ence in working with the San Bemardino Police Department to the proposed pro-
gram.
(b) E\IlcIence of your MOO parlnln and project ........... prHllPIication RJIe in de\IeIopi,. the plan and pro-
SII8CIiwlIOIe In the procram 1mpI_n.
.
Staff of AFE-Pioneer Associates. L P. initiated communications with the San Ber-
nardino Police Department and with the San Bemardino D. A.'s Office duting April
2001. Communications with the San Bernardino Police Department, resulted in
almost immediate advice about the type of security Improvements they would rec-
ommend for Pioneer Park Plaza and for Sf. Bernadine Plaza. At that time the San
.
P.13
Bernardino Police Department also submitted crime statistics to be included in the
application, advised staff of AFE-Pioneer Associates of their previous participation
in another NAAD grant, and offer to act as the liaison following up on our initial
communication with the D. A's office. They also at that time began to consider
what type of augmentation of police services would have the most impact over a
two year period. The prospective role of the Police Department will be to Increase
both car and bike patrols around the target housing developments and to provide
educational workshops. The role of the D. A's office will be to provide personnel
to process the expected Increase in arrests due to the additional patrols.
.
The roles of other partners-namely, St Bemadine Corporation, the fifth Street
Senior Center (Administered through the Park and Recreation Department), and
the San Bernardino Adult School (Administer through the San Bemardino Unified
School District) was defined during meetings held in May of 2001. St Bemadine
Plaza, Inc. will contribute to the partnership by installing improved security fea-
tures to their buildings and by overseeing outreach to residents of their buildings
advising them of planned safety, drug abuse, and to crime prevention workshops.
The Fifth Street Senior Center will house the improved computer center, while the
San Bemardino Adult School will staff that facility. The Fifth Street Senior Center
will provide space for our educational workshops in personal safety, crime preven-
tion, and drug abuse awareness.
Meetings were also held in May with residents of The Pioneer Park Plaza, St Ber-
nadine's Plaza, and with members of the San Bemardino Senior Citizens Center to
advise them of the availability of the grant funds and to seek their recommenda-
tions on the type of security and safety measures needed in the neighborhood.
(See samples of resident crime perception surveys and letters (Following Needs!
Extent of Problem Section).
(e) Indication of the ~ of the ~ hoU&ing d8WlIopmeo,b;, CIWn8lllhip 8nd IIl8rl8pment (bEed on
available mar...ment reviews by .....mlng public enUlies) to unclwmke their ohare of f1lSIlClNIlblllly.
Both AFE-Pioneer Associates, L P. (owners of Pioneer Park Plaza) and St Bema-
dine Corporation have more than sufficient capacity to undertake their roles of in-
stalling capital improvements In their respective buildings, of informing residents
of meetings related to the program activities, and of keeping accurate accounts
and reporting in a timely fashion. Note: Since AFE-Pioneer Associates only ac-
quired Pioneer Park Plaza in November of 2000, it has not yet received a manage-
ment review.
(d) The win..... of the unit of local C<Nernment to use Its prosecutor's olIices as Its Ieed "ll8f1CY In Impla-
msnting the srant.
.
The D. A's Office will not be acting as the lead agency in implementing the grant;
rather AFE-Pioneer Associates will be the lead agency. The D. A.'s Office will be a
partner in the grant
.
P.14
(e) Participation of additional pertnelS other than those requlredtoslgn MOIls.
St Bemardine Corporation will contribute to the Downtown NAAD Program by utiliz-
ing grant funds to improve security on their property. These improvements will in-
volve security cameras/monitor systems and lighting. The Fifth Street Senior Cen-
ter provide meeting space and room for the upgraded neighborhood computer
center. The San Bernadino Adult School will instruction for some of the educa-
tional WOrkshops and all of the instruction for the computer center on services re-
spectively to the Downtown NAAD Program.
(f) Effectlwness of the PIIrtnefshlp 8lrUcture.
.
The proposed partnership structure Is thought to be highly effective in that each
partner brings with it a component of a coordinated crime fighting strategy: AFE-
Pioneer Associates. L P. brings security improvements to the buildings and
grounds of Pioneer Park Plaza and outreach to residents; 5t Bemadine Corpora-
tion brings security improvements to the buildings and grounds of St Bernadine's
Plaza and outreach to residents; The San Bernardino Police Department's Division
D brings increased increase patrols and crime prevention work shops; the San
Bernardino District Attorney's Office provides personnel to process the increase
volume of prosecution due to the expected increased arrests; the Senior Citizen's
Center brings outreach to neighborhood seniors other than those residing at the
two target housing developments; and the &In Bernardino Adult School brings its
computer center and expertise in educating adults.
.
.
P.14a
Staff Members Involved in the Mana2ement of the Grant Pro2ram and Funds
An2ela Soencer. Assistant General Manaeer-has been with the company for 2
years. She has over 15 years experience in housing and property management
Her role will be to oversee the entire program and to act as the liaison to the ao-
counting department
.
Kathi Breeden. Southem Califomia Prooertv Suoervisor-has been with the com-
pany for 8 years. Her role will be to : (a) monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of
security capital improvements to the two target housing developments; (b) work
directly with the police and DA's Office on identifying problem spots in the
neighborhood and helping to craft community policing strategies along G Street in
the area adjacent to the bus depot; (c) assist in coordinating regular bi-monthly
educational sessions on personal safety, crime prevention and drug abuse aware-
ness-in conjunction with the San Bemardino Adult School and the San Bemar-
dino Police Department; (d) coordinate, in conjunction with the Program Director;
quarterly planning meetings; and (e) oversee the improvement and use of the
San Bemardino Senior Centers Computer leaming Center to further the educa-
tion, heaith, and well-being of persons living in the neighborhood.
Susan L Phillios. Regional Pro2ram Director-has been with the Company for 7.75
years; she has worked to develop and implement programs to enhance the
safety, well-being, and self-sufficiency of low and very-low Income residents for 10
years. She has over 5 years experience in writing grant applications and monthly,
quarterly, and annual reports for city, state, and federal grant programs. Her role
will be to assist the Property Supervisor implement, coordinate and oversee the
Program and to do the written reports.
Joe Goralka. Chief Financial Officer-has been with the company for 10 months.
He is a CPA and has over 20 years experience in administering funds, including
grant funds. His role will be to guarantee that the grant expenditures are In accor-
dance with proper accounting procedures and that they are in accordance with
OMB requirements.
.
Mea2ham Gum. Ar.r.nuntant-has been with the Company for 1 years and has
worked as an accountant managing housing and program funds for 7 years. Her
role will be to drawdown and disburse the grant funds, as well as to ensure that all
expenditures are made in accordance with proper accounting procedures.
Meaghan currently does the accountants for properties with operating budgets
amounting to $4,776,209 in total.
.
P.15
Rating Factor 2. Need! Extent of the Problem
.
.
.
P.16
Rating Factor 2. Need/Extent of the Problem
Since the closure of Norton Air Force Base in the 19805, San Bernardino has
never fully recovered its economic base; crime-especially, drug-related crime-has
sprung up to fill an economic vacuum. For example, the San Bernardino Police
Department's Crime Analyst has supplied official crime statistics for the last three
months for which data is available-february 1. 2001 to April 30, 2001. During
this period. in our target Downtown neighborhood, there have been:
No murders; 5 rapes; 45 robberies; 67 cases of aggravated assault; 98 burglar-
ies; 230 cases of larceny; and 74 cases of grand theft auto. The magnitude of the
problem becomes apparent once the size of the neighborhood is considered: 1.9
miles by 1.3 miles.
Note that Type II crime data is not kept by the San Bernardino Police Department.
.
Also the SBPD Crime Analyst has provided statistics for this same period-February
1. 2001 to Apnl 30,2001-for a 9-square block area around the crime infested bus
depot and the two target properties. In this latter area, there were: no cases of
rape or murder; 10 cases of rObbery; 6 cases of aggravated assault; 13 cases of
burglary; 38 cases of larceny; and 9 cases of grand theft auto.
The need for a crime prevention program in this area is urgent as there are 345
vulnerable seniors and younger disabled persons living in the two target housing
developments, as well as innumerable seniors visiting the adjacent Fifth Street
Senior Center.
(See Data Summary from the San Bernardino Police Department
and maps showing exact locations of crimes following)
(2) Othercrimedata
Staff of AFE-Pioneer Associates, L P. conducted discussion sessions with and dis-
tributed Crime and Nuisance Perceptions Surveys to residents of Pioneer Park
Plaza, St. Bemardine Plaza, and members of the Fifth Street Senior Center. That
over 600 questionnaires were returned is evidence In itself of a strong concern
about crime in the area. Of the 600 returned, 444 were returned in time to be
analyzed. Results showed that fully 74% of the respondents (considering agree
and strongly agree answers together) considered the area dangerous. Note that
the first question was reversed for analysis.
.
(See summary table of questionnaire results, sample questionnaire, and letters
from residents, following)
.
.
Type of Crime Area "0" RO 51040
Murder 0 0
Rape 5 0
Robbery 45 10
Aggravated Assault 67 6
Burglary 98 13
Larceny 230 38
Grand !heft Auto 74 9
Total 519 76
San Bemard",o Police Departm.nt Crlm. AnalYSIs un.t- K.". 6/18/2001)
Crime Statistics for Area "0" & RO 51040
February 1 - April 30, 2001
The following Infonn.Uon Ia obtained from the STAT scroon within the Records Managem.nt System IRMS). Thla
Is tho acreen UIId to compile tho numbo.. that .,. ..ported to tho stall on a monthly bools. The numbor of
unfound.d crlm.. may be sllghBy higher than IIatod h.... but not ltaUsUcally Ilgnlflcant .nough to affect tho
parcontagos ..ported. If a crime II unfounded In the month that II reported then that InfonnsUon Is ntfloctod
h.... If the crime Ia unfoundad In eny othar month than tho one Itla reported In thon the STAT screen Ia not
modffiad to reflect that InfonnaUon but tho RMS sylllm lubtracts It from tha total ..ported to tho atate for tho
cu.....nt reporting month.
.
~ I I -1iraj IlJ I IiJrn
! I l~ ''; I tc '~~ .... ~"
IT'" 0 .1h.~"; f1
'\; \' .....:" ,'....' " 0" ~.,,~
.. -I """i5'L~~ -:
o ., J kt, t: '-''''' ".,' ,,,,, RO" f,d ":d " .. u ~ ,
~ I;;CJ" -'- U", ',',Y.""'... "Y""-'lIIIi ,
-""Mllit 1'1,,;;.: ,t; W:l", ":i:~ :' -'-I "" l"f, 'T '
~ri),2i1mLl ~i<: ...... ~FI'" ,.:
..13IK. ..,c. ~\.. 'Tic c." c.... :f:i~ ____\CI.lA~ Wi:. ~N~I;'
:,"7:",,,,,;, ",""IC ry "i'. '" ""'" ,,'_, ~I'
,,> , "', '..,
e ~~"''''o'',,, ~"'"","" L e.
1 ' ''':.. I" "'co" "'""""",, =_, .
c ""'01 <"i/I hi. '" 1'1 '.'-" ,'r L '" =, ,"':",
" " >>," Ir, '::'::'e At ,.i l:. ,_ .
..... , , .' " 'e. .... ,::, ;,!, '
> r- - ("ID'l"'i.I:,;:';. ;,;10 ~"rt ' . .1
...., ." "s., "IGII.. I';~;'" ., .'
,-. '-,"", ..' u :~~,~~ :'';: '
r~H.ILdL""~ "'i'[6,":
' llH -" ~"", .
. I ',;>
I." " ~I~' ni
il ,;, "IS:';: ~" ,.,"" JIDi ~
::J' . ,c.: , " ; <.Jil
I 1.:.,.... AI -ll 1--::
r .... 1...0 : ~N
' ':' 'tr-
y I" r' .. _ .
.... .... I . .... ..:::cOURt....
,J.''':L ~"'"",,, .:"" I '....
F":c~""""'K, '.' '.'. e., .L "
."-),- ' , ,'7, _ '
;J' .
..JlWA . ...KlIG'
!: - 1.:11 .~ ... ....
,_m r ~ '", 1..1. ""'"
IBEll C I I
I. -' ...:.
~
,tmi
T
8
c
I
. 7TH
D
J:l-fIIl
.'AI ~
I
:
;
K, ! r
917/00 E
r.
.
J
.~.
-
1_. B'Iin.' Lu DI&.\~
'ICIlfe: vt ru .
I
.
-,
-.,.
...
-..
.
.
.
"-
.
..
.
-
I
==~Ii'lmJ
I
City of San Bernardino
Reporting Districts
.....-.......-.... ".
3j
::J
f '1
I J DRUCE
I
I.
~ 51040
V or
[
. .
..
:3 ~
~ 2ND
]
~ ~
'ALTO
I
h__L.
.
-
1
0
-
Legend
Part 1 Crimes
. II'" - fIii -
~ .....- . ----
CD - - -
--... 0 -.....
R - ...... -
* -- Vii Col_
.. -- .. ClTAQ/T
~ - .. C1TAIlOC
~ County RD's
~ County Areas
Area Comnumds
t~~~~~ ADAM
BAKER t
..~';~~~;" CHARLIE
~r:. .:\:T....
- DAVID
.. EDWARD
. .
- SBIA
.
.
iMail Map Suggestions to:CG/S
-'
...
h_
...
I{
~~
IS
i
,
i
I
----..--
1---- .
-
1
o
Legend
Pllrt 1 Crime.
,. ~ At........
~ -- .-
(D--. ......,....
.......--... 0 ~.,...
- -
CIIIII-.. ii9 c....
R
*
.. c............ .. GTMM
. -
@ C.""yRD's
_ CoIllllyA_
Area Co_nt/s
'.:iflfi~'~ ADAM
BAKER
CilARLIE
... GTMIiC
-
.,.
..
+
DAVID
EDWARD
SBIA
,
\
\
\
\
,
i
I Part 1 Crimes
I August 7th to August 20th, 2000
S
I
I
~
cl
I
I
I
----..
Legend
P_rt 1 Crimes
, AI-. tiI---..
I!i __ ._
0;_ __
....-- ii 0..".1'-'1
R..... .........
*...- liij '"-
lit ~""'-- .. OTAOlIt
w..... .. GTM!C
@ County RD'o
_ County A....
Area Commallds
.-:~~:.j$t ADAM
BAKER +
:<~!l.~~ CHARLIE
I!J8 DAVID
.. EDWARD
- SBlA
Part 1 Crimes
August 14 to August 27,2000
,
\
\
\
\
, ,
L~
Email Map Suggestions to: eGIS
Ih-
~
,
---..,
;~
--E
,
; ,
i .
-!
,
!
r-
Legend
Part 1 Crimes
". ~ &........
ilr/ __ ._
1Ji_ __
.............. 0 0..,,...
. - -
* -- Iii Co_
.. 0........... .. OTIQIf
........ .. OTAIIIC
@ C_RD'.
- eo...,. A_
Area COmmands
ADAM
BAKER t
CIlARUE
- DAVID
.. EDWARD
,
. SBJA 1_-
-j
.~
\ .
.. -----
.---.
I Part 1 Crimes
,
r August 28 to September 10, 2000
i
Email Map SUggestions to: eGIS
-----L-
'------..----
1-
--..--1--.__1
I :
~
,
----.
E:S,
------..---..
'---1
,
r-
Legend
PIIrt 1 Crimes
,. - . -
19 -- . -
[j - - -
-- II --
R - ., -
* -- OJ "'-
I. -- .. ......
II - .. ......
~ County RD',
_ CountyA_
Al'ell CO_lid.
..,,;>'....,
'i-:{r~.\~; ADAM
~(,:[iit, BAKER +
.... CllARLlE
~ DAVID
- EDWARD
. SBIA
----
\
'---
,
i
II Part 1 Crimes
August 21 to September 3, 2000
,
---..--.... '--'--
Emsil Map Suggestions to: CGli:
Q>
, ,
, ,
I ,
~
,
;--j
, .
--E
Legend
Part 1 Crimes
'....... fii.........
I'!l __ ._
(I.,. .....-...
--..w..- ii ....ThoII
R _ _
* -- p;;j Co_
.. 0.-............. .. 0TA0ur
if.-... .. OTAllIC
@ CountyRD's
_ CountyA_
Ares COmmands
ADAM
.
BAKER +
CHARLIE
.. DAVID
.. EDWARD
- SBIA
._----....
..----'
. ,
-;---_.~
I
I Part 1 Crimes
i September 4 to September 17, 2000
,
!
~.
-- --..-, ..---- --'-- .
--.
Email Map Suggestions to: eGIS
l~f-1r
. ----;---
,
I Part 1 Crimes
,
l September 10 To September 24
EmaiJ MaD Sunn...'"",.. 6.... ^_..
r-----j
: I
Legend
"'n 1 Crim..
'1lIIloool ......
a __ ._
cD....., ~.....
~---- 0 ......1'-'1
"- -
* -- IiOl <w_
.. ~"'-- .. lIT*lUT
if "'- .. lITNlIC
* C_RD'.
_ COlmIy A_
AUtlCD_tIs
ADAM
..
-.-,
~;i'it!~
..
BAKER
CHARLIE
DAVID
EDWARD
SBIA
-'~----:
Ql
---.~
----0
+
~
I
---
--.-.-.---
-,
I
L._~
c----j
-----(9
f---
i
.<@
Legend
Part 1 CrimM
,.. - OJ -
III -- . -
(i - - -
-- ii --
R - -
* -- j;i "'-
.. -- - "'-
w - - "'....
* C"""'YRD'.
_ C"""'YA....
Ar"4 ComnralUh
'!~1~1;' ADAM
~g'e:t~ BAKER +
CHARLIE
4ID DAVID
. EDWAAD
~ SBIA
_n______ "__,
"'- -----.:.-1
.'--'--.-
/- ------
, Part 1 Crimes
,
!
....---..--.--.-.... ..
September 18 To October 1,2000
Em.il MAn "'''''''''1__.. 6.. ~"'11"l
J , .
~--~. '
'.. '-__---l
,
;--,
I
K!)-
I
I
;
i
i
,
,
I
-..-t
-;
,
i-
fj-
..----
+1
, I
I
I I
Legend
Part 1 Crt",..
,. - .
-
1'/ -- . -
CD - - -
-- 0 --
R - -
* ""'- Pi! ..-
. -- - ..-
f - - ..-
~ CountyRl>'s
_ CountyA_
Arc" eo""""".
;'iF;", ADAM
~~~ BAKER
CIlARLIE
... DAVID
.. EDWARD
C
t ,_._M< S81A
.._----..;
+
t~~=-
,-'
;
I Part 1 Crimes
September 25 To October 8, 2000
Eml" MID SUlIllMII",,_ 11'\' ~nl.
---..--.------ .".
.....---,
! I
-.- -..'---. .._---j-,
; I
... .---T--+-~
: j !
!'_.--1--+l i
i . !
-
._.__.t;__..t~____.;_ .____.:
--_.--:
I
t-----.-
--.-..-..-.-..
r - .. -
I!l -- . --
Qi - - -
--- D --
R - "-
-I< -- i<I ~-
'. -- .. "'....
;; - h OTNl!C
>09- County RD's
- County Aras
Area COmmands
ADAM
BAKER +
CHARLIE
DA VID
EDWARD
SBIA
!
;
---!
i
,
_.i_..
!
.
\
....!
~"-.._- -...--...--.----
.----.....-...-.-
:~
! Part 1 Crimes
; October 2 To October 15,2000
Ema" Map Sugg..Uon. to: en,..
~ ..J ~~ l~D \
I ~ 'Ii' l
- :.:'I
-.. , (S) 1Al
J
f: r---
J - ~
I -
, ~
j . s
~
- s
-.It:'\ .t w~
~
".'.
I S
-- S
- 6
-<;> /'
{g}
.ri - D
I._~
,
I
' - . -
l!l -- . -
(I _ - -
.......... 6 .........
R - -
* -- Ii;) .._
· ---........ - -.cur W-
~ - - "'-
@ CGulIy III7a
- CGulIy~
.... C. _.II>
- ADAM
- BAK&I. + 8ii
.. CILWm I
.. DAVID
.. EDWARD -
m-' -
...- llIIL\ - 1\
l- I
I I
t- \ ~
J B
""'i"""
Part 1 Crimes :. .:l
, >.
=-1:0... October 9 To October 22, 2000
EmaI. M8p SuQ"..;1l.oa.. Ill: CGIS CJ.1.~"'''II..__ 0__
- -
I I ~;~ . I I~J
16
...~ ~~'Y
( I Q
,,- I I
I r - 1.6 D:
I I --
I
-
~~ \
-
-
EI w_pJ,B~
W
- - =-$-
CJ
~
-e -&
D
e
l_ '\.::..;~.
Legend
PM 1 om-
tr - & -
cg -- . -
L& - - -
-- .. --
R - -
* -- 6;1..._
. ............. ~ .." -
" - - - ..
@ CooayIU7a
~ ~An.
.... "'......w,
- ADAM
- IIAEEIl + .~ ).,l..
- CIIAIWE ,-<J..
.. DAVID Cl
- EDWARD T c-
- SIIIA rn - \
- I
~I
- \
~ (
~~.. ..j
Part 1 Crimes ...
@.' .. ~.
October 16 To October 29,2000 .. . .
~ Emelr Mep s,~..u..n. to: CGIS la.1,.......U..., ... e..."
.,-------..--..
,
!
-8-.-
--~.
--_._..1
,
".-.-......,
-----,
..-.---;--.
-., --.---..-
.. --.-.---J
,. - ..
-
III -- .
(j "'-
- - -
--- ;; --
R -
* "-
-- OJ
.. ~-
..... "'--. - "'''''''
~ - - "'Uk
~ Count)' RD's
., COWllyA_
Area Commands
ADAM
BAKER
CHARLIE
DA VJD
+
EDWARD
<f~ SBlA
\
,
-1
~-_.
i
..'.---..--....-
Part 1 Crimes
Oc~ober 23 To November 5, 2000
Ema'l Map Suggeltion8 to: ('GIS
It,
~ ---..;
--...-
Legend
Part 1 Crimes
r - 6; -
~ -- . -
di - - -
-- 0 --
R - -
1< -- iOl '"-
'II -- .. "'-
~ - .. "'-
* CountyRD's
_ cOunty A_
Area CO_lids
ADAM
BAKER +
CHARLIE
~ DAVID
.' EDWARD
.. SBIA
-8----
;tX\
--e
----
,
~-.
!
, Part 1 Crimes
--..--.-----....
i October 29 To November 12, 2000
.._....u l..... CO..._....t1_ . __._
-j
---,_ __b.___
i
------;
-...-......
-~
----l- _...
Legend
Part 1 Crimes
"..-.- ..--....
\!f __ ._
LD'-Y -""",-
----- 6 o.-~
R 11_ ....
,*. 0lIII-.. iii c.......
..
.
---,--+--,-.-f--,
. . i
, i
I .
. --.J
--
'-
M....
.. GTQ(C
* ColUn)' RD's
_ County Areas
ATea Commands
ADAM
;~1.i'1':"
/-:~3-'
BAKER
CHARLIE
DAVID
EDWARD
+
., SBIA
1-
-.-..J
\ '
I
~--
I,--_._-~
. ,
:----- _...
,
----- ,.-. ------
i Part 1 Crimes
,
i
! November 6 To November 19 2000
Email MaDSuaas.lnn.tn.nAI.. '
--.-..--...----.
'-. .--:
-..-....
----
....
~
-..-. ---......,
Legend
Part 1 Crimes
" - 61 -
I!l -- . -
dl - - -
-- 0 --
R - -
* -- ~ "'-
I. -- - M_
~ .... .. M_
@ COWIIy RD'.
.. COllllIyA..u
Area Commonds
ADAM
BAKER +
CHARLIE
~~,. DAVID
EDWARD
. SBIA
----~
-- .-- '--.---
~-_.._--._-
I '---__.
,
,
'-"-"-.
Part 1 Crimes
November 13 To November 26,2000
Emall Map SURR9sllons 10: C':C:lJJO
J_____
}-
.--.----- '
----.
,
.L
>
. i
; ,
, i
,---+--11
i 1
Legend
Part 1 Crimes
". - II;
\If "-
-- . -
LS - - -
-- ,. --
R "-
-I< -
-- PJ
.. "'-
-- ... "....
~ - 0" "..'"
*' COURty RD'I
.. County ARaS
Area Commands
ADAM
BAKER +
CHARLIE
DAVID
EDWARD
~ SBIA
-~
,
,
7--.-'
I I \
l----L-- '';---.i
!
I \_@------
! Part 1 Crimes
,
:N
~__ ovember 20 To December 3, 2000
Emall Map Suggestions 10: eGIS
Legend
Pert 1 Crimes
r - II; '-'
~ -- . -
~ -. - -.
"-00.._.._ 0 -""
R .," "-
* -.... I>il
I. ~-
-- .. .,....
~ - .. MM"
~
. ---,
I
..........-...-i
,
--"--7'-"-'
-----.--
------.---
* COWllyRD's
_ COlIl'Y A....
Area COmmand.
ADAM
BAKER +
CHARLIE
DAVJD
EDWARD
.,
.. salA
.~
; .
. Ii.
;-~-_. -.---.
------.--
...----.,--.
, Part 1 Crimes
- November 27 To December 10, 2000
Emall Map Suggestions to: eGIS
$__nL_
--&-
--.I
,
-.----,
'- -
Legend
Part 1 Crimes
,. - 6t -
I!i -- . -
c>> - - -
--- 0 --
R - -
* ~- ~ "'-
I. -- .. .""'"
it - .. "'MOC
~ County RD's
Ell> County Areas
Area COmmanth
ADAM
BAKER +
CHARLIE
-to DAVID
'<!,~ EDWARD
r'::::il"-"
4>> SBIA
--~-.....;
~..~
_.-._._..._-~
/G--
.-
f '
r-r-i
i ! :
!
- --l
--
--___J
\
\
\
,
I
I
~....,
\ '
--~
'U'-_n
I
! Part 1 Crimes
,
i
l_December 4 To December 17, 2000
Emall Map Suggestions 10: eGIS
--'.'1
~
$.n
,-
I
---I
i
--l.,_.L._.
i .
i j
@.=-
I I
;(8
----
Legend
Part 1 Crimes
r - ,.
~ "-
....- . -
ill - - -
--- it --
R -
* "-
-- jiJ
I. ~-
-- .. "'-'
~ - .. "'MO<
~ County RD's
~, COIIIIIyA....
Area Commands
ADAM
BAKER
+
CHARLIE
DAVID
EDWARD
SBIA
..--..--
'5i<~,
\'~r)
i...._._._.___
-<
I
,
. . .
-;...--..!_~
, .
-,.---
.......~
VI
---_.
. Part 1 Crimes
: De~ember 11 To December 24,2000
J:m:all f1ADn ~11"""""'''''I__... ..... "''''.,..
Ir-~-
--- --
-~__L-_~ -:..._._
--@
~-@-----
i _- E-
i
,
---
----t-
._.._....h......
Legend
Part 1 Crimes
".... .............
"'....- . '"'-
[l}......, ....-...-
--- ii --
R - -
* -- Pi) "'-
I. -- o. ......
~ - o. ......
~ County RD's
_ COurtty Areas
Area ComllUlnds
ADAM
BAKER +
CHARLIE
DAVID
EDWARD
0 SBIA
,
1
'-.---..-.-
-I
!
I
..t----~,--__..._
,
,
7'-- ...-.----,
.---.....---.--------...----
~--~
-....-.----.
- Part 1 Crimes
De~ember 17 To December 30,2001
Emall Map Suggestions to: eGIS
! Part 1 Crimes
!
to
c. e~ember 25 To January 7, 2001
Emaol Map SUAAeslicns 10: eGIS
..
j
----
f'~
I-~'-~
-,-!._~@-
.. '-...
. . .
.---...--,
,
~--_.-
_._..~
--..,...--....:
....--...'-
~---
n.--j..._-j
I !
Legend
Part 1 Crimes
,. - e;
~ '-
-- . --.
dl - - -
-- 0 --
R ""
-I< -
-- j;a
.. ~-
-.- .. ~-
~ - .. GT"IIC
'* cowny RD's
_ County Areas
Auo Command.
ADAM
BAKER 4-
CHARLIE
'~'.'~ DA V/D
EDWARD
':'~. SBIA
': -J
I
,
I
l.
-1
~.
~_..~
-...'----
-.'-'--
..
~,
---I
~-
~,
,-... -_.
-'-@i--
,..--...--1
,
, ,
, ,
'"+--t-------_ ...
I '
,
f' ,------
;
,~
I I
----r-+----' ,
, ' I '
: -t---{ !' .
I! I.
Legend
Part 1 Crimes
". - ...
1'1 -
-- . -...
[] ..... - -
-~- 0 -...
R '-
* -
-- Iii
I. "'-
--. .. ~...
it - .. ~....
~ CoumyRD'.
~.~~ County Areas
Area CO""""nds
ADAM
BAKER
CHARLIE +
DAVID
EDWARD
~" SBIA
-
I 6
.---j
i ; \
!---r---_ ,_.. _. ...--..:
... ---..--------.-
-----=:.:::-.4
1:
'-..-.,.
i Part 1 Crimes
~January 1 To January 14 2001
Emaif Map Suggestions 10: eGIS .
~... @
s--
~
i__._
,
!t:\ ·
-J"ii'r _...,-_._~._.
E
'--
"1
..1.-...
Legend
Parr 1 Crimes
,.. - Ii; --
~ ....- . _.
(S - ... -
.....-- 0 --
R - -
1< -- ~ ~-
I. -- .. .,,-
>> - .. "'AAOG
~ CounlyRD's
"W~ CountyArQS
Ana Commands
ADAM
BAKER +
CHARLIE
DAVID
EDWARD
SBIA
8
--,-.-o__..____.. -__'n_n_
. ---.-------.--
1:
Part 1 Crimes
. January 8 To January 21, 2001
emall Mall SUQQaallonllo: CQIR
t
-i
'1_._._.._
-L._
-__L~.
: 'eV
-----.---
E
.--.---
{l}--
:-----,
------'---~
-.------1
,
.._._-._....l j,
f
~.
Legend
Part 1 Crimes
Jr - '" -
I!I "-- . --
rn - - -
--- 0 -no,
R - "'-
* -.... IWl "'-
I. -- .. ..-
>> - .. GTAIlIC
~ County RD's
::l;.....
~~. CountyAreas
Area CO_nds
ADAM
BAKER +
CHARLIE
DAVID
EDWARD
.'~:--
SBIA
---'---.- -_...
......--...'\
Part 1 Crimes
- January 15 To January 28, 2001
Fm"i1 Man ~Il"",...e+;........ ...... """'It'
(J)
-----R;- '-Wi-'" .
rr.._--...!. -
;;....1.,;;; ,
;::::, i. I' I
in!; ,:
n:: .
~-.:.._-- ~ ~..
, .. I $-;
l~
....-'----' .<;
~
-~---
~
.
Legend
Part 1 Crimes
JP - ""
~ ---
-- . -,
CD - - -.
""--.- 0 --
. ...
* "-
""'.- 6ij
I. Co,_...
o.....v...... ." ..."'"
>> "- ." ",UK
~ County RD's
County Areas
A,ea Commtlnds
ADAM
BAKER +
CHARLIE
DA VID
EDWARD
SBIA
'---
____-(8"'
,. ..
,
,
~
I
:-----,
----..---.
--1
Part 1 Crimes
~bruary 5 To February 18, 2001
Email MaD Sunn....t1.",n_ ."'. ~"'Iro
I } <- -
~.
-.-..-
t-
I@JlI
!
i~
---.--..
---
!
...~._._...
Legend
P8n 1 Crt"",.
, - tII -
I!l -- . -
CD - - -
-- D --
. - -
"it -- lOa "'-
. -- .. "'-
" - .. "'.."
@ County RIl's
.. County,,-
An. CO_lids
ADAM
BAKER
CHARLIE
DAVID
EDWARD
(~ SBrA
....--.
+
-,
i
...--...--..,
----..
.----...
..-J
"----..
i Part 1 Crimes
. February 12 To Februa 25,2001
Em8/1 Mep Suggestfon, 10: eGIS
r- Ltiiiid
,.., f om..
'..... ........
~--.-
~- --
--.. -....
R "- .".__
*-- j;iJ,.-
-----
If-. _...
~ o...,.~
. ..";. ~~
. ADAM
. IIAQa
DClAIluIl.l
. Do\VID "
. fDWARD
.. lIBIA
Part 1 CrImes
Feb 19 To March 4, 2001
en.r, Msp SUlJl'. .""'.10: CGrs
Legend
Parr 1 Crt",..
,. -.. .. ""--
I!I __ .__
rD-.. "'VoIoIdo
---- . "''nIoll
- -
--
I}@
~.
R
*
.. 0..-.........
if
-
>@. COUIlI)'IlD't
:!~'l County Areas
"'-'.~.
Arell Com"ulIfds
ADAM
BAKER
CHARLIE
DAVID
EDWARD
'"'
..
-...._.M.__..._.
.,
@
,! ;
~ .
. -:--'~':~'
, . . . .
..
i l'~
--__J~. ;
I .
..
<0-
.."""
......
+
------...
..' .--- "'--.--.
-."-."--.
:(1
Part 1 Crimes
~~~ruary 26 To March 11,2001
Emei' Map Suggestions 10: eGIS
€fi)-' , '
. ! .
."-
, ' ;--/-
LegendL,J
Pan 1 Crimes
- ..
-- .
-
I
. -'-.-,
- ----..-- - ..
~-
-~ .
a.CD
,.
Ii
CD
-- 6
R -
it -- 6ij
I. -- -
~ - ...
~ c-.y RD'.
(.~ CauuyA_
A," COlllltltmds
ADAM
BAKER
CHARLIE
DAVID
EDWARD
SBIA
- - -
--'-+-B' ,
.-+---
. ,
-'
f@
c
. ..,
-'- 1
O-~~
'-,.__,~
-
-
- -
--
-
"'-
"'-'
......
+
"'.,:,
.....-1
-'-~--.
_._..~-._...-
- -.--
;8
"-"-'-
Part 1 Crimes
~arch 5 To March 18 2001
Ernei/ '
Map SUggastlons to: eGIS
- March 12 To March 25, 2001
Emall Map Suggestions 10: eGIS
-----0.
-
I i @,q--
=B__~
I
;:1
----Q---a 0=1
_ i I
-.....-..---
. ."i-j
.
11-
I.
.
~
; }."
; , I i
-~~I~'
i. iJ"
Legend ___.I'
Part 1 Crimes I
"-.. iii.........
I!l __ ._
Q}..., .............
.....--- 6 GIMl'l'liloll
-
-
Orol...... 5ii c.........
o...-VIIlonq .. GrIlClUr
..... .. GTAIlIC
Coun" RD's
~.' county Areas
Aru CDmllltlllds
ADAM
BAKER +
CHARLIE
DAVID
EDWARD
SBIA
--"
,
... ~_. ....i...-._._,~_..
---- ------- --= ':=--.--
;8
Part 1 Crimes
I f-- --8-
.Ci.
~
- .-___n_ _
0--.-
- .u____.
Legend
Pan 1 Crimes
, - Ai -
I!I -- . -
(j -. - -
-- 0 --
. - -
* -- Iiil '"'-
.. -- .. ..-
~ - .. ..-
~ Coumy RD~
.' Coumy A_
Area CO_nds
ADAM
BAKER
CHARUE
DAVID
EDWARD
~, SBIA
-~-
.;.~_.-
-.--...
._~
, .
I i
'--_._..1
I
:-------,
, I
.._-----,-,
-~-D
+8'
;, i
I
:
r
+
n___ "....
......----..
----.-..-
..-----.
-__A
Part 1 Crimes
March 19 To April 1, 2001
Emsn Map Suggestlons to: eGIS
BAKER
CHARLIE
+
--T-.'~'.. _.. ~'--~-.
.'
_._...~.
I I
,
.0
...-...--.
:@
.-.
i
Legend --......-. ~".
Part 1 Crimes
r - '" -
a -- . -
(S - - -
-- 6 --
" - -
* -- Pi "'-
'II -- .. "'-
>> -- .. "'-
~ County RO's
COlmly Areas
Are'a CO"'ItIIInds
ADAM
DAVID
EDWARD
SBIA
1.,~' ,
@)
Part 1 Crimes
March 26 To April 8, 2001
EmaifMap suggestions 10: eGIS
II
s
..~.
o
.~
.
Legend
Part 1 Crimes
,.. - ..
Ii!l -
-- . -
(j - - -
-- 0 --
R -
* ...- -
'. j;j ..-
-- .. ..-
" - .. ..-
~ CounIy RD'a
c CounIy "-
An" Commands
ADAM
BAJ<ER
CIlARUE
DAVID
EDWARD
SBIA
+
Part 1 Crimes
~pril2 To Apr/115, 2001
Email Map Suggestions to: eGIS
I
"'--.i
'-
...- ...-..
-...-. ....
~-
,
I
..
.._---~..
s
.-.....-.--r---4
, ;
...i_.._..___~~
I
i ......---i
:-"---,1
. . .'
f-- --~
--~_.~
~' .-
- ,
. ~
, j. .
'--, ---:"_--r I,
" I; l",
.......... I I'"
~
ciW
,
.Legend
Patt 1 Cnme.
I'" - 6;
~ - :;:
-- . t.: .-,~.
(; -
- - -
-- 6 -- '"
R -
* -
...- j;ij
I. '"-.
-- .. "'-
>> - .. m_
~ CO..lly RD's
County AIMS
Area CO_lid,
ADAM
BAKER +
CHARLIE
DAVID
EDWARD
SBIA
, Part 1 Crimes
~pril 9 To April 22, 2001
Email Map Suggestions to: eGIS
I
..-8
,
--1__-
._~..-
----..--.
@
_n_.... '0__.____
---~3
---:----,..1 _-
.!~
..~--:
Legend
Parr 1 CrimlUl
r - AI
a -
-- . -
di - - -
-- i -....
R - -
* -- j;i "'-
I. -- .. ......
. - .. ..-
~ COIlll\yRD'.
t:~_ C
~.,~;::-- OUftty Areas
Area CO_nds
ADAM
8AKER +
CHARLIE
DAVID
EDWARD
--. S81A
!---
'n._.._..__
-~----e
. -. '-.
--------- --_-L_.__
Part 1 Crimes
~ril18 To April 29. 2001
Emall Map Sug98stions 10: eGIS
I
....--@---
~
I IQI
---r-.-
!
I
-'.--'-
. ....-.---.-..-.--.--
----:-~_.
----. I
~
R
*
I.
If
~ COUIl1y RD's
~li" COUIl1y A_
- A_ CO_ands
ADAM
Legend
PIIn 1 Crimes
'..... 111-....-
~-- l-
eD..., ........
-----. ii ....1'IIIll
- -
0IlIlI...... Pi c.......
aw..~ .. GTAOur
.... .. GTNIIc
BAKER +
CHARLIE
DAVID
EDWARD
J/:..1{ SBIA
-- L______
I
--;
8
.'--0:
"0. _...._.__......_.
.--....;
Part 1 Crimes
. ~riJ 23 To May 6, 2001
Eman MBp Su9sestlons to: CGIS
.
C1 "'ell a.U1 0'0. IDi w "a.Il) ...,
... ct. i .. . Cl . gct. . I
Ii Ii ~l) ,..i ~ " ... 8' 0' '& ;: zl
ii' :1_ 2:
li.ll a. ct ~ -"'0
" .L.::\.~ ct3... ~
::!:a -.)0 53& -.)"'ct "" CD i"
0 .. -.)ct ! iil '< ID ;r z.o
'" a.
-.) :I ID 'e.a. n .. " "
...,- "'0' III 0' ~ ~&
" li.~ f
... 0 ; " z
"
... ct .. ~ ct 0
g .. :I
~ If ...,.
.. III
0-
I 5l.CD CD
....--...--...--.-.. .."- -------1 ~& ~
~~
100 "':u =tl
... CD !R
. . . en . . ... iOa if
. ell bw Ow Ow
18 ell bw :.. ill.... ell:l C
~ ~ lie. ~ lie ~ ~ I iil 'e. iJf
CD'< "'ll
~5l. a
!--.--.. ..........----. ._-...._._--..,_.._,..~-'"_.._. '''''-- ".....l -J!
I Slo (')
&>'" ...
-.
0 al 3
~II) 00 II) ell 01 00 . =- ~;: (l)
....... ~ :"'11) :"'U1 o ell ~ ~w ... .. ~
~ ~ U1 lie i ., ...
. 5.J! a
i !QE (l)
- --1 ~ " " 'C
a.:u '*
~l! 0"
II) w ... ': ::l
w... WII) ....11) WII) ell II) ..w ~t; I 5l.lr en
Ow f1'ell 00 Wen ill.... ell.. ~i c
~II) ... ~ l/I. lR l/I. U1 ~
l/I. CD5l.
ffl0
~fn "'r- 0
ell i~ ff c
.... en en. .. ~~ ~~ 33 !R
Qlw (gw ....en ~ ., .
"(g ;"'01 P'w i.Jen 0.0 i'la '*
lRw lie ... ~ ~ ~ lie o'
, ~i ::l
i---- -. -...---..-..----.----. -_._..._.,._~_. -...'....-....- 'C.l ::l
Z:O:~ III
o :I 5.N ~r
>0:1 ....,
... (g QI (I> I\) ... i.!.~ W"
;...U1 ill.... ~(I> :"'en 0.11) .w 0.... '"
'" 111. 111. ct a
lR lie 111. ~ 111. ..
"'-----"-- . .-.-----.-.. ..-....---.........
(g ... ... ... ... .... .... C1
(g.. ell !""'4 ell ell ",.... co.
. .. . .... ''''4 ''''4 g:... ~~' or
18.. (1).. (1). m.. . g: .. co.
(I> m (I> ~ ~ ii'
lie ~ lie l/I. lie
.
.
.
.
s::e'c 1t:1l0l
1t.f:J, ..:JIJI "utI.,a 0';.:J,c 'U:JOO"~O~~
1 :(
1 1
A .
oe -=
~ a
! I
e I
,; e
:: i
i .j
i l-
t a
C a
~ I
110
f i
f I
(I.)
I
i
f
,;;
If
~
J
... .
,~~'"
0~ 8~~ ~~i
J
I
,
i)
".I
!f
:..
1U!
iJ
...
.:
... ..,
... ... '"
...
...
rot ......
..
-
.. -..
I lr j
.... i J t
U il i
'1 1.1 1
Iii ~'-J
II 1:1 it
...( -eA"I 5t
.J .It I ...
!&! !.i ~&'
... .'~ ..;
f'l
.
...
I:
I .!
- 't':;
i ,
.! ..
f 1
I ~
.. ! ~
.J .a
. .
"J "1
J 11
~J ~t~
WI ..
')
/
"'AIUI:. 0.."
.
.
.
(B"d 1t:l.lO.l
~~I~~,~UU~ V~.~~ 'U~OOW~O~~
1 'If
e oS..
-; 1
.. .
fo .:
-;
z a
~ I
E I
,: 8
-;
: 'S
i .j
; l-
t ~
Q a
~ I
...
~ '!!
! t
f I
CI)
&
~
I
.
..
is
i
~
V)
I
.t
I
rn .
1t1t:, P"\..&tL&A
~
\:)
- (j 8 ~G\ G ~/i
j
.. '"
'" ...
G"
J !'
i ... ..1
1Ii J) ..
:;11 J il
;J U Ii
:1 ''I1.l'.Ji
~.. It ..t
~.. 'IJ" ...oJ
"''I .. . .J.!I.
!I !,! !~i
- ... ...;
'" ......
... .....
" "..
B .J .J
..! .!! ..
f f j
-l I !
I '; ';
3 .i J
j' h h
.1....: ..,.
.!&' !f !f
.; wi 'II
\.
...
.
..
~
~J
- ~~
)
"'''''Uf:. O.j
.
r9"d ll:I.lO.l
tI:.J/,)IUJ.,U&U tJ".:I'" ~cr'OO",)O:>>'"
1111:. f"1..6a.c.",
If
~ l ~ ~Ii
0 i
c
.. '" ... ., ., ... ... ... S:;~
~ I ~
. ... "
~ I
\I
e c
2: a G ~ ~G 8.-
0 I j ...
0
- ~
.. \f:)
. I
e I ~)
.. e (;)...
III J PI ... ... ... .')
.
. . '8 -J.
IrJ .j
II
~ ~ i
c '8 e::
- l-
II . ... ... - ... ... \!)'<
~ .. is
'4! f
c a
.. I I ]1 . I !
.. .t) -
f- .! .! ..
.... .. f
0 .. i .... .: J :I !
;0" ...
E 1E : J) ]'1 J . ~
t I .
., !) ! I ij .. z:
rn . ...
b I 1 'I 'I
.! h n ~fi 11 .J !
e ~- ':1 .
. "1
rn
:.. If i... II J~ !J ~
~. 'IJ e'e f!J ~..: '.
~J · ..IJ i i II Ii I
~. !&! !sl
..t ..a -. iP:
..: ... ..; .. ,,; ..
,
.
"'&.I\:It. O~
. .
~ t" .. !'-. ,.. :-
.. - · - oS - I~. - r - Ii
if il i! i.~r!
...
Ii If Ii f~~ i; ...
".
t~ =- I.. If! I Ii , en
.
;: ~ ~ I} 'I Ii ;a
llIi q
~ \ r.. 1 r l cn
1 J .. II il t~ II
~ It' :l
l .. ~ :. r I l- .
r . i r ! .... '4e
" 0
I' ~ .. ... i I ....
f · I' 41 I ~
t if ..
.
I 0
t ;
~ f
>- i r. - - - - - 1 II
.. \ \\...~/ -
1 a.... 0
XII! ~ ~
~. . II
r ~.:_ :. cn
. t f t .
{h II
.. .. .. .. .. Coo 1 ...
, \ ;: =
) H- .
I '"
II
'p If; .
l. f t ..
. , . ...
-.!' '*' . ,._, f' II
l.! ' "~ 100 '...l 101 100 .. 0
\_' \/ 2:
'f t .
t r -
- ,.
~ ' "" 1 cr
>~ '-j . (~ f 0
- '"
. i l r
!\) 0
0
i c.
.
C'Q ':IC'Itt..,
...,.".. ~.
~CO~~OOCftC ~C.~n TQn7'QCIr.n
TOTRI. P.03
. f" !" ~ !'" !'" :-
:s- lI- B- Ia'- ili ....
It.. I' -:1 .. 1'1 Ir
"&os Blrl' r.
"If' i. 1- ..,.
i. 11 ,I ~ ..I. 8>S
i "5 il It-
.- · 5 -
l:J lr ;.. f" Ill' en
r -t -I~ ~1 wf. f .
- . ;0
[ 0- 0 I'if
- .. II q
0 e. 1 ri t.
... t CI.l
... .. . IS. le.
iZ .i lr' t~ ~If' III
. .. S. ~
f .. II lo ..r I!. ~
.. II.
. . r~ I- '<
l f f .... '"
i - i c
I' .. .. ~I ...
- i" ~
f- a ala
f 0 I II"
,.
at C
1\ ~
..e <2> Si! '"
- .. .. .. 'I II
j -
i. c
~
.
1lI Ul
t::. 8w ~ ~ .
. ~, ft II
.... ... w w 1 =
~ ..
~ ! ..
II
.. .
\ \L f t Do
...
G <0 II
rk8 ... ... ... 1.\ 0
t 2:
,.
:to ....
t: CI 00
, r
~~ . en l ao
... ... ... ... - ~ ~
... i l cr
......... 0
II
.. ~ c.
II
.
C"D ~...
"~""'':Iwl
lOCO,"ftOOCQoIC "c .CD rr.lln7 "Ie' "~n
TOTAL P.B3
. 1"- !A f'" ... !'" :-
~~ ~- a- Il- I~- ii ....
il i~ ':5 :1'1 Ii'
rt ..... Ii 'I- Dli'r Ii ..tt-
0_ llO f.l . .r. !foil
"II' .i
ff i if! 01. IO:
;. D_
0'" l.. l.. -. If. ti Ii ae' rn
r -or ~1 .
. . -."C ;-
Ii' [ G .... 1'_ I
}<' - .. ..t- jIoo .q
0 t. 1 ...
... 'l- Is. II i CI.l
~ 'V . .
.. iI .. ;- II
- f. t :!
.. .. .. ..=-
l l- i lor 0 St- .
Do i "<
f r. ... .... ..
% . I; 00 . .. I c
I' .. .. .... a ...
- ;- o. i -i
.
t f 0 ... I lIP
.
S 0
if. ~
U\> e Sl ..
- - - - - .. 1 II
Y'!: ~ -
i. 0
. :r 3 ~
Jt II
:a r.Il
~ f t .
. II
... ... ... ... ... '" 1 ... ell
/ a .
. ..
\f' l II
.
A t Ill.
f ...
. II
'" '" '" w Co> ... c
I 2:
8
. -
Cl ~
f
. <n 1 go
6 WG ~ - i ..
~~I l II"
0
II
-,., i c.
t:
.
,"0 ~04
"?t9,-, ~ I
C'coC'..ooc.nc 7C .cn fnn;r ")C' 'r.n
TOTAL P.B3
.
5 f/1/l- F:-ctr /7 q iJ
5J'S- M C sf, B-I2,.3
/
::5.( I() Bot Q jV41l.~ \ I\I~,. CA. q24-(() - "3 <-
70 IU~ ;;/~ ~
~S~~ d'\.~
~ ~ ~ (1j\.
f~ J~ tYl-. .s_'<"A'~ ~~
~~~~~iJr
.
)( ._\.r: A1, t- '1 ''Q-.b~-'A
I 1(1-
.
I.
Casinero Ranario
555 N G St B207
San Bernardino CA 92410
TO WHOM THIS MAY CONCERN:
I wish to express my concern over the safety
problems that we see in the neighborhood especially
drug-related crime.
I have a strong feeling that more pOlice
presence would improve the neighborhood.
Also, I believe that educational workshop on
"'me p"vent'.n V'~d help the ne'~'h"~r-
CASI RANARIO
~
r
.
.
-
.
~r'} / 0<~. 800 /
IT ~-tA.-L., AJ ~.t:i. (J ~ -~
,5 b 0 /V, "F"':; -r. =!/J tJ 9-
25l?t~~~~~ e~ "'9fJ.~/.1- 31 r- '(
.
c-:! () 92) 4n 2.-t- ~ ~.;7
J~ ~ ?Let!'" . ?V-~ &. ~~/~~
.~:- ~~'ft Q.rf;~1 ~ I ~a/L"A~, ~
I ,~~ ~~fJd- ~
fld" ~ 9I!ht- I}-/J( ~ &+ ~ J-
A..-iuv'" a~,~ ~ L/2,t711-lf*:- LPu^- ~j
~' S'(u..u-~ ~ ,t;;;z.~A~.
'~u7 dJ~iJ~f/"~ P-A .,P~-~ ~-0P/1(,)
0/.:> ~d? ~hLfJ..L.A: d' f) ,.-h? . . tJ /.) - /J
~ L.:.~:, -:"(J Yfi~,.tA-\- kfUL.... tK.P-cp'2...J
tntA- ~~ OL e:.~. ~~) ~ ~~
, ~t~ - & ~.:J./Lect ,e;.~ cy a---'
~ %?-a~--' ~ J.k, t!.d <14--1: J-t~ ~.~ - t
{J ~-ef!e/ ~ ~~JI c9 ~.~ ~~ t!/ ~-f ftu-r~. './
~ }z),l.- d-CJ '~e-d!. ~7n-(.'l-V?~ t!;4'-'e.:-" ~
-t-;'kL.... hUz-. ~~ .. ~it1t, ..
d?e-1-t.~"/'-' (9 ,. ." ... . a~ 3tYO ~~~
~1' qz.l-#t-#- ". -A:h~o-r:~ U~ ~
<-1 '7JLd2P {} ~ ~ l?v:-e. (k~ ~,
~'~c..e.Z/l.eU~-e-- 'h..c.u1", A:~.' '?H!~~. ~.
. /'.... ' J :' 1
<. Ip Ie ~, tezt &d.uCa.-:t..p~.f. ~~-' 'f4- (~ )
~~.If1-u~..e~ V #~ [lI.4d.M-~ ()vrrn.fld..
--/{d2t O~._- "'1U!-LrA.. p-e;';"t a~ .
~-r<~~-4J,
~) (I- ~I J)
"-'1 do '" .; .-,' h j .4-A-4/
.
.
Ervzr'?4LI::E {}JaR... .
<. A -;<11- >
crV::~J?1 ",,;t ~j c-t9~~
In.~ ~ /Z,~ ,::9. _Ka,~/.t.~'~f h If ~ 13
~-t.;Gz'J/ v::f .;tk ? p P 1.-2/f14'-'r.A::1r-eM..f4, ~. 4-i-en.. .44hL;e-'
t v
/J-u:..e.",w +:
tie,:
""
}t.(.i'...c-'
'.
:ls~' <,,<CPC.L
-~..Q'U- ~-i.l-~4('t1A,:f.. (jYL(di(;Z--~_
-c,l
/M
.'
~~'? - -J-. . /J ~~. . h--"'-vt-" _'~
~ ,....t:..t:... rl--~.... /p~.c... .N<?V'-€-t.., _..
l/ r/
(p <I j.+, <. p '- - . . :f-
' J.-&P.- /uroi:~v /f.,~M~-e.' 1/1 tJ..u,-'f4 '/-- CP-i.:i<Jtzt-<t.-<~ ex. .
i~.{jv-,..e.;.i "'1-- ~F<-e-I tJ.?-cP (,~ S-t--J - ,J.!. u.--a"v t./-r'-'te "':;fI-(ff_-.cyl".j
.
rJ2./
.~. ,;1<'-' /f? .o/a4?<<.k'>(' tlt-v7!3
I, ,.." 1/
""<i v'--i-ie.w.l' ."" .A.-i..-",~..,
.'1 ~, "
'A. )
r - , " ..
L-- ,A,4- PL-)~ ,AJt'u2.a:t ft-''"<4V:-'~Jz..-Ce.
,.. ..
.. d:
e..,.~,. ./... ,:r;-. ;-.
.... ,...,' ,. ...... #;#'
:.:t.-u;.t<..
, /'if; .
.ffi-vt A-v:-Ukl?,f .44-4) ci-kc.;p - eJ.A4... -..J~ a-c1M,';.Ai
t/ (1....-. \- f/ t'/;-~ .
a. .j f- .-!~l--'_)~/21'"w.~. <'Prt.'L ~Q.l........,;p .."7",,(.,......) .s t" ;'z.lcc;k<{
v J ~ .
l.;j~ "". 0- /J>.UL/J:.,.. ~~ j<-c:,-",,~;" ,
. t1'""
c:?/rk .$.. :~.'t-e/t..~~~C ..;tic ~ 1
CZk....'""".L.-d..;.-.~,.~ /&.<z- i )<"1-7 ,J
(/ ii, .
J;::i.' ,r
{ ~r. ~#
(> r ----i- ? 1.
C<-,{.,;.~. fj/!.a--;;< /l.-(; ~~r-u;: Jl/'?! /i<--/i...~t-t.,.,~.1 ~h'i
.
/-i(, .Jdt::j....~,\- "4- (;i.<_Vv...d-i-t.:-0-..-T:"O;~
-,t. f' i' A ("" /,i .
. ). r:,\ f _. ~/. ,.
" . .."'". . ... ~...; " , " ;. . .., ~'" .". , .,' ~ . . .
'.' 1<--0 'i-e,J!. /I-t--<.. .--)",-,,-.r;Y /U~:;1L.-OC.Ct-~. -",*,-..c"''--,...Zy .'4,'('.-c1-'<"{~""-'
. ,J __
/~ ~..~
'.if;' /'1, . fJ..,. . ,:7--_
l.c.....T~....~~ t;~~\. ,.'~%.- /1-(:. ?'<.. ~..~:..~~....
.
~ ~/~
/ {' '. ,
, ' ,
'-ald & ~
...... /(.'.
~- ~ t' /(~dL :;t A.rud #,,,,2/6
/
.dc,;-!t.. '&/.fftld:U, rl"'-. 9"<'1'/0
,
~' /, ..) "OM /}
. t' 1c,U;6?ft., u:-t: ~ ~ L4.lt<'..u,,,,-/,'
.
iJ-'<<-"7 ,'11r -d",c- ...4~'t!.,.~ ,--4'-I2~,-ccm-'.e ,,~ :.:d. AId:
I~a./ if J/u'(.. ...i~.e- UU4/j.e- r ~ //h~'^-'7 :
/. ~~. ..nt'~ ,~?L tf-{'d"A.. fl":;,pu.(?(,~ r ~d<>-rL'-u.,
:;Z, ~6 aU__Ma41 ,-.L,.m~> c.i~"'4// a4'ld/PL-'
c;l.Gt<j "a.dd~d.a...c' ~-<yt-it:_ C-x" .z<,4" ,/!1!ZZa,,a,.,
3. .; ~i; 1<'-' ....6- ~" y--,,/{L-e'1/.2;tu'L- cH, ,tV-d r,j~~"
01at~;;'-a:a.., dtd.-c4-/,.LL dt2f11L6~iH<.u/.
"I i' <--,f.~U-l- V{,NtLz'4U/y ~,,-?Z.. add,~, ,41'Zcr<-C'</
c24'z..L aL tJ.?U:.' ~"'-'/ ';';;~"'-L- .;t<1/~~ /c-t.- cZ:..x.<~k<.L
Jc.~,L , .lrlJtI-me ,?l24z>tc ,z.. ,'7z~~'."d ~ Yt-~,
..J, ~.-u .t.i~, ;&:'4.t .L..~z<-, ~, . 4YU; +1 !t;i'/Lid /Jtlf-a....'-
-.A:.lj2,,/J!,~...f' #mtuy ~, .'n., ~d yJJI..t,4
/' cj.-?nf "?&dj rJ..-?! L ?/:~/ " "
,j/.//'.... ~ ,<2Ld _~...L ,,1 J~~:L. ~) .j ';:;'ui
--:tia.:<:. ,if a-17!. --?/~M<,--.-t...d""Z;<.~-<6 &i~ fl"""';! tta.i--1-~Z'(-<..J.,."
l7t111i~ldu1V ..?t"-tt( --;lU.z -!-l.-t.i 4JZY f/'(d4Itt.'!!.L~ULtt""..L;,U_
f-.(.. AJU/.:d- J'-<2,~.;t:, ,,/ J~ -.l..l,~~:Lt'-<- .-fi.ild..k- !~-t
___~I .L~L,,;:t'k dU11dadv ,zt~ . ii', L/L- Aea~'
./N.-c<.<--L. ,,),C71Zt, -,-&,0- ' ,
j.
,/I{:b-1U'~"-' ~/
/! .. l",-j/
L-"-d. t.c.-t.-- .(l... '~~L4-;'''
.
.
May 31, 2001
Grace L. Combs
560 N F Street-.1324
San Bernardino, CA 92410-3138
To Whom It May Concern:
I have lived here since August 4, 1997--almost four years.
I lived here in San Bernardino in 1968 when Norton Air Force
Base was in full swing. At that time, this city proudly wore
the name, "The Greatest Little City in the World, the gateway
to the Southland." When I retired, I wanted to return here
because I consider it "Home". I love San Bernardino as anyone
loves their home-town.
.
When I returned in 1997, I soon discovered to my dismay that the
city had changed. As I walked about and rode around, every-
where , I saw signs of gangs, drugs, dilapidationl graffiti
covered boarded-up buildings which were overgrown with neglect.
The streets were littered with trash and debris. At the bus stops
derelicts with shopping carts filled with and hung with garbage
and trash bags sat waiting for anyone they could ask for a few
coins. And one look into their eyes told ue that what they'd
spend those coins on would not be nourishing to their bodies.
I cried for my city and it's heartache. I cry for my city now.
I cry for my community.
.
The Plaza, a senior citizen apartment complex formerly known
for many years as Pioaeer Park Plaza, consists of building "A"
and building "B". Due to neglect of and exploitation by former
owners and managers, our complex had become as dilapidated
Combs
.
2
and crime-ridden as the rest of the city--a mecca for drugs,
drug-users, and prostitution.
Recently, our building was purchased by a different company.
With the take-over of the new owners came new management. And
with new management came new ideas, new attitudes, new zeal and
interest in reviving our community.
We now have the basis. What we need further is help in pushing
this beginning forward, help in putting out and keeping out the
drugs, excessive use of alcohol, prostitution and crime.
San Bernardino has become a melting pot. We get the fall-out
from Los Angeles, Riverside, and all the cities in between where
expenses are too high for welfare people and the homeless to
make it.
.
We're close to the mountains where pot can be grown without
being easily detected. And methamphetamine labs are concealed
in rural homes. Gangs run rampant here and in nearby towns.
Our community, The Plaza, is two blocks from downtown. I walked
across to the Mall one day and on the street-corner while wait-
ing for the light to change, I was approached by a gang of young
boys, eleven to fifteen years of age, who asked for money, and
when I refused, they cursed me and called me names.
.
The Plaza is two blocks from Stater Brothers Market where most
of us from here grocery shop. Between here and there, on one
trip, I have been approached by as many as four or five different
down-and-outers begging for money. There was one in particular,
a mentally unstable person, who followed me a block while cursing
and calling me names when I refused to give money.
Combs
3
.
We're just across the street from the Greyhound Bus Depot,
which is located on "G" street. The depot is a known hang-out
for prostitutes.
We're right in the middle of all this and easy prey for
everything. In the four years I've lived here, there have been
several break-ins here.
One morning my friend had to leave our bUilding early to make
a doctor's appointment, and on one of the stair landings ran
smack into a seedy, stinky old man sleeping off a binge, who'd
gained entry through a side door that had been left ajar by
someone.
.
Until the new owners took over, there was a woman who was
obviously high on something at all times, who hung out on our
front veranda constantly. She would slip into our building at
every opportunity. She drank; she smoked; she brought drugs
with her. I'm sure she is now waiting for management's head
to be turned, and she'll be back in.
From the time I came in 1997, until now, I have been constantly
apprehensive and on edge. I believe, from every indication,
that the new owners and management team have the welfare of we,
the residents, in mind. They are trying to make The Plaza a
fit and decent place for us to live. I believe that they are
coming to the realization that this is going to be a task.
I, for one, appreciate the effort they're putting forth, and
I, along with my fellow residents, will appreciate any help we
may receive in eliminating chances for infiltration into Our
community frpm all of the outside threats so close to us.
. S Stpi .e erreell~ 'p 7 /. )
. ~C~C&~
'Grace L. Combs
L. t_-t.:-(f{. . L~X......"= ..
,;.-....._.::::;- N. ,.- ....-.;,"""'"i".
'../_J M/' . ~.... .
.
;-; t..,LJIff',i( f'T ..11 ~I L/ dc.,D l'i!::/2t..:/
'-f(11.-::, L&TTc/-l... /f:, 'l6 €Yt/fu'55 IJ1ytlCtlje0-/ZJV f/f30u r
;11.t:::- 17 r- 7!i{;1f(I'!r.-t-;::;: I i-Ilt'6"t:: ~S(;;:..<z.t/C:-O ~ li<!..(...... ;,llCVGt)
'Ie Ir-fl~ A(Jf{(Zi>t10J-iT II if rrt...~ dlC/i€:; &111(/ /f 'f~/2....
~~)f
I , . /1 U:J-,cr7;1-' 1
iU(-fr:.U/ ! kh;.,-r /llc>.-l'{~(/ IA/ 11&'1..( / L.1t-'8) I,{j rI.hu.-c",,("erLr
~ ?C '37 I 11-1/.5 ./!p"lj/,.:r:1(€$'vTj t.U/Il,tJ~4./5 FIIQ.€; AiD tZ:l7J /rIL-}J
eV t:~(~/-cril,,", 11ft: //L)-r&-d.'S€#'1?ca/ tzrF' 6 #. ( 6:.> r/4..:..:=-rs,
/ /llfl) /1 tl~?Y (it'h'!/Z (/f ea..' ttJF 1JJe:- o1t//I4/l/? !.e'f" cy.:;.:-17IG--
~l/t'41 '? /ll?~rct.. 6-1' ~ 'B'.'1 (J Ii l50 -171t: tlkfl j~) A1.(:b r
. 77/( (6li~ (Ju/,q; / t>56'6cZt/6j) Ii ~ /;",,<-0(-"
c) (Ir(/t--.: /~-[/ ilL: ffl{:; 1J;l/2/<..1i..~ ie, 7'~'cP- 71ie &;i 5 IJ~:17t:5 T/-JrlJO
LSfi/ t '6" ::;r;'2{t:7-'(~/vi (ji-'T/f ~~/b(s. t5r f//f5;R~r;) I {)/;),,/r
" \, ( t/
/1/ c' -r ( (!.{;; 11t\J~ CrLI At d..> IT L I{(!--:l) v I T?j 0 J -r 7il-~ Jlo '7 /
) I f) !J I.r((Ck; (v ((f: 14 f?:w '1'~'l{; f'8/er~ (Jf)t-l C!.r.::- (!tt2f;
li,''(-((;;-tui /{I)O(lII.l6 '/({( lip:; ;A:;1'/C"Y';j(U) If fb::o 1f,'r1=- / '7i{(.{j
;i,1 r.;u l-Iftt<t:-s ft,Lt,.. it,-, (Hf-l'{:; i i/6r-lC-5' IIf(....() ::i4.&A.J..5U;~,A)<"';'O
: /0 ~
5 ;< (,' ,:',;/// L ri ;t/ (:,:;.. I /lilt) 76 {-{)lfL-.fL fI(!(2<J.>-5 70 '((k. /2 () 5
0(/-',,,( (/JUell"'" me !J,f{{Li6ttrlb:'I26)-ro l'",ip(.J(;U:-I!,g" () T
. ,,)
. (>:' h U ) C {(5 ftl; 0 i(I1T~ I /;l/L 1/;2..( ;;'::JLl.1 / tt"It5- 5ro(~iJ(.JJ
Pi t.J.-L ~ 2.0. ,
.' ,7", ri,t '(' \,lle
>l/-rV ~UI..)itr2() I tv'o /-Yr, ~-T ' ,
I.I.} t( .'1/ AlAi {,-"J:U1 '0'/ r:.-
, "'rtt.J'firJt/'-) ~Z..c. .:~"} ./' _ ''''"'-';,' ,.... ..
, ./ blL' (.., f~C> t r-t-"",p-N-_Jt D /Pf(:;LItL:7- S;~:1e,lil C!2S
) I" f:.u c~~(. t.,V (::'<i!) -r f;)(j.;..-r....fi-[ ./.~"" "':.. ,;a'- 1]'-:- /i.' 'I /. I L, t ~ TM- \ . ..
.. 1 \ ~_, v' I ~t.'f .. ( U ~l rr! / {V tj5 O-r' ~t;-.f Ii
1. . .. . I /'-'WV\
. .....( (G0 A vt!:t.;.1 GA--pt;- etvlJlJ4:IL')rt~7rc'cr ",-';::j.,C'}/.' "y(". " /.
.' " I I' '1'-=- n ft' I ~/{7~
11ttlU:: J 5 ttl?(-rf::- vl0rT t;t;:: f1'f?)(- -rW-..;y(~l1fC() f/LL.?C' 0j{~
eN))) 71-i:VJW,( l~lU1ij/i,c; bl(,
,:PCi/ ~(... -((:VI€:;> DOtJ.-ifJJ" '(ff(. Plt&p~ /k;to;Zs / ~
10 (,c 70 >TIt 1(:7.1.1", ,ntr/lKJ2r tV '-I- ~ s-r, /{I1Itx;l( I-Q I/Pf ~$
I (--\f'{/~- HAD ~WP~lb{Lttj(L~/J1qpy:( I ~(;.4{ft~ 17/(t{e/; It, (ttf:-
0..(Id1?!lUb (iP- G1t: "a- C;, f\1JD It F~ -(I M& A~.(lU'r'7 Ii-/(; r;1?2kr
(vuu\:~ <jo tlJxrW1L-l Ao:P (1+ F{;fJ!J lUll ~ ! ~71frf: (!ctJ(/W)
\JJtlL,KW~j U:v\v{~ (~tt1 0. 9r; -ro~'LCf? 41f(/lK-er~
f} fCt.{.7 7f.,f1f::7, Wf-tllt-! vv!t7 '31(rNJb ItlJ 11fE:-t..D6Yr Tlr~p
.1 C .?otl'lf' a=::11t 0'11-'6L 1tJt.'J(iC(3 ('fft1ItiJvy ! 1-f1/C/& O~3!!..
. "t-(<Y iJ;;oAl.(;p up II<./Jet<-' &( 111 e "'-"! '( Ffl-I8.iQ7 (]p~ ! 1-'--"-
r-'>:F)O r\\'f ltiLJ~ r (jtt.. {~~~ /(JJ) &Ifq fl(f;" 1f/2I::- &ott06 (D
l) i 111 ~6;1'tk:i;t1lE 1fd./'ti"T, ( ~ ~T l<i<xx-c.J '{/tff( 1fI-t:i~
\,lJ o,llfl80 {b~i-f- 1/-tutf:rc pc fJl/Y 1Ff/liJ f:: f3tl:D} 6 tJr I f)/D l-MrL--
~ f0W (!ojlkv-p7 '(b -rfMT r;p;:Efr(1
i iLkA.LWf ~&j (:(Jb t:.C0 jf~()L..j) (-We:;- ,,f/orLb ptX-4<:Lc i/r5/&L/TC/
c~ I(;:(;J, (rZ&t{ ~ -tTb If- --3 / 1)1->0 '1ffi; b 1f/ifLt:- :J/jeOlf) t;&-
A ~~\ -n~4f: 1t~ t,tft.-L ij~ f1 iIwt-' bt-Ia~ t: .ftQl-~, (lJ-h.( I11Ti{~'L.-41jdJ
. I
.~~4:~1{,.'1Hf: HtJftfbrmt1J0 flfJD Wv i--cf7; 0/1- f/-'f LM/ r Ii- F8JJ
l:::hU S~lPfl-1f11 UU\ &tIb II'7Htvl.( jMtit:. f~tO ('fift,;, Jr'Dcr:p fj-c 8rz~SJJ
! ~. ~ / &--1) :11 ttttri[ ,,~2it1J5 &:fP rift /-J ~e.-Ifjftl b ~ /) 41t M:8J 8Cf
.eft!/: UdJl--4ttU'.:pwC- PU2-;'OAJ &"-nl2-1iJ~ ,
--1
;::';0 ,,! ',f'.,'"_.!':l (/ [1/
;'(f'_'c....~~-
! /--;;' /t-'
6._.1:, c/J:Jf.k-:-
r
.
, ./
'':':'-'-c.p- 0 /
.
. b.u- -4 ~ ~-73
. ~ <-2-: ~l-(-<<)- ~~~' ,~
(J@",~~~ ~~~
rY~~ d~ ~~.7
:~/ ~,6 ;.s:6--t... .~
:~4- .~..(~~c
~Jl~J~ J'
~"q.. ~
.L-<2-).~ ..~~, ~~ ~~-<e~~
(ee.~~~ v1'n...(,~ ,.,.u'-t"_<<-1.< "7
a. ~?_.'~+. '.. --. ~..~ P-
.?? . '. .#~~2.-"7 O~ ~
1"7f/ ..
~~ . j"" p> ..
~~ .. -c~. 7"Le~ &~---"';r
.~ .t>f ~ (}6 ~-=-?~
~""--- .., ~ /~~..",....~ ...e."
..~ ........., '" d ~
q-r ~~ ~~j ~ Vi
../YL~~--r- ~. .,~ ~Zl
~ ,J2~t./' ~bLh... ~ ..
/'\) , U;/-_
'. u~... /?e--7 k<-,U.
.
,"_.n.. 'U""_..__.,,_ -.... .. -______.._..... ......._.. __n.... '. '"...__._ . nO n.. ._____.._. .., __.__.. . ,...._ .... _._ ._" n., .... ....._.__.._.._......_........ .', ____.___._ ..... _. ......
Jo~ Dowd
...11.6.......21.
........ C& 12t10.32&3
~ ~~.v{~.--_..,..'~-'.Lf..~- lEb. ~
. . . f ( ~
.
.
~ ~ /0-620;1/~ ;:g;;[.
.&~ ~~d q"/.ilO ~J-,(,~oC?1
0; . /J.... .r"~
f(!)~Jj~_~...__.. .... ........ . 'P,
,........j;/~..Jil!J p~-.1/.&~tL~~ ~.gf}<t...~
.....~r~-~-~.-.~.~~__k
....~/...u_~~~~fJA-j.kfJ~.
'~.~--~--f1~._.~~~.. '. ".
~-~~-,~.. ..,.'. .~.~.. ... ..... .
~~..~., ~@.u.lk.~-, ?J;ent?. P~.Jjj~
..~.d-~-lud,~~.ctQQ,.......... .
. ~.P~:&.kd~ ~M
.~..do..,,4.J~.MjJ....~:~~ ..
... ....'1~~tF"~~e<,PQQ~ .1.li.&.'1/~t>>J .~.
..~ J.~..-;j/.iM.el.w.kJ- :t~. .g~..J.
4 ,
.. ..~ ... .~,j,d .<'41<
-~~...._.... ...~.
.~ ..t(5...J...b-;..9.$Jak. . ~,~. "~.
,.~.4J~~,.~-Ib~~~ . ~ .. . ...
-. ..., ....----...--:;,.~..--'--..-...,-.--..----~(r,... .
. 1/~......?44 f!-.~!.~.<:j&.
..... 'H'M.... '"-.--.,. .. .", ......"... . ._n..__._".. . ''''d_... ,...._.. "'" __....,._, "_0 .'..... . ._.
. ....-.-.. .. '._.... ~... u. '.. .... . ........ _.. .'
.
. . .....-...."--.. ..... .......
.. .........------..-.." -,.-..-...-....-.. . .-"" ...._,-."... -'.. ---..-..-...'..-.................. .
'.
1IrIt. Ma. AlIlOla C. Outierrez
.... S60N.FSt,'A21S
.. '.. ~~no. CA 92410
.'---. ---."...--.-...-.
.
J~ //~/
7b 7f) dn" .<- T /'<<7 (J.."CLZ-..-?z...
":;;I"~..e ~" ~ .~ ~
3 h~ cvv~ L::I 0 c:ZtJ /&--~7~
k/u.. 'he.-, f: ~e.e... ~ ~
~ !/.f2-~Z. ~ ~ "d?7.AAV<V
v 'Uv ~ ~u~ 4 ~ ~:;-'..q..
..3 ~ p~ tJ/~~._
~~~--k,;'__ ';Y7h-/
.~' Cv'~ .9 ~~
E-z~.t.-' - 7c -4-. -0 ~-;? ..e€... <!_ 9k~
n-<- ~ &' . {kz.. v..
~ ~ ,S '/~.
h 7~ .~~ '~L0
~ ~l<-e.-- ~dL~ J Q.O~~
~? D .P~<u-~
~? ''.IJ ,?de-~ ~
./f~ ?~ .~. ?C..e~7 ~ k ~~
iW,~'~7' ~t.eJ 7~;t}> ~
~ w71 -kt 7z.~ ,4-c:~?:f:7
~ :;/J kl~-.-. fu
IV 1).. ~ ?z~ L;!v ~ x:2a;.~~
.
.
.... .... n_...__.. .__.,....,~....,..__._ ........ '_.~_. ..._......
r
.
.
rJJ&/i~_., .
5~f) NF,d fit? ~
~d~~..
~/~~~~~ZI~.
~~~~~~
~~~. .
v ~ ._ - - I '~n1..e.... ~ Ua
1W'~~. !I -
~~~~,~~
b~~.
~w: A14d ie~.J~~/~~
f!.M~r~A
1}#~.47.id- ~n--~~ ~
flMavv. ~ /
dk,vk ~,/
.
.
~
{J~~-~ ~~<-_
g;- !; () I..u, ~ gji-
1fr::t b 0 -z.-
.
---dt~.___~~_~_~_~~_~_.__.....
-~""=i ~~-~/'- -/ ~'- .h-erf''' ~~ 7---
.~1tt;,' ';~.d~~_
..(;:1:._-;.. ...t---AlJ::'i..e.,~--~rd4&~
.~ ~~!! t/':.t-_ ~Ji4___!.~ '( ..~ Y- ~ ~J.~.
' 4 l I
) i " . .n.. ..___....
2.~~."e.__._.~~
/ . '.J1' J / "'-.
._-t.7I-.~..- ,,--~!:.~~T:c:-~_."'-~__h.
, . /
...~-~~ {~..,--_._----_._..__.__.._-_....
"..,.-.-..----__.M~_.__.._._._..____
-...--..---.-------....- "-
. ....~.. ....-..,
.. . ...........---...._ . '_h'~.
. .-.....-.-.-... -~...._-_..__.. .. ...--...--...-....-. -_. --",
._-~._----._._.._- ------
....-....-.-. ...-....--.....-...- -.---..-..--.-.... ._._-.._-.....__._~_._-_._._._---.~_..,_. ..
-..--.---..----.
----.-.-----.----.--.-------..--.---.-
.. --.,..-.. .__._._n _....
.. -.....--.-..-...........------.--.----...---.. ---.--....-..-----. .....
..-... _.._w..___._..__._._...._..... __.______.____.____..._.. _
_'_'__h__.. _"'~'_'__"" ......:_._._........._.._... __.._.__"__.__..._____..___..__...______._.._...__ _...__.____..._.__..._.___
.- ..-..-....-.-... ..-....-..-...---...- --... ...--.-........-.-.....-.....-.-... -...-----...-...- -..... "'-..-." -..-.--....-----.----.-. --...-.
......-_. ....--..--.-..-.-.........-........ -.-.....-..-- -'--'-.-
... -....-- -.-..--.---..-..,-....- .-. -.'- ....-..- .-.... --.----,.---. ._.
. -.......-..-....--....-.-.. .---.-....-- -'... ..
..--.............-..... .-....----" ......-......--....,..
--- _... ....
.
....--..--..--....-....--......-
-. '......----....-.....
. ....----.-....-..-____.__..__n..__ ___......_.. '_"__..
.
.
---'----.-----..
.....----....-..--
.
_n'-...-'_.._..___._____
.
;1)
-----------l-.Lo ~ 4.J~~~~~_
.
;i
--------- --------------------------------------------
--L-~r~>.44-
---~~~ ---~--~~----
--'~~-
-___v~_JL& n-_-!:t~__.__~~_
~--~---SJ~ S1~_~___________
-~-~~~-
- --~~-- -.yL<.--~__~____EI2.. _'nn .__~_.Q..._______
--;z::..:f:Li7.L&..rL~__~_.~_
-.~-j~~--~qJ.___.._.__
E~~.~~~~
----~--"~ G..-___d2;' _. ___~-_
". ; /J--;S .
--~~&---cJ!1!..~__ _ ~_L~__
.._~-~-~~7~~_
-----~------d::_~----~--~-~-
--- ~~-c.J;4f.~~--;-
-~-~,-.1l:_ jJlt-(~- ~----C;~__zr_
- '\. -!J- . lr-'.t1'
-----?~~---"4---~----~V~______
- ---.. -----------.---.
.
.
Michael Mitchell
560 N F at # 123
San Bernardino Ca.
92410
To Whom it concern
I do Live at the plaza appartment
I Do belive that liveing here chould be better
or improved My car was stolen sunday after 9.00 pm
therefore I think that perhaps more police in the
neighborhood would help.thire are a lot of" drug being
sold in the neighborhood Ido see a lot of drug and
rock hoors Women that sell bodys for drugs .G street
at the Liquor store the bus Depot The AM/PM up and
down the street In the Plaza
Yes more security guards would help us and more
Workshops on crime would be good for this neighborhood
So What ever you can do to help we will take
Thank you for your time .
Dr. Michael Mitchell
p.
.
.
.
.
TcJ VI) /; o'.1rt- / \7 (79)7 tJ.;.:/ t/~/-tf L
._-'"
,. r
({:? To 1>1}" '1 1:';1 L 1 Z-) u -( I~" f rv
13 11 C7' / I..!cJ I ;-L-./ f ~ 4-/ ~ (/ /1.- p' J-
;fr. t.. c> 11,. r A".( J-, ~ , .
.
. .~.7t? 1h;t::J-IfJ'-t f(/J L7 . fi ~ '1.-. t I ~I G 110
A 1'1:.,( C7 VJ c1r -~e J[ ~ 0 r -6' .t:~
'.. .. h (f f/)-6CJ -r J k 'Z /z-!~"/-l)';
~./.
IrJ JJ-~ 1'111:7;1 hy .,1-'L?tJ '-'/~ c'/
e c;'; /n /~ / / IV' .:h:fcFYJI' c::?>{;7 v /./____
,~ 7-:0
v) / (J
tel
......
,/- ....
/ ~ /;~/'
" ///.'" '"/
I ,/." ,-
l//
.
').5U LV 5 ~ -VI ..:fl/
;jf.{'A-J ,~/ ~ tJl
./uWUJ1'l.LP .~ t '
t7l....t.J
~~~. ~
~~.' ~ . ) ~
G/CJ~~"!... . ....... .'
/I . .. II 'S'it" ... ...., . ~ ,/'.
. ~~~.. ~~.-
~ ch ~ ,/4;;UJ, ~c/o ~ {j
~ ~~~~ .~
14 hE- .~~ ~T~~.
~ ~i cMf:j'il.-~
~~~........i"'....:.'...;'..
. .'.... c' ,. . _. j ... .
'". ~ ".' -
t//~~{W1---t/~~ ~~~
, ~~_..
y~ /Uj /~jV;J1 fftb'ht,ldeA-
~42 ~--iJ~::U-u
u>f~~ ~4fJb '
.
/
.-
-.
-- --,-_.-
-
.,- .
/~( .2~~/
rd /2A/~J -m ~
. s"/- w t:A-HLJ ~ ~I ~ .~~, e:, '
'. ~'.l--rL ~ ~.
~~ . '. ;:s,
. ~ -fL .~ ~ U/~.~~
. ~ ~ ~~ a--J~
. .. .~ Ct2--1~ ~~
---L~ ' f ' cr
~I
~k-.~
s-s.~ ~).3 c...t- ~
.# 9CJ 2..,-
~~ g~~ ~
.
~
~ ~
~Ti ~ 1 \~
~ _ "" t ~s
~ ~ l'<>~ · ~ A.
~ t\ ~ t 0c. · I
, t~ . ~~ l ~ t~
: ~ f <>. J ~ - r~ {)< ~
J l~ ~ . J ~ ~ · ~
_ c:; ). tI> ) l r~ ~ ~ i.
? !~4~ ,,' jl
~1~~ ~. ''>I ~jil{} ~'i~
~'"0 ~ 1-:i.~ ">l; ~ ~s l ~ ~ ~ ~.t
..~~ :q.- J j.f \") t ~.,,~l \) ~ j J ,,'j
,~. '>J '1 ~ ~ . '\l ~ ~ ~ l E" t ~
~"--CJ ~ ," 1 ,,1 Y>- ~
.
S.JT ;\I-G '57," #./l-YI3
Yn :JJ:-)-~J;~1l (4.
. '12y/tJ
70 w~ /:/ /7r"Y
I
COnce-r/7 .
.
u-kn !/"v /I~'r //7 -/if ~,~
2" L~17 {"t:..~";/ AC.(,f (3./~c./ $-fj tJn/f(;n~'
al/./I'~1 ~'V7' Iv&" ~rr/7 /if;r"c d:~-f- :.J;h~
CONY?"?'" rr a.lJ'cI iZ/r' /1" ~ ~?h ':')..-/H7& '3rrClS.
#c. fO;:C~ 01"1 ~L de- so, hll&';' //' ~
C&...."'w~ t:e-clll~ -1 )v/)/ /I? 7/c:- G:...;,7os we::-
:;Jrnpt,.-' 5 Ct..c,./r-(". 'I "j,~c S() #1;JI?Y jP?-.dtVY7.s I lIP e-
~/.Ie- he/' tl fJ.-"..... , ,SC-I7"'Y 5 ;n"9"-c/ (11'/ cI ')-~jd-:.-L \
//7 ~~d --.doY~f'#r. S()m~ of ovv :kI-JCj1r<;; /h
/!fy couyk: 7"- p-.rf/.l-r~ ;Ics ,1~.'e ~,.,..'e, f-. ck,t'ps/'/-
/11 .q, A~11 Is for- -/-/,.,).- ~s I/' ;:; S", :hIr..:f Cd5 h .
;/-kl V c.tre k~ 8~ T.I~ d~::J-- / s.(.-r?v 87-t!$ ,JH.1,..j",,~_
&i'l7 Ol-.'C:" / P7 ~# C <? 6rr):P19' (1(.+ CCJV} S..-C C<.-hC'
/5 C:J5//"Ic!:. -fir'; ch~J<.. )/:> a)o"f /12- $~ks.
ak.,Jy' "} hz-I' 4- ~M"/I_,.-r 3/tWlcI /rv"; ),,)/
S"-~?"'J'- c'ovF7;Pkx. 's- ;Y? -Afc. ~y~ o/'/-/c e~~s (
3#~\. ./? . C-
--9-' /~
__~ ,~_c-
.
"-5 ~ 0 7Z, 'Y-~J:?{ () I
~~~d1A,&
q :L cj (ZJ
t--, ~/ 30 (~{
/0 ~ ~ '-1JI~ (! ~Wu<-;
. Y~W<L ..u:> CL P-l"'~ '7~ AM <I
0tV~ ~. . r& (
, h tVti- ,iA~AL~~
.U{, 7~~-^ L . ,u-</{. - -- !
i -q7~cy ~. -. ~ '7tu-d;j
Y~I ~J,.~ &u.r..LhfMv ~ ~e;;j.
~ W a...- ~ 'f~.
e. f2<y ~~ N'-L. ~ ~&
'. ~ ;;;-dia:z;, ~~tlu.: ~iwJ-' ~~
~ u~ tJ<1lu ~ud) ~ ~
~aJl ~
UI~ 'i!~ ~1 ~ ~
~~. 1.1. aa40 ~ tV '-1t.iuY kJ04/rh 21A
~4 ( f.). >>-.
'A~IJ~~
.
.
P.17
Rating Factor 3. Soundness of Approach
.
.
.
P.1B
Rating Factor 3: Soundness of Approach
QulIIIlJ vi PIlI. (3li) .......
(lJ (25....)
The Action Plan as presented In the Preceding pages is expected to be highly effective in
in preventing d"*""ated crime and crime associated with drug dealing. As stated In the
Community Problem Solving guide of the San Bemardino Police Department, in order for a
crime to happened three thinp must come together at the same time: a victim, a suspect,
and a locetion. By Installing security equipment at PIoneer Park plaza and at Sl Bemar-
dine Plaza, the Program curtails the ability of offenders to commit criminal acts at thasa
locations. By Increasing patrols around the two properties and, at the same time making
increased prosecution personnel available through the D. A.'s OffIce, the Program re-
moves some of the potential criminals. By Utilizing the teachers of the San Bernardino P0-
lice Department and of the San Bernardino Adult School to teach crime prevention work-
shops-as well as space of the San Bemardino Department of Parks, Recreation, and
Community Services, the Program removes some potential victims through education
( See Action Plan for more details);
(a)
.
Through the Downtown New Approach Program, the City of San Bernardino
Police Department will increase car and bike patrols In a 2o.block area sur-
rounding the two talget properties. At Present in the Downtown Neighborhood,
the police have 21 patro' units working for five hours during each of four daily-
shifts ( or 1260 man-hours). The SUpplemental sarvices to be provided by the
police will add 1060 hours over the two year grant period to their existing ser-
vices. The supplemental units will patrol three times a week In the first month,
to notify potential offenders of their presence and then two times a week of
the remainder of the grant per/o(f. We expect this increase in patrols will
cause an Increase in arrests.
The DA's OffIce, under the terms of the Program are fully prepared to coordi-
nate with the Police Department by increasing the personnel working on cases
related to the expected increased arrests in the Downtown area.
The installation of safety equipment at the two properties will fill an unmet
need. The implementation of safety workshops at the Street Senior Center is
an addition to services present in our target area. The present neighborhood
computer center located at the Senior Center for use by the public, re,..rdless
of age, has 6 out-moded computers and no Intemet Access. With the funds
provided by this grant, the center would be expanded to 8 work stations with
all new computers and access to the Internet. That center also plans to be-
come an official Neighborhood Network Center during the period of this grant.
.
.
P.19
(2) Adequacy of the process to collect data
The AFE-Pioneer Associates Property Supervisor and Program Consultant will work
closely with the Crime Analyst of the San Bernardino Poliee Department In preparing
reports of the number, location of, date of crime, time of crime, type of crime commit-
ted in the target neighborhood on a weekly basis. The Program Director, who has an
MA In SOCIology and who is therefore is trained in date analys/s, will utilize the Pollee
analyst's reports to determine the impact of the increased patrols and Pf'OS8Cution
on crime In the neighborhood at three month intervals. She will make written and
graphic presentations of her findings at the Program's quarterly planning meetings so
that the planning body may make modifications of the program as needed. In addi-
tion the managers of the two properties will keep records of the number of pollee
calls to their buildings, the date, time, and type of problem Involved.. They will tabu-
late them by month and present the results at the quarterly planning meetings.
.
.
e
e
e.
P.19a
Downtown New Approach Anti-Drug Program
For San Bernardino, CA
Line Item Budget
Personnel:
Consultant salary .........................................................................
Fringe benefit .............................................................................
(@25%)
Travel:
Consultant's travel.....................................................................
(include airfare from Northern to Southern CA & rt,
Hotel stay, meals)
SUPplies ......................................................................................
( Misc. office supplies & COpy services, and telephone
Charges for ConSUltant)
Equipment ...............................................................
(InclUdes: computers, peripherals, B-station computer
learning center at Senior Center; fencing, lighting.
and security camera systems at Pioneer Park
Plaza; & lighting & security camera system at
St. Bernardine Plaza)
Sub-Contract for Supplemental Police Services ...................
Other: wiring for computer center & Internet charges ......
Two Year Total
$ 1,487.58
$ 407.42
$ 2,800.00
$ 2,200.00
$112,849.00
$128,500.00
$ 1.756.00
$250,000.00
.
P.19b
First Quarter:
Activities:
ExlleCted Expenditures:
SBPD:
· begins patrolling
three times per week for the first month .............................._....
($1.8ClO/wk rar 4 wks)
· continues to patrol two times a week for
the next two months .....................................................................
($1.2OOIwk for 8 wks)
. administrative charge ..-...........................................................
. purchases two bicycles ............................................................
two hand-held transmitters, + mise.
(2 bikesO $5OQ EA, 2tfTs. $400 EA + $200 misc.)
$ 7.200.00
$ 9.600.00
$ 1.112.50
$ 2.000.00
AFE-Pioneer Associates obtain bids
for securi4' equipment and schedule appts.
N/A
$ 1.000.00
.
Adult School obtains bids for equipment ............................................
orders equipment, and has wiring for Intemet
installed
Deot Parks & Rec. Senior Center , AFE-Pioneer Associate
& SL Bernardine Corp. start advertising & recruiting for
educational crime prevent/on WOrkshops
N/A
Staff of Adult School & SBPB
meet to develop a Joint CUrriculum. to
COOrdinate teaching schedules. and
to teach the first class
N/A
AFE-Pioneer Associates'
consultant makes three trips to San Bernardino:
Salary .._.........._............_.........................................................
Fringe ...............................................................:................
Travel .........................._...........................................................
Misc. Office supplies & telephone eJlpenses ......................
$ 454.80
$ 113.70
$ 350.00
$ 100.00
Arst of Quarterly Planning Meetings commences
N/A
Arst Quarter Total
$ 21.931.00
.
, -...--..------
.
Second Quarter:
Activit~
P.19c
Exoected Exoenditures:
~ COntinues patrols ........................................................................... $ 14.400.00
twice a week
SBPO administrative charges .................................................................. $ 1,112.50
AFE-Pioneer Associates. L P. installs
security equipment at Pioneer Park Plaza
Fencing ..............................................................................
Ughting ...............................................................................
Security cameras and monitors .........................................
.
St. Bemardine CollXlration installs
security equipment at St. Bernadine Plaza
Ughting ......................................................................................
Security cameras & monitors .................................................
Adult School installs equipment for up-graded
Computer Center ..................................................................
Classes in up-graded ComPuter Center start
Crime Prevention Workshops continue
Consultant makes one trip:
Salary .......................................................................................
Fringe ...................................................................................
Travel ......................................................................_..............
Mise. office supplies & telephone (3 mos.)............................
Second Quarterly Planning Meeting is held
Six month evaluation is presented and COnsidered
Second Quarter Total
.
$ 60.907.62
$ 7,200.00
$10,764.26
$ 6.600.00
$ 13.645.18
$ 13.731.94
N/A
N/A
$ 151.60
$ 37.90
350.00
$ 300.00
N/A
$ 129,201.00
.
P.19d
THIRD QUARTER:
Activities: ExDeCted Exoenditures
SBPO continues ......................._.m............................................ $ 14.400.00
twice a week patrolling
SBPO administrative charges .................................................... . $ 1.112.50 X
Crime prevention workshops continue N/A
Computer classes continue N/A
Intemet charges .........................................................
$ 126.00
Consultant makes one trip to San Bernardino
To assist with implementing & evaluating program
.
Salary .....................................................................................
Fringe .................................................................................
Travel .....................................................................................
Office SUpplies, telephone for 3 mas ..................................
$ 189.50
$ 37.90
$ 350.00
$ 300.00
Third Quarterly Planning Meeting is held N/A
Third Quarter Total 16,478.00
.
.
P.1ge
FOURTH QUARTER:
Activities:
Exoected Exoenditures
~ continues ...................................................................
twice a week patrolling
$ 14.400.00
SBPO administrative costs .................................
$ 1,112.50
Crime prevention workshops continue
N/A
N/A
Computer classes continue
Internet charges .............................................
$ 126.00
Consultant makes one trip to San Bernardino
To assist with implementing 8. evaluating program
.
Salary .......................................................................
Fringe....................................................................
Travel ..............................._..................................
Office SUPplies, telephone for 3 mos ....................
$ 151.60
$ 37.90
$ 350.00
$ 300.00
Fourth Quarterly planning meeting is held
One Year Evaluation is Presented
N/A
Fourth Quarter Total $ 16,478.00
.
.
P.19f
FIFTH QUARTER:
Activities:
Expected Expenditures
SBPO continues ...............................................................
twice a week patrolling
$ 14.400.00
SBPO administrative charges ............................
$ 1.112.50
Crime prevention workshops continue
N/A
Computer classes continue
N/A
Internet service charges ...................................
$ 126.00
Consultant makes one trip to San Bernardino
To assist with Implementing & evaluating program
.
Salary ......................._............................................
Fringe..................................................................
Travel ......................................................................
Office supplies. telephone for 3 mos ..................
$ 151.50
$ 37.90
$ 350.00
$ 300.00
Rfth Quarterly planning meeting is held
NfA
Fifth Quarter Total
$ 16,478.00
.
__n.. _______.__..___..___._.____..~.. .____
.
P.19g
SIXTH QUARTER:
Activities:
ExIlected Expenditures:
SBPO continues ..........................................;..............
twice a week patrolling
$ 14,400.00
SBPO administrative costs.................................
$ 1,112.50
Crime prevention workshops continue
N/A
Computer classes continue
NfA
Internet service charges......................................
$ 126.00
Consultant makes one trip to San Bernardino
To assist with Implementing & evaluating program
Sala'Y ..................................._...............................
Fringe .................................................................
Travel ....................................................................
Office supplies, telephone for 3 mas ..................
$
$
$
$
189.50
37.90
350.00
300.00
.
Sixth Quarterly planning meeting is held
Year & one-half evaluation is presented
N/A
.
.
P. 1.9h
SEVENTH QUARTER
Activities:
Expected Expenditures:
SBPD continues to ....................................... ....._.................
iWiOO a week patrolling
$ 14,400.00
SBPD administrative costs ..__.._................_.........
$ 1,112.50
Crime prevention Workshops continue
N/A
N/A
Computer classes continue
Internet service charge .....................................................
$
126.00
Consultant makes one trip to San Bernardino
To assist with implementing & evaluating program
.
Salary ..............................................................................
Fringe ................._.......................................................
Travel..............................................................................
Office supplies, telephone for 3 mas ...........................
$
$
$
$
151.60
37.90
350.00
300.00
Seventh Quarterly planning meeting is held
N/A
Seventh Qua!terTotal
$ 16,478.00
.
.
P.191
BGHTH QUARTER
Activities:
SBPO continues ........................................._......................
-
twice a week patrolling
SBPO administrative charges .........._...................
Crime prevention workshops continue
Computer ,.,,, 5 as continue
Internet service charge ..........._........................................
Consultant makes one trip to San Bernardino
To assist with Implementing & evaluating program
Salary ..................._............................__......................
Fringe ...........__......................................._.....................
Travel..~..__._....._..................._.........__.....................
Office supplies, telephone for 3 mos ...........................
.
Eighth Quarterly Planning Meeting Is held
On~r evaluation is Pl'esented
Eight Quarter Total
ExllllCted ExDenditures:
$ 14.400.00
$ 1.112.50
NfA
NfA
$ 126.00
$ 151.60
$ 37.90
$ 350.00
$ 300.00
NfA
$ 16,478.00
.
.
P. 19j
Downtown New Approach Anti-Drug Program
For San Bernardino, CA
Budget by Activity
Increase Patrols around the tWo tarl!et
Housing Developments: .
Cost of patrol units over 2 years ......................................................
$117.600.00
Cost of equipment for patrol units ...................................................
$ 2.000.00
Administratlw costs ( scheduling. record keeping. .........................
payroll)
$ 8,900.00
AUl!/TIent security equipment around two tal'l!et bUildings:
.
Pioneer Park Plaza:
Fencing..........................................................................................
$ 60.907.62
Lighting ..........................................................................................
$ 7,200.00
Security cameras & monitors .......................................................
$ .10,764.26
St. Bernardine Plaza:
Llghtlng...........................................................................................
$ 6,600.00
Security cameras & monitors .......................................................
$ 13,645.18
Educational WOrkshops in personal safety, crime prevention, ......... $ N/A
and drug abuse awareness
(all in-kind donation)
Upl!rllding an existing compUter center .............................................. $ .13,645.18
Other Computer related Wiring for Internet & Internet service ..... $ .1.756.00
Consultant to assist In COOrdinating and evaluating program ....... $ .1.895.00
.
Accumulated Two Year Total
$250,000.00
.
P. 20
Rating Factor 4. leveraging Resources
.
.
.
P.21
Rating Factor 4. Leveraging Resources
The Downtown New ApProach Anti-Drug Program has been fortunate enough to leverage
many resources, aside from HUD funds. In preparing the proposed program. For example,
the San Bemardino Police Department are contributing a police officer to teach one-half
of the bl-monthly crime prevention WOrkshops; The San Bemardino Adult School Is con-
tributing a teacher to teach the other half of the bl-monthly work shops. The San Bernar-
dino Police Department has already contributed staff time to make recommendations re-
garding the proper placement of securl1;y devices at both properties, and will provide-
classes to train management and maintenance staff In crime prevention strategies at no
cost. The staff of Pioneer Park Plaza, of the Fifth Street Senior Center, and of 51. Bemar-
dine.s Plaza are contributing staff to do outreach for both the workshops on personal
safety, crime prevention, and drug abuse awareness and the computer classes. The San
Bemardino Adult School is contributing staff to teach the computer classes. The Fifth
Street Senior Center Is COntributing the space to conduct both the bl-monthly educational
workshops and the daily computer classes.
(See table of In-Kind Donations following)
.
.
_._m_______________..___
21. a
. I III I~ ~re !
"
" e "
0 ;:; III
... iil " &' "
f{ !!3 3
o III :r
" " 1i a III -
i a :J
" s- o
... CD C
0
:J
c-
o
lire i~ ~ nlllll '2.ire ~:~~ lire ~oi I 0
~i~ ::l.o.lir ~ 8 :J
~ - ;: Illj_ '2.iii Ql
_Ill ... n n e 3~:t " II ~ !l 8 :t ...
g:o< I~m CD CD CD : am :. 0< ~n3m 110< ",,:r 0'
a a iill. " ... ..o.~
:. a ~1I- o ::l.l- :'0 :J
i ~'g i 3 II oem
ii 8 iii ! 1lD~ " ~ " a Ul
3 !! CD 0< Illli
Ii ~.. 3 i ~~I) l~ -o"s Ii ~ " iii l:T
iil 0 ~ i !l. g i~O< '<
Ii :r S-I) "'C
-. " ~ l!l: "a. II>> :r3 Ql
" Iir " ... ~5' al2 "i
II>>!! .. n o ;:; o " ~
~ 0 " i~ " ".. i :J
" " i CD
.. :r
" 0 Cil
... i
:J
...
W -=~ (3'1-> tit I\) I\) I\)l:> I\) I-> &' ::r
:r !ll Ol ~~ I\) :r :r l:>:r :r Ol CD
~ CD :r 0 i,; ~ ~~ i,; :r n 0
~~ l:>1l i ~ e
3 ~ .. 3 . iii 0
0 0< 3 3 ;:t 3 .. :e
o . ~ tit 0 0 tit 0
.. (3'0 !I'. I\) .. . l:> 0 :! :J
. e .. I\) .e .e ! ...
.. tit 0. tit tit 0
l:> ~.. ~ III :r Ii: I-> :r :e
co :rl\) ~ ~ co ~ l:>
.. 3 III ~ 3 0' ~ ~ (3' .e :J
co o .. ... ~ ~ ... :r
a "0) 0 ~ co ... :z
3 2:~ rt .. :r :r 3 0' s:
~ '" l:.) ... ~
3 0' 0' ~ ...
I-> ~ 0
Ol 3 ... ~
~ ~ co "'C
3 ~ (3
P lJQ
W
3
0
.....
en
Ql
tit .. .. .. .. tit :J
.. .. .. .. If
~r I\) l:> I-> W aJ
g, g l:> ~ I\) :.. ill CD
I->W ~ 3
....UI III III lD .... l:>
lIll\) III I\) 0 UI I-> 0 0 Ql
~8 b b 8 8 i.l i.l b 8 a
0 0 0 0 0
:;'
9
(')
?>
.
.
P. 22
Rating Factor 5. Comprehensiveness and Coordination
.
.
.
P.23
Rating Factor 5: Comprehensiveness and Coordination
(1) Extent to which actlvltl.. _ ccordllllltlld prior to .ubmlsslon of application
The proposed activities were developed during April and May of this year in a com-
munity planning process attended by:
o residents and staff of the HUD funded Pioneer Park Plaza apartment
complex;
o the residents and staff of the HUD funded senior apartment complex,
St. Bernadine Plaza;
o the staff of the City of San Bernardino Police Department;
o a police liaison to the City of San Bernardino District Attorney's Office;
o the staff and members of the San Bernardino Fifth Street Senior Center;
o and the students & staff of the San Bernardino Adult School.
(2)...... tobe.---..lntlleSs. .......rdlno~ ...........prc: 111...
.
AFE-Pioneer Associates consultant and Property Supervisor will take the lead in en-
suring that the Program partners become active In the community's Consolidated
Planning process. Our activities will be reported to the appropriate offICial at the
Economic Development Association of San Bernardino on a regular basis. We will
send a representative to their community planning meetings.
(3) -- ...---..........-_ on................ __ _ allier law ML.__.a."".,....
"'1II8nbd ....~111 _
In planning for the Downtown New Approach NAAD Program, AFE-Ploneer Associ-
ate, L P. has shared and COOrdinated information on specifIC crime prevention s0-
lutions and their resPective outcomes with both the Police Department of San Ber-
nardino and of San Francisco. For example, our Consultant and the Manager of
Pioneer Park Apartments, met with officers of the San Bernardino Police Depart-
ment on three occasions during April and May to seek theIr advise on how the P~
lice Department could best contribute to combating drug-related crime in the
Downtown neighborhood, esPecially in and around the two target properties. The
police recommended that increasing patrols-both car and bike patrol&-in a
twenty-block square block area surrounding the two housing developments.
.
Police Department also referred our representatives to the coordinator of the De-
partment's Rental Housing Program, who sent the Department's Crime Preven-
tion Specialist to each of the two properties to make an assessment of the needs
for and the best loCations for security equipment-including lighting, fencing, and
.
P.24
video cameras/monitor systems. Property managelS of both target buildings then
received written reports on the police recommendations. The Police Department
also offered to provide the services of their Crime Prevention Specialist to teach
one half of the educational workshops on pelSOnal safety, crime prevention, and
drug abuse awareness and offered the services of the Rental Housing Program,
which trains management and maintenance staff in a three part series of classes
on crime prevention and prevention reporting procedures In housing. AFE-Pioneer
associates has also been in communication with the Police Department's Crime
Analyst who has provided detailed Crime statistics to assist the Program with de-
termining baseline crime data and program evaluation. The Program partnelS will
continue to work with the Crime Analyst in the future to obtain specifIC data that
the Crime Analyst will extract from the Police data base.
.
A police officer also offered to and did act as a liaison with the District Attomey's
office for the purposes of developing a MOU with the DA's Office for the Program.
A MOU wit the DA's Office has been signed and is submitted with this Proposal.
The Police Department has agreed to the purposes of Program and has made a
verbal and written commitment to provide supplemental police patrol and educa-
tional services; we are merely awaiting a review of the MOU by the City Attorney
before it is signed by the Chief of Police (See letter to the effect with the MOU's
and LetteIS of Commitment).
AFE-Ploneer Associates, L P. - via its general partner-A F. Evans Company, Inc.
has also shared Information about solutions and outcomes with the San Francisco
Police Department, as A. F. Evans owns or manages two buildings on the Tender-
loin neighborhOOd of SF that are target properties for New Approach AntI-Drug Pro-
gram there. Its consultant to the San Bernadino Program has considerable experi-
ence in working with the police In San Francisco to determine solutions for crime
prOblems and evaluating outcomes of those solutions.
(4) T_...- .....tDd....llIt> .........tD_I_..,.....-.., -.....
(a) AFE-Assoclates, LP. plans to work with the Adult School Computer Center
teacher (and with the Director of the Senior Center in which the Computer
Center is located) to apply for designation of this up-graded computer labora-
tory as a NeighborhOOd Network Center. We will assist the Center throughout
the application process.
.
(b) The propOSed Program will also make linkages to the existing NeighborhOOd
Watch Program in San Bernardino for their advise on holding Watch meetings.
In addition we will, as a program, become involved in the Consolidated Plan-
ning process of the Economic Development Agency in San Bernardino.
.
San ilemardlno
Police Department
.
San Bernardino Unllled
School DIsIrIct.
San Bernardino Adult School
Adult education Teacher
San Bernardino Adult School
PIon.. Park Plaza
A. F. Evens Company, Inc.
St. Bernadine Plaza
St. Bernadine Plaza, Inc:.
San Bernardino
District AttDmey's OffIce
San Bernadino Park, RecreatIon
and Community SeIVIces,
FIfth SlnIetSenIor Center
San Bernardino Police Dapt.
CrIme PI1MIntIon ~Iist
Un.. of Authority Amongst Partners In the
San Bernardino Downtown New Approach AntI-Drug Program
.
P.25
.
6. Action Plan
The partners in this Action Plan are:
AFE-Pioneer Associates, L P.
The City of San Bernardino Police Department
The City of San Bernardino District Attorney's Office
The San Bernardino Adult School
The City of San Bernardino Department of
Parks, Recreation, and Community Services
.
.
I. .
P.26
i.
P.27
6. Action Plan:
a. The specific goals of the Downtown New Approach Anti-Drug Program are: to re-
duce crime in the target neighborhood by 10% the end of the first year; by 20% the
end of the second year; and to improve neighborhood residents' access to re-
sources. To accomplish these overall goals, the Program objectives are to:
1) create a drug- and crime-free environment at the Subject Properties;
2) provide for the safety and protection of residen1s of the Subject Prop-
erties;
3) enhance a drug-free and crime-free environment for the residen1s of,
workers of, and visitors to the Downtown neighborhood;
4) educate the residen1s of, workers of, and visitors to the Downtown
neighborhood so that they may protect themselves;
5) provide access to the latest computer technology for residen1s of and
visitors to the Downtown neighborhood in order to enhance their the
welfare and well-being; and
6) ensure close community oversight and evaluation, as well as revision
of the Program as needed.
.
b. Descrlbe the actlvltl.. and rol.. to be underteken by each ......".ntee.
lbe ActIon Plan for the Program consists of the following six steps:
Step 1) Install protective fencing, security cameras, and lighting around
two HUD funded senior and younger disabled persons buildings;
Step. 2) increase both blcycle and police car patrol in the Downtown
neighborhood in general, but especially in a 2Q..square block
area around the two target HUD funded buildings;
Step 3) augment the joint effort of the police and District Attorney to
Prosecute and/or refer to treatment (as is appropriate) offenders
committing crimes, especially drug-related crimes, in the Down-
town neighborhood;
Step 4) develop and Implement a series of educational workshop on per-
sonal safety, crime prevention, and drug abuse awareness;
Step 5) provide seniors living in HUD assisted buildings and the
neighborhood In general with access to the latest computer re-
sources for improving their health and well-being;
Step 6) develop community coordination of the Program via quarterly
meetings attended by representatives of the Program partners
and other interested community members, including residen1s
and staff of the two target buildings.
.
e
"""
",,0
~~~.
.3',g.~
i!ilO
coiUi
:g{g~
~1.!1~
i! ~
. n
:2:~
~ng
~On
::!!-o
ii'~~
Hi
i-l~
o. .
i'.~
roo' '2
->.
~~~
Oltg~
1-;:
.:~
3..
-,,,
~~!
~!
O'
;Ii
z..
if
g3
fl
o~
.as
:~
/<:
-.
~.ii
~
..
.
~
.
o
e
-g
.
i
"
i
.
.
a
o
~
I
o
.
i
.
.
.
;;
~
::
!l
a
3
n
i
.
.
t
:
II
:r
~
l:
"
.
~
"
.
~
.
.
.
5
"
..
"
!!.
i
e1
III
~
:l
11
.. :: i ..J L_. ! ';';ij' ; '~' .,
;, ~_ 1;' [__'__H"" ~~:- ,,1 f- ,1 I' .
." .....; ,_. .._... . r""-<:.. " ,'n i '-c..." . 'i
.' " :, i' 1'--" "'""r......' LJ{ 11';""". " ,. .
;:ud " I L. J L_ ; I r,; / ! r", ~ rM~;'bU!lloi: - i ! i j ;; ; ;'-',-~'~'~ ,.
t;""'.;,c:~-,-" i.1 ~ [;::,,-=*..~ii...~Jrl'J 1,,~~Illet-.or-_JLji.l--' -"','
0, -' ...;; ~-i" -ii;::::::';';---:O-:' 'J ":':. :: :~"ilfl. J/#:"c::::J i -r'I~'I'-::'~=';::-:';'--
r. .~ ~ '",-_,c;. it ,I f;" ~-'<",il' I Ii ! III' ,i-"
""'7"''''~"''.";;;. ~.:'Jijj! ::vii! .:-~T::'T'.:~' I'" r~: ~JIi=-nc~a.:.:;::J!::::::t'i;a, I> '.. ,I!~:: i.
" .~"",..,,' _.,,_. I~;....<ol ,~\"" ' ...) c"'"
i: c, : I Ii ,u",..l,!li r;:5Q. ,r',-'A' ~ J 'I;j ",' .~H I, ,. c::
:~'Oi{'-~ r.:~:!(MtvJL_j\.Ji [ill Ji cHI d Ir;l~n' I ifil II .'J
C-t. r ~ ~ T'~ 'i.'..lIDOI1--li- l.~l;=" ~L.' I: J [-=:J i k.. f) ~ n~'ru L. ~I" .i
: -:_ ~ g 'j,l , I~' ,1nr - _---.J I L I' I;!' 0
l~=~' 'I' ~.'. l1!i" ~ ~'.IL..iJ'JI iI-IL'. ITJl nO po,LJ 'UU ~
. ...,Ii !:I; II 1; ILu"""" I' '. _l f- .~I '.1- ct
:::!!_~.__ >-:j~ ,,," '-- ,nl r; U ' 'L m
"'1""" ...," .. ,---,r--J-." Ii ,. .~ L . 'C. -
...J.l .:1 : .L. :-=.' ~\ Ii 51r'- J .j=c::::rr:frt-l1~.! LJ r r i~ Li: a'
V*~ i=!itlo~ ~ III" ~Ulll 'I' '-- ." ~
,} ",~'q \iriP ,;JOclU,jLJ ~ = c;
. ". I'" L r- j h 1'1 n 11. ~
i ' , I U' ~.. L"= en
I,r-""
,~ III
l- ::J
1- III
. . Q)
\n13
;'\ .:sr.~; A)
JI; i.. 1 U 9:
L" ::J
l'~''''O
. J ,.,. ! r -
I' ~ ,: en
IlL';
,(""..:- ::J"
. _Ji ~ j ~
.: J~ j. , '-,.., I __: ," _' ..__. ;1dts[' ::J.
..... 1!l:::::'.: ....!.:::-~.::... ,/.:> iJ ..-::C"-=' :..._..~ - co
w " ", 1'f~~jtA ; ,...._, r':: . C"~ )>
..: a. ,.....n......,. !IlI;"-""'~ .. 'I' .. .-""",-
......ClrI tic ,.. ; I : ; i ._~-- ", .-:.._c..j !....:t1..-.. .;::....: -.
" *" ..::' ..., ,. ,i'-"~ II ft-l Ti <D
_' '" ;, ,:.... ., ;.:::::.,,:_-:..,.._]: 'I ~:-: 1; ~ III
~ ~~:':i' ~-;:: -j ;-lr., ~~~._LL..~! l __ r; ;: j"l r-i, i ~_MJiI!";;'; II i I i I -:':~-l:':lr-:- 0
~ .....-' .. i I. Ir~I""""'1~ ..--' o. -
IT1 ___ . .....,,)1 , ., I' . -' t J -- ' "
fA EP. ~'~f~1 I"" .,,~ ".':::::' '--'L.J '.:::' i J'i . ..:' ..:r-I.-_....::" -...: :: :;-
:-::fr;~;i ifaU Ilfi~}~b~Oi:-~~J
0> ," ' 'I i!i ", &. ; i c'tl !' &r1 lit. .~ ...-"" "'0
_, :__ ~ ,I" I :: 1i I I! .'. !!1.
.. " .,' '1 I 'I ' II I :::--- ,--'\'"
: . ' . _......_.... ' '! i' ---, , ,,,... 0
: : . a . T"" '-l1f. "'::'\'~-;-r: - I ! ' ...~:.- 1ii
;'~'~':I; .,:;.~.,...,;;,:...i Q' . . ~ ~
.. . .... ~ iGPi>'1i. I '! ~~=.= ....
i! riQ,_";...i2 0H.. Iii .,' 21 ~
:! !.,Xi.'. ~",\.,:..,"_(Q.,-".::' -=---" '~_. '::: jA-=-': r-"-,' I' ~
, 'i t ,i e ii *, ~ - * ~
. ~;'''i:.,~J,: I:. 'i'<~"';:i; -;'rPi....::::~;; B-
'm-' ., .. ,""., ill,. ,:: ' '"
~ . ..., .,. ',~~::: . .. c ,
& ~ W16......' ,...., ... r;"~"""""."~' ·
i " ,.,. t: [! ,_Rd . "":~,",'~ '
WhItIOcik,A.~:C:~. . " . '....~
! .....nyon:Rd"..'
!",.. ........
_ "'IS.UO'li "_h.,;
......,~a:.
o
".
!'
mi
.~.
~
P
0>
r\'j
i
iii
0.....
~.....
Cli . .
~8,
~
~
;"
C'I
~ fi!
...
.
.
.
"--.
P.28
c. This action plan was developed in a community planning Process attended by:
. residents and staff of the HUD funded Pioneer Park Plaza apartment
complex;
. the residents and staff of the HUD funded senior apartment complex,
St Bernadine Plaza;
. the staff of the City of San Bernardino Police Department;
. a police liaison to the City of San Bernardino District Attorney's Office;
. the staff and members of the San Bernardino F"rfth Street Senior Center;
AFSPIoneer AssOC:Iales. L P.: AuGMENrINe SECURITY AND ENGAGlNe CoMMU-
NITY
throUgh the Downtown New ApProach Anti-Drug Program, the AFE-Pioneer Ass0-
ciates, L P. will either contribute grant funds for or specifically carry out steps 1-
6 above. Specifically, we will:
(1) Utilize $78,871.88 for security capital improvements to Pioneer Park Plaza.
These improvements will include: fencing, lighting, security cameras and
monitors.
(2) Utilize $6,895.00 of the grant funds to support the costs of a consultant
experienced in community organizing, program development prograrn
evaluation, and report Writing. These costs include salary, travel, and office
expenses.
(3) Disburse funds to St Bernardine Corporation, the San Bernardino Police De-
partment and to the San Bernardino Adult School to carry out their action
steps.
(4) Provide the services of fIVe staff rnembers to monitor, oversee, report on,
and keep the accountants for the Program.
(5) Represent AFE-Pioneer Associates, L P. at Program planning meetings.
· St. Bernadine Corporation: AUGMEIfflNG SECURITY AND ENGAGING CoMMUNITY
Through the Downtown New ApProach Anti-Drug Program, St. Bemardine Corporation
will specifically carry out step 1 above and will contribute to steps 4 & 6. SpecifICally,
the will:
P.29
a) Utilize $20,245.18 of the grant funds to install lighting and security camera systems
at St. Bernardine Plaza; and
b) Devote 4 hours per month of staff time to recruit their residents and neighbors for
the educational wOrkshops and computer classes. This in-kind donation is valUed at
$1,771.20.
c) Designate 4 hours per quarter of staff time to represent St. Bemardine Plaza at
quarterly planning meetings. This in-kind donation of staff time is valUed at $1,325.
City of San Bernardino PolIce FOrce-.AUGMENrING SEcURITY AND ENGAGING CoMMUNITY
.
ThroUgh the PropOSed Downtown New APProach Anti-Drug program, the City of San Ber-
nardino Police Department will carry out action step 2) and will contribute to action step
4) through the follOWing commitments:
(1) Utilizing $ 128,500.00 of grant funds, over a two year period, to augment uniform
and undercover patrol in a twenty square block area surrounding the two HUD l&
sisted housing developments; this figure includes administlation and purchase of
two bikes and two hand-held transmitters. This increaSed presence will discourage
drug related activity in and around the two buildings and will assist in the prosecu-
tion of crimes. With these funds, the police will dedicate apProximately 60 hours of
increased presence per month in addition to their current baseline senlicas of al}-
proximately 600 hours of patrolling.
(2) Contributing approximately 16 hours of staff time per month to conduct, 6 class
over a two year period, bi-monthly edUcational sessions In personal safety, crime
prevention, and drug abuse awareness in conjunction with the staff of the San Ber-
nardino Adult This in-kind donation is valued at $2,688 (16 hrs @$35/hr per mo. x
6 mos.).
(3) Contributing an in-kind donation 4 hours per month to act as a liaison with the dis-
trict Attorney's office and for aCting as a representative at quarterly COOrdinating
meetings. Thisin-kind donation is valued at $1,352 (3 hrs @ $4Sfhr x 8 mos.).
(4) Making classes in Crime Prevention Certification available to the management, s0-
cial senlice, and maintenance staff of both Pioneer Park Plaza and St. Bernardine
Plaza.
.
.
City of San Bernadine'. DIsbfct Attorney'. OffIce.- DILIGENT I'ROSECUTION OF OF-
FENDERS/REFERRAL JU lREATIIfENT OF OFFENDERS
P.30
Through the Proposed Downtown New ApProach Anti-Drug Program, the District
Attomey's Office will carry out action step 3) above. Specifically they will:
continue to COOrdinate closely with the San Bernardino Police Department in
prosecuting crime cases, With particular attention paid to criminal acts, and espe-
cially to drug-related criminal acts committed in and around the two HUD assisted
properties, Pioneer Park Plaza and St Bernadine Plaza; and 2) send a representa-
tive to Program planning meetings.
San Bernardino Adult School: ENGAGlNe AND EDucAmve THE CoMIlfUNITY
throUgh the proposed Downtown New ApProach Anti-Drug program, the City of
San Bernardino Adult School will contribute to action steps 4, 5 and 6 above by:
.
1) Utilizing $ 14,731.94 of the grant funds to upgrade an 8 station computer cen-
ter sited in The City of San Bernardino Department of Parks Recreation, and
Community Services' Fifth Street Senior Center for the use of members of the
downtown neighborhOOd and the city in general.
2) Utilizing $756 of the grant funds to pay for Internet charges.
3) Contributing to the program I>y making an in-kind donation of staff time to con-
duct educational Workshops, on personal saf~, crime prevention, and drug
abuse awareness, In conjunction With the San Bernardino Police Department
This in-kind donation is valUed at $ 3,840 dollars (16 hrs mo @ $ 40 per hr for
6 mas).
3) Contributing staff time to attend quarterly planning meetings for the program.
This in-kind donation is valUed at $ 640 (2 hlS/mo @ $40/ hr for 8 mas).
The above partners in the Program-AFE-Pioneer Associates, LP.; St. Bernardine
Corporation; the City of San Bernardino Police Department; the City of San Bernar-
dino District Attomey's Office; the San Bemardlno Adult SchOOl; and the City of San
Bernardino Department of Parks, Recreation, and Community Services' Fifth Street
Senior Center will carry-out this action plan over a tw~year period. The effects of
the plan will be monitored and measured at four pOints in time: 6 months, 1 year,
11,12 years, and 2 years after the start of the grant period, in conjunction with
quarterly meetings. At these meetings representatives of the partners, of resi-
dents, members of the Senior Center, and students of the Adult School, and other
interested parties will gather to monitor, evaluate, and modify, if necessary, the ac-
tion plan.
.
-----.-....-- -
.
P.31
City of San Bernardino Department of Parks, Recreation, and Community
Servlce&-Flftb Street Senior Center: ENGAGING lHE COIfMUNrrY
Will contribute to the Downtown New Approach AntH>rug Program byassist-
ing in carrying out steps 4) and 5) above. Specifically they will:
1) Make an in-kind donation of space to hold bi-monthly educationltl work-
shops. This space Is valued at $480
2) Make an in-kind donation of space to house an up-graded 8 station com-
puter center. This space is valued at $4,032.
3) Contribute 2 hours of staff time per month to coordinate educational
workshops and act as a representative of the San Bernardino Depart-
ment of Parks, Recreation, and Community Services. This in-kind dona-
tion is valued at $480 (4 hrs @ $ 20 x 12 mas).
.
.
Certification of Consistency
with the Consolidated Plan
u.s. ~l of 1fousI"II
and Urb8n Dew/opment
I~
.' 'l-' '.
.
I c:erliJy III8l the pIOpolOd lICtivitiorlproj_ in tho application are coaaillont with tho juriadictioD'. ClII1eIll, appmvod Coaaolidalocl PIaD.
(Type or cloorly print tho foil_ins informotio.:)
Applicaot N.....:
AF'E-Ploneer Associates, L.:1".
Project Name:
I)Tf'\m:II:tD D~RJ( WJ'D (R'~CI Zl z. D )
Locotio. of tho Project:
560 N. F ~ & 555 N. c:: !;f-n><>f-
San Bernart:tino, CA 92410
Name of tho PocIoni
Prosrom to wbich the
applicaot ia applying:
New Approach Anti-Drug Prog.....n
N..... of
CorlilYins Juriodiotioa:
.
CcrlifYins Offtcial
of tho Juriodictio.
Name:
Title:
Sipaluro:
Date:
.
I'8ge 1 of 1
bm HUD-ae1 (3/88)
I.
.
.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
LEE DEAN. CuwOFPOUCll
P.O. Box 1559. San Bernardino. CA 92401-1559
909.384.5741
www.ci.san-bernardino.ca.us
June 18, 2001
William F McClure, Senior Vice President
AFE - Pioneer Associates, LP
2000 Crow Canyon PI Ste 130
San Ramon CA 94583
RE: HUD Funded New Approach Anti-Drug Program
Dear Mr. McClure:
The San Bernardino Police Department agrees to work in partnership with AFE _ Pioneer
Associates in a cooperative program known as the Downtown NAAD (New Approach Anti-
Drug) Program. We support the program objectives and agree to supplemental baseline police
services in the area in the form of increased patrols and educational services with funding from
the HUD NAAD Grant. All additional services performed above the baseline activity level will
be supplemented by these grant funds.
This letter signifies our interim agreement to this partnership pending finalization of a
Memorandum of Understanding between the City of San Bernardino and AFE _ Pioneer
Associates.
Very truly yours,
~.,- -
Lee Dean
Chief of Police
/rm
LEADERS IN SETTING THIl STANDARD OF EXCELLENCIl
.
Memorandum of Undenstandlng between
the San Bemanllno Police Department and AFSPIoneer ~8SOCIates, L P.
1. IDEN11F1CATION
The agreement contained in this Memorandum of Understanding ( .Moo. herein), effeo..
tive as of the date BpeclfIed in Section 3 below, Is entered into by the City of San Bernar-
dino Porice Department (.SBPO- herein) and AFE-PIoneer Associates, L. P. (PIONEER ~
SOCrATES herein).
2. REClrAlS
2.1 PIONEER ASSOaATES Is the Iaad asent for a U. S. Department of housing and
Urban (-HUO- herein) funded New Approach Anti-Orug Prog,am (prog,am
herein) for the benefrt of residents of, workers in, and vlsitDrs to the Downtown
neighborhood ("Downtown- herein) or the City of San Bernardino. This collabo-
rative program shall be known as the Dowrrtown NAAD Prog,am ("Program"
herein). .
2.2 Dowrrtown Is herein defined as that area of the City of San Bernardino
bounded by Baseline Street on the North, N. Siena Way on the West, Rlaito
Avenue In the South, and Highway 215 on the West
.
2.3 The goals of the Downtown NAAD Program are to:
(I) create a drug- and crime-free environment at the Subject Properties; (n)
provide for the safety and Protection of residents of the Su~ PIOpeIt/es;
(iiI) enhance a drug.free and crime-free environment for the residents of, work-
ers of, and visitors to the Downtown neighborhood; (iv) educate the residents
of, workers of. and visitors to the Downtown neighborhood in personaJ safety,
crime prevention, and drug abuse awareness; and (v) provide computer leam-
ing centers to anhanoe the welfare and well-being of residents of and visitors
to the Downtown neighborhood.
2.4 PIONEER ASSOaATES owns a HUO funded !lousing complex for senior and
disabled persons within the boundaries of San Bernardino: PIoneer Park Plam.
Pioneer Park PIam's two buildings are located at 560 N. F Street and at 555
N. G Street.
2.5 The A. F. Evans Company, Ine. Is the general partner of PIONEER ASSOCIATES
and, as Such, has the authoril;y to make contracts and<S/gn MOU's on behalf of
PIONEER ASSOCIATES.
.
MOU Betw_ s.n .......n1IDo Police Department
ond AFE.....on... AuocJotea, L P.
Pa.a1of8
.
2.6 Evans Properly Management, Inc~ a wholly owned subsidiary of the A. F.
Evans Company, Inc, ("EPMI" herein) Is the manalllng agency for Pioneer
Park Plaza.
2.7 In order to cany out the goaJs of the Program, PIONEER ASSOCIATES has en-
tered into a partnership with Sf. Bernardine Corporation, owners of another
HUD funded housing complex for senior and dlaabled. persons within the
boundaries of San Bemardlno: Sf. Bemardine Plaza located at 584 W. 5th
Street. The Sf. Bernadine Col')lOration will contribute to the Program by
making Improvements to the secu~ equipment at Sf. Bernadine PIeza.
2.8 Pioneer Park Plaza and Sf. Bernardlne Plaza together are the "Sul!lect Prop-
erties" to which this Agreement refers. The Subject Prop&itJes are located
within the San Bernardino Police Departmenfs Area D and In the Downtown
neighborhood of San Bernardino, CA.
2.9 For the purposes of achieving the goals of the Downtown NAAD Program,
EVANS has also entered Into an informal partnership the CIty of San Bernar-
dino Adult School ("Adult School" herein) whereby a member of its staff wDi
co-teach and COOrdinate the Educational Workshops. Stsft of the Adult
School will also teach computer classes to enhance the welfare and well-
being of its class members.
.
2.10 For the purposes of conducting the Downtown NAAD Program, PIONEER AS-
SOCIATES has also entered into an Informal partnership the Clly of San Ber-
nardino's Parks. Recreation, and Communlly Services Department's fifth
Street Senior Center ("Senior Center" herein) located In the Downtown
Neighborhood of San Bernardino, whereby it will host the educational work-
shops. The Senior Center will also house an enhanoed Computer Leamlng
Center to add to the welfare and wel!-belng of residents of and visitors to
the Downtown nelghborhood.
2.11 Collectively, PIONEER ASSOCIATES. SBPD, the D. A. 'S OFFICE, Sf. Bernadine
Corporation, the Adult School, and the Senior Center are collaborators In the
Program.
2.12 PIONEER ASSOCIATES desires to obtain supplemental police service In the
form of Increased patrols and educational services from SBPD In order to
achieve the ~1s of the Program.
2.13 PIONEER ASSOCIATES AND SBPO agree that the Patrol services rendered by
SBPO under this MOU are In addition to SBPD's baseline level services In
Police Area O. SBPO and PIONEER ASSOCIATES ilso agree that SBPO will
not reduce its baseline lellel of services In Area 0, particularly In the areas of
communlly policing, patrol, and InvestlPtlons.
.
MOU Betw_ Sen Beru...1no Police Depoortment
.nd AFE Fl41f.... ...oc...... L P.
..... 2 of .
r
"'-"
'"
.
Now, therefore, and in consideration of the mutual covenants and conditions herein con-
tained, SBPD and PIONEER ASSOCIATES agree as follows:
3. TERM
This Agreement will become effective on October 1, 2001 and will continue In effect
for a period of 24 months unless terminated earlier. Either party may terminate this
Agreement upon thirty days written notice to the other party.
4. ASSIGNED PERSONNEL
4.1 Subject to the provisions of paragraph 4.2 below, SBPD shall render the services
required by this agreement by means of POST-certified sworn and non-sworn
personnel of SBPD ("Assigned Personnel" herein) .
4.2 PIONEER ASSOCIATES may request SBPD to replace any of the Assigned Person-
nel for any of the reasons set forth in this paragraph 4.2. In conjunction with
each replacement request, PIONEER ASSOCIATES shall provide a written state-
ment of the reasons therefore and shall Include supporting documentation.
SBPD shall have a reasonable opportunity to evaluate the request and to make
changes in the Assigned Personnel. The grounds on which PIONEER ASSOCIATES
may req uest replacement of any of the Assigned Personnel are as follows:
a.
b.
. c.
d.
e.
f.
Neglect or non-performance of duties.
DiSOrderly conduct, use of abusive or offensive language, or fighting.
Criminal action.
Selling, consuming, posseSSing or being under the influence of intoxicants,
including alcohol or illegal substances.
Inadequate punctuality or attendance.
Substandard complaints from residents or management of the Subject Prop-
erties.
MOU a.tween the San aernardlno Pollc. Depertm.nt
And AFE-Plon..r Assoclat.... l. P.
Page' 3 ola
.
?,'c/
.............. . ........_ _I.. _
.
5. SCOPEOFSE~CES
5.1 SERVICES PROVIDED BY SBPD
5.1.1 Swom officers of the Assigned Personnel shaD COnduct, In one or two
person units, specialized patrols of a twe~uare block area sur-
rounding the Subject properties for the IIUfPOlI8 ofenforclng applicable
State ~, local ordinances and regulations. The SBPD and PIO-
NEER ASSOCIATES have Bgreed that the units will petro/ the area of San
Bernadino bounded by 9th Street on the North, E Street on the East, 4th
street on the South, and H street on the West ("the Patrol Area-
.hereln) three days per week for four (4) weeks and two days per week
for one-hundred (100) weeks, durfng the hours of 7 PM to mid-n/ght. by
car or by blcyc/e, depending on the weather.
5.1.2 Assigned Personnel patrolling the Area on bk:ycles wDl be trained in bicy-
cle patrol.
5.1.3 All the Assigned Personnel shaD be trained In community relations. will
J>?$f''''Ss interpersonal communication skills, and wiD employ community
policing concepts.
.
5.1.4 Trainings In personal safety, crfme prevention, and drug abuse awareness
will be Provided, in part, by the SBPD Crime Prevention Specjalist
("Specialist" herein). The edUcational services of the Specialist will be
provided during that Specialist's usual work hours and will, therefore,
be provided at no C08t to PIONEER ASSOCIATES.
5.1.5 saPD shall designate a member of its Police Department to be the saPO
liaison OffICer for the purposes of this Agreement. SBPO's Ualson ()ffl.
cer shall work in concert with resident leadership and management rep-
resentatives of the SUbject Properties on a quarterly basis for the pur-
poses of (I) reviewing SBPD's performance under this Agreement and (II)
planning for future changes or modlflcatlons of this Aweernent
(-Quarterly Planning Meetings- herein).
5.2 SERVICES PROVIDED BY PIONEER ASSOCIATES
Under the terms of the Downtown NAAD Program:
5.2.1 PIONEER ASSOCIATES shall commit staff time to coordinating. monitoring.
accounting. record-keep/ng. and reporting for the Downtown NAAD Pro-
gram..:.
MOU Between San Bernanllno Police Department
and ~ -"S'ocillles, L P.
.
Page40fB
.
5.2.2 PIONEER ASSOCIATES will provide funding for the security related Improve-
ments under the Downtown NMD Program to be made to St. Bernardlne
Plaza and to Pioneer Park Plaza.
5.2.3 PIONEER ASSOCIATES shall provide funding for Increased police patrols In
and around St. BernadIne Plaza and PIoneer Park Plaza. .
5.2.4 PIONEER ASSOCIATES will collaborate with the San Bernardino Police De-
partment and with the San Bernardino D. A.'s Office in ensuring continued
diligent prosecution and/or referral to treatment of persons commlWng
drug..ralated and nolHlrug related crimes In the Downtown nel&hbolhood of
San Bernardino and, especially, of persons commlWng drug-related and
nOn-drug Rllated crimes In or around St. Bernadine Plaza and PIoneer Park
Plaza.
5.2.5 PIONEER ASSOCIATES shall collaborate with the San Bernardino Adult
School and the San Bernardino Police Department In developing bI-monthly
educational WOrkshops In personal safety, crime prevention and drug abuse
awareness.
.
5.2.6 . PIONEER ASSOCIATES shall commit staff time to organizing and advertise
bl-monthly training WOrkshops in personal safely, crime prevention, and
drug abuse awareness for persons Interested In helping to achieve the
goals of the Downtown NMD Program.
5.2.7 PIONEER ASSOCIATES shall commit funds to enhancing a neighborhood
serving computer center located Within the Fifth Street Senior Center and
funds to develop computer stations within PIoneer Park Plaza and St. Berna-
dine Plaza, for the use of their respective residents.
5.2.8 PIONEER ASSOCIATES shall designate a Senior Member of its Management
Company's, EPMI's, staff to be its liaison ("Ualson" herein) who wilt '(I) coor-
dinate the efforts of all the staff and resIdents of Pioneer Park Plaza; and (il)
to arrange quarterly meetings of the Program partners and residents of the
Downtown neighborhood, In order to monltorthe prog,ess of the program
and to plan for any future changes In or modifications to the Program.
,/
.
lIIOU Between SIIn Bernan/lno Police Dep8l1ment
MId AFE.plon_ ANocl.t., L P.
P."lIof8
I
MRR.21.2002 '12:42PM
R.F. EVRNS
NO.621
P.l/2
.
2000 crow Canyclf'l Place. Ste 130
San llaman. CA 94583.1367
P!'1onol 925.244.1600
Fae!iimile: 925.244.1804
March 19,2002
Lt. Mark Garcia
City of San Bernardino Police Department
PO Box 1559
San Bernardino, CA 92401.1559
Via Fax 909.384.5739
No Hard Copy to Follow
Re: Grant Amendment
Dear Lt. Garcia:
We received your latest adjustment to the New Approach Anti Drug Grant. As I
had mentioned to you yesterday, HUD finds it acceptable to make whatever
adjustments we deem necessary, however the amount given to each agency
cannot pe altered. In light of that I have a breakdown below of what your
department originally proposed and what would be acceptable for us to remain in
compliance with our grant.
. Originally requested for SBPD $127,200.00 Patrol
2,000,00 Equipment
8,900.00 Administrative Service
Total $138,100,00
Amended MOU should read $128,500.00 Patrol
7.424.51 Eqllipment
2.175.49 Administrative Service
Total $138,100.00
We have made this change to our copy of the MOU and initialed the change. A
copy of which is attached.
If you have any further questions, please contact me directly at 510.465,6996.
Sincerely,
:P~I~4wJ
Patricia Rasheed ~
.
MRR-21-2002 12:16
Mar 21 02 06:31p
Morh 1 Apa~ e ts
5104659204
p.~
.
6. COMPENSATION
PIONEER ASSOCIATES agrees to pay SBPD, and SBPD agrees to accept in full satisfac-
tion for the services provided hereunder, compensation as follows:
PIONEER ASSOCIATES shall pay SBPO the amount of the actual overtime salary of
each individual member of the Assigned Personnel patrol units per hour spent by such
members in the perfonnance of the services required by this agreement. and the cost
of two handheld transmitters and of two bicycles for the use of the Assigned Person-
nel provided, however, that PIONEER ASSOCIATES shall not pay the SBPO more than .;
one-hundred and twenty-seven thousand, two-hundred dollars (U<l7,<IQ9) In the ag-' ~;. ~Sq? CO
gregate. for SBPD's patrol services, not more than two-thousand ~'~~ for equip: ./ ~
ment, and not more than eight-thousand, nlne-hundred dollars ~,!88' under thl~ ~ 'I,)~'5.
Agreement for administrative services. SBPO shall Issue Invoices, on a monthly DaSIS ~ '11:, "1
or less frequently, for services rendered. Invoices Issued by SBPO shall be made .
within thirty days of PIONEER ASSOCIATES' receipt of the funds for each specific in-
voice from HUO. Invoices shall specify the services provided, the amount due under
the invoice, and the aggregate amount of payments to be made by PIONEER ASSOCI-
ATES under this Agreement
7. RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES
.
The assigned Personnel shall at all times remein part of, subject to and in direct rela-
tionship with the SBPO's chain of command. Additionally, SBPO shall at all times pro-
vide sole supervision, control, and direction of work activities and assignments of the
Assigned Personnel, including disciplinary actions. SBPO shall be solely responsible
for the compensation and emplOyee benefits of the Assigned Personnel.
8.
INDEMNIFICATION
8.1 To the full extend authorized by law, PIONEER ASSOCIATES, wnI defend, indem-
nify, and hold harmless SBPD, its employees, agents and offlcers, from any li-
ability, claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceed-
Ings, regulatory proceedings, losses. expenses or costs of any kind, whether
actual, alleged, or threatened, as well as attorney's fees, court costs, interest.
defense cost (inCluding expert witness fees) and any other costs or expenses of
any kind whatsoever incurred in relation to, as a consequence of, arising out of,
or in any way attributable to, in whole or in part. PIONEER ASSOCIATES' per-
formance of the services required by this Agreement
@
~lv?'
.
MOU Between San Bernardino Police Department
end AFE-Ploneer Auocletes, L P.d
Pege 6 of 8
MAR-21-2002 1?:54
5104659204
96%
P.02
.
8.2 To the full extend authorized by law, SBPO, will defend, indemnify, and hold
harmless PIONEER ASSOcIATES, Its employees, asents and officers, from
any lIablllly, claims, suits, actions, arbitration JlI'OCeedings, administrative
prooeedlnss, regulatOJy Proceedlnss,/cnas. exj)eIISes or costs of any kind,
whether actual, alleged, or threatened, as well as attorney's fees, court
costs, interest, defense cost (Including expert .wltness fees) and any other
costs or expenses of any kind whatsoever InCUrred In relation to, as a con-
seqi{ence of, arising out of, or in any way attributable to, In Whole or In part,
SBPO's performance of the services required by this Agreement.
8.3 The obligations imposed by this SectIon 8 shall survive the termination of
this agreement.
9. NonCES
All notices required or desired to be served by either parly hereunder upon the
other parly shall be In writing and may be served by registered or certified United
States mall return receipt requested. Service by mail shall be deemed complete
on the expiration of the fourth day after mailing and shall be addressed as fol-
lows:
1)
If served upon PION~~ ASSOCIATES, notice shall be addressed as
follows:
.
William F. McClure, PresIdent
Evans Properl;y Management, Inc.
2000 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 130
San Ramon, rA 94583.
2)
If served upon SBPO , notice shall be addressed as follows:
Chief of Police
CIly of Sen Bernardino Police Department
P. O. Box 1559
San Bernadino, CA 92401
.
MOU BetwHn San Bernardino Police Deportment
ond AFE-PIonoor '1..oclot... L P.
Po,. 7 of 8
.
.......-.
.
TO EFfECI' THIS AGREEMENT, the parties have caused by their duly authorized
representatives to execute this Agreement on the dates set forth below.
"SBPD" ;,
CHIEF OF POUCE
CnY OF SAN BERNADINO
'PIONEER ASSOCIAlES"
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
A.F. EVANS COMPANY, INC
2~kvL
Senior VICe PresIdent
A. F. Evans ny, GenenlI Partner
Date:
By:
Lee Dean, Chief of Police
San Bernadino Police Department
Date:
.../1-.
// LL-
JU th- Valles, Mayor
1i y of San Bernardino
!
c.
MOU Betwoon Son IIerlUlrdlno PDllco Deportmont
and AFE-Plonoor "-lot... L P.
PallO. of.
.
TO EFFECT THIS AGREEMENT, the parties have caused by their duly authorized
representatives to execute this Agreement on the dates set forth below.
"SBPD" -'
CHIEF OF POUCE
CRY OF SAN BERNADINO
'PIONEER ASSOCIATES"
SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT
A.F. EVANS COMPANY, INC
Date:
2'~~L
Senior Vice PresIdent
A. F. Evans ny, General Partner
Date: .
By:
Lee Dean, Chief of Police
San Bernadino Police Department
M
vIt,-
.
o:;m G/'f(,i;; Pr~dent
.
MOU Between SIIn Ba.nard.... Police Department
end AFE-PIon... "-Iat... L P.
Pelle 8 of 8
---".. -- ~ I i-'t)
P.2
.
St. Bemardine Pla%a
550 WEST FIFTH STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CAliFORNIA 92401
(909) 888..01 $3
June 18, 2001
To Whom It May Concern:
The St. Bernardine Plaza Corporation, Owners of St. Bernardine Plaza located in
Downtown San Bernardino, California, is fully committed to the goals of the
Downtown New Approach Anti-drug Program. The gOals of the collaborative
program are to:
.
· Enhance the safety and seCUrity of residents ofHUD.assisted developments
· Ensure the safety and security of people in the downtown neighborhood in general
· Provide for the se1f-education of our citizens by training them in personal safety,
crime prevention techniques and in awareness regarding drug abuse
· Provide opportunities for computer training for peciple who presently have no
access to learning the latest technology
These goals were developed in a community planning process to benefit the
downtown neighborhood of San Bernardino, C81ifomia. The other partners in the
collaborative program are the APE-Pioneer Associates, L.P.; the San Bernardino
PoJjce Department; the San Bernardino A~ult School; and the Fifth Street Senior
Center. Our plan includes the following action steps:
· Increasing police patrols in the area surrounding the two targetHlTD buildings
· Having the District Attorney's Office designate specific personnel to handle the
expected increase in arrests due to the increased patrols
· Installing safety features at two HUD propertiell
· Coordinating and conducting neighborhood-wide educational workshops on
personal satety, crime prevention and drug abuse awareness
· Designating some grant funds to start or up-grade neighborhood computer Centers
~
.
.
.
... --- ---... I 'Cog
P.3
St. Bemardine Plaza Corporation will contribute to the Downtown NAAD Program
by utilizing up to $20,000 of the NAAD Program grant for security
improvements-namely lighting, as well as security cameras and monitors-to St.
Bernardine Plaza. These additions to this HlJD-assisted apartment building for
seniors and disabled persons will make a great. diff~nce in the safety of our
residents and staff, as Downtown San Bernardino is a neighborhood rife with drug
dealing and prostitution. In addition, our role in the Downtown NAAD Program will
include designating four staffhours per month to providing outreach to our residents
and neighbors regarding educatiopal workshops on personal safety, crime prevention
and drug abuse awareness to be given by partners in the NAAD Program at the
nearby Fifth Street Senior Center. We will also designate four hours per quarter for
a staff member to attend quarterly meetings to monitor and coordinate the NAAD
Program and to plan for modifications of the NAAD Program. In addition, we will
advertise classes of the up-graded computer training center to be located at the Fifth
Street Senior Center to our residents and neighborS.
We greatly appreciate the San Bernardino Police Department's offer to conduct
increased patrolling in our immediate area .1 believe this, in conjunction with
continued prosecution of offenders by the D. A.' s office, will help the neighborhood
tremendously.
Sincerely,
Thomas A. Redfern
Managing Agent
2
._-~..._----
.
San Bernardino Adult School
GEORGE BOHN, Principal
CHARLIE BROWN - GARY DEHRER - DR. FLORANTE PARRENAS
Vice Principals
June 14, 2001
Don Freeman, Grant Coordinator
Multiple Family Housing, HUD
611 West 6th Street, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90017
Dear Mr. Freeman:
.
The San Bernardino Adult School in its affiliation with the City of San Bernardino Parks,
Recreation and Community Services Department provide Older Adult classes with credentialed
teachers at several of their senior and community centers in San Bernardino. These centers
include the Fifth Street Senior Center, Penis Hill Senior Center, and Delman Heights
Community Center. Older Adult classes at the Fifth Street Senior Center include: Life Planning,
Nutrition, Communication/Computers, Fine and Applied Arts: Watercolor, and Physical Fitness:
Line and Ballroom Dancing.
The Adult School is supportive of the possible upgrading of the computer center at the Fifth
Street Senior Center through HUD funding. It is our understanding that AF.E. Pioneer
Associates, the owners of the Plaza which is near the Fifth Street Senior Center, are applying for
a HUD "New Approach Anti-Drug" grant.
Sin2:. r~IY'. rl j
.,f~.J~
~~{hi1, Principal
San B:t~~no Adult School
.
Phone: (909) 388-6000
1200 North "E"Street, San Bernardino, CA 92405
Fax: (909) 381-2887
.
.
.
300 North un" Street. San Bernardino. CA 92418-0001
www.ci.san-bcmardino.ca.us
..
June 13,2001
Susan L. Phillips
A.F.E. Pioneer Associates, L.P.
22 Miramar Avenue
San Rafael, CA 94901
Dear Susan L. Phillips;
The City of San Bernardino Department of Parks, Recreation, and Community Services fully
supports the action plan of the Downtown New Approach Anti-Drug (NAAD) Program _
initiated by the A.F.E. Pioneer Associates, L.P. - for the benefit of the downtown neighborhood
of this city. Those goals are to:
[) Ensure a crime- an? drug-free environment for the residents of HUD funded buildings in
the downtown area;
[) Protect the residents of those buildings;
[) Enhance a crime- and drug-free environment for the residents of, workers in, and visitors
to the downtown neighborhood in general;
[) Educate residents, workers, and visitors to the downtown area in personal safety, crime
prevention, and drug abuse awareness;
[) Promote the economic welfare of and personal well being of residents of, workers in,
and visitors to the downtown area through starting or enhancing neighborhood computer
centers.
The fourth and the fifth goals above are fully within the mission of the San Bernardino
Department of Parks, Recreation and Community Services.
The Manager of the Department's Fifth Street Senior Center has met with representatives of
A.F.E. Pioneer Associates, L.P. and other partners in the program. In addition, the senior
members of that center have had the opportunity to participate in determining their needs in
regard to drug-related crime and personal safety by means of a brief survey questionnaire and
discussion. We are fully committed to joining with A.F.E. Pioneer Associates, L.P., and their
other partners, in the Downtown NAAD Program.
.
The Department of Parks, Recreation and Community Services will host a series of BI-monthly
educational workshops at its Fifth Street Senior Center for the benefit of the community. In
addition, the Department currently houses a computer center in which the equipment is owned by
the San Bernardino Adult School; the classes of that computer center are taught by staff of the
Adult School also. The Fifth Street Senior Center will also continue to house this computer
center and will cooperate fully with A.F.E. Pioneer Associates, L.P. and the Adult School in up-
grading the present equipment.
Sincerely,
JAKlln
.
.
Certification Regarding
Debarment and Suspension
ecertUladlon A: Certlf'"",1Ioo Reprdlog Deblrment, Suspealloa, and
Other Responslhlllty Mallen - PrImary Covered TransactloDI
I. The prospective primary pllllicipant certifies 10 the best of its knowl-
edge and belief that its principals;
a. A~ not presently deba=d, suspended, proposed for debannent,
declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from cov~ _sactions
by any Federal debannent or agency;
b. Have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal,
been convicted of or had a civil judgment ~nd~ against them for
commission of fraud or 8 criminal offense in connection with obtain-
ing, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal, State, or
local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of
Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft,
forgely, bribery, falsification, or destruction of ~ords, making false
statements, or receiving stolen property;
c. Arc not presently indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly
charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with
commission of any of tbe offenses enumerated in paragnph (I )(b) of
this certification; and
d. Have not within a th~e-year period p~eding this application!
proposal had one or more public tnnsactions (Federal, Statc, or local)
terminated for cause or default.
2. Where the prospective primarypanicipant is unable to certify to
any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant
shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
enltnedoDI for Certlfic:atlon (A)
I. By signing and submitting this proposal, the prospective primary
panicipant is providing the certification set out below.
2. The inability of a person to provide the certification required below
will Dot necessarily result in denial of participation in this covered
transaction. The prospective participant shall submit an explanation
of why it cannot provide the certification set out below. The cerufi-
cation or explanation will be considered in connection with the
department or agency's determination whether to entcr into this
transaction. However, failure of the prospective primary participant to
furnish a certification or an explanation ahall disqualify such person
from participation in this transaction.
3. The certification in this clause is a material representation of fact
upon which reliance was place when the department or agency deter-
mined to enter into this transaction. If it i. later detennined that the
prospective primary participant knowingly rendered an erroneous
certification, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal
Government, tbe department or agency may terminate this transaction
for cause of default.
e
U.s. Department nf Housing
and Urban Develnpment
4. The prospective primary participant ahall provide inunediate writ-
ten notice to the department or agency to whom this proposal is
submitted if at any time the prospective primary plllIicipantleams tbat
its certification was erroneous when submitted or bas become errone-
ous by ~son of changed circumatances.
S. The terms covered traDladloD, debarred, lupended, IDeliaJble,
lower tier eovered lraaSledoa, partldpul, pen... primary cov-
end tranSledon, prlnclpaJ, proposal, and voluntarily oeluded, as
used in this clause, have the meanings set out in the Defmitions and
Coverage sections of the rulea implementing Executive Order 12549.
You may contact tbe department or agency to whicb this proposal is
being submitted for assistance in obtaining a copy of these regulations.
6. The prospective primary participant agrees by submitting this
proposaltbal, sbould the proposed covered tranaaction be entered into,
it ahall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered tranaaction
with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or
voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered ttansaction,
unles. autborized by the department or agency entering into this
. transaction.
7. The prospective primary participant further ag~ by submitting
this proposal that it wiI1 include the clause titled "Certification
Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclu-
sion - Lower Tier Covered Tnnsaction,' provided by the department
or agency entering into this cov~d _saction, without modification,
in all lower tier covered transactions and in aU solicitations for lower
tier covered transactions.
8. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a ccnification
of a prospective panicipant in a lower tier covered transaction that it
is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the
covered transaction, unless it knows tbat the certification is erroneous.
A participant may decide the methnd and frequency by wbich it
detennines this eligibility of ita principals. Each participant may, but
is not required to. check the Nonprocuremen1: List.
9. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require
establishment of a ayatem of ~cords in onler to render in good faith the
certification required by this clause. The knowledge and infonnalion
of a participant is not required to exceed that which is nonnally
possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business
dealings.
10. Except for transactions authorized under paragraph (6) of these
instruction~ if a participant in . covered. transaction knowingly enters
into a lower tier covered transaction with I person wbo is suspended,
debarred. ineligible. or voluntarily excluded from participBtion in this
transaction, in addition to other remedies available to the Federal
Government, the depanment or agency may terminate this transaction
for cause of default.
1I91ct2
Ionn HUD-2882 (3198)
Certification B: Certification RegardIog Debarment, Suspension, IDeIl-
gibiUty .nd Voluntary Exdusion - Lower TIer Covend T.......tion.
I. The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of
.hiS proposal, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred.
suspended, proposed for debanoent, declared ineligible, or voluntarily
excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal depart-
ment or agency.
2. Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certifY to
any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant
shall attach an explanation to this proposal.
Inatructiona ror Certln..lloD (8)
I. By .igning and aubmitting this proposal, the prospective lower tier
participant is providing the certification set out below.
2. The cenification in this clause is a material representation of fact
upon which reliance was placed when this transaction wu entered into.
If it is later determined that the prospective lower tier participant
knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, in addition to other
rcmedies available to the Federal Government, the department or
agency with which this tnnsaction originated may pursue available
remedies, including suspension and/or debannent.
3. The prospective lower tier participant shall provide immediate
written notice to the person to which this proposal ia submitted if at any
time the prospective lower tier participant learns that its certificatioD
was erroneous when submitted or bas become erroneous by reason of
changed circumstances.
4. The terms c:overed transadlon, debarred, IU'PCDded, Ineligible,
lower tier covered transac:tioD, partidplat, perIOD, prllDary COY..
ered transacdoD, principII, proPOIII, lad voluntaril)' e:nlnded, as
_used in this clause. have the meanings set out in the Definitions and
overage sections arrules implementing Executive Order 12549. You
may contact the penon to which this proposal is submitted for assis-
tance in obtaining a copy of these regulations.
S. The prospective lower tier participant agRes by submitting this
proposal that, should the proposed covered transaction be entered into,
it shall not knowingly enter into any lower tier covered transaction
with a person who is debaned, suapended, declared ineligible, or
voluntarily excluded from participation in this covered transaction,
unlesa authorized by the department or agency with which this trana-
action originated
6. The prospective lower tier participant further agrees by submitting
this propoaal that it will include thia clause titled 'Certification
Regarding Debanoent, Suapension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclu-
sian.. Lower Tier Covered Tnosaction," without modification, in all
lower tier covered ttanaactions and in all solicitations for lower tier
covered transactions.
7. A participant in a covered transaction may rely upon a certification
of a prospective participant in a lower tier covered tnanaaction that it
is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from the
covered transaction, unless it knoW51bat the certification is enoncous.
A participant may decide the method and frequency by which it
detenoinea the eligibility of ita principala. Each participant may, but
is not required to, check the Nonprocurement Liat.
g. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed to require
establishment of a system of records in order to render in good faith the
certification required by this clause. The knowledge and infonoation
of a participant is not required to exceed that which is nonnally
possessed by a prudent person in the ordinary course of business
dealings.
9. Except for transactiona authorized under pangnph (5) of these
instructions, if a participant in a lower covered transaction knowingly
enten into a lower tier covered transaction with a person who is
suapended, debaned, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from partici-
pation in this transactio, in addition to other remedies available to the
Fedenl Government, the department or agency with which thia trans-
action originated may pursue available remedies including suspension
and/or debannenl.
Applicant
_~, /I-r-~________________________
I TiUe
J'R. y. p.
!~ }
: <6 Idlal
. f -
.... 2 ot 2
form HUD-2t82 (3198)
Certification for
a Drug-Free Workplace
._n'N.....
U.ll. uepanmam or nou.,ng
and UrlIIIn Dev.lopment
An-Pioneer Associat@s. L.P.
"'-m1AdMty-.ong"-_t Fundilg
New Approach Anti -Drug Program
Acting on behalf of the above named Applicant as ita Authorized Official, I make the foUowing certifications and agreemenlll to
the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regarding the sites listed below:
(I) Abide by the tenus of the statement; and
(2) Notify the employer in writing of his or her convic-
.tion for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the
workplace no later than five caleodar days after such conviction;
e. Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days
after receiving notice under subparaaraph d.(2) &om an em-
ployee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction.
Employers of convicted ernploy_ must provide notice, includ-
ing position title, to every grant officer or other designee on
whose grant activity the convicted employee was working,
unless the Federalagency has designated a central point for the
receipt of such notices. Notice shaJI include the identification
number(s) of each affected grant;
I certify that the above named Applic:.nt will or will continue
to provide a drog-free workplace by:
a. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the un-
lawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or uae
of a controlled substance is prohibited in the Applicant's work-
place and specifying the actions that will be taken against
employees for violation of such prohibition.
b. Establishing an on-going drug-free awareness program to
inform employees -.
(I) The dangers of drog abuse in the workplace;
(2) Thc Applicant's policy of maintaining s drug-free
workplace;
(3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and
employee assistance programs; and
. (4) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees
for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace,
c. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged
in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the statement
required by paragraph a.;
d. Notifying the employee in the statement required by para-
graph a. that, as a condition of employment under th. grant, the
employee will -
f. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar
days of receiving notice under aubparaaraph d.(2), with respect
to any employee who is so convicted _
(I) Taking appropriate personnel action against aueb an
employee, up to and including tennination, consistent with the
requirementa of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or
(2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfacto-
rily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program ap_
proved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law
enforcem.nt, or other appropriate agency;
g. Makin8 a llood faith effort to continue to maintain a dro8-
free workplace through implementation of paragraphs a. tbm f.
Z. Sites for Work P.rrorm..... The Applicant shall list (on separate pages) th.lite(s) for tho performance of work don. in connection with the
HUD funding of the Prognm/activity shown lIbav.: Pia.., of Perfonuance shall includ. the IIreeI address, city, county, Stal., ond zip code.
Identify each sheet with the Appli.ant .sme and addreu and tho program/activity receiving grant f\mding.)
Pioneer Park Plaza, Buildings A & B
560 N. F St. & 555 N. G St.
San Bernardino, CA 92410
a.-heraO._-ftItcpI.....onfile__notklonlltlecl...lha__.
I hereby certify that all the information stated herein, I' well.. any information provided in the accompaniment herewith, is true and accurate.
Warning: HUD wtll pro..cute fala. cl.lm.and I'atements; Convlctton NY relult In crfmlnaland/orcfyll penaltlea.
(18 U.S.C. 1001. 1010. 1012: 31 U.S.C. 3729, 3802)
.~~:::'IAL ~k....____J~~__
~~;1/J1t/~ . - ;o..."/U/01 '-
Ionn HUD-IOO70 (3198)
rBI. HandbocIco 7417.1, 7475.13, 7485.1".3
Certification for
a Drug-Free Workplace
U.ti. uepanmenl or ""uSIng
and Urban Development
. AppIic8n1N.....
AFE-pioneer Asscx:iates. L..P.
Pragnun/AcIhlty ~ -.. Clnnl Funding
New Approach Anti -Drug Program
Acting on behalf of the above named Applicant aa its Authorized Official, I make the following certificatillllS and agreements to
the Department of Housing and Urban Development (BUD) regarding the sites listed below:
.
I certifY that the above named Applic:.nt will or will continue
to provide a drug-free workplace by: .
a. Publisbing a statement notitying employees that the un-
lawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, polIsesaion, or use
of a controlled substance is probibited in the Applicant'a work-
place and apecifying the actions that will be ta1cen against
entployees for violation of sucb probibition.
b. Establiahing an on-going drug-free awareneaa program to
infonn employees --
(I) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
(2) The Applicant's policy of maintaining a drug-free
workplace;
(3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and
employee aaaiatance programs; and
(4) The penallieathat may be imposed upon employeea
for drug abuse violationa occutring in the workplace,
c. Making it a requirement that eacb employee to be engaged
in tbe performance of thC arant be given a copy of the statement
requited by paragrapb a.;
d. NotifYing the employee in Ihe stalement required by para-
graph a. IhIt, as a condition of employment under the grant, the
employee will -
(1) Abide by the terms of the llIlemenl; and
(2) Notify the employer in writing of bis or her convic-
tion for a violation of a crimi"!ll drug statute occutring in the
workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction;
e. Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days
after receiving notice under subparagraph d.(2) from an em-
ployee or otherwise receiving actual notice of auch conviction.
Employera of convicted employees must provide notice, includ-
ing position litle, to every grant officer or olher designee on
whose grant activity the convicted employee was working,
unless the Federalagency haa designated a central point for the
receipt of such notices. Nolice shall include the identification
number(.) of each affected grant;
f. Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar
daya of receiving notice under subparagraph d.(2), with tespect
to any employee who i. so convicted --
(I) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an
employee, up to and including lennin'lion, consistent with the
requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or
(2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfacto-
rily in a drug abuse aaaistaDce or rehabilitation program ap-
proved for sucb purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law
enforcement, or other appropriate agencY;
g. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-
flee workplace through implementation of paragraphs a. lhm f.
2. Shea for Work r.rrorma_. The Applicanllballlill (on separalo papl) the lilo(l) for tho performance of worle don. in connection wilh th.
HUD fundinl oflbo program/lClivity ahown lboY.; Pllce ofPerfonnance lhall inclllda th.llreol oddrou, city, counly, Slal., and zip codo.
Iclenlify each sheol with the Applicant aame and addrell aad tho propllll/activity receivinllfllllfundin..)
St. Bernardine Plaza
550 W. Fifth Street
San Bernardino, CA 92410
ChecIc -011..... ...~onllle lhat... notldenllffed..,1he__.
I hereby certify that IlIth. informalion .toted h.roin, II well u any informotion provided in the accompanimenl herewith, is lru. and lecurate.
Wemlnll: HUD will pIOI4lCUtelal.. cIalmo end otatomenta. Con_on may "oullln criminal and/or civil ponaltie..
(18 U.S.C. 1001. 1010. 1012: 31 U.S.C. 3729, 3802)
. ~~~-
Irolle
_ --------L__.-.! a . ~~i?~_______
[DetoIl.)sjOl
form HUJI.$OO70 (3198)
rat. Handbooka7417.1. 7475.13. 7485.1 &.3
Certification for
a Drug-Free Workplace
U.lI. uepenmem or mualng
and UrbIm Developl1lllnt
Appllcenl Name
.
1\FE-Pioneer Associates. LaP.
"-""AolMIy-.mg F_ _Fundlng
New Approach Anti-Drug Program
Acting on behalf of the above named Applicant as its Authorized Official, I make the following certifications and agreements to
the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regarding the sites liated below:
I certify that the above named Applic;nt will or will continue
to provide a drug-ftee workplace by:
a. Publishinll a statement notifying employees that the un-
lawful manufacture, distribution, dilpensing, possellion, or use
of a controlled substance is prohibited in the Applicant'l work-
place and Ipecifying the actions that will be taken against
employeel for violation of such prohibition.
b. Establishing an on-going drug-free awarenell program to
inform employees __
(1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
(2) The Applicanfs policy of maintaining a drug-nee
workplace:
(3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and
employee assistance programs; and
. (4) The penaltiel that may be imposed upon employees
for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace,
e. Malting it a requirement that each employee to be engaged
in the performance of the grant be given a copy of the at8temenl
required by paragraph a.:
d. Notifying the employee in the statement required by para-
graph a. that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the
employee will -
(I) Abide by the terms of the statement; and
(2) Notify the employer in writing of his or her convic-
tion for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the.
workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction;
e. Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days
after receiving notice uncier lubparagraph d.(2) ftom an em-
ployee or otherwise receiving actual notice of luch conviction.
Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, includ-
ing position title, to every grant officer or other designee on
whOle grant activity the convicted employce was working,
unlell the Federalagency has designated a central point for the
receipt of such notices. Notice shan include the identification
number(l) of each affected grant:
f. Taking one of tbe following actions, within 30 calendar
daya of receiving notice under lubparagraph d.(2), with respect
to any employee who is so convicted __
(I) Taking appropriate persolUlel action against such an
employee, up to and including terminatioo, consiltent with the
requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or
(2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfacto-
rily in I drug abuse assiltance or rehabilitation program ap-
proved for such purposes by a Federal, State. or local health, law
enforcement, or other appropriate agency;
g. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-
me workplace throup implementation of paragraphs a. tbm f.
2. Sites for Work Performa..... The Applicant shaU lilt (on lopuato pa..s) the Iite(l) for the performance of werle don. in connection wilb th.
HUD fund in, of the prognm/lCtivity shown lbove: PI... ofPerfonnonce shall include the.root Bddr.... oity, county. Slit., and zip code.
Identify elell sheet with lb. Applicant .Ime and acldre.. and the propo.mlactlvity JeCCivillJ JIl8IIt funding.)
City Of San Bernardino Oeparbnent of Parks, Recreation, &
Ccmnuni ty Services
Fifth Street Senior Center
500 W. Fifth St.
San Bernardino, CA 92410
~-DIt--~onftlolhata..nol-"'......__
I hereby certify thaI all the Information lilted herein. II well II any information provided in the accompaniment h....with, il tna. and aeeurote.
Warning: HUD win prolecute fal.. c18lms and slItementa. Conviction may relult In crimlnsl and/orclvll penaltlel.
(18 U.S.C.l00l. 1010. 1012: 31 U.S.C. 3729.3802)
NI,.. of AuIhorized 0fIic:ili1
. p!t;:Ji~~dfe_.___.. ...----.--.
1T1tle
i S /2. V. P.
om. (. lIS! 0 I
form HUD-50070 (3198)
ref. Hendboob7417.1, 7475.13. 7485.1 &.3
Certification of Payments
to Influence Federal Transactions
U.s. Department of Hou.ng
and lIi'Hn Development
Office of Public and Indlan Housing
.
..ppIIc:ontN....
APE-Pioneer Associates, L.P.
Prognun/AdIvIIy R-.tng Fed.... GnlntFundlng
New Approach Anti -Drug Program
The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that:
.
(1) No Federal appropriated funds bave beeo paid or will be
paid, by or on behalf of the undemgDed, to any penon for
infiwmc:ing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of
an ageney, a Member of Coogre... an officer or employee of
Congreaa, or an employee of a Member of Congreaa in connec-
tion with the awarding of any Federal c:ontnlel, the making of any
FederoI grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into
of any eoopellltive agreement, and the exteosion, continuation,
renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal conlral:t,
grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any fimds other than Federal appropriated fimda bave
beeu paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or
allempting to infiuence an officer or employee of an agency, a
Member of Congreaa, an officer or employee of Congress, or an
employee of a Member of Congreaa in connection with this
Federal conlral:t, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the
undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form-LLL,
Disclosure Fonn to Report Lobbying, in accordance with its
instructions.
(3) The underaigned shall require that the lansuage of this
certification be inc1udedintheawarddocuments for all8Ubawarda
at all tiers (including subcontrae18, subgrants, and contracts
1IIIIIea' grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all
subreeipients sball certilY and disclose accordingly.
This certification is a material representation offect upon which
reliance was placed wbml this transaction was made or entered
into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making
or entering into this tranaaetion imposed by Sec:tion 1352, Tille
31, U.S. Code. Any person who fai1s to file the required
certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than
SIO,OOO and not more than $100,000 for each sueb failure.
I bereby Gel'tify Iba. an the information .tatod herein, ., wen u any iDfonuation provided. in the accompuimont herewith, is true aud aGCun.te.
Wamlng: HUDwll_te Ialse dalms and _nls. eon_ maY_in crimi.... andIord.. penal_.
(18 U.S.C. 1001, 1010, 1012; 31 U.S.C. 3728, 3802)
Namo"'__~ TIle
William F. McClure
SigMbn . ...
. \r.:}t'!~N phr: /~
...--.
Prevloua_Io_....
Sr. Vice President
DoIo(mmldd~)
6-18-01
fann HUD 10071 (3198)
RII.Handbooolls7417.1, 7475.13. 7485.1,& 7485.3
DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
Complete this form to disclose lobbying activities pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352
See reverse for ublic burden disclosure.
2. Status of Federal Action: 3. Report Type:
I a .Ia. bid/offer/application W a. initial filing
a, ~b. initial award . b. material change
c. post-award For Material Change Only:
year quarier
date of last report
None
a~Con__a SF.LLUI,lfnecess
11. Amount of Payment (check aI/that apply): 13. Type of Payment (check all that apply):
$ 0 actual 0 ""nn.d 0 L retsina.
o b. 0..11_ fee
o c.commlseion
o d. contingent fee
OLdofwred
Of._;~
1. Type of Federal Action:
. :-' a. contract
ih~ b. grant
c. cooperative agreement
d.loan
e. loan guarantee
f. loan insurance
4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity:
~ Prlm. 0 Su-"'.
AFE . Tier, if known:
-PJ.oneer AssocJ.ates, L.P.
A. F. Evans Ccmpany, Inc.
2000 Crow Canyon PI., Ste. 130
San Ranon, CA 94583
Con rassional District if known:
6. Federal Department/Agency:
Dept. Housing & Urban Deve10pnent
8. Federal Action Number, if known:
10. a. Name and Addrass of Lobbying Entity
(if individual, last name, first name, M/):
None
12. Form of Payment (check all that apply):
o L cash
o b.ln-ldnd; opecJIy:
nature
value
Approved by OMS
03480046
5. If Reporting Entity in No. 41s a SUbewardee, Enter Name
and Address of Prime:
Con resslonal District if known:
7. Federal Program Name/Description:
New Approach Anti-Drug Program
CFOA Number, if applicable: 14-191
9. Award Amount, if known:
$
b. Individuals Performing Services (including address if
different from No. lOa)
(last name, first name, M/):
14. Brief Description of Services Performed or to be Performed and Datels) of Service, including off'JCer(s),
employeels). or Member(s) contactsd, for Payment Indicated In Item 11:
a~Con_
15. Continuation Shee s SF.LLLA attached:
16 Informdon NqUedId twaugh 1fIiI farm II luIIorUcl by ... 31 U.8.C. MCIlln
'1352. n.dllClDlurwDliobbylng ~II. mlllMll,....1an ottlcl
upon.rllch NIIIncI_1lI-.d b)rthrt tier.. when ~..'~ .... NdII
or....... inD. ThiI ~ .. requiNd ........ tel 31 u.s.c. 1352. ~
infonbdan will be........... eong,... ~..Iy _ wi! be ~""Ior
lUJkinlpectlon. A6rt,.,...whof.IfJ......,...,nd.~lhIIIbI
subject>>. civM..... f1I not.... hi $10.000 8nd not men .....,00.000 for
ucfIu:h~.
Federal Use Only:
a SF-LLl.JI,if
o v..
Signature..
Print Name: rv /1.,1.""...., F
TiUe: S If. .
Telephone No.:
Date:
-- ... Local Reproduction
Stancf80l Form III Rev.7.1i17
.
.
.
Certification of Consistency
with the EZIEC Strategic Plan
u.s. Depllrtment of Hwslnll
end UrINIn IleveIopment
I certifytbaltheprap0se4llC1iYitiesfprojecb in lhiaappJicatiOll ""COIlIisIctIlwith theS_pc PlaDofa Fedetally-desianatecl Empowenuent
Zone (l!Z).l!nIerpriae Comtn1lDi1y (EC). aD Urbon Enhanced IlDtetprite COIIItIIWIity, or as_sic PIanDinI Community.
(Type or clearly print the followiol iDformaliotl)
Applicant Nam.
Name of lb. Federal
Prnpam 10 which the
applicanl i. applyiDI
Name ofEZlEC
AFE-PlOOEm ASSOcIATFS.L. P.
NEJf APPRa!\af. AN.l'I-DROO PROORl\M
[ further certify that the propoaed .eIiYitiealprnjecta will he located within the llZIECIUrtwa EnIwlccdEC OrStrlIlepc PlaDninl Community
and willl1C1Ve the EZIECIUrbon Enhanced Ee or S_slc PIotuIluI Coltltltuuity residents. (2 polata)
Name of lb.
Offici.l Authorized
10 Certify lb. EZIEC
Title
Siplture
Dol. (mm1ddlyyyy)
Page 1 0/1
Ionn HUD-2IIO (112000)
.
Acknowledgment of
Application Receipt
u.s. Depertmant of Housing
and Ultlan DevelopJMnt
Type or clearly print the Applicant's name and full address in the spsce below.
williams F. McClure
A. F. Evans CaI1pany, Inc.
foe AFE-Pioneer Associates, L. P.
2000 Crow Canyon Place, Suite 130
San Ram:m, CA 94583
. ,.___...__.' ..___.._____....... "'".__....__._._ ... ..'_'_""~_" 'h~__~_' .,....-. ...._....._....
((old Ii.c)
Type or clearly print the following infonnation:
.
Nsme of the Federsl
Program to which the
applicant is spplying:
New Jlwroach Ant:; -nn\q "Pn'\g:r"'"
To Be Completed by HUD
HUD received your application by the deadline amd will collSider it for fuoding. In aI:COrdance
with Section 103 of the D~eot of Housing sod Urban Development Reform Act of 1989,
00 infonnation will be released by BUD regarding the relative atSDding of any applicant until
funding announcements are made. However, you may be contacted by BUD after ioitial
screeniog to permit you to correct certain application deficiencies.
i]
HUD did not receive your application by the dcadlillO; therefore, your application will not
receive lUrther consideration. Your application is:
i l Enclosed
r"] Being sent under separate cover
Processor's Name
Dote of Receipt
.
loon HUD-2883 (2m)
.
Cily of San Bmuudino - Onuolldllted PItm - FY 2(]()()..200S
FY 2000 FlVE-YEAR CONSOLIDATED PLAN
TABLE OF CONTENTs
f!G
EXEclJ'nvs SUMMARy .............................................................................................................1
1 INTRODUCTION ...........:....................................................................................................;..15
A. Vaion IDd Mission Swt"ll1el1t.................................................................................................15
B. Puiposc and Cnl1tcnt................................................................................................................15
n. CtrlLtiN PARTICIPATION AND CONSULTATION .........................................................16
m HOUSING and HOMRI ESS NBBDs ASSESSMENT ..........................................................20
IV. NON-HOUSING COMMuNny D~VBLoPMENTNBBDS ASSBSSMBNT.....................47
.
A.
B.
.c.
A. Citizen Participation ........................................................................................:..............16
B. Consultations ....................................................................................................-..........18
A.
B.
C.
Geaeml............................................................................................................................20
Housing Needs for The Next Five yClll'll........................................................................20
Categories of Persons Afl'ccted.;.................................................................................~...26
1. Extremely Low-Jn~ ........................................................................................,...,.28
2. Low-Incomc................................................................................,.~-..:..................::.....29
J. Other Low Income .................................................................;....:.......;;;.....................30
4. Moderate-i~e.........................................:...................:.......:..................................3 1
5. Middle-J"~._._..............................;........................:.........:......................_........31
6. Total Households ............................................._.......................................................32
7. Public Housing - Section 8 .........................................................................................33
8.First Time Homcbuyem ..............................................................................................34
9. Elderly Persons with Disabllities......................................................................_......35
Nature and BYfcot ofH,,","I--.,_ ...............................................................................36
1. Needs ofSheltcred Homeless .................-.................................................-.._..37
2. Needs ofUDSheltcred Homeless ................................................................................38
3. Needs ofSubpopulations ............................................................................................38
4. Needs of Persons ~~cd with HomcJf!CSDess......................................................40
'.
D.
S. Table ID - Bn",eless Population & Subpopnl.,;ons..................................................41
B. Populations with Special Needs - Other than H~e1c:ss............................................;....43
1. Needs for Supportive Housiug......................-....................................................._43
2 .Table IE - NOn-Homeless SpcciaI Needs Populations...............................................46
In1iastructure ImproVf!lll...,ts .........-..........:....-.........................................................47
lob CrQtion IDd Economic Dcvelopmcnt.....................................................................A9
Public Services.........................................................._..................................................56
,
D:JIJ~~moI'UMlDtJo~2Dl'UNl/D'l.DOC
r
Oly orb Bernardino. Conso/UkJed P/tm . FY 2000-2ooJ
.
D. Conclusion. .....................................................................................................................57
v.
HOUSING AND MARKET ANALYSIS ...............................................................................61
A. Marketing and Inventory Charactcristics.................................................................................61
1. Ccmol11llDity Description..................................................................................................61
a. Background and Trends......................................................................................-..61
b. Demographics..........................................................................................................63
c. Racial & Ethnic Characteristics .............................................................................65
2 Market and Inventory Conditions................................................................................... 70
.
a. Housing Supply and Demand.................................................................................. 70
b. Assisted Housing Inventory ....................................................................................89
I. Public Housing........................................................................................:..................89
2. Section 8 .............................................................................................................90
3. Other ...................................................................................................................91
c. Inventory of Facilities and Services for
the Fiomelcss and Persons Threatened with Homelcssncss ....................................94
d Inventory ofSlIpportive Housing for Non-Honieless Persons with Special Needs .......96
3. Available Resources .................................................................................................~...~...97
A. Federal Programs .........................................................................,.:...................:.......97
B. Non-Federal Public ..................................................................:..:.:..........................100
I. State Programs.................................,....................~.....~:..........................._....IOO
2. Local Programs............................._.................;..........:.................................102
C. Private Resources....................................................................................................103
I. For-Profit.......,................................................................................................1 03
2. Non.Profit.......................................................................................:................103
VL S'IRATEGIC PLAN.............................................................................................................103
A. Introduction ..........................................................................................................................103
B. Priority Analysis and Strategy DcveIClpJDent.......................................................................104
· Priority #1: Preservation and Rehabilllldon ofBxistins Single Family DwI!!Jil\gS .-....105
i. Analysis.................................................................................................................106
ii. Strategy Development (Activities and Programs).................................................107
iii. Objectives..............................................................................................................108
.
· Priority #2: Expand HOJDeowneribip ~tiea and Assist Ho~ebuycq With The
Pun:h8sc of Moldable Permanent Housing <Bxistina 8lId New Construction)... 108
i. AnalY5is.................................................................................................................I(l9
ii. Strategy Development - Investment Plan (Activities 8lId Programs) ...................110
r
OI~~7ZDI'I..fMztJotJCQ>-..,;flZDl'l.fNUYUIOc
II
CIlyc;f.. 11 BmumJi...
'oflSo;.Jated Plan. FY 2000-2003
.
:. Objecti\, es ...........................................
................
........................................11 I
.
Prior:
, #3 Provide Rental Assistance and Pre:.
. Housing to Very Low Income HollS ..
Analysis ..............................................,
Strategy Development -Investment p,
;.:lds.........
Existin'
e.,
Jrdable Renta1
Objectives ...........................................
(Activitil
'1... ...................................112
.............................................112
".' ' "'; i >rogra.m.s) ...................114
.".....................................116
.................
'............,.
. Pri'
or.,
I
. Priori .
#4: Assist Homeless and Special Need~ . '!'SOns wil: ""pportive Services..._......116
Analysis ................................................
Strategy Development -Investment P 1
Objectives ...........................................
...............................................................116
(Activitit"., id Prognuns) ...................11 7
.,................,
............................................118
#5: Expansion of Affordable Housing '.
Analysis ..............................................
Strategy Development -Investment P .
.Jortunitie., : hrough New Construction 118
.................
C. Home: ssness Strategy ....................................... .. ................ .............................................123
i. . Objectives ..........................................., . ................ . ............................................123
(Activitie. lnd Progra.m.s) ...................121
............................................118
D.
Other .lecial Needs............................................ ................. .............................................124
] i~rail Elderly ......................................... .............................................................,..124
. ) 'th M tal D' b'll' 124
.4. 1 ersons WI en 158 I ties .........................................................................
3. Persons with PhYSicallDevelopment Di:. dilities .........................:.,.:..................::..;125
4, i>ersons with Alcohol or Other Drug A. . ...: ;tion ....................;.....,.......;.,...................125
S 'ersons with AIDSIHIV ....................... . ..~...................;.......:................................125
y-...
.
E. Non-HOusing Community Development Stratet
PIan .......................................................125
· Priori\ #6 Promotion of Economic ~e1opm\ :; t and Eritployment OpPOrtunities
for I.e...- and Moderate-Income HOuseholds...,. ',...............................................................129
· Priority #7 Expand and Improve Infrastructure " Meet Current and Fu~ Needs ...........130
F. OYCrCl. . ting Baniers to Affordable Housing...., "..............................................................130
· PriQrit'j #8 Elim;nRtion of Impediments for Fai, Housing Through Education,
Enforcement. and Testing ................................. . ................................................................131
Impediments to Fair Housing Choices.............. ................................................................131
Lead-Based Paint Reduction Strategy .............,. ................................................................132
Anti-Poverty Strategy...................................... ,...............................................................135
Institutional Structure . ..................................... ,................................................................137
Coordination ..............................................._..... .. ................................................................137
Neighborhood Revitalization Strategic Plan ................................................-.......................137
Public Housing.Residcut Initiatives .....................-......................-......................................138
r
G.
H.
L
J.
Ie.
.
fW111a01lt1P:~~II:D,.LCNI1DotICON.W1uAcn:o,.UNllEYl.DOC
111
City olSon Bernardino - ColUol/doled PIOll- FY 2000-2005
N.
o.
Geographic Distribution........................................................................................................139
Service Delivery and Managem~t ......................................................................................140
vn. ONE YEAR. AcrION PLAN ..............................................................................................141
Introduction ...............................................................................................................................141
A. Strategy' Implemmtation ............~.........................................................................................142
1. F1Jnding Sources and Available Programs ..................................................................142
2. Support of Applications by Other Entities ..............................................................._.144
3. Priority' In.vesttnent Plan..............................................................................................145
4.. Non-Housing Community' Development Activities....................................................147
S. Geogmphic Distribution..............................................................................................151
6. Service Delivet)' MlI1Igement ....................................................................................151
B. Other ActiollS ..............................................................................................~........................152
1. Public Policies .............................................................................................................152
2. Institutional Structure ..................................................................................................152
3. Public Housing Improvements ....................................................................................152
4. Public Housing Resident Initiatives .......................................................~....................153
S. Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction...........................................................................153
c.
Anti-Poverty Strategy ...........................................................................................................153
D. Coordinating Services .................................................................................,..................II~..~.IS4
. .',
E.. PrograIDlProject Monitoring ......................................................"..........................................154
F. Required Progra.m Requiremcnt...................................~.......................................................154
Listin.g ofFY 2000-2001 Proposed Projects................................................................................157
Exlnllit I
APPENDIX A:. Citizen Participation Plan
APPENDIX B: Continuum ofCaIe
APPENDIX C: Programs Application and Certification
,
1III1_,--~JZDI'UMNOIIClClNIQUACJZDn.w_z.DOC
If'
.
-'
.
~
.
.~
l
...
City of San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2()()()..200S
.
San Bernardino's Consolidated Plan/or 2000
Executive Summary
L
BACKGROUND AND INTRODUcnON
.
San Bernardino's 200012005 Consolidated Plan COnstitutes a strategic vision for housing and
community development in the City. This Executive SummllI)' highlights a plan so that citizens
within the community can have a quick overview of San Bernardino's housing and community
development problems; the 5 year broad goals, strategies, and actions proposed to deal with those
problems; and the specific projects proposed for 20Q01200 I to carty out the first year of the Five
Year strategy. In addition, maps demonstrate the location of most of these projects and how they
relate to the neighborhood conditions.
In addition to the Five-Year Consolidated Plan, the City is required to have an Annual Action Plan
that implements the goals and objectives of the five-year Consolidated Plan.
It is important to note that much of the information contained in the Consolidated Plan is based on
1990 Census because there was no other comprehensive source of community information. Where
available, additional public and private sources of information have been used to supplement the
1990 Census to provide as much currency as possible to the Consolidated Plan. .
The Consolidated Plan also establishes new priorities and needs based on a 1998 Comniunio/
Priority Needs Survey (conducted by the Mayor and Common Council). The ~ priorities.reflect
the City's desire to focus its efforts on improvement of existing neighborhoOds and increasing
homeownership opportunities rather than the constnl9tion of a~tiorial.housing for low- and
moderate-income households (except in cases of special needs). ThcCo!1SOlidated Plan includes
new priorities forjob development, improvement ofinfuistructure, public facilities, and fair housing
issues.
D. GOALS
The City of San Bernardino attempts to address numerous issues through the programs set forth
within the Consolidated Plan for Fiscal Years 2000-2005. These issues include, but arc not limited
to:
· the elimination of slums and blight;
· the elimination of conditions that arc detrimental to health, safety and public welfare;
· the conservation and expansion of the nation's housing stock;
· the expansion and improvement of the quantity and quality of community services;
· a better utilization ofland and other natura1 resources;
· a reduction in the isolation of income groups within communities and geographical areas;
· the restoration and preservation of properties of special values; and
· the alleviation of physical and economic distress.
.
,
IISIlfV2lJfJO/':IF'OIIMSWOlJS1NG~moI'I.ANUOOOCXIMOUll.ImoI'LAN 1lEY1.DOC
1
Because phys:
of the 1995 C
theCity'sove,
(Exceptions a ;
City o/San Bernardino - ConsoiIJaled Plan - FY 2000-200$
.
. ,1, ,d economic conditions have not changed dramatically since the adoption
,lidated t ) an, these 0vera1l goals are similar to those adopted five years ago, and
;JOliey thncst for implementing the Consolidated Plan remains essentially the same.
Jted below.)
.
-'
DL crm ' PARTICIPATION PROCESS
The 1995 Col
citizen"s advi "
Consolidated !'
Cnmm;ttee w.
meetingswCff
comment on :',
agencies that '
consulted. The "
and receive tu '
:dated Pian waS developed with citizen participation input, which included the
" committee's help to develop different sections within the Pian. Because the
\ represCIl!S a limited changes from the 1995 Pian, the City's Citizen Advisory
, JnsuIted p ,incipally in the,development of the Annual Action Pian. Two public
,Iducted by the Committee on February 3 and February 10,2000 to obtain public
?oliey dir:ction for the updated Annual Action PIan. and private and public
.lement h >ing and community development activities were contacted and
mmon Council will hold a public hearing on May 15,2000 to obtain citizen views
r comments on the Conllidated Plan prior to its adoption.
Citizens are g ,ufficient infolD18tion alut the subject of the hearing through an advanced notice
published in ocal newspaper. Accc' modations were made to ensure adequate access for
disabled ind' Is. At the public hearin, ., the City receives public testimony on the housing and
non-holo.:, , ,munity development 'eeds, including priority non-housing community
deve1opmer, , , 3. The public hearing ~.:i\lre the City Council includes the draft Consolidated Pian
proposed..,' ,. A third public hearing will be scheduled at the time the City prepaies it Annual .
Perfonnance ' .lIt in order to prav:; " , ' , quate infonnation to its residents to review the ptogri:ss
of housing an" a-housing HOME, ESG, and COBO funded activities,. ,,'
IV. CHAt, ,S FROM THE 1995_JNSOLlDATED PLAN
The 20001200 '
changes and :
priorities are I' ,
lnsolidated Plan cont, :; a number of new sources ofinfolD18tion and several
',ions in program pri< ':;s from the 1995 Consolidated Plan. The eight (8)
ibelow:
mgh Priority, '. Preserve and Rt: ,'iilltate Existing Single FamUy Dwellings.
High Priority Expand Homeownershlp Opportunities and Assist Homebuyers with
the Purchase of" ,rdable Housing (ExIsting and New Construction).
mgh Priority
Provide Rental i,.' '!stance and Preserve Existing Affordable Rental
Housing.
High Priority. 4: Assist Homeless. " ! Special Need Persons with Supportive Services
Programs.
~
High Priority 5: Expand "Afford, ~.' elf Houslnl Opportunities through New
ConstructIon (to Aadress Special Needs that are not met Through
other PubUc or Private Initiatives). '
.
"
i.:
M/lfJlJOOtJp:lFORMSWOUS/NG FORMN:ONsoUIJATED PUNI1<<1O CON8OUJJATED PUN RE" l.DOC
2
! '
~ ;
;..;
City D/San Benral'dinD - Consolidated Plan. FY 20000200S
.
mgh Priority ##6:
Promote Economic Development and Employment OpportunlUes for
Low- and Moderate-Income Households
High Priority #7:
Improve and Expand Infrastructure to Meet Current and Future
Needs
High Priority #8:
Eliminate impediments to Fair Housing Through EducaUon,
Enforcement, and TesUng
ChlUlges in Pl'OgrtUn Priorities
1. Less Emphasis on New Housing ConstrucUon for LoW!Moderate-lncome Households.
The 1995 Consolidated PIan included a priority (Priority tiS) for in~ the supply of
low/moderate-income housing, particularly for large families. The 2oo0-2ooS PIan
recognizes that San ,Bernardino already has sufficient housing to meet most low-income
needs, including large family housing needs. The problem is the condition and availability of
that housing. The program emphasis in the new Consolidated Plan is to use public and
private investment to preserve, improve, and increase the availability of existing housing to
low- and moderate-income households.
2.
.
Spedal Needs Housing. The City l'CCOgJ1i7es that. despite the general availability of
housing for low. and moderate-income households, special circumstances exist iIl,wJUch .0 '.
public and private effons will not address the needs of particular IOW~.9t mocferate..iiicome
individuals (such as frail elderly or handicapped individuals). . 'FhC City has included as a
priority the construction of such special ~ housing in th~ 2000~OOS Consolidated PIan.
V. COMMtJNrryPROFILE
Located at the base of the SanBemardino Mountains in the "Heart of the InlAnd Empire," and within
a sixty mile radius to ocean beaches, desert playgrounds. and mountain resons, San Benwdino
offers the best Possible location for recreation, culture. and employment OPPOrtunities. The City is
served by major transportation routea including Interstates 10 and 215, raiIroads. and the MctroIink
commutertrain serving the greater Los Angeles area. Mctrolinkprovides opportunities forworkcrs
from the Los Angeles area to live in San Bernardino in quality housing at affordable prices. In
addition, an ample SUpply of inexpensive, undeveloped land exits within the City, ensuring that the
construction of cully level homes to serve the needs oftirst time buyers. San Bernardino also has
vacant land in biUdside and other areas on the fringes of the City that is suitable formore expensive
homes oriented to middle- and Upper-income households.
BeClluse much iJfthe lnformmlonfor the community Pl'OflIe Is onlJllWllilizblefrom the 1990
Census, most of the Census dIIt4 thm W4lS cited In the 1995 Plan Iuu lleen I'd4/ne4 In the
200012005 PIIln. Howner, sevend important community stIIt/stlcs IUId needs ewzllUltlons lutve
IJun IIpdtztedfriJm Wlrlous pull/Ie IUId prlWlte 60lll'CeS. Updated /nformlltJon Includes:
. estimAtes of the number of cases and potential exposure to Icad-basCd paint
. r
DSI1012D()(JP."lFrJRJawOUSlNO~n:oI'UNuDDD~n:o,l.ANurl.lJOc
$
City a/San Bema1Ylino - Consolidated Plan. FY 2000.200$
High Priority #16:
Promote Economic Development and Employment Opportunities for
Low- and Moderate-Income Households
.
High Priority #7:
Improve and Expand InCrutructure to Meet Current and Future
Needs
High Priority #8:
ERmlnate impediments to Fair Housing Through Education,
Enforcement, and Testing
CJuznges in Program Priorities
1. Less Emphuls on New Housing Construction for LowlModerate-lncome Households.
The 1995 Consolidated Plan included a priority (priority #5) for increl\Sing the supply of
low/moderate-income housing, Particularly for large families. The 2000-2005 Plan
recognizes that San Bernardino already has sufficient housing to meet most lOw-income
needs, including large family housing needs. The problem is the condition and availability of
that housing. The program emphuis in the new Consolidated Plan is to use public and
private investment to preserve, improve, and increase the availability of existing housing to
low- and moderate-income households.
2.
Special Needs Housing. The City recogJIi7cS that, despite the general availability of
housing for low- and moderate-income households, special circumstances exist in,wJUch "
public and private efforts will not address the needs of particular IC!W~.!lt moderate-income
individuals (such as frail elderly or handicapped individUals). . The City hu included as a
priority the construction ofsuch special ~~ hoUSing in th~ 2000~005 Consolidated Plan.
V. COMMUNrryPROFILE
.
Located at the base of the San Bernardino Mountains in the "Heart of the Inlll1!d Empire." and within
a sixty mile radius to ocean ~pehes, desert playgrounds, and mountain resorts, San Bernardino
offers the best POssible location for recreation, culture, and employment opportunities. The City is
served by major transPOrtation routes including Interstates 10 and 215, railroads, and theMctrolink
commutertrain serving the greater Los Angeles area. Mctrolinkprovides opportunities forworkcra
from the Los Angeles area to live in San Bernardino in quality housing at affordable prices. In
addition, an ample supply of inexpensive, undeveloped land exits within the City, ensuring that the
construction of CDI1y level homes to serve the needs offirst time buyClll. San Bernardino also bas
vacant land in hilldside and other areas on the fiinges of the City that is suitable for mote expensive
homes o~ented to middle- and upper-income households.
BeCllulSe much of the informat/onfor the community profile lIS only IIvlllld/efrom the 1990
Cen.ru.r, moISt of the CenISIIIS dtltlz that W4lIS cited In the 1995 P/tI/I hIlS bun I'dIIlned In the
2000/2005 PlIm. However, 1Snmz/ Importtlllt community lStIlI/stJes tIIId nUlls evtJ/lUI//ons hllVtt _.
bun updizJed frOm Vflr/olllS pub/Ie 11M private ISOUI'C4 Updated InformatJon IndlUles:
· e.m..."tes of the number of cases and potential exposure to lead-based paint
r
OsqOl2~OUS/N(;~JZ"DPL.lMZDoo~JZ"DPLOlUJrl.DOC
J
c,.,.,.,_ -".i
City of San Benuudillo . Consolidated Phm _ FY 200f).200J
e b. Income. Based upon 1998 data, the median tiuni1y income for a family offourwithin the County
of San Bernardino was 526,845. This figure is 36 percent less than the median income within San
Bemardino COunty ($36,596). The 1999 HUD median income estimate in the County fora tiuni1y
of four is $47,400. Based upon this figure, a vety low-income family (one whose mcome is 50
percent or less of the County lDf'.tIian income) within the City of San Bernardino would have an
annual income of$23,600 or less (see map I in ColiSOlidated Plan). Families with low-m"""'llS (one
whose income is between 50 and 80 percent of the County median) would have annllal earnings
ranging from 523,600 to 537,760 per year (see map 2 in Consolidated Plan).
Co PopultztJon Growth. As of January 1999, the City of San Bernardino was home to 185,000
residents, an increase of about 13 percent from 1990 (164,164) and 57 percent since 1980 (117,490).
The City's rate of population growth, while'substantia1 over the past 20 years, was still below the
countywide rate of86 percent The population of the City of San Bernardino is s~ll growing, butata
significantly reduced rate (less than one percent annually). Most other cities increased much faster in
population during the I 980s than did San Bernardino. During the 1990s, however, San Bernardino
experienced population growth that exceeded that of many other cities.
II. Bthnicity. Non-census population estimates during the late 1990s suggest that the City's
racial/ethnic compoSition have changed substantially. The Don-Hispanic Whitepopulationdecreases
from about 45% to 37% of the citywide total, while the Hispanic population increased from 34% to
43%. The percentage of Blacks and individuals of AsianlPacific Islander ancestry inc:teased
eSlightlYduringthe 1990s. By2010, Hispanics will likely be a majority population group in thogty, "~.
followed by non-Hispanic Whites at about one-third of the City's population, ~omiaDePlitinent
of Finance estimates and projections show that about two-thirds ofPOPu.lation growth results from .
natural increase, while nearly 90% ofpopulationgrowt1rfor Hispani~ res1i1ts from natural increase.
Historically, households of Hispanic origin have maintained IlIrg~ fiumlies which favors higher
population growth for this group.
The distribution of population is not expected to change dramatically from that reported in 1995,
except that Hispanic households are expected to become the largest minority group, or majority
group, in some areas that are now predominantly non-Hispanic Whites.
LoW-income concentrations, and/or areas of high unemployment tend to coincide with areas of
racial/ethnic concentrations. Data on lo-W:inCOIl1e'c6nC6htrations within the City of San Bernardino
confimi this tendency. The census tracts within which t1ie median income is less than 80 percent of
the area median income generally overlays the Common Council Wards in which there is an
ethnic/racial coDcentration of 50 percent or more. The highest areas of unemployment within the
City of Ban Bernardino are within the central portion of the City and the central western edge of the
City (see map 6 in Consolidated Plan).
VL HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS
The needs section of the Consolidated Plan outlines the extent of need by various groUps forhousing
. the problems with community development that need to be addressed. AmODg the most urgent
,
OSl/DI2Dt101':IFOIlAlSWOIJSJNG ~1I'D1'1ANIlDooCOl4'OuAt1l'D1'LAN UYl.DOC
. _ n_ _ _..._..__
s
City of San Bernardino. Consolidtlled Plan. FY 2000.2005
.
b. Income. Based upon 1998 data, the median family income fora family offourwithin the County
of San Bernardino was $26,845. This figure is 36]lC1'Cent less than the median income within San
Bemardino COunty ($36,596). The 1999 BUD median income estimate in the County fora family
of four is $47,400. Based upon this figure, a very low-income family (one whose income is 50
percent or less of the County median income) within the City of San BemarcJino would have an
annual income of$23,6OO or less (see map I in Consolidated Plan). Families with low-incomes (one
whose income is between 50 and 80 percent of the County median) would have annual earnings
ranging from $23,600 to $37,760 per year (see map 2 in Consolidated Plan).
Co PoPllltztion Growth. As of January 1999, the City of San Bernardino was home to 185,000
residents, an increase ofahout 13 percent from 1990 (164,164) and 57 percent since 1980 (117,490).
The City's rate of population growth, whilnubstantial over the past 20 years, was still below the
countywide rate of86 percent. The population of the City of San Bernardino is stm growing, but ata
significantly reduced rate (less than one percent annually). Most other cities increased much faster in
population during the 1980s than did San Bernardino. During the 1990s, however, San BemarcJino
experienced population growth that exceeded that of many other cities.
II. Ethnlclly. Non-census population estimates during the late 1990s suggest that the City's
racial/ethnic compoSition have changed substantially. The non-Hispanic WhitepopuIation dccrcascs
from about 45% to 37% of the citywide total, while the Hispanic population increased from 34% to
43%. The.......... of,""" ODd -. of"""""""", ""'"" _ -... .
slightly during the 1990s. By 2010, Hispanics will likely be a majority population group in thQ City, ".'
follOwed by non-Hispanic Whites at about one-third of the City's population. CalifomiaD~
ofFinancc estimates and projections show that about two-thirds ofPOP$doii"growth results from .
natural increase, while nearly 90% ofpopuIatio~ growtIrfor Hisp~~ rcstilts from natural increase.
Historically, households of Hispanic origin have maintained larger fimu1ies which favors higher
popuIation growth for this group.
The distribution of population is not expected to cbange dramatically from that reported in 1995,
except that Hispanic households are expected to become the largest minority group, or majority
group, in some areas that are now Predominantly non-Hispanic Whites.
Low-income concentrations, and/or areas of high unemployment tend to coincide with areas of
racial/ethnic concentrations. Data on low:income'ct)nC6i1trations within the City ofSanBemardino
confiml this tendency. The census tracts within which die median income is less than 80 Percent of
the area median income gcnerauy overlays the Common Council Wards in which there is an
ethnic/racial concentration of 50 percent or more. The highest areas ofuncmployment within the
City of San Bernardino are within the central portion of the City and the central wcstcm edge of the
City (see map 6 in Consolidated Plan).
VL HOUSING AND COMMtJNrry DEVELoPMENT NEEDS
The DCCds section of the Consolidated Plan outIines the extent ofnecd by various groups forhousing
aud the problems with community development thatnced to be addressed. Among the most urgent
,
OSIID/1I1fJQp:IFO/WSWOIJS/N(] ~mol'l.ANIztJoo~mol'l.ifN/lElfl.DOC
~
.
,-
I
.
.
.
City o/San Bemtlrdino . Consolidated Plan. FY 2000-200$
While it is difficult to obtain an accurate count oCthe total homeless population, estimates indicate
that total range ofhomelessness in the City may be as low as 1,000 persons and as high as 2,000
persons. This estimate is within the same range previous estimates by homeless service providers
from the early 1990s County Homeless Coalition 1997 survey. It is estimated that the City has
approximately 30 01'gllni7Jltions providing a variety of services, including housing, food. emergency .
financial assistance, job refemlsltrainingleducational guidance, and basic social skills.to the
homeless population within the City of San Bernardino.
i. Other Specitd Needs Groups. The City's strategies to meet other special needs (such as
frail elderly, persons with disabilities, persons suffering from mental illness, persons with
HIVI AIDS, substance abusers) is essentially the same as in 1995. The City does not expect
to begin any new program initiatives or make use of new sources of federal, state, or local
funding that were not available in 1995. Rather, the City will continue to target programs
and resources to the highest priority needs and adjust its targets as priority needs change.
Sub-populations of the homeless include individuals with mental disabilities, substance
abuse problems, or AIDS; veterans; chronically unemployed persons, and very low-income
families who have experienced severe financial difficulties. Each of these sub-populations
have different needs that include substance abuse recovery, mental health treatment, medical
attention, andjob training and placement Anecdotal evidence from social service providers
suggest that special needs populations with age, illness, and substance abuse related
conditions have increased in San Bernardino, though not dramatically, while the number of
unemployed and non-retired households on public assistance have declined since 19,9S.... . "
f .....
ii. Homelus FllIIIiJiu with Children. As stated earlier, the City of San Bernardino has
several organi7JItions that provide a variety of services speciticalty for homeless persons.
Some provide emergency shelter and traDsitional housing, while others provide supportive
service for homeless and other special needs groups. The scope ofhomelessness in the area
continues to exceed these organi7Jltions' ability to provide adequate services to all homeless
individuals desiring and requiring services. Thus, there is an unmet need within the City,
although the total extent of that need is unknown. Improving economic conditions may have
reduced the number of families facing homelessness since 1995, but current statistics on
low-wage and public assistance incomes relative to housing costs suggest that homelessness
is still a threat for most extremely low-income households.
ilL Other Issues. The Children's Fund. Inc., which operates within the City -of San
Bernardino, provides services Primarily for homeless youth. Other facilities provide food
and clothing for this segment of the homeless population. Los Padrinos Youth Services
provides runawayf'throwaway" (minors who are expelled from their homes) homeless youth
services including individual and family counseling and follow up services. The Frazee
Center and Salvation Army also provides services for homeless individuals, families and
youth.
r
OSlI0I2000P..IFO/lMWfOCISING FOIlMISICONIlouD,7ED Pl.AM3Ooo CONllOUDA7ED PLAN MY 1.lJOC
'/
VL NON HOUSING COMMUNITY NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Qty of San Bel7lllrdino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200$
Tho <:ny.,............ - """""'"'"'._"..... !) """'" "P~ ~
. infrastructure in older neighborhoods to support commUll1ty and econonuc development objectives.
2) revitalize the downtown and other older commercial districts. 3) attract high-tech, production, and
other high-wage industries to the City, and 4) train youth, the unemployed, and underemployed
residents to provide a Productive, skilled work force that meets the future needs of businesses.
II. Infl"tlStruC/ure Improvements. The City has adopted a five-year Capital Improvement Program
<ClP)-fi>>l_'999""""",,2<104. Tho__a_of.....&ciIity
and infrastructure needs, ranging from general building improvements to parks and recreation. The
Plan proposes to spend nearly $85 million over a five-year period, approximately ha1f(47 percent)
for street and street lighting improvements, one Quarter(22 percent) for sewer system improvements,
IS percent for stonn drainage and flood control, and the remainder for general building, traffic
control, and parks and recreation. These expenditures reflect the City's priority to improve older
neighborhoods and provide new infrastructure in support the City's economic development goals
(Priority #7 of the Consolidated Plan).
.1
b. Economic DeVelopment. Since the adoption of the 1995 Consolidated Plan, unemployment in
San B_ baa """"'" """laDtiaIIy ondjob....... baa -. aIlhou8h__
remains substantially higher than the countywide rate. Most of the City's new employment
continues to be in lower-wage retail and service positions, however. The City's historic lack of
prod"""".......,,;, a......"...... why... Clly "'" a ,_ --., orh;~ j....
_08 ... ........"" b,,, or -BY ........" ;, ... key 10 _ h;gb.wag,
employment on a large enough scale to raise lOcal incomes and living standai'ds~ an accomplishment
unreachable by retail, tourism, or govemmentjobs. In addition, the City needs to continue its efforts
at improving the downtown and older commercii! districts, identi1ying industry niches for which the
<:nybaaa_.............ond.........""" _Io-lbo....ofa........
economy. For this reason, the City has adoPted Priority #6 ..~romotion of Economic Development
& ....-.-...eo,-Lowond__............ "a ""'_'10
the 2000 Consolidated Plan.
.i
PubIk s..w- Tho <:ny', J>rioril;" eo,- ..... _ ... 10 ....... -...." .-...
""""- ...." -. bomclaa -.. -. _ _". _ ond
~. ond a""......" ond -,..... _ The <:ny', """';, Io...ride a "'" living
-... eo,-a11 or....._..whkI> danyliving....... "'_by....."""""""", of
all eight (8) priOrities depicted in the Five Year Consolidated Plan.
vm. HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIC PLAN
Tho Sbateg;o Plan """'"" a !oog-tonn _ 10 ... wkb lbo ........ ond _Iy
"""- .... w;... ... <:ny of San........... The CiIy', prioriti" eo,- ....... ond
~d_""_~oa_1 of"'_,,~. 1bcae .
pnonties were chosen as the highest pnonties for the fOllOwing reasons:
,
OS/IOI2000P:IFOI/MS\HOCISING FOItMSlcoNSolJAtrm Pl.AM20t/0 CXJNsoUlUrm PUN /lEY 2.DOc
.
.
.
.
.
if.,,'.,,:","-';
. " ~ "
City a/San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200$
The City's existing single-family housing stock is its greatest asset for providing long-tenn
affordable housing to current and future low- and moderate-income residents {Priority #I}.
· Increasing homeownership is the most cost-effective way to stabilize neighborhoods, provide
affordable shelter, and provide an opportunity for low- and moderate-income residents to
accumulate wealth (priority #2).
.
. The existing stock of rental housing cannot be duplicated and is an affordable housing resoiJrce
that must be preserved. Even as the City promotes homeownership, there will always be a
segment of the population that does not desire"homeownership or for whom homeownership is
not a realistic financial alternative. Rather than construct new rental affordable housing, the
City seeks to increase the availability of rental subsidies for low-income households {Priority
#3}.
· The City of San Bernardino accommodates a disproportionate share of the county's homeless
population. The root causes ofhomelessness can be traced to the lack of supportive services
and appropriate housing environments. The key to reducing homelessness is to provide
supportive services specific to the needs of each homeless individual in a residential setting
commensurate with the individual's ability to function independently (priority #4).
.
Although San Bernardino's general strategy is to improve the existing housing stock and
promote homeownership to meet low- and moderate-income needs, the City recognizes that the
construction of additional affordable housing, may be necessary to meet special needs"sJic;his
for elderly and handicapped housing {Priority #S}. . .'. ' .'
'.
· Housing problems are closely related to e~nomic'problems... If more city residents had the
education and skills necessary to obtain higher paying jobs, many of the problems of
overcrowding, overpayment, and substandard housing conditions would resolve themselves.
For this reason, a high priority for the City is to attract industries that offer higher payingjobs.
One of the factors in attracting such industries is the presence ofaskilled Iaborpool. The City,
in cooperation with other public agencies, will seek to provide education and job training to
low- and moderate-income households with the objective of increasing the pool of skilled labor
locally (priority #6).
· San Bernardino is one of the oldest cities in the Inland Empire, and the infrastructure in many
older neighborhoods needs substantial repair or replacement. These repairs are vital to the
City's economic development strategy. In addition, areas of the City designated for
commercial and industrial growth will need new infrastructure to support the types of industries
the City is seeking (priority #7).
.
The identification and removal of impediments to equal housing opportunity are n~ssary if
the City is to increase homeownership and improve the existing housing stock. For these
reasons, ahigh priority is to ensure equal housing opportunities through an objective analysis of
housing practices and community-based programs to promote, and monitor compliance with,
fair housing laws {Priority #8}.
r
tlS/JDI2l1OOJ>.lF'OIIMSIHOUSING FORMStCONSouDA7ED P/.AM2/J(JO t:oNSoUJu.7ED PLAN REY 2.DOc
9
City of San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200$
IX. NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GOALS
e
The City's non-housing conununity development priorities can be summarized as: (1) Increasing
employment opportunities for local residents and broadening the employment base to include more
moderate- and high-wage jobs; (2) Training and transitioning non-senior, able-bodied adults on
public assistance to the workforce to support objective #1; (3) Expanding infrastructure and public
services to acconunodate the types of industries and employers the City is seeking; and (4)
Improving existing neighborhoods (curbs, gutters, sidewalks, paving, and lighting).
The City of San Bernardino is committed to expanding economic opportunities for its residents. In
addition to providing a suitable living environment with decent housing, the purpose of the
Consolidated Plan is to encourage and support the development of a balanced, diverse conununity
by expanding economic opportunities principally for persons oflow-and moderate-income. Short
and long term non-housing goals that may be pursued by the City of San Bernardino over the next
five years include: (1) Provide for a safe and secure conununity; (2) Seek opportunities for
education, recreation, and personal growth of the citizenry; (3) Activate conununity outreach and
conununication and work to meet the diverse services need of the entire conununity; (4) Enhance the
physical beauty and promote the image of the City; (5) Improve housing quality and balance within
the City; (6) Revitalize major conunercial corridors; (7) Attract and retain businesses that provides
skilled and higher income jobs; (8) Attract and retain businesses that will support job training and
provide entIy-level employment to the long-term unemployed; (9) Improve the overall quality of the
roadway system; (10) Provide appropriate maintenance of streets, storm drains, sanitation, sewers, e
public rights-of-way, public building, and other infrastructure; (11) Streamline City operations to
improve efficiency and effectiveness; and (12) Improve trust and conununication throughout City
government and conununications with the public.
These goals were obtained from the 1998 Mayor and Conunon Council Strategy.
X. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS
a. Overcoming Barriers to Affordable Housing
To remove or improve any negative consequences of existing public policies, the City of San
Bernardino intends to maintain a dialogue with developers and the citizenry to ensure the best
planning, infrastructure and development decisions, and will continue to increase public awareness
and acceptance of the need for affordable housing services throughout the City.
b.
Lead Based Paint Reduction Strategy
The goal of the five-year strategy is to reduce or eliminate lead-based paint hazards and prevent
childhood lead poisoning. Implementation of coordinAted efforts for testing of children for lead and
lead-based ~t abatement rests Primarily with the County Public Health Department and City of
SlI;D Bernardino. The following is the lead-based paint strategy: I) coordination of public and
pnvate efforts to reduce lead-based paint hazards and protect young children; 2) integration oflead
hazard evaluation and reduction activities into existing housing programs' 3) public awareness
through educational materials and programs; 4) education and advocacy. '
"-
e-
r
L
OSIJOI2IX1OP:lFORMS\HOUSING FORMSlCONSOUlMTED PLANuI1fJ() OONSOL1JJ.fTED PLAN REI' Z.DOC
10
-
\';,'J',;;",fi;;';'.{'.;:'",
City olSan Bemardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2oo0-2ooJ
e
Co Anti Poverty Strategy
The Anti-Poverty Strategy focuses on those factors affecting poverty over which the City has
control. Cwmitly, several programs exists that specifically target households in poverty, assisting
them in improving their long-term financial and social positions to eventually bring them out of
poverty. The programs used by the City include:
· the Job Training Partnership Act (JTP A), which provides Federal funds for job training of high-
risk youth, unemployed adialts and other economically disadvantaged individuals, providing
services at no cost to the participants to prepare them for entry into permanent jobs;
· CalWorks, combining public assistance to families in need with "welfare-to-work" training for
economic self-sufficiency; and
· the County Family Self-Sufficiency Program (County Housing Authority and Public Social
Services Department) which helps identify and remove economic barriers to make each
household independent of housing assistance programs by increasing household income and
eliminating the need for rental assistance.
· The San Bernardino Economic Development Agency and Employment Training Agency, which
undertake a number or'economic, employment development, and skills training programs.
eeL
The Economic Development Agency Housing and Community DeveloPI11.ent Division will continue
to focus on improving existing housing and neighborhoods while assisting the development of
additional housing for special needs groups when necessary. During FY 2000, specific actions will
be taken to achieve COOperation and coordination among state, local, and other public agencies;
private agencies; nonprofit organizations; lending institutions; and educational institutions in
implern""'ting activities. .
Institutional Structure/Coordination
"
..
";J:'>'~'
e. PubUc Housing Resident Initiatives
The Cit,y of San Bernardino docs not operate public housing. The Housing Authority of San
BCmardino County owns and manages 798 units of public housing in the City for occupancy by VCIy
low to low income families who pay no more than 30 percent of their monthly income forrent. The
Housing Authority has initiated several programs establishing Public Housing Resident Groups.
The City will continue to support the Authority's efforts.
r. Impediments to Fair Housing
Theprlmary impediments that many San Bernardino residents face in obtaining suitable, affordable
bm''';'lgrelate to financial/economic considerations. Many low-andmoderalc-income residents face
economic barriers to obtaining suitable housing due to their low incomes. A second impediment that
arcsidents may Ace relates to home purchase and home improvement loans. Programs implemented
.wm focus on alleviating these problems.
r
11SI/iJf1DtXJr;1FOIIMSIH0US/N(] FOIIMSIC:ONsouJJd1ED Pl.ANIHtJo CONsoulu1ED Pl.IIN UI' UJOc
11
--~
,
City o/San Bernardino. CotJSolidtJted Plan _ FY 2000-200'
go
Strategic Vision and Mission Cor Change
Om vision Cor the city of San Bernardino is for it to be strong and prosperous. The City of San
Bernardino will be the hub of economic growth in the InlRlld Empire. San Bernardino will offer a
wide range of housing, recreation, education, and employment opportunities for all who live and
work here. A strong sense of community will continue to grow and thrive within om City limits.
Om mission is to provide quality and cost effective services to the people of San Bernardino. We
will provide excellence in leadership through the allocation of public resources to City programs that
are responsive to community priorities and maximize opportunities for economic, educational, and
cu1tum1 viability.
h. Neighborhood Revitalization Strategy Areas (NRSA)
The city is participating with the County of San Bernardino under the NRSA pilot program. The
goal of the program is to identitY blight areas and use all available existing programs to eradicate
blight through beautification rehabilitation of homes and infrastructure improvements.
Approximately SI5 million is available over three (3) years to address blight
L Monitoring Plan
The aty has an ongoing process for monitoring compliance with the Consolidated Plan, Annual
Action Plan and achieving Plan objectives through annual auditing of programs. .If certain programs
are Dot achieving desired outcomes, the City will modifY its approach "arid or substitute new
prognuns for the ones that are not achieving the desired results.
XL ANNUAL ACTION PLAN
The Consolidated Plan for the City of San Bernardino also includes an Annual Plan consisting ofan
. application for funds under three HUD formula programs for a total of approximately S5.7 million.
The three HUD programs are:
· Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
· Emergency Shelter Grants (ESG)
· HOME Investments Partnership
These funds, plus program income to the City from prior projects, local funds (such as: general
funds. redevelopment housing set-aside funds) for profit and non-profit resources and in-kind
services, State and Federal grants, etc., will support the activities to be funded for the.20001200I
program year. HOME funds used by the City will support Priority numbers I, 2, 3, and 5. ESG
funds will support Priority number 4. Of the CDBG funds to be committed ~ the City in 2000-
2001, Snmm...y 1 shows the proposed uses and priorities to which those uses relate.
,
DSI10f20fJtJP:1F'OIlMSIHOtJSING FOItMS'oCtJNsouDATED l'UNI14DiJ COfaOUD.ITED l'I.fN IIE':J.DOC
lZ
.
-
.
.
_________1
City a/San Benulnlina . Consolidated Pian - FY 2000-2005
. 1. CommaDlty Development Block Grant Recommendations
A. Public Service Programs
~ !EJect/Activity Name
806640400 Arden-Gutbrie Community Spirit Center (City Program)
804602201 Asian-Americm
804602200 Asian-AmeriCID Resoun:e Center
804604500 Assis1ance Leape of San Bernardino
804080100 Boys " Girls Club
806770300 Cunp Fire Boys " Girls
804603800 Central City Lutheran Mission
80442??oo CbiIcIrcn', Fund
804560000 Comentone 1'rcIchoo1
804603000 Elder Citizen Protcclion Services
804602600 Fair HlIUIing (HUD Mondoted)
804600400 Family Serviee Agency
80409??oo Frazee Community Center
804040000High\and Senior
806790100 Home of Neighborly Services
80401 ??oo Lop! Aid Society
80437??oo Liberia Del Pueblo
804340000 Librmy Lilerlcy (City Program)
80443??oo Mary', Mercy
804604400 North Americm Assoc. for Svc, Ed. " Relief
80407??oo OptionHo~
804190000 Sllvation Army
80435??oo San Bernardino Child AdVOClCy Program
. 804160000 San Benwdino CommunitiOl AgainIt Drup
804603200 San Benwdino County Community Services (Senior Nutrition Program)
80429??oo San Benwdino Sexual Assau1t
804604300 SL BOI'DIdine MediClI Center Foundldon
804604100 Uptown YMCA
80441??oo Well Side Steppers (City Program)
80440000O YWCA
B. CAPITAUGENERAL PROJECTS
806904700 Neighborhood Revill\ization ProgrBml or Code Compliance Depanmeot
L Code Compliance Depanmem
b. Los PadrinOl Grafliti Abatement
c. F'n Prevention Code Enforcement
cI. Police Dept Multi-Family Crime Free Program
ADA Improvements CHandiClp Rampl)
BusinOlllncentive Program (EDA)
City HI1J ADA ReIlroom Retrofit (6'" F1)
Fire Equipment Leues (IO-Yr Commitment)
National Development Ou"lQI (EDA)
Sm. BUI. Development Corp. (SBDC){EDA)
Uoprosranuned Fundi
SUB TOTAL
806904600
806902400
804603400
80683??oo
804603700
806840200
806903400
6S5040000
804603701
9OOOOOOOO
c. PROGRAM ADMlNISTRAnON
804603500 Ncighborhooci Cootdinator (MIyor's Otre)
50?0ooooo Program Administration " P\annina
SUB-TOTAL PROGRAM ADMlNISTRAnON" PLANNING
TOTAL CDDG GRANT
SUBTOTAL
.
<
DSlIfJt1DfXJ1':lFOIlIISIHoCISING FOIlMSIt:oNsouJTED Pl.fMlDtJtJ COIGOUD.fTED PLAN /lEY UJOc
Amount
SIO,ooo
S8,OOO
S6,ooo
SI5,OOO
SI2,OOO
SI2,OOO
SI5,OOO
S8,ooo
$4,000
SIO,OOO
$40,000
SI5,OOO
SI5,ooo
SI3,ooo
SI2,ooo
SI3,ooo
SI3,ooO
SI3,OOO
SI5,ooo
SI5,ooo
SI4,ooo
S9,OOO
SI5,ooo
. .' S8,OOO'
. -' . Sl1,oOo
SI5,OOO
SI3,ooo
SI2,OOO
SIO,ooo
S12.ooo
$383,000
SI,5oo,ooo
SI20,ooo
S50,3oo
$45,000
S250,ooo
Sloo,ooo
S22,OOO
$497,650
S50,OOO
S20,ooo
S62.850
S1,717,800
S58,I00
S717,I00
$175.200
$3,876,000
13
City o/San Berruzrdino . Consolidated Plan - FY 2000.2005
2.
HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP ACT GRANT RECOMMENDATIONS
(HOME)
.
Activitt Amount
Program Administration (10%) $177,400
Community Housing Development Organizations Project (CHDQ's) - Projects (15%) 5266,100
Community Housing Development Organization (CHOO's) - Operations (5%) 588,700
Mortgage Assistance Program (MAP) 5700,000
Other Housing Projects - (SeniorlMultifamily) 5541,800
TOTAL 51,774,000
3. EMERGENCY SHELTER GRANT (ESG) RECOMMENDATIONS
Activi.!I
Homeless Essential Services (30%)
Homeless Prevention (5%)
Shelter Operations (65%)
TOTAL
Amount
$41,400
56,900
.$87.000
5138,000
For more information on the City's Plan, please contact:
Economic Development Agency
201 North "E" Street, Suite 301
San Bernardino, California 92401
Phone: (909) 663-1044
Fax: (909) 888-9413 .
Attn: Maggie Pacheco or MUSlDaU Arogundade
.
,
,
.
a.
14 ~
OSIJOI2t1OOP:1FORMSIHOUSING FORMSICoNSQUJJATED Pl.ANIZ<<XJ CDol:S'OLtZwTED PUN JIEIf l.DOC
, -",'" ',~i"'"'' "'. .
---...., ,~..,,-~~, '".'
City afSan Bernardino - Consolidated Plan - FY 2000-200$
. L INTRODUCTION
I A. VISION AND MISSION STATEMENT
Our vision for the City of San Bernardino ~ for it to be strong and prosperous. The City of San
Bernardino will be the hub of economic growth in the Inland Empire. San Bernardino will offer a
wide range of housing, recreation, education, and employment opportunities for all who live and
work here. A strong sense of community will continue to grow and thrive within our City limits.
our Mission is to provide quality and cost effective services to the people of San Bernardino. We
will provide excellence in leadership through the allocation of public resources to Cityprograms that
are responsive to community priorities and maximize opportunities for economic, educational, and
cultural viability.
B.PURPOSEANDCONTENT
During calendar year 1994, the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
(HUD) issued proposed rules relating to the consolidation of several formula grant programs. These
programs are the Coinmunity Development Block Grant (CDBO), Home Investment Partnership
(HOME), Emergency Shelter Grants (ESO), and Housing Opportunities for People with AIDS
. (HOPW A). The City of San Bernardino currently participates in the first three programs. Th~. City
administers the first three programs and the City of Riverside administers the HOPW A. . The
purpose of the Consolidated Plan is to assist the consolidation process by' bPnging together. the
planning, application, reporting, and citizen participation components of.each of these formula grant
programs. The City of San Bernardino, a Charter City under a MaYll.f-elected form ofgovemment in
the State ofCalifomia, is the Lead Agency responsible for overseeirig the development of the Plan.
These programs have three basic goals: securing decent housing; providing a suitable living
environl11ent; and expanding economic opportunities. Providing decent housing includes
rehabilitating the housing stock, providing opportunities for first time homebuyers, and increasing
the availability of permanent affordable housing for low-income households without discriminqtion.
Providing a suitable living environment includes: improving the safety and livability of
neighborhoods; enh.nr.ing housing OJlpoJtuDities for low-income persons and minorities; revitalizing
neighborhoods; restoring and preserving natural and physical features with histOric, architectural,
and aesthetic value; and, conserving energy resources. To expand economic oPPOrtunities. the
comprehensive approach encourages job creation, stimulating access to credit for community
development and assisting low-income persons with achieving self-sufficiency in federa11Yassisted
housing. .
The Consolidated Plan consists of four main components.
1. Bousln!! and Market Analvals - A description of the ho.using market conditions including
supply and ~.lld. condition of the housing stock, cost of housing, concentrations of
. households by income andlorracefethnicity and the inventol)' t8ct0rs affecting the availability of
affordable housing within the City of San Bernardino.
r
DS/JiII2fJtJOI'.:lRmMSIHoUSlNG FOlIMS'ICJONsouD.fBD Pl.dNIZo<<J CONSoUDdfBD PLANREI' uxx:
u
City olSan Bernardino. Consolidated Plan - FY 2000-2005
2. HouslnJ and Non-houslnv Community DeveloDment Needs - This section is an ass~sc:ment of
the cunent and projected housing needs oflow- and middle-income families, homeless families
and individuals and others with special needs who require supportive services. In addition, this
section considers what resources arc cunently available to meet those needs. This portion of the
Consolidated Plan also documents the housing and non-housing community development needs
over the next five years in the City of San Bernardino. The Needs Assessment is the result of
input obtained from the citizens in the 1998 survey, the required consultations and analysis of
HUD and census data.
3. Strategic Plan _ TheStrategic Plan identities the City's strategies, priority needs, and objectives
of its Consolidated Plan. The Five Year Strategy contains an analysis of the City's general
housing priorities, the programs that will be used to achieve these priorities and the resources
that will be used to fund these programs. Additional sections of the Five Year Strategy address
the relevant public policies, court orders and other constraints or barriCIl! that may impact
opportunities for affordable housing, describe the public, private and non-profit orgt'ni7Ational
structure, address the City's strategy to remove negative effects of public policies that serve as
barriers to affordable housing, descn"be activities that encourage public housing residents to
become more involved in management and participate in home ownership, deScribe the City's
lead-based paint hazard identification and reduction strategy, provide an anti-poverty strategy,
identify measures to overcome gaps in the institutional structure that will implement the strategy
for addressing priority needs, and describe activities that will enhance coordination between
public entities.
4. One Year Action Plan _ This section constitutes the Annual Action Plan,ofthe new 6ve year
Consolidated Plan. This Annual Action Plan sets forth a specific plan for mvestment or use of
affordable and supportive housing funds and non-housing community development funds that
are expected to be available during the coming fiscal year, determines goals for individuals and
households to be assisted, and describes the implementation plan guiding the activities and other
actions to be taken. This Annual Actio!1 Plan discusses specific plans and programs for the
period July 1,2000 to June 30, 2001 on affordable housing needs and non-housing community
development needs. .
,
n. 'CITIZEN PARTICIPATION AND CONSULTATIONS
As a part ofpreparlng the Consolidated Plan, the City of San Bernardino consulted with public and
private agencies as required by HUD regulations. The input received from this process was part of
determining the City's housing and non-housing community development needs. The Citizen
participation and Consultation process and its results are descn"bed below.
I
A. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION
Consolidated Plan Development Through a Town Meetinfl/Consultant Model.
The FY 200012005 Five Year Consolidated Plan was developed through the adminillttative efforts of
the City of San Bernardino Economic Development Agency and the San Bernardino County
r
_____......._ .__._....,..._.._ --...._~..-.a,....~_"'... ~...__._rrra~_"'.... 6ar.."" ~
-
.e
e
,.
I
....
e'
L
16
L
. ~. "", ,<"iTl~.."'t'.-...,.:,.;,<, i_i"~' ;I:'''~1_~, ':J,--.. F~'
City O/San Berntlrdino - Consolidated Plan - FY 20()()..200S
.
Housing Authority and other County Departments. In addition, consultant assistance was furnished
by Parsons Harland Bartholomew and Associates, Inc. This Plan, because it builds upon the 1995
Consolidated Plan, is also reflective of previous citizen outreach and advisory committee processes.
Public outreach for the Plan involved a hearing before the City's Community Development Citizen
Advisory Committee.
As in the development of previous Consolidated Plan documents, the Economic Development
Agency was given the role of lead agency in gathering and analyzing the relevant data for the
development of the FY 200012005 Consolidated Plan. Discussions among City departments
regarding the implementation of the FY 200012005 Consolidated Plan has also provided a logical
forum by which the Plan was developed. The City also relied heavily on the November 1998
Citizen's Need Survey.
Efforts to Broaden Public Participation
The Citizen Participation Plan (Appendix A) adopted by the City of San Bernardino sets forth the
guidelines and procedures for the continuing participation of the citizens of San Bernardino. The
Citizen Participation Plan broadens public participation in the development of the Consolidated Plan
by providing for a public hearing prior to the publishing of the Consolidated Plan and providing for
a thirty day public comment period and a second public hearing, prior to submitting the Plan to
HUD. The Citizen Participation Plan contains provisions for outreach to residents of public housing,
. low- and very low- income persons particularly those living in slum or blighted areas, non-English
speaking persons, persons with mobility, visual or hearing impairments, religipus org~iions, "
business organi7JItions, social service providers, and non-profit organi7JItions~. . '
r , "'.
, .,
The Citizen Participation Plan encouraged the involvementofall groups ine<luding k!",.'-:~:::: very-low
income persons, members of minority groups, non-English 8p"llH...g persons, persons with mobility,
visual or hearing impairments, residents ofareas where a significant amount of activity is occurring
or proposed, the elderly, the business community, and civic groups. Two public hearings were
conducted - one before the Community Development Citizen Advisory Committee on February 10,
2000 to inform the public and solicit comments on community needs, and one on May IS, 2000
before the City Council to accept public comments on the Draft Plan. " '
Citizens were given sufficient information about the subject of the hearing, through an advanced
notice published in local DCWSpapers. The hearing held in Council Chambers which accommodated
the working population disabled persons. At the public hearing, the City received public testimony
on the hOusing and non-housing community development needs, including priority non-housing
community development needs. The second public- hearing included the draft Consolidated Plan
proposed activities. A third public hearing will be scheduled atthe time the City prepares its Annual
PcrCortnancc Report in order to provide adequate information to its residents on the progress of its
housing and non-housing HOME, ESO and CDBO funded activities.
Citizens were given sufficient information about the subject of the hearing through an advanced
notice published in the local newspaper. The hearing held in Council n.Rm"m; which
.accommodated the working population disabled persons. At the public hearing, the City received
public testimony on the housing and non-housing community dcvclopmentneeds, including priority
r
tISIlf1I2fJOO1':IFOIII/SIHOUSlNG FOlIMSICONSouJumD I'LANI2DfJO fXJNSOUD.(mD I'l.I/N BEl' l.DOC
17
City o/San Bernardino - Co1l$olidlJled Plan - FY 2000-2005
non-housing community development needs. The second public hearing included the draft
Consolidated Plan proposed activities. A third public hearing will be scheduled at the time the City
prepares it Annual Perfonnance Report in order to provide adequate information to its residents to
review the progress of housing and non-housing HOME, BSG, and CDBG funded activities.
Atthe Febnwy public hearing prior to the release of the Plan for public review, program description
and eligible activity and information were distributed. This handout addressed the following areas:
housing needs, homeless needs, public housing needs, lead-based paint needs, market conditions,
barriem to affordable housing, fair housing, needs of special populations, and non-housing
community development needs. In addition, at the public meeting, input from citizens on the above
mentioned areas was verbally requested.
.
-
I
B, CONSULTATIONS
The City of San Bernardino Economic Development Agency and the City's consultant contacted
public agencies and private nonprofit organizations in the updating of the Consolidated Plan. The
following agencies were consulted:
I. Health DI:Dartment - The City consulted with the County of San Bernardino, Department of
Public Health and requested that the County provide any Health Department data on the
addresses of housing units occupied by low-income families or very low-income families which
contain lead-based paint hazards. .
2. Houslne Authority - The City consulted with the San Bernardino Comity Public Housing
Authority to ensure that activities with regard to local drug elimination, neighborhood
improvement programs, and resident program services, funded under the public housing
program and those funded under prograinscovered by the Consolidated Plan are tully
coordinated to achieve comprehensive development goals. The consultation identified a need
for homeless vouchers. This outreach effort encouraged the participation of residents of assisted
housing developments in the process of developing and implementing the Consolidated Plan.
-.
~
3. AdJacent Units or Local Government - The City notified and had dialogue with adjacent units
of general local government in preparing its description of non- housing community development
needs. Discussions centered on the problems and solutions that go beyond a single jurisdiction.
Coordination in the area of economic development and other activities were agreed to.
4. Homeless Providers - The City solicited input from providers of services to homeless pemons,
those threatened with homelessness, and the County department of Public Social Services, who
,tlmini$ters the County continuum of care program.
. .
~
As summarized below, several additional agencies were specifically targeted and consulted, via
telephone and private, individual meetings, regarding the housing needs of certain pemons, namely
children, elderly persons, disabled pemons and homeless pemons:
,.
t
r
~
tISIllIIl<<XJ1':lFORJIStHOCISING 1'ORNSICONsoI.J'11!D PUNI1D/1(J CONSOuD.f'11!D PI.Mlu" UJOC
l'
u
..
..
.
'<'''1'';',,'
City olSon Bernardino. Consolidated Plan. FY 2000-2005
Elderly Persons. Housing needs of the eidcdy were obtained through telephone contact
with neighborhood senior centers. These agencies indicated thatthe frail elderly arc in need
of general supportive services such as nutrition programs, transportation services, assistance
with affordable housing, and assistance with minor home repair.
Since the adoption of the 1995 Consolidated Plan, the City has witnessed a growing need for
housing addressing the specific physical and lifestyle needs of older adults who cannot live
independently without supportive services. Blderlyresidents who arc frail or have mobility
impainnents may need a range of housing and Supportive services, depending on their
abilities. These include:
· accessibility modifications to existing dwelling units;
· daily living assistance, including transportation, housekeeping, meal preparation, and
personal assistance; and
· accessible health care services.
The type of residential environment most suited to an elderly person depends on that
person's needs and abilities. Many elderly residents can function independently in their own
homes with accessibility modifications. Others may also need daily living assistance
provided in the home. Still others may need a higher level ofcare and supervision in a group
home environment.
Disabled Persons. Disabled persons include the physically handicapped, the chrQni~l1y ,
mentally ill, and substance abusers/addicts. To update the ConsQlicla'ted Plan, tile City
consulted with organi7J1tions such as Easter Seal Society, CcJ1ter for 'Individuals with
Disabilities, Rolling Start, and Inllll]d Empire Deaf Services resulted in the identification of
an array of housing needs for the developmentally disabled and physically disabled.
As. a result of these contacts, the City has concluded that many persons with developmental
disabilities living in fulloC!lrC facilities have become self sufficient over time. The next step
for such individuals is to live independently, outside of an institutional or residential care
setting. However, the income of persons with disabilities docs not support the cost of
independent living. An ongoing housing subsidy would be required for most of these
individuals. Moreover, while some persons will be able to adapt to independent living with
no support services, many others will require transitional housing consisting of part-time
support/care statTin order to make their change less stressful and more feasible. Bven most
of those who "graduate" to full independent living will require ongoing supportive services.
The type and level of supportive services needed by persons with disabilities will depend on
their abilities. Some will only require accessibility modifications to their homes to live
independently. Others with developmental disabilities may need ongoing, periodic
supervision and supportive services to mllil]tAin an independent lifestyle. Still others with
self-c:arc limitations may need assistance with housekeeping or meal preparation to maintain '
a separate residence.
,
_IIV8KI/J1':II'DJUaIHOlISlNGFO~TEDPUNlZI1Df1CONSoUDATED PUN ""'.DOC
19
City of San Bemardino. Consolidated Plan - FY 2000-2005
I
I
A. GENERAL
I
I
.
m. HOUSING AND HOMELESS NEEDS ASSESSMENT
The City prepared its assessment of the housing and non-housing community dcvelopmentneeds for
the next five years by obtAin;l1g input from citizens of the City of San Bernardino through the 1998
Citizen's Need Survey, by analyzing HUD and Census data, and by contacting community
ol'gl'ni7J1tions with more CUlI'CI1t information. lbrough HUD and local data sources, consultations
with various entities and input obtained from the Citizen Participation process, the City determined
its housing and non-housing community development needs. .
I . B. HOUSING NEEDS FOR THE NEXT FIVE YEARS
The most significant shift in the City's assessment of housing needs since 1995 has been the
realization that, while the population will continue to increase at a modest pace, the current housing
stock is sufficient to accommodate the needs of low. and moderate-income households, provided:
· older housing and neighborhoods are improved to meet current housing standards
. existing single family homes can be made available for homeownership
· the City can use the existing stock of vacant housing (which has been historically high) to meet
current and future needs.
.
City"s effort at assisting the construction oi:additionallow- or moderate-income housing"should
address special need groups who are not being adequately served by ~tin,8 programs or the current
housing stock. " .". .
Population is expected to grow from 183,589 in 2000 to 208,179 by 2005, which is a growth rate of
7.5 pen:ent (14,590 additional residents) during the five year period (approximately 1.5 percent
..nn....lly). Although about half of the population growth is anticipated to include low- and
moderate-income households, most of this growth can be accommodate through the availability of
currently vacant housing, the rehabilitation of existing housing, and assisting low. and moderate-
income households purchase single family homes currently occupied by middle-income households
(many of whom are expected to move to new higher cost housing that is available or will be
coDSlnlcted in the City);
The City of San Bernardino is projected to have a population increase of 14,590 and a housing unit
increase of approximately 4,889 in the next five years, although the lUgh percentage of vacant units
in the City may dampen the demAnd for new housing construction somewhat. Part of the City's
population increase is projected to be absorbed in units that are CUlI'CI1tly vacant. However, within
the next decade, the vacancy rate is anticipated to approach a normal level, and housing unit growth
will more closely reflect population growth. .
Given the current increase in Hispanic households and the relative large size of these existing
households, it can b~ inferred that the Hispanic population will likely increase its total number by
2005. Also, the relatively stronger growth rates in two other population groups, Blacks and Asians,
,
.
L
UI'_~~fC"UMJOIJOCON8Ol.IDAfC"UN""UK1C
%0
."
City olSon Bernardino - Consolidated Plan - FY 2000-2005
.
point to growth in these household types as well. Population estimates for 1998 and projections by
the California Department of Finance both suggest a large increase in the Hispanic population, a
modest increase among Black and Asian/Pacific Islander households, and a decrease in the non-
Hispanic White population. The extent of these changes in population will depend, in part, on the
City's success in attracting residential development for middle- and upper-income residents and
assisting in the improvement of the existing housing stock.
Since 1990, the Department of Finance estimates that the average household size increased, froni 2.9
to 3.0 in the City. This increase in household size may have resulted in a higher incidence of
overcrowding; although there is only anecdotal evidence of this. Household sizes are expected to
level off, and perhaps begin to decline later in the current decade. Whether this trend holds true for
San Bernardino will depend on the relative increase in households from minority groups that tend to
have larger household sizes. It should be noted that in the 1990 Census, San Bernardino was found
to have gained 45,950 foreign born persons between 1980 and 1990. NumCJ;ically, this figure
accounts for nearly all the growth in San Bernardino's population expansion from 1980 to 1990 of
47,095 persons. Immigration.was the largest contributing factor to growth in San Bernardino's
population during the 19805. During the 1990s, this immigration became relatively less important to
population growth relative to natural increase (births minus deaths).
.
..'
.'
.
r
OS/lt1I2OOI1P:lFORAISIHOIISING FORMSICONSOLlDATED PI.ANt1INJO CONSOl.m.cTED PLAN IIEY HV".
4.
0-30%ofMFI ~.
31 - 50% of MFI [t!19" I
51 - 80% of MFI 1"19" I
ItlUU
1/4tl
I ",Utl1
1.1uu,uuu,uuu I
1.1lli,tl/O,UUU I
J$;suu,uuu,UUU I
--
e.
,
L~
.% t,
~ :
...-----
1- t-P J~
-
- ~
. - :p
-
1== ~
-- L
-
:t- -
-
_I~ ~
~
r-
I
I
r-
.
.1
-
-
= =-
,- i
II
r-
r-
I
-
.
I
-
,-
-
-
1-
-
-
-
I
-!
,
'"
It)
o
~
L.
o
<0
J~~ K
~=- ......,
-fI
,
1-
r
-
\
\
\
1\
~ r
J..--
t::
-j
.-1...1
'J..
.L
.1
-
..[
~
I
-== .1.
_L.1
-
1
I
r-
II r-r J
- r
1 r
~ \, I
.. ~-
,
o
<0
.
-
'. ..~.
'.
-
I
"'"t
j
<3
..~.'J'
~;
,;&: "'"
." ,.:.",.;1"::'.1:1 I
f4;~': v:Uw ....~.
"#i~," {.,o,.' . -'". I
I
_,0
'""
'?~~.f'
,.~ ~5t..", ,
~.,..~ ~:'
".".~,._..:. I:' ;'~_
. ~"f'!::-r-- ~.
1__. .
~ ~ r~ ~~'r ~~t .~ :'y.
i-~;:, .',;
.1. .~..to"..'
~ ....~~~;~~'.-I~ IL
',/IJ _.,.^~.
I V
~"1~} ,'tf"" ..
..... 'l~:;':'.,'."
~ . ~. ~~f~;~~~~"
~~,. ~.,.,. 'W ID.U....
~, ,:1"- ':;f:';"~~~~:' !-' ~r
:f~'7,k-;,~., . '_. .'
..~,;>:-...~?~'/.........<.
.~I~. . . , ..
L ~ '-,
':;'&. ....:,: .' ..
I~";-"l.:~ . .... .. ,
,ORE_I' .;' '7 i& I , t- I
I . '~:.., f-f-
.;i!tO{r~LL '
:) r-
w
.1.4
I
~"''''''.''
I-
f--
~
~ ... E.........~.J...
I ..~,.,.
W T ,nuT' I
J I ..... .
........
YE I t--
. /-L ....... ...1
II...
-
"'.TN .. ulnud..
/V w
J
, .. :tDn.
ST
I
III..... ,
t-i .. "..'
r- WH~ ST
-
I
H
.\
\
ST
,
..nu...
.
,...;J '~:~ "10:111--
.. ,,". ~":l~'
. . .'. ~t )~i "~,,. ,
":::1'~~ ~ ~,' .'
"-Ii .
"'~{iqi:':':~~ ,,' ;
,', "'''}i!~'"''''''''
, ,,2:~~:i::,~1ff,;";'i
..,;~'L:::"~t..::..
..~..~
....;.;:,.~..;;..TN ~..
,,:2Jla~~;"::';' ,,'
.- ....... .-,}:.." "
'~!l'../~~",., .: '
: ".'...:.Yl:!';.~:r'~~'.~
.... .., ......~J~:~.~
-
.' ~'~::k~X~~~~~:~~~~~i
-
lAUD .':"~ "';,?<.tI;..~:;:,~ :
-. .' ~', ~l:.-: ;:. ::
", '.:' . '.: ~: ..t..._' .
;..~
I I
---
.. ..:---......-.
--
....
I
I I
I
.
.
.
i
City of Son Bernardino - ConsolidaJed Plan _ FY 2000-200$
· The City analyzed the estimated housing needs and needs for supportive services for the ensuing
five year period. These needs were derived from input received from the citizen participation, the
CHAS, and from data available from BUD, the U.S. Census and local studies.
A major housing problem in the City is overpayment (Cost BurdenlAffordability). Almost thirty_
seven percent of the City's households are paying more than thirty percent of their income for
housing expenses. Cost burden is defined as households paying more than 30 percent of their
incomes for housing expenses. Cost burden is most severe among extremely low-income renter
households (those earning 30 percent or 'ess of the county median family income), with 76 percent
of those households paying more than 30 percent of their incomes for housing expenses. Nearly half
(47 percent) of all renters within this group paid more than 50 percent of income for housing in
1990. Nearly two-thirds (64 percent) of owner, households within this income group also face cost
burdens of more than 30 percent. 'Ibis segment of the population, those earning I~ss than 30 percent
of merli,,'l and paying more than 30 percent of income on housing, also have highest risk of
becoming homeless due to personal financial circumstances. There are few non-subsidized dwelling
units in the City affordable to this lowest income group, particularly larger homes suitable for
families with children.
Cost burden is also a problem among very low-income renter households earning between 30 and 50
percent of median income. Over three-fourths (79 percent) of these households pay more than 30
percent of their incomes for housing. Overpayment is not as severe among lOW-income households
. (those earning between 50 and 80 percent of median income), but is still prevalent. Nearly ~1r.(45
percent) of the renters and one-third (33 percent) of the owners within this income group pay more
than 30 percent for housing. Cost burden is also a problem for moderate-income homeowners (those
earning 80 to 120 percent of median income). Nearly one-third (32'Perclmt) of these households
overpay. However, only a small percentage (II' petcent) of moderate-incOme renters ovelpay. A
high percentage of respondents to the Community Needs Survey rankrentaI housing development as
a high priority.
Another housing problem in the City is the physical condition of a large portion of the housing
stock. Physical condition of the housing stock is the second significant issue identified in the
Community Profile. Since the adoption of the 1995 Consolidated Plan, the condition of the housing
stock has been documented through a block-level property survey conducted in November 1999,
covering approximately 75 percent of the City's housing stock. ACCOrding to the housing element of
the City's General Plan, the majority of dwelling units on nearly half of the blocks in San
Bernardino's residential neighborhoods have varying problems from deferred maintenance to
dilapidation. Nearly one-third (30 percent) of the blocks were characterized by houses needing
deferred maintenance (painting, roofrepairs, window/door repairs, siding repair, etc.). Over one-
third of the blocks (36 percent) were characterized by houses nP.Alfing rehabilitation, primariIYminor
to moderate. Nearly 40 percent of the multifamily properties of four units or more in the areas
surveyed needed rehabilitation, while over one-third (37 percent) exhibited signs of deferred
D"laint~s:mcc.
.
r
DJ//IJQ(J(J(Jp:IFORMSI/{OCISING FOIWSICONSOlJD.('/'E/) PUNI1000 CONSOlJD.('/'E/) PLrIN REI' 2.JJOC
2S
Cily olSan BlU7Ulrdino - Consolidated Plan - FY 2000-200S
Substandard housing conditions were concentrated in the southem and westem residential
neighborhoods of the City (generally between Highway 30, west of Waterman Avenue, and north of
Mill Street), particularly in areas near downtown. Overall, the age of the neighborhood was not a
definitive factor in the condition of the neighborhood, although blocks with a majority of homes
more than 30-40 years old tended to have a higher incidence ofhousiog problems. There were very
old neighborhoods in excellent condition and there were 20 to 30 year old neighborhoods quickly
becoming run-down and in need of property and structural maintenance. Often, blocks with homes
predominantly in sound condition had properties that were commonly in need oflandscaping and
clean-up. Overall, there is a need to maintain the character of neighborhoods primarily through
aesthetic maintenance. A high percentage of respoodents to the Community Needs Survey rank
residential property maintenance/code enforcement as a high priority.
Below average rates of home ownership, and the corresponding high rate of . rental single-family
homes, have continued to be a prominent issue since the adoption of the 1995 Consolidated Plan.
The number ofHUD repossessions and rented single-family homes have become more ofa problem
since the early to mid-1990s. The low-incomes of many City residents have prevented many families
from becoming homeowners, even with the relatively modest housing prices in San Bernardino.
Fifty-two percent of the City's housing units are owner-occupied while 48 percent are renter-
occupied. When vacant rental units are counted, less than half of the City's housing stock in
ownership housing; However, 60 percent of the City's housing units are single family and another
7.3 percent are mobile homes. The potential exists, therefore, to increase home ownership
substantially, perhaps to 60 percent or more of the City's households.
Forty percent of all renters occupy single-family detached homes. The vacancy rate amoog rental
units was four times the owner vacancy rate at the time of the 1990 CeilsUs. The high rate of
absentee owners contributes to a lack of maintenance. In addition, pride of ownership among
owner-occupied units contributes to maintenance and upgrading of the housing stock. Thus, there is
a need to increase homeownership in order to stabilize neighborhoods throughout the City.
Homelessness is also a problem in the City of San Bernardino. As the City has a relatively large
homeless population. While it is difficult to obtain an accurate count of the homeless, estimates
indicate ~J. the range ofhomelessness in San Bernardino is as low as 1,000 persons and as high as
1,850 persons. This estimate is within the range of previous estimates during the early I 990s, but
the nature of homelessness may have shifted, with a larger proportion of homeless individuals
affected by intlrmities, substance abuse, and mental illness.
C.CATEGORmSOFPERSONS~CTED
.
-
.
HUD definitions for income groups applicable to the Consolidated Plan are listed below. These
definitions are applied toward federal funded programs and activities such as the
AcquisitionlR.chabilitation Program, the Single Family Home Improvement Program, the Senior
Home Repair Program, the Fair Housing Program among others.
Pleose note that the differences in income amongfederal programs as described below. In .
particular. the terms "low-income." "moderate-income. " and "middle-income" have different
metmings under differentfederal programs. .
,
fIVlfJQINIOII:lI'r1IIMSWOwnia FOIIMSICONSOlJDArm I'I.ANIJ(J(J() CONSOl.ID.4rm I'UN REI' UJOC
26
L'
...
I
':::,;"- -_..~::",,jiA:. ,:. ,j - /1\_' -;"'1 J;~':;';',:,'~:.,_~
City olSan BenuJr/Jino . Consolidated Plan . FY 2000.2005
.
1. Extreme1v Low-Income Famil.ie1: Families whose incomes are between 0 and 30 percent of the
median income forthe area, as established by HUD with adjustments for smaller and larger families,
except that HUD may establish income ceiling higher or lower than 30 percent of the median for the
area on the basis ofHUD's findings that such variations are necessary because ofprevai1ing levels 0
construction costs or fair market rents or unusuall hi or low famil incomes.
2. Low-Income FamUles: Low-income families whose income does not exceed 50 percent of the
median area income for the area, as determined by HUD, with adjustments for smaller and larger
families except that HUD may establish income ceilings higher or lower than 50 percent of the
median for the area on the basis of HUD's findings are necessary for use prevailing levels 0
construction costs or fair market rents or unusually high or low family incomes. (This term
co onds to ve low-income in the CDBG Pro
.
3. Other Low-Income Families (for federal DJ"O.r!rams OTHER THAN the Community
DeveloDment Block Grant Prortram): Households whose incomes are between 51 percent and 80
percent of the median income for the area, as determined by HOD, with adjustments for smaller or
larger families, except that HOD may establish income ceilings higher or lower that 80 percent 0
the median for the area on the basis ofHUD's findings that such variations are necessBIy becallSe 0
prevailing levels of construction costs or fair market rents, or unusually high or low family income,s.
is term corres nds to moderate-income in the CDBG Pro am. .....:.,... .
,
4. Moderate-income Famllv (for the federal CDBG Prol!ram ONLfJ: Family whose income does
not exceed 80 percent of the median income for the area, as determined by HUD with adjustments
for smaller and larger families, except that HUD may establish income ceilings higher and lower
than 80 percent of the median for the area on the basis ofHUD's fmdings that such variations are
necessary because of prevailing levels of construction costs or fair market rents, or unusually high or
low family incomes.
So Middle-income FamUvi. Family whose incomes are between 81 percent and 95 percent of the
median income for the area, as determined by HUD, with adjustments for smaller or 1argerfamilies,
except that HUD may establish income ceilings higher or lower than 95 percent of the median
income for the area on the basis ofHUD's tintli'1gJ that such variations are necessBIy because 0
prevailing levels of construction costs or fair market rents, or unusually high or lowfamily incomes.
(This tkfl1lition corresponds to the term "moderate-income" under the ClUS statute, 42 U.S.c.
12705. In addition. this definition is different than thatfor the CDBG Program in that the range
would be between 81 t and 120 'Cent 0 the median income or the area.
.
,
0SR0IlOOOP:1FORMSIHOUSING FORMIICONSOUDATE/)PUNI100DCONmT.m..,."n D'.., ..". ~
City of San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan - FY 2000-200S
HUD regulations require that the housing needs of certain income groups be estimated by the City.
Household Incomes in the City are identified in Table 1.
TABLE 1
HOUSEHOLD INCOME
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO U or 1990
%or JacoMe Number orHouleholds
Medlaa Raage Reaten Owaen Total
lacome tI % tI % tI %
Low Less !baa 12,603 23% 5,450 10% 18,053 33%
0-50% SI4422
Other Low S14,423 . 5,019 9% 4,898 9% 9,917 18%
51-80% S23 074
Middle S23,075 - 1,852 3% 2,452 5% 4,304 8%
81-95% S27400
Upper More !baa 5,959 11% 16,411 30% 22,370 41%
95%4- $27,401
1. Extremely Low-Income (0-30 percent MFl)
Extremely low-income families are those earning 30 percent and less of the median family income.
Since 1990, the income level for such a household has increased with the increas~.in median income.
In 1994. a range of incomes less than $8,652 per year for a family of four persons was considered
extremely low-income, based on a median family ipcome of $28,843. There were 10,354
households within this income group in San Bernardino. Based on the .1999 median income of
$47,200, an extremely low-income family is one withmi income of less than $14,150 per year for a
family of four persons. However, it is unknown how many households currently fall within this
income group. .
Renten. There were 7,739 renter households that were extremely low-income. Of these, 88 percent
reported hoUsing problems, 86 percent reported cost burden of more than 30 percent, and 71 percent
reported cost burden of more than 50 percent There were 1,390 elderly renter households in the
extremely low-income group. Of these, 76 percent reported a housing problem, 76 percent paid
more than 30 percent of their income for rent and 47 percent paid more than 50 percent of their
income for rent There were 3,519 small renter households. Of these, 89 percent reported some
housing problem, 86 percent paid more than 30 percent of their income for housing and 75 percent
paid more than 50 percent of their income for housing. There were 1,516 large renter households. Of
these, 97 ~t reported some housing problem, 93 percent paid more than 30 percent of their
income for housing and 79 percent paid more than 50 percent of their income for housing.
Ownen. There Were 2,615 extremely low-income owners. Of these households, 66 percent were
cost burdened by 30 percent or more and 64 percent were cost .burdened by 50 percent or more.
Forty-seven percent of these households reported a housing problem. There were 818 elderly
extremely low-income owners. Of these, 56 percent paid more than 30 percent of their income, 37
percent paid more than 50 percent on housing, and 56 percent icported a housing problem.
,
OSl/OI2I1/JD1':lFORMS1HOUSING FOIlMSICONSOlJD.(TED PLAN\11XXJ CONSOIJD.fTED PUN REV l.DOC
ZI
.
-"
.
.
.
II.
r
;
'"
"';'
"..f""".'.'i;i~...!..:,(.; /'''','.,
l
City olSon Bernardino - Consolidated Plan - FY 2000-200S
-I
2. Low-Income (0-50 percent MFl)
The income o/low-income households does not exceed 50 percent of the median family income.
The median income for a family ofCaur was $28,843; low-income households earned a maximum of
$14,422 annually or less. There were 18,053 low-income households in the City. In 1999, a four
person family in the low-income category would earn up to $23,600 annually or less.
Renten. The maximum that a very low-income family of four could afford to pay in monthly
housing expenses is $590. The median rent for a two-bedroom unit in San Bernardino is about $550
permonth. With utility costs, this median-cost unit wouldjust be affordable to a low-income family
of four earning 50 percent of the median income. It would not be affordable to a family of four
earning less. In 1990, low-income families could afford up to $460 a month on rent, which was 17
percent less than the City's median rent of$556. There were 12,603 renter households that are low
income. Of these, 85 percent reported housing problems, 75 percent reported cost burden of more
than 30 percent, and 29 percent reported cost burden of more than 50 percent. As cited previously,
housing cost burdens are generally concentrated among all household earning less than 30 percent of
median income, followed by those earning 30 percent to 50 percent of median income
There were 2,849 elderly renter households in the low-income group. Of these, 68 percent reported
a housing problem, 65 percent paid more than 30 percent of their income for rent and 32 percent
. paid more than 50 percent of their income for rent. There were 5,507 small renter households. Of
these, 84 percent reported some housing problem, 79 percent paid more than 30 percent pft!1eir '.
income for housing and 28 percent paid more than 50 percent of their incom" .fur housing. 'There
were 2,792 large renter households. Of these, 95 percent reported some housing problem, 67
percent paid more than 30 percent of their income for housing and 22 percent paid more than 50
percent of their income for housing. A total of 72 percent of all low renter income households,
regardless of family type, cited some housing problem.
Ownen: There were 5,450 low-income households in the City. Of these, 49 percent were cost
burdened by 30 percent or more and 44 percent were cost burdened by 50 percent or more. Twenty-
two percent of these households reported a housing problem. There were 2,849 elderly low-income
owners. Of these, 28 percent paid more than 30 percent of their income, 18 percent paid more than
SO percent on housing, and 8 percent reported a housing problem.
.
fIS//fJI2IXXJP:IFO/tMSWOUSING FOIIAISICONsorJTEDPUNIZOooCONIOUD.cTEDPUN UVZ./XJC
29
City of San Bemal'dino - Col/Solldated Plan - FY 2000-200$
TABLEZ
HOUSEHOLDS BY INCOME RANGE AND ETHNIClTY
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Total Very Low Income HHs Low-Income Hbs Moderate-income Hbs
Households (50% MFI). (51-80% MFI). (81-120% MFI).
# and % #and % # and % #and%
White 36 791167% 9737/26% 6911119% 2432/7%
Black 8,331115% ~485/42% I 55S119% 56618%
Native American 55711% 231141% 128123% 43/8%
Asian &. Pacific Islander 160413% 630139% 215/13% 43/3%
Other race 7,361113% 2.334/32% I 696/23% 66319%
Hisuanie" 14 111/26% 40532/32% 3.138122% I 27019%
All Housdicilds 54 644/100% 16417/30% 10505/19'.4 3 747n%
· MFI- Median Family Income - San Bernardino _ 12B,B43
50% and below MFI- 114,422
J/-BO% MFI- 114,423 - 123,074
B/-J20%MFJ - $13,075 - 127,400
..p- of Hispanic origin are already included as a perr:entage of other papulation groups
Saurr:e: /990 U. S. CeI/SUS
.
~
Racial DistrIbution: Minority and ethnic households are represented in disproportionate numbers
among low-income families. This has not changed since the adoption of the 1995 Consolidated Plan.
At the time of the 1990 Census, 42 percent of all Black households (who made up 15 percent of the
population), and 39 percent of all Asian households (who made up but 3 percent of the population) .
in San Bernardino were very low-income. In addition, 32 percent of Hispanic households (who
made up 26 percent of the population) had very low-incomes. This is in contrast with the, White
population who had 26 percent in the low-income bracket while comprising 67'percent of the total
population.
3. Other LoW-Income'
Other low-iitcome families are those earning between 51 and 80 percent of the median family
income. a range of Sl4,423 to S23,074 per year based on the 1990 median family income of
S28,843. There were 10,505 households within this income group in San Bernardino, representing
19 percent of the total households in the City. Housing aft'ordability in this catcgorywould required
monthly hoUsing expenses of no more than $577. In 1999, low-income families had incomes
ranging frOiii $23,600 to $37,750 based on the 1999 median family income of$47,200. However, it
is unknown how many households currently fall in this category.
Renten. Nearly 20 percent of aU renters were low-income households. However, while 45 percent
of these households were rent burdened by more than 30 percent of their monthly income, only 2.8
Percent ofthesc households suffered from extreme cost burden of greater than SO percent. onow-
income renters, 67 percent reported some type of housing problem. The elderly reported these
problems the least (55 percent) and large families reported them the most (87 percent).
Overcrowding was reported by 26.1 percent of the total renter households in this income group.
However, 71.5 percent of the large family renters in this income group reported overcrowding.
Ownen. Low-income owners made up 17 percent of all households. Of these households, 33
percent were cost burdened by 30 percent or more and 10 percent were cost burdened by SO percent
or more. Forty-two percent of these households reporte4 a.housing problem. Overcrowding was
IJSIJOQt1IXJ1':lFORAa1HOUSlNG~7mI'IJIVIl<<KI~mol'loINlUlYl.DDC
30
L_
.
Li
1:
,.
...
t,..,", ".',A' '.
.'. \:"~"~"~"~'!~,~/$; ~:,;j", .
City 01&11 Benuudino. CoMolidaled Plan. FY 2000-2005
. Renters: Middle-income households comprised 7 percent of all renter households. Small related
families were 4S pcn:cnt ofthcsc total households. Thirty pcn:cnt reported some sort of housing
problem, which could be cost burden, overcrowding or physical inRdequacy. Of the total middle-
income renters. 11 percent reported cost burden of30 percent or more. No households reported cost
burden greater than SO percent
Elderly households comprised 7 percent of the middle-income renter households. Twelve pcrccntof
these elderly paid more than 30 percent of their incomes on housing. Large middle-income
households constituted 19 percent of the middle-income population. Large families reported a
housing problem in 6S percent of these households. Since only 2 percent of the large renter families
in this income group reported cost burden greater than 30 percent, it can be determined that
overcrowding and unit inadequacies were the most common housing problems. All other
households made up 29 percent of total renter households. Ofthcse households, 21 percentreported
some sort of housing problem, and 14 percent reported cost burden of over 30 percent
Owners. Middle-income owner-occupants comprised 8 percent ofall owner households. Ofthesc,
28 percent were elderly. Among all middle-income owners, 32 percent reported cost burdcnsrcatcr
than 30 percent and 3 percent paid more than SO percent Sixteen percent of the elderly reported
cost burden greater than 30 percent.
Racial Distrlbut12n. Middle-income families arc a small Percentage of the total within each racial
group. Percentages ranged from 3 percent of the Asians to 9 percent ofOthcrs within the middle-
.come range in 1990.
I ,~&~~ 1
..
The following table lists total households by tcnl,lrC and type withanYhousingproblcms. Themajor
problems arc cited for summlrypurposes. Cost burden is the overwhelming housingprob1em facing
San Bernardino households. Overcrowding and unit inadcquacies arc secondary according to census
report findings. Ethnic minority households arc disproportionatelYaft'ected by all housing problems.
TABLE 3
HOUSING PROBLEM MOST PREVALENT BY HOUSEHOLD 'lYPEAND TENuRE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
All Elderly RenlII HolllCholds Cost Burden 58%
All SIIIIIJ BauIl H!l!ISehoIds Cost Burden 50%
All LInre BauIl ~Ids Cost Burden 53% ). ~dinl!no%\
All Other BcafI1 H!l!ISehoIds Cost B!II'den 46%\
TolBl RealBJ H01IICholds Cost Burden (SI%). OverCiOwdina (22%) &;
All Eldedv Pwner HOuseholds PhYliCll Unit Inadeauacies
Cost Burden. 0%
A11911Jer Owner Households Cost BlIIden 3%
Tcn.J Owner ~Ids CostB~
Tcn.J Hnu-,bolds in San BCI1I8rdino Cost Burden (37%). Oven:rOWdina (IS%) &;
PhYlIc:a1 Unit . .
s......r: /910. u.s. c..w; CHAST/Ibk /e, -H-IlwIlaI#MiiiNMbfl/r-MiIlt14. ,. r-~"'H~",",w...
,
OSIIOl2D11tJi':II'OIIMswott.rm~1lrD/ll.ANIlllOll~1lrD/lI.ANU"UJOc
..
T
~
~
..
~
.
.
~
r
City olSon Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200S
found among 13.8 percent oflow-income owners~ increasing to 22.2 percent of non -elderly low-
income owners. Elderly low-income owners reported 9 percent paid more than 30 percent and 4.6
JlCrceut paid more than 50 percent on housing.
RacIal Distribution. There are fewer differences among raciaYethnic categories in the proportion .
of families who were low-income than very low-income. Among low-income households, the
variation was 13 percent to 23 percent. The highest percentages were Native Americans (23
percent) and Other (23 percent) while Asians had the lowest percentage (13 percent) in this income
group.
f
4. Moderate-Income
Moderate-income families are those earning less than 80 percent of the median family income, a
range of incomes less than $23,074 per yesr based on the 1990 median family income of$28,843.
There were 27,970 households within this income group in San Bemardino. Housing aff'ordability .
in this category required monthly housing expenses of no more than $577. In 1999, moderate-
income families hsd incomes less than $37,750 based on the 1999 median family income of
$47,200. However, it is unknown how many households CllITently faII in this category.
Renten. There were 17,622 renter households that were moderate-income. Of these, 81 percent
reported hOUSing problems, 71 percent reported cost burden of more than 30 percent, and 39 percent
repOrtedco~burdensofmorethan39percent.
There were 2,468 elderly renter households in the moderate-income group. Of these, 70 pertent
reported a housing problem, 69 percent paid more than 30 percent ofth~ir inCome for rent and 36
percent paid more than 50 Percent of their income for rent. There were 7,697 smaJ1 renter
hOuseholds. Of these, 80.percent reported some housing problem; 72 percent paid more than 30
Percent of their income for housing and 42 percent paid more than 50 percent of their income for.
housing. There were 3,936 large renter hOUSeholds. Of these, 93 percent reported some housing
problem, 60 percent paid more than 30 percent of their income for housing and 38 percentpaidmore
than 50 percent of their income fur hOUSing.
0Jm~. There were 10,348 moderate-income owners. Of these hOuseholds, 46 percent were cost
burdened by 30 percent or more in rent payments and 21 percent were co~ burdened by 50 percent
or more. Fifty percent of these hOuseholds reported a housing problem. There were 4,696 elderly
moderate-income owners. Of these, 29 Percent paid more than 30 percent of their income, 16
Percent paid more than 50 percent on housing, and 30 percent reported a housing problem.
L
S. Middle-Income
Middle-income families earn between 81 percent and 95 percent of the median family income.
ACCOrding to the 1990 median family income, a middle-income household WOuld earn $23,075 to
$27,400 annually. There were 3,747 middle-income households in San Bemardino, representing 7
JlCrc:cnt of all households in the City. In 1999, a midd1e-income family Would earn between
$38,232aud $44,840 annually and WOuld be able to afford monthly housing costs between $955 and
$1,121.
1
,
_JGQ~.-oR.lG'lQ:)lo:ml.tD.tlZDl'~~J2l'DI'~IlEV:r.."".
.
1
.
,
.
-
L'._ ...."5;.,..:;.,.....~..... 'J.',
City o/&n Bernardino - CoMolldaled Plan _ FY 20()(J.200S
-,
7. Public Housing Section 8 Housing
1
The San Bernardino County Public Housing Authority was created in 1941 to provide affordable
housing opportunities for very low-income families in the county. Although the dl!llllll1d for
Housing Authority assistance has increased since 1990, the Authority's ability to increase the
number of assisted units, public housing, and Section 8 vouchers and certificates has not kept pace.
The Housing Authority currently owns and manages 798 units aod provides ao additiOnal2,ll89
rental units to very low-income families through the Section 8 Housing Assistaoce Payments
Program. Of the individuals waiting to be assisted, 2 percent of the Section 8 recipients (38) are
elderly. In addition, 11 percent of individuals on the Section 8 waiting list and 14 percent of the
County public housing waiting list indicate some type of disability. Unfortunately, there are 2,191
additional households on the waiting list for assistaoce from these two programs. Fifty-seven
percent of all households waiting meet federal preferences for admission tQ rental assistaoce
programs within the City. The City has tabulated only those households meeting federal preferences
for over a year.
-
The remaining preferences shall be equally ranlced:
'.
D. Households involuntarily disp1aced by
1. Natural disaster (fire or flood).
2. Landlord action which:
a) Is beyond the applicant's control
b) An action which occurs despite applicant having met all previously imposed
conditions of occupaoey.
c) Action taken is other thao a rent increase.
3. Action by a member residing in applicant's unit which threatens the physical safety of
applicant or other members of household (domestic viOlence).
The Housing Authority's system for applying the federal preferences is a two-step process. First,
when the applicant enters his/her name on the waiting list, the applicant is given the opportunity to
certify theirqualitication for federal preference. Second, when a certiticate/voucheris offered to the
applicant, verification of the applicant's certification is done by the Housing Authority. The
Housing Authority's Administrative PIao outlines the verification/certification procedures in full.
-
r
DSnDl2011(Jp:IFOItJawOIlSlNo~JZD"l.iINUoDo~mD"UN REl'UJOc
..
-
City 0/&
. 10 . ColUolidaled Plan. FY 2000.2001
8. Fint lime Hom. "UY~/:>
J
.
With homec .;rship having ~een identified s asignif ....; i~. forall types of households in the
-':ity of San . 'nardino, there is emphasis 01' assisting firoi,; .; homebuyers with that first step
toward hOIr nership. The City has three "ctive at! <Ja'L]" l:;neownership programs. These
. :ograms ta low and moderate-income fardIies who ;' v'.dJ I .: iJave the oPPOrtunity to purchase
a home wit! · assistance. It should be noteJ that MHime [,..::ebuyers moving into the owner
;"Jusing DIal .. euables existing homeowners to move-;. \ ;" ie, ;"'.; er and more expensive housing.
The City 0: :80 Bernardino is interested h promol:l,g a bai:lced community that includes
u..meowner; '. . ,> at all income levels includinr entry-ley. f and n, ..' 'Ie-up housing.
'~..ble 4 prav :s information on the income nc edcd to plli;l.a:;~ .: " 'Jmcat the median vaIUC)(about
$90,000 at t . end of 1999). If a low-incon,e family was able to save 20 percent for a down
.,~yment, th" .vould be able to purchase th(., ::-:dian priced hOIr.} only if the interest rate was 6
percent Oue Even at current rates, the 0..,;: ; 'ype ofIoan with ;i low enougIi interest rate is an
adjustable I'll . oan. While they would be a I, .' afford the initia; rate on an adjustable rate loan,
future increa in the interest rate would CaUSe' .,em to pay more .ban 30 percent of their income
unless their: )me also rose. A model1l'.:-L:ne family coule afford to purchase the median
priced home, .uncnt interest rates if they were .... ,Ie to save atIea:,. 20 percent down'-With a down
payment of j .' . or ten percent, a model'lll.; ne family coulc' only purchase if they used an
adjustable rate : Ian. Thisdiscussionshou.>.l i.ll. iitethaiwithtodr,"Sinterestrates,hoUSingprices .
are still too hi p' for many families to afford 8 ).", chase.
'-
.
'.
,
.
,
li
fWIDI:ll1DOl>:lFOIINSIHOCISING ~JZD"L.fN\lIlClOCON.souD.clZD"l.fN IlE/fz.Doc '
, "
r
City DISon Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 200D-200S
.
TABLE..
INCOME NEEDED TO PURCHASE A MEDIAN PRICED HOME
. . IN THE ern: OF SAN BERNARDINO, 2000
20% 10% 5%
Dowa pa)'meat Dowa pa)'llleat Dowa Pa)'meat
Mediaa Home Price, 1990 Census $96,200 $96,200 $96,200
Down t (as mark~ $1~40 $~620 $4-1.810
Loan KeQuired $7~6O $8~80 $9 !.!9O
Montbly Mortgage Pa)'llleat
(30YearTerm).... $376.35 $423.39 $446.91
@".2% interest (ARM)
@ 7"10 interest 5512.02 5576.02 $608.02
@ 7.5% interest $538.12 $605.38 $639.01
@ 8% interest 5564.71 5635.29 5670.59
A9% interest 5619.24 5696.64 S735.34
TIIllCIIIIIclIasurance 5129.85 $129.85 . $129.85
Private M~e Insurance None 5 35.00 5 35.00
Total Monthl)' Pa)'lllenl $506.20 5588.24 .S611.76
@4.2% interest (ARM) .
@ 7% interest 5641.87 $740.87 $772.87
@7.5%interest . S667.97 $770.23 5803.86
@ 8% interest $694.56 5800.14 S835.44
{li} 9% interest 5749.09 $861.49 5900.19
Mioimum Annual Income Required 524,625 $25.564
@4.2% interest (ARM) $20,228
@ 7% interest $25,649 $30,724 $32,002.'
@ 7.5% interest $26,692 $31,89~ $33,241
@ 8% interest $27,754 $3~,092 . $34,502
9% interest $2t934 535.s44 537.090
s-",.. CIIIf"""'.~J'H . .'-.0'.....
NOIe: 1M c.llf-Wt ~ qfR.JJor. _iii. ....n...u/..prlt:cPcdnblrAomaqfS90./)()()/n NDWMWD/19PP. II"
atbttoud tNzt IIro _iDIJ u/.. prlt:ep AU. Aoma I. 1999 ~ __ Aoma,/ _ d...to lIro....n...fiIvro roporttJI/
bytIJ.I990c.n-. n..--'fiIvrollMllpTtlble4IuuNJI_t:Iwtpd,lIwtforo. .
.A"'"'Ie /n__P._....../~-.I_ aqfl60wed:qfFelwuiuy 7.lIIiJi) _ U"'- '"""-
JlDDd ""-II NOl'NfII/Iwl_ tNzt -...... qf18" qf"""-""..,.... pritrdpoI.1IrIorat, _............ Soow
~1IuI1ltItl-"""Mw"__-.tcNt~""Jen-
,
9. Elderly Persons with DisablliJies
I
Elderly houSehold members are more likely to be disabled and require housing accessibility
modifications. They also need special security features and access to public transportation snd
medical services. Therefore, sny newly constructed elderly housing shoulel be strategically located
so that access to these types of services are afforcled. Accorcling to the 1990 Census, 42.3 percent
(6,455) of those age 65 and oleler have mobility orself-care limitations. The clisabled senior citizens
include 2,243 with a self-care limitation, which may also inclucle a mobility limitation. This group
ofscniorcitizens needs supportive housing services inclucling aiel in accompijshing basic tasks such
as bathing ancllMti'1g. Those !lervices may be provicled in the senior's home or the senior may need
. live in a &cility with services on-site. The renu,ini'1g 4,212 clisabled senior citizens have a
mobility limitation without a self-care limitation. Senior citizens with a mobility limitation may
f
OMDI2/JOOJ'.oIFrJRMSIHOClSJNc; FOIIAiS1CONSOUD..c17!D PLAM1000 C'ONSOunJTJI'n ,,, .u .~... _ __
City O[SaIl Benumllllo . CollSOlldated Plall . FY 2000-200S
need modifications to their housing unit in order to provide better access and may need assistance in , .
maintaining their housing units.
D. NATURE AND EXTENT OF HOMELESSNESS
The City does not have any numerical estimates which reflect methods that are statistically reliable
and eliminate duplicate reporting on the number of homeless (sheltered and/or unsheltered) within
the City of San Bernardino, The City does have the population count in selected group quarters .
during the shelter and street enumeration (S-Night) as provided by the Bureau of Census, The City
is well aware that the results reported from the Census S-Night count are not and were never
'nlended to be a count of the total population of homeless persons. .
1990 U. S. Bureau of Census S-NIght Enumeration. The S-Night census count enumerated
persons at selected locations where homeless persons were known to be found and does not
represent acomplete count of the homeless population. This count represents one of the Census
Bureau's efforts to include homeless persons in the 1990 Census. The S-Night ~lImeration counted
persons in emergency shelters and visible in street locations. In addition to S-Night, the Census
Bureau counted persons who reported they had no usual home elsewhere during the standard
enumeration of special places and group quarters.
S-Night enumeration took place on a single night, the evening of March 20. 1990 to the early
morning of March 21, 1990, at locations identified before the census as locations where homeless .
persons are found. S-Night resultS do not reflect the prevalence ofhomelessness over a give~ year.
..
,
With all this in mind, the 1990 Census identified 512 homeless persons hi San Bernardino. The
location and ages of these persons is identified in Table S.The S-Night enumeration of512 homeless
in the City of San Bernardino is the only empirically based number the City has ever received.
1997 Countywide Estimate of Homelessness. In addition to the S-Night Count, the San
Bernardino County Homeless Coalition identified 2,2S4unduplicated homeless persons in the
County of $lU1 Bernardino in 1997, including people with low incomes who are ~ly to become
homeless, -Jbis represents 4.02 percent of the estimated 56,000 people in the County who will
experience bomelessness within three years. The homeless individuals counted included 994 adults
and 1,,260 cliildren. The highest percentage of homeless were White (46 percent), followed by Black
(23 percent), Hispanic (21 percent,) Native American (6 percent), and Asian (2 percent). Whites and
Blacks were over-represented while Hispanics were underrepresented. Sixty-two percent of the
homeless had at least a high school diploma and most had been homeless for less than a month.
However, the majority of all homeless persons (60 percent) were children. Approximately 200 to
300 home~ persons are mentally ill, primarily through substance abuse and addiction.
Based on reported statistics and data collected through interviews with service providers in San .
Bernardino, in 1992 there were between 1,000 and 1,750 homeless persons in San Bernardino at any
given time. Other previous estimates ofhomelessness in the City range from 1,000 to 2,000
individuals. Contacts with homeless and socia1service providers in 1999 indicated that this range is
still valid, but probably closer to 2,000 on the average.
.
~
.
.
~
,
i.J
DS//tlQOD()J>:IF01IM:SIHOU&ING FO/lAQICONSouD.cl1iD I'UMlOiXJ ~l1iDI'l.AN lillII' 1.DOC
$6
r'.
L
City of&.n Bernardino - Consolidllted PlIIn. FY 20()().200S
.
In gen(;\'lll, demographers use a three percent rule, whereby three percent of ~e population will
liket'..:tperience homelcssness within a three to five year period. Based on this standard and the
CUrl'L,lt City population of 185,000 persons, there may be between 1,110 and 1,850 people who are
home!,),;s in the City. It has been difficult forthe City to determine the actual needs of the sheltered
or unsheltered homeless population; the needs are as varied as the rcBSOns for homelessncss. The
most common reasons, however, arc loss ofajob or lac1c of job skills, evictions, substance abuse and
physical and mental illness. Appendix B (Continuum of Care Plan) describes new approaches to
addressing the homeless that will improve the development and reliability of homeless data over the
five year life of the Plan.
TABLES.
POPULAnON IN SELEc'rED GROVP QUARTERs DURING 8-NIGHT ENtIMERAnoN -MARCH 20,
1"0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
YBARS TOTAL
o..s 6-12 13.17 18 & Over
Em Shelters S9 4S 28 32S 4'1
Shelters for Runaway, Neglected, IIId Homeless 0 0 0 0 0
Children .....
Shelters for Abused Women 6 3 1 4 14
Visible In Street LocatIClDS 0 0 2 39 41
TOTAr ,s 6S 48 31 368 S12
Source: /990 U. S. CensKr, HUD ClUS DtztDOOQk. Tllbl. /0
,
· n......_24-_ln...._whkb....Ihe_. '"""'~ '
12 offering emergency shelter and transitional housing, IS providing referrals and counseling ind II
providing emergency food and clothing. The emergency shelters include those for veterans,
homeless youth, the mentally ill, victims of dQm~tic' violence ~d ~g and alcohol recovery
programs. .
Homeless shelters include emergency and temponil)' shelters and transitional housing. Emergency
sheltel'S Primarily provide protection from the eleJtl~ andmay include food and bathing facilities.
Temporary shelters provide for longer stays and may include such support services as family
counseling, Transitional bousingprovidcs the basic shcltcrand food needs and is USUally associated
with II jlrogram to treat the caUSes ofhomel..ss~ in order to transition these persons back into
society, The causes ofhomelcssness arc varied andmay include unemployment. substance abuse or
mental,Jl.oblems. Treatment programs may include substance abuse recovery, counseling and
treatment ofm'"l1tal problems andjob training and Placement. Once Persons have regained stability
and have a reliable income, they can move back into pcrmllnCDt housing.
Man)' of the hOmeless or at.risk populations would be able to regain their footing but for the first
andlast month's rent required to secure a rental unit. Many require transitional assistance until they
can get themselves back on their feet in a new job. It is difficult to know the extent of the problem
~ the ('conomy continues to change. Seasonal variations affect the in11wt aDd visibility of the
.melws population. The greatest need apPClllB to be rental assistance hl'the fonn ofsccurity
dePOSji~ (first and last month's rent), mortgage assistance. emergency utility assistance, job
,
.J.. Needs ofShellered Homeless
J
IlSnI1l2OC()/':IFORJawolJS/NG ~mo/'r..tMzoooCON.rouD.cmo/'UN UYl.DOC
...
City o/San B/!I7Ulrdino . Consolidoted Plan. FY 2000-2005
.
referraVtrainingleducational guidance, and basic social skills from budgeting, to coping with
setbacks. family planning, and treatment of mental disabilities.
2. Need lor Unsheltered Home1es, - }ltlcllilles IInd Services lor Homeless IndMdullls IUUI
Homeless Ftlllfllles with Children
.
~
.
The scope ofhomelessness in the area exceeds these OrgJIni7ltions' ability to provide services and
thus there is an unmet need, although the total need is unknown. The most pressing need of the
unsheltered homeless is to find protection from the elements. The. unsheltercd homeless may be
participating in food services such as soup kitchens or they may also be in need offood. Providing
this basic need is the first step in assisting this group. Once this need is met, then these persons need
emergency housing where they can transition into programs to help them recover from
homelessness, such as referrals to services to help the homeless with substance abuse recovery,
counseling and treatment of mental problems, job training and placement and rental assistance.
The City of San Bernardino has 12 agencies that provide shelter for homeless persons. However,
some of these agencies provide residential alcohol and drug treatment for persons that are not
homeless. These shelters and transitional housing units can house a total ofS 12 persons, far below
even the minimum current estimate ofhomelessness in the City. Therefore, there is a need for
additional emergency beds. It should be noted that most alcohol and drug treatment programs in San
Bernardino were developed to handle a need for substance abuse recovery without regard to
homelessness. These facilities may provide occasional assistance to homeless persons b)1t this is not
their focus.
,..
-.
3. Needs ofSub-l1ol1ultzJions
..
Sub-populations of the homeless include those with mental disabilities and substance abuse
problems, persons with AIDS, veterans, and the unemployed and very low-income families. Each of
these subpopulations have different needs including substance abuse recovery, mental treatment,
medical treatment and job training and PlacemenL
Needs of Severely Menttz/ly/U
San Bernardino residents receive on-going case management of chronic niental health problems
whether they are homeless or are residents within the City, at the saui Bernardino County
Department of Menta! Health. The staff anticipates there are other persons who are undiagilosed
including visible and hidden hoiDeless who, for whatever reason. do not seek assistance or are
oblivious to their mental health needs. In addition to San Bernardino County, the following
orgllni7!ltions provides services for the mentaI1y ill of San Bernardino:
L
Awareness for Community Development Organization (ACDO)
Catholic Charities
Frazee Community Center
Patton State Hospital
San Bernardino Mental Health Association
County Department of Mental Health
..
.
.
,
,
L
QJnlJt1f11i01':IR)RJa\HOCISINGFO~1UJI'l..UiUlIOI)~1UJI'LlNREY:Z.DOC
J,
,.
L
~ of San BenrllTdino . Co1Uolidated Plan. FY 2000-2005
.
Family Service Agency of San Bernardino
Veterans Administration
Mentally III Homeless Program.
A.lcohoVDrUIl Dependent
J
A number of non-profit agencies provide COUI1F"Jing andrefenal services for alCohol/drug <iependeut
homeless persons. There are at least six organizations that provide refemd, counseling, intervention.
educational and medical services for homeless suffering 1iom a1cohol/drug~. It should be
noted that some substance abusers may also suffer 1iom mental illness. The major deficit in all
programs is adequate administrative and operationaltbnding sources. Orgllni'78tions offering
alcohol and drug recovery programs are as follows:
Casa de Ayuda
Casa de San Bernardino
Salvation Army
New House, Inc.
Central City Lutheran Mission
Gibson House
Victory Outreach
I
.
Domestic ViOlence Services
Five agencies provide domestic violence Services to San Bernardino ~idCnts. Frozi' ~~~
intervention in the home to rape treatment and counseling and temporary shelter Services, the
follOwing five agencies provide referral or assis"~ . ."
American Red Cross
Catholic Charities
Option House, Inc.
Family Service Agency of San Bernardino
House of Ruth
,
Again, the greatest need faced by these organizations is obtaining operational and administrative
funding on a regular, annual basis.
Persons with AID$IHn'+
J
r
There are fiv~ facilities that Provide Services to AlDSIHIV+populations, or infonnation and testing.
These agencIes are:
San Bernardino County Public Health Department
Jnl"nd AIDS Project
American Red Cross
Catholic Charities
Cen1ral City Lutheran Mission"
.
,
OSlJDIZt1tJtJp:IFOIIJ.tSWOClSlNr; ~NSoLIDAmopl.tM1/J(J(J~moPL.fN RE"U>oc
e.
City olSan Bet7/Qrdino. Consolidated Plan. FY 2oo0-2oos
Homel. Youth
J
.
There are four organizations that focus on the needs of homeless youth. Los Padrinos Youth
Services provides temporary shelter for runawaylhomeless youth including individual and family
counseling follow-up services. The Home of Neighborly Services provides emergency food and
clothing to youth and families. The Children's Fund, Inc. provides services such as food, clothing,
shelter assistancelrefenal, baby items, and other essentials to at-risk children up to age 18. Finally,
the Homeless Children's Fund provides education and emergency outreach through housing
ass'''''''nee, food, clothing. baby items, and bus passes. .
4. Needs 0 'Persons Threatened with Home/usn.
Within th-e-City of San Bernardino persons threatened with homelessness would likely be those
households at 30 percent of area median income or below. These people Were d.iscUSSed within the
subset of very low-income renter and owner households who were cost burdened by 30 to SO percent
of their monthly income for rent These households are at greatest risk for homelessness as any
intenuption in their modest income could make them homeless within one to three months
dePending on the circumstances.
Of all the very low-income renter households at 30 percent of area median or below who reported
cost burden as a significant housing problem, 6,620 of these households reported COst burden of
greater than 30 percent; of those households, 5,471 hOuseholds reported COst burden of greater than
SO PCrcent The cost burdened households included the elderly, small related families,large ~Ia,ted
families and all other types with each of these groups reporting more than 7~ petcent cost burden. It
can be estimated that nearly 4,634 very lOW-income renter households had children and were in
financial danger ofhomelessness. Within the very low-income owner hOuseholds, 1,233 households
reported cost burdens of greater than SO percent, 430 additional houSeholds reported cost burdens of
greater than 30 percent These households were also at-risk since any interruption in income could
cause them to fall behind on their mortgage payments and put them at-risk of foreclosure and
POtential homclessness. In addition to these CCO!1omic factors, other groups at risk ofhomelessness
include: victims of domestic violence, substance abusers, individuals with developmental
disabiliti~d individuals with mental disabilities.
.
-.
,
QSlJI1I2I1otJi>:IFORJawOCISINGFO~1ZD'~~JmIJI~JI..U_ ___
L
~
-
- ""r.c
'i ...\, .~",,,,,),,,.;.~:
Continuum of Care: Gaps Analyala . Indlvlduala
Job Training ~uu J ~ou ] L""OU 'J ~n ]
Case Management Bou 1 fro ] ~/O ] I!!!gn ]
Substance Abuse Treatment Clou J ~u ] 01U ] ffi!gn ]
Mental Health Care ~uu ] r-au J C!ou ] (!!agn ]
Housing Placement ~uu ] pu ] ~lSu ] l!!!B.!u
Ufe Skills Training /!>>uu J l!>>u J ~ou ] ~gn 1
;
.:J.....
Chronic Substance Abusera ~o ] ~u J ~o .
J p:llgn ]
Seriously Mentally III ~ti 1 '~u J' Ciu ] [!Rgn J
DuallY-DlagnOaed @u J . 8u 1 ~u ] I!!!gn J
Veterans ~",u J @u ] (!Iu ] ~
Persons With HIV/AIDS ~u J ~ J Cio J ~
Victims of Domestic Violence pu J @ou j ~ ] l!!!iu
Youth ~u J ~ J ~o J (!!agO ]
.
,
-,
estimated Current Unmet NeedJ Relative
Needs Inventory Gap Priority .
Emergency Shelter ~uu J ~o 1 0"0 ] l!!iu
Transitional HousIng ~uu ] 1J0 1 ['Iao ] ~
Pennanent Housing Buu 1 ~u 1 ~ou J ~.
Total . 600 110 490
Continuum of Care: Gaps Analysis - Persons In Families with Children
.,.. ... ".
. --
Job Training B.uou ] f2uu ] O.oou. J ffilgn 1
Case Management ~.ouu ] ~uu 1 ra.uuu ~ ffi!.gn ]
Child Care C!.UUU 1 puu 1 @uu J m..gn 1
Substance Abuse Treatment Ouu ] Bu ] ~u ] lfugn 1
Mental Health Care Oou ] &u J ~uu ] m..sn ]
HOUsing Placement ~uu ] IJuu ] ~uu 1 ~9n 1
Ufe Skills TraIning ~,U/O J [~o ] B,uuu ] mlsn 1
""- . ~,do
Chronic Substance Abusers B>>u ] . Oil: J @a ] ffi.!sn ]
Seriously Mentally 11/ ~ ] B>> ] Bu ] (fuSE 1
DuallY-Diagnosed lJuu ] ~u ] J?u ] I!!!sn J
Veterans @ ] ~ 1 @ ] [ 1
Persons With HIV/AIDS Oou J ~u ] Duu J ffilgn ]
Victims of Domestic Violence ~uu 1 [!lu J lJil:U ] lfugn 1
-
.
.
.
.
.
, i:
!.
,
..
City o/San Bernardino - ConsolidoJed PltlII- FY 2000-200S
· E. POPULATIONS WiTH SPECIAL NEEDs - OTHER THAN HOMELEss
Guidelines stipulate that the Consolidated Plan include a description of special housing needs that
exist in the community, such as those for the handicapped, elderly, large families, and single parent
households. The following discussion Presents the housing needs of these groups in San Bemirdino.
L NEEDS FOR SUPPORT HOUSING
a. ElderlYlFraU Elderly
W1U~ ooJy "" """'" of"'" """ __ _.... "'" ... of 65. ............... ....,.
-- Maqy-_....-..........-liuood.IdU6odtyln.....
with rising housing costs. This problem will grow in magnitude as the percentage of city residents
that are elderly continues to increase, which has been projected. .
SuPPOrtive services that are desirable to this population include:
· Affordable housing for very low-income senior citizens.
· Housing which is:
Wheelchair accessible.
Mixed with non-senior housing. "
Energy efficient . . ., J : ,. " .
Equipped with elevators, door handles for arthritic hands, emergencY pull cords, 'rails in
bathrooms, waIIc-in tubs with no-slip coating, limited stairs (short and low), colors to
heighten vision.
· Services to help elderly age-in-place include:
Congregate meals, Service Providers for in-home needs, nutrition, hon-Jceeping,
transportation, medical services provided on site, and counseling for age-related
stressors.
,
.
b. Persons with Mental DlsabWUes
The follOwing suPPOrtive housing and services are desirable for this population:
· Emergency and transitional shelters with support service SPecifically designed for this
POPulation.
· Apartment complexes for people to transition to independent living.
· Group.home flIciIities to teach people to live independently.
· SUPPOrt serv~ces such as, nutrition, budgeting and basic hOuseIceeping.
· Housing in safe areas close to public transportation and stores.
· Community rooms for social activities.
· AffOrdable PCl1nanent housing to very Jow-income perions.
... On-going SUpervision (case management) of drug-treatment, counseling, and/or therapy
· PfDgnuns that mitigate baniers to independent living .
r
osnl1l2OOop..IFORMswOlJSma~Gt1N.rouAf1EDP~~moPLANU,,~."'-
City a/San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200S
Co
Persons with PhysicallDevelopmental Disabilities
.
The following supportive housing and services are desirable for this population:
Housing which is:
· Affordable to very low and low-income disabled persons.
· Wheelchair accessible.
· Equipped with roll-in showers, grip bars, ceiling fans with extended cords,low sinks and
light switches, automatic door openers.
· Close to public transportation and stores.
· On going supervision (case management)
According-to the 1990 Census, 13 percent of San Bernardino's population age 1610 64 was disabled.
Another 42 percent of the population age 65 and older were disabled. In addition, respondents to the
Community Needs survey identified improvements for handicapped accessibility as a high priority.
Since 1995, CDBO funds have been allocated yearly to provide handicapped accessibility of public
facilities according to the Americans with Disabilities Act. This has become an increasing priority as
more residents face mobility challenges. .
d.
Persons with Alcohol or Other Drug Addictions
Persons with alcohol and other drug addictions often, because of the behavioral reinforcement their
condition requires, need supportive transitional housing after their initial ~ilitation to "piactice"
their rehabilitated lifestyle. Many require job referral ~ervices and ed~tional guidance.
e. Persons with A1DSIHIV+ and Other Related Diseases
.
Persons who are mv positive are a serious "at risk" populatiGn. As with the homeless POpulation,
these individuals are largely invisible to conventional population counts. People.who are in this
population group become "visible" at the point which they are in most acute need ofheaItb, housing.
and supponive Services. Between 1983, when the flrstcase of AIDS was reportcclin SanBemanfino
County, and December 1998, there were 497 AIDS cases in the City (about 20 peleent of the 2,503
cases in the entire County). About 85 Percent of AIDS cases were reported as "com"lunity cases"
affecting individuals who were county residents at the time of reporting. The number of AIDS cases
in the City represent neady one-fourth (24 Percent) of countywide cases, but that percentage is
declining relative to other communities with greater population growth. Although the rate of
increase in AIDS may be declined since the early 19901, it is increasingty and disproportiouately
affects minority COmmunities and special needs groups such as substance abusers. The orientation of
AIDS supportive services prognuns will need to address the changinguature of the AIDS epidemic.
There is a need for more supportive hOUSing and services for persons who have lost their ability to
generate income to pay for shelter and medical care as a result ofmv related illaess.
-. .
,
OYI0/2I1D(Jp;1FDRMswOtJSING~1EDI'~Q7~''''(mDI'UNuYJ.DOC
..
- ,- . --
44
,
.'
~
.
r. Large ::' ~dlilles
City olSon Bet'lUU'dino - Consolidated PIDn . FY 2000-2005
The housing needs of large families within this community are problematic on two counts. First,
there is a limited supply of rental units with 3 or more bedrooms in the City. In 1990, there were
9,330 households having five or more members requiring larger rental units. As of the 1990 census,
Dearly 17 pet'Cent of all households in the City of San Bernardino required 3 or more bedrooms.
Often large families have several dependent children and need a location close to day care centers
and schools. A high percentage of these households are low and moderate-income. AdditiOnally, a
higher than aVerage percent are paying more than 30 percent of their incomes for rent.
g. FamUy SeJf-Sumclcncy Program
To assist households in achieving economic self-sufficiency, the San Bernardino County Housing
AuthOrity and Department of Social Services have implemented a Family Self-Sufficiency program.
'Ibis program consists of a network of employers, social service agencies and educational
institutions that provide Participating hOuseholds with job skills and social services to:
1. Increase the household's income;
.
2. Make the household self-sufficient; and
3. Eliminate the household's need for rental assistance.
.1 ..
.
,
OSf10121JtJoi>:IFORAGwOUSlNc;R)~1rDn.tNIz<<KJ~1rDn.wIlEl'Z.DOC
pecial NeedslNon-Homeless
Sub-Populatlons
.
Elderly
Frail Elderly
Severe MentallJlness
Developmentally Disabled
Physically Disabled
Persons with Alcohol/Other Drug Addiction
Persons with HIVlAIDS
Prlority Need
I!!!:a!u
ffiign I
M!Qn I
ffi!gn I
~gn I
ffi!a!L.J
~gn I
estimated $
f$~.uuu.uuu
l"OU,UUU
J$~ou,uuu
f'l.UUU.uuu
J$~.ouu.uuu
J$l,UUU,uuu
l$aDu,uuU
TOTAL l~tI.;s:au.uuu'
I
I
l
I
I
I
I
,
.
....
~
"
...
, ~-';
City olSan Bernardino. Consolidaled Plan _ FY 2000-2005
. I IV. NON-HOUSING COiIfMUNITY NEEDs ASSESSMENT ]
.
A major goal of the City of San Bernardino, in addition to creating and maintaining a viable urban
community by providing decent housing, is to provide suitable living environment and expand the
economic oPPOrtunities for its current and future residents. This section of the Consolidated plan
will establish the needs of the San Bernardino Community in terms of economic opportunities,
public infrastructure and facilities improvements and crime prevention activities.
I
A. !NFRAsTRU~ IMPROVEMENTS
J
Infrastructure is the collective, long-term investment by citizens in public facilities and public
infrastructure necessary to their safety and convenience. Examples include transportation facilities
(roads, bridges, fire stations, police substations), utilities (water syst~, hazardous waste disposal,
storm drains and sewers), and public service facilities (libraries, fire stations, police substations). For
many years, key structures such as bridges, roads, bus systems, water supply systems, sewage
treatment, solid waste disposal, and libraries have been taken for granted. Today, these public
facilities needs exceed available funding. Unaddressed, the facilities will continue to decline and the
costs of replacing these vital systems could escalate beyond the limits of the City's funding capacity.
The City's priorities are to repair or replace aged infrastructure older neighborhoods and make other
capital improvements that will support the City's economic development objectives. Nearly half of
. the planned City expenditures (47 percent) are for street and street lighting improvements, andoile
quarter (22 percent) for sewer system improvements. . . .
,
The City has developed a Capital Improvement Plan that coordinates long range general plans of
growth and development with the annual budget. The plan's programs are formulated by priority to
comply with State law and remain within the City's lIIUlual budgetaIy constraints. Improvements are
programmed to stay within the confmes of the limited budget and are aimed at minimi~"8 the
impaCt of projects on local resources. The plan's continuing operational and mainten~nce costs are
analyzed against the public benefit and operational savings resulting fiom the replacement of
substandard facilities. The Capital Improvement Plan is divided into six sections. These major
sections are: general buildihgs; streets and street lights; sewers; storm drains; traffic controls; and
parks and recreation. A total of $85,414,200 has been allocated toward capital improvement
projects between 1999 and 2004.
The General Buildings section includes bond service payments forthe construction of City buildings
and the remodeling or replacement of existing facilities. General building projects are funded
through the General Fund, Redevelopment Bond Proceeds, Community Development Block Grants,
State funds, and Refuse funds. These projects have been allocated $6,830,000 between fiscal years
1999 and 2004. Specific projects under this section include the Santa Fe Depot Rehabilitation
project ($4,099,000) and the Waterman Landfill Closure project ($800,000).
Street and street light projects include street widening and resurfacing, and construction of curbs,
Attcrs. sidewalks, handicap ramps, bikeways, right of way acquisition, aDd street lighting. The City
, deiennmecJ. based on the age of the City's in1iastn,cture and past repair and improvement
OJltOl2IJO/JP:lFOlIMWfOClSlNG FORMSICONsoulu:rml'l.ANI1ooo~mDI'UNRlWl.DOC
..
City of San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan. FY 2000-2005
funding limitations, that some type of immediate rehabilitation work is necessary on all of its streets
and major arterial roads. The City prioritizes the form of rehabilitation of streets in order of cost
effectiveness. That is, by preserving streets with seals and overlays, the useful life is increased. If
rehabilitation work is not performed as necessary, streets will further deteriorate and require
complete reconstruction (remove and replace). There is a large range of costs for pavement
maintenance. By effectively preserving streets with seals and overlays the City can minimize the
major expense required for complete reconstruction. Projects are funded through federal and State
aid, State Gas Tax funds, Sale Tax funds, and Community Development Block Grants. These
projects have been allocated $40,283,400 between fiscal years 1999 and 2004. The City has
budgeted funds for a number of specific projects including the Mt. Vernon Bridge grade separation
over the Burlington Northern Santa Fe yards ($10,950,000), pavement rehabilitation at various
location throughout the City (S6,500,ooo), and the Pepper Linden Drive widening project from 1-215
to KendaUDrive ($4,500,000).
.
.
The Sewer. section includes projects designed to increase sewer system capacity for new users or
meet new regulatory requirements, or projects that replace aging or obsolete systems. Projects are
funded through connection fees and sewer line construction and maintenance funds. These projects
have been allocated $18,407,100 between fiscal years 1999 and 2004. Specific projects include the
Eastside Interceptor installation project ofan eight to twelve inch reliefsewer inLynwood Drive and
Harrison from Valencia to 36'" Street ($3,200,000) and the Norton Outfa)lline installation project
for a IS inch relief sewer from E street to Tippecanoe Avenue ($2,350,000).
New storm drain installation and replacement of aging and obsolete systems are projects represented
under the Storm Drain Section. Storm drain projects are funded through development feclf and
storm drain construction funds. These projects have been allocated SI2,5oo,2oo between fiscal
years 1999 and 2004. Major storm drain projects include projects on 2'" Street (S 1 ,400,000), Mt.
Vernon Avenue (SI,4oo,000), and Mt. View Avenue ($4,500,000).
The fifth major section -Traffic Controls- includes projects for the installation of new traffic signals,
traffic striping, and the replacement of aging and obsolete traffic control systems. Development
fees, Federal.and State aid, State Gas Tax funds, Sales Tax funds and Traffic Systems fees fund
traffic contJj)1 projects. These projects have been allocated $3,880,500 between fiscal years 1999
and 2004. The City has distributed these funds to a number of traffic control projects, most notably
through the upgrade of traffic signals and signal improvement at various locations throughout the
City ($483;300) and at a project along Del Rosa Avenue (S340,000).
Finally, Parks and Recreation projects include the maintenance and upgrading of parks, courts and
fields, field lighting, recreation buildings, park restrooms, and playground equipment. Community
Development Block Grants and park construction fees provide funding for parks and recreation
projects. These projects have been allocated $3,513,000 between fisCaJ years 1999 and 2004. The
City has allocated funds to 22 specific projects. Some of those projects include the Nunez Pool.
(S534,ooo), City-wide tot lots (S603,00), and City-wide park parking lots ($375,000).
.
'-
.
.
,.
...
tJJnOl1OODP:II'OIIMSWOUSING FOIIAI3ICONsol./DATED PlNil21K1t1 amsoUD.Cmo PLAN /lEI' l.JJOC
4'
. r
to
""""',?'07-~-."-~-
City olSan Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200S
Summary
. U;,__......._'-...-.._....._ '-_.......
the short run exceed the City's ability to address all of the problems. Since the current deficiencies
in the sewer, stonn drain and street systems are paramount, the City will utilize CDBG funds to
address this need to the extent available.
L
Respondents to the 1998 Community Needs Survey identified the fOllOwing needs as high priority:
employment training, crime awareness, job creation, public safety, removal of blight, improvement
of infrastructure in existing neighborhoods, and ~usiness support services.
B. JOB CREATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
J
[
Economic Outlook -
]
The following information has been taken from California Employment Development Department
reports and the San Bernardino Community and Economic Profile prepared by the Economic
Development Agency.
Sales Recession Ended
Inland Empire home sales indicate that the housing recession has ended and that home sales ~d
. prices have risen since 1996. This upward trend should continue as housing- sales in Soutrlem
California continue to shift inland, away from high coastal prices. High interest rates may hinder
rapid.growth, however the growing employment opportunities should oftSet interest rate factors.
,
In the Second half of 1996, Inland Empire home markets began to grow again. As Southern
California's population outgrows home construction, a substantial pent-up demand exists. Also,
homes are more affordable since moItgagepayments have dropped as interest rates hit2S-year lows,
yet are beginning to increase slightly while still IeII1Rini1\g below 1990 levels. Although, Inland
Empire new home prices are rising, prices inland and resales are still less expensive than in LA or
Orange Counties. While more people are moving inland from LA and Orange Counties, the City of
San Bernardino, has not yet felt the benefits of this migration. However, the City is likely to see
gains in home sales if this trend continues.
Growth Resul'2ence
The most important factor influencing the demand for new homes is the rate of employment
expansjou. New jobs attract new hOUSehOlds to the region, and jobs provide the necessary
pwr.h..,i1\g power for home ownership.
Market Demand Forecast
.
r
IISIJIV.lDOOP:lFOIlAawoClSlNG FOIIAt8tCoNso/JD,f'lED "UN\1ooo CONso/JD,f'lED "LAN REI' l.DOC
<19
Cil)' o/San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan - FY 2000-2ooj
Since the adoption of the 1995 Consolidated Plan, unemployment in San Bernardino has declined
substantially and job growth has resumed. Most of the City's new employment continues to be in
lower-wage retail and service positions, however. The City's historic lack of production industry is a
primary reason why the City lacks a sufficient numbe{ of high-wage jobs. Expanding the production
base of technology industries is the key to generating high-wage employment on a large enough
scale to raise local incomes and living standards, an accomplishment unreachable by retail, tourism,
or government jobs.
.
,
~
The counties of San Bernardino and Riverside are monitored by the State on a combined bi-county
basis. The bi-county area expanded its employment base from 1,128,700 in 1990 to 1,487,280 in
1999. The figures represent a gain of358,580 new jobs, or a 3.2 percent annual growth rate.
The bi-county job base declined in 1991 by 0.8 percent due to the national economic slowdown that
began in mid-1990. This is a relatively strong performance compared to the other counties of
Southern California, each of which experienced a decline in total employment dUring 1991 of more
than 2.0 percent. The relatively strong performance is partially due to the strong growth momentum
that had been built up over the past four years. The rate of employment growth in the RiversidelSan
Bernardino bi-county region continued to decelerate throughout 1991 and through 1993.
Employment growth retumed by the end of 1994, with an increase of 1.8 percent. As of November
1999, the City of San Bernardino had a total labor force of80, 190, of which 75,400 were employed
and 4,790 were unemployed. Therefore, the unemployment rate was 6 percent compared to 4.1
percent for the entire County. The unemployment rate has been decreasing by 1 to 2 percent
annually since 1993, when the unemployment rate was 14.1 percent. The unemployment rate for the
City fell to a low of 6 percent by the end of 1999. Employment is projeCted to increase by 8.9
percent between 2000 and 2005 from 96,614 jobs to IOS,l80 jobs. .
.
Since the City is located at a transportation crossroads of vehicle and rail transport and has very low
office and industrial. space rents, new businesses will continue to be attracted to the area. For
example, the 2000 Community and Economic Protile states that between the third quarter of 1998
and the third quarter of 1999, 25 million gross feet of industrial space were absorbed in bi-county
area. According to Grubb and Ellis. 1999, industrial space costs in the San BernardinolRed1ands
area was 31 cents, compared to 57 cents in San Diego or even 35 cents in Fontana. Many of the
existing fimiS have planned to expand. most notably in the aeronautics and technology/research
ind~tries at the former Norton Air Force Base, as well as distribution and lDlIi1ufacturing industries
and government agencies such as the U.S. Postal Service, the Internal Revenue Service, and the
Defense Finance and Accounting Service (CD Commercial, Grubb & Ellis, CullhmAi! Wakefield,
Lee & Associates, Collins Fuller,lEEP, and Local Press, 1994-1999). .
-
...
ProJected New-Home Demand
There is a direct relationship between new home sales and the strength of the regional economy.
Coincident with a decline in total employment., the San Bernardino County new-home market
exhibited considerable weakness in 1992. However, total employment has since increased in the
County and City and the unemployment rate is projected to remain low. The continuation of
o.
-
.
r
Lj
f1SIIOI1I1IJOI':IFOIlMSWOCISING FO~JZDI'LANo1Dt1D~'/ZIIflZDl'l.AN"'~
.'
. . so
...
,
'". ~.
CIty O/San Bernardino. Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200$
positive employment gains is projected to result in higher new-home sales volume for San
. Bernardino market area
The increase in sales projected for the San Bemardino market area is smaller than the increases in
employment and the increases in sales in other market areas. The area will benefit from an increase.
in the household base due to new jobs. Modest sales increases will emanate from a strengthening of
consumer confidence as the regional economic outlook continues to improve. This will enable the
release of pent-up demand caused by delayed purchase decisions among the existing household base
due to interest rate hikes.
Emplovment Tren4 Since 1995, unemployment in the City has fallen over one-fourth to single
digit rates. The gap between City and County unemployment remains high, however, and has not
decreased appreciably. Unemployment in the City is still nearly 1.5 times that countywide. The
largest employers in the City of San Bemardino are in the retail and office sectors. The City has two
regional malls, the carousel Mall and the Inland Center Mall. Other large employers, each
employing over 1,000 persons, are: San Bemardino County, San Bemardino City Unified School
District, San Bernardino County Medical Center, St. Bernardino Medical Center, the City of San
Bernardino, San Bernardino County Hospital, California State University, San Bemardino, Stater
Brothers Markets and TRW. The labor force in the City of San Bemardino constitutes 60.8 percent
of the population age 16 and older. Of the female population age 16 and older, 50.9 percent are in
the labor force. The follOwing table provides employment data.
.
TABLE 6
COMPARA1lVE lINEMPLOYMENT RATES
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
1995 .1998
City of San Bcmanlino 11.3% 8.2%
San Bernardino County 7.9% 5.6%
State of California 7.8% 5.9%
United States 5.6% 4.5%
Sourr:eS: Colif. Employment Develop"'ent Depan,i,ent, Labor Market In/ol'nlation DivisIon and U.s.
~t o/Labor, BIIIWIlI o/Labor StatutiC6, January 2000
,
As; these figures show, San Bernardino has higher unemployment than the region, state and nation.
The change from 1995 to 1998 reflects the economic growt4 occuning throughout the nation and
stale. It should be noted that, while the City of San Bernardino has a higher unemployment rate, the
change from 1995 to 1998 has been greater and comparatively, the City has reduced its
unemployment rate more rapidly than statewide or nationwide (although not more rapidly than
COuntywide).
lieed for Job Tl'tzInlnrt and Businen Retention Prortl'tUft.\ In lune of 1994, the City, in conjunction
with several other public agencies and private Orpni~tions, prepared an application to the federa1
government known as the "Empowerment ZonelBnterprise Communities Application." This
application identified the needs ofa specific area of the City which is very distressed. This zone for
the most part coincides with the census tracts identified previously in this Consolidated Plan as low-
iome census tracts. According to the 1990 census, 38.7 percent of the residents live below the
.verty line; the average unemployment rate is 17.10 percent and 32 percent of the residents rely on
,
M/111I2fKJD/t:1F01IMSIH0CISJNG FOIIMsIc:oNsoutTED I'I.AMzI1lJt} CON8OJ.JJJATED 1'L.fN /lEI' :UXJC
..
City olSon Bernardino - Consolidaled Plan _ FY 2000-200$
public assistance. The City was not designated by HUD as an empowennent or entelprise ZOne.
These characteristics are indicative ofa need on the part of the City to develop job training programs
to assist these persons in rising above the poverty level. It is the intent of the City, when feasible, to
utilize redevelopment monies as well as CDBG funds to provide business retention programs and
job training programs to economically empower the residents of these neighborhoods.
.:.
,;..
,
lUf111al1Gl1P:~~JZD1'l.fM1DlxJ(DIll<n''''fJZDI'l.ANIlEI'UJOc
sz
.
.
..
..
,
"i&;
,-
u
.
.
.
IE>, 1_
f.~ . CG
O...:.a.CD.... PCD
.......0000
5)tOilooOOC
!l0:S'S'S'=
S' 0 ... CD :"I; CD
w......oo
P:"Iilooo"a
000 _
00 0
~
!
..
QJ
S'
. ~
n
.....
,
.s-J
CiJy olSan Bernardino. ConsolidaJed Plan. FY 200o..200S
San Bemard;no Eml'lovment and Tra;n;nr! (SBET AJ. The San Bernardino Employment and
Training (SBET A) is responsible for employment and job training programs for more than twenty
years. Job training is paramount to available employment opportunities. Collaboration with the
community has always been an integral part of the SBETA's job training effort. The training
programs being administered today by the SBETA require very strict eligible requirements for those
in desperate need of job training through govemment programs. There is a great need to train or
retrain adult unemployed who may not meet the strict eligibility requirements for JPT A and other
programs. This group is being locked out Many of the City's residents are educated yet
unemployable due to changes in demand occupations. Many may be existing on savings from good
jobs once held, yet are diminiRhing savings due to economic changes and the inability to enrolling
retraining programs due to being ineligible. Serious effort must be initiated to accommodate those
in this emqency situstion. This is particularly true of persons previously unemployed because of
the closure"DfNorton Air Force base.
.
Business Environment. If San Bernardino is to diversify its economic base, existing "export" fl11I1S
must remain in the City and expand, and new firms must be convinced to migrate to it. In the
competitive era, with companies willing to locate anywhere, it is up to the City to create an
environment which entrepreneurs and executives see as the most favorable to their operations.
The City's historically weak economy and reputation for poor business impede the growth of local
business and discourage outside businesses from establishing themselves in the City. In breaking
out of this dilemma, the City will need to make changes that enhance the establishment of local
business and create a vibrant economy that attracts outside buSiness to the~.. At the time of the
1995 Consolidated PIan. the City's economic development strategy largely reflected its vision
(articulated in the City's General Plan) that San Bernardino would be the premier retail,
entertainment, and commercial center of the Inland Empire. Since the" expansion of Ontario
International Airport and the redevelopment of much of the surrounding area, many commercial and
retail opportunities have migrated westward. The City now realizes that it has to focus on niche
markets and industries for which the City has a comparative advantage relating to its natural
resources ($,ii,ch as water), transportation system, education/medical institutions, and historic
resources. ;:
Specifically;"the targets of a retention and expansion strategy must be those companies whose
customers mostly lie outaide the City and/or the region. These firms are in the economic base as
they draw dollars to the community. They include manufacturers such as Cobra Industries, Accent
Furniture and Anita's Mexican Food; service companies like Automated Health Services Launchy
and Santa Fe Railroad; restaurants like TGIF or Lc Rendezvous; and regional retail stores like
HarrislGottschalks Company, and Sears.
Since 1995, another key facet of the City's economic development strategy is technology transfer
from local higher institutions, encouraging them to seek to incubate companies from research, as
happened in Silicon Valley. Loma Linda University and Medical Center and University of
California, Riverside both are significant research institutions capable of generating
COmmerclali7Jtble technology. Region-wide there is a rising interest, and COOperative discussion,
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
i
OJnO/1IXXJ1':IFOIUISIIIOUSING I'OJUiSICoNsouDTED PI.ANtJotJo ~TED PUN II/lI' l.DOC
54
t
.
i
.
.
....."....,..,...............''1',
~.""-.',.~...."'1"'"
City o/San Bemardino - Consolidtlted Plan _ FY 2000-200$
about how to promote technology based, high wage industry in the Inland Empire through higher
education technology transfer, as well as other means.
Retail, tourism, and government employment cannot produce high-wage earnings on a level equal to
technology industries. Retail employment can only provide high employment rates and sales tax
revenues if the area can become a ~or retail hub. However, the presence of highly competitive
retailing centers in the surrounding area make high retail benefits unlikely. Tourism also provides
limited income as jOb skill levels in the tourism industry tend to be low. Like retail, the tourism
industry requires popular tourist attractions to become valuable to the City. Although government
employment offers well-paying employment opportunities with higher skill levels, government
cutback trends continue to make such jobs unlikely to grow in the future.
One strategy to attract growth is the Business-Industry Growth Strategy (BIG). This strategy seeks
to attract and retain "high tech" industry such as research and development, computers,
biomedicines, and other industries requiring highly skilled workers. Therefore, it is critical that the
City focus its efforts on increasing high-wage private industry to raise income levels in the City, yet
not ignore non-production industries altogether as they do provide revenue. The goal of BIG is to
increase the relative level of production industry and employment in the City's economy. As high-
wage Production industry employment becomes mOre prevalent, retail sectors will enjoy growth
from increased local spending. Another goal of BIG is to help City Hall become mOre "business
oriented" for all types of businesses. If this occurs, the City can increase its efforts toward local
business retention and reduction of impediments to small businesses. Strategies directed at
promoting a stronger San Bernardino production base will eventually promote a stronger: loeal
economy overall. ...
In creating a retention and expansion strategy,. it should be noted that Small firms are of equal
importance to large ones. While the latter may represent much oftoday's economic base, smaller
companies provide most of tomorrow's job growth.. This is Particularly true in a newer l:C9nomic
zone like the Inland Empire. Here, despite the defense cutback, the economy has added jObs
because existing small firms have continued growing and new ones keep migrating to the region.
San Bernardino has seen its share of smaller firms grow up to be major employers. In the past,
McDonald's started as two brothers with a hamburger stand on "E" street. GE Capital's San
Bernardino operation was once San Bernardino MOl1gage and Loan. Anita's Foods was a family
businessjust off ofMt. Vemon. Crown Printers started as three brothers working together. Today,
a new generation of firms such as Games .For Fun and Health Sciences Data Corporation, are
proving the truth of this axiom again.
A third focus of the City's economic development efforts is downtown revitalization. This has
become especially important since the adoption of the 1995 Consolidated Plan. The City realizes
that its downtown must remain competitive with emerging retail and entertainment centers, must
offer unique amenities not found in other locations, and must be perceived as a safe, attractive place
for public gatherings. Unless San Bernardino's downtown can be restored through the elimination of
crime, blight, and other problems related to decay, it could prove imPOSSible to attract and retain
firms to zaise local incomes, living stand8rds, and the tax base. Revitalization of the downtown
.Jistrict can be reeogr.iw through the promotion of tourist, entertainment, and cultural attractions
r
OS//fJI2IJOO/>:lFr>>tJiswOCISING FOIWSICoNsou/UTED I'L.fMlooo COM'ouJUTED I'lJIN BEY 1.DOC
City o/San Bernardino - Consolidaled Plan _ FY 2000-200S
for non-residents, while Pursuing mixed-use development strategies to encourage light industrial, .
arts and crafts, and residential Occupancy above business establishments for City residents.
Encompassing twelve blocks, the downtown district has a daytime population of 30,000. A high
percentage of these are professional employees from downtown businesses and from city, county,
and state offices. The historic California Theater and Sturges Auditorium are also located here,
drawing thousands downtown for evening and weekend perfonnances. The Raddison Hotel and
Convention Center features 238 rooms and plays downtown host to COnferences, conventions, and
important social events including the Route 66 Rendezvous. The million-square-foot Carousel MalI
is within the boundaIy, offering shopping and dining as well as a multiplex cinema.
I
Summary
J
Past and current assessments of need detennine that the major problem facing lOW-income residents
of San BerDardmo is OVClpayment or high cost of housing relative to City incomes (not in relation to
housing costs elsewhere in the Inland Empire), coupled with unemployment and/or
underemployment. To assist in rectifying these impediments, the City may Create job training
opportunities utilizing CDBG and other funds as appropriate. Commercial rehabilitation will also be
pursued by the City in an attempt to ameliorate the health and safety code violations and promote the
viability of neighborhoods where very low and low-income households reside.
C. PUBLIC SERVICES
.
A major goal of the City of San Bemardino is to create and maintain a Manifesto for. crime-
prevention revolution that will be successful in sharply reducing crime in its neighborhoods, schools
and entire cities. There are currently three active organi7~tions in the City: (I) San Bernardino
Neighborhood Watch; (2) San Bernardino Police and Sheriffs Departments; and (3) the Citizens
Patrol Organization.
The City priority, in its endeavors to provide a safe living environment for all of its residents with an
emphasis on residents in lOw-income neighborhoods, is to expand the availability of the
Neighborhood Watch Association on a daily basis to lower-income residents in the City. To assist
in reducing crime overall in these neighborhoods, the City will pursue the acquisition of various
pieces of equipment such as POrtable scanners and hand engravers. These types of equipment will
enable the City to (I) keep track of actual day to day crimes, locations and physical description of
suspects and (2) make it easier for citizens to report the stolen items, respectively.
The hiring of additional police officers may also be considered by the City over the next five year
period as an active measure to provide a safer and more protected environment for all of its
residents.
~
The City recognizing the need for services for youth, seniors, disabled, counseling and drug
rehabilitation, job trainil\g, health services etc., has engaged the lOcal service providers to submit
Proposals for funding to provide services. These agencies are identified in the action plan funding
level needed.
.
>
,
..
OSI/D/2tJOlJp:IFOJ/NWfOCISING FOIIAISICoNsoIJJUTEDPLfNl2()(J(J~TEDPUN U"z.DOC
S6
r
'"
.
.
.
City of San Bernardino. Consolidated Plan. FY 2000-200$
I D. CONCLUSION
San Bernardino's limited resources are not adequate to address all the non-housing community
development needs.
The infrastructure problem facing San Bernardino is also overwhelming.
The problems facing the City have accumulated over decades, and their resolution wilI take many
years. The people of San Bernardino share in the task of exploring creative approaches to expanding
the supply of. housing. eliminating homelessness, solving the infrastructure deficiencies, and
increasing employment and the wage levels of San Bernardino's employees.
HUD funding sources are extremely smalI, in relation to the size of the City's needs, as noted above.
Yet, the City intends to move forward in securing and applying all federal, state, and private
resources in resolving the City's housing, homeless, infrastructure, and economic development
problems, one year and one step at a time.
,
OJ//Df2fXX11>:IFOIIMsiHOllSlNG FO~TEDl'lAM1oooCONSoi.JD.fTEDI'I.AN REI' Z.DOC
S1
... .- _._---'_._._-~-
Community Needs
Anti-Crime Programs .
Need Level Units Estimated
Overall High 200 $200,000
Sub-Categories .
Crime Awareness (051) High 200 $200,000
- - ,
Need Level Units Estimated ~
Overall 145 $29,000,000
Sub-categories
Rehab; Publicly or Prlvately-owned Commer (14E) High 10 $1,000,000
Clland AcqulsltionIDlsposltion (17A) Low 5 $5,000,000
Cllnfrastructure Development (17B) Med .10 $10,000,000
CI Building Acquisition, Construction, Re (17C) Med 5 $5,000,000
Other Commerciatnndustrlallmprovements (170) Med 50 $1,500,000
ED Direct Financial Assistance to For-Pro (18A) High 25 $2,500,000
ED Technical Assistance (18B) High 20 $2,000,000
Micro-Enterprise Assistance (18C) High 20 $2,000,000
Need Level Units Estimated ~ . .
Overall - 20,353 $37,450,000
Sub-Categories
Flood Drain Improvements (031) Med 10 $5,000,000
Water/Sewer Improvements (03J) High 15 $10,000,000
Street Improvements (03K) High 20 $15,000,000
Sidewalks (03L) High 20,000 $1,500,000
Tree Planting (03N) Med 8 $950,000
Removal of Architectural Barriers (10) High 300 $5,000,000
Privately Owned Utilities (11) - 0 $0
-- - - . - - ..
--
Need Level Units Estimated ~
Overall High 0 $0
Sub-Categorles
-
.
,
...
, :
...
Community Needs (Page 2)
Overall
SuboCategories
Public Facilities and Improvements (Gener (03)
Handicapped Centers (038)
Neighborhood Facilities (03E)
Parks,-Recreational Facilities (03F)
Parking Facilities (03G)
Solid Waste Disposal Improvements (03H)
Fire Stations/Equlpment (030)
Health Facilities (03P)
Asbestos Removal (03R)
Clean-up of Contaminated Sites (04A)
Interim Assistance (06)
Non-Residential Historic Preservation (16B)
.
Need Level Units Estimated
High 295 $20,800,000
High 20 $5,600,000
High 6 $1,600,000
High 10 $1,000,000
High 16 $2,600,000
Med 6 $500,000
- 0 $0
High 20 $3,600,000
High 5 $1,900,000
High 200 $2,500,000
Med 5 $900,000
High ' 5 $500,000
Med 5 $500,000
Need Level Units Estimated
Overall High 1,216 $28,720,000
Sub-Categories $15,OPO,OOO . ;.
ublic Services (General) (05) High 120
andicapped Services (05B) High , 10 $1,000,000
Legal Services (05C) Med 500 $200,000
Transportation Services (05E) Low. 1 $20,000
Substance Abuse Services (05F) High 15 $2,000,000
Employment Training (05H) High 500 $5,000,000
Health Services (05M) High 10 $2,000,000
Mental Health Services (050) High 10 $2,500,000
Screening for Lead-Based PaintlLead Hazar (05P) High 60 $1,000,000
OvllraU
r:UboCate90ries
Senior Centera (03A)
Senior Services (05A)
!
I
~
I
I
Need Level Units
High 3,502
Estimated
$5,500,000
Med 2
High 3,600
$500,000
$5,000,000
r
Community Needs (Page 3) ,
.. .
-
Need Level Units Estimated ~ .
>
Overall High 75 $28,000,000 -
Sub-Categories ..
Youth Centers (030) High 15 $5,000,000
Child Care Centers (03M) High 10 $5,000,000
Abused and Neglected Children Facilities (03Q) High 10 $4,500,000 "
Youth Services (050) High 10 $3,500,000
Child Care Services (05L) High 15 $5,000,000
Abused and Neglected Children (05N) High 15 $5,000,000
Need Level Units Estimated ~
Overan High 30 $50,000
Sub..categories
Urban Renewal Completion (07) - 0 $0
COBG Non-profit Organization Capacity Bul (19C) High 30 $50,000
COBG Assistance to Institutes of Higher E (190) - 0 $0
Repayments of Section 108 Loan Principal (19F) - 0 $0
Unprogrammed Funds (22) - 0 $0 .
.:;;;,
,-
.
,
!.."
~
..
", ,.~ .'"
City lJfSlln Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2oo0-2ooS
-j
v. HOUSING AND MARKET ANALYSIS
The Housing and Market Analysis section of the City of San Bernardino Consolidated Pian provides
a description of the City's residents, highlights Icey market and housing characteristics and identifies
the primary housing needs within the community and the available resources to develop affordable
housing opportunities.
Specifically, this section of the Consolidated Pian will assess who lives in San Bernardino, what are
the past, CUrrent and future housing and non-housing characteristics in the City, what problems and
opportunities exist given the composite of resident needs and housing and non-hOUSing
characteristics and what actions and resources have historically been used to meet the City's housing
needs.
I A. MARKET AND INVENTORY CHARACTERISTICS
In order to create a context for the Consolidated Plan, the City descn"bes important factors, trends,
and general population characteristics in the following section. This section provides a general
background of San Bernardino citizens, neighborhoods, and economic and social factors affecting
thecommuni~ .
-'
I
1. Community Description
a. Bac/quound and Trends
'. .1 .
".I
I
Incorporated 1U ~llj4, the City of San Bernardino is proud ofits heritage and rich cultural diversity.
Located at the base of the San Bernardino Mountains in the "Heart of the Inlantf Empire", and within
easy proximity of ocean beach~ desert playgrounds and mountain resorts, San Bernardino offers
the bestpossible location forrecreatioD, culture, and employment opportunities. The City is served
by major transportation corridors including Interstates 10 and 215, railroads and the Metrolink
commuter train linking Los Angeles employment with affordsble, quality housing. The City of San
Bernardino is located within easy proximity of South em California's chief employment centers of
Los Angeles and Orange counties, making ita "strategic" residential location. San Bernardino is the
County Seat for San Bernardino County, the largest county in the continental United States, and is
the area's governmental, financial and business center.
The City experienced rapid growth during the 1970s and 1980s, but was especiaIly hard hit by the
economic recession of the early 1990s. Population growth slowed dramatically during the early
1990s. After the adoption of the 1995 Consolidated Plan, population growth increased, although
modest1y compared to the previous two decades.
From 1990 to 1999 San Bernardino's population grew by approximately 13 percent. The City's
CUrrent population of roughly 185,000 residents is expected to grow to 223,417 by the year 2010.
~ccelerated job growth is forecast for San Bernardino into the next centwy, thus highlighting the
~ for significant additional housing opportunities.
r
DS/IOt2OOOP:IFORMSwOCISING FORMSICoNSOlJDA1ED PUNI101J() CONSolJDA1ED PlAN IIEY 1.DOC
_.. .., ....-....--...
61
City olSan B~mardino - Consolidated Plan - FY 2000-200$
,
There is an ample supply of inexpensive, undeveloped land within the City of San Bernardino. Land
values are such that entry level homes can be built to attract first time buyers and more upscale
development is also possible in the prestigious hillside communities of the City.
One of San BemardiIio's most attractive qualities is its central location relative to the recreational
playgrounds and cultural attractions of South em California. The City is within a 6O-minute drive of
Pacific Ocean beaches, desert communities such as Palm Springs, the mountain resorts of Lake
"Arrowhead and Big Bear, Disneyland and downtown Los Angeles.
In tenns of transportation, San Bernardino is extremely well connected. One of the largest freight
aiIports in the world, Ontario International Airport, is located less than 25 miles from the City.
.
.
"
<<
Locally, the City features its own cultural attractions including a Civic Light Opera Association, and
the County Museum of Natural History.
A complete array of educational facilities are available in San Bernardino including: 39 elementary
schools, eight middle schools, six senior high schools, five "special needs" schools (including Adult
Education), and five children's centers for pre-schoolers. San Bernardino Valley College and
California State University, San Bernardino, are also located within the city. A variety of other
institutions are located within a ten mile radius including the world-renowned Loma Linda
University Medical Center, the University ofRedlands and the University of California at Riverside.
Household Income
.
The median family income for a family offour in the City orSan Bernardino was $28,843 according
to 1990 Census data. This was 28 percent less than the median income within San Bernardino
County of$36,977. Based on these numbers, a very low-income family (one whose income is SO
percent or less of the City median income) would have an annual income of $14,422 or less.
Families with low-incomes (one whose income is between 51 percent and 80 percent of the San
Bernardino City median) would range from $14,423 - $23,074 per year. The following table
provides ~ income breakdown according to the 1990 and 1999 median income.
TABLE8
- lNooMERANGES
ClTYOJlS4NBERHARDINO
1990 CeIIIUI Median Income. Rlvenlde-San Beraanl1noMSA S28 843
Cate20rv DeflnltJoll Illcome Rall2e
Very Low-income (*Low) Less tbaa So% ofMediaa Less tbaa SI4.422
Low-income (* Olha- Low) 511080%ofMediaa $14,423 - S23,074
~~illCO~ (*Micldlc) 81 10 95%ofMediaa 523,075 - S27,4OO
Hi UDDerl More tbaa 95% of Median ' Mllnl tbaa $27 400
1m Medlall Illcome. Rlvenlde-S11l Beraardlllo MSA 547.200
Cate20ry Deflnltloll Income Rall!!e
Very Low-iacome (*Low) Less tbaa 50% of Median Less tbaa 523,600
Low-income (* Olha- Low) 5110 80% of Median 524,072 - $37,760
Moderate-iacome (*Midd1c) 8110 95% of Median 538,232 - $44,840
Ifjm Income (*UDDerl More tbaa 95% of Median Mllnllban $44 840
s...n:..: IHO c..-. CllA3r..IA; HUD 1m ~ Umilo . New BUD DdiDitiau Cor tile ("__II....~ 'lID
"
.
~j
tJSIltvlIJODI':II"OIIMSlHOUSINO FOIINSICoNsoUIJA.TED PLAN\1D(J() CON.tOuzl.cTED PI.AN UP 1.DOC '
'U
'-I
~ .
<,
...
tS''i!;'-;'J~;'-:r~'ii' .i; .,:
City,of&n Bernardino. CotlSolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200$
.
For reference pwposes, the HUD adjusted 1999 median family income for a family offour for the
City of San Bernardino is $47,200. The HUD median r:mmy ~come is significantly higher~ the
City's median family income since the HUD number IS a regional figure for San Bernardino and
Riverside Counties that includes the higher income communities in the western portion of the
County.
I
J
b. DemoJUYlphics
General Porndation
According to the Bureau of the Census, the 1990 population of the City of San Bernardino was
164,164 persons. The City is the most populous city in San Bernardino County and grew by 40
percent between 1980 and 1990. In 1990, the City of San Bernardino had approximately 12 percent
of the total County population of 1,418,380. The City's population increased by 40 percent while the
County's population increased by 59 percent between 1980 and 1990. However growth has slowed,
and only 13 percent growth occurred in the City and 17 percent growth OCCurred in the County
between 1990 and 1999. The City has 11 percent of the total County population of 1,654,000. The
City's current population is estimated at 185,000 as oflanuary I, 1999. The growth rate has dropped
to levels experienced in the 19708 after an extreme growth surge in the 1980s.
.
TABLE ,
POPULATION AND GROWTH
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO '.
Year P!!.ILulatloD % Increase from ~lor censui
1'80 117,490 .13%
1 !l9O 164,164 40%
1 !iI99 18S 000 13%
Source: U. S. Census (/980. /990); tIIId Clllifomla /Jepartment of FiMnce, /999.
,
The population growth of the past decade may be attributed to migration to the Inland Empire from
Los Angeles and Orange counties as well as immigration from Mexico.
J
Household POlJUlation
The most significant changes in household population since 1995 have been the increase in
household sizes and the higher Percentage of Hispanic hOuseholds. The number of households in the
City of San Bernardino increased by 11,657 between 1980 and 1990 to a total of54,482. By 1994
the number of households grew to 57,422, was estimated to be 59,000 m 1998, and is expected to
reach ~187 in 2000 aCCOrding to SCAG. The average household size increased from 2.62 persons
in 1980 to 2.9 persons in 1990 and is currently 3.0 persons. ACCOrding to 1990 U.S. Census data,
family groups made up 70 percent of these households, including female-headed households which
comprised 17.s percent of the total hOusehold population.
ACCOrdingto 1990 U.S. Census data, the average household size forrentec-occupiedhouseholds was
..97 persons per unit as compared to 2.84 persons per unit for owner occupied households.
.OWCVer, the average housing unit size for renters was 3.8 rooms while oWners averaged 5.s rooms.
The data on overcrowding confirm that renter households had a more difficult time finding ~ousing
W/DOOtIOP:IFORJIswOUJ1NG FOIIMSICONsorJD.f'lED PUNI1000 CON3OJ.rDA'lED PUN REI' Z.DOC
..,
CIly of San BertlQrdlno - Consolidated Plan - FY 2000-2005
ofan adequate size. City-wide, there were 7,924 overcrowded households, representing 14.5 percent
of the total households. An overcrowded unit is defined as having more than 1.01 persons per room
(excluding bathrooms, halls, foyers, porches and half-rooms). Amo~g renter house~o!ds, 21.5
percent (5,603) were overcrowded with almost one-q~ of those umts (1,350) con~g more
than 2.01 persons per room. Owner-occupied households mcluded 2,321 (8.2 percent) umts .that are
overcrowded.
.
TABLE 10
HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Cbancterlstlc 1980 1990
Total Households 45,260 54,482
Total Families 29,636 38,368
% Families': 65% 70%
Single Penon Households 11,141 12,722
% Single 25% 23%
Average Household Size 2.6 2.9
Overcrowded (1.01+ 3,123 7,924
nersoDS ner room\ /6.9%\ (14.5%\
Soun:e: U. S. Census (1980. 1990)
.
From 1980 to 1990 the median age decreased from 30.1 to 28.2. Since 1990, the median City age
appears to have stabilized as more middle-aged families have moved to the .city and the elderly
population has increased. It is estimated that the median age as ofl998 ~ approximately 30.3. In
1990, the largest segment of the population was adults ages 2S to 44, comprising 32.6 percent of the
City's population. School age children, ages 5 thrOugh 18, were the next largest group, with 22.3
percent of the population. The smallest segment Qfthe population was senior citizens, age 65 and
older, with 10 percent of the City's total. The City's 1998 estimates show a similar patterns with
only slight variations in percentages. However, the number of young adults between the ages of 19
and 24 has become the smallest age group. Table 11 illustrates the City's age distribution. The
m~i..n age could decline again over the next ten years if there is a mini- "baby boom" among the
new generation of young adults. .
TABLE 11
AGE DISTRIBUTION
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Age 1990 Number 1990 l'aecDt 1998 Number 1998 Percent
0-4 (Pre School) 17,698 10.8% 18,865 10.6%
5-18 (School) . 36,533 22.3% 39,331 22.1%
19-24 (YoqAdult) 17,084 10.4% 16,195 9.1%
2S44 (Adult) 53,589 32.6% 56,238 31.6%
45-64 (Middle Age) 22,864 13.9% 29,721 16.7%
6S+ (Scaior ("lri,-~) 16,396 10.0'"' 17,619 9.9%
164.164 100.0% 177969 100.0%
So.-.: 1990 Casru: tlIUI CIly DcmtJgraphla &t/mQlesfor 1998 by NallonallHtblon Systems. 1998.
.
,
. --- ----.---.-- -..-
__~........r'...~"""., ~M'^"",.."U!W't'm~'nrn 1*UN Uf'1.DOC
64
~;;<i'4fij,:,~~"'1~'.--., 'i-'.i!::;.,,1:.....!:Ji;i;./;;:~.\_'ti-.:i-
CItY 'OjSan Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200$
.
Persons living in group quarters. Also noted at the time of the 1990 census was the fact that 4,071
people, or 2.5 percent of the City's residents, lived in group quarters such as mental hospitals, homes
for the aged, group homes and donnitories.. Additionally, 1,988 lived in correctional institutions.
. .
c. Racial and Ethnic Characteristic
The City of San Bernardino is one of ethnic diversity. The most significant changes in the City's
composition since 1990 has been the increase in persons of Hispanic origin and the decrease in the
number of non-Hispanic White residents. OtherraciaVethnic groups experienced modest population
growth during the 1990s.
According to the 1990 U.S. Census, Whites were the largest racial group, with 45.6 percent of the
population. Hispanics represented the next largest ethnic group in San Bernardino, with an increase
in total population growing from 25 percent in 1980 to 35 percent in 1990. Blacks comprised just
over 15 percent and AsianslPacific Islanders comprised almost 4 percent of the City's population in
1980. The Black population grew by 47 percent and the Asian/Pacific Islander population grew by
2.5 percent between 1980 and 1990. According to 1998 estimates, Hispanics outnumbered non-
Hispanic Whites, while the percentages of Blacks and Asian/Pacific Islanders remained nearly the
same. Table 12 below provides the population's ethnic and racial distribution.
.
Concentration of RaclaVEthnlc MInorities and/or Low-income Fammes. An "area of 10w-
income concentration" is defined as a specific section of the City where lower-income households
(less than 80 percent of median) reside in concentrations of 50 percent or greater. Similafly4.8n
"area ofraciaVethnic minority" means specific regions of the community whereniinorities coilstitute
SO percent or more of the population within the ceIisus tract
'.
TABLE 12
RACE AND ET8NICITY
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
RacelEtJaalc1ty 1990 1998 Estimate 1998 Percent oCTotal
Native American 1,173 1,250 1%
Asian 6.195 7,448 4%
Black 2S,I64 2S,349 14%
White 74.817 66,608 37%
Otber 402 226 <1%
Hispaaic 56,413 77,088 43%
TolaI 164164 177.969 100.0%
SoIU'Ce: U.s. Census 1990 dDla. and 1998 Cily Demographic8 Estimates, National Decision Systems.
Rac:1a1/Ethnic Concentrations. While individuals of all ethnic groups can be found throughout the
City, slightly higher concentrations of specific populations can be found in the following areas:
.
r
DS/JDlJOfJO/':IFOIIAiSIHOIISING FORMsICONsoLlDA7J:D PLItNI1IJ()(J CONSoulJ,c7J:D PUN /lEI' UJOC
6S
City ofSDn Bernardino. Consolidated Plan. FY 2000-200S
TABLE 13
POPULATION DISTRIBUTION BY ETHNIC GROUPS
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
City Hispanic % Black % Asian % Other % All
While % Minorities
Wild 1~
1- 5459 22 13857 57 3.620 15 5 276 I 24434
2- 10.283 42 10158 41 3023 12 4 247 1 24 95
3" 8059 33 11869 49 2716 11 1435 6 198 1 24 77
4. 18321 75 3044 13 1932 8 817 3 225 1 24 39
5. 16183 67 4589 19 2.306 9 1080 4 224 1 24,382
t;- 3160 13 10471 43 9737 40 836 3 191 1 24,395
,. 16.165 67 4483 19 2.508 10 609 3 209 1 23 974
Source: "City ofSDn Bernardino Clerk's OfJice, R4chel Krasney, City Clerk, Febnuzry, 1992.
The First. Second, Third and Sixth Wards are all areas of minority concentrati~n in the City of San
Bernardino. A map of the wards with these concentrations marked is presented at the end of this
section (Map I).
.
Low-Income Concentrations. Historically, low-income concentrations tend to coincide with areas
ofraciaVethnic concentrations. Data on low-income concentrations in San Bernardino confirm this
tendency since the census tracts within which the median income is less than 80 percent of area
median income generally overlay the wards in which there is an ethnic/racial concentration of 50
percent or more. This information is presented on Map 2 at the end of this section. .
Households Below Poverty Level Poverty thresholds are revised periodically to allow for ch3Dges
in the cost of living as reflected in the Consumer Price Index. The average poverty threshold for a
family offourpersons was $12,674 for 1989. Poverty thresholds are applied on a national basis and
are not adjusted for regional, state or local variations in the cost oeliving. Consequently, the true
number of impoverished persons in San Bernardino is higher than revealed by the 1990 Census since
the cost ofliving in the area is higher than national figures due to higher housing costs. As of 1989,
7.613 families had incomes below the poverty line; this figure represents 19 percent of all fiunilies in
the City. Based on these statistics, nearly I in 5 families lived in poverty in the City of San
BemardinoAlUring 1989. However, according to the 2000 Community and Economic Prome, 38.8
percentoftli"P." families in the City of San Bernardino had incomes over $45,000 in 1999, well above
the 1999 mecUan family income of$35,747 (Economics and Profiles, Inc.). This suggests that there
is an increase in economic activity, possibly through the attraction of new business to the highly
affordable area.
,
DSlJOIZI1Ot1I':lFORMSIHo/JSING FORMSICONSOl.lDArEDPUNlZDt1OCDNmulMrEDPUN IlEl'l.DOC
66
..
,
"
..
o
L
!
,
iw
.,'t\I/~':~r~V;1J''f1-",. . ",~:. ft..-~t'..\"-'~~.~,~':'~
City''OfSan Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200S
.
TABLE 14
HOUSEHOLDS BELOW POVERTY
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Below Pov~rty Level Above Pov~ Level
Household_Type #I % #I %
Households Below Poverty 18% 44,836 82%
Level 9,808.
Families 7,532 19% 31,504 81%
Married Couple Family: 14% 12,971 86%
With Children 0-17 2,128
No Children under 18 391 3% 11,115 97%
Female-Headed Family: 3,270 44%
With Children 0-17 4,106 56%
No Children under 18 318 14% 1,962 86%
Elderly (65+) 1193 11% 10674 89".4
Source.. 1990 u.s. Census.
A substantially higher portion of the City's families (19 percent) lived in poverty when compared
with the State rate of9.3 percent, and the County rate of 10.3 percent, as defined by the 1990 U.S.
Census. Black, Hispanic, and Asian households were disproportionately represented in very low-
income categories, exceeding 40 percent or more. This indicates that there is likely to be a higher
concentration of these households experiencing life at poverty level than White or Native American
. households experience. ..
Another indication of impoverishment is the number of households registering for public assistance
programs. Records kept by the County Department of Public Social Services (DPSS) show a
tremendous decrease in case load in the public Bssistance programs. Since 1995, the number of
hOuseholds on public assistance has declined substantially, although in proportion to the population
at-large is still substantially higher than any other juriSdiction in San Bernardino County.
,
According to the 1une 1998 reports, 58,387 people were on some fonn of public assistance in the
San Bernardino City area. This is a 14.9 percent decrease from the 1997 population of68,626. The
average monthly grant amounts to recipients of Temporary Aid to Needy Fariillies (TANF) is $596
for a three-person family and $710 for a four-person tiunily as of May 1999.
In the past year DPSS intake has decreased by nearly 15 percent despite increased migration from
Los Angeles and Orange County due to housing costs and constraints in these areas. At this time;
combining all types of assistance, 32 percent of the total population receives some type of public
assistance. As of 1998 in the City, there were 36,119 people receiving cash benefits, 15,648 people
on Medi-caI,.and 6,620 people on food stamps only. The total value per program in 1998 was
$6,983,970 for cash benefits, $7,568,335 for Medi-caI, and $3,322,042 for food stamps, with a
monthly distribution of$17,874,347 and an annual distribution of$214,492, 168 for the combined
welfare programs.
.
,
OSIlOl2I1ODP:lFOIWswolJSJNt; ~TED"I.lNIlOoo~TED"UN IIEYZ.DOc
61
City o/San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-2005
TABLE 15
TYPES OF PUBLIC ASSISTANCE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Cueload Persons
TANF 10,264 46,773
Food Stamps Only 2,772 7,81111
General Relief 152 154
13,188 54,826
SaIl1'Ce: CoU'1lJ'DepL o.L PublIc Sacial Servicu. Febru~ry 2000..
'. .
. ~.l
.....
r
t1S/1QQ/J/J(Jp:'FORMswoUSING ~n:oI'UNIZfJooO?N.\'OUzl.fn:oPLAN IlBVUlDc
II.
.
.
-.
.
.
III'.'
i....
." "
!i::;~:
cn~WN
CIIcnCIIW
OC.O:r.
0000
.............
000 0
...cn~W
OCllcnCII
0000
COOO
o
.
-- -.--.- --.
.~i~~.i~,(f..J:7.~~"t'l;:. ",-' ..;;:,:"..'\'~~'t~',;::t?it,..
,
..a.
OCD
. CD
00
0"0
6'0
NCJ
~O
~::s
0..
3:
-.
::s
o
..
~
X
o
C
fn
CD
::s-
O
-
fG
C/O' o/San Bmuudino - CoIUO/ldated P/Qn _ FY 2000-2ooS
This section of the FY 2000-2005 Consolidated Plan is comprised offour sections. The first part
summarizes the City of San Bernardino's general housing market and inventory conditions in tenus
of supply, demand, condition and cost. The second part discusses the availability of any assisted
housing, Section 8 housing and public housing. The third part is an inventory of facilities and
services for the homeless. and services for those at rislc of becoming I1omeless. Part four inventories
supportive housing for non-homeless persons in need of special assistance. CHAs Table IB, at the
end of this section, reviews much of the narrative put forth here.
2. Market and Inventory Conditions
.
J
San Bernardino has experienced a modest increase in its housing stock since 1990, wen below the
levels achieved during the 1970s and 1980s. Most of the housing COnstructed since ,1990 has been
single tiunily homes (with the exception of so me assisted rental housing). Although the Yacancyrate
remains high, it has declined as population growth has outpaced growth of the housing stock.
The 1990 California Department ofFinllnce data indicated a total of year-round housmg in San
Bernardino at 58,969 units. Approximately 93 percent of~e units are OCCUpied, with 26,014 (44.2 .
percent) renter-occupied and 28,468 (48.4 percent) owner-occupied. The vacancy rate at the time
was 8.5 percent for rental units or 2,407 rental vacancies and 2.1 Percent for owner units or 609
owner-occupied units available for sale.
A. HOUSlNGSuPPLY AND DEMAND
J
There was a total housing unit ~crease of9 percent (5,431 units) during the 1990's from 58,969 to
64,400. During this same time period, POPulatiC?n increased by 13 percent, which indicates that the
housing stock did not grow at the same rate as the 'population. The overall vacancy rate for 1990
was 7 percent, growing nearly to 8 Percent by 1999. Table 16 shows the number and type of
housing units in the City of San Bernardino in 1990 and 1999.
"
TABLE 16 ,
HOUSING STOcK BREAKDoWN
- Cl1Y OF $ANBmuwmINO
-1l'Pe .,- 1"0 l'eraat Ill" Percent
Singlc-Fllllily 35,1!18 60% 38.893 60%
Mulliplc Fllllily 19,362 33% 20,831 33%
MobilcHomcs 4.409 7% 1.676 7%
TOTAL 58 96lI 100.0% 64400 100.0%
80_: /990-/999 Oz//f0f'll/Q ~ ofFinmiiii.
.
L.
.
..
.-.
r
.'
b
OJ/lfJI2f1DOP:IFORIaIHOCISINa~7ZDI'lAM1<<1o~7ZD"l.AN ltEf'z.Doc
10
r:
~ ~
....
""h ..
'.', 'C'. ".'~",.~L '.; "',,,: ,1_'
City olSan Bernardino. Consolidated Plan _ FY 200D-200S
.
OWDer-occupled UoIts. In 1990, there were 28,468 owner-occupied units in the City. These
totaled 48.4 percent of the total occupied housing stock. As of 1990, 80,962 persons or49.3 percent
of the total population resided in owner-occupied units. Over 86 percent of all owner-occupants
lived in single' family detached homes. The second highest percentage were the 9 percent of all
owner-oc:cupants living in mobile homes. The remainillg 5 percent of owner-occupants lived in
condominiums or single family attached homes.
Rental Units. In the City of San Be~o in 1990,44.2 percent of all occupied housing units
were renter occupied. In 1990, approximately 76,509 persons occupied these rental units. Forty
percent of all renters occupied single-family detached units. The second highest percentage, or 13
percent of all renters, occupied three and four unit garden apartments. The remaining 47 percent of
all renters occupied a varied mix of units from single family attached rental units to large apartment
complexes and mobile homes.
According to the California Department of Finance, the vacancy rate in the rental market is cum:ntly
8 Percent This is thought to be a result of the stagnant housing market in the City.
TABLE 17
AVAILABLE RENTAL AND OWNER VNITS
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Ca 0 0 and 1 Bedroom 2 bedrooms
Renter 11.491 or 40% 11,941 or 42%
Owner 2 26 or 8% 9013or31%
Solll'c:e: U.S. /990 Census. CHAS Table /B
3 or more bedrooms
4,989 or 18%
17738or61%
OIIercrowding
The 1990 Census showed that there were 7,924 overcrowded housing units, representing 14.5
percent of the occupied units. Overcrowding was more severe among renters, with 5,603 (21.5
Percent) overcrowded rental units. However, overcrowding was also an issue with some owners,
since 2,321 (8.2 percent) of the owner-occupied units were overcrowded.
The City of San Bernardino contained 2,302 large households (7 or more persons) comprising 4.2
percent of the total households. As the statistics on overcrowding would sugges~ large households
have.special needs in finding housing that is ofan adequate size. Table 18 illustrates the number of
persons per unit for both renter and owner households in 1990.
.
r
OSIlOl1I1ODP:IFORIoaIHOCISING FO~lEDI'UNI1<<Jo ~lEDl'l.AN REl'UJOc
11
City of San Bernardino - CollSolidated Plan - FY 2000-200$
.
TABLE 18
TENURE BY PERSONS IN UNIT
Cl1Y OF SAN BERNARDINO
PenoDslD UDlt Owoer-Occunled ReDter OecuDled
Number Pen:enl Number Pen:ent
1 PClSOII 6,078 21.3% 6,644 25.5%
2 PClSOIII 9,097 32.0% 6,222 23.9%
3 PClSOIII 4,727 16.6% 4,497 17.3%
4 PersoDS 4,288 15.1% 3,840 14.8%
5 PClSOIII 2,216 7.8% 2,286 8.8%
6 Persous 1,090 3.8% 1,195 4.6%
7 or men PersoDS 972 3.4% 1,330 5.1%
TOTAL 28.468 100.0% 26.014 100.0%
Sourr;e: 1990 CeIlSllS
.
Housing Stock Condition
Since the adoption of the i995 Consolidated Plan, the City conducted a comprehensive block survey
of residential property conditions covering about 75 percent of the housing. The 1999 survey
included all areas of the City exceptneighborltoods and subdivisions developed after the mid-1980s.
The objective of the survey was to assess the overall, predominant conditions of properties and
dwelling units at the block level, in contrast to a propertylhousing conditions survey of individual
dwelling units. One important finding of the survey is, that despite the large percentage of
residential properties with problems, most substandard conditions can be addressed by correcting
deferred maintenance or undertaking minor rehabilitation. As a result, the City's current housing
stock represent a tremendous resource for meeting tJi\' affordable housing needs of existing and
future low- and moderate-income residents.
.
The survey areas included nearly 50,000 dwelling units, about 75 percent of the City's housing stock.
The survey examined exterior property and dwelling unit conditions using a point scoring system for
yard maintenance/appearance and the conditions of major exterior components of dwelling units.
The rating s~ used the definitions identified below.
~~
Prop~ Conditions RIztlng Il1Id Dejmit10ns
The point score categories for property conditions Were: a) 0, excellent; b) 4 B 9, good; c)
10 B 14, fair; d) 15 B 24, poor; and e) 25+, severely deteriorated. The definitions
corresponding with these categories were:
Excellent: Property is new or well maintained, with no visible deficiencies.
Good: Property is generally well-maintained, but may have overgrown landscaping, paving
in need of repair, plants in need ofreplaccment, or walIIfences in need of repair.
Fair. Property has multiple deferred maintenance needs and/or requires removal of debris.
Poor. Property is not well-maintained. Landscaping, walls/fences, and paving need
substantial repairs or replacement. Substantial debris may be present.
'-
.
.
.
,
L
tJS/JtJ/1(J(J(Jp..IFOIlAIStIiOUsI~~,...n II' ~MtIINI"""""'",""'ft.r ...,...,._
....
if
l
.
,( ",.....'"
City o/San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200$
Severely deteriorated: Property is in a severe state of neglect and represents a human health
hazard. Broken pavement or unpaved areas are typical. Landscaping in not present or is
unmaintained. WaIls or fences have collapsed or taIlen over. Visible debris may be a source
of venn in or other vectors. Junk (inoperative vehicles, equipment, appliances, furniture and
the like) is present.
Dwelling Unit Conditions
The point score categories for property conditions were: a) 0, excellent; b) 3 B 9, sound; c)
10 B IS, minor rehabilitation; d) 16 B 39, moderate rehabilitation; e) 40-55, substantial
rehabilitation; and t) 56+, dilapidated. The definitions corresponding with these categories
were:
Excellent: A dwelling unit that is new or well maintained and Structurally intact (no visible
defiCiencies). Foundation appears structurally undamaged and rooflines are straight.
Windows, doors, and siding are in good repair. Exterior paint is in good condition.
Sound: A dwelling unit that requires minor deferred maintenance, such as repainting,
window repairs, the replacement of a few shingles on the roof; or the repair of cracks in the
foundation.
Minor Rehabilitation: A dwelling unit that shows signs of multi pie deferred maintenance, or
that requires the repair of one exterior component.
Moderate Rehabilitation: A dwelling unit that requires deferred maintenance on. ~ev.eraI
components, and/or the repair/replacement of one or more exterior .components. .'
Substantial Rehabilitation: A dwelling unit that requires the repair or replacement of all
exterior components. .
Dilapidated: A dwelling unit that suft'ers fiom excessive neglect, appears structurally
unsound and not safe for human habitation. May not be feasible to rehabilitate.
General property conditions on each block were rated according to the condition of the paving,
landscape, walls and fences, and the amount of debris surrounding dwellings. The dwelling units on
each block were rated according to the COndition of the foundation, root; siding, and windows and
dOOllii. Table 19 shows the number of blocks per property and dwelling unit condition rating.
In general, there was a close correlation between property conditions and dwelling unit conditions at
the block level. On about nine percent of the blocks surveyed, however, property conditions varied
significantly fiom dwelling unit conditions. On about 60 Percent of blocks with substantial
differences between housing and property conditions, the majority of dwelling units were in
excellent or sound condition while the majority of properties had only fair or poor maint.."al1CC.
Conversely, on about 40 percent of the blocks with substantial differences, the majority of dwelling
units n"eded minor or moderate rehabilitation while the majority of properties were well-maintained
(excellent or good COndition). Blocks with substantial differences between dwelling unit and
property conditions were generally scattered throughout the City. There are some exceptions; and
_ese are listed in Table 20.
.
r
DSlIOI2D/101':IFORMSlHOUSING FORMSicoNsoUDA1ED PL.fN\1000 CONsol.IJu1ED PLIIN IlEYz.ooc
7J
City a/San Bernardino - ConsolldaJed Plan _ FY 2000-200S
TABLE I'
HOUSING STOCK CONDmON
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Condition Sigle-Family BIlICkI Multi-Family Blocks
Property Conclltion 417 40
Exc:elJeIU
Good 121 24
Fair 113 22
Poor ISI 28
Severely Deterioratccl 121 10
DweU1ng UnIt Condition 318 30
1lY-llau
Sound 272 16
Minor Rcbabililalion 263 21
Modcrate'Rcbabililalion 68 17
Subslanli8l RehabililalioD 1 0
Dilapidated 0 '0
s.....r: ""'-it HBA. J.c. Now.iJiii.,,,,,
TABLE 20
STREET SEGMENTS WITH SUBSTANTIAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HOUSING AND
. PROPERTY CONDmONS - ~r More Blocks Onfy)
Street Name Block Number Property Condition Dwelling Condition
N. Lawrence 2900 B 3000 Fair Excellent
Sepulveda 2700,4100 Fair Excellent
14. Street 100E, ll00W Poor Sound
W. Bclleview 1000 B 1100, 1600 Fair or Poor Sound
W. Grant !l00 B 1000 Fair Sound
W. HilIctest !lOO B 1000 Fair Sound
N. Penis 1300, lSOO Fair Souod
W.I~ 900, II 00 Good Minor Rehab.
-W.2" 900 B 1200 Good Minor Rehab
!:E.2" 1200B 1300 Good Minor Rehab
s. Booker Hill SOO B 600 Good Minor Rehab
W. Magnolia 400, 1000 Good Minor Rehab
N.Pico 1200 B 1300 Good Minor Rehab
N. Siena 2100 B 2600 Good Minor Rehab
N.K 1200 B 1300 Good MocIcratc Rehab
.
-"'~HIM.""I"',
Although there arc POOrly maintained properties and dwelling units in need of rehabilitation or
rcplaccmcntscattczed throughout oldcr city neigbborhoods, the predominant need in mostresidcntial
areas appears to be for the correction of deferred maintenance, minor rehabilitation, and/or the
rcpl'~ent of landscaping.
osnOQIIIIDP:IFO/ww(OClSlNO~2ZDPI.ANlzDt1D~2ZDPLfNREf'l.DOC
14
.
4
.
.
.
u
~l
L
,;'(;,r;F::,~"'i'Y,
j:'.>''t:",':t.,~'',''~'~-'''~~f'
City o/San Bernardino. Consolidated PllIIl . FY 2000-200S
The survey results indicate that the property conditions in the majority of blocks (S8 percent) were
. excellent or good. Nearly 30 percent of the blocks surveyed, however, have properties in
predominantly poor or severely deteriorated condition. Although a lowerpen:entage of multifamily
properties (S2 Percent) were rated as excellent or good, most of the remaining properties were in fair
conditions (rather than poor or severely deteriorated). . .
. The housing condition survey results indicate that the predominant housing needs on most blocks
(nearly 60 percent) are for deferred maintenance, such as repainting, minor roof repairs, or
doorlwindow repair, or for minor rehabilitation. A higher percentage of multifamily dwellings than
single family dwellings (13 percent versus 6 percent) need moderate rehabilitation.
The biggest problem for properties in San Bemardino appears to be 1andscaping maintenance.
Unkept lawns, overgrown trees and bushes, and other yard deficiencies reduce the character and
value of neighborhoods, but can easily be rehabilitated to rejuvenate neighborhoods. Deteriorating
walls and fences were also common, particularly on blocks with multi-family Pl'9perties. Visible
debris was a common problem in single-family neighborhoods, with 29 blocks exhibiting severe
litter in the yard such as appliances, cars, and furniture. A few blocks had severe problems in almost
all property condition categories (except walls and fencing where there were none). These blocks
include 1800 through 21 00 N Macy and 800 through 1200 S Washington, both of which are loCated
near the western City limits at Highland Avenue.
Of the housing condition problems noted in the survey, deteriorated roofs and siding (including a
need for repainting) appeared to be the most prevalent problems. .
. The majority of blocks with property and/or dwelling unit problems had dwe~ units mostly over
30 years old. Blocks with predOminantly newer housing were usually good. or excellent condition,
although there were some properties in need of minor repairs and clean-lip. At 30 years of age,
many property and dwelling unit components are- beyond their tisefullives and need repair or
replacement.
Of the streets surveyed, the 100 block ofa 14" had the most dwelling units in need of substantial
repair with severely deteriorated and littered yards and fencing. .Other areas that contained more
than one block in need of significant rehabilitatiQn include: W 10lll; a 211d; W 4"; W S*; W 7"'; W
81b;W Clevenger, W Congress; S Foisy: N H; a Hope: N 1: S Lincoln; N Macy: a Norman; W
Poplar; a San lacinto: a Santa Fe; W Spruce: N State: S Sunnyside; S Valley View; and S
Washington, most of which immediately surround the downtown area or are in southern portions of
the city.
There were also a number ofblocks CODtaining homes in excellent or sound condition. These blocks
include 24" St., 2SlII St., 2~ St., a 27'" St., 281b St., 29" St., Acacia. Anowhead, Avalon, Camelia.
Cedar, N D St., Genevieve, N G St., Golden, Hanison, Lawrence, Leroy, Lugo, Lynwood, Marsha11,
Mayfield, Mt. View, Parkside, Pershing, Piedmont, Sierra, Valencia. and many others, most of
which are located in northern sections of the City. .
Table 21 lists those street segments with multiple blocks (three or more) in which a majority of the
dwelling units have one or more housing orprope.ty condition problems. It was assumed that street
.gments containi'lg three or more blocks with housing problems had systematic, neighborhood_
. de problems (in contrast to isolated problems from poor housing conditions on one ortwo blocks.
r
t1J//tJfZOoOp:IFORMWIotISING FO~7rDI'LAMzoooavaoz.m.c7rDl'uN REYz.ooc.
1S
City olStm Benuzrdino . Consolidaled Plan. FY 2000-2OOS
Table 21
Nelrhborhoods In Need of ReD air
Block Street
100 8 200, 600 8 1400 W 10th
200 8 300. 600 8 1700 W 11th
300 8 400 700 1800 W 13th
200 8 400 600 !lOO 8 1400 1900 8 2000 W 14th
100 900 8 1100 1300 8 IS00 1900 8 2000 E ISth
100 8 700 1000 8 IS00 W 16th
1400 8 1700 N 17th
SOO 8 700 E 20th
IS00, 1700 W 20th
SOO 8 700, 1400 8 IS00 E 21st
200 8 300, 900 8 1200 W 24th
100, 1100 E 27th
900 8 1100 W 27th
600 8 700 W 28th
100 B 200, 900 81300 E 2nd
1008200 E 4th
100 E Sth
130081S00 W Sth
!lOO 8 IS00 W 6th
100 8200,600 81800 W 7th
200 8 300, SOO 8 700, 1000 8 1600 W 8th
SOO 8 700,1100 81400,1800 W 9th
3000 8 3S00, 4800 8 SI00 N Acacia
1900 82100,2400 8 2600, 2800 N 8elle
!lOO 8 2100,1600 W 8elleview
SOO 8 800 S 8W1ker Hill
1200 8 ISS00 N California
2300 8 2600 N Cedar
-- 800 81100 S Clevenger
90081600 W ConJ!l'eSS
2700 8 2800, 4800 8 SI00 N D
2700 8 2800, 4800 _ SI00 N E
900 8 1200 W
!lOO 8 1100, 1300 8 IS00, 1900 8 2000,2200 W Evans
. 600 8 900 S Foisy
2800 . 3300 N G
SOO 8 600, 1200 8 1300 N Ganlcna
160081700,230082800 N Genevieve
. IS00, 170082000 W Gilbert .
600, 1700 82300 N H
1100, 1400 B IS00 N Hancoclc
800 B 1000 W Hue!
900 B 1100 W Hillcrest
3000 8 3200 N I
700 B 800 S I
r
tW/I1I2OOoP:lFORMswoUSING FORAiSICoN$O/JJJ,fTED "lJN\zooo c:'ON.rouD.ITED "UN BEY 1.DOC
. 76
.
.
.
,
,,~,,' <~!,': 'IV, t'I;1t1~.., y;r.llA '~l'~, q.'-,,',;,.:,
City o/San Bernardino. Consolidated Plan. FY 2000-2005
.
Table 21
Nelehborhoods In Need oCRepalr
Block Street
100 B 200, 500 B 800 N J
500 B 600, 800 S J
300, 700 B 800, 1200 B 1300 N K
1400 B 1600 W Kemda11
1300 B 1500 W Kingman
500 B BOO N L
800 B 1200 S LiDcoln
1900, 2300 . 2800 N Lugo
100 B 500, 900 B 1100, 1300 B 1500, 1900 B 2000 W ila
1100 B 1400 W MusbaU
1200 B 1600 N M'.ss'~"ussetts
4BOO - 5000 N ~e1d
600,loooB 1100 N Medical Center
HOO B 1300 W Mill
1800,2800 N Mt.Vemon
400 B 800 B Noonan
600 800, 1300 B 1400 W Olive
1400 B 1600 N P~lvania
600 B 800, 1200 B 1600 N Penis
1700, 2700 B 2800 N Pml!ing ,
,
900 B 1300,2000 N Pico ,.'".",
500 B 600, HOO N . Ramona
800 B 1200, 1400 E Rialto
600 B 800 E San Ja;lnto
600 B 800 'S SIIIIlaFe
400,1600, 1BOO B 2000, 2400 B 2600, 2800, 4000, 4200- N Sepulveda
4600
1400-1600 W Sheridan
1800,2100,2400 B 2600 N Siem
900 B 1200 W ~PNce
1800 B 2100 N State
2800,4800.5100 N Stoddard
400 B SOlI, 1300 - 1500 S 'Trenton
1200 - 1500 W Union
600 - 800 S Valley View
800 W Victoria
1100, 1400, 1600 B 1800 W Victoria
700, 1500 B 1800 W Virginia
1900 B 2100 N Wall
1300 B 1500 W Walnut
800 B 1200 S Washington
1900-2100 W W .
500 B 600, 900 B HOO N Western
Sounoo: PonoiiI HBA; 1m
.
r
osn~IF'ORMSWOllSINaFOllAlSlcoNsouo7mI'UNI3OODCONSOUDA7mI'UIN REI'l.DOC
11
City ofSiln Bernardino. Consolidated Plan. FY 2000-200'
In summary, neighborhoods north of the City are in better condition than neighborhoods south of the
City, although all neighborhoods were interspersed with dwellings in need of some additional repair
or maintenance. Figure 1 shows the general results of the housing condition survey.
Table 22 shows the age of San Bernardino's housing stock. Approximately 8.6 percent, or 5,520
units, were built prior to 1939. These units may have historic value in the community and may be in
good condition. However, age is one indication of the potential need for rehabilitation. Housing
built before 1939 is also less likely to have been built to the structural standards necessary to
withstand a major earthquake. Since San Bernardino is located in a region with earthquake faults
that are capable of producing a major earthquake (Richter magnitude 6.5 or greater), its housing
programs will need to address the earthquake safety of older housing units. Seismic safety
improvements are considered necessary to protect health and safety and, as a result, may be funded
with CommUnity Development Block Grant funds if the building occupants meet income eligibility
requirements. The most common problems in older units are failure to securely fasten the structure
to the foundation and unrcinforced masonry work (chimneys and porches).
.
TABLE 22
AGE OF HOUSING STOCK
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Year BuUt Uolts Pereeot
Before 1939 S,s20 8.6%
l!140-19S9 7,I8S 11.1%
1960-1979 . .28,809 44.7%
1980-1989 17,4SS . 27.2%
1990-1999 S,43 1 8.4%
Total 64,400 100.OOA.
$0_: 1990 U. So Censu.r. and 1990-1999 Colffomia Department of Finance.
.
"Substizndtlrd Condition", by local definition, refers to units that are in such poor condition as to be
neither stru~lly or financially feasible for rehabilitation.
"SubstmuItiivJ Condltlon but Sultablefor Rehabilitlltlon" means by local definition dwelling units
that do not meet standard condition but are both financially and structurally feasible for
rehabilitation. Units that require only cosmetic work, correction, or minor livability problems or
maintenance work are not included.
The need for this option will increase Over time as the baby boom population gets older and as
medical advances and emphasis on healthy lifestyles increases overall life expectancy. San
Bernardino's residents aged 65 years or older increased nominlllly (13,256 to 15,259) but fell as a
pen:entage (11.3 percent to 10 percent) of the total population from 1980 to 1990.
The age of San Bernardino's housing stock is advanced, especially as compared to the County.
While the age of the housing stock does not necessarily COl1'Clate with deterioration, it appears that
in the City of San Bernardino much of the housing stock has been allowed to deteriorate due to
absentee landlords or a general lack of care by the landlords. Thirty-three percent of the total
number of rental units are owned by absent landlords. ~o, within the City, Over 9,383 single-
.
P:IFORMswOVSlNO I'DIIMsIcxJNsoIJAcTED PUMzooo CONSOIJAcTED PLAN MY 1.DOC
L...
18
<"'f:f ":~':'.".r',: ';'-",~'i',!"t'
City a/San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan. FY 2000-2005
.
family units (over 26 percent of all single family units) have absent owners and it is presumed that
the majority of these are rented homes.
The 1990 Census revealed that 235 (.4 percent) of the housing units lacked complete plumbing
facilities and 412 (.7 percent) lacked complete kitchen facilities. M.ost of these ~ts were ~~_
occupied and contained more than 1.01 persons per room. These UnIts would reqwre upgrading m
order to bring them up to standard condition. It is possible that some of these problems are found in
housing units that need replacement .__
TABLE 23
HOUSING UNITS LACKING COMPLETE PLUMBING AND
KITCHEN FACILITIEs
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Number Pc:n:cnt
UnilS Laclcing Complete Plumbing Facilities 235 _ 0.4%
UnilS Laclcing Complete Kildlen Facilities 412 0.7%
Source: /990 Census
AflordabWty of Owner-occupled Housing. Trends in the price of housing can either expand or
contract the number and proportion of families that can afford homeownership. When the price of
new housing continuously increases at a rate greater than income gains, more and mOre households
are priced out of the homeownership market. The impact of price escalation is most severe on,first-
.time homebuyers. . . ";:,,,_: _
The price of new housing influences the resale price of existing homes. When new home values are
high relative to consumer ir....;;Ale. consumers interested in home ownership turn to the resale market,
thus inducing pressures fti!" price increases in that sector.
Since 1995. the most substantial influences on housing prices have the relatively weak new hoUSing
market and the slow recovCIy of property values for existing homes (which dropped dramatically
during the economic recession of the early 19908). While San Bernardino benefited from the
general rise in property values during the 1980s. this rise was not nearly as dramatic as in the
neighboring communities ofLoma Linda and RedIands.
During the decade of the 1980s. housing cost in SanBemardino increased substantially. In 1980 the
median single family unit value was $52,600. In 1990, the median housing unit value was $96,200,
an increase of82 percent injust 10 years (not adjUSted for inflation). Median home prices dropped
as the housing market stagnated and then declined in the 199Os. AccordinLto the California
Association ofRea1tors. the City's median home price in November 1999 was $90,000. and increase
of6 percent from October when the median price was $85,000. Comparison of the November 1998
median price and NOVember 1999 median price reveals an increase of17.3 Percent However, 1999
median prices in the City are nearly 7 Percent less than 1990 median prices. It appears that the
market is jUst starting to revive as only modest annual gains were made in 1998 and 1997 on.o
percent and 8.3 percent respectively. In addition, mfllfian prices fell between Octoberand November
~1998 to a loss of5.1 percent and in 1997 with a lOBS of 0.6 percent...showing that the housiIig
.et was stin unstable just a few years ago. . .
P:1F'01Uaw0lJSJNG FORMstcoNsoUlJATED PUNIl/)()() CON.rouD.cTED PUN REI' l.DOC
r
19
City a/San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200S
It should be noted that home prices differ between existing and new homes. ACCOrding to the 2000 .
Community and Economic Profile, the median sale price of existing homes was $86,665 for the first
three quarters of 1999. Existing home prices in the City of San Bemardino are small in comparison
to nearby areas, particularly Los Angeles, San Diego, and Orange counties where prices are at least
$100,000 more. The median price of new homes in the City of San Bemardino was $145,583 in the
first three quarters of 1999, or approximately $140,000 less than new homes in Los Angeles, San
Diego, or Orange counties (Dataquick, 1999.) Home prices will continue to rise in the City as the
market becomes flooded and high demand areas reach buildout, forcing new growth east
Interest rates have been fairly low compared to years past, but are beginning to rise due to the
growing health of the economy. The atrordability index for San Bernardino and Riverside Counties,
which measures the percent of the population that is able to purchase a median priced home, reached
57 percent in September 1997 (C.A.R 1997 Atrordability Index). However, despite rising interest
rates and increasing prices, home sales have made gains in the region although gains within the City
remain comparatively lower than many adjacent cities and counties. .
Assessing 1990 data, prices have continued to escalate at a commensurate rate throughout the
region. In 1990, the median value of a home in the City of San Bernardino County was 34 percent
greater than a home in San Bemardino. Between 1980 and 1990 the median value of homes in San
Bernardino increased at an Overall rate of 82 percent This reflects the incredible appreciation in
home values that the Southem California region experienced throughout the 1980's. Housingprices
"" - -...... _. - odi_;, _.. "'.we """" of_ .
throughout this region. Home values are not expected to experience tremendous growth during the
next 10 year period in the City, although SlUTounding cities such as Redlands, Loma Linda, and
cities in Riverside County are expected to experience an uPsurge of value growth.
Aff'ordabWty oCRental Housing. In the past, rental rates had increased at a slightly faster rate than
housing prices. However, during the I 990s median rental rates and incomes grew at nearly the same
pace, with median incomes in the County growing faster thaf! City rental rates. The average rental
in 1999 was approximately $524 per month, an increase of 24 percent In comparison, median
income increased by nearly 28 percent Renters with incomes of at least $20,960 Would be able to
afford the l1I"'<lian 1999 rent.
For the City-ofSan Bernardino in 1980, the median rental rate was $196 per month. By 1990, the
average rental was $422 per month, an increase of 115 percent ftom 1980. During the same time
period, median income increased by 106 percent which indicates that rents increased at a faster rate
than incomes. The 1990 median rent of$422 would require a minimum annual income ofS16,900
in order to avoid ovetpayment (spending more than 30 percent of gross income on housing costs).
nata on gross rent as a percentage of hOUSehold income by type in 1990, the most recent data
available, is Presented in Table 24. The majority of the City's lower-income hOuseholds are renters
and this influences the character of housing assistance needs. In 1990, 7,075 (24.9 percent)
hOUSeholds in owner occupied housing units were spencfjng 30 percent or more of their income on
hOUSing. In 1990, the number oCrenters paying more than 29 percent of their income for rent was
12,872 hOuseholds, 49.5 Percent of all renter households. A large number of hOuseholds (31.3
Jlercentor 17,054 hOUSeholds) in lower-income brackets 8pentthirty percent or more of their income
for housing costs. Because of the high home values in California, ovetpayment Cor shelter is a trend
-.
~~ F01IMSICoNsoLlD.4TEDPLfNIlOfJOCOIaoz.tD,.,TEDPLAN IlE/'l.DOc
r
....
'0
~.
\
..
'''ii'''."~f'j''''~,.,~;- "
;- c..:,..., ,-~' .'....'.\.<".:;.1.;,-.1'
City ofStm Benuzrdino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200$
.
that has been proven throughout the 1980's and is shown to persist in the 1990's given the following
data.
.
TABLE 24
COST BURDENED RENTER AND OWNER-oCCUPANTS
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Hoasehold by Type, lacome and % Reaten Owaen Total
Colt Burden Households
Vety Low-iDcome (VU) Number Puceat
0-30% MFI. 7,739 2,615 10,3S4 19%
% Cost Bunleaed > 30% 85.m 63.6%
% Cost Bunleaed > 50% 70.7% 47.2%
4,664 2,835 7,499 13.8%
31-50%MFI. 78.5% 44.2%
% Cost Bwdened > 30% 30.0% 21.6%
% Cost Bunleaed > 50% 12,403 5,450 17,853. 32.8%
TOlaI VU Households
Low-income (LI) 44.9% 32.7%
51-80%MFI.
% Cost Bunleaed > 30% 2.8% 9.7%
% Cost Bunleaed > SO% 5,019 4,898 9,917 18.2%
TOlaI U Households
Modcratc-iacome (MI) 10.9% 31.9%
81-95% MFI. 0% 3.1%
% Cost Bunleaed > 30% '1,852 2,452 4,304 ' 7.~'.
% Cost Bunleaed > 50%
Total MI Households
0.2% 1.1%
UPJICI'-iDcome (UI) 0% 0.6"-'
95% or_ ofMFI. 6,159 16,411 22,570 41.4%
% Cost Bunleaed > 30%
% Cost Burdened > SO% 12,872 7,075 19,947 36.6%
Total UlHousebolds
AD CGst Bardened Boaseholds
-.., OlofSrollotc.'Hllc..._
wn-_'..q,_
"
Cost Bardened. The term "cost burdened" refers to households that are paying more than 30
percent of their adjusted gross income for housing (rentlmoltgage payments) annually. Cost burden
is a direct indicator of housing atrordability. CHAS Table lC illustrates the cost burdened renter
and owner households in the City of San BemanIino. A cost burdened household has less income
available for other needs such as food and clothing, as weD as discretionary purchases. In addition,
owner-occupied residents who are oVClpaying have less ability to pay for routine maintenance and
repaUs, thus accelerating the deterioration of the hoUSing stock.
.pfthe total households in San Bemardino, 36.6 percent were cost burdened. This included 49.S
.ercent of the renter households and 24.9 percent of the owner households. Clearly, housing
aft"ordability is a major problem within the City. ,
P:IFOIIMswOUS/NG FOIIMSICONsorJD.cTED Pl.AM2(J(J() CXJNSoJJruTED PLAN BEY 1.DOC
'1
~ _n __...______.__
Oly of San Bunard/no - Consolidated Plan - FY 2000-200$
..
Suitability of Existing Units for Special Needs Populations. As special needs populations become
a greater focus for cities around the nation, the ability to track their needs and develop targeted
programs for that population's improvement increases. From what the 1990 U.S. Census figures
show, it appears that some 1,782 low-income renter households and 677 low-income owner
households were experiencing some type of housing problem unrelated to being cost-burdened. This
could include units needing repairs, overcrowded units and units in need of alterations for
handicapped access. These problems are all reported as pertaining to households at or below 80
percentofarea median income. All 2,459 low-income households are likely eligible to participate in
one of the City-designed rehabilitation programs or rental assistance programs. Households
requiring physical improvements to their unit may improve their property for a low interest or
deferred loan available through one of the City's housing rehabilitation programs. The City of San
Bernardino makes every attempt to meet the needs of these groups through existing programs.
A great d~ of discussion was generated during the Consolidated Plan develop~ent process with the
public and various focus groups regarding the "suitability" of the City's housing stock. While many
persons indicated that a unit was "suitable" ifit was "affordable," a like number described the types
and design of units that would benefit certain populations. One group described a rental project with
a child-care facility/community room built into the complex as a suitable project for single-headed
households. Along with that design feature, the need for the rent to be affordable to persons on
TANF, which pays roughly 15 percent of area median income to a household, was another
stipulation. In an effort to move single-headed households up and out of this type of project, a job .
training component was also suggested as a requirement of residence in such a project. These were
all ideas the public brought to the City as being more suitable types of housing for particular needs
groups. It is important to note, while this and other projects were suggested, the recurring message
from all groups was that affordability of housing is the major impediment for the City's households.
Physically Disabled and Handicapped Households. Another group with special housing needs is
the physically disabled population. Correctly serving this population requires housing design
modifications and alternative solutions to housing accessibility. The City of San Bernardino makes
funding a~ilable for various low-income special needs populations to modify their units as
nccessuy to:cnable elderly and disabled persons to remain in their homes through City-sponsored
rehabilitation programs. According to 1990 U. S. Census disability information, there were 12,091
Pc;sons aged. 16 to 64 with a mobility or self-care limitation. This number includes all persons in
this age range also prevented from working. Also, there were 6,455 persons aged 65 or older with
mobility or self care limitations residing within the City. However, from this data, there is little
statistical ability to discem which of these self-disclosed disabled persons require access to
affordable housing or other supportive housing services. .
Cl~y, handicapped residents need wider doorways, ramps, elevators for multiple story units,
~odified ~binets, pl~ing, ~d lighting. These modifications are expensive and not usually found
molder umts. The City reqwres that all new units constructed with public. funds conform to the
accessibility requirement of the Uniform Building Code and the Americans with Disabilities Act of
1990 as modified in 1999. . :
f
I';~ F'OIWSICON$()UJrml'I.ANIZDIJOCON8OUDArml'UIN REl'UXJC
,%
City olSan Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-2005
.
Elderly Households. Households of elderly are a small portion of San Bernardino's total
households. In 1990, census figures showed 16,396 elderly households or 10.0 percent of the total
number of households. Of these, 73.5 percent owned their homes an!l26.5 percent rented them.
Elderly houseJiolds were more likely to own their home than the general San Bernardino population.
Elderly households were frequently on fixed incomes and may not have the resources or stamina to
repair their homes when problems arise. Elderly households clearly need access to programs that
win assist in clearing up deferred maintenance problems and which may augment limited funds for
required home repairs. It is expected that the elderly will constitute an even greater portion of the
population by the year 2005. Therefore, proven, successful programs which assist in providing
elderly residents with needed assistance should be well-crafted and operative in order to handle an
increasing caseload in coming years.
Cost burden is also a problem among the elderly, particularly for renters. Among the very low- '
income senior renters, 72.6 percent were paying more than 30 percent of their in~omes on housing.
Among the low-income senior renters, 55.0 percent were overpaying. For elderly homeowners, 55.8
percent of those with incomes under 30 percent of median and 27.9 percent of those with income
from 31 to SO percent of median were overpaying. Another 9.3 percent of the senior owners with
incomes in the 5 I to 80 percent range were overpaying.
Elderly household members are more likely to be disabled and require housing accessibility
modifications. They also need special security features and access to public transportation and
medical services. Therefore, any newly constructed elderly housing should be strategically lQcated
. so that access to these types offacilities is provided. .' ',' ','
Large FamWes. There is no shortage of housing with the appropriate number of bedrooms to house
large families. Projecting trends from the 1990 Census, there over 10,000 large families in the City.
Yet, there are over 25,000 dwelling units wi~:" three or more bedrooms that could accommodate
these families. The problem is affordability and availability, particularly for low-income large
families. There are not enough affordable rental units or single family homes that low-income large
families can afford, or a sufficient number oflow-cost single family homes in sound condition that
such families can afford to purchase. This suggests a need to increase subsidies for low-income
large families rather than the construction additional dwelling units. As of January 2000, the
Housing Authority had a waiting list of over 293 households that were see1cing rental assistance for
four- and five-bedroom units.
"
Of all large renter households, a total of 2,622 households or 28.8 percent of all large related
households, were paying more than 30 percent of the household's income for shelter. Of the low-
income renter households, some 1,502 very-low-income large households, or 16 percent ofalllarge
households, were paying more than SO percent of their income for monthly rent. Certainly, some
large related households are experiencing overcrowding if there are families with Section 8
certificates who cannot fmd units with an adequate number of bedrooms. There are a total of2,615
lower-income large family renter households that are cost-burdened and require rental assistance.
Clmently, 4061arge related households in San Bernardino receive Section 8 rental assistance.
Approximately IS percent of all large households requiring rental assistance are able to obtain this
~.
r
P:1FORJlSWOCISING FORMSICON$(}lJD.fTED I'UMlJIoo CONSolJrJATED I'LtIN RE,. J.Doc
8J
City of San Bernardino. Consolidated Plan. FY 2000-200'
Small Related Renter Households and Other Renter Households. Single parent headed
households are disproportionately represented among the poor throughout the United States. This is
reflected in San Bernardino's population as elsewhere. These households are likely to have special
needs for safe housing near day care and recreation facilities with access to public transportation.
Households with a female head are especially likely to need assistance because women continue to
earn less on average than men. In 1990, 9,063 San Bernardino households were headed by single
men or women representing 16.6 percent of the total households. All of these households include
children. Of these households, 5,721 or 22 percent of all renter 110useholds in the City were paying
more than 30 percent of their income for rent Those households supporting the greatest cost burden
were 3,258 small related and other renter households or 12.5 percent ofall renter households paying
50 percent or more of their income for shelter each month. While there appears to be an adequate
number of units for these populations in the bedroom type required for the household size, the cost
burden is substantial for a significant portion of the population.
Other Housing Problems Identified by AD Households. Cost burden is by far'the largest problem
facing the renter household population. Nearly 50 percent of all renter households were excessively
cost burdened; 27 percent reported severe cost burden. Owner households reported excess cost
burden in 2S percent of all owner households and severe cost burden in 8.8 percent of all owner
households.
.
Other housing problems are reported by 11 percent of all renter households and by 6 percent of all .
owner households. In all households, the precise problem - overcrowding versus unit inadequacy-
is not reported and difficult to ascertain. Further discussion on unit adequacy will be explored in.the
Five Year Strategy.
AffordabiUty and AvallabiUty ofPubllc Housing. As of January 1,2000, the Housing Authority
of the County of San Bernardino currently owns and manages 798 units and provides an additional
2,089 rental units in the City through the Section 8 program. The Authority currently bas 2,191
individuals on the City's rental housing waiting Iisl The average rent paid for these units ranges
from $190 for a one-bedroom unit to $370 for a five-be4room unit Public housing tenants pay 30
percent of .their household income towards rent, therefore public housing tenants are not cost
burdened. However, the large number of households on the waiting list indicates that there are not
enough unitS available to meet demand.
Impediments or Opportunities Created by the Muket
Many of the factors that tend to restrict housing supply cannot be controlled by local government,
especially those that relate to the regional, national and international economy. Various factors not
under the control oflocal government influence the cost, supply and distribution of housing. These
factors include land costs, construction costs, fmancing costs, and availability ofland and land use.
controls. .
l.IUul tuUI Construction Costs
San Bernardino is still a relatively affordable housing market with low land and development costs.
~ evaluation of housing construction costs undertaken since.the 1995 Consolidated Plan for the
(
I',_OUSINO I'ORMSICONSOlJDTED I'LANIZ/J(J(J CONSOUD.fTED I'UN /lEI' Z.DOC
u
.~
.
City o/San Bel7lardino - Consoiidoled Plan _ FY 2000-2005
.
City's Housing Element concluded that a homebuilder could construct a basic single family house
on a 7,000 square foot lot for $105,000 plus profit. With down payment assistance and/or below-
market-rate financing, many low- and most moderate-income households could afford to purchase
such a basic house. Typical prices for new home oriented to moderate- and middle-income
households are in the mid-$IOO,OOO range. ' Land costs are substantially lower than in neighboring
communities. and this contributes to the relative affordability of new housing.
The cost of construction is dependent Primarily on the cost of labor and materials. The relative
importance of each is a function of the complexity of the construction job and the desired quality of
the fInished product. The trend over the last severaI decades has been toward improved efficiency in
housing production, largely because the construction of housing usuaIly occurs through a bidding
process in which the most reasonable contractor bid is awarded the job. As a result, builders are
under constant Pressure to complete a job for as Iowa price as possible while still providing a
quality Product. This pressure has led (and is still leading) to an emphasis on labor-saving materials
and construction techniques. ,
However, the price paid for material and labor at anyone time will reflect short-term considerations
of supply and demand. In general, construction cost estimators generally expect material prices to
rise no more than five percent per year. Future costs are difficult to predict given the cyclical
fluctuations in demand and supply that are, in large part, created by fluctuations in the state and
national economies. It should be noted that the volatile nature of the lumber market can have a
significant impact on housing costs.
.For the average home, the cost ofIabor is generally two to three times the cost ofmateriats,'and
therefore represents a very important component of the total cost of construction. Most residential
construction in San Bernardino County is done with nonunion contractors, and as a result, labor
costs are responsive to changes in the residential'markeL The relative ease by which a skilled
tradesperson can get a contractots license further moderates the pressures that force labor costs to
rise. As of 1999, the average (:Ost for a single-family home, including pennits and other related
expenses. was approximately $105,000 for a 1,000 square foot unit on a 7,000 square foot lot or one-
sixth acre lot. However, the high vacancy rate in the City, increases the economic risk for new
developments and drives sale prices down due to high sales competition.
Laud Costs 8Ild AvaUabWty
The cost and availability of~d are other major impediment to production of affordable housing.
Land COsts are influenced by many variables. including land scarcity and development density (both
of which are indirectIy controlled through governmental land use regulations), location, unique
features, and the availability of public utilities as of July 1999, the City had approximately 3,449.84
acres of vacant single-family land and 1,963.96 acres of vacant single- and multi-family land. In
1993, the City had approximately 7,469 acres of vacant single-family land and 1,028 acres of vacant
multiple famDy 1and. Therefore, scarcity of land is not a major constraint in the City.
The cost of residential land in San Bernardino is not the impediment it was in the 1980's. Land costs
~ve deeliDed due to a decrease in d-Il''ld for real estate due to current land value conditions.
~rding to the City's Housing BJement, vacant single-family land in the Verdemont area of San
1':IFORMswOllSlNGFOIIJISICONsoUD.frm PLAMz/1DO CON.soull.crm I'UN /IEJ' 1.DOC
r
85
ClIy of&n Bernardino - Consolidaled Plan _ FY 2000-200$
Bernardino ranges from S50,OOO to S60,OOO per acre. This is the area of the City with the most
vacant residential land. 1999 prices for vacant single-family residential land zoned for minimum
lots currently average S30,OOO per acre or approximately $4,615 per 7,200 square feet ofland.
The ability to fulfill housing needs is greatly constrained by factors prevalent in the housing market.
Non-governmental factors inhibiting the availability of housing include hOUSing costs, land prices
and construction costs, fmancing costs, and consumer expectations.
Discussions with local housing developers reveals that construction and new housing costs are
relatively low because the City Primarily has an entry level or first move-up market, and therefore,
costly investments are not optimal because of the nature of the market. New housing costs range
between SI50,OOO to $160,000 for an average sized home, but costs for new homes can range
anYWhere)rom $110,000 to $180,000. New home prices are therefore very low. The primary
problem with the stagnant housing market stems from an FHA lending cap of approximately
SI74,OOO for loans in San Bernardino. This creates a restriction on the market because buyers,
particularly fist-time buyers are unable to get loans large enough for down payments on more
expensive homes. Because loan levels are held low, housing prices are also held low enough to be
marketable in the community. The County is experiencing influx from neighboring Los Angeles
and Orange Counties, which has increased home prices in some western portions of the County.
However, this growth has not yet reached the City to result in higher housing prices.
Land prices and construction costs also impact affordable housing development. According to local
real estate and development profeSSionals, raw land for single-family homes averages around
$30,000 per acre, without improvements. One Single-family parcel, 30 acres in size, was recently
for sale for $33,000 (Source: LoopNet, Inc. web site). Two multifamily parce~ one just ovez-three
acres and the other just under one acre were recently for sale for about SI36,OOOand SIIO,OOO per
acre. The higher priced multifamily parcel was zoned for 18 units per acre and the lower costparcel
R-2. By comparison, several industrial parcels recently for sale had asking prices of ranging from
S65,Ooo to SI31,OOO per acre, ilnd one retail commercial site with freeway access had an asking
price of$676,OOO per acre.
Improvements such as utilities, water, and sewage services among others is an additional $15,000 to
SI8,OOO periot (7,000 square feet to 15,000 square feet respectively). Development also results in
local fees such as school fees, fire district fees, and others, which cost SI8,OOO per housing unit.
Marketing..iS an additional S5,OOO per unit. Soft costs, such as architecture. engineering, and other
professional services averages $7,000 per unit. Other expenses, including administration and sales
averages S9,OOO per unit. Materials and labor range from $40 to $50 per square foot. Therefore, a
1,000 square foot unit would average around $45,000 in construction costs. The minimum cost ofa
1,000 square- foot site-built single family home on a 7,000 square foot lot would be about SI05,ooo
in land, construction, and related costs (Dave M1ynarskj, MAPCO, 1999), excluding the
homebuilder's profit. In addition, financing and interest rates fiutherconstrain the market. One and
a halfpercent financing and interest rates of9.75 percent are the average current rates for the City.
These rates are fairly low compared to previous years, and even in the past ten years when average
interest rates were between II percent and 12 percent. Dropping rates are likely in response to
market stagnation; however if an influx of population from Los Angeles and Orange Counties
re'l"hes the City and economic growth continues in the region, rates may rise along with housing
prices.
.
P:1FORJawOUS/NG FORMSICoNSOUDATED PLANuooo C'ONSOUD.cTED PLAN /lEY Z.DOC
86
.
.
,
.
.
-
.
"-
~.
L
~
L
r
City of San Bernardino - Consolldizted Plan. FY 2000-2005
.
FilUUlcing Com
Fmancing costs, for the most part, are not subject to local influence. The control of interest rates is
determined by national policies and economic conditions. Interest rates greatly influence the
housing market for home buyers through the rates charged on home mortgages. Rent is also
indirectly influenced by interest rates since most landlords borrow monc;y in order to purchase the
units and rental amounts are a reflection of the income needed for the landlord to recover their costs
and make a profit
The cost of borrowing money can present a constraint to both the producer and consumer of
housing. Higher interest rates increase the cost of doing business for land developers and
homebuilders. Higher interest rates also increase the consumer's cost ofborrowing money for home
loans. Tables 2S and 26 show how changes in interest rates affect borrowing costs, and impact the
finished cost per unit, of housing.
Table 2S shows that each I percentage point increase in the interest rate increases borrowing costs
by about 6 percent for a IS-year home loan, nearly 20 percent if the increase is from Seven to 10
percentage points. For a 30-year loan, each I percentage point increase, increases the monthly
payment nine to 10 percent, nearly 32 percent if the increase is from seven to 10 percentage points.
Even small increases home loan interest rates can substantially affect monthly housing costs and
reduce its affordability to low- and moderate-income households.
Many consumers mitigate the impact of rising interest rates by purchasing adjustable rate mortgages
. that typically begin with substantially lower introductory rates. Adjustable rate mortgages !Illow a
borrower's interest cost, and monthly payment, to rise or fall with market rates. In a rising interest
rate climate, adjustable rate mortgages can offer sub~tial short-term savings over a fixed-rate
loan. In a declining or highly volatile interest rate climate, adjustable rate mortgages can lead to
higher short-term costs.
"
.
Table 25
Impact of Interest Rates on Consumer Borrowing Costs on Monthly Payment
Loan Monthly Payment on a IS-Year Monthly Payment on a 30- Year
Amount Loan Loan .
7% 8% '9% 10% 7% 8% 9% 10%
$75,000 S674 $716 S762 S806 $499 SSSO S603 S658
S100,ooo S899 S9SS S1,Ol4 SI,074 S66S S733 S804 S877
5125,000 SI,I23 SI,193 51,268 SI.343 S832 S917 SI,OOS SI,097
5150,000 SI,348 51,432 SI,524 SI,612 S998 SI,IOO SI,206 SI,316
5175,000 SI,572 SI,671 SI,776 SI,881 SI,I64 SI,283 SI,407 SI,53S
$200,000 SI,797 51,909 S2,029 $2,149 SI,331 SI,467 SI,608 . SI,7SS
$225,000 $2,022 $2,148 $2,285 $2,418 SI,497SI,650 SI,809 SI,974
S250,000 , $2,247 I $2,387 I S2,537 I S2,687 I SI,663 I SI,833 I $2,010 I S2,193
- -IIBA
r
P:IFO/UiSWOUSING FOIIMSICONSOUlMTED I'UMzDOO COI.:VOuD.cTED PI.4N IlEI'UJOc
'7
An increase in borrowing costs affects the cost of providing rental housing in two ways: I)
construction costs rise (most residential development if fmanced, at least in part, through
construction loans), and 2) permanent borrowing costs increase.
Table 26 shows the impact of changes in loan rates on the monthly rent for a hypothetical apartment
project that is privately fmanced and that receives state and/of federal funds. In the examples in
Table 26, three per-unit project costs are assumed: I) a small apartment complex with minimal
amenities that costs $55,000 per unit to construct, 2) a medium quality apartment complex with
average amenities that COsts $65,000 per unit to construct, and a luxwy apartment complex that costs
$75,000 per unit to construct. In each case the properties include a mix of one- and two-bedroom
apartments. These examples assume that 75 percent of the project is financed at a commercial
lending rate for a term of 15 years.
City o/San Bernardino. Consolida/ed Plan _ FY 2000-200$
.
Table 26
Impact oC Interest Rates on Commercial Borrowing Cos~
(Expressed lIS the Monthly Lotl1l Cost Per Unit)
Per Unit Loan Monthly Loan Cost Per UDlt
Amount
8% 9% 10% 11%
. $41.000 S392 $416 $441 $466
$49.000 $468 $497 S527 S557
S56.ooo S535 S568 S602 S636
Soun:e: P_ HBA
.
A 3 percentage point increase in interest rates for permanent financing, from 8 percent to I I percent,
will increase the per unit borrowing cost by nearly 19 percent and the overaII per unit cost
(accounting for operation and maintenance expenses) by aboullO percent.
f
Local HousinR Marut
J
Local housing market conditions can represent both a constraint and an Opportunity to meeting
objectives for housing COnstruction and conservation. As documented previously, San Bernardino
has a high vacancy rate and a persistent glut of HUD-repossessed single family dwellings. In
additiOD, the City has a high rate of -absentee- ownership among single family homes that are
rentals. As a consequence, San Bernardino's large stock of affordable housing represents an
oPPOrtunity to allow lOW-income families to become homeowners and to attract middle-income
families to the City. Because many of these homes are in deteriorated condition Of not available fOf
sale, local housing marIcet conditions also create impediments to achieving these objectives.
...
Although the lOcal housing market shows signs of improvement, it is still affected by the aftermath
of the economic downturn of the early 1990s and the clOSUre of Norton Air Force Base. These
conditions have slOwed down some of the new homebuilding that City could have otherwise ..
expected, and have redUced oPPOrtunities for low-income families to become tirst-timehomebuyers.
The City has adopted a number of programs (see the Program Evaluation section) to make San
..
P:IF'OIIMSWOUSlNQ FORAlSlCONSOLID.41'ED Pl..CNIzflOO c:'ON.soL1D.41'ED PLAN REI' Z.IJOC
r
.irJ
B8
~j
~
,-' '.r'
City o/San Bernardino. Consolidated Plan _ FY 200o.200S
. Bernardino more attractive to a broader segment of the population (and the homebuilding industly)
and to make more homes available for purchase by lower-income households.
I A,lleofHousinllStock
The housing stock in the City of San Bernardino is relatively new when compared with the nation's
stock as a whole. This is generally true of South em California's housing stock as indUSt1y grew most
rapidly here in the post World War n era and even more significantly With the advent of service,
computer and telecommunications industries growing, and expanding many plants and offices in
CalifomiL The City of San Bernardino contains 12,705 housing units built prior to 1960,
comprising 22 percent of the total housing stock. These housing units are those most likely to be in
less than ideal condition since thirty years is a standard indication of when housing begins to need
repair and rehabilitation. Map 3 at the end of this section presents the historical development pattern
in the City of San Bernardino. This indicates the location of housing units by construction era.
I
I
b. Assisted Housinll Inventory
J. Public Housinll
The City of San Bernardino 'does not currently own any housing units. All public housing that is
located in the City is owned and managed by the Housing Authority of the County of San
_Bernardino. The Housing Authority of San Bernardino County was created in 1941 to provide "
~ffordable housing oPPOrtunities for very-low-income families of San Bernardino County. 'The
Housing Authority currently owns and manages 798 units (of which none are currently vacant) that
are located within the City of San Bernardino and provides an additional 2,089 rental units for low-
income families funded by the Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments Program,
The current philosophy of the Housing Authority is to build small clusters of units in order to allow
for a greater diversity of incomes within neighborhoods. These single family units, sized for larger
families, have been found to be more desirable to the families, the neighborhood, and the
comml1~ity.
Tenants in the Public Housing Program are required topayrent based on 30 percent of their adjusted
income. The difference between the tenant portion of the rent and the operating costs ofmaintainiT1g
the unit is paid by HUn in the form of an operating subsidy.
.
r
P:IF'OItNsIHOUSlNG FOlIMSIC:oNsoururm PUNIZoDo CONsoJ.m"rm PUNREI' J.DOC
89
City olSlln Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-2OQ5
TABLE 27
PlIBUC HOUSING ETHNIC POPllLAnON
CITY OF' SAN BERNARDINO, 1m
GROUP NUMBER PERCENT
Non-H' . White S 1%
Non- Hispanic Black 262 39%
Native American 4 1%
AsianlPacific Islander 97 14%
liispanic White 2S4 37%
flispanic Black S6 8%
TOTAL 678 100%
.. 1m
~
5
":
TABLE 28
... PUBLIC HOUSING SIZE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, 2000
NO, OF BEDROOMS NUMBER PERCENT
I Bedroom 138 17%
2 Bedroom 334 42%
3 Bedroom 232 29%
4 Bedroom 74 9%
SBedroom 20 3%
TOTAL 798 100%
_. SIII_ CGolaIJIIouIina_Iy,
- SIll IIcmonIiaa CGolaIJ IIouIina AldbariIf,lm
.
A review of records kept by the Housing Authority indicates a total allocation number of798, with
currently 2,191 households on the waiting list Currently, there are 23 vacant units, for a vacancy
late of3 percent The average rent ranged from $190 for a one-bedroom unit to $370 for a five-
bedroom unit A further break down of the current total participation (678 households) is shown in
the precen;I\g tables.
There are 215 C1derly households (32 percent of the total) participating currently in the Public
Housing Program. Additionally, 510 households (75 percent of the total) are headed by females and
174 (25 perceu,t) by males. No public housing units lire expected to be removed from the inventory
for any reason:
At a minimum, all public housing units are inspected annually and must comply with Housing
Quality Standards (HQS) or be brought into compliance. Therefore, all public housing units are in
h satisfactory condition.
I
2, Section 8
.
The Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments Program administered by the Housing Authority,
provides financial assistance to low-income families inclUding senior citizens, disabled and
handicapped individuals. The assistance is provided on a first-come, first-served basis, subject to
the availability of1Unds, Applications for the Program are accepted only during the open enrollment
periods. There are currently 2,191 City residents on the ~unty's Public Housing waiting list
.
1':IFORJlSWOUSlNQ FORMStaJNSolJDA'l!:D PL4N\1oDo CXJNso/JD,f'l!:D PLAN BEY ZJJOC
Ll
90
f1
l.oi
i .
.
Cily a/San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2oo0-200S
TABLE 2lI
SECTION 8 ETHNIC POPULATION
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, 1!193
GROUPING NUMBER PERCENT
NO~~White 391 19%
Non.' 'cBIack 1,047 SO%
AmeriClllllDdian 11 1%
Asiml 90 4%
Hi5llllDic White SS4 26%
Hispanjc Black 6 -
TOTAL 2,099 100%
Soun:e: SIIlIlenwd... eoun" IIouoloa "-"i. 1m
TABLE 30
SECTION 8 HOUSING SIZE
Cl'1Y OF SAN BERNARDINO, 1993
Number ofBcdrooms Participants Percent
Studio 46 2%
I Bedroom 363 1'1"/0
2Bcdroom 773 37%
3 Bedroom 694 33%
4 Bedroom 217 10%
SBedroom S :
-
6 Bedroom I -
TOTAL 2,099 . 100%
Soun:e: SIll........ c.o..., """"-i AuIhori".lm
The average rent in a Section 8 unit is $190 monthly Cor one-bedroom units, $227 monthly Cor two-
bedroom units, $278 monthly Cor three-bedroom units, $301 Cor Cour-bedroom units, and $370 Cor
five bedroom units (including utilities), further breakdown oC the recorded information of
participating households is shown in the Preceding tables.
A3 seen in the tables, above, there are 2,099 Section 8 households oCwhich 789 or 38 percent are
elderly households. AdditiOnally, oCthe total numberoCparticipating Section 8 households, 1,825 or
87 perCent are headed by women. and 274 (13 percent) have male heads oChousehold. At this time
no units are expected to be removed from the inventory Cor any reason.
3. Other
.
The City of San Bernardino has traditionally been aggressive in utilizing any and all types oC
resources to fund a wide variety oChousingprojects. A breakdown oCthese projects by housing type
follows.
L Low- to Moderate-Income Housing Fund (20 Percent set-aside) The City has pro-activeiy
. used the RcdevelopmentAgencys low- and moderate-income housing fund, to assist single-
r
P:IFDRI4woClSJNO FOIIMSICoNSOlJJJ.4TED PUNI10txJ CONSOlJJJ.4TED PLAN BEY z.ooc
91
family, senior housing, and multiple family housing development generated from 20 percent
of the revenues received from redevelopment activity.
City of San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000.2005
Single-Family. Under this Progrllln. construction of new homes ranging from 1,200 to 1,800
square feet has been funded. A minimum of20 percent of the homes within each project,
however, must be "affordable" to buyers whose total annual household median income does
not exceed 120 percent of the published annual household income limits. These homes must
then remain designated as "affordable" for no less than ten Years. New construction housing
projects include the following number of homes.
.
.
Osborne Collection at Northpark
Osborne Collection, Phase U
Emblem Development
Project Home Run
.. Falcon Ridge
Young Homes
Arrow Vista
Habitat for Humanity
Yeoman and Associates
Park Place Homes
Pacific Star Development
TOTAL
45 units
72 units
59 units
7 units
16 units
36 units
50 units
I unit
36 units
77 units
10 units
Senior HOUSing. In resPOnse to an identified conununity housing "need", the City utilized the 20
percent Set-Aside Fund to develop three senior citizen oriented housing complexes. One project
was constructed in Partnership with the Housing Authority of San Bernardino, which provides a
leverage to the City funds of 50 percent. The remllinil\g two projects Were built Cooperatively
with local non-profit organizations. These projects are: .
409 units
.
...:..t,',..
:.. Ramona Senior Housing Complex
.:::, Highland Lutheran Senior Project
'. : Arrowhead Woods
TOTAL
. 44 units
50 units
51 units
2. Tu Exempt MultiCalDlly Bond Ymanclng. Since 1980, this program has been used to assist
with the financing of mortgages in the construction of multiple family units. To participate in
this progrun, 20 percent of the total units constructed must be made available to low and
moderate-income families, who will not pay more than 30 percent of their gross family
household income towards rent.
145 units
'-
..
-.
1':1FOIIIawollSlNG FOilJaIcoNsoUDA'lED PlAM2000 coN3Or.lDA'lED PUN REI' Z.DOC
,
L
92
.
;
..
.
~
City olSon B_martiino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200$
Multi-Family. Five multiple family projects have been financed through this program:
Shadow Ridge Apartments
Creekside Village Apartments
University Park Apartments
Royal Palms Apartments
Castle Park Apartments
TOTAL
Total Units
328
304
540
216
508
1,896
Low-income Units
49
61
89
42
lll.
352
As a result of the construction of these projects, as well as privately financed new apartment units,
the City now has an over-supply of multiple family units.
3. Other. The City of San Bernardino had some Section 202 housing projects.. Staffis not aware
of any housing projects assisted through the Section 811, Section 221 (d)(3) or Section 236
programs.
4. Assisted housing projects in the City can alleviate the financial hardships lOw-income
households may face. Assisted housing projects are those that offer financial aid or provide
extra services for people in need of financial or basic living assistance. There are a variety of
programs, each focusing on a specific need or with a specific goal to eliminate unmet housing
needs in the community. .
.
. I'..
The California Housing Finance Agency has three listings for State assisted housing projects in
San Bernardino (Abe Tsadik, California Housing Finance Agency,pers. comm. 1999). One
project, DoJjiI Estates is owned by CHFA and ~ere(ore docs not have contract expiration dates.
The second project, Victoria Woods, is a non-Section 8 non-Section 202 scniorcomplex thathas
only received a loan ftom CHF A, and therefore, does not have an expiration date. These
projects are based on SO percent of the median income and are therefore, directed toward very
low-income households. The third project is Little Zion Manor, which operates low-income
family and senior units. The Section 8 contract for Little Zion Manor is due to expire in 2021.
Under Section 8 assistance, eligible tenants pay 30 percent of their income for rent, and the
difference bctwccn the tenant's contribution and the actual rent is paid by HUD through
operating subsidies to owners. Assistance is tied to the project and rent is subsidized only as
long as the tenant occupies the unit.
HUD's November 1999 rental listings for the City lists IS assisted multi-family housing
complexes. Ofthcsc IS complexes, seven offer elderly units for a total of841 desigl'Ated elderly
units. Thirteen of the complexes listed by HUD are Section 8 assisted complexes. offering a
total of 1,181 units. All of the assisted housing projects listed by HUn had no vacancies as of
November. Of the fifteen projects, the terms of afl'ordability on ten have expired, and the
owners are free to charge whatever rent they desire. Of the five remaining projects with active
affordability agreements, three are at-risk of conversion to market rate housing between 2000
and 2010, representing 218 very low-income units. Of these units, 188 are owned and operated
by non-profit olpni7Jltions that are unlikcly to convert the rentals to market-rate housing.
Nevertheless. the potential exists.
.
,
l':lFORNSIHoUSINri FOIIMSICONSOUlMTED PUNI2000 CX1NSOl.IlMTED PLAN /lEY 1.DOC
93
City ofStm Bemardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-2OOS
With regard to Section 8 projects, the property owner can opt to tenninate the Section 8 contract
(opt-out), or renew the contract for another five years. The primary incentive for Section 8
property owners to opt-out is the higher rent that would be paid for these units at market value.
In order for the property owner to successfulIy opt-out of the Section 8 contract, the owner must
satisfy certain Procedural requirements. A Notice of Intent (NOI) must be filed with HUn one
year before the tennination date that indicates the owner's intent to convert the units to market
rate. Failure to file an NOI within the specified timeframe, or folIow the other procedures to
opt-out of the Section 8 contract, results in an automatic contract rolI-over for five years.
Upon filing of an NOI, HUD may offer several incentives to property owners to remain in their
contracts including re-financing the property mortgage, and establishing higberrents charged for
the projects.
Pursuant to Section 65863.10 of the Government Code, the property owner ofa Section 8
contract must also provide six months advanced notification to each tenant household if the
property owner intends to tenninate the Section 8 contract The notice must indicate the
anticipated date of conversion and the anticipated rent increase. The property owner is also
required to serve notice to the City.
Table 31
IlUD-Asslsted MultlCamDy Houl~ . Seetloo 8 Coottactl
Name Owoer Type Explratloo RIsk Assellmeot Seetloo 8 Total
Date Volts Volts
Arrowhead Vista Apls Non-Profit 03/25105 Low Risk-Restricted or NP 40 40
Little Zion Manor - 06130121 . Post-2005 Expiratioo 125 125
SL Bernardine Plaza Non-Profit 03122101 . Low Risk-Restricted or NP 148 150
Sterling Village - 04128113 Post-2005 Expiration 80 80
Greenbriar at the Park Profit Motivated 12109105 losu1J'icient Data 30 160
u.s..o.p....,~...u.e...Dri '. -I~""""-"'C. .
c. Inventory of Facilities and Services for the Homeless and Persons Threatened with
.... Homelessness
The range of estimates of the homeless population have not changed significantly since 1995. The
composition of the homeless population has shifted, however, with more individuals affected by
ilIness and substance abuse and a decline in the proportion of homeless famiIies affected by
temponuy fmancial hardship due to unemployment
The City of San Bernardino has a broad range of services and facilities to assist the homeless.
However, efforts have now begun to evaluate the depth of these services and the objectives of
various components of the services provided. While ~ City would like to assist all homeless
persons, there is reCOgnition that approximately 10 percent to 30 percent of this group have
withdrawn fi'om society and may no longer seek assistance. The City views facilities and services
for the homeless as individual components of an integrated system, whose primary goal is not only
,
P:IFOIIMS\HOUS/NG FOIWSIC()NSOUIJATED PLIIM2DOO CONsolJDdTED PUN BEY 1.DOC
94
.
.
.
t.
.
~
City o/San Bernardino. Consolida/ed Plan _ FY 2000-2005
.
respond to individual basic needs but also to provide progressive stages of assistance which will
enable homeless persons to move from a dependant to an independent lifestyle.
The three components identified by the City are:
· This component identifies those renters and homeowners who have realized a substantial loss or
reduction in,income that has placed them in the status of eminent homelessness;
· This component includes all persons who no longer have a stable or reliable residence; and
· This component represents fonnedy homeless or at risk persons who have transitioned from
homelessness back into society and have become self sufficient and independent This status
represents the goal of the program, a person who has stabilized and no longer requires
assistance.
.
TABLE 32
FACILITIEs AND SERVICES FOR THE HOMELEsS AND mOSE AT RISK OF
HOMELEsSNESS
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
~oCFa~ Number oCFacllllles
Soup Kitcben 1\
Drojl-in Kitchen 2
Em Sbelter S
T SbelterlHousing 2
TllIIISitional Housing 1\9
Permanent Housi!!iJor Persons with Disabilities. 80
· The figure noted represents the number oChouseholds to be assisted annually through the Slate Aften:are
program, IdminiSlered by the County Housing Authority.
"
Tempol'tllJ' / Transitional Housing. AJS seen in the table above, the current focus for assistance is
on the needs of the homeless through counseling and life-skills hOUSing, programs that teach the
homllless, particularly those with alcohol/drug dependencies or those escaping dangerous
environments, how to survive on their own without public assistance. There are approximately 512
emergency shelter, and temporary/transitional housing beds available in the City for the homeless,
mentally ill, victims of domestic violence, unwed mothers, and those with drug and alcohol
dependencies. Approximately 54 of these beds are not currently available, but have been given
authorization to be constructed or made available within three years. According to the City's last
Quarterly Report on Homelessness (June 1992) there were a total of 286 beds available for
emergency shelter (3 to 7 days). The number of beds available today is 266. This total includes 52
beds for families left homeless due to domestic violence. The City assists the following shelters
through allocations of Community Development Block Grant funding and the Emergency Shelter
Grant Program:
~
TABLE 33
CDBGlESG Fundlae
I
r
P:IFORM$WOllSlNG FOIWS\CONSOUDA'lEDPUN\21)(J(J CONSOUDA'lEDPUN REY2.DOC
9S
City olSan Bernardino - Consolidated Plan. FY 2000-200S
.
Salvation Army Sheltcc
87 beds (There is also capacity for 26 in their
transitional housin units
31 beds
Option House
House of Ruth
21 beds (There are also 3 transitional housing units)
Frazee Community Center
TOTAL NUMBER OF BEDS
77 beds
216 beds
In addition, the County Department of Mental Health contracts for 3S emergency beds within the
City. The City bas 34 transitional beds with attentl'lnt case management services. It should be noted
that the defmition and source of funding for food and lodging vouchers is not uniform throughout
the provider community, and therefore these numbers must be considered approximate.
EmD1fency Shelter Gl'tUlt Progrtlm, These Federal funds arc allocated to local providers to assist
homeless individuals and families with support services, shelter and homeless prevention programs.
Homeless Shelter Umltles Payment Program. This Program has provided local funds and now
provides ESG funds to homeless Shelters to cover facility operating costs, including electricity, gas
and water.
Victims of Domestic Violence Program. The City is currently allocating Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) funds to provide victims of domestic violence with shelter and services and to
. assist other emergency providers of this service. ,'" l' '
Other. The City is currently using CDBG monies to fund several public services that have a
component to assist the homeless.
"
ortive Housin or Non-Homeless Persons with Si oial Needs
In addition to those services detailed above, there arc several agencies in San Bernardino that
provide services to non-homeless persons with special needs.
Elderly and Frail Elderly. There arc 26 facilities in the City ofSanBcmardino that provide housing
for the elderly. These residential facilities can house from 3 to 240 persons and have a total caJI!ICity
of64S persons.
Persons with Physical and Mental Disabilities. The Awareness for Community Development
Organi7'1tion (ACDO) provides a 1WI service room and board facility for the mentally ill. The San
Bernardino County Department of Mental Health provides ~ and referral, case manllgement
and counseling and vocational services for the mentally ill. The San Bernardino Mental Health
Association operates a day center that provides a variety of services inclUding a sociali7.Ation
program, independent skills, academic skills,job filJtlil18 and others. In addition, there arc 19 homes
for the mentally disabled and 29 homes for developmenta1ly disabled non-scnior adults and 1 home
.lor dCVClopmcnta1ly disabled children located in the City of San BCmardino. These homes can
~mmodate from 1 to IS persons, with a total capacity of386'persons.
- ,
P:IFORMSwOUSINa FOIlMSICONSOlJJu.TED PUNIlooo CON.roLiAfTED PUN /lEY UXJc
96
City a/San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-2005
!
Alcohol and Drug Abuse. Casa de Ayuda provides long-tenn residential drug treatment to women
ages 18-65. Casa de San Bernardino provides oUlpatient treatment for drug and alcohol addiction as
well as outreach programs and substance abuse counseling for children. New House, Inc., provides
a residential alcohol recovery program for men and Women based Upon the 12-Step Alcoholics
Anonymous guidelines. Central City Lutheran Mission operates a transitional house for people
suffering from substance abuse. Victory Outreach operates rehabilitation homes. for men and
women. Other organizations located in San Bernardino which address alcohol and drug abuse issues
are the Alana Social Club, the Salvation Anny, Mothers Against Drunk Driving and the San
Bernardino County Alcohol and Drug Abuse Program.
.
~
.
~
,
AIDSIH/Y. The San Bernardino County Public Health DePartment currently provides AIDS
infonnation and testing. The In1and AIDS Project, Catholic Charities, and American Red Cross also
provide infonnation, advocacy, and referral services. Central City Lutheran Mission operates a
transitional house for people who are H1V positive and plans to designate seveD more homes under
this program.
3. Available Resources
I
This section of the Housing and Market Analysis describes all available resources for housing and
non-housing (i.e., public facilities and improvements, disposition of property, privately owned .
utilities, clearance, public services, interim assistance, relocation, loss of rental income, removal of
architectural barriers, commercial rehabilitation etc.) Federal Programs, Non-Federal Public
Programs (state and local), and Private resources (for-profit and non-profit). There is a short
description of each program resource.
Given recent developments at the Federal and State levels in the authorization and funding of
housing programs, it is difficult, if not iml'ossible, to project what public resources will be available
over the next five years. Budget constraintS at all levels ofgovemmenthave further complicated the
"resources" question.
a. Federal Profi!1Ylms
The Federal government has a number of programs that are available for use in San Bernardino.
These programs may be used for acquisition, rehabilitation, homebuyer assistance, rental assistance.
new construction, homeless assistance, homeless prevention and non-housing activities. The
programs available under each of these categories are discussed below.
HOME Program. The HOME Program is a flexible grant program which provides fonnula and
competitive grants to participating jurisdictions (PIs) and community housing development
Organi~tions (CHDOs) allowing these entities to detennine, within program regu1ations, the best
use of these funds. All HOME funds are to assist households at 80 percent of area median income
and below. These funds may be USed to acquire vacant land or existing structures foratrordableand .
supportive housing activities and provide first-time homebuyers assistance and rental assistance. It is
ODe of the ~ sources offederal housing funds available to the City. However, there are many
regulatory l'eqWl'ements attached to proper use of these funds, which may impede expeditious i..
r
I':IFDIIMS!HOUSING F'OIIMSICoNSOUlM.TED PUNl2000 CONsouD.tTED I'IAN lIEI' 2.DOC
"
~
i
..
City olSon Bernardino. Consolidated Plan. FY 2000-2005
.
project implementation in some instances. For instance, with acquisition and new construction
activities, a 30 percent nOn-federal match is required. The City plans to use HOME funds to provide
acquisition, rehabilitation, and first-time homebuyer programs.
Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program. The CDBG Program is the largest"
federal formula grant allocation program that targets funds for the benefit of low and moderate-
income persons, the eradication of slum and blight and for urgent revita1ization/economic
development needs within the City. These funds may be used for acquisition of vacant land or
existing structures to provide community facilities, housing or economic development-re1ated
improvements throughout San Bernardino. These funds have been used for nearly many years in the
City and have provided a wide range of benefits regarding affordable housing and supportive
services to populations in greatest need. San Bernardino intends to continue to use CDBG funds for
capital improvement activities, improvement of existing neighborhoods, economic development, and
abatement of blight.
Community Development Block Grant Section 108 Loan Guarantees. The Section 108 Pro~
allows San Bernardino to use their CDBG funds to guarantee loans/notes for development projects.
This program is a subset of the CDBG entitlement program discussed above. Real property
acquisition may occur and CDBG rules apply. The City pledges CllII'Cllt and future CDBG funds as-
principal security fotthe loan guarantee. The City has provided Section I 08 loans for the West Side
Plaza Shopping Center and the Harris Department Store acquisition. In addition, an ED! grant is
being used to supplement the Section 108 loan.
· L<u4_h"~~ nw.___......_......,q;.;;...
effective community lead-based paint abatement strategies. The funds awarded may be used for
rehabilitation, planning and program operating costs. 'Awards are based On a five-point rating
system. Criteria are strategy, capacity, readiness, resources that will be committed, and the local
comm1lnity. Award funds must be matched by other sources. States and local governments with
populations of more than 50,000 are eligible
,
Supportive Housing Program. This is a competitive grant program to which the.City, non-profits
aud community mental health associations may apply for funds to promote the development of
supportive housing and services. Grants are made for operating costs up to 75 percent for the first
two years aud 50 Percent for the next three years. Recipients must match funds requested for
acquisition and rehabilitation activities with an equal amount from othernon-federal sources. (This
program was created by the Housing and Community Development Act of 1992 and replaces the
Shelter Plus Care, Supplemental Assistance for. facilities to assist the homeless, Safe Havens
Demonstration Programs, Supportive Housing Demonstration Program, the TransitiOnal Housing
Demonstration Program and the Permanent Housing Handicapped Homeless Program.) This
program has a substantial amount of funding available. Supplemental assistance for facilities to
assist the homeless, is dependent on availability. "
apOPE 3 (Homeownership OpportunltJesfor People Everywhere) Program." The HOPE 3 Program
WProvides a city, in conjunction with a non-profit applicant, financial assistance for first-time,low-
,
P:IF'ORJ.awOUS/NG FOI/MS1CONsoUDATED PUNIZ(J()() CONsolJ/J.(TED PUN IlEY l.DOC
"
City o/San Bernardino - eonsolldoJed Plan _ FY 200D-200S
income homebuyers through an annual competitive grant process. Program Planning and
Implementation Grants have been available in the past A city and non-profit compete for awards in
regional pools. The maximum grant amount is S3 million for implementation grants and SI 00,000
for planning grants. Acquisition is an eligible activity when rehabilitation of the structure will
occur. The City may only participate in the competition if applying with a non-profit entity.
However, if the city has a known pocket of available properties and a capable non-profit paitner, an
implementation grant award would quickly and visibly impact a targeted neighbomood.
Section B Moderate Rehabllltation Program for Single Room Occupancy. These federal funds
provide rental assistance on behalf of homeless individuals in connection with the moderate
rehabilitation of SRO dwellings. Public Housing Authorities (pHA's) and private non-profit
organizations may apply for these funds. Resources to fund the cost of rehabilitating the dwellings
must be from other sources. These funds can be used for monthly rental assistance, operating
expenses and debt service for the rehabilitation financing. Units must need a minimum ofS3,ooo in
eligible rehabilitation to qualify. The funds available annually for this program average SIOO
mil1ion. The average award is S350,OOO.
.'
Section B Rental CertiJIcates Program. PHA's adminill~ring this program provide rental assistance
payments to private owners who lease their units to eligible very low-income families. A PHA may
choose to use IS percent of this rental assistance to implement a project-based certificate program.
This means that assistance is based on the unit in which a tenant resides. The rental assistance stays
with the unit should the tenant decide to move to a different unit Once a household enters a unit .
with this assistance or obtains this certificate assistance, they may receive this assistance for up to IS
years if their household's very low-income status does not change. San Bernardino plans to aSsist
2,089 units annually through Section 8 Rental Certificates. .
Section B Rental Voucher Program. PHA's administering this program provide rental assistance
payments to private owners who lease their units to eligJ.ole very-low-income families. This renta1
assistance is tenant-based assistance rather than Project-based. This means that a tenant may take
their assistance and rent any unit within the City which meets Section 8 housing quality standards
and meets that household's family size requirements. The tenant must pay 30 percent of their
household inCOme; the PHA pays for the difference between the tenant's payment and the unit's fair
market rent10 the landlord. If the tenant wishes to move to a different unit, the renta1 assistance
goes with the tenant to their next location; the renta1 assistance does not remain with the unit Once
a household obtains this voucher assistance, they may receive this assistance for up to IS years if
their household's very-low-income status does not change. The City of San Bernardino plans to
assist ISO families per year with Section 8 Rental Vouchers.
Supportive Housing/or the Elderly (Section 202) Program. In order receive a Section 202 aWard,
the City would apply for a Section 202 reservation to the Los Angeles HUn Field Office in response
to the Department's published invitation. A private, non-profit or consumer cooperative may apply
(not a city). Project rental assistance covers only the difference between the HUD-approved cost per
unit ~d the ~ount the resident pays (30 percent of their inC9me). Capital advances can be .. .
proVIded to pnvate, non-profit applicants to fmance elderly housing that also offers supportive
services. The non-interest bearing advances are based on development cost limits published
..
r
...
P:IF'D1IIaWOUSING FORAaICONS01JA47'ED PUNI2IJ()(J CONSourJ.t.7'ED PLANREI' Z.DOC
"
r
t
.
.
';~' ",; "~;l/l'\""\' .,
J ", ,"',~ ,.
"',!;,
City of San Bernardino - Consolidated Pia" _ FY 2000-200S
periodically in the Federal Register. Advances may be used for acquisition ofvacant land or an
existing structure for elderly housing.
Emergency Shelter Grilllls Program. These grants improve the quality of existing emergency
shelters and increase the number of developing shelters for the homeless. Program funds are
awarded to fonnula grantee cities in proportion to their previous year's CDBG allocation. San
Bernardino may distribute part of all funds to non-profit subrecipients to cany out these activities.
Funds can be used for renovation, conversion of buildings, rehabilitation, essential social services
and operating costs, but not staff payroll The average annual grant to a formula city is $190,000.
The City of San Bernardino expects an allocation of $138,000 to assist in providing emergency
shelter and supportive services to approximately 3,000 homeless persons.
Surplus Housing for Use to Assist the Homeless. In this program. rent-free, suitable Federal
properties are leased to homeless organizations. These organizations must pay operating and any
rehabilitation and/or renovation costs. Homeless organizations are the only entities eligible for this
assistance. HUD publishes a weekly notice in the Federal Register of property determinations and
availability. Homeless Orgllni""tions notify the Department ofHealth and Human Services (HHS) of
the intention to apply for a property within 60 days of the Federal Register notice. Applicants have
90 days after an expression of interest to submit an application. Notification ofaward oflease is
within 2S days. A homeless organization based in San Bernardino recently applied to the Federal
government to use a portion of the facilities being vacated by Norton Air Force Base. At this time
this organi7-lltion has been approved.
Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS Program (HOPW.4). There are two ~ .of
graDt&-entitlement and competitivo-for housing assistance and supportive services for low.
income persons with AIDS or related diseases and their families. Funds may be used for acquisition
activities. The City of San Bernardino is part of the HOPW A Riverside/San Bernardino County
consortium fonned to receive a fonnula allocation annually to provide shelter, health, rental and
food services to persons with AIDS.
I
I
b. Non-Federal Public ProJUantS
J. State ProJUams.
There are two State agencies which provide resources which can help the City properly fund
affordable housing programs, the California Housing Finance AgenCy (CHF A) and the California
Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD).
The CHF A provides debt financing for rental and homeowner housing. Most ofCHF A's financing
is provided by the issuance of tax-exempt bonds. These bond issuances are not typically designed
solely for low-income households. However, made with bond proceeds, loans are subject to the
federil and state requirement that at least 20 percent of the units be rented to very low-income
~ersons or 40 percent of the units be rented to persons with incomes below 60 percent of median
. mcome.
r
P:IFORJIswO/JSJNG FORMSICoNSOlJ1MTEDPUNI1DODCONsolJIuTEDPUN U"UJOC
100
CII)' o/San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan - FY 2000-200S
Mortgage Credit Certificates. The State offers mortgage credit certificates through an annual
application process which provides a federal tax credit for moderate-income homebuyers who have
not owned a home in the past three years. CHF A financing for rental housing often can be combined
with the Federal low-income tax credits (which arc allocated by the State) in order to help facilitate
the development of projects that can benefit low-income renter households. Financing assistance to
low and moderate-income homeowners can also be provided by CHF A.
The other State agency, the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), fOCUSes
less upon debt financing and more upon the subsidy requirements necessary for the promotion of
low and moderate-income housing. The particular programs available from HCD tend to change
over time depending upon the needs within the State and the voter passed propositions that have
been approved. The City will continue to assess whether any of the HCD programs and resources
can be effectively utilized over the next five years to supplement federal and local resources.
Programs-ctirrently operated by HCD (as of 1999) with state funds include:
MllltlfamUy Housing Program (MHP). This program assist the new construction, rehabilitation
and preservation ofpcrmanent and transitional rental housing for lower income households through
deferred payment loans of at least SS years. Eligible costs include the cost of child care, after-school
care and social service facilities integrally linked to the assisted housing units; real property
acquisition; refmancing to retain affordable rents; necessary onsite and offsite improvements; .
reasonable fees and consulting costs; and capitalized reserves. Local public entities, for-profit and
nonprofit corporations, limited equity housing cooperatives, Indian reservations and rancherias, and
limited partnerships in which an eligible applicant or an affiliate of the applicant is a generBl partner.
.
UrINm Predevelopment Loan Program. This program provides funds to pay the initial costs of
preserving existing affordable housing developments for their existing tenants. Priority will be
given to applications with matching financing from local redevelopment agencies or federal
programs. Eligible program costs include capital assessments to establish a project's condition and
potential rehabilitation costs; purchase option agreements; professional services such as consultant,
architect, engineering and legal; permit and application fees; bonding fees; etc. Eligible applicants
include Local government agencies, nonprofit corporations, cooperative housing corporations, and
limited ~erships where all general partners arc nonprofit mutual or public benefit corporations.
Emergency Housing Assistllnce Program. This program funds emergency shelters and services for
homeless individuals and families. Each county receives a grant allocation. Eligl'ble activities
include Rehabilitation, renovation, expansion of existing facilities, site acquisition (including lease
or purchase of existing facilities), equipment purchase, vouchers, operational costs, direct and
indirect client services, and administration of the award (limited to S percent). Eligl'ble applicants
arc local government agencies and nonprofit corporations that shelter the homeless on an emergency
basis, and provide support services.
Mobllehome Pllrk Resident Ownership Program. This program provides loans forthe preservation .
of ~ordable ~ob!lchome parks by conversion from private ownership to ownership or control by
resident orglUllZations, nonprofit housing sponsors, or local public agencies. Eligible activities
iDclnil.. Purchase ofa mobilehome parle by a resident organization, nonprofit entity or local public
r
I':l1'Dlu.DNlOUSING i'ORMSICoNSOUDATEDPI.AN\1(J(J(JCION8OuD.fTEDPUN REI' 1.DOC
lOl!
;'W~(ir~"f4.i"'"., '. \..~,~.Y!"~~~~ri:1\l""
CityoJ;San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan - FY 2000-2005
.
agency; purchase by a low income resident of a share or s~ace in a par~ convert~ to ~ident
ownership or ownership by a nonprofit sponsor or a local ~ublic agency. EligIble applicants mcl~de
mobUehome park resident organIzations, nonprofit housmg sponsors, local government agencies,
and low-income residents of converted paries.
Californltz Low Income Housing Tax CredJt Program. The State ofCalifonria maintains a Low-
income Housing Tax Credit program which is similar to the Federal program. The City will
encourage private and non-profit developers to tUlly use this resource in the future.
2. Local ProJl1'an&S
Redevelopment Set-Aside Funds. Twenty percent of all redevelopment project funds generated in
the City are made available for housing in the City of San Bernardino. These funds are flexible and
provIde the City with an ideal source of match for federal programs requIring such. The
redevelopment funds come from tax increments collected annually from designated redevelopment
areas. Twenty percent of these funds are "set-aside" specifically for housing activIties.
Redevelopment funds have been used in the past year (1999) to assist over ISO single family units,
minor repair program, rehabilitation of existing single family housing and mortgage assistance. etc.
As dIscussed above, these local funds are used for many various activities in the City. The
rehabilitation of housing units to improve neighborhoods throughout the City is one of the. main
strategies the City employs in its Plan. Loans and grants are made with these funds to eligible
homeowners and investor-owners to improve owner-occupied and rental units in designated "foCUS"
neighborhoods throughout the City. The City is currently using HOME funds and 20 percent set-
aside funds. These programs include the Housing Rehabilitation Home Improvement Program, the
Infill Housing Program, the AcquisitionlRehabilitationlResa1e Program, and other programs for
housing repairs on single fanUly homes owned by senIors, minor repairs on single family homes. and
mobUebome repairs. The programs help maintain the housing stock and character of neighborhoods
by helping residents maintain their dwellings through repairs such as exterior paint, exterior
improvements and others. These programs apply to both single-family and multi-family housing.
The City also contributes to "image" enhancement programs through City-wideGratliti Removal
and neighborhood clean up in selected "focus" neighborhoods such the Neighborhood Improvement
Programs in Arden Guthrie. The "focus" neighborhood program concentrates programs, projects,
activIties and resources within a target area and utilizes interdepartmental cooperation and
networldng with social servIce provIders and neighborhood residents to change the economIcs of the
"focus. neighborhood so that it requires only nonnal City serviceS.
Homebuyer Assistance A.ctivities. The City is currently using 20 percent set-aside funds for
programs to assist low-income first time homebuyers. The City has also implements a first time
homebuyer program which provIdes down payment and closing cost assistance to low- and
m~income flISt time homebuyers. Finally, the City is provIding funds to a non-profit entity
(Netghborhood Housing ServIces of the Inland Empire, Inc.) that provIdes financial counseling and
. support services to low-income households embarking on the purchase of a home (Homebuyer
Education Program). . .
.
,
P:IFORIIsWOCISING FOlIMSICONsoLllNlTED PUMlooO CfJNSOuDATED PUN IIEY 2.DOC
.101
City of San Bet7llJrdlno . Consollda/ed Plan. FY 2000-200S
Rental Assistance Activities. Twenty percent set-aside funds are also used to provide rental .
assistance to very low and low-income households through the Rental Assistance Program.
New Construction Activities. San Bernardino uses 20 percent set-aside housing redevelopment
monies to acquire land and finance the development and construction of high quality new housing.
These projects include single family detached housing.
I
I
J. For-Profit
I
I
c. Private Resources
The City or San Bernardino will encourage private lenders to provide either interest-subsidized or
low interest loans so that willing developers can provide infill housing in redevelopable areas.
Investor-owners of multifamily housing units contribute a substantial portion of funding used to
rehabilitate these units.
2. Non-profit.
Non-profit organi7J1uons receive tax deductible contributions, grants, and nominal user fees for their
on-going affordable housing and supportive services activities. In addition, as noted earlier, the non-
profit organization Neighborhood Housing Services is active in San Bernardino in assisting low~ .
income families with home improvement loans, grants, homebuyer education, and home ownership.
.8ssistance.
I
I
A. INTRODUCTION
I
I
VI. STRATEGIC PLAN
In the Housing and Market Analysis section of this Consolidated Plan, pertinent characteristics of
the City and its residents were described and the City's primary housing needs and non-housing
needs were identified.
As a part of the Federal application process for the CnBO and HOME Programs, the City of San
Bernardino is required to produce a single; five year, strategic plan that brings needs and ~urces
together in a coordinated housing and community development strategy. The strategy must be
developed to achieve the following statutory goals, principally for low-, very low-, and extremely
low-income residents:
· provide decent housing,
· create suitable living environments, and
. "'Cp"ntf economic opportunities
.
In compliance with federal regulations, the City's five year Strategic Plan has been developed in
accordance with the following statutory goals: ,
1':IFOlIJISWOIJSING F'Ol1JlSI(X)NS()UlJATED I'UNo1OOO COIISOLIIMTED PUN REV:J.DOC
103 I
f-. ,', ,;.. ~'< ,...f.....,;.,~,':...: ..
City olSan Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200$
.
Elimination of slums and blight, elimination of conditions that are detrimental to
health, safety and public welfare, conservation and expansion of the nation's housing
stock, expansion and improvement of the quantity and quality of community
services, better utilization of land and other natural resources, reduction of the
isolation of income groups within communities and geographical areas, restoration
and preservation of properties of special value, alleviation of physical and economic
distress, and conservation of the nation's scarce energy resources.
The mission of the City of San Bernardino is "To actively maintain, improve and develop quality
neighborhoods and housing opportunities throughout the City of San Bernardino." The definition of
this mission indicates a strong desire on the part of the City to respect the right that every citizen
have safe, decent and sanitary shelter. To address the prilIlll1y need of housing and to meet their
goa1s. the City has identified eight priorities to aggressively pursue on a policy and program basis
over the next five years. These priorities reflect the policies and programs which will best meet the
needs within the City as described in the Needs Assessment portion of the Consolidated Plan. These
priorities are essentially the same as expressed in the 1995 Consolidated Plan, except:
· greater emphasis will be placed on preservation, rehabilitation, and improvement of the existing
affordable housing stock to meet low- and moderate-income needs;
.
· greater emphasis will be placed on providing r1I'St-time homebuyer assistance to better use the
existing stock ofmoderate-cost single family housing for homeownership by low- and moderate-
income households; and . . .
· less emphasis will be placed on the development of new housing for low- and moderate-income
households unless such housing is needed to meet a special need (frail elderly or handicapped,
for example) that is not addressed by other public or private initiatives.
I
B. PRIORITY ANALYSIS AND STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT
I
The City of San Bernardino is fortunate to have a diversity of housing stock with which to meet the
needs of all incomes. Approximately 60 percent of these homes are single family homes (attached
and detaChed), 33 percent multiple-family units, and 8 percent mobile homes. The City has
established a history of pro-actively encouraging programs that will allow this housing to be
affon!able to low- and moderate-income individuals and families. Future housing availability and
affordability will depend upon the City continuing this pro-active approach with financial resources
from the private sector, local funds, and the assistance of state and federal funds.
The priorities and programs have been developed based upon:
I. Successful programs set forth in the FY 1994 CHAS, the 1995-2000 Consolidated Plan, the
2000 Housing Element, and the San Bernardino Redevelopment Agency's housing plan
(which addresses housing preservation, rehabilitation, production, and replacement); .
.
r
P:IFOIUawOUSING FOIIMSICONSOlJD.fmo PL4NI2<<1o CONsol.IllAmo PUN MY Z.DOC
104
City olSan Bemardino - Col/So/idated Plan _ FY 2000-2005
2. Information contained in the 1998 Citizen's Need Swvey and other City of San Bernardino
reports regarding affordable housing needs and programs; and
3. Discussions with public sector and private sector groups and individuals.
Successfully accomplishing the priorities set forth Over the next five years is an ambitious objective
that will challenge the constituents of all sectors of the community. Moreover, the collective ability
to meet these objectives will depend not only upon the effective implementation of programs, but
also upon access to sufficient federal, state, local and private resources and funding.
The City of San Bernardino has many important and often competing housing, community service,
and economic development needs that the community must address. To remain fOCUSed and assure
effective .and successful management in meeting these identified housing needs within San
Bernardino, the number of highest priorities has been limited to eight (8) manageable issues.
The high priority needs in San Bernardino and the specific programs and five-year goals for
successfulIy meeting these priorities are:
.
o
High Priority #1: . Preservation and Rehabilitation of Existing Single Family Dwellings.
High Priority #2: Expand Homeownership Opportuirlties and Assist Homebuyers with the .
Purchase of Affordable Permanent Housing (Existing and New
Construction).
High Priority #3:
High Priority #4:
High Priority #5:
High p~~.ty ##6:
"1'1"
Provide Rental Assistance and Preserve Existing Affordable Rental
Housing
Assist Homeless and Special Needs Persons with Supportive Services .
Expansion of "Affordable" Housing Through New Construction
Promotion of Economic Development and Employment Opportunities for
Low- and Moderate-Income Households
High Priority #7: Improve and Expand Infrastructure to Meet Current and Future Needs
High Priority ##8:
Elimination ofIdentified Impediments to Fair Housing Through Education,
Enforcement, and Testb1g
Within the discussion of each priority, an analysis and strategy development wilI be presented.
In addition. the Consolidated Plan contains one-year and five-year objectives for each priority.
r
1':IF08MswoUStNQ F'OIlMSIcoN$OUIJATED PLtNI1000 CONSOuAITED PI.rIN UYl.DOC
10S
-
~
.
..
-
. ,
~
fl
,
I
",''o'.~!t'VI;>,'",
City o/San Bernardino - Consolidated PlDn _ FY 2000-200S
) L Analysis I
· """""""''''''Clt>. ........................... of""'..............""". 1bo~...
priority for the City of San Bernardino. First, replacement of existing units is costly and very time
consuming. Generally, if the City is able to provide pro-active code enforcement and provide
fmancial assistance to property owners who cannot afford to maintain or rehabilitate their dwelling
units, (single family and multifamily), it will be easier to maintain the supply of decent, safe, and
affordable units. More financial resources can then be use for the development of additional
affordable units for all income levels rather than the replacement of dilapidated units.
TABLE 34
INCIDENCE OF ANY HOUSING PROBLEM BY INCOME GROUP
CIlY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Income Gro!!!!.. Renters Owners
<30% of Median 88% 82%
31% - SOOA, of Median 8S% 72%
S 1 % - 80% of Median 67% 3!1%
81% - !lS% of Median 300A, 35%
-lmu.s.Ccuru,CHASr..tc.
The City believes its first priority is to improve the quality of life for permanent/owner occupied
households and to increase the numbercxisting single-Camily homes available to low- and moderate-
income homebuyers through acquisition, rehabilitation, and homebuyer assistance prograuis. . In
. order to assist about 9,000 owner-occupied households who may be suffering from any o!1eof a
number of housing problems such as unit inadequacies or cost burden, the City operates the Home
Improvement Program and the Mobile Home Handywor.k Rehabilitation Grant Program. The City,
however, is also concerned that renter households live in quality housing that is free from physical
in"dequacies. .
"
The prinwy characteristic of older neighborhoods and housing thathas created a need for the Home
Improvement Program is the high perccntag~ dwelling units in substandard condition at least 14
percent citywide and over 30 percent in some neighborhoods. This 14 percent includes 11 percent in
deteriorated condition and 3 percent dilapidated and therefore, unsuitable for rehabilitation. The
City's population is expected to increase by only one percent per year between 2000 and 2005. In
the past new housing construction has not kqJt pace with population growth, although this has
changed since the early 19908. Since that time, vacancy rates have increased as have the numberof
deteriorated homes (many of which were repossessed by HUD when the homeowners defaulted On
their home loans). This first priority, more than any other, addresses all three aspects of housing
discussed in the Consolidated Plan. .
1. Hoasiag AvaUabWty. First, housing rehabilitation maintains the availability of sound,
affordable housing by assisting owner-occupants. It also increases the availability of sound,
affordable rental housing by providing fmancial assistance to improve such housing in exchange
affordability guarantees, ensuring that the number of affordable units available today continues
to be available foratlcast the next IS years. (Generally, the lifespan ofa moderate to substantial
. property improvement should be at least IS years).
r
P:IFORMSIHoUS/NG FORMsv::oNSOlJDAmr> Pl.ANtZooo CONSOLal.cmr> PUN REY 1.DOC
106
Oty of San Bernardino' Consolidated Plan. FY 2000-2005
1. Housing Affordabllity. Second, housing rehabilitation addresses hous~g affordability. by ·
keeping affordable units habitable at a less~ c:ost than new construction or by first-ti~e
bomebuyers, which can require deeper subslClies to some households. ~,a h~~~g
rehabilitation program that targets entire neighborhoods tends to encourag~ sundar actiVities
throughout the neighborhood. First-time homebu~g does not neces~ly ha!e the ~e
neighborhood-level effect, though it is also a desuable strategy for unprovmg housmg
affordability and accessibility. ~
3. Housing Adequacy. Finally, housing rehabilitation addresses housing adequacy by ens.uring
that substandard dwelling units are brought to an acceptable level of occupancy, according to
acceptable standards of habitability. The rehabilitation to be accomplished, whether at a
moderate or substantial level, will ensure that the completed unit has been repaired or
refurbished to the extent that it will remain in the affordable stock for at least the next 15 years
(longer, iffeasible).
Based on the needs and factors identified in the preceding paragraphs, the City has developed a
strategy to actively maintain, improve and develop stable neighborhoods and housing opportunities
throughout the entire City. This strategy will utilize six programs aimed at owner-occupied units
and one that targets rental properties. As shown in the CPS Summary of Priority Needs Table,
rehabilitation of existing owner-occupied units is ranked as a High Priority while rehabilitation of .
TCnIal units is ranked as a Medium Priority. These programs are as follows:
lL Strategy Deve10 ment (Activities and Programs).
L Home Improvement Program.
'lbisprogram is designed to fmancially assist low and moderate-income single family homeowners
with rehabilitation/restoration of their property. In order to improve San Bernardino's "quality of
. life" and housing stock, the Home Improvement program offers' fUlllllCial incentives to upgrade
single-family homes and neighborhoods. High-qualityrehabilitation projects serve as an impetus for
increased neighborhood pride and maintenanee. The Home Improvement Program has two
components, one for targeted neighborhoods with concentrations of substandard housing and
property conditious and the other available citywide. The targeted neighborhood component
concentrates available resources within desii""t..n neighborhoods. The overall objective of this
approach is to change the economics of each targeted neighborhood and stimulate increased
neighborhood pride and stability. Programs within these neighborhoods are available to households
eaming up to 120 percent of median income.
The primary golll o/the targeted neighborhood IIpprollCh is to chtlnge the economics 0/
tmch neighborhood to such tin eztent thtlt It wUl be mllintllined tit tin IICCqtllble level
without the need/or "more tIum normlll" city resources.
The ~ component of the Home Improvement Program is available citywide to households ·
earmng up to 120 percent of median income. This component allows for rehabilitation on a casc-by-
case basis for income-eligible households. The eligibility criteria include the existence of
r
I'ilFOl/NlNl0U$ING I'OIIMSICONSOU/MTED PUWOlJ{)CONSOUJMTEDPUN REl'Z.DOC
107
't;\1'~l~;"!i'~~~:-.;~", #iit,;.>\,;;,t,j~~'V:):c;,jj
City olSan Bernardino - ConsolidDted Plan. FY 2000-200S
.
demonstrated "critical property improvements" and/or significant negative impact on the
surrounding residential community.
The Home Improvement Program will provide financial assistance through five programs, some of
which have components adclressing needs of specific population groups depending on applicant.
chamcteristics, the type of dwelling unit, income eligibility, and level of rehabilitation required. The
City's housing rehabilitationfunprovementprograms and their components are 1isted in the following
table. The City expects that over eighty percent (80%) of the Program funds will be retumed from
the repayment ofloans for use in aSsisting other households.
A. Home Improvement Program:
1. Single Family Loans
2. Exterior Beautification Grant Program (Owner & Rental Occupied)
3. Minor Repair Grant Program (for single family owner occupied \lDits)
4. Mobilehome Grant Program
B. AcquisitioDlRehabilitatioDlResa1e Program (rehabilitation and homeownership
oPPOrtunities)
C. Mobilehome Inspection Program
D. Neighborhood Revitalization Program (code compliance)
E. Utili Assistlince Pro
.'
fiL Objectives
PRIORITY #1: Preservation and RehabWtatioD oCExlstigg Single FamUy DweWan
,...
I .:-
Tbe Five-year target Cor rehabWtation is:
. ~ Single Family units
lQ2 Households Provided with Utility Assistance
The One-year target Cor rehabWtation is:
,
lQ2 Single Family units .
~Households Provided with Utility Assistance
High Priority #2: Expand Homeownenhip Opportunities and Assist HomdJuyen with
the Purchase oC Aft'ordable Permanent Housing <Existing and New
Construction). . .
.
,
I':IFORJawoUSlNG FORMSICONsoUlJ,f7l:D PUM2tIIJD a1NmUD.c7l:D PUN 1lEYUxx:
108
City of San Bernardino. Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-2005
I
L Analysis
I
.
a. Housing AfTordabillty. 1990 Census and other data indicate that most extremely low:,lo:^,-, and
moderate-income families (families whose incomes do not exceed 80 percent of the median mcome
for the area) cannot afford the median priced home in San Bernardino even though housing prices in
the City are substantial below regional averages. In addition, many moderate and middle-income
families have difficulty saving enough for a down payment and closing costs to purchase a home.
Table 4 in the Community Profile provides a breakdown of the income required to purchase a
median priced home in San Bernardino at current interest rates. Table 4 indicates that most
households earning less than the San Bernardino County median income for a family of three would
have difficulty purchasing a home without at least a 10 percent down payment and a low initial
interest rate on an adjustable rate mortgage.
These factors illustrate the need for home purchase assistance, either in the form of downpayment
assistance or below-market-interest_rate fmancing. For its part, the City implements several
homebuyer assistance programs: Mortgage Assistance Program, Acquisition, Rehabilitation, and
Resale Program,land set-asides for developers, Homebuyer Education Program (through NIlS), and
in addition to assisting families with home purchases, these types of programs have an additional
benefit offreeing up rental units for new families. In some cases the availability of these units might
allow households experiencing housing problems to move into more suitable housing.
b. Housing Accesslbillty. Very often, the homes available at prices acceptable to first time .
homebuyers are those in need of repairs or rehabilitation in older areas of the City. Therefore, there
is a need for a program that will provide rehabilitation and home improvement financing as part of
the home purchase.
Accessibility appears to be a greater problem for the handicapped, disabled and elderly populations.
Access is constrained by inadequate transportation linkages and a shortage of adequate
accommodations that prevent some households from gaining-access to neighborhoods and housing
opportunities that might meet their needs. These access problems could be overcome by providing
better traniortation services to seniors and individuals with mobility impairments, and providing
housing ~ is close to services that these population groups need (health care, shopping,
recreatiOnal,programs, personal services, etc.
Co Housing AvaUabWty. Overall, the housing supply appears to have kept pace with demand. In
fact. vacaney rates in the City have been consistently higher for the past ten years than needed the
level needed to assure freedom of movement in the market. Vacancies in the City have ranged from
seven to eight percent of the year-round housing stock according to.the California Department of
Finllnce (even higher by City estimates), whereas an adequate level ofvacaney needed to assure
consumer choice and mobility Would be five percent or less.
In addition, underwriting guidelines used by most lending institutions make it difficult for most low-
income and many moderate-income households to purchase a home. While there is an ample supply
of properties for sale, many of these remain out ofreacb offl1'St-time buyers. During the late 1980s,
the market produced many move-up homes that remained vacant when the recession reduced the
d.....lInd for such homes. There is a relatively larger sUpply of higher-prices homes for sale than
r
~
.
P:IFOJUawOUSING FORMSICONSoUlMTED PLANI1000 t:X>>iStJuDA.TED PUN MY l.DOC
*-'
109
~j
"
.,.
~
5:i,:':'+-c;;~,~''u,~.;f''';J' "~;J1':~*~,~;I~'N
Cily olSan Bernardino - Consolidated PlDn - FY 2000-2ooJ
.
homes affordable to fust time buyers (with the exception of HUD-repossessed homes that are
acquired, rehabilitated, and resold to low-income families through the City's acquisition and
rehabilitation program).
The stock of available affordable flISt-time homebuyer units could be expanded through the
construction of homes on Redevelopment Agency-acquired land purchased housing set-aside funds.
If the Agency can enlist a developer through incentives and the dedication ofland (possibly through
a ground lease) affordable first-time homebuyerunits will be developed and sold. These units could
be single-family detached homes, townhomes, condominiums, limited equity co-ops, or some other
form of housing.
I
it Strategy Development (Activities and Programs) I
The intent of providing opportunities for affordable homeownership is to assist marginal households
into the mainstream of the home buying market through - financial assistance and homebuyer
C'nucation. Home ownership is the traditional method by which Americans accrue wealth. The
premise is that homebuyers assisted by the City have a cha!lce to improve their economic standing
and eventually move up to a more expensive home. This premise app~ to be valid for most
assisted first-time homebuyers. The Redevelopment Agency's recent experience with BUD
repossessed homes suggests that a large percentage of assisted homebuyers were either not prepared
for homeownership, have insufficient financial resources, or suffered unanticipated economic
hardships that required them to take a "step down" on the ladder of economic progress. .
.
,
The City of San Bernardino and its Redevelopment Agency is also committed to fuSt time
homebuyers as a mechanism to increase' community pride and stability. This commitment is
reflected in the CPS Summary of Priority Needs Table as a high pnority for the City.
"
1. First-TIme Homebuver's Mortl!al!e Assistance Prolmlm lMAf.l
This program is designed to assist first-time homebuyers with the purchase of an existing home
within the City of San Bernardino. Eligible properties include condominiums, toWnhomes, single-
family detached homes, and multi-plexes (up tofour units). The Agency provides assistance with
down payments and closing costs- up to 10 percent of the purchase price. The Agency then
receives an equity interest in each assisted property, receiving its contrIbution back when the home
is sold or refinanced within the first ten years. Upon transfer of the property, the first-time
bomebuyer receives a share of the equity in the home pursuant to a deed restriction that limits the
sale to another first-time homebuyer at a price affordable to a low- or moderate-income housebold.
During the period of ownership, the program participant has lower property tax payments, has
accrued, equity to purchase another home, and acquired home oWnership and management
experience. The homes purchased under this programmay be located in any census tract in the City,
so long as the homes are occupied by, and affordable to, low-income homeowners.
, The Agency will continue to implement a marketing program designed to promote homeownership
. oppmtunities. The goal of this effort will be to promote long-term homeownership opportunities
within the City of San Bernardino, thereby stabilizing neighborhoods and improving community
pride.
,
I':IFDRJISIHOUSlNG FOIIJ4ICONSOUlMmD I'UNI2(J()() CON8OI.IIM.7ED PLAN IIEY 2.DOC
110
City a/San Bernardino. ColISolidaled Plan - FY 2000-200$
2. Acqulsltlon/RehabWtatlon/Resale Program
This program provides additional opportunities for low- and moderate-income households to
become homeowners. The ARR program works in tandem with the Mortgage Assistance Program
or as a stand-alone program. The ARR Program allows the Agency to purchase HUD repossessions
at a discount then sell them to qualified contractors who rehabilitate them to "new" status and resell
the properties to qualified low- and moderate-income households. Twelve (12) contractors cunentIy
participating in the program.
..
3. Homebuyer Lease-to-Own Program
Through@jointpowers authority, the Agency has initiated a lease-to-own program that is available
to low- and moderate-income renters who want to purchase single family homes but do not have the
ability to immediately take on that financial responsibility (due to income, credit, down payment, or
other factors). A participatipg renter may lease a single family home for up to five years, with the
rental payments credited toward the purchase of the home. After five years, the renter receives title
to the property.
4. Homebuyer Education and Financla1 Counsellng
This project, operated by a non-profit organization (Neighborhood Housing Services of the Inland
Empire, Inc.), provides fmancial counseling and services to low- and moderate-income households .
embarking on the purchase of a home. The counseling tesches participating families about basic
household budgeting, the importance of savings major repairs, and regular household maintenance
and its importance in the upkeep of the family home. As a result, a list of potential pre-qua1ified
homeowners will be available to the City for inclusion:in its home buying program initiatives.
I
ill. Objectives
PRIORITY #2 - Expand Homeownershlp OpportUnities and Assist
Humebuyen with the Purchase of Mordable Permanent Housing (Existing
.=. and New Construction)
The five-year targets are:
~ First-Time Homebuyers (existing single family homes)
ill Households receiving homeownership homebuyer education
~ First-Time Homebuyers (newly CODStructed homes)
The one-year targets are:
1Q.First- Time Homebuyers (Existing Single Family Homes)
ll..Households receiving homeownership homebuyer education
ll.. First-Time Homebuyers (newly constructed homes)
.
.
".
P:lFORJawOUSING FOIIMJ'ICONsoUlJATED PLANlZooo CONSOUlJATED PLAN REI' 1.DOC
111
..
-
". ".~i'~,r>.~~ l',lJO.~}Qr' ;,.";<,,,-,'P-.~ -oS:.,:" ,.~.'.
City o/San Bernardino. ConsolidDted Plan. FY 2000-200S
.
High Priority #3:
Provide Rental Assistance and Preserve Existing Afl'ontable Rental
Housing
I
L Analysis
Among low and moderate income households, different types of families experience different
housing problems, and, therefore, have different needs. Almost universally, however, the
overwhelming majority of extremely low-income households, regardless of type, experience excess
or severe cost burden. Over 10,283 extremely low-income renter households are cost burdened in
San Bernardino.
TABLE3S
INCIDENCE OF PROBLEMS AMONG VERY LOW INCOME RENTER HOUSEHOLDS BY TYPE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Problem Elderly smaU ~l'Jle Other
Any Problem 73% 87% 96% 8S%
Excess Cost 73% 84% 81% 84.s%
Severe Cost S7% SSO" S3% S9%
Overcrowdittg 0% 2S% 72% N1A
Sotur:.: 1m u. s. c-.... CHAS Databoak,
Similarly, with elderly and other owner household types, severe cost burden affects at l~t 59
percent of all extremely low-income owner households (nearly 3,000 households). .
.
TABLE 36
INCIDENCE OF PROBLEMS AMONG VERY LOW INCOME OWNER HOU8EHOLDS BY TYPE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Problem E1de~ Other
Any Problem 42% 74%
Excess Cost 42% 66%
Scvcrc Cost 23% 46%
Overcrowding NlA 19%
Sa_: /990 U. S. Censur, CHAS DIltIIbook.
.' ..
Congresshas designated extremely low-income renters who live in substandard housing or pay more
than 50 percent of income for rent (severe cost burden) as having the "worst case housing needs."
Congress has directed that these households be given priority for admission to federally assisted
programs. As shown earlier in the Community Profile, assisted housing is in great demand in San
Bernardino (see Table 36 above). .
Currently, about 2,200 extremely low-income households receive federal rental assistance through
the federal Section 8 program while another 800 reside in federa1lY-assisted public housing operated
by the San Bernardino County Housing Authority. Another 2,191 extremely low-income
households are on the Housing Authority's waiting list However, the current waiting list is closed,
80 there are undoubtedly additional households that are eligible for and desire housing assiStance but
. have been unable to even make the waiting list Nationally, about 30 percent of the income-cligible
renter households received assistance in 1989. Fifty-seven percent of the households on the waiting
list meet the "worst case housing needs" criteria and have federal preference. In fact, within the
1':1FrJJIJISIH0USING FORMSICON$OUD.(rm PI.ANIZOOD COIiSOLIDArm P1.IIN //Elf UXJC 111
.
City o[San BenllJrdino . CofUolidaled Plan - FY 2000-200j
State of California, 49 percent of all extremely low-income renter households are designated as
having the "worst case housing need." In San Bernardino, according to the County Housing
Authority Administrative Plan preferences, elderly have received 21 percent ofall assistance, small
families receive 44 percent and large families receive 35 percent of assistance allocated to San
Bernardino residents.
.
.
.
a. Housing A vaUablllty. Approximately half (48 percent) of the housing stock in San Bernardino
is rental housing, including over one-fourth (28%) of the single family housing stock. This is a
substantially higher percentage of rental housing than the countywide average (37%). The City of
San Bernardino offers a diversity of housing by cost, type, and tenure, more so than most
communities in the region. This diversity provides an opportunity for many households of varying
incomes to live in San Bernardino. This opportunity also presents a constraint, however, to the City's
efforts to improve single-family neighborhoods and increase homeownership. The large proportion
ofsingle-flimily rental housing reduces the availability of modest-priced ownership housing for low-
and modeiate~income households. Many single-family rental homes are owned by absentee owners,
which increases the City's challenge in working with property owners to improve older
neighborhoods.
While the City, through its Redevelopment Agency, provides some housing opportunities for low-
and moderate-income renter families, it has been determined that as many as 71 percent of these
households are currently overpaying for housing costs.
b. Housing Arrordablllty. Housing affordability is the single biggest housing problem/need facing
San Bernardino residents. Fully 10,283 extremely low-income, 2,253 low to moderate-income and
201 middle-income renter households state excess cost burden as a problem. Therefore, 12,872, or
S 1 percent of the total renter household population, is rent burdened in San Bernardino. This is why
rental assistance is the City's fourth priority. .
.
The City of San Bernardino's employment is concentrated in the service sector, with many retail,
hotel and restaurant establishments. Together with other businesses they employ hundreds oflow-
income W!-Be earners. Employment projections by both the CalifoIQia Employment Development
Depa..lwent and SCAG indicate that the number oflower-paying service, Im~1<illed, and semi-skilled
jobs will e.~perience the greatest gains during the current decade in relation to higher-paying
profession3l and technical jobs. If these employment projections are accurate, local job growth
could result in a further imbalance between incomes of new workers and the cost of new housing.
Commonly, it requires two wage earners per household to meet a family's basic needs, especially
among lower-paid service workers. The City acknowledges it's responsibility to house employees in
affordable housing close to their work and has established programs to encourage the rehabilitation
and construction of more affordable units.. However, many households currently have limited
incomes and are paying more than 50 percent of their income for rent. Despite the numbers
receiving Section 8 Certificates and Vouchers or residing in public housing, there are still many
households who need housing assistance, including almost 2,000 on the waiting list for Section 8 .
and over 2,000 on the public housing waiting list.
.
...
P:1FOJWS\HOUSlNG FOIlMSICONSOUDA'11!D PUNl2000 CONSouD.f'11!D PLtIN BEY Z.DOC
113
..
.
.
ft'!""~"'i<JIt:1';"ii!~_",-...;.~".;>",":f'!!'.?~.~~~.~;
City of SQIl Bernardino. Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-2ooS
c:. Housing Adequacy. A survey by the City Code Enforc:cment Department indicated that
approximately 4S% percent of the housing in the City is in substandard condition. A general block
analysis of housing conditions, conducted in 1999 and including about 7S percent of the City's
housing stock, indicated that the majority of homes on about one-third (36%) of the blocks surveyed
nccdcd minor to substantial rehabilitation. The majority of homes on another 30 percent of the
blocks surveyed needed maintenance such as repainting, roof patching, or minor window or door
repairs. Based on 7S percent survey coverage, the City estimates that the majority of homes on
nearly one-half(SOOA,) of all residential blocks in San Bernardino require repairs of some type, from
minor maintenance to complete replacement
The City, through its Redevelopment Agency makes funds available to the property owner through
the housing set aside, CDBG, and HOME funding for rehabilitation, but property owner motivation
is often lacking. Also, many of occupants of homes in need of repair (whether owner-occupants or
renters) have language limitations and arc unaware of the unsafe or inadequate CQnditions or how to
report them. .
The quality oflife and the security of residents in San Bernardino's existing neighborhoods depends
upon the continued maintenance and protection of these communities. Central and West San
Bernardino arc examples of neighborhoods of older, smaller homes that arc ideal for first time
buyers and retired seniors. Through City zoning policies, these types of areas have been protected
from encroachment of incompatible uses and the negative impacts of noise, traffic and other
environmental influences. Because the housing stock in San Bernardino contains a high percentage
of rental housing, issues of housing preservation and rehabilitation must address the conc~.of
both the homeowners and rental property owners. Both homeowners and investors must aCtively
participate in solutions. In particular, the City must find ways to involve absentee landlords in the
effort to rehabilitate properties, upgrade neighboIhoods.and restore community priclc.
The Code Enforc:cment Department survey also suggests that the majority of the renter units and
owner-occupied units require rehabilitation. Rental assis~ce for extremely low- and low to
moderate-income renter households may encourage rental property owners to invest some working
capital and to take advantage of City-sponsored rehabilitation programs. .
The extent to which rental property owners participate in City efforts at neighborhOOd revjtali7<lt1on
will continue to depend largely on a combination ofcconomic sclf-intcrcstand compulsory action by
the City. InvestorS must be convinced that their net income can improve through subsidized
rehabilitation loans, especially ifthcrc arc substantial costs associated with City's continues a strong
code cnforc:cment program that leaves rental propeltf owners with few alternatives to participation
in City programs.
I
IL Strategy Development (Ac:tivitles and Programs)
The intentofrcntaI assistance to cxtremely low- and low to moderate-income households is twofold:
1) to provide additional affordable housing opportunities for fimilies who have few or no options in
. the private market, and 2) to improve the existing stock of affordable housing in San Bernardino.
The City intends to use the following seven programs to be funded with Section 8 and
Redevelopment Set-Aside funds. Assistance to rental households is ranked as a Medium Priority on
. . . r
/':IFOIIMSWol/$/NG FOIlMSICONSOLID.fTED PI.IM2fxxJ GW.I.rOuD.fmo PLAN REY l.DOC
114
'.
I
City o/San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan - FY 2000-200$
the CPS Summary of Priority Needs Table, with the provision of rental assistance a primary activity
for these households.
.
1. Rental Assistance Prouam
The Rental Assistance Program is a safety net program offered to tenants who arc living in
substandard housing conditions. Under the Program, the Redevelopment Agency assists relocatecs
with first- and last-month's rent and a security deposit. The participating rental unit must be in
sound, sanitary and safe condition.
2. Section 8 Rental Assistance Certificate Prol!ram
Through.the Section 8 program administered by the San Bernardino County Housing Authority,
landlords agree to a specific rent for one year, with a rent increase possible after the first year.
These federal Section 8 payments cover the difference between the contract rent ofa rental unit and
what the tenant is required to pay (no more than 30 percent of income). Initial gross rent (contract
rent plus utility ailowance) cannot exceed fair market rents for the area.
Because of the size and diversity of San Bernardino County, the fair market rents defined by HUD
for the entire metiopolitan statistical area exceed the actual market rents in several cities and
communities throughout the County. In areas with lower market rents (such as in the City of San .
Bernardino) the Fair Market Rent structure can allow participants to rent housing that may be
considered luxury housing or with more amenities than intended by program regulations. At this
time, HUD is not receptive to permitting sub-market rents to aileviate this concern.
3. Section 8 Rental Assistance Voucher Prol!ram .
The Housing Authority provides voucher assistance that may be used to rent any unit to eligJ.ole low
to moderate or extremely-low income San Bernardino residents.. The Voucher Program operates
much the same as the Section 8 Program in that it provides fmancial assistance paid dircct1y to the
property QWJ1er on behalf of participating families residing in privately-owned and managed
dwelling units. The basic differences arc:l) the term "payment standard" (which determines the
amount ot:usistance to be paid on behalf of the family) is used instead of "fair market rent";'2)
annual increases in the amount of the payment standard arc not provided for, although two increases
per five-year period may be made; 3) any rcntnegotiation would be between the voucher holder and
the owner; and 4) the tenant is permitted (at thislher option) to pay rent in excess of30 percent of
adjusted income, although HUD a>nsiders such a payment to be a "rent burden".
4. Preservation of Assisted Rental Housin~
The Housing Authority administers the Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Program, which provides
affordable rents for fifteen years to owners of existing multifAmily housing who rehabilitate their
properties and agree to rent the assisted units to low- and moderate-income households at affordable .
rents. The guaranteed rents make it possible to secure favorable financing terms for the _
rehabilitation work.
l':lFORMSIHoUSING F01lMSICONSolJD.4TED PLANIZootJ aINSOlJD.4mo PUN REf' J.DOC
!
L
llS
.
City of San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200$
.
In administering rental assistance programs, it is the intent of the City of San Bernardino to
minimize permanent displacement of tenants as a result of the City's program activities. If the
permanent displacement oflow-income families is unavoidable, financial and tes:hnica1 relocation
assistance will be provided to those families. Very low-income families will not be permanently
displaced in favor of non very low-income families.
I
W. Objectives
I
PRIORITY #3: Provide Rental Assistance and Preserve ExIst1nI Afl'ordable
Rental Assistance to Low and Moderate Income Households
Bousln artlcularl Government-Assisted Bousln .
The five-year targets are:
~ Section 8 Rental Certificates and Vouchers.'
m Rental Assistance Program .
-L Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Program
.
The one-year targets are:
1.291 Section 8 Rental Certificates and Vouchers..
~Rental Assistance Program
--L- Section 8 Moderate Rehabilitation Program
I SoUR1e: San Bernardino County Housing Authority Estimates.
High Priority #4:
Services
Assist the Homeless and Specfal Needs PenoDS with Supportive
J
L Analysis
The 1990 Census reported 53 visible persons living in the streets and 916 residing in homeless
shelters. Based on reported statistics collected through interviews with service providers in San
Bernardino, it is estimated that 1,000 and 2,000 homeless persons reside in San Bemardino in any
given year. These numbers indicate that homelessness is a serious problem in SanBemardino. The
City's size, and other factors such as the availability of quality services, draws homeless persons
from throughout the region into the City.
In 1999, there were 512 shelter and transitional housing beds in SanBemardino (including 20 which
are reserved for families displaced by domestic violence), which is at least 500 fewer shelter beds
than would be needed to house the average nightly homeless population according to the lowest
estimate of the homeless population in the City. In addition, over 5,000 very low-income
households earning under 50 percent of median family income are cost burdened by paying SO
. percent or more of their incomes for purchasing and are at-risk ofhomelessness.
r
P:IFO/lMSlHOlISING FOIIMSICONSOUlMTED PUNI1000 CONsolJIMTED PLANREI' Z.DOC
116
City o/San Bernardino. Consolidated Plan. FY 2000-2005
u. Strategy Development (Activities and Pro rams)
The intent of this priority is to continue to provide City support of nonprofit and other supportive
service institutions that provide homeless assistance, emergency shelter, transitional housing and
homeless prevention services to San Bernardino homeless and at-risk populations. This.priority
includes the City's strategies to provide transitional housing and emergency shelters for the
homeless, the prevention of homeless ness, and assisting the homeless in making the transition to
pennanent housing. Assistance for the homeless is ranked as a second priority on CPS Summary of
Priority Needs Table, with support facilities and services the designated activity to assist this group.
1. Emel'1!encv Shelter Grant
The Emergency Shelter Grant program benefits homeless individuals and families through services
and shelter, coupled with employment,jOb training, and additional support servic;es to deal with drug
and alcohol abuse. The City expects an allocation totaling $138,000 from the federal Emergency
Shelter Grant Program in FY 2000-2001 to assist in providing emergency shelter and supportive
services to approximately 3,000 homeless individuals and/or households. Four facilities have
benefited from these funds in the past and will likely receive funds again in the future the Salvation
Anny, Option House, Inc, Mary's Mercy's Table, Inc., and the Central Lutheran Mission. Other
Orgllni7"tions are located centrally in the City of San Bernardino.
2. Transitional Housig
The Redevelopment Agency funded its fIrSt transitional housing project in FY 1994 that is designed
to help persons to make the transition from homelessness back into society. The Agency worked
with the Frazee Community Center to purchase three 4-unit apartment buildings in the Arden.
Guthrie neighborhood. The Agency acquired and rehabilitated the units andFrazee now operates the
transitional housing facility. Two units in each building are rented at home market rates and the
proceeds from those units are used to provide two transitional units within each building. The
transitional units are interim in nature (up to 24 months) and provide supportive services for the
residents. "Since 1994, the City has also assisted in allocating ESG funds for the essential services
and operation of transitional housing. In addition, the Agency assisted the 0' Bershaw House with a
$200,000 ii!mt to rehabilitate ten dwelling units to be used for transitional housing for families with
chi1dren. --
3. Battered Women's Shelter Pro~ralQ
The Agency will continue to provide CDDG and ESG funds to battered women's shelters to assist
women and children who are homeless or low income and are in need of special services such as
counseling, employment, financial planning, and/or housing. 'Ibese shelters provide a safe
environment during case management for individual situations, as required. The service providers
include the House of Ruth, Option House, and New House, Inc.
1':1FORJ.aw0US/N(; FOIlJiSlCONSOUDATED PLAN12000 CONsoi.oJATED PLtIN MY ZJJOc
,
111
.
.
.
'--
...
City a/San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan - FY 2000-200S
. 4. San Bernardino Countv Continuum of Care ~oalltlon
This cooperative organization comprises various local govemmen~ entities, with the county as the
lead agency slate social service departments, and nonprofit agencies that serve the needs of the
homeless within the City and County of San Bernardino. The Coalition seeks f? !I"~ that the
program components for serving the homeless are adequate and that each participating agency
provides its fair share of local resources for the development of homeless shelters, transitional
housing, and services to address homelessness (See Appendix B). In-kind contribution of staff time
(Iahor), CDBG, and ESG funds constitute the City's resource commitment for this program.
I
III. Objectives
PRIORITY #4: AssIst Homeless and Special Needs PersODS
With SUDDortlve Services Prol!l'llMS.
The five-year tareets are:
.l.Q2Q Emergency Shelter Households'
~ Rental Assistance Program
!Q T11I1ISitionsl housing units
W Battered Women and Children
.lJl Child Care Facilities Assisted
.
.
The ODe-year tareets are:
~ Emergency Shelter Households.
~. Rental Assistance Program
1 T11I1ISitionsl housing units
.l.ll2 Battered Women and Children
~ Child Care Facilities Assisted
I This number is not duplicated since a household may spend more than one night in a shelter.
mgh Priority #5:
anslon of II Aft'ordable" Houaln Through New Construction
I
L Analysis
I
a. Housing AvaUabWty and Adequacy. Prior to 1995, 20 Percent Set-aside funds for low to
moderate income housing have been used to assist in the development of 409 single tiunilyunits and
145 multiple tiunily units. Tax-er""'Pt bond financing has been used to assist in the construction of
1,896 multiple tiunily units. Since 1995, redevelopment funds have assisted in the construction of
Dearly 900 additional atrordable units. There are many opportunities to address underutilized
properties and rethink existing land uses in the City. Some creative approaches to housing
development include mixed use, increased density to allow for more open space and transfer of
. development credits.
,
I'.~USING FOIIMSICONSOUDATEDPLANIZD/)()CONSOz.m.cTEDPLfN 1lEI'2.DOC
11'
City of San Bernardino. Consolidated Plan. FY 20()()..200S
Table 37 illustrates this basic approach for the City of San Bernardino. If the ratio of housing unit
change to household change is less than 1.0, then the growth of the housing stock has not kept pace
with household fonnation. Conversely, if the ratio is greater than 1.0, the stock has increased by
more than enough units overall to accommodate household growth. As shown, the ratio is 1.09,
indicating the stock has increased more than the number of households. In addition, the number of
vacant housing units (primarily rental units), already high in 1990, remained high in 1999, indicating
a capacity for the City to accommodate additional households without new housing construction.
In 1990 the vacancy rate for owner-occupied housing was 2.4 percent, which indicates there might
. have been some unmet demand since ideal vacancy rates for freedom of movement in the market are
estimated to be 4 percent. However, the 1990 rental vacancy rate of9.4 percent is higher than ideal,
which would indicate an overabundance of available units. Vacancy rates for both rental and owner
occupied writs indicate that supply exceeds demand.
TABLE 37
ADEQUACY OF THE HOUSING SUPPLY
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Household Increase, 1990-1999: 4,994 .
Housing Unit Increase, 1990-1999: 5.431
.. 1.09 Units per Household
Note: Population growth was more rapid than houschold growth and thc averagc household size increased
from 2.9 to 3.0 pcrsons.
Rental Owner I2l!l
1990 Vacancy Rates* 9.4% 2.4% 5.9%
1999 Vacancy RIltes N/A N/A 7.8%
Soun:c: 1990 Census, 1999 Dcpt of Finance Population Estimates.
*Includes units rented or sold and awaiting OCCUpancy; excludes IClISOnaI, boarded up, migrant, and oiber
vacant units representing 1.7"" of the total housing stock.
-
Generally, the pace of housing production has kept up with population growth. This is also true as
presented in the Table 38 below, which displays the number and percentage of the available rental
and owner housing stock. By available stock, we mean identified occupied and vacant rental and
owner units.
TABLE 38
AVAILABLE RENTAL AND OWNER UNITS
. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CateJ[Ory o aad 1 Bedroom 2 bedl'llotDI 3 or more bcdrootDI
Renter 11,491 or 40",(, 11,941 or 42% 4,989 or 18%
Owner 2,326 or 8% !l,013 or31%. 17.138 Or61%
Soun:c: U.s. 1990 Census, CHAS Tablc IB
Table 39 compares household types and total available units. Although admittedly oversimplified,
there appears to be adequate owner units available, with the smaller owner households living in
larger units. This table disguises the fact that some owner households are overcrowded, which was
(
P:1FOI/JISWOUSING I'ORM8\CONSOUD.fTED PLANI2IJ(J() CONSOUD.fTED PUN REI'l.DOC
119
I
..
.
,
.
,.
.
.
~
.
.
.
.
City of San Bernardino. Consolidated Plan - FY 2000-200.5
discussed in the Community Profile. The overcrowded owner households would be large families
that are living in units with two or fewer bedrooms. Among rental units, there is a shortage of units
with two or more bedrooms. The larger rental households that cannot find adequately sized units are
thus housed in zero and one bedroom units, leading to,overcrowding.
TABLE 3'
COMPARISON OF HOUSEHOLD TYPE AND AVAILABLE UNITS
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. 1"0
Households By Type Ualls by Size- Surpllll
CShortal!e)
Elderly Renters 2,'96 o and I Bedroom Rental 11,491 8,495
Elderly Owners 7,934 o and 1 Bedroom Owner 2,326 (5,608)
Small and All Other Renters 17,469 2 Bedroom Rental' 11,941 (5,528)
Large Related Renters 4,968 3+ Bedroom Rental 4,'89 (21)
All Other Owners 2.Lm 2+ Bedroom Owner ~ ~
Total 54.644 Total 57 498 2.854
Soun:e: FY 1994 ClU.S TlIblu 18 IIIId Ie, 1990 CHAS DatIlboot
*111dMt1a OCCIlpIed IIIId WlCdlI/ Im/tslor rut or uk bill -ruda oJMr _ IUII1L
Table 39 clearly shows that there is a large surplus of dwelling units available to meet the needs of
elderly and other small renter households and single family homes to meet the needs of owner-
occupant householdS (including large families). There is!i substantial deficit of housing suitable for
elderly owners and small/other renter households (meaning rental units with two bedrooms).
The problem with this analysis is that it does not reflect actual occupancy patterns.' Many' small
households (elderly and non-elderly) may choose (and be able to afford) to live in larger housing
units with three or more bedrooms, offsetting anyapparCnt "deficit" for this category, but increasing
the deficit of housing actually available and affordable to larger households (primarily large, low-
income renter households). Conversely, small, non~lderly renter households of one or two persons
will compete with seniors for studio and one-bedroom housing units that meet their needs.
In terms of physical inadequacies, this priority addresses new construction that must be built to
current City codes. In addition, development requirements bring adequate infrastructure, open
space. and streetscape elements that enhaace the quality of the living environment and encourage
long-term pride of ownership.
Usually, change in the size and composition of the housmg stock does not always coincide with the
population trends in a community. However, the City can proactively work to serving the
community projected to reside in San Bemardino over the next S to 10 years by developing single
tlunilyand rehabilitating multiple family housing for various income levels. San Bemardino, with its
ample supply of vacant, developable land, has an opportunity to work with the homebuilding
industry to plan for and assist in the development ofa variety of housing types and costs to address
the unmet needs of current residents and the anticipated needs oftbture residents.
k noted above, the emphasis in prior years was on multiple family construction. However, in
recognition of the high vacancy rates among multiple family units, the City has shifted its focus to
single family detached housing units. The goal of now single-family detached housing construction
,
P:II'DIfNsWOUSlNG FOIIMSICONSOlJD.(TED PUNlZOOD CO/iSOUD.{TED PUN REY Z.DOC
120
.
City of San Bemardlno . Consolidated Plan. FY 20()().200S
is to produce high quality/affordable units which set the standard for future development and will set
the standard for other programs in order to improve the surrounding neighborhoods.
b. Housing Arrordabillty. In the City of San Bernardino, one-third of the households fall within
the very low income bracket ofSI4,422 or less, another 18 percent have low incomes of$14,423 to
$23,074. As shown previously in Table 4, the median home price, currently in the $90,000 range, is
out of reach of all very low- and most low-income families. It should be noted that the occupations
that fall within these ranges include service occupations such as hotel and restaurant employees,
retail clerks, delivery personnel, providers of personal services such as housekeeping and beauty
care, secretaries, aides and many other blue collar personnel. The largest employers in the City of
San Bernardino are those which primarily provieJe low paying jobs, such as the Inland Center and
Carousel Malls, several hospitals and government employers. The City recognizes this and
encourages the rehabilitation of rental units that are affordable to these families.
..
.
.
.
.
..
-
!'
U. Strategy Development (Activities and Programs)
The intent of this housing priority is to provide ample affordable housing opportunities for existing
households and future residents of the City. The strategy to accomplish this task combines financial
and regulatory incentives. These programs are a secondary activity for meeting the needs of first-
time homebuyers, who are High Priorities on the CPS Summary of PrioritY Needs Table.
The following five programs will assist in the implementation of this Priority # S.
.
n New Senior Housln2 DeveloDment The Redevelopment Agency has utilized low- and
moderate-income housing set-aside funds to construct new, .single-family and affordable units
targeted for seniors. Projects initiated since 1990 have assisted in the construction ofneady 900 new
affordable housing units (renter and owner-occupied) in San Bernardino.
Three (3) senior housing complexes located in the northwestern area of the City have been
constructed. A S I-unit complex was funded in cooperation with the County Housing Authority and
the other two were funded in conjunction with non-profit entities. The Casa Ramona Senior
Housing ~ject contains 44 units and the Highland Lutheran Senior Housing Project contains 50
units. Ov~~6.4 million in housing set-aside funds have been used to build these three projects. All
projects are designed to maximize private sector participation in the implementation of housing
strategies and developing affordable housing opportunities.
Due to the overwhelming demand for senior housing, the Citts Redevelopment Agency plans to
construct two additional senior complexes. One 75 unit senior complex is proposed in the westside
of the City and the second senior complex is proposed to be developed in the downtown area.
2) In-fill Housln2 DeveloDment Prol!'ram - This Program was designed to create high quality
housing on unimproved (vacant) infill sites,located within established neighborhoods throughout the
City of San Bernardino. The Redevelopment Agency works with local developers and lending _.
institutions interested in joint ventures to create housing opportunities for first-time homebuyers.
The program has been designed and implemented in such a way to ensure that these homes serve to
!
~.
P:IFOIIMS1HOCISING FOIlMSICONSOUDATED PLANI2000 CONsouDdTED PUN llEI'l.DOC
121
..
. ~.; c ~,. ..
.,.".,.'''r:-.:.,-,..,-.'J....,
City of San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan. FY 2000-200$
I.
significantly improve/enhance the surrounding residential community, while also offering
homeownership opportunities. To date, 26 housing units have been constnlcted on infill sites.
.
Redevelopment Agency Rousing Funds are utilized to directly offset building permits and loan fee
costs, in order for the homes to remain tnlly "affordable" to the low-income households eligible to
purchase them. In addition, the Redevelopment Agency loan guarantee may be provided to ensure
that acquisition and constnlction financing is immediately available to the selected developer. Once
constnlcted, the local lender provides takeout financing to eligible first-time homebuyers, thereby
making acquisition and constnlction monies available for another infill site.
3) Multi-Family Rousln!! Tax-ExelllDt Bond l"inancln!! - Through the California Statewide
Community Development Authority, this Program finances mortgages in the constnlction or
rehabilitation of multi-family housing units. At least twenty perceot (2oo,,) of these rental units must
be made available to families at eighty percent (80%) of area median income or b.elow. Of the more
than 1,500 units that were constnlcted or rehabilitated in the early 1990s, nearly 300 units are
dedicated to households at or below eighty percent (8oo,,) of area median income, a total of 19.5
percent of all units assisted with tax-exempt bond financing. These various multi-family housing
projects are located throughout the City.
4) Density Bonuses. State law requires jurisdictions to grant density bonuses to developers who
agree to dedicate a certain percentage of homes, condominiums and apartments to elderly, low or
moderate-income purchasers or tenants. The required density bonus is a 25 percent increase over the
otherwise maximum allowable residential density under the applicable zoning ordinance and land
use element of the City's General Plan. .
S) DeveloDment orNew Sln&le FamUv Rouslnr Uni!! . The City's Redevelopment Agency will
assist with the development of single family housing through the provision ofland assemblage, land
right down, development fees, infrastnlcture costs, etc. The City will enforce this State policy and
encourages housing that is provided for handicapped and elderly people to be located in close
proximity to public transportation and services.
The Redevelopment Agency will encourage the development of residential units that are accessible
to handicapped persons or are adaptable for conversion to residential use by handicapped persons.
Redevelopment funds may be used for rehabilitation of existing units and private developers will be
responsible for including all handicapped-accessibility features in new projects approved by the
City.
.
<
I':IFORJawOUSlNG FOJIMsICoNSOuAlrm"l.IIN\ZD(JQ~rm,.UN REY:l.DOC
122
City olSon Bernardino. Consolidated Plan - FY 2000-2005
I
ill. Objectives
.
PRIORITY #5: Expansion of Affordable Housing Opportunities through New
Construction
The Dve-year targets are:
~New affordable single family detached units
~Handicapped-accessible apartments (conversion)
~lnfill housing units.
The one-year targets are:.
LNew affordable single family detached units
LHandicapped-accessible apartments (conversion)
... Llnfill housing units
I
c. HOMELESSNESS STRATEGY
The City completed the HUn Priority Homeless Needs Table and assigned all categories a medium
priority.
This strategy reCOgJIizes that ifhomelessness is to be eradicated, the City must address the causes of
homelessness for both broad and sometimes overlapping groups of homeless people as discussed
earlier in this Plan: those in crisis poverty and those suffering from chronic disabilities. The
recommendations offer a two-pronged strategy: I) take emergency measures to bring those who are
currently homeless back into the community, work force, and their families; and 2) address total
need of many very low-income individuals, which often includes educational, job-training, and
social services in addition to housing, to provide the n~sary support for the very poor in society to
prevent the occurrence ofhomelessness.
.
While the resources. services, and needs vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction, a systems and .
regional approach must be based on the same premise. To be effective, a homeless system must
provid<< three distinct components of organi"J1tion. First, there must be an emergency shelter
assessment effort that provides an immediate alternative to the street and can identify an individual's
or family's needs. The second component offers transitional or rehabilitative services for those who
need them. Such services include substance abuse treatment, short-term mental health services, and
independent living skills. Appropriate case management should be accessed to ensure that persons
receive necessary services, for example, that children attend school regularly. The third and fina1
component, and the one essential component for every homeless individual and family, is
permanent housing or supportive housing ammgements. While not all homeless individuals and
families in a community will need to access all three components all three components are
coordinated within a community. This approach is refeJTe4 to "continuum of care. " A homelessness
prevention strategy is also key to the SUCCess of the continuum of care. For this reason, the City
~
.
,
...
P:IFORM$JHOIJSING F'01UISIcoNSOUlMTED PUNI1(J()(J CONSOl.aMTED PLAN lIEI' 2.DOC
123
, .
~ :
l...
1''':'-''n,'''''~'''\OO''';''." J""~~,"; ~~'i!);q,.;o..,\~,
City olSan Bemardino . Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000.200$
wodes in COncert with the County of San Bei'nardino and other organi7JItions to address the needs of
. the homeless. Refer to Appendix B "Continuum of Care" for further details.
I
D. OTHER SPECIAL NEEDS
HUn Guidelines stipulate that the Consolidated Plan include a description of special housing needs
that exist in the community, such as those of the handicapped, elderly,large families, and single
parent households. The following discussion presents the housing needs of these groups in San
Bernardino.
I
1. Frllll Blderly
J
This age group has many special needs. Many senior citizens have fixed incomes and experience
financial difficulty in coping with rising housing costs.
Supportive services that are desirable to this population include:
.
· Affordable housing for very low income senior citizens
· Housing which is:
· Wheelchair accessible
· Mixed with non-senior housing
· Energy efficient ,
· Equipped with elevators, door handles for arthritic hands, emergenQy pull cords, rails in
bathrooms, walk-in tubs with no-slip coating,limited stairs (short and low), colors to
heighten vision. ,
· Services to help elderly age-in-place include:
· Congregate meals, service providers for in-home needs, nutrition, housek!lCPing,
transportation, medical services provided on site, and counseling for age-related
problems.
· Housing rehabilitation to improve living environments.
I
2. Persons with Mentlll,JJ/sllblJJJJu
I
The following supportive housing are desirable for this population:
· Apartment complex to allow people to transition to independent living
· Group home facilities to teach independent living
· Support services such as case management, nutrition, budgeting and basic housekeeping
· Housing in safe areas close to public transportation and stores
· Community rooms for social activities
· Affordable permanent housing to very low income Persons
.
P:1FOI/IISWOCIS/NG F01IMSICo~uD.CTED PLANIzoooco~uDATEDPUN RE/'UJOC
,
114
I
CiJy of San Bernardino. Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200S
3. Persons with PhyslCll//])evelopmental Dlsablllties
I
.
The following supportive housing are desirable for this population:
Housing that is:
· Affordable to very low and very low income disabled persons
· Wheelchair accessible
· Equipped with roll-in showers, grip bars, ceiling fans with extended cords, low sinks
and light switches, automatic door openers.
· Close to public transportation and stores.
4. Persons with A.lcohol or Otl,er Drug A.ddictions
Persons with alcohol and other drug addictions often, because of the behavioral reinforcement their
condition requires, need supportive transitional housing after their initial rehabilitation in order to
"practice" their rehabilitated lifestyle. Many require job referraI services and educational guidance.
5. Persons with AIDSlHIV+ IInd Other Relllled DlsellSes
Persons who are HIV positive are a serious "at risk" population in the Los Angles and San
Bernardino metropolitan areas. As with the homeless population, however, this population is largely
invisible to any sort of population census. People who are in this population group become "visible"
at the point when they are in most acute need of housing and supportive services. Agencies such as
Catholic Charities and the Inland AIDS Project provide needed housing and supportive services
through the HOPW A program.
I E. NON-HOUSING COMMtJNrryDEVELOPM1lNT STRATEGIC PLAN ]
.
The City of San Bernardino is committed to expanding economic opportunities for its residents. The
Action Pian contains over $1.8 million in CDBG and Section 108 funding for economic
development activities and other activities suPPOrting economic development objectives during the
2000-2005 program year.
In addition to providing a suitable living .environment with decent housing, an objective of the
Community Development Block Grant Program is to encourage and support the development of a
bal..nced, diverse Community by exPanding economic opportunities, principally for persons oflow-
and moderate-income. Based on the information contained in the Non-housing Community
Development Needs Analysis section, the follOwing is a summlry of the short-and long-term non-
housing goals activities that may be pursued by the City of San Bernardino over the next 5 year
-~ ~.
1. The elimination of slums and blight; the prevention of blighting influences and the deterioration
wproperty; . ~
.
P:lFORJlswollSlNa FOIlMSICONSQUDATED Pl.I/Nizooo CONsoUAlTED PLAN REI"l.DOC
12$
..
.".....,",..'-,..,..'
...""""'~,_. o,~ "<'1'~"
City of San Bernardino. Consoiidated Pian _ FY 2000-200S
.
2. The elimination of conditions which are detrimental to health, safety, and public welfare through
the development of neighborhood and community facilities, the funding of public service
programs (Principally for persons oflow and moderate income) public improvements and related
activities;
3. The conservation and ex~ion of the Nation's housing stock to provide a decent home and a
suitable living environment for all persons; and to affirmatively further fair housing, principally
for low and moderate income persons;
4. The expansion and improvement of the quantity and quality of community services (Principally
for persons of low and moderate income) that are essential for sound community development;
5. The reduction of the isolation of income groups within communities and geographical areas and
the promotion ofan increase in the diversity.and vitality of neighborhoods 'through the spatial
deconcentration of housing opportunities for persons oflower income and the revitalization of
deteriorating or deteriorated neighborhoods to attract persons of higher income;
6_ The restoration and preservation of properties of special value for historic, architectural, or
aesthetic reasons;
.
7. The alleviation of physical and economic distress through the stimulation of private investment
and community revitalization in areas with population out-migration or a stagnating or dec~g
~~and ,"
'.
EXPANDING SAN BERNARDINO'S ECONOMIC BASE
,
A review of the six activities that form San Bernardino's economic base (see section #B) reveals
three upon which most of the City's economic development energy should be focused. Working
from the weakest to the strongest:
1. Retirus
2. did Recipients
3. Low-Income Working Households
As an older urban city, one of San Bernardino's growing problems is the increasing importance
which retirees and governmental aid recipients play in its economic base. This can be inferred from
1990 Cc:usus data Which showed that 30 percent of City households earned below $15,000. It.can
also be seen in the growing number of detached homes which have been converted to low income
rentals. .
WJu1e these two groups have become a major source of outside funds for San Bernardino neither
will provide it with a strong enough base for economic expansion because: '
. a. Loca1 retirees, unlike those in places like Hemet or Palm Springs, tend to have lower incomes
that do DOt grow as fast as inflation.
1':1F01lMWiou3rNG FORMS\CONsoUDATED PLANIZooo CONsouo..rTED PUN REYUJOc
,
,116
City of San Bel7ltlrdino - Consolidated Plan. FY 2000-2005
b. Aid recipients, if anything, will see their incomes fall in the CUrrent political climate.
In """ ...................... or_ "'"....................... _...."._...
or_........ -"'" '--_.. ...cny,""""""'....or_ ""'-..
n..,m. ... ,.... -.. or........ "'" old _ ...... ...... wiJ] "'" fiI<dy ...
-.-Y......... ....,.Iow__..................... on public __ who, .....
--~ -...............--"'l......._.............
economic well-being and move into the middle class.
.
4. Non-LoCll/ Government
....~ofN_""'-_ _ '",;" blow...... B_ ...... "'""",""",
~...,;....... or.................... c;ly _......... "'" """"'-
....""'or----.....CRyotBivonidowiJ]_.___km
in the future.
.... c;,y. ..-.. ........... (hlllhwo,." ........ "'" ,"-l "'" ... '""",,",, "'"
"""'" 10-.."..",... -..-__ _ """- .... o;ly ""'....
........." -- - "'" - -... -............. if...""" "".........
budget slUpluses are accurate.
o."'_oide. ..._Of...Deko.e............-..""""......B_
"'" ... ...... UclHty wiJ] odd .. ... 0;".., _..... So.... wiJ] .." .......... _ S""
. ".,...,.. ..." ... S""....... """"Ie>< """""""'........... ODd.." .......... ""_ .
University San Bernardino's budget.
.s. Commuters Il1Id Other Resident Workers
WhiIc it " -'" to ....,.... . m,jo,. """"" of"""", dol...... ... ...... Empa. _y
........ i. - - ~ "-dmg..... '990 c..... 23~600 out or '.000.000....
-. diO>c.. Loo AD_. -.. ""'......... """"" ""'...........__
In .... B_ -..... "'" ..... ........ _ ...... .... out........ . ..,;..
........ fir_.. "'0;".., -...... The_... """... <>fhooomo. ~
buill_ lOw -........ ... CRy duriog... ,_ ADd, fir.""'" or_ ... cny,
....... """"""....... """..............y """ -.......... Ao.......-.
buyers 'have Dot located in the City at a rate comparable to other cOmmUnities.
""'''............. In.. "".. which....."... -.. fir _I.......... ... 0;".., low
-............. '" "'" fir.......... flow or_ -. """"""" -....... """
011, .... B_ ... ... "'- ...... ....... .. ........ "'"-a B"" -..... ..
"""""'""............. <-... -.... .._-........ CoUtbnDo_~.......
COSts in San BCl1Jardino are about 2S ))ercent lower.
"
.
P:!FORJawOllSlNG FOIWSIc:oNsoUlJA1'ED PLANI2000 CON.souD..1'ED PLAN /IEI',.DOc
,
127
'... .~.-~.,.... -""."'"
..~.'.
City a/San Bernardino - Cansolida/ed Plan _ FY 2000..2005
.
Since 1990, San Bernardino's low priced housing has lured people to the City, giving it the Inland
Empire's highest population growth numerically (about 21,000). However, it was low-income
tenants who dominated this growth, not workers, since much of the affordable housing was bought
by landlords. As a result, a potential community asset has become a liability, taxing social services
and increasing the crime rate. Worse, to the extent that landlords are not local residents, theirprofits
have been a drain on the City's economic base.
Looking forward, the vast potential for the affordable housing stock to lure young workers lind
commuters to the City of San Bernardino still rem-ins. What is needed is a comprehensive strategy
designed to encourage landlords to sell and potential owner occupants to buy in the community.
6. Expanding the City's Economic Base
San Bernardino's best chance for expanding its economic base lies with high paying firms that either
produce goods locally for sale outside the City, or supply services to clients outside of it. This is
particularly the case where their employees reside in the City.
Employment projections from the State of Califomia and SCAG suggest that service employment
will have the greatest expansion in the near term (most of the large employers in the City are either
public agencies or large retail outlets). Long-term employment trends in the Inland Empire during
the 1990s suggest that the City has an opportunity to capture a portion of the non-defense
manufacturing and "export" services employment that has benefited the Inland Empire economy.
· I THE ECONOMIC STRATEGY
Given this analysis, and recognizing that San Bernardino like other cities has finite resources, the
City's economic strategy must contain several elements:
1. The City must concentrate on basic, not secondaIy activities, as these provide the funds that
allow the balance of the economy to grow and survive.
2. Of the basic activities, it should s~ those with the maximum likelihood offostering economic
growth.
3. The City must include housing programs that encourage workers to live and spend in the
community, its economic base is dimini~hed if they do not. .
4. As economic expansion requires access to modem transportation and communications
infrastructure, it must cultivate investments in each.
S. The City should aim at convincing existing "export" firms to remain in the City as they are a
prinuuy source of employment growth and best advocates for other firms to join them.
6. The City should aim at using the existing competitive advantages of the City to lure new
"export" firms into its base.
.
P:IFD/IMW{OllSlNG FORMSICONSOUDATED PUNI1DOD CONsol.JJJATED PUN IIEI' l.DOC
1Z'
City a/San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan. FY 2000-2005
.-
7. Those retailers who receive the preponderance of their revenue from outside of the City should
be treated as part of the economic base and encouraged in the same manner as "export" goods or
service firms.
8. The City sho~ld seek to Overcome the obstacles to community decision making that have
inhibited the City's efficiency and economic growth. .
A set of strategies addressing each of these elements is outlined below. In each case, a goal is
established and justified and specific policy recommendations are made.
.
mCH PRIORITY #6
. ,: PRIORITY #6 - Promotion of Economic Development and Employment
Opportunities for Low- and Moderate Income Households.
Promotion of Economic Development and Employment
Opportunities for Low- and Moderate Income Households
The five-year targets are:
~New businesses assisted finanCially
:tOO New jobs created an~or retained
The one-year targets are:
.
10 New businesses assisted fmancially
60 New jobs created and/or retained
I
.
SPECIFIC NON-HOUSING COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS
I
To provide for the development of specific non-housing activities in support of the goals and
objectives described above, the following specific needs may be met through the CDDO
progxam.
1. The continuation of the City's ongoing efforts to design and construct streets and sidewalks
needed to improve the living environments and prevent the deterioration of the
transportation infrastructure in low/moderate neighborhoods.
2. The provision of community-based police protection in low- and moderate-income
neighbomoods.
3. The provision offinancial assistance to private non-profit organizations whose purpose is to
provide services (i.e. day care) to low- and moderate-income and disadvantaged individuals.
4. Elimination of the blighting influence of graffiti from low/moderate- income
neighborhoods.' .
.
l':lFDllMsIHOUSING F01lAlSlCoNSOIJD.fTED PlAM2{J(J(J CONSoIJD.fTED PUN BE/!' UJOC
,
'-
129
..
City olSan Bernardino. Consolidated Plan. FY 2000-200$
. S. The provision of park improvements in low- and moderate-income neighborhoods.
6. The provision of incentives for the rehabilitation of historic properties and the elimination
of structural deficiencies is needed to prevent and eliminate blight, blighting influences, and
conditions detrimental to public health and safety.
7. The rehabilitation of several facilities to comply with the American Disabilities Act.
8. The continuation of the City's ongoing efforts to design and construct storm drains needed
to improve the living environment and prevent flooding in low/moderate neighborhoods.
9. Provisions ofloans through the Section 108 Loan Program to encourage the construction of
commercial and industrial centers to continue job creation for the economic empowerment
oflowand moderate-income. . .
10. Assisting in the provision of chi1dcare facilities in locations convenient to the workplace for
low-income residents. (The City's Redevelopment Agency currently assists childcare
facilities operated by Cornerstone Day Care, Camp Fire Boys and Girls, and Pal Center.)
mGH PRIORITY #7
Expand and Improve Existing Infrastructures to Meet Current
and Future Needs
.
PRIORITY #7 - Expand and Improve ExIsting Infrastructure to Meet
Current and Future Needs
The five-year targets are:
100 handicapped access ramps at various locations
J!!Q:.Street and sidewalk rehabilitated/constructed
.!Q Traffic signals installed at various locations
I
The one-year targets are:
~handicapped access ramps at various locations
@: Street and sidewalk rehabilitated/constructed
4 Traffic signals installed at varioUs locations
F. IMPEDIMENTS TO FAIR HOUSING CHOICES
I
The CUITent impediment to Fair Housing Analysis identified the following summary findings with
sugg~ corrective actions. The City is currently updating the impediments to Fair Housing
.t.:~..IYSI8. If the outcome suggests findings that are dift'erent from the ones below the new findings
...~1 be incozporated when completed: ,
P:IFOI/JIW{OllSlNG FOIIMStCONSOU/MTED PI.IIN11000 CONsouD./TED PUN REP Z./JOC
,
130
.
· Lack of knowledge and awareness of Fair Housing Laws makes it impossible for residents to
recognize disCriminatory practices by housing providers and lenders.
· Recommended Action: Increase the level of education through various means such as
newsletters, workshops, paid public announcements on the radio, community billboards, and
personal interviews on local cable television.
City olSan BeJ7/Qrdino - ConsoiidoJed PiIln _ FY 2000-2oos
If
.
· Discriminatory lending and insuring practices based upon color, race, nationality, and other
arbitrary characteristics Such as families with children and persons with disabilities
· Recommended Action: Conduct intensive lenders and insurer's training with emphasis on fair
lending practices.
· Lackllf affordable large units to accommodate large families.
· Recommended Action: Encourage the development of3+ unit apartments and single-family
units.
mGU PRIORITY #8
PRIORITY #8 - Elimination of Impedlments to Fair HousJng Through
Education, Enforcement and Testin2
The five-year targets are:
~Education, Tlllini"8, Public Announcements
~Cases of Testing
~ Enforcement - Advertisements
ElimInation of Impediments to Fair HOUSing Through
Education, Enforcement and Testing
.
The one-year targets are:
~Education, Training, Public Announcements
1 Cases of Testing
i Enforcement - Advertisements
G. OVERCOMING BARRIERS TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING
In order to remove or improve any negative effects that may result from public policies
........... ............- "'CltyofSon"- '_...........1bIIowmg
COurse of action during the next 5 years:
I. .....,.... ~ with ~.... .....................-.....,... .
to ~ISt the City m making the best Planning, infrastructure and development
decISIOns.
P:lFOJwswoUSlNa FOIIAISIcoNsouAlTED PLdNt2000 CONSoUAlTED "LAN lIEI' 2.DOc 1Jl
co.,'.,.;.
,,' ~.,/,.:..'~r~.:' '.;y,;
Cify.ofSan Bernardino. Consolitkued Plan. FY 2000-2005
I
2. Continue to work towards increasing public awareness and acceptance of the need
for affordable housing throughout the City.
3. Continue to work toward increasing public awareness and support for the identification
of humane and viable solutions to the City's problems with homelessness.
.
H. LEAD-BASED PAINT STRATEGY
]
The overall goal of the S-year strategy is to reduce or eliminate lead-based paint hazards and prevent
childhood lead poisoning. A long-term strategy to reduce lead-based paint poisoning should include
the development and integration of comprehensive health, environmental and housing programs that
can effectively address lead hazards. Actual programmatic, coordinated efforts regarding testing of
children for lead or lead-based paint abatement rests primarily with County and City health and
housing and community development programs and staff. This data, along with the estimates
determined through the CHAS development process, bas driven the objectives within the five-year
lead-based paint abatement strategy. This strategy contains five parts;
1. Coordinating pubUc and private efforts to reduce lead-based paint hazards and protect
young chUdren. Establish an interagency workgroup and develop a public-private task force to
coordinate and provide direction for prevention activities.
.
2. Integrate Lead Hazard Evaluation and Reduction Activities Into Existing Housing ".
Programs. Integrate activities to identify and reduce lead hazards with all g!)Vemment-assiSted
rehabilitation activities. " .,.
.
" "
3. Develop Technical Capacity to Address Lead-Based Paint Hazards. Develop a COre of
environmental specialists who can ensure that the technical aspects of assessment and lead
hazard reduction are managed appropriately.
4. Promote Comprehensive Public Health Programs. SUpport the development of programs
with capability for screening and the provision of foJiow-up for children identified as lead
poisoned, and public education and prevention.
5. Education and Advocacy. Work with appropriate agencies to ieeJc: lead-based paint hazards
reductions to protect the public. Clearly communicate the extent of the lead problem and the
measures to be taken to reduce risk and protect health. Also, advocate for increased Federal,
State and local funding, as appropriate, to finanCe lead hazard abatement and reduction activities.
The County identified 891 cases in the City oflead-based poisoning that have been reported
since 1992. However, these are only the reported cases as there are more children in the
community who have not yet been tested. As awareness of this problem, its symptoms and
health and behavior effects grows, the number of reported cases will probably increase.
Although lead was banned ftom residential paint in 1978, about half of the total United States'
hOUSing stock - an estimated 57 million older homes _ contains some lead-based paint.
Approximately 20 million hOUSing units contain lead~; flaking orpeeling lead-based paint
P:IFOJUawOU$1N(; FOIlAIS1coNSOUDA'IrD Pl.AM2(J(J(} CON.1ouAf'IrD PlAN REY 2.DOC
132
or excessive levels of tiny lead Particles in household dust HUn estimates that 3.8 million
homes containing such immediate lead hazards are occupied by families with young children
who are at immediate risk of POisoning. Half of these families own their homes; haIf have
incomes above $30,000 per year.
City olSon Bernardino - Consolidated Plan. FY 2000-2005
.
Lead-based paint containing up to fifty percent lead Was in common use through the 1940s.
Although the USe and manufacture of interior lead-based paint declined during the 1950s,
exterior lead-based paint and some interior lead-based paint continued to be available until
the mid-1970's. In 1978, the Consumer Product Safety COmmiSSion banned the manufacture
of paint containing more than 0.06 percent lead by weight for use on interior and exterior
residential surfaces and furniture. Lead-based paint is still available for industrial, miIitaIy
and marine use and occasionally ends up being used in homes.
'fobl" 40 """ 41 ohow.. -... or... .......or........... ;" ... c;,y -.... ""'-
..... -.............. - by "'Y Iow-... """'............ """-"" by....
renter- and owner-ocCUpants. The County estimates that 59,558 children in the 100 percent
federal Poverty level live in pre-I 950 housing in the County and may be at risk.
TABLE 40
HOMEs AT HIGHEST RISK FOR LEAD-BASED PAINT HAzARDs
~ HOUSEHOLDS - CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Age of iI ofVer" Low and % with Lead- iI Esthaated Marcia of
Uall: Year Other Low lacome Based Palat with Lead- Error
BuUt Households Based Palat ~ .'.
PRE-I940 3052 X.90- 2747 X.IO .. 275
1940-1959 3107 X.80- ~486 . X.IO- 249
1960-1979 12~94 X.62- ~808 X.IO- 781
Total Reuter Households Estfaiated 13,041 :!: 1,305
with Lead-Based Palat
Source: Table 9, H0U8ing Unlu by Age of Unit, Tenure. tlJU/ Income G""'P: 1990 ClUS Dtzlilbootc.
.
TABLE 41
HOMEs AT mCIlEsT RISK FOR 1'~BAsED PAINT IlAzAIms
OWNER-oCCUPIED HOUSEHOLDS - ~ OF SAN B~ARDINO
Ace of iI of Vel)' Low and % with Lead. iI EstJDiited Marcia of
UaIt: Year Other Low Iacome Based Palat With Lead- Error
BuUt HOUSeholds Based Palat
PRE-I940 2468 X.90_ ~~ X.IO_ 222
1940-1959 4078 X.80- 3 62 X.IO_ 326
1960-1979 1~15 X .62 .. 1Q,.053 X.IO- 1005
Total OWUer HOUSeholds Estfmated 15,536 :!: 1,553
With Lead-~ Pafat Soutii,: Table 9, H0U8ing Untb by Age ofUntr, Tenure. and Income Group: 1990 CiUS DalIIboak.
.
P:IFrJ/WswOClSlNG F'ORMSICoNSOUD.(TED PLitNI1aoo CONsoUD.(TED PlAN lIE" 2.DOC
,
IJJ
.-,../,.,,~-f;!.'\
,','i "t_~',i~-.. ;;.; :,,>..
City o/San Bernardino. Consolidated PIDn . FY 2000-200S
.
TABLE 4Z
SUMMARy OF ALL HOUSEHOLDS BY AGE OF UNIT
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
AaeorUalt: Year t# orVery Low" Otlaer Low- t# Eatlmated WltIa Lead- ~
BaDt Iaeome Houehol", Based Palat or Error
PRE-I940 5~20 ~968 + 4!l7
1!l4O-1!l5!l Z,J8S ~748 + 575
1!l6O-Im 28 80ll 11-861 + 1.786
Tola/s 41"14 28.577 + 2.858
SDww: TtIbItJ 9. HtNUing Unl# byAp oj'UnIt, T--.1IIId I~ Group: 1990 CIIAS Dtltabook
TABLE 43
SUMMARy OF ALL HOUSEHOLDS BY TENuRE
ClTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
t# or Very Low " Otlaer t# Eatlmated WltIa Marcfa or
_'lYPeoCUalt Low-Iaeome HODlehol", Lead-Baleel Palat Error
Renter 18753 13.041 + 1~04
Owner-<>CCupied ~61 15.536 + 1~S4
TolaIs 41514 2~,s17 + ~858
s....-: TflbltJ 9, H_ing Unl# by Ap O/Unil. TtJlUnW, tlJ/d IN:t1mtJ Group: 1990 CIIAS Dalabook.
.
BUD provided information on low and vczy low-income hOUSeholds by age in the 1990 CHAs
Databook. This benchmark information collected from the 1990 Census was USed to create Tables
42 and 43. Natioually, the percentage of units containing lead increases with the a~ pf.the
structure. This is why the .90, .80, and .62 factors with a:!: margin of error arc used in estimating the
total number of POtentially hazardous units.. The likelihOOd of housing containing lead is influenced
by geography, housing type, and climate. These factors iIre only a guide. Due to the fact that lead-
paint is typically used in more harsh climates as a protectant, southern California housing is less
likely to have used lead paint on residential structures, because of the wanner temperate and mild
climate. However, by multiplying the number of housing units of a particular age by the likely
Percent containing lead-based paint The resulting estimates were obtained.
'.
Of all low- and very low- income housing units in San Bernardino, 28,Sn arc estimated to have
lead-based paint; 13,041 would be renter households below 80 percent of area median income and
IS,536 would be owncr-occupied houschofdS belowSO'Perccnt ofarea median income. Those units
which may be of greatest risk to low and very-low income renters were built prior to 1940 and
number 3,OS2 or S.2 percent of the total housing stock. Pre-194O units which may present the
greatest risk to very low- income renter households arc less than 2 percent of all units in the City;
I,on hOUSing units. ACCOrding to the 1990 census, the oldest housing units arc located in CCDsus
tracts 4200 and 4800 through S800. These tracts arc located in the central portion of the City,
generally bounded by Waterman Avenue on the east; Mill Street on the south; Lytle Creek drainage
ditch on the west, HighlllndAvenue west of the 21S Preeway; and, the 30 Preewayto~tfllll Drive
then to 40th Street on the north.
. . .
. TolIIe 3-3. JIIl&e 3.,. ~"'1IId WoobbIcP/aa Ibrlhe""'__1 orLcacl.Buod PIiDlIa PriYl/elyOwaed~.
,
I':IFrJJtAawousma F'OIU.tsIC(}NSOUl).(TEDI'UNI1ooo~TEDI'UN REY2.DOC
IJ4
J
City of San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200J
I. ANTI-POVERTY STRATEGY
]
.
The Anti-Poverty Strategy requires taking into account factors affecting poverty over which the
jurisdiction has control. Poverty thresholds are revised annually to allow for changes in the cost of
living as reflected in the Consumer Price Index. Poverty thresholds are applied on a national basis
and are not adjusted for regional, state or local variations in the cost ofliving (with the exception of
several "high cost" areas. As of 1999, the poverty threshold varies by household size and
composition (age, number of children). For a single, elderly individual, the threshold is about
$8,000. For a family of four (two adults, two children. the threshold is approximately $17,000.
In 1990 the City of San Bemardino had 7,613 families living below the poverty line or 20 percent of
all families in the City. Some of these families are ClIJTently assisted by County General Relief,
TANF or through emergency assistance programs. There are a few structured programs, usually
administered at the County level, specifically targeting households in poverty and assisting these
households in improving their long-term financial and social positions, eventually bringing them out'
of poverty.
-., ~ .. ....... """" ...... · """"'..... -... "" lob Tnimng .
Partnership Act (JTPA), Federal funds provided for job training of high-risk youth, unemployed
adults and other economically disadvantaged individuals. This program is administered by the
Housing Authority. All services are provided at no cost to the participants and are designed to
prepare Participants for enlly into permanent jobs. .
Assisting Impoverished Households to Achieve Economic Independence
Eligible Participants include persons that meet income guidelines that are:
· Youths (14 to 21 years of age). .
· Older persons (55 or older) who are experiencing substantial difficulty obtaining
employment.
· Persons with disabilities who are having diffiCUlty obtaining employment.
· Displaced workers dislocated due to plant closure or mass layoffs (income limits may
not apply).
Services rendered include classroom training, on-tho-job training, and youth employment programs.
DepClltlil\g on the person's needs, suPPOrtive services may be available, such as transPOrtation
allowances, childcare allowances, emergency food assistance, or other special services.
The U.S.Depanment of HOUSing and Urban Development (HUn) bas instituted a new program
c:alIed Family Self-Sufficiency (PSS). The goal of the FSS program is to identify and remove
economic baniers and make each household independent of the housing assistance programs. The
PSS program is administered by local public housing authorities. '_
:..
P:IF'OlWswOllSlNo FORAiSlCONsoulJATED Pl.INI1DOfJ CONsouD.tTED Pl.IIN /lEI' l.DOc
r
Co!
1.U
"
f,..:,_,;,\",,'/II'~";"'::",
i~.n"""",:,';"I,,-j'~", j,
.
City o/San Ben/Qrdino - Conso/idaJed PIIIn _ FY 2oo0-2ooS
HUD has determined that Housing Authorities each must initially assist between 25 and 50
households under PSS. Through the PSS program, a network of employers, social service agencies,
and educational institutions is developed to provide each participating household withjob skills and
social servicei to:
1. Increase the household's income;
2. Make the household self-sufficient; and
3. F-liminAte the hOusehold's need for rental assistance.
The participating household signs an agreement to work over a five-year periOd toward becoming
self-sufficient. In exchange for the hOusehold's commitment and work, the housing authority
evaluates the household's specific needs and determines fac~rs that arc detrimental to the family's
self-sutliciency. ,
The Housing Authority provides a sequence of services to increase the households income. These
services might include education, employment training. language training. interviewing skills
train~ childcarc services, and/or transportation services, dcpcnding on the households needs.
Appropriate social service providers and education institutions have been contacted regarding the
feasibility ofthcir providing services to PSS program participants.
.
Los PadrInos Community Coalition. This program has been developed to provide gang
suppression counseling and job training to at-risk youth. The program includes Proactive graffiti
removal and clean-up through a twenty-four hour hotIine in order to address slum-blight
COordiDatIng G.-sls with Other Programs and Services. The City is confident that theCurrcnt
services it provides through the JPTA and PSS arc significant and well-integrated. Currently, there
arc DO plans to change the existing successfUl course. '
, - '
,
COordiDating Services. The City of San Bernardino will continue to meet with public and other
assisted housingprovidcrs and private and governmental health, lUental health, and Service agencies
to use all available fCSOurces to their maximum levels of effectiveness to provide for needy San
Bcmardino residents. Meetings between thcscpartics win occurregulariy throughout the fisc:a1 ycar
to cndozse applications for funding and to discuss cooperative ventures as they present themselves.
I. S-mcc adoption 'of the 1995 Consolidated Plan, federal we1filrc reform has rcsulted in
modifications to many existing social and supportive service programs and the adoption or
several new programs that relate to anti-poverty efforts. The Inl..nd Empire WcIfarc Reform
Coalition SPOnsored a forum on November 13, 1997 to obtain input on the County's CalWORKS
Plan, which is one of the prinuuy anti-poverty strategy document, and develop local
Performance outcomes. The event was widely publicized and Over 300 persons rcprcscnting
various community Olpni"ltions attended. As a rcsult of the collaboration, San Bernardino
County's CalWORKs plan descn'b~ a blll~nccd approach to moving we1filrc recipients Jiom
dcpcndcncyto unsubsidizcd employment while preserving a safctynct forchiidrcn. Itpromotcs
. PersOnal l'CSponSJ'bility forwelfarc recipients in securing employment and supports the goals of
~g families in attaining self-sufficiency, improving the ciuality of life for families and
chiidrcn, and decreasing the cost of public ~ce through higher levels of employment.
IW'WMSWOtG7NOFO~1'ED I'ldlNooo CON.s'o.uJ:wmol'/.AN UI'Z.Dae
r
-- - _n.__._
.
.
City o/San Bernardino - ColI$olidaJed Plan _ FY 2000-200$
To fund this pilot program, $15,000,000 in Neighborhood Initiative Funds, have been appropriated
1hrough federal legislation (H.R. 2158). The fimds are placed in the federal Deparlment of Housing
and Urban Deve1opment's (BUD) budget to be drawn down by the County of San Bernardino, City
of San Bernardino, Highland, and Redlllnds to eradicate neighborhood blight. Consequently, the
City of San Bernardino has adopted seven (7) target areas in which to implement this program.
Working closely with neighborhood organizations and other agencies, the County and City will
revitalize neighborhoods and offer specific programs and funding to improve the target
neighborhoods. The programs to be offered are:
A. NEIGHBORHOOD INITIAllVE PROGRAMS AND FUNDING:
.
Responsible Entity Amount Allocated
$450000
SIOOooo
$400 000
$450000
SIOOooo
A SI50000
A SI50000
A SIOO 000
A To be funded in Year 2
A SIOOOOO
S2 000 000
The above programs will be offered in the Target Areas below, however, COnmtencing wia( " "
TargctAreaL , .
B. NEIGHBORHOOD INITIAllVE PROGRAM TARGET AREA BOUNDARIES
"
orth ofKendaIJ
,
M. PUBLIC HOUSING RESIDENT INITIATIVEs
;
As in,U""ted in previous Parts of the Plan, the City of San Bernardino does not own any public
housiug but will continue to support the Housing Authority's efforts.
.
P:IfDR.tt.swoUI7NG FORMsIcoNSoUDATED"l.lN\1oqo CONSolJDATED PUN IlEYl.lJOC
r
1$'
.
.
.
City o/San Bemtlrdino - Consolidated PltIIl- FY 2000-2OOS
over the period of the Consolidated Plan, the City intends to adopt additional areas and possibly
implement programs on a City-wide basis.
J
o. SERVICE DELIVERY AND MANAGEMENT
1
The Economic Development Agency (BOA) has the lead responsibility for the development and
implementation of all of the City's housing and community development programs. The Division is
responsr'ble for the annual plan's execution, any amendments to the Plan, and reporting on progress
..ft!t;ned during a given fiscal year toward the completion of the Plan.
The curn:nt 5 year Consolidated Plan inCOlporates all funding sources: federal. state, local, tax
increment and private and developer financing. These funds create single and multiple family
housing. as well as senior housing and other identified special needs projects. The types of housing
which will m:eive the greatest level of City advocacy will be housing for the elderly, handicapped,
special needs populations and low and moderate income families. .
Numerous projects require the need to involve private developers, as well as non-profit developers,
in order to enhance and expand atl'ordable housing opportunities in the City. The BOA will look to
utilize all sources offunding and work with private developers, as well as non-profit developers, to
help reaIize its housing goals. The Agency is able to establish and implement a variety of programs,
inceutives and agreements with developers to provide gap financing, construction rmancing
suarantees, rust time homebuyers programs. This is coupled with the administration and
implementation of rehabilitation programs fo~ single-family units and mobile home parks, infill
housing, and manufactured housing projects that provide atl'ordable hOUSing in the City. . .' '.. ..
'.
r
P:IFORJawOUS/N(; FOIWSIt:oNsoUZU'IEDPUNI1t11JfJCOIaouzu'IEDPUNllEYz.DOC
140
.
City olSon Bernardino. Consolidated Plan. FY 2000-2001
As stated Previously, the mission of the City of San Bernardino is to actively maintain, improve and
develop quality neighborhoods and housing opportunities throughout the City of San Bernardino.
The City has identified eight "needs" .and priority areas to pursue. The priority areas are:
1. Preservation and rehabilitation of the "affordable" existing single family units.
2. Expansion ofhomeowncrship oPPOrtunities and assistance to homebuyers with the purchase of
atrordable housing (existing and new construction).
3. Provision of rental assistance and preservation of existing affordable rental housing
4. Assistance to homeless and special needs persons with supportive services programs.
5. Expansion of "affordable" housing opportunities through new construction.
6. Promotion of Economic Development and Employment Opportunities for Low- and Moderate-
Income Households.
A. STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION
J
.
7. Improvement and Expansion of Infrastructure to Meet Current and Future Needs and To Create
a Suitable Living Environment.
8. Elimination of Impediments for Fair Housing Through Education, Enforcement, and Testing
The City's strategy is to aggressively utilize federal, state and local funding sources to operate a
number of programs to assist hOuseholds in each of the eight priority areas. FollOwing is a
disCUSSion offunding sources, a SUIlunaIy of each of the priorities listed in the Five Year Strategy
section of this Consolidated Plan, the One Year Objectives that have been established by the City,
the proposed geographic allocation of resources and a pian for service delivery &nd management.
1. Fundln Sourcu tuUI A.vlliJahk Pro
a. Funding Sources Anticipated to be Available for Programs and Activities. The resources
expected to be available to cany outprojccts and activities identified during the 2000-2001 fiscaI
year are:
Pro Dl
CDBQ
HOME
ESQ
$cctioa 8 - Pro'oct &: T~
$cctioa 8 - M!I!Iaile ~i1iladoa Pro
~108
TOTAL
Federal Soan:e
JtesoUI'Cel
$3 876000
$1 774000
$138000
$6170829
$535000
$1800000
$14 '3 82'
I':IFDRAawOUSlNt; FOIWSIcoNsoUlJA'lED PlANI100(} CO~UlJA'lED PUN lllrV. "^'"
,
.
.
CiIy afSan Bernardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-2005
2. Fandin2 Source
A. FonnulalEntltJement Programs
ESG
Public Housing Comprehensive Grant
B. Competitive Programs
HOPE 1
HOPE 2
HOPE 3
ESG
. SlIpJlOrtive Housing
HOPWA
Safe Havens
Rum! Homeless Housing
See. 202 Elderly
See. 811 Handicapped
Moderate Rehab SRO
RenIaJ Vouchers
RentaJ Certlllcates
Public Housing Development
Public Housing MROP
Public Housing ClAP
UHTC
.
,
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
CPO Consolidated Plan
Support of Applications by Other Entities Report
Support Application
by Other Entities?
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
y
N
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
1':1FOItIISW00000000~TEDl'lANIlODtJC'ON.fOUD.fJZDI'I.ANItEl'UJOC
U~
· Priority #3: Provide Rental Assistance and Preserve Exfstia Afrordable Rental Houslag
Uaderthis priority, the City will assist low- and vCJy low-iacome households with rental payments
to allcviatc rent burdca, overcrowding and.unsafe or uasaaitaly living conditioas. .
Acc:ordingto the SanBcmardiao County Department of Public Social Services, over one-third of the
City's population relied on some form of public aid during the earlYaad mid-1990s. There is
statistical evidcacesupportiag a doubliag ofapplicaats for public support service assistancc during
tile threc-ycar period 1992-1995. This was due, ia part, to the dccliaiag availability of affordable
housing iaLos Angeles and Orange counties, causiag some migration ofpcrsoas to San Bernardino
County in pursuit of more affordable housiag and housing assistance. In addition, the impacts of the
economic recession that plagued the local economy until at least 1995 cannot be downplayed as a
filMOJ:
CiJy o/San Benuzrdino - CoIIS()Iid4ted Plan. FY 2000-200$
As a consequence, the Cityprojccts a continued high level ofnced for housiag assistance during the
2000 -2001 period, even if economic conditioas continue to improve.
The FlW- YearConsolidatcd Plan outlines the programs to be used to provide rental assistance under
this priority. The following table SUDUnarizcs the funding sources, funding amounts and households
to be assisted ia the next year.
.
TABLE 47
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PrIority #3: ProYlde Reatal Asslstuee aad Preserve ExIstInIl Afl'ordable Reatal Houslal! . . .'
AcCIvIty . FuadJaC P1aIUled . HOllleholds to be
Uadertakea . Source FuadJal! Assisted
Scaiaa B Rada1 Certificate and Voucher Program Section 8 S6,170,82ll l,2lll
Sec:liClll8 Moderate Rehabilitation Program Moderate S535,ooo 27
Rehabilitation
PlOgram
RcaIa1"'ni_~ Program RDAHousing SI20,ooo 50
Fund
Utility ....bi~ Program RDA Housing S80,OOO 220
Fund
s.....-: CllyqfStm B_rdino 61qJf alimlua; CorIn(yofStm Benwrdino H_inB JlIIlIrm1Jy &Iinuttei.
'.
#4: Assist Homeless and S eda1 Nced Penons with Sa ortlve Services
~ 1his priority, the City provides the grc&test amount of housing assistance aad supportive
servlC:~ to ~ ~cmardino's h.omcl~ population, "at-risk" population, aad other special needs
. poplll'lfions "t-lied by the City. This priority iacludes the City's strategies for transitional and
em.ClJ~dtclters forthe homelcss, the Prevention ofhomelflllmess aad helping thehomelcss make
a tnmsiIion to pllDDaacnthousiag. The foUowingtable details the fimtfi"Jsourccs planning fUntfi"J
and hm._1.oJds to be assisted through these programs iD the next year. '
r
~~~CONSOuluJl2)I'LiINIlfJooCONsn'.In~",n D, ~.r.._.. ___
· limits and in tom, encouraging the economic empowerment of its low- and moderate-income,
especially low-income residents.
City olSan Benuzrdino . Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200$
Priority ##6:
Promotion of Economic Development and Employment Opportunities for
Low- and Moderate-Income Households
The City's highest priorities are: I) to attract industries and employers that provide more higher-
payingjobs and a wider range of employment opportunities, and 2) to assure that local workers have
the nC('....,~pry skills to till those jobs.
To implement these priorities, the City, in conjunction with other agencies and privateorganizatiODS,
will pursue strategies that promote the growth of production industries whose goods or services are
sold to state, national, or global markets to bring outside income into the col11Diunity. The City will
also promote particular industries that are attracted by the Comparative natural resource,
tIansportatioa, cost, labor force, and other advantages that San Bernardino offers.
The primary structure for implement these priorities are the City's Economic Development Agency
and the Mayor's Business Advisory Council. During the 2000-2001 fiscal year, the City will
continue to support job training, education, downtown revitalization, and infrastructure improvement
efforts.
.
TABLE 51
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Priortty #Hi: Promotloa OfEcoaomlc Development and Emplo)'llleat Opportuallles for Low- and
Moderate-Iacome ROuelaolclt
Activit)' Fuadlag Plaaaed ROlISebolds To
Uadertaken Source Fuadla.. Be Assisted
Small Dusiness Development ColpOratioa CODG $20,000 10
Community lavcstmeat ColpOmtioa COBG $120,000 25
NatioaaI Devclllplllent CoIporatioa _ Grow s.n CODG $200,000 4
Beman!iao
Business lacentive COBG $160,000 16
Sourr:e.. CiIy olSan Bef7llll'dinD 6tq/f at/nuua.
Priority ##7:
Expand and Improve &!sting Inf'rastructure to Meet Current and
Future Needs
The City's five-year Capital Improvement Program (1999-2004) represents a key community and
economic development tool to implement the priorities discussed in the Consolidated Plan. This
~gnun allocates funding for targeted public investments that support revitalization of older
. DClghborboods and downtown San Bernardino as well as new development that will create
employmcm for local residents.
- .
P:IFOIIJtSwoClSlNa~TEDPLfNl2fK1D~TEDPUNIlEVUX>/"
r
.
.
CiIy ofStln Bernardino - Con.ro/Mated Pion _ FY 2000-2OOS
Priority tJ8:
Ellmlllation of Identified Impediments to Fair HOUSing through
EducatiOIl, Enforcement. and Tes~
To support the City's efforts to increase housing availability and accessibility for low- and
moderate-income households, the City supports a number of programs and services to promote fair
housing, inclUding:
· Education and training on state and federal fair housing laws
· Mediation and complaint resolution
· Monitoring of compliance by individuals and organizations involved in the sale,
financing, renting, advertisement, and management of housing.
· Financial assistance and economic development programs to increase incomes for
Jow- and moderate-income households.
The City will focus on two strategies to remove impediments to fair housing: I) increase
accessibility to homcownership, and 2) ensure that low- and moderate-income renters have adequate
access to sound rental housing.
.
Current and past studies of impediments to fair housing and monitoring of compliance have
concluded that the primary difficulties faced by low- and moderate-income households relate to their
financial circumstances rather than race, ethnicity, gender, or national origin. Most complaints
submitted to the Inland Mediation Board involve landlord-tenant disputes, and many of these
involve property maintenance issues. There appear to be a disproportionate number of complaints '
filed by female-headed households with children, which could indicate that some sing1e mothers
experience difficulties in obtaining suitable housing for their families. Of thirteen complaints filed
with the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing between 1997 and 1999, race and
disability were the primary bases cited for the complaints. Eviction was themost-cited act forwhich .
a complaint was filed, follOwed by refUsa1 to rent and offering ofuncqual terms. .
In light of these findings, the City will continue to implement programs and support efforts by other
agencies to improve economic OPPOrtunities for low- and moderate-income households, increase
hOUSing availability (partiCularly homcownership), assist other agencies in Providing child care and
supportive services for families with children, and ensure that single parents are not unreasonably
zcstriCted in their housing choices.
TABLE SO
Cl'IY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Prio till: E1lnol"~Uoa orIm edhaeaCl to FIIfr Rolllla 1brou h Educacioa
Activit)' FaadJaa PIaaaed
- Uadertakea Soan:e Faadla
Fair Housiag/LandJordfI'eaaat Pro&nlll CDBQ $40,000 120
F"',,'"Itioa, TIaiaiog, Public AnnouaCClllcaI CODO $40,000 5UaiII
TCSIiug Cues CODa $40,000 I Uait
Ear~t'Ad~ CODO $40 000 5 Uairs
......, ao..-s..__...,-___
I':~ FORMSICoIaOUD.ITEDI'l.fM2{)(J(J CON.roLnl.cTEDI'UN1lRV~,.,.,.
-
c.
-I
City o/Sa" Bernardi"o - Como/idated Pia" .. FY 2000-2005
I
I
B. OTHER AcnONS
I
I
1. Publlc Polides
To ameliorate the negative effects of public policies, the City of San Bernardino will take the
following actions in FY 2000.
L
Zoning - Unit allowances (square footage). To ameliorate public policies, the City Planning
Department staff made procedural/policy changes to allow infill units to reduce minin:twn
square footage requirements from 1300 square feet to 1100 square feel This will allow for
more affordable units to be buill
b.
Seismic Retrofit Ordinancc. The City has also established a seismic retrofit Ordinllnce. As it
relates to mobile homes, the City's new Mobile Home Rehabilitation Program will assist
low-income owners. This will ensure these affordable units remain safe,viable units in the
City's Overall housing stock.
The City has increased dialogue and project coordination with the various departments
involved in implementing the city's hoUSing goals and will continue to provide input on
regulations, codes, and ordinances that could POtentially have adverse affect on the provision
of affordable housing.
The EDA will continue to aggressively attract housing development, andlhrouih extensive surveys
and market analyses, will ensure that all development will be completed in harmony with the State
Housing Element and Consolidated Plan goals. During FY 2000-2001, specific actions will be taken
. to achieve cooperation and coordination among state, loca~ and private agencies or institutions in
implementing activities.
2.
Institudontzl Structure
J
.. .
'.'
The City coordinates the development and execution ofa regional homeless assistince plan with a
countywide Homeless Coalition and a Local Coordinating Group. Participation in these groups
includes non-profit servicc Providers, County Board of SUpervisors, County Department of Public
Social Services, County Department of Mental Health, County Department of Public Health,
Realtors. the AFL-CIO, Veterans, the Building Industry Association, Habitat for HlIIi1anity, local
colleges andjob training groups. The participation ofthc City in this cooperative effort enables and
tacilitates delivery of homeless services and reso~ through effective networking. In addition,
any development of homeless services outside the city limits serves to lessen the City's homeless
problems.
1
_The Housing Authority of San Bernardino owns and manages about BOO units of public housing
within the City limits, and nearly 2,000 countywide, for OCCUpancy by very low-income 1iImi1ies
who pay no more than 30 percent ofthcir monthly income for rent. The agency's public housing
program includes a mixture of single family housing, pwItir"no;ly housing, and special .needs
3.
Publk HOlISm/! ImDrovt!lIIt1II/B
I':Ii'DJUawoUSlNO FrJRMSICoNSOUAlTED PUNuDDD c:DNM, no...... .. no __. _ ___
-I
CiJy olSon BenuJrdino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200'
D.
Coordinating Services
"
The City of San Bernardino will continue to meet with public and other housing providers and
private and go~emmcnta1 health, mental health, and service agencies to use all available resources to
their maximum levels of effectiveness to provide for needy San Bernardino residents. Meetings
between these parties will occur regularly throughout the fiscal year to endorse applications for
funding and to discuss cooperative ventures as they present themselves. '
I
Eo Progrll1tl/Pro}ect Monitoring
The City will undertake annual reviews of all agencies it provides financial assistance to in
confonnance with 24 CPR 91.230. It's findings will be provided as part of the CAPER Report due
to HOD 8II"1lally. The report will describe the ClllTent status and success of planned activities as
described in the Plan and other infonnation which descn'bes progress and successes of activities.
The Five year Consolidated Plan priorities will be evaluated through comparison of goals. set out for
the fiscal year compared with productivity characteristics and completion data for each program or
activity set for accomplishments of those goals. The numbers presented in each Annual
Pezfonnance Report with objective will state each progran,t and priority's overall effectiveness.
_J
F. Programs Requirements
"CPD Consolidated Plan System Listing of Proposed Projects" identifies the City's ~riority
Description and One-Year CDBO Funds Investment Plan for non-housing community deveiopment
activities for the City of San Bernardino. Proposed non-housing activities include public filcility
improvements such as the rehabilitation of a public semce filcilities including but not limited to a
senior center and emergency shelterlhomeless filcilities, park/playground improvements, installation
of lighting within low- and moderate-income neighborhoods, as well as the funding ofa multitude of
public services agencies. A majority of the public service agencies funded provide counseling, food,
job training, child care and serve the City' seniors, children/adolescents and households in general.
L Specific CDBG Grant Program SubmissIon Requirements
A. CDBO - other resources that may become available in addition to annual grant:
1_ Program income expected to be generated during the Program Year: None.
L the amount expected to be generated by and deposited to revolving loan
funds: None.
-
b. the total amount expected to be received from each new float-funded activity
that is included in the Plan: None.
'c.
the amount expected to be received during the ClllTent program year from
float-funded activities descn'bed in a prior statement or pian: None.
P:IFORJi:swOUSlNG FOJ/AfsI~T6Dl'l.AINoooCON.1aulunrn N.411...._
r
"1
.
.
..
.
Cily ofStm Bemardino - Consolidated Plan _ FY 2000-200.5
Befin..ndng - N/A
m. Speeiflc ESG Submission Requirements
The City solicited, received, reviewed and evaluated all proposals and made funding
ICCOmmendation based on experience, ability to provide service and ~e number of households
expected to benefit from the program. Match grant funds were also identified in each recipients
application.
,
P::1FD1lJISI1InrmNn m_uafY)AA"/11 ,,,,,...'" .... 4......... __.__. _ .__
! I I I I
~; . . I
:g: I J I I ,J'll I I
'--'-
~ 'jl~!!W!ldU!!
. t- E ...
l! .S! ~
C
Q ~ i
',-e-.-
- 10. ~ 'tJ I
~ :-' m a. Cij ~p -
CIJ -
,-I u.: .1 I
t-- J CD ~
r- E i~
~ -'C-' ~ ~ \J
. . 0 ~
I r L t-.
, . '\ l ';: . .. ~
..
- I~ ~-I. ~ ~
. j F
-
:- ~ ~ "-
I - : ~. i!:
- l. III -
" I.. CD ! :.--1,....-
-~
0 .~ ~. ~ .
r-- ') "E . :
II: -
.i- .. fJ I-
h ... ~ .. l
c.
. .1" ,~' I
b
j= ,~
'- :l! :
L- ;g g - l~ ~ ~ I -
III .; ~ Iii J .~ ;
':i II) C
---.: ~ 0
~ rm ~
r-- j' p. = T
III ! j
-B ~ .~
nf
'--- -IJ · I....J ~ '\ 1/\._\ r
, ......
? m /' " -l-" I
.! ~ .~ "'- /1 I \
1 ~ () cI) r--
.9-e ~
~ '2 ' ~
- I;? .9 \.
'"
- - ~z
CD
r-- 0 0 .
--.f! I
~
. CD ~ - t-
,Q ~
::::J ~
'-'
\ r- _I_I
l- f
I
-
.. - '-_._~..._.,.---- -"--~-
.
Oty olSan Btm/Qrdino . er.,...rolidaJed P/tur _ FY 2000-200S
CONSOLIDATED PLAN
LISTING OF PROPOSED PROJEcrS
FY 2000- 2001
EXlDBlTr
.
.
~~~zrol'l.ANIlooo~zroI'LfNREVUJOc
,
~.~ -..-------.---
.
J
2000
15.........
o
...
...
~ :
o
...
...
I f
~
0
..
- II
C Cl w~ g 5
CD
i lDi~o ~
Bwxx F-
0
-
~
a! ~
CCCD
ClI J! e' ~...
-eo. ~I
::),,0. I!
GIS.!l .!!
c
II. s~
QClI0 u
"0 ~ ~ ~ 2l
. c= a. ..... if
:. (ij 0 0 0 J
=0... "! 0
. OCa. ~ Ie ..,
:cO.... .., ... i
....00 8
....
00 Q H,
-a.c J!
co-
CD 1;;
E - Ii
1:: ..J 0
...
ClI it ~~ i
Q. Is :!:!
CD u. ~
0 il
. iJ. f
~ s:
:;) 81
i i_j ~
It :&
I ;;1.. < lI.l
..!j ~ f
.,11 i~
~ !;j :11 ~
i In I...s Ji r .!!
lI.l
a;si fll.lJ I
II !
==
,g.,g. .5;
!!
. ..... r
~
.
-
c
CD
E
Q.
o
-
~
! ~
CCCD
ar .!!! 0'
.Qa....
.:)"a.
05-11
=" ~
c= Q,
", - 0 0
" rn rn ...
. g Ca.
x 0....
....(,)0
OQ Q
-a.c
c,.._
CD....t;j
E ::;
"t:
ar
Q.
CD
Q
.
rn
:i
.
t
-
-j ,
.!
Q.
oS e.
8 j
1'lI~ ~
i f ~
.. 12
C3 8 I/)
I
e
::J
o
a-
~I
MM
II !f
8 ~~
~~
IIi
~~ ~cil~
J
ROOo
1:).........
lIS
tit
~ :
lD
tit
f
~
~mJI ~ J
~-
~
c:
..
~
IS
if iI
i. II
sf "81
~I 'iiI
I Ii III
IJliUnt
j
.2
...
.~
~
0!-
S
i
()
...
~
Is
i~
..t
Ii
fl
8
I I
....
~
c'j
f
m
a
I
(Q
w
i.. ~
'If ~
If(Q~ ::
J
.
Raaa
;5......
N
-
..
~ ::
-
..
I go
e ~
~
0
1: !'C g ~
CD C) W~ I
E G1!:Eo
Q. B ~:J: ...
0
-
CD
~ S
c u ....
==CD I! ~-
as .!! 0' J !
.QQ.... ~I
~"DQ. -
a5CD"D -
-CD ! J ""j
easel) II Rc
"Do 'i" J
.==a, ;i - il
- .."U'
". -0 6 ~
.'. !Iud! ii
O=Q. .... ~
~ II) - ~
x 0... l
...C,)o ..
OQe ~~
-Q.c l'li
=0= ~1 ~f
CD II) fi.3 - II a
E - a ., -
...I .0,& ...
1:: 1; ~ ! III
as :e a ~ c3
Q. ll'" o 0 Iii(/)
CD l!! I- 11 zz f
c c3 at
. ... ~.!!
~ I!!l Ii if
~ ~ GI
~J &i ~
C)
1 'D15 ~ ,
jt. Ii
f - Is I
j s- i~
~ ,d !S. . Jt i:!* .-
-
H ,g ~It -
~ ~U ~ ... ~J If I J
.9-& iI(/)~ 13
:!:!
. I ~
~
".
..~"~ .
.
.
..
J
....
~
~
..
i
.
E
~
c
rZ
..z
!
UJ
W
l
....
D
N
.
.
1:
QJ
E
lCI.
o
-
QJ
>
c! ~
CCQJ
as .!! 0'
.QQ.1io
~"ga.
05-11
CD'r:I ~
'C="a.
'. - 0 0
" l/)rn..
5cQ.
:co...
...00
OQ CD
-Q.C
;O~
E ::i
1::
!.
QJ
Q
.
(/)
.
::3
.
II)
e
:l
o
,I
..
2'
:;z
~
f
Go
8
~
1
~
III
ROOO
15***
N
...
*
!!C
C)C)!JIf
l!lIl)OO
UW:J::J:
I
! I !
c ~ S!
:g II) N
Ii
Is
...
-"
.gJo/
"'S
s.
II
. II
! j~I'
i 10
8
...
~ !
J
~ :
...
...
*
f
~
~ iI
~ ~
...
Iii
1)1
iil
1.11
~il
Ui,
li!l
hll
~...
~I
.. j
~c!!
Ii if
S IIJi
-
!~
'i-
III';
~~ IJitiJ~ ~
f
..
In ~
~ II)
tI 'If
:~ !
..:J: i
Ii III I .
.
.
-
c
CD
i
o
-
~
! .e
CCCl)
III .!! e'
-ea.a.
~""
05.!CD
_ClIIII)
...." 0
,'C==Q.
. "i 0 2
g!a.
:1:0....
....(,)0
00 Q
-a.c
c(J~
CD II)
E -
1:: -'
!
CD
Q
t4
::)
.
Rooo
~.........
II>>
...
I
::I
o
I
i :
II>>
...
f
~
HilI ~ J
t
e
~ f
.!!II i
e'Q.;; c
og! ~
8 I i
.~ IA ~ J
:8 i ~
S Ii: ~ 0
(3 :g Iii ~
if
t t-
l sf
; II
i ~ f J!~
I j 1ft
~ I
.E
.j
i~
l!!if
J:s
f'
lj
II
lie
a.llJ
&.-
~I
~M
ij JI
I I~
...
~,
e:j
~ I
~~ j ~
II)
.-
:$
'"
~
g
I
... lD
~ ~
Is 1
J r J* j .
i! f f !
11,,,, fi
l
.;
.
52000
;s--_
vr
...
-
~ :
II)
...
-
,
I E'
~ J
0
- ~
C CI wi ~
~ GI I
;, E mCl~i
C- Bfa: ...
0
- lJ
! ~ c:
:i GI .! CD
c u E i
.c:
"' CCGI .!! I
ClI .!! 0- - ~ ~..
.Qa.... a. ~I
oE ..
~"aQ. 0 l l2.
05G1"a )(8 I
-CD .. .!i
C)ClIfI) 1lI~ ~ ~~
c'1:I 0 u
. --=0. j ~ ... II
fI)~e ~ Ja-
SCQ. ~ Ie lli
- 8 ..
x 0... u
...00 ~~
00 C) f ~j
-Q.C
co= . ::I
CD I/) II) ....11.
E - 5 ..,! I!! ill
1:: .... i fa
ClI i 'i .J) I
D. S "'i~
CD .lIl Ij ~i !! ~II)
c -! 'I'll lj
. 0
UJ f Sa ~~ ,
. II II
~
II)
Ii- ~
f i'. ~! rZ
I -- ot
I 'o'l! Is I
s.. !j Ii
~ iO
f f != i .. w
If-3 Iff j
II; zJ
if I
..
. I
..
..
8
,
e
.
.,
.,
...
~
..
..,
e
"e
b
-
c
CD
E
Q.
o
-
CD
~ ~
CCCD
CIS .!!! 0-
.QQ.a;.
:5-aQ.
CD-a
....-CD
.... CIS rn:
C)-a 0
c= Co
-0
rnrn2
:ICA,
00
:l:u'O
-
00 Q
-A,C
Cu=
CD rn
.e :J
[
CD
o
.
U)
:::)
fi
:lI
o
Rooo
IS***
ft
...
*
!!C
C),ft!l~
m""oo
Bf3~~
~
.
E
_.c
.!!
ala.
E I
Og ~.
~, ...
cae ~ - 'C
j : f I
~ ~
ft
...
*
f
~
~ I
It {i
t" J:
Jil II
~~ 11)1 n
:1 j j 1ft Ii
~ I
~...
~I I
~j ~
Ii !i
B I~
~~
ill
~~ ~lil
I
Ii
~ .c
~~ ~
h if";"~ I
If J ~
.
;
52000
;5.........
N
..
...
~ ~
'..
....
. J
-
e
::I
0 ~
1: ~
GI ~~II I
i BfB
0 t
-
CD
a; .s I
c (,) .c I
CCGI .! a"
ClI .!!! 0' -'Q. .... ~I
-eA.&:; 0& e. I
:;)'0'1:1 i i
05.!GI 8 e. MM
Qar", .~ - .!!
c:2o I .!!. I ii .'0'
"-'0 a. 0 ..
! 0 ~(
"'",e "!
. ::ScQ. Q. ~ ~
00 u :g :a~
:J:uo ...
~ f ~I
OQ Q
-A.C
cu= Iii
CD ", it
E - Ja
-I
1:: ..
as ..
a. 8- J~ !! ;
CD
c 11 ~I cs
. f
~ II I~
:;)
.) I
lD
j )0 IJ !
Is
i~ (
If
I t n ill i
Q. Q. Z
!
8
. l') !
..
8
.
.
-
c
o
E
Q.
o
-
~
.! !
cCo
as .!! 0"
.Qa....
~"aD.
oB.!l'g
=-! 8
. c= Q,
.' Iii 0 ...
. (tIz:::
::I cD.
00
%0'0
-
OQ OJ
-D.c
c,,=
CD '" en
E -
1:: ...I
~
CD
Q
.
~
::)
..
I
::I
o
,;
0200
..5....
tri
..
~ :
ID
..
f
!C ~ ~
2Clif ~ I
Bf3!i:~ ~ F
,IJ
c:
CD
E
i !
IDa. .I
o~ 1
~ 8 is-
raj IfU
8 ~
I
G
- I
:!. ..
:g S
.. I!!
~ ~
I
If Jfn Ii, ,
I I~f 5 I" . 2
i~htl NI" J
1jfihef'al :
t :Jill' Ie )
II) fi1 ~ ,el.a
- ~ 1 I..f ..
~..
~I
jj
c!c!
'I
~~
...
II)
!i!
Is
t;;:e
r~
:i!1
zJ
If
f
~
II)
I,
fI
J*
'II)J
.
52000
15--_
..;
..
-
,;
~ :
C')
..
-
.
-
C
CD
a
o
-
~
a! -e
CCCD
ClI .!! l
-eQ.Q.
:J'tJ'tJ
051:
Q'tJ 0
.C=...
'-0-
. r4rne
. g Co.
:CO...
...(,)0
00 Q
....Q.C
CO"~ _
CD"'';
E -
1:: ..J
!
CD
o
.
~
::)
.
.
I
:s
o
J
52000
15.........
g
-
...
~ ~
R
-
...
J
~
~ml! ~ I
~ J
j i
i ~ J
:s ~ _
8 ~ I
f
11 I i
=1 ~I
11 s) i
i b 1
~. ~8 ~
{I il IJ
~ jl, IIi II
i ,
i
a-
~I
If
ij
:2:2
J1I'
!i
:I~
..
~,
.....
if I g
~U)~ ~
~
J
~
...
U)
Q
< .
II ~
... ~ -
U Iff'
.
1:
CD
E
Q.
o
-
~
.! -a
CCCD
III .! 0-
~Q....
~-aQ.
oaS-g
-11Im
-'a 0
oC= ...
.0 - 0-
0- ! rn e
. 0 CQ.
%0...
...00
00 Q
1:0 Q. .5
CI) ';n
of ::i
III
Q.
CI)
o
c4
::)
.
J
OORo
tit tit 15 tit
~
tit
~ ~
~
tit
.
.
~
o
f
~
C) wi ~ i
B~~~ ~ F
s
.J J
f. f
05 ~
~ I ~
lag U :!: J
;:I :i!j :g 0
.s criB ::J ::
c:; :g~ 01 _
tf~J 5! I
:8IUj i:l -jl...!
jlt:. ~O" !!i
~f:;;~ D..
~ ',"II j ~ ~Iil
~'5 " Sa III I'I iolt:
:=, Ij& If! li!l.
'j I~IIII jJ" j ji,il
=111 Jj~Hj U' nIn
I
j
I
S
R
I
I
II
Ij
a'"
~I
Gf
~Q
Ij
r
u
~~
If;
~
Is
j~
Ii
:c ..
~!
.&t
:!!:c
"E..
!~
i~
C) 5
- ~
~8
i! ..
fff
'(/).9
.
c
CD
E
Q.
o
-
~
~ !
CCCD
III III 0-
.a-a;;
...Q.Q.
=>>"0
...CD"O
....-CD
=&a0
. CJ:! 0
-- Q.
000
::10...
OCQ.
x 0...
_(,)0
OQ Q
C Q.(,) .5
CD -
E .!l
1:: ..J
&a
Q.
CD
Q
.
(I)
:i
.
"
e
:I
o
52000
~-......
i
.,:
...
l ~
l
..
...
~
~
!C ~
ClCl~f ~ .!!I
1!l000 0 i
OW:I::I: F- ~
I -c ~
~ f i
~ ~ ~
..
JL:
jltJ
!1,lli
BJ ..I
I J~ ~e
1 filii
j,fi je III..
alii
J '~IIU
, Ililili
I
i J
j
n I ! it
H Ii! Ii
;d ~~l 'ii
fti IIII ii)
111 ji!t j.
Iii' lIill IB
~..
..g
~~
jij
~~
'l: c
at
!!
~
;(
~
t~
::1:
It
~J
tt
:1::1:
.
52000
~........
vi'
..
...
~ ~
II')
..
...
II) f
.
e
::II
0
..
1: !C ~ 8
. ~8111 ~
a ~
0
-
~
· S
Q u
Cfi~ ~..
ar_ 0
~a..... Co ~I
~'Ca.. f !
G/SS'C i
are I/) e- RR
Q'C 8 1 - II
.e Q.
c- Q, I
-- .. il
. .ge x Ii! "
::Sca. =0 ~ ~
00 ~
XU'O 8 10
- ..Ii;
oCQ I ~~
-a..c .J
cU- .~
· 10 -
s - I !i =e ::'1: .
1:: ~ i il UI !
ar
Q, i ..a fj ~~
. Ii
C
. f f
en .al l! _
. Jj 11
:)
~ ~I j .B
J, c
II) 01 ii ~
ale ~
, in ~ I
-. j .Ii i~
gj lif Ji Iff i
025' i :2
"'0 z ~I ID
f':t. i
-xx
. I
II)
..
S
i.
.
.
-
c
CD
i
o
-
~
t! I
CCCD
ca .!! e'
i!Q.a.
~""
oIS-!:
tlJ" 0
c='c,
-00
cnfOi;
5cQ.
%0....
_00
00 =
-Q.C
co=
II) fO
E :J
1::
[
II)
Q
c4
::J
1
::I
o
Rooo
45.........
.
...
...
!!!:
CI W~
B~~~
i
J
'I
I ~
CD ~
~ Ii;
~
..
11
6j
c
,g
I
~
i
~
.
s
I
is
g I
"
~ ~
:t
...
f
~
~ 11
~ j2
,
!2.
j
I
:l!
l;:
...
~...
~I
Us
~s
ii
<3
I
If J~
i. Jt
:1 I
,I Ii!
I If. 11'1
~ ~il ii
~ III ~s
~~
"''0'
jl
..~
~I
-
... -
:;:5i1l
~I!
~,g~
~
~
...~
ii i*
i! ill
!! Jj~
e
lJ
f
c
~
~
~
q
~
.
.
1:
g
a
o
-
~
.~ ~
CCg
CIS .!!! 0'
.Qa...
5-aD.
a5 Jq~
I:DCIS(/)
C J:! 0
-- Q,
(/)00
=(/)..
OCD.
%0...
_00
00 Q
-a.c
co-
lD '&;
.e ::;
CIS
Q,
CD
o
.
~
~
.
I
~
o
Rooo
~....-
t:S
..
...
B~~!
t
I ~
j ~ I
, ~ 1
:g t; i
,
~ :
o
..
...
f
~
~ ii
~ ;2
it
if ~
I Ji · S!
, If ! j
J II :1
f I .J
! j JS4i 11
j , 10 if
~
g i
~-
~I
~~
il
~~
~
~
I~
Ii
JJ
ff
II
"'
I
..
~I
iJ I
']1 i
~
f
a
>:
~
~
~
i
t;
...
Ifl
.
.
J
51000
;s.........
.0
...
~ :
CIl
...
I f
e
&
- ~
C !!C g
CD Clli1~~ I
E III 00
Q. Bwxx I"-
0
-
CD
~ S
Q u ....
CCCD m ~..
&a .m 0- c
.aD.,__ s1 .... ~I
I!
~'tJD., I II .J!
~CD" i t
-CD e. ~~
Q&afIJ I:
~ t u
. c!! 0 i Ii
-iSQ. .. II
flJfIJE ~ IL
0
SCD., N Q.
:co... :g .. 8 ~Ia
...00 "-
OQ Q 1 ~.!i
-D.,C J .~
co; Ii j _
CD fIJ -,8 ,9
E -
.... I, I ~ a..
t:: 0
&a 21i ..
Q. :,9 ~~ ~
gj -
CD I II
Q t t
. ,;
In S 1
. I ~I 11
:J
,9 IJ I I!
~ IJ c
,
t I J:~ I Is I
1~
Ii co
I ~ 1;1 . t III i
I ILU
iJ I
,g.,g. ~
. S !!
-
i ~
e
-
C
CII
E
a.
o
-
~
~ ~
CCo
caS1)"
"fa....
::>>-aa.
~sl
QClSCO
C~ 0
e -'0 Co
!COe
OCa.
:CO...
_00
OCa
1: G..O .5
CD -
E .!!
1: -I
!
o
Q
.
ell
::>>
e.
"
e
:II
o
s:!Ooo
~.........
iii
..
...
l ~
10
..
...
!!C
CI Wl
Bm~~
'"
oS
I
u;
a;
8
~ J
c
i
B
J
I
J
...:
~~
Saf!
C>
~
i
e.
~ i
~ i
.lOR
~.i!
E If II
I z. *1
I if Jsc
I if IIi
:l i ill I
j l l u 81
i I
~..
~I
MM
Mj
I
fer
~f
!t
n,
..,
..
~
~
f
~ ~
~ ~
C'-~ j
Jt j" Q
~J , J ~
. If J ~ !
~~
.
,;
5!ooo
~.........
..
...
i ~
co
...
I I
e
~
.. ~
c . !!C
CD CI wf ~
i Bf3~~.~ J
0
-
CD
:: f
o ~
CCCD
I'll .!! 0- ~I
.aa.... I
5-aQ. ~
olS/di , lili
Q-a rn ~ ! !!
c- 0
. -'Co
'. - 0 .. II J~
0
." rn rn e g
6cQ. :g a J~
x 0... I/) ..
_uo all - ...~
00 Q l . ~,
"Q.c j.
cu= ;'
CD rn J fH
E - if ..
1:: ..J :1 0
i
I'll
Co !! tj
CD I- II CI)~ f
c
. sf
UJ
. IJ it
::) III
1Ii .i
i! (/)
c
if '1: ..
j J:. ~ i
Ii fill
lId h
II .
ii
If
. I
... ..
.. i
8
J
.
51000
25......
!
..
~ :
~
..
""
. f
e
::I
0
II;
- ~
c
CD CI !!II ~
i G1C100 !
0 Bfa:: ...
-
~
CD lJ
Q u
CCCD I 'l
ClI .!!! 0-
~Q.... I ~..
:)-aa. ~I
~J!!i I
QClI8 15
. c:2 Ie ~ iii.!
". -- Co l ~~
rooo ..
0
. :sro... D:~ '" If I
oCa. ~ ~
~8'O ~dl
S ,
OQO)
-a. c ...
cCJ= Ji. ~ ~I
CD rn f
E - jJI I ' e
1:: ..J I! ~i=
ClI I =.s
Q.;.a.
Co j.rli ,I mCli
CD I- ;]
Q - ~ ~~ ..
~ 0
. i.' ~ i
tI) j!
. I! lJ
:) I
ql I I
~i - ~ j
It
0 ~
t , 'I ..
0
I 'ii i~ I
GI llit sl Ji III
c: ~ Q
~ _J! JJ J
I 11 ~
. I !
;
.
Iiooo
as--_
i
-
~
i
-
o
-
I
e f
::I
0
..
c
CD ..
S !C ~ 8
Q. i~~f
0 Ceo ~ J
- uw:z: ~
~ s
.! s c:
II
ccg E -
.c:
ClSIlIO' .!! c:-
i!ii:&;. GI- G
a.
=>>-aD. oE i ~..
aess-a 0 e.
Q.g I u ~I
u I
1I~ a
c= Q.
-0 ~
. ~(tJe 0 E 's s
;:I ..
0 ! C!C!
OCD. ! ~
:co... ~ i j li
_uo () eo= J
OQ Q I
-a.c j
cu= . 8
CD (tJ .. ...
~ :J j ... ~I
III c i
Q. ~ , j ~J I
CD i
Q
. df ~] e
UJ J s !! L; J
,g ..
. 0
::>> i ~ ~
~ 'S lj
u : I f
., f .c:
Gle l! ~
J f . J.
= I m
u1J . l'- Is a
GIGI J :-! JI
e:a- , )O- J
c !1 .
0 8J ~ lif s
~j C
a:
...
. 8 If w
i .~
~ J
-.. --'.--.---
J
.
5/000
cs.........
..r
...
...
! ~
...
...
I f
:I
0
- ~
= !II: ;i!'
CD Bmll I
i ~
o.
J .II
Ii
! ! E I
.c
==CD "
IV .!!! 0- = ~..
-eo.... Q. .~ .... ~I
o~ I
::)-ao. j
oeCD'tS 0
-CD 0 ~ ~~
t:l)IVU) ..~ ~ J
- =3! 0 ~
-- Q. & .. if
CI)~e 0 J
. ~ ~ II.
S=o. :l! ~
%0,,- 0 :g ... I
...uo 8
..
Oc m ~c
-0. =
=u- I ~S
CD 1;) .,
of ::; J liJ
Is ~ 0
IV ..
Q, IT ~] i
CD I f'" . .. ~~
C s ~
.
. sl , i
CI) ~
.
::) !II .e I
I ~
' I <( !
f j !;f Is I
C'oCi!:
1.1 ii
i ~ In ,fi< i .
lI.i iJ I
::
s.s. ,.; 18
, :!:!
.
I
.
.
-
c
CD
i
o
-
~
~ -e
CCCD
ClI .!!! 0'
.Qa....
~'aa.
~si
=~~
c- ...
---
rnie
Sca.
x 0...
_(,)0
Oc l:l)
-a. c
co=
CD rn
E -
1: ..J
ClI
Q.
CD
C
.
~
:;)
.
It
e
:I
o
,
0200
...~......
Ii
...
~ ~
...
co
...
C) w~
B!~~
f
I&,
III
B
~ !
i
..
I
I!
.
ii i
- ..
s. a
1;j e
Ie If
.., 0
'01
BI
I~
I!~
t.
o.!!
aJ
iqf h~ ~
nl~.i;Jli, f
1~~51INi. II
J~fjfi!fl~ !
! I!:J'HJlli 1
f Illf;fli~ifl i.
j J '~'JI!II!JI Ij
& I ~ d il ~..o;:.@JI
I I
~..
~I
.. s
~c!
II
a
f'
<"
U
. .
~~
f
Ie
..,
,~
j~
Ii
0U
~
<
15
';o~
U II .uBj t.;
If
.
52000
zs......
..s
..
..
.'
i :
CO)
..
..
I f
e
g
- ~
C !!C ~
CD w~ I
i elel:!!
Bf3~:z: ~
0
-
CD
~
Q ~
CCCD 1$"
III .!!! 0'
-eA.&: ; f ~I
:)"O'tI ~
ol5SCD .!i.!i
QIlI(I) i - 1 .. ..
. c:g 0 .!. cc
. -Q. :! .. il fa-
.':000 ~
::1(1).. ~ ~ 0 If
OCA. co
x 0... U) ..
s
_Uo 1M ...
000) ~I
-A.c
Cu- .~
CD l) -
E - i5~ HI
..J ~!I
1:: C$
III
Q. ii i
CD itj' C;II)
0 i ~
. f
en
. ~J
:)
~ II
GI
<( c
li.' Is cZ
i~ r:
I
flii .J!:Z:
I! III ~
... (/)..'" ... ~J z
II)
..
.&t 0
..
:!:z: '" I
. I
..
il!
,
.
5!ClClCl
CS.........
N
..
...
~ :
N
..
...
"
CD f
e
~
0
... ~
C . !!C ~
CD ~ffiJI
~ i
e {!.
0
-
~
.!" ~
CCCD
CV J! 0' ~..
~A.... ~I
5~A. -
I
a5.!~
CVCD f 0;
Q~ :l ! :s ~ 'Ii
c- Q, CQ
-- 1 !i
. 1t)0e .....
gf!!A. ~ iii ~f
zo.... .. J
....uo I~
00 Q ..
"'A.C e ~ ~,
cu= c
CD It) f .
~ :; if t ill
Q.
! J C!
CD t- II ~~ ii
0 ~ lO(I) ~
. ~ sf
~ I
::) J h I,
011 jl j
i
f Jf. ! a
>-
d ~~ Is I
~~
~ ~ Ii
(I) 10 If!
I Q.j iiI 'Ii
..
' Q. N
:1:: !
~a
s.... 2
8 !!
..
. r
I
,
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
"CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN"
DRAFT
APPENDIX A
TO THE 2000/2005
. CONSOLIDATED PLAN
,
.
City of San Bernardino - Consolidated Plan. FY 2000-200S
.
APPENDIX A:
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
.
.
r
,
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PLAN
L
INTRODUCTION AND POLICY STATEMENT
It is the policy of the City of San Bemardino to provide for community involvement in the
planning, development, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of programs funded under
the Housing and Community Development Acts of 1974 and 19n, as amended, and the
Cranston-Gonzales Act of 1990.
The Cillzen Participation Plan rPlan") sets forth the procedures and gUidelines to be
Implemented by the City to provide for the continuing participation by the citizens of San
Bemardlno. While the City desires and recognizes the need for citizen Involvement and has
appointed the Community Development Citizen Advisory Committee (CDCAC) to provide citizen
input, it Is the City Council which has final detennlnatlon and responsibility for all aspects of the
C/ty's housing, community development and homeless programs. This Plan,. originally adopted
In 1975, may be amended from time to time by the Common Council and shall re~ln In effect
until Superseded by a new Plan or until the City no longer participates In the Community
Development Block Grant Program, Home Investment Partnership Program and Emergency
Shelter Grant Program, or other programs that pertain to the consolidated planning process as
required by 24 CFR parts 91, et al.
en.
A summary of the primary objectives of the Plan are provided below: (1) Ensure that citizens are
infonned of the amount of funds available under the Plan, the range of activities that may be
undertaken, as well as the various program requirements; (2) Provide for pubnc hearings on
community development and housing needs; (3) Provide citizens with adequate OPPOrtunities to
participate In the development of the Consolidated Plan with any required changes, revisions, or
amendments to the plan; (4) Provide technical assistance to clllzens In developing specific
Proposals for funding consideration; (5) Provide an on-golng process for citizens likely to be
effected by program activities, to articulate needs, express preferences about proposed
aclivlUes. assist In selecting priorities, and participate in the overaU development of the
Consolidated Plan; (6) Provide a process through which citizens may participate in the
monitoring and evaluation of community development and housing activities; end (7)
Provide a Process whereby citizens may comment with respect to any aspect of the City's
housing and community development perfonnance and be assured that oral and written
comments will be considered and responded to in aCCOrdance with federal regulations.
EURPOSE
m. STANDARDS OF PARnCIPATlOti
All aspects of the City's citizen participation efforts shall be conducted in an open manner with
freedom of access to all interested parties. The City encourages the Involvement of all Income
groups, partiCUlarly those living In blighted areas, and In areas where CDBG funds are proposed
to be used inclUding non-English speaking persons, as well as persons with mobility, visual or
hearing tmpalnnents, members of minority groups, the elderly, the disabled, the business
.mmunity, civic groups and the community at large. .
r
1
Reviewing and preparing recommendations to the Mayor and Common Council on all
proposed program amendments, as necessary.
Receiving and answering citizen complaints regarding housing and community
development activities.
In addition to the responsibDllies listed above the CDCAC will act as liaison between the
community and the City. Therefore, the CDCAC will also be responsible for meeting with citizen
groups which represent residents Impacted by community development and housing activities,
providing technical assistance to citizen groups when requested, and keeping the general
community informed on housing and community development matters of Importance.
.
7.
8.
.
v.
3.
Receiving and reviewing citizens' comments on housing and community development
program progress and performance;
Receiving and reviewing housing and community development project proposals for
specific funding to Include Community Development Block Grant and other federally
funded projects. .
Preparing Spec/fie funding and program recommendations to the Mayor and Common
Council on the use of grant funds.
Assisting and evaluating ongoing housing and community development program
activities.
4.
s.
6.
J'E~~CAL ASSI:::;~E TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CmZE~
ADYi~RYCOM~
To help facilitate citizen Input, the CIty's Redevelopment Agency, Housing and Community
Development Division will provide technical assistance through Its staff to the Community
DeVelopment Citizen Advisory Committee as well as to groups reprasenting low and moderate
Income residents who may require such assistance In developing ProPOsals for federal funding
as required by federal regulations. Technical assistance will be provided by telephone,
meetings, and WOrkshops throughout the year as needed. .
VJ. PUBLIC INFORMAnQ!i
In order for citizens to become InfOrmed and Involved In the Plan process, the City will make
available all relevant Information inclUding the following: (1) Material concerning the amounts of
funds avaDable for proPOsed community development and housing activities and the range of
acllv/Ues that may be taken. (2) Applicable regulations and gUidelines governing all asPects of
the funding source. (3) Prior applications, final statements and amendments, grant agreements,
grantee performance rep'orts, citizens participation plan and any other reports required by the
U.S. Ilepartment of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). (4) Documents regarding other
important program requirements such as contracting Pmceduras, environmental policies, fair
hOU$lna and other equal opportunity requirements and relocation Provisions. (5) MaDlngs and
promOtional materials, minutes of meetings and hearings and any other documents the 'CIty
believes Is necessary to the consolidated planning Process.
,
'it
. . The City is unable to finance the activity on Its own, and
. Other resources of funding are not available to cany out the activity.
A condition will generally be considered to be of recent origin if it is developed or became critical
within 18 months preceding the City's certification.
X. OUtREACIj
The City will utilize the CDCAC and Other forums of public participation to reach out to the
Community. Letters of Invitation to attend the public hearing to receive Input on housing and
non-housing community development needs will be sent to community service organizations,
business organizations, Chamber of Commerce, religious organizations and any Other
applicable groups and affected parties showing an Interest In the Plan. The City Will also
COOrdinate Its planning activities with the Housing Authority as well as any Other applicable Inter-
governmental Jurisdictions Impacted by the Plan.
XI. COMPLAINTS
The City will make every reasonable effort to provide Written responses to complaints within 15
working days In compliance with 24 CFR 91.105(1). A copy of each Written citizen comment or
complaint regarding the CIty's housing and community development performance under the
Plan, the City's assessment of the comment or complaint and a deScription of any action taken
or written response made will be kept on file as a public record.
.
XIL PUBLIC MEETINGS AND PUBLIC HEARING~
The City will conduct pUblic meetings and public hearings during various phases of the Plan
pI'DCeSs each program year. AI; public meetings and public hearings shall be open to the pUblic.
Meetings will be held at times and at locations In the City that are convenient and acceptable to
potential and actual beneficiaries. Special accommodations shall be made for persons with
disabilities upon advance notice and as necessary. In cases where a significant number of non-
. English speaking residents are reasonably expected to participate. an Interpreter will be
provided by the City upon advance notice.
The COCAC will meet, confer and hold pUblic meetings as needed. to review tssues related to
the Plan and plan performances. ete. Moreover, the Common CoUncil shall conduct a total of
two (2) pubUc hearings during the program year. A first pUblic hearing will be held to obtain
views on the proposed Plan prior to Its review and adoption by the Common Council. A second
public hearing will be held to review Plan perfonnance (CAPER).
Prior to each pUblic hearing, a legal notice shall be publiShed In a newspaper of general
circulation wlthlri a reasonable time frame. The legal notice sha" contain the fOllowing
information: (1) Date, time and place of hearing. (2) Subject to be considered (3) Basic
information about the Plan program
t
r
I:
.
0", orSon Benurrdino - Consolid4ted Plan _ FY 2000-2005
APPENDIX B:
CONTINUUM OF CARE
.
r
.
1999 Application Summary
1bis inbe rust pqe of your applicatioa. Remoye tills pqe lad place It Ia tile froDt Of your appllcalioa.
C". r""-N CoWley of San Benard1uo &o.ele.. c:ou.ort1_
ODtillaulD 0 ....,... &IDe:
CODliaaamorCWCODIIct Carol7D Debenc (909) 891-3862
Pe:soo ad pbODe Dumber. :
.
Continuum of Care Geography
. Usia, tile Oeo,rapblc Area Gulcle.lIst tile Dame lad tile slxodl,lt ,eo,raplllc code aumber for ~.~" cily
ladlorcouaty panlclpalial ia yourCoaliauula Of Care. Because tile ,eOlrapby covered by your system
will affect your Need score. It Is ImPOrtaat to be accurate. The Iaronaalioa coataiaed oa tIIis pale must
be cross-referenced lad mustmatcb tile Iafol1llalion you proYlde Ia Ellblblt I: Coaliauum Of Care ortlle
applic:atloa. Before complelia.. please read tile NOF A luldaace lad pale 4 or tills applicalion regUdin.
lleo,rapbicaJly oyerlapplng Coaliauum or Care systems.
. ! Apple Valley 060108
Cb1Do 060708
11'0Il~ 061332
, 1fesper18 061638
OIltar1.o 062556
: .....<<110 r!I'''-aaga 062930
I
Jtell'-ct. 062964
. RJalto 062988
: San JIenard1uo 063180
San Berliard1uo CoWley 069071
Vp1aiu! . 063852
Gaographlc Araa Name 6-diail Cod.
.
I
I
I
V1.c:t:on1l1e 063900
Jleproduce lblJ pqe to lacIude Adcudollll Dames lad codeI.
r
.
.
..
EXH '.Brr 1: CONTINUUM OF CARE NARRATIVE
L
Abstratlt of Continuum of r1.....
This Consolidated Application for 1999, with one Continuum. of Care strategy, targets
i"""rifled needs in San Bernardino County. The application is submi~d by San Bernardino
Coumy Cmnmunity Services Department (CSD) on beha1f of twelve comprehensive projects
. requesting funding for the following services and activities:
· A SbeJter Plus Care project that will provide 2S 1IIIits of permaneqt housiDg with llIpponi,ve.
services for severely m_Uy Dl individuals IIId &mllirs with a severely JUen"'''y m mcinber.
TeIl1lllits will be set aside for dually dblJllJSed periODS. (Houslq Authority of tbe Couu1y of
San Bernardino; locatiODS tbroughout SlID Bcmard1no COWIty)
· Permanent SUPPOrtive h"'siDg for 28 persons 1ivIq with a d1ap'osls of HIV positive. (Cculral
City Lutheran Missloa; 1000.tf~ SlID Bcmard1no)
· Supportive services for an iDt.eusive, 35-bed le$ltf_.;.1 tno.....,at proP'llD1 for homcJcas
VdlcI....s wilh IUbstalK:e dcpeudcucy. The treatmcat proP'llD1 will ~ located OIl a former
military air base IIId will serve hnm..less vctcrans in SlID Bcnwd/no IIId RiversJdc c"'ntl~.
(Los ADgdea Vcteraas Iuitiative, Iuc.; IncalioD: March Air Reserve Base, Riverside, CA)
· A tr:o"dtiOllllliviD,lcase IIIIDagemeat program for lIomdeas vctcrans, to assist tbem in tbe Ilea
of Job traiuiur IIId employmem. Tell shcltei bciU\vlll be set aside for tr:onoltinn~lllousfu, for
hmqe1ess veteraus. (Frazee C'nmtnlt"lty CeiIIer; IlIMtloa: SlID Bemardiao IIId 1IiBf'1...."
· A tr.o..oItI....al h"QsiDg proP'llD1 for homeless &mlll"lln tbe High Desert region oftbe COlIIIty
JJI'OVidia, comprehensive services geared towards .df-.ufHcieucy. The program wiIllaclude a
c:hDd care &cuity IIId ......,...;011 CCIIIer. (Desett Mauna Miulstries; 10t".'iClIl: Barstow)
· A tr:olldljnqal housiDg program for batterecl wOIIIeJl, II10YiDr diem from CIIWJeDCy shcltei
(0DCe tbey are stab1lizecl) Into a loDg-tcrm program offeriDr ed'J"Itiou, Job traiufDg, Ufe sklIJs
cIcveI(!p"leat, IIIdCOllrlea In home OWIIenhip IIId m.I_...~. (Victor Valley Domestic
VinJ-ee; IlIMtloa: VictoniUc) .
· 1'1-oItI....1l housiug proP'llD1S for hneneLo.ss youth, ODe for males IIId ODe for fcmaJca, both
fnron.;~ OIl family un1fie.tfOllIlld re.lln~.tlOD. ProP'llD1S will provide tr:ono1tloaal housiDg.
life IJdI1s CraiDlDr. ""'''r'tiClIl, Job traiufDg, IIId pareatiDg IkiIIa to prepare tbe yOUlh to live
The Continuum. of Care system for San Bernardino County, California is a Partnership of local
governm"'llt entities, commllnity based orpnl7!ltions, and the private sector. The San
Bernardino County Ho~ess Coalition is the umbrella entity for the Continuum. of Care
system, lUId is comprised of community based orpnl7!ltions, city representatives, businesses,
health care entities, veterans service organizations, churches, community colleges, state
univmities, lUId formerly homeless individuals. The Homeless Coalition Executive Committee
meets bi-monthly 10 disCuss current issues on homelessness. and 10 recommend and approve
activities 10 address bomeless Issues. Because of the vast size of San Bernardino County,
Local Coordinllting Groups of the Homeless Coalition were established in various geographic
regions of the County to address bomeless needs locally, as well as on a countywide basis.
r
.
-.
closure of George, Norton, and March Air Force Bases, as well as the down-sizing of defense-
related industry. Redevelopment of closed military bases is slow in coming, and throughout
the County, the lingering effects of the recession of the early 1990's is evidenced by closed
businesses, vacant houses, and blight. The Department of Economic and CommllJlity _
Development reported in their 1998-99 Consolimlted Plan that nearly one-fourth of all
households in San Bernardino County are.extremely low or low-income, based upon data from
the 1990 Census. The proportion of the total population living below the poverty level
increased from 12.7" in 1989 to 17.6" in 1993. A disproportioDate number of San
BemarcIino County children live below the poverty level. The 1990 Census revealed there were
2S,S71 c:hiIdren under the age O/five living in poverty. In a 1998 rCpon compiled by the San
Bernardino County Social Services Group (SSG), it was determined that the County's welfare
POPulation numbered 262,929, or 16.2" of the total general population, and ranged from a
high of 32" in the city of San Bernardino to a low of 3.5 % in Chino Hills. Although this
represents a decrease of 12.5% from 1997 figures, the ratio is still far too high, particularly
.:amnllg the minority populations.
.
Blight has become a major problem in every city because of closed businesses, vacant homes
and buildings, and vantl~lism. The City of San Bernardino, in particular, has pockets of blight
throughout. The City submitted an application in September 1998, to win status as a federal
EIIIpOWermem Zone to encourage community revitalization. The application was unsuccessful;.
however. the City of San Bernardino continues to plan strategies and programs for economic
revitalization. Although housing is COmparatively affordable in the lnIand Empire and in San
Bernardino County, affordability is still an overwhelming problem faced by many househOlds.
.According to the 1990 Census there were 16S,s59 cost-burdened households. These are .
households that spend more than 30" of their income on housing COSts. These households are
4t risk ofbecoming homeless as they struggle to make ends meet. Additionally, with an
lIn~loymem rate of 5.4% in San Bernardino County, more Mliving wageM jobs are needed,
as wcIl as more affordable, decent housing.
H07lU'f8.f P~"ulnri".. ~
S"mce Us inception in 1991, the San Bernardino County Homeless cOalition has conducted two
surveys of the homeless POPulation - one iii NO'Vembcr, 1992 and the other in March, 1997.
Each survey idc-nr;fied appr_lm~~ly 3,000 MliteraIly hom('less" individuals, Le., those Iiviug
in abandoned builtlinp, vehicles, shelters, under bridges, ete. It is understood, however, that
1bose figures are extremely understated for a IlIImber of reasons.
(1) The vast size of San Bernardino County made it vinuaIly impossible to COVer each
unique geographical area in COnductiil& the surveys,
(2) As h""1elessness is a very transitory condition, the surveys missed those who might
~ been homt'1ess im'\'''''i~~ly after the survey was contfll~
(3) The SDl'Ve)'s also missed those who were homeless, but were not found at sheIters or In
~ at soup ki.fChens. They might have been sIeeping on the tloor in the homes of
friends or relatives, or they might have been in a ~tment program, or in some other
temporary &rraugement.
, .
.
.
.
"
.
AD 99S respondents lUISwcred questiODS regarding drug and alcohol USe and abuse and
HIV/AlDS, even though the interviews were often conducted in public settings with minim"l
privacy. Of the respondents in this category:
· 427 (43 %) indicated they used alcohol and 250 (2S I) indicated alcohol use was a problem
for them.
· 268 (27%) indicated they used lIOn-prescribed drugs and 190 (191) indicated drug use
was a problem for them.
· S4 respondents (5.4%) reported they or one of their immediate family members had AIDS
or had tested positive for the HIV v~.
When asked what services were required in order for them not to be homeless, respondents
reported a variety of single services, and some cited more than one. When fIrSt respoDSes as to
needed services were reviewed, the categories of need were as follows:
· 414 individuals stated employment related services ("ajob, work, employment, a good.
paying job, fuIl.time employment") would allow them not to be homeless. .
· The second largest category was housing related services ("a home, a house, a roof over
my head, affordable housing, shelter").
· TweDty-seven individuals reported money and 26 reported monetary benefits such as
AEDC, SSI, VA benefits, etc.
· Eleven individuals reported they lI"edecf drug treatment scrviccs in order to overcome their
homel~sDeSS.
· Seven reported they needed "education and lor traiDiDg" . .
However, when all the rcspoDSes were reviewed from each individual (first, second, and
thircl), 1be number requiring education and/or training, especially jOb-rc1atcd traiDiDg, jumped
to 44.
From the survey sampling we see that the hollle~s are aware of the services they need to
remedy their situations, The goal of the San Bemardino County CoDSOrtium is to bring those
services to the homeless through an effective delivery system.
The San Bcmardino CoUnty HOlllelcss en..1ition SPODSored a HolIICless Care Fairc on April 22,
1998. The Care Faire was held at the former Norton Air ForCe Base and was the effort of
more than forty orpnifttious and churches, as well as numerous volUDtccrs. Services
iDcIudcd: .
· Free health and deDtalIlCl'l!ll!ning
· ShowernDd hygiene items
· Clothing
· Assistance with obtaining a CaUfornia m card
· BllIn. for VCtcrlUIS (provided by Ihe.YA Hospilal)
· EIupJoymem search and resume Preparation
. .. Counseling and information regarding domestic violence, drug aDd alcohol abuse, etc.
Public transportation VOUchers
· Breakfast and lunch
· Referral to services available throughout the ~mrn"Dity
.
.
available information on homelessDCSS, review federal and stare legislation regarding homeless
issues, and develop a program strategy outliniDg objectives, funding levels, resources, and
staffing. The primary respousibility of the Tisk Force was to prepare for the winter of 1989-
90 and develop a Cold Weather Plan. A plan was developed to provide emergency shelter for
the ~lcss during the cold weather season, October I, 1989 through March 31, 1990. The
Department of Economic and CommWlity;DeveJoplllCllt and Commuaity Services Department
combined their federal Stewan B. McKinney funds and selected strategically located homeless
shelters to provide services. Motel vouchers that were distributed throughout the County as a
"gapfdl- strategy supplemented the homeless shelters. The media partlcipated by publicizing
the services available. The Cold Weather Plan was implemented effec~ely and effiCiently,
providing 16.000 shelter nights for the winter of 1989-90. Although the Task Force was not a
resolution to the problem of homelessDCSs in San Bernardino County, it did improve
coordimlri.,n and communication among County departments, state and federa1 agencies, and
commu'lity based organi%atious. It also raised community awareDCSS of homelessDCSS and
itl..nritie.d the need for an ongoing strategy for addressing the problem.
.
Ta1cing the Task Force a step further, on February 26, 1991, a Public Hearing on
Hom..I~DCSS was held at the County GoverlllDCllt Q.nter in San Bernardino, spousored by
Comml1nity Services DcpartlllCllt and ChUdren's Network. The goal of the public hearing was
to improve the coordination of services to San Bernardino County's homeless POPulation
through information sharing, problem identification, and plllnni'lg. The mlmber Olle
recomm..ntllltion as a result of the Public Hearing was for the establi,hm..nt of a Countywide
Hn"l~l'"SS Network., The recommentlllrion called for the establishment of a HOlllt'less Policy
CoUDCil that would include a m"lII.ber of the County Board of Supervisors with appointed
represCDtatives from member ageucies to provide leadership in the deve10plDCDt of
comprehensive and coordinllted services. Thus, the San Bernardino County Homeless
C,."liti()n (SBCHC) was formed. The HOmeless Coalition's Organizational Plan called for a
Policy CoUDCil of thirty-eight (38) lII.embers, as outlined below:
Seftn m 11"""'- s...-tor R"",__..-.
~ R=IaI 0wIas ,&-..I.~
Bon, r...... 1 - Anowba4 CRdI& UIIioa, LIn7 SIIup .
S. B. VIUq IIoutl ofltalraa - CIIIinuaa, LoCI( GcMmmeat ""'.';0". DaWi ~hn'...
IlaiJdiuar"" h. -~Aidorl.LA. .
.IDIIDd Iinlpl~ Er-I(o C--q.
LaIlor thdom - APLaO
Private rn~ 'I c--n f'or SIIlIlcmudiao COIIIIlJ
.
Sew. m ntw Rrn(~~...!
2 &am cbe Delat - Mayor, a" tfWctonUlc; MaJOr Pm TaD, a" III ~
2 &am cbe East V.., - MaJOr, a" qf Stm 11mIarrtino: MaJllr Pro TaD, a" tf~
2 &am cbe Wac VIUq - MaJOr Pro Taa, a" qfRitnt:hD n.. {f .-va: a" qfOrlniJ
I AI-LIrp
Seftn ~~~..~..""""_1Ia"'" Or..nmrlon R...._@nbfl.~.
D d: Desert MarlllaI411rlstrt#. P.Rd ...........d; lIJfhDGen I1t1melc Sm4ca, DcbbJ Gardaa
Ease VIlJcr. ~Mny tf8.8., ~ PriIz: ~ CcJ,.__1I(p ecnr., Nedra WIIIaco
,
.
.
.
"
vision to combat homelessness has been demonstrated by its continued suppon of the
Homeless Coalition and its related activities. In lanuary 1998, the new Welfare Reform
legislation, CalWORKS, was implemented in San Bernardino County. The County has
kept an ongoiug dialogue with community-based orgllni""tions, faith-based
orgllni.,."tions, and other nonprofit groups, to effect a smooth transition for clients from
welfare to work. In addition, San Bernardino County participates in the In1a.ad Empire
Welfare Reform Coalition (lEWRC), a bi-county endeavor with Riverside County. The
Welfare Reform Coalition was eslablisheci in late 1994, 5pear-fuo.JIded by Catholic
. Charities, along with the community action agency in each county, (Community
Services Department [esD] of San Bernardino County, and the Department of
Community Action [DCA] in Riverside County). The lnland Empire Welfare Reform
Coalition merges the public, private, and nonprofit sectors of the two counties, to track
the trends in welfare reform legislation, the impact of implementation. and the
characteristics of the welfare reform population. .
In 1998 the County Social Services Group, through a competitive RFP process,
awarded approrim"tely $2 million to community-based and faith-based orgllni.,."tions
for weIfare-to-work projects. This year, on lune 30, 1999, a Community Forum will
be held to gather iDput from service providers as to how the new welfare reform is
. workiDg to motivate clients to become self-sufficient. At the community level, more
local orgllni"".ions are askiug to be identif'1Cd and included in the plllnning process for
events such as the Homeless Care Faile, fitndlng oppo.lunltles, the Homeless
Conference, etc. Each year since 1994 San Bernardino County has submitted an
app1i....tion for homeless assistance fitMlng to the l>epanmeut of Housiug and Urban
Development in an eft'on to secure rcsourcea to combat homeless""Js. In 1997 and
1998 San Bernardino County was awarded fitMlng that totaled over $4 million each
year. As a result, successful programs are underway to serve growiug IlUIIIbers of
homeless individuals and families. The j;.ndlng in the last two years has enabled the
COIUIty to address a backlog of need creatccl by previous years' unsuccessful
apPlications. As long as the need exists, San Bernardino County will continue its
teJlacious eff'ons to Identify resources for programS serviug the homeless.
b.
Frmd~(ll Cn"lP"f/t!nH of Cnlllillu"... of eart! nnt!lll m,.,.,nrlv in DiDr.t!.'
San Bemardino County has always responded to ill hom""ess population through
expanded emergency shelter beds (as in 1989-90), food, cIothiug, health care and other
CJDCrgeDcy crisis intervention activities. However, as the problem ofhomelessness has
grown, service providers have begun to c:hange their delivery strategy. While
emergency services are still vital, programs now arc structurccl to focus on diminating
the problem rather tbanjust treating the sympto1lll. The compollrnts of a Continuum of
Care system currently in place in San Bernardino County are:
· o.m....~. In"'lre. IlIId A_~nt
/n plIzu: Throughout the County, churches; commllnlty-bascd orpni""tions, soup
~ns, hospitals, ctc. provide outreach to the commll'1lty to Identify the homeless.
.
Orgllni7JItioDS such as Community Services DepartmcJlt, RM1auds Family Services,
Catholic Charities, H.O.P.E., and others also provide motel vouchers to the
hom~lcss. Each year the Emergency Shelter Grant (SSG) Proaram is ,dmini.t,ered
by the Department of Economic and Community Development, fnntli'lg
approrimlltcly 12 - IS shelters. during the cold weather season.
Working Iowtud: The Homeless Coalition will continue to work toward
ccntrali7-ing information regarding the availabUity o.f emcrgcucy shelter beds
throughout the county. Through the Homeless Provider Network meetings,
strategies will be developed 10 identify additioaal n-dcd shelter beds, particularly
during the cold weather season. Homeless Provider Network meetings held
quancrly will serve to lipdate the Coalition regarding changes in resources
available, new programs under development, funding Opportnniti~, etc. A
newsletter will be developed for disll'ibution throughout the Coalition membership.
Local Coordinating Groups will meet monthly or bi-monthly to assess homeless
needs in their Particular geographic region.
.
How lIS8istDnel is rleavld or tleeulld: Agcncics in the Homeless Coalition
network refer clients among themselves, based on availability of beds. Clients are
often provided with bus passes to varioUs shelters that have available beds, or motel
vouchers are provided to clients. The Homeless Coalition staff person, who is
housed at Community Services Department, accepts calls for hom.-Jess assistance
. and no:."'" appropriate referrals.
· TnncIHnlllll Roudqr
111 pltzce: Currently there are approrimllfely 2S ll'aDSitioaal housing programs in
place in San Bcruardino County, serving film"Je& IDd iDdividuals, home~ss
veterans, a1cohollDd substaDce abusers, victims of domestic violcilcC, persODS
living with mv, IDd hom..less youth. The apprnrimllt,.; inventory of beds is as
foUows:
- 268 beds for gcueralll'aDSitiolll1 housing
- 528 beds for 1l100holls~taDce abuse programs
- 126 beds for domestic violence victims
- 12 beds for ......""'lplltccl youth .
- 6 beds for persons with mv+/AIDS
- . 24 beds for pregDaDt unwed WOIllCll .
AU of the above programs provide supportive services designed to prepare clients
for se1f-sufficiellC)' and permll"_ housing.
.
Wolting Iowtzn/: The Hom..I'eSs Provider Network wm_..hll'lp and share
information reaarcIiDI how propams can be improved. what .tl4itiolll1 services are
.........,sacy, and what follow up care Is """'decI to reduce the risk o( clients slipping
back Into old lifestyles, and 1I1tlmllfely, Rp""'t1"1 the home1essnelS cycJe. The
County of San Bemardino Social Services Group and lobs and Emp10ymcm .
Services Division is workiDg closely with community buecl orpnl7JItloDS to provide
,
.
.
.
. ..
How suvit:n tlTe received tz1Ul accessed: Supponive services are accessed through
participation in transitional housing programs and through non-housing service
provident Orgllni".tilJDS such as ID1IJId Behavioral Services, CommUDity Services
Department, Catholic Charities, Rr.tll"nds Family Services, and others bave case
mllnagement prosrams for homeless flImilies tbat provide supportive services to
help the families attain self-suftlcieDcy. Services are accessed through referrals, .
and some require participation in a structured cue man"gement program.
.
· Penn.Dent Housfa
In place: Affordable permanent housing is addressed through several avenues.
although a severe shortage still remains. The major challenge for transitional
housing programs is assisting their clients in identifying decem. sUe, and affordable
housing once their transitional program is complete. The current inventory of
affordable housing is as follows:
- Frazee Community Cemer has 8 permanent housing units in addition to its
transitional housing program.
- Operation Grace has one permanent housing unit.
- POlDOua-1D!aDd Valley Councll of Churches has seven permanent housing units.
- The County has 2,180 units of public housing stock, operated by the Housing
Authority. The Housing Authority also assists a,pproYim"te1y 2,791 low income .
households through the Section 8 Program. However, waiting lists for public
housing are very long, with geaerally a two to three year waiting period. .
To help eligible clients with the -up-front- costs of perm"nent housing, Community
Services Department IIdminicters a Security Deposit Program 011 behalf of the
Department of Economic and Community Development, through HOME Tenant
Based Assistance funds. Eligible households may qualify to bavc their security
deposit and utility deposits paid upon finding a qualified apartment or house tbat
they can afford. .
Worting toward: The County of San Bernardino is working toward m"l..;ng more
units of affordable perm"n..nt housing avaUablc. Beglnni'lg in 1993, the County
;all""lted Commllnity DevelqJment BlocIc Grant funds as seed money to licquire and
rehabilitate \'acaDt &Dd distressed single-family properties. The ~ority of homes
will be acquired from HUD's existing REO inventory and wiU be 10cated in HUD
approved reviblll".t!oll areas throughout the COWIty. The program is currently
opc:ating in four areas.
.
How tuSistlutce is reeaved Dr tICCUIed: Homeless persoDS access perm,,-nt
housing largely throUgh transitioual programs in which they have been particlp"t1Ilg.
Case m"n"gers, COUI1Selors, outreach workers, CIC. help clients to Id..ntify
perm"-..r housing programs. Hnm..lets pcnons off the street are assisted through
refemls to perm,,-lIt housing programs addressing their specific Deeds (Le.,
hom..l~s vcterans, homeless mentally_W, s'!bstaDcc abusen, etc.) .
.
d. Haw I!ach prqfl!t:t willJill a flqp in thl! Continuwn qf earl! rmi!.m.
.
lr1,nJqied gap: Housing IllUl suppottiv, ,uric" lor"" ho""",, m,nIlIlly fll:
IEl workiIJI toward a truly effective CoDtinuum of Care system to serve the
homeless population, it is important to target all Subpopu1atloDS. The largest
homeless subpopulation with s~ia1 housiDs needs Is most likely homeless pcrsoDS
with mental i11Dcss. It Is estimllted that, siDee the 1990 Census. the number of
sevcrcly meDtal1y ill ill San BcruardiDo Cowny bas risen to between 2,400 aud
3,000. Permanent supportive housiDs programs arc needed to effectively serve this
population and help them to live as indcpcndcntly as possible.
The San Bernardino County Department of Behavioral Health, along with the
HousiDs Authority, operates a program for the homeless meDtal1y,iII, both families
and individuals, and subcontracts with service providers such as Shobai, Inc., Lilly
Ruffs, Davis Room and Board, Acacia House, and others to provide services. In
tbis application, the HousiDs Authority (priorily 11) Is proposiDs a plT71IIUII1It
s~lpponive housiDs program which will provide 2S .t1t1itioDal units, with 10 units set
aside for the dual1y..dilll"osed; i.e., pcrsODS with both serious mental illncss IIId
chronic substance abuse problems.
Id,nti/iId gap: Long II1'm housing IllUl lenka pt'DgrtlIM lor holllllu, vllutuu
Of the Dumber of severely m..ntlI1ty ill, a great many arc veteraas who Suffer from
PlrsD (post-tJ'lIlImlltjc stress disorder), or substance abuse as well. Most
drug/alcohol dependent homc1css VCteraas have DO family, fiicuds or fiDancial
suppon system ill place, which results ill a continual cycIc of homelcssDeSS. The
Jerry L. Pettis VctcraDS Hospital bas an outreach program for homel~s veteraas,
staffed by a formerly homeless vctcraD. In this CoDtiDuum. of Care competition, the
LeIS Angclcs Veteraas 'nitilltive, IDe. (prilJrily 13) proposes an iDtcDSive trI!lItrqeDI
pr,t)gram for Iwmeless veteraas CD assist tbem ill ovcrcomh'l substance abuse IIId
DIl:ntal iI1n~s problems. The program will be l""1tcd on the March Air Reserve
BaISe ill Moreno Va1Iey, aud will serve both Riverside aud San Bcnmd1no Cowny
vetcraDs. Los AngcIcs VctcraDS lnitilltlvc, IDe. wiIIact.as the Project Sponsor, IIId
SCl.'Viccs will be rcudcrccl by the V.A. Hospital, the VctcraDS Alcohol Recovery
Prograin (V ARP), and others.
It iis equally important, folloq rchabili12tion. to provide case IJWIlI&CIDCDt to
ho:l'Q"lcss VCteraas CD prepare tbem CD rHntcr the work force. Frazee Community
Cclltcr (prilJrily 14) proposes to operate a traDSitioaal housiDs program for 12
hollDe1css veteraas, asslpiq a case mllnqcr to work with tbem In ldeDtifyiq job
. training programs CD prepare tbcm for employment aud Self-sufficiency.
Idtrn4JW gill': BrpIllUlId Domutk Vlolllrc, Suvlt:a
MaID)' women (and their children) who "ttempt CD leave abusive aud violcDt domestic
sit,,"tiODS may have DO housiq qJtIoDS aval1able to tbem, and coJlSCClUCntly may
become homeless. . Domestic violcncc Is a problem that Is stcadUy rlsiq ill San
.
Most homeless persons lack transportation, have limited knowledgc of how to
ad-iOCItc for services for thcmsclves and their children, and CllIII10t access the
scrvices that arc available. Not knowiDa how or where to access services, the
homeless remain in their predICament. Thc lack of fully trained and skilled wcasc
mllnllgersw Is seen as a pressing umDet need in the continuum of care system in San
Bernardino CoIll1ty. This Is CSlJeCially true silll:c the imp1cmcntation of the IIClW
Welfare Reform Icglslatlon that mllrvfll~s specific timcllnes for those on public
assistance to obtain employmcDt or to become cnrolled in an cmployment training
program. Whilc there is a wide array of services for the homeless in San Bcrnardino
CoIll1ty, many arc provided 1Ddividua1ly by a I1WIlber of unrelated agcllCies that arc
often widely dispersed. Pomoaa Inland VaIlcy CoUIICil of Churches proposes the
Ontario Access CcIUC1' (priority 19) in the West End, a OIlCl-5top CCIUC1' providing an
array of services for the homcless, from cmergcucy intervcntion ~ casc
managcment. ....-
.
Ide1lli,fied gap: Long-t".", progranu lor nUlltance IIbUlur:
Homeless persons with substance abusc problems arc served through programs such
as V.A.R.P. (VCteraDS Alcoholic Rehabilitation Program),lericho Outreach, Cedar
House, Salvation Army Alcoholic RecoverY ~nter, and others. Providers have
found that resi~nti,,1 trutm"nt programs for substance abusers arc, in themselves,
not enough. Loug term clean and sober liviug enviroDmcIllS arc necessary in order
for homeless clielllS to avoid goiDa back to drugs and/or alcohoL St. lohn of God
Health Care Services (pritJrity 11) and Cedar House RehabDltlltion ~ntcr (pritJrity
111) propose loug-term transitioDa1 housing with supportive services in a clean and
sober liviug environ.....1lt. .
.
Ide1lli,fied gap: TnmsitioIUllIiJling progranulor 10111h:
Youth is an especially wlDenble homeless subpopulation. Too olel for foster care,
yet with DO family or support system, many youug men and women find themselves
hoaIeless, with DO skiDs or means of supponiug tbemsclvcs. Worse, many youug
women arc .prcgnant or parcntIug,'aDd many youug men arc fathers and c:&IIIIOt
provide for their family. A need for transltioaalliviug programs was identif"led by
service providers who have worbcl with tradIdoaal youth programs, aDd fouud that
....mlln..ipatecl youth- were w"'lIl"l throuih the cracks- in terms of available
services. Provisloaal A&:cc1eratod Lcamiug (PAL) CeDrer Is proposiDa Operation
Safe Harbor U (pritJrity 18), a transit10aal housing propam for homeless males,
particuIar(y African American and Hispanic, who arc also fatberI. The propam
wou1cl provide Iiviug skiDs to help prepare the youug men for bciug parclllS aDd
would seclc to unify or re-unify the famJIy. Educatioaal progrims and employment
If.lIini''l programs wou1d be provided to prepare youug men to be good providers.
Positive IMA1E Enterprise (pritJrity II%) proposes the same tflIe of program for
'..m1l1es, many of whom arc _ moms, pmpnt. runawa1l. first time jllVCllile
offeDders, or s"Y011I1Iy abused. A Ioug-term.propam wouIcl provide chilcl care,
parcntiug claSses, basic Iiviug s~ trainlug, edll~tlOaal programs, etc., with the
.
.
f. Mer.hod. proc~ss fl1Ill ~rlt~riQ arM to det~rmi"~ ~o;: DI'Qj<<:t priority_
,. ' How th~ prqJ~ prio(Jtv s~l~oll procl!SS M.m ti
A Request for Proposals (RFP) was m.i1ed to approximately SCVCnty-five (75)
known providers of homeless services COUntywide, explRinl, the CoDtiDuum. of
Care Notice of FundiD& Availability (NoFA). The RFP packet contallJeCf materials
provided by HUD to assist agencies in prepariD& iDdividual proposals. In order to
give agencies a maximum. amount of time to prepare proposals, a copy of the
application was retrieved from Ihe Internet to avoid waitlDg for a packet to be
mailed from Washiugton. A workshop was conducted by Community Services
Depa.nment on March 26. 1999 to explain the local process and timelines, and a
foUow up tel'hni('~1 assistance workshop by Shelter Partnership, Inc. was held on
April 12, 1999. Maximum. flexibility was given to ageDCies, in extending Ihe
proposal deadline to the extent possible. After preliminary screenirig by Community
Services Department, aU project proposals' were provided to seven members of an
independent panel to review and score, usiD& a criteria and scoriD& sheet provided.
The review panel members represented the followiD& orvnintioDS and entities:
.
· Higher education (San Bernardino Valley College)
· Veteraus orpnintion (1erry L. Pettis V.A. Hospital)
· Community.based orgRnintion (Option House)
· Faith-based orpnintion (Ecclesla Christian Fellowship)
· City govemment (City of Ria1to Housing DivisioD)
· Local go\'CrDIDent (Board of Supervisors)
· County department (Social Services Group)
Each project could receive a m....imum score of 100 points. Criteria for scoriDg
were: project feasibility and SOIlM""$1 of apProach. 30 points, applicant t!lIpaclty,
25 points, project eligibility, 2S points, &lid cost-effectiveuess, 20 points. The
review panel met at length to compare scoriDg, discuss the proposals &lid identified
gaps, determine fmal scores and asslp priority 'pnlrllll.
S. Surmll!11ll!1flnl Rl!SDUPrIt,!
.
a. 'Ibe Project LeveragiDg chart has been completed aad appears at the end of this
section. It is important to DOte that San BenwdiDo County is leveraaiDI Dearly
$7.1 million doUars in iDkiDd services. other &rant """"'''1, aad donations.
b. How mainstream resourcu wlU be used to /ill ,tIpI.
'Ibe San BensardiDo County Department of EcotlOmic aad Commlln'~ Development
and the HousiDg Authority of the County of San BenIardino are by players in
fllliDg gaps in the Continuum of Care that are DOt addressecl throuah the
CoIIJDlldated Application. The HousJu, ~i1y owns aad m.n~ over 2,000
units of public bousiDg for extremely low. aad low-lDcome households. Under a
.
ContinuU;D1 of Care: Gaps Analysis
"
Wecl 011 3.000 hO.eleaa OIl 8IlJ &1veu lli&ht
I EllimaIAcI Current I UMMlI NM4I I AllaUvl
N.. Invlntory Gap Prlortly
Individual.
Enai".'i'-" "~lD9i~"'~;:": :~",;:"" ~?U:'~~, ;~; "'W,;":~" .;;,:::""~:<"
Em.. Sholl.r
Bod8lUnllo Tro",Illo",' HOUlIn
I P.rman.nt Su rtlva Frou.1n
Total 696 :'""",.,"
! roln H
;Ca.. Mana .m.nt 557 78 H
:~=~~. " Subllano. Abu.. Treatm.nt 607 408. K
Slota M.ntal H.alth Care 348 158 H
Hou.lng Plao.mant 278 60 K
LN. SkUll Trolnln 7 174 H
"OIII.r 0 0
,Oth.r 0 0
Chronic: Sub.tanc:. Abut.ro 07 4 K
. SarloUl M.nta III
Sub- Dua. .Dla no..d H
populatrono Vataro",
Parao", with HIV/AIDS
Vlc:tlma 01 Doma.1le: VIol.nc:o
Youth
OIII.r
.
Bod8lUnllo
Supportive
Sarvlo"
Slota
Sub-
populallc:no
.
Perwon. in Famllle. with Chlldrwn
Em.IV' Sholtor
Tro",lllona' HoUlIn
P.rmanant SUPPOrtlv. HOUIIn
Total
Job Trolnlng
Cu. ana .mont
Child Care
Subllanc:o Abuae reatm.nt
M.n .aIlh Care
HOUlIng PIac.m.nt
Life S 11
OIlIer
OIlIer
Chronic: SUbIIanc:o Abut.ro
Serlo.. Manta I.
Dua' -D'a nolld
V.terono
Paroo", with HIV/AIDS
VIc:tImi 01 Domo.1le: Vlolanc:o
OIII.r
968
1 843
432
348
288
922
4
o
28
8
20
1
R
R
K
K
R
M
R
328 M
1 R
12 R
K
".
5
.0
o
,
.
.
City ofSiJn BenuJrtJino . ColUolidated Plan. FY 2000-2005
APPENDIX C:
Program Appncatlons And Certifications
.
.
,
.
~ Ylplication for Federal
.sistance
2. Dale SubmIIIecI AppIlGlnt Identifier
05f31/OO S-OO-MC-Q6.0539
1. Typeof~'''' I' ........ 3. Dale ~Ivlld by $laIll $laIll Appllcallon IdenIlIitr
AppDCldIan: . Non- CcnstIuction 4. Oalll ~Ivlld by Fednl Aaencv Fednlldenlllier
'reappnCldlan: Not Applicable- 0SI31/OO
5. Applicant Informatiaii
~ru. OIgllllzaUonal UnIt
CIty gf San Bemanlino Local Government
"'I'I~. Conlac:l
201 NOllh E SInlet. Suite 301 "= Pachecof Muslbau Arogunclade
Sanllemanllno. CA 92401 9 3-1044
San Ben_dinG County
5. En1PlDYer ldt..lliflCllllon Number (EIN): 7. Type of Applicant
95-600077 Municipal
B. TypeofApp~
Type: New
8. Namii of Federal Agancy:
U.S. Depl of HOUSing and Urban DevaIopment
10. CaIaIog of Federal DomeiilC Assistance Number: 11. DeacrijiilVi TIUe of AppIiCiiii'i PnIjeCt
C Number. 83-S23 Provide home.... pr&venUon. esaanllal actIvitIea and
r1CIl TItJe: Emervenc:y Shelter Grant (ESG) OJl8I8lion ...latar1Cll to homelaa. .ervlces provIdllf'lln
the city.
12. AIua MeI:Ied by PIDjecf
City of San Bemardino
13. Pnlp~ ..d PIojea: 14. ConglUllonel DiIlrlcli or:
SlaltDCll End Dale L Applicant b. PIlljeC(
O71D111lO 0llI30I01 36th 38th
15. E>olL....w ~ 18. II AppIicalian Subject 10 Review by $laIll ExecutMi ORler 12372 Plocieii?
....Fede.... Review Statu.: PlOgram not covered
$138.000
b.. Aw'",..... $0
c.~ $0
II. Lac:lIl 17. II lIMo ApplIcaril YllIlIIquent on Atrt Federal DeIlt1
$0 No
e. DlhIIr $0
f. "'.........lncomI $0
II.T_ $ 138.000
,. <<beltGf.:t, bowliiiga and beUef. all data In lhla aM and t;!IIlKt, III docluiiiiiil has been lIIIIY QIhodziiI
Gfthe ~ ..4 and the applleaIl!wm ~ Ihit .....;hed __.111......... DUIeIL
'-
'& lypedNMwolAulhadzed~ b.11Ui II. .,...lephollB NumlIer
Judith V'" I Mayar l109-3Bi &133
II. SjgIIIIIUIi 01 AuIhaiIZiiii Repiiintallvll .. Dale SIliIl8ll
r
. .
\ "plication for Federal
.istance
2. Dw SubmIlIecI App/lCiii!
0SI31JOO ~C-06.o53II
i 1. Type of SuIlmUliiii: 3. D8Ie Receivlld by Sl8Ie State ApplIcjijOii IdenIlliir
I 1Ipp!icatiDn; Non - ConslnIc:IIon 4. D8Ie ReCllivlld by Fedel8l Agency Fed8l81ldentlllii
"reapp/icalicln: Not Applicable 0SI31JOO
.
5. A/lIlllCIInllnIonn8IiOii
~NlIme 0Ig1lllralloMl Unit
ClIy of San B8Ill8IlIino Local Government
-- ConlICi
2O'l NoIlh E snet. Suite 301 =t:achecol Mualbau Arogunclacle
San 8emanIino. CA 92401 1044
SanBemanlino County
6. Employer IdentiliCiiilii Number (ElN): 7. Type of Applicajit
85-600011 Municipal
8. Type of "-ppr~t~
Type: New
8. Name of Fldel8l Agency;
U.S. Oepl of HousIng and U/ban Oeve/opment
10. Catalog ofFedetalDomliitiCAssistince Number: 11. DeIcriPUVi Tali of AppIiCiiii'i PnljICl:
NUIIIbeI: 14238 Provide funds for the CHDO OP8l8lfons.ecqulllUon.
lllIe: HOME PlI11nershlp Act FundI rehabilitation and homebuyer 8111stancit.
12. Area AIlecIed by Pnljii:iE
Ci\J af San SemanIino
13. Pnlpooed PIajec:t 14. Cong~1I8I DlItrIc:li of:
S/adDq End o.ti L AppIIClIiii b.P/Ojecl
D7JD11l1D 06130I01 38th 36th
15. EslirnaiiI funding: 18. Is AppfiCitiiiii Subjeci to RevieW by Slate ExeciiilVi OnIer 12372 PIaCiii?
L FeCIeaII RevIew SI8lus: ProglBll\ not covered
$1.774.000
b. AppIiClInt $0
Co Sl8Ie
$0
......... .""'-., ..
4.l..l:al 17. Is... AppI/Ciiii Dellnijuent on Ally ~ Deli?
$0 No
... Qllw- $0
1 Pnlg_..-.. $0
i.TaI $ 1.774.000
.. TO"'1lllII of.:3;. ~ and beW. .. dIlllln ... ~_ _llllIt;!IImCl. ... dOCUlllllll.... beeii duly auIhorliiil
of... app/IClInIllllI... 8IlPlIcanId.., _Ihit ....1lll8cI-....-.............. .......
LT NlIme of AutboiIZiiii ~ b.TIIli Co T....18 Numbii'
JudIlh y.... Mayor ~8111133
I. "v~.. ofMlhorlo.il RelnI.nI8lM .. D81e~
r
I
.
. I.
4-
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CERTIFICATIONS
In accordance with the applicable statutes and the regulations governing the Consolidated Plan
regulations, the jurisdiction certifies that:
Allirmatively Further Fair Housing - The jurisdiction will aftinnatively further fair housing,
which means it will conduct an analysis ofimpcdimcnts to fair housing choice within the
jurisdiction, take appropriate actions to overcome the effects of any impediments identified
through that analysis, and maintain records reflecting that analysis and actions in this regard.
ADtl-displacement and Relocation Plan - It will comply with the acquisition and relocation
equirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act
of 1970, as amended, and implementing regulations at 49 CPR 24; and it has in effect and is
foDowing a residential antidisplacement and relocation assistance plan required under section
104(d) of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as IlJllcuded, in connection
with any activity assisted with funding under the CDDO or HOMB programs.
Drug Free Workplace - It will or will continue to provide a drug-free workplace by:
Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution,
dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's
workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of
such prohibition;
2.
Establishing an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform employees about _
<a> The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace;
(b) The grantee's policy ofmRinblinil1g a drug-free workplace;
(c) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs;
and
(d) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations
occurring in the workplace;
~
Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the
grant be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph 1; .
Notifying the employee in the Sblt""l'i:l1t required by paragraph 1 that, as a condition of
employment under the grant, the employee will.
Page I of3 ,
.
.
of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative
agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report
Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions; and
It will reqUire that the language of paragraph I and 2 of this anti-lobbying certification be
included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts,
subgrants, and contracts under grants,loans, and COOperative agreements) and that all
subrccipients shall certify and disclose accordingly.
ADthorl1y of .Jurisdiction - The consolidated plan is authorized under State and local law (as
applicable) and the jurisdiction possesses the legal authority to carry out the programs for which
it is seeking funding, in accordance with applicable HUD regulations.
3.
Ccmsistenc:y with plan - The housing activities to be undertaken with COSG, HOME, ESG,
and HOPW A funds arc consistent with the strategic pian. . .
Section 3 - It will comply with section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968,
and implementing regulations at 24 CPR Part 135.
.
Judith Valles
May 1~. ?non
Date
M~ ("i~ nf'!::fIIn Rp-n"u-ttinn
Title
! .
Page 3 of3 r
.
.
.3.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
SPECIFIC CDBG CERTIFICATIONS
The Entitlcmcnt Community certifies that:
Citizen Participation - It is in full compliance and following a detailed citizen participation
plan that satisfies the requirements of24 CPR 91.105.
CA--unlty Development Plan -Its consolidated housing and community development plan
idl'!ntifjes community development and housing needs and specifies both short-term and long-
tClm community development objectives that provide decent howiing, expand economic
opportunities primarily for persons of low and moderate income. (See CPR 24 570.2 and CPR 24
pan 570)
FoDowlng a Plan -It is following a current consolidated plan (or Comprehensive Housing
Atfordability Strategy) that has been approved by HUD. .
Use of Funds - It has complied with the following criteria:
1.
M..yimnm F....~ihl.. Prinri~ With respect to activities expected to be assisted with
CDDG funds, it certifies that it has developed its Action Plan so as to give maximum
feasible priority to activities which benefit low and moderate income families or aid in
the prevention or elimination of slums or blight. The Action Plan may also include
activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development
needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and .
immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community, and other tinanciaI resources
are not available);
2.
Ov.....n R""..f'it The aggregate use ofCDDG funds inCluding Section 108 guaranteed.
loans during program year(s) 200012001 (a period specified by the grantee consisting of
one, two, or three specific consecutive program years), shall principally benefit persons
oflowand moderate income in a manner that ensures that at least 70 percent of the
amount is expended for activities that benefit such persons during the designated period;
~"i..l A ~~~~..nt~ It will not attempt to recover any capital costs. of public
improvements assisted with CDDG funds including Se(:tjon 108 loan guaranteed funds
by assessing any amount against properties owned and occupiCd by persons oflow and
moderate ~come, including any fee charged or asses"'Del1t made as a condition of
obtaining access to such public improvements.
However, ifCDDG funds are used to pay the proportion ofa fee or assessment that
n:latcs to the capital costs of public improverqents (assisted in part with CDDG funds)
fin..need from other revenue sources, an asses"ment or charge may be made against the
property with respect to the public improvements financed by a source other than CDDG
1imds.
r
Page 1 of2
.
OPTIONAL CERTIFICATION
CDBG
.
Submit the following certification only when one or more of the activities in the action plan are
designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency as specified
in 24 CFR.570.208(c):
The grantee hereby certifies that the Annual Plan includes one or more specifically identified
COBG-assisted activities which are designed to meet other community development needs
having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to
the health or welfare of the community and other financial resources are not available to meet
such needs.
Judith Valles
MR)' 1<Ci ?nnn
Date .
.
MA~ r;11 nf~Rn Rfln\Rrtf,nn
Title
.
,
Po_I
.
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
SPECIFIC HOME CERTIFICATIONS
The HOME Participating Jurisdiction certifies that:
Tenant Based Rental Assistance - If the participating jurisdiction intends to provide tenant-
based rental assistance:
The use of HOME funds for tenant-based rental assistance is an essential element of the
participating jurisdiction's consolidated plan for expanding the supply, affordability, and
availability of decent, safe, sanitary, and affordable housing.
Eligible Activities and Costs - it is using and will use HOME funds for eligible activities and
costs, as described in 24 CPR ? 92.205 through 92.209 and that it is not using and will not use
HOME funds for prohibited activities, as described in ? 92.214.
Appropriate Financial Assistance - before committing any funds to a project, it will evaluate
the project in accordance with the guidelines that it adopts for this purpose and will not invest
any more HOME funds in combination with other Federal assistance than is necessary to provide
affordable housing; .
MSlY 1<<\. ?nnn
Date
Judith Valles
M~nt' rii:y n"~~" ll"''''!llMinn
Title
r
Paae 1 oft
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ESG CERTIFICATIONS
The Emergency Shelter Grantee certifies that:
M2ajor rehabllitatloDlconvenlon - It will maintain any building for which assistance is uSed
under the ESG program as a shelter for homeless individuals and families for at least 10 years. If
the jurisdiction plans to use funds for purposes less than tenant-based rental assistance, the
applicant will maintain any building for which assistance is used under the ESG program as a
"h..lt.... for homeless individuals and families for at least 3 years.
Essential Services - It will provide services or shelter to homeless individuals and families for
the period during which the ESG assistance is provided, without regard to a particular site or
structure as long as the same general population is served.
RenO\'atlon - Any renovation carried out with ESG assistance shall be sufficient to ensure that
the building involved is safe and sanitary.
.
Snpportive Services - It will assist homeless individuals in obtaining appropriate supportive
services, including pennanent housing, medical and mental health treatment, counseling,
supervision, and other services essential for achieving independent living, and other Federal
State. local, and private assistance.
]VI....."11'l1 Funds - It will obtain matching amounts required under ?576.71 of this title.
Conlidentlality - It will develop and implement procedures to ensure the confidentiality of
records pertaining to any individual provided family violence prevention or treatment services
under any project assisted under the ESG program, including protection against the release of the
adchas or location of any family violence shelter project except with the written authorization of
the pcISOD responsible for the operation of that shelter.
Homeless PenoDS Involvement - To the maximum extent practicable, it will involve, through
employment, volunteer services, or otherwise, homeless individuals and families in constructing,
renovating, m..intsoinlng, operating facilities, and providing services assisted through this
progmm.
CousoUdated Plan - It is following a current HUn-approved Consolidated Plan or CHAS.
JudUh Valles
MAY 101\. ?non
Date
.
u~ ~ nf"~tlln ltfl!l'ntll'.tUnn
Title
,
D..__ , _,..
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
"REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT"
Agency/Organi7J1tion:
Address:
R.eiu1bursement for the Month of:
2000
Agreement Date:
Amount of Reimbursement: $
The undersigned hereby certifies that the expenditures identified on the attached "Budget
Swnmary Form" are true and correct, and that said expenditures were incurred and paid within
the month designed above in accordance with the agreement identified herein. Evidence of all
payments (bills and/or receipts and check copies) for each of the expenditures listed is attached
hereto.
(Authorized Signature)
(Type Name and Title)
(Date)
Amount by Funding Source REQUEST Balance
~urrent Month Year to uate Available
Payee Name:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
SALARY SUB-TOTALS:
6. FICA/SUI
7. Life/HealthlDentallnsurance
8. Other
9.
10.
11.
SALARY & BENEFIT TOTALS:
12. Accounting/Bookkeeping
13. Rent
14. Utilities
15. Insurance
16. Office Supplies
17.
18.
19.
20.
MONTHLY GRAND TOTALS
.
Subrecipient
.
.
City of San Bemardino
Economic Development Agency
COBG Monthly Budget Breakdown
Month:
Approved Grant Amount $
Year: 2000
Please attach supporting Invoices and documentation.
.
.
I
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
"REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT"
Agency/Organization:
Address:
Reimbursement for the Month of:
2000
Agreement Date:
Amount of Reimbursement: $
The undersigned hereby certifies that the ~nditures identified on the attached "Budget
Summary Form" are true and correct, and that said expenditures were incurred and paid within
the month designed above in accordance with the agreement identified herein. Evidence of all
payments (bills and/or receipts and check copies) for each of the expenditures listed is attached
hereto.
(Authorized Signature)
(Type Name and Title)
(Date)
Cily of San Bernardino
Economic Development Agency
CDBG Monthly Budget Breakdown
Month:
Approved Grant Amount $
.
.
Subrecipient
Year: 2000
REQUEST Balance
Amount by Funding Source Current Month Year to Date Available
Payee Name:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
SALARY SUB-TOTALS:
6. FICA/SUI
7. LifelHealth/Dentallnsurance
B. Other
9.
10.
11.
SALARY & BENEFIT TOTALS:
12. Accounting/Bookkeeping
13. Rent
14. Utilities
15. Insurance
16. Office Supplies
17.
1B.
19.
20. .
MONTHLY GRAND TOTALS
.
.
Please attach supporting InvoIces and documentation.
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
"REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT"
Agency/Organization:
Address:
Reimbursement for the Month of:
2000
Agreement Date:
Amount of Reimbursement: $
The undersigned hereby certifies that the expenditures identified on the attached "Budget
Summary Form" are tnIe and correct, and that said expenditures were incurred and paid within
the month designed above in accordance with the agreement identified herein. Evidence of all
payments (bills and/or receipts and check copies) for each of the expenditures listed is attached
hereto.
(Authorized Signature)
(Type Name and Title)
(Date)
.
.
.
I
I ~_H_ .~
Subrecipient
City of San Bemardino
Economic Development Agency
CDBG Monthly Budget Breakdown
Month:
Year: 2000
Approved Grant Amount $
Amount by Funding Source REQUEST Balance
Current Month Year to Date Available
Payee Name:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
. SALARY SUB-TOTALS:
6. FICA/SUI
7. LifelHealthlDentallnsurance
8. Other
9.
10.
11.
SALARY & BENEFIT TOTALS:
12. Accounting/Bookkeeping
13. Rent
14. Utilities
15. Insurance
16. OIIice Supplies
17.
18.
19.
20.
MONTHLY GRAND TOTALS
Please attach supporting Invoices and documentation.
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
"REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT"
Agency/Organi7J1tion:
Address:
Reimbursement for the Month of:
2000
Agreement Date:
Amount of Reimbursement: $
The undersigned hereby certifies that the expenditures identified on the attached "Budget
Summary Form" are true and correct, and that said expenditures were incurred and paid within
the month designed above in accordance with the agreement identified herein. Evidence of all
payments (bills and/or receipts and check copies) for each of the expenditures listed is attached
hereto.
(Authorized Signature)
(Type Name and Title)
(Date)
City of San Bemardlno
Economic Development Agency
CDBG Monthly Budget Breakdown
Month:
.
Subrecipient
Year: 2000
Approved Grant Amount $
Amount by Funding Source REQUEST Balance
Current Month Year to Date Available
Payee Name:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
SALARY SUB-TOTALS:
6. FICA/SUI
7. lifeJHealth/Dentallnsurance
8. Other
9.
10.
11.
SALARY & BENEFIT TOTALS:
12. Accounting/Bookkeeping
13. Rent
14. Utilities
15. Insurance
16. OIIice Supplies
17.
18.
19.
20.
MONTHLY GRAND TOTALS
.
.
Please attach supporting Invoices and documentation.
.
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY
"REQUEST FOR REIMBURSEMENT"
Agency/Organization:
Address:
Reimbursement for the Month of:
2000
Agreement Date:
Amount of Reimbursement: S
The undersigned hereby certifies that the expenditures identified on the attached "Budget
Summary Form" are true and COrrect, and that said expenditures were incurred and paid within
the month designed above in accordance with the agreement identified herein. Evidence of all
payments (bills and/or receipts and check copies) for each of the expenditures listed is attached
hereto.
(Authorized Signature)
(Type Name and Title)
(Date)
Assistance Award/Amendment
U.S. Department of Housing
And Urban Development
Office of Administration
1.Assistance In.trument 2. Type of Action
. Coopenatlve Agreement X Gnant X Award o Amendment
"strume"t Numbe, 14. Amendment Number 5. Effective Date of thle Action G. Control Number
A16HAD0030101 10125101
7. Name and Address of Recipient 8. HUD Administering Olllce
AFE-Ploneer Associates. L.P. clo A.F. Evans Company. Inc. Los Angeles Multifamily Hub
2000 Crow Canyon Place. Sulle 130 611 West 6" Slreet. Suile 800
San Ramon, CA 94583 Los Anoeles, CA 90017
Project Name: Pioneer Park Plaza Ia. Name of Administrator lb. Telephone Number
Joe Hirsch (213) 894-8000 x 3800
10. Recipient Project Manager 9. HUD Govemment Technlca' Reprosenlatlve
Angela Robinson-Spencer Donald Freeman, Housing Contract Specialist
(925) 244-1600 (213) 894-8000 x 3634
11. Assistance Arrangement 12. Payment Method 13. HUD Payment Office
X Cost Reimbursement 0 Treasury Check Reimbursement Janice Johnson
CFO Accounting
0 Cost Sharing 0 Advance Check Forth Worth HUD Office
0 Fixed Price 0 Automated Clearinghouse
14. Assistance Amount 15. HUD Accounting and appropriation Data
Previous HUD Amount $ 158. Appropriation Number I 15b. Reservation Number
HUD Amount this action $250.000
Total HUD Amount $250.000 Amount Previously Obligated $
Recipient Amount $ Obligation by this action $250,000
Total Instrument Amount $250,000 Total Obligation $250,000
16. Description
. AFE-Ploneer Associates, L.P. were selected 'or a FY 2001 New Approach Anti-Dru9 Grant for Pioneer Park Plaza.
The New Approach Ant~Drug Grant will be administrated by A.F. Evans Company, Inc. on behalf of AFE-Pioneer Assooiates, L.P.
The requested grant term will begin with the elrectlve date of January 1, 2001and terminate on December 31, 2003.
The total grant term allowabie under the New Appro.ch Anll-Drug Grant program Is 24 months.
Any term extension must be preceded by a wrill.n justification acceptable to HUD.
o Recipient is required to sign and retum three (3) copies
of this document to the HUD Admlnisterln Offlce
19. Recipient (By Nam.)
18.
o
Recipient Is not required to sign this document.
20. HUe (By Nam.)
Jo. Hirsch
~/7ht./
Williams F. MCClune, Stnlor VIce President
Date (mmlddlyyyy)
Signature & Tille
Oate (mmlddlyyyy)
II!O:19ITrJ
Director of Operations, Los Angeles Multifamily
Hub
I"'I."'.'~
- i
\w n *;
. .........'/
0FF1CE OF ne ASSIST A'In SECUTARY F'OI
FOIl NOUSDfQ-FEJ)D,AL HOUSrNO C'CMMJSSJONEJl
U.s. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING "''ID URBAN DEVELOPi\IE.'IT
WASHINGTON. D,C, 20410-1000
NEW APPROACH ANTI-DRUG PROGRAM
GRANT AGREEMENT
Grant Number: CA16HAD0030101
Project Number: 143-35027
Project Name: Pioneer Park Plaza
TIN: 68-0453130
.
This Grant Agreement between the Department of Housing and Urban 'Development (HUD)
(Grantor) and AFE-Pioneer Associates, L.P. (Grantee) is made pursuant to the authority of
Public Law 104-204 approved September 26, 1996, no stat.2888 (HUD's FY 1997
Appropriation Act.), HUD's approval letter and the New Approach' Anti-Drug Grant Program
approved application package, as may be amended by the provisions of the Grant Agreement, are
hereby incorporated into this Agreement.
The Grantee agrees to carry out it's grant activities under this Grant Agreement in compliance
with the requirements of the Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) issued for this program,
HUD fiscal and audit controls, grant special conditions, 24 CFR Parts 84 and 85 (as applicable),
all applicable laws, including without limitation, all Federal, state, and local laws, regulations,
. executive orders, OMB Circulars, codes, and assurances and certifications in the
approved/amended application. Further, the Grantee agrees to accept responsibility for such
compliance by any other entity(ies) to which it makes grant funds available.
In reliance upon and in consideration of the mutual representations and obligations hereunder,
HUD and the Grantee agree as follows:
Subject to the provisions of this Grant Agreement, HUD will make available to the Grantee a
grant in the amount of S 250,000
The Grantee's rights under this Grant Agreement may not be assigned without the prior written
approval ofHUD.
.
l
ARTICLE I. GRANT ADMINISTRA nON
.
A. Grant funds shall be used in accordance with the New Approach Anti-Drug Grant Program
Notice of Funding Availability (NOFA) published in the Federal Register and the HUD
approved/amended application.
B. The grantee is responsible for ensuring that there is no duplication of funds. Any activity,
project, or program that is funded under any other program and/or project funding (such as
Reserve for Replacement or rent increases) shall not also be funded by the New Approach
Anti-Drug program.
C. The accounting systems of the Grantee must ensure that HUD grant funds are not
commingled with funds from other Federal agencies or other HUD program funds.
D. Implementation of the grant program - the plan, budget and timetable - as described in the
approved application must be operational within 60 days .of grant agreement execution.
Failure to implement the program may result in sanctions or other legally available actions,
including default, deemed appropriate by HUD.
E. The Grantee is required to expend grant funds in accordance with the approved budget
(SF-424 and SF-424A), budget narrative, plan and activity timetable, unless an
extension/amendment is approved by HUD.
.
F. The grant term may not exceed 24 months - measured from date of obligation to grant
termination date - unless an extension is approved by HUD. Any term extension must be
preceded by a written narrative justification acceptable to HUD. The total grant term
allowable under the New Approach Anti-Drug Grant program is 24 months.
G. The Grantee shall receive payment of grant funds through use of the Line of Credit Control
System/Voice Response System (LOCCSIVRS). New Approach grantees will continue to
use the LOCCS program area originally set up for the Safe Neighborhood Grant program.
The LOCCS program area for which to apply for access is "SNGP". Draw-down of funds
shall be based upon actual disbursement needs. Grantees shall minimize the time elapsing
between the transfer of funds from HUD and disbursement for project purposes. The
maximum time between transfer and disbursement shall not exceed seven calendar days.
H. Grantee draw-downs that exceed 10% of any authorized budget line item in a one month
period must be approved by HUD.
I. The Grantee shall obtain and carry adequate insurance coverage to protect itself against any
potential liabilities arising out of any eligible activities under this program.
ARTICLE ll. PERIODIC GRANTEE REPORTS
.
In accordance with 24 CFR Parts 84 (non-profits) and 8S (State and Local Governments)
grantees are required to provide the local HUD Office with a semi-annual financial status report
(SF- 269A) covering the first 180 days of funded activities. The report must be submitted to the
local HUD office no later than 30 days after the date of the specified reporting date. No grant
payments will be released for projects with overdue financial repo~s.
.
.
.
ARTICLE III. AMENDMENTS
This Grant Agreement may be modified at any time by a written amendment. Any amendment
request must be approved by the local HUD Office before proceeding with any changes to the
approved budget, plan, activity timetable, or scope of work as listed in the approved/amended
application package. Amendments must reflect the rights and obligations of all parties and shall
be executed by HUD and the Grantee.
ARTICLE IV. CERTIFICATIONS
The Grantee certifies that it shall comply with the provisions of the Fair Housing Act (42 US.C.
360]-3619); Title VI of the Civil Rights Act ofl964 (42 US.C. 2000d); Executive Order 11063
as amended by Executive Order ]2259 (3 CFR ]958-]963 Comp., p. 652 and 3 CFR 1980
Comp., p. 307); section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 US.C. 794); the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975 (42 U.S.C. 6]0]-6107); Section 3 of the Housing and Urban
Development Act of 1968 (12 US.C. 1701u), Executive Order 11246 (3 C.F.R. 1964-]965
Comp., p. 339), Executive Orders 11625, ]2432; and ]2138 and all implementing regulations
issued pursuant to these statutes and authorities.
A Grantee under this program shall give preference to the employment of residents, and
comply with Section 3 of the Housing and Urban Development Act of 1968 and 24 CFR
part 135, to carry out any of the eligible activities under this program, so long as such
residents have comparable qualifications and training as non-resident applicants.
B. The requirement of Executive Orders 11635 and 12432 (concerning Minority Business
Enterprise) and 12]38 (concerning Women's Business Enterprise) require that Grantees
make an effort to encourage the use of minority and women's business enterprises in
connection with grant funded activities. 24 CFR 85.36(e) describes actions to be taken by
the Grantee to assure that minority business enterprises and women's business enterprises
are used when possible in the procurement of property and services.
C. The Grantee must maintain records of its efforts to comply with the requirements
described in the above 2 paragraphs.
ARTICLE V. GRANT CLOSE-OUT
A.
24 CFR Part 84 prescribes uniform close-out procedures for Federal grants and other
agreements.
B.
It is the responsibility of the grantee to comply in full with all close-out reporting
requirements and to submit close-out reports in a timely manner.
C.
Within 90 days after the termination date of the grant or any approved extension (revised
termination date), the following documents must be submitted by the grantee to !IUD:
· Final Financial CSF-269A). The Final report will be a cumulative summary of
expenditures to date and must indicate the exact balance of unexpended funds. The
report shall cover from grant start date to termination date. When the final SF-269A is
approved, HUD will establish the amount due to HUD or cancel (recapture) any unused
grant funds as applicable. \.
---'--.'--
.
.
.
l
. Final Performance ReDort. A post-grant cumulative performance report
evaluates the grantee's overall performance against its plan. This report must be
submitted to the local HUD office. It should contain brief information related to the
following:
a) Comparison of change indicators drawn from the applicant's plan.
b) Successful completion of any strategy components:
c) Discussion of problems encountered;
d) Projected progress versus actual progress;
e) Resident participation;
f) Involvement of any other program or resources related to the plan.
D. The close-out process may entail a review by HUD to determine compliance with the Grant
Agreement by the Grantee and all participating parties. The grantee agrees to cooperate
with any review in any way possible, including making available records requested by
HUD for inspection.
E. When HUD has determined to its satisfaction that the grant activities were completed and
all Federal requirements were satisfied, the HUD Field Office will prepare and execute a
closeout agreement in consultation with the Grantee. The agreement will identifY the grant
and any unused funds to be canceled (recaptured) by HUD.
ARTICLE VI. AUTHORIZED FUNDS BY BUDGET LINE ITEM:
The total for funding categories is S 250.000
A summary of the funding categories and amounts are as follows:_
9150 Increased Law Enforcement $128,500
9160 Security Services $
9]70 Investigation/Prosecution $
9180 Capital Improvements $112,849
9]90 Other Program Costs (]O% $ 8,65]
max.
roved Amount $250 000
ARTICLE VIT- DEFAULT
A default under this Grant Agreement shall consist of (I) any use of grant funds for a purpose
other than as authorized by this Agreement, (2) any material noncompliance with regulations,
Federal, State or local law as determined by HUD, (3) any other material breach of this Grant
Agreement, or (4) any misreprese\ltation in the application submissions which, iflcnown to HUD,
would have resulted in this grant ~not being provided. If HUD determines preliminarily that the
Grantee is in default, HUD will give the Grantee notice of this determination and the corrective or
.
.
.
remedial action proposed by HUD. The Grantee shall have an opportunity to demonstrate, within
the time prescribed by HUD (not to exceed thirty days from the date of the notice), and on the
basis of facts and data, that it is not in default, or that the proposed corrective or remedial action
is inappropriate, before HUD implements the corrective or remedial action.
Corrective or remedial actions that HUD may instruct the Grantee to undertake during the
performance of this Grant Agreement shall include preparing and following a schedule of actions
for properly completing the approved activities affected by the default.
Where HUD detennines that corrective or remedial actions by the Grantee have not been
undertaken as instructed, or will not be effective to correct the default and to prevent further
default, HUD may take the following additional corrective and remedial actions under this Grant
Agreement:
a) Reduce the grant in the amount affected by the default;
b) Take action against the Grantee under 24 CFR Part 24 and Executive Order 12549
with respect to future HUD or Federal grant awards;
c) Demand repayment of all grant amounts disbursed;
d) Initiate litigation or other legal proceedings designed to require compliance with the
statute, regulations, this Grant Agreement or other pertinent authorities;
e) Take any other remedial action legally available.
No delay or omission by HUD in exercising any right or remedy under this Grant Agreement shall
impair HUD's ability to exercise such right or remedy or constitute a waiver of, or acquiescence
in, any Grantee default.
.
.
.
ARTICLE vrn. SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
This Grant Agreement is hereby executed on behalf of the parties as follows:
GRANTEE
Name of Grantee: AFE-Pioneer Associates, L.P.
By: William F. McClure
Signature:~ ~
Title: Senior Vice President
Date:
.
, '
y' 'D~ !"\......."'.,
, : I c:r- ;cr:,'u f
SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
By: Joe Hirsch
Signature:
Title: Director of Operations, Los Angeles Multifamily Hub
...,....,
Date:
\.
---- ..-.---.--------