Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout48-Public Works " CITY OF SAN BER.RDINO File \0. 15.30-295 - REQUEST eaR COUNCIL ACTION Date: June 25, 1990 Adoption of Negative Declaration & Subject: a Finding of Consistenc~' with the Circulntion Element of the General Plan Vacation of a portion of Huff Street. between "G" Street and Crescent Avenue. Mm:ROGER G. HARDGRAVE, Director ~t:Pub]ic works/Engineering Synopsis of Previous Council action: Public ~orks Project No. 90-19 03-05-90 -- Director of Publ ic works/Ci ty Engineer and Ci t~. authorized to proceed with proposed vacation of Huff Street between "G" Street and Crescent Avenue, 8031 was approved. C1 erk were a portion of and Plan No. Recommended motion: e 1. That the Negative Declaration for Public works Project No. 90-19, Vacation of a portion of Huff Street between "G" Street and Crescent Avenue, be adopted. 2. That" finding be made that the Vacation of a portion of Huff Street between "G" Street dnd Crescent Avenue, is consistent with the cil'culation element of the General Plan cc: Shauna Clark, City Administrator Contact person: Anile. no'Rn 1 + Phone: staff Report, Notice of Preparation Supporting data attached: Initial Studv. NeE! Dec. Man Ward: ~32\l 3 FUNDING REOUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.) (Acct, DescriDtion) Finance: OnCil Notes: OO-:l:l-YQ 7Co,.O?I;? Aopnrl::l Itpm Nn ~8 ::""' CITY OF SAN BE"RDINO - AEQUES"'OR COUNCIL ACTION e STAFF REPORT The Negative Declaration for Public works Project No. 90-19 was recommended for adoption by the Environmental Review Committee at its meeting ot 04-17-90. A 21-day public review period was afforded from 04-19-90 to 05-09-90. No comments were received. we recommend that the Negative Declaration be adopted and a finding made that the project is consistent with the Circulation Element ot the General Plan. -- o 06-25-90 75-0264 ~ , -- -- o . o CLERK OF THE 30ARO OF SUPERVISORS 1930 APR 18 AH /() 04 ,..... . .,',~;.;: r IJF S.\n BEtWAno' . . Cn:rORI/tA ,flO NO'l'ICE or pa~DBCt.UA'l'ION 'l'BB CITY or SAN BBRHARDINO proposes to adopt a Neqative Declaration for the following' projects. ~e Bnvironaeatal Review CGmaittee found that the project will no~ have a si.nificant effect on the environment on the ~sis of the Initial Study and mitig'ation measures (If applicable). PUBLIC NORIS '~'l' ~. 90~ - To vacate a portion of Huff Street, between G Street iftd Crescent Avenue. Staff is pro- posing' a Neqative Declarati~n. Copies of the Initial Study arei available for pUblic review at the Planning' Department, 300 North ~D- Street, San Bernardino, CA 92418, and the reldheym Li~rarY~ 555 West 6th Street, San Ber- nardino, CA. Any environlllental COlIlaIents you have should be received in this office no late than 4:00 p.m., May 9, 1990. If you do not respond in writin , we will assume that you have no opinions and/or recommendations on the above projects. SUBMI'l"1'ED: April 17, 1990 PUBLISH: April 19, 1990 CI'l'Y or SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DBPAR'l'MBN'l' 300 North RD- Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 384-5057 CP C7 NOPND41290 5-25-90 (- e e 11 Applicant(s) Address City, State Zip MISC: ISPREPARATION ke/9-1-89 C8 f OF SAN BERNA",...,O PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY Initial Study for Environaental Impacts For PVe'Jl..,c. Wof(~ P!j!:O.>e(:.."'" /1010. QO-Iq Project Number Project <lescription/Location ~1"~"" Vk:..A71aJ OF A .P~lo....I ~ MtJF=~~"'. 1IIu!:!'f"'~~f4Ll ,,~,\ ~ - -rIPfIIIIt_"'AaJn r..<.I" _tII\"'" .....JCll!I' Date MA-r'I"'!-/ 7 7 ,e/4t'J I Prepared for: D~AG'-1"MIlE.Ll-1'" ,..,. ,:tu~L....Il~._ uJrJlrtL C; C4r\l ~ ,,5~_.~tA.Pn/AJO ~o ~~~~ ., .. aU..J1 PJ Prepared by: t2a~,..AId'>~" ~ ~I '....M~tJ Name JrsS'ST4f4T ~~~ Title City of San Bernarelino Planninq Departaent 300 N. "0" Street San Bernarelino, Cl 92418 Y OF SAN BERN DING PLANNING DEPARTMENT e ENV'_ENTAL IMPACT CHECKtlST A. BACKGROmm Application NUmber: PtJJ5uc... IA.ln~ ~\~~ NO. '10-1 ~ Project Description: "t""o vAC.+-roS A- tlt/o' POI!f'loN OF HUPP :':1fC'/:f' -rO pel'l1rr THE DE.llr I I?PHeAi7 t'JP' r;./E PIt(lr F L 5 rtJ 71fj; IItJRrll Mh) ,o/)J7J./ ,45 I?N~ 'P1?D. lEY-r, LQcation: ~-r,../~__~l ,....f'1""_c:,.-....~.l..,- ME. AND}.;t ~~"1'" Environmental Constraints Areas: General Plan Designation: c.e:foJ1"~ t"---cf\l ~-rH DJf:Tr' 4>.( OrS-r1Z.\c.-i" e Zoning Designation: wD B. ~B~~~ IMPACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a separate attached sheet. 1. !f.th Resources Will the proposal result in: Yes No Maybe a. Earth movement (cut and/or fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or more? K b. Development and/or grading on a slope greater than 15' natural grade? c. Development within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone? J( )( e d. Modification of any unique geologic or physical feature? x REVISED 12/87 PAGE 1 OF 8 e e e e.- Soil erosion on or off the project: site? f. Modification of. a channel, creek or river? g. Development subject mUdslides, other similar Other? within an area to landSlides, liquefaction or hazards? h. 2. 6l1LRESOU~: Will the proposal result in: 3. REVISED 12/87 Substantial an effect quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? a. air upon emissions or ambient air c. Development within a high wind hazard area? IfmL-RESOURCES: proposal result in: a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to impermeable surf~ces? Will the b. Changes in the course or flow of flood waters? c. Discharge into surface waters or any alteration of surface water quality? d. Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters? e. Exposure of people or property to flood hazards? f. Other? Yes No x x x X x x K x K x )( x X Maybe PAGE 2 OF 8 e e e 4. BIOLOGICAL RBI2DRCBSr proposal result in: . a. Change unique, specie. habitat trees? Could the in the number of any rare or endangered of plants or their including stands of in the number of any rare or endangered of animals or their 5. NOISE: Could the proposal result in: 6. REVISED 10/87 b. Change unique, species habitat? c. Other? a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to exterior noise levels over 65 dB or interior noise levels over 45 dB? c. Other? ~ USE: result in: Will the proposal a. A change in the land use as designated on the General Plan? b. Development within an Airport District? c. Development within -Greenbelt- Zone A,B, or C? d. Development within a high fire hazard zone? e. Other? Yes No x ^ ;( >( ;< x x X Maybe PAGE 3 OF 8 e 7. MAR-MAD. BADltP1h project: Will the a. Use, store, transport or dispose of hazardous or toxic materials (including but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b. Involve the release of hazardous substances? c. Expose people to the potential health/safety hazards? d. Other? 8. BQY~: Will the proposal: a. Remove existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? b. Other? 9. ~B6~ORTATION/CIRCULATION: Could the proposal result in: a. An increase in traffic that is greater than the land use designated on the General Plan? b. Use of existing, or demand for new, parking facilities/ structures? c. Impact upon existing public transportation.systems? d. Alteration of present patterns of circulation? e. Impact to rail or air traffic? f. Increased safety hazards to vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? REVISED 10/87 Ges No x X X J< x < < )( x ;( x. Maybe- x PAGE 4 OF 8 , o _ .. . g... -:,." disjointed pattern 'roadway improvements? h. Other? 10. PUBLIC SERVICES Will the proposal impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service? a. Pire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools li.e. attendance, boundaries, overload, etc.l? d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Medical aid? f. Solid waste? _ g. Other? 11. UTILITIESI Will the proposall a. Impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service or require the construction of new facilities? 1. Natural gas? 2. Electricity? 3. Water? 4. Sewer? 5. Other? b. Result in a pattern of extensions? disjointed utility c. Require the construction of new faCilities? _"- REVISED 10/87 OYes Mayb.. ~ of No ( X x X K >( X x: )( )( ;( >( >( x" x X' ...,j PAGE 5 OF 8 e e e 12. AB8'l'IIftICS'c a. Could the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic view? b. Will the visual impact of the project be detrimental to the surrounding area? c. Other? 13. ~P~1]1bL~~QORCESI proposal result inl a. The alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? Could the b. Adverse impacts historic object? c. Other? physical or aesthetic to a prehistoric or site, structure or 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance eSecUon 15065) The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate REVISED 10/87 Yes x X I. X- l( No ;( Maybe PAGE 6 OFt Ye. No- Mayb.. e ~~~~ i~,taa~ example. of the .,.a< period. of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.> c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? C. DISCUSSION OP BNVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (Attach sheets as necessary.) x I. x x 4T:>. "''''~e. MAY J3~ AN A-L,..'T~JC:A'-'ON TO P1iaS5fE,..rT" PAi'TeRNS 01'= CIRGl.h..,A''-'ON .o,.s A R-ESVt.-T OF I/A<:..A"'N~ ~I.l~ 5-r~eE"l, e&r~ ~.JT Ave- ArNl/ '~":51. HlMr!I/E!R I e:A::rreovND ~c.. CW HLlF'f' 5'n~ee...-r INl'eiJDI/,Jet ,0 ~A-I,.,J !'f<J t'S$ -'-0 "6:1" ~-r~ee...,.. CA,..1 e~ 'D'\le.e-re.p NOlC:rH oN a:esc.e:NT AVE.. ,ANt' CAS'T" olJ M II.-L-. "H~ -rorA-L,...- IN~ IN DISrA-Nc.e. 'lR'AVEl-L-E'D FOR I1LJFF 51: 'T2./r?P1C- REVISED 10/87 PAGE 7 OF 8 . Date ~ 'l--/C(~ 0- e c. D1scu.sion o~ Bnvironaental Eval~tion and M1t1qat1on M...u.. (cont1ned) ,Iol1""t':tJ'D//'oleJ ..,-0 -rfI:Avr::-L- NO~""Heou/>.l"D ON "t:!:l ~ s."c..e;e7,- 1.5 ~PPfZCtl<INIr1CLY :"'QO Fc~A:::'!/' Fo~ ~p, c.. IN-rerJ'D 1/'''\0 "7i:) "f\Z..IWf!f:i- SOUTH- e>OVNt:) I 71--t6- IN~ IN D/~A-fJce- IS ~~,I/I/Ir""~ 1140 ~e;.-r:. Oe.c.~C- HUFF- 5~ez-r I-=- Ne.t-rH~ A MAjOr: A'R-rCr:::IAL} Se<::..oNPA-~V Ar~'ll;:.KIA-L- NOR A COLJ -6<:""OJc::./-rH~ tHP/rt:.--r CAlJ~e:o '6'( -n..t6 IN~e1'tSe.D 'DI :S"TltNa "1"'RAV~ f"Olie. C-GI-1M()-re2..~C- Wll..--I.- Be. MINIMPrt...- ..,-0 '/.He 'f"t)IIJ'l 6F tIJ5l8lNIF1CANc.e A-t..-'So I HLJr::::F s~e~ AS I r NOvJ e:x.IS-r.5 WHeRe- "/HC 'Pf<:.o'Po5f:.V VAGA'-ne>>J. L-(~":5 / Te~t1'Nkie5 AI :r.-Z/5 of) 'IHt::= We:~ AND - , " I'r I (3f '51", O~ "'(He t;;A-S'lj A -m-rA-L- ""p/srANCC: 0"-' A'PF"f20XIt-14-re.--{ 1::500 ~~ DUe.. TO --rrtC t-eN~-r+-t of SA-1 D p(!:)~r/(!:)N (!)P- H'c/;::p 5-r'Rr:=-e..r /rAID B~5E... '''n.{c -rERNIIV/rL-5 r=o~ e.M~e:NC>( V~+-Il~~S> ARe- /;...Out-reo ~tk:J..l -f"HA-i" -n-lI:=..'{ WOJL-D /\lOi" 7l<.IWE-L- ON Hv~ S~a;T I ex.c..e.;:>r -'-0 ~\JE ~~oJCie:.S otJ HUFf=S~t I, rHc l.-CV~ OF" ..,~ Qvl'rv/;Y OP &M&lU!:? e:;NC( '5~VIc.e /1.1 ~H'e- C./rV OF .sAN 13~AiZpIl.Jo wlJ....t...- N07" ee.. CoMPIZOMI'::>eD ~ 1+ Rt=-S()l,'l OF -n-tE- ~P05J::D 'S"1"7<:~e.r VAck-r/oN, MIse: EVALUATIONMIT.M e e .'~. '... e e e DE'l'ERMIBM'l2B On the basis of this initial study, ~ The proPo.ed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the L:j environ.ent and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, although there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures de.cribed above have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. D. o O The proposed project MAY have a sign~ficant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA - -r;,., Eo HWH;'~,er' , 4Nt;1'"t- /1,,*,lf~~ , Name and Title F(~". gnature .,t-~ -'70 Date: REVISED 12/87 PAGE 8 OF 8 CITY OF SAN BER_DINO PU. IC: NClF\K8 D8PAn Il..T .11 '.u.. DlYI8ICIN RIIJL JI u:r~... yo ...t.IIDN .. . ,/ .61 I lEV VACM'IDN , P{)ertcN a: HUFF' STJ2.E~T; 8ETWEEN al/!!.ESl!E.NT A-VSV'/IE ANb ~~H S7'7eee-r e ," M I~~' 5rR lEer ~ CJ 'l' r') - ,. , , \ \ \ HUFF .sr: e 'U ~ ~ < q.-IO' 1J1'l1 r\.0. .... ~ 1lI ~ ~ t) (! OLLE.(i,E :DR p".,.,.ect It!!' CheclCect It!! I . DATI I .1.-1 - eARIA IIACttTlD lMOM" THUI NIINIIR Sheet 1.of 1 - - -- , \ '\ " " ~..I.. ' ~ .>0.,' ("0 ~~ \ ~o..o Q' '\ "'\1' C(, ~ \ " \ ~ >~~" \ NOT r'o SUI \~ \ ,~ \ \ , \ \ \ \ , \ ~ '" llJ ill ~ V) 4jo' ~ \1) + e CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT NOTICE OF DETERMINAnON r . ., FROM: TO: _ OFFICE OF PlANNING AND RESEARCH 1400 TENnl STREET. ROOM 121 SACRAMENlO. CA 95814 X COUNTY ClERK COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO 385 NORTH ARROWHEAD AVENUE SAN BERNARDINO. CA 92415 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. PlANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 300 "D" STREET SAN BERNARDINO. CA 92418 SUBJECT: Filing Clf Notice of Determination In compllMce wllh Section 211D8 or 21152 of the Public Reeource. Code. ProjectTltIe: PIIRI Tr WnI!lC<; PIlO.JFrT NO QO-J Q MIKE GRUBBS Lead.Agency ConIaCC Person (714) 384-5112 Area CGdaITeIejlhone(E-.1ion Sta. CloeringhouM Number (" submillId.. c1e1l'.lQhauM) _HUFF ~ ~FTWFFN "G" STREET AND CRESCENT STREET. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDI/IO JIiOjiii _ (include caunIy) e Project Description: e STREET VACATION This is to advise that the ClIy of s.n Berll8lllino. Pl8nning IIIld Building Servicee Oepertment has approved the abaft .dncrlbed project on M~RCH 22 ~990 and h.. mede the following delennllilllion~., .::; reqarding thubove aiel ibed projeCt . '-'~ . ~ = 1. The project [0 wiI ~wiI not) hevu algnllc"Ulfect on thunvironment {~ :;; ~ 2. 0 An Environmental Impact Report w.. pqparad for lhit JIIVj8Cl pullU8nt to the provisions ot.!?~ ~ CI A Negative DecIaralIon w_ prepared for this project puquanllll the proviaions of cEOAl2 ~': "" 3. Mlllgalion meuu_ [0 we,. ~ we,. not) mede a condftion of the approval of the project. ;.:. .. - 4. A .....m.nt of Overriding Consid.rations [0 _ IKI_ nal) edapted for this project. ""..,.. #" 5. Findings [0 were ~ wer. not) mad. pursuant III the proviIiona of CEOA. = .""'j ~p .~.') '-", . '_<0.:." :-'? ...\;: -. :,;; --. .1~ .'-. . - .' This is to certify that the final EIR with comments IIIld ~_ IIIld recon:l of project approval is available III the General Public at: /z"/H) ~j"I!'I7-a..)//.t.~ ___ (PulIlie) . Dele _Ived for filing at OPR: JUNE 26, 1990 Dalt SENIOR PLANNER TIIIa ... z::.:. - ~ m -- P_'OF. 'MIl e ,'" MIL..~' STREeT \ , , , , .\ HUFF .s7: ~ q.'kJ' 100' ~ 1f1'Z1 ~ r\.0. "- 0( IlJ ... ill ~ ~ 1tI V) ~ ~ (\l \!) lU ~ (! t:JI.LSt;;E ZJR \ , , \ , ~.L ' ..... ^' ("0 ~~ \ ~~ c> \ ca ~ \ \ "YIJ' -0 \" , \ ~ > '1-~ ~ \ NOT ro SlY/. \ ~~C'L \ \~, \ \ ~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ CITY OF SAN .,lattAamHO ........u:; NCI _~. IHIPMJ. &JT ......... OIYI~ R.... IIN2. a,. T ...... ION ST"-lIT / ALLEV \lACM'1ON I 'PoeT/eN t:)F HUFF STA!.E~~ BETWEEN' OIfeESt!ENT A-VSVIIE ~NJ:> "(i,ll sneEET Sheet 1.of 1 --- -