HomeMy WebLinkAbout57-Public Works
. . 1:J):f, Ale No. 15-30-284 .
e'lTY OF SAN BERNARmNOltjREQU'I'ST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
.From:
Dept:
ROGER G. HARDGRAVE
Subject:
Adoption of Negative Declaration &
Finding of Consistency with the
Circulation Element of the General
Plan Vacation of Remainder
of -J- Street, North of Oak
Street and south of Lytle Creek
r.hrtnnp 1
Public Works/Engineering
Date:
12-06-89
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
09-06-89 -- Director of Public Works/City Engineer and the City
Clerk were authorized to proceed with the proposed vacation
and plan was approved.
Public
Works
Project No. 89-38
;u
,. r'
t..I:,1 n
0 ~:J
,
(-;
, .~
-...J ,.....'j
:.;,:
..
(..:.:; 1;:-:.
.."
:-q
_.,j
Recommended motion:
1.
That the Negative Declaration for Public Works Project No. 89-
38, vacation of remainder of "J" Street, north of Oak Street and
South of Lytle Creek Channel, be adopted.
.
2. That a finding be made that the vacation of the remainder of "J"
Street, north of Oak Street and South of Lytle Creek Channel,
is consistent with the Circulation Element of the General Plan.
cc: Marshall Julian
Jim Richardson
~
Contact person:
Roqer G. Hardqrave Phone:
Staff Report, Notice of Preparation,
Init.Studv. Neq.Dec.. Map Ward:
5025
Supporting data attached:
3
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
N/A
Source: (Acct. No.)
(Acct. Descriotion)
Finance:
. Council Notes:
75-0262
Agenda Item No.
~7
C~Y OF SAN BERNAR&O - REQUAT FOR COUNCIL AC~ON
.
STAFF REPORT
The Negative Declaration for Public Works Project No. 89-
38 was recommended for adoption by the Environmental Review
Committee at its meeting of 10-19-89.
A 14-day public review period was afforded from 10-26-89
to 11-06-89. No comments were received.
We recommend that the Negative Declaration be adopted and
a finding made that the project is consistent with the Circula-
tion element of the General Plan.
.
. 12-06-89
75.0264
.
.
.
.
NOTICE ~REPARATION O~GATIVE DECLARATION
OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
.
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO proposes to adopt a Negative Declaration
for the following projects. The Environmental Review Committee
found that the project will not have a significant effect on the
environment on the basis of the Initial Study and mitigation
measures (If applicable).
1. PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO. 89-36 - Proposed vacation of a portion
of an east/west alley between "G" Street and "H" Street and bet-
ween 5th Street and 6th Street.
~UBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO. 89-38 - Proposed street/alley vacation
of remainder of "J" Street, north of Oak Street and south of
Lytle Creek Channel.
4. PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT 89-35 - To widen Palm Avenue from Cable
Creek to Verdemont Drive.
5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-45 - To allow an indoor swap meet
within an existing vacant building located at 1675 North Mt. Ver-
non.
6. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-43 - To construct an 817 square
foot fast food drive-thru restaurant on a 0.49 acre site located
at the northeast corner of Highland Avenue and Lincoln Drive.
7. WATER DEPARTMENT PROJECT NO. 89-3 - To construct an 8 foot by 50
foot water tank and a 3,000 gallon pneumatic pump northwest of
the terminus of Ridgeline Drive.
Copies of the Initial Study are available for public review at the
Planning Department, 300 North "0" Street, San Bernardino, CA
92418, and the Feldheym Library, 555 West 6th Street, San Bernar-
dino, CA. Any environmental comments you have should be received
in this office no later than 4:00 p.m., November 6, 1989. If you do
not respond in writing, we will assume that you have no opinions
and/or recommendations on the above projects.
SUBMITTED: October 24, 1989
PUBLISH: October 26, 1989
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
300 North "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
384-5057
CP
C7 NOPN01019
12-06-89
.
.
.
i
Applicant (s)
Address
City, state
Zip
MISC:
IS PREPARATION
ke/9-1-89
ell f~ SAN BERlARDINO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
.
INITIAL STUDY
Initial Study for Environmental Impacts
For P/Ab lie /}J~rks '8'1--.;'8
Project Number
escription/Location (.)rof.'o$~
S ee 'I~ <:al,.,,,, o~ a' e eft'
, ;:r" 'S+r~+ " ;,...r-M 0..;& 04/< Sf~ e>A.JC/
St:>uH. of 'L,,!le Cr_k c.haNAJI!!!/
.
Date Qc:..fober 9. /9g1
,
Prepared for:
~/"l~ "'~ ~~~n:rh~t:J
t!"r r.J-AA...u lit:. k/.ri!$
300 AJor+A "D" -5-1-,.-+. ~!2 r/CtCr
5"""J f3~"Nt:Jrd"AJO. t::A 'q2~/tJ
,
Prepared by:
'"7/:"" -ra ~ ke"'tt-
Name
P/I!1~Wl1er
Title
City of San Bernardino
Planning Department
300 N. "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
.
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST
A. BACKGRO!l@
Application Number: Puhlic. {)Jt:>rks '6'1- 3 '1?
Project Description: PY~fo~d 5.fr"d /A-/ky //"'~~;v
o.f Y~"",a/#der o.,c /'T1, '5fl?e~. #"""'~ o~ c:::::'a-.K ~~r<"'d
a/f..Jtd ~ f4 c -f' L vfl e Lr,,'-K L hp/V,Ne/
,
Location:
Environmental Constraints Areas:
General Plan Designation:
T L - L/9/rf- .r.NdI..l~fr/e;t-('
Zoning Designation:
/1 - .:1.
B. ~NVIBONM~~ IMPACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a
separate attached sheet.
1. EaI.~h Resources Will the proposal result in:
Yes
No
Maybe
a. Earth movement (cut and/or
fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or
more?
x
b. Development and/or grading on
a slope greater than 15'
natural grade?
c. Development within the
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies
Zone?
x
x
d. Modification of any unique
geologic or physical feature?
x
REVISED 12/87
PAGE 1 OF 8
.
.
.
.
r
.
.
e. Soil erosion on or off the
project site?
f. Modification of a channel,
creek or river?
g.
Development
subject
mudslides,
other similar
within an area
to landslides,
liquefaction or
hazards?
h.
Other?
2. AIR RESOURCES: Will the proposal
result in:
a.
air
upon
emissions or
ambient air
Substantial
an effect
quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
c. Development within a high wind
hazard area?
3.
Will
the
WATER RESOURCES:
proposal result in:
a. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface runoff
due to impermeable surfaces?
b. Changes in the course or flow
of flood waters?
c. Discharge into surface waters
or any alteration of surface
water quality?
d. Change in the quantity or
quality of ground waters?
e. Exposure of people or property
to flood hazards?
f. Other?
\..
REVISED 12/87
Yes
No
x
x
x
.
X
x
x
x
x
x
.
x
x
X
Maybe
.
""'l
x
~
PAGE 2 OF 8
.
.
.
.
4.
BIOLOGICAL R~SOURC~~:
proposal result in:
Could the
a.
Change
unique,
species
habitat
trees?
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of plants or their
including stands of
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of animals or their
5. NOISE: Could the proposal result
in:
6.
REVISED 10/87
b.
Change
unique,
species
habitat?
c.
Other?
a. Increases in existing noise
levels?
b. Exposure of people to exterior
noise levels over 65 dB or
interior noise levels over 45
dB?
c. Other?
LAND_ USE:
result in:
a.
A change in
designated
Plan?
Will the
proposal
the land use as
on the General
b. Development within an Airport
District?
c. Development within "Greenbelt"
Zone A,B, or C?
d. Development within a high fire
hazard zone?
e. Other?
Yes
No
,X
x
X
x
X
,
X
,
x
x
x
,
x
X.
I
Maybe
PAGE 3 OF 8
.
.
.
.
-e
.
7.
MAN-MADE HAE~N>~:
project:
Will
the
a. Use, store, transport or
dispose of hazardous or toxic
materials (including but not
limited to oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)?
b. Involve the release
hazardous substances?
of
c. Expose people to the potential
health/safety hazards?
d. Other?
8. HOUSING: Will the proposal:
a. Remove existing housing or
create a demand for additional
housing?
b. Other?
9. !~NS!,QETATION/CIRCULATION: Could
the proposal result in:
a. An increase in traffic that is
greater than the land use
designated on the General
Plan?
b. Use of existing, or demand for
new, parking facilitiesl
structures?
c. Impact upon existing public
transportation systems?
d. Alteration of present patterns
of circulation?
e. Impact to rail or air traffic?
f. Increased safety hazards to
vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
Yes
No
Maybe
x
x
x
X
x
X
x
x
.
x
x
x
x
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 4 OF 8
.
.
.
.
g.
A disjointed pattern
roadway improvements?
Other?
of
h.
10. FUBLIC SERVICES Will the proposal
impact the following beyond the
capability to provide adequate
levels of service?
a.
Fire protection?
b.
Police protection?
Schools (i.e. attendance,
boundaries, overload, etc.)?
c.
d.
Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e.
Medical aid?
f.
Solid waste?
g.
Other?
11. UTILITIES: Will the proposal:
a. Impact the following beyond
the capability to provide
adequate levels of service or
require the construction of
new facilities?
REVISED 10/87
1. Natural gas?
2. Electricity?
3. Water?
4. Sewer?
5. Other?
b.
Result in a
pattern of
extensions?
disjointed
utility
c.
Require the construction of
new facilities?
Yes
No
x
X
x
,
X
,
x
X
,
X
X
X
x
X-
I<
X
X
x
Maybe
x
PAGE 5 OF 8
.
.
12.
13.
.
AESTHETICS:
a. Could the proposal result in
the obstruction of any scenic
view?
b. Will the visual impact of the
project be detrimental to the
surrounding area?
c. Other?
CULTURAL RESOURCES:
propOSIal-resuIt in:
a. The alteration or destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
Could the
b.
Adverse
impacts
historic
object?
physical or aesthetic
to a prehistoric or
site, structure or
c.
Other?
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance
(Section 15065)
.
REVISED 10/87
The California Environmental
Quality Act states that if any of
the following can be answered yes
or maybe, the project may have a
significant effect on the
environment and an Environmental
Impact Report shall be prepared.
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate
Yes
.
x
,
X
I
'X
,
x
x
X
.
No
Maybe
PAGE 6 OF8
.
.
.
.
.
.
Yes
important examples of the
major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the
potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact
on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts
will endure well into the
future.)
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually
limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may
impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively
small, but where the effect of
the total of those impacts on
the environment is
significant.)
d. Does the project have
environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
No
Maybe
.
x
~
x
,
x
.
C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES
(Attach sheets as necessary.)
q d.. EXI'5h/..J1 ~t1!'M4W& ~..6~ r~15 erve:.:t? lOr
uh;?/", d~ e'_'&?~'-i' i/eft/C/e 00';'';.$.
I ..,.... /
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 7 OF 8
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
""'IIi
.
DETERMI NAn ON
On the basis of this initial study,
.
~ The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
L:J environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
The proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, although there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described above have
been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
o
o
The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
..:JiI'IIv HoAffou1dY . I?etMV,'JIf~ A<I1f/A/E,/e
I
Name and Title
~t~
Date: (0 -1'l-?1
"'-
~
PAGE 8 OF 8
REVISED 12/87
-.
.
I I
~ ~vn.E
(ii)
'"-,,
cal!~
, 'lII1:..'....,......
.
:.....
---
SCWOOL
...:...-
~
- ._-~--~
-'-.;'-'. . --~--
- -.= ~.;: .:-:",:,-, ~>::r L.
--- --':;-
-.,.,
'..-
I'......
:~Wi.tr
.
-- 'ARe", ~
____...sc
_ ~_-=- f.j ~~T-: o'
, '
__...... _.' I _ _...-
" . .:\..,,' ,.'" ~"'. ~"'.
".,,~ '. ,"~~ ,'.~~. ..""'",,.
. "'~';\". ".'" ~.,..... ,~:-"'" ~,."
':-...".," '~. " ~"~,,,,~~
.,~ ~,,')'. "@": .:s.~,"',...
,,,' .'" ,~..." 4" '" ,:\,.",
. . .,'. .". ~ 60'~ ""''<.''.
""~ """~~ $.:. '"'' "....
~~~ : ,,'~.~,;,:~> ........ ~~~:: ,,' '" ,:..' .
:\." ... '....... '" ..' .
.' ..,', ,".,~.'''''"..' ,':"',.
'~'.' ',,', ."~~ .:'. ,.,.,
:\." '",' .~.. ,~~' ~,"'.' '.", ..."
"~,~. :. ,.:,.',,,. ,... '...' , '\
~"~.",, 'I': :.. ."\.,:'.~.~"";~\.
~:::'~JJ1.~..". ..,," ","\\~'''~'
.",..:'':...'..... ..' ' ,'.'" ,~",.
'. . ...~~";,, @)"':.,. ",,~,
~"".'~~~~...a " ~:"'~':~".' I
'..~ ~)..,~':""" ,. '"..',.... It.:
~""~~....:.~-....:>' ";""""1
,,",~~"....., ~.~~,'~~~ ~,~
,....... ",.".... ..",. V-. "
.... . . ,'" ,. . -
,:S::~ ~~"..~"".., "",., ..'.,
;"\ ;:S::'\ -.", '14 ~ "':"" ,~. ....
.... :-.." . " . ." ...::.' .
.~:\: "fA' .." ~,: , :-..".,.
1 ~'l~,'''~", j' -: :.~,:",:" I
~ ~":\,,'~.~~, '"",.~~~ ~
, .. ...~~, ,"~~~ "'" ..,~, :\'''
. ~~~~"~,,,~,~,~;\.,.,,~~ I
".."', ,...' .. '-.. "",. , .. " "
"~~",,~,.. ':S: ,,'....,.:\.-' """.;-
..-~:-..----_. ~M I~""..'
~
~ .1Ii I i JL ~ I ~.
ST-
.....
...~.
....
'::'. ::i
Q
..
. .
___. ,..4t~.....
"
.
I
I
..
-....
..
~
I~
r.;
&UHKlta
.'
. '7
o."T. J~
..~- ---r-- ..:---
, ,
~1aIC!
, IS I ~
I
.
~
~
'0
..
-.......-. - ---....... t
,
---.----..-..t--~-- - ~
1 I :".
;
~---
---.~
lTQACT' 19"
a .. ~ %
;
~
I
D
P...p....d tI,\
Ch.cM.d tI, I I. AI
DATE I ,AUltrUST I b I
AREA VACATED SHOWN THUS
Sh..t
iofi
WHUUbMlH&
.
FILE HO.I 15.30-284
PLA" HO.\ g '6 1.
81.S
"fs': -:'-
fa . :r
5'- !
. L .
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PUBLIC HOAKS DEPARTMENT
ENGINEERING DIVISION
REM.. PROPERTY SECTION
....w.
.
'"
,Oft
,
~
~
~
=
~
....
...
~
C'I
1.71
rr
STREET I ALLEV VACM'IDN \
RE~lAINDER OF "J" STREET. BET14EEN OAK ST.
AND LYTLE CREEK CHANNEL