The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About50-Planning ... - -- - -....- .. CITY OF SAN BE "\ ~ARDINO/~, REQUES" FOR COUNCIL ACTIOI From: Larry E, Reed, Directo~ Subject: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S 'DENIAL OF TENTATIVETRACT No. 13630 Ol~t, Planning and Building Services Date: February 6, 1990 Mayor and Common Council Meeting February 19, 1990, 2:00 p.m. Synopsis of Previous Council action: No previ ous Counc il action. January 23, 1990, the Planning Co~~ission by a 5 to 2 vote failed to pass a motion for np~rcv~l, and thus denied the tract. Recommended Motion: 1. That the hearingbe closed; that the appeal be denied; and, that Tentative Tract No. 13630 be denied. (Supports Planning Commission Action.) OR 2. That the hearing be closed; that the appeal be upheld; that Tentative Tract No. 13630 be approved subject to the Findings of Fact, Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained in the January 23, 1990, Planning Commission Staff Report (Exhibit "E"); that the Mitigated Negative Declaration be adopted; and, that the Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program be adopted. (Supports Appellant's request and original staff's recommendation.) 3. OR That the hearing be closed; that the appeal be upheld; that Tentative Tract No. be approved subject to the Findings of Fact, Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained in the January 23, 1990, Planning Commission Staff Report (Exhibit "E") and the additional infrastructuring financing and timing conditions contained in Exhibit "0"; that the Mitigated Negative Declaration be adopted; and, that the Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program be adopted. (Support's present staff's recommendation based on Planning Commission's policy direction.) ~~k/ Signature La rry E. eed, Director 13630 ~ Contact person: Larry E. Reed Phone: 384-5057 5 ~.> . I,' ..~'_.'I -'..1 f,") Supporting data attached: Staff reoort . Ward: -") ...., c:,:'; w FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A "H. '-'~~ .... '~"'" Source: {Acct, No.! ':'~ ", ::':7 (Acct, Descriotionl Finance: Council Notes: 75.0262 Agenda Item No, ..sO ... - - ~ CITY OF SAN BERltARDINO - REQUEST ..-OR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S DENIAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 13630 MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL MEETING - February 19, 1990 REQUEST The applicant, Joseph E. Bonadiman and Associates, Inc" is appealing the denial of Tentative Tract No. 13630 by the Planning Commission, The applicant requests that the Mayor and Council reconsider the denial and approve the tentative tract. BACKGROUND Tentative Tract No. 13630 is an application to subdivide one 11,42 acre parcel into 35 single-family lots located at the northeast corner of Belmont and Magnolia Avenues in the RL, Low Residential, General Plan land use designation, The tract was effectively denied because a motion for approval was denied by a 5 to 2 vote of the Planning Commission on January 23, 1990. (See Exhibit "B".) The Environmental Review Committee reviewed the Initial Study for the project on December 21, 1990, and recommended that a Mitigated Negative Declaration be adopted. The site is located in an area susceptible to liquefaction, high wind, high fire and biological and archaeological resource management overlay districts, APPEAL BASIS AND ANALYSIS The applicant is basing the appeal upon the fact of compliance with the General Plan land use designation density and development standards. Residents in the area do not agree with the density designation of the General Plan, and their testimony was heard by the Planning Commission, However, the tract is being proposed at a density of 3.06 units per gross acre, and the General Plan allows for a maximum density of 3.1 units per gross acre and a minimum lot size of 10,800 square feet. These requirements are complied with. In addition, the residents cited the need for infrastructure in the area. The Planning commission denied the tract because inadequate infrastructure to support the development that has occurred or 75,0264 #> city of San Bernardino Mayor and Common Council RE: Appeal of Planning No. 13630 Page 2 Meetig February 19, 1990 Commission's Denial of Tentative Tract is scheduled to occur in the Verdemont area has not been provided. The necessity of having installed or constructed schools, adequate roads, drainage, fire station, and landscaping and park facilities prior to development was sited as the problem with approving this and any other tracts in the area. This timing and financing issue has been a difficult policy matter the City has been trying to resolve. OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL The Mayor and Council may: 1. Deny the appeal and uphold the Planning Commission's denial of the tract: 2. Uphold its appeal and approve the tract as originally conditioned in the Planning commission's staff report: or, 3. Uphold the appeal, approve the tract as originally conditioned in the Planning commission's staff report, and add conditions of approval which limit the development to start only after construction of all the infrastructure improvements have begun and to limit home occupancy to occur only after completion of all the infrastructure improvements, (See Exhibit "D" for additional Conditions of Approval.) option 1 supports the Planning Commission's action. Option 2 supports the Appellant's request and original staff's recommendation. option 3 supports a compromise position sUbdivision, but prior to construction and homes adequate infrastructure must be built. of approving occupancy of the the RECOMMENDATION Staff is amending their original recommendation by trying to resolve the timing issue and making that issue a Condition of Approval. Therefore, staff is recommending Option 3 as outlined above. This option places an incentive on the' developer to help solve the financing issue for the needed improvements and push for their constuction. lit City of San Bernardino Mayor and Common Council Meetig February 19, 1990 RE: Appeal of Planning Commission's Denial of Tentative Tract No. 13630 Page 3 PREPARED BY Exhibits: John E. Montgomery, A.I.C.P, Principal Planner For Larry E. Reed, Director Planning and Building Services A- Letter of Appeal to the Mayor and Council B- Statement of Official Planning commission's Action C- Public Hearing Notice D- Recommended Conditions of Approval Concerning Infrastructure Timing E- January 9, 1990, Planning Commission Staff Report M&CC:TT13630APPEAL jnmg ... EXIIIBIT "A" i .... -,'j .JOSEPH E. BONAOIMAN & ASSOCIATES. INC, ENGINEERING ARCHITECTURE PLANNING 250 S, LENA RD, . SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA . MAILING ADDRESS: P.O, BOX 5852 ' SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92412 ' (714) 885,3806 January 24, 1990 270,2 L00009.T Mayor & Common Council City of San Bernardino 300 N. "0" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 RE: (IN 871754.12), Appeal- of Planning Commission Denial of Tenative Tract 13630 Mayor & Common Council, Please accept this letter as a formal request to appeal the denial by the City of San Bernardino Planning Commission, of Tentative Tract 13630. As the Tentative Tract complies with the city of San Bernardino General Plan: as the Planning Department staff recommended approval of the negative declaration for Tentative Tract 13630: therefore, it is requested that the Common Council overturn the denial of Tentative Tract 13630 by the Planning commission and approve the negative declaration, We would appreciate being heard at the next scheduled City Council Meeting. & ASSOCIATES, INC. LLY/sd .' EXHIBIT "B" city of San Bernardino STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION PROJECT Number: Tentative Tract No, 13630 Applicant: Joseph Bonadiman and Associates for Harz, Kurtz and Fike ACTION Meeting Date: X January 23, 1990 Request is Denied, Since Motion to Approve Did Not Carry, with Vote as Shown Below VOTE Ayes: Nays: Abstain: Absent: Corona, Lopez Clemensen, Jordan, Lindseth, Sharp, Stone Cole None I, hereby, certify that this Statement of Official Action accurately reflects the final determination of the Planning Commission of the City of San Bernardino. ~ ~ ~ , '7<.:,: I signat;Ure Larry-E. Reed Director of Planning and Building Services ~r;~k?c// ~?~ >Yfrc /' Date' Name and Title cc: project Applicant Project Property Owner Building and Safety Department Engineering Division Case File mkf PCAGENDA: PCACTIONA Exhibit "Cn ( "\ OFFICIAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL APPEAL OF TENTATIVE TPACT No. 13630 \, j , r THIS IS TO INFORM YOU THAT THE FOllOWING ITEM HAS BEEN APPEALED TO THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL BY Applicant I" '" SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT No. 13630 APPEAL WARD :# 5 r PROPERTY LOCATION : Located at the northeast corner of Belmont and Magnolia Avenues in the Verdemont area. PROPOSAL: To subdivide 11. 42 acres into 35 single-family lots. ) PUBLIC HEARING lOCATION: SAN BERNARDINO CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 300 NORTH "0" STREET SAN BERNARDINO, CA,92418 ~ HEARING DATE AND TIME: February 19, 1990, 2:00 p.m. r A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL IS ON FILE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT CITY HALL. IF YOU WOULD LIKE FURTHER INFORMATION ABOUT THIS PROPOSAL PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING, PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN PERSON OR BY PHONING (714 ) 384-5057. THANK YOU, I" It. .J jill, 1914 Ik, EXHIBIT "0" ADDITIONAL VERDEMONT AREA INFRASTRUCTURE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TENTATIVE TRACT NO, 13630 29. The developer shall comply prov1s10ns of resolution No. Council on April 17, 1989, timing within Verdemont Area, with all applicable 89-116 adopted by City concerning development 30. The developer or any successor in interest to any portion of the subdivision shall participate in the establishment of assessment district (s) or other approved financing plans for "right-of-way improvements" and "public improvements" (improvements) and shall sign and record an agreement which guarantees payment of their proportionate share of these improvements at the time of issuance of building permits, In addition, building permits shall not be until construction contracts for all of improvemepts are awarded, and final inspection not be made and utilities cleared for occupancy construction of the improvements are completed. issued the shall until "Public Improvements" shall mean the acquisition construction and installation of drainage facilities, park facilities, fire station facilities and landscaping as described in the Engineer's report dated January 2, 1990. "Right of acquisition, width streets dated January Way Improvements" shall mean the construction and installation of full as described in the Engineer's report 2, 1990, in the following locations: Those certain portions Verdemont Avenue and immediately adjacent to of Palm Avenue between Kendall Drive which are undeveloped lots Walnut Avenue Irvington to Belmont Belmont to Ohio (portions) Irvington Pine to Olive (portions Olive to Magnolia Olive Avenue Verdemont Avenue to Ohio Ohio to Belmont (portions) Belmont to Irvington Olive Avenue pine to Palm (portions Palm to west of Little Little League Drive Page 1 of 2 Magnolia Avenue Verdemont Avenue to Little League Drive Little League Drive Irvington to Verdemont Meyers Road Little League Drive to New section New section to Cable Canyon Belmont Avenue Pine to Olive (limited portions) Olive to Palm (portions) Palm to just past Little League Drive -~ ." TT No. 13630 Verdemont Avenue Little League Drive to Palm Avenue Palm to pine (portions) Frontage Road Palm to City Limits (Devore) Cable Canyon Road Meyers Road to Frontage Road (new roadway) Ohio Avenue Pine to Palm (portions) Palm to west of Little League Drive Buildings Permits shall not be issued until con~uction contracts for "the elementary schools at Littl..-r:eague and Belmont and,a't: Palm and Belmont are awar ,and final inspection/-Shall not be made and utili's cleared for occupanc>~/until construction of the sc ols is completed That a notice and a 8 1/2" x 11" map, which describes and locates the proposed state of California Department of Water Resources Devil Canyon Second Afterbay Power Plant Project, in relation to the sUbdivision, be attached to each deed. 31. 32. M&CC TT13630APPEAL. C Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT "E" , CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT '" SUMMARY 'loo.. lLl en <( (.) t; lLl ::> o '" a: ..... <( lLl a: <( AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE WARD 3 1/23/90 5 ~ APPLICANT Joseph Bonadiman & Assoc. P,O. Box 5852 San Bernardino, CA 92412 OWNER Hartz, Kurtz and Fike 322 Vista Del Mar Redondo Beach, CA 90277 Tentative Tract No. 13630 To subdivide one 11.42 acre parcel into 35 single-family lots located at the northeast corner of Belmont Avenue and Magnolia Avenue in the RL, Residential Low, General Plan land use desig- nation. GEOLOGIC / SEISMIC HAZARD ZONE DYES K)NO @YES oNO EXISTING PROPERTY LAND USE ZONING DESIGNATION Subject Vacant RL RL, Res. Low, 3.1 du/acr North Single-Family Residences RL " " " " " South Vacant RL " " " " ,. East Single-Family Residences and Vacant RL " " " " " West Single-Family Residences RL " " " " " -I <( ~ Zen lLl(!) :EZ Z- OO a::Z :;&L Z lLl HIGH FIRE HAZARD ZONE o NOT APPLICABLE o EXEMPT o NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS NOV 1981 REVISED JULY 11182 SKY DYES ~NO FLOOD HAZARD DYES OZONE A ZONE ffil NO OZONE B C SEWERS ~ ~~S ) AIRPORT NOISE / CRASH ZONE o POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS WITH MITIGATING MEASURES NO E.I.R, o EIR, REQUIRED BUT NO SIGN IFICANT EFFECTS WITH MITIGATING MEASURES o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS SEE ATTACHED E,R, C, MINUTES REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ARE^ APPROVAL Z o - ti ALO ALZ lLl j!:E en:E o (.) lLl a:: CONDITIONS DENIAL CONTINUANCE TO CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT 13630 ~ OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM ~3___ HEARING DATE 1123i90 PAGE 2 r ""\ REOUEST The applicant is requesting approval to subdivide one parcel consisting of approximately 11.42 acres into 35 single-family lots in an area designated by the General Plan as RL, Resi- dential Low. The proposed denstty is 3.06 units per gross acre: the minimum lot size proposed is 10,800 square feet. The land use designation allows a density of 3.1 units per gross acre and requires a minimum lot size of 10,800 square feet. SITE LOCATION The 11.42 acre site is located at the northeast corner of Blemont Avenue and Magnolia Avenue, in the Verdemont Area. The site has a frontage on Belmont of approximately 735 feet and a frontage on Magnolia of approximately 645 feet (see Attachment H, Location Map.) MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE The proposed project is consistent with and in conformity with the General Plan ment A. the Municipal Code as shown in Attach- CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY ACT The Initial Study was prepared by staff and presented to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on December 21, 1989. The ERC found that no significant impacts will result from the project and recommended a Negative Declaration. The Negative Declaration was available for public review from December 28, 1989 to January 8, 1990. To date no comments have been received. If comments are received, they will be presented to the Planning Commission at the January 9, 1990 Planning Commission meeting (See Attachment E, Initial Study. ) ANALYSIS site Characteristics The 11.42 acre site is currently vacant with the exception of an old foundation, The property slopes slightly (Ca. 5%) from northwest to southeast and has two natural drainage ravines that traverse the site in the direction that it slopes. The property has been recently disced and all that \0.. r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT oase. .,R"ATIONS ~ ::::DA 1::Ml::O " - ,YI-' I HEARING DATE 1/23/90 PAGE 1 remains are grasses and a small stano or ornamenta~ ~ree species. The property currently has frontage on Belmont to the south, Magnolia to the west and Meyers Road to the north. Belmont and Magnolia are paved but are not improved with curb, gutter or sidewalks. Meyers Road is improved on the north side with curb and gutter. All three of the roads are in very poor condition. Surrounding Area The property to the south and northeast are vacant. One residence is located adjacent to the southeast corner of the site and single-family residences are located to the north, across Meyers Road and to the west, across Magnolia. Density and General Plan The General Plan allows a maximum density of 3.1 dwelling units per gross acre with a minimum lot size of 10,800 square feet. The proposed project proposes a density of 3.06 units per acre with a minimum lot size of 10,800 square feet. Access and Circulation The proposed tract proposes two cul-de-sacs and a temporary cul-de-sac at the east terminus of Meyers Road. Meyers Road currently dead ends at the east terminus of the project site and has residences located on the north side of it. Meyers Road is approximately 760 feet in length. The Subdivision Code (Title 18, San Bernardino Municipal Code) and the Verdemont Area Plan does not allow dead end streets or cul- de-sacs in excess of 500 feet in length. Therefore, the Engineering and Fire Departments are requiring that a tempo- rary cul-de-sac be constructed at the east terminus of Meyers Road and that lots 27, 28 and 29 not be developed until such time as Meyers Road is extended to the east and provides a secondary access. Those three lots mentioned are located more than 500 feet from Magnolia Avenue and would be at risk in the event of evacuation for a disaster. A condition has been included. (See Attachment C, Conditions.) Two means of access Avenue, to Belmont site. are provided or Irvington, via Palm Avenue or pine to Magnolia Avenue to the CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT 13630 .. OBSERYATIONS AGENDA ITEM . 3 HEARING DATE ...lD3/90 PAGE .1 r Grading The applicant has indicated that there will be 41,000 cubic yards of cut and 39,000 cubic yards of fill. There will be approximately 3,000 cubic yards of export. A permit from Public Services will be required for truck route approval and hours of operation. Hazards The site is located within an area susceptible to liquefac- tion, high wind, high fire and Greenbelt Zone C. A liquefac- tion report will be required and must be reviewed by the Engineering Division prior to the issuance of any permits. Tile roofs with hurricane clips are required on all construc- tion and standard requirements for development within Green- belt Zone C are required. (See Attachment C, Conditions.) The site is located within the Chestnut Storm Drain Assess- ment District. The developer will be required to comply with Resolution No. 89-116 for development of the site. The site is located in the Verdemont Area and is also subject to the Development Fee Program. Compliance with the resolution and fee program were found to be necessary for health and safety of existing and future Verdemont residents. This is required as a standard requirement (Attachment D. Biological Resources The site is located in the Biological Resources Management overlay District. A biological assessment was prepared by Michael P. Hamilton and Associates in September of 1989. The assessment indicates that "the habitat quality of the site is of minimal biological value . No endangered, threatened, rare or sensitive species are likely to be directly impacted by this project." An arborist report was prepared by Knapp Associates in May, 1989 at the request of the Park and Recreation Department. The site has approximately 30 randomly planted trees. The report recommended preserving the Eucalvptus qlobulus (Blue Gum) . There are three of these trees located on the site. The report recommends replacing the other trees due to structural defects, regrowth from stumps and loss of vitality from lack of cultural care. The Park and Recreation Depart- ment and the Environmental Review Committee agree with this conclusion. To mitigate the loss of these trees, the ERC recommends \0.. .. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT 13630 ~ OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM 3 HEARING DATE ..J...L23/Q() PAGE 5 replacing any tree removed with a 24" box tree. Thl.S requirement is in addition to required street trees and front yard landscaping requirements. In order to save the Euca- lyptus trees, the developer is proposing to render the lot located at the northwest corner of the site non-buildable and to place the lot within an Assessment District for mainte- nance. This is reflected on the tract map (Attachment G) and in the conditions (Attachment C). , ""'\ Archaeological Resources The site is located within an area identified by the General Plan as having potential archaeological resources. A cul- tural assessment was performed by victor C. de Munck in June, 1989. This study included a review of the archaeological, ethnographic and historical literature pertinent to the study area, and an intensive field investigation of the subject property. A series of cement foundations were located in the northeast corner of the subject property. The foundations were part of a single-family residence built by the Triena family in the late 1930's. The residence was donated to the San Bernardino Fire Department District in the late 1950's and was burned to the ground as part of their fire training drills. The Triena family also cultivated a grape vineyard on the subject property. No remnants of this grape vineyard remain. The historical significance of the foundations was assessed in accordance with the National Register Criteria and it was determined not to be significant. No other cultural resources were located during the field survey. A condition has been included that, if subsurface cultural deposits are exposed during development, a qualified archae- ologist shall be consulted to evaluate these resources and shall be empowered to halt constructed until appropriate data recovery/protection measures have been implemented (See Attachment C, Conditions). Comments Received All City Departments reviewed the proposal at the Environ- mental Review Committee meeting, The Engineering Division and Parks and Recreation Department have attached standard requirements, The San Bernardino Unified School District commented that the project would be subject to school facil- ity fees as established by the Board of Education. The Southern California Edison Company (SCE) commented that the '" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT 13630 ~ OBSERYATIONS AGENDA ITEM 3 HEARING DATE l..LV/90 PAGE fi developer would be required to furnish two copies of the ~ final map prior to 'recordation and comply with all rules and regulations of SCE, as filed with the Public utilities commission for the installation of underground or overhead electric utilities within this tract. The Water Department commented tfiat water required and that water pressure for this 100 - 120 psi and that pressure regulators customer's side of the meter, main area are extension is ranges from suggested on CONCLUSION Tentative Tract No, 13630 meets all of the development standards of the Municipal Code and is consistent with the General Plan and the Subdivision Map Act, Impacts associated with the project will be mitigated and reduced to a level of insignificance. A mitigation monitoring program has been prepared to ensure that all mitigation required in the Initial Study will be complied with, RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission: 1. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and, 2, Approve the Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program (Attachment F); and, 3. Approve Tentative Tract No. 13630, subject to the attached Findings of Fact (Attachment B), Conditions of Approval (Attachment C) and Standard Requirements (Attachment D). Res~ectfull~ sUb~tted, d0'C-:~ /J:.RRI E. -REED Director of Planning and Building Services ANN LARSON-PERBIX Senior Planner Attachments: A - Municipal Code and General Plan Conformance B - Findings of Fact C - Conditions of Approval D - Standard Requirements E - Initial Study F - Mi tiqation Moni toring/Report..ing Program G - Tentative Tract Map H - Location Map ~ \", rnkf PCAGENDA TTl36300 .. ATTACHMENT A ~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT 13630 OBSERYATIONS AGENDA ITEM 3 HEARING DATE 1/23/90 PAGE 7 MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE ""\ r Cateqorv Proposal S.B.M.C. Permitted Use Single-Fam. ~RL, Res. Low Residential Lot Size 10,800 sq. ft. 10,800 sq. ft. or more minimum Lot Depth 100 ft. min. 100 ft. or more Lot Width 80 ft. or more 80 ft. min. Corner Lot t-hdth 88 ft. min. 88 ft. or more Density 3.06 du/acre 3.1 du/acre maximum Frontage on Required for all lots All lots Street Grades 7.40 max. 12% max. Intersections Right angles Right angles Access Two standard means Two standard means Cul-de-sac Length 500 ft. max. 500 ft. max. mkf PCAGENDA: TT13630-A " General Plan RL 10,800 sq. ft. minimum n/a n/a n/a 3.1 du/acre maximum n/a n/a n/a n/a 500 ft. max. in Verdemont Area Plan ~ttachment "B" r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT 13630 FINDINGS of FACT "" AGENDA ITEM 3 HEARING DATE 1 / 2.3 /90 PAGE 8 r 1. The requested subdivision is consistent with the mlnlmum lot development standards of the RL, Residential Low, land use designation and is consistent with the General Plan adopted by the Mayor and Cornmon Council on June 2, 1989, in that the density of the proposed tract is 3.06 dwelling units per gross acre while the plan will allow 3.1 dwelling units per gross acre. 2. All lots created meet Municipal Code requirements in that they and each rectangular lot has a minimum width of 80 feet (88 feet on corner lots) and depth of 100 feet. The irregular lots meet Code requirements. 3. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or cause serious public health problems, in that devel- opment will occur according to the conditions of approval and standard requirements contained in this report. 4. The proposed tract meets or exceeds the minimum require- ments of the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 18) and the state Subdivision Map Act. All lots will have frontage on dedicated streets. 5, All proposed streets meet the minimum requirement of the Department of Public Works for street improvements. 6. The design of the subdivision will easements acquired by the public at through or use of property within the sion in that no public agency has regarding required easements. not conflict with large for access proposed subdivi- stated comments mkf PCAGENDA: TT13630F "" ATTACHMENT C CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT 13630 CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM 3 HEARING DATE ..1.L23/90 PAGE 9 "" 1. The project shall comply with all applicable development standards as specified in the Verdemont Area Plan. 2, Removal of more than five (5) trees will require the issuance of a permit from the Planning Department (Ordinance No. MC-682). 3. The developer shall comply with the approved Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program (Attachment F). 4. Roofs shall be constructed to 20 pound wind load requirements. 5. Roof material shall be tile only. 6. Each tile shall be nailed and have a high wind clip installed on it. 7, Hold-down strapping shall be required in the garages. 8. Two publicly dedicated means of access shall be pro- vided. 9. static water sources all have clear access on one side of at least 16 feet. 10. Each fire hydrant shall be identified with approved blue reflecting street markers. 11. Fire flow gpm, duration and hydrant spacing shall be provided in accordance with City standards. 12. Open ends of tile roofs shall be capped with non-ignit- able material. 13. No attic vent shall be placed facing the wildland/foot- hills, the northerly and westerly sides of the proposed project. 14. All exterior walls shall be constructed with materials rated by the USC as one-hour fire resistant. Chimney spark arrestors with 12 gauge 1/2 inch opening, mounted in vertical from the ground shall be provided, 16. Underground utilities shall be required. wire screen and position visible 15. , CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT" CASE TT 13630 CONDITIONS 3 _1[23/%_ 10 ~ "" AGENDA ITEM HE:'RING DATE PAGE ,. ""'I 17. A liquefaction report shall be prepared, reviewed and approved prior to issuance of building permits. 18. Lot No. 35 shall be non-buildable. This shall be noted on the final map. 19. Comply with the Park and Recreation Department require- ments in preserving the trees on Lot No. 35. 20. Replace any tree requirement is in yard landscaping. removed with a 24" box tree. This addition to trees and required front 21. Conceptual landscape plans are to be submitted and approved by the Park and Recreation Department and Planning Department prior to review and approval of final landscape plan submittal. Conceptual plans shall show the new tree locations, including street tree locations and any hard surface. 22. Upgraded landscape for front yards and slopes will be required and shall be reflected on the conceptual plans showing intended plant sizes. 23. Lot Nos. 27, 28 and 29 shall not be developed until such time as Meyers Road is extended to the east and a secondary access is provided. 24. If subsurface cultural deposits are exposed during development, a qualified archaeologist shall be con suIted to evaluate these resources and empowered to halt construction until appropriate data recovery/protection measures have been implemented. mkf PCAGENDA: TT13630C \.. ..J "4QV 1980 " CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT 13630 CONDITIONS \. AGENDA ITEM ~ HEARING DATE 2j23/90 PAGE 11 25. STANDARD CONDITIONS 26. Minor modifications to the plan shall be subject to approval by the Director of Planning. An increase of more than 10 percent of the square footage or a significant change in the approved concept shall be subject to (Planning commission and Development Review Committee) review and approval. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the Plans, approved by the Development Review committee, Planning commission or Director of Planning. The developer is to submit a complete master landscape and irrigation plan (4 copies) for the entire development to the Engineering Department with the required fee for approval, the landscape plans will be forwarded to the Parks, Recreation, and community Services and the Planning Department for review and approval. (Note: the issuance of a building permit, by the Department of Building and Safety of the City of San Bernardino, does NOT waive these requirements/conditions.) No grading permits will be issued prior to approval of landscape plans. The design shall include, but not be limited to the following: x Street trees shall be planted on 35 foot center spacing unless otherwise indicated by the Department of Parks, Recreation, and Community Services. The Parks Department shall determine the varieties and locations prior to planting. A minimum of 25% of the trees shall be 24" box specimens. Trees are to be inspected by a Park Division representative crior to planting, Planters shall be enclosed with concrete curbing. The setbacks from the north ____ , south ____ , east ____ , west property line shall be bermed at a maximum 3:1 slope and shall be planted with a tall fescue type turfgrass. A Landscape buffer zone shall be installed between" facilities and street. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT 13630 """I CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM -2-: ___ HEARING DATE 1/23/90 PAGE 12 r X The landscape and irrigation plans shall comply with the "Procedure and Policy for Landscape and Irrigation" (available from the Parks Department). Subject to the Conditions of the Department of Parks and Recreation (attached). 77 Trees, shrubs and groundcover of a type and quality generally consistent or compatible with that characterizing single- family homes shall be provided in the front yard and that portion of th side yards which are visible from the street. All landscaped areas must be provided with an automatic irrigation system adequate to insure their viability. The landscape and irrigation plans shall be approved by the Parks and Recreation Department. At all times the business will be operated in a does not produce obnoxious noise, vibration, smoke, glare, or other nuisance. manner which odor, dust, A sign program for the multi-tenant commercial/industrial center shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of certificate of Occupancy. 28. In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the city, its officers, agents and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of San Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and attorneys' fees which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligation under this condition, PCAGENDA:STNDCONDITIONS 10/19/89 ATTACHMENT D r CITY CASE OF SAN BERNARDINO TT 13630 " REQUIREMENTS STANDARD \.. AGENDA ITEM 3. HEARING DATt.. 1/.23/90-- PAGE 11 - - ~ I ~ESIDENTI~T. nF.VELOPMENT " 1. Tentative Tract No, 13630 shall be in effect for a period of 24 months from the date of approval by the Planning Commission and/or Planning Department, However, if the final map has not been filed with the County Recorder's Office at the end of the 24 month time period, the approval shall expire. Additional time may be approved by the Planning Commission upon written request of the applicant if made 30 days prior to expiration of the ~ month time period, Expiration Date: January 9, 1992 c. ~ COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR P.R,D. a. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC & R's) shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to final approval of the tract maps. The CC & R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, and exterior of all buildings. The CC & R's shall also include a statement that no radio frequency antenna shall be included within the complex except for central antenna systems. b. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's group, or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights or interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assessment power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC & R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lots and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC & R's shall permit enforcement by the City of provisions required by the City as conditions to approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the Commission prior to making any such sale, This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in an ~ ".s Uy CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS TT 13630 CASE AGENDA ITEM 3 HEARING DATE 1/23/90 PAGE 14 r ""'Ill association, owning the common areas and facilities. d. Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas, including parkways, shall be provided for in the CC & R's. e. The CC & R's shall contain wording prohibiting the storage or parking of trailers, boats, campers, motor homes, and similar vehicles outside of the specified common areas, 2 . PARKING: a, This development shall be required to maintain a m~n~mum of ~ parking spaces for each buildable lot within an enclosed garage. b. All parking and driving aisles shall be surfaced with two inches of AC over a suitable base or equivalent as approved by the City Engineer. Parking spaces shall be striped and have wheel stops installed at least three feet from any building, wall, fence, property line, or walkway, c, Whenever an off-street parking area is adjacent to or across an alley from property zoned residential, a solid decorative wall six feet in height shall be erected and maintained along the property line so as to separate the parking area physically from the residentially zoned property, provided such wall shall be three feet in height when located within the required front or street side yard setback. Where no front or street side yard is required, such wall shall be three feet in height when located within ten feet of the street line. Said wall shall be located on the north , south , east _, west or peripheral -==:-property lines, d, Whenever an off-street parking area is located across the street from property zoned for residential uses, a solid decorative wall or equivalent landscaped berm not less than three feet in height shall be erected and maintained along the street side of the lot not closer to the street than the required depth of the yard in the adjoining residential area. No fence or wall located in the front setback shall obscure the required front setback landscaping. Said wall shall be located on the north , south , east , west ____, or peripheral ____ property lineS:-- ---- All parking areas and vehicle storage areas shall be lighted during hours of darkness for security and protection. 3. Recreational vehicle storage areas shall be screened by at least \... .J leu Illy ... .. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS CASE AGENDA ITEM 3 HEARING DATE 1/23/90 PAGE 15 TT 13630 '" r a six-foot high decorative wall with screened gates. There shall be provided for each unit, within the garage or carport, or other specifically designated area, a loft or other usable storage area with a minimum of 150 cubic feet in addition to standard utility storage. Traffic bumps provided on the interior private roads shall be subject to the City Traffic Engineer's approval. A commercial-type drive approach, as shown on No, 204 or equivalent, shall be constructed at the development. Location and design shall approval of the Engineering Division, standard Drawing each entrance to be subject to Prior to issuance of any building permit, access rights shall be granted to the City for the purpose of allowing access over the private drives within the project for all necessary City vehicles including fire, police, and refuse disposal vehicles, and any other emergency vehicles. The documents covering this matter shall be prepared by the own~r and approved by the Planning Department. All refuse storage areas are to be enclosed with a decorative wall, Location, size, type and design of wall are subject to the approval of the Planning Department and Division of Public Services Superintendent. Energy and noise insulation shall comply with all state and local requirements. 4. LANDSCAPING: a. Four (4) copies of a master landscape plan shall submitted to the Engineering Division for review approval, The plan shall include, but not be limited the following: be and to, 1) Size, type, and location of plant material proposed. 2) Irrigation plan. J) Such other alternate plants, materials and design concepts as may be proposed. 4) Erosion control plans. b, Tree varieties and exact locations will be determined prior I '" .... I'" .~ - CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS TT 13630 CASE AGENDA ITEM -~ HEARING DATE J,L,23/90 PAG E 16 '" ~ to planting by the Director of the Parks and Recreation Department or his/her designee. A minimum number of one inch caliper/15 gallon, multi-branched trees shall be planted within the parkway for each of the following types of lots, as per the city's specifications: 1) Cul-de-sac lot -- one tree; 2) Interior lot -- two trees; 3) Corner lot -- three trees, c, To protect against damage by erosion and negative visual impact, surfaces of all cut slopes more than five feet in height and fill slopes more than three feet in height shall be protected by planting with grass or ground cover plants, Slopes exceeding 15 feet in vertical height shall also be planted with shrubs, spaced at not to exceed ten feet on centers; or trees, spaced at not to exceed 20 feet on centers; or a combination of shrubs and trees as cover plants. The plants selected and planting methods used shall be suitable for the soil and climatic conditions of the site: Trees 10\, 15 gallon; 40\ 5 gallon; 50\, 1 gallon. Shrubs 20%, 5 gallon; 80%, 1 gallon, Ground cover 100% coverage, d. Slopes required to be planted shall be provided with an irrigation system approved by the Parks and Recreation Department. e. The maintenance of graded slopes and landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer until the transfer to individual ownership. 5. f. All grading and drainage facilities, including erosion control planting of graded slopes, shall be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the City Engineer. A grading permit shall be obtained prior to any grading being done. All lots shall have a minimum area oflO,800 square feet, a minimum depth of 100 feet, and a minimum width of 80 feet, ( 88 feet on corner--Iots). In addition, each lot on-a-cul-de- sac--or on a curved street where the side lot lines thereof are "" ~ 1115 ally CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS r 6. 7. 8. TT 13630 CASE AGENDA ITEM 3, HEARING DATE 1/23/90 PAGE 17 , ~ diverging from the front to rear of the lot, shall have a width of not less than 60 feet measured at the right angle to the lot depth at the midway point between the front and rear lot lines, and a width of not less than 40 feet measured along the front lot line as delineated on the tract map. Where lots occur on the bulb of the cul-de-sac, a minimum lot depth of 100 feet will be permitted. If the proposed depth is less than 100 feet, a plot plan must be submitted to demonstrate that a buildable lot area is possible and to justify the lesser depth, Variable front building setback lines of at least 25 feet and averaging 30 feet, and side street building setback lines 15 feet shall ~delineated on the final tract map. All garage entrances on a dedicated street shall have a minimum setback of 18 feet. Perimeter walls and walls required along the rear of all double frontage lots shall be designed and constructed to incorporate des~gn features such as tree planter wells, variable setback, decorative masonry, columns, or other such features to provide visual and physical relief along the wall face. The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval of the visual or engineering design of the proposed wall. 9. When graded slopes occur within or between individual lots, the slope face shall be a part of the downhill lot, Exceptions to this requirement must be approved by the City Engineer, 10. \.. Grading and revegetation shall be staged as required by the City Engineer in order to reduce the amount of bare soil exposed to precipitation, Compliance with all recommendations of the Geology Report shall be r~quired (if applicable), Any clubhouse, swimming pool, spa, putting green, picnic areas or o~her amenities shall be installed in the manner indicated on the approved site plan, 11. During construction the City Engineer may require a fence around all or a portion of the periphery of the tract site to minimize wind and debris damage to adjacent properties. The type of fencing shall be approved by the City Engineer to assure adequate project site maintenance, clean-up and dust control, ~ ...! ..y CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS TT 13630 CASE AGENDA ITEM _~~ - -- HEARING DATE 1{23/90 PAGE 8 ,. 12. "" No certificate of occupancy shall be issued prior to compliance with these Standard Requirements as well as all provisions of the San Bernardino Municipal Code, MECHANICAL EQUIPME~T: a. All utility service boxes, connections and service lines shall be painted to match the building exterior on which they are located, b, All existing overhead utility services and wiring shall be relocated underground, c. No roof-mounted equipment shall be placed on any unless screened as specifically approved by the Department (except for solar collection panels), building Planning d, All utility systems including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and Cable TV shall be provided for underground, with easements provided as required, and designed and constructed in accordance with City Codes and the utility provider. Telephone, Cable TV, and/or security systems shall be pre-wired in the residences. \.. ~ ..., ally CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS TT 13630 CASE AGENDA ITEM ..L HEARING DATE 1/23/QO PAG E 19 r 13. """"l COMPOSITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN A composite Development Plan (COP) shall be filed with the Engineering, Planning, and Building & Safety Departments prior to Final or Parcel Map processing by the City pursuant to Ordinance No. MC-592, The COP shall provide additional survey and map information including, but not limited to, building criteria (e.g. setbacks), flood control criteria, seismic and geological criteria, environmental criteria and easements of record. The COP shall be labeled with the title "Composite Development Plan", and contain a section entitled "Composite Development Plan Notes". The applicant shall have listed under the COP Notes section the following conditions or mitigating measures required for the development of the subject property: Conditions of approval Nos. 1 - 28 and Standard Requirement csj/12/8tj~. 2 - 13. DOC:PCAGENDA DOCUMENTS,l IIiIo.. ~ '11' ..y 'r CITY OF SA~ JERNARDINO PUBLIC. WORKS/ENGR. CASE TT 13630 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS '" AGENDA ITEM 3', _ _ HEARING DATE 1 l?l/qO PAGE 20 Project Description: 1k /.3630 3, 'F~ {..tJ7'S ~c.~r8:)"'" Nt1l.7JI8f.5T C()IZNt!!R. "F &-L.MDNr Ave AN/) r?.4<SNOJ."4 ~ Date: / Z.tS -B'I Page ~ of ~ pages Pre par e d By: HuJ(~ Rev i ewe d By: Applicant: I1I9RZJKtJ/ZT'Z.) nxt- NOTE TO APPLICANT: Where separate Engineering plans are required, the appl1cant 1S responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly to the Engineering Division. They may be submitted prior to submittal of Building Plans, Drainage and Flood Control All necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be subject to requirements of the City Engineer; which may be based in part on the recommendations of the San Bernardino Flood Control District. The developer's Engineer shall furnish all necessary data relating tv drainage and flood control. 11. -.15.. A local drainage study will be required for the project, Any drainage improvements, structures or storm drains needed to mitigate'downstream impact:. or protect the development shall be designed and constructed at the developer's expense, and right-of-way dedicated as necessary. _ The development is located within Zone A on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, a Special Flood Hazard Area Permit issued by the City Engineer shall be required. _ The development is located within Zone B on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, all building pads shall be raised above the surrounding area as approved by the City Engineer. _Comprehensive storm drain Project No. is master planned in the vicinity of your development. This drain shall be designed and constructed by your project unless your Engineer can conclusively show that the drain is not needed to protect your development or mitigate downstream impacts. 15. -3All drainage from the development approved public drainage facility. drainage facilities and easements satisfaction of the City Engineer. sha 11 be If not shall be directed feasible, provided to an proper to the "- ~ r CITY OF SA'" BERNARDINO PL8L1\,; WORKS/1NQIl CASE TT 13630 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS .... AGENDA ITEM _ 3 _ HEARING DATE 1/23,190 PAGE ? 1 Pro j e c t Des c rip t i on: 7lt./~" '3tJ Date: Iff"~ Page -2- 0 ages Prepared By: 11~ Reviewed By: Grading 16. ~If more than l' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plot/ grading and drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and the City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer in advance. 17. -XIf more than 5,000 cubic yards of earth~/ork is proposed, a gr'ading bond will be required and the grading shall be supervised in 'accordance with Section 7012 (c) of the Uniform Building Code. A liquefaction report is required for the site. This report must -be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. Any grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction report shall be incorporated in the grading plan. An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where -feasible, this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and shall conform to all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the Municipal Code (See "Grading Policies and Procedures"). The on-site Improvement Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. A reciprocal easement approval if reciprocal proposed to cross lot recorded to remove the shall be recorded prior to grading plan drainage, access, sewer, and/or parking is lines, or a lot line adjustment shall be interior lot lines, 18. X The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the -City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 4 copies to the Engineering Division for checking. An on-site Lighting Plan for the project shall be revie~/ed and approved by the C~ty Engineer, This plan can be incorporated with the grading plan, or on-site improvement plan, if practical. Utilities: 19. X Desi gn and construct all -accordance with City Code, serving utility, including and cable TV. public utilities to serve the $fte in City Standards and requirements of the gas, electric, telephone, v/ater, se\~er .... . , , CITY OF SA,. dERNARDINO PUBLIC, WORKS/ENGR. CASE TT 13630 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS '- AGENDA ITEM _3, __ HEARING DATE ...L'23..!.9Jl.... PAGE 22 ~ Project Description: IlL 13~3o Da te: /2 - Z z-89 Prepared By: nUl&- Rev i ewed By: Page ~ of ~ pages 20. ~Each parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer facilities so it can be served by the City or the agency providing such services in the area. 21. XSewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be -constructed at the Developer's expense. Sewer systems shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings. 22. XUtility services shall be placed underground and easements -provided as required. 23. ~All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either side of the street shall be undergrounded in accordance with Ordinance No, MC-601 (Subdivisions) or Resolution No. 88-65 (Non-subdivisions). 24. ~Existing utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer. Sewers within private streets or private parking lots will not be -maintained by the City but shall be designed and constructed to City Standards and inspected under a City On-Site Construction Permit. A private sewer plan designed by the Developer's Engineer and approved by the City Engineer will be required. This plan can be incorporated in the grading plan. where practical. 25. _v ~"",",""", Su.A., Cl_ ~....,....~ '1>L!" ~_ r- 7~ ....,,""- ~ .....' WT"'f 1:'...... ,,,",M THE" I /oJ -rEttS8=TlcN 0 F PM.-tn ~UC AND ~.,.,r AveHvE A~H6 8et-MDI<II Ar/l:NC/t!= 70 71f(; INrEt2~t:.-nOAJ QC ~.N"" /It/eNc.J~ 19N~ M,R6~I,IA-J THeN lJo(t.-n+ IN MA-fi1/J()t./~ AYf;iVcn; 70 MEV~.s ~o~t:>. SC;:W~ SHI1U.- !3€ IN.sr.4l..L6) 'N Meyees ~ ~ /lPPli!!bt/eO ey ~ t:1 ry G;.JG,Ne'Se. r CITY OF SAN'SERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/ENGR. CASE TT 13630 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS .... AGENDA ITEM 3' HEARING DATE .l..L2..3/90 PAGE 2 3 r Project Description: 'T'It.. 1~,"3o Date: IZ-Zg-S" Prepared By: nl.lJ& Reviewed By: Page ~ of tl pages Street Improvement and Dedications: 26, )cAll public streets within and adjacent to ,the development shall be -improved to include combination curb and gutter, paving, handicap ramps, street lights, sidewalks and appurtenances, including, but not limited to, traffic signals, traffic signal modification, relocation of public or private facilities which interfere with new construction, striping, signing, pavement marking and markers, and street name signing, All design and construction shall be accomplished in accordance with the City of San Bernardino "Street Improvement Policy" and City "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Street lighting, when required, shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Street Lighting Policies and Procedures". Street lighting shall be shown on street improvement plans except where otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 27. )(For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street -right-of-way (R.W.) to provide the distance from street centerline to property line and placement of the curb line (C.L.) in relation to the street centerline shall be as follows: Street Name E!:a..MtJIoJI Ibt? t1 ,lM,NoLl A AvtF f1€YG7t-S R.p rA/~/ol! :577Zl:e'f'S All rights of vehicular -the following streets: Right-of-Way (Ft.) .30' 30' 30' ;2~' ingress/egress Curb Line (Ft.) 20' /8' 18' /8' shall be dedicated from 2'1. X .4 fYlINII'I1()P? 01= 28' 0;: Pl'tV9neNl" SH/tI.L Sf: PlbvlDeD eN &'-A'lDNr AveNvG, /'1A6NOI.IA /llA!!Nu6 AND /'1ey~5 ~1'1.0 A~;rl9ctP/1.lT -,; 7'Hl?- $/'re. ----D 8el-PlDNi IJII'E SIf/1f..l, ~ I'/hIE1> h U!Jt157 .;2 $I I tV/J)C FeDm 7'7-M SI re:- 70 ?Ih-/"l ~ IItVO Ztf' WICE F~ ~ SIn:: 70 urn..C: t.e'/96t/e:'. ....~ (..(/~ flE-rt./tt.N ~~ J J $1+""-'- BE 25'. 29. 30. r CITY OF SAffSERNAADINO PUBLI(, WORKS/ENQR. CASE TT 13630 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS .... '10.. AGENDA ITEM J.: _ HEARING DATE 1 /'1/~ PAGE 2 4 J ,. Pro j e c t Des c I' i P t ion: 1/2. / 3'- 30 Da te: 1'2 -Z8 '8' Page --5- of 8 ;lages Prepared By: Nw(y Rev i e\led By: t1apping 31. X A Final/Parcel Map based upon field survey vill be required. 32. X A.ll street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer prior to Map approval. 33, X Additional survey and map information including, but not limited to, building setbacks, flooding and zones, seismic lines and setbacks, geologic mapping and archeological sites shall be f i 1 e d \'1 i t h the C i t yEn gin eel' i n ace 0 I' d a nee ~I i thO I' din a nee No, MC-592. Improvement Completion 34. )(. Street, Se\ler, and drainage ir,lprovement pl1lns for the entire project shall be completed, subject to the approval of the City Engineer, prior to the recordation of the Final/Parcel Map. 35. X If the required improve~ents are not completed recordation of the Final/Parcel t1a;J. an improvement accompanied by an agreement executed by the developer City will be required. prior to security a nd the If the required improvements are not completed prior to record- ation of the Parcel ~1ap, an ir.1provement certificate shall be placed upon the Map stating that they \1111 be cOr.1pleted upon d eve lop (,1 e n t . A P P lie a b 1 e top a I' eel map s con s i s tin 9 0 f 1 e s s t h a n 5 lots only, Required Engineering Permits: 36. X Grading perr.1it (if applicable). On-site improvements construction perr.1it (except buildings - see 3uilding and Safety). 37. x Off-site improvements construction perr.1it. \0.. .J r CITY OF SAJII/BERNARDINO PUBLk., WORKS/ENQIl CASE TT 13630 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS .. '10.. AGENDA ITEM ,3 HEARING DATE 1/23/qQ PAGE 2 5 .. , Projec t De scr i p t ion: ~ 15630 Da te; /Z-z.B-f!I! Page ~ of B pages Prepared By: f1r.vf:r Revi e~led By: Applicab~e Engineering ~ees:~ Bridge improve~ent fee in amount of S 41. X Drainage fee. Exact amount of fee shall be determined by Department of 3uilding and Safety at time of application for building permit, 42. X Landscape Plan Revie~ Fee S 65.00 43. ~ Traffic System Fee of S 12.54 per vehicle trip for City-wide traffic mitisation. The total amount of the Traffic System Fee shall be determined by the City Traffic Engineer at time of application for building permit. 41. X Street Light Energy Fee to pay cost of street light energy for a period of 4 years. Exact amount to be determined prior to ma~ recording. 45. X A Landscape Maintenance District shall be implemented to maintain landscaping ~Iithin the follolling areas: P/lllKwlfyM.a<. 1kAH6 711~ N~Y :NPG t:1= ~Dl<lr 1MitIf/€ /WI> ~~'j S/I)e tJl= I'1A6NoL" ~ /fl4FNVlF /hit) LOr 3~. 46 . )(,AN t:""~Mc!#H r ~ LANP5CA-F'INf? 'p1I,e.p~$(fS SNA1.L 8r ,l)Ep,cA~t) f)w;:,t. Lor '3>' iD 7"': c./ry DI! t.~.,. 3S- ~HA1.A.- Be- ~F'O 70 /liE;: ury. ;Jk. Pees /f12-E- :5 </!1J€c-r To CHmv6€ WI r~ C/ r No IICC . . .. , CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLIC WORKS/ENGR. CASE TT 13630 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM -1- ~ HEARING DATE U ~ 1/ Q 0 PAM 26 .' ,. .., ProJ~ct Descriptfon: r~/"3o Prepared Pa ge 7 Date: IZ-ZB-S' By: f7w(r' Rev 1 ewed 8y: of ~ pagts ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS 47. 48, 49. 50. 51. .... )( A "Communication Conduit" shall be installed in all streets within and adjacent to this subdivision. The conduit shall be dedicated to the City on the final map and its primary use shall be for Cable TV installed by the Cable TV Company under permit from the City of San Bernardino. x A landscape maintenance easement shall be dedicated over the front setback area of each lot and a 1 andscape maintenance di stri ct formed to ma i nta in the front yard landscaping in case of owner neglect. This development will be required to purchase "Development Rights" prior to issuance of buil di ng permi ts. (sIlBje~t te fi Ad 1 aj:lj:lra'Ja 1 af tile: t1ayor antt CORUROR CQIlRcil of tt1e VerElemoRt Area Pile 1 i c \!orks I nfrastru<:-4:lIr-e-f..inand ng P1 aR) . )C x This single family residential project lies within the proposed Chestnut Storm Drain Assessment District boundary. Therefore, a storm drain Surcharge Fee of $0.09 per square foot shall be pa i d (not to exceed $2,000.00 per lot), if the District is not formed prior to approval of building permits. This commercial, industrial, or multiple residential project lies within the proposed Chestnut Storm Drain Assessment District boundary. Therefore, a storm drain Surcharge Fee of $0.135 per square foot for the first 3,000 square feet of building area, paving or other impervious area, and $0.045 per square foot in excess of 3,000 square feet, sha 11 be pa i d if the District is not formed prior to approval of building permits, x This project lies within the proposed boundary of the Palm Avenue Box Culvert and Traffic Signal Assessment District; therefore, a fee of $0.04 per square foot of net project area shall be pa i d to the Ci ty if the District is not formed prior to the approval of building permits. This project lies within the proposed boundary of the Palm Av~nue Improvement Assessment District, therefore, a fee of $0,27 per square foot of net project area shall be paid to the City if the district is not formed prior to the approval of building permits. '~ CITY OF SA.4 BERNARDINO PUBL~v WOAKS/ENQR. CASE TT 13630 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM ,.~ HEARING DATE 114~/90 PAGE IT ,. "" X If more than 5 trees are to be retilOved from the si te. a tree removal permit must be obtained from the Planning Departcent. X !'f/2,(olt. (0 STIf%,i" DF /!JeL./YIONT ArlGIoIi/E DeSIGN Pt:J:Ho.IS oJ SU~LHoaes' IFNG 'NEIH.., ~H/tL.'- p~(),Pr:sc?- ,4 ~,eA~ LlNG-;:qz BGt../t'Io/'olT /JVtavve F12m, urrt..e "GI9r;,v~ J)1lI~ 70 p/rl./n ,t:}vliFfYt/6. 54,/) 6t2..4f)~ "',,",iF ..5#"ft-L- &; ?t4rre'O A-(f,,,,"',ST 71fE ~/.sT/N6- Gel/DE /rI'-lO SH~'-'- &- Sc.lBmrrriFP) 7j,GGT~ WITH fiel.-[) No ""~I fD!'IJ.) /fHD C/l~5S St5t::Tl4NS) 10 IIIE' Clry I:""G/N~e ;:q. ~el/tev hAIl) ApAf!4T/Itl-. X A ~poA.A1ey -rvt2.1oJ AtZIvND p~ '-ITy STD. Nl>. ICZ- SII/h..(,. Be CewsrlWC~D /lr 1fIf5 1:f1S~ 761tl"lINCJS ~ t1~5~/), 52. 53. 54. 55. '\. Project Description: ~/3630 Date: Prepared by: Page 8 of /z-ll-89 f11.AX:r Reviewed By: fZ1 pages X The above fees for the Chestnut Storm Drain. Palm Avenue Box Culvert and Signal and the Palm Avenue Improvement Districts represent estimates of this project's share of the cost of the improvements. If the Districts are approved. the amount of the fees will be considered payment in full. If any District is not approved. the fee will be retained in a fund for construction of the improvements for which it Nas paid. This project is located adjacent to Chestnut Equestrian Trail. Therefore, a fee equivalent to the cost of constructing icprovements in accordance with the approved trail and landscaping plan shall be paid for the full width of the trail adjacent to the project, and the developer shall join a landscaping maintenance district for future maintenance of the trail and landscaping. A wall conformi ng to the approved Chestnut Tra il and Landscapi ng Pl an sha 11 be constructed along the tract boundary adjacent to the tra il and storm drain easement. ATTACHMENT F MITIGATION MONITORING/REPORTING PLAN for Tentative Tract No. 13630 Mitigated Negative Declaration Introduction In compliance with Public Resource Code Section 21081.6 (enacted by passage of AB3180 (Cortese}), public agencies approving projects which may cause significant environmental impacts must monitor the mitigation of those impacts. This Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Plan, ensures implementation of the mitigation measures adopted by the Planning commission in approving the project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Mitigation Measures and Monitoring/Reporting Activities Prior to beginning construction the applicant shall furnish the City Planning Department with a checklist chart to use in tracking the mitigation monitoring and reporting activities. The chart shall list each mitigation measure, monitoring or reporting action and be ruled into columns that are designed to record responsible agency, dates of completion, inspector or other certifying persons and the person recording the information. Biological Resources Mitigation Measures 1. A tree removal permit shall be obtained from the Planning Department prior to the removal of trees. 2. Preserve the Eucalyptus trees as recommended by the Arborist Report. 3. Comply with the City of San Bernardino Park and Recrea- tion Department in preserving and/or relocating trees. 4. Replace any tree removed with a 24" box tree. Biological Resources Monitoring/Reporting Action 1. Upon issuing a tree removal permit, the Planning staff shall retain such notice in the project file and anno- tate the file indicating compliance. 2. The developer shall have noted on the tract map and composite development plan the Eucalyptus globulus (three trees) to be preserved. The composite develop- ment plan shall be approved by the Planning and Park and Recreation Departments. Upon approval of the Planning and Park and Recreation Department, the Planning staff shall retain such notice in the project file and anno- tate the file indicating compliance. Page 1 of 2 Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Plan for TT No. 13630 Page 2 of 2 3. Upon final acceptance of the developer's work effort in the preservation of the Eucalyptus globulus, the devel- oper shall obtain written verification of compliance from the Park and Recreation Department and shall provide the city Planning Department with a copy of such written compliance. The Planning staff shall retain such notice in the project file and annotate the file indicating compliance. 4. Upon final acceptance of the developer's work effort in replacing any tree removed with a 24" box tree, the developer shall obtain written verification of com- pliance from the Park and Recreation Department and shall provide the City Planning Department with a copy of such written compliance, The Planning staff shall retain such notice in the project file and annotate the file indicating compliance. mkf PCAGENDA: MM/RTT13630 ( rtJ.. .l..t'\l.-n.L'.L"::".L~ l. 1:.. <. _ TV OF SAN BERNAf.-~INO PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY Applicant (s) Address City, State Zip MISC: IS PREPARATION ke/9-1-89 Initial Study for Environmental Impacts For "Tel ",-I-",,+,,/e.. TrIA (oJ.. \3c'n3Q Project Number Project description/Location TC ~L~bc1I' vIA. c "'~ P.4:z, Q4'''lQ. <:l~~ ll\h -:-5 l.~(L' l'l..l-\.\ ,\" \ '.. -t'} ;, .1.:1-," CL.+ + ItUL ~() ( -\.-1M,i;i ~.:t- ~-1"""',\,\': \ t:.1- i....i2J. .. '-.'~ ,..vr1 .~.., ~.,. \,-1 J v Date ~\ .:.J..L-: :1 ";:;;1_ .., "..: , I prepared for: ~ ~, l:. c' , " . _\ ' /', \\ '(\ F7 ~ '~ '.{. '-'7: .. ~ ~ ~ ' " '-, S?~ 5' ('L.v\ ,J- ",(\ f'1 CA , !\ 1 1-1 c;.... ::.. '12412.. P~epared by: j.-J. ."' '." t ..1-( . .=-. - (.\ - ". 'I ..: Name ... .........;. '^ ,.:I.. ~'.:.i: 1\ " C\ Title City of San Bernardino Planning Department 300 N. "0" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 ..~- r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT '" ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST ~ "'" BACKGROYlm. Application Number: Tentative Tract No. 13630 Project Description: To subdivide 11,42 acr~ parc~l inrn 14 single-family lots in rhp RT" r,pnpri'll Pl i'ln 1 i'lnn ""'''' n"''''i'}''?'tion Location: Northeast corner of Belmont and Magnolia Environmental Constraints Areas: High Wind, High Fire, Greenbelt Zone C, Biologic Overland Distric~ Liquefaction potential and Flood. General Plan Designation: RL, Residential low, 10,800 square foot minimum lot area Archaeological area of concern Zoning Designation: RL B. ~FVIBONM~ET8~ IMPACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a separate attached sheet. 1. Ea~th Resources Will the proposal result in: Yes No Maybe a. Earth movement (cut and/or fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or x more? b, Development and/or grading on a slope greater than 15% natural grade? x c. Development within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone? x d. Modification of any unique geologic or physical feature? x "- ~ REVISED 12/87 PAGE 1 OF 8 r Yes No Maybe "" e. Soil erosion on or off the project site? f. Modification of a channel, creek or river? x x g. Development subject mudslides, other similar within an area to landslides, liquefaction or hazards? x h, Other? 2. bIR_RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in: a. air upon emissions or ambient air x Substantial an effect quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? yo c. Development within a high wind hazard area? )( 3. WbTER RESOURCES: proposal result in: Will the a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to impermeable surfaces? x b. Changes in the course or flow of flood waters? x c. Discharge into surface waters or any alteration of surface water quality? x d. Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters? e. Exposure of people or property to flood hazards? f. Other? x x ~ ~ REVISED 12/87 PAGE 2 OF 8 , Maybe "" 4. BIOLOGICAL R~SOURC~p: proposal result in: Could the Yes No ~ ~ a. Change in the number of any unique, rare or endangered species of plants or their habitat including stands of trees? Report prepared and on file in Planning Department b. Change in the number of any unique, rare or endangered species of animals or their habitat? Other? Removal of mature trees c. 5. NOISE: Could the proposal result in: a. Increases in existing noise levels? b. Exposure of people to exterior noise levels over 65 dB or interior noise levels over 45 dB? c. Other? 6. Will the proposal x x x x x x x LAND_ USE: result in: a. A change in designated Plan? the land use as on the General REVISED 10/87 PAGE 3 OF 8 b, Development within an Airport District? c. Development within "Greenbelt" x Zone A,B, or C? d. Development within a high fire x hazard zone? e. Other? Yes No Maybe 7. MAN-MADE HAZbFPp: project: Will the a. Use, store, transport or dispose of hazardous or toxic materials (including but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? x b. Involve the release hazardous substances? of x c. Expose'people to the potential health/safety hazards? " d. Other? 8. HOUSING: Will the proposal: a. Remove existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? x b. Other? 9. 1RA~~FORTATION/CIRCULATION: Could the proposal result in: a. An increase in traffic that is greater than the land use designated on the General Plan? )( b. Use of existing, or demand for new, parking facilities/ structures? )(' c. Impact upon existing public transportctionsystems? '( d. Alteration of present patterns of circulation? e. Impact to rail or air traffic? f. Increased safety hazards to vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? X. 'x' x REVISED 10/87 PAGE 4 OF 8 Yes No Maybe g. A disjointed pattern roadway improvements? of ^ h. Other? 10. fUBLIC SERVICES Will the proposal impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service? e. f. a. Fire protection? 1< >< b. Police protection? c. Schools (i.e, attendance, boundaries, overload, etc,)? x d. Parks or other recreational facilities? '/. X '< Medical aid? Solid waste? g. Other? 11. UTILITIES: Will the proposal: a. Impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service or require the construction of new facilities? b. c. 1. Natural gas? 2. Electricity? )( ~\ ~ x: 3. Water? 4. Sewer? 5. Other? Result in a pattern of extensions? disjointed utility Y. Require the construction of new facilities? x REVISED 10/87 PAGE 5 OF 8 , Maybe " The alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? " R<.port p~p,),.~ '.lMd .=-r\ h,~ I" Pl"'...,,\ ,,~ De.ph Adverse physical or aesthetic impacts to a prehistoric or historic site, structure or object? 12. AESTHETICS: a. Could the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic view? b. Will the visual impact of the project be detrimental to the surrounding area? c. Other? 13. ~P~~URA~--FESQURCES: proposal result in: Could the a. b. c. Other? 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance (Section 15065) \.. The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate Yes No x x x x ~ REVISED 10/87 PAGE 6 OF 8 Yes No Maybe important examples of the major periods of California history or pr~history? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.) x x c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is significant. ) d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x L C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (Attach sheets as necessary.) 1a. The project will involve earth movement of more than 10,000 cubic yards. The Preliminary Environmental Description for submitted by the applicant indicates 41.000 cy of cut and 39,000 cy of fill. The City Engineering Department will require a gradinq bond to be posted for any earthwork over 5,000 cy to ensure that the work is done in accordance with section 7014 (C) of the Uniform Building Code. REVISED 10/87 PAGE 7 OF 8 -- -- -- ---- - ... Project I' ber Date C, Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measures continued... 1q. The site is located within Rn RrPR subject to liauefaction. It is a standRrd rpqll; rpmpnt that a liquefaction report hp prppRrpc1 !':llhM; ttprl Rnd approved by the Engineering Department prior to building pe~its. 2c. The site is within the High Wind Hazard Area. It is a standard requirement of the Building Department that any construction have tile roofs with hurricane clips. This will reduce potential impacts to less-than-significant. 3a. During grading and development of the site there will be changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns and the rate of surface waters due to impermeable surfaces. This impact is considered to be less-than-significant with the proposed improvements to handle the runoff. 3d. The proposed project may reduce the guantity of water seeping into the ground. This is not considered to be significant due the small size of the project and thus the small difference in the quantity. 3e. The site is located wi thin the Chestnut Storm Drain Assessment District. The develooer will . be required to comply with Resolution 89-116 attached hereto. The site is also in the Verde- mont area and is subject to the Development Fee . . ------ ~ -- ----~ proj ect NL ..:>er Date C. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation ~rogram With these requirements Measures (continued). . and the standard requirement that all drainage be directed to an approved drainage facility or that proper drainage facilities and easements be provided reduce this potential impact to less than significant. 4c. The project site has approximately 30 randomlv planted trees. Grading and development will require removal of the trees. An arborist report was submitted. The report recommends preserving the Euclayptus qlobulus (Blue guml. There are three of these trees located on sitP-o It is necessary not to disturb thp- ~oil within fifteen feet from the basp- of thp trpp~ to hp preserved. The report statp-~ th~t tnp rpm~inner of the trees should be replaced due to structural defects, regrowth from stumps and less of vitality from lack of cultural care. The Parks and Recreation Department agrees with this conclusion. The developer is proposing to render the ~ot located closet to the corner lot may be saved. The developer shall work with Parks and Recreation and Engineering to save the tree if at all possible. To mitigate the loss of the mature trees the developer shall: 1. Obtain a tree removal permit from the Planning Department prior to removal of any trees. ~-- -- --- ... Project N jer Date c. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measures (continued)..... 2. Preserve the eucalyptus trees as noted in the above discussion. 3. Comply with the requirements of the Parks and Recreation Department in preserving and/or relocating trees. 4. Replace any tree removed with a 24" box tree. This requirement is in addition to street trees and front yard landscaping requirements. 5. Conceptual landscape plans are to be submitted and approved by the Parks Dept. and Planninq prior to review and approval of actual landscaoe plans. Conceptual plans shall show the new tree locations includinq street tree locations and any additional landscaoe hard surface. 6. Uoqraded landscape for front yards and slopes will be required and reflected on the conceoutal plans showinq the intended plant size. .. TT No. 13630 Discussion _ Environmental Evaluation add Mitigation Measures (continued) 6c. The site is located in GrRRnhpl~ ~nnp "r" The developmRnr ~~nnnnrn~ nf rh;~ zone are standard conditions of the devRlopment of the homes and is considered to hR lRss-rhan- siQnificant. 6d. The sitR is ln~n~pn w;~hin n High F;rp Hn7nrd 7.nnp The requirements of the High Wind Zone and Greenbelt zone reduce the impact to less-than-significant. MIse: EVALUATIONMIT.M , ~ D. DETERMINATJON On the basis of this initial study, D The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The proposed project could have a significant effect on the ~environment, although there will not be a significant effect in ~ this case because the mitigation measures described above have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. D The proposed project ~mY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA :J:+/tJ i1 ol'l1';o'1ERt; ;;MJ~//'/lL. ;t/lV#OC Name and Title ~u~ Date: / - 1- '7tJ \.. j REVISED 12/87 PAGE 8 OF 8 D . . D n ---. Attachment G -". ~"i\l ~'l " l"I'li; -, -ii .\1. ld 1\1, ZONED R - J - JOBOO f(ESlDEN~ ~q \ !U '- N ~ :Dtf -~ t'1 I ~!<2 ::0 .: i gli\ , . 'z~ !l ~~ L . 0 . 15 - 0 . ~ 0 0 \1 \ ~ ~" ZONEp R~l- 10BOo ,,-- ~SJpe:NCE) / -:; --;, ) -/l c ;; i = . . . I I' ! H! I u I nil~ hi I' t'!' I iP~ H~~ if; I ! 'it ~: I..!: ! ,ni il'" .! .:! ri ;~..:!! .. f iiii !:5 ;1. I 'r :' i:i: Ii , ,. ii !~! :, - IZ .1 I...... ,.:1..:. ..f...... -; i j i-i :~i! I: 'I' - ! il;:r ":i :, r !: ~, fl~~ J ~~! i i ii': !~i! ~i i" ii ! il a ; :1= ;;;: i, .. '! n ;i wi: II ! H;: i: I :~ I: !h. t, i i" 'i'i ::i: 1; Ii ~ E,l'j j li'l: 'Ij~ j h · "~It 1,_ !, i :j' :' to. I I:: '. ,', 'i = .:, . i.", :le :.. :1 , ' .. . I I' I< : In 1 Ii: F: : .' li,'.. j I ,I: ," . ! - TENTATIVE TRACT 13630 - .....CI.IC aOftT....aT i ~ ~":I i . ~ ;h~ -4 I. .1... m .~;.= Z el: -4 ciJ ~ ~ -t :;p -4 < > ~ '- m ~ ,- -4 :Il CfJ ~ -t 0 5. -4 - CfJ ... CD ... 0 . . ~r- ] ~NT I '. · , ! f. ! i : t i r i I I i i .:l13~,.~,."..", ...~'..:- ';~. ~-------- ....- ,--..-- -. ~ ...., \ ~/ i' . v v to r,ae & L!"os:e:;e Ce~::~r" PRELIMINARY REPORT FOR: JOSEPH BONADIMAN P.O, BOX 5852 SAN SE~~AR~IN~, CA~IFORNIA 92412 OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR TREES LOCATED AT: N ,...l. CORNER OF BELMONT AND MAGNOLIA, SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT . 13630 PREPARED BY: SAMUEL I,. KNAPP, ASCA CONSULTING ARBORIST KNAPP hSSO~IA~ MAY 11, 1989 = ~'S:':~ "t.~ ~:~..;:.~'j =.. ~.~:... ...~ t.~:.:S'" '::,~'. :":; ::t ~-?-:- . ::! ~'::~ :alif:'1""~ ~2:~~ v v R~: Observations and reco~nendaticns of trees for arborist report. PROP!R7Y: Tenta~:ve tract ::3630, N.W. corner of Be2nont and Magnolia, San Bernardino, California, I i~spec~ed the ~ree5 on M!y 8. 19B9 a~d my findings are as fo110....5: :::n :"IY opin:o?"\, the t..uca:'19tU~L.,gkl2:.;1:-.L'2., (Blue gun) would be sU:~3ble for p:eserv:ng. ~:l other ~xis~ing trees and sh:ubs on ~he site should be replaced. There are a total of thirty (30) randomly planted trees and founda- tion plants. T~ey are existing in an environment they have es~abl:sted over the past forty-pl~s years. In preservation it wi12 be necessary not to disturb the 50:1 ~ithi~ fift&en feet (15') from the base of the trees, :nj~ries and stress become of paramount when existing trees are urbanized and preserved. If preservation guide- lines cannot be followed, I recommend replacement of all existing trees and shrubs. ( l) [I E ;'i'~ 1 -- "..:: 0'" f-- I:'" 1 _. : ...... ~~l v INVENTORY GUIDE: F:: _ ~":'I-4 \wi D.S.H, ~ia~e~e~ at breast height, ~h~ ~rees diameter measured at four poin; !~ve feet (~,5') above grade. The trees varied from 4" to 36" D.B,H. ?~r:~El-IENr: Replacenent trees an~ shrubs are not suitable for preserving. Due to structural defects, regrowth from stumps, and loss of vitality fro~ lack of cultural care. SPECIES: \;uoressus, cypress Ceratonia siliqua, Carob EY..c.al~~_qlQbu 1 \\5 , Blue gum Sambucus caer~lea, Elderberry ,;a:-:,irix, Salt cedar Qltl, Olive Schefflera, Umbrella tree NC!-!E ER : COHMENTS: 1.1 Replace~ent. 2 Rep:acement, 3 Prese:,,',e, 2 Replacement. S Replacement, 1 Replacement. 1 Rep1.acement. VAR:OCS SHRrS FO~~DATION F:~NT~: Oleanders Euger.i a Citrus Privet Stonefruit Scrub oak ( 2 ) v v CO:IC:,:'~SION : In ~y opinion, the E. 91ob~lus would be suitable for p~eservat~on, Hc~ever, if preservation g~ide:ines ca~~ct be f~~:o~ei, : ~ou~d re=~~~~~d rep:a~e~ent, ?lease find enclcsed, Preservation' and Minimizing liabil~ty guidelines. vpon request, Knapp Associates ~~l: S~PF:j g~i~elines for ~ree re~lacenent and pru~ir.g. If necessary, :ur~~er discussion of this information is welconed. Your interest in our "Living Investment" is ap~reciated. , \ I (.....) ','t;: / Ii 0Ui~{'" ' '1' ,V,,'>r'! It ,.1('1/'11 , " ~ . "1"/'/ I,' " !i Ii Sanuel L. Knapp, ASCA Ccns~lting Arborist KNAPP ASSOCIATES Enclosures ( j ) v v ?RESER1,'ATI.9!\ R2L~IR!'::llf:i':S FOR t-A.ATTJRE'!'REES 1. Correcci~e pr~nin~ ~o Arbo~iou:~ura1 standard for tree preservation in urban development, (Certified Arborist preferred)~ 2, Establish..",en~ of u:'odis~u,d;t:d 50i: zone arour.d t~ee bases, se~ at a 12:1 ratio of soil surface width to potential trunk diameter, ], Cl~Bring o~ de~sc vi;e~~tio~ u~d re~€nticn of all natural leaf li~t~r ben~~~h canop~e~, installation of wood chip mulch on a needed basis. 4. Where soil ha~ bean cccpected or otherwise distur- cea in th~ root ZO~~ area ;?articularly ~nter canopies) fertilization, aeration and watering via soil injection of all accessible soil in the root zone. 5. Insta:lacion of dri; type irrigation systems with cap3clti ~or Ferio~~= d~e~ wa~erins, during and after development. Water every 30 day period of i~suffici~nt r~infall, 6, r~!:a:lo~i~n o~ c~a~n li~k ~~nci~g to ~ro~ect trees durlng deve:opment of the tree area, Chain link fence should extend to crip line or well beyond on specific trees. j. :Xa.:1li~at.~c:-. !l~cl ~oc~.:.rnen-:'d.~i~';"'~ of each ;,=er:::, with specific ~ain~enanc~/preservation ~equirements, 8. '~ra~$~i~tal of reco~~e~dations and specifications ~O~ conti~~:i~; ~:~~ n:aintQ~al~:O ~o p~r~ies or indiv- respcnsib:e for :ree an~ landscape managemen~ on completion of area development, RE: .. . . "'-.;. CO!_CEi<S5 : 5':-~.~!:::~:;:5 ; v v S:RA::~~:S !CR ~:~:MIZI~G LIA3!L:~Y RISKS ~ature :~e~s ~~a~ a~e ~c b~ ?res<!:-v~d ~. Ag:~g u:oa~ :or~s~ E. Grow~h of s~bu=bs C. C~a:.;~~; ~~~i=o~~.e~~a: ~ac:ors n. A:::i~~:~z!~j.o~ ~o e~"i~:~rr,~~~ -r.t .=~:::,:'~a: ~:;$;ec~;"c:"'. ':1y Cer-:.i~ied Cc~s~::~~; ^~=c=:s~ E. Es~a~!ishment cf sys:e~a~ic rnanase~en~ ~:~~ i.e. ?~~~:~g, ::r~gat:o~, soil e~v::or.~en: l. ~??:y sc~r~ &=~~=lc~~c~=a! ;ri~cipa~s O. Avcid cr~s~s ffia~a;e:e~t E. ~ocume~~atio~ ,~ F f;' ...: 4 F' ~::' - Ync1 P9 !\5 ~ '-":. ;Jr;(.''t (.... .... (....~"ow,~ ~/C~/S~, ~ t : ~,~ '''; 1 '.. , ~ ,. .,....:;-.. K;,OlPP l,lISC\;. pho....o t.~kQn :/2/8<). h~<; ;':)v;.,', '.1: :.:--tc __: ~..; l...:;:: ,;, . ...._f ..._._..--..... _.f".... ...-.,.. ATTACHMENT H LOCATION CASE TT 13630 ~TG~~C; I j CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE 1-23-90 ...-.\ i 1 ~ ,~ ~ 1 , ,1 ~ 1 1 ,\ A . l ,,; '! 1 1 j ;~ I , l " A