Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout18-City Attorney ORIG\NAL CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION From: JAMES F. PENMAN City Attorney Subject: Authorization to join amicus curiae hrief in the case of Rubin v. City of Burbank. Dept: CITY ATTORNEY Date: March 14,2003 Synopsis of Previous Council Action: None. Recommended motion: That the Mayor and Common Council authorize the City Attorney to join in the amicus curiae brief in support of the City of Burbank in the case of Rubin v. City of Burbank. fl= 7~ Contact person: James F. Penman Phone: 5255 Supporting data attached: Staff Report Ward: All FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: None at this time Source: Finance: Council Notes: Agenda Item No. 18 STAFF REPORT Council Meeting Date: March 17. 2003 TO: Mayor and Common Council FROM: James F. Penman, City Attorney DATE: March 14, 2003 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to join amicus curiae brief in the case of Rubin v. City of Burbank (Agenda Item No. 18) A minister ended his religious invocation at a Burbank City Council meeting with the phrase "in the name of Jesus Christ." One of the attendees, Irv Rubin, objected to this and brought a legal action against the City of Burbank. The trial court granted an injunction prohibiting Burbank from permitting "sectarian" prayer at the City Council meetings. The City appealed and the trial court's decision was affirmed by the Court of Appeal in a published decision (Rubin v. City of Burbank(2002) 101 Cal.App.4th 1194, 124 Cal. Rptr.2d 867). The California Supreme Court refused to hear the matter. The City of Burbank will now ask the United States Supreme Court to review this matter. Burbank's position is that this opinion requires it to review each prayer before it is delivered at a Council meeting and edit it for content. Burbank argues this would require it to "entangle" itself in religious matters and interfere with the First Amendment rights of those delivering the invocation. Burbank further agrees that prior U.S. Supreme Court opinions allow sectarian prayer at public meetings. This issue is important to every public entity in California. The City Attorney recommends the City of San Bernardino join in the amicus curiae brief. There is no charge to the City of San Bernardino for joinder in the brief.