HomeMy WebLinkAbout22-Public Works
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
File No. 4.80
From: ROGER G. HARDGRAVE
Subject:
Support for AB 97 - Providing
Funds to Finance Claims by
Local Agencies for Flood
Control Facilities
Dept: Public \'Yorks
ORIGINAL
Date: 1-29-97
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
Consent given for adoption of a Resolution of Intention
by the Board of Supervisors relative to establishment of
a Benefit Assessment District to finance the unfunded
portion of the local agency share of the improvement of
San Timoteo Creek.
Resolution supporting County's proposal continued to 05-
22--95.
Resolution referred to Legislative Review Committee.
Resolution tabled.
Resolution No. 96.49 adopted supporting County of San
Bernardino's proposal to form an assessment district for
San Timoteo Creek Improvement.
05-02-94 -
05-15-95
05-22-95
06-05-95
02..19-96
Recommended motion:
Adopt resolution.
cc: F. \'lilson
J. Penman
AD;';LN. Ol'?iCt:,
a~~
Signature
29 .!AN 97 9151
Contact person:
Roger G. Hardgrave
Staff Report,
Resolution & Memo
Phone:
5025
Supporting data attached:
Ward:
All
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
N/A
Source: (Acct. No.)
(Acct. DescriPtion)
Finance:
Council Notes:
Res 97- 51
75-0262
Agenda Item No.
J./17/9t.
-3..7...
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
AB 97 was introduced by Assembly Members Frusetta and
Morrissey to stipulate that $170,000,000 be made available to the
Department of Water Resources for payment of claims by local
agencies.
The local agency share of federal flood control
improvement projects is 25%. In 1988 the State Legislature
determined that they will pay 70% of the local agencies' share of
federally funded flood control projects. However, no funds have
been allocated in the past few years to pay claims by local
agencies.
Approval of AB 97, known as "Frusetta - Morrissey Flood
Prevention Act of 1997," would make $170,000,000 available for
70% of local agencies' shares.
The assessments to be levied for the San Timoteo Creek
improvement project would be significantly decreased, if State
funds were available to pay a portion of the local agency share.
Therefore, we recommend that the City support the enact-
ment of AB 97 into law.
A copy of the inter-office County memo from Tim Kelly to
Ken Miller, dated 1-14-97, is attached for reference.
Attach.
1-29-97
7~.0264
. .
,.,... . ':'-;,;;;-'''''."'":1, ~'., . M-"'tff.....,~
.,.; -
_'!IE_ _">tft' --.-_ - .
---'......
..
/1"
/
INT:ROFFICE MEMO
DATE: January 14, 1991
FROM: KEN A. MILLER, Director Is/
TransportationIFlood Control
PliO}{E: 387-2623
MAIL CODE 0835
TO: TIM KELLY, ACA
Public Services Group
File" j((',4!. )lbl
SUBJECT: FLOOD CONTROL SUBVENTIONS FUNDING - ASSEMBLY BILL AB 97
I On January 7, 1997 State Assembly members Frusetta and Morrissey introduced AB 97, which
addresses funding for the State Flood Control Subventions Programs. The Legislative Counsel's
Digest for the bi\l states, in part, the following:
Under existing law, the Department of Water Resources administers a state flood control
subvention program for local flood control assistance.
This bi\l would enact the Frusetta-Morrissey Flood Prevention Act of 1997, which would
make legislative findings and declarations with regard to the importance of state
investment in flood control and a statement oflegislative intent that SI70,000,000 be
made available to the Department of Water Resources by the Budget Act of 1997 for
flood control subventions to local flood protection projects.
The bi\l would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
The Flood Control Subvention Program has been a vital component in the funding offederal flood
control projects since the early 1900' s.
~ .
Policy regarding State participation in federal flood control projects was first established in the
early 1900's, amended in 1946 and again in 1988 when, in response to the enactment by Congress
ofPL 99-662 (the Water Resources Development Act of 1986), the legislature determined that
the State shall pay 70% of the non-federal cost required by Congress.
The Department of Water Resources currently has on file approximately S162 million in unpaid
claims for State payment of its share offederal flood control projects, constructed or under
constructioQ, ip nine counties throughout the State. Our County currently has submitted claims
to the state in the amount ofS4.2 million for expenditures on the Seven Oaks Dam and Mill
Creek features of the Santa Ana River Mainstem project. In the next 30 to 60 days, we wi\l be
submitting additional claims in the amount ofan estimated $4.5 million for additional
expenditures that have been incurred on the Seven Oaks Dam and San Timoteo Creek feature
bringing our total claim for reimbursement to S8.7 million. By the time the Santa Ana Mainstem
project in our County (including Seven Oaks Dam, Mill Creek Levee, and San Timoteo Creek) is
completed, our total claim for reimbursement will be approximately $15 million.
< .
,~~.,.r
-
., .
/
MEMO TO TIM KELLY
January 14, 1997
Page 2
I The Department of Water Resources administers the Flood Control Subventions Program for
state financial assistance to local agencies cooperating in federal flood control projects. The
Department of Water Resources has historically funded Flood Control Subventions to local
agencies with money appropriated from the General Fund or the Special Account for Capital
Outlay. Since 1990, the state's economic difficulties and budget deficits have led to the programs
not being funded for four of the past six years. Funding in the other two years was very limited:
in 1991-1992 funding was limited to $29.75 million and in 1993-1994 to $12 million. Proposition
204, which was passed by the voters in November 1996, included $90 million for the subventions
program leaving a shortfall in excess of $70 million for claims that are already in hand at the
Department of Water Resources. In addition, with projects still in progress around the State,
such as those in our County, and new projects coming on line around the State, the amount of
claims will continue to rise.
The Flood Control Subventions Program was very important to enable our County to meet its
local cost cOlllmitments on prior projects such as the LytlelWarnl Project in San Bernardino and
the Cucamonga Creek/Deer Creek project in Rancho Cucamonga and Ontario. We anticipated
reimbursement through the subventions program when we put together our financing plan for the
Santa Ana Mainstem project. Without anticipated reimbursements from the State, we had to put
in place an assessment district to finance most of our local interest costs for the San Timoteo
Creek feature. Full reimbursement from the State through the subventions fund would enable us
to substantially reduce or even eliminate these assessments on benefiting landowners. Other
counties with ongoing major federal flood control projects eligible for funding under the
subventions program include Contra Costa, Fresno, Kern, Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San
Diego, and Santa Clara.
It is absolutely essential that the State acknowledge its commitment to these local sponsors and
begin regular reimbursement of their claims. Some may suggest that the State has no obligation
to reimburse these local sponsors. Clearly, the local sponsors do not hold this view. They have
proceeded with these projects, after the projects were authorized by the State, with the clear
understanding that the State would reimburse a percentage ofthe non-federal costs. Section
12585.5 of the Water Code says that the State.mM! pay a specified percentage of the non-federal
costs. It does not say mav or mi8ht. it says SHALL. It is understood that State funds must be
appropriated, but it is the responsibility of the legislature and the Governor to make those
appropriations consistent with the statutorily declared policy.
It is important that there be a commitment on the part of the State to address the backlog of
claims and to anticipate claims from ongoing work on all State authorized projects. AB 97 would
go far in achieving this.
KAM:rc
cc: Jim H1awek