The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About18-Planning & Building Services CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO... REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACflON FWchael E. Hays, Director Dept: planning & Building Services Subject: (g(Q)[FJW Date: March 6, 1997 General Plan Amendment No. 96-13 - To amend the General Plan land use designation from RS, Residential Suburban, and CO-I, Commercial General, to RU-l, Residential Urban, on 14 parcels of land located between Mt. Vernon and Eureka Avenues north of Mill Street MCC Date: April 7, 1997 Synopsis of Previous Council Action: N/A Recommended Motion: That the Mayor and Common Council close the public hearing and adopt the resolution which approves General Plan Amendment No. 96-13. -\D:i IN. Oi:r': C~: :~ 1,:;"''' 97 ~;': 5) . person: Michael Hays Supporting data attached: Staff R~ and Resolution FUNDINO REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.) N/A (Acct. De.<=iption) Council Notes: ~ 9- 7~ 9~ #-31 . Continued to tJ5jtJ5'" /r 7 ~~ Phone: 384-5357 Ward: 3 Finance: Agenda Item No. I? tf!r;.//Q7 . . . CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 96-13 MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 7, 1997 OWNER/APPLICANT: PETER S. SOLER P.O. BOX 4322 WEST COVINA, CA 91791 REOUESTILOCATION The applicant is requesting a change in the general plan land use designation of a triplex located at 431-435 S. Pear Street from RS, Residential Suburban, to RU-l, Residential Urban. Based upon site visits and an assessment of the neighborhood, the Department of Planning and Building Services included 33 other parcels in the proposal as a recommended alternative, including a multi-family residential property located in the CG-l, Commercial General, land use district. The resulting project area is located along Pear Street between Mt. Veroon and Eureka Avenues and Poplar and Mill Streets (Refer to Exhibit 1, General Plan Land Use & Location Map). The Planning Commission modified the proposal to include only 14 parcels (Refer to Exhibit 2, General Plan Amendment Proposal With P.C. Modification). KEY POINTS * The proposed amendment would change the status of existing multi-family residential units in the direct vicinity from "legally nonconforming uses" to "permitted uses" to encourage their maintenance and rehabilitation. * The proposed amendment would not increase the density of the site. Although the RU-l district allows 8.5 units per gross acre compared to 4.5 units allowed by the existing RS district, the proposed amendment area consists of existing multi-family units already built at a higher density than the proposed RU-l designation. * The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the General Plan. Pursuant to General Plan Policy 1.12.12, it is the policy of the City of San Bernardino to "allow existing multi-family units to remain as a conforming, permitted use in areas designated as Residential Urban (RU-l and RU-2)(Il.l and 11.2)". . General Plan Amendment No. 96-13 Mayor and Common Council Meeting April 7, 1997 Page 2 of 3 The Planning Commission Staff Report prepared for the February 18, 1997 Planning Commission meeting provides the detailed background and analysis of this project (Refer to Exhibit 3). COMMENTS RECEIVED No written comments have been received as of the date of this staff report. However, several residents appeared and spoke at the February 18, 1997 Planning Commission meeting. Their concerns revolved on the dilapidation of their neighborhood and the desire to maintain the existing single-family residences and prevent new multi-family development. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION This project is exempt from CEQA as a general rule [Section 15601(b)(3)). No new development is being proposed. Staff completed an Environmental Impact Checklist and all items were marked "No". . PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION At their February 18, 1997 meeting, the Planning Commission considered comments from the public and voted to recommend the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 96-13 to the Mayor and Common Council with a change in the project area proposed by Staff. The Planning Commission amended the proposed OPA area to include only existing multi-family residences and one interior vacant parcel (Refer to Exhibit 2, General Plan Amendment Proposal Map). The vote was unanimous: 5 ayes (Gonzalez, Lockett, Quiel, Schuiling, & Trasher), 0 nayes, o abstentions, and 4 absent (Enciso, Hamilton, Stone, & Strlmpel). . STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Mayor and Common Council: 1. Adopt the Resolution to approve General Plan Amendment No. 96-13 to change the general plan land use designation of fourteen (14) parcels of land generally located along Pear Street between Mt. Veroon and Eureka Avenues and Poplar and Mill Streets from RS, Residential Suburban, and CO-I, Commercial General, to RU-l, Residential Urban (APN's: 137-134-01 & 137-161-06, 21, 25, 28, 31, 32, 33, 34, 43, 50, 51, 52, & 53). . . . l General Plan Amendment No. 96-13 Mayor and Common Council Meeting April 7. 1997 Page 3 of 3 Prepared by: GUSTAVO J. ROMO, Assistant Planner for MICHAEL HAYS, Director of Planning & Building Services EXHIBITS: 1 2 3 4 General Plan Land Use & Location Map General Plan Amendment Proposal Map With P.C. Modification Planning Commission Staff Report (February 18. 1997) and Attachments Resolution ExmBIT 1 AGENDA """'I ITEM # GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION -, AND lOCATION MAP CASE GPA-96-13 MCC HEARING DATE 4/07/97 Adopted 6-2-89 TO'EAA -. I SANTA,r "AILW'" == ... -, -l1 NORTH Ln ~~.~&.,..:tJ P\.MoI.11 PME' OF 1 t.... EXlDBIT 2 . 1lI7-1~ Ta.x Rat. Area 7/67. TO/2 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 96-13 :,L:, , \' , CG-1" " ..' ~ COMMISSION PROPOSED , AMENDMENT AREA FROM I , AS . CG-l TO RU-l .... ..AS @ I I smar , (I)' Ie: qj I '. 8 , C!)~I IC!) .e .q ... ~_.. _..l ~ ~ C!) (!) ,C!) (!)IL.. .. I I RS - \a p ~ ~ ~. lee I . ._ I ~ ~ALIY ~ INCU IllED BY STAfF 4 @l 'S' e 4@ .e, . .: ' " @ , ,~, ,ooPLEX(I) " SF. , 'COM. (!). 1\., . ~,' ('" "...... ' ~SF ,~ ':, tr.l I _ ~Q), ..' ~, 1''NDSF~.' ~, , ; "~.,(!j.,.",, ~'~'\'\SF'~\ *', ~ :SF};\SF: ~' -:-~ IF'I, . ..,,(.,~'" ~~:lte:f-'4:~\'_ . _". Jill - 0...'\..","W0 :J y. " ~~ /"'/'i t: ~ ~ '\..~'\..~ _ ' ~~ '7 ~ '/,'// ~~,~ ~ ~~~~~~' ~~- ~~"\"'"'" ~ ~ II 2 ,,,,"" \~~'\\.~ Z ' "y /. , :I~~ \x VAC II '~ Z/ /j '" '/' !i TRIPLEX ,,).' '\ " " ~0~~~ ~ ~ .~oS,~ ~,J'7 // '/;;, '/ y' / v/ :::i: ~c;IUAD~ r7/~ e ~'~ /0~ ~/ .//y.~m ~ ~OM~J!I//~~ ~{200~~N0~~ ! . ,,~. . ~~~~~~~ _I . c~ ~~~~'>.~~~~Sf",~~,t-5f' .J @ .. .. ': ':~ -. " ~~ ,'. . ~+~:,,:~~..~ ::~ "'C:........-..:......,.:.: 1:\1" ,,', ' .~ ':'.:,' ~;.l' _ 0' F[ .. ~ , . " @ , STRUT: ~1lI.l. . r . CG-' +-}-+ AS @ , . ~ AI...... ..., _ /37 fIaao Ie San ssmanIlno CluIII' ..............en ...... Uf ........ ..... .. ".,.... . . . EXlUBIT 3 SUMMARY CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DMSION -----========================================== CASE: General Plan Amendment No. 96-13 AGENDA ITEM: 1 HEARING DATE: 02/18/97 WARD: 3 APPLICANT: PETER S. SOLER P.O. Box 4322 West Covina, CA 91791 OWNER: VARIOUS ===_~=_c=====================_a==========_===== REQUFSTILOCATION - The applicant is Rlql....mng to change the General Plan land use dHigrll.tion of a triplex located at 431-435 S. Pear Street from RS, Residential Suburban, to RU-l, Residential Urban. Based upon site visits and an assessment of the neighborhood, the Department of Planning and Building Services bas included 33 other parcels in the proposal as a recommended alternative. The resulting project area is located along Pear Street between Mt. Vernon and Eureka Avenues and Poplar and Mill Streets. =============================================== PROPERTY ExISTING LAND USE LAND USE DR~GNATTON SUBJEcr NORTH SOUTH EAST WEST SiDpe &: Mulli-FlIIIily 1I".;~ Smile &: Mulli-FlIIIily 1I..w- Sinlle-FlIIIily lIMideoce- SiDsJe-FlIIIily 11"';"- o-rat ReWI RS, Resi"-tiol Suburbm RS, Residelltial Suburbm RS, Residelltial Suburbm RS, Residelltial Suburbm 00-1, CoIlllDll!Cial GeneraJ GEOLOGIC/SEISMIC YES C FLOOD HAZARD HAZARD ZONE: NO. ZONE: HIGH FIRE HAZARD YES C AIRPORT ZONE: NO. NOISE/CRASH ZONE: YES C SEWERS: YES . NO. NOc YES C REDEVELOPMENT YES . NO. PRomcr AREA: NO C ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: /J Not Applicable . Exempt /J No Significant Effects /J Potential Effects, Mitigating Measures, No E.I.R. /J E.I.R. wI Significant Effects . APPROVAL /J CONDmONS /J Significant Effects, See Attached E.R.C. Minutes /J DENIAL /J CONTINUANCE TO: . . . General Plan Amendment No. 96-13 Agenda Item: 1 Hearing Date: February 18, 1997 Page 1 of 3 REQUFST AND LOCATION The applicant is reqn..ml1g to change the General Plan land use designation of a triplex located at 431-435 S. Pear Street from RS, Residential Suburban, to RU-l, Jle~(Iential Urban. Based upon site visits and an as~,ment of the neighborhood, the Department of Planning and Building Services bas included 33 other parcels in the proposal as a recommended alternative. The resulting project area is located along Pear Street between Mt. Vernon and Eureka Avenues and Poplar and Mill Streets (Refer to Atlachment A, General Plan Land Use De.cig1ultion And Location Map). CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUTY ACT (CEQA) STATUS This project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3). No development is proposed. An Environmental Impact Checklist was completed by Staff and all items were marked "no". DEVELOPMENT CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE Single-family and multi-family residential land uses are "permitted" within the RU-lland use district per Section 19.04.020 of the Development Code. Many of the psopetlies in the proposed GPA area are presently legally nonconforming "multi-family residential" land uses within the RS land use district. Pursuant to General Plan Policy 1.12.12, it is the policy of the City of San Bernardino to "allow existing multi-family units to remain as a conforming, permitted use in areas desig,."'tP1l as Residential Urban (RU-I and RU-2)(Il.l and 11.2)". As such, this proposal is in conformance with the City of San Bernardino Development Code and General Plan. BACKGROUND General Plan Amendment No. 96-13 was requested by the pl"CIpe1ty owner of an existing triplex located at 431,433, & 435 South Pear Street. The proposal was made after the owner became aware that the triplex bad lost its "nonconforming use" status and would have to be converted into a single-family dwelling. General Plan Amendment No. 96-13 was reviewed by the Development Review Committee (ORC) on December 19, 1996. The project was cleared to the Planning Commission with a recommendation for approval. . . . General Plan Amendment No. 96-13 Agenda Item: 1 Hearing Date: February 18, 1997 Page 2 00 ANALYSIS Site and Area Characteristics The site consists primarily of multi-family residential structures ranging from duplexes to an 81- unit apartment complex. Of the 34 parcels proposed for the General Plan Amendment, 18 (53") consist of the following uses: 4 duplexes, 3 triplexes, 3 quadplexes, one l2-unit complex, one 8l-unit complex, 4 vacant parcels, and two parcels serving for easem....t purposes. The remaining parcels contain single-family houses. A mixture of single-family and multi-family residential structures surround the site to the north, east, and south. Commercial uses are present along Mt. Vernon Avenue west of the site and within the CG-l, Commercial General, land use district. The nearest multi-family land use district (RU-l) is approximately onc-quarter ofa mile northwest of the proposed GPA site (Refer to Attachment A, General Plan Land Use Designation And Location Map). Density Under the RU-l designation, all vacant parcels would have the uppottunity of being developed at a density of eight (8) units per gross acre. Cunently, the maximum density in the existing RS designation is 4.5 units per gross acre. The density for existing single-family parcels may be increased under the proposed RU-l designation if the requirements of the Development Code are met. However, based on the configuration and size of the existing parcels, an increase in density would be minimal, if any. EXISTING LAND USE DESIGNATION The RS, Residential Suburban, land use district is intended to promote the development of single-family detached units. More than 50" of the existing land uses within the proposed GP A area are presently nonconforming to this land use district. PROPOSED LAND USE DESIGNATION The RU-l, Residential Urban, land use district is intended to promote the development of detached and attached units, duplexes, mobile home parks, and small lot subdivisions as part of a planned residential development. The RU-l land use district would make all existing nonconforming "multi-family residential" land uses "permitted" within the proposed GPA area. In addition, single-family residential land uses would remain permitted uses within the RU-lland use designation. . General Plan Amendment No. 96-13 Agenda Item: 1 Hearing Date: February 18, 1997 Page 3 of3 COMMENTS RECEIVED . No comments have been received as of the date of this staff report. CONCLUSION General Plan Amendment No. 96-13 is con.;-t with the City of San Bernardino General Plan Policy 1.12.12 and is in acc:ordanc:e with all applicable Development Code Standards. Furthermore, the proposal is not subject to CEQA based on Section lS061(b)(3). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the planning Commiqion recommend to the Mayor and City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 96-13 based on the Findings of Fact (Attachmeqt C). . ?J-1 ........., /Z~ . MICHAEL ~.'J~ Director of Planning and Building Services ~r GUSTAVO J. ROMO Assistant Planner ATTACHMENTS: A - General Plan Land Use Designation And Location Map B - Site Plan and General Plan Amendment Proposal C - GP A Findings of Fact . ATTACHMENI' "A" GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION .. ~. AND LOCATION MAP CASE GPA-96-13 HEARING DATE 2/18/97 ~ AGENDA .... ITEM # .... Adopted 6-2-89 TO..r:AA -. S'NTA '1 == lIIl.rJ. NORTH :J. :J l ---l ] \ "'-'. ="::=-..Jc.i Pl.AH-L1' PAGE 1 OF 1 ("-ID>> Tax Rate ArlO 7/67,70'2 137-1: ATTACHMENf "B" GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 96-13 RS~ PROPOSED AMENDMENT I @ r . I "...<..: FROM RS & CG-1 TO RU-1'f STREET I ,.CG-1,.' :.J P CG .J @ ~". . ~;"F,<;<: ':. . @) .' e BIRCH , T.' Tit' T"", @Il' I@ 18" !@ @ 2(!) Q I. /0 5@ -1 ~ 7 . (I 1") .@ ~@ @ I' s@) . - - (!)I @ ~ '" ::> . @. is ill ,5 @) . @ 'S' e e # I' lL.. '-1' [r@ @ @d~~ @ 1'"13 M I I RS ;~(I ~ "I@) @) I . - 1_ @) I POPl.AIl ., ---,.-" srREET I ~LEX@ 10 ~_~.S!'~.7 :'~s,.q-I';i~,'~ .. .. COM.@' I~~ .~. ~.~ ~~..... -- J~'l: . . ~" . '.' . ~L ~SF'''' r (Ii) ,.sF ~. .....:.;,: <W .'. ~j ~ ..!i (!) I IIIG~ ,.' ."'J'~" ". :/~~\SF~' ...:.......:,....\: ~ ~ @. ~ ,;.r:6.~~. ~.'.///: ", ~ s'SFSF . @l '~l." .......'. . ~,'-ijj)-' ~ ~.~~ ~lAFil;~' @ -qY5 ..:. _' _ ~~~< <bC~4'W~ ~[ i~ "..2 ~~ 'l: yitH~ ~p i ~(TORU-1)~,;f4: '~. ~.. ~ ~ e~8 ~~ /'. .... .....~ r/ '/ C~.J!@Z~ ~1f~~/. ~ L ~ I @, 8 ~~~n~~~ :IE _~?,M' :j~~~/ 0' )I~'l05!/'A'DpI'LEX.t'!" '. . -";. . _I . 'MILL 4 STREET ~ . , CG-1+-1 .... @ IRS . r ".,. -.......,.. ItN" . Lit .._..... .... .. 'Un'" Assessor'l _ 8001< 137 .... 16 San 81mcm1lno CGunlr fa "'lJ &:.. . .4. . ATIACHMENT C FINDINGS OF FACT FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 96-13 1. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the General Plan. The proposal meets the General Plan's goal to "allow existing multi-family units to remain as a conforming, permitted use in areas designated as Residential Urban (RU-l and RU- 2)(11.1 and 11.2)" (General Plan Policy 1.12.12). 2. The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City in that the proposed land use designation is in accordance with the existing multi-family residentia1land uses. In addition, single-family residentia1land uses would remain permitted in the RU-lland use designation. 3. The proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the City. The proposed amendment area will remain as a residentia1 district. No change to commercial, industrial, or other type of designation is proposed. The subject site is physically suitable for the requested RU-lland use designation. Over 50% of the proposed GPA area is presently occupied by multi-family residentia1land uses which were legally permitted and reviewed when first constructed. Furthermore, no development is proposed at this time. . . . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 96-13 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Recit.a1s (a) WHEREAS, the General Plan for the cit.y of San Bernardino was adopt.ed by the Mayor and Common council by Reso1ut.ion No. 89-159 on June 2, 1989. (b) WHEREAS , the amendment. proposal and associated development. project. was reviewed for compliance with the California Environment.a1 QUa1it.y Act. (CEQA) and based upon t.he preliminary review, the project. was found t.o be exempt. from CEQA pursuant. t.o CEQA Guidelines !il5061 (b) (3) which stat.es that. CEQA applies only to project.s that. have the pot.ent.ia1 for causinq a siqnificant. effect. on the environment.. (c) WHEREAS, on December 19, 1996, the Cit.y's Environmental Review Commit.t.ee concurred with the findinqs of st.aff's preliminary review for CEQA and recommended that. the P1anninq commission recommend t.o the Mayor and Common Council that. a Notice of Exempt.ion be filed with the San Bernardino County Clerk of the Board if the project is approved. (d) WHEREAS, the P1anninq Commission conduct.ed a not.iced public hearinq on February 18, 1997 in order to receive public t.est.imony and writt.en and oral comment.s on General Plan Amendment No. 96-13, a proposal t.o chanqe the General Plan Land Use Desiqnat.ion from RS, Residential Urban, and CG-1, Commercial General, to RU-1, Residential Urban, on fourteen (14) parcels of 1 . . . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 land generally located along Pear street between Mt. Vernon and Eureka Avenues and poplar and Mill streets and fully reviewed and considered the Planning Division staff report and the recommendation of the Environmental Review Committee. Ce) WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council held a noticed public hearing and fully reviewed and considered proposed General Plan Amendment No. 96-13 and the Planning commission and Environmental Review Committee recommendations and Planning Division staff Report on April 7, 1997. Cf) WHEREAS, the adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 96-13 is deemed in the interest of the orderly development of the City and is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the existing General Plan. SECTION 2. Environmental ne1:ermina1:ion NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND AND DETERMINED by the Mayor and Common Council that the proposed amendment to the General Plan of the city of San Bernardino is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act Guidelines !il5061 (b) (3) which states that CEQA applies only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect on the environment and as such, the proposed amendment is hereby ratified, affirmed and adopted. SECTION 3. Findinas BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino that: A. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the General Plan in that it meets the General Plan's goal to "allow existing multi-family units to remain as a conforming, 2 . . . 1 2 3 B. 4 5 6 7 8 9 c. 10 11 12 13 D. 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 A. permitted use in areas designated as Residential Urban (RU-1 and RU-2) (I1.1 and I1.2)" (General Plan Policy 1.12.12). The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City in that the proposed land use designation is in accordance with the existing multi-family residential land uses. In addition, single-family residential land uses would remain permitted in the RU-1 land use designation. The proposed amendment would not affect the balance of land uses within the City in that the proposed amendment area will remain as a residential district. No change to commercial, industrial, or other type of designation is proposed. The amendment site is physically suitable for the requested RU-1 land use designation in that over 50% of the proposed GPA area is presently occupied by multi-family residential land uses which were legally permitted and reviewed when first constructed. Furthermore, no development is proposed at this time. SECTION 4. Amendment BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council that: The Land Use Plan of the General Plan of the city of San Bernardino i. amended by changing fourteen (14) parcels of land from RS, Residential Suburban, and CG-1, Commercial General, to RU-1, Residential Urban. This amendment is designated as General Plan Amendment No. 96-13 and its location is outlined on the map entitled Attachment A and further described in Attachment B, copies of which are attached and incorporated herein by reference. 3 . . . 1 B. General Plan Amendment No. 96-13 shall become effective 2 immediately upon adoption of this resolution. S SECTION 5. Mall Notation 4 This resolution and the amendment affected by it shall be 5 noted on such appropriate General Plan maps as have been previously 6 adopted and approved by the Mayor and Common Council and which are 7 on file in the office of the City Clerk. S SECTION 6. Notice of Exemlltion 9 The Planning Division is hereby directed to file a Notice of 10 Exemption with the county Clerk of the County of San Bernardino 11 certifying the city's compliance with California Environmental 12 Quality Act in determining that the project is exempt from the Act. IS I I I I 14 IIII 15 I I I I 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 4 . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 . 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2S 24 25 . 26 27 i 28 I L_ RESOLUTION. . .ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 96-13 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held on the day of , 1997, by the following vote, to wit: council Members AIn BAn ABSTAIN ABSENT NEGRETE CURLIN ARIAS OBERHEUIAN DEVLIN ANDERSON MILLER of city Clerk The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this , 1997. day Tom Minor, Mayor City of San Bernardino Approved as to form and legal content: JAMES F. PENMAN, City ttorney 7. 5 . . . CG-1. :r 11 ~. CG .J @ :-:~:~,':' ;"-: :.J @> , ATl'ACHMENT A To.. Rar. Area .....13' 7167,7012 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 96-13 . RS ,@".~~{t STRaT I REVISED: 2/18/97.. I 811lGH .... @_. ei. . <i>-:' I . @). I 8 - II ... J.. ~-- . -I' I .(!) @)@) @I~(!) @) . I!!i. p",. If 1 18 , .1 8 RS - I 7 · 4@ r IlU, D 4 e ., I 8 @) . Ii> . 1 ... e . ..::... , - , @) l.e il. IS If OJ -1 ~ .. 7 . rr , \_...... 1 e @) ~.. ~ ~.... _I: . __~_.STREETI ~SE (1) OJ l~tSF~-I'~i~~. M ~SF.@)' I .SF......",j~<"l .' . .~ ~ .'. K.Sf. SF@).' .' ..oOSF ~. 'u. .'SF:fiiXSF 'SF@).il" , @ '4'cg) . ..~ " ....;.1. _' : ~X~ " .~[ _ ,.'//'" "'l.,n !!- < ~~ ~~~ ~ "II,..,:., , " " ... !i ... ~ 'l~~7 w/@~6~~. _ '(/~ @ 8 ~J/% 1'/-0 '7/f{/}jf}]!J./7"/. c~~J!0"$M '/~2~~~ 8 {SF: 8 ~ -... 8 _..~ '~: ., I~. i Sf! SI'~~ II ~ ~~;!, @ I' - :n 0-\ I" @)SF~ II!:' ,\.' .@ @ ! · li>SF 1 , ." , ". '.:., ouPLeX@) OJ ~ . .COM.$' .- : ..!i~ · (1(!)- 7!E'lfi- z , , - ~ ~ /7 I ~ 8 .SF' 8 .SF (!) 8 @) SF -- p~'SF - @) SF, -I . ~"'L STREET: . r CG-'+j- RS@ I r ...........en ..... . Uf ........ .... .. a...... .....-. IIap 8ooI<1371'al1016 San S""""","" CaunIl' ~ . . . AT'l'ACJIIIBJIlT B GPA-"-13 PROPOSED AMBBDED PARCELS: Assessor Parcel Numbers: 137-134-01 137-161-06 137-161-21 137-161-25 137-161-28 137-161-31 137-161-32 137-161-33 137-161-34 137-161-43 137-161-50 137-161-51 137-161-52 137-161-53 6