Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout16-Personnel (' " \ .' city OF SAN BE"L~ARDINOA~ REQUESl ":OR COUNCIL ACTIOt I ,I} From: GORDON R. JOHNSON, DIRECTOR OF PERSONNEL Dept: PERSONNEL Date: JANUARY 17, 1990 Subject: RESOLUTION ~~ENDING RESOLUTION NO, 641: REVISING THE PROCEDURE FOR SPECIAL MER ADVANCEMENT, Synopsis of Previous Council action: ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION NO, 87-65 LAST AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 6413, SECTION FIVE. .:. ~. 1 ~,..;, .; t...:..., f'n n '-- ....'.. _.~ .- o .::') 1:;:'1 _. 1 (:~1 ....: Ci;) Recommended motion: ADOPT RESOLUTION, Lt: ~U-, " ~ignature Contact person: GORDON R, JOHNSON Phone: 384-5161 Supporting data attached: YES Ward: N/A FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: Source: (Acct, No,) (Acct. DescriPtion) Finance: Council Notes: .o.npnrb Itpm Nn__~ .' CITY OF SAN BEF., ~ARDINO - REQUEST .:OR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT The current language in Resolution No. 6413, section Five provides that the city Administrator may approve a special merit advancement for City employees upon the recommendation of the employee's Department Head, without regard to the minimum length of service provisions of that Resolution. The attached Resolution. adds the requirement that the Common Council must also approve such an increase to section Five paragraph (F). The proposed language will delete the last two sentences from paragraph (F) of section Five which now reads: "Such a special merit advancement shall establish a new compensation advancement date for the next step increase which may come due. Informational reports on such increases shall be submitted to the Council by the City Administrator." By deleting the first sentence listed above, the city Admin- istrator will have the latitude to determine the next in- crease date. The second sentence listed above will be unnecessary since the Council will be approving all future special merit advancements. PM:5 lmt 1/17/90 75-0264 ,," " 1 2 3 4 S RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 6413 ENTITLED IN PART "A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A BASIC COMPENSATION PLAN FOR OFFICERS AND/OR EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. . .", TO REVISE THE PROCEDURE FOR SPECIAL MERIT ADVANCEMENT. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION ONE: Resolution No. 6413, Section Five, relatins 6 to the procedure for special merit advancement is hereby 7 amended to read as follows: 8 "SECTION FIVE: All officers and employees of the City of 9 San Bernardino except Safety members shall be compensated in 10 accordance with Section Three of this resolution, as follows: 11 "SECTION FIVE: All officers and employees of the City of 12 San Bernardino except Safety members shall be compensated in 13 accordance with section Three of this resolution, as follows: 14 step "1" shall be the minimum and normal hiring (a) ~I IS ji step. The Mayor and Common Council may, upon the recom- 16 mendation of the city Administrator, start a new employee at a 17 higher salary step in a situation where unusual difficulty has 18 been encountered in recruiting a sufficient number of 19 qualified applicants or in the event the experience and 20 qualifications of the person being considered for employment 21 would, upon commencing work, be as proficient as those already 22 employed within the subject class at the salary step being 23 24 2S 26 27 28 recommended. (b) An officer or employee who has been compensated continuously for six months at step "1" in a class witQ satisfactory performance shall be advanced to step "2" upo~ (continued) Page 1 of 5 January 17, 1990 . . 1 2 3 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING RESOLUTION 6413 ENTITLED IN PART "A RESOLUTION TO REVISE THE PROCEDURE FOR SPECIAL MERIT ADVANCEMENT. the positive recommendation of his/her department head. (c) An officer or employee who has been compensated S continuously in the class for one year in step "2" shall be 6 advanced to step "3", upon the positive recommendation of 7 his/her department head. 8 (d) An officer or employee who has been compensateq 9 continuously in the class for one year in step "3" shall be 10 advanced to step "4", upon the positive recommendation of 11 his/her department head. 12 An officer or employee who has been compensated (e) 13 continuously in the class for one year in step "4" shall be 14 advanced to step "5", upon the positive recommendation of II 15 II his/her department head. 16 (f) In such cases as may occur wherein an employee shall 17 demonstrate exceptional ability and proficiency in performance 18 of his/her assigned duties, and is not yet on step 5 of the 19 salary range, said employee may be given a special merit 20 advancement wi thout regard to the minimum length of service 21 provisions contained in this resolution, upon the recommenda- 22 23 24 2S 26 27 28 tion of the employee's department head and the approval of the city Administrator and the Common Council. (g) When recommended by the department head, the com- pensation step advancements as provided for in subparagraph$ b, c, d and e abpve, shall become effective upon the date of (continued) Page 2 of 5 January 17, 1990 1 2 3 4 S 6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING RESOLUTIOij 6413 ENTITLED IN PART "A RESOLUTION . TO REVISE THE: PROCEDURE FOR SPECIAL MERIT ADVANCEMENT. completion of the required service time. To determine when a~ employee shall receive a compensation step advancement, the following procedure shall be followed: (1) The Finance Department shall submit to each depart- 7 ment head on a monthly basis a list containing the names of 8 each of that department's employees eligible to receive a step 9 advancement during the following month. 10 11 mendation opposite each name and return the listing to the (2) The department head shall indicate his/her recom- 12 Finance Department prior to the first of the month in which 13 the step advancement becomes due. If the department hea~ 14 indicates that he/she does not recommend an employee to !I 15 jl receive a step advancement on the scheduled date, he/she will 16 submit to the Personnel Department a completed Employee 17 Evaluation Report on that employee substantiating the negative 18 recommendation, in addition to returning the annotated list to 19 the Finance Department. 20 (3) For those employees for whom a step inprease was not 21 recommended, the department head will review the employee's 22 23 24 2S 26 27 28 performance at intervals not to exceed 60 calendar days to determine if the performance has improved enough to warrant the step advancement. If the department head, upon review, determines that a positive recommendation is subsequently i~ order, he/she shall complete another Employee EvaluatioQ (continued) Page 3 of 5 January 17, 1990 , . 1 2 3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING RESOLUTION 6413 ENTITLED IN PART "A RESOLUTION TO REVISE THE PROCEDURE FOR SPECIAL MERIT ADVANCEMENT. Report to indicate the improvement and submit it to the 4 Personnel Director with a recommendation in memorandum form S that the employee receive the step advancement. 6 (4) The Personnel Director shall review the evaluation 7 and shall process the memorandum requesting the step advance- 8 ment through the Finance Department immediately upon receipt 9 of the positive recommendation from the department head. The 10 date the step increase in subsequently granted by the depart- 11 ment head shall establish a new compensation advancement date 12 for the next step advancement that may come due. 13 (h) If any employee feels that he/she was improperly 14 denied a step advancement when originally due, he/she may have 15 1\ a review made of the negative recommendation of the department 16 head by following the appropriate grievance procedure. The 17 time limit for filing an appeal shall be within 10 working 18 days from the date of the officer's or employee's negative 19 notification via the Employee Evaluation Report. 20 21 22 23 24 2S 26 27 28 (i) When an employee returns to work after a break in "continuous service" as defined in Section Nine of Resolution No. 6433, as amended, and when such break in "continuous service" shall have been by leave of absence with the approval of the Mayor and Common council, his/her anniversary date and compensation advancement date for the purpose of establishing compensation as provided for in this section shall be advanced (continued) Page 4 of 5 January 17, 1990 . . 1 2 3 4 S 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1. 15 ,I 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 2S 26 27 28 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING RESOLUTION 6413 ENTITLED IN PART "A RESOLUTION TO REVISE THE PROCEDURE FOR SPECIAL MERIT ADVANCEMENT. to such date as will account for the period of uncompensated time off." I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duy adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the city of SaQ Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held , 1990, by the follow- on the , day of ing vote to wit: AYES: council Members NAYS: ABSENT: City Clerk The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day of , 1990. W.R. "Bob" Holcomb, Mayor Approved as to form and legal content: City Attorney PD AMEND87-65 jyr 1-17-90 Page 5 of 5 January 17, 1990 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 6413 ENTITLED IN PART "A RESOLUTION 3 ESTABLISHING A BASIC COMPENSATION PLAN FOR OFFICERS AND/OR EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO . ", TO REVISE THE 4 PROCEDURE FOR SPECIAL MERIT ADVANCEMENT. 5 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: 6 SECTION 1. Resolution No. 6413, Section 5, relating to the 7 procedure for special merit advancement is hereby amended to read 8 as follows: 9 "SECTION 5. All officers and employees of the City of San Bernardino except Safety members shall be compensated in accordance with Section Three of this resolution, as follows: (a) Step "1" shall be the minimum and normal hiring step. The Mayor and Common Council may, upon the recommendation of the City Administrator or elected officer, in the case of an employee specified in Charter Section 242, start a new employee at a higher salary step in a situation where unusual difficulty has been encountered in recruiting a sufficient number of qualified applicants or in the event the experience and qualifications of the person being considered for employment would, upon commencing work, be as proficient as those already employed within the subject class at the salary step being recommended. (b) An officer or employee who has been compensated continuously for six months at step "1" in a class with satisfactory performance shall be advanced to step "2" upon the 25 positive recommendation of. his/her department head. 26 (c) An 0 f f icer or employee who has been compensated 27 continuously in the class for one year in step "2" shall be 28 JFP/dys/6413.res March 2, 1990 1 // /f 1 advanced to step "3", upon the positive recommendation of his/her 2 department head. 3 (d) An officer or employee who has been compensated 4 continuously in the class for one year in step "3" shall be 5 advanced to step "4", upon the positive recommendation of his/her 6 department head. 7 (e) An officer or employee who has been compensated 8 continuously in the class for one year in step "4" shall be 9 advanced to step "5", upon the positive recommendation of his/her 10 department head. 11 12 demonstrate exceptional ability and proficiency in performance of (f) In such cases as may occur wherein an employee shall 13 his/her assigned duties, and is not yet on step "5" of the 14 salary range, said employee may be given a speci a1 merit 15 advancement without regard to the minimum length of service 16 provisions contained in this resolution, upon the recommendation 17 of the employee's department head and the City Administrator, or, 18 in the case of an employee specified in Charter Section 242, by 19 the employee's elected department head. Said recommendation 21 20 shall be presented for the approval of the Mayor and Common Council. Such employee shall be eligible for advancement to the 22 next salary step one year following his/her compensation step 24 23 advancement to the step held prior to the special merit increase. (g) When recommended by the department head, the 25 compensation step advancements as provided for in subparagraphs 26 b, c, d, e and f above, shall become effective upon the date of 27 completion of the required service time. To determine when an 28 JFP/dys/6413.res March 2, 1990 2 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 employee shall receive a compensation step advancement, the 2 following procedure shall be followed: 3 (1) The Finance Department shall submit to each 4 department head on a monthly basis a list containing the 5 names of each of that department's employees eligible to 6 receive a step advancement during the following month. 7 (2) The department head shall indicate his/her 8 recommendation opposite each name and return the listing to 9 the Finance Department prior to the first of the month in which the step advancement becomes due. (3) For those employees not specified in Charter Section 242 for whom a step increase was not recommended, the department head will review the employee's performance at intervals not to exceed sixty (60) calendar days to determine if the performance has improved enough to warrant the step advancement. If the department head upon review, determines that a positive recommendation is subsequently in order, he/she shall complete another Employee Evaluation Report to indicate the improvement and submit it to the Personnel Director with a recommendation in memorandum form that the employee received the step advancement. (4) The Personnel Director shall review the evaluation of employees not specified in Charter Section 242 and shall process the memorandum requesting the step advancement through the Finance Department immediately upon receipt of the positive recommendation from the department head. Elected officials shall present the JFP/dys/6413.res March 2, 1990 3 1 memorandum requesting the step advancement for employees 2 specified in the Charter Section 242 to the Finance 3 Director. The effective date of the step increase, as 4 approved by the Mayor and Common Council, shall establish a 5 new compensation advancement date for the next step 6 advancement that may come due. 7 (h) If any employee not specified in Charter Section 242 8 believes he/she was improperly denied a step advancement when 9 originally due, he/she may have a review made of the negative 10 recommendation of a department head by following the appropriate 11 grievance procedure. The time limit for filing an appeal shall 12 be within ten (10) working days from the date of the officer's or 13 employee's negative notification via the Employee Evaluation 14 Report. 15 (i) When an employee returns to work after an approved 16 leave of absence, without pay and has over two (2) months of 17 uncompensated service within the prior twelve (12) month period, 18 his/her anniversary date and compensation a~vancement date for 19 the purpose of establishing compensation as provided for in this 20 section shall be extended by the length of time for which the 21 leave of absence was granted." 22 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly 23 adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San 24 meeting thereof, held on the Bernardino at a 25 / / / / 26 / / / / 27 / / / / 28 JFP/dys/64l3.res March 2, 1990 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION...AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 6413 ENTITLED IN PART "A RESOLUTION. . ESTABLISHING A BASIC COMPENSATION PLAN FOR OFFICERS AND/OR EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. . .", TO REVISE THE PROCEDURE FOR SPECIAL MERIT ADVANCEMENT. day of , 1990, by the following vote, to wit: Council Members: AYES ABSTAIN NAYS ESTRADA REILLY FLORES MAUDSLEY MINOR POPE-LUDLAM MILLER City Clerk The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day of , 1990. W. R. Holcomb, Mayor City of San Bernardino Approved as to form and legal content: JAMES F. PENMAN, City Attorney f By: ~ ,r-'.' // / 9/ ;.../., JFP/dys/64l3.res March 2, 1990 5