Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout29-Planning .... CITY OF SAN BERI ~RDIN REQUEST )R COUNCIL ACTION Date: January 10, 1990 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S Subject; APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14528 Department Mayor and Common Council Meeting January 22, 1990, 2:00 p.m. From: Larry E. Reed Director Planning and Building Services ..Jept: Synopsis of Previous Council action: On December 12, 1990, the Planning Commission unanimously (7-0) approved Tentative Tract No. 14528. No previous Council action. i "i .:' .~ .. c_ ~ That the hearing be closed; and, that the Miyo~~and Council uphold the appeal and deny Tentativfi:)T};~ct No. 14528. (Supports appellants' request.) __ ::;:1 ,- OR That the hearing be closed; and, that the Mayor and Council deny the appeal and approve Tentative Tract No. 14528 subject to the Findings of Fact, Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements contained in the December 12, 1989, Planning Commission's staff report (Attachment D), and, that the Negative Declaration be adopted. (Supports Planning Commission's action and staff's reco~on~ ~ Larry 'E. Re d Signature Director Recommended motion: Contact person: Larry E. Reed Phone: (714) 384-5057 Supporting data attached: Staff Report Ward: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A Source: (Acct, No,) (Acct, DescriPtion) Finance: ~ouncil Notes: -.<: n~~" Agenda Item No, -2" CJ ~ CITY OF SAN BERN4RDINO - REQUEST F()R COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT SUBJECT: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14528 MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEETING - JANUARY 22, 1990 REOUEST The appellants, seven neighbors in the area (see appeal letter Attachment "A") , are appealing the approval of Tentative Tract No. 14528 by the Planning commission on December 12, 1989. The appellants request that the Mayor and Council reconsider the approval and deny the proposed subdivision. BACKGROUND Tentative Tract No. 14528 is a proposal to create a 14 single-family home subdivision in the RL, Residential Low, land use designation. The project is located on a 5.0 acre site at the northwest corner of Meyers Road and Magnolia Avenue in the Verdemont area. The minimum parcel size that is proposed is 11,549 square feet, with a density of 2.8 units per gross acre (3.1 units per gross acre is allowed). The Environmental Review Committee, on November 2, 1989, recommended a Negative Declaration for the project. No comments were received during the public comment period. On December 12, (7-0) voted to 14528. 1990, the Planning commission unanimously conditionally approve Tentative Tract No. The site is located within the high wind, high fire, Greenbelt Zone B and an archaeologically sensitive area. The project was conditioned to comply with all standards that mitigate being located in these zones. The subdivision was also conditioned to provide secondary access by the construction of a 24 foot wide, paved temporary emergency access by extending Meyers Road westerly from the project to Little League Drive. 75.026. city of San Bern_Ldino Appeal of Planning Commission's Approval of Tentative Tract No. 14528 - Mayor and Council Meeting, January 22, 1990 Page 2 BASIS OF APPEAL Belmont Avenue is in poor condition and is not able to provide adequate access to the subdivision. Magnolia Avenue is a one lane road and is not able to provide adequate access to the subdivision. The area is located in a high wind area. The area is "out of olace" among the nine homes that exist on one acre parcels. ANALYSIS OF APPEAL The Engineering Department has reviewed the road circulation system supporting subdivision and has required improvements along Magnolia and Meyers Roads. In addition, the road system in Verdemont is proposed to be upgraded by the Development Fee Program the City has initiated. The project was conditioned to construct the residences in compliance with the mitigation standards for high wind. The density issue in the Verdemont area was debated by the Planning commission and Council during the General Plan hearing process. It was decided by Council to designate this area as RL, Residential Low, which allows parcels to be a minimum of 10,800 square feet and not 1 acre. This designation and the General Plan were adopted on June 2, 1989. OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL The Mayor and Council may Tentative Tract No. 14528 or tract. deny the appeal and approve uphold the appeal and deny the city of San Bern~_dino Appeal of Planning Commission's Approval of Tentative Tract No. 14528 - Mayor and Council Meeting, January 22, 1990 Page 3 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Council deny the appeal and approve Tentative Tract No. 14528. Prepared by: John E. Montgomery, AICP for Larry E. Reed, Director Planning and Building Services ATTACHMENTS: A- Letter of Appeal to the Mayor and Council B- statement of Official Planning commission Action C- Public Hearing Notice D- December 12, 1989, Planning commission Staff Report M&CC: TT14528APPEAL /nm ATTACHMENT "A" Decen. .r 14, 1989 To the Hcnorable Mayor and Common Council: ~oposition to the Planning Co~nission's approval of Tentative Tract 14528. The residents in the immediate area of the proposed housing s~IaVEbpFos'e@LEB~the deveJepment of Tentative Tract 14528. We moved to this area to get away from the busy residential streets that exist all over the City elf San Bernardino. 'C'l~e ~jcU) t~fO 9Hiet country like living and the openness of not having homes built so cl~se ~&gJ(her that you can see the color of your neighbor's eyes from your own front doors. Who will purchase these proposed homes? Couples from surrounding cities who want to move here because housing is more affordable? Couples that work in cities other than San Bernardino, spend more time and money in other cities, but send their children to already over crowded San Bernardino schools? The major~ty residents in the immediate area work in San Bernardino and own businesses in San Bernardino. Business owners that pay business license fees, utility tax on their business utilities, and property tax on their business. The present home owners want to work in the City and enjoy living "out in the country". We want to keep this area of Verdemont in a country like atmosphere and oppose the proposed development of Tentative Tract 14528 ior the following reasons: The condition of Belmont Avenue, which is the main road off of Palm Avenue and leads up to the proposed development, is very poor. There are numerous patched pot holes, dips, bumps and mud when;tt rains. Belmont Avenue is wide enough to let two cars pass if one car uses the dirt shoulder. The proposed tract will bring 14 new families to this area. Considering that there will be at least two cars per home, that would mean at least 28 cars traveling along Belmont Avenue. During the Little League Baseball Tournament, baseball fans park their cars along both sides of Belmont Avenue causing one way traffic. Just this last tourna- ment, a car was traveling too fast down Belmont Avenue, hit one of the dips and rolled over. There was one paramedic truck, two ambulances and two police cars at the scene blocking traffic either way. ~ '",,\ '~ ,'\ ~~). /, /;.;.) '-, ~=d)~ 0.' ./ ,. ~/#~ 'C'-' ,. ./ .;p i:: ~'.~ 'E9~ '../ Magnolia Avenue, which is an access road to the proposed development, is a one lane road, A car coming up or down Magnolia Avenue has to pul~ over and stop,to let a car coming in the opposite direction to pass. ~e impact of 28 more cars in this small area is overwhelming. ~.;'i. -"9-- ",p ~~~ .,,~ .~.:.;;.'.,. "J"~ \'..-:. ~. .....$~. ,~ '.v~ c' ......~ <;:'.) ":...:., -",,-,' ~~ ~.o I..:' ":::\ C' .,. -i~ ~:;~ ~\ ::0 ,'T1 ':? ", ,:=I - ,-;; ,." ::-J '=:l This area is a high wind area, Since October 4, 1989 alone, ther~has: been 33 days of very strong wind. Because these strong ,,;c:old winds amP ,::2 other harsh weather elements we face up here are impossible to walk in;owe have to drive our children to the school bus stop (corner of Belmont a~ Magnolia Avenues). One morning there were three cars parked there wit~ children for the school bus. If the proposed development is completed:- will there be 14 more cars parked at the corner with children waiting for the school on windy and rainy days? ,'1'1 U -x: We live in a unique area. Where else in the City of San Bernardino can you find homes on one acre lots? We would like to see this area stay unique, to stay quiet from the traffic and development of track homes. We do not want to see 14 homes built on only five .acres. The residents now living in this area built their homes on' their one acre plus lots when the zoning was for acre lots only, It was our understanding then that this area would qy one acre lots only, We built our homes with pride and a lot of time and effort. We ~~n't want to see homes built so fast that they fall apart before the tenants move in. We are not opposed to new housing in this area on one acre lots. This proposed track is ~ of place among the nine homes that already exist on one acre parcels. ATTAcHMEr';T "A" TT#14528 This project looks good on paper but we do not live on paper. Please consider this a little more than how it appears on paper. Before you make a final decision that will have a lasting effect on the area and on over nine families already living here, come up and visit this area. You will see how out of place this track will be. Can .the City of San Bernardino have at least one place where you can still see hawks flying overhead and the only sound you hear all day and night is the train whistle? As the Sun stated in the December 6, 1989 newspaper, this is "the city 's last large reserve oTOpen space". Can we keep it that way? C'-~1\..4 La ~o 4 V'f\ct ~~D \i q -A~e.. R-d. " CD _ \ ",,- \ r v D \,... \ """, C ~Cfd,JY'----' meyefS :> ) ~ ~ n t 'I l(l ~ K \) , t716 jlI{~ ~ b 7?6 t?/~~~ ~ 3~~~ ~,~.~ 7o?o f!{~U1/-( 3 LjSS ~-<-rLJ ~. g'1(J~-- ~ ~~ ~-..J 1<-/ b re- V ///CY4/c( 33 '?.r 6~~' '5 wJJ { PJ~~ Gai~ ~~~~~ tUWJ';l m~ ATTAC.'-!HEN'I "B" City of San Bernardino STATEMENT OF OFFICIAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION PROJECT Number: Tentative Tract No. 14528 Applicant: Sierra Engineering Development for Pacific Land ACTION Meeting Date: X December 12, 1989 Adopted Negative Declaration for Environmental Impact and Approved Request Subject to the Following Findings of Fact, Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements (Attachment A) . Denied based upon the following Findings of Fact. other. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The requested subdivision is in accordance with the minimum lot development standards of ,the R-1-10,800 single family residential zone and is consistent with the General Plan adopted by the Mayor and Common Council on June 2, 1989, in that the density of the proposed tract is 2.8 dwelling units per gross acre while the plan will allow 3.1 dwelling per gross acre. 2. All lots created meet Municipal Code requirements in that they and each rectangular lot has a minimum width of 80 feet and depth of 100 feet. The irregular lots meet code requirements. 3. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or cause serious public health problems, in that development will occur according to the conditions of approval and standard requirements contained in this report. 4. The proposed tract meets or exceeds the minimum require- ments of the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 18) and the state Subdivision Map Act. All lots will have frontage on dedicated streets. 5. All proposed streets meet the minimum requirements of the Department of Public Works for street improvements. - City of San Ber c_ino STATEMENT OF OFFiCIAL PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Tentative Tract No. 14528 Page 2 6. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision in that no public agency has stated comments regarding required easements. CONDITIONS This project was approved subject to the Conditions and Standard Requirements contained in Attachment A. VOTE Ayes: Clemensen, Cole, Lindseth, Stone None None Corona Lopez, Nierman, Sharp, Nays: Abstain: Absent: I, hereby, certify that this Statement of Official Action accurately reflects the final determination of the Planning commission of the City of San Bernardino. ~ C kd signa ure Larry E. Reed, Director of Planning and Building Services Name and Title o/~ 3 I/rP'O ;r Date cc: Project Property Owner Project Applicant Building and Safety Dept. Engineering Division /mkf PCAGENDA: PCACTION - ATTACHMENT "c" Public Hearing Notice A notice of the appeal hearing was sent to the property owners within 500 feet of the subject property and the applicant at least ten days prior to the hearing, as per Municipal Code Section 19.89.020. A copy of this notice is attached. - , " OFFI'CIAL NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL APPEAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14528 ~ r "" THIS IS TO INFORM YOU THAT THE FOLLOWING ITEM HAS 8EEN APPEALED TO THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL BY Nelghboring Landowners (7) \. [ SUBJECT, TENTATIVE TRACT No. 14528 r WARD =# 5 PROPERTY LOCATION : Located at the northwest corner of Meyers Road and Magnolia Avenue in the Verdemont Area. PROPOSAL: To subdivi~e 5.0 acres into 14 single-family home parcels, wlth the smallest parcel proposed being equal to 11,549 square feet. \. PUBLIC HEARING LOCATION: SAN BERNARDI NO CITY HALL COUNCI L CHAMBERS 300 NORTH "0" STREET SAN BERNARDINO, CA,92418 ) I '- HEARING DATE AND TIME: January 22, 1990, 2:00 p.m. A DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSAL IS ON FILE IN THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT AT CITY HALL, IF YOU WOULD LIKE FURTHER INFORMATION ABOUT THIS PROPOSAL PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING, PLEASE CONTACT THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT IN PERSON OR BY PHONING (714) 384-5057. THANK YOU, ).J jll, III. ok, '- \.. ATTACHMENT "D" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUMMARY 6 TT14S~H 1? 1? Rq 5 AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE WARD APPLICANT Pacific Land Development P.O. Box 566 Bellflower, CA 90706 Same as above ~ (f) ~ (,) TENTATIVE TRACT 14528 OWNER: tn ~ :) a Lt.I a: ..... ~ ~ a: ~ The applicant requests approval to establish a l4-10t single family subdivision in the RL, Low Residential, General Plan land designation. The 5.0 acre site is located at the northwest corner of Meyers Road and Magnolia Avenue. EXISTING LAND USE Vacant Vacant Residential Residential Vacant GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION Low Residential Low Residential Low Residential Lml1 Residential Low Residential PROPERTY Subject North East South ~vest ZONING RL RL RL RL RL GEOLOGIC / SEISMIC DVES FLOOD HAZARD DYES OZONE A SEWERS DYES HAZARD ZONE {JNO ZONE S3 NO OZONE B DNO HI~ FIRE BYES AIRPORT NOISE / REDEVELOPMENT DVES HAZARD ZONE DNO CRASH ZONE PROJECT ARE^ QNO ...J o NOT o POTENTIAL SIGN I FICANT Z in APPROVAL ~ APPLICABLE EFFECTS 0 WITH MITIGATING - ~ Zen MEASURES NO E.I.R, ti CONDITIONS ~C!) o EXEMPT o E,I.R, REOUIRED aUT NO 1&..0 0 DENIAL 2Z I&..ffi Z- SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS ~:E 00 WITH MITIGATING 0 CONTINUANCE TO a:Z MEASURES en:! >ii: 0 ~NO o SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS (,) Z UJ .,. UJ SIGNIFICANT SEE ATTACHED E,R. C, a: EFFECTS MINUTES NOV 1981 ~EVISED JULY I~'Z SKY CITY OF 5, J BERNARDINO PLAt liNG DEPARTMENT CASE TT14528 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE h l?-l?-RCJ 2 r REOUEST The applicant requests approval of Tentative Tract 14528 to establish a 14 lot single-family subdivision in an area designated by the General Plan as RL, Residential Low, Estates. The proposed density is 2.8 units per gross acrei the minimum lot size proposed is 11,549 square feet. The land use designation allows a density of 3.1 dwelling units per gross acre and requires a minimum lot size of 10,800 square feet. SITE LOCATION The 5.0 acre Meyers Road and Attachment "G", site is located Magnolia Avenue, Location map). at the northwest corner of in the Verdemont Area (see MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE Proposed Tentative Tract 14528 is consistent with the Municipal Code and General Plan as shown in Attachment A. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL OUALITY ACT An Initial Study was prepared by staff and presented to the Environmental Review Committee (ERC) on November 2, 1989. The ERC found that no significant impacts will result from the project and are recommending a Negative Declaration. The proposed Negative Declaration was advertised and available for public review from November 7, 1989 to November 22, 1989. No comments were recieved from the public during that period (See Attachment liE II , Initial study). ANALYSIS site Characteristics The 5.0 acre site consists of vacant land located at the northwest corner of Meyers Road and Magnolia Avenue. The property slopes from north to south at approximately 6.5 per- cent. The site is located in the Verdemont area and within the High Wind, High Fire, Greenbelt Zone B, and an archaeologically sensitive area. surrounding Area The properties to the north and west are vacant. To the "" CITY OF SAI'. BERNARDINO PLAN~ING DEPARTMENT CASE TT14528 OBSERVATIONS '" AGENDA ITEM h HEARING DATE 1 ?-l ?-Rq PAGE 3 ~ r south across Meyers Road are existing residences. To the east across Magnolia Avenue is an existing residence. Density and the General Plan The General Plan allows a density of 3.1 units per gross acre with minimum lot size of 10,800 square feet. This project proposes a density of 2.8 units per gross acre, and all lots proposed are greater than 10,800 square feet. Access and Circulation The proposed project is required to have two points of access. The project will be required to provide secondary access by construction of 24 foot wide temporary emergency access extension of Meyers Road westerly from the project to Little League Drive. All of the interior streets have been designed to meet the requirements of the Verdemont Area Plan (VAP) and the city Engineering Department. ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERNS As stated above, the project is located within the High Wind, High Fire, and Greenbelt Zone B areas. The project will be required to comply with all applicable Verdemont Area plan standards, which will mitigate the potential hazards of being located in those zones. The project is also located in an archaeologically sensitive area. A Cultural resources records search was conducted by the Archaeological Information Center of San Bernardino County Museum, which recommended that a field survey was not necessary. A biological resource survey was performed for the site on August 29, 1989, which found no evidence of any sensitive or endangered species of plants or animals. Drainage The project site slopes from north to south at approximately 6.5 percent. A six foot high decorative screen wall is proposed along the northerly property line. Off-sLtestorm water will enter the site through weep holes in the walls and be conveyed into cross lot drainage through lots 10 and 11, confluenced with on~site water, and conveyed westerly onto Meyers Road. All on-site drainage will be conveyed into the interior streets and then into Meyers Road. This project is located within the assessment district being formed for the Chestnut Avenue Storm Drain. The property owners will be required to join this assessment district as a condition of approval of this map. ~ ~ CITY OF S/. \ BERNARDINO PLA~'" 'ING DEPARTMENT CASE TT14528 OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 6 12-12-89 4 ,. '"""I Comments Received All City Departments reviewed the proposal at the Environmental Review Committee meeting. The Engineering and Water Departments have attached Standard Requirements. The San Bernardino Unified School District commented that the project would be subject to school facility fees as determined by the Board of Education. The Southern California Gas Company commented that it has a three inch gas main in Meyers Road which ends at Little League Drive from which distribution lines could be extended to serve the proposed project without any significant impact on the environment. CONCLUSION Tentative Tract 14528 meets all of the development standards of the Municipal Code, and is consistent with the General Plan and the State Map Act. Potential impacts associated with the development of the project will be reduced to a level of insignificance. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning commission: 1. Adopt the Negative Declarationi and, 2. Approve Tentative Tract No. 14528 subject to the following Findings of Fact (Attachment B), Conditions of Approval (Attachment C) and Standard Requirements (Attachment D). Respectfully submitted, ~~Y Larrf E. Reed, Director Planning, Building and Safety ,J~ ~dAdf Tim Tackett r Associate Planner \. CITY OF SA... BERNARDINO PLAN. .,NG DEPARTMENT '"' I CASE TT14528 OBSERVATIONS 6 12-12-89 5 ~ """I AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE \. , ATTACHMENT: A- B- c- D- E- F- G- Municipal Code and General Plan Conformance Findings of Fact Conditions of Approval Standard Requirements Initial Study Tentative Map Location Map PCAGENDA:TT14528 /nmg . :""- ~, -- ATTACHMENT "A" CITY OF SJ.. ~ BERNARDINO PLAt\: ING DEPARTMENT CASE ~~1~~?R OBSERVATIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 6 12-12-89 6 "'" , MUNICIPAL CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCE Setbacks 25-35 feet Municipal General Code Plan Yes Yes Defer to 25 feet General Plan 10,800 min. 10,800 min. Category Project Permitted use Tentative Tract Lot size 11 , 5 4 9 mi n . to 16,239 Dimensions: Width Depth Lots exceed min. requirements 80 feet min. 100 feet min. 80 ft. min. 100 ft. min Density 2.8 du/acre gross 4.03 du/acre gross 3.1 du/acre gross Frontage on dedicated streets All lots front Title 18 requires on dedicated streets all lots front on dedicated streets N/A Special Require- Must join ments: Assessment Dist. Plans for public improvements Defer to General Plan Must join Assessment Dist. r 10. - ATTACHMENT "B" , "\ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT14S2R FINDINGS of FACT '\. , AGENDA ITEM 6 HEARING DATE 1? 1? R q PAGE 7 1. The requested subdivision is in accordance with the minimum lot development standards of the R-1-10,800 single family residential zone and is consistent with the General Plan adopted by the Mayor and Common Council on June 2, 1989, in that the density of the proposed tract is 2.8 dwelling units per gross acre while the plan will allow 3.1 dwelling per gross acre. 2. All lots created meet Municipal Code requirements in that they and each rectangular lot has a minimum width of 80 feet and depth of 100 feet. The irregular lots meet code requirements. 3. The design of the subdivision and proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or cause serious public health problems, in that development will occur according to the conditions of approval and standard requirements contained in this report. 4. The proposed tract meets or exceeds the minimum require- ments of the City's Subdivision Ordinance (Title 18) and the state Subdivision Map Act. All lots will have frontage on dedicated streets. 5. All proposed streets meet the minimum requirements of the Department of Public Works for street improvements. 6. The design of the subdivision will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision in that no public agency has stated comments regarding required easements. PCAGENDA: TT14528FF "" ATTACHMENT ":c" , ""'I CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT14528 CONDITIONS "- AGENDA ITEM 6 HEARING DATE 12-12-89 PAG E ~ , ""'I 1. The applicant shall comply with all applicable development standards as specified in the Verdemont Area Plan. 2. The applicant shall comply with all applicable provisions (Section 1,3,&4) of Resolution No. 89-116 adopted by the City Council on April 17, 1989, concerning development timing within the Verdemont Area. "- CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT14528 CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 6 12-12-Rq 9 r 3 STANDARD CONDITIONS x 4 x ..... Minor modifications to the plan shall be subject to approval by the Director of Planning. An increase of more than 10 percent of the square footage or a significant change in the approved concept shall be subject to (Planning Commission and Development Review Committee) review and approval. Construction shall be in substantial conformance with the Plans approved by the Development Review Committee, Planning Commission or Director of Planning. The developer is to submit a complete master landscape and irrigation plan (4 copies) for the entire deveiopment to the Engineering Department with the required fee for approval, the landscape plans will be forwarded to the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services and the Planning Department for review and approval. (Note: the issuance of a building permit, by the Department of Building and Safety of the City of San Bernardino, does NOT waive these requirements/conditions.) No grading permits will be issued prior to approval of landscape plans. The design shall include, but not be limited to the following: Street trees shall be planted on 35 foot center spacing unless otherwise indicated by the Department of Parks, Recreation, and Community Services. The Parks Department shall determine the varieties and locations prior to planting. A minimum of 25% of the trees shall be 24" box specimens. Trees are to be inspected by a Park Division representative prior to planting. Planters shall be enclosed with concrete curbing. The setbacks from the north ____ , south ____ , east ____ , west property line shall be berrned at a maximum 3:1 slope and shall be planted with a tall fescue type turfgrass. A Landscape buffer zone shall be installed between. facilities and street. ~ r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT CASE TT14528 CONDITIONS AGENDA ITEM 6 HEARING DATE 12-12-89 PAGE 10 5 x 6 x 7 x ""\ The landscape and irrigation plans shall comply with the IIprocedure and Policy for Landscape and Irrigation" (available from the Parks Department). Subject to the Conditions of the Department of Parks and Recreation (attached). Trees, shrubs and groundcover ofa type and quality generally consistent or compatible with that characterizing single- family homes shall be provided in the front yard and that portion of th side yards which are visible from the street. All landscaped areas must be provided with an automatic irrigation system adequate to insure their viability. The landscape and irrigation plans shall be approved by the Parks and Recreation Department. At all times the business will be operated in a does not produce obnoxious noise, vibration, smoke, glare, or other nuisance. manner which odor, dust, A sign program for the multi-tenant commercial/industrial center shall be approved by the Planning Department prior to issuance of certificate of Occupancy. In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the city will promptly notify the applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. Once notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, its officers, agents and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding against the City of San Bernardino. The applicant further agrees to reimburse the City of any costs and attorneys' fees which the City may be required by a court to pay as a result of such action, but such participation shall not relieve applicant of his obligation under this condition. PCAGENDA:STNDCONDITIONS 10/19/89 '\. - ATTACHMENT "D" r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CASE TT14528 '"" STANDARD REQUIREMENTS '" AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 1 ~~nrnriv~ ~rnct 14528 shall be in effect for a period of 24 months from the date of approval by the Planning Commission and/or Planning Department. However, if the final map has not been filed with the County Recorder's Office at the end of the 24 month time period, the approval shall expire. Additional time may be approved by the Planning Commission upon written request of the applicant if made 30 days prior to expiration of the ~ month time period. Expiration Date: 12-12-91 COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS FOR P.R.D. a. The Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC & R's) shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department prior to final approval of the tract maps. The CC & R's shall include liability insurance and methods of maintaining the open space, recreation areas, parking areas, private roads, and exterior of all buildings. The CC & R's shall also include a statement that no radio frequency antenna shall be included within the complex except for central ante~na systems. b. No lot or dwelling unit in the development shall be sold unless a corporation, association, property owner's grc~p, or similar entity has been formed with the right to assess all properties individually owned or jointly owned which have any rights o~ interest in the use of the common areas and common facilities in the development, such assess=ent power to be sufficient to meet the expenses of such entity, and with authority to control, and the duty to maintain, all of said mutually available features of the development. Such entity shall operate under recorded CC & R's which shall include compulsory membership of all owners of lets and/or dwelling units and flexibility of assessments to meet changing costs of maintenance, repairs, and services. Recorded CC & R's shall permit enforcement by the City of provisions required by the City as conditions to approval. The developer shall submit evidence of compliance with this requirement to, and receive approval of, the Commission prior to making any such sale. This condition shall not apply to land dedicated to the City for public purposes. c. Every owner of a dwelling unit or lot shall own as an appurtenance to such dwelling unit or lot, either (1) an undivided interest in the common areas and facilities, or (2) a share in the corporation, or voting membership in _.. In Uy ... ~ CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO " TT14528 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS CASE AGENDA ITEM 6 HEARING DATE 1? 1? R C} PAGE 1 ? \.. ~ " r association, owning the common areas and facilities. d. Maintenance for all landscaped and open areas, including parkways, shall be provided for in the CC & R's. e. The CC & R's shall contain wording prohibiting the storage or parking of trailers, boats, campers, motor homes, and similar vehicles outside of the specified common areas. 2 x PARKING: a. This development shall be required to maintain a minimum of 2 parking spaces. in a garage for each unit. b. All parking and driving aisles shall be surfaced with two inches of AC over a suitable base or equivalent as approved by the City Engineer. Parking spaces shall be striped and have wheel stops installed at least three feet from any building, wall, fence, property line, or walkway. c. Whenever an off-street parking area is adjacent to or across an alley from property zoned residential, a solid decorative wall six feet in height shall be erected and maintained along the property line so as to separate the parking area physically from the residentially zoned property, provided such wall shall be three feet in height when located within the required front or street side yard setback. Where no front or street side yard is required, such wall shall be three feet in height when located within ten feet of the street line. said wall shall be located on the north ,south ,east ____' west or peripheral ____ property lines. d. Whenever an off-street parking area is located across the street from property zoned for residential uses, a solid decorative wall or equivalent landscaped berm not less than three feet in height shall be erected and maintained along the street side of the lot not closer to the street than the required depth of the yard in the adjoining residential area. No fence or wall located in the front setback shall obscure the required front setback landscaping. Said wall shall be located on the north , south , east , west ____, or peripheral ____ property lineS:-- ---- All parking areas and vehicle storage areas shall be lighted during hours of darkness for security and protection. Recreational vehicle storage areas shall be screened by at least \.. ~ In) sky .. ~ CASE TT14528 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO '" STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 6 12-12-89 13 ~ ...., "" ~ 3 x "" a six-foot high decorative wall with screened gates. There shall be provided for each unit, within the garage or carport, or other specifically designated area, a loft or other usable storage area with a minimum of 150 cubic feet in addition to standard utility storage. Traffic bumps provided on the interior private roads shall be subject to the City Traffic Engineer's approval. A commercial-type drive approach, as shown on Standard Drawing No. 204 or equivalent, shall be constructed at each entrance to the development. Location and design shall be subject to approval of the Engineering Division. Prior to issuance of any building permit, access rights shall be granted to the City for the purpose of allowing access over the private drives within the project for all necessary City vehicles including fire, police, and refuse disposal vehicles, and any other emergency vehicles. The documents covering this matter shall be prepared by the owner and approved by the Planning Department. All refuse storage areas are to be enclosed with a decorative wall. Location, size, type and design of wall are subject to the approval of the Planning Department and Division of Public Services Superintendent. Energy and noise insulation shall comply with all state and local requirements. LANDSCAPING: a. Four (4) copies submitted to the approval, The plan the following: of a master landscape plan shall be Engineering Division for review and shall include, but not be limited to, 1) Size, type, and location of plant material proposed. 2) Irrigation plan, 3) Such other alternate plants, materials and design concepts as may be proposed. 4) Erosion control plans. b. Tree varieties and exact locations will be determined prior ..J III 5 Illy - r CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO '" CASE TT14528 6 12-12-89 14 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS \... AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE ~ ~ 1) Cul-de-sac lot -- one treei 2) Interior lot -- two treesi 3) Corner lot -- three trees. c. To protect against damage by erosion and negative visual impact, surfaces of all cut slopes more than five feet in height and fill slopes more than three feet in height shall be protected by planting with grass or ground cover plants. Slopes exceeding 15 feet in vertical height shall also be planted with shrubs, spaced at not to exceed ten feet on centersi or trees, spaced at not to exceed 20 feet on centersi or a combination of shrubs and trees as cover plants. The plants selected and planting methods used shall be suitable for the soil and climatic conditions of the site: Trees 10%, 15 galloni 40% 5 galloni 50%, 1 gallon. Shrubs 20%, 5 galloni 80%, 1 gallon. d. Ground cover 100% coverage, Slopes required to be planted irrigation system approved by Department. e. The maintenance of graded slopes and landscaped areas shall be the responsibility of the developer until the transfer to individual ownership, shall be provided with an the Parks and Recreation f. All grading and drainage facilities, including erosion control planting of graded slopes, shall be done in accordance with a grading plan approved by the City Engineer. A grading permit shall be obtained prior to any grading being done. 4 x 10 800 All lots shall have a minimum area of' _ square feet, a minimum depth of 100 feet, and a minimum width of ~ feet, (~feet on corner lots). In addition, each lot on a cul-de- sac or on a curved street where the side lot lines thereof are \... ~ I'U Illy , TT14528 "'" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CASE AGENDA ITEM 6 HEARING DATE 12-12-89 PAGE 1 <:; ~ ST ANDARD REQUIREMENTS \... , 5 x 6 x 7 x 8 x 9 x 10 x \... " diverging from the front to rear of the lot, shall have a width of not less than 60 feet measured at the right angle to the lot depth at the midway point between the front and rear lot lines, and a width of not less than 40 feet measured along the front lot line as delineated on the tract map. Where lots occur on the bulb of the cUl-de-sac, a minimum lot depth of 100 feet will be permitted. If the proposed depth is less than ~ feet, a plot plan must be submitted to demonstrate that a buildable lot area is possible and to justify the lesser depth. Variable front building setback lines of at least2~ feet and averaging ~ feet, and side street building setback lines 15 feet shall be delineated on the final tract map. All garage entrances on a dedicated street shall have a minimum setback of 18 feet. Perimeter walls and walls required along the rear of all double frontage lots shall be designed and constructed to incorporate design features such as tree planter wells, variable setback, decorative masonry, columns, or other such features to provide visual and physical relief along the wall face. The developer shall obtain Planning Department approval of the visual or engineering design of the proposed wall. When graded slopes occur within or between individual lots, the slope face shall be a part of the downhill lot. Exceptions to this requirement must be approved by the City Engineer. Grading and revegetation shall be Engineer in order to reduce the precipitation, Compliance with all recommendations of the Geology Report shall be required (if applicable). staged as required by the City amount of bare soil exposed to Any clubhouse, swimming pool, spa, putting green, picnic areas or other amenities shall be installed in the manner indicated on the approved site plan. During construction the City Engineer may require a fence around all or a portion of the periphery of the tract site to minimize wind and debris damage to adjacent properties. The type of fencing shall be approved by the City Engineer to assure adequate project site maintenance, clean-up and dust control. ~ lies Illy r CASE TT14528 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REQUIREMENTS " STANDARD AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 6 12-12-89 lb \.. , 11 x L2 x ~3 x ~ " No roof-mounted equipment shall be placed on any building unless screened as specifically approved by the Planning Department (except for solar collection panels). within 75 feet of any single-family residential district, the maximum height of any building shall not exceed one-story or 20 feet unless the Commission determines that due to unusual topographical or other features, such restrictive height is not practical. All utility lines shall be exceptions approved by the Engineer. No certificate of occupancy shall be issued prior to compliance with these Standard Requirements as well as all provisions of the San Bernardino Municipal Code. installed Planning underground subject to Department and the City csj/5-9-88 DOC:PCAGENDA DOCUMENTS. 1 \... ~ III! Illy 14 15 CITY OF SAtJ lCJERNARDINO PUBLlr WORKS/ENGR. CASE ~~14S?R STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 6 12-12-89 17 r Project Description: 77< /452.~ /4 5r~ t..()r~ oN HtJtt~.sr C~I!Nel2 I)~ 11€y~~ /(If) .4fV/:) /'1At;NDuA Ar/lrNt/e Date: 1/-7-i9 Prepared By: I1u.b-Revi ewed By: Page ~ of ~ pages A P P 1 i can t : 'p,4C.t;:::'C '-/tN./) 1JEyFu~r NOTE TO APPLICANT: Where separate Engineering plans are required, the appllcant 1S responsible for submitting the Engineering plans directly to the Engineering Division. They may be submitted prior to submittal of Building Plans. Drainage and Flood Control ~A11 necessary drainage and flood control measures shall be subject to requirements of the City Engineer, which may be based in part on the recommendations of the San Bernardino Flood Control District. The developer's Engineer shall furnish all necessary data relating to drainage and flood control. ..1lA local drainage study will be required for the project. Any drainage improvements, structures or storm drains needed to mitigate downstream impacts or protect the development shall be designed and constructed at the developer's expense, and right-of-way dedicated as necessary. _ The development is located within Zone A on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, a Special Flood Hazard Area Permit issued by the City Engineer shall be required. _ The development is located within Zone B on the Federal Insurance Rate Maps; therefore, all building pads shall be raised above the surrounding area as approved by the City Engineer. _Comprehensive storm drain Project No. is master planned in the vicinity of your development. This drain shall be designed and constructed by your project unless your Engineer can con c 1 us i vel y s how t hat the d r a i n i s not nee d e d to pro t e c t yo u r development or mitigate downstream impacts. 16 ~ All dra i nage from the development approved public drainage facility. drainage facilities and easements satisfaction of the City Engineer. to an proper to the shall be If not shall be directed feasible, provided ~ , CITY OF SA( BERNARDINO PUBLF~ WORKS/ENQIl CASE TT14528 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 6 12-12-89 18 \0. Project Description: tiz 14~28 Date: 11-7-81 Prepared By: /1Wrr Rev i ewed By: Page ~ aT ~ pages Grading 17 XIf more than l' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plot/ grading and drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and the City's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer in advance. 18 X If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed, a g~ading -bond will be required and the grading shall be supervised in 'accordance with Section 7012 (c) of the Uniform Building Code. A liquefaction report is required for the site. This report must -be submitted and approved prior to issuance of a grading permit. Any grading requirements recommended by the approved liquefaction report shall be incorporated in the grading plan. 19 -X-An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where feasible, this plan shall be incorporated \tith the grading plan and shall conform to all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the Municipal Code (See "Grading Policies and Procedures"). The on-site Improvement Plan shall be approved by the City Engineer. A reciprocal easement approval if reciprocal proposed to cross lot recorded to remove the shall be recorded prior to grading plan drainage, access, sewer, and/or parking is lines, or a lot line adjustment shall be interior lot lines. 20 ~The project Landscape Plan shall be revie\ved and approved by the City Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 4 copies to the Engineering Division for checking. An on-site Lighting Plan for the project shall be reviewed and approved by the C~ty Engineer. This plan can be incorporated with the grading plan, or on-site improvement plan, if practical. Utilities: ~Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in accordance with City Code, City Standards and requirements of the serving utility, including gas, electric, telephone, ~later,J....se.lver and cable TV. I+' "CDfttI""UI'lICA1"IDH CoNt>vIT" PtJIZ.. ClH5te TV VS/f SH",",,- /StF Nsr/lt..U!1) IN ~ 't:E ., C, ~ hi/> 7D rNtF Ct y CA-~Le 7V UNE !SNIf(,./- ~ IIVST1I-U.t"X> IN 'ntr!= CeJHLJV/'1" UNl>h'L f~"", T ~o"., 7"HtF Clry. 21 r CITY OF SAN lERNARDINO PUBLlr WORKS/ENGR. CASE TT14528 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS ... AGENDA ITEM 6 HEARING DATE 12-12-89 PAGE 19 ~ r Project Description: tie 1452.B Date: /1-7...8' Page ~ of ~ pages Prepared By: 11uJ(,-- Rev i ewed By: 22 XEach parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer -facilities so it can be served by the City or the agency providing such services in the area. 23 XSewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be -constructed at the Developer's expense. Sewer systems shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and Procedures" and City Standard Drawings. 24 XUtility services shall be placed underground and easements -provided as required. 25 XAll existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site -on either side of the street shall be undergrounded in accordance with Ordinance No. MC-60! (Subdivisions) or Resolution No. 88-65 (Non-subdivisions). 26 XExisting utilities which interfere with ne\~ construction shall be -relocated at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer. Sewers within private streets or private parking lots will not be -maintained by the City but shall be designed and constructed to City Standards and inspected under a City On-Site Construction Permit. A private sewer plan designed by the Developer's Engineer and approved by the City Engineer will be required. This plan can be incorporated in the grading plan, where practical. 27 ~ S~eJe MltlN ~TEN$iON to .sEte.VE -r,.,.; 5111r SHJItt..L. COH~1lm 70 ~ CI""Y~ ~ MItSTEI!.. MN. 7H/~ WIU- ~Qt)Ifl&" f5c ~/ON At.cfVI 71* IN7E7tsc:-cnfJN f!)F F>>-L./YI /fND 8eL/V1rWT AUNt:? &4-MoNT 10 H116Nt>ul1 ~ /lf6N lJo/lTHr;f2"j' //./ I'1/rGN()(,11} 70 -r~ ND/lr#E!Uy tiNE" (),c THE 7Z.<<i; /IN/) ~i82"y IN t1~ytiitS RD 70 rH€ (,(8.rEfUy /..INE ~r ~~7- 28 29 30 31 CITY OF SA~ .3ERNARDINO PUBLI'-' WORKS/ENGR. CASE TT14528 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 6 1~-lL-l:j9 20 , Pro j e c t Des c rip t ion: m 14-5'2. 8 Da te: 11- 7-g&J Page ~ of ~ pages Pre par e d By: nWfr Rev i ewe d By: Street Improvement and Dedications: )( A 11 pub 1 i cst r e e t s with i n and a d j ace n t to .t h e de vel 0 p men t s hall be -improved to include combination curb and gutter, paving, handicap ramps, street lights, sidewalks and appurtenances, including, but not limited to, traffic signals, traffic signal modification, relocation of public or private facilities which interfere with new construction, striping, signing, pavement marking and markers, and street name signing. All design and construction shall be accomplished in accordance with the City of San Bernardino "Street Improvement Policy" and City "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Street lighting, when required, sha 11 be desi gned and constructed in accordance with the Ci ty I s "Street Lighting Policies and Procedures". Street lighting shall be sho~ln on street improvement plans except where otherwise approved by the City Engineer. ~For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street right-of-way (R.W.) to provide the distance from street centerline to property line and placement of the curb line (C.L,) in relation to the street centerline shall be as follows: Street Name Right-of-Way (Ft.) Curb line (Ft.) All rights of vehicular ingress/egress shall be dedicated from -the following streets: ~ M~Y~S f(!D SHA1...t.. Bt; pltV8:> rvu.. WIIY"'-1 ADJltceNr 7t) {1-Ie flZo..]1!it:..T. r; .5HIttA- 3~ €x~N~D Ar LE'ItST 2.4' W,rx: ~OM /HIs lIlAc T To LITT'LE LtFA6'-E t>rZ.1 ve . x. MAGNO I.rIA /lVeNvE SI,If1..L, &; p~O ,It.,. /..i:It5T 2~' WI/)(; FreD(YJ Heyetl~ R()/l-D 70 BeLMoNT AYefJtI!5. \.. J , CITY OF SAl BERNARDINO PUBL~ ~ WORKS/ENQfI. CASE TT14528 ...... STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM 6 HEARING DATE 12-12-89 PAGE L 1 \. "project Descri pti on: 772145:;.8 ...... Da te: //-7-sc1 Page ~ of 7 ~ages Prepared By: I1UJrr Revie\led By:_ r~apping 32 X A Final/Parcel Map based upon field survey \Iill be required. 34 )< All street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer prior to Map approval. X Additional survey and map information including, but not limited to, building setbacks, flooding and zones, seismic lines and setbacks, geologic mapping and archeological sites shall be filed \'Iith the City Engineer in accordance ':Iith Ordinance No. MC-592. 33 Improvement Completion 15 )( Street, seller, and drainage ir~provement plans for the entire project shall be completed, subject to the approval of the City Engineer, prior to the recordation of the Final/Parcel Map. X If the required improvements are not completed recordation of the Final/Parcel r~ap. an improvement accompanied by an agreement executed by the developer eity will be required. prior to security and the 36 If the required improvements are not completed prior to record- ation of the Parcel ~1ap, an iraprovement certificate shall be placed upon the Map stating that they \Jill be completed u~on de vela p (,1 en t . A P P I i cab 1 e top arc elm a p s con s i s tin 9 0 f 1 e s s t h a n 5 lots only. Required Engineering Permits: 37 )< Grading permit (if applicable). 38 X On-site improvements construction permit (except build~ngs - see Guilding and Safety). 39 X Off-site improvements construction permit, , ...... CITY OF SA. , BERNARDINO PUBI .~ WORKS/1NQJl CASE TT14528 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS AGENDA ITEM HEARING DATE PAGE 6 12-12-89 22 "" """'I 'project Description: 1?l./4-5ZB Da te; /1-7-8r; Page ~ of ., pages Prepared By: r1~Reviewed By: Applicab1e Engineer~ng Fees:~ 40 X Plan check fee for Final/Parcel ~1a p. X Plan check and inspection fees for off-site improvements. X Plan check and inspection fees for on-site ir.1prover.1ents (except buildings; see Building and Safety). 41 42 43 X Plan check and inspection fees for grading (if permit required). Bridge ir.1provement fee in amount of $ 44 X Drainage fee. Exact amount of fee shall be determined by Department of Suilding and Safety at time of application for building permit. 45 X Landscape Plan Review Fee $ 65.00 ~ Traffic System Fee of $ 12.54 per vehicle trip for City-wide traffic mitisation. The total amount of the Traffic System Fee shall be determined by the City Traffic Engineer at time of application for building permit. 46 47 X Street Light Energy Fee to pay cost of street light energy for a period of 4 years. Exact amount to be determined prior to map recording. A Landscape Maintenance District shall be implemented to maintain landscaping within the following areas: 48 X Ct4c>-rNCJT NEA .!Str()~ JAeA1~ SlJt!.t:JMtU;,E Ft!e - ./~.09/SF 49 X P~UY\ AveNUE' &x ANt) S~WV- FE~ - -I (),t)"I!7r- ;k. feES ~ S</fJJ€CT To CHmvG€= w/~vr No1icE. "" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PUBLrC WORKS/ENGA. CASE TT14528 STANDARD REQUIREMENTS .' ~ ProJ~ct Descrfption: 7/2./4528 Oa tI :rl-7-alf Prepared 8y: ,;w ev 1 ewed By/: Page 7 0 7 pages IrDOI TtDNItI- teeQlJlte8fll8JT.!:. , 50 X Au... CtJf16 I?E1VbJ5 SHAtL fI/h/e Z~ ~RI/. 51 X c.UL.-DE'-SAC.~ SlfAt..L. BE pe.,.~1J8> PeL S;rl) ND. JDI. 52 X rF 7fI15 1I~6Nr /-Ifl€A ?tJ&/c W~ INFIlA.5TIUK.7t.J11!5 fiNIWClu6- ftAI'I 15> ~ 8y 71IG HIIy<< ""/tIl> ~mm'N. e,f/AlelL. ) III(; ~f'E;e ~r 7H15 ~/IC"" v W,u... /Je ;e~ t/11U!D 10 fV/ZCH~e J)evf!'t.4jJ/I1E'JI'T I? {6 HiS " ftltlJtL 70 /SSU/1I<Je,E (JF 8(/11-/>1"'6- ~,rs. 53 X ~ S~/RL ftEtZIM., WIU- BE 1J;iq1J1ftet) I~ nDP: TJM/</ 4 77l66S A1tG to & 1!!EP1D1/S> ~,., 7lIIF SIn:. 54 X .A '-~P!SC1'1Pt: 1"1k1^,~Afo.Ic.G ~€f'^'T ~~ ~ ])e)1 C ,qr~D ()flEtt. fIlS ~lJr 5€TMcK. (),F 61cH ur AN/) II '-111J[)~e /'111r~IJANce- plsr)!.tcr A~ED {o nil/idA'^' 7lH? rt!tJHr yl11U> htt^,l>~O~6- fA! T~ eveNT OF oWAJ€!R. t<letfN..e:.:r. .... - '\N BERNARDINO CITY WATER DEPARn....~T'S STANDARD REQUIREMENTS TT14528 ,:~:::P1~ ~ ?77~ ~:~;"'d T".., C"."ct;", - - . -" ~ O..;.d, Owner/Developer: ~_ __ _ _ ~ Continued: ENGINEERING: Name~~~~ 4~~~,- Date: /~-q-ri 55 11' P.S.I./-AJ' -r . 56 ~ Size of Main Adjacent to the Project / to '1' ~ ~~/ /.2 ".;:;. m~~ 57 g Pressure Regulator Suggested on Customer's Side on the Meter. 58 ~ co~nts: .L#~'is 59 / Subject to the rules & regulations of the Water Department in effect at the time of application for water service. WATER QUALITY CONTROL DEPARTMENT: Name: 9~~ JJ?J-VJ~ Date: /2 -4 - ~ ., o R.P.P. Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. o Double Check Backflow Device Required at Service Connection. o Air Gap Required at Service Connection. o No Backflow Device Required. ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL OFFICER: Name: ;;;;i!~ ~~') o Industrial Waste Permit May Be Required by Environmental Control Officer. o Grease Trap Required by Environmental Control Officer. o No Regenerative Water Softeners May Be Installed Without Prior Approval of the Environmental Control Officer. o Approved by Environmental Control Officer. Date: 12-1/--%'7 , SEWER CAPACITY INFORMATION: Name: -;;J~% ~ LJ A_ .-----' { , o No Sewer Capacity Charge Applicable at This Time. o Sewer Capacity Right Must Be Purchased from the Redevelopment Agency or the Mayor's Office in the Amount of Gallons Per Day. Sewer Capacity Rights Date: {2 -1/-- r 1 , Breakdown of Estimated Gallons Per Day: 60 And/or: ~ Proof of Purchase Must Be Submitted to the Water Department Prior to Issuance of the Building Permit. o This Area is Serviced by East Valley Water Oistrict and All Fees Will Be Determined by Their Department. "216 5/85 ( , ATTACHMENT "E" C. I'V OF SAN BERNAR.,INO PLANNING DEPARTMENT INITIAL STUDY Applicant(s) Address City, state Zip MISC: ISPREPARATION ke/9-1-89 Initial Study for Environmental Impacts For ~lLIfa-f/u~ Tr~.c.~ 11.(52~ Project Number Project description/Location 76 sw.bd/u/de S- at::r~5 /N ft:, /'f ~~/t!!. ~AA:/l, /01'5 /o~ af- ~~~ ~ ' e'# ~o..)~r ~ M t!!v~r. 4.vd ~ ::k A-v w~e. ,',.; -rite: t/t!!r;'~:::: AreA. Date OC./-Obl!"f 2.~, /9~1 , Prepared for: Pa~;;:/'c.. u,vd D~ve~*,eN+ Pc>. B~.>< 5"&b 8"//~/~m.-r. t':A 9~706 , Prepared by: --rt~ ~~ Name PlaNPer Title City of San Bernardino Planning Department 300 N. "0" Street San Bernardino, CA 92418 , "" CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST ~ '" BACKGROYND Application Number: TeitJfaf/t/e 7Y-~~+ /'-15'"2 <g' Project Description: 70 54'6c0'v/d~ 5acrt:!'S /~I-o /~ ~/Nrk ,4z.M//7 hIs Locat ion: ~~r#/.JX'1S..f corN~r ~-f' ,;N1 ~Y'/.5 ~ #/Vc;/ /"'1""fN~//C. h~...... Envi ronmental Constraints Areas: Ytt'rde'"_Nf- Ar~A. p~, fllf;J. tv//vd/ flJrl1 Fire / A-rc:-lt<f1de??-y. General Plan Designation: RL- Low 12e-s/de/f.JI./~ E:5fa--k5 Zoning Designation: !2.-I- /01 ~oo . B. ~HVIBONM~NTAL IMPACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a separate attached sheet. 1. Eaf.th Resources Will the proposal result in: Yes No Maybe a. Earth movement (cut and/or fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or more? x , b. Development and/or grading on a slope greater than 15% natural grade? c. Development within the Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone? x x d. Modification of any unique geologic or physical feature? x \... ~ REVISED 12/87 PAGE 1 OF 8 r Yes No Maybe '" . e. Soil erosion on or off the project site? f. Modification of a channel, creek or river? x x g. Development subject mudslides, other similar within an area to landslides, liquefaction or hazards? x , X h. Other? 2. ~IR RESOURCES: Will the proposal result in: a. air upon emissions or ambient air x Substantial an effect quality? b. The creation of objectionable odors? x , c. Development within a high wind X hazard area? - 3. ~ATEB___RESOURCES: proposal result in: Will the a. Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface runoff due to impermeable surfaces? x , b. Changes in the course or flow of flood waters? )( , c. Discharge into surface waters or any alteration of surface water quality? x , d. Change in the quantity or quality of ground waters? x e. Exposure of people or property to flood hazards? f. Other? x x "'" ~ REVISED 12/87 PAGE 2 OF 8 " 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCEp: proposal result in: Could the a. Change unique, species habitat trees? in the number of any rare or endangered of plants or their including stands of in the number of any rare or endangered of animals or their 5. NOISE: Could the proposal result in: '"- 6. b. Change unique, species habitat? a. Increases in existing noise levels? Yes No Maybe "" x x x , x x x x , x , x x x ~ REVISED 10/87 PAGE 3 OF 8 c. Other? b. Exposure of people to exterior noise levels over 65 dB or interior noise levels over 45 dB? c. Other? LAND_ USE: result in: Will the proposal a. A change in the land use as designated on the General Plan? b. Development within an Airport District? c. Development within "Greenbelt" Zone A,B, or C? d. Development within a high fire hazard zone? e. Other? r 7. MAN-MADE HAE~~P: project: Will the a. Use, store, transport or dispose of hazardous or toxic materials (including but not limited to oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b. Involve the release hazardous substances? of c. Expose people to the potential health/safety hazards? d. Other? 8. HOUSING: Will the proposal: a. Remove existing housing or create a demand for additional housing? b. Other? 9. ~RANSPORTATlqN/CIRCULATION: Could the proposal result in: a. An increase in traffic that is greater than the land use designated on the General Plan? b. Use of existing, or demand for new, parking facilities/ structures? c. Impact upon existing public transportation systems? d. Alteration of present patterns of circulation? e. Impact to rail or air traffic? f. Increased safety hazards to vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? -.... REVISED 10/87 Yes Maybe '" No . x x , X f x x X , x x x X )( I x ~ PAGE 4 OF 8 ,. g. A disjointed pattern roadway improvements? h. Other? 10. pUBLIC SERVICES Will the proposal impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service? a. Fire protection? b. Police protection? Schools (i.e. attendance, boundaries, overload, etc.)? c. d. Parks or other recreational facilities? e. Medical aid? f. Solid waste? g. Other? 11. UTILITIES: Will the proposal: \... a. Impact the following beyond the capability to provide adequate levels of service or require the construction of new facilities? 1. Natural gas? 2. Electricity? 3. Water? 4. Sewer? 5. Other? Yes Maybe "" of >< No . )( x x Y- o X / x x 'j. x x X )\ X x x ..J b. disjointed utility REVISED 10/87 PAGE 5 OF 8 Result in a pattern of extensions? c. Require the construction of new facilities? 12. AESTHETICS: a. Could the proposal result in the obstruction of any scenic view? b. Will the visual impact of the project be detrimental to the surrounding area? c. Other? 13. ~P~~URA~--FESQURCES: proposal result in: Could the a. The alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? Adverse impacts historic object? c. Other? b. physical or aesthetic to a prehistoric or site, structure or 14. Mandatory Findings of Significance (Section 15065) The California Environmental Quality Act states.that if any of the following can be answered yes or maybe, the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. a. Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate Yes Maybe _ No . x x X x )( , x REVISED 10/87 PAGE 6 OF 8 - r Yes No Maybe '" . important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? b. Does the project have the potential to achieve short term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? (A short-term impact on the environment is one which occurs in a relatively brief, definitive period of time while long-term impacts will endure well into the future.> X I 'X c. Does the project have impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (A project may impact on two or more separate resources where the impact on each resource is relatively small, but where the effect of the total of those impacts on the environment is signif icant. > x d. Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? x C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES (Attach sheets as necessary.> 2c. TAt:: '5/f~ / 5 /c:7cd~ //v ~e I-/J?/r to/AId f-krz.4rd are",. jAe t/erdeM6'AJI- .Art'A ~~AI r5?p/r~.5 I-/td hl~ r~~..,t'S bV/~ hUrrtC4,J~ t::-1/~5 be //V:S~//~~ v rlt/~ ,$ 0::::; f3c..I/'jd/~.r -;;~,cc.,L,/ :51n~a~ Yo/~/'re~~1- ~c>r hie h'9A ;U/~ ~r~a S. 3. a-e. D.eve.Jc>/,~f.~.f #< OI'~L?~~t!'rJ /?rt::';~~ I.e. , v ,..J 1 r~/~ . {'aN ~.f.tuc;.:fr'o" I ,.,-,C k.l'-'\~-<, ~ fr~d5. ~.cc-h'c? S' . , " , \.. ~ REVISED 10/87 PAGE 7 OF 8 - --.- proj ect .- '.mber -r;"v/.:t.f1lJe 7,."d 1'i!>2.1J Date /0 -6/fi1 C. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measures (contined) tt7/IJd dr/vet-Vays/ May rtf''Su/.,t- /N I~~ re/~7 tb p6:S<::>~ph~AI r~e~. w...~~r .fhw.5 PA/d' /.?t::'~I#/"~ -e>yJOfwr~ .,.to .,P/o~ .hd24r.a's. , ~",.,de:trd ro/p/r'No..wrr I'-pi' coNd/h&>#s "I' "j~/'O(/a/ w/II reA'uu:.. ~5~ J?t??,~~i-' /:-p~~. r/l/ ~dfft:>.N, /, , r~~;/'~ I?A/'frC'~'~,u ,~ .eN .:;r~ wide e:t~~e55"""4f.lf / ' d/~lr/'c..f .,tor ~ 'M/)/,e;>I'tt!'NLeAl.f ~I" s-k>rM .::0...,;'; / P,lVR rk>o.::>'" c~Nho/ fk.,:.;fihe.s- ",/11 __/fr?-r~ J?pr;,AlIrA.P I aA'vt!'rs-e /';""'/...d.s -Ie> a /t!"ve/ CJ-f' /';v'5"9A/i~,.c.-vce.. 4.a.b. ,4 -Ibrlk h/~~;ca/ /'~~u/'Cl' 6U/'Vt!'y ~",., r'r~~ L?ro~~~ rJ/c:>i~ bL/ Top ~~r~,.J. flAp , y / v / ~ 4/vd 4S:5CJC"~P5. /Vo ~~N~"/-"V~ c::Jr l!"'-~Ad....~ Yt!'&Ie-S ~~ 11?~h- .,,.- .:r.........,:..-.-/s- /Nt!:rc ~u~ ,,.j 1/ ~e 5/re . 5":h. Durill.,hl -fk C~NS.fr~'oN f'A..~~/ 1'1e:>;~e leve(5 /0(///1 rrad'c-/~ /~crep~ a~ "vt?arA(L, Y"~"'P'~fr 0;1// aFN'S~r~H we:>rkr.s .t:Ifre .,Lt'?,r.-r'7 er&t? -1-0 IV~S~ ?~Ntt!'r~ br <'tPrI~,r,.~c,/II ,c/r'v,7'l'eS'. 5~Ard r&f'~'re~f.5 ;"..,p~~ed #fI2S ... .c.-~r,.;'N , c::r.f -r,ad,',v1 .,.~ bu,la'#i ,r;e/,,;4A,;t /s~wc-Ice ~/:~. h;"",i4~ .#< MU/~ ~ r~.Nldru~OAJ ~er~~~. ~.) -:f4~uld r~ce ~ po~/7~ /~~ ~ ~ I l.e (/~ CJ -I" ;/V '5'7;1// He 41Ke . MIse: - be. d. -r It. -s/,te: ~ ~~ ~/:rh/N ""A~ H, 1 nre #.dZ4,oetfl , Ze/J<Jt::. ",.-vPi' G rt!!"eAJbelf t3 t7.,.t' &~ .r-~,t.h"'// II/,/ 1/ (O,AA~^,/'f/~5 Pro-k,;;-)/ve u-r~N'-'t!!"/f Pror~- ProrJ't!!"J de611/IJ d~ C&~fr";"N.s a.,c~'P/~(/~ r~p'r;Nf /A.rl'/~,...,p~,,~ =.,L #~ &=-r~',A)~t!!/.f- Prc>r;-.a~ ,,...,C/ #j;-fi ,P;r~ &2ar~ ~/Ve 5fd,IV~~~ w/I/ r~~IUC"~ ~ tA&>/,,lf/h'-' /--~ / , b "::;'"v /N~~/V"'~t::-_AJ ~ /-PI./.e/ 9: c -1 file. /7/"C:>d?O~e::d /f'J/"o/".J pt.;/I/ rt!!"f?.H'//e I' V' (/ v MO ~/~ ~ C?CC:~5'S.. A- 2 LII //Viele &7CCe~.5 , ro~ """,//);~ ~x.l.....~~ G:27..,c't!!'.e:7 /,e:>",." ~ I{.).....~~,)- ~~/''''''',4-uS ~~ /"1~7t!!'rf ~ .,Lo L./If/e L~k~ J.Jr/ve, /1. c. -jJ,e. n/"~6~ /?r~jt!!'d (AI':)/ J'Jrowd~ ~ , , , .g 1/ 5e'tA..u'r VAle 01/ ,.,Me:"'~.f ~. t../,Uc/t fA-J,//J EVALUATIONMIT.M Project Number Date C. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measures (contined) b", -e."df!!lVd~ f)Je"~.,t.i!'rll/ r /11//1-/',',.,; fie 2'7' I Ju/d~ ac.~.s:s r04.::t' 74:::> L/iY/~ t~?We ,or/lie. / Ate k;V~ ~/// ~~...u be <xr,."w.r"~ ~V~ ~6C>./ ~ ,cd'A.o'A/.......::::--7- ~/~ ..,.,,- -e.x/.;s~~ "f3' "" h.A.-<e a-~ ~ /..:v/<:!"'/'~~d.v or:' L/ 1f'k .(~,U'~ L/r/ve t:?~ ,se/-~ ~J/~~ . ~,LA~r~ ~~~Y;"d>A/.~ ~,.....// r'4Wr~ -7'.4..7'- ~e .... /~'r~J"e"'''''''MS" c::'r t:?/I-t!"/A.l::Zhv.e. /;''p/pv/,M~"LJ 6rf:!t~s~,.y ?b ~ u/<'y E~/~'~r ~e CdN$h-~c:-~ .or/t?1'" Iz::, Me /$-S4!dA.C:e ~ c.~r,i./;'::-''''_4'''.e'.s d , bee ?A/C.y . J3. &:t. rhe ;re:> ~~ ~ro/'i!'c.-I- /s /.clC~~ ""N , / , &::7# 4r~ ~"c Cd'A/~rN ~r d/~e/"Y"~ rt!';I.t::1Wr.cr,.s ""~ "w",~ bv ~ c:;;::.~~ g..,. # c~#pr~ r ,. Y~rc~.s' recc::>rt:)l~ -:t~/'d ~p~ 6t!':/4/'..-.~ , b), ~e /'frdae/~/~ I "v~/,,,Mr__hew ~r o~ #te ~...v ,8t!!'r.;f.,f4/d/'u~ (/!1UAlry ..-c1p~~~. 7Ae r',hpr-l- C~A.-'<::::/~e'S ~~ ~ ;o4'ev'~ ~~r(N'v- /$ Pd7' r rc~o~~~ - - D. DETERMINATJON . o On the basis of this initial study, ~The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the L:J environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, although there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described above have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. D The proposed project ~~Y have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA :1if~ f. #-{ON-r4()f1f.~Y , fkrN<1PItL Name and Title I -PFu~~~ Date: III 'J4/ <sq I ( 11 ~"'A/E~ REVISED 12/87 PAGE 8 OF 8 - - ATTACHME~T "F" . ~ t! ; I~ II ~ . ~~ ~ ; .. ~~ "- ~ ~ J' : ~. ~z- ~u -I ii, fTl d~ z h. -I H :> " -I Ii I; t--C !; < ~. ~ fTl i; ; 'J Q- ~. .J: 'i!~ -I !. ~~ -n .;r~ "^' .;i~~ __ '. ~t ..- ~i~. 0 11;1 -I :' ~3 ji, .11 Z .,;: a ~; II "I _ Ii ~ i~ Rj :~~ CD !.... - - ATTACHMENT "G" "... CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DEPARTMENT "'" , AGENDA "" ITEM # LOCATION CASE TT14528 6 HEARING DATE 1 ?-1 ?-RQ \.. ~ \.. ~ " I 918 "'---