HomeMy WebLinkAbout33-Planning
.
C~TY OF SAN .BRNADINO - RilQUBST F~ COUNCIL ACTION
From: Larry E. Reed, Director
Dept: Planning and Building Services
Subj~: Appeal of a Condition of Approval for
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-07
Mayor and Common Council Meeting
September 5, 1990, 2:00 p.m.
Date: August 20, 1990
Synopsis of Previous Council ~ion:
On June 4, 1990, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit ~o. 90-07,
by a 6 to 2 vote.
On July 16, 1990, the Mayor and Common Council continued the appeal so that alternative
amendments to the screening condition could be developed.
f .... ...,.~
t ;_' t"T\
l_;':'1 C.>
~
'-'-'
<.:.? I
j"~l ,.:~
W 1~'J
',-'
Recommended motion:
",,' c:;
That the hearing be closed; that the appeal be upheld and that Conditional:Use-'Permit
No. 90-07 be approved subject to the Findings of Fact, Conditions of Approval and
Standard Requirements contained in the June 5, 1990 Planning Commission Staff Report
(Exhibit "C"), except that Condition No.6 be modified to read, "That the applicant
provide a 10-foot landscaped buffer as approved by the Parks and Recreation Department
on the outside of the existing fence on the north and east property lines. A Temporary
Encroachment Permit is required to be obtained from the Public Works Department prior
to landscaping and irrigating the buffer area." (Sup orts Staff Recommendation.)
r-
Signature
. Larry E. Reed
Contect person:
Larry E. Reed
Phone: 384-5357
Supponing date iIIllllh.hed:
Staff Report
Ward:
6
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
N/A
Source: (Acct. No.!
(Acct. OescriDtionl
Finance:
Council Notes:
75.0262
Agenda Item No
~3
) CITY OF SAN BI!RNAOo'NO - RI!QUI!ST FdtJ COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
Subject: Appeal of a Condition of Approval for Conditional
Use Permit No. 90-07
Mayor and Common Council Meeting
September 5, 1990, 2:00 p.m.
REOUEST
The applicant, Larry Bangert, is appealing a condition of
approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 90-07. The applicant
requests that the condition be modified so that the condition
to construct a six foot high "woodcrete" wall be modified to
allow landscaping.
BACKGROUND
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-07 is a request to establish a
U-Haul business within an existing mini-storage facility
located at the northeastern intersection of Hallmark Parkway
and Lexington Way next to 1-215. The mini-storage was
approved on September 6, 1988, and established 15 mini-
storage buildings totaling 68,750 square feet on 3.83 acres.
The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) recommended a
Negative Declaration for the project on April 19, 1990. No
comments were received during the public comment period. The
Development Review Committee (DRC) had a final review and
clearance of the project on May 10, 1990.
On June 4, 1990, the Planning Commission approved Conditional
Use Permit No. 90-07, by a 6 to 2 vote. The approval requir-
ed screening by a "woodcrete" wall around the entire proper-
ty. This Condition has been appealed.
On July 16, 1990, the Mayor and Council continued the appeal
so that alternative amendments to the screening condition
could be developed. These have been developed. One alterna-
tive is to require a landscaped buffer outside the existing
chain link fence on the city's right-of-way. This area is
designated for the proposed Pepper Linden Drive and inter-
change. A temporary encroachment permit from the Public
Works Department would be required and the applicant has
applied for this permit (See Exhibit "B"). Another alterna-
tive is to require the landscaping on the inside of the
fence. However, the amount of landscaping area would need to
be restricted so that adequate access lanes can be main-
tained.
15-0264
Appeal of a condi~n of Approval for
No. 90-07
Mayor and Common Council Meeting of September 5, 1990
Page 2
o
Conditional
Use Permit
OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL
The Mayor and Council may deny the appeal and maintain the
condition of approval as required by the Planning Commission.
OR
The Mayor and Council may uphold the appeal and modify the
condition of approval for the fence to require that the
applicant provide a 10-foot landscaped buffer on the outside
of the existing fence on the north and east property lines.
OR
The Mayor and Council may uphold the appeal and modify the
condition of approval for the fence to require that the
applicant place a5-foot landscape planter area inside the
existing fence. The planter area should be landscaped with
dense mature trees and shrubs. The rear access lane shall be
maintained at a minimum of 15 feet from building "0" to the
planter area.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends amending Condition No. 6 to allow the
applicant to obtain a temporary encroachment permit from the
City of San Bernardino and to plant and maintain a 10-foot
landscaped buffer area adjacent to the existing property line
on the north and east property lines.
Prepared by:
John E. Montgomery, AICP
Principal Planner
for Larry E. Reed, Director
Planning and Building Services
Exhibits:
A - Letter of Appeal to the Mayor and Council
B - Letter Request for Temporary Encroachment
Permit
C - June 5, 1990, Planning Commission Staff
Report
M&CCAGENDA:CUP90-07AP.
o
EXHIBIT A
o !J(~ F.
~ Jq- 4~4-~CJC)
RECE!VD-r'(V r'_Eq~
JUII. 11, 1990
'90 JUN 19 A 7 :48
"r. Llrry E. R..d
Dlr.ctor of 'llnnln, Ind lul1dln, S.rvlc..
Plttl NlhU1
'lInn.r
CITY Of SAN IERNARDINO
'DE'ART"ENT Of 'LANNIN8 AND IUILDIN8 SERYICES
300 North '0' Str..t
Sin I.rnlrdlno. Cl1lfornll. 9241'-0001
.
.
RE: Condltlonl1 U.. '.rllt No. 90-07
Delr "r. R..d . ".. Nlhl11.
We Ir. Ilkln, I forll1 100.11 to the d.cl.lon of the Jun. 5. 1990 I..tln, of the P11nnln,
COIII..lon In r"lrd. to the Condltlonl1 U.. '.rllt No. 90-07.
We ICC.ot III of the ter.. and condition. nceot for the Condition NUlb.,.. 6 :
i.ln, I .II-foot hl,h .011d 'Woodcr.ta' Will on the p.rlph.rl1 prop.rty 1In..
The .11 foot 'Woodcr.t.' wall will not orovld. the vl.ul1 .cr..nln, nor will It .nhlnc. th
proo.rty frol the fr..wlY. Th. proJ.ct I. twe1v. to fourt..n f..t b.10w the .urflc. of th
fre.wlY 111.dllt.1y to the .I.t of the proJ.ct.
Apo..1 Points:
1. Fence will NOT provld. vl.ul1 .cr..nln,.
A. Our proJ.ct I. only vl.lb1. to .outh bound trlfflc.
I. Surf Ie. of Fr.ewlY I. tw.1ve to fourt..n Ibov. oroJ.ct.
2. No oth.r .u.ln..... 10cat.d In our COII.rcI11 lu.ln... Plrk hlv. thl. type of f.nc. or
n..d for It.
3. co.t of bl.lc f.nc. would b. loprollllte1Y '35.00 I ft -or Ibout '4o.ooo.oo( It Ilnllul
A. Thl. f.nc. I. not In option to own.r.. I' th.y Ilde n~ flnlncll1 1110wlnc. for thl
In thl. oroJect.
I. All IIJor con.tructlon hi' b..n cOIP1.t.d and III fund. IVll11b1e hay. b..n u.tllnh
con.tructlon 10.n la cOIP1.t.ly fund.d.
4. Th. Lick of 'U-Hlul' lualn... ha. n.'ltlv. .ffect on atorl" bu.ln....
A. 'U-Hlul' '0.' h.nd In hind with the .tor.... I' It .lve. I 'l.ld' to bu.ln....
I. Th. 10.t of the 'U-Hlu1' ..rvlc. hi' I IIJor .ffect on the profit of the .torl"
bulln....
W. hlv. two propo..d option.:
1. R.dwood '.llt.' In pre..nt f.nc. on the .ubJ.ct prop.rty.
2. Thlt th.re b. 1Ind.cIPln. on the City Ind CALTRANS cwned 1lnd.
In c10.ln. w. wlnt to r.lt.rlte thlt I .ood 100kln. proJ.ct 1. In III our b..t Int.re.t..
W. would 11k. to work to..th.r with the City to Ilk. the ~e.t 100kln. project po..lb1..
~
~.S~"Hnf (.,'~~ S~--
~ Iln~
2255 Av.nldl D. LI 'lIYI. Suite 2
La Jo111. CA 92037
o
EXHIBIT B
o
MVROPERTlES liNG
2255 AVENID4 DE LA PLAYA
SUITE 2
LA JOLLA. CA 92031
(819) 454 5800
ROBERT W. HAMMOND I PRESIDENT
July 24. 1990
Mr. Roger Hardgrave
Director of Public Works
City of San Bernardino
San Bernardino. CA
....
.
Subject: REQUEST FOR TEMPORARY ENCROACHMENT PERMIT
PEPPER LINDEN DRIVE/CROSS REFERENCE CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO. 90-07
.,'
Dear Mr. Hardgrave:
On behalf of State COllege Self Storage I am hereby
requesting a temporary encroachment permit to plant
oleander bushes on the City of San Bernardino's property
located on Pepper Linden Drive where it abuts State
College Self Storage in the State COllege Business Park.
These.oleanders will act as a screen between the storage
facility and Highway 215.
I acknowledge on behalf of State College Self Storage that
the encroachment is temporary and we will vacate said
encroachment within 30 days written notice from the City
of San Bernardino. We absolve the City of San Bernardino
of any responsibility or liability that might occur from
this encroachment.
I.
Robert W. Hammond
Managing Partner
State College Self Storage
RWH/mg
~t/~
J----..
,0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
EXHIBIT C
o
SUMMARY
AGENDA ITEM ___.!3
HEARING DATE ~une 5. 1990
. WARD
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-07
APPL.lCANT : 0 e rt . HaRlllon
2255 Avenida De La Playa, Ste. 2
La Jolla, CA 92037
OWNER: Robert & Helen HaRlllond
Larry & Jody Bangert, and
Step-Con, Inc.
..,
3
a
::;)
1:
a:
....
c:r
..,
~
To establish a U-Haul franchise within an existing
mini-storage facility under authority of San Bernardino
Municipal Code Section 19.83.30D in the IL, Industrial
Light, General Plan Land Use Designation.
The site is located at the northeasterly intersection
of Hallmark Parkway and Lexington Way and is further
described as 5185 Hallmark Parkway.
EXISTING GENERAL PLAN
PROPERTY LAND USE ZONING ~SI~ATI9~
~uDJeCt Mlnl-Storage Tacllity lL Indus r a L19 t
North Flood Control Channel PFC Public Flood Control
South Industrial and Vacant IL Industrial Light
East Interstate 215 and RS Residential Suburban
Residential
West Industrial and Vacant IL Industrial Light
GEOLOGIC I SEISMIC oVES FLOOD HAZARD oVES OZONE A ( SEWERS DYES )
HAZARD ZONE \IJ NO ZONE lONO OZONE B ONO
HIGH FIRE EVES AIRPORT NOISE I ~YES REDEVELOPMENT ~YES
HAZARD ZONE NO CRASH ZONE NO PROJECT AREA oNO
...I o NOT o POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z !XI APPROVAL
~ APPLICABLE EFFECTS 0
-
WITH MITIGATING Ii !XI CONDITIONS
z., MEASURES NO E.I.R.
LI.ICl) o EXEMPT o E.I.R. REOUIRED BUT NO 11.0 0 DENIAL
:Ez II.~
z- SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS I!:E
00 WITH MInGATING o CONTINUANCE TO
a:Z MEASURES .,:E
-- 0
>11.
Z IE NO o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS M
.., SIGNIFICANT SEE ATTACHED E.RC. a:
EFFECTS MINUTES
110".1"1 ".,IUO ....Ly ....
.y
-.0-.("\
CITY OF SAN BERNARDIN~_ PLANNI~~EDEPARWW
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM 13
HEARING DATE .June:J .
ees. i:
.L~90
REOUEST
The applicant requests approval of a Conditional Use Permit
to establish a U-Baul franchise within an existinq mini-
storaqe facility under the authority of San Bernardino
Municipal Code Section 19.83.300 in the IL, Industrial Liqht,
General Plan Land Use Desiqnation.
SiTE LOCATrON
The 3.83 acres1.te is located at the northeasterly
intersection of Hallmark Parkway and Lexinqton Way. The site
has a frontaqe on Hallmark Parkway of approximately 320 feet
and is further described as 5185 Hallmark Parkway (see
Attachment "H", Location Map).
MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE
The proposed U-Haul operation within the existinq mini-
storaqe facility is consistent with the Municipal Code and in
conformance with the General Plan as shown in Attachment "A".
CALIFORNIA EHVrRONMENTAL OUA T.TTY ACT
The Initial Study was prepared by staff and presented to the
Environmental Review COIIIIIIittee (ERC) on April 19, 1990. The
ERC found that no siqnificant impacts will result from the
project and recOJlllDended a Neqative Declaration. The Neqative
Declaration wa. available for public review from April 26,
1990 to May 3:6, 1990. To date, no cOJlllDents have been
received. If_ COJlllDents are received, they will be presented
to the Planninq COJIIIDission at the June 5, 1990 Planninq
COJIIIDission meetinq (see Attachment "E", Initial Study).
l
-s
~
o
o
CITY OF SAN BERNARDIN~. PLA~NI~~EDEPAR1~iW
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM 1~
HEARING DATE June 5. 1990
PA~,
BACKGROUND
The subj eet property was created as Parcel Number 1.of Parcel
Hap Number 5962 in 1980. In June of 1988, "the Planning
Department received an application for a Conditional Use
Permit to construct a mini-storage facility on'the subject
site. Conditional Use Permit Number 88-35 was approved by
the Planning Commission on September 6, 1988 and established
15 mj,ni-storage buildings totaling 68,750 square feet. In
October of 1989, the applicant's representative filed a sign
permit application with the City of San Bernardino. The
'appliication wail, fori. a' . pole sign identifying the U-Haul
b'u'Si'ne'ss which ,.,a, not ~ part o~ the original Conditional Use
Permit' approval. sign Permit' Number 89-119 was '. subsequently
denied by Planning Staff and by the Planning commission. On ,
appeal to the 'Mayor 'and Common Council, the applicant
withdrew the requested pole sign request.
On January 19, 1990, the Planning Department received the
applicant's request to establish the U-Haul franchise at the
mini-storage site. On May 10, 1990, the Development Review
Committee, after reviewing the prOposed use, recommended
approval with the requir_ents that the applicant park the
rental trucks only between Buildings "G" and "H" and
Buildings "H" and "L" and that the applicant should screen
the mini-storage use with a "Woedcrete" wall.
ANALYSiS
The applicant requests approval ot a Conditional Use Permit
to establish a U-Haul 'rental otfice and accompanying rental
truck operation within ~'existing mini-storage facility. The
applicant has provided a description of the operational
procedures tor the intended use. The procedures for
ordering, picking up and returning the trucks are as follows:
* CUstomer arrives at the site and parks their car in
the parking spaces outside the front gate.
* customer goes into the storage/U-Haul' office
located in Building "I" and completes paperwork tor
rental. .
* The on-site manager then delivers the truck to the
applicant outside the main gate.
,.
-,
CITY OF SAN .J
ARDINO PLANN' K
CASE
.....
EPARTMENT
. CUP 90-07
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
~
.I."
June :I,
4
.
!!I!lO
The truck is returned to the
inspected, then the manager returns
its ,assigned space.
Surrounding Area
*
property and
tl)e - truck to
The site is located within the State College Business Park.
The Cable Creek Flood Control. Channel lie. to the north of
the subject property. Interstate 215 is adjacent to the
eastern project boundary with residential uses on the other
side 'of the freeway. . The balance of the surrounding area is
a ,combination of' industrial uses and vacant properties. . The
facility will be a service to the surrounding area. .
Traffic and circulation
The subject property will utilize Hallmark Parkway for
primary access and Lexington Way as .econdary access. The
improvement. for the project were completed under Conditional
Use Permit Number 88-35. No further improvements will be
required at the present time.
COMMENTS REeEYVED
The project was reviewed by all City Departments at the
Development Review cQlIIIDittee meetinq on May 10, 1990, the
Police Department bas provided .tandard requirements for the
proposed useCsee Attachment wDw, Standard Requirements).
CONCLUsrOM
The proposal meets the current development requirements of
the San Bernardino llUnicipal Code and is permitted in the IL,
Industrial Light, General Plan Land Use De.ignation .ubject
to the approval of a Conditional U.e Permit. The propo.ed
use will be compatible with the adjacent u.e. and the
. surrounding area. There i. a propo.ed Negative Declaration
for the project.
/ /.
.-".
, CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT'
CASE CliP 90-07
o
o
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING ;;.
13
.111",:11 5 _ 1 Q90
~
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planninq Commission:
1. Adopt the Neqative Declaration~ and
2. Approve Conditional Use Permit Number 90-07, subject to
the attached Findinqs of Fact (Attachment "B"),
Conditions of Approval (Attachment "C") and Standard
Requirements (Attachment' "0").
~t~.:~Ub7~e~, !
La E.' Reed, Director
Planninq apd Buildinq Services .
~ WoJJJ '
Patti Nah~ll, Associate Planner
!
I
"
I "
. '
LER:PN/sd
ATTACHMENTS:
A - Municipal Code and General Plan Conformance
B - Findinqs of Fact
C - Conditions of Approval
o - Standard Requirements
E - Office Layout
G - Site Plan
H - Location ~p
-_o..n
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
; ....., CASE CUP 90-01
OBSERVATIONS
AGENDA ITEM 1"
HEARING DATE June !It 1990
PAGE b
A'l'TACHMI!:NT A
MUNYCrPAL CODE AND GENERAL PIAN CONPORMA.NCE
Ca1:.8aorv Pr~Dosal Municinal Code
Permitted U-Haul M-1 Standards, with
Use Operation Conditional Use
'. Pel'1llit; A,pproval
Front
'Set'Back SO -feet , 2.0' feet I
; :" 'I
'Parkinq I ,: I' :: "
11 spaces 3 spaces
Gener~l Plan
IL,
Industrial Liqht
RIA
RIA
PCAGENDA:CUP90-070
"'"
/ :::-/
00
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE CUP 90-07
FINDINGS of FACT
.1.:5--
111Jnp- ~ 1990
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING DATE
. PAGE
. ATTACHMENT B
1. The proposed U-Haul operation conforms to the objectives of
the City's General Plan in that the use is permitted in the
IL, Liqht Industrial, General Plan land use desiqnation.
subject to the approval of a conditional use permit.
2. The proposed' use will not adversely affect the adjoininq land
use and the qrowth and development of the area in which it is
propo.ed to be located in that the proposal is compatible with
adjacent and nearby industrial, residential and publiC
faCility us.s.
3. Th. size and shape of the site propos.d for the use is
ad.quate to allow the full d.v.lopment of the propos.d us. in
a mann.r not detrimental to the particular area nor to the
p.ace', health. safety and qeneral.w.lfare in that the site can
accommodate the propo.ed laundromat and satisfy all
d.v.lopm.nt standards in the Industrial Liqht deaiqnation.
4. The traffic q.nerated by the propo..d use will not impo.. an
undue burd.n upon the str.ets and hiqhways d.siqned and
improv.d to carry the traffic in the ar.a. in that the site is
locat.d on Hallmark Parkway and has the capacity to handle the
additional traffic.
S. The qrantinq of Conditional Ua. Permit No. 90-07 und.r the
condition. impo..d will not b. detrim.ntal to the p.ace.
health, .af.ty and q.neral welfare of the citiz.n. of the City
of San Bernardino in that all .nvironmental concerns and
.afety conc.rn. r.qardinq acc..s and circulation have b..n
ad.quat.ly addr....d.
.
- 0
o
,. CITY 'OF SAN BERNAR91NO PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
CASE CUP 90-07
CONDITIONS
AGENDA ITEM
HEARING ~~~
. ~
.LJ
\June 0,
II
1990
ATTACHMENT C
STANDARD CONDIT:J:ONS
1.
I
Minor modifications to the plan shall be .ubject to
approval by the Director of Planninq. An increa.. of
more than 10 percent of the square footaqe or a
siqnificant chanqe in the approved concept shall be
subject to Planninq Commi..ion approval. Construction
shall be' in substantial conformance with the Plans
approved I by, the Development Review Commit.tee, Planninq
Commission'or DiTector of Planninq. .
2. '. At ; all ,:tilDes the ; business will be operated in a manner
.,,'Whi:chdoes~ nQt produce 9bnoxious noise, vibration, odor,
dust, smoke, qlare, or other nuisance.
,
3. In the event 'that this approval is leqally challenqed,
the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim
or action and will cooperate fully in the defen.e of the
matter. Once notified, the applicant aqree. to def.nd,
indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers,
aqents and eDiployee. ,from any claim, action, or
proceedinq aqainst the. City of San Bernardino. Th.
applicant further aqr... to r.imbur.e the City of any
costs and attorneys' fees which the City may b. r.quired
by a court to pay as a res~t of .uch action, but such
participation shall not ..r.lieve applicant of his
obliqation under this condition.
3. After twelve (12) months of operation of the O-Haul
business, the owner shall submit to the City, two (2)
sets of gumm.d mailinq label. of prop.rty owners and
their. addresse.;an~/or t.nants addr..... of property
within 500 feet of the .xt.rior boundari.. of the
.ubj.ct prop.rty owned by the conditional u.e permit
holder. A map illu.tratinq the 500 foot radius boundary
and the parcel within the boundary .hall be al.o
submitted. Thi. information .hall b. obtained from the
latest San Bernardino County .qualized as.es.ment roll
and maps. After 'the r.ceipt of the mailinq lab.l. and
map, the city will .end an evaluation que.tionnaire to
those neiqhborinq property own.r., council member. and
Buildinq Services Department official.. Thi. evaluation
questionnaire will ask questions about the operational
impacts of the business, the effectivene.. of current
conditions of approval and any propo.ed chanqe. to the
conditions of approval.
-'
, .
o
,--0
CITY OF SAN BERNARE)INO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
, CASE CUP 90-07
CONDITIONS
AGENDA ITEM 13 -
HEARING DATE June 5. 1990
eeil Q
If any substantiated and substantial negative
evaluations are received or at the City's discretion, a
public hearing with the Planning Commission shall be
held. Opon notice by the City, fifty pe~cent of the
latest Conditional Ose Permit appl~cation fee shall be
paid by the applicant for the preparation of the
evaluation report to the Planning Commission.
After the p~lic hearing, the Planning Commission may
-modify any existing conditions of ' approval or revoke
Conditional Ose Permit Number 90-07. The revised
conditions or revocations shall be permanent and subject
to appeal to the Mayor and Common Council within fifteen
(15) ,days after, ,imposition.
The above process of evaluation of the business
operation impacts may be required in any subsequent
years of operation as determined by the City.
Operation quidelines that the owner must follow are:
* Compliance with all applicable development
standards of the City of San Bernardino.
* All signs' shall be in conformance with the San
Bernardino Municipal Code.
* The business shall be operated in a manner which
does not create visual imDacts, does not produce
obnoxious nois., or other nuisance.
5. The rental tru~k parking shall be restricted to only
those parking spaces between Buildings "G" and "M" and
Buildings "H" a~d "L".
6. A six-foot high "Woodcrete" wall shall be constructed
around the entire subject property to provide visual
screening.
PCAGENDA:COP90-07C
,
. r CITY' OF "'0 BERNARDINO
. (I~T ANDMD REQUIREMENTS
~:.,
C)Au
CUP 90-07
AGEMOA ITEM 11-
H!:MING DATE June 5.
PAGE 1 n
Hl90
,.
eoMMrRer&~_ rNDU.IAra~
""I
ATTACHMENT D
2.
x
. . .
Conditional Use Pennit Number 9D-07 aball be in .ffe= for a
period ot 12 1IODt118 froll the elate of approval. Howev.r, if no
dav.1ClJllNllt baa been initiated at the end of tile 12 aonth
period, the application .hall expire. AddiUonalU....y b.
approv.d upon requ..t of the applicant prior to expiration of
th.. 12-aonth p.riod. Expiration Date: June 5, 1991.
PAJUaNG:
a. Thia clev.lopaent .hall be requir.d to maintain a minimwa of
3 .tanelaJ:d off-.tr.et puJdng .pac...
b. All patlt1ng and driving ai.l.. .hall be surfaced with two
inches of AC ov.r a .uitable ba.e or .quivalent a. approved
by the City Engineer. Parking spac.s shall b. .triped and
have wheel staps in.talled at l.ast thr.. fe.t froa any
building, wall, fence, property lin., or walkWay.
Whenever an off-street parking area is adjacent' to or
across an alley froa prop.rty zon.d r..id.ntial. a solid
decorative wall .ix feet in heilJht shall be erected and
..intai~e~ along the property line so a. to .eparate the
parking area phy.ically from the re.id.ntially zoned
property provided .uch wall .hall be three feet in height
when located ~ithin.th. required front or street .ide yard
.etbacJc. lIher. no front or .treet .ide yaJ:d i. required.
.uch wall shall be three feet in heilJht when locat.d within
ten feet of the .treet line.
1.
x
c.
(
d. "'"h.n.var an off-street parking area i. located acro.s the
.treet from property zoned for r..idential u.... a .olid
d.corative wall or .quivalent landscap. bera not 1... than
three fe.t in heigbt .hall be .r.cted and ..intained along
the stre.t .id. of the lot not clo..r to the street than
the reql:ired d.pth of the yaJ:d in the adjoinilUJ r..idential
area. No fence or wall located in the front ..tback .hall
ob.cure the required front .etback land.capilUJ.
ItEl'USJ: ENCI.OStIRES:
Wh.never refUGe bina are located within or adjacent to a parking
area used by the public, they .hall be enclosed by a decorative
vall six feet 1n heilJbt alolUJ the r.ar end sld.. and scra.ned
gate(s) .ix fe.t in beight alOftlJ the front. 'I'he enclo.ure sball
not be plaCed within the required front or stre.t side yaJ:d
-~;; ...
.
.w' ~'C
..
- Illy
..'::' ".. ....
, ',.
"
CITY OF 810 BERNARDINO
.""
.~;,. STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
a'ASE
CUP 90-07
13
June 5..
11
1]90
AGENDA ITOt
HEARING DATE
PAGE
3.
x
4.
x
(
C"';':
:~~.: ....
d.
e.
f.
.etback area. ZXa" loca~ion and .18. of nfU8e eDCllo.ure. are
~o be de~enained by. ~e Pl&llft1n9 Depart.Mn~ and Division of
Public Service. Super1n~endent.
WALLS:
. .
.
a. Six-foo~ hi9h solid ~1'Yoodcrete" vall. ahall be required on
the north , south , e..~ , and wes~ or
peripheral::r:: propertylIiies. (Only ~e ..rked with
"X" or check ..rk apply).
IAMDSCAPING:
The intent and purpose of this section is to preven~ ~rees and
other land8~apinq from da..qing public t.provementa.
a. Street tree. must be installed at a minimum of 30 feet on
center. VarieUes and exS" location shall be detenained
~y the Director cf Paries and aecreation.
b. All require~ set!lacles abuttinq a public ri9ht-of-way shall
be lan~s~a~e~ (except for walles and driveway. which bisect
or encroach upon the required land.cape area).
c. ,Four (4) c:lpies cf a landscape plan (1ncludin; plant
:at.ria: .pecifications) shall be suba1tted to the
!nqineerin; Civision for review and' approval.
All re~ired landscaping s~all be protected from parkinq
areas and shall be provided with auto..tic sprinkler
facilities which shall be ..intained. in an operative
ccncl.i:.lc:t.
tnterior plantin; shall be-required and maintained equal to
at, le.st five percent or ten percent of the open surfaced
parkin; srea excludin; the a:t:ea of landscapinq strip
required by subs~ion "b" and shall include at least one
t:-ee for every five spac_ or ..jor fraction thereof.
Measurements shall be co.puted froa the inside of perimeter
valls or set~ack lines.
The r.quirecS set!laclc(s) froll ~ north , south, ,
ea.~ _, west _ property line iiiiIl be densely
landscaped with ..ture tre_, sbrubs, and qroundc:over. A
-foo~ landscaped earthen ben .hall be encud and
UIiitained within the Reback al0D9 the above lndica~ed
property line.
....
-...
CITY OF M~BEANAADINO
~
~~ STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
t;ASE
CUP 90:97
13
June 5.
1?
1990
AGENDA 11'111
HEARING DATE.
N!
5.
x
,
ILUJMIlfAnORI
. . .
a. All l1gb~iD9 flxtun. in ~. parJcincJ ana. ima11 b.
dir.cted a..y.froa adjacen~ p~~i.. and ~. public
rigbt-of-WaY. .
HECHAHICAL IQUIPIIIHT:
.
a. Air conditioniftll and vent duct. aball b. directed away from
any adjac~ r.aid.ntial u.., and all aid.. of the
building .ball b. free of any external vent. aDd -c:banical
.quipment including, but not 11a1t.d to, conduit. and
ducta.
b. All bUlldilllJ-aupport.d ..chanical .quipm.nt (including roof
.quipm.nt, ladder. and air conditioning and v.nt ducts)
shall b. .nclosed within th. building'. prill&ry
archit.ctural .lement.; ind.p.ndent .cr..ning d.vic.. .ball
not b. p.rmitt.d.
c. All qround-supported .quipm.nt auch a. tranafol'ller8 and air
condition.rs shall b. locatad within th. buildilllJ and/or in
Und.rground vault..
<.
d.
All utility ..rvic. box.., connectiona and ..rvic. 1in.s
shall b. paint.d to II&tch the building .xt.rior on which
th.y .r. locat.d.
e. All exi.tinq ov.rh..d utility .ervic.. and wirin9 .ha11 be
reloc.ted underground.
t. All utility .y.t.ms inCluding g.., el.ctric, te1epbone,
wat.r, ....r.nd C.b1. TV aba11 b. provided for
und.rground, with .....ent. provided .. requir.d, and
d.sivn.d and con.tructed in .ccordanc. with City Cod.. and
th. utilU:y provid.r. T.l.pbon., cabl. '1'V and/or .ecurity
.~.t... .ball b. pre-wired in the structur...
COIIFli.nc. with all r.cOllll.nd.tion. of th. G.ology Report aha11
b. required (if .pplicable).
Grading and raveq.tation .ball be .ta_ .. required by the City
Engin..r in ord.r to reduce the UIOunt of bare .011 exposed to
pr.cipitation. .
Dudftll cona~ion, ~. Ci~ Zn91nHr..y require a f.nc.
around all or a portion of the peripbuf of the .ita = .1,.4-1..
wind and debd. dallag. ~o edjacen~ properti... ~ ~ of
r....,
~:;. ..
.....
--
K"
'. t' CITY O~ SA"OBERNARDINO
lcrrANDARD REQUIREMENTS
Oe: CliP 90-07
13
.1I1ft" ~
1":1
1 Q90
AGENDA ITIM
HEARING DATE
PAGE.
,.
~enc:ill9 8ball' H app~ed by 1:be City Bn91nev = a..an
adequa~. p~'.~ .a1~e ..1n~e, clean-up &ftd dua1: con1:~l.
Within 75 fee~ o~ any .1n9le-~..lly re.idenUal db1:Z'ic~, tile
lI&Ximwa hei9b~ o~ &IIi bulld1ll9 .ball no1: excead one .1:ory or 20
tee~ unle.. the CoDb.ion de~eZ'aine. ~1:' due 1:0 unuaual
1:opcl9Z'apbical or other f..~UZ'e., .uch na1:Z'i~ive bei9b~ 18 not
prac~ical.
6. X No Certifica~e of OCCUp&llcy aball be i..ued prior 1:0 coapliance
with ~he.e S~andard bquinaen~. a.. well a. all p~i.iona of
the San Bernardino Municipal Code.
7. ,x SIGNS:'
All ai9fta ahall be in conformance with San Bernardino Municipal
Cede Sec~ion 19.60. Three (3) copi.. ot a plo~ plan and
el.va~ion of ~he 519n drawn to acale .hall be .ubait~ad ~o tile
Plannin9 Department for revlew and approval prior ~o iaauance of
ehe s,19n permi~ fro::! the Buildin9 and Safe~y Departaen1:.
(
Monument-~~~a s19ns shall not be located within the
required .e~ack for tile zonin9 dis~Z'ict in wbich the a19n
is loca~ed. The monument .i9ft ahall be locatad a minimum
c,t 5 te.t trom 1:.". property line. If the aonuaen~ s19n is
located withln the aetback, it- shall not excead an overall
he19ht ct thr.. (3) t.et.
b. All treestsnc1in9 sl9M must have ei9ht (8) teet of
clearance between average 9round level and the bottom of
t~e a19n.
a.
~;..
. .~.
....
-..,
/-,0
-0
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
CASE
AGENDA ITEM .
HEARING DATE
CUP 90-07
13
tJune :), .1~90
14
.
,
POLICE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS
8. X Any display of light should take into account adequate positioning of
fixtures in order that "stray" light does not affect adjoining property
owners.
9. ,.X Open parking lots shall be provided with a minimum maintained one (1)
foot candle of light evenly distributed on the parking surface during
the hours of darkness. Lighting devices shall be protected by weather
and vandalism resistant covers.
,': ......
Applicant(s,
Address
City, State
Zip
MISC:
IS PREPARATION
Jce/9-1-8t
t
,
,
CIT F SAN BERNARD".
Pt..ANNJNG DEPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY
ATTACHMENT E
Initial Study ~or Environmental I.pacts
For CoII.JDMi~,- t.tSE. PERMIT m. 'P-07
Proj ect NWllber
Project description/Location 5/~5 ItAL.U~
~'f o~ Ea1a1:.iat.::l!E. -'E..HA" -""L1"'~ ""~
~ ~T- I~--::=J~T~. ~~~Ar~~~~~M91-'
MiNi -~s. ?'iitlcA1...lT'1'.
Oate ~L I'lJ 1~'.fO
. ~d ~y:
. t ~
. Nue
~~Te 9L...A1\JA. '&::P
Title
City of San Bernardino
Planning Department
300 N. -0- Stre.t
San Bernardino, CA 92418
- .
-...,g - _ 0
CITY OF SAN BE~NARDINO.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST.
A. BACKGROP!IR
Application Number: 7
.
Project Description: 1b ~rr tE/E: ~T1/J'U ex: A
, ." . .
~~.13~;1:~~~ Mlf\JI-51TYJV~ F~1Lrf1f-
Location: 51?15 HALL..MARY -:PA?KltJA.~ J 0fJ TT::I~ 6A5,-
61~ CF ~ MtlYl'" ~V A.T r~1 ~JU"'11'QJ WI:IU
'~r-~aV. ll.c....' --r
Environmental Constraints Areas: ~ UJI~~ ~Ll
.
General Plan Designation: :td-
.
LJGlf-fr 1Nt2US~,q I
Zoning Designation: -t1:J
~~ PPr. APPLJ(' 13P1,-i=
B. ~~B~~~~ Explain answers, where appropriate, on a
separate attached sheet.
1. IJlth Resources Will the proposal result in:
Yes
No
Maybe
a. Earth movement (cut and/or
fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or
more?
x
b. Development and/or grading on
a slope greater than 151
natural grade?
c. Development within the
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies
Zone?
x
x
d. Modification of any unique
geologic or physical feature?
x
REVISED 12/87
PAGE I OF 8
-- ~
_ r-"
1"\.
,.
e. Soil erosion on or off the
project site?
f. Modification of a channel,
creek or river?
.
.
g.
Development
subject
mudslides,
other similar
Other?
within an area
to landslides,
liquefaction or
hazards?
h.
2. . 61B_mQll~: Will the proposal
result illl
Substantial
an effect
quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
a.
air
upon
emissions or
ambient air
c~ Development within a high wind X
hazard area?
3.
!~B___RESOURCES:
proposal result in:
a. Changes in absorption rate.,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface runoff
due to impermeable surfaces?
Will
the
b. Changes in the course or flow
of flood waters?
c. Discharge into surface waters
or any alteration of surface
water quality?
d. Change in the quantity or
quality of ground waters?
e. Exposure of people or property
to flood hazards?
f. other?
'"
REVISED 12187
/1 "/.
o
Yes
Maybe
~
No
><
)(
)(
>(
)(
x
)(
x
><
)(
x
><
~
PAGE 2 OF .
--0
,.
4.
BIOLOGIC6kJli9~~:
proposal result in:
Could the
a.
Change
unique,
species
habitat
trees?
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of plants or their
including stands of
b.
Change
unique,
species
habitat?
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of animals or their
c.
Other?
5. NOISE: Could the proposal result
in:
6.
\...
a. Increases in existing noise
levels?
b. Exposure of people to exterior
noise levels over 65 dB or
interior noise levels over 45
dB?
c. Other?
LAml_-llH:
result in:
Will the proposal
-('"")
.
Yes
No
x
x
)(
x
x
X
)(
x
x
)(
X
Maybe
"""'Ill
a. A change in the land use as
designated on the General
Plan?
b. Development within an Airport
District?
c. Development within wGreenbeltW
Zori. A,B, or C?
d. Development within a high fir.
hazard zone?
e. Other?
....
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 3 OF 8
. .
. .
IlIo...
...
r
....
""'I""
7.
W111
the
MAN-~E HAj~JlPj;:
project:
a. Ose, store, transport or
dispose of hazardous or toxic
materials (including but not
limited to oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)?
b. Involve the release
hazardous substances?
of
c. Expose people to the potential
health/safety hazards?
d. Other?
8. BQY~: Will the proposal:
a. Remove existing housing or
create a demand for additional
housing?
b. Other?
9. 1Mlf~l'OR'l'ATIO~~ATION: Could
the proposal result in:
a. An increase in traffic that" is
greater than the land use
designated on the General
Plan?
b. Ose of existing, or demand for
new, parking facilities/
structures?
c. Impact upon existing public
transpolt~tion systems?
d. Alteration of present patterns
of circulation?
e. Impact to rail or air traffic?
f. Increased safety hazards to
vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
REVISED 10/87
o
Ye.
Maybe
"""lIlt
No
x
x
x.
X
x
x..
)(
x
x
x
X
x
~
PAGE 4 OF 8
-..0
.. ~
.
Yes
Maybe
""'lIl
r-
g. A disjointed pattern of
roadway ~mprovements?
h. Other? ItJ~~ CtPl'1U Lt"TT()0
ON -:>1T5-
10. r~C SERVICES Will the proposal
impact the following beyond the
capability to provide adequate
levels of service?
a. Pire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools (i.e. attendance,
boundaries, overload, etc.)?
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e. Medical aid?
f. Solid waste?
g.. Other?
11. Y]1LITIES: Will the proposal:
a. Impact the following beyond
the capability to provide
adequate levels of service or
require the construction of
new facilities?
1. Natural gas?
2. Electricity?
3. Water?
4. Sewer?
5. Other?
b. Result in a disjointed
pattern of utility
extensions?
c.
Require the construction of
new facilities?
....
REVISED 10/87
~
.^
'No
X'
x
X
x
)(
K
X
)(
x
X
)(
)(
>(
)(
><.
-
>(
~
PAGE 5 OF 8
. .
o
,
12. AESTRETI~I
a. Could the proposal result in
the obstruction of any scenic
view?
13.
b. Will the visual impact of the
project be detrimental to the
surrounding area?
c. Other?
~P~1~~--F~9URCES:
proposal result inl
a. The alteration or destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
Could the
b.
Adverse
impacts
historic
object?
c. Other?
physical or aesthetic
to a prehistoric or
site, structure or
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance
(Section 15065)
...
REVISED 10/87
/-
;:-
The California Environmental
Quality Act states that if any of
the following . Can be answered yes
or maybe, the project may have a
significant effect on the
environment and an Environmental
Impact Report shall be prepared.
a.
Does the project have the
potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining level.,
threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate
o
Yes
Maybe
x
x
x
><
X
No
..,
x
~
PAGE 8 OF8
--0
.
Yes
No
Maybe
important example. of the
major periods of California
hi.tory or prehi.tory?
b. Does the project have the
potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact
on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts
will endure well into the
future. )
K
)(
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually
limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may
impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on
each re.ource is relatively
small, but where the effect of
the total of those impacts on
the environment is
significant.)
d. Does the project have
environmental effect. which
will cause .ub.tantial adverse
effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
)(
x
C. DISCOSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES
(Attach sheets as nec....ry.)
jZc.f TIle.. ~--'.J "PPr1::If=;rr ~ I cr."o!_'.J 1,0 A.
.u.,~ . ,
!I,Il:IIH W(IUD AP.E:A. '"DEV~ nPI'IIlEE/t..lr W/'TJ.hIl.) 1ltr:5
.
.l1~"", ~U~ l'~J::l"1FW\ \AjI'Tl; ~~n J.11'M~1Ja\.}
~~r=..:;.. ~~\UFz.~~ B~i ro;ItJA-.
~~~~~~ ~II
1l3uc.r~ ANJ:2..1JZA,', ~~ Of~~14 "DR~.
'. .
=-
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 7 OF 8
. .
.0
Project Numt: 0
Date
c. Discus. ion of Environmental Evaluation and Miti9ation
. .
Measures (conUned) ~EE"P ~ ~\Vl::. A~~
oe:(W~ -ewl,-Oif.J("....~" e.'i AND 110 It..
fflEe ~ '.~ lAAII.:'6P6 ~ ~CF:::.S.
-
I
.
llz..oj11-tE. Vi"5UA1 /fv'lPAC..IT COllJ n ~
.
.
p~ml yY)~1 Ib THe: ~UJ\J12..lM:q.
APlE"A iF me. ~ CF -reF.- -=F'A~
:E ~~=~~~~ ADF;~ It-
is VI
I ~
.
'1:jAiT.u=u=' ~~ ~ L..AtvDGc:.APJ~
. .
jt.t:J 11~ TO ~ M\1'l(,"'5I~"'1Be.
~~u. ^ I \Y\"\tp~,. ;.r- CF' 1EE ~.....v=:
~ "'1"P.A1rY~.
,
"
/'. .
::/
-
,
--.Q
.~
.
"'"
D. DE'l'ERMIBM'l211
On the basi. of this initial study,
~The propo.ed project COULD NOT have a significant effect
L:J environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will. be prepared.
The proposed project could have a significant effect on the
O environment, although there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described above have
been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
on the
D The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY or SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
~
00fAJ t1,,"'rt:O'16C-Y . &/,J~dfft. /24A/'Ne-A:.
Name and Title /
~u~.~
Date: ~~ 11-flJ
....
~
REVISED 12/87
PAGE 8 OF 8
"
o
W
!C
c
z
:c
::E
.
I-
:l
o
ATTACHMENT F
e
>-c
wA.
._-------------~~------
z
o
~
Iii
a::
W
I-
VI
z
.
>-
C
..J
lIIeA.
Wa::1II
c)(cS
woo
a::IDIDIII
c..J_W
_.....J
wCwc
a::::1 A. III
E2~2
.
"
"
~
W
,
z':
0"
i='
~J
11:,.
w.
1-.
z'
::I
o
U
" .~.
a:: Z :c
w2 U
I-!C
351-
a:: III
A.
III
~
U
!i~~
WWI-
..J::I~
OIl.ZCl .
Sczl-
~ ..Jcu
:l21D:CW
::I
1-0
11I0
wa::
a:
>-z
!::o
a:-
:l!C
UI-
Will
III
- 0
III
III ~
~1I:1Il
OOC
:...U
g
II.
II:
W
~
C
W
5
Q
W
c
l!l
W
W
Z
III
W
::;
W
:
fll
Z
o
i=
j!
III
lli
IE
::I
B
.
-i
....
~
III
II:w
w>
Z-i
II:w
0:
UIIl
o
III
C
11:11:
OW
...~
wlllU
....w
!!!>w
IIl-iO
III W c.
0:_
II. III >
Z
o
i=
~
fll
>-
~
II:
::I.
U
W
III
...I
o
a:
IE
OQ,
Uw
ww
!cQ
G.
wct
j!:~
a:
~.
><:
Oct
!Deft
~
\j
c
~
~
~
I
~
~
III
~
o
:
Z
o
~
II:
W
IE
ii!
II.
- o ATTACHMENT H .-- 0
. .
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CASE CUP 90-07
AGEN,)A
ITEM #
13
LOCATION
HEARING OATE Jun~ 5. 1990
~
J:.-
. ..
~
"
"
\'
\'
\\
\.
\'
\'
"
.
. ~ Or~
,
~ .
. .
---1L ,. 0
",.~. .~. .
, "':, ","" '. ..,
- .
.,- ~....
'.f~ .~
\~ J~
~~ 1--
I !'t
..
_i
ATTACHMENTG
o
'--..
",
i
i~
.
,/ ~
.-
;
.
-..
".
f
~
~
--_ 4.
ig ~~' 15~4
4~
"7
10;
,'" I
:SJO,O;S'
r: ",
.
...
O.
~ I".
Ii tj
..
l; ..... -I!
~ ~
.. c
J I ~ "
~~ '. ..
, ~
~~ at- .-- -< '"
l - . . '. {.
?" -- " r-
-. ,.
~ ....,
C> -
~ --
-. "
-
. . .,
.
~,
. . .
- ,
~ III III \
1> 0 b'
-'. If" III'
. . . \
III . :t 0
--
6 - -, - ,
.
1\'" "
I ~-........
J'. I ,
'.. - \
--- --
" ,
.' --- ,
,
. -- .
ts' 40' 1.5" <la' zr ",,'- 40'
" "
-
s4.7!' -- \5'4! .
'.
o "
-, ~