HomeMy WebLinkAbout24-Planning & Building Services
..
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
From: Michael E. Hays, Director
Subject:
General Plan Amendment No. 97-02 - To
change the general plan land use designation
from RS, Residential Suburban, to RU-2,
Residential Urban, for 23 parcels located
between 16th and 17th Streets at 648-652
W. 16th Street.
Dept: Planning & Building Services I
ORIGINAL
Date: July 22, 1997
MCC Date: August 4, 1997
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
The Mayor and Common Council closed the public hearing and denied General Plan Amendment No. 97-02
in concept, continuing the item to August 4, 1997, directing staff to prepare Findings of Fact for denial.
Recommended Motion:
That the Mayor and Common Council adopt the Findings of Fact for denial of General Plan Amendment
No. 97-02.
~/f;()
Michael s
Contact person: Michael Hays
Phone: 384-5357
Supporting data attached: Staff RllPOrt
Ward: 6
FUNDING REQillREMENTS:
Amount: Nt A
Source: (Acet. No.) NtA
(Acct. Description)
Finance:
Council Notes:
Agenda Item No. ~ J..f
gjl/lq7
,
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-02
MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 4, 1997
OWNER/APPLICANT: VARIOUS/GARY R. YEAKEL
444 VIA VISTA DRIVE
REDLANDS, CA 92373-7159
(909) 792-8053
REQUESTILOCA TION
The applicant is requesting a change in the general plan land use designation from RS,
Residential Suburban, to RU-2, Residential Urban for a triplex located at 648-652 West 16th
Street.
Based upon site visits and an assessment of the neighborhood, the Department of Planning and
Building Services included 22 other parcels in the proposal as a recommended alternative. The
resulting project area consists of an entire City block located between 16th and 17th Streets on
the north and south and "F" and "G" Streets on the east and west (Refer to Exhibit I, General
Plan Proposal Map).
BACKGROUND
The Mayor and Common Council opened the public hearing and heard testimony from the
applicant and discussed the proposal at their July 21, 1997 meeting. The hearing was then
closed and the proposal was denied. Staff was directed to prepare Findings of Fact for denial
based on the incompatibility of a multi-family land use district with the existing lot sizes and
single-family homes.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Mayor and Common Council adopt the Findings of Fact for denial
of General Plan Amendment No. 97-02 (Exhibit 2).
Prepared by:
GUSTA VO J. ROMO, Assistant Planner for
MICHAEL E. HAYS, Director of Planning & Building Services
EXHffiITS
1 General Plan Proposal Map
2 Findings of Fact for Denial of General Plan Amendment No. 97-02
I ~~_.G'
.~.
,'GPA:'97-o2 PROPOSAL MAP
" '
-~"r:"'-
I
'"
i
~
:1
-] ~'r""
;: ,-:-, ~
(;) ~! 3 I @ ~
i' I'
-'
~,
;;
..
-'
'"!
.
,n 'J
~ G ;; :: ~ ,
""
@J iii 15 ---
~
3;2\ .. ,-:-
'"
8~1@ " @:
3 !:! .. G
e .. " @ ,
..
, ..' ,
"
: : ; - ,
, .' -
.. .. ..' , , ...
~@ , ~ @
~ "l' ;
, '~ , "
" , : .
.-' ""'. I'; ; ; "
@ : > ...
.... --:--.,-F
I '
~
~~
"a'<r
~
~~
t~
\n~
go .'
152
S'~
C'l~
:;'0
" -
~
.
cr.::tl~
c c..
'" Q..
"'..
al ..
,,_..
... 4C
g cn~.
...
s,~i:
"'",,,
c.."
C1
ON
$
'<
"=Q"~
"'''''' ..
~~..",~
.....:::~..ii
....;::. -;
, .
-,
;i\
~
~G .~~ )~
'. Cii '\. <;; :;:';:: ... ;;; ,I
. " .~,
-~--~------... - -1".~~
----,7r-=:-..'---r~7. +i
~.:; ...... :: S
'"::\ _ .;.. _ 1:\.
\J~~ c~
:~"r:f:'
-- ~~'Q
~\:~/- - :: $
~@
3 :-:"'-r-
""
... .,::.,
.,
::
~
"
..,
\ ~!'It -- _ -="
, v:oo . - ..!,.
D4._u~'.;...J"__J'.ze: ~_
~ 7-+----t--~-7":...i.a OJ
~ .. ~ :>t - I
,
'j
"
"
1
I
" I'" 1"<6' I
,
.
"'~
....
~
~
""
..'
--.:....... ~~If'.
,
~
o
648-652 W. 16TH STREET
PROPOSED AMENDMENT AREA
FROM RS TO RU-2
",.'
,
"
'.
;;;
--,-
i
'!J"
~;
:'
- '....
i @ OJ
Oi
:i-
TRI@ ::
V e> Q
TRle ..
SFRe ..
1lIe> ..
~
112~,
.
, """.
---~--,-
.
.
,
... , ..
,-
@
@
~
:!
;..
@
.
,\ '
".
e
1-~ @
~
(3
S
.3
0'
...
~
'"
...
I
i~A
~"A
I@
I--:~
....j .
!. --.. ,--'1'
!:@ e e::
",
'----+
I,
!.
i i.
1..4' '.
f '
STREET-."-C
,.... M'
e; @TRI i
...
""TAl :;:
& ..e, .
EXlDBIT
1
DtI' - DUPLEX
Ui ~SFR
- - TRI - TRPLEX
'2h. QUAD - QUADPlEX
:; @SFR , SFR - SNU-FAf&t
; @SFR RESmENCE
;0 @SFR V - VACANT
" (i)TRI
c
.. @TR1
-
" ~SFR
"
'"
.. @DlA' ~
..
'"
...
..
..
STREET
....
;
I
_..J__
,-
.. @
..
.. ~
.. ~
'" ~
'" ~
'"
"'"
.::J
'"
'"
..
..
", ,
o I
-------!
I
I
.I
--"'---1
I
;
..
..
..
0;
:j.
..
:; ...,
~
11:'1
~ 1:S':
a
,
iO @
-4-
..
..
@. i
--~-;-:1)--_.
\
.
"
,.... "
e;
. '
--,
"I
II
I
I
I
I
"'fl'
i
I
"
.r
-
....
:;:
'"
il
'"
'"
"1
,:,,,.
,
STR&T- ~ .-
\
-
~',
.
@
r-
..:
:r'
!
-.
-
:~
f
....
;'1
~,
T
,
~
;~
.~
......Qitn
2)(31
!"~al
~2.~
O')CI~
ol>Cl.
;; S'
oc
C'l
~
i
<II
,
-
-
I\)
EXHmIT 2
FINDINGS OF FACT FOR DENIAL
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-02
I. The proposed amendment is internally inconsistent with the General Plan in that it
conflicts with General Plan Goal I G(g) which states that it is the goal of the City to
achieve a pattern and distribution of land uses which retain and enhance residential
neighborhoods and provide distinctive and compatible neighborhoods. The small lot sizes
within the proposed amendment area are not compatible with the sizes established for
multi-family uses. Furthermore, it is the goal of the City to "promote the development
of single-family detached units in a high quality suburban setting" (General Plan
Objective 1.11).
2. The proposed amendment would be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety,
convenience, or welfare of the City in that the proposed land use designation is
inconsistent with the General Plan and has the potential to increase the number of
residential units on the site, thus, potentially impacting circulation as well as other public
services.
3. The proposed amendment would be detrimental to the balance of land uses within the
City in that the intention of the General Plan to eventually convert this area into single-
family and amortize existing legal nonconforming multi-family land uses would be
eliminated.
4. The subject site is physically suitable for the requested RU-Iland use designation in that
some of the proposed general plan amendment area is presently occupied by multi-family
residential land uses. However, the existing multi-family development may not conform
to current development requirements pertaining to unit size, open space, and other
development code requirements, and additional public services may be impacted due to
the potential increase in number of residential units.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
From: Michael E. Hays, Director
Subject:
General Plan Amendment No. 97-02 - To
change the general plan land use designation
from RS, Residential Suburban, to RU-2,
Residential Urban, for 23 parcels located
between 16th and 17th Streets at 648-652
W. 16th Street.
Dept: Planning & Building Services
JUN 1 8 1997
Date: June 16, 1997
MCC Date: July 7, 1997
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
NtA
Recommended Motion:
That the Mayor and Common Council close the public hearing and adopt the resolution which approves
General Plan Amendment No. 97-02.
~/JjJ
Contact person: Michael HlIYs
Phone: 384-5357
Supporting data attached: Staff Re.port and Resolution
Ward: 6
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount: Nt A
Source: (Acet. No.) NtA
(Acet. Description)
Finance:
Council Notes:
Agenda Item
Previously - t JI t, .- {)7/o 7/'17
Jf;zL/
08"fr /'17
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-02
MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL MEETING OF JULY 7,1997
OWNER/APPLICANT: VARIOUS/GARY R. YEAKEL
444 VIA VISTA DRIVE
REDLANDS, CA 92373-7159
(909)792-8053
REOUEST/LOCATION
The applicant is requesting a change in the general plan land use designation from RS,
Residential Suburban, to RU-2, Residential Urban for a triplex located at 648-652 West 16th
Street.
Based upon site visits and an assessment of the neighborhood, the Department of Planning and
Building Services included 22 other parcels in the proposal as a recommended alternative. The
resulting project area consists of an entire City block located between 16th and 17th Streets on
the north and south and "F" and "G" Streets on the east and west (Refer to Exhibit 1, General
Plan Land Use & Location Map).
KEY POINTS
*
The proposed amendment would change the status of existing multi-family residential
units in the direct vicinity from "legally nonconforming uses" to "permitted uses" to
encourage their maintenance and rehabilitation.
*
The proposed amendment would not increase the density of the site. Although the RU-2
district allows 8.0 units per gross acre compared to 4.5 units allowed by the existing RS
district, the proposed amendment area consists of existing multi-family units already built
at a higher density than the proposed RU-2 designation. There is one vacant lot which
could accommodate a maximum of two units based on existing development standards.
*
The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the General Plan. Pursuant to
General Plan Policy 1.12.12, it is the policy of the City of San Bernardino to "allow
existing multi-family units to remain as a conforming, permitted use in areas designated
as Residential Urban (RU-l and RU-2)(11.1 and 11.2)".
The Planning Commission Staff Report prepared for the May 20, 1997 Planning Commission
meeting provides the detailed background and analysis of this project (Refer to Exhibit 3).
General Plan Amendment No. 97-02
Mayor and Common Council Meeting
July 7, 1997
Page 2 of 2
COMMENTS RECEIVED
No written comments have been received as of the date of this staff report. A few residents
have called the City seeking further clarification. No opposition or concerns have been
presented from the public.
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This project is exempt from CEQA under the general rule exemption [Section 15601(b)(3)]. A
general rule exemption applies when a site is already developed and no new development is
proposed. Staff completed an Environmental Impact Checklist and all items were marked "No".
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
At their May 20, 1997 meeting, the Planning Commission considered comments from the public
and voted to recommend approval of General Plan Amendment No. 97-02 to the Mayor and
Common Council as presented by Staff. The vote was unanimous: 8 ayes (Gonzalez, Hamilton,
Lockett, Quiel, Reilly, Schuiling, Suarez & Thrasher), 0 nayes, 0 abstentions, 1 absent (Enciso).
STAFF RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Mayor and Common Council:
1. Adopt the Resolution to approve General Plan Amendment No. 97-02 to change
the general plan land use designation of 23 parcels of land consisting of one City
block generally located between 17th and 16th Streets on the north and south and
"G" and "P" Streets on the east and west from RS, Residential Suburban, to RU-
2, Residential Urban (APN's: 145-121-03 through 145-121-23 and 145-121-25 &
145-121-26).
Prepared by:
GUSTA VO J. ROMO, Assistant Planner
for MICHAEL E. HAYS, Director of Planning & Building Services
EXHmITS:
1
2
3
4
General Plan Land Use & Location Map
General Plan Amendment Proposal Map
Planning Commission Staff Report (May 20, 1997) and Attachments
Resolution
EXlDBIT "lit
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AGENDA
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ITEM #
LAND USE DESIGNATION CASE GPA-97-02
AND LOCATION MAP HEARING DATE MAY 20. 1997
I
I
...,
~fj'
"
M
Oh' (lIIl .... .......,
---
PlAN-I.t1 PAGE 10Ft tol-lDt
. GPA;'97-02 PROPOSAL MAP
-{ r~'''-
___liS"
~
I
.....
'-"! -"j'l
~, I '" -n
,. e. ~:'
III !
;;
...N' ~ 3<1 r ..-'
1-. i i
-I ~ ~\ .\
..::e,i! ~ ~ :;
, '
-'
.:r. i::
;;
'"
_J, . _JC
l G ~ :: '='. ;
~
,3 ~ 0 <>
~
~-'"' ~
.~f.O_ ~ ~
f\J ,<>
8~,-, .. ~
8 ~ -; <5
~ G .. " @ ,
.. ,
",:Ji<flO /~o .
\
, , ,
'"
~~ :- + ", -
..
:@
,
@,@ ~
@) .~
"
-'
. ~.;
~
<!?..J
'"a-<l'
j :
..
@ : ~ ""
'J ----:---,-F
I .
,.
..
.,-
" ~
~;:.
a 5
~
tn~
g'lA.
~ S
-. ~
~ 0,
<>-
::::;. (:)
" -
..
~
cnOJ:b
QOm
00'"
,.."
'" '"
,,-'"
~ "'0
5 c.n:.
~
9,d';:
0", 0
0" "
<:1
0-
c:'"
o
-<
c,
'"
:"1"
'"
...
.., -" : -" .,.,.
::\ ~
~
!~ e .~ 'j
, :
' ~
" Oi'... U; :;;';;... ;;; ,I
. " .:% .:,
:o:'-.....--"T""------~ - -....-,
--- .,;"1ft!"":: -,,- --r~7'-+1
~ ~ -,' ~ 'I
:: .-=..
G .. (g I
;; . c I
,
,
'l;~-;' '" <> i
'.:.!J
-.... CQ i
- ,
~' . "" I
.. '- " -$I
o .' ,
3 - - ~ .'" i
- , ,,::,
~ -- ~ ,I
.':' .. e J
v " .~
U4._~L:;'_../;l _-/-ZtL. ..:._
iAA+7 - + - --t---+- -"'i6~4
. . I
'" .. '" " - ,!
\ .~ <> ~
, , ~ ..,. ,j
, "
'I
~,. ~. ,f ...". -.' I
.,'
~-.~~IE.
,
~
o
648-652 W. 16TH STREET
PROPOSED AMENDMENT AREA
FROM RS TO RU-2
OIl :::-'2l'"
~~~~ ~ ~
~~~S ~ ~
Q"'::::ca ft.~
, -
'.
--,-
i
'1.....
.. .~"
I @ ;;; I
a;
..
TRI@ ::
V e Q
TRI@ ..
SFRe ..
TIlI@ ...
0>
..
0
..
..
..
..
\ '"
I ..
..
04 . .'
~ ;
".
~ "+'<?
c,
...
ill
'"
...
1-..
iRA
I@
ii@
t__+
I'
..
I.
"
;
,...1'
t
STReeT-....r
....."'. ""t'
I;:; @TRI 1.
....
;;
:;; @TRI
.. (])SFR
'2 !FR's
~ @SFR
e; @SFR
iO @SFR
@TRI
@TRI
~SFR
@OUP
'"
~
...
STReeT
-'
_L_
EXWBIT "2"
DUP - DUPLEX
. TRI - TRIPLEX
QUAD - QUADPLEX
SFR - SWGLE-FAMIY
RESIlENCE
V - VACANT
'.
.
STi/EeT- ~ --
:j;;
01
.
-
I\)
-
"
'.
i
-
SUMMARY
,
..
.._~---,.
fuunBrr "3"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DMSION
CASE:
General Plan Amendment No. 97-02
.===============================================
APPUCANT:
GARY R. YEAKEL
444 Via Vista Drive
RedIands, CA 92373-7159
OWNER:
VARIOUS
AGENDA ITEM: 4
HEARING DATE: 05120/97
WARD: 6
-----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
REQUESTILOCATION - The applicant is requesting to change the General Plan land use designation
of a triplex located at 648-652 W. 16th Street from RS, Residential Suburban, to RU-l, Residential
Urban.
Based upon site visits and an assessment of the neighborhood, the Department of Plannil\g and Building
Services has included 22 other parcels in the proposal as a recommended alternative. The resulting
project area consists of an entire city block located between 17th and 16th Streets on the north and south
and "F" and "G" Streets on the east and west.
-----------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------
PROPERTY
ExIsrlNG
LAND USE
SUBJECT
NORTH
SOUTH
EAST
WEST
Single & Multi-Family Residences
High School
Single-Family Residences
Single & Multi-Family Residences
Church & Single-Family Residences
GEOLOGIC/SEISMIC
HAZARD ZONE:
YES 0 FLOOD HAZARD
NO. ZONE:
HIGH FIRE HAZARD
ZONE:
YES 0 AIRPORT
NO. NOISE/CRASH
ZONE:
LAND USE
DESIGNATION
RS, Residential Suburban
PF, Public Facilities
RU-2, Residential Urban
RS, Residential Suburban
RS, Residential Suburban
YES 0 SEWERS: YES .
NO . NO 0
YES 0 REDEVELOPMENT YES 0
NO. PROJECT AREA: NO .
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS: STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
0 Not Applicable 0 E.I.R. wi Significant . APPROVAL
. Exempt Effects
0 No Significant 0 CONDITIONS
Effects 0 Significant Effects,
0 Potential Effects, See Attached E.R.C. 0 DENIAL
Mitigating Minutes
Measures, o CONTINUANCE
No E.I.R. TO:
- .'.----.......- -
General Plan Amendment No. 97-02
Agenda Item: 4
Hearing Date: May 20, 1997
Page 1 of 3
REOUEST AND LOCATION
The applicant is requesting to amend the General Plan land use designation of a triplex located
at 648-652 West 16th Street from RS, Residential Suburban, to RU-2, Residential Urban. Based
upon site visits and an assessment of the neighborhood, the Department of Planning and Building
Services has included 22 other parcels in the proposal as a recommended alternative. The
resulting project area encompasses one entire city block located between 17th and 16th Streets
on the north and south and "F" and "G" Streets on the east and west (Refer to Attachment A,
General Plan Land Use Designation and Location Map).
SETTING/SITE CHARACTERISTICS
The site consists primarily of multi-family residential structures ranging from duplexes to a 12-
.. unit apartment complex. Of the 23 parcels proposed for the General Plan Amendment, 13
contain multi-family land uses consisting of the following: 2 duplexes, 7 triplexes, 3 quadplexes,
and one 12-unit complex. One parcel is vacant and the remaining 9 contain single-family
houses.
Single-family residences exist east, west, and south of the project area. A church is located
directly to the west across "G" Street and San Bernardino High School is located to the north
and above 17th Street. The nearest multi-family land use district (RU-2) is directly south of the
project area across 16th Street.
BACKGROUND
General Plan Amendment No. 97-02 was requested by the property owner of an existing triplex
located at 648, 650 & 652 West 16th Street. The proposal was made after the owner became
aware that the triplex had lost its "nonconforming use" status and would have to be converted
into a single-family dwelling. General Plan Amendment No. 97-02 was reviewed by the
Development Review Committee (ORC) on April 10th and May 1st, 1997. The project was
cleared to the Planning Commission with a recommendation for approval.
A letter of intent was sent to all property owners within the proposed project area.
Approximately five (5) calls have been received as of the date of this staff report. No objections
to the proposal have been indicated.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND ANALYSIS
1) The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the General Plan.
The proposal meets the General Plan's goal to "allow existing multi-family units to
remain as a conforming, permitted use in areas designated as Residential Urban (RU-l
and RU-2)(l1.1 and 11.2)" (General Plan Policy 1.12.12). Many of the properties in the
- "_.~-...... .-
General Plan Amendment No. 97-()2
Agenda Item: 4
Hearing Date: May 20, 1997
Page 2 of 3
proposed GPA area are presently "legal nonconforming" multi-family residential land
uses within the RS district. As such, this proposal is in conformance with the City of
San Bernardino Development Code and General Plan.
2) The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety.
convenience. or welfare of the City.
The proposed land use designation is in accordance with the existing multi-family
residential land uses. The RS, Residential Suburban, land use district is intended to
promote the development of single-family detached units. The majority of the existing
land uses within the proposed GP A area are presently nOIlCOnforming in this land use
district. The RU-2, Residential Urban, land use district is intended to promote the
development of detached and attached units, duplexes, mobile home parks, and sma1llot
subdivisions as part of a planned residential development. The RU-2 district would make
all existing "legal nonconforming" multi-family residential land uses "permitted" within
the proposed GPA area. In addition, single-family residential land uses would remain
permitted uses within the RU-2 land use designation.
3) The proposed amendment would maintain the appropriate balance of land uses within the
City.
The proposed amendment area will remain as a residential district. No change to
commercial, industrial, or other type of designation is proposed. Under the RU-2 land
use designation, vacant parcels would have the opportunity of being developed at a
density of eight (8) units per gross acre. Currently, the maximum density in the existing
RS designation is 4.5 units per gross acre. The density for existing single-family parcels
may be increased under the proposed RU-2 designation if the requirements of the
Development Code are met. However, based on the configuration and size of the
existing parcels, an increase in density would be minimal. The vacant parcel could be
developed with a duplex only.
4) The subject site is physically suitable for the requested land use designation and anticipated
land use development(s).
The majority of the proposed GPA area is presently occupied by multi-family residential
land uses which were legalIy permitted when first constructed. Furthermore, no
development is proposed at this time.
. -.. u..-----__--.o.-.__
. ~---, ;.-.
General Plan Amendment No. 97-02
Agenda Item: 4
Hearing Date: May 20, 1997
Page 3 00
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
This project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3). No development is
proposed. An Environmental Impact Checldist was completed by Staff and all items were
marked "no". Single-family and multi-family residential land uses are "permitted" within the
RU-2 land use district per Section 19.04.020 of the Development Code.
CONCLUSION
General Plan Amendment No. 97-02 is consistent with the City of San Bernardino General Plan
Policy 1.12.12. Furthermore, the proposal is exempt from CEQA based on Section 15061(b)(3).
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the planning Commission recommend to the Mayor and Common Council
approval of General Plan Amendment No. 97-02 based on the Findings of Fact.
Respectfully Submitted,
U2fJf#p
MICHAEL E. HAYS
DZ-"'" Bmldmg """"
GUSTA VO 1. ROMO
Assistant Planner
AITACHMENTS:
A
B
General Plan Land Use Designation and Location Map
Site Plan and General Plan Amendment Proposal
."~.""'-
~-:~.
~
.
AITACIIMENT "A" I
-'
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AGENDA
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT ITEM #
LAND use DESIGNATION CASE GPA-97-02
"" AND LOCATION MAP HEARING DATE MAY 20. 1997
l
~d ' ::
3[;J-....,~
jGJC3~
j" I E:
~" iL ~ G::
" .
ii i_
u..~,--, ~I-=-;'D~~ II ~ JI
== 14~ ~ Wr::JW~fi1r ~t ~ 1/.
~ - Qlrr.i ~I!lll':f I I -,.~
! ~~ _ ,cHIDe r- ,c . F\l
t:.- ::::: . f I~, (!) ~ ' __lInl
rr .~.~ 11-- 1-......
d" .. ~.J r- ,--
-..J, fAt", .0. E33~ 'N! &0- ~
~
Iv - I lit ~ Ii
'~$;~ r.t.,,~. 11~i-!' rn~
l' __ [JJ ilfol
I~ .~
-~M
t--" cO'lI; n.
.(,D ~l&
l iaT
,jl
.....
-,
."M-'
r
~
\V :1 ." t- t- I. .~
, I ...1
I I '" Pltl r-I
: r-'r tr
f ~ I c.t ~'" I ,,,,1. flY::
~ 7J1.Yb " ,. :;
~ u . ... I-!'" _
~~~~ d~ I~ F
..-:: .1...? S F= I ~ t-I......~ .. .
~ 5T ~ ~If ''''
. ~ Ir-ll N
eD-'
.
I
I
l.wi I I. !
--; ~l,
. ~
-- --
J
~ !J tLlVft ~J .r
=.: .... T'_~
PWI-I.11 P.oGE HII'I I.....
. 'GPA:'97-G2 PROPOSAL MAP
r:"'-
I !~-"G'
o( -'I' -] ....T~....~ -
,." ;i. ,-: Il
i ,; _ . I ~ ,\
~ r-e, @ ," .:!) ! @ ~ :
VI j I 1
Oi '~ ;: ~!
"
-"
\
'JU 'J"
~ G :; :: '"=' .
""
.3) ;; a '"='
~
~_/""'I .. '"='
",..- '"
I.
8~~ .. @;
3 !:! ... ~
e .. .. @ .
.. .
, "'.16'
'.
: ; - i
'" .. '"' .. '"" -
, ,
~@ "l' ; ~
@ @ "
, ',:. , "
, .
, , ;
.-' '-/t" ; .
,.
~
~.J-.
-a-.,.
A : > ."
~~-'..-F
<:
<:~
~ ~
t~
~
ln~
g- ~.
! e
_w
~'
C'\~
:;'0
" ..
...
~
<r. an:.
QO;ll
"0"
"'..
~-=
.. ""'0
g c.n~.
..
Cl.";J
S',g ~
0.."
~
'0'-
c:'"
"
'"
.. :::-.....
~'.e."1II
!'tlol~,:!~'"
~~~~..!
....::."' 0
,
..
-,
. .
;:;..
~
~ G "3 " 1
'. ai" ii; ~':: \. .. ,I
. " . ~"
-~---------... - -~.~.,
--- -/7.-':;-.-,- --7~'lT'-+1
. ~;;; .....- :: $ ~l
G c; .' c ~
- -~"~:J ~ @
I~,' -=-
~v'" - :: ~
,
--3 ::~.;.. ...:5
",
~
"
~ ... ... !
, 3 ~ .: ~.~ .J~r
U4._UJZ.:;'_..I'__J.rlf.: . _ .
'0.+7 - +-- --t--.,.- -:-:-i"~ '1
c.n ... <.- ~ -!
~ <~ ~ ~ :1
"
'I
,"' -',.: I"d' I
...
..'
-,:
U'
--.:..-. ~~'f".
,
~
o
648-652 W. 16TH STREET
PROPOSED AMENDMENT AREA
FROM RS TO RU-2
..
--,-
i
'~J'
.. -I..
i @ ;;; ~
Oi
" TRI@
::
V 6 Q
TRle ..
SFRe ..
TflIG ..
~
""
I
,
.
112~.
.
'---@--~-
, \
,
- ,,'
--
@
@ '"
~ ..
'.
::
@
",
,
"
e
",
...
~
'"
...
~ '"7<1> @l
~
G
3
I ;3..
I-=tA ,
(@ . I"~~
I, @ -eI0~'
~--... .--\
i~ N
'.
;
,.'"..'
.,J_...,.
.-..--.-.-....
ATI'ACHMENT "D"
.. ..:
t
STRCET-."'r=
,..." M'
;; @TRI L
...
, ;:
0; @TRI '
'"
..
STREET
;,.
;
,
_.1-
,-
.. @
..
.. -=-
'" ~
'" ""
.. ~
'"
""
'"'
--,
"
I,
..
'"
... I
0,
- - __ _ _ ...J
I
.. I
,I
--..,.--.,
-...", ,
.a' ,
"
..
..
:; """
'"
10 ~ Z
11S':
;; ~
-
u; @
-4-
@. i
--~-:..-~--_.
.
(
.
.....,. ..
;;
. '
~
STREET - , --
\
!
I
,I
-
"
-.
.
I
'i'"
~
;r'
!
..,
::.
:,:;
i~;
:;:;
,
~:
"'
;;~
''';'
...
;:
'"
...
'"
'"
'"
...
.,"1"
,
@
r-
,
I
,
,
1
,
I
,
,
1
I
,
I
,
I
I
I
1
,
I
I
I
,
,
I
......Qitn
2)(g
!":ll0l
~2.~
O')CI 6
o~..
...~
.."
00
Q
~
i
<II
.
-
-
I'V
1
RESOLUTION NO.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
Recitals
the
for
2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 97-02 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN
3 BERNARDINO.
4
5
6
7
8
(a)
WHEREAS, the General Plan for the
of San Bernardino
was adopted by the Mayor and Common Counci
159 on June 2, 1989.
(b)
WHEREAS,
by Resolution No. 89-
amendment
reviewed
was
9
10 compliance with the California Enviro
11
12
based upon the preliminary review
ental Quality Act (CEQA) and
the project was found to be
recommend to the MaY9r and Common Council that a Notice of
/
Exemption be filed with the San Bernardino County Clerk of the
I
/
Board if the projec~ is approved.
(d)
Planning commission conducted a noticed
22 public hearing on May 20, 1997 in order to receive public testimony
23 and written and ral comments on General Plan Amendment No. 97-02,
24 a proposal to ange the General Plan Land Use Designation from RS,
25 Residential S urban, to RU-2, Residential Urban, on a City block
26 consisting of twenty-three (23) parcels of land generally located
27 between 17th and 16th Streets on the north and south and "G" and
28
1
1 "F" Streets on the east and west and fully reviewed and considered
2 the Planning Division staff report and the recommendation of the
3 Environmental Review Committee.
4 (e) WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council held a noticed
5 public hearing and fully reviewed and considered
oposed General
6 Plan Amendment No. 97-02 and the
7 Environmental Review Committee
8 Division Staff Report on July 7, 1997.
Commission and
and Planning
/1
9 (f) WHEREAS, the adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 97-02
is deemed in the interest of the orqerly development of the City
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
and is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the
existing General Plan.
SECTION 2.
Environmental/Determination
,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOL~O, FOUND AND DETERMINED by the Mayor
I
and Common Council that thelproposed amendment to the General Plan
./
of the City of San Bernardino is exempt from the California
i
Environmental Quality ~ct pursuant to the California Environmental
Quality Act Guidelin~s S15061(b) (3) which states that CEQA applies
;'
only to projects t~~t have the potential for causing a significant
effect on the en~ironment and as such, the proposed amendment is
/
21 hereby ratifiej! affirmed and adopted.
22 SECTION 3. Findinas
23
24
25 A.
26
27
28
by the Mayor and Common Council of the
BE
city of
Bernardino that:
The roposed amendment is internally consistent with the
in that it meets the General Plan's goal to
"allow existing mUlti-family units to remain as a conforming,
permitted use in areas designated as Residential Urban (RU-1
2
1
2 B.
3
4
5
6
7
8 c.
9
10
11
12 D.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 A.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 B.
28
and RU-2) (11.1 and 11. 2)" (General Plan Policy 1.12.12).
The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City
in that the proposed land use designation is in accordance
with the existing multi-family residential
addition, single-family residential land
permitted in the RU-2 land use designat
uses.
In
would remain
The proposed amendment would not aff
the balance of land
uses within the City in that the pr osed amendment area will
remain as a residential district No change to commercial,
industrial, or other type of d ignation is proposed.
/
The amendment site is physic~ily suitable for the requested
RU-2 land use designation in that over 50% of the proposed GPA
area is presently occupied by mUlti-family residential land
uses which were legally permitted and reviewed when first
constructed. Furthermore, no development is proposed at this
time.
SECTION 4. Amen~ent
BE IT FURTHER ~OLVED by the
Mayor and Common Council that:
The Land Use lan of the General Plan of the City of San
Bernardino i amended by changing twenty-three (23) parcels of
Residential Suburban, to RU-2, Residential
Urban. T is amendment is designated as General Plan Amendment
No. 97-02 and its location is outlined on the map entitled
Attachment A and further described in Attachment B, copies of
which are attached and incorporated herein by reference.
General Plan Amendment No. 97-02 shall become effective
immediately upon adoption of this resolution.
3
1 SECTION 5. MaD Notation
2 This resolution and the amendment affected by it shall be
3 noted on such appropriate General Plan maps as have been previously
4 adopted and approved by the Mayor and Common Council and w
5 on file in the office of the city Clerk.
6 SECTION 6. Notice of ExemDtion
7 The Planning Division is hereby directed t file a Notice of
8 Exemption with the County Clerk of the y of San Bernardino
9 certifying the City's compliance with ifornia Environmental
10 Quality Act in determining that the proY'ct is exempt from the Act.
I
11 IIII /
/
12 I I I I I
13 I I I I
14
15
16
17
18
19 /
I
20 I
!
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
1 RESOLUTION. . .ADOPl'ING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-02 TO THE
2 GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO.
3
4 adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the
5
6
7
8
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing
resolution
duly
of San
Bernardino at a
meeting thereof, held
Council Members
~
~
wit:
day of
, 1997, by the following
ABSENT
NEGRETE
9 CURLIN
10 ARIAS
11 OBERHELMAN
12 DEVLIN
13 ANDERSON
14 MILLER
15
,/~
--I-
I
-f-
l
/
,-
/
-,
,I
city Clerk
16
17
18 of
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this
day
, 1997.
19
20
Tom Minor, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
By:
28
5
GPA-97-02 PROPOSAL MAP
~_-"G"
"
.. -' I -',
I I
'" .,.
~ '8 I @
;z
'" ,
I
c;; , ;;
/~.
~ e "
(~ ;;
3-
<0_
8'" 1'0
"0
:3 ~
8 '"
'"
" c'
",
i
'" <- i
,
~@ @
,
-'"
@ , "F"
'J --:-_9<:tj_
I .
.4 ,"''' I
~
;z-
o ~
~a-
a ~
.
lilQ
6" IIi
~ ~
s. ;
"-
::;' '0
n _
;;-
.
tr.CC~
00.
" 0 .
"'''
iJJ .
,,-'-'
~ .0.0
g <.n~.
~
~cl';:
"", 0
0""
(')
0-
eN
"
.;:
0'1 ::-~ 'M
~~~~ ~ ~
~~,~ ~ ~
......~,. ...
~.... 01
I~ e
,
. ;''\. zn
,
"
_"~
'I
-n?' r~~~'~ J""
I: I'
~ I ~ k-,\ ~
..:!!J ~ ~ ':~
i I >
:;:: l.o<l N
/JC
:: @)
o ~
'"
I.,) \b
.. @:
.... f?
""
.. @
4f "".Ie'
,
..'
III ....... -
:~ ~
@:
"
. ,.~-
~
~"j
~~
,
"
r="--
- _JC
FR@ ;;; l i
C;;
;;.
TRI@ ::
V e <5
<0
,
,
'.
""
,112-~l!
~___@-_~.5 "
~ - ~ ~
_ D
;.;r ._111
--,-
i
'-,,"111' '~J
_,C
@
@
~
~
~ r
~ ,
~ " "
>r
1
-
"
2) .- ~
;; e C
'" "='
'-2;
.. '"
-- ~
3 ~ ~ , ""
.,. -",
~~
~ 8 ~ , . ~.:E. ":'
Ifld. _.!..T..lZ. '..:r _J'.;l__.../.z<!""..:.._.J
iRA 7" - 't-;- -+---t'- -7j"6~~
01 "" t..I I'J
c,
.~
\
, "'~
"
..,
~
...
~
. .4"<7" .?'f J"I?" __,,' .
.. '
--.~-!...'e"
,
WJ
o
I;
\ ~'.
"
e
Gl
~
G
~
STREET-....C
.,.~... #of'
.. @TRI~ '
i: @TRI
....
~
l
\
I
u; GSFR
'2 St=R's
.. @SFR
ii @SFR
;;; @SFR
'" @TRI
0
'" @TRI
'" @SFR
'"
Ul
'" @DUP ~
'"
..,
'"
<- ,
......0. -
I
STREET _L_
" A
..,..~
"'A
TRA
@
"
"
"
c,
..,
ill
,."
"
I,@
~--+
I-
"
--.; --~
'"
--
'" @
<-
'" "='
'" '-'!J
'" ~
'"
'"
@
,..~.I' ;
'"
@
"
'"
'"
o
- - -.- - - I
.. I
,I
--;'---1
;::.;:;J\ !
_ '"sl I
"
~
~
"'"
':';
..
:;
,~
@
<0
c;;
,
---'C
o
u; @
-4-
8 0::
@i:
--'--'- "" ---'
, .-.;p
,
,
,
", ",' 't
;;;
'"
(;;
*,c'
648.652 W. 16TH STREET
PROPOSED AMENDMENT AREA
FROM RS TO RU.2
ATTACHMENT "A"
DUP - DUPLEX
TRI - TRIPLEX
QUAD - QUADPLEX
SFR - SINGLE-FAMLY
RESOENCE
V - VACANT
---.,
~t I
"
1C2
1;'.;:
'.
,
r
,i
STREET- ~ --
"
-
"
..
~
I
I
'1"'"
;f"
!
':.
"','
:.:
..:;
'r
,
~:'
~~
....
~
'"
..,
:0
'"
'"
..,
,;'s'
,
@
r-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
""iQiUl
Q)c g
~::UiJJ
....0"
0;(;'3
Q
ObQ.
~ -.
" "
00
Cl
~
-l>
01
,
-
~
r\)
i
:... " i:j \1'
"'"
:,,>,,-~--.;....-.:;-----.;. - ~.~
- - - -",7"......::; -.,,,.- - -7~tr"- t-:
-3 ~ oA"l' :: ~ :i
ATTACHMENT "B"
GPA-97-02 PROPOSBD AMENDBD PARCBLSI
Assessor Parcel Numbers:
145-121-03
145-121-04
145-121-05
145-121-06
145-121-07
145-121-08
145-121-09
145-121-10
145-121-11
145-121-12
145-121-13
145-121-14
145-121-15
145-121-16
145-121-17
145-121-18
145-121-19
145-121-20
145-121-21
145-121-22
145-121-23
145-121-25
145-121-26
L_