HomeMy WebLinkAbout2006-339
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2006-339
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 655 ENTITLED, IN PART, "A RESOLUTION... DESIGNATING CERTAIN
STREETS, OR PORTIONS THEREOF AS THROUGH HIGHWAYS..." AND
ESTABLISHING A FOUR-WAY STOP AT THE INTERSECTION OF PALM
A VENUE AND IRVINGTON AVENUE.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1: Resolution No. 655, which designates certain streets, or portions
thereof, as through highways, Section One is amended by amending Subsection (8.6)
IRVINGTON AVENUE to read as follows:
"(8.6) IRVINGTON AVENUE
(A) From Magnolia Avenue to Pine Avenue.
(B) At its Intersection with Palm Avenue (4-Way Stop).
(C) At its intersection with Olive Avenue (4-Way Stop).
(D) At its intersection with Walnut Avenue (4-Way Stop)."
SECTION 2: Resolution No. 655, which designates certain streets, or portions
thereof, as through highways, Section One is amended by amending Subsection (13.7A)
PALM A VENUE to read as follows:
"(13.7 A) PALM AVENUE (VERDEMONT)
(A) From Cajon Boulevard to and Including Melvin Avenue.
(B) At its intersection with Cajon Boulevard (4-Way Stop).
(C) At its intersection with Kendall Drive/I-215 Ramps (4-Way Stop),
except vehicles travelling westbound and turning north from the 1-215
Freeway off-ramp.
(D) At its intersection with Irvington Avenue (4-Way Stop).
(E) At its intersection with Belmont Avenue (4-Way Stop).
(F) At its intersection with Verdemont Drive (4-Way Stop)"
/I
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
2
3
4
5
6
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 655 ENTITLED, IN PART, "A RESOLUTION... DESIGNATING CERTAIN
STREETS, OR PORTIONS THEREOF AS THROUGH HIGHWAYS..." AND
ESTABLISHING A FOUR-WAY STOP AT THE INTERSECTION OF PALM
AVENUE AND IRVINGTON A VENUE.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the
Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a joint regular
7 meeting thereof, held on the 18th day of September , 2006 by the following
8 vote, to-wit:
COUNCIL MEMBERS
AYES
NAYS
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
ESTRADA
x
BAXTER
x
VACANT
DERRY
x
KELLEY
x
JOHNSON
x
MC CAMMACK
x
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this
September , 2006.
()~h,~
~chel Clark, City Clerk
....,0.. J1.
<:::::>b. day of
Approved as to form:
James F. Penman
City ttorney
<
2006-339
City of San Bernardino
WARRANTS FOR STOP SIGN INSTAllATION
location
Existing Control
Prepared bylDate
Palm Avenue at hvington Avenue
2.Way Stop
A.A. lugo 8118106
.
POLICY
Stop sign may be warranted at an intersection where any of the following warrants A-1, A-2, B or C are met
A.1 STATE WARRANTS FOR MULTI.WAY STOP CONTROL
Warrant is satisfied if any of the following criteria are met
CRITERIA REQUIREMENTS REMARKS Y N
A-1.1 Traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, multi-way stop need to be installed X
as interim measure until signal is installed
A.l.2 Five or more right angle and/or turning movement accidents in recent 12 months X
Combined vehicle volume on both streets during any 8 hours averages 500+ veh/hr x
All 3
conditions Combined vehicle and pedestrian volume on minor street during the same 8 hours
listed to the averages 200+ unit/hr,
A1.3 right must And x
be met to Delay to minor street vehicles during the maximum hour of the same 8 hours averages
satisfy 30 seclhr
warrant
A-1.3 85th percentile approach speed exceeds 40 mph (64 km/h), min. vehicular volume
warrant is 70% of the above requirements
A.1: IS STATE WARRANT FOR MULTI.WAY STOP CONTROL SATISFIED? X
A.2 STATE WARRANTS FOR TWO/ONE.WAY STOP CONTROL
Warrant is satisfied if any of the following criteria are met
CRITERIA REQUIREMENTS REMARKS Y N
A-2.1 On the less important road at its intersection with a main road where accident history ~ ,..,.-
justifies the placement of Stop signs.
.../ ....
A-2.2 On a county road or city street with its intersection with a StatfJHighway.
A-2.3 At the intersection with two main highways. The i9~~~ --pp;;d depends
on the approach speeds, voiumes and turnilJll \ ov .
A.2.4 On a street entering a legally estab~h fl/r~way or street.
A-2.5 On a minor stree;where the safe~~'is less than 10 mph (16 kmll1).
A-2.6 At an un-si!J1ar e.Ll~~ in a signalized area.
A-2.7 At inte~re a combination of high speed, restricted view and accident
records' Icates a need for control by the Stop sign.
A.2: IS STATE ~~NT FOR TWO/ONE.WAY STOP CONTROL SATISFIED?
/
2006-339
8.PETITION WARRANTS FOR LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS
8Y CITY ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
Use only at residential street intersections excluding arterials, collectors, local collectors, where ADT do not
exceed 2,500 Vehicles on each Intersecting Street
Warrant 8 is satisfied if 8 and any two of the criteria 8-1 through 8-10 are met /
CRITERIA REQUIREMENTS REMAR~ y N
Is there a petition signed by more than 60% at property ownerslresidents located V
B. within 600 teet at proposed stop sign; AND TWO OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA
ARE MET.
B-1. School located within 600 feet of intersection and intersection is on usu7
route to school".
B-2. Streets leading to intersection do not intersect at right angles. /
B-3. One or more streets leading to intersection is at a grade of mo~n 5%.
Where one or more of the approaches, requiring th~;r)' does not meet the
B-4. required minimum sight distance, due to permar nt vie obstruction or roadway
geometry.
B-S. Intersection is abutting a park, major ShOP~ enter or other high pedestrian
use facility. . .
B-6. Pedestrian volume greater than 48 .v. r in any 8 hour period.
The combined vehicular and ;1 !It olume crossIng the major street exceeds 125
B-7. unfts during at least two hours at least 200 vehicles enter the intersection each
hour from aI/ approaches duri y 8-hour period.
8-8. One approach of the inters,Jion is a driveway serving a commercial area.
8-9. One approach ~f thJ ~~section is a driveway servicing a residential property.
Pass thro ,h n~ocal traffic) on the subject residential street exceeds 50 vehicles
B-l0. per hour eds 40% of the vehicle traffic during the hours from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00
a.m. and ~.m. to 6:00 p.m. on a non-holiday Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday,
with laca IC defined as vehicles traversing/commuting through the neighborhood.
B-ll. Th~;;;:'c/e volume entering the Intersection from aI/ approaches exceeds 600 units
duri any hour at an intersection.
~: than desirable pedestrian or vehicular condftions not listed above or contained
B-12. n the criteria of the State of Califomia for the instal/ation of Stop signs exist at the
I intersection (as determined/verified by the City's licensed Traffic Engineer).
8: IS 8 PL~Y TWO OF THE CRITERIA 8-1 THROUGH 8-12 SATISFIED?
,/
I
2006-339
C. ACCIDENTS AND SAFETY WARRANTS FOR LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS
BY CITY ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY
Use Only at Residential Street Intersections Where ADT do not exceed 2,500 Vehicles on each Intersecting Street
Warrant C is satisfied if C and any two conditions C.1 through C.10 are met /'
CRITERIA REQUIREMENTS REMARKS Y N
Three or more accidents in a 12 month period susceptible to correction by stop /
C. signs; or at least 200 vehicles enter the intersection each hour from all approaches
during any consecutive 8 hour period; AND TWO OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA
ARE MET.
C-l. School located within 600 feet of intersection and intersection is on "SUgg/,
route to school".
C-2. Streets leading to intersection do not intersect at right angles. /
C-3. One or more streets leading to intersection is at a grade of ~re~ 5%.
Where one or more of the approaches, requiring the stc IfJ /Pfs), does not meet the
C-4. required minimum sight distance, due to pe rna;~ l1li obstruction or roadway
geometry. .
C-5. Intersection is abutting a park, ma7f ...11., iJJ;enter or other high pedestrian
use facility. I 1/
C-6. Pedestrian volume is greater than*, nitslhr in the B-hour period.
The combined vehicular ~~T volume crossing the major street exceeds 125
C-7. unffs during at Ie l''';7;~urs ere at least 200 vehicles enter the intersection each
hour from all ap roa es d ng any B-hour period.
CoB. One approa ft ~)fersection is a driveway serving a commercial area.
Cog. One appro ,(he intersection is a driveway servicing a residential property.
Pass thro~ ((nOn-lOcal traffic) on the subject residential street exceeds 50 vehicles
C-l0. ~nd 40% of the vehicle traffic during the hours from 7:00 a.m. to g:OO a.m.
and 4' 0 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. on a non-holiday Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday, wffh
lac traffic defined as vehicles traversing/commuting through the neighborhood.
C-ll. / 'The vehicle volume entering the intersection from all approaches exceeds 600 unfts
during any hour at an intersection.
Coy Less than desirable pedestrian or vehicular condffions not listed above or contained
in the criteria of the State of Califomia for the installation of stop signs exist at the
intersection (as determinedlverified by the Cffy's licensed Traffic Engineer).
C: IS"6 PLUS ANY TWO CRITERIA C.1 THROUGH C.10 SATISFIED?
DID THIS LOCATION MEET ANY OF THE WARRANTS A.1, A.2, B OR C ABOVE?
IF YES, CHECK WARRANTS MET [ZJ 0 0 cO
A-1 A.2 B
IF ANY OF THE WARRANTS ARE MET, A STOP SIGN SHOULD BE INSTALLED AFTER APPROVAL BY MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL AND
THE INTERSETION IS DESIGNATED A "STOP INTERSECTION" BYTHE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL.
Good traffic engineering judgment must be exercised before installing stop signs at certain intersections (whether it meets the warrants
or not)