HomeMy WebLinkAbout15-Public Works
CIT~ OF SAN BE~ARDINcJ~REQJ~~T~~~o~~~NCIL ACTION
Dept:
Public Works/Engineerings~ /
,.,,, "r.r. Adoption of Negative Declaration &
R:C'D,-,\'> "SubjllCtl Finding of Consistency with the
, ",Circulation Element of the General
~\ 1-, . .
Plan - Extens~on of Sunset Dr~ve
from Caroline Street to Redlands
Boulevard
, ....,
From:
ROGER G. HARDGRAVE
Date:
May 9, 1990
Public Works Project No. 90-06
Synopsis of Previous Council action:
None.
Recommended motion:
1. That the Negative Declaration for Public Works Project No. 90-
06, Extension of Sunset Drive from Caroline Street to Redlands
Boulevard, be adopted.
2. That a finding be made that the Extension of Sunset Drive from
Caroline Street to Redlands Boulevard is consistent with the
Circulation element of the General Plan.
cc: Marshall Julian
Contact person:
Roqer G. Hardqrave
Staff Report, Notice
Init.Studv,Neq.Dec..
Phone:
of Preparation,
Map Ward:
5025
Supporting data attached:
3
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS:
Amount:
N/A
Source: (Acct, No.l
(Acct. DescriPtion)
Finance:
Council Notas:
A____.J~ I~___ .1_
LS
. CITY OF SAN BER~RDINO - REQUEST (.)oR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
The Negative Declaration for Public Works Project No. 90-
06 was reconunended for adoption by the Environmental Review
Conunittee at its meeting of 05-03-90.
A 21-day public review period was afforded from 05-08-90
to 05-28-90. No conunents were received.
We reconunend that the Negative Declaration be adopted and
a finding made that the project is consistent with the Circula-
tion element of the General Plan.
5-09-90
o
NOTICE OF
,0
PREPARATION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION
OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO proposes to adopt a Negative Declaration
for the following projects. The Environmental Review Committee
found that the project will Qot have a significant effect on the
environment on the basis of the Initial Study and mitigation
measures (If applicable).
PARCEL MAP NO. 11951 - To subdivide an approximately 14 acre
parcel into 4 parcels of varying size. The site is located on
the north side of 16th Street, approximately 190 feet north-
westerly of Hancock Street in the CO-1, Commercial Office l~nd
use designation.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 89-64 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14337 -
A proposal to construct a 36-unit condominium project as Phase
II of the existing 58-unit Pine Ridge Condominium Project. The
2.85 acre site is located at 1974 Lynwood Drive, generally
situated 340 feet north of Lynwood Drive, west of Sterling
Avenue in the RM, Residential Medium land use designation.
~BLIC WORKS PROJECT NO. 90-06 - To construct street paving,
curbs and gutter, sidewalks, lights and related work on Sunset
Drive between Caroline Street and Redlands Boulevard.
PUBLIC WORKS PROJECT NO. 90-08 - To construct street improve-
ments (curb, gutter, sidewalk, etc.) on Palm Avenue and Kendall
Drive: a storm drain along Palm Avenue from Irvington Avenue to
Cable Creek: a box culvert on Cable Creek at Palm Avenue and a
traffic signal at the intersection of Palm and Kendall Drive.
Copies of the Initial Study are available for public review at ~he
Planning Department, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, CA
92418, and the Fe1dheym Library, 555 West 6th Street, San Ber-
nardino, CA. Any environmental comments you have should be
received in this office no later than 4:00 p.m., March 28, 1990.
If you do not respond in writing, we will assume that you have ~o
opinions and/or recommendations on the above projects.
SUBMITTED: March 6, 1990
PUBLISH: March 8, 1990
r-..,
.."-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
384-5057
,
en
I ~ .
f":"j.
.,."
CP
C7 NOPND3190
I':
",
o
-J
,"
-
r
C'.TV OF SAN BERNAIlOINO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
'-,
INITIAL STUDY
Applicant (s)
Aaaress
City, State
Zip
MISC:
ISPREPARATION
ke/9-1-sg
Initial Stuay for Environmental Impacts
For '"PIA.S'-lG. WOIt.k.S 'P1l~c:rtJo. 90-0'
Project NumDer
Project aescription/Location To c.o~.sTRI.\c::r
f~;';:;;:~~ss~~:;.'::::;:k~ ,~tEiim:
c.AItoLIIoIl! STltAiS'T A~Jl-It6J>L.A"~ .....Ul #"VAC.
Date F'EB~U.f"t.Y ". "90
.
Preparea for:
GI1"f eF SAN C€fNAltbIN()
l>SP"ltrMst.tT aF flu.Sl.le. W6ltkS'
200 tJe<<:TM -2>,e STt1tEET
sAl:! .".","OIt.)O . CA 'f.:l4111
.
Preparea by:
_"PAw. ~. S~
Name
ACSIS-r",..T ?L.U'''''Ir~
Title
City of San Bernaraino
P1anninq Department
300 N. "0" Street
San Bernaraino, CA 92418
,
-
, ITY OF SAN BERNi1HDINO
, "'"
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACT CHECKLIST
lil... ~
, ""'"
A. BACKGROllllD
Application Number: ~c. Wo~ 'Ptt~EC:T NO. ~o - 0'
Project Description: 4o~N~~"'IOtJ eF StA,JJ8eT ~ R.1IIC ~o %t.!CL.l.U)€
S'fU€T PAI/I~G,I CllJl&s 4r.1h (;.~Tfl5/ltS I "s1:be:WALt::s: ) LtG-Utt A&
~UA-re:. ~~ .
Location: SUAS&T l>bl/f!. '2I'.TWf6 " c:.A~LlNE: srraEET AN.b.
-
~LA~b~ 'BDlll_.~,d).
Environmental Constraints Areas: .coo YEM, FLaOb lLA.lJ A~b
"IG-M &.IQ~"'''CTlo''' $u&eErrt~L!TY A~A.
General Plan Designation: ~,~,~ ~e.ceL.S ~G---' <'i-E#o)eML
.
.
c.oM.ME~L. ~A.T AI.I}> vJE5'"T oF' of PR4:lPos&:1) S1'itE~T.
zoning Designation: ~G-I
B. ~IDlI~~~~~PACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a
separate attached sheet.
1- EaJ.th Resources Will the proposal result in:
Yes No Maybe
a. Earth movement (cut and/or
fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or X
more?
b. Development and/or grading on
a slope greater than 15' X
natural grade?
c. Development within the
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies X
Zone?
d. Modification of any unique X
geologic or physical feature?
"'- ~
REVISED 12/87
PAGE 1 OF 8
-
,.
r,
-,
, '
. __4
Yes
No
Maybe
"'"
e. Soil erosion on or off the
project site?
f. Modification of a channel,
creek or river?
x
x
g.
Development
subject
mudslides,
other similar
within an area
to landslides,
liquefaction or
hazards?
x
h. Other?
2. ~IR_RESQYRCES: Will the proposal
result in:
><
a.
air
upon
emissions or
ambient air
x
Substantial
an effect
quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
x
c. Development within a high wind
hazard area?
x
3.
~ATEB_ RESOURCES:
proposal result in:
Will
the
a. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface runoff
due to impermeable surfaces?
x.
b. Changes in the course or flow
of flood waters?
'X.
c. Discharge into surface waters
or any alteration of surface
water quality?
d. Change in the quantity or
quality of ground waters?
e. Exposure of people or property
to flood hazards?
f. Other?
x
x
><
X
-....
~
REVISED 12/87
PAGE 2 OF 8
,
-
o
Yes
.
.,
No
Maybe
""
4.
BIOLOGIC6U~~URCE:9:
proposal result in:
. uld the
a.
Change
unique,
species
habitat
trees?
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of plants or their
including stands of
x
b.
Change
unique,
species
habitat?
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of animals or their
'x
c. Other?
5. NOISE: Could the proposal result
in:
a. Increases in existing noise
levels?
x
b. Exposure of people to exterior
noise levels over 65 dB or
interior noise levels over 45
dB?
x
c. Other?
6.
LAND_ USE:
result in:
Will the
proposal
a. A change in the land use as
designated on the General
Plan?
x
b. Development within an Airport
District?
x
c. Development within "Greenbelt"
Zone A,B, or C?
x
d. Development within a high fire
hazard zone?
><
e. Other?
~ ~
REVISED 10/87 PAGE 3 OF 8
,
.,
-
\...I
.es
No
Maybe
""lIIl
.
7.
MAN-MADE HA';bFP13:
project:
will
the
a. Use, store, transport or
dispose of hazardous or toxic
materials (including but not
limited to oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)?
x
b. Involve the release
hazardous substances?
of
x
c. Expose people to the potential
health/safety hazards?
d. Other?
><
X
8. HQY~: Will the proposal:
a. Remove existing housing or
create a demand for additional
housing?
><
X
b. Other?
9. TRA~~F~TATION/CI~ATION: Could
the proposal result in:
a. An increase in traffic that is
greater than the land use
designated on the General
Plan?
x
b. Use of existing, or demand for
new, parking facilities/
structures?
x
c. Impact upon existing public
transpoJtetion systems?
oX
d. Alteration of present patterns ><
of circulation?
e. Impact to rail or air traffic? ;><
f. Increased safety hazards to
vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
x
lIo...
~
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 4 OF 8
.
.,
,
g.
h.
-
A disjointed pattern
roadway improvements?
Other?
10. PUBLI~ SERVICES Will the proposal
impact the following beyond the
capability to provide adequate
levels of service?
a.
Fire protection?
b.
police protection?
c.
Schools (i.e. attendance,
boundaries, overload, etc,)?
d.
Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e.
Medical aid?
f.
Solid waste?
g.
Other?
11. Q11LITIES: will the proposal:
....
REVISED 10/87
a. Impact the following beyond
the capability to provide
adequate levels of service or
require the construction of
new facilities?
1. Natural gas?
2. Electricity?
3~ Water?
4. Sewer?
5. Other?
b.
Result in a
pattern of
extensions?
disjointed
utility
c.
Require the construction of
new facilities?
of
-
~
~es
No
x
X
><
X
'X
x
><
'X
X
')<
X
X
X
X
x
x
Maybe
'"
~
PAGE 5 OF 8
."
"
--/ "
Maybe
'"
r
12. AESTHETI~:
a. Could the proposal result in
the obstruction of any scenic
view?
b. Will the visual impact of the
project be detrimental to the
surrounding area?
c. Other?
13.
Could the
~P~~URA~--FESQURCES:
proposal result in:
a. The alteration or destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
b.
c.
Adverse
impacts
historic
object?
Other?
physical or aesthetic
to a prehistoric or
site, structure or
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance
(Section 15065)
\..
The California Environmental
Quality Act states that if any of
the following can be answered yes
or maybe, the project may have a
significant effect on the
environment and an Environmental
Impact Report shall be prepared.
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate
REVISED 10/87
Yes
No
x
x
'X
><
><
X:.
~
PAGE 6 OF 8
ti
,
rJ.
(J.
r
Yes
No
Maybe
""'Ill
important examples of the
major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the
potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact
on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts
will endure well into the
future. )
x
x
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually
limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may
impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively
small, but where the effect of
the total of those impacts on
the environment is
significant.)
d. Does the project have
environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
'X
x
C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES
(Attach sheets as necessary.)
.15' .t'oo V&'fL FtpQ]) f'LA1,.a ",.all ..,&11 LIClu.eFAd"'O~
-nI~ ~p~'^ oF ST"AB&!'T CIlIU7'~~ N IS LoeA'1'6) WI"fM'Jol A Gor. YE~ F'-'"
ftl..Au~ A/Q) M.... L.1~F'~C.T/Illr.1 "..........4'TI.,L,tTV zt>,.a.. .:IlNeE THE; .%N'T&4l!Q)
I.\SA.S IS f'o~ "T"AAf'Fle, ~Ul\o\J I __<<e'ss Iblb Avu:.1...G o,.sl.Y IAlITKocaANV
.sT~~c..ar~AL. 'Z>~F'P'IE.f\lT'. No ~1&NtFlat.IT ~AI~ ClIlLL- RBIA.t-T.
.
3a.
.A~OItPT10'" tu'TC& ~ .sU,lU9lc.s llIANOFF
ce~T'c,.I OF flCtl~ .5"r'IUET ~'^~ fulb ULA~ .%~FEAM.4I8Ui:
~
to..
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 7 OF 8
.,
.
Pro; ect NUn:).
Date
-
\-'
C. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation
:38. Measures (contined) .s~If.FAc:.c Af<.EA,S Wl~~ bl!!ut.sASe:
~e.soll!.PTION ~-re.s' ANb :I:N~SE WATalt. ~oFF.
UOWEI/e~ . ~ "To "Tlt- SMAU- AltSA.x:NVOLV61) THI.I w,U-
.
~ PoQE A. SISN~F/C"'rr :%.M.PAC.T A,S AI-L. ~~ 1ollLl.. ..
~ lIC.Ec.11i1> IlaTO c rrY oSTof/.M bcAlIoI .&'tS1liMS.
Sa. NOt.$S- UV6l-S
1)\lItltJGo TH~ OfI!T'bt.,cTI-) Pcmob .wI> AFnEL Cc\I'\',,"",lAJ..s 01"
"THE """'''''r "'el.s~ UVSU TO A~c:o...ltll)Go PII&>I'6/crtES Wll.L..
I
,-,/(EL,Y %tJeIlliA.~ F'kM -rMFFI.C. \.\SAGE'. ,s,.,C& TilE
P.Fc.SE'b .nfu!.,s-r "JILL Sl5RJJE. OIlt.Y AoS AN aUa.bmo"AL.
tJ6~TK - 'seu."t'tol CO"~.c:...,..,q. ''To TIS AUAS MAcro fit E"W-
w~.,. THO~l.\&HFA~C J R.ElIU~bS lIow...€W~b J IT J.s
A~CIPATC'>> ~HIlT '11lESE 'fol-&A~&S ,., 'T/tAFFIC NoLS&'
~UL1 6. "'~'TW'N AGCEf'T'A6LE. UIJE.l.S AN.!> AUtT ll2.~nlt."T IAJ
A ~t&AlIAc.A,"" Xl'\PAc.. "1'0 .s~IA,NbltJG c:.t\E1tc:.,A." y_
:bQ"I6~"T6.1> 'AAPG~U.
qcl. .ALTUttno.;) t:# et~u.4ttIO'" ~1J'E~
:11. ~~$ SOb _fftr#Ir.-r OuUT....C.T/olJ w.u.. . --...rr ''''
.
A ,.,aT ~ITl\l€ %~ To "TN" AUAS EXISMNG T<<lCFFlc.
CIRt'ul..H'M'" PA~flS'. -nuS' IS .. "t'o "-UE EIIt'bEI'IT
fJ.~ ~ All) l"TloNAL. (bN....~iL .~...O: 1""fJItS' f'A.S'T
~lA'LA)(;. AAU "0 M LeN. ~AfF'G CON.Elno~ ~
f'lUrs...rr AL'T"EilWMWE CN.1'LE1'$ -re ~ MAallIl.. E.A&'r-fAGST
AiI&I IJ6JI:rW - ~,... "I"Ifo~.w;.N ""US .
I
D.
.fi .
-
DETERMI~M'lQll
On the basis of this initial study,
~ The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
~ environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
J
..,
';
,
,.
o
The proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, although there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described above have
been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
o
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
ttr1n l.Ju51W1 -~: 5.0111&1 / ~I\.t-\
Name and Title
~do~,j~
Signature
Date:
:~-1-9()
.
ll...
~
REVISED 12187
PAGE 8 OF 8
"
~ " .,'
. , CITY OF SAN BERN ARC ,0
, ..,..
GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION
Date
\.
Adopted 6-2-89
. Panel No. Z1.
~
T
DR. ~.... j r.
_r I"
G4'-1 ~,~
I.-,H r""
~~\
. ,
r
T.-
STEEL.
c.~: .~ITE""DI[
COIN..E.,
6
N