The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About11-Public Works CITY OF SAN BE.....,ARDINO/~ REQUESl '.). 15.30-289 FOR COUNCIL ACTIO' From: ROGER G. HARDGRAVE Adoption of Negative Declaration Subject: & Finding of Consistency with the Circulation Element of the General Plan - Vacation of Alley south of Olive Street & North of 10th Street bet. "D" St. and Arrowhead Avenue -- Public Works Project No. 89-49 Dept: Public Works/Engineering Date: 2-20-90 Synopsis of Previous Council action: 12-04-89 -- Authorization to proceed given and plan approved. _.,~ ..r.,J , rr , .- , " n '"'" r::- r':~) . "..J ,.. "J 7''''' , 1.:J '. I:, ... ~-'l'i C", -c' .. , Recommended motion: 1. That the Negative Declaration for Public Works Project No. 89- 49, vacation of an alley south of Olive Street and North of 10th Street between "D" Street and Arrowhead Avenue, be adopted. 2. That a finding be made that the vacation of an alley south of Olive Street and North of 10th Street, between "D" Street and Arrowhead Avenue is consistent with the Circulation element of the General Plan. . /fl xJ7A . Marshall Julian Jim Richardson cc: ~ Contact person: Roqer G. Hardqrave Staff Report, Init.Study, Supporting data attached: Neq. Dec., Map Phone: 5025 Ward: 2 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct. No.! (Acct. Description) Finance: Council Notes: ^ ___-1_ 1........- 1\.1_ II city OF SAN BEFt~4ARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIO~ STAFF REPORT The Negative Declaration for Public Works Project No. 89- 49 was recommended for adoption by the Environmental Review Committee at its meeting of 1-18-90. A 14-day public review period was afforded from 1-25-90 to 2-15-90. No comments were received. We recommend that the Negative Declaration be adopted and a finding made that the project is consistent with the Circula- tion element of the General Plan. 2-20-90 r ~ITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY Initial Study for Environmental Impacts For p~o~ \(. ~o.;""S PF.C.,JU.:r iIi'.J ~ ""''1 ProJect Number . proj ect description/Location f'fL1?o~SD v'AC.-A-rIO~ of A ~'t1". 5 riA PCt;) A~'( Off""..eCN O'-fVe ANY ':ir\ ::> -R~lJ:> N...J a::"f",,'~ lID" 5>(R:~-r AJ...;O ,\ k.rx' \,.. tI r AD A'v /E..i\J.) .::: Date ..JAN~lAh\( lC I Iqrrc Applicant (s) Address city, state Zip Prepared for: (I If (I . ;~'fl'\J' .=:'r.:,^-A:I':u<.."'O,N(...I 01.-, /II?" IVIl:N,- C-f-"":" 1=t.r-3L,r ~J~~ ,<t<:'S :X'C "-t"r\/14 I'D" 'S-n;;~r::y_-r ::'~\"-l iSF_K....1AI"i:C)/N(' CA Cf1..4/f': , Prepared by: "::1 t'.t::L-.f,:-;+(.... ~. C,I,,'Oi"\AI..:a Name ^".?:';'l'"=> j"1\~1 Pt-A~N~ Title city of San Bernardino Planning Department 300 N. "0" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 MISC: IS PREPARATION ke/9-1-89 2-20-90 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST A. BACKGROUND Application Number: 17, :,-)L...IC v-.iOhh"-, ~L:. r:n -'-ILi Project Description: Ie vAc:Ai[;:. A C-,.,rlAPt:i~ /ll-i.-EY Location: Be 1........u.N (t..-.,,'e AtJv /O,'M S rFZ2.e:T:S I\~v BC-1',.-jf3.G;':' . D "::>H~,~e..-r ^",",v Ar<r-c'w t-ti:./ID I'\I~"'-i..'e... Environmental Constraints Areas: IoJlfrlt~ A t-f/(ft1 {1/~d~,Ntl f"',,,J e.C,.,;e, General Plan Designation: ~ Zoning Designation: F\ -S-:-=)(Co B. ~HVIBONM~NTAL IMPACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a separate attached sheet. 1. EaI.th Resources Will the proposal result in: Yes No Maybe a. Earth movement (cut and/or fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or more? )( b. Development and/or grading on a slope greater than 15% natural grade? c. Development within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone? K j. d. Modification of any unique geologic or physical feature? f. REVISED 12/87 PAGE 1 OF 8 Yes No Maybe e. Soil erosion on or off the project site? f. Modification of a channel, creek or river? x x g. Development subject mudslides, other similar within an area to landslides, liquefaction or hazards? " h. Other? )( 2. bIR RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial an effect quality? air upon emissions or ambient air x b. The creation of objectionable odors? x c. Development within a high wind hazard area? ~ 3. WATER_RESOURCES: proposal result in: Will the a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to impermeable surfaces? K b. Changes in the course or flow of flood waters? x c. Discharge into surface waters or any alteration of surface water quality? .< d. Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters? e. Exposure of people or property to flood hazards? f. Other? l( ^ REVISED 12/87 PAGE 2 OF 8 Yes No Maybe 4. BIOLOGICAL R~SO~?: proposal result in: Could the a. Change unique, species habitat trees? in the number of any rare or endangered of plants or their including stands of x b. Change unique, species habitat? in the number of any rare or endangered of animals or their K I, c. Other? 5. NOISE: Could the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? x b. Exposure of people to exterior noise levels over 65 dB or interior noise levels over 45 dB? X i. c. Other? 6. LAND_ USE: result in: Will the proposal a. A change in designated Plan? the land use as on the General x. b. Development within an Airport District? K c. Development within "Greenbelt" Zone A,B, or C? x d. Development within a high fire hazard zone? x ^ e. Other? REVISED 10/87 PAGE 3 OF 8 Yes No Maybe 7. MAN-MADE HAEbFPS: project: Will the a. Use, store, transport or dispose of hazardous or toxic materials (including but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? x b. Involve the release hazardous substances? of ~ c. Expose people to the potential health/safety hazards? )( x d. Other? 8. HOUSING: Will the proposal: a. Remove existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? x. 'l( b. Other? 9. :!,RANSPORTATIQN/CIRCULATION: Could the proposal result in: a. An increase in traffic that is greater than the land use designated on the General Plan? )( b. Use of existing, or demand for new, parking facilities/ structures? ;( c. Impact upon existing public transportation systems? l(' d. Alteration of present patterns of circulation? )( e. Impact to rail or air traffic? f. Increased safety hazards to vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? K )( PAGE 4 OF 8 REVISED 10/87 g. h. Yes No Maybe A disjointed pattern roadway improvements? of x 'J( Other? 10. FUBLIC SERVICES Will the proposal impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service? a. b. c. d. e. Fire protection? police protection? y K Schools (i.e. attendance, boundaries, overload, etc.)? x Parks or other recreational facilities? '( :( :( <. Medical aid? f. Solid waste? g. Other? 11. UTILITIES: Will the proposal: a. Impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service or require the construction of new facilities? 1. Natural gas? ;( 2. Electricity? / x.. 3. Water? x ( 4. Sewer? 5. Other? { b. Result in a pattern of extensions? disjointed utility ( c. Require the construction of new facilities? 0( REVISED 10/87 PAGE 5 OF 8 12. AESTHETICS: a. Could the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic view? b. Will the visual impact of the project be detrimental to the surrounding area? c. Other? 13. Could. the CULTURAL RESOURCES: proposal-result in: a. The alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? Adverse impacts historic object? c. Other? physical or aesthetic to a prehistoric or site, structure or b. 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance (Section 15065) The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate Yes No x x.. ;( ;( X' K Maybe REVISED 10/87 PAGE 60F8 Yes No Maybe important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future. ) x: )( c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) x d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x c. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (Attach sheets as necessary.) 1~.rHc;.. ?\.-'i?JeL...:r A~e.A IS '''' A ri.Ln-l l-IQv!P"/lCfIC.t--. UA'"c.. HCwc:..yf...R I Be:L:.Au'..:,e NO Pt..~2-uA7J-.iE..NT i"', lNJ..,;/--,jc.,), ....r1e~.E... ~..JILL- P,r= NO f:>,DoJEAS& ~N';~I~f"\l::'NjA-t.. r.MrAc.-T<) Lf i) c:.l(I~iIN~ ~,'?e.r\e;......-rs ~rlp..L--"'" t?i:. ~e:..?l.::.-~.J c:-v pc.;.<., i-Ol-lC.~S:~ -{ l V:-Il,i('/ t\N"O c :-rti:" \~IG..'vt\R. Acc:..c~C:", REVISED 10/87 PAGE 7 OF 8 D. DETERMINAT10N On the basis of this initial study, r-l/The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the ~ environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, although there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described above have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. D D The proposed project ~~Y have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA ::S;~AJ t. HoATfCjo'1!ttr , f~loJc.rf'4c... &NNt"'- , Name and Title ~ ~. q-~ sijnature Date: d - cJ() - 90 REVISED 12/87 PAGE 8 OF 8 11 "f'N S rA e E. .,.. \lJ ::r -$ ~ ~ 0\ ~ ....:: ct - o J,.J Y E ST'R.E"E.r ~ ~ UJ :s rL WfIT' ~ I- Jf '8 ~ se~LE \I) J/I t3 u.. $ & ~ (:) " if ID IJ, ~ ~ ~ 1 , j,bTfl STUET 1 r Dl Pr.p.r.d b!ll Ch.ck.d b!l I DATE: .11- 0 ~ . AREA VACATED SHOWN THUS ~~ FILE HO.I I .30- PLAN NO.1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING DIVISION REAL PROPERTY SECTION STREET / ALLEY VACATION I \\ U" .shD..~d o..ll~ cLtwftr\. IOT1f . 0 '-I VE a.1'\.d.. bt.fw~el"\ "'D" Q,..~ Prrrow I\.ea..d.