The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About71-Planning - elT'" SAN ....NARDlN.- R.U.ST FOR COUNCILe.ar1ON From: Larry E. Reed, DiIect:or _dpt: Planning and l'lni loinq Services D8te: June 22, 1990 Subject: ArP'-"1 of a Condition of ~ for Conditional Use PeI1nit~. 90-07 Ma}'Or and Camon Council Meeting July 16, 1990 Synopsis of Previous CouncillCtion: ~1o previous Ch1ncil action. (k1 JUne 4, 1990, the Planning l'rmni..si.cm conditionally ~ Conditional Use PeI1nit ~. 90-07, by a 6 to 2 vote. Recommended motion: 'Blat the hearinq be closed: that the "Pl""'l be upteld and Conditional Use PeI1nit ~. 90-07 be 4H:&~ IlUbject to theEi.ndi.ngs of Pact, Conditions of ~ and Standard ~ ocntain8d in the JUne 5, 1990 Planning Carmissicn Staff .1:""- t (Exhibit "D"), ~ that Condition~. 6 be llDdi.fied to read, "'Blat the ~-foot high chain-link f8rIoe be ala1:1led with redI<<xld 8lats or redwood-colored pla8tic slats around the ent.ile IIUbject ~~ to pt'OI7i.de visual sc:teeni.ng. 'lhis slattinq shall be maintained in good repair and ccnd.ition."; and, that the Negative Declaration be ~tcd. (SUWlrtB staff %.~......aation). .6~~ Contact penon: Larry E. Reed Supporting dM8 attached:. Staff !leporl FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A PhOM: Werd: 384-5057 6 Source: (Acct. No.1 (Acct. DescriDtionl Fin8l1C:e: leit No..: 75.0262 Aaenda Item No 7/ CITY. SAN _RNARDlNC6 R.....T FOR COUNCIL ~ STAFF REPORT Subject: Appeal of a Condition of Approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 90-07 Mayor and Common council Meetinq July 16, 1990, 2:00 p.m. REOUEST . The applicant, Larry Banqert, is appealinq a condition of approval for Conditional Use Permit No. 90-07. The applicant requests that the condition be modified so that the condition to construct a six foot hiqb -weodcreteW wall be modified to allow the installation of redwood slattinq in the already existinq six foot hiqb chain link fence. BACKGROUND Conditional Use Permit No. 90-07 is a request to establisb a U-Haul business within an existinq mini-storaqe facility located at the northeastern intersection of Hallaark Parkway and Lexinqton Way next to I-215. The Ilini-storaqe was approved on September 6, 1988, and . established 15 mini- storaqe buildinqs totalinq 68,750 square feet on 3.83 acres. The Environmental Review Committee (ERC) reco_ended a Neqative Declaration for the project on April 19, 1990. No cOmments were received durinq the public comment period. The Development Review Committee (DRC) bad a final review and clearance of the project on May 10, 1990. BASYS AND ANALYSIS OF APPEAL The applicant is objectinq to the cost of installinq a "woodcreteW cement screeninq fence around the Ilini-storaqe/U- Haul business and that such a fence will not provide visual screeninq. (See Exhibit "A") The appeal request is reasonable in that a abain-link fence is already constructed around the project and red-wood slattinq would provide the screeninq desired for the parkinq and circulation areas. OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL The Mayor and Council may deny the appeal and maintain the condition of approval as required by the Planninq Commission. OR The Mayor and Council may uphold the appeal and Ilodify the condition of approval for the fence to require red-wood slattinq in the existinq chain link fence. 75~0264 o . . . REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION - APPEAL OF CUP NO. 90-07 JUNE 25, 1990 PAGE 2 RECOMMlDln.a.TION staff rec01lll8ncl8 aaendinq C~nc1ition No. 6 to allow red-wood slattinq in the existinq chain link fence. Prepared by: John MontqOll8ry, AICP Principal P1aMer for: Larry E. Reed, Director P1aMinq and Buildinq Services Attachments: A - Letter of Appeal to the Mayor and Council B - statement of Official PlaMinq Commission Action C - Public Hearinq Notice D - June 5, 1990, PlaMinq commission Staff Report M&CCAGDDA: APPBALCOPtO-07 . EXH.T "A". . fD) rn ~ rnu \VI rn rID l.J1) JUN 1 8 1990 June 18. 1990 "r. Lerry E. Reed Oirector of Pllnning end Building Service. Pltti Nlhill Pllnner CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEPART"ENT OF PLANNIN8 AND BUILDIN8 SERVICES 300 North 'D' Str..t Sin B.rnlrdino. Celifornie. 92418-0001 CITY OF SAN IEIlIWIDINO DEPAIITMENT 01' I'LANIM. .. BUILDING IEIMCIS RE: Conditionll U.. P.rlit No. 90-07 Deer "r. R.ed . ".. Nlhill. W. ere .eking I for.ll epP.Il to the deci.ion of the June 5. 1990 leeting of the Plenning COI.i..ion in reglrd. to the Conditionel U.e Per.it No. 90-07. We ecc.pt ell of the ter.. Ind condition. exc.pt for the Condition Nu.ber 6 : Being I .il-foot high .olid 'Woodcrete' Will on the peripherll property line. The .il foot 'Woodcrete' will will not provide the vi.uIl .creening nor will it enhlnce the pro,erty fro. the freewlY. The ,roject i. twelve to fourteen feet below the .urfece of the fr..wey i..edietely to the .e.t of the project. ApPell Points: 1. Fence will NOT provide vi.uIl .creening. A. Our p~oj.ct i. onlY vi.ibl. to .outh bound trlffic, B. Surfec. of Fr.ewlY i. tw.lve to fourteen Ibove proj.ct. 2. No other Bu.in..... loclted in our Co..erciel Bu.ine.. Plrk hive this type of fence or need for it. 3. Co.t of be.ic fence would be epproxi.etely '35.00 I ft or ebout '40,000.001 et .ini.u.) A. Thi. fenc. i. not en option to owner.. I. th.y .ede no finlnciel ellowlnc. for this in this proj.ct. B. All .ejor con.truction he. been co.pleted end ell fund. eveileble heve been u.el1he con.truction loen i. co.pi.t.ly fund.d. 4. The Leek of 'U-Heul' BU.ine.. he. negltive".ffect on .torege bu.in.... A. 'U-Heul' goes hind in hend with the .torege. I. it give. I 'leed' to bu.in.... B. The lo.t of the 'U-Heul' ..rvice he. e .ejor eff.ct on the profit of the .torege budn... . W. hev. two propo.ed option.: 1. R.dwood '.llt.' in pre..nt fenc. on the .ubj.ct prop.rty. 2. Thet th.re b. Ilnd.cIPing on the City end CALTRANS own.d lend. In clo.ing w. wlnt to r.it.rete thet e good lOOking project i. in ell our be.t int.re.t.. w. would like to work tog.ther with the City to .eke the be.t looking project po..ible. _c..LerelY. "~~~ 2255 Avenide De Le PleYI. Suite 2 Le Jolle. CA 92037 - - - . ( EXHIBIT B City ot gn Be~inO {, o STA"rJ5lUa'lT OF OFFICIAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION IrDn.T1I'CT Number: Conditional US. Permit Number 90-07 Applicant:. Robert W. Baaond, tor Robert W. and Belen M. B&IIIIIIond: and Larry and Jody Bangert ACTION Meeting Date: _X_ June 5, 1990 Adopted Neqative Declaration and approved Request Based Upon the Att:ached Findift9s ot Fact (Att:acbJlent B), and Subject to the Conditio... ot Approval and Standarel Requirements (Attac:blllents C and D) CONDITIONS This project was approved subject to the Conditions and standard Requir_ents contained in Att:achlllents C and D. ~ Ayes: Hoes: Abst:ain: Absent: Cole, Corona, Jordan, Lindseth, Lopez, Sharp, Cleaensen, Stone None None I, hereby, certify that this St:at...nt ot Otticial Action accurately reflects the tinal cle'teraination of the Planning co_ission of the City ot San Bernardino. ~'J_ ~o~r~~:r Larry E. Reed, Director Planning and Building Services cc: Project Property OWner Proj ect Applicant Building and Satety Dept. Engineering Division \;o...J af I (~.,O o Date luf PCAGElfDA: COP90-07/ACTION . .IBIT 0" . O'fICIALNOTI,CE OF PUBLIC H'IAaING IEFORI THI CITY OF SAN 118NA_"O MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL APNAL OF CONDITION NO.6 OF THE APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-07 .., THIS IS TO INFORM YOU THAT THE FOLLOWING ITEM HAS BEEN APPEALED TO THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL BY THE APPLICANT. r SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-07 APPEAL WARD -# 6 PROPERTY "" LOCATION : Located at the northeastern intersection of Hallmark Parkway and Lexington Way next to 1-215. "" PROPOSAL: To establish a "U-Haul" business within an existing mini-storage facility. PUBLIC HEARING LOCATION: SAN BERNARDINO CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 NORTH "0" S I ra:t.1 SAN BERNARDINO, CA. 92418 HEARING DATE AND TIME: July 16, 1990, 2:00 p.m. A DETAILED OESC:ItIPTION OF THE PII0POSAL IS ON FILE IN THE PLANNING OEPAIlTMUlT AT CITY HALL. IF YOU WOULD LIkE I'URTHER INFORMATION ABOUT THIS PROPOSAL PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING, PLIAK CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN PERSON OR BY PHONING (714) 384-5057. THANK YOU. ...\. I'" .- .., - - . CITY OF SAN - . DEPARTMENT E9IT "XO BERNARDINO .PLANNING SUMMARY B I a: .... c 1&1 i AGENDA ITEM -!3 HEARING DATE __une 5. 1990 APPLICANT: 0 . IIII10n 2255 Avenida De La Playa, Ste. 2 La Jolla, CA 92037 OWNER: Robert & Helen Hammond Larry & Jody Bangert, and Step-Con, Inc. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 90-07 ".111 :a-.L.....-.hlll'l TQ establish a U-Kaul frtnchise within an existing mini-storage facility u,",*r authority of San Bernardino Municipal Code Section 19.83.300 in the IL, Industrial Light, General Plan Land Use Designation. The site is located at the northeasterly intersection of Hallmark Park..y and Lexington Way and is further described as 5185 Hallmark Parkway. ~ North South East West EXISTING ~lity Flood CClntrol Channel Industrial and Vacant Interstate 215 and Residential Industrial and Vacant ~ PFC IL RS IL ( GEOLOeIC I SEIIMIC . HAZMO ZONe: ( o YES)" ( FLOOO HAZARD" OYES III NO _. ZONE 1C NO OYES) AIIlPOltT NOISE I 0 YES mNO _ CItASH ZONE mHO -' ~ Zen III. 2Z Z- OC a:Z -- >11. Z 1&1 HI8M FIRE HAZAItD ZONE o NOT APPLICABLE o EXEMPT aho SIGNIFICANT !!'PECTS IlOV. .H' _lVI' D _ .... .y ".~ o POTENTIAL SI8NIFICANT EFFECTS WITH MITIGATING MEASURES NO E.I.R. o E.I.R. REQUIRED BUT NO SIGNIFICANT E"ECTS WITH MITIGATING MEASURES o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS lEE ATTACHED E.1t. C. MINUTES z o - i It; e! &l II: GE~ PLAN s a Public Flood COntrol IndustrUl Light Residential Suburban Industrial Light g=: ) ( SEWERS ~= ) RIE_VELDI'MENT IJI YES P1tO.lIECT AREA 0 NO lJJ APPROVAL (II CONDITIONS o DENIAL o CONTINUANCE TO - - f C~~OF SAN ~~.~DEP~ . OB8ERVATIMS ==:GI1~ ~une ~. !~90 , REOUEST - The applicant requaau approval of a Conditional Use PerIlit to _tabliu . U-Baul francbbe within an existincJ a1ni- stoRqe facll1tyunder the authodty ofSan8ullard1no Municipal COde 8ection 1'.83.300 in the IL, Indu.trial L1qht, General Plan Lanel Use De8iqnation. S:In LOCA.TYOH The 3.83 acres1te is locateel at the northeasterly intersecUonof Ballllark Parkway and Lex~ Way.. ~ site has a fronts,e on Hdlurk Pa"y of awz-rf-tely 3aO f_t and 1& fur1::ber eI..*1I:Ied as 5185 Ba1l1lllrk Parkway (s.. Attacblllent WBIt, Location Map). MUNICIPAL CODE AHD ClENERAL PLAH CON1l'QRMANCE The proposecS U-Haul operaUon within the exbt1nq .ini- storaqe facUity is CQIISistent with the Munic.i.pal COde and in conforaance with the o.neral Plan as uown in Attat!-ent WAit. CALrPORNIA. .IUIV~K01lll'RlftlAL on_T.TTY ACT The Ini t1al 8tuclI was prepared by staff anel pr....tecS to the Enviromaental Rev ew COIIII1ttee (ERC) on Aprll 19, 19.0. The ERC found that no slqniflcant impact. will result froll the project and recaaendecS a _"aUve Declaration. '!'be _"ative Declaration was available for public review froll April 26, 1990 to May 16, 19.0. To date, no ~V"_ta have bean received. If. ~ are receivect, they will be pr-.nted to the Planninq COIIII1s81on at the June 5, 19.0 Planninq Commission ...tinq (s_ Attacblllent ItEIt, Initial Stucly). ; r cIvOF SAN ~.~DEPARlWrf ~I()NS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE ne 90 BACKGROUND '!'he aubj ect p:r:operty waa created aa Parcel NWIber l..of Parcel Map Nwlber 5962 in 1110. In .rune of 1988, 'the Plannill9 oepart1llent received an 'application for a Conditional U.. Perait to cOMtruct a ain1~rage facility on'the Abject 81te. Conditional U.e PeJ:1Iit Haber 88-35 va. apprtWed by the Planninv CU ".81... on ~ I, 1981 and e.tabliahed 15 Dd,ni-.tor&ge bui~4inv. ~ill9 68,750 .quare f..t. In October of 1989, the applictlnt'. repre..tative filed a ai9ft permit application with the City of san Bernardino. '!'he applJioation va., for i. . . pOle ai9ft idehtifyinv the U-llaul wain... whicb wa, not e! part fit the od9inal concli~l U.. Permit' approval. 81p Penlt' IIUJDber it-lIt va. . nb~ent1y denied by Planninv Staff and by the Planninv c_ ".on. On appeal to 1:he 1Iayor 'and """"on council, the applicant withdrew the reque.ted pole .ip reque.t., On January 19, 1990, the ..~ill9 Departaant receiYjICS the applicant' a r~ to ..taId!jb the U-Raul franclU... at the mini-.torage .ita. On "y 10, 1990, the DevelGl-Mn1:;.Reviev CODIII1ttee, after reviev1rl9 the propoaed UH, rea~~ .,I"nded approval with the requir-lI...ta that the applicant pan the rental truca only bebreeD BuildiD9a -c;- and ..- and Building. -8- and -L- and that the applicant ahould .creen the mini-.torage uae with a ..ooacrete- vall. AlfALysrs '!'he applicant reque.a appxoval of a Conditional U.e Perait to eatabliah a U-Baul 'rental office and acc, apanyinq rental truck operation within an' _iatinG aini-atorap facilIty. TIle applicant baa provided a ducr!ption of the operational procedure. for the intended uae. TIle procedurea for ordering, picJd.ng up and raturnin9 the truca are aa followa: * CU.toaer arriv.. at the aite and parka their car in the parking .pace. outaide the front 'lata. * cuatoaer 'IOU into the .torage/U-Baul office located in Building -I- and coaplet.. paperwork for rental. * TIle on-.ita --9er than deliver. the truck to the applicant outaide the ..in 'late. . ' - JvC C"" OF SAN BL"~NAR.~. fO'NNI~~DEPARDi. OBSERVATIONS l.:t June :I, " lllllO AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE p * The truck is returned to the property and iupected, then the un.qer retum. tl)e -truck to it.....iqned .pace. surroundinq Are. The aite 18 located within the state College Buain... P.rk. The cable creek Flood Control.~el lie. to 1me north of the .ubject property. Interetate 215 iiI .dj.cent to the e..tem project bounct.ry with r..idl8J'ltial uaea on the other aide 'of the freeWay. : The balance of the .urrounding are. 18 . .combi~.tion of'indu.tri.l.u.e. aDd vacant propertie.. The f.cility will be . .ervice to the aurroundinq .re.. . . . Traffic .nd Circul.tion The .ubject property will utili.e H.llmark Parkway for pru.ry acce...nd LexinlJton w.y ...eoondary aCC88.. The iaprovaenta for the project were coapleUd under Conditional u.. Penit NUllber 88-35. No further illprovaenta will be required at the pre.ent time. cnvM2N'l'S RECEYVED The project wa. rev1awed by all City Departaenta at the DlWalopaent Review ('..-itt.. ...tih9 on Kay 10, 1IJ90, the Police Depan-ent bu JtRVided .tandaJ:d ~ir-almta for the propo.ed u.e C.ee Att8~ent -D-, standard RequireJMnta) . COlfCUJSl:ON The propo.al .eta the cunent developMftt requiraent. of the San Bernardino Municipal Code and 18 ~'tted in the IL, Indu.tri.l Li9bt, GeIleRl Plen Land U.. Deaipation aubject to the .pprov.l of a Conditional u.. Pezait. The propo.ed u.e will be COIIplltible with the adja-.nt 118.. and the .urroundinq .rea. '1'I1en 18 . propo.ed Negative Declaration for the project. l , ~J ( l - - - - .... ~.. OF SAN BEFlNAFnLo ~ DEPARTMENT .... CASE OB8ERVATIONS CliP go-07 AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE ~ IJ .1I1ft.6. lqgO RECOMMENDATION It is recOIIIIIended that the Planninq COIIIIIi..ion: 1. Adopt the" Neqative Declaration7 and 2. Approve Conditional U.e Permit Number '0-07, .abject to the attached Findinq. of Fact (Atu"-,"""nt "."), _Conditio~ of Approval (Atta<,),".nt "C") and Standard Requir_ent. (Attachment' "D"). e;<u1~l67.' II ~; .~ ~, E.- Reed, Director Planninq a1"': 1Sulldinq Services WJJ;t ifJaJiJ) . Patti Nabill, u.ociate Planner LER:PN/sd A'1"l'ACHMEN'l'S: A - Municipal Code and General Plan Conformance B - Findinq. of Fact C - Conditi~ of Approval D - Standard Requirement. E - Office Layout G - Site Plan H - Location Map ; , , I. i - - - .~ _. .f Jfv.o F SAN. ~.... .. .....~DEP~ . OII8ERVAYfONS ~=:GI~~ J~:e ~ 1990 ~ ATTACIDIRN'l' A. Mmn:Cl:DU t'!nml! AIfD C--U PLUl COHlPO-AUCE Ca't.AClorv 1)p1W\ft..l Muniaiaal Cod. (;an.rat Plan Perai1:1:ed V.. V-Haul OperaUon M-1 Stanclana, with CondiUonal u.. PerJai t A,pproval IL, Indua1:rial Liqht Pront S.tBack 'Parkinq , 50 ~..t .. . t' 11 lIpac~.' 2:0, r..;t j I' . ' I 3 .pac.. N/A N/A PCAGENDA:CUP90-070 i. ~ .... - - . . . _. 0 CITY OF SAN BMNAFID1f4b ~ DEPAR'IMiINT CASE CUP tll-Q.7 S ofRtlCT AGENDA ITEM 1" - - HEARING DAtt JI~~ 1; 1990 . ATTACHMENT B 1. Th. propo.ed U-Haul op.ration conform. to the obj.ctive. of the City'. Gen.ral Plan in that the u.. i. p.raltt.d in the IL. Liqht Indutrial. O.n.ra1 Plan land u.. d.e1qnation. .ubj.ct to the approval of a conditional u.. permit. 2. The propo..d'u.e will not adv.r.elY affect the adjoinin; land u.. and the qrowth and d.v.lopm.nt of the ar.a in which it 1. propo..d to be locat.d in that the propo.al i. c~atible with adjac.nt and n.arby indu.trial. re.id.ntial' and public faciliry u.... 3. Th. .iz. and .hap. of the .i t. propo..d for the u.. i. ad.quat. to allow the full d.v.lopment of the propo.ed u.. in a ..nn.r not d.tri..ntal to the particular ar.a nor to the peac.. heelth. .af.ty and q.n.ral,welfar. in that the .it. can acc~dat. the propo..d laundromat' and .atisfy all d.velopaent .tandard. in the Indu.trial Liqht d..iqnation. 4. Th. traffic q.n.rat.d by the propo.ed u.. will not i.po.e an . undue burel.n upon the .tr..t. and hiqhway. d..iqn.d and i~rov.d to carry the traffic in the ar.a, in that the .ite i. locat.d on HaU..rk Parkway and ha. the capacity to handle the additional traffic. S. Th. qrantinq of Conditional U.e Permit No. 90-07 under the condition. impo.ed will not be d.tr.L-.ntal to the peace. health. .afety and qen.ral welfare of the citizen. of the City of San "rnardino in that all enviro...ntal concern. and .afety conc.rn. r.qardinq acce.. and circulation have been adequatelY addre..ed. - - - - - . . . CITY OF SAN.IIEFINMIINo':~ DEP~ CASE . -. . CUnO'-07 CONDITIONS ... .1.:5 oJuneo, 1990 ATTACHMENT C STANnQD CONDITIONS 1. Minor modification. to the plan .hall b. .ubj.ct to approval by the Dir.ctor of Plannin9. An incr.... of more than 10 percent of the .quar. foot.9. or a .ignificant chan9. in the approved conc.pt shall' be .ubj.ct to PlanninCJ Ccmmi.sion approval. Construction shall be" in sub.tantial confonanc. with the Plans approv.d i by. the Dev.lopment MYiew CO!IIIIlitt.., Planninq COlDlli..ion or 'Dir.ctor of Planninq. . 2. At ; all ,;tiiM. th.; bus in... will b. operated in a mann.r ... 'Which doe.~ nQt prOdu'c. obnoxious nois., vibration, odor, du.t, .mok., qlare, or other nui.anc.. 3. In the .vent that this approval i. l.qally chall.nq.d, the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the d.fens. of the matt.r. One. notified, the applicant a9r... to d.f.nd, indemnify, and hold hanal... the City, ita offic.r., .qent. and _ploy... from any cl.im, .ction, or proc..dinCJ .qainst the city of S.n Bernardino. The .pplicant further .qr... to r.iJIbura. the City of any co.t. and .ttorn.y.' f... which the City may be r.quir.d by a court to p.y a. a result of .uch action, but such particip.tion shall not ..r.liev. applicant of his obliqation under this condition. 3. Aft.r twelv.(12) months of operation of the U-Haul bu.in..., the own.r .hall .ubmit to the City, two (2) ..ts of gumaed mailing label. of property own.rs and th.ir .ddr...... a~/or tenant. .ddre.... of property within 500 fe.t of the .xt.rior boundari.. of the subj.ct property own.d by the conditional u.. permit hold.r. A map illu.tratinq the 500 foot radius boundary and the parc.l within the boundary .hall be al.o .ubmitt.d. Thi. information .hall be obtained from the lat..t San Bernardino County .qualized ........nt roll and map.. Aft.r 'the r.c.ipt of the ..ilillCl labels and map, the city will .end an .valuation qu..tionnair. to those neiqhborinq prop.rty own.rs, council 1IeIIbers and Buildinq S.rvic.. Department Official.. Thi. evaluation qU.stionnair. will ask qu..tions about the oper.tional impacts of the bu.in.s., the .ffectivene.. of current conditions of approval and any propo..d chan9.. to the conditions of approval. ;' .-- .J. - - -. CITY 'OF SAN "EIEANARIINo ItiNNRG DEP~ CASE tUP . 07 COIeITIONS ll" - 90 .. ,. If any substantiated and substantial negative evaluationa are received or at ~e City's cUscretion, a public bearing with the Pl~ing commission 8ball be beld. Upon notice by the City, fifty peZ'cent of the latest Conditional U.. PemJ.t application t_ 8ball be paid by the applicant for the preparation of the evaluation report to the Planning commi.sion. After the public hearing, the Planning COIIIIIisaion may 'modify any existing conditi~ of ' approval or revoke Conditional Use Pera1t ~~~r 90-07. The revised conditions or revocationa 1Ibal1 be peraanent and subject to appeal to the Mayor and co.mon Council within fifteen (15) days afterillpoaition. The above process of evaluation of the business operation impacts may be required in any sub.equent yeara of operation as letermined by the City. Operation guideline. that the owner must follow are: * compliance with all applicable development standards of the City of San Bernardino. * All si9118 shall be in conformance with the San Bernardino Municipal Code. * The buain... sball be operated in a lI&Mer Which d~s not: craat. visual i_~, does not produce obnoxious noise, or other nuisance. 5. The rentel tru.ck parking sball be restricteeS to only those parking spaces between Buildings "G" and "K" aneS Bui1eSinga "K" ~d "L". 6. A six-foot bigb "Wcodcrete" wall sba11 be constructed around the entire subject property to provide visual screening. PCAGENDA:CUHO-07C . I, ,. _ J. ---. . ( 8'TY OF s,-~ BE-e'AR~O . (I~T ANDARD REQUIREMENTS r -. CASE CUP '07 ".... 111M 1:1- HE'-'" DATI June 5. NGE 1n :(!go '" ~o...IIIJ!;._era.~._ D..............r...T. 1. 2. (" ..f' ... yo;.. ATTACHMENT 0 x . . . Conditional Use Pennit Number 90-07 aball be in att~ tor a period ot 12 WOIlta8 troa tha data ot .1M''Wl101. BltllUV, it no d..al(l( tat baa been iniUated at the .... o~ the 12 MIIth pedod, the app1icaUon aball apin. '"lIf.'''..l ,....1' be appnveel upon nqueat ot the appl~ pd. t:b aplntion ot th.. 12-J1011th p.dod. Expiration Date: June 5, 1991. PARKING: a. Th18 d.v.lel" Int _.11 be nlpIJ.ftIlIto _1I*dn . a1niaua ot 3 .tI.l'IcIUd ott-.treet JIQId.nf apace8. b. 1011 parld.nt and dd vinv d.l... .baU _ .Ul't~ wlth two Inebes ot AC over a .ultabl. baa OI',..~,ued.. ~eeS by the City Zn91ne.r. .&J:Icint...... ~1 _.8=1'" and have wh..l .top. In.tall.... at 1...t ... t..t treta any bulldinq, wall, tenc., pl'Operty 11n., 01' valkWay. c. Wh.nev.r an ott-str..t pal'Jc1nv ana 18 adjacent. to or acrosa an all.y tl'oap~ allMld naidient1al, a ao11d d.corativ. wall six tHtin he4_ ~11 be enc:1:ed and ..1ntalnad aloll9 the 1'1'0""' Un. .. _.. 1:0 .....l'Ilte the pulc1nt ana phyaically treta the nai....t:~Uy aOned proputy pl'OY1ded such wa11'..l1 be "Ior-t't..t 1ft "~t wben located t.;lthln the I'equi:nd t~ 01' .UMt ai"~.rd ..tbac:Jc. lIbal'a no tI'Dllt 01' .t~t .i.... yari i. ..lnd, auch wall shall be thn. t.at in haiqbt Vben located withln ten ta.t ot the straat llne. d. "'henevar an oU-atnat pal'k1n9 area 1. located across the street troa pzooperty aoned tor ....1dent:1al uaa, a so11d dHClraUv. wall or .qulvalent laM..... IIena not 1... than thl'Ile t..t in b.lqbt sball be ~: &lid ..iata1ned alont the stne1: .1d. ot. the lot not oloser to the .treet than the I'eql:ind depth ot the raid in the a4io1ninq nsldential ana. No t.ac. 01' wall loo&teeS in tbIl front Htback shall obsCUZ'e the 1'-..1nd' tl'ont s.tback 1andacep1nq. Ul'USZ DlCLOSUUS: llbenever l'IltUII. bina an 100&teel wlthin or a4jacent to a ,.I'klnv ana ueel by the pUlle, they aball __I'" by . ."4.lultiva vall .1x fHt 1ft bellbt: alO11f the nu .... e1deit .....IUMd pte(.) aix feat in bellbt: al0ft9 the fI'_t. tile '11l111Hue ~1 no1: be placed within the nquind fnn~ 01' ea.at .ide yard x . . .!:'.. ... .... ... .., r- ....' ..a- - CASE O'TY . ."" k. STANDARD OF S,...., BEeaAR~O REQUIREMENTS CUP 0>7 ..'" AGENDA ITIII j3 HEARING Dlll une 5. NGE 11 1]90 ..: WALLS: a. S1x-foo~ bi,b .011d -::''Woodcrete.u val18 8ba11 __ nqu1ncl on ~ nol1:b , .OU~ , aut. ,.... .... or pedpberal " propertyl'IiiU. (oilY ~b..e urJced"""'Wi~ .x. or checkiirJc apply). loAIfDSc:APIJrG : The inten~ and purpo.e of ~18 -.i.. i. to ,reftM ~ree. and other land8~apin, fl'Oll d..,iftt ,..110 iaproveaenb. 3. x 4. x a. b. c. d. e. f. ro. ... ... ... 'j .:,' ..... .e~acJc uea. Exa" location and .lae of nfUe eDC1.oeune an to be deurained by. ~ Plun1nv ~~ and Div18ion of Public Service. SupednUndent. . Street tree. .u.t be iab11ed a. a ainlaua of 30 feet on center. VarieUe. and .xt<< I_Uon "11 be de~erailled ~y the Director of paru and ReonaUon. All r.qu1r.l! aetbaclca aJNtt~ a ,..Uc r....t-of-vay .hall be landa.:ap.d (.-=.pt for ..11ca and dd""'" which b18act or encroach upon the r.qaired lanl.aape ana). fou:, (4) cop i.. of a landscape plan (iDc1uc1iDf plant zat_rial .pecificatioa) Ibal1 be .~~ to the Enqine.rinq Diviaion for review and. .pp~.l. All ra~1red landacapinq aball be protected from parJciDf are.. ane! shall b. provided vUh aut...Uc .,dlllcler faciliti.. which .ball b. uintain~ in an operative ccndi:.1cn. . Interior planUDf shall be required and ..intained equal to at lea.t five percenc or tan pe~. of ~ open .urfacael parJciDf uea axc:lud1ft9 the ana of land8capiDf strip required by sub~ion .b. and....11 inclucle at l..st on. t=-_ for ev.ry five spa.. or ..jol:' fnotion thel:'eof. Mea.ur_nee shall be c:-.natecl f:raa the inside of peri.etel:' walla 01:' .etbacle line.. fte r.quil:'ed aeeMcle(.) !:raa the north , aouth, ~, ea.. , wa.t _ property line iiil'i b. clenae.l.Y lancl8ciiiCi with utun trees, ......., and tpOUIIcIclonr. A -foo1: landaoaped. eanben ... &ball ... anated and iiIiiU1ned within the M1:bau &10119 ~ U0V6 ind1cated property Une. ... -.., CUP 07 eTY OF SAH BE'eAR~O I STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Air cond1~1on1nv aDd v...~ duou ....11 be d~ away ~Z'OII any adjac::.. rea1-.rtlal ...., UId &1.1' ........ .~ ~e bulldlnv ....11 be fno of ...,. 0JdleIa.1 'U'.........JR1~.lIlc::al .qu1....n~ includ1nv, bu~ ~ 11.1~ h, aOn4u1b and du~. All bulld1nv-supportad ..~.n1~1 8fIIli....~ (1nclUdIDlJ roof .qulpae~, ladd.rs and a1.r COIIlI{~1on1nlr.... v...~ duc1:S) shall be .nclosed wl~in t:be buu'd1nt's priMly archit.~ural el...nts: ind_ndont scnen1nv d_lc.. ....11 not be peraitt.d. c. All 9Z'oUnd-supported .qul",n~ such aa ~f.Z'Mn and air COndition.rs shall b. locat.d witbin ~e bu1ldlnt and/or in Und.qroUnd vaulu. 5.." X b. ( . CASE "liNe>>- 11111 ~3 HEM1N8 =.., ne 5. {990 ILUJIIDfA1'%OIl: ., " , a. All li9h~lD9 ~1xtuna in ~ puk1Dg anu idta11 be d1not:ed a.y. fZ'Oll adjacent pUtEt1.. and the public riVbt-of-vay. . HZClWrICAL J:QUIJIIIIIIT: a. d, All utili~y service box.., connect10ns and service l1nes shall be paint.d to match tbe bulld1nv exterlor on Which ~hey ar. loc::at.d. 'All exis~ing ov.rhead utility services aDd w1rinv shall b. reloca~ed undervround. All u~il1~y systau includinv vas, elec1:rlc, t.lepbon., wa~.r, aever and cable 'l'V ....11 be p~i4ed for . uncIeqroWld, wi~ eaa...nu Prw1dod aa requlred, and des19ftOCl and constructed in acc::udUoe w1~ C1ty Cod.. and tbe utili~y provider. 'l'elepbone, cable 'l'V and/or security ayet... ahall be pre-wired in ~. stru=ures. COIIJ:l1anoe wltb all rec~ndatlons of tbe GeolO9Y Report shall b. requ1red (If appllcabl.). Grad1nv and revevetaUon Shall be s~a," UAilUired by the C1ty J:ft91neer in oNer ~o reduce tba aaount of ban sol1 expoaed to prec1p1tatlon. . Durlnv coutruc:tion, ~ Cit:y....la... _I' nquin a tenc:e around all or a PN't1_ of ... pll'ipbIfL". at ... aita to .~..t.he vlnd and dari. daaava h ad,acent ~",~e.. ~ -.. of .. - .. ~t . ~ -- .- I~:Z;D:.iDs;E:Cs " ... 'AS! ----..euuO.z-' AGDII)A I1'IM -..1L. MINIM D41E .ll1n.. 1\ 1 Q90 NIl 1':1 tenc:ift9 8ba11' be appJ:OYed by ~e Ci~ _1M_ = a.nn adequa~e pni~ ,81te ..1n~, clean-up and dua1: con~retl. Wi~in 75 tee~ of ,any aift91_taa11y n.iden~ia1 dia~Z'ict, ~ lUlXiawa hei9b~ of any =11di119 .ball not: exceed one .to&'1' or 20 fee~ UIlle.. ~e 0..1aaion dRU'IIifte. ~~' clue to UftU8U&l ~oP09Z'apbica1 or other feature., .uob Z'U"ictive bei9bt i. not pra~ica1. No Certificate of Oc:cupancy aball be i..uedpZ'ior to co.pUanc:e wi~~... ".~an a.cpaiz:,.,nts a. well a. all pnv18iou of ~e San Bemanino Munlcipa1 COde. 1. - X SIGHS:' 6. X ( All 819M ....11 be in confonance "1~ san BemaI:lIJ.no Munlclpa1 Cede Section 1'.'0. 'l'hne (3) copl.. cf . )Jl~ plan aM e1evatlon of the dqn drawn to acale aIaa11 _~~ = the PlaM1ft9 ceP4lrtunt fo:, review and.....val Pa..- _ i8Rance of ~e a,19n peZ'llli'e frCI:I the lu11dinvand safety DePu"tMnt. a. MonUllen'e-~7t"e d;ns aball not be located within the required .euacJc for the aonlnv d18"ict in wblob ~ea1;n is located. '1'be aonUMlat al;nahall be 1.... a ainuu. of 5 f.et trOJl to". PZ'OP4lZ'tY line. If the .'~~-lIt .. 18 located within the .etback, it' aball not eH...d an oveZ'all bei9bt cf three (3) feet. b. All freeauncu.n; a19M muat have eigbt (I) feet of cl.arance between avera;e 9retund level and ~ bottOJl of to". ai9n. '6>- '. , '. " ... ., ,- . - o . .. o o o CITY OF .MN...IIIINMlDlNO ST_ RE_IIIINTS , CASE AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE CUP 90-07 . 13 \lune..:;), .L~90 ,14' POLICE DEPARTMENT REQUIREMENTS 8. X Any display of light should take into account adequate positioning of fixtures in order that "stray" light does not affect adjoining property owners. 9. "x Open parking lots shall be provided with a minimum maintained one (1) foot candle of light evenly distributed on the parking surface during the hours of darkness. Lighting devices shall be protected by weather and vandalism resistant covers. " . - , Applicant(.) Addre.. City, State Zip MISC: IS PREPARATION Ice/f-l-It - . CIT\ ~F 510 BEOARDIL~ PlANNING DEPAFlTMENT INITIAL STUDY ATTACHMENT E Initial Study ~or Enviro~ntal I~ct. por ~OI\.A '-- Lli!O&. ~"" II klC), 'l?-o7 Project NWllber _,e. ..c.t..._.cr..iP. t...iO'A/t.oca..... ... t...~o. n.._....................... .. ... ~~a.....................~ ..~.. M9"I MIM - ~ "FfQc.a,--/Ttj, oate~ ~J '<1'10 Prepar~ for: ~~,'''' ~ed ~y: . . t J N..... '~Jl\Te ':p~ Title City of San "ma~ino PlaMinq Depal'tlHnt 300 N. -D- Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 ..-=... - CITY OF SAN _..NARDINO. o. ..'. . PLANNING DEPARTMENT ENVMNIIENTAL IMPACT CHECKUST A. BACICil\9P. Application NUmber: Project Description: ~.I~:;J ~h~~ MllVi -51TPjV~ FYr~; Tf- Location: !i2.I~5 fi8LL-MAf3,t:. ~"'A~. O#J ~,.... '~orV. . Environmental Constraints Areas: ~ . WIt,n .~ General Plan Designation: Ll6t Zoning Designation: -t1:J ~~ /'rr. ~r.q~~ B. I~BQIIINrAL IMPACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a separate attached sheet. 1. lI~h Resources Will the proposal result in: Yes No Maybe a. Earth ~ve..nt (cut and/or fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or ~re? x b. Developaent and/or grading on a slope greater than 1St natural grade? c. Develop.ent within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone? d. Modification of any unique geologic or physical feature? x x )( flEV1S1D lVI' PAGE I 01' I -.. - . .. . . 4. Bltw.tv.lICAL...IJJ9ag;, I propo..l re.ult 1nl Could the a. Ch.nge unique, .peai.. habitat tr.e.? b. Ch.ng. unique, .peai.. h.bitat? c. Other? in the number of any rare or .ndang.r.d of plant. or th.ir including stand. of in the numb.r of any rare or endang.r.d of animals or their s. NOISE I Could the proposal result inl a. Incr....s in existing noi.. levels? b. Exposure of people to exterior nOjse levels over 65 dB or interior noise levels over 45 dB? c. Oth.r? 6. ~_ DSE: r.sult in: Will the proposal a. A change in the land use as d..ignat.d on the G.neral Pl.n? b. Development within an Airport District? c. Development within -Greenbelt- Zone A,B, or C? d. Development within a high fir. h.zard zone? e. Other? FlEVISID 10117 . Ye. No x x >< x x X )( x x )( X Maybe "AGE i OF 8 e. Soil erosion on or off the project site? f. Modification of a channel, creek or river? g. Development subject Iludslides, other sillilar Other? within an area to landslides, liquefaction or hazards? h. 2. 61B_BlJQU~: Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial air ellis.ions or an effect upon aabient air quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Development within a high wind X hazard ar.a? 3. If WI- RESOURCES: propo.al result ins a. Change. in absorption rate., drainage patterns, or the rate and alIlOunt of surface runoff due to imperlleable surfaces? Will the b. Changes in the course or flow of flood watera? c. Discharge into surface waters or any alteration of surface water quality? d. Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters? e. Exposure of people or property to flood hazards? f. Other? F1EVISEO 12117 " .... Yes No x )( >( >< K x x x >< >( x X Meybe PAGE 2 OF . . o 7. Will the MAf':np"l BAJbJtP'r pro~ectl a. 0.., stor., transport or di.po.. of h.z.rdou. or toxic mat. rials (including but not li.it.d to oil, p..ticid.., ch..icals or radi.tion)? b. Involv. the r.l.... h.z.rdous subst.nc.s? of c. Expos. people to the potential h.alth/saf.ty hazards? d. Other? 8. lQUllIal Will the proposall a. a..ov. .xi.ting housing or cr.ate . d.mand for addition.l housing? b. Other? 9. rB6IJi1'02rA'1'IOt!LkI~1 Could .th. propos.l r..ult inl a. An increa.. in tr.ffic th.t is gr..t.r than the l.nd u.. d..ign.ted on the G.n.r.l Plan? b. OS. of .xi.ting, or d.mand for n.w, p.rking f.ciliti.sl structur.s? c. Imp.ct upon .xi.ting public tr.nsport.tion .yst..s? d. Alter.tion of pr...nt p.tt.rns of circul.tion? .. Imp.ct to r.il or .ir tr.ffic? f. Incr....d safety h.z.rds to v.hicl.., bicycli.t. or pede.tri.ns? REVISED 10117 , ,I .. . . Y.s No x )( x.. X x x. x x x x X x MaYb. I'AOE . OF I . .. . . 9. A disjointed pattern of roadway ~rov...nts? h. Other? I CfJ -e1'J'S,. raw~~YI~~8 Will the propo..l i.,~ttKe following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service? a. Pire protection? b. Police protection? c. Schools (i.e. attendance, boundaries, overload, etc.)? d. Parka or other recreational facilities? e. Medical aid? f. Solid waate? g. Other? 11. UTILITIES I Will the proposall 10. a. Impact the following beyond the capability to prOVide adequate,levels of service or require the construction of new facilities? 1. Natural gas? 2. Electricity? 3. Water? 4. Sewer? 5. Other? b. Result in a disjointed pattern of utility extensions? c. Require the construction of new facilities? REVISED 10117 ,.. .... " Yea 'No x x X x )( x: X X )( X X' >< )( )( ><. Maybe >( PAGE 5 OF . - . A_.... . . _. ( Ye. No M.ybe i~rtant e...ple. of the major periods of C.liforni. hi.tory or prehi.tory? b. Does the project b.v. tb. pot.ntial to .cbiev. .bort t.rm, to tb. di.advantag. of long-t.rm, .nvironmental goal.? (A sbort-t.rm impact on tbe environ.ent i. on. wbicb occur. in a r.lativ.ly brief, definitive period of time wbile long-t.r. i~t. will endure well into tbe futur.. ) c. Do.. tbe proj.ct b.v. i~ct. wbicb .r. individually limit.d, but cumulativ.ly con.id.rabl.? (A projtct may impact on two or more .eparate r..ource. wb.r. tb. i~ct on ..cb r..ource i. relatively .mall, but wb.re tb. eff.ct of tb. tot.l of tbo.eimpacts on the environm.nt i. significant. ) d. Doe. tbe project b.ve environment.l .ff.ct. wbich will c.u.. .ub.tanti.l .dv.r.. eff.ct. on huaan being., eitb.r dir.ctly or indirectly? )( x )( )( C. DISCOSSION or ENVIRONMERrAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (Att.ch .b.ets .. n.c....ry.) j 2.c,.f TIfe: ~l ~ 'PP4Jl=rr ~ I a:..o,-, ~ I..J A. ttlGaH Wti\ln A~EiA- .1:>ev~ ~~--.J&m.hA) ~ . ,Llp,,:::'4 ~lA~ C'.l"VlJJ:nFWI W'I-n; ~ljZ:)J\ D'\r\T:> ~1T7l3.)A."lTa\} . . . ~~<t:i.. ~~\UP,~C1 B~Lnlt\Jt<'n ~~~~~~~ . " REVISED 10117 PAGE 7 OF . ,. . . ~ect H\lIlll:"'- o c. Discussion of Environaental Evaluation and Mitiqation . . Me.sur.. (contined) ..KEE"'P ~ ~\VE. Al.?LE'5 l3Ea:W,c:::;e:~ ~ '7ifJ("....~ "e" Al\.Jo \\ 01(. fflEe QE. . A#.&{ 1AAIL:. *=-ffl. ~ ~c.,:::s. .- . , . [I? ~ 11:te: Vi~UA1 '~P~T CoUJ n eE... . . ~IM~1 Ib -me: ~u~ A~ iF The. ~ a= 1BF- ~~ :e ~-- >=Q .<o.-=:'~ is VI I ~ . ~ -rRr"'l::--. ~ ~lI'\PI~ . , J.I\~ II~ TO 'I:tia.:P M.o:rAtA1.~ \Qe. . l1"!S>u ^ I lY'Y\'P'Ar r- a=- ~F ~ -p~ -re.ury~. , "; -:- ~ - - - ~ .. .. . . Ye. No Maybe 12. A&8rR~I", a. Could the propo.al result in tbe obstruction of any scenic view? x b. Will tbe visual impact of tbe project be detrimental to tbe .urrounding area? c. Otber? )( x 13. 'PI4'mw.JUPORC~S I proposal result in: a. Tbe alteration or destruction of a prehistoric Or bistoric archaeological site? Could tbe )( b. Adver.e illlpacta historic object? c. Other? physical or aestbetic to a prehistoric Or Site, structure or >< X 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance eSecUon 15065) Tbe California Environmental Quality Act states tbat if any of tbe following can be answered yes Or maybe, tbe project may bave a significant effect on tbe environment and an Environmental Impact Report sball be prepared. a. Doe. tbe project have tbe potential to degrade tbe quality of the enVironment, substantially reduce tbe habitat of a fisb Or wildlife specie., cause a fish Or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining level., threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number Or restrict tbe range of a rare or endangered plant or .nimal or eliminate REVISED 10117 "AG.IOF. . .. D. DE'l'ERMI1671gJ On th. ba.i. of this initi.l .tudy, ~Th. propo.ed proj.ct COULD NOT have . .ignificant .ff.ct on the L:J environaent .nd a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will b. pr.pared. Th. propo..d project could hav.. significant .ff.ct on th. O .nvironm.nt, although there will not be a .ignificant .ffect in this ca.. b.c.use the .itigation ....ur.. de.cribef",y. hay. been add.d to the proj.ct. A NEGATIVE DICLARATION will be pr.p.r.d. O The propo..d proj.ct MAY h.ve . .ignifi~ant effect on the. environ.ent, and an EHVIIONMENfAL IMPACT RIPORr ia required. EHVIROlIIlNTAL REVIEW COMIII'1"1'EE CI'l'Y OJ! SAN BEltNARDINO, CALIFORNIA -- JOf/1J I1DA17l1~Y . &;,AJ~;,Iff~ /?ifA/N"€~ ;' IlaM .nd Titl. ~u~- Date: ~- /1-'1') RIVIIID 12117 PAGE I OF I o . ~ '0 .. ATTACHMENT F I!! C C z ; . t- ::I o C >oC wA. ._-------------~~------ z . [7u ! ~r c.:: ~....... z" ::f o U >0 IDC~ WIlD cS IS I- ID C"'IW we ~ a:=- ID ~flf . ID ~ u ~:q~ IIwt- QA.ii!~ ! J...cu ..._z'" ::I =0 ...0 a:c (- >oz CO !~ Ut- WCIl ID .. . ...~ ~8 ~... IDO 5:t- t-w rial OC "'w Cm E~ zA. _0 ~lI! uty w'" CJ . Ca: a: I!! ez 'ID::I ",0 "'u~ cz~ A.!l!B Wt-z w>o== ~a:lI' OWl&. "'>0 ~iS t-co o .~ 5 ~ ~ .~ ! f ~ ~ -- 0 . .. II .' III e a:: 15 ~~ III ~ ~~ ~a::1D ..I ioe ..I WIIlU s- "'U ; ..IW ID>W IL~ i; iii..lg sl;; III III 0:1:_ ILIIl> Sill z o !i = a:: W ri = 8 I g z a:: 0 W i= ~ ~ III ~ > !: 6 ~ a:: =. a: ~ U !Z W III III Oil. ti 0 Uw III ~w 0 0 cQ ~ Ii! c:l::. 1&1 _. i i:~ 2!t ~ )(: OC!, I IDGI ~ ~ III III ..I i 11), III ~ III i z 0 ~ t- III a:: III Ii ii: IL . "., ~ "---.. 0 ... -. . . .CHMENTO . O~--. 2 _ " ,.... ..--""" . 110.03' .'\. - -~ . " ~._.: 111 -., .~~ r . '. "Z {t..;, If f/ $- ....... ... ... -.;" - Ii -. ... CO l .... -,... . .ff" '-r n . ....... ro' ... 8 II' . . II ~ ) . "1 u' ~ "! ..... '" ~ ... . .' ~...- a. "," I ~~.i , - -...... -1 - --- . -- . . .~ r'" .. - - ~- . . _. .A4HMENT. . otr SAN IDNARDINO 'PL.AiNtHe OEMIn'MtNT 41..... o CITY LOCATION CASE CUP 90-07 HEARING DATE June s. 1990 MINDA ITEM_ 13 . e' ee \. \' " \' \' \' \\ \\ \' \\ . .