HomeMy WebLinkAbout37-Development Services
MAYOR & COMMON COUNCIL AND
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
MEETING BACKUP
MEETING DATE: July 10, 2006
DEPUTY: Linda Sutherland
ITEM NO.
STATUS
37 Continued to 7/24/06
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Date: June 7. 2006
Subject: Public hearing - 4:00 p.m.. and
Resolution Ordering Work - San Bernardino
International Airport/Alliance-California area
Landscape and Lighting Maintenance
Assessment District AD 1022. Zones I. 2 and 3.
From: VALERIE ROSS, Director
Dept: Development Services
File No. 14.40-138
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
04/07/1997 - Authorization to proceed with the formation of a Landscape and Lighting
Maintenance Assessment District in the San Bernardino International Airport area (former
Norton Air Force Base) was given.
04/03/2006 - Resolution ofIntention No. 2006-91 was adopted.
05/15/2006 - Public Meeting was held and item carried over to the Public Hearing on 06/05/06.
06/05/2006 - Public hearing was continued to 6/19/06.
MCC Date: 6-19-06
Recommended Motion:
I. That the public hearing relative to the formation of the San Bernardino International
Airport! Alliance-California area Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District,
AD 1022, be closed; AND
2. Adopt Resolution (4/5ths vote required).
MMvv.f(~
Valerie Ross
Contact person: LASZLO "Les" FOGASSY
Phone: 5026
Supporting data attached: Staff Report, Maps Ward:
$6,000 (Processing fee paid by applicant)
$21,796 ( Initial General Benefit maintenance costs
to be paid by the City.
Source: (Acct. No.) 254-000-2301-6030/6031 (Processing Fee)
001-182-5506-0000 (General Benefit costs)
(Acct. Description) Assessment District. Deposits/
Real Property Landscape Contracts
Finance:
=# '-f / ~ 1Jc; lot
) , {
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount:
Council Notes:~.t.j
Agenda Item No.
,31
7)10/04->
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Staff Report
SUBJECT:
Public hearing - 4:00 p.m., and Resolution Ordering Work - San Bernardino International
Airport! Alliance-California area Landscape and Lighting Maintenance Assessment District AD
1022, Zones L 2 and 3.
BACKGROUND:
On July 17. 1996. the Inland Valley Development Agency (IVDA) Board requested the City.
through the office of the Director of Public Works, to initiate proceedings for the establishment
of a Landscape Lighting Maintenance Assessment District within a major portion of the former
Norton Air Force Base property, now known as San Bernardino International Airport (SBIA) and
Alliance-California.
On April 7,1997, authorization was given for the formation of the proposed assessment district.
Due to the dynamic changes occurring at this site over the years, no master plan had been
formed regarding the assessment district and what was to be maintained and what the district
boundaries should be until recently. The IVDA had hired an Assessment Engineering firm
(David Evans and Associates) to complete the Engineer's Report and mapping that was required
to bring this project to completion.
Currently, the IVDA, the City, and the property owners are maintaining the landscape areas. The
formation of the district will relieve the IVDA and the City of these costs and assess them to the
properties receiving the benefit. Landscaping along arterial and collector streets are deemed to
have some general benefit, which cannot be assessed to the property owners and will need to be
paid from the general fund. Additionally, as required by law, any City owned property that is
receiving benefit from the maintenance will be assessed. The total cost to the City is listed
below.
Due to the large area, the assessment district has been divided into three separate zones. and
parcels in each zone will be assessed for the benefit received by the maintenance in its respective
zone. The assessments will cover the costs of street lighting and the maintenance of landscaping
along the major streets within the airport area. Specifically, the streets are 3cd Street, Harry
Sheppard Boulevard, Rialto Avenue, Mill Street, Central Avenue, Del Rosa Avenue. Palm
Meadows Drive, Lena Road, Tippecanoe Avenue and Leland Norton Way. Additionally, the
maintenance of Timber Creek drainage channel, which is owned by the City of San Bernardino
will be included in the proposed assessment district.
The assessment for each zone will be spread across the parcels in proportion of the area (land
only) of each parcel to the total area of parcels within the zone. Some of the areas are proposed
to be maintained by the adjacent property owners and/or businesses through a Default
Assessment Agreement. Property owners will still be assessed for maintenance of the common
areas and street lighting costs. Properties qualifying for a default agreement must either be 2.5
acres or larger in size, or have a front footage of 400 feet or more. The limits were established to
assure a more uniform maintenance schedule and appearance across the smaller parcels. Table A
Staff Report - Continued
shows the various assessment amounts for each parcel within each zone with Default Assessment
Agreements in place. The total for each zone has been estimated to be $ 62.863.90 for Zone 1.
$35,119.11 for Zone 2 and $27,959.71 for Zone 3, as shown in summary in Table A-8 of the
Engineer's Report.
Table B shows the maximum assessment amount assuming no Default Assessment Agreements
have been executed, and development in the area fully built out. The estimated costs of
maintenance for the first year under this scenario is $209,807.36 for Zone 1, $140,660.92 for
Zone 2, and $93.336.89 for Zone 3, as shown in summary in Table B-8 of the Engineer's
Report.
As required by law. the maintenance costs for areas or portions of areas determined to also have
a general benefit cannot be assessed to the district and must be funded from some other source,
such as the general fund. The Engineer's Report gives details as to the percentages and amounts
determined to be general benefit. In summary, the amounts are $9,905.60 for Zone 1; $3,786.31
for Zone 2; and $3.143.33 for Zone 3 for the proposed first year' s costs. The total for all three
Zones is $16,835.24. The estimated general benefit amounts on full build-out and development
are $32,927.40 for Zone 1; $16.917.47 for Zone 2; and $10,269.09 for Zone 3, a total of
$60,113.96 for all three Zones.
Proposition 218 requires that any publicly owned parcels be assessed if they receive any benefit.
The IVDA owned parcels will be assessed, as will City or other publicly owned parcels. There is
one City owned parcel that would be subject to assessment, shown as Assessment No. lIon the
Diagram map. Tl1e initial assessment on this parcel will be $4,960.97.
The City's total portion of the maintenance costs, including the City owned parcel together with
the general benefit amount will be $21,796.21 for the first year and 565,074.93 for ultimate
build-out. Since the District is within the IVDA redevelopment area, they have indicated that
they would be open to discussing the assumption of all of, or a portion of, the City's costs of the
full build-out amount, sometime in the future.
On April 3, 2006, authorization to proceed was given and a resolution of intention was adopted
preliminarily approving the Engineer's Report and setting a public meeting for May IS, 2006
and a public hearing for June 5, 2006. All owners of record or as otherwise known were given
notice of the meeting and hearing by mail, along with an Assessment Ballot.
On May 15,2006, a public meeting was held and the item continued to the public hearing on
June 5, 2006. The public hearing was continued to June 19, 2006. due to new ballots being
mailed and to allow sufficient time for property owners to respond. The new ballots were
needed because the original ballots showed incorrect amounts. At the conclusion of the public
hearing on June 19, 2006, the results of the assessment ballots will be determined. If ballots
representing more than 50% of the total assessment amount are submitted in opposition to the
assessment district, proceedings for the formation will have to be terminated. It is anticipated
property owners of the larger developments (and thus larger assessments) will elect to execute a
Staff Report - Continued
Default Agreement, a majority opposition to the formation of the district is not anticipated. The
Default Agreements are being submitted under as a separate item. and will need to be considered
prior to the adoption of the resolution creating the assessment district.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
Applicant has paid the $6,000 processing fee and all subsequent work carried out in the district
will be assessed back to property owners, with the exception of $2 L 796.21 determined to be
general benefit and City obligation for the first year ($65,074.93 at ultimate build-out). This
amount will need to be funded from the general fund or other non-district funding source.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the public hearing be closed and the resolution be adopted.
~
No Sco.le
Base Line
St.
5th St.
.
o
c
u .. .
.
0.
0.
i= _ 0
LOCATION OF
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 1022
VICINITY MAP
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REAL PROPERTY SECTION
Proposed Landscape and Lighting
Maintenance Assessment District No.
1022 - San Bernardino International
Airport area.
~ indicates un-incorporated areas
~ within City's Sphere of Influence
Created by: .:... FcOJi
Date: ~ -/-/-1",
. j ,
~ , .
;liY, I s, ,II i l' L- ,
~ ~
I, Ii" i .
. '!Ir! Ie 'I l:. ! . l
i , 31115,i! , ~
IHf,ll II i "
:; . .
, fl". , .
: 'dlli
j IH}llhl I till I!! u j
, . ,
hi; Il'l . <
0 l II '11' !
/', i:i~~ ~I i~ &
i I I i P;ll !,~ . ~ E!~ It
~~ zl' Ii I i I ,
I ' ' , 'jJ ~!i! . ,:.i~o>)..
I li~n Ii I" / I 1 !
11 i ,~!~ ~I! , lu .;i!i I .
I 00" I' ] I' "1,111', , l
. _ ~ i z '..1_ , ~
a t;O,! lil ;o-5ll! =I!! i"G
ji IH di5.) I I 111 I i ~:.. ~ I~ ~
"0
l I dO III I: I II 0 , I"' ii~ I!-'ni i~ t
I .... '! 9 , , , .. Ii:'!; ~!: i .'
, I j"" j; i::. 13 I~"" ~~ 0 I t~ <0
10: ,I I ' l I., i~iiis~;~ l'i.:-
I. iUi ~.(.:: Un:l6 , <30 .0
d
-,
/
I
(
\
\
\
)
~g:g
-< 0 ~
~--: ~ "
C)O* ~
-< Z ~ B>-
-1-:5 :J~
o ~ ~I ~~
'-I-u~~e
Zrn gu tl)Z
WCi i~ ~~
~I-I~~(/)
z lll'" o..W
U>UJ ~ 5~
(/)L.LI:2~ ~'"
UJ > z
cncn5 <
w. -'
(/) UJ "
-< UJ ·
<{
nn_._._____..nn..........._......................
-----r-ll!,
. .
r..-t.-......-.~_n.._-.-----_..--_.................
, "
. "
. .,
: ::
: :no.,v
i
R
~@<'
~~
nomj.___..___ ...n....__ __on
@
@
L{)
. . .,
! ~.~!! !!cfl
L.............,.............-."'...;'t'"' .""""--.0......'. "@;"i' T@ i~
: '.' :
: : :
i ~ ~ e i @. @
..1 'e~
,.... .....
,.--.--.
'=-+-
j~1
.rEi"'::----------n..... n i i ~
_;. !o g
j: i ~ i
: '!' g ~
)I~ L. .noun..........n..._..._..n...........n.J ~ i i
i ~ i ~
~ ~ ~ ~
n~
i I: f f
@
H~
.... .....
.'
-
,
~.
r
"Ell
.
iiiiiiiiiOiiii["':
Z
IN
J~ J
I
'"
'1'
" ~ ~
.
i
l
,
o ~ I I
I ~i ~IU
I ~~ II~I
~ ~~ I.
ii\~~ I'll
~ r I~~
~ ~ . i
ll~
o
.
- I
t ~ : ~
I. ~ -I :::
;I!.i !
!'-I!! ;It
" ,
!i I
'.
,.
~I I'
!i ; ~ ,~
Is'"
:~ i !:I
i!
I ~j
! i,
!
~
i
.
I
I .
i ;
.
i !
! ! i
.
I j
. , i
. .
~ ! i
II ~~8