The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About58-Planning CITY OF SAN BER~ADINO - REQUEST 90R COUNCIL ACTION 6fjm: .t: Larry E. la!d, Director -'-. ~_... :~ubject: General Plan l\inerldl!ent No. 90-1 to change the land use designation fran RS, RU-1 and CN to CG-1 and RlJ-1 to RS on 22.41 a=es along 5th Street beo..een Flores Street and Herrington Avenue. l-layor and Camon Council ~ting of August 6, 1990, 2:00 p.m. Planning and Building Services July 10, 1990 Date: Synopsis of Previous Council action: '!he l-Iayor and carm:m (buncil directed staff to initiate a general plan anezxment for both sides of 5th Street beo..een Flores Street and Herrington Avenue at their neeting of December 18, 1989. At their neeting of June 5, 1990, the Planning Ccmnission recc:rmended approval of General Plan l\inerldl!ent No. 90-1. Recommended motion: Mopt resolution. e ~v V la!d Signature Contact person: Larry E. la!d/Valerie C. Ross Supporting data attached: Staff Report Phone: 384-5057 Ward: 1 . FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct, No,) (Acct, DescriPtion) Finance: ~Cil Notes: _~9' CITY OF SAN BER""DINO - REQUEST Rm COUNCIL ACTION o STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment No. 90-1 Mayor and Common Council Meeting of August 6, 1990 REOUEST This is a city initiated amendment to change the land use designation from RS, Residential Suburban, RU-l, Residential Urban and CN, Commercial Neighborhood to CG-l, Commercial General and from RU-l, Residential Urban to RS, Residential suburban on a total of 22.41 acres as shown on Exhibit A of the Initial Study, attached. Site is located along both sides of 5th Street between Flores Street and Herrington Avenue excluding Nunez Park and the omnitrans facility. BACKGROUND e The site was designated RU-l Residential Urban and CN, Commercial Neighborhood on June 2, 1989 with adoption of the General Plan. The land uses are a mix of commercial, residential, churches and vacant land. Exhibits Band C of the Initial Study show the existing General Plan designations and existing land uses respectively. ENVIRONMENTAL The Environmental Review Committee reviewed the Initial Study prepared for the proposed amendment and recommended a Negative Declaration. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION The proposed amendment was considered by the Planning commission at a noticed public hearing on May 22, 1990. As a result of citizen concerns about the proposed amendment, the item was continued. A community meeting was held on May 29, 1990 to address these concerns. At their meeting of June 5, 1990, the Planning Commission recommended adoption of the Negative Declaration and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 90-1. MAYOR AND COUNCIL OPTIONS 1. The Mayor and Council may adopt the Negative Declaration and approve General Plan Amendment No. 90-1 based on the findings on the resolution. e 2. The Mayor and Council may deny General Plan Amendment No. 90-1. 75.0264 o e e . o General Plan Amendment No. 90-1, Mayor and Council Meeting of August 1, 1990 July 10, 1990 Page 2 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Mayor and Common Council adopt the resolution copy attached as Attachment 2, which adopts the Negative Declaration and approves General Plan Amendment No. 90-1. Prepared by: John R. Burke, Assistant Planner for Larry E. Reed, Director Department of Planning and Building Services Attachment: 1: Memo to Planning Commission, June 5, 1990 Staff Report to Planning Commission, May 22, 1990 Attachment A: Initial study Exhibit A: Proposed Amendment Exhibit B: Existing Land Use Designations Exhibit C: Current Land Uses Attachment B: Proposed Amendment Attachment C: Location Map Attachment 2: Resolution Attachment A-1 to A-6: Location Map Attachment B-1 to B-12: Legal Descriptions ke/6/26/90 M&CCAGENDA GPANO.90-1 , CITY OF SAN IlERNlUlDINO ~ ~. . eX) - , ): ~< .~ PIAN ~lT 00.-1, C 0 I co !:2 e ~ CO 0 U ,. n l '- .. ~ 'l!<( .. ~~ " .. -"Cll ~ ilfl .. ..0 .- ....... ..- CllG::_ ..... liSS ~/ .. .. ... "0 .. II) .. .. I:l "0 B~el <l:Cll en"".... ~ @ (!! r e @ Gi I(!) , en , I I I -,.. I 'C ~<9. , -- ~-1 J.3~J.5 CQ \l'N3OlMl-~--' It I - I . 1 "',.- .. ..2$" I o i ii I . . , ( . ~ @ @ I @ @ ~ @ @ . , - i.::/ , I , I , .. '" .. 0 .. !! .. ! < .. .. .. .. , .. ~ 0 < ;; .S .. I '" .. II) .. .. .. .. 1:J .. I ~ l:l ~ ''0' ~ I ~ e (!) e E , ;I ~ ~ II) e co CQ . I ( 6 ~@ 0 @ , c (f) ": (5 ---~-J.33!I.L5 CQ 531101,4- ~ ---I C cq ;. ,.. . 0, I ( ! :I . 1 ~ 1 I -----------.. U 1 ~ 8 e (!) Gi @ e B @ 1 :!@ , ~ 1 ------------. .. '" ~ OJ 0 .. !! .. 1 .. '" .. .. .. .. '" , If , ~@ 0'. , - @ \I Ii) " ~ ~. Ii 'm .... ~ -'~ .~, ,,,-9(-"1 d':'W , .i \:;.I .Ii. -: ff)~ -~ iJ -L__ '!L'Itl- A...u!:J OIlltJWHIIH ~_ .,: III I -- tit ~ o o z : A-1 e OJ o I CO ~ ~ i3 i~ ..<t E~ GO COlt:_ c:..8 o 0.- Ul""~ .2 ~ ... 0 e c: ... Ql 1tI S ~ CID CI) ,.. 1Ij 0 ~ '5 ~ ~ .f e . . . ~ - - ' . CI'lY OF S1\NBERNARDmQ . .... .~~ PIAN J\MENIHNl' NO. 9'0-1, CN ) (g) " t.l33ILLS . .. ,~ @ @ @ C1J ' - o. . - ~ @ , ~ I L vNmrvu t .J.33lJl S ~ 1.LO:JSnt'v ~ . '" 0- W W ll: 0- <n '--, . -- ~ m; ~€ c--------..-- m______________ o - J: ... >< iii '.... CID ~ ~f> ..... "'~ ." ;.-- i <n E on -- A-2 ;:;:....- I!!'~ . . :lo '>i~. I w'::::' IG:o., ~ ClI o 8-& ~&f ."'co ~~ ::~ :0 <(co 'Q .... <Il '" iii ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ .. <l: . " ~ @ - ... , _ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~rn " . 0 ~ PLAN MlEMt-lEW NO. 90-1, " - J .' I I I I L- Cll ~ ~ II) 3rw31f1f~ ~ SOIa8OII - , ~ , --, e ,~ "I' ,- "" , ... , ... , 1:> ... e 0 e e G e @ ~ , ~ 0' 13 \ -< IS) IS) e @ Cl.., 1e ig ll.- e~ .. -.. co ;CBl 0"' c!~_ ....c :.. ( 0:..0 @ lID @ @ @ (;) @ "0 Jlt2~ .. 0 q co' ,:@ I I -3rw31f1f N~31S3iM--~ ._-: _H- I I c I I I - I I I III 16 I I I I ' ~ ~ e e e E. ~ f;=;. '! ~1<ID @ I ~ ' ~ ~ I I ' . C .. '" .. '" .. 2 lID I.. . .. .. .. .. .. .. . ,,,. - I - ., .. . '" I 0 .. '" .. '" .. .. ID I .. ~ c: ,- "tl I .. - ~ I@ ~ ~ ~ "" (gJ I 0 , - (~ \..'" ~ - ~ E e CI) lD C\l . c: ~ ~ ~ ~ 1--- I - 3fW3l1tt ~e>, V~3WV:>- ~ , .--, iii ~ ..- ~ ~ u .- ~ e 0 Gl e e e e (g) @, ~ ..- .. .. '" .. 2 !! !:: .. .. ,.. .. .. .. &. I . -- t , .. '" .. .. .. .. .. ! . , ~r:. @ @ c; ~ ~ @ ~ ~ ,- I '".". , , I :--, -3fIN3I1V vNOI'Itt~-'1 u_: I I I . . I I --'- l 'N Ie 6> (!) e (!) ~ I :!.> \ - ~ ::; ~ ,~ "" ~ @ ~ @ VNmI'ttll " A-3 e E '" I .- )....~ -a1:. .. 3flN311tt .--' e - - , Q) ~ ~ o g~ '- .. ""1: JI_ c:..2 ~.21::: .~ 'b ~ a c: e ~ CD Q3 ~ ~ " aI a ~ .c: 0 ~ -.: If o - --.: - CITY OF Sl\N BERNARDINO _ ~,"",T , GEt" PIAN NmDlENT NO. 90-1, ~V>.T -.J I ~~ -~-_3flN3Al;' I @ I II -+- I . I L N0MI3A :1.11 ; -~- I ,- I......... .'W''' ~ ~ '111 I ~ - ""'-.-3nN3Al;'-- I . .. 1.,,'" .. 6i 101 01 ., , I 1'1 ....."'i.. .c I~I - IVI co ,I I .t l . ~~fr:rw3Al;'~ .- l- I:! ~ e @ III I .'~- PI- ,- ~ ;mN3Al;' I . @ @ <ID e~ ..... .-~ 1 I , 1 I e 1 01. . J ',:9 e Gl @'t I- loJ ~ III @ @ .. .. ~. '" h" 1,..1 - - . ... "~Ollo I - <- @ @ I ~ I I ~ I, ,'r:t/ . I NO.L9NIW3H -~--- . . I '" ... .. 10 .. "8 ~ @ ~ e 1@ , t;\ . 't-'=' ~ . I ,; -.,..- I .- .. e · . i III 1 - __'_1 ~ " -+-- .~ .. ~ @ .. ... @ I ----i I " fD.....O' ........ E on , ,1"" ',SClII~_ ~ .J I I (g) A-4 ~~iD k~'" ~ 'iil~ . . . E -< -c Q.. .g CIl~ c: f1 .'" co ~ ;S"l~ ..-0 .. It .... .. 0 C .. 0 t: <tQ)1I' . 'So! ... ~ cai:: .. .~ :~ ..", gcr. :cr. .... .. c <[.c . E . " _z ~ @ .. ~ , OIl Gl . (\. O)CElrr: ;t):Ecc 1Ii"'-' . . III :!~~ CCC .2.2 .2 .;.!! .~ ~.!:~ .c~.c: " " " (l)CI)lr. ~.~ .- c: "- .._ e Q.'l! .., Ell'" e...8. Q .S; 1:1 .. Q c: e ~ co a ~ (1) CI:i Q ~ .c: u c: ~ '" ~ ".:- ~ N. -1 -- I co ~ _..._1 , .".,., e 1 ~ r i3 ... CI) 02 c:.. '6Ol ~II ..- 110 1ZIQ:_ ~~~ I ____I , I I CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ,.. c. PINl AMENDMENr m. 90-1, ~a'l I=i a'~:; "'= !lI ~ @ @ (..... ----~----. ~ , .t\t ~. -\-~---~- .. .. ,l(! '~ @ _"'4!. , . - ~ . ~ -~ J'~ @ ~ ~ m , ~ . . @ ~ . , e ,... ~ 'l . ~ - . . @- - ~ ", --\------~ , @ ( . €I , .. @ \1\1." I- < @' . . \, ~ ov ~ . -= ~.N \ , ~. ~ , r.. . r.: $ l . '.' .. @ .- . ,'-. ... ~ ... III I- m ... III Ie "" ~ t\j ~~ ..- .. G- ... ... Ol( l..~ \0 t\j , . , . <: , . :i c ~ 3flN3111f . . . u_ __--,-- _~_ I , ~/ ---I !--- ~ , @ @ :: @ If~3118 If~ ~ @ ~ ,~ , ~ , . , , \ It) C\I . , . @i'",p~ @~ I/. -t.. .... f ,;:, '00 ~ ... I ~ . '" , I '" _..~ . @ z , IE , +-- " ---....-- '" ,.._" o~_ ~ '!; \~ Q. ~ ,..; ... ~ '" ~ ,:t .., , '" ~ ! III .. . I C\I . (~ e . --_. ~ 0; II " I ~ ! ... ~ .c \'" ~ r_ - , fi .... .. A~5 I ~ ~ .. .-- J I H ! 3f'IN3111f .~- .-:.. ~ ~ 0 " ... en ~ . " CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ,;; - ~ PIAN ~ NO. 90-1, LCCATIOO ... . ~ ctl L ~ e .J @) @ ~ i3 00 \ .3IlN3/111 -. -NONlI3/1 :U' -: Q. .5 ~ ----l I ' T- i iOl ."'1" .- .11> _.! I J .. ctlli!_ l- I I- 0 ~ ... II> i I co "..g It! t:l .. clil~r<; r;;\ @ ~ i~ ~ . !@ cg; co ~ , ... @ ~ II> CIl CIl Ol' I I '" CIl - I ... .. . .reo .. I ~ @ " ~ / ~. ~ .~ @ = ... @ (i' @ .. .. " . .-..,.,. eo ~; COO' ... ~ . .. .. , . ~ co ~ @ .. . @ .. ~. .. . ----....i.--. ___ ' ; Q ,~-, .~I- c:: . ~. (fi . ... ~I ; ~ '6 .. .. . , . c ~ Q .. @ @ '" eo @ t OJ .. . e CXl 0\ @ ~ on t~: . C\J . ~ c:: C\J @ @ ~ ~ @ ... . ~ .. . .8 ~ <ID .. (}l . .. , U c:: ~ ~ e .. .. ~ e 0 ~ . . a:. i- -- -, I . 8 @ , D~, ,#--, 1 @ @ / @ , ~ " .. , .-vr-' e '.. " . cil ~. I : t\I # '..,. , ~ I @ : e @ I (i;' , I .. ~ @ ~ f! . . e . III @ ~ I I ."~. ! ~ .: ;; '" 8 riOI . - 1& 1 ... , r .,...~,. , -.-- Ii;- ,'-""''' , e ..., I --:'- ~~::! ~ .t\I~ A-6 PARCEL NUMBER e8-092-04 138-092-05 138-092-06 138-092-07 138-092-20 138-092-22 e 138-101-11 138-101-12 138-101-14 138-101-22 138-101-23 e I.. I I ur ;'''1' l)t.Kr'AKUil~U 0 GENERAL4IIrN AMENDMENT NO. 90-1, RU-l TO -1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION W 2.57 FT E 102.57 S 50 FI' LOT 8 BLK 23 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY COM 580 FI' S OF NE COR LOT 8 BLK 23 TH W 100 FT TH S 56 FI' MIL TO S LI SD LOT 'I1I E 100 FI' 'I1I N TO POB RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY S 50 FI' N 580 FI' E 100 FI' LOT 8 BLK 23 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY S 50 FT N 530 FT E 100 FI' LOT 8 BLK 23 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY W 2.57 FT E 102.57 FI' N 150 FI' S 200 FI' LOT 8 BLK 23 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY S 150 FI' LOT 8 BLK 23 EX E 102.57 FI' THEREOF AND EX ANY PTN LYING WITHIN MUSCOTT STREET RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY E 55 FI' W 280 FT S 150 FI' LOT 7 BLK 23 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY E 41 FI' W 225 FI' S 150 FI' LOT 7 BU 23 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY . E 48 FI' W 88 FI' S 150 FI' LOT 7 BLK 23 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY E 48 FI' W 136 FI' S 150 FI' LOT 7 BLK 23 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY E 48 FI' W 184 FI' S 150 FI' LOT 7 BLK 23 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY B-1 PARCEL NUMBER _CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GENERAL N AMENDMENT NO.90-l, RU-l LEGAL DESCRIPTION o to CG-l _8-102-12 138-102-33 LOT 16 BLOCK 1 TRACT 1759 RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 23, RECO~DS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 15 BLOCK 1 TRACT 1759 RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 23, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 14 BLOCK 1 TRACT 1759 RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 23, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PARCEL 1 PARCEL MAP 1688 RECORDED IN BOOK 14 OF PARCEL MAPS PAGE 7, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PARCEL 2 PARCEL MAP 1688 RECORDED IN BOOK 14 OF PARCEL MAPS PAGE 7, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY PARCEL 3 PARCEL MAP 1688 RECORDED IN BOOK 14 OF PARCEL MAPS PAGE 7, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-102-13 138-102-14 138-102-32 138-102-34 tj8-l03-13 LOT 16 BLOCK 2 TRACT 1759 RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 23, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-103-14 LOT 15 BLOCK 2 TRACT 1759 RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS .PAGE 23, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-103-15 LOT 14 BLOCK 2 TRACT 1759 RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 23, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-103-16 LOT" 13 BLOCK 2 TRACT 1759 RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 23, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY . 138-103-17 LOT 12 BLOCK 2 TRACT 1759 RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 23, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-103-18 LOT 11 BLOCK 2 TRACT 1759 RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 23, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-104-15 W 50.64 IT E 59,39 IT N 50 IT S 131.87 IT LOT 4 BLK 23 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY W 50.64 IT E 59.39 IT S 81.87 IT LOT 4 BLK 23 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-104-14 e B-2 - PARCEL NUMBER ~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO c:. GENERAl'PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-1, RU-l TO CG-l LEGAL DESCRIPTION e 138-104-16 138-104-17 W 25 FT E 84.39 IT S 131.87 IT LOT 4 BLK 23 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY W 37.5 IT E 121.89 IT S 131.87 FT LOT 4 BLK 23 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY E 31.5 IT W 227.5 IT S 131.87 LOT 4 BLK 23 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-104-18 138-104-19 E 12 IT W 196 FT S 131. 87 IT LOT 4 BLK 23 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-104-20 E 44 FT W 184 IT S 131.87 FT LOT 4 BLK 23 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY E 50 IT W 140 IT S 131. 87 IT LOT 4 BLK 23 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY E 50 IT W 90 IT S 81.87 FT LOT 4 BLK 23 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-104-21 _38-104-22 138-104-23 E 50 FT W 90 IT N 50 IT S 131.87 IT LOT 4 BLK 23 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-111-42 LOT 1 AND 2 TOMPKINS SUB NO 3 RECORDED IN BOOK 20 OF MAPS PAGE 14. RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 3 TO 8 INCL TOMPKINS SUB NO 3 RECORDED IN BOOK 20 OF MAPS PAGE 14, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 34 THRU 38 EX E 1 IT FOR ST TO~lPKINS SUB NO 3 AND RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO S 276.6 IT E 157.5 IT LOT 3 BLK 23 RECORDED IN BOOK 20 OF MAPS PAGE 14, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-111-43 138-111-49 138-113-07 LOT 12 BLOCK 2 PADDOCK SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 16 OF MAPS PAGE 32, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY e B-3 PARCEL NUMBER C~OF SAN BERNARDINO - <:) GENERA~AN AMENDMENT NO. 90-1, RU~1 TO CG-l LEGAL DESCRIPTION -'38-113-08 138-113-09 LOT 11 BLOCK 2 PADDOCK SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 16 OF MAPS PAGE 32, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 10 BLOCK 2 PADDOCK SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 16 OF MAPS PAGE 32, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 9 BLOCK 2 PADDOCK SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 16 OF MAPS PAGE 32, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 8 BLOCK 2 PADDOCK SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 16 OF MAPS PAGE 32, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 7 BLOCK 2 PADDOCK SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 16 OF MAPS PAGE 32, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-113-10 138-113-11 138-113-12 138-171-01 LOT 12 TRACT 1802 BROOKS SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 18, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-171-02 LOT 11 TRACT 1802 BROOKS SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 18, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-171-03 LOT 10 TRACT 1802 BROOKS SUB e RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 18, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-171-04 LOT 9 TRACT 1802 BROOKS SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 18, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-171-05 LOT 8 TRACT 1802 BROOKS SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 18, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-171-06 W 1/2 LOT 7 TRACT 1802 BROOKS SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 18, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-171-07 E 1/2 LOT 7 TRACT 1802 BROOKS SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 18, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-171-08 LOT 6 TRACT 1802 BROOKS SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 18, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-171-09 LOT 5 TRACT 1802 BROOKS SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 18, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-171-10 LOT 4 TRACT 1802 BROOKS SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 18, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-171-11 LOT 3 TRACT 1802 BROOKS SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 18, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY e B-4 PARCEL NUMBER C~ OF SAN BERNARDINO <:) GENERAdllLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-1, RU-l TO CG-1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION _38-171-12 138-171-13 LOT 2 TRACT 1802 BROOKS SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 18, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 1 TRACT 1802 BROOKS SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 18, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 5 AC SURVEY BLK 24 N 100 FT E 100 FT LOT 25 BLK 24 EX E 20 FT ST RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY N 65 FT LOT 25 EX N 45 FT THEREOF TRACT 1802 BROOKS SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 18, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY N 45 FT LOT 25 TRACT 1802 BROOKS SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 26 OF MAPS PAGE 18, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-171-14 138-171-36 138-171-37 e e B-5 PARCEL NlJMBER \",1 I I ur .:H"\U O~r\I"I"'\r\U.l.llU GENER~LAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-1, RU-1 <:)CG-1 ~ESCRIPl'ICN _ 38-173-01 N 130 PT E 54 PT W 84 PT wr 26 BWCK 24 RANCH) SAN BERNARDIOO, ~ IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, mDJRllS OF SAN BERNARDIOO 0XlN'lY 138-173-02 N 130 PT E 55.4 PT W 139.4 Fl' wr 26 BWCK 24 RANCH) SAN BERNARDIOO, REX:X::mlED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, REXDRDS OF SAN BERNARDIOO 0XlN'lY 138-173-04 N 140 Fl' E 104.4 Fl' wr 26 BWCK 24 EX THAT PIN OF roLIaoIING DESC PARCEL LYING WITHIN wr 26 <D1 326 Fl' W OF NE <DR wr 27 TH W 60 Fl' TH S 140 Fl' Th E 60 Fl' Th N 140.Fl' 'ro POB RANOiO SAN BERNARDIOO, REXDRDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, mDJRllS OF SAN BERNARDIOO 0XlN'lY 138-173-05 PINS wrs 26 AND 27 BWCK 24 ~ CN N LI wr 27 326 Fl' W OF NE <DR SO wr TH S 140 Fl' TH W 60 Fl' TH N 140 Fl' TH E 60 Fl' 'ro POB RANCHO SAN BERNARDIOO, REmRDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, mDJRllS OF SAN BERNARDIOO 0XlN'lY 138-173-06 W 28.2 Fl' E 326 Fl' N 140 Fl' wr 27 BWCK 24 RANCHO SAN BERNARDIOO, REXDRDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, mDJRllS OF SAN BERNARDIOO 0XlN'lY 138-173-07 e 138-173-08 ~ AT PT 271 Fl' W OF NE <DR wr 27 BWCK 24 TH S 140 Fl' TH W 26.8 Fl'TH N 140 Fl'TH E 26.8 Fl' RANCH) SAN BERNARDIOO, Ri:a>1<uID IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, REXDRDS OF SAN BERNARDIOO 0XlN'lY PIN wr 27 BWCK 24 <D1 AT PT 226 Fl' W OF NE <DR SO wr TH S 140 Fl' W 45 Fl' N 140 Fl' E 45 Fl' RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, REXDRDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, mDJRllS OF SAN BERNARDINO 0XlN'lY 138-173-09 <D1 176 Fl' W OF NE <DR wr 27 BWCK 24 TH S 140 Fl' TH W 50 Fl'TH N 140 Fl'TH E 50 Fl' RANCH) SAN BERNARDIOO, IuiXDf<uID IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, mDJRllS OF SAN BERNARDINO 0XlN'lY 138-173-10 ~ 125 Fl' W OF NE CXlR wr 27 BWCK 24 TH S 140 Fl' W 50 Fl' N 140 Fl' E 50 Fl' RANCH) SAN BERNARDIOO, l<I:U..ll<lJ&I IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, mDJRllS OF SAN BERNARDIOO 0XlN'lY 138-173-11 ~ 75 Fl' W OF NE CXlR wr 27 BWCK 24 TH S 140 Fl' W 50 Fl' N 140 Fl' E 50 Fl' 'ro POB RANCH) SAN BERNARDIOO, Iu:m<u.w IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, REXDRDS OF SAN BERNARDIOO 0XlN'lY <D1 25 Fl' W OF NE <DR wr 27 BWCK 24 TH W 50 PT TH S 140 Fl'TH E 50 Fl' TH N 140 Fl' RANCHO SAN BERNARDIOO, I<Ea>lWED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, REXXlIDS OF SAN BERNARDIOO 0XlN'lY 138-173-12 e 6-6 PARCEL NtlMBER 1..11 Y VI- :>IIN tstKNIIKU1NV ~GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90<:) RU-l TO CG-l ~Pl'ICN _8-173-13 E 25 f'1' N 140 f'1' Im 27 BUCK 24 RANCID SAN SERNARDn<<:l, RtuJ1<IJJ:1J IN B:X)K 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, IW:XA<OO OF SAN BERNARDn<<:l CXXJNl'Y 1 38-173-32 CXl1 175 f'1' W OF NE CXR Im 27 BUCK 24 'm S 140 f'1' 'm W 1 f'1' 'm N 140 f'1' 'm E 1 f'1' 'lO FOB RANCID SAN BERNARDn<<:l, ~ IN BJOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, R!X:X:lROO OF SAN BERNARDn<<:l CXXJNl'Y PIN Im 26 BUCK 24 CXl1 AT A PT 158.8 f'1' W OF NE CXR SD Im 'm W 50 f'1' TH S 208.8 f'1' 'm E 50 f'1' 'm N 208.8 f'1' 'lO FOB RANQK) SAN BERNARDn<<:l, REO:llIDED IN BJOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, ~ OF SAN BERNARDn<<:l CXXJNl'Y W 54.4 Fl' E 158.8 Fl' N 208.8 Fl' Im 26 BUCK 24 RANQK) SAN BERNARDINO, REO:llIDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, ~ OF SAN BERNARDINO CXXJNl'Y 138-173-30 138-173-31 138-173-35 PIN Im 26 BUCK 24 CXl1 CN E LI CABRERA AVE 109.47 Fl' N OF N LI KINGlAN ST 'm N 40 Fl' TH E 109.4 Fl' TH S 37 Fl' TH SWLY IN A STRAIGIf1' LI 'lO FOB RANCHO SAN BERNARDn<<:l, RECORDED IN BCa< 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, R!X:X:lROO OF SAN BERNARDINO CXXJNl'Y I>> e B-7 PARCEL NUMBER ~ilY Ur ~AN btKNAKDiNU 0 GE~~ENT NO.90-I, RU-1 T -1 _38-181-01 W 50 Fl' N 140 Fl' rm 28 BUlCK 24 Rl\NCH) SAN BERNARDIOO, ~ IN HX)K 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, ~ OF SAN BERNARDINO CCXlNTY 138-181-02 E 24 Fl' W 74 Fl' N 140 FT rm 28 BUlCK 24 Rl\NCH) SAN BERNARDINO, ~ IN HX)K 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, ~ OF SAN BERNARDINO CCXlNTY E 24 Fl' W 98 Fl' N 140 Fl' rm 28 BUlCK 24 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, IW:Uww IN HX)K 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, Rro:m>s OF SAN BERNARDINO CCXlNTY W 50 Fl' E 250 Fl' N 140 Fl' rm 28 BUlCK 24 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, REXXlRDED IN HX)K 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, Rro:m>s OF SAN BERNARDINO CCXlNTY 138-181-03 138-181-04 138-181-05 W 50 Fl' E 200 Fl' N 140 FT rm 28 BUlCK 24 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, REXXlRCIED IN EOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, Rro:m>s OF SAN BERNARDINO CCXlNTY 138-181-06 W 50 Fl' E 150 Fl' N 140 Fl' rm 28 BUlCK 24 RANCHO SAN BERNARDIOO, ~ IN HX)K 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, Rro:m>s OF SAN BERNARDIOO CCXlNTY 138-181-07 _ W 50 Fl' E 100 Fl' N 140 Fl' rm 28 BUlCK 24 RANCHO SAN BERNARDIOO, REXXlRDED IN EOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, REXDRDS OF SAN BERNARDINO CCXlNTY 138-181-08 E 50 Fl' N 140 Fl' rm 28 BUlCK 24 Rl\NCH) SAN BERNARDIOO, !WXltww IN EOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, REXDRDS OF SAN BERNARDIOO CCXlNTY 138-181-09 rm 17, SANTA FE TRACl', I<tXl.It<uID IN HX)K 15 OF MAPS PAGE 49, Rro:m>s OF SAN BERNARDIOO CCXlNTY 138-181-10 rm 16, SANTA FE TRACl', REXXlRDED IN EOOK 15 OF MAPS PAGE 49, REXDRDS OF SAN BERNARDIOO CCXlNTY 138-181-11 rm 1 5, SANTA FE TRACl', l<tOJJ<uID IN HX)K 15 OF MAPS PAGE4!l, REXDRDS OF SAN BERNARDIOO CCXlNTY 138-181-12 rm 14, SANTA FE TRACl', REXXlRDED IN HX)K 15 OF MAPS PAGE 49, Rro:m>s OF SAN BERNARDIOO CCXlNTY 138-181-13 W 22 Fl' OF rm 12 AND ALL 13, SANTA FE TRACl', REXXlIDID IN HX)K 15 OF MAPS PAGE 49, Rro:m>s OF SAN BERNARDIOO CCXlNTY 138-181-14 W 11 Fl' rm AND E 28 Fl' rm 12, SANTA FE TRACl', !WXltww IN HX)K 15 OF MAPS PAGE 49, RI:iD1<1.6 OF SAN BERNARDINO CCXlNTY -- B-8 PARCEL NUMBER CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ GENERA~AN AMENDMENT NO. 90-1, RU-l ~G-l ~~OO . 88-181-15 E 39 FT 1m 11, SANTA FE TRACl', ~ IN BOOK 15 OF MAPS PAGE 49, REXDlt\S OF SAN BERNARDINO a:xJN'lY 138-181-16 1m 10, SANTA FE TRACl', REXXlRDED IN BOOK 15 OF MAPS PAGE 49, REXDlt\S OF SAN BERNARDINO a:xJN'lY 138-181-17 1m 9, SANTA FE TRACl', 1UOCX>J:uJID IN BOOK 15 OF MAPS PAGE 49, REXDlt\S OF SAN BERNARDINO a:xJN'lY 138-181-18 1m 8, SANTA FE TRACl', REXXlRDED IN BOOK 15 OF MAPS PAGE 49, REXDlt\S OF SAN BERNARDINO a:xJN'lY 138-181-19 1m 7, SANTA FE TRACl', REXXlRDED IN BOOK 15 OF MAPS PAGE 49, REXDlt\S OF SAN BERNARDINO a:xJN'lY e e 8-9 PARCEL NUMBER e 138-082-01 138-082-20 138-082-21 138-082-22 138-082-23 138-082-24 138-083-01 138-083-02 0138-083_14 138-083-15 138-092-24. fit CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO 0- GENER~LAN AMENDMENT NO. 90~1, RS TO 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 12 BLOCK B TRACT 2291 RECORDED IN BOOK 33 OF MAPS PAGE 11, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 13 BLOCK B TRACT 1942 RECORDED IN BOOK 28 OF MAPS PAGE 10, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 14 BLOCK B TRACT 1942 RECORDED IN BOOK 28 OF MAPS PAGE 10, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 15 BLOCK B TRACT 1942 RECORDED IN BOOK 28 OF MAPS PAGE 10, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 10 BLOCK B TRACT 2291 RECORDED IN BOOK 33 OF MAPS PAGE 11, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 11 BLOCK B TRACT 2291 RECORDED IN BOOK 33 OF MAPS PAGE 11, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 12 BLOCK B TRACT 1942 RECORDED IN BOOK 28 OF MAPS PAGE 10, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 11 BLOCK B TRACT 1942 RECORDED IN BOOK 28 OF MAPS PAGE 10, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 10 BLOCK B TRACT 1942 RECORDED IN BOOK 28 OF MAPS PAGE 10, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 10 BLOCK B TRACT 1942 RECORDED IN BOOK 28 OF MAPS PAGE 10, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY E 102.57 FT SD LOT EX S 150 FT THEREOF AND EX N 230 FT RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY B-10 PARCEL NUMBER ~jlY Ur SAN BERNARDINO ~ GENERAtlfLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-1, RU-l ~S LEGAL DESCRIPTION ~38-113-01 138-113-02 LOT 6 BLOCK 2 PADDOCK SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 16 OF HAPS PAGE 32, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 5 BLOCK 2 PADDOCK SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 16 OF MAPS PAGE 32, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 4 BLOCK 2 PADDOCK SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 16 OF MAPS PAGE 32, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 3 BLOCK 2 PADDOCK SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 16 OF MAPS PAGE 32, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 2 BLOCK 2 PADDOCK SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 16 OF MAPS PAGE 32, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY LOT 1 BLOCK 2 PADDOCK SUB RECORDED IN BOOK 16 OF MAPS PAGE 32, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY 138-113-03 138-113-04 138-113-05 138-113-06 o 8 8-11 PARCEL NUMBER CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO 0 GENE~AL tlJN AMENDMENT NO. 90-1, CN TO C LEGAL DESCRIPTION o 138-101-10 W 48 IT E 69.3 IT S 150 IT LOT 7 BLK 23 RANCHO SAN BERNARDINO, RECORDED IN BOOK 7 OF MAPS PAGE 2, RECORDS OF SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY e o B-12 e o -- ~City of San Bernardino INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 9005-3327 o TO: Planning Commission FROM: Larry E. Reed, Director of Planning and Building and Safety SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment No. 90-1, 5th Street between Mt. Vernon Avenue and Flores S.treet DATE: June 5, 1990 AGENDA ITEM NO. 3 WARD NO. 1 ------------------------------------------------------------- On Tuesday, May 22, 1990, the Planning Commission continued General Plan Amendment No. 90-1 until Tuesday, June 5, 1990 to give area residents an opportunity to meet with staff to answer questions related to the proposed amendment. A community meeting was held on Tuesday, May 29, 1990 for that purpose. Representatives from Planning, Building and the Redevelopment Agency were in attendance, as was Councilwoman Estrada. Staff gave a brief summary of the proposed amendment and answered questions from the public. The questions dealt with potential changes to existing residential or existing commercial uses with either the RU-1, Residential Urban or CG-1, Commercial General land use designations in place. Also discussed were compatibility issues and the project review process. There were also questions pertaining to possible inclusion of the areas in a redevelopment project area. Although the questions were answered and explained, a few people did not like the CG-1, Commercial General designation and felt that a residential designation should remain in place for a few more years at a minimum. They were concerned that the residences had been there for several years and that they might be inadvertently forced out as a result of a commercial designation. Others felt that a commercial designation was more appropriate since the area would not see new residential development due to its location along a major street. 'ATTACHMENT -1.- J e e o INTEROFFICE MEMO~DUM: General Plan Amendment Vernon Avenue and Flores May 30, 1990 Page 2 o 9005-3327 No. 90-1, street 5th street between Mt. RECOMMENDATION staff recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 90-1 based on the analysis and the findings in the Staff Report dated May 22, Zzr.-k/ Larry E. Reed Director of Planning and Building Services jke o CiTY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT tit SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE WR 6 1Q9n GEm:RAL PLAN AMENI:MI1Nl' NUMBER 90-1 APPLICANT: CITY nUTIATED 1&.1 ~ OWNER: : ! a: " cr 1&.1 a: cr 'Ib change the land use designation fran RS, Residential SUburban, RU-1, Residential Urban and CN, Camercial Neighborhood to 00-1, catmercial General and fran RlJ-1 to RS on a total of 22.41 acres alon; 5th Street between Flores Street and Herrington Avenue. e PROPERTY Subject North SOUth East West EXISTING LAND USE CamI8rcial, Residential, Vacant Residential Residential cc.imercial Camercial ZONING N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A GENERAL PLAN DESI~TION RlJ-1, Residential Utban and CN, Camercial Neighborhood RS, Residential Suburban RS, Residential Suburban 00-1, catmercial General 00-4, catmercial General ('lheIre ) GEOLOGIC / SEISMIC DYES FLOOD HAZARD DYES OZONE A ( SEWERS ClI YES ) HAZARD ZONE CJNO ZONE f]NO OZONE B ONO HIGH FIRE DYES AIRPORT NOISE / DYES REDEVELOPMENT DYES HAZARD ZONE fiI NO CRASH ZONE UlNO PROJECT AREA ~NO ..J o NOT o POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT Z a APPROVAL ~ APPLICABLE EFFECTS 0 WITH MITIGATING - 0 Z(I) MEASURES NO E.I.R. tc CONDITIONS 1&.1" o EXEMPT o E.I.R. REQUIRED BUT NO ...Q 0 DENIAL 2z ...j5 Z- SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS oQ WITH MITIGATING ~:I 0 CONTINUANCE TO a:Z MEASURES (1):1 -- >~ 0 Z [JNO o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS (,) 1&.1 SIGNIFICANT SEE ATTACHED E.R C. 1&.1 EFFE CTS MINUTES a:: .NOY. ".1 RIVI8ID ""LY .... SKY tit - -- CITY OF SA ERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE GPA 90-1 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM b HEARING DATE May 22. 1990 PAGE REOUEST This is a city-initiated General Plan Amendment (GPA) to chanqe the land use desiqnation from RS, Residential Suburban, RU-1, Residential Urban and CH, CObercial Neiqhborhood t~ CG-1, Commercial General and from RU-1 to RS on a total of 22.41 acres of land. Attachment B shows the areas proposed for chanqe. The followinq. is a list of the changes by acreaqe: RS to CG-1 6.37 acres RU-l to CG-1 14.93 acres 'RU-1 to ,'RS . 0.94 acres CN to CG-1 0.17 acres 22.41 acres LOCATION The proposed amendment is located alonq both sides of 5th street between Flores Street and Herrinqton Avenue excludinq Nunez Park and the omnitrans facility (see Attachment "C"). BACKGROUND The previous zoninq of the area was a mix of C-2, Community Commercial, C-3A, Limited General CObercial, T, Transitional, and R-2, Two-Family Residential. Adoption of the General Plan on June 2, 1989 assiqned the residential and commercial desiqnations as shown on Exhibit "B" to the Initial study. Because of the current land use desiqnations, all of the commercial uses are non-conforminq. They are subject to reversion to residential uses after structure vacancy of over 180 days or structural damaqe qreater than 50 percent. Vacant land can only be developed accordinq to the underlyinq residential desiqnation. MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE MUNICIPAL CODE Not Applicable . ' e o CITY OF SAN ERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE GPA 90-1_ OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 6 May ~~, 1990 3 GENERAL PLAN This application is to chanqe the General Plan land use desiqnation. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY ACT (CEOAl STATUS The General ,Plan Amendment is subject to CEQA. The Environmental Review Committee reviewed the application on March 29, 1990 and determined that the proposed amendment would not have an adverse impact on the environment and a Neqative Declaration was recommended. There was a public review period from April 5, 1990 to April 25, 1990 to review the Initial Study and the proposed Neqative Declaration. COMMENTS RECEIVED No comments have been received. ANALYSIS SITE CHARACTERISTICS The amendment site is irreqular in shape, flat and developed. It straddles 5th Street from 200 feet west of the centerline of Mount Vernon Avenue to Nunez Park on the south, and Flores Street on the north excludinq the omnitrans facility. It is made up of mostly commercial and residential uses. LAND USES The site is comprised of a mix of commercial uses, residential uses, vacant land, churches and offices frontinq on 5th street. Approximately 52 percent of the property frontaqes are made up of parcels used for commercial purposes, vacant parcels, and of parcels utilized for parkinq. There is 9 percent used for church properties. About 39 percent is used for residential purposes. The area proposed to chanqe from RU-1 to RS on the south side of Spruce Street north of 5th Street, is comprised of four (4) sinqle-family residences with two (2) undeveloped parcels used as qarden plots. Adoption of the CG-1 alonq 5th Streeet would leave an RU-1 "island" at this location. CG-1 is not appropriate because the parcels do not have frontaqe on or Visibility from 5th Street. The RS desiqnation is consistent with the existinq land use of the surroundinq area to the north. There is no evidence that the area is deterioratinq nor that the use is qoinq to chanqe from the current one. To preclude the spot zoninq of this area, it is proposed to be , d RS 'n lieu of remainin RU-1. --", e o CITY OF SAN RNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE GPA90-1 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE ; The area proposed to change from CN to CG-l is a single 0.17 acre parcel at the northwest corner of 5th street and Ramona Avenue. The CN, Commercial Neighborhood designation was instituted to provide for "... small scale, low-intensity commercial uses which serve and are in pro~imity to resideRtial neighborhoods..." with the commercialization of 5th street, the original need for the CN designation no longer exists and the CG-l designation is consistent with that proposed for the adjacent parcels. The area proposed to change from RB to CG-l is the second parcel north of 5th Street on the east side of Medical Center Drive. Medical Center Drive is a secondary arterial route and as suc~ is not conducive to new single-family residential development. Residential side frictions need to be minimized to insure safe and efficient functioning of arterials (General Plan Policy 6.1.5). The parcel is vacant and consists of approximately 0.9 acres with a tire shop to the south and a school playground to the north. The Omnitrans facility, an industrial operation, is across the street to the west. SURROUNDING AREA The amendment site borders on single-family neighborhoods to the north and to the south. There is an area designated RB, Residential Suburban, south of 5th Street and north of the IL, Industrial Light, designated area fronting on 4th Street. All of the area north of the amendment site-is comprised of single-family residential neighborhoods with the exclusion of the Omnitrans facility and Alessandro School~ both of which are designated PF, Public Facility. The land recently re-designated CG-l, Commercial General from RB, Residential Suburban by General Plan Amendment 89-2 is to the west of the site and land designated CG-4, Commercial General (Theme) is at the east of 5th Street with commercial development fronting on Mount Vernon Avenue. _c c~,,'~'''~~_ e -- o CITY OF SA ERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE GPA 90-1 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 6 Mav 22. 1990 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMITY The CG-1, Commercial General, land use designation is compatible with the majority of uses along 5th Street. The area has been transitioning from residential to c~ercial land uses as a result of the previous zoning~ Approval of this General ,Plan Amendment would bring the existing commercial land uses into conformance with the proposed CG-1 land use designation and allow for the "... continued use, enhancement and new development of retail, personal service, entertainment, office and related commercial uses along major transportation corridors ... to serve the needs of the residents..." , . (General Plan Objective 1.19) It is also the objective of the City of San Bernardino to "Upgrade the economic health of the local serving commercial corridors that are currently not viable. (General Plan Objective 4.17) It is the policy of the City of San Bernardino to: "Designate for local-serving general and neighborhood commercial retail activity." (General Plan Policy 4.18.1) Redevelopment of the project site could involve demolition of existing structures. Any structure built prior to 1941 will be Subject to Ordinance MC-694 which requires review to determine historical significance prior to issuance of a demolition permit. Mitigation measures will be applied at that time if deemed appropriate. The majority of the area is developed with commercial uses and the traffic increase that will result from commercial development along 5th Street will not be sufficient to cause a significant impact. The total traffic volume along 5th Street will be less than the street's design capacity. e e RNARDIN~ PLANNI~~EDeg~~J~ENT OB8ERVATIONS CITY OF SAN AGENDA ITEM b HEARING DATE May PAGE 6 22, 199 The development of commercial activities along 5th will create a buffer between the residential uses noise generated along 5th street. General Plan 14.3 states that the city wants to street and the Objective "Minimize the adverse effect of traffic generated noise on residential and other noise sensitive land uses from noise and highways." Objective 14.6, in turn, states "Minimize noise industrial uses neighborhood." This will be accomplished during the project review stage. spillover from commercial and into adjoining residential This amendment, if approved, will re-allocate 21.3 acres of land from residential to commercial uses. This area could potentially yield 192 dwelling units but, in fact, there are only 39 single-family dwelling units and 6 multi-family dwelling units present today. Because of the lot sizes (many are under 7,200 square feet), development within the RU-1, Residential Urban (9 dwelling units per acre) would only produce single-family or duplex structures. Full build-out of residential units would produce many residential side frictions which are incompatible with traffic flow along a major arterial route. A commercial designation would encourage lot combining and, thus, produce sites of a size conducive to viable commercial development, while reducing the number of potential curb cuts. The residential lots would become non-conforming if a desiqnation of CG-1, Commercial General were approved. They would be permitted to remain and could be converted to commercial uses in the future. FINDINGS The proposed land use and CG-1, Commercial goals, objectives and desiqnation of RS, Residential General are not in conflict policies of the General Plan. Suburban with the The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare City. All public services are, or will be, available site. public of the to the The subject parcels are physically suitable for the requested land use desiqnation and anticipated development. e e e ERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT . CASE . GPA 90-1 OBSERVATIONS CITY OF SA AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE b May ~~, I 1990 CONCLUSIONS The proposed General Plan Amendment is in conformance with the goals, objectives and policies in the General Plan. It is compatible with land uses within the amendment s~te. The land use designation changes to RB, Residential Suburban and CG-1, Commercial General with their permitted uses will not create an adverse impact on the environment. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Planning Commission make a recommendation to the Mayor and Common Council that: , 1.. A Negative Declaration be adopted in accordance with Section 21080.1 of CEQA for the proposed Amendment. The General Plan Land Use Hap be changed from RU-1, Residential Urban to RB, Residential Suburban and from RU-1, Residential Urban, RB, Residential Suburban and CN, Commercial Neighborhood to CG-1, Commercial General as shown on the Proposed Amendment Map (Attachment "B"). Respectively submitted, 6EC~t4r Planning and Building Services 2. ~~~~~nt Planner Attachments: A - Initial Study B - Proposed Amendment Map C - Location Map LER:JRB/sd PCAGENDA: GPA90-10 l . o e CITY OF SAN...8IRHARDINO PlANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY . Initial Study for Environmental Impacts for General Plan Amendment 90-1 Project Description: To chanae the land use desi;nation from RS. RU-1 and CN to CG-1 and from RU-1 to S on a total of 22.41 acres. Project Location: Alona 5th Street between Flores Street and Herrinaton Avenue. e Date: March 29. 1990 Prepared for: The Citv of San Bernardino Mavor and Common Council-Initiated Applicant(s) Name and Address: Prepared by: Name: John R. Burke Title: Assistant Planner City of San Bernardino Department of Planninq and BUildinq Services 300 N. "D" Street San Bernardino. CA 92418 ATTACHMENT A e e -- - ,. " . o INITIAL STUDY for GPA 90-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report is provided by the City of San Bernardino as an Initial Study for General Plan Amendment No. 90-1 to change the land use designation from RS. Residential Suburban. RU-1. Residential Urban and CN, Commercial Neighborhood to CG-1, Commercial General and from RU-1 to RS on a total of 22.41 acres of land located along 5th Street between Flores Street and Herrington Avenue. As stated in Section Environmental Quality Act Initial Study are to: 15063 of the California guidel ines, the purposes of an 1. Provide the Lead Agency with information to use as the basis for deciding whether to prepare an EIR or Negative Declaration: 2. Enable an applicant or Lead Agency to modify a project. mitiqating adverse impacts before an EIR is prepared. thereby enabling the project to qualify for Negative Declaration: 3. Assist the preparation of an EIR, if one is required, by: (A) Focusing the EIR on the effects determined to be significant, CBl Identify the effects determined not to be significant. and (Cl Explaining the reasons for determin~ng that potentially significant effects would not be significant. 4. Facilitate environmental assessment early in the design of a project: 5. Provide documentation of the factual basis for the finding in a Negative Declaration that a project will not have a significant effect on the environment: 6. Eliminate unnecessary EIRs: i. Determine whether a previousl y prepared EIR could be used with the project. e e o . o 2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION INITIAL STUDY for GPA 90-1 2. 1 The proposed amendment request, shown on Exhibit A, is to change the General Plan land use designation from RS, Residential Suburban, RU-l, Residential Urban and CN, Commercial Neighborhood to CG-I, Commercial General on 21.47 acres and from RU-l, Residential Urban to RS, Residential Suburban on 0.94 acres. The project site is located along 5th Street between Flores Street and Herrington Avenue, excluding Nunez Park and the Omnitrans facility across the street from the park. The existing land use designations are shown on Exhibit B. The following lists the changes by acreage: RS to CG-l --------- RU-l to CG-l ------- RU-l to RS --------- CN to CG-l --------- 6.37 ac 14.93 ac 0.94 ac 0.17 ac Total 22.41 ac The land use designation of CG-l permits a diversity of community-serving retail and service uses, entertainment uses, and professional and financial offices. AMENDMENT SITE AND SURROUNDING AREA CHARACTERISTICS a. Amendment Site The land uses within the amendment site (see Exhibit Cl include a mix of resid~ntial, commercial and vacant land. Approval of the General Plan Amendment will bring the existing commercial land uses into conformance with the proposed land use designation of CG-l, as well as to allow commercial infill development to occur. b. Adjacent Area Surrounding land uses, include residential located adjacent to and north of the amendment site: commercial to the east between the amendment site and Mt. Vernon Avenue: residential to the south between the site and Kingman Street: and flood control facilities and a mix of commercial and residential to the west of the project area. e o e . o INITIAL STUDY for GPA 90-1 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 3.1 Environmental Setting The amendment site is irregular in shape. comprised of residential. commercial and properties. The site straddles a major arterial It is vacant route. o CITY OF SAN .ERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT ENYIRONMIINTALIMPACT CHECKLIST _,,,,....,1!l;;!'<I A. BACRGROllND Application Number: Project Description: IA,,; l> U-"" M.J"~"';/J 7'/~"''S tfb'If';:;;' /:?R" d.,,/.. 'il>/ll".h. T 7[ - / 7f (.~.~';tr Tfil!: ,cx;lS,-;...v~ ~~."A' ~ M4?11 I.~' RII-/ """D C# 7Y-' C'A-/;'M/l> . d",." ~I/-/ TI":' ~5 tON /II 7rrA/.,- c/ ";2.4-/ ",,"-/L€.r. , Location: .NL;A';.5" Ii!. '7~A'r d.t'14 'LL~' /~""#-( S"...7::fL r /y~";::;' II~~A/<-T~P /,hil'.-'l.-"L Environmental Constraints Areas: 1t/;l"oJ Hnd",e; 7A/1/'JA...'T'A7'//...../ , .,. I / C/l/i./lA.r,r..; Ci/?TlI'.IUJI- I<<€Sa:o:C.6S I" General Plan Designation: L~~-~ - Rs ~~-I. (J\I AUI'ESLl) - Cc;-/ t:!~ . Zoning Designation: iii/A . B. EHYIBONM~~ IMPACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a separate attached sheet. 1. EaLth Resources Will the proposal result in: Yes No Maybe a. Earth filll more? x movement (cut and/or of 10,000 cubic yards or b. Development and/or grading on a slope greater than 15% natural grade? x c. Development Alquist-Priolo Zone? x within the Special Studies. d. Modification of any unique geologic or physical feature? x REVISED 12/87 PAGE 1 OF 8 . e. Soil erosion on or off the project site? f. Modification of a channel, creek or river? g. Development subject mudslides, other similar within an area to landslides, liquefaction or hazards? h. Other? 2. hIR RESQYRCES: Will the proposal result in: 3. REVISED 12/87 Substantial an effect quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? a. air upon emissions or ambient air c. Development within a high wind hazard area? Will the WATEE RESOURCES: proposal result in: a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to impermeable surfaces? b. Changes in the course or flow of flood waters? c. Discharge into surface waters or any alteration of surface water quality? d. Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters? e. Exposure of people or property to flood hazards? f. Other? o Yes No >( x v' /\ )( x 'X x x X' x x >< )< Maybe PAGE 2 OF 8 4. . BIOLOGICAL R~SOURCE~: proposal result in: Could the a. Change unique, species habitat trees? in the number of any rare or endangered of plants or their including stands of b. Change unique, species habitat? in the number of any rare or endangered of animals or their c. Other? 5. NOISE: Could the proposal result in: 6. REVISED 10/87 a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to noise levels over 65 interior noise levels dB? exterior dB or over 45 c. Other? bYiP USE: result in: Will the proposal a. A change in the land use as designated on the General Plan? X b. Development within an Airport District? c. Development within "Greenbelt" Zone A,B, or C? d. Development within a high fire hazard zone? e. Other? . Yes No x ;< X x x x ;( ;( Maybe x' . )( PAGE 3 OF 8 7. MAN-MADE HAjbFP~: project: Will the a. Use, store, transport or dispose of hazardous or toxic materials (including but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b. Involve the release hazardous substances? of c. Expose people to the potential health/safety hazards? d. Other? B. HOU~: Will the proposal: a. Remove existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? b. Other? 9. :t'~NSPORTATION/CIRCULATION: Could the proposal result in: a. An increase in traffic that is greater than the land use designated on the General Plan? b. Use of existing, new, parking structures? or demand for facilities/ c. Impact upon existing public transportation .systems? d. Alteration of present patterns of circulation? e. Impact to rail or air traffic? f. Increased safety hazards to vehicles, bicyclists. or pedestrians? R!'VISEO 10/87 Yes No )( x )( x )<: 1< >< x Maybe x )( x PAGE 4 OF 8 e o g. A disjointed pattern roadway improvements? of h. Other? 10. ~~C SERVICES Will the proposal impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service? a. Fire protection? Police protection? Schools (i.e. attendance, boundaries, overload, etc.)? b. c. d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Medical aid? f. Solid waste? g. Other? 11. UTILITIES: Will the proposal: a. Impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service or require the construction of new facilities? b. c. REVISED 10/87 1. Natur~l gas? 2. Electricity? 3. Water? 4. Sewer? 5. Other? Result in a pattern of .extensions? disjointed utility Require the construction of new facilities? Yes No )( )( x X x )( )( , >< x x )( )( x x x x Maybe PAGE 5 OF 8 e 12. AESTHETI~: a. Could the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic view? b. Will the visual impact of the project be detrimental to the surrounding area? c. Other? 13. ~Y~~URA~--FESQURCES: proposal result in: a. The alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? Could the b. c. Adverse impacts historic object? Other? physical or aesthetic to a prehistoric or site, structure or 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance (Section 15065) The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate o Yes No x x )( x- X Maybe )< REVISED 10/87 PAGE 6 OF .8 . o Yes Maybe No important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) x x c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) ",; " d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (Attach sheets as necessary.) (k ~77nC/Mj) .s#E~"S. >< REVISED 10/87 PAGE 7 OF a . o ~ INITIAL STUDY for GPA 90-1 3.2 ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS 3.2.1 Impacts upon. Earth. Air. Water and Biological Resources as well as Public Services and Utilities will be minimal due to the infill nature of the proposed project. 3.2.2 Noise 5.a,b. ... . Fifth Street is an eXisting four lane major arterial. Future noise levels within the project site adjacent to 5th Street are expected to be between 65dBa and 70dBa. This range is considered acceptable for the proposed commercial land use. However. the existing residential uses adjacent to the proposed commercial uses may be exposed to short-term high noise levels resulting from individual site construction activities. Standard Requirements and Conditions of Approval imposed upon site. specific development permits will reduce the potential impacts from construction noise. Also. concrete block walls and buffer planting will be required along the rear and side lot lines of the adjoining residential districts as conditions of specific project approval. These buffers will serve to reduce noise impacting- the existing adjacent residential uses from future commercial development. 3.2.3 Land Use 6. a. The proposal is to change \the General Plan land use designations as indicated in<the Introduction. 3.2.4 Man-Made Hazards 7. a. e Future commercial projects could use hazardous or toxic materials not normally found or not normally found in quantity in residential areas (i.e. dry cleaners. paint stores. etc.). Specific uses are addressed at the project development stage and mitigation measures applied if necessary. e e e . 0, 3.2.5 INITIAL STUDY for GPA 90-1 3.2.6 3.2.7 Rousing 8.a. Approval of the proposed project may resul t in the removal of existing housing as the project site is redeveloped for commercial uses. There are approximately 6 multi-family dwelling units and 39 units of single family housing involved. Transportation/Circulation 9.a. The project is located along 5th Street, which is an existing four lane major arterial. Currently, 5th Street handles an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) of 16,300. The . street is capable of handling an ADT of at least 30,000. Approval of the proposed amendment may resul t in the generation of additional traffic, which may impact 5th Street and the surrounding street network. According to the City Traffic Engineer, however. the additional trips generated from the proposed amendment are not sufficient to cause a significant impact on the adjacent street system. Al so, specific design detail s and conditions of approval will be considered for individual projects during the development review phase. Appropriate mitigation, such as traffic signal installation. could be imposed at that time if deemed necessary. The proposed project has been reviewed by Traffic Engineering and does not meet the minimum criteria for traffic impact study as established in the Traffic Policy Paper, or as determined by the Traffic Engineer. The additional trips from the proposed project are not sufficient to cause a significant impact on the adjacent street system. Total traffic volume will be less than the street design capacity. Cultural Resources 13.a. Redevelopment of the project site for commercial uses will involve the demolition of some of the existing structures. Some of these structures may have an historical value. Any structures constructed prior to 1941 which are to be demolished are subject to Ordinance e o o . o INITIAL STUDY for GPA 90-1 MC-694. which requires the review of the potential historical significance of these structures. Mitigation measures. if necessary. will be applied at that time. e D. D DETERMINhTlON On the basis of this initial study, ~The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the L:J environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, although there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described above have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. o The proposed project ~mY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA XtJJ ltoKTCtW<<r , r}/A/Urlf,-!k"",</UC , Name and Title *~~-, nature ~ -~'7 - C9() Date: REVISED 12/87 PAGE a OF 8 ~ ~ ~ .... i:: iii " - ~ :I: :!: )( ~ w v ~#,~P\ff1~ &is/./ 'J a~!~~tj~:. ~ . e I"U'i" ;L . .1- e 00;- zo -ell c, a:o <(Z z... a:z Will ca~ ZZ <(III U)~ U.z o~ >A. .......1 -cA. Oa: III z III c:J @ SI~' ,,~I ~-l '., . w oJ .... ;: ~'. ... ---- w___ .. i. ~!' .. a I.. . I...: - ~_ I . " z," 1 '. ~ I-I. ad '5" =: s .~ 15 I!I .1 10 ....1 .~ .11I )~C ~ L. '. . ll- ot___ I. . ~ CG-4.i. ...~.tt-I 0 .., ~ou., t": 1 .. A.........!. 'I ~ . . 1 . I , :i: .; I:. I ~ :q ~ : .i I ... . . ! \-::1 .....: . .. '0 ~ lIa t; ..~ . . . . . . . . . "1 I i~~ 118: ~ ~ '" !e ~ :r ~ X ~ W ,. .....1...... .....' i: ., ii. . , ~: .~ ,', ,- 0' . , ..I - .'" ...... ,I :E: - .... 'i' + · l' ,1'1 I ~ ~ \ '~ i I ~': , . I (--. ~ ! L .~- , '" G : ~ '.'" i}' l . .r G... 0', " 00;' zo - c. a:o c(z z~ a:z Will a:l~ Q Zz c(1II U)~ U.Z Oc ..I >a. 1-..1 -c CJII: III Z III ~ @) ."1':1 ."..- 'v",@' c!t . :. . U '"..l ell . .11: = ~- eji I ) I .. -- -- I.:' : ~ ,,:, .1 . ~~,~F~:i~~'- ~., ;i~;':<~" , ..J";(. ..,.. ....,....~~, (::~;;; ~ t;.~(~ ~ d' ,,~...,~r:./. 'r:'f.1~r.;i-.t;(~. i o 0';' zo -01 Q. a:o c(z z... a:z UJW m:E Cl zz c(W (I)~ ILz oc -I >lL 1--1 -c (Ja:: W z W c:J ~ "--"'"'"I _ ~;.. i :.. )0 ~..~ 1 a.. ;t' I::: =11 .1 ..' i : ~ IS ..-I- .... ~. )~V ~ ..- ~._~ l~ ~',o ~ ~ .... '" III ... ~ ~ X UJ ~. W ..J .... .... L ____ -F I I '0';' zo -Gl C. 1:1:0 CCZ z~ a:z Will m2 CI ZZ Clll cn~ LLZ OC ..J >a. .....J -c 011: III Z III ~ ~ ... . en . . ;"" II: ~~I"Y:'- '. ._-9_.. ~ -.--- - ---- , . '. i "n; " . J I i' ! :~ .-- - I I .:.-:,: . ....- 01 .. 0' Zea - o. a:O c(z z... a:Z Will m:! CI ZZ c(1II (J)~ II.z OC ... >IL ..."" -C II: III Z III CJ ._~ . ".. . . (l 0'" .' , - ~I !;:, >- \ b-' ---..-..-- . - .. .-....--- , , e o e . o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ~ ~ 24 ~ 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 90-1 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. Recitals (a) The General Plan for the city of San Bernardino was adopted by the Mayor and Common Council by Resolution No. 89-159 on June 2, 1989. (b) General Plan Amendment No. 90-1 to the General Plan of the City of San Bernardino was considered by the Planning Commission on May 22, 1990 and June 5, 1990, after a noticed public hearing, and the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval has been considered by the Mayor and Common Council. (c) An Initial Study was prepared on March 29, 1990 and reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee and the Planning Commission who both determined that General Plan Amendment No. 90-1 would not have a significant effect on the environment and therefore, recommended that a Negative Declaration be adopted. (d) The proposed Negative Declaration received a 21 day public review period from April 5, 1990 through April 25, 1990 and all comments relative thereto have been reviewed by the Planning Commission and the Mayor and Council in Common compliance with the California 1. e 8 e . o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Environmental Quality Act and local regulations. (e) The Mayor and Common Council held a noticed public hearing and fully reviewed and considered proposed General Plan Amendment No. 90-1 and the Planning Department Staff Report on August 6, 1990. (f) The adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 90-1 is deemed in the interest of the orderly development of the City and is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the existing General Plan. SECTION 2. Neaative Declaration. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND AND DETERMINED by the Mayor and Common Council that the proposed amendment to the General Plan of the City of San Bernardino will have no significant effect on the environment, and the Negative Declaration heretofore prepared by the Environmental Review Committee as to the effect of this proposed amendment is hereby ratified, affirmed and adopted. SECTION 3. Findinas BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council of the city of San Bernardino that: A. The change of designation to CG-l, Commercial General and RS, Residential Suburban for the proposed amendment will change the land use map only and is not in conflict with the guidelines and policies of the objectives and policies of the General Plan. 2. e e G . o 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 B. The proposed amendment will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the city. C. All public services are available to the study area. Any development permissable under the CG-1 Commercial General and RS, Residential Suburban designations proposed by this amendment would not impact on such services. D. The proposed amendment is to redesignate 21.47 acres to CG-1, Commercial General and 0.94 acres to RS, Residential Suburban. No housing stock will be affected and future housing development would be unlikely to occur. E. The amendment site is physically suitable for the requested land use designation. Anticipated future land use has been analyzed in the Initial Study and it has been determined that project specific mitigation measures will be sufficient to eliminate any environmental impacts. SECTION 4. Amendment BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council that: (A) The Land Use Plan of the General Plan of the City of San Bernardino is amended by changing approximately 22.41 acres from RS, Residential Suburban, RU-1, Residential Urban and CN, Commercial Neighborhood to CG-l, Commercial General 3. e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e e . o and from RU-l, Residential Urban to RS, Residential Suburban. This amendment is designated as General Plan Amendment No. 90-1 and its location is outlined on the maps entitled Attachments A-l to A-6, and is more specifically described in the legal descriptions entitled Attachments B-1 to B-12, copies of which are attached and incorporated herein by reference. (B) General Plan Amendment No. 90-1 shall become effective immediately upon adoption of this resolution. SECTION 5. MaD Notation. This resolution and the amendment affected by it shall be noted on such appropriate General Plan maps as have been previously adopted and approved by the Mayor and Common Council and which are on file in the office of the City Clerk. SECTION 6. Notice of Determination. The Planning Department is hereby directed to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino certifying the City's compliance with CEQA in preparing the Negative Declaration. IIII IIII IIII IIII 4. e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 e -- . o RESOLUTION...AOOPTING THE NEGATIVE DECLARATION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT AND APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 90-1 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. OF NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 6th day of August, 1990, by the following vote, to wit: Council Members ~ NAYES ABSTAIN ESTRADA REILLY FLORES MAUDSLEY MINOR POPE-LUDLAM MILLER city Clerk The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day of , 1990. W.R. Holcomb, Mayor ci ty of San Bernardino Approved as to form and legal content: JAMES F. PENMAN, City A.ttorney By:.-C/' _ ? /-. 7-_. ( '-'" 5.