HomeMy WebLinkAbout29-Planning
IdII
~
CITY OF SAN BERNQDINO -
REQUEST FOI COUNCIL ACTION
FO
Dept:
Date:
..,,' ~'.' Appeal of Planning Commission denial of
Larry E. Reed, Director REG'D. - t,t;~':S-ubj9\:t:' Variance No. 90-08, requesting approval
'{. cr, to place wall signs on four sides of a
Pl anni ng and Bui 1 di ng Services'l \:'.'j 7' . v"" restaurant at 885 East Harriman Pl ace.
h..-.1~. .-
The Mayor and Common Council meeting
November 21, 1990 of December 3, 1990
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
On November 5, 1990, the Mayor and Common Council heard the appeal and continued
the hearing to November 19, 1990. On November 19, 1990, the Mayor and Common
Council approved Variance No. 90-08 in concept and directed staff to prepare
positive Variance Findings of Fact.
Recommended motion:
o
It is recommended that the Mayor and Common Council adopt the attached Findings
of Fact, and approve Variance 90-08 for the proposed wall signs on four sides
of the restaurant.
4
r ,bg/
Signature
Contact person: Larry E. Reed
Supporting data attached: Staff Reoort
Phone: 3R4-S3S7
VVard: 1
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
Source:
Finance:
QnCil Notes:
Agenda Item No
~9
CITY OF SAN BERNADINO - REQUEST Fa. COUNCIL ACTION
<:) STAFF REPORT
subject: Appeal of the planning Commission deni~l of variance No.
90-08, requesting approval to place wall signs on four
sides of a restaurant at 885 East Harriman Place,
whereas the Municipal Code permits signs on a maximum of
two sides.
Mayor and Common council Meeting
of December 3, 1990
REOUEST
The applicant, Yoshinoya West, Incorporated, through their sign
contractor, San Pedro Electric Sign Company, is appealing the
denial of variance No. 90-08 by the planning Commission. The
applicant requests the Mayor and Common Council approve a variance
from Code Sections 19.60.220{B) and (E), which allow the placement
of signs on a maximum of two sides per building, to install wall
signs on four sides of a newly constructed restaurant in the
"Pace" shopping center located southeasterly of the intersection
of Harriman Place and Gage Canal.
o
BACKGROUND
On November 5, 1990, the Mayor and Common Council heard the appeal
and continued the hearing to November 19, 1990. On November 19,
1990, the Mayor and Council approved variance No. 90-08 in
concept, allowing the applicant to place signs on four walls with
the understanding that property is giving up any right to a
monument sign for the restaurant, and directed Staff to prepare
positive variance Findings of Fact. The revised Findings are
submitted on this date for adoption by the Mayor and council.
OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
The Mayor and Council adopt the
approve Variance No. 90-08, or
Fact and direct staff to further
attached Findings
reject the attached
revise them.
of Fact and
Findings of
o
75-0264
o
o
o
-
.
o
o
Appeal of Variance No. 90-08
Mayor and Common Council Meeting of December 3, 1990
Page 2
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Mayor and Council adopt the attached
Findings of Fact.
Prepared by:
Gregory S. Gubman,
Assistant Planner
for Larry E. Reed,
Director of Planning and Building Services
A - Findings of Fact
Exhibits:
o
o
.a
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
VAR NO. 90-08
FINDINGS OF FACT
CASE
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
PAGE
r
""""'I
1. There are exceptional or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applicable to the property involved, or to the
intended use of the property, which do not apply generally to
other property in the same land use district, in that the
curvature of Harriman Place prevents visibility of the
restaurant from Hospitality Lane.
2. The granting of this variance is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of
the applicant, in that adequate on-site advertising is
necessary for the restaurant to attract customers.
3.
The granting of this variance will not be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or be injurious to property
and improvements in the land use district in which the
property is located, in that the scale of the negative impact
created by the excessive signage is insignificant.
4.
The granting
objectives of
not set forth
of the variance will not
the General Plan, in that
specific sign criteria.
be contrary to the
the General Plan does
...
z::,&~
PlNl-I.06 p_ 1 OF 1 (4-10)