Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout49-Planning CITY OF SAN BERN)4RDINO - REQUEST ""R COUNCIL ACTION From: Larry E. Reed, Director Subject: Public Hearing to hear public comments concern- ing a proposal to in- crease Plan Checking fees Planning and Building services Dept: January 8, 1990 Date: Synopsis of Previous Council action: November 6, 1989 - Council referred Planning & Building Department proposal to increase Plan Checking fees and Plan Checking Staff to the WAys and Means Committee. November 13, 1989 - Ways and Means Committee recommended Council approval. December 4, 1989 - Council set Public Hearing for January 8, 1990 at 10:00 a.m. January 8, 1990 - Public Hearing. Recommended motion: That the hearing be closed~ and that the City Attorney be directed to prepare the necessary resolution to incorporate the recommended fee increases. cc: Larry E. Reed 384-5281 Contact person: Phone: Staff Report Supporting data attached: All Wards Ward: FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: # Source: (Acct. No.) N/A (Acct. DescriPtion) Finance: Council Notes: COUNCIL:CA.REQ-14 Aoenda Item No. 1/1 STAFF REPORT BACKGROUND: The city has identified the need to improve the level of it's Plan Review and Plan checking services. The current level of Plan Checking service is deficient in terms of the number of people to handle the volume of customers and their applications. Not having enough staff negatively effects the ability to provide excellent customer service and the city's ability to do an adequate technical Plan Check and protect the public welfare. The Plan Check staff currently consists of two (2) Typist Clerks, one (1) Plan Checker, and one (l)Plan Check Engineer. The cost of the current operation is $ 163,146.00 including overhead, supplies, and equipment costs. The City is proposing to create a Permit Services Division to address these identified deficiencies. This new Division would have the following additional positions. ( 1) ( 1) 1/2 1 1/3 (2) ( 1) (2) 8 5/6 FTE Assistant Director Senior Plan Check Engineer Adm. Op. supervisor (Office Mgr) Receptionist (Typist Clerk II) Planning Aide (Counter Tech) Assoc. Planner (Planner II) Plan Checker positions Range Classi- fication # Step 5 4468 $5564 4429 $4580 4364 $3311 1065 $1639 1097 $2435 1127 $3526 1118 $3156 Total Cost $86,798.40 $71,448.00 $51,651. 60 $34,090.35 $75,972.00 $55,005.60 $98.467.20 $ 473,433.15 In addition, there is approximately $200,000 indirect cost to the city involving coordination and review by other Agencies (Fire Marshal, Public Works, Engineering, City Attorney, and Administrative Personnel cost). The total programming cost (current staffing plus the additional positions is: $ 473,433.15 $ 163,146.00 $ 200.000.00 $ 836,579.15 Total Note: including overhead, materials and supplies. To pay for this improved level of customer and Plan Check service, increase in Plan Checking Fees, and new filing fees are being proposed. The Uniform Building Code as published by the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO) sets forth Plan Check fees based on a percent of the calculated building permit fee. The current Plan Check fee is 65% of the Building Permit fee. The City currently doesn't charge a filing fee to review alternate materials and methods of construction applications or to appeal an administrative decision to CA.STAFF-13 01/03/90 Page 1 the Board of Building commissioners. The following increase in Plan Check fees and new filing fees are being proposed: 1. Increased Plan Check fees: a. For commercial and industrial and multi-family buildings, an increase to a fee equaling 95% of the Building Permit fee. b. For single family and two family dwellings, an increase to a fee equaling 75% of the Building Permit fee. c. Exhibit "A" attached provides two examples, one of a house and the second, a 5,000 square foot commercial building, showing the additional Plan Checking Fees. 2. a. A $75 application fee to review a proposal to use an alternate material and/or method of construction than that specified in the state Building Code. b. This fee will cover 81% of the staff time for most applications, which is approximately 1/2 hour of clerical time at $11.72/ hour equalling $ 5.86, plus 3 hours of Plan Checking review time at $28.84/hour equalling $ 86.54, for a total of $ 92.40. 3. a. A $75 filing fee to appeal an administrative decision of the Board of Building commissioners. b. This fee will cover 88% of staff time for most applications, 2 hours of clerical time at $25.97/hour for $ 51.94, plus 1.5 hours of Code Officer time at $21.99/hour equals $ 32.99, for a total of $ 84.93. It is estimated that the above fee increases will $120,000 per year based upon charging plan Check totalling approximately $200,000,000 of valuation. raise an additional fees for projects The plan Check fees collected for fiscal year ending June 30, 1989, were $751,553.00. For the first five months (July through November, 1989), the Plan Check fees collected have equalled $ 323,844.00. The revised estimate of Plan Checking fees for the current fiscal year without the proposed fee increase is $770,000. CA.STAFF-13 01/03/90 Page 2 SINGLE FAMILY HOUSE 1800 SQ FT House x $57.91 per SQ FT = $104,238.00 575 SQ FT Garage x $16.26 per SQ FT = $ 9,349.50 Total: $113,587.50 Valuation A. PERMIT FEE: A $113,587.50 value house pays a $ 668.50 Building Permit fee B. PLAN CHECK FEE: 1. Proposed $ 688.50 Permit fee x 75% = $ 516.38 2. Current $ 688.50 Permit fee x 65% = $ 447.53 * Additional Plan Check fee of $ 68.84 ====================================================================== COMMERCIAL - RETAIL STORE 5000 SQ FT Retail store x $38.17 per SQ FT = $190,850.00 Valuation A. PERMIT FEE: A $190,850.00 value business pays a $ 958.00 Building Permit fee B. PLAN CHECK FEE: 1. Proposed $ 958.00 Permit fee x 95% = $ 910.10 2. Current $ 958.00 Permit fee x 65% = $ 622.70 * Additional Plan Check fee of $ 287.30 Examples of Fees CA.STAFF-ll Page 3 01/03/90 11 11 11 11 C> 11 11 e 11 ..... 11 III III III III III III III III III III 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ III 11 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 QJ QJ 11 U e 11 a 0..... II ..... \0 \0 ~ eo ~I- II I M M I I ~ I M I Q.. II \0 M ~ M ~ II II 00 II ..... ..... II ..... II e '" a N ..... ~ r-- M ~ N a o a:: a r-- Lt'l Lt'l \0 0'\ r-- Lt'l M ..... Lt'l Lt'l ,... ~ \0 ~ 0'\ eo eo .....~ . . "'QJ Lt'l 0'\ ,... ,... \0 0'\ ..... eo \0 ...-~ a Lt'l ..... ..... ..... ..... M ..... ,... :::l U Q.QJ o.c Q.. u e 0 a ~ a ,... a ..... eo Lt'l a ..... a ~ \0 N a r-- ~ a \0 ..... a ..... N ,... a 0'\ 0'\ ,... \0 '" . . ...- ..... 0'\ ~ ~ a r-- M ,... M :::l ..... ...- N a ..... r-- \0 M Lt'l Q. N ...- ...- ...- ..... ...- 0 Q.. 0 ..... QJ ..... II a eo a eo a a 0'\ ...- Lt'l e e '" II a M a ...- M ..... N .c M 0 "'a:: II 0'\ \0 ~ N 0'\ r-- M '" ,... ..... ...- II . ...- +>c...~ II 0'\ N N M ~ r-- N ..... 0'\ '" QJ II -=t -=t -=t ,... M eo Lt'l '" Lt'l :::l0~ \0 N ~ ~ Lt'l eo ~ > \0 .... .....U '" '" QJ N \0 ,... M a ..... M ...- ::0- .c 0'\ ~ ~ Lt'l ~ \0 ~ +> 0'\ u ...- ...- 0 - - - - - - - e - 1Il"'C e ~ eQJ'" QJ 0 ~ .;:,t. ..... .;:,t. er- a ~ 0'\ a a a a a a ...-U~U+-J \0 Lt'l ~ \0 a ~ a a a c...QJ QJ'" ...- M Lt'l ...- ~ eo 0'\ M ...- .co.ca:: N .- N 'll=u.....u II II III >- II e ~I.I- 11 a eo a a a 0'\ a a a '" U II N a ~ \0 a Lt'l a a a .,.. QJ~ 11 M ,... eo 0'\ N M eo \0 N CLi .c 0 II ~ M -=t M .- ~ u.... I 'll= QJ .- ,... ~ 0'\ M N 0'\ .... eo 0'\ .- ,... a ...- 0'\ ~ Lt'l .c ,... eo+>e eo N eo M ,... eo r-- '" ~ I -,... 0 . .... . eo e..... 0'\ Lt'l \0 0'\ ~ a ~ ..... 0'\ eo~"'" 0'\ eo 0'\ M a Lt'l a '" ...- QJ'" N ~ a eo \0 Lt'l 0'\ > M >-c...:::l . . '" 1.1- .... Lt'l N N a .- ,... \0 M '" I eo 0'\ M N N ~ eo ..... eo ::0- Il M M M ~ N 0 ...- II - - - - - - - e - 11 .... 11 .... II '" ~ ~ 11 +> eQJQJ II III '" ~..... >, II III III CII,.....,-...~ III III III III III ..... U ~..., I QJ QJ QJM"'- I QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ .... Q..QJ:::l:::l >, >, >.. '-'"' -... '+- >, >, >, >, >, '" .coO e uu 0 ..... e~ +> >- "'QJ iC iC ..... UJ ...-~ N N ,... \0 M -=t N N N "'C ::0- Q..U "'C a:: 'll= QJ '" ~ .... .c Vl au C> e 0 ...- QJ '" e +> ...- "'C C> ..... III I ..... 0 e '" "'C QJ 1.1- III '" ..... 0 0 0>' e "'C e ~ :::l 1.1- ~ e ~ .c e eQJ '" e 0 '" l:T c( I QJ 0 '" U '" QJ...- ..... '" ..... e QJ I- >, II > e +> e U ~.... e .... .... e ~ ~ Vl ..... II ..... 0 e "':::l 0'" 0 Q. 0 "'QJ ..... II a:: c... a a::u ::E:::O- 1.1- ~ U Vl a:l c( iC U