The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About12-Development Services . , , . , CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Subject: Resolution Authorizing the Initiation of Reorganization Proceedings generally along portions of 3rd Street between Tippecanoe Avenue and a point 232 feet east of Shirley Avenue. File No. 12.01-344 Synopsis of Previous Council Action: MCC Date: 09-04-2001 09-11-1962 - Ordinance No, 2447 was adopted approving Annexation No. 143 for the area generally south of 3rd Street, east of Tippecanoe Avenue (former Norton Air Force Base). From: JAMES FUNK, Directv ,I I" , " , . Dept: Development Services R I ~ i j , . ,1 L Date: August 23,2001 03-12-1976 - Resolution No. 12285 was adopted approving Annexation No. 305 for the area generally between 3rd Street, Del Rosa Drive, Court Street and Del Rosa Avenue. Recommended Motion: ADOPT RESOLUTION -~-~~ Contact person: LASZLO "Les" FOGASSY Phone: 5026 Supporting data attached: Staff Report, Maps, Letter, Ward: I Resolution FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: None Source: (Acct. No.) N/A (Acct. Description) N/A Finance: Council Notes: 'V rf>c" "'" 2r{", l - L'\ <\ Agenda Item No. /~ 9/f/()J , , . , CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION Staff Report SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing the Initiation of Reorganization Proceedings generally along portions of 3rd Street between Tippecanoe Avenue and a point 232 feet east of Shirley Avenue. BACKGROUND: As a result of recent development proposals within San Bernardino International Airport (former Norton Air Force Base) along the south side of 3rd Street, the widening ofJrd street will be necessary pursuant to the requirements of the proposed industrial development and Circulation Element of the City's General Plan. Presently, the common corporate boundaries between the City of San Bernardino and the City of Highland in this area run along the south side of 3rd Street between Tippecanoe A venue and a point approximately 232 feet east of Shirley Avenue, with the exception of the area between Del Rosa Drive and Del Rosa A venue, south of Court Street. The City of Highland has jurisdiction over the entire portion of 3rd Street for this area, except as noted above. Currently, the City of Highland would need to process any permits for street improvements, including curb cuts for driveways, that would occur as a result of development in the airport, which is under the jurisdiction of the City of San Bernardino. The City of Highland has requested this realignment of boundaries to minimize any dual jurisdiction involvement for development that occurs along this portion of the airport. Additionally, Highland is recommending a change of boundaries for a portion along the north side of 3rd Street, lying between Del Rosa Drive and Del Rosa Avenue, south of Court Street, since the portion along 3rd Street, between Tippecanoe Avenue and just east of Shirley Avenue is within Highland's jurisdiction. A vicinity map and a map depicting the present and proposed boundary change is attached. Under this Reorganization proposal, no parcels would be annexed to the City of San Bernardino; Eleven parcels would be de-annexed from the City and annexed by the City of Highland. The present land use of the area to be de-annexed is a combination of residential, commercial, vacant and public facility. More specifically, there are 4 vacant parcels; 2 parcels contain a well site for East San Bernardino County Water District; 3 residential parcels and 2 commercial parcels, one of which is a boarded up market, and the other appears to be an auto repair facility. As part of the proceedings, Highland will contact the property owners within the area proposed to be annexed to the City of Highland. The formal proceedings to be conducted by LAFCO will include mailed notices to the property owners within the area to be annexed and a public hearing will be conducted by LAFCO. If a majority protest is made by the property owners, the Reorganization could be modified to exclude this area and address only the issue of realigning the boundary along the centerline of 3rd Street. If the Reorganization is approved as proposed, the property tax revenue, which is estimated to be approximately $600 per year to the City of San Bernardino, would go to the City of Highland. Actual tax revenue dollars will be calculated as part of the proceedings. Since the area is within the Inland Valley Redevelopment Agency's (IVDA) boundary, most of any increases in property tax revenue (tax increment dollars) as a , , result of new development or redevelopment of this area, would go to the IVDA regardless of which City has jurisdiction of this area. The benefit to the City of San Bernardino for this Reorganization would be a more orderly development of the airport along this portion of 3'd Street, since the permit process for street improvements would be handled by one City, rather than two. The de-annexation of the block between Del Rosa Drive and Del Rosa Avenue from the City of San Bernardino and annexation to the City of HigWand would benefit the area by a more efficient delivery of services, including Police, Fire and Code Enforcement, since the area is bounded on three sides by the City ofHigWand and would reduce the confusion of public safety calls and have consistency ofland use regulations on all properties on the northerly side OD'd Street. The area containing the eleven privately owned parcels contains approximately 2.75 acres (including adjoining streets). This small peninsula of eleven parcels protruding north above 3'd Street into the City of HigWand was annexed in 1976 to the City of San Bernardino, prior to the incorporation of Highland in 1987. The perimeter of this block is approximately 1400 feet (measured along the centerlines of the adjoining streets). Currently, the City of San Bernardino would be responsible for maintenance of any existing curbs, gutters and sidewalks. If de-annexed from San Bernardino, future responsibility for such street improvements would be HigWand's. The area presently receives water distribution from East Woods Farms Community Water and maintenance of sewer lines is under the jurisdiction of East Valley Water. Water and sewer services would remain the same after this reorganization. Attached is a summary of pros and cons relative to the annexation of this block to the City of Highland. The City of HigWand has offered to act as lead agent for the Reorganization. HigWand will pay the necessary filing fees. If this proposal to initiate proceedings is approved, the City of HigWand will prepare the necessary documents needed to be filed with the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). The final documents will be submitted to the City of San Bernardino for review and approval prior to being filed with LAFCO. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The City of Highland will pay any LAFCO fees for this proposal. Estimated tax revenues of $600 per year will go to the City of HigWand, however, they will also assume the responsibility of street maintenance, police and fire protection and other related municipal services for this area. RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution , ' ATTACHMENT A SUMMARY OF PROS AND CONS OF DEANNEXATION OF THE BLOCK OF ELEVEN PARCELS PROTRUDING NORTH ABOVE 3RD STREET · Reduction of the City of San Bernardino's responsibility to maintain approximately 1400 linear feet of street improvements. . Increased clarity of the boundaries of the City limits of the two cities. · Loss of approximately $600 in annual property tax revenue to the City of San Bernardino · The cost of services (such as Police Department, Fire Department, Code Enforcement, Public Services Department, etc.) appears to exceed revenues to the City of San Bernardino. However, in the event that a significant sales tax revenue generator would locate in this block in the future, the revenue would go to the City of Highland. · The annexation to Highland would benefit the area by a more efficient delivery of services since the block is currently bounded on three sides by the City of Highland. SUMMARY OF PROS AND CONS OF REALIGNING CITY LIMITS BOUNDARY ON 3RD STREET CENTERLINE . The City of San Bernardino would become responsible for maintaining the street improvements extending from the existing boundary north approximately 50 feet to the centerline OO'd Street. . The City of San Bernardino would gain jurisdiction and process permits over the street improvements (including curb cuts for driveways) serving future industrial development on the airport properties. . The City of San Bernardino has a greater interest in maintaining street improvements in front of the industrial properties in San Bernardino. No Scale 5th SI. Mill SI. .. , o Location of Proposed Boundary Realignment CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT REAL PROPERTY SECTION VICINITY MAP Proposed realignment of City boundary along 3rd Street from Tippecanoe Avenue to east of Shirley Avenue ~ indicates un-incorporated areas ~ within eit 's S here of Influence File No.: Created by: j. HJv/f5S' Date: 7/:;/", , ~ ~~ "0 CO 0)"0 en c:: o :::J C. 0 0.0 .... a.. ....- ~ t:: CO 0 "0 c.. ~ c:: :::J L- a 0 <( c .0 'E C) al c:: CO E :;::; Q) "w c:: ED "x c 0) 0 al .- en 0 ... '0 c:: CO b 'e c:: i:'3 CO L- c:: Q) .... 0) ... a::l c:: c:: - CO . en CO - . 0 en ~ u - Ocnz ZWO 50- a::-1-- _>0 _c:::w zwcn a::cn~ ~!za: zWW c(:::2:a. (1)0.0 u.0C::: O...Ja. >~...J ....w< -ow o c::: ~ - o Ql 0 -00 cc..... :lOUl o U 0 ..0 Ql Ql 0.. >,o.N :<=1=1') U N C -Ql>' OQlQl +J~O ~ Ql E E.c .x c.... 0 O'lQl,- ._ Ql 0. o~ a.Q) QlU)O:l '- c: ~ 0 Ql -o~.....> Ql'- .... Ul I") Ql..... 00'l:l>, o.c:c- o 0 Ql.!:: L..._ >~ o..o<l:U) - <:l -- ~ '" " ~ c 30N\;;IJ3ddIl f- e/) ~ z C\J ~ ~ , '"'-.\ >. .c "0 ~ I!! u . '-6 rn@~O\Y1~[Q) llli AUG 2 1 2001 L~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT City of RIG ~m7Q 27215 Base Une Highland. CA 92346 (909) B64.6861 FAX (909)862-3180 www.ci.highland.ca.us City Council Mayor John R. Starbuck Mayor Pro- Tem Larry Brown Council Members Ray Rucker. Jr. Brad Sundquist John P. Timmer City Manager Sam J. Racadio SENT VIA FACSIMILE & U.S. MAIL August IS, 200 I James Funk, Director Development Services Department City of San Bernardino 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418-0001 Dear Mr. Funk: At its meeting of August 14, the City's Public Works Subcommittee discussed the proposed annexation/detachment between the Cities of Highland and San Bernardino along the southerly half of 3'" Street (41.25 feet) from the City corporate boundary at Tippecanoe to the City boundary east of Shirley Avenue. In addition, the Subcommittee considered the inclusion in the annexation/detachment between the two Cities, that portion of the City of San Bernardino on the north side oD'" Street be conveyed to the City of Highland. It is the Subcommittee's opinion that such a exchange in territory would be beneficial (i.e., both the southerly side of 3'" Street and that portion north of 3'" Street) to both Cities in that it would assist the public and property owners in understanding the jurisdictional lines of the two Cities, reduce the confusion of public safety calls, and have consistency of land use regulations on all properties on the northerly side oD'" Street. An "Area Map" is attached depicting the areas to be considered for the annexation/detachment between the two Cities. I have also included a letter dated June 12, 200 I, for Sam Racadio, City Manager to Fred Wilson, City Administrator, suggesting the boundary exchange and other reason as to why such action is appropriate. If you have any questions andlor comments on the information, please feel free to contact me at .. (909)864-8732 extension 213. Rlspectfully, ~ Hartmann Community Development Director attachments pc: Sam Racadio, City Manager -"""""'es Fogassy, City of San Bernardino !rch - - 1=1- :n Lmg~ l ~ .0 ~";23 ~ "!.. [llPl f-- Ik ~1I111 1111- II III ~ r= r=p rTlI I II I I I 11 rl n n I- ~ .J.... = ~f::lnnlll 111I ~II ~ F i- lllllmTTIlJII]]] (< XI r mmIIIIIIIlLJ ,-t IIllIIIJE },......I- /.J.D I I II II I 1 J.IlllllliItj III II 1=11 II Iln ~ _ II In-I- ,,[:: ulllJ I- n I- '1111 I- I- m III n II III III - ...- ...... .11-1 II ;:: ,- ~!:: f::f::: I:::~ .. rtHl Jr I- 11 r, ~ \ I r---L ::: 1:= I-!= != f-- I- 1= l= II- ~ ~ r JI1I- -I-tr h I"-L - 1---- I " h~ ~~ H =1\ Ii 18/11 ~/::: fill i ~ '---j r III 5::- y 1.1:::- I- = ;z~ ...ii>i-'_ ~ I- /:. ~ ~~ ::- - ~'1-- l- f:;::: rl ~ ~E . ~I-- 5l:!IU= ~ I=IIITIII I . J:uuw IlIIIIlIII . :J I---, ~ II-;- \--l ~\\ , \ \ \ \ \ >>- " s , " r I-- F= ~- It ~ 11 - ! =r II . ~illIHi~!I~ ~~rnmmm [ ~ // l =: · I U. r.~ !~~~ ~~l~ il ~ / ,..I f. ~l! +() ~l ~ - l~ ~ 1><.\ ~\i !.~ ile ~_.- .?J g 1 I I \-:.::- I III--- - "'-- I-t= .L- f-"'J- -;:: _ L. ~ I-- ~ .-1-- I- . r , ~ c ~~ s~ ~ .~ ~ ~ - ~ TITTlIll Hmf 11111111 mllll' -'-I =- nIllllIl ~ I L- t ~ 17215 Base Une ~ighland, CA 92346 :909) 864-6861 'AX (909)862-3180 'IWW.ci.highlend.ca.us ~Ily Council ~ayor lohn R. Starbuck ~ayor Pro-Tem ..arry Brown ~ouncll Members lay Rucker, Jr. lrad Sundquist lohn P. Timmer ~Ity Manager lam J. Racadio June 12, 2001 Q....., ~. Ine. 1987 Fred Wilson City Administrator City of San Bemardino 300 North D Street San Bemardino CA 92410 Dear Fred: On April 30, 2001 the Highland City Engineer and City Planner met with representatives from your Planning and Traffic Departments to discuss the design of and access to Third Street relative to a proposed project known as Norton Tech Park, This project will be located south of Third Street between Tippecanoe and Del Rosa Drive within the IVDA project area. The nature of the project is primarily warehousing with some office use. Since Highland's city limit boundaries extend beyond the south side of Third Street, San Bernardino staff suggested that both cities enter into an agreement so that San Bernardino could maintain the southerly half of Third Street. This would also Include allowing San Bernardino to be responsible for plan checking, permitting and Inspection of any necessary street work south of the Third Street center line, which would be within the city limits of the City of Highland. Third Street is the only area where the city limit boundary that abuts another city is not at the centerline. We do not know why LAFCO allowed an annexation that would not be to the ~nterllne. . .. . I have discussed this maller with the Highland Public Works Subcommittee and they asked me to talk to you regarding a possibility of detaching the area on the south side of Third Street from Tippecanoe to approximately 232 feet east of Shirley Avenue. Further, we believe in an effort to clean up the area that is a small portion of land north of Third Street between Del Rosa Drive and Del Rosa Avenue should detach from San Bernardino and be annexed to Highland. Such actions would require LAFCO approval for detachment and annexation and would make good business sense In cleaning up the situation along Third Street. These actions would allow the Norton Tech Park Project to go forward without undue bureaucratic paper work and agreements. Please let me know if you would like to pursue this matter further so we can make the appropriate contacts with LAFCO. Sam J. Racadio City Manager " . . . 1 2 ~(Q)[?W RESOLUTIO~O. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE 3 INITIATION OF REORGANIZATION PROCEEDINGS BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF HIGHLAND RELATIVE TO A 4 REALIGNMENT OF CITY BOUNDARIES ALONG A PORTION OF 3RD STREET, 5 BETWEEN TIPPECANOE AVENUE AND A POINT APPROXIMATELY 232 FEET EAST OF SHIRLEY A VENUE AND CITY BOUNDARIES BETWEEN DEL ROSA 6 DRIVE AND DEL ROSA A VENUE NORTH OF 3RD STREET. 7 WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino and the City of Highland desire to modify the along a portion of 3'd Street, between Tippecanoe Avenue and a point approximately 232 feet 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 east of Shirley A venue as said City of San Bernardino boundary was established by City of San Bernardino Annexation No, 143; and WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino and the City of Highland desire to modify the boundary line between the City of San Bernardino and the City of Highland, as it now exists, generally along portions of Del Rosa Drive, Court Street and Del Rosa Avenue, as said City of San Bernardino boundary was established by City of San Bernardino Annexation No, 305; and WHEREAS, said modifications consist of the annexation to the City of San Bernardino and de-annexation from the City of Highland for the area generally between the centerline of said 3'd Street and the south line thereof, lying between Tippecanoe Avenue and a point a approximately 232 feet east of Shirley Avenue and annexation to the City of Highland and de- annexation from the City of San Bernardino for the area generally lying between said 3rd Street, Del Rosa Drive, Court Street and Del Rosa Avenue; and WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino and the City of Highland desire to submit a joint 25 26 application for said reorganization to the Local Agency Formation Commission; and 27 28 08/21/01 YIo ' /J- 9/1~1 . e e RESOLUTION AUTHORIZATION THE INITIATION OF REORGANIZATION PROCEEDINGS BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF HIGHLAND GENERALLY ALONG 1 PORTIONS OF 3RD STREET BETWEEN TIPPECANOE AVENUE A POINT APPROXIMATELY 232 FEET EAST OF SHIRLEY A VENUE. 2 3 WHEREAS, the City of Highland, proposes to act as lead applicant for said 4 reorganization in the preparation of all documents and maps and the payment of fees for said 5 reorganization, subject to the approval of the City of San Bernardino. 6 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY 7 OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: 8 SECTION 1. The Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino hereby 9 consent to the joint filing of a reorganization of boundaries between the City of San Bernardino 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 and the City of Highland with the Local Agency Formation Commission, pursuant to Government Code Section 56000 et seq. (Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government Reorganization Act of2000). SECTION 2. Said reorganization shall consist of annexation to the City of San Bernardino and de-annexation from the City of Highland ofa portion of 3'd Street, lying between the centerline of said 3d Street and the southerly line thereof, and between the centerline of Tippecanoe A venue and a point approximately 232 feet east of Shirley A venue, said point being on the corporate City limit line of the City of San Bernardino, as said City of San Bernardino 20 boundary was established by City of San Bernardino Annexation No. 143, and de-annexation 21 from the City of San Bernardino and annexation to the City of Highland of the area generally 22 bounded by the centerlines of said 3rd Street, Del Rosa Drive, Court Street and Del Rosa 23 24 A venue, as said City of San Bernardino boundary was established by City of San Bernardino 25 Annexation No. 305. 26 SECTION 3. The Mayor and Common Council do hereby authorize the City of 27 Highland to prepare an application form and appurtenant documents including, but not limited to, 28 08121/01 2 '. . . . RESOLUTION AUTHORIZATION THE INITIATION OF REORGANIZATION PROCEEDINGS BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF HIGHLAND GENERALLY ALONG 1 PORTIONS OF 3D STREET BETWEEN TIPPECANOE. AVENUE A POINT APPROXIMATELY 232 FEET EAST OF SHIRLEY AVENUE. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the preparation of maps and legal descriptions and payment of fees relative to the filing of a reorgani7ation with the LocaI Agency Formation Commission, subject to the review and approval of said documents by the City of San Bernardino. /1/ /1/ 08121101 3 .-. . . . . RESOLUTION AUTHORIZATION THE INITIATION OF REORGANIZATION PROCEEDINGS BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND THE CITY OF mGHLAND GENERALLY ALONG 1 PORTIONS OF 3RD STREET BETWEEN TIPPECANOE AVENUE A POINT APPROXIMATELY 232 FEET EAST OF SmRLEY AVENUE. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting thereof held on the day of .20 . by the following vote, to wit: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT ESTRADA LIEN MCGINNIS SCHNETZ 14 SUAREZ 15 ANDERSON 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MCCAMMACK City Clerk The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day of .20_. JUDITII V ALLES, Mayor City of San Bernardino Approved as to form and legal content: JAMES F. PENMAN City Attorney Br 1-, &-.-. 08121/01 4 " ** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - NOT A PUBLIC DOCUMENT ** RESOLUTION AGENDA ITEM TRACKING FORM Meeting Date (Date Adopted): q -4~O\ Item # IL Vote: Ayes I-i Nays.0- Change to motion to amend original documents: Reso. # On Attachments: ~ Contract term: - Note on Resolution of Attachment stored separately: -= Direct City Clerk to (circle I): PUBLISH, POST, RECORD W/COUNTY Date Sent to Mayor: Cf - 5 - 0 \ Date of Mayor's Signature: Cj-<;'-Ol Date of ~k/CDC Signature: Cj - Co -0 \ Date Memo Si nature: See Attached: See Attached: See Attac e 60 Day Reminder Letter Sent on 30th day: 90 Day Reminder Letter Sent on 45th day: Request for Council Action & Staff Report Attached: Updated Prior Resolutions (Other Than Below): Updated CITY Personnel Folders (6413, 6429, 6433, 10584, 10585, 12634): Updated CDC Personnel Folders (5557): Updated Traffic Folders (3985, 8234, 655, 92-389): Copies Distributed to: City Attorney ,/ Parks & Rec. Code Compliance Dev. Services v Police Public Services Water Notes: Resolution # Abstain ..&-- "2 00 \ - 2,4 Absent -A- NullNoid After: - By: - Reso. Log Updated: v" Seal Impressed: v Date Returned: Yes " No By Yes No .....L By Yes No-L By Yes NOjr By Yes No By EDA Finance MIS Others: lk'S ~P6>( BEFORE FILING, REVIEW FORM TO ENSURE ANY NOTATIONS MADE HERE ARE TRANSFERRED TO THE YEARLY RESOLUTION CHRONOLOGICAL LOG FOR FUTURE REFERENCE (Contract Term. etc.) Ready to File: ..m:c.... Date: q -(,-0 Revised 01/12/01