HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-City Attorney
CITY. SAN 8IERNARDIN~ RIEe-EST FOR COUNCIL OcT ION
..
From:
James F. Penman,
City Attorney
SU~Kt: FINDINGS OF FACT IN SUPPORT OF
DENIAL OF CUP 90-15.
Dept:
Date: July 13, 1990
Synopsis of Previous CouncillCtion:
On May 8, 1990 the Planning Co~ission denied by a 5 to 2 vote Conditional
Use Permit No. 90-15 for the sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption in
an existing mini-market.
On July 2, 1990 the -Mayor and Common Council in effect denied CUP No. 90-15.
A motion to deny CUP No. 90-15 was not carried based on a 3 to 3 vote. No
subsequent action to approve the CUP was taken. The Council voted unanimously
to direct the City Attorney to prepare Findings In Support of Denial of CUP
No. 90-15 for the July 16, 1990 Council Meeting.
Recommended motion:
Adopt the Findings of Fact in support of Denial of CUP No. 90-15, attached
as Exhibit A.
'1
,
/f
. l--
F. penmadiJgnltureCity
Attorney
J
of Fact
ity AttY'Phonl:
Ward: 1
384-5235
Contle! penon:
Supportlnl de.. IttlChld: Findings
Henry Empeno, Jr., Deput
FUNDING REDUIREMENTS:
Amount:
N/A
Source: (ACCT. NO.)
(ACCT. DESCRIPTION)
Finance:
Council No...:
Agenda Item No.
/2
... .......
..
CITY -= SAN _RNARDINCe R....ST FOR COUNCIL G:TION
STAFF REPORT
.
On May 8, 1990 the Planning Commission denied by a 5 to 2
vote Conditional Use Permit No. 90-15 for the .ale of beer and
wine for off-site consumption in an existing.mini-market.
On July 2, 1990 the Mayor and Common Council in effect
denied CUP No. 90-15. A II1Otion to deny CUP No. 90-15 wa. not
carried based on a 3 to 3 vote. No subsequent action to approve
the CUP was taken. The Council voted unanimously to direct the
City Attorney to prepare Findings In Support Of Denial of CUP No.
90-15 for the July 16, 1990 COuncil meeting.
Because of the likelihood that the applicant may challenge
in court the City's actions regarding this CUP, we feel that the
Mayor and Common Council should adopt these Findings of Fact In
Support of Denial of CUP No. 90-15, attached as Exhibit A.
[HE/dys/cup90-l5.sr]
75-0264
.
.
.
o
ATTACHMBN'l' A
.
FINDINGS OF FACT IN SUPPORT OF
DENIAL OFCONDITIONALUSB PBRMIT NO. 90-15
MAYOR & COMMON COuNCIL MEET1NG or JULY 16, 1990
1. Whereas the proposed use, the sale of beer and wine for
off-site consumption in an existing mini-market, is permitted in
the CG-l, General Commercial, Land Use Designation--subject to
the approval of a Conditional Use Permit--it is in conformance
with the objectives of the City's General Plan.
2. The proposed use will adversely affect the adjoining
land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it
is to be located.
The nearest residences are approximately seventy-five feet
(75') from the subject building and approximately twelve feet
(12') from the parking lot of the subject property. The nearest
school, Arrowview Junior High is approximately one-tenth (1/10)
of a mile from the subject property.
The subject property is located within Census Tract 53.
There are seven (7) existing on-sale licenses in this census
tract: only five (5) are allowed by the State Alcoholic Beverage
Control Board. Four (4) off-sale licenses are allowed in this
tract. Currently, there are two (2) off-sale licenses - both of
which are for beer and wine only. The nearest off-sale sites
are: 7-11, located 165 feet from the subject property: Mobile
Mini Mart, located 171 feet from the site: and Smitty's Liquor,
which is one-tenth (1/10) of a mile from the site.
After conducting an investigation, the Police Department has
concluded that approval of this CUP would lead to an increase in
crime and police calls for service in this area, and that
incidents of publiC intoxication, loitering, alcohol purchases by
minors, panhandling, littering, drinking in public, and drunk
driving would increase.
Numerous neighboring residents have signed petitions
opposing the CUP and have testified that there are already too
many alcoholic beverage outlets in the neighborhood, and that
loitering, littering, panhandling, urinating in public, and other
crime problems would increase if the CUP was approved.
The San Bernardino City Unified SchOOl District has stated
that because of the close proximity of the site to schools,
approval of the CUP would adversely impact its students and
would increase traffic congestion and crime in the area.
3. The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is
HE/dys/cup90-15.fdg
July 13, 1990
1
I
.
.
.
o
adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a
manner not detrimental to the particular area nor too the peace,
health and general welfare in that 'the cOllUDercial developlllent on
the site was approved under Review of Plans No. 86-135.
4. Whereas Review of Plans No. 86-135 was evaluated by the
City Traffic Engineer who determined that the commercial center
would not significantly impact existing patterns of circulation,
and due to the fact that the Planning Division determined that
the commercial development provid.. sufficient off-street parking
to serve the proposed use, the traffic generated by the pxoposed
use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways
designed and "improved to carry the traffic in the area, and that
adequate parking is provided.
5. Based on the above-noted Findings, the granting of
Conditional Use Permit No. 90-15 will be detrimental to the
peace, health and general welfare of the citizens of the City of
San Bernardino.
HE/dys/cup90-15.fdg
July 13, 1990
2
~
-
)
D a
o
__ _. __n_ _____.. .._______., __ ...._____ ,.____ ~____..._..
, r: .
- -- ___.i~~-.J_ ~"~ . 0" 'x !:,k~~,~, ,_\\J~,:,..::.."'\:;~ 6:____-._~~''\,;~(._,,/j _____~____
0ah ' ~ ~ 'C :.~~' I
'-. ~ - .. . . \
o " '_ '" - > "tJ \".,,~ "," . ,,~,_ ",,_ 0 ,'. . ' I .\ /'
......~.......~... _L ~.lc," ~P,.., ';S~''-'-'~'~''~__2:~' .I__.~.
~/Islqo .~ ~~__~. . _1'"",.,-
Gio 1~ -&tftif~---is1 tUd3d. c'$-~s:.
~115Irt() .._~~- ~ :--~~-~: _ __ -_R21P/--0U~~j~~
~lls/90 -. ~ . ~ ~~_1J~----~~_W~23~/f._-:
fi:S!:o u..~.~.~~4'~ . 3-...__-lP2P,J-.3al ~..S~: 7~Y~
'Ij iff () ~~ ~~. - ~-_. ?:~.7.. 1v~d::3~1 J!;2~,-4. p~
~)V?-~ ~~~&~-- - .~... --..____fgl_~~;2~] -~.~-f ~7~J705-
?!/I!r._~.J~_ . :i'3? ..;I;<,;'3:.v,5;~(4 7077-S
6/L6 f/{J ~ .' _u_~~ -~-~____~!t$t!! ~~ S7-1, J'~I _tA ~t$ ,
.t;/~/~a~- . ._~<L~-~--3sJt~ -:f~fbs-
rr;V'fta ~ ~-Jk~~ .23slS._~'(
tt: - - - - '--~ =- =-;}/Z.~.if~ ~~o~
?/& f!!ftf~ m m '-. .~ -- . ~-t':~~'~~~~
6jll/~ "'-~_j;;, 1::: ~4- ...)-=-:n7~9=iv -:Y-~-cSC4-92j8!f
&~/~-f(r7.. ~ ~_7L1q UJ. ~nI~.~~1;)</QS"' .
,,'
Joo.. _'""~'
).,-<
~
~.".
,
~
.
~ .">..-,-....,.-
:1_).
,
_.~
,
,'\..
'-~
"->-'
.i. ~_"
"
\--~~
.~-) ~
"
, -
\r.'. F
,"", ~
""
-:.,. ....
\....,.,--.....
\'
,
'i ;;.1
\
,I
\~ <.,~
,
.......'--,'~
'') ;'L"::"''':
,-
'\ ''''''-'''
~\. -i
" \
;,
~
\ '
-,.-
.\
,\
-<....~
\,
\,
"
,
~-~.
/
,- \
~,
\
\
;.~..,.,~, .;.
-~
- -'-'
'-.J:.
"~ \
~
.. ,'J-
~
. '~-J
.
.
-
, ,
~ :_~'L
-
'''1:""
\" .~
;:.,.
/
.'"
....."
"..'i.: ,""
"\ --
,:>-",--,,,,
\. '\. ,. ~-J...:':':" .:..c.,
~:-J,"''''-~,.f
~~
-S"'>-,
".' ,
\
"':-"
-\~-
).>
,~ '...
'.~,
,
~:':'~':"--
s
"(
<._",. ',_..~'_-.oi'-'"
.~. ~- ..-~
..,'
"......--
"-.....-
"
1;- \
1
-"'-_._---..~.~-
, -"",- --::..~:~:.~.>, '->
~-
\-",.
.'--i"cA-.> \
"",J-'... .
.>
~
"c -...:
.'\:- ~
,~
....
,:} ....
...11"" '>.,l
_'_._ .-,.,c:.~~'-"'~:
',";'
(,
-
"-"
"
~-"~-:-~-\~:
,\'i:'-
~".~
~--~.,.;:-"'_:...,,.,.,
- ,. \ \ --t;~-Jj
i't""--,, j;r", "
,_..../ _ll ~_'I, _",
" '-.
-~..;.-,,-.......~!
... .. ,.........~-~~ : .~ .. --'
-I
'1. :~ '-"
.J- __
~>
-.\. ~-~<~
,
"
~
,,",-.
\. "\
F~:;.~,,....
, ;',-..j
~"
,',
,
..:".\
h~':-.-_ ...i
. (...
,\ ,\ I
)\ 'J, ../\;
, c-
:.. '~.:,~'~'>~..~
- ",....'
\- "-.
'~
~.,
,
, "
\..."\,,.,. \'
,<;-
;:::, \\ '-.,
',"';
.. ,..
J
,"
{ t\.,
,-'
"
"~ ),
~ ,
iL
, \
)-......-.~.j
-:--"
.,'>. '--
.
,.....\;
~
e
---~
, ,
~
\
~
, ,
'\
'0:' -.
, : ~
>'
,
\r;:"
"
,~
\
'-
oJ. \ \-..i
'.
llIIl
~
.-::
~... i
,..,
'0
':.
"
"\ -..\
~