The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About51-Planning ~'1 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ft.~IREQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTIOI Larry E. Reed, Director From: of Planning and Building Services' Subject: Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Tentative Tract No. 14604 Dept: Planning Mayor and Council Meeting of March 5, 1990, 2:00 p.m. D~e: February 21, 1990 Synopsis of Previous Council action: On February 6, 1990, the Planning Commission, by a 5 to 1 vote, denied Tentative Tract No. 14604. No previous Council action. Recommended motion: 1. That the hearing be closed; that the appeal be denied; and, that Tentative Tract No. 14604 be denied. (Supports Planning Commission action.) or 2. That the hearing be closed; that the appeal be,upheld; that T.T. No. 14604 be approved subject to Findings of Fact, Conditions of Approval and Standard Rqmts. contained in the 2/6/90 Planning Commission staff report (Exhibit E); that the Mitigated Negative Declaration be adopted; and, that the Mitigation Monitoring/ Reporting Program be adopted. (Supports oricinal staff recCX11rendation.) or 3. That the hearing be closed; that the appeal be upheld; that T.T. No. 14604 be approved subject to the Findings of Fact, Conditions of Approval and Standard Rqmts. contained in the 2/6/90 Planning Commission staff report (Exhibit E) , but that the Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program be adopted; and, that the Mitigated Negative Declaration be adopted. (Su ports staff's present recommendation.) ~ ;-- &J' Signature Contact person: Larry E. Reed Phone: 384-5057 -7 ,.~. ' frl \~ . Supporting data attached: Staff Report Ward: 5 ...,., C' r"-, ~2 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: n/a r-....: :-:"" ,""', l"',~' -'i:' Source: (Acct, No,) ,"-,. ~ 'I Co -I~; (Acct, Descriotionl -;"", ~,-- Finance: Council Notes: 75-0262 Agenda Item No, 5/ . r CITY OF SAN BER.....ARDINO - REQUEST ..OR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT Subject: Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of Tentative Tract No. 14604 Mayor and Council Meeting of March 5, 1990 REOUEST The applicant, Sierra Engineering, is appealing the denial of Tentative Tract No. 14604 by the Planning Commission. The applicant requests that the Mayor and Council reconsider the denial and approve the tentative tract, BACKGROUND Tentative Tract No, 14604 is an application to subdivide one 15.21 acre parcel into 47 single-family lots located at the northeast corner of Magnolia Avenue and Ohio Avenue in the RL, Low Residential, General Plan land use designation, The tract was denied by the Planning commission at its regularly scheduled meeting of February 6, 1990 by a 5 to 1 vote, (See Exhibit B, Statement of Official Planning commission Action.) The Environmental Review Committee reviewed the Initial Study for the project on January 4, 1990 and recommended that at Mitigated Negative Declaration be adopted. The proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration was advertised and available for public review, To date, no comments have been received, The site is located in an area susceptible to high wind, high fire and biological and archaeological resource management overlay districts. APPEAL BASIS AND ANALYSIS The applicant is for denial and schools, basing the appeal requests review of upon inadequate findings Condition #24 regarding The Planning Commission denied this tract because inadequate infrastructure to support the development that has occurred or is scheduled to occur in the Verdemont Area has not been provided. The necessity of having installed or constructed adequate roads, drainage, fire station, landscaping, park facilities, and schools prior to development was cited as the problem with approving this and any other tracts in the area. This timing and financing issue has been a difficult policy matter the City has been trying to resolve. A Mello- Roos Community Facilities Assessment District has been the latest proposal to finance the needed improvements. The construction of these improvements is proposed to be phased. The timing and extent of each phase would be critical to knowing what would be an appropriate condition of approval for this tract. In addition, there has been a concern raised about Condition #24, which limits construction start of homes until construc- 75-0264 Appeal of Planning Commission Denial of T.T. No. 14604 Mayor and Council Meeting of 3/5/90 Page 3 tion contracts for the schools have been awarded and occu- pancy of the homes could not occur until the schools were completed, The objection is that the city does not control when or where the schools might be built, However, this is the main point of the condition. The timing of when the development comes "on-line" should be closely coordinated with the timing of when the schools come "on-line." CONCLUSION The tract can be participate in the infrastructure, and development coming infrastructure comes have been amended in approved, if properly conditioned to financing plan for providing the needed if conditioned as to the timing of "on-line" when the needed surrounding "on-line." Condition Nos. 23 and 24 Exhibit D to reflect these concerns. OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL The Mayor and Council may: 1. Deny the appeal and denial of the tract. sion's action.) uphold the Planning Commission's (Supports the Planning Commis- 2. Uphold the appeal and approve the tract as originally conditioned in the February 6, 1990 staff report to the Planning Commission. (Supports staff's original recom- mendation. ) or 3. Uphold the appeal and approve the tract as originally conditioned, but with amendments to conditions as specified in Exhibit D. (Supports staff's present recommendation). Prepared by: John Montgomery, AICP, Principal for Larry E. Reed, Director of Building Services Planner Planning and C D Letter of Appeal to the Mayor and Council Statement of Official Planning commission Action Public Hearing Action Recommended Amendments to Condition Nos. 23 and 24 February 6, 1990 Planning commission Staff Report Exhibits: A B E mkf/2/21/90 M&CCAGENDA:TT14604 EXHIBIT A Sierra Engineering CIVIL ENGINEERS . LAND SURVEYDRS · LAND PLANNERS DIVISION OF PROJECT 2000, INC, February 7, 1990 City of San Bernardino 300 North "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 Attn: John Montgomery, principal Planner Re: Appeal of Planning commission Denial- Tentative Tract 14604 Dear John: We wish to appeal the Planning co~~ission denial of Tentative Tract 14604 and request an immediate hearing before city Council, No findings were made to support the denial, nor were adequate reasons or evidence presented in the hearing to justify this denial. We believe ample mitigation measures were incorporated in the project and the conditions of approval to mitigate all reasonable concerns. We do request review of Condition 24 regarding schools, since this condition goes beyond the ability of the both the developer or the City to ensure. To address the concerns regarding schools you might indicate that the School District shall indicate that adequate facilities are available to serve the students from this project. I understand that this was a concern expressed by the Planning Commission on a previous project. However, as your staff report indicates, the fact is that the School District has already indicated that the only mitigation required is payment of school fees. If there are additional concerns or issues to address, please advise us, We have enclosed our check #3661 in the amount of $100.00 payable to the City of San Bernardino, for the appeal fee. Please advise us as soon as possible when this is scheduled for City Council hearing. Sincerely, PROJECT 2000 INC./ SIERRA ENGINEERING f-- -1\.&.s fYC\.-Z.~ Nelson E. Miller Vice President NEM:aw/jn:89-037:89037M Enclosure cc: Don Kaplan cn4)B62~400 San Bn~lff~t~% ~\~ Eql~.L~1 G H LAN D. CALIFORNIA 92346 EXHIBIT B City of San Bernardino STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION PROJECT Number: Tentative Tract No. 14604 Applicant: Sierra Engineering for Donald and Linda Kaplan and Spiegel Enterprises, et al ACTION Meeting Date: February 6, 1990 X Denied Based Upon the Attached Findings of Fact (Attachment A). VOTE Ayes: Nays: Abstain: Absent: Clemensen, Jordan, Lindseth, Sharp, Stone Lopez None Cole, Corona I, hereby, certify that this Statement of accurately reflects the final determination Commission of the City of San Bernardino. ~~ r /f./ Official Action of the Planning FJ /7", /'r?tl Date I Larry E, Reed Director of Planninq and Building Services Name and Title cc: Project Applicant Project Property Owner Building and Safety Department Engineering Division Case File mkf PCAGENDA: PCACTIONA -....- .... ATTACHMENT A CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT , CASE T ,T. 14604 FINDINGS of FACT AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 3 2/6/90 ,. Plannina Commission Findinas of Fact 1. The requested subdivision is consistent with the m~n~mum lot development standards of the RL, Residential Low, land use designation and is consistent with the General Plan adopted by the Mayor and Common Council on June 2, 1989, in that the density of the proposed tract is 2.83 dwelling units per gross acre while the plan will allow 3.1 dwelling units per acre, however, the proposed tract is inconsistent with the existing pattern of development in that the density of the surrounding area is one (1) dwelling unit per acre. 2. All lots created meet Municipal Code requirements in that they and each rectangular lot has a minimum width of 80 feet (88 feet on corner lots) and depth of 100 feet. The irregular lots meet Code requirements. 3. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage or cause serious public health problems. in that the proposed tract will remove windrow trees that currently provide a buffer from the.J1i9J:L,,!incL)'lI'lQ provide nesting areas for many specie!,;j] that the-existing road systems I and drainage facilities in the Verdemont Area are I inadequate to support the proposed subdivision, and that \ there are no schools in the Verdemont Area to handle the potential students generated from this tract. 4. The proposed tract meet or exceeds the minimum requirement of the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 18) and the State Subdivision Map Act. All lots will have frontage on dedicated streets. 5. All proposed streets meet the minimum requirement of the Department of Public Works for street improvements, however, the existing road systems, improvements and drainage facilities are inadequate to support the proposed subdivision. 6. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision in that no public agency has stated comments regarding reqUired easements. '\.. - EXHIBIT C r '""\ OFFICIAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY OF SAN MAYOR AND COMMON APPEAL OF BERNARDINO COUNCIL Tentative Tract No. 14604 "'- ) r THIS IS TO INFORM YOU THAT THE FOLLOWING ITEM HAS BEEN APPEAI,.ED TO. THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL BY the applicant, Sierra Eng1neer1ng, '\. SUBJECT: Appeal of Planning Co~~ission's Denial of WARD *' Tentative Tract No. 14604 5 \, PROPERTY Located at the northeast corner of Magnolia and LOCATION: Ohio Avenue in the Verdemont Area. '\. r PROPOSAL: To subdivide 15.21 acres into 47 single-family lots that are a minimum of 10,800 square feet in size. PUBLI C HEARING LOCATION: SAN BERNARDINO CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 NORTH "0" STREET SAN BERNARDINO I CA,92418 \, ~ r I HEARING DATE AND TIME: Monday, l1arch 5, 1990, 2:00 p.m, '\. r A DETAIL.ED DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL. IS ON FIL.E IN THE PL.ANNING DEPARTMENT AT CITY HAL.L., IF YOU WOUL.D L.IKE F\JRTHER INFORMATION ABOUT THIS PROPOSAL. PRIOR TO THE PUBL.IC HEARING, PL.EASE CONTACT THE PL.ANNING DEPARTMENT IN PERSON OR BY PHONING (714) 384-5057. THANK YOU, '\. 'lo.. jol, IH4 .., EXHIBIT D ProDosed Amended Condition Nos, 23 and 24 Tentative Tract No. 14604 23. The developer or any successor in interest to any portion of the subdivision shall participate in the establishment of assessment district(s) or other approved financing plans for "right-of-way improvements" and "public improvements" (improvements) and shall sign and record an agreement which guarantees payment of their proportionate share of these improvements at the time of issuance of building permits. In addition, building permits shall not be issued until construction contracts for an appropria1;.&'phase or ,phases of the",improvements" are awal;'ded~ and final inspection shall not be made and utilities cleared for occupancy until construction of those improvements is completed~ "Appropriateness"/'shall be jointly decided by the/6irectors of the Pu~lic Works and the Planning and ~iiding Services Departments. "Public Improvements" shall mean the acquisition, construction and installation of drainage facilities, park facilities, fire station facilities and landscaping as described in the Engineer's report dated January 2, 1990. "Right of Way Improvements" shall mean the acquisition, construction and installation of full width streets as described in the Engineer's report dated January 2, 1990, in the following locations: Those certain portions of Palm Avenue between Verdemont Avenue and Kendall Drive which are immediately adjacent to undeveloped lots Walnut Avenue Irvington to Belmont Belmont to Ohio (portions) Olive Avenue Verdemont Avenue to Ohio Ohio to Belmont (portions) Belmont to Irvington Magnolia Avenue Verdemont Avenue to Little League Drive Little League Drive Irvington to Verdemont Irvington Pine to Olive (portions Olive to Magnolia Olive Avenue pine to Palm (portions) Palm to west of Little League Drive Verdemont Avenue Little League Drive to Palm Avenue Palm to pine (portions) Frontage Road Palm to City Limits ( Devore') y";,Y,,,' I' \ "."" " ,\ T,T. 14604 - Amended Conditions Page 2 Meyers Road Little League Dr, to New section New section to Cable Canyon Belmont Avenue pine to Olive (limited portions) Olive to Palm (portions) Palm to just past Little League Drive Cable Canyon Road Meyers Road to Frontage Road (new roadway) Ohio Avenue pine to Palm (portions) Palm to west of Little League Drive 24. Building permits shall. n(jt:be issued until construction contracts for the elementary schools at Li-ttle<i.eague and Belmont-arid at Palm and Belmont are'-/ awarded, and final insp~ction shall not be made and utilities cleared for /"ac:cupancy until construction of the schools is completed. An alternative to this requirement shall be the sub- mittal of a letter authorized by the School Board that adequate facilities are available to serve the students from this project. This letter shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Services Department prior to building permits being issued, r mkf2/21/90 M&CCAGENDA:TTCONDITIONS -'" ",' / I If , ( , (i .,,,,," {I c-- ,/ ." ~ .<r ' ("" . EXHIBIT E , CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT '" SUMMARY AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE WARD 3 ::>-h-qn 5 ~ \.. I&J (I) 4 (,) t; 1&.1 ~ o ... a: ..... 4 I&J a: 4 AP~ICANT Donald & Linda Kaplan 612 Sepulveda Blvd.,Ste.ll Los Angeles, CA 90049 OWNER Spiegel Enterprises 1131 Lugo Lane Colton, CA 92324 TENTATIVE TRACT 14604 To subdivide 15.21 acres into 47 single-family lots located at the northeast corner of Magnolia Avenue and Ohio Avenue in the RL, Residential Low, General Plan land use designation. PROPERTY Subject North South East West -' ~ Zen L&J(!) 2Z Z- OO a:Z :;ii: Z L&J EXISTING LAND USE Vacant Single-family Res. & vacant Single-family Res. & Vacant Vacant Single-family Res. & GEOLOGIC / SEISMIC HAZARD ZONE HIGH FIRE HAZARD ZONE UlVES ONO o NOT APPLICABLE o EXEMPT ONO SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS NOV, 1911 "EVISED JULY 11112 SKY ZONING RL RL RL RL RL [J YES egNO FLOOD HAZARD ZONE RL,Res.Low,3.1 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION PL,Res.Low,3.1 Du/Acr RL,Res.Low,3.1 Du/Acr RL,Res.Low,3.1 RL,Res.Low,3.1 OVES OZONE A g] NO OZONE B SEWERS lID YES ONO AIRPORT NOISE / 0 YES CRASH ZONE ~ NO IiU POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS WITH MITIGATING MEASURES NO E,I.R, o E,I.R, REQUIRED BUT NO SIGN IFICANT EFFECTS WITH MITIGATING MEASURES o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS SEE ATTACHED E,R. C, MINUTES Z o - ti Ll.0 Ll.ffi ;!:E en:& o (,) L&J a: REDEVELOPMENT OVES PROJECT AREA [lNO Q APPROVAL 51 CONDITIONS 0 DENIAL 0 CONTINUANCE TO CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT "'\ CASE TT14604 OBSERVATIONS "" AGENDA ITEM 3 HEARING DATE 2-6 '90 PAGE? r ""II REQUEST The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide 15.21 acres into 47 single-family lots in an area designated by the General Plan as RL, Residential Low, The proposed density is 2,83 units per gross acre and the minimum lot size proposed is 10,800 square feet. The land use designation allows a density of 3.1 units per gross acre and requires a minimum lot size of 10,800 square feet, SITE LOCATION The 15.21 acre site is located at the northeast corner of Magnolia Avenue and Ohio Avenue, in the Verdemont area. The site has a frontage on Magnolia Avenue of approximately 704.21 feet and a frontage on Ohio Avenue of approximately 1,026.85 feet (see Attachment H, Location Map). MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE The proposed project and in conformity Attachment A, is consistent with with the General the Municipal Code Plan as shown in CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT The Initial Study was prepared by staff and presented to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on January 4, 1990. The ERC found that no significant impacts will result from the project and recommended a Negative Declaration. The Negative Declaration was advertised and available for public review from January 10, 1990 to January 24, 1990. To date no comments have been received. If comments are received, they will be presented to the Planning Commission at the February 6, 1990 Planning commission meeting (s,ee Attachment E, Initial Study), ANALYSIS site Characteristics The 15.21 acre site is currently vacant with the exception of eucalyptus trees along the northern, southern and western property lines and one eucalyptus tree near the center of the project site. The property slopes approximately seven to nine percent to the south and has two natural drainage swales on the eastern third of the property that traverse the site to the south. "" .. ,. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT "" CASE TT14604 OBSERVATIONS J 2-6-90 3 AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE r ""'IIi The proposed site has frontage on Magnolia Avenue to the west and Ohio Avenue to the south. Magnolia Avenue is paved but is not improved with curb, gutter or sidewalks. Ohio Avenue is an unimproved dirt road, Surrounding Area The property to the east and south are vacant. Scattered single family residences and vacant land are located to the north and west of the proposed site, Density and General Plan The General Plan allows a maximum density of 3.1 dwelling units per acre with a minimum lot size of 10,800 square feet. The project proposes a density of 2.83 units per acre with a minimum lot size of 10,800 square feet. Access and Circulation The primary access to the site will be from Magnolia Avenue. Lots numbered one through six have double frontages, however, access to these lots will be restricted to an interior street and a six foot perimeter wall will be placed adjacent to Magnolia Avenue. Secondary access will be provided via Ohio Avenue to Little League Drive and to Palm Avenue. The Engineering Department is requiring a minimum 24 foot wide pavement from the site to Palm Avenue and from the site to Little League Drive should this proposal develop prior to other approved tracts on Ohio Avenue. Environmental Concerns The project is located within an area susceptible to High Wind, High Fire and Greenbelt Zone B. . The project will comply with all applicable Verdemont Area Plan Standards for development located in these zones (see Attachment C, Conditions). The site is located within the Chestnut Storm Drain Assessment District. The developer will be required to comply with Resolution No. 89-116 for development of the site. The site is located in the Verdemont area and is also subject to the development fee program. Compliance with the """I CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT14604 OBSERVATIONS 3 2-6-90 4 .... AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE r """I resolution and fee program were found to be necessary for the health and safety of existing and future Verdemont residents (see Attachment C, Standard Requirements Nos. 22,23, and 24 and Attachment D, Standard Requirements). Biological Resources The site is located in the Biological Resource Management Overlay District. A Biological Assessment was prepared by Joe Gorman, PhD, Associates in December of 1989 which found no evidence of any sensitive or endangered species of plants or animals. An arborist report was prepared by Knapp Associates in November, 1989 at the request of the Parks and Recreation Department. The site contains approximately seventy-nine trees. The report recommended the preservation or relocation of an Olea Eurooaea (olive) tree. The report recommends replacing the other trees due to their overall poor condition and vitality. The Parks and Recreation Department and the Environmental Review Committee agrees with this conclusion. To mitigate the loss of these trees and the preservation of the olive tree, the developer has prepared a Mitigation Monitoring Program (see Attachment F). The Parks and Recreation Department has included as a part of their conditions a requirement for a follow-up report from the arborist (see Attachment E, Initial Study). Archaeological Resources The site is within an area identified by the General Plan as having a potential archaeological resources. A cultural assessment was performed by victor C. De Munck in October, 1989. No evidence of any cultural or historical remains were discovered. A condition has been included that, if subsurface cultural resources are found during development, a qualified archaeologist shall be consulted to evaluate these resources and shall be empowered to halt construction until appropriate data recovery/protection measures have been implemented (see Attachment C, Conditions). COMMENTS RECEIVED All City Departments reviewed the proposal at the Environmental Review Committee Meeting. The Engineering Division and Parks and Recreation Department have attached ..... CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT ""' CASE TT14604 OBSERVATIONS r AGENDA ITEM 3 HEARING DATE 2-6-90 PAGE 5 ""' standard Requirements. The San Bernardino Unified School District commented that the project would be subject to school facility fees as established by the Board of Education. The united States Postal Service commented that the developer is encouraged to show easements or other mapped provisions for the placement of centralized mail delivery units. CONCLUSION Tentative Tract No. 14604 meets all of the development standards of the Municipal Code and is consistent with General Plan and the Subdivision Map Act. Impacts associated with the project will be mitigated and reduced to a level of insignificance. A Mitigation Monitoring Program has been prepared to ensure that all mitigation required in the Initial Study will be complied with. Infrastructure timing concerns have been conditioned to approval of the tract. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning commission: 1. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration: and, 2. Approve the Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program (Attachment F): and, 3. Approve Tentative Tract No. 14604, subject to the attached Findings and Fact (Attachment B), Conditions of Approval (Attachment C) and Standard Requirements (Attachment D). Respectfully submitted, ~ ~fl1 ----// L.~ Larry E. Reed Director, Planning and Building Services ~.:.- l-fJ~ Patti Nahill Associate Planner \. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT ""' CASE TT 14604 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM :1 HEARING DATE 2-6-90 PAGE h r ""' ATTACHMENTS: A- Municipal Code and General Plan Conformance B- Findings of Fact C- Conditions of Approval D- Standard Requirements E- Initial Study F- Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program G- Tentative Map H- Location Map PCAGENDA:TT146040 ..... ATTACHNENT A , CITY OF S,(N BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT14604 OBSERVATIONS 3 2-6-90 7 AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE r MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE Cateaorv Proposal S.B.M.C. General Plan . Permitted Use Single-Fame Residential RL, Res. Low RL Lot Size 10,800 sq. ft. 10,800 sq. ft. 10,800 sq. or more minimum ft. minimum Lot Depth 100 ft. or more 100 ft. min. n/a Lot width 80 ft. or 80 ft. min. n/a Corner Lot width 88 ft. or more 88 ft. min. n/a Density 2.83 du/acre 3.1 du/acre maximum 3.1 du/acre maximum Frontage on All lots Required for all lots n/a street Grades 7.21 max. 12% max. n/a n/a n/a Intersections Right angles Right angles Access Two standard means Two standard means Cul-de-sac Length 215 ft. 500 ft. max. 350 ft. max. ~ ATTACHMEKT B CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT14604 FINDINGS of FACT 3 2-6-90 e r 10. AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 1. The requested subdivision is consistent with the minimum lot development standards of the RL, Residential Low, land use designation and is consistent with the General Plan adopted by the Mayor and Common council on June 2, 1989, in that the density of the proposed tract is 2.83 dwelling units per gross acre while the plan will allow 3.1 dwelling units per gross acre. 2. All lots created meet Municipal Code requirements in that they and each rectangular lot has a minimum width of 80 feet (88 feet on corner lots) and depth of 100 feet. The irregular lots meet Code requirements. 3. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or cause serious public health problems, in that development will occur according to the conditions of approval and standard requirements contained in this report. 4. The proposed tract meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 18) and the state Subdivision Map Act. All lots will have frontage on dedicated streets. 5. All proposed streets meet the minimum requirement of the Department of Public Works for street improvements. 6. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision in that no public agency has stated comments regarding required easements. PCAGENDA:TT14604FF .... ~ ATTACHMENT C CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT14604 CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM --1......... HEARING DATE ,fi-:q() PAGE 1. The project shall comply with all applicable development standards as specified in the Verdemont Area Plan. 2. Removal of more than five (5) trees will require the issuance of a permit from the Planning Department (Ordinance No. MC-682). 3. The developer shall comply with the approved Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program (Attachment F). 4. Roofs shall be constructed to 20 pound wind load requirements. 5. Roof material shall be tile only. 6. Each tile shall be nailed and have a high wind clip installed on it. 7. Hold-down strapping shall be required in the garages. 8. Two publicly dedicated means of access shall be pro- vided. 9. Static water sources all have clear access on one side of at least 16 feet. 10. Each fire hydrant shall be identified with approved blue reflecting street markers. 11. Fire flow gpm, duration and hydrant spacing shall be provided in accordance with City standards. 12. Open ends of tile roofs shall be capped with non-ignit- able material. 13. No attic vent shall be placed facing the wildland/foot- hills, the northerly and westerly sides of the proposed project. 14. All exterior walls shall be constructed with materials rated by the UBC as one-hour fire resistant. 15. Chimney spark arrestors with 12 gauge 1/2 inch opening, mounted in vertical from the ground shall be provided. wire screen and position visible 16. Underground utilities shall be required. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT14604 """I CONDITIONS 3 2-~-90 U '\. AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 17. Comply with the Park and Recreation Department requirements in preserving the Olive tree. 18. Replace any tree requirement is in yard landscaping. 19. Conceptual landscape plans are to be submitted and approved by the Park and Recreation Department and Planning Department prior to review and approval of final landscape plan submittal. conceptual plans shall show the new tree locations, including street tree location and any hard surface. removed with a 24" box tree. addition to trees and required This front 20. Upgraded landscape for front yards and slopes will be required and shall be reflected on the conceptual plans showing intended plant sizes. 21. If subsurface cultural deposits are exposed during development, a qualified archaeologist shall be consult ed to evaluate these resources and empowered to halt construction until appropriate data recovery/protection measures have been implemented. 22. The developer shall comply with all applicable provisions of resolution No. 89-116 adopted by City Council of April 17, 1989, concerning development timing within the Verdemont Area. 23. The developer or any successor in interest to any portion of the subdivision shall participate in the establishment of assessment district(s) or other approved financing plans for "right-of-way improvements" and "public improvements" (improvements) and shall sign and record and agreement which guarantees payment of their proportionate share of these improvements at the time of issuance of building permits. In addition, building permits shall not be issued until construction contracts for all of the improvements are awarded, and final inspection shall not be made and utilities cleared for occupancy until construction of the improvements are completed. "Public Improvements" shall mean the acauisi tion construction and installation of drainage facilities, park facilities, fire station facilities and landscaping ..... ...- - """"" -= ~ ~--~ .. ... ~m___ - ..----". ..... CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT . CASE TT14604 CONDITIONS 10. """I AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 3 2-fi-90 1 1 r as described in the Engineer's Report dated January 2, 1990. "Right of Way Improvements" shall mean the acquisition, construction and installation of full width streets as described in the Engineer's Report dated January 2, 1990 in the following locations: Those certain portions of Palm Avenue between Verdemont Avenue and Kendall Drive which are immediately adjacent to undeveloped lots Walnut Avenue Irvington to Belmont Belmont to Ohio (portions) Olive Avenue Verdemont Avenue to Ohio Ohio to Belmont (portions) Belmont to Irvington Magnolia Avenue Verdemont Avenue to Little League Drive Little League Drive Irvington to Verdemont Meyers Road Little League Drive to New section New Section to Cable Canyon Irvington pine to Olive (portions Olive to Magnolia Olive Avenue pine to Palm (portions Palm to west of Little Little League Drive Verdemont Avenue Little League Drive to Palm Avenue Palm to pine (portions) Frontage Road Palm to City Limits (Devore) Cable Canyon Road Meyers Road to Frontage Road (new roadway) Belmont Avenue pine to Olive (limited portions) Olive to Palm (portions) Palm to just past Little League Drive 24. Buildings Permits shall not be issued until construction contracts for the elementary and middle schools in the Verdemont area are awarded, and final inspection shall not be made and utilities cleared for occupancy until construction of the schools is completed 10. ... ...- .... .. ..... ... . - .. - .. .. . r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT14604 CONDITIONS ..... AGENDA ITEM 3 HEARING DATE 2-6-90 PAG E 12 ""' 25. That a notice and a 8 1/2" xlI" and locates the proposed state of of Water Resources Devil Canyon Plant Project , in relation to attached to each deed. map, which describes California Department Second Afterbay Power the subdivision, be PCAGENDA TT14604C 10. ~~ ......... -.... ----.... --......----- CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT 14604 CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 3 2-fi-QO 13 , 26 STANDARD CONDITIONS 27 Minor modifications to the plan shall be subject to approval by the Director of Planning. An increase of more than 10 percent of the square footage or a significant change in the approved concept shall be subject to (Planning commission and Development Review committee) review and approval. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the -Plans approved by the Development Review Committee, Planning Commission or Director of Planning. The developer is to submit a complete master landscape and irrigation plan (4 copies) for the entire development to the Engineering Department with the required fee for approval, the landscape plans will be forwarded to - the Parks, Recreation, and community Services and the Planning Department for review and approval. (Note: the issuance of a building permit, by the Department of Building and Safety of the City of San Bernardino, does HQI waive these requirements/conditions.) No grading permits will be issued prior to approval of landscape plans. The design shall include, but not be limited to the following: x x x Street trees shall be planted on 35 foot center spacing unless otherwise indicated by the Department of Parks, Recreation, and Community Services. The Parks Department shall determine the varieties and locations prior to planting. A minimum of 25% of the trees shall be 24" box specimens. Trees are to be inspected by a Park Division representative prior to planting. Planters shall be enclosed with concrete curbing. The setbacks from the north ____ , south ____ , east ____ , west ____ property line shall be bermed at a maximum 3:1 slope and shall be planted with a tall fescue type turfgrass. A Landscape buffer zone shall be installed between. facilities and street. -- ...--- ,. ""' CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPA4RTMENT CASE TT 1 604 CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 3 2-6-90 , A 28 x 29 x '" The landscape and irrigation plans shall comply with the "Procedure and Policy for Landscape and Irrigation" (available from the Parks Department). SUbject to the Conditions of the Department of Parks and Recreation (attached). x Trees, shrubs and groundcover of.a type and quality generally consistent or compatible with that characterizing single- family homes shall be provided in the front yard and that portion of th side yards which are visible from the street. All landscaped areas must be provided with an automatic irrigation system adequate to insure their viability. The landscape and irrigation plans shall be approved by the Parks and Recreation Department. At all times the business will be operated in a does not produce obnoxious noise, vibration, smoke, glare, or other nuisance. manner which odor, dust, A sign program for the multi-tenant commercial/industrial center shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of certificate of Occupancy. In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of San Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City ot any costs and attorneys' tees which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligation under this condition. PCAGENDA:STNDCONDITIONS 10/19/89 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CASE TT14604 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 3 2-6-90 15 Tentative Tract 14604 shall be in effect for a period of 24 months from the date of approval by the Planning commission and/or Planning Department. However, if the final map has not been filed with the county Recorder's Office at the end of the 24 month time period, the approval shall expire. Additional time may be approved by the Planning Commission upon written request of the applicant if made 30 days prior to expiration of the -1!- month time period. Expiration Date: February 6, 1992 ~ 'TAT. Ill'; 1 x b. c. Ilio.. .... COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR P.R.D. a. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC & R's) shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to final approval of the tract maps. The CC & R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, and exterior of all buildings. The CC & R's shall also include a statement that no radio frequency antenna shall be included within the complex except for central antenna systems. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC & R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC & R's shall permit enforcement by the City of provisions required by the City as conditions to approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the commission prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for PUblic purposes. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an .... 1.15 ..' CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS r - -------.--- --- CASE TT 14604 AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 3 2-6-90 16 """ association, owning the common areas and facilities. d. Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas, including parkways, shall be provided for in the CC & R's. e. The CC & R's shall contain wording prohibiting the storage or parking of trailers, boats, campers, motor homes, and similar vehicles outside of the specified common areas. 2 x PARKING: a. b. 3 x ""-- This development shall be required to maintain a m1n1mum of ~ parking spaces. for each buildable lot within an enclosw garage. All parking and driving aisles shall be surfaced with two inches of AC over a suitable base or equivalent as approved by the city Engineer. Parking spaces shall be striped and have wheel stops installed at least three feet from any building, wall, fence, property line, or walkway. Whenever an off-street parking area is adjacent to or across an alley from property zoned residential, a solid decorative wall six feet in height shall be erected and maintained along the property line so as to separate the parking area physically from the residentially zoned property, provided such wall shall be three feet in height when located within the required front or street side yard setback. Where no front or street side yard is required, such wall shall be three feet in height when located within ten feet of the street line. Said wall shall be located on the north ____, south ____, east ____, west or peripheral ____ property lines. Whenever an off-street parking area is located across the street from property zoned for residential uses, a solid decorative wall or equivalent landscaped berm not less than three feet in height shall be erected and maintained along the street side of the lot not closer to the street than the required depth of the yard in the adjoining residential area. No fence or wall located in the front setback shall obscure the required front setback landscaping. Said wall shall be located on the north ____, south ____, east ____, west ____, or peripheral ____ property lines. All parking areas and vehicle storage areas shall be lighted during hours of darkness for security and protection. c. d. Recreational vehicle storage areas shall be screened by at least ... '8" .. - - CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS CASE TTl4604 AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 3 2-6-90 17 ., , a six-foot high decorative wall with screened gates. There shall be provided for each unit, within the garage or carport, or other specifically designated area, a loft or other usable storage area with a minimum of 150 cubic feet in addition to standard utility storage. Traffic bumps provided on the interior private roads shall be subject to the city Traffic Engineer's approval. A commercial-type drive approach, as shown on No. 204 or equivalent, shall be constructed at the development. Location and design shall approval of the Engineering Division. Prior to issuance of any building permit, access rights shall be granted to the City for the purpose of allowing access over the private drives within the project for all necessary City vehicles including fire, police, and refuse disposal vehicles, and any other emergency vehicles. The documents covering this matter shall be prepared by the owner and approved by the Planning Department. standard Drawing each entrance to be subject to All refuse storage areas are to be enclosed with a wall. Location, size, type and design of wall are the approval of the Planning Department and Division services superintendent. Energy and noise insulation shall comply with all state and local requirements. decorative SUbject to of Public 4 x LANDSCAPING: a. Four (4) copies of a master landscape plan shall submitted to the Engineering Division for review approval. The plan shall include,. but not be limited the following: 1) size, type, and location of plant material proposed. 2) Irrigation plan. be and to, 3) Such other alternate plants, materials and design concepts as may be proposed. 4) Erosion control plans. Tree varieties and exact locations will be determined prior b. ... ~ ,.., I" , - ~ -- ...- -- CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS CASE TT14604 AGENDA ITEM 3 HEARING DATE 2-6-90 PAGE 18 '" r to planting by the Director of the Parks and Recreation Department or his/her designee. A minimum number of one inch caliper/IS gallon, multi-branched trees shall be planted within the parkway for each of the following types of lots, as per the city's specifications: 1) CUl-de-sac lot -- one tree: 2) Interior lot -- two trees: 3) Corner lot -- three trees. c. To protect against damage by erosion and negative visual impact, surfaces of all cut slopes more than five feet in height and fill slopes more than three feet in height shall be protected by planting with grass or ground cover plants. Slopes exceeding IS feet in vertical height shall also be planted with shrubs, spaced at not to exceed ten feet on centers: or trees, spaced at not to exceed 20 feet on centers: or a combination of shrubs and trees as cover plants. The plants selected and planting methods used shall be suitable for the soil and climatic conditions of the site: Trees 10%, 15 gallon: 40% 5 gallon: sot, 1 gallon. Shrubs 20%, 5 gallon: 80%, 1 gallon. Ground cover 100% coverage. d. Slopes required to be planted shall be provided with an irrigation system approved by the Parks and Recreation Department. e. The maintenance of graded slopes and landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer until the transfer to individual ownership. 5 x f. All grading and drainage facilities, including erosion control planting of graded slopes, shall be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the city Engineer. A grading permit shall be obtained prior to any grading being done. All lots shall have a minimum area of 10.800 square feet, a minimum depth of 1M- feet, and a minimum width of 80 feet, (~feet on corner lots). In addition, each lot on a cul-de- sac or on a curved street where the side lot lines thereof are "" ~ ..., Illy .- .. - - - CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS r 6 x 7 x 8 x 9 lO 11 "'" TT 14604 CASE AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 3 2-6-90 19 ""'l1lI diverginq from .the front.to rear of the lot, shall have a width of not less than 60 feet measured at the right angle to the lot depth at the midway point between the front and rear lot lines, and a width of not less than 40 feet measured along the front lot line as delineated on the tract map. Where lots occur on the bulb of the cul-de-sac, a minimum lot depth of 100 feet will be permitted. If the proposed depth is less than--- 100 feet, a plot plan must be submitted to demonstrate that a buildable lot area is possible and to justify the lesser depth. . Variable front building setback lines of at least ~ feet and averaging 30 feet, and side street building setback lines 15 feet shall ~delineated on the final tract map. All garage entrances on a dedicated street shall have a minimum setback of 18 feet. Perimeter walls and walls required along the rear of all double frontage lots shall be designed and constructed to incorporate design features such as tree planter wells, variable setback, decorative masonry, columns, or other such features to provide visual and physical relief along the wall face. The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval of the visual or engineering design of the proposed wall. x When graded slopes occur within or between individual lots, the slope face shall be a part of the downhill lot. Exceptions to this requirement must be approved by the city Engineer. Grading and revegetation shall be staged as required by the City Engineer in order to reduce the amount of bare soil exposed to precipitation. Compliance with all recommendations of the Geology Report shall be r~quired (if applicable). x Any clUbhouse, swimming pool, spa, putting green, picnic areas or other amenities shall be installed in the manner indicated on the approved site plan. x During construction the City Engineer may require a fence around all or a portion of the periphery of the tract site to minimize wind and debris damage to adjacent properties. The type of fencing shall be approved by the City Engineer to assure adequate project site maintenance, clean-up and dust control. ~ .tlS Illy ... ,. - ---~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS CASE AGENDA ITEM 3 HEARING DATE 2-6-90 PAGE 20 TT14604 r 12 x ..., No certificate of occupancy shall be issued prior to compliance with these Standard Requirements as well as all provisions of the San Bernardino Municipal Code. 13 x MECHANICAL EQUIPMEtfT: a. All utility service boxes, connections and service lines shall be painted to match the building exterior on which they are located. b. All existing overhead utility services and wiring shall be relocated underground. , d. No roof-mounted equipment shall be placed on any unless screened as specifically approved by the Department (except for solar collection panels). All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and Cable TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, Cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residences. building Planning c. -..... ..J .... Uy CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS CASE TT 14604 3 2-6-90 21 AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE ~ , 14 x COMPOSITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN A composite Development Plan (CDP) shall be filed with the Engineering, planning, and Building & Safety Departments prior to Final or Parcel Map processing by the City pursuant to Ordinance No. MC-592. The CDP shall provide additional survey and map information including, but not limited to, building criteria (e.g. setbacks), flood control criteria, seismic and geological criteria, environmental criteria and easements of record. The CDP shall be labeled with the title "Composite Development Plan", and contain a section entitled "Composite Development Plan Notes". The applicant shall have listed under the CDP Notes section the following conditions or mitigating meas~r~s reqgired for the development of the subject property: Cond~t~ons of Approval Nos. 1-29 and Standard Requirements Nos. 2-13. csj/12/8/88 DOC:PCAGENDA DOCUMENTS. 1 \.. ~ 1111 .., 15 16 17 .CITY OF SAhBERNARDINO PUBLI,-, WORKS/ENGR. CASE TTl4604 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 3 2-6-90 22 r Project Description: T~ 14f>04 4- 7 5~,e (..tJrs ON No~r~-r ~/Jt5it- t::JI# OHIO ~ AN/:) MA61./tJ'41't Ar/15 Date: I-//~ Prepared By: ~ Revi ewed By: Page ~ of pages Applicant: ~~N ~~ NOTE TO APPLICANT: Where separate Engineering plans are required, the appl1cant 1S responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly to the Engineering Division. They may be submitted prior to submittal of Building Plans. Drainaqe and Flood Control ~All necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be subject to requirements of the City Engineer; which may be based in part on the recommendations of the San Bernardino Flood Control District. The developer's Engineer shall furnish all necessary data relating to drainage and flood control. -XA local drainage study will be required for the project. Any drainage improvements, structures or storm drains needed to mitigate downstream impacts or protect the development shall be designed and constructed at the developer's expense, and right-of-way dedicated as necessary. _ The development is located wi thi n Zone A on the Federa 1 Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, a Special Flood Hazard Area Permit issued by the City Engineer shall~be required. _ The development is located within Zone B on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, all building pads shall be raised above the surrounding area as approved by the City Engineer. _Comprehensive storm drain Project No. is master planned in the vicinity of your development. Th1S drain shall be designed and constructed by your project unless your Engineer can conclusively show that the drain is not needed to protect your development or mitigate downstream impacts. ~All drainage from the development approved public drainage facility. drainage facilities and easements satisfaction of the City Engineer. shall be If not sha 11 be directed feasible, provided to an proper to the , CITY OF S~ BERNARDINO PU8L.~ WORKS/DIQJl CASE TT14604 "I STANDARD REQUIREMENTS 3 2-6-90 23 AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE \. ""' , Pro jec t Des cr i pt ion: lit I~O~ Date: 1-11-'10 Page ~ or ~ pages Prepared By: f1~ Reviewed By: l8 Grading -1If more than I' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plott grading and drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and the City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer in advance. ~If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earth~~ork is proposed, a grOading bond will be required and the grading shall be supervised in . accordance with Section 7012 (c) of the Uniform Building Code. " 19 A liquefaction report is required for the site. This report must ----be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. Any grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction report shall be incorporated in the grading plan. . . An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where ----feasible, this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and shall conform to all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the Municipal Code (See "Grading Policies and Procedures"). The on-site Improvement Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. A reciprocal easement ----approval if reciprocal proposed to cross lot recorded to remove the shall be recorded prior to grading plan dra i nage, access, sewer, and/ or park i ng is lines, or a lot line adjustment shall be interior lot lines. 20 --LLThe project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance ofa grading permit. Submit 4 copies to the Engineering Division for checking. An on-site Lighting Plan for the project shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. This plan can be incorporated vith the grading plan, or on-site improvement plan, if practical. Utilities: 21 -X-Design and construct all accordance with City Code, serving utility, including and cable TV. public utilities to serve the site in City Standards and requirements of the gas, electric, telephone, vlater, se\~er '" ~ " .. ,. . CITY OF SA.. BERNARDINO PUBL."", WORKS/ENGR. CASE TT1ll604 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS "" \. AGENDA ITEM 3 HEARING DATE 2-6-90 PAGE 24 ( Project Description: -r~ 14-"04 Date: f-'1-90 Prepared By: f1~ Reviewed By: Page ~ 0 ~ pages 22 ~Each parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer facilities so it can be served by the City or the agency providing such services in the area. 23 ~Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be constructed at the Developer's expense. Sewer systems shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings. 24 X Utility services shall be placed underground and easements ----provided as required. 25 26 27 ~All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either side of the street shall be undergrounded in accordance with Ordinance No. MC-60l (Subdivisions) or Resolution No. 88-65 (Non-subdivisions). -X-Existing utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer. Sewers within private streets or private parking lots will not be ----maintained by the City but shall be designed and constructed to City Standards and inspected under a City On-Site Construction Permit. A private sewer plan designed by the Developer's Engineer and approved by the City Engineer will be required. This plan can be incorporated in the grading plan. where practical. ~ ~~ MAt~ SHItU- f3I;. t!3>'~ Frz.,Wl 7HtE' er.l.>TIN6- LJIJf: A-T C,#+e'f)JUT AND OHtO Pl!!t' 7Jt/3h03 IN (),wo ~V6 7b nAf.:N.l.fJlA4 T/fe1.J !JottiH /fL,oNG I1l9-6tY()(.//I n 7'"1If: IWllr~ TIUJ C T $OIl,..q;;;ftV- .... -- - CITY OF SAR BERNARDINO PUBL.~ WORKS/ENGR. CASE TT14604 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 3 2-6-90 ~::> Project Description: Ie l4-b~ Date: '-/~ Page ~ of pages Prepared By: I1wfr- Rev i ewed By: Street Improvement and Dedications: 28 --1LAll public streets within and adjacent to ,the development shall be improved to include combination curb and gutter, paving, handicap ramps, street lights, sidewalks and appurtenances, including, but not limited to, traffic signals, traffic signal modification, relocation of public or private facilities which interfere with new construction, striping, signing, pavement marking and markers, and street name signing. All design and construction shall be accomplished in accordance with the City of San Bernardino "Street Improvement Policy" and City "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Street lighting, when required, sha 11 be des i gned and constructed in accordance wi th the Ci ty I s "Street Lighting Policies and Procedures". Street lighting shall be shown on street improvement plans except where otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 29 X For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street ----right-of-way (R.W.) to provide the distance from street centerline to property line and placement of the curb line (C.L.) in relation to the street centerline shall be as follows: Street Name ()J/lf) 11A-c;,1Jou~ II1/C ()7~ S~ Right-of-Way (Ft.) 30" ~' ~S'/ Curb Line (Ft.) 20" 18' Ie' All rights of vehicular ingress/egress shall be dedicated from ----the following streets: 31 --1S.. 28' Or ?~~T(N"JIPlIlh7) SHRz..I.- $6- ,P/ZtJVI/)ED 1f'uJ1tI'- ()Hf f) Av9-Jve AND I1A-GNO/..I,I1 .llveNv€= A-I>.:r,lt(; 61T 70 rlft3= 51 ~ . X ~' v.h~ PI'N~eN( r"",JoJIYI1VIJ'l) 5tf1ttL.L ~€- P/!DV?l>eD ~N 011'0 /tv61Jlle Pbfl'l 11-te .s, ~ "10 f/fUY1 /Vt?Nl.lf: .llNb ~,." ~ SI~ 7b llrru~ t..EAtf1t1~ Zfttve. fl2Jott 7Q :sr$7H.1G- lat6N ;II ~ 1 i-E ~ 8E St.ll$Mlr1l!l> liE c/I) tENGI NESe . 30 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 - - CITY OF SAri BERNARDINO Pl8L~ WORKS/INQR. CASE TT14604 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS "' AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 3 2-6-90 26 ""' (prOject Description: Ie. /4-'0+ Date: /-II~O Page -5- of pages Prepared By: 11W(;r Revi e\led By: t~appi ng X A Final/Parcel Map based upon field survey will be required. X All street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer prior to Map approval. X Additional survey and map information including, but not limited to, building setbacks, flooding and zones, seismic lines and setbacks, geologic mapping and archeological sites shall be filed \'Iith the City Engineer in accordance ~lith Ordinance No. MC-592. Improvement Completion I< Street, Se\ler, and drainage ir,'provement plans for the entire project shall be completed, subject to the approval of the City Engineer, prior to the recordation of the Final/Parcel Map. prior to security and the ~ If the required improvements are not completed recordation of the Final/Parcel Map. an improvement accompanied by an agreement executed by the developer City vli1l be required._ If the required improvements are not completed prior to record- ation of the Parcel ~lap, an improvement certificate shall be p lac e d up 0 nth e Map s tat i n 9 t hat the y \i i 1 ~ bee 0 m p 1 e t e d up 0 n developlo,ent. Applicable to parcel maps consisting of less than 5 lots only. Required Engineering Permits: X Grading permit (if applicable). X On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see B u i 1 din g and Sa f e t y ) . (Fort. tAJA&.L$). . )< Off-site improvements construction permit. 10.. )( Dra i nage fee. Exact amount of fee sha 11 be determi ned by Department of 3uilding and Safety at time of application for building permit. X Landscape Plan Review Fee $ 65.00 )( Traffic System Fee of $ 12.54 per vehicle trip for City-wide traffic mitigation. The total amount of the Traffic System Fee shall be determined by the City Traffic Engineer at time of application for building permit. Es11MMeo FEfIr ~t:;Jqoo.CO. 47 X Street Light Energy Fee to pay cost of street light energy for a period of 4 years. Exact amount to be determined prior to map recording. 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 48 r """I CITY OF s..~ BERNARDINO PU8L.~ WORKI/1NQJl CASE TT14604 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 3 2-6-90 27 10. ,. Project Description: ""' II! 14-~o+ Date: I-II-Iff) PageO-,-- of 8 pages Prepared By: 11tJ.J(,. Reviel'/ed By: Applicable Engineering Fees:~ )l Plan check fee for Final/Parcel ~1ap. ~ Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements. ~ Plan check and inspection fees for on-site improvements (except buildings; see Building and Safety). (fi<<.W~) ~ Plan check and inspection fees for grading (if permit required). Bridge improveQent fee in amount of $ X A Landscape Maintenance District shall be maintain landscaping within the following areas: /11.-014& H/t-6NtJU/J I1vl!l'J()e. implemented PR1!K.. c.c)ItV o to ~ Fees /1'1ll3 SI..IBJe::.., To CHmv6€ wllitovr No/Ice. '" 49 50 51 52 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/ENGR. CASE TT14604 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS 3 o' ~-b-~U r ProJ~ct Dtscrfptfon: n /4604 01 tI : I-//-~O Prepared By: ~~Re'l..e- By: Pagl 7 of plglS ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS x A "Communication Conduit" shall be installed in all streets within and adjacent to this subdivision. The conduit shall be dedicated to the City on the final map and its primary use shall be for Cable TV installed by the Cable TV Company under permit from the City of San Bernardino. . x A landscape maintenance easement shall be dedicated over the front setback area of each lot and a 1 andscape mai ntenance di stri ct formed to ma i ntai n the front yard landscaping in case of owner neglect. This development will be required to purchase "Development Rights" prior to issuance of buil di ng permits (3tl6jCe:t to fi 1'1 a 1 al'l'l o. a 1 15 f ti,e 116.J 0, Qlld t:81ll1ll8f1 t:etlfleil af tRe 'JepeeIR8Rt !'.rea PblB 1 i ~ ~!orl(s I RfrastrlllQtblre ri RaRci R~ Phfl) . x x This single family residential project lies within the proposed Chestnut Storm Drain Assessment District boundary. Therefore, a storm drain Surcharge Fee of $0.09 per square foot shall be paid (not to exceed $2,000.00 per lot), if the District is not formed prior to approval of building permits. This commercial, industrial, or multiple residential project lies within the proposed Chestnut Storm Drain Assessment District boundary. Therefore, a storm drain Surcharge Fee of $0.135 per square foot for the first 3,000 square feet of building area, paving or other impervious area, and $0.045 per square foot in excess of 3,000 square feet, shall be paid if the District is not formed prior to approval of building permits. 53 X This project lies within the proposed boundary of the Palm Avenue Box Culvert and Traffic Signal Assessment District; therefore, a fee of $0.04 per square foot of net project area shall be paid to the Ci ty if the District is not formed prior to the approval of building permits. This project lies within the proposed boundary of the Palm Avenue Improvement Assessment District, therefore, a fee of $0.27 per square foot of net project area shall be paid to the City if the district is not formed prior to the approval of building permits. ..... ~ r CITY OF SJlt.~ BERNARDINO PUBLI~ WORKS/ENQJI. CASE TT14604 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS "'" AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 3 2-6-90 29 "" Project Description: lit. /4604 Da te: /-/1 .-1ft) Prepared by: ~ Revlewed Page R of ~ pages By: 54 X The above fees for the Chestnut Storm Drain. Palm Avenue Box Culvert and Signal and the Palm Avenue Improvement Districts represent estimates of thi s project I s share of the cost of the improvements. If the Di stri cts - are approved. the amount of the fees wi 11 be consi dered payment in full. If any Di stri ct is not approved. the fee wi 11 be retai ned in a fund for construction of the improvements for which it was paid. This project is located adjacent to Chestnut Equestrian Trail. Therefore. a fee equivalent to the cost of constructing ir.lprovements in accordance with the approved trail and landscaping plan shall be paid for the full width of the trail adjacent to the project. and the developer shall join a landscaping maintenance district for future maintenance of the trail and landscaping. A wall conforming to the approved Chestnut Trail and Landscaping Plan sha 11 be constructed along the tract boundary adjacent to the tra il and storm drain easement. 55 X If more than 5 trees are to be removed from the site. a tree removal permit must be obtained from the Planning Department. \. r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/ENGR. CASE TT14604 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 3 HEARING DATE 2-~-90 PAGE 0 Please be advised that the Parks Department concurs with the arborist report submitted by Sam Knapp dated November 17, 1989. The Parks Department requires that the one Olive tree be preserved on site in its present location or be transplanted to another location on site. In either case, it will be required that a follow-up report by the arborist be completed for this particular tree based on the procedure and policy for a California certified arborist's report (see attached). The Parks Department also requires the following mitigation measures: 56 57 ~ Upgraded landscape for front yards and slope areas. x Tree replacement ratios of tree removed. (This is in street tree requirement.) one 24" box tree addition to the for each standard 58 x Conceptual landscape plans are to be submitted and approved by the Parks Department and Planning section prior to review and approval of actual landscape plans. Conceptual plans shall show the upgraded intent in plant sizes. New tree locations including street tree locations and any additional landscape hard surface. 59 x The developer will be Municipal Code 682, Destruction of Trees". required Chapter to comply with the 15-34 "Removal or The Parks Department suggests that the landscape and irrigation along Ohio be placed into a landscaped assessment district. This landscape will be required to be developed by current Assessment District Standards. PCAGENDA:TT14604SR 10. ~ \ - CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES PROCEDURE AND POLICY FOR CALIFORNIA CERTIFIED ARBORIST REPORTS NOVEMBER 1989 All existing trees on site will require a California certi- fied Arborist report covering but not limited to: 1. Identification of each tree, botanical and common names and tree locations. Tree locations are to correlate with the tree locations on tentative tract maps and grading plans. 2. Height and crown width. 3. Trunk circumference. 4. Health and vitality, including status of disease prob- lems, insect problems, physiological problems, and death of any tree. 5. Liability problems current and future. 6. Measures to preserve trees on site in their existing locations. These measures are to include but are not limited to: A. Trimming needs using I.S.A. standards (Internat- ional Society of Aboricultural). B. Protecting trees during construction. c. Irrigation of trees pre and post construction. D. Insect and or disease control. F. Proper supervision by the arborist to ensure measures have been taken. 7. Provide short and long term maintenance recommendations for the trees. These maintenance recommendations are to include but are not limited to: A. Irrigation. B. Fertilization. C. Trimming. D. Insect and disease control needs. E. Growth characteristics and expectations. 8. Relocation of trees due to conflict of proposed improve- ments. The Arborist report must cover feasibility of relocation and all items found above in t1 - '7. 9. The Arborist report must be on file with the Parks, Recreation , and Community Services Department, City Planning Department and city Engineering Department prior to tentative tract approval and final grading plans approval. 10. Changes in project design may be required trees. These changes will be reviewed through and D.R.C. process. to preserve the C.E.Q.A. Feel free to call the Parks and Recreation Department at 714/384-5217 if you have any questions. "A Tree & Landscape Concern" PRELIMINARY REPORT FOR: SIERRA ENGINEERING 27007 FIFTH STREET HIGHLAND, CALIFORNIA 92346 ATTENTION: DARREN HARLEY OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF TREES LOCATED AT: TENTATIVE TRACT # 14604 SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA PREPARED BY: SAMUEL L. KNAPP, ASCA CONSLUTING ARBORIST NOVEMBER 27, 1989 Riverside 714/688-6043 Fullerton 714/447-8811 Post Office Box 8796 . Riverside, California 92515 Re: preliminary observations and recommendations of trees for arboricultural report, Tentative Tract # 14604, San Bernardino, California. As per my directive, I inspected the trees, and my f in- dings are as follows: There are approximately seventy nine (79) trees on site, which form three (3) w1ndrows. One (l) windrow runs north and south, and the other two (2) windrows run east and west. The trees appear to be located within the proposed tract grading and street improvements. (See Exhibit "A"). For report purposes, the tract is separated into three (3) sections w1th descriptive representation of trees. The criteria for preservation of trees involves a multi-step process of identifying the trunk condition, growth rates, structure, presence of insects and disease, crown develop- ment, and most important the life expectancy. section # 1: North - South Windrow. Approximately twenty one (21) Eucalvptus globulus (blue gum), which form a north - south windrow. Trees have ran- dom regrowth from cut stumps. Existing trees are not sui table for preservation, due to lack of vi tali ty and proper cultural care. section I 2: East - West Windrow. This windrow consists of six (6) Eucalvptus alobulus (blue gum), and one ( 1 ) Eucal vptus camaldulensis (red gum). Trees have regrowth from cut stumps, fire damage and decayed basal area. Existing trees are not sui table for preservation or relocation, due to lack of vitality and proper cultural care. 1 section' 3: East - West Windrow. This windrow consists of approximately fifty (50) trees, which are a combination of Eucalvptus alobulus (blue gum), Eucalv9tus camaldulensis (red gum), and one (1) Qlgg europaea (olive). Of the existing trees, only the olive tree is suitable for preservation or relocation. The eucalyptus are not suitable for preservation, due to lack of vitality and proper cultural care. (regrowth). Conclusions: In my opinion, the overall poor condition and vitality of the eucalyptus trees render them unsuitable for preser- vation or relocation. I recommend that all three (3) windrows be replaced. The olive tree is suitable for preservation or relocation. Again, this is a preliminary report and further site in- s~ections maybe necessary. We know that our knowledge will al.d in your green investment. Your interest in our "Living Investment" is appreciated. .Y;Jq~ Samuel L. ~p, ASCA consultinglt~b~rist Enclosure SLK/RS 2 ~ ~ -" 6 I o 0, o 0, 01 01 I I JU ~uJ 1:J i"2- !uJ i~ i :0 :i :0 ~~..m _.__._.0.._____._..__ '- ---.... .___.____O~_.______...~ -l ~A(;NDUA.. ~e:.NUE. . ____.___ _0' _.._. __ __._.__ 0_ _.. .. .... ........ .......... ..-.,.-- -- ,- ---j ~" "A Tree & Landscape Concern" ASSOC,09PP November 27,1989 Darren Harle Assistant Planner Sierra Engineering 27007 Fifth street San Bernardino, California 92346 Re: A message of appreciation. Dear Darren: A friendly "Thank You" for your patronage, and for the confidence you have placed in us. Our people are con- scientious and are here to serve your "green investment" needs. Your understanding and satisfaction of our services is our goal, please do not hesitate to call on us. We will always do everything we can to assure your complete satisfaction. Again, our thanks for your patronage: we're looking for- ward to many more opportunities of serving you in the future. ~, muel L. Kn WJi Consulting Ai~rist SLK/rs Riverside 714/688-6043 Fullerton 714/447-8811 Post Office Box 8796 . Riverside, California 92515 r ATTACHHENT "}:;" L, TV OF SAN BERNA~.JINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY Applicant (s) Address City, State Zip MISC: ISPREPARATION ke/9-1-89 ""' Initial study for Environmental Impacts For ull"la-f/ue. T~e:.-+ l'ib04{ project Number Project description/Location 70 ~u~~/~e a/$".21 "",,crt!" ~~rt!!. /~o '17 :r";.,,k ";;'--"''7" ,.tCSI(::le--NJ.,~ ~ /t'!'L:--'~ ..r-.4.e. ",rHte--_-I- conue,.. t:I~ ~ -" M_A... ~ e:9Ao,;e. A"'#lltVN'-~ Date O-t'c.t!'~"t5t!'r /3 I 191f"1 ~ Prepared for: D~~/cJ. aAJd DAJda /lQo.(,AJ. Fr: ~ 6/2 1.1. ~-:/u.dd. Blvd . .svlr~ 1/ ~.5 AA/tp'ekS'_, c:.~ 9~t'T prepare~ "1INT IA Name P~r Title City of San Bernardino Planning Department 300 N. "D" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 .... .. , CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT "'" ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST ~ "'" BACKGROY!ID Application Number: -r;.~,t/ve 7/;:,d- /Jf6~~ Project Description: 70 5~b~/j,./d~ /5": '2/ ~~"'$ ,~ ~7 ~//Y?k /.,,;w./A., re:s'~',vft~ .h~.s I Location: /ht!:' :f...;!e: "',$ ..b~~ a-r #{e ne>r-/lt~ r~A.Jer ~.,c ~""AAI'/.-~ ~ c:!'''/~ ~rAf:'N"":!S. Environmental Constraints Areas: /I~rd'--vl- ArC? P"'AJ. H',?A ta~ #.yh /ire 6r~eWklf ~ B B/o~", Ar-c.haeo/~ I ' / ~ General Plan Designation: RL) L~tA.J Ilt!!!'$/~~;./ Es~"s zoning Designation: t2.-}- It', 800 . B. ~NVIBONM~NTAL IMPACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a separate attached sheet. l. Ea~~h Resources Will the proposal result in: Yes No Maybe a. Earth movement (cut and/or fill) of lO,OOO cubic yards or more? X b. Development and/or grading on a slope greater than 15% natural grade? :x . c. Development within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone? x d. Modification of any unique geologic or physical feature? x \.. ~ REVISED 12/87 PAGE 1 OF 8 ,. Maybe "" e. Soil erosion on or off the project site? f. Modification of a channel, creek or river? g. Development subject mudslides, other similar within an area to landslides, liquefaction or hazards? h. Other? 2. bIR_RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in: a. Substantial an effect quality? air upon emissions or ambient air b. The creation of objectionable odors? c. Development within a high wind hazard area? 3. Will the WbTEB RESOURCES: proposal result in: a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to impermeable surfaces? b. Changes in the course or flow of flood waters? c. Discharge into surface waters or any alteration of surface water quality? d. Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters? e. Exposure of people or property to flood hazards? f. Other? lrl.... REVISED 12/87 Yes x , No )( x x X x x x x x x x x ~ PAGE 2 OF 8 4. BIOLOGICbL R~SOURC~p: proposal result in: Could the a. Change unique, species habitat trees? b. Change unique, species habitat? c. Other? in the number of any rare or endangered of plants or their including stands of in the number of any rare or endangered of animals or their 5. NOISE: Could the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to exterior noise levels over 65 dB or interior noise levels over 45 dB? c. Other? 6. LAND_ USE: result in: Will the proposal a. A change in the land use as designated on the General Plan? b. Development within an Airport District? c. Development within "Greenbelt" Zone A,B, or C? d. Development within a high fire hazard zone? e. Other? Yes No Maybe x x x x x x X / x x x x REVISED 10/87 PAGE 3 OF 8 , Maybe "" 7 . MAN-MADE HAEbFPp: project: Will the a. Use, store, transport or dispose of hazardous or toxic materials (including but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b. Involve the release hazardous substances? c. Expose people to the potential health/safety hazards? d. Other? 8. HOUSING: Will the proposal: a. Remove existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? b. Other? 9. rRA.N~FORTATION/CIRCULATION: Could the proposal result in: a. An increase in traffic that is greater than the land use designated on the General Plan? b. Use of existing, or demand for new, parking facilities/ structures? c. Impact upon existing public transportation systems? d. Alteration of present patterns of circulation? e. Impact to rail or air traffic? f. Increased safety hazards to vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? "'--- Yes of No x x , x X , x , X , x )( x x X x , ~ REVISED 10/87 PAGE 4 OF 8 . , Yes ("./i" ) I /, \. g. h. A disjointed pattern roadway improvements? of Other? lO. fUBLIC SERVICES Will the proposal impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service? b. l a. Fire protection? police protection? Schools (i.e. attendance, boundaries, overload, etc.)? c. d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Medical aid? f. Solid waste? 11. UTILITIES: Will the proposal: g. Other? REVISED 10/87 a. Impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service or require the construction of new facilities? l. Natural gas? 2. Electricity? 3. Water? 4. Sewer? 5. Other? b. Result in a pattern of extensions? disjointed utility c. Require the construction of new facilities? x No Maybe ~ X I x X x x X . x X x , X X X / x , X I ~ ~ PAGE 5 OF 8 12. AESTHETICS: a. Could the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic view? b. will the visual impact of the project be detrimental to the surrounding area? c. Other? 13. ~P~1URA~--FESOURCES: proposal result in: a. The alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? Could the b. Adverse impacts historic object? physical or aesthetic to a prehistoric or site, structure or c. Other? 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance (Section 15065) The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered. plant or animal or eliminate Yes No x x X / x X Maybe )( REVISED 10/87 PAGE 6 OF 8 r Yes No Maybe '" important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) x X / c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) X / d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (Attach sheets as necessary.) .1. C/. /At!:- ,4'r~~ ?r-'.I? ~~~AJ ,N.I/I rt!!YuAL ,,;..; ef'~'<=')(.I:c.w~f 3~/ 300 cub/It: )/44/5 t?-tC" ",-,4 ..,.II4d' 2~c:::~WG? cul:)/~ )111.,1.5 cnC +;//.. .5 .uc~ .-::; '7 r~~ re~~ """"7 ,;M~t ~ 4?A~/-6'~ "'A.hn".,,vA-t-.rf t" .e/t!>~"t!:J,.), vl'ra.l;""'~e. ~. ) , , , "r P$ iVe//4S' k. c.t?,M""'''IfI/A.I (dl.l~-I-. A/.,,;Se. /~~~r-l- /~x_r+ I ' ", , rrlAc.k Tn. Me.,. ~ -f-c.). :>~~4rd 12~.N.I;"e~~ ~~ (~~-,t,;"".,.s t?r4" ~r.,,~ 11/;// r~~~ ~;/ ~r~Ah'/~ /M~ ~Q .a /"ve/ ."c /,NS,?A//"c;'t::.Nce. , ~ ~ REVISED 10/87 PAGE 7 OF 8 Project N 'ber-reJafive. J~ /'160'"/ Date r2./t:>j-ge:; c. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measures (contined) 2. C. /he ~?'e /~ /ac.a-/e/ I'.,.; -Ik A~?A JV/~ htfl2.a# ,prt!f:l. .5 ~rd' ro/tN;"M~N7".s- ,,,,,,d Ce>..vd"'~"'''''''''S ~ ~'P.J7~V~ /U!rIz:1/~/:V1 ro 'okQU-7 r~ 4!:WS~rkC~,d".) ICN"/! , /fItlN;A1,,'~e .orl..-/~/A/ A""'2d/;1:#"'$ ~~ h A~f?A , IV/Ad. 3. a- e.. /:Ie IY'~~/"-c o.,c #e 'or~i~T. ~: e. l' r..",..,w~ v'" -Q c.::w:s"r~fi~ A A"'_~5. $~""'~.s ~ha.s d'~ , ., , a"'r/tlt!'IAJaYS:,. .........~I r~u/~ ...:,.... ~.".....e ~A/'n__~.MA~ .I:.w~~ts- yo eiahM-; ~ Qk,."h~ ,.....ks / .w"""r ~.:S'" ~ o~~,ph'-t' ~)t'~o$#r~ -k:J ,Pb.e-rl' A"'2~~.$. I E,N9,;..".~m~ P~r.-~ ::5r~n:,' R~:r~~ .eA'.qI' ~A.d~~4w.s ",.,L" ~/"bV~ '"",/'/ r~..:::e ~~e ~h~ /;..,~ _ 4.4~, rtt?""U'~;'t!!!!:tII'" , , , / ~,-h~./d~'#' /~ a'A/ pre:a ~N~~ peA/e.,L;~ a~#"(!!'~-.nL , , ~':1-~r/e-f +e,r #ie /~rt!n,.~",...;r e:>,L ::s,.t'~I''- dra/Al tt:'.Illd fl'~ r/!:>N~r~/ ~;Jh~.5 ~/// .-...~~ -,..ee ..:'~~,.~~ ~,/We /;"~.?-ri:-. , , 'f.a.l lite /I'~id- -:v~ /".5 ...6~~,,;,v k ,8/O/t:ylcd 4t!!~;re ,.4?~e:.r~ ~ver~ .R'/1;'?~qL; A 6/~drc~ r~~tre 5urve-r.,. """,~ orep4~ "':;;'r / /, -/k d;,;k JL, :roe ~/'AAAN Ph 0 h~/;...k.s / d"d~ R?eceM~er '2... /9'1>7. -rAe re~rf c.o/lJt:.~.5 , v " -I"A:a..I Alt:' <S"e'AI::1I'~ve ~.4e.c/~ vV~r~ .,t:C"""..M::1' C:>N o>r " ......1 lVt!!'4r A1e ~r~erJ.\'/. /here are.. A~wt!"Vt':r. ~ ,,/ "" , proj ect ,- "lber -r;~h'l/~ /;.u:-.f /-$1607' Da te /"2,1;,.;,/ ~ c. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measures (contined) hWM~er c/ .c.)c/$~/~ ~rot!".e'.:S ~N -$ /~e ~ oM...."'.be '::174e;;'d~,.,/ ~ / (,~AI~.frth:..h'o;'; 01'" 7"Jf/~ ~r.:PI'e&'-. dAl d/'hr/~.j- , V' r'A?r.f /A/~ ~'~re:/ -hI'" /k ~/;te hL/ , V , 54AtH~ / K Ab~../ ~A..Jsu/;4AJ1 A,./:w.,'?-I-., ......._~ /!)t::?I..Ie:.-kr 2"?- /969. ~~ I""" ~ v4~N1~ ~ S4/d ,.~/'I _#" ,4 'eU sHr"~ ~ ~~'''''.f by ~ Az$$' r'€~~~A.J ~;tJP ~~N7";"',. L?9""',..~rJItt; EoAeb~e".p.s ~ ~~ ,H'"..// ,.'.....,...,;.e ~ ~ P"7r........ , , be /":".P~;"""~~ ~ Pr~~e;ol/~.. re,./~ d.....d /or II' , , "''F~~ /k -cx"s;t,#7 ~~~.,~ #~S. fJ.h. lJUrlNtg c.C>/lJ.4f~laAJ. .../'At!'r<: ,;s ~ ~~~ '" , .,JI,~ ,N.:::'./.s-e kv~ ,.:.v k e?/e'4t( "",..._ '~r.....--e r 1P0"#I.:::h (::-~ d,",N:;~ A/ e'.tArJ..,. r~~"d""& '-#1 "" ,6 e , , ~'''''I'''nttn;Y ~~~5~ ~ ~/?4' N",,,':se /~~. , , J( et!J~u#f ~c>r",.~ e?~ ~"r/7.;,..,t'e ~c>........,f/N1 ~#fJ'~ or ""'/// r"A'~e 6IAJiJ ..:::'''',....4oVh~ .......~ve .....;........,.......6-. , , , b. ~.d. -rJt!.. ~"..~ /~ /dJ~ JIV/~;"" ~ h"jA ,4i-e. "'?d2Ar# 2.~;()~ t:?N~ Gre~Al),i!!'/f- ~A.Je B ~ o<<e. rco-l~1/s ~~.eu'''''' PrCJ-rt"'cft'vt!' G-;-~klf PrC!AfnsM. Pr'7l~~ de::S'-9N ",Ad C""&'M:?'/ n-~ C!!>ZL' ~~ ro/N"..:r/~ //.pkMIjto/M~ o~ Me r,~~/f /;1rc::y"-""""" -.?t/d A~ ~;'e hit 7d!rd "U);I'lJ€ ;$~~"'/d!t:" ,..wll /""~.:::e #e o~e"v//~ /~~~ ?b e:{ /~d ~ /~""?AJ""~~~ f , ,. Project ." 'mber ~.vr~Ve 7r4'::71'76O'I Date 1"2-/1_/ ~ c. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measures (contined) ~ '! -rAe 'p/"~i~d w;/1 Pt!!:. r~k;re;dJ ~O hAV~ Mo .oLt'/A/r.f e:?r ac-ces..s. , A' 2. 'I ~~ .u.'",~e ~d v~ t:7e"~~s.$ r.::;:Jad ,$/"'4- , i>e e',X~,~~.d r"rp.... ~ B-~~ ~U"","!'ltu7 .,r ~ /'Jr1P"Y cdbNe( CJA/CJ ""fve;uae ~~/"f 3~ /./ -/'~-e-f r~ C4'e::1~~ heA/~e. 13. a. iAe: :$"/7I-e /;~~ JA-l/1th/N ON pre::At:7~~/~4 SeA/:S/ r,i/ ~ Ar&:;fl t?5 ",;d".N,L/,L';'e'&!r' .6v ~e u;,tv S- f / &~~az/ P~.N'. A CH//H~ r~d::Pu/"c~ .,,~~~ b,/ j//cl~r ~e.Af"~ / ;:S'"ri.-~/ . /N':::/~~ / ' r~cc>n:::I4' 6tt?arc.-t" r~(//e"e.J t::'~/l2em/ved An:.AA~~/e-.-./ k;l~r.../ur~ t?IV~ <y~k~~ A~y /~~~h:9''''''*#...J d/# /U::I'-r .-b~~ .,;v~/ c-/~r"'/" r~#eJI<<rc~. ( Wa~ coNdvc.hcl ~r ~~ ~;.c~ dt?r~ Oc.hkr /9tf1. -?/Ie .. , ~ D. DETERMINA!JON On the basis of this initial study, D The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, although there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described above have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ~ D The proposed project ~mY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA .::1.dAJ rt4""6()n~,ey 0 4A/(!I"""c.. l'f,hVN'a Name and Title 1 ~ ~ ' ~/tJ~~If? /wJAI,v~ ~ignatu ' Date: /- 1'-" ll.... ~ REVISED 12/87 PAGE 8 OF 8 ATTACHMENT "F" TT 14604 Agenda Item #3 Hearing date: 2-6-91 MITIGATION MEASURES AND REPORTING/MONITORING ACTIVITIES FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 14604 Prior to beginning construction, the applicant shall furnish the City Planning Department with a checklist chart to use in tracking the mitigation monitoring and reporting activities. The chart shall list each mitigation measure, monitoring or reporting action and be ruled into columns that are designed to record responsible agency, dates of completion, inspector or other certifying person and the person recording the information. Biological Resources Mitigation Measures. A number of existing trees may be affected by the construction of this project. An arborist report has been submitted to the city for review and comment. Based on that report and field survey and analysis (parks and recreation, planning), conditions of approval will require that a program be implemented to preserve, relocate and/or replace the existing stands of trees. Biological Resources Reporting/Monitoring Action. Upon final acceptance of the developer's work in implementing a program to preserve, relocate and/or replace the existing stands of trees the Parks and Recreation Department shall notify the City Planning Department, in writing of compliance. The Planning staff shall retain such notice in the project file and annotate the file indicating compliance with the measure. CONCLUSION This Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program shall be retained by the City in the Planning Department project file for Tentative Tract 14604. As various mitigation measures are fully implemented their completion should be documented by appropriate notation on the checklist chart provided specifically for this project. When all measures have been confirmed as completed on the checklist, this Reporting/Monitoring Plan is complete. aw:miti . II liP IlIIlil mI. I I_~ . !:I !lIJd, 11/1 · . :Il~ !\ld\f Ih 1 !ill ..~.. ATTACHMENT "G II . . ~ .. w' j , l - . 1 l ~--. 1 , .'V ..0. lp . i! !. . . , I cD : Z I it . ~- ~i Q ~I~~ < IHrI.I' a:::: . · ~-6 . w ~: lpi ;: I~I ~ iI! <C .!P ~ lid ! z w ~ J ATTACHMENT "H" r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT -., r AGENDA """Il ITEM #: LOCATION CASE TT 14604 HEARING DATE 2-6- 90 3 \... ~ ... ~ C I T Y 0 F SAN B ERN A R DIN 0 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor and Common Council FROM: Henry Empeno, Jr., Deputy City Attorney DATE: March 2, 1990 RE: AGENDA ITEM NO. 51, MCC MEETING ON MARCH 5, 1990 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14604 Attached please find proposed Findings of Fact in support of the three possible motions listed in the Request for Council Action form. ~~ HENRY EMPENO, JR., Deputy City Attorney cc: James F. Penman, City Attorney HEjdysjfindings.mem March 2, 1990 1 /~ G7) "~--"~' / Motion #1: Denial of Tentative Tract No. 14604 (Planning Commission Action). 1. The requested subdivision is consistent with the minimum lot development standards of the RL, Residential Low, land use designation and is consistent with the General Plan adopted by the Mayor and Common Council on June 2, 1989, in that the density of the proposed tract is 2.83 dwelling units per gross acre while the plan will allow 3.1 dwelling units per gross acre, however the proposed tract is inconsistent with the existing pattern of development in that the density of the surrounding area is one (l) dwelling unit per acre. 2. All lots created meet Municipal Code requirements in that each rectangular lot has a minimum width of 80 feet (88 feet on corner lots) and depth of 100 feet. The irregular lots meet Code requirements. 3. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are likely to cause substantial environmental damage and serious public health problems and public safety problems in that the proposed tract will remove windrow trees that currently provide a buffer from the high wind and provide nesting areas for many species: and that adequate infrastructure to support this development and future development in the Verdemont Area will not be provided in a timely manner. AdequatG schoOlS, roads, drainage, fire stations, and landscaping and park facilities to support this development will not be constructed prior to occupancy of this subdivision. Existing schools, roads, drainage, and fire stations are inadequate to support the proposed development. 4. The proposed tract meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 18) and the state Subdivision Map Act. All lots will have frontage on dedicated streets. 5. All proposed streets meet the minimum requirements of the Department of Public Works for street improvements, however, the existing road system, improvements, and drainage facilities are inadequate to support the proposed subdivision. 6. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision in that no public agency has stated comments regarding required easements. HEjdys/findings.mem March 2, 1990 2 Motion #2: Approval of Tentative Tract No. 14604 Original Recommendation) (Planning Department's 1. The requested subdivision is consistent with the minimum lot development standards of the RL, Residential Low, land use designation and is consistent with the General Plan adopted by the Mayor and Common Council on June 2, 1989, in that the density of the proposed tract is 2.83 dwelling units per gross acre while the plan will allow 3.l dwelling units per gross acre. 2. All lots created meet Municipal Code requirements in that each rectangular lot has a minimum width of 80 feet (88 feet on corner lots) and depth of 100 feet. The irregular lots meet Code requirements. 3. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or cause serious public health problems, in that development will occur according to the conditions of approval and standard requirements contained in this report. 4. The proposed tract meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 18) and the state Subdivision Map Act. All lots will have frontage on dedicated streets. 5. All proposed streets meet the minimum requirements of the Department of Public Works for street improvements. 6. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision in that no public agency has stated comments regarding required easements. HE/dys/findings.mem March 2, 1990 3 Motion #3: Approval of Tentative Tract No. l4604 with revised infrastructure financing and timing conditions contained in Exhibit "D", Conditions 23 & 24 (Planning Department's present recommendation). l. The requested subdivision is consistent with the minimum lot development standards of the RL, Residential Low, land use designation and is consistent with the General Plan adopted by the Mayor and Common Council on June 2, 1989, in that the density of the proposed tract is 2.83 dwelling units per gross acre while the plan will allow 3.1 dwelling units per gross acre. 2. All lots created meet Municipal Code requirements in that each rectangular lot has a minimum width of 80 feet (88 feet on corner lots) and depth of 100 feet. The irregular lots meet Code requirements. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor serious public health problems nor public safety problems in that adequate infrastructure to support this development and future development in the Verdemont Area will be provided in a timely manner and that development will occur according to the conditions of approval and standard requirements contained in this report. AdG~udt.e sl.:hools, ro.ad8,~r-a-ionage, fire s:tations, and landscap1n~fand--park-- faoi-li-ties- to suppG-r-t-tlH.-.s-deve.J,.opment ~dll be COAstrl1r;:tad. p.r-wr--1:;e-occupancy of this-subdivision in compliance with- Conditions 23-24 in Exhibit "0". (attached). 4. The proposed tract meets or exceeds the minimum requirements of the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Title l8) and the State Subdivision Map Act. All lots will have frontage on dedicated streets. 5. All proposed streets meet the minimum requirements of the Department of Public Works for street improvements. 6. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision in that no public agency has stated comments regarding required easements. HE/dys/findings.mem March 2, 1990 4 (;) 23. EXHIBIT D ~ Proposed Amended Condition Nos. 23 and 24 Tentative Tract No. 14604 The developer or any successor in interest to any portion of the subdivision shall participate in the establishment of assessment district(s) or other approved financing plans for "right-of-way improvements" and "public improvements" (improvements) and shall sign and record an agreement which guarantees payment of their proportionate share of these improvements at the time of issuance of building permits. In a dition, buildin permits shall not'be issued until constr tion contracts for an appropr~e phase ~ phases f the" improvem ts" are awarded ~ and final" inspection shall not be ma~e and utilities'cleared for'., occupancy Until constructio~of those improveaents is '" completed. \\ "Appropriateness "'-."shall be jointly"q,ecided '-" by the Directors of the Public '-Works and the Planning " and Building services Departments~~ ,/1 "Public Improvements" shall mea11/ the acquisition, / construction and installation of~rainage tacilities, park facilities, fire station fac)llities an~/landscap~rig as descrined in the Engineez.'s eport da~ed January 2, 1990. / ~ / "RighV~f way Improvements shall me the acqui~ition, construction and installation of f 1 width streets as described in the Engineer's report dated January 2, 1990, in the following /locations:. / · / I Those certain portions of Palm/Avenue between Verdemont Avenue and Kendall, Drive which are immediately adjacent to undeveloped lots /' ~ Walnut Avenue Irvington to Belmont Belmont to Ohio (portions) Olive Avenue Verdemont Avenue to Ohio Ohio to Belmont (portions) Belmont to Irvington Magnolia Avenue Verdemont Avenue to Little League Drive Little League Drive Irvington to Verdemont Irvington pine to Olive (portions Olive to Magnolia / / Olive Avenue /' pine to pal~/(~ortionS) Palm to wesv of Little League D?,fe Verdemont ~venue Littl~ League Drive to palIll./Avenue p~m to pine (portions) Frontage Road Palm to City Limits ( Devore) ,. 'if' , T.T. 14604 - Amended Conditions Page 2 Meyers Road Little League Dr. to New section New section to Cable Canyon Cable 'Canyon Road Meyers Road to Frontage Road (new roadway) Belmont Avenue pine to Olive (limited portions) Olive to Palm (portions) Palm to just past Little ~ague Drive / / Ohio Avenue pine to Palm ~portions) Palm to wes~'of Little League Dt.:Ple /' (\ .' Buil ing permits Sh~l not be issue.d until construction contr ts for the ementary schuols at Little League and Be ont and at Pam and Belmont', are awarded, and final ins ection shall rio~ be made and'~tilities cleared for occupancy until conStruction of'~he. schools is completed. ~ ~ An alternative/' to this requi,r'ement shal1~e the SUb- mittal of a Letter authorize~bY the Sch~l.Board that adequate facilities are available to se~e the students from this project. This letter shall/be submitted to the Plann~ng and Building Services Department prior to building permits being issued. 24. / I mkf2/21/90 M&CCAGENDA:TTCONDITIONS '--- ') . '( ) / /I ~ -.J" / 1--/ }// ___/ - / C9- . . . . .~ 7 I,L'y V JC/7 ,{/P a .{LkU. ( v _ ./1 #:!(c'7 ~ ~2,,~J ~-eb/;t t'!/I/[ . C---' .bj ,/ - . /' /1 ../ #U-f dAL7~uea/ . /1/)// ~/I/ ,:;;/da-/24- ~;jr ~~<-_/ /-1 '. /'; dr?t! . ~c::t;CdY au a'Z'zul?~il/ ? ~ . .L- <-?Z-{ j,:;nzt'Yt! &-/Y/Z/ t-h'c?C/'J ;~ /, $"~ ~'2/f:~~~ <}!/?f z.,zct4 /~ ?< ,