HomeMy WebLinkAbout11-Public Works
-
-
CITY OF SAN BIERNADINO - RIEQU~i~;. BFa o~;'UNCIL ACTION
ROGER G. HARDGRAVE
- .~....... -
,~- ~ -.....,.
. -
ur i.
0:
Dept:
; .-
.- Sl:abject:
Set Public Meeting for Establish-
ment of Storm Drain Fee of
$7,159/Acre -- Project 3-5
(Pepper/Kendall) in Comprehen-
sive Storm Drain Master Plan No.3
Public Works/Enginee:t(ing-
. _ z. -
Date: 10-09-90
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
08-13-86 -- Resolution No. 86-318 adopted authorizing execution
of a Standard Contract with County of San Bernardino
and the City of Colton for study of Drainage Area
3-5.
o
Recommended motion:
That a public meeting be set at 10:00 a.m., during the regular
Council meeting of Monday, 11-19-90, to receive oral or written
presentations relative to the establishment of a storm drainage
surcharge for Project 3-5, in Comprehensive Storm Drain Master
Plan No.3.
cc:
Shauna Edwins
Andy Green
Jim Penman
(1~
V
J~'
~/
. . ,,--. ~ /
. . . n~~~;'
/
/
i/ _ (
Ward:
5125
3
Contact person: Gene R. Klatt
Staff Report &
Supporting data attached: F.xp.cuti ve Summarv
Phone:
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
N/A
Source: (Acct. No.!
(Acct. DescriPtion)
Finance:
OCil Notes:
7S.0262
Agenda Item No
II
4!c
.
. CITY OF SAN BERNAaDINO - REQUEST F&\ COUNCIL ACTION
o
STAFF REPORT
Page 1 of 2
In August of 1986, the City entered into an agreement
with the County of San Bernardino and City of Colton to study
Project 3-5, of the Comprehensive Storm Drain Plan No.3. At
that point in time, the City of Colton and the County Flood
Control District were suggesting that all development on the
west side of the City of San Bernardino be deferred until such
time as adequate drainage facilities were constructed, or
financed.
The area in question is basically south of 6th Street
and east of the Southern Pa.cific Railway. While the County
maintains several drainage basins in this area, they are con-
sidered inadequate. Addi tionally, there is presently an
inadequate drain under 1-10 for the necessary outlet to the
Santa Ana River. This causes storm water to back up along the
north side of the freeway.
o
After several meetings and much discussion, the County
has completed the study report. In general, it suggests that
the County, City of San Bernardino, City of Rialto and City of
Colton impose a fee of $7,159 per acre on all development in the
Project 3-5 drainage area. This fee has the potential to
generate $5.56 million of the $8 million estimate of cost to
construct adequate improvements to meet the needs of the area.
The request further suggests that other forms of agree-
ments be adopted to fund the remaining $2.44 million. These
figures allow for existing improvements to be added to the
overall cost and are stated to be in compliance with AB 1600
with the proper nexus and accounting. This fee would only apply
to undeveloped lands, and the dollar figure is based on collec-
tion of monies from all of the participating agencies. The City
of San Bernardino has 31% of the total drainage area and 26% of
the available vacant land to be charged.
The majority of this area within the City of San
Bernardino is designated as RS, with a maximum density of 4.5
units per acre. Therefore, the proposed drainage fee of
$7,159/gross acre equates to $1,591 per lot. Our present
drainage fee is $O.ll/sq. feet of net area, which amounts to
$792 for a 7,200 sq. ft. lot. The proposed fee represents an
increase of $809 per lot, from $792 to $1,591. We anticipate
that these fees would be held in a trust account until the
County is ready to start work on a project.
o
A draft Memorandum of
detail the agreements reached.
Memorandum of Understanding was
office for review and comment.
Understanding was developed to
In October of 1987 a draft of a
forwarded to the City Attorney's
10-09-90
75.0264
-
. CITY OF SAN BERN~DINO - REQUEST FcQ COUNCIL ACTION
o
o
o
75-0264
STAFF REPORT
Page 2 of 2
The Cooperative Agreement provided that each of the
three agencies would participate to the extent of $2,500 in the
estimated cost for preparing the Drainage Report. Payment has
been made for the City of San Bernardino's share.
Our regular drainage fees are low by comparison to other
cities. The increase to $7,159 per acre in this area should not
have a significant detrimental effect on development.
A copy of the Drainage Report is available in our office
for review.
Section 54992 of the Government Code requires that a
public meeting be held to receive oral or written presentations
before levying any new fee or service charge. This public
meeting must be held during a regularly scheduled Council
meeting. We recommend that a public meeting be scheduled for
the Council meeting of 11-19-90.
1\doption of this special drainage fee would presumably
result in Colton not objecting to future developments within
this area. Confirmation of this assumption may be a
prerequisite to approval of this fee.
10-09-90
PLAN
:~~-'PROJECT 3-5
-r-- {Of:.:
,?:ENGINEERS REPORT
,,~; "
;",:.:-.;.,..,;.,
APRIL 1 ~90
. PREPARED BY
.};,SAN BERNARDINO COUNlY
:2l:.FlOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
);;:::::r--- , PLANNING DMSION
I
.0
I
I
I
I
I
o
o
o
u..,nrpp;-- - - VJli 8ItIII ImDf PIM '3
PICTIC'1' 3-5
J'DlU, IlI:il'UlCl"
Table of 0:Iltenl:s
EXEX:Ul'IVE ~
.
.
.
.
.
.
!l1lCI<GRXlND .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~
. .
. .
. . .
.
. .
CXH;IIERATICHl
. . . .
. . . .
.
CXST ESTIMATES .
Table 1: Alternate Ali-;o.....nt 0:lSts
AIll'ERNATIVE SEW:TIOO
A. DetentiCX'l Basin PL. 'l-'Jeal
B. Ran:::ho Averule Ali-;Oll.elJt
c. original Project 3-5 Ali-;Ollll=lIl
D. ~ Averule Ali-;o.......Jt
RECXHmmED PIAN
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
FOSSIBIE ftlNDIN:; .
Table 2: Trihltazy lllld Vacant Area
Table 3: District Expenditures CX'l Exi.sti.n;
Project 3-5 facilities .
.
.
.
. .
REXX:.tHMlo\TICHl
.
.
.
APPENDIX 'A'
FIGURES
.
.
.
APPENDIX 'B'
IE;CRIP1'I00 OF AIll'ERNATIVES
. .
APPENDIX 'c' - CXST ESTIMATES
.
. .
o
.
.
.
. . .
.
.
.
. . .
. .
APPENDIX 'D' - CXJ!MENl'S 00 '!HE ~ PR:lJECl' 3-5 EN:;INEERS REl'Ul'a"
.
.
.
.
. .
.
i
.
1
1
2
2
3
4
4
4
4
5
5
6
6
7
8
13
17
31
..
II
--
JI
.
.
It?
II
I.
i
.
.
.
II
II
'0
tI
t.
J
o
o
az.. DPh,"9" PlD
ft'ojeclt 3-5
~~'. JliIport
"."....,*i_ SUImIarv
Existin;J Q:ntitions: '!he Flood a....LLul District owns, operates am maintains
the East Rialto QJannel, am the ~, Mill am Randall Basins, lo-
cated as shewn in Figure 1 in ~ 'A'. 'lhese facilities are not
CXIlSi.dered adequate to CXlI1tain major stotm flews. In l!Idditien, there is
not an CJ.Itlet fran Randall Basin nor drainage facilities to cx:nlIct
&tam flews BCUth, under Interstate 10 am sout:hem Pacific Rai.1raKl
tracks am to the santa Ana River. Flood ~ has occurrecl in the
past alaq Valley Blvd. in the vicinity of ~ am Meridian Avemes.
Devel_at of the Dalinage Plan: In 1986 the Cities of COltcn am san
I!emaniino an:i the Flood centrol District entered into an _---at to
review alternatives, am develcp a drainage plan, to .........ely the afore-
menticned drainage ClCI1CemS. D.1ring the devel_at of the plan key
iJnpacted property owners am the City of Rialto ~ cx.ntacted to
review am 0. ...._" at on the plan.
p..., ........ded Dalinage Plan: '!he t'.I..l.....ed hprcvement:s are shewn in Figure 1 am
include an adiiticnal tumcA1t frail East Rialto Olannel to PaRler Basin,
excavatien am CJ.Itlet structures for MUl am Randall Basins, am a stotm
drain fran the Randall Basin BCUth, under Interstate 10 am the railroad
tracks, to the santa Ana River.
p... . ....~-'lded Financin; Plan: A developer fee of $7,159 is justified in acc0r-
dance with AB 1600, am is I-............Lled, to finance approximately $5.56
millien of the $8.0 million required to CCI'ISt.ruct the af.............ticned
improvements. It is further 1""'" ...-.ded the Cities of Rialto, san
Bemllrdino am COltcn, the COUnty am the Flood a....L...ul District can-
ti!ue to worX together to develcp a DIElllIlS to tund the $2.44 millien not
acquired by the developer fee.
Further Reo ...._'ldations: New devel_at in the area shcW.d CXlI1tinue to
mitigate any il.............Lal increase in %\IllOff genexated by the devel"t-"l.elat
until adequate dclwnstream facilities are CCI'ISt.ructed. Also new develc:p-
ment BCUth of the East Rialto Olannel shcW.d be designed such that they
are prctectecl frail infmquent di.sd1arges aver the East Rialto Olannel
spillways am flews fran MUl am Randall Basins until adequate :im-
pmI/eIIII!nts have been provided to cx:nlIct stotm flows to the santa Ana
River.
~
-i-