HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-384
NOTE: RESOLUTION NULL AND VOID NOT SIGNED
DUE TO CHANGE OF COMPANY NAME
1
2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO APPROVING A
3 SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH THE KEITH
COMPANIES, INC. TO PROVIDE SEWER LINE CAPACITY EVALUATIONS,
4 INCLUDING FIELD FLOW TESTS AND TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR
UPGRADES AND IMPROVEMENTS OF SEWER LINES AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
5 IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, SW04-21, SW04-36, SW05-01, SW05-02, SW05-
6 05, SW05-06 AND SW05-07, (CITY FUNDED PROJECTS).
7
RESOLUTION NO. 2005-384
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY
8 OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
9
10 SECTION 1. THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC., 19 Technology Drive, Irvine, CA
92618, is competent, experienced and able to perform the sewer line capacity evaluations,
11
12 including field flow tests and to make recommendations for upgrades and improvements of
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
sewer lines at various locations in the City of San Bernardino, SW04-2l, SW04-36, SW05-01,
SW05-02, SW05-05, SW05-06 and SW05-07, (City Funded Projects) per Agreement for
Professional Services, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachment A, for the not-to-
exceed amount of$ 43,844.00. Pursuant to this determination, the Purchasing Manager is hereby
authorized and directed to issue Purchase Orders for said services to said firm. The Mayor is
hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement on behalf orthe City.
SECTION 2. The authorization to execute the above referenced Agreement is rescinded
22
if it is not executed within sixty (60) days of the passage of this resolution.
23
24 / / /
25 / / /
26
27
28
2005-384
1 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO APPROVING A
2 SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH THE KEITH COMPANIES, INC. TO PROVIDE
SEWER LINE CAPACITY EVALUATIONS, INCLUDING FIELD FLOW TESTS AND
3 TO MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR UPGRADES AND IMPROVEMENTS OF
SEWER LINES AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO,
4 SW04-21, SW04-36, SW05-01, SW05-02, SW05-05, SW05-06, SW05-07, (CITY FUNDED
PROJECTS.
5
6
7 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and
8 Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a j t. regular
meeting thereof, held
9 on the
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24 Approved as to
25 form and legal content:
26 JAMES F. PENMAN,
City Att~NdufdD /1 /1 /)1.
27 By: 1tJI~f? ~
28
21st day of November
, 2005 , by the following vote, to wit:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
ESTRADA X
-
LONGVILLE X
MC GINNIS X
DERRY X
KELLEY X
-
JOHNSON X
-
MC CAMMACK X
f) ..~:~!
l. (),Cdtt . [l) U
V'. \ A ~ Ra. cheI.l ~J. a....rk,ity Cler~ '. ~
i.A\ XJLflfr~{H l~fY\o\.- J)tiJVlVl,k
The foregoing resolution is hereby approvkiJthis;1G; . Cl X'f L.{i1U11-:l~005\j
alles,Mayor
of San Bernardino
A TT ACHi\IE~T .'..\"
AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Agreement for Professional Services to provide sewer line capacity evaluations, including field flow tests
and to make recommendations for upgrades and improvements of sewer lines at \'arious locations in the City
of San Bernardino, SW04-21, SW04-36, S'vV05-0L SW05-02, SW05-05, SW05-06 and SW05-07. (city
funded projects).
This AGREEMENT is made and entered into this X;lJ. day of' )~,. '.' i .( (:.i ~., , 2005, by and
between the City of San Bernardino, California, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City"
and the keith companies, inc. hereinafter referred to as "Consultant."
WITNESSETH:
A. WHEREAS, City has need for Civil Engineering Services; and,
B. WHEREAS, Consultant is competent, experienced and able to perfornl said services; and,
C. WHEREAS, Consultant has provided the most advantageous and best proposal for the provision
of such services;
NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
I. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Consultant shall perform those services specified in the Request for Proposal (RFP), dated August 8,
2005, to provide Civil Engineering Services for sewer line capacity evaluations, including field flow
tests and to make recommendations for upgrades and improvements of sewer lines at various
locations in the City of San Bernardino, SW04-21, SW04-36, SW05-0 1, SW05-02, SW05-05, SW05-
06 and SWOS-07, (City-Funded Projects) and Consultant's proposal dated August 29, 2005, all of
which are attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachments Band C. The flow tests have been
increased from 9-day periods on a 24-hour basis to two (2) full weeks or 14-day periods on a 24-hour
basis.
2. TERM OF AGREEMENT
The services of Consultant are to commence after the City has authorized work to start by issuance of
a Notice to Proceed. This Agreement shall expire one year from the date of this Agreement, unless
extended by written agreement of the parties.
3. ST ANDARD OF PERFORMANCE
Consultant shall complete all work product and design in conformance with City of San Bernardino
Standard Specifications and Standard Drawings.
4. CHANGES/EXTRA SERVICES
A. Performance of the work specified in the Proposal is made an obligation of Consultant under
this Agreement, subject to any changes made subsequently upon mutual written agreement of
the parties. Any change, which has not been so incorporated, shall not be binding on either
party.
5. COMPENSATION
A. The City shall reimburse the Consultant for actual costs (including labor costs, employee
benefits, overhead, profit, other direct and indirect costs) incurred by the Consultant in
performance of the work, in an amount not to exceed $43,844.00, except that reimbursement
shall not include courier services, mileage or reimbursement for travel to the City to attend
meetings or conduct the activities. Actual costs shall not exceed the estimated wage rates and
other costs as set forth in the Proposal. See Attachment D for Consultant's cost breakdown
attached and incorporated herein.
B. Said compensation shall not be altered unless there is significant alteration in the scope,
complexity or character of the work to be performed.
Any adjustment of the total cost of services will only be permitted when the Consultant
establishes and City has agreed, in writing, that there has been, or is to be, a significant
change.
C. The Consultant is required to comply with all Federal, State and local laws and ordinances
applicable to the work.
6. PAYMENT BY CITY
A. The billings for all services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be submitted monthly
by Consultant to City and shall be paid by City within thirty (30) days after receipt of same,
excepting any amounts disputed by City. City retains the right to challenge all or any part of
an invoice. All tasks as specified in Proposal shall be completed prior to final payment.
7. SUPERVISION AND ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICES
A. The Director of Development Services of City or his designee, shall have the right of general
supervision over all work performed by Consultant and shall be City's agent with respect to
obtaining Consultant's compliance hereunder. No payment for any services rendered under
this Agreement shall be made without prior approval of the Director of Development Services
or his designee.
2
8. COMPLIANCE WITH CIVIL RIGHTS LAWS AND AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES
ACT
Consultant hereby certifies that it will not discriminate against any employee cr applicant for
employment because of race, color, religion, sex, marital status, national ongin or disabilit!.
Consultant's hiring practices and employee policies shall comply with applicable Federal, State and
local laws. Such action shall include, but not be limited to, the following: Recruitment and
recruitment advertising, employment, upgrading and promotion.
9. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
A. This Agreement may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice in the
event of substantial failure of the other party to perfornl in accordance with the ternlS of this
Agreement. Each party shall have twenty (20) days following date of such notice within
which to correct the substantial failure giving rise to such notice. Consultant hereby
covenants and agrees that upon termination of this Agreement for any reason, Consultant
will preserve and make immediately available to City, or its designated representatives,
maps, notes, correspondence, or records related to work paid for by the City and required for
its timely completion, and to fully cooperate with City so that the work to be accomplished
may continue. Any subsequent use of such incomplete documents shall be at the sole risk of
the City and City agrees to hold harmless and indemnify Consultant from any claim, losses,
costs, including attorney's fees, and liability arising out of such use.
B. This Agreement may be terminated for the convenience of the City upon thirty (30) days
written notice to Consultant. Upon such notice, Consultant shall provide work product to City
and City shall compensate Consultant in the manner set forth above.
C. Following the effective date of termination of the Agreement pursuant to this Section, the
Agreement shall continue until all obligations arising from such termination are satisfied.
10. CONTINGENCIES
In the event that, due to causes beyond the control of and without the fault or negligence of
Consultant, Consultant fails to meet any of its obligations under this Agreement, and such failure
shall not constitute a default in performance, the City may grant to Consultant such extensions of
time and make other arrangements or additions, excepting any increase in payment, as may be
reasonable under the circumstances. Increases in payment shall be made only under the "changes"
provision of the Agreement.
II. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
Consultant shall act as an independent contractor in the performance of the services provided for
under this Agreement. Consultant shall furnish such services in its own manner and in no respect
shall it be considered an agent or employee of the City.
3
12. ASSIGNMENT OR SUBCONTRACTING
Neither this Agreement. nor any p0l1ion thereof, may be assigned by Consultant without the written
consent of City. Any attempt by Consultant to assign or subcontract any performance of this
Agreement without the written consent of the City shall be null and void and shall constitute a breach
of this Agreement.
13. NOTICES
All official notices relative to this Agreement shall be in writing and addressed to the following
representatives of Consultant and City:
CONSULTANT
Mr. Robert S. Reid, P.E., President
The Keith Companies
19 Technology Drive
Irvine, CA 92618-2334
CITY
Mr. James Funk, Director
Development Services Department
City of San Bernardino
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
14. RESPONSIBILITIES OF PARTIES
Upon termination, or completion of all work under this Agreement, Consultant \vill transfer
ownership and title to City of all programs, reports, documents, plans and specifications.
15. INDEMNITY
Consultant shall indemnify, defend and hold CITY, its officers, employees and agents harn11ess from
and against any and all claims, demands, suits, actions, proceedings, judgments, losses, damages,
injuries, penalties, costs, expenses (including attorney's fees) and liabilities, of, by, or with respect to
third parties, which arise from Consultant's negligent performance of services under this Agreement.
Consultant shall not be responsible for, and City shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless
Consultant from and against, any and all claims, demands, suits, actions, proceedings, judgments.
losses, damages, injuries, penalties, costs, expenses (including attorneys' fees) and liabilities of. by or
with respect to third parties, which arise from the City's negligence. With respect to any and all
claims. demands, suits, actions, proceedings, judgments, losses, damages, injuries, penalties, costs,
expenses (including attorneys' fees) and liabilities of, by or with respect to third parties, \vhich arise
from the joint or concurrent negligence of Consultant and City, each party shall assume responsibility
in proportion to the degree of its respective fault.
16. LIABILITY/INSUR\NCE
Consultant shall maintain insurance policies meeting the minimum requirements set forth herein. All
insurance maintained by the Consultant shall be provided by insurers satisfactory to the City.
Certificates evidencing all insurance coverage required herein shall be delivered to the City prior to
the Consultant performing any of the services under the Agreement. All insurance certificates
required herein shall name the City as an additional insured and provide for thirty (30) days written
notice from the insurer to the City prior to cancellation or modification of any insurance policy of the
Consultant.
4
A. ERRORS & OMISSIONS - The Consultant shall maintain errors and omissions insurance
with a combined single limit of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per
occurrence.
B. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY AND AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE - The
Consultant shall maintain comprehensive general liability and automobile liability insurance
with a combined single limit of not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per
occurrence.
C. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE - The Consultant shall maintain worker's
compensation insurance in accordance with the laws of the State of California for all workers
employees by the Consultant.
17. VALIDITY
Should any provision herein be found or deemed to be invalid, this Agreement shall be construed as
not containing such provision, and all other provisions which are otherwise lawful shall remain in full
force and effect, and to this end the provisions of this Agreement are declared to be severable.
18. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
This Agreement represents the entire and integrated understanding between the parties hereto and
supersedes all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, representations, understandings and
Agreements, whether written or oral, with respect to the subject matter thereof. This Agreement may
be amended only by written instrument signed by both parties.
5
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date shown
below.
THE KEITH COMPANIES INC.
Date:
by:
Signature
Print NamelTitle
Date:
CITY ~F SAN BERNARDINO
\, .
'x ! /., ( (
by: /..;.~ C . /.,----.
titl{Valles
ay~r
I
. City' of San Bernardino
.
ATTEST:
. ) .' 'i \\
.K\\ L. \ \ P\/I:
Rachel Clark, City Clerk
\. \
1/\ ;,,"Ili\,\\ 11\\ [..', \'
" Approved as to form
and legal content:
,. -'
i ",' I
i \\ il\ d.
I '~-" r ' - .
. j
\.(\t
. .'
+?~:\?\(
James F. Penman
City Attorney
By lJ~jI~
Iii
6
~.C'"''''
A TT ACHMENT B
;;100'
City of San Bernardino
Development Services Department
PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
TO
PROVIDE CIVIL ENGINEERING SERVICES
FOR
SEWER LINE PIPE CAPACITY EVALUATIONS
AND
RECOMMENDED UPGRADES AND IMPROVEMENTS
TO SEVERAL SEWER LINES SITUATED AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS
WITHIN
THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ISSUED ON: AUGUST 8. 2005
DUE ON: AUGUST 29, 2005
I. INTRODUCTION
The City of San Bernardino (City) intends to engage the services of a consulting
engineering firm (Consultant) to provide sewer pipe capacity evaluations. including field
flow tests and to make recommendations for upgrades and improvements of sewer lines
situated at various locations within the City of San Bernardino. These sewer lines are
part of the City of San Bernardino Capital Improvement Program (CIP).
SEWER LINE LOCATIONS
Se ment 10
SW04-21
SW04-36
SWOS-01
SWOS-02
SWOS-OS
SWOS-06
SWOS-07
* Sewer lines recommended for improvements in the Psomas (WSMP) Report.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Location Project Description
Virginia S1. Replace approximately 719 feet of existing 8" sewer main with
12" sewer main in VirQinia S1. between "I" S1. and "H" S1.
"I" S1. Design replacerTIent of existing sewer main in "I" 51. between
17th S1. and 21st Sr.-with new sewer
7m S1. Replace or parallel approximately 2.830 linear feet of 12-inch
sewer main with 1S-inch sewer main and 30 linear feet of 18-
inch sewer main with 24-inch sewer main from M1. Vernon Ave.
to Harris S1.
Harris S1. Replace or parallel approximately 423 feet of 18-inch sewer
main with 24-inch sewer main in Harris 5t. from 7th St. to 400
feet south .-
Industrial Pkwy Replace or parallel approximately 334 feet of 12-inch sewer
main with 1S-inch sewer main in Industrial Parkway near Cajon
Boulevard to LexinQton Way
Tippecanoe Ave Replace or parallel approximately 442 linear feet of 24-inch
sewer main with 30-inch sewer main in Tippecanoe Ave from
Base Line S1. to 9th St.
I Colorado St. Replace or parallel approximately 2,785 linear feet of 8-inch .
; sewer main with 10-inch to 12-inch sewer main in California S1. i
from Base Line St. to Colorado St; in Colorado St. from
California 81. to Magnolia Ave south of Hansford 8t. from
Colorado 81. to Grand St., and Grand 51. from cul-de-sac to
Evans S1.
2 of 7
II. BACKGROUND
Psomas prepared a Wastewater Collection System Master Plan (WSMP), in 2002,
In the report, Psomas provides recommendations for sewer line improvements
throughout the city, based on land use information, population projections, and data
obtained from a temporary flow monitoring study, The hydraulic modeling software used
for the study was the H20MAP SEWER 2.5.
The report lists deficiencies found as a result of peaked situations in the sewer system,
and provides recommendations and related costs for either replacing or paralleling
existing sewer mains. Costs estimates were based on costs as of January 2002 for the
Inland Empire.
The City is seeking a qualified consultant to review the available information, perform
independent flow tests and pipe capacity evaluations and make recommendations
regarding the cost effectiveness of the listed sewer line improvements.
III. SCOPE OF SERVICES
Services to be performed related to the above listed sewer lines include, but are not
limited to the following:
. Review the information available in the City's Master Plan for the listed sewer lines.
. Review/study the existing and calculated flow capacity for the listed sewer lines.
. Review/study the proposed improvements and cost estimates presented by the
Psomas Report for the listed sewer lines.
. Perform a field evaluation of the '1isted sewer lines and identify any potential
construction constraints.
. Review available plans, maintenance records and proposed improvement cost
estimates for the listed sewer lines.
. Conduct flow tests at selected manhole locations for the listed lines. The flow tests
should be conducted for a minimum 9-day period on a 24-hour basis.
. Consultant may conduct the flow monitoring study using the same manhole locations
of the Psomas study, but may expand the number of locations at the ~ity's approval.
. Establish high, average'and low flow periods from the recorded data. Flow tests must
be conducted by a qualified sub-contractor.
. Based upon the review of available information and the flow monitoring study, assist
the City in determining whether or not the improvements recommended in the
Psomas report should be implemented and/or provide alternative recommendation for
upgrading the listed sewer lines.
. Meet with the City's Engineering and appropriate Water Department personnel to
discuss the preliminary improvement recommendation.
. Prepare final report providing improvement/upgrade recommendations and updated
cost estimates for each sewer line.
IV PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS
3 of 7
A. Six (6) copies of the proposal shall be submitted to the following:
City of San Bernardino
Department of Development Services
Division of Public Works
ATTN: Mr. Byron G. Montalvo, P.E., Senior Civil Engineer
300 North "0" Street, 3rd Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Proposals shall be received in hand by this Division up to the hour of 5:30 P.M.
on Mondav, August 29. 2005.
B. Responsive proposals will include, but not be limited to, the following:
1. Responsive proposals will present a Scope of Services that includes at a
minimum the above described services and any other tasks necessary for
the evaluation of the sewer lines. The sewer line evaluations and
improvement recommendations will be used to prepare plans, specifications
and cost estimates for the listed sewer lines.
2. Identify the professional, technical and support staff that will be performing
the work associated with the proposed scope of services. Short resumes
may be included, but extensive resumes should be limited to key personnel
only.
3. Include a timeline indicating project milestones for the delivery of the final
report.
4. Include a list of similar projects recently completed by the Consultant.
identifying the location, date, agency and contact person name, and
address and phone number.
5. Previous obligations with other projects (related to time and availability of
staff) .
6. Name of sub-consultants or sub-contractors to be used for specific aspects
of the project, including a summary of previous working arrangements on
similar types of work.
7. Statement of local preference eligibility, including identification of any office
located in the City of San Bernardino and the number of employees
stationed at the office, the number of employees doing business inside the
City limits, and a copy of your firm's City of San Bernardino Business
License.
8. Items, actions or information the Consultant expects to be provided by the
City.
4 of 7
9. Any comments or suggestion that the Consultant believes necessary to
improve the finished project or to comply with the requirements of this RFP.
10. Separate sealed envelope. Fixed fee or not-ta-exceed fee for the work
required by this RFP, together with an hourly rate sheet applicable to this
project for classifications above, including all materials and expenses, shall
be submitted in a separate sealed envelope. Please note that the City will
not payor compensate for travel time, courier services, mileage or
reimbursement for travel to the City of San Bernardino to attend meetings
or conduct the activities necessary to complete tasks required to be
performed as part of consultant services.
The fee proposal shall include the total fee and a separate fee breakdown
for the individual segment 1.0. This is necessary for cost tracking within the
City's Capital Improvement Program.
V. SELECTION PROCESS
The selection process will be based on a point system and will consist of three phases as
follows:
1. First phase selection shall consist of an evaluation by staff (including the
Development Services Director, City Engineer, and Senior Engineer/Project
Manager) of proposals based on the above items identified in Section IV B (except
No. 10). An additional five (5) points will be given to City of San Bernardino based
consultants. In order to be deemed as "City of San Bernardino Based Consultant,
the company shall have an office with a minimum of two (2) owners or employees
doing business inside the City limits and shall possess a City Business License.
The three (3) consultants with the highest points will continue to the interviews. A
maximum of 100 points can be achieved in this phase of the selection process.
The three consultants with the highest numerical scores will be invited to continue
with the second phase of the selection process.
2. Second phase of the selection process will consist of staff evaluation of a
presentation by the three consultants with the highest numerical score from the
first phase selection. The interview will be detailed questiomf-on this specific
project, including, but not limited to, personnel, schedule, project staging, and
knowledge of the project. Five (5) points of local preference will also be awarded
in this phase of the selection process for Consultants that meet the requirements
identified in paragraph 1 above. A maximum of 100 points can be achieved in this
phase of the selection process.
3. The third and final phase of the selection process will consist of staff submitting a
final package to the Mayor and Council for consideration approval. Final scores of
the top three consultants will be submitted to the Mayor and Common Council with
a recommendation to award an Agreement for Professional Services to the
consultant with the highest numerical score. However, the Mayor and Common
Council have the prerogative to award an Agreement for Professional Services to
any of the top three consultants or reject all proposals.
5 of 7
4. If the Mayor and Common Council award an Agreement for Professional Services,
the selected consultant will be requested to execute an Agreement for
Professional Services (draft copy attached). Failure of the consultant to execute
the Agreement within 60 days of approval by the Mayor and Common Council will
void the approval.
VI GENERAL
This "Request for Proposal" does not commit the City to award a contract, pay any costs
incurred in the preparation of a proposal in response to this request, procure or contract
for any services. All proposals submitted in response to this request will become the
property of the City and may be used by the City in any way deemed appropriate. The
City reserves the right to accept or to reject. in part or in its entirety, the response to the
request for proposal if such action is deemed to be in the best interest of the City.
Any contract entered into as a result of this proposal shall be considered to include the
items of work detailed in this proposal unless specifically deleted in the proposal at the
request of the City.
VII PAYMENT
The Consultant that is recommended by Staff and approved by Mayor and Common
Council shall attend a preliminary meeting to establish the start date and resolve other
issues. Once the Notice to Proceed has been given, the Consultant can submit for
payments. The City will release funds at percentages with receipt of preliminary and final
reports. No payment shall be given above the percentage of completed work accepted
by the City. The City shall hold 15%-of the total cost for 360 calendar days after
acceptance of the final report by the City, or 45 calendar days after the City issues a
Notice of Completion for the project, whichever occurs first.
Any request for additional information or clarification should be submitted to Mr. Byron G.
Montalvo, P.E. Public Works. at (909) 384-5263.
ATTACHMENTS: Liabilityllnsurance Requirements
Draft Copy of Agreement for Professional Services
LIABILITY I INSURANCE
REQUIREMENTS
Engineer shall maintain insurance policies meeting the minimum requirements set forth
herein. All insurance maintained by the Engineer shall be provided by insurers
satisfactory to the City. Certificates evidencing all insurance coverage required herein
shall be delivered to the City prior to the Engineer performing any of the services under
the Agreement. All insurance certificates required herein shall name the City as an
additional insured and provide for thirty (30) days written notice from the insurer to the
City prior to cancellation of any insurance policy of the Engineer.
6 of 7
A. ERRORS & OMISSIONS The Engineer shall maintain errors and
omissions insurance with a combined single limit of not less than One
Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence.
B. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY AND AUTOMOBILE
INSURANCE The Engineer shall maintain comprehensive general
liability and automobile liability insurance with a combined single limit of not
less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence.
C. WORKER'S COMPENSATION INSURANCE The Engineer shall
maintain worker's compensation insurance in accordance with the laws of
the State of California for all workers employees by the Engineer.
If additional information is needed, please contact Mr. Byron Montalvo at (909) 384-5263.
Sincerely,
BYRON G. MONTALVO, P.E.
Senior Civil Engineer
BGM:pm
7 of 7
'.
.:,j';!.:
.. ,
.. ~
, .<,t.
~.~., .
'>eo-
.......
,,' ,
~"-\,
'tl
.... _.'.
't'
\
l,-
"
~ .. ..,.
--~--
~."..,'
;,- ,>. . . q
:..,;~~, 1~ .'t'" '
;J
.~
f~1
~-~
"f'
a
iii
~'
m';.\
~..
i!~:~'
T~'e'<cl::h CO';'"lpar~!es -n<"C
1459
ft'..,....
.!f}':
..<
';ij
, :~i
19 Technology Drive
Irvine, CA 92618
PlI'pl'.;.;i!l'," 1'1','\ h,k \1. J! LI1:':'Jlll'l'llr:b S....,I\,iCc"
\ Jri,\u'" ~t:'\\l'l i Jlh'! il~t- ~ .q'.!l it: [\dluatl,)ns, l pgraJ,'" ,:\",1 inif':<'\ll "t':'
Tr-e Ke'th CompanIes n<c
Table of Contents
Table of Contents... ............. ....... ............. ............... ........... .............. ....... .................. ..... i
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING ................................................................................. I
PROJECT APPROACH ................ ..... ............... .......... .... .... ...... ........ ............... ........ 2
KEY DESIGN ISSUES .................................................................................3
SCOPE OF WORK .....................................................................................................5
1. Data Collection and Revie\'.! ....................................................................5
2. Flow Testing ......................................... ....... ... ............... .......... ................ 5
3. Hydraulic Analysis .. .................................... ............................................ 5
4. Prepare Report ........................................................................................ 6
5. Meetings. ........... ...... .... .... ... .................. .......... .................. .......... .......... ... 6
PROJECT TEAM ...... ... ...... ....... ............. ............... ... ....... .... ................... ..... .... ........ .... 7
ORGANIZA nON CHART....... .... ......... ......... ... ... .................. ................... .... 7
RESUMES .. ... ...... ... ...................... ..... ... ...... .... ............ ................ ........ ........ .... 8
SUBCONSUL T ANT PROFILE......... .................... .... ..... .......... .......... ........... .... ...... 15
Key Personnel.................................... ....... .......... ................ .............. ......... ... 16
COMPANY PROFILE ......... .............. .... .... ................................. ....... ..... .......... ...... 17
REFERENCES ...... .... .......................................... ...... ................. ........... .................... 19
BUDGET ......... ......... ............. .... ...... ............. ............ ....... ... .................. .......... ........... 22
SCHEDULE .......................... ............. ..................... ........................ ..... ...... ... ......... '" 23
INS URANCE ... ............ ...................... .......... ... ................... ....... ............ ...... .... .,. ....... 24
T'e <w C~~,a -ITKC
. .':;
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING '
In 2002, Psomas prepared a Wastewater Collection System Master Plan (WSMPl.
The report provides recommendations for sewer line improvements throughout the
City. The recommendations were based on hydraulic modeling analyses based on
land use information, population projections, and data obtained from a temporary
flow monitoring study,
The improvements recommended in the report were due to deficiencies found in the
existing sewer collection system as a result of peak flo\>" conditions. The report
provided recommendations and related costs for either replacing or paralleling the
existing sewer lines. Cost estimates were based on costs as of January 2002 for the
Inland Empire,
The purpose of this study is to review the available information, perform independent
flow tests, and perform pipe capacity evaluations for the listed improvements from the
WSMP. New recommendations are to be made as to the costs effectiveness of the
listed sewer line improvements. The improvements to be evaluated are listed below. It
should be noted that all but one of the improvements were recommended in the WSMP
by Psomas. This would be the 7th Street sewer line replacement or parallel pipe.
S(,\H'r Lin(' Imprm ('m('nt Locations
Segment Location - Project Description
ID
5W04-21 Virginia Street Replace approximately 719ft of existing 8-inch sewer main with 12-
inch sewer in Virginia 51. between ''1'' SI. and "H" SI.
SW04-36 ''I'' Street Replace of existing sewer main "I" St between 17'" 5t and 21;{ 5t with
new sewer
Replace or Parallel approximately 2,830 feet of 12-inch sewer main
SW05-0 I 7lh Street with 15-inchs sewer. and 30 feet of existing IS-inch sewer main with
24-inch sewer from MI. Vernon Avenue to Harris 51.
5W05-02 Harris Street Replace or Parallel approximately 423 feet of IS-inch sewer main
with 24-inch sewer in Harris 5t from 7lh 5t to 400 feet south.
Industrial Replace or Parallel approximately 334 feet of 12-inch sewer main
5\V05-05 Parkway with 15-inch sewer in Industrial Parkway near Cajon Boulevard to
Lexington Way
5\V05-06 Tippecanoe Replace or Parallel approximately 442 feet of 24-inch sewer main
A venue with 30-inch sewer in Tippecanoe A venue from Base Line St to 9'h 5t
Replace or Parallel approximately 2.785 feet of 8-inch sewer main
with lO-inch to 12-inch sewer main in California St from Base Line 5t
5\V05-07 Colorado Street to Colorado 5t: in Colorado St from California St to Magnolia Avenue
south of Hansford St from Colorado St to Grand St, and Grand 5t
from cul-de-sac to Evans 51.
PI459 I 8/29/05
,:]; 1.1 ; 11,;' t ,\, \' !r.c l ~:"
T"e Ke,th Compen.e!! n<c
r'r(_~rh',,(d [',I !",~1\ :i..k '-- 1\ \1 t. i::=:'!ll\'l'!'ll~~~ '-'t: __.l L''''
\ diil'U'""t'\\,' ;lih j"it'l-..q'..iI.il\ f'-..,du"uic,ns i r'i.2.rJ....ll......
PROJECT APPROACH
The Keith Company's approach will focus on adhering to a clearly defined scope,
establishing and achieving specific project goals, and assembling the most qualified
team members. We have completed many wastewater capacity studies and capital
sewer pipeline replacement designs. Our past experience has shown that it is
important to obtain accurate information regarding existing underground facilities
and investigate thoroughly alignment alternatives to choose the most cost effective
and efficient alignment and construction methodology.
TKC has identified several goals for this project. These goals will provide direction
in planning, coordinating, and preliminarily designing the proposed facilities to
effectively accomplish the scope of services defined in this proposal. Specific
project goals include:
. Thorough and accurate collection and interpretation of plans of existing
facilities.
. Full utilization of current resources, data and experience to prodllce a quality
document in a timely manner.
. Comprehensive evaluation of alternatives.
. Provide the most cost effective and efficient recommendations.
. Provide accurate and comprehensible report and exhibits.
. Meet or precede the project schedule.
. Maintain frequent and quality communication with the City of San
Bernardino.
. Maintain frequent and quality coordination with other agencies involved.
While the scope of services and project goals provide general direction, the overall
success of the project lies in our Project Team's ability to complete the required tas~s
and achieve the goals established. TKC's team will be directed by a project principal
with extensive experience in these types of projects. The project principal will
ensure that there is frequent and effective communication with the project team
members and the City of San Bernardino.
PI459 2 8/29/05
!'!I~[',,,,,.:t h'. i'll''. ~Jt' \ .i.. ill".lI~!nt'('1'in:-: '~';'\ I.. ,",
\ .tli''''ll'' -;t'\\l'j I iilt' l1it"t.' \--.q~.;lit.. !\.ilU~(tit'l~" L r~;.j~:~' ,j'.~ in;;'l. ll",\ :'.
The KMh co~pen"'.1 T1<"C
KEY DESIGN ISSUES
As part of our approach to the project, TKC understands the importance of
understanding the key issues that are related to the project. The success of this type
of project is associated with the project team's ability to foresee issues or identify
procedures that will have a direct impact on the quality of the deliverable, as well as
the schedule and budget. Tettemer has identified a few of these key issues in
preparation of this proposal. They are briefly described belO\v.
Understanding of Flows and Flow Monitoring Locations
TKC understands that to appropriately perform any sewer flow assessment analysis
such as the one proposed herein, a firm understanding of the existing flow conditions
is absolutely essential. As-built plans and interviews with operations staff will be
vital sources of information to determine the flows into and out of the specific sewer
reach to be studied. Identification of all branch sewer laterals and service laterals is
needed so that proper manhole flow monitoring locations can be selected. In order
for the flow monitoring data to provide meaningful data, careful consideration must
be given to the locations and duration of modeling. The durations identified in the
RFP will be reviewed for each site to determine if other duration recommendations
are required. Consideration must also be given to manhole accessibility and traffic
control.
Existing Condition Assessment
Other factors will need to be considered other than just the hydraulic limitations to
make the best recommendations for improvements. Factors such as maintenance and
repair issues will need to be addressed. Maintenance records will be reviewed and
operational staff will be interviewed to gain a firm understanding of the existing
conditions of each of the sewer improvement reaches.
Accurate Flow Monitoring
In addition to selecting the appropriate locations for monitoring, the monitoring data
will need to be accurate and interpreted correctly. The monitoring equipment will
need to be calibrated correctly and checked after installed to be sure that the
equipment is not clogged and reading the measurements properly.
Hydraulic Analysis
Utilizing the flow monitoring data correctly and performing a reliable hydraulic
analysis is critical to making proper recommendations. TKC's hydraulic analyses
will be performed using MWHSoft's H20MAP Sewer modeling software. Model
input data for the physical sewer parameters will based from the as-built sewer plans.
The input data and results will be reviewed with City staff.
PI.t59 ~ 8/29/05
~
l!!I
r~I\)p(''''dlllf;1\'\1:...!t\..i\1;!!1.c~il;(, ;1._ t.,i,!"
\, .!lil111'" <~,.,\t: 1\'1; i'll't' \ ,l}",., i;' t-. .:iL:, ~]{_q> ;,~";j,,, Jill! Imrl"',-'\\ :1~,":1'"
The Ke,th Compen.es n<'C
QA./QC
As with any project, TKC understands the need for QA/QC to meet the high
standards of quality and develop accurate and meaningful recommendations.
Management will be heavily in\'oh'ed in the project to check the progress frequently
to ensure the integrity and reliability of the study.
PI-t59 4 82905
~
=
!~1(1r\",~d I',' lll',\il.k l'j\il LJl,Slnt't'ri1:~ '<'l\ill.'"
\ .lri,~-,tl'.. St'\\~'11 il)!, r'il'\.' \...Irj~'it\ ~ \J.lti.ltl~\l> ll~~~-.~;.il.""_~~l.! Iii'; ,i"'-:'t"
Tr-.e Ke,t,n Companies n<c
SCOPE OF WORK
1. Data Collection and Review
A. Obtain and review the information available in the City's Master Plan
for the listed sewer lines.
B. Obtain. review, and study the existing and calculated flow capacity
for the listed sewer lines.
C. Review proposed improvements and cost estimates presented by the
Psomas Report for the listed sewer lines.
D. Perform a field evaluation of the listed sewer lines and identify any
potential construction constraints.
E. Review available plans, as-built plans, maintenance records, and
proposed improvement cost estimates for the listed sewer lines.
F. Interviews with City operation staff to determine existing conditions
and supplement information in the maintenance records.
2. Flow Testing
A. Prepare a flow monitoring plan to be reviewed with City staff. As
stated in the RFP, the same locations used in the WSMP may be used
for this study, but the City may request the number of locations to be
expanded. Monitoring locations \~:lll be shown on II x 17 drawings,
or atlas maps, for the City's review prior to installing monitoring
equipment.
B. Conduct flow tests for selected location from the approved monitoring
plan. The flow tests are assumed to be for 9-day periods on a 24-hour
basis. This duration will be reviewed and other parameters may be
recommended on a site by site basis. Flow testing will be performed
by Downstream ~ervices, Ine.
C. Flow test data will include average flows, high flows, and low flow
periods.
3. Hydraulic Analysis
A. Based on the as-built plan information and flow monitoring data,
TKC will create a hydraulic model for the sewer pipes to be studied.
The H20MAP Sewer modeling software will be utilized. The model
will be run for the peak flow conditions. The results will be compared
against the City design and analysis criteria for depth of flow and
velocity. Defic;iencies will be identified and reviewed with City staff.
Modeling results tables and model node diagrams will be provided to
the City.
P 1..\59 5 8/29/05
E2
l!!I
!'r,)t'I'.....Jl [,_, rn,' l(~('
l_ 1\ i: ,- T-,;":; ~h'~' ;;1:' '<-, " :' \ ..
. .
The Ke,th Compan.es TKC
\ .l:-h.'lh Sl-'\'\"~,': lli1\' r'li't I. .:rd\. i;\ I \jIL~.j~];P.., (
t'~rd~k,- ,i!ll~ !ll1j'!_ ,'Ii}, :11~
B. Based on the modeling results. TKC will assist the City in
determining recommended improvements. Recommendations may
include confirming the previous report's recommendations or
provided alternate or new recommended improvements.
4. Prepare Report
A. A report will be prepared that will describe the data, assumptions,
results, and recommendations for each of the sites to be studied. The
report will include tables and figures to best illustrate the conclusions.
The figures will be II x 17 and provided in color that will clearly
show the existing sewer and sewer improvement locations and limits.
B. A cost estimate will be prepared for each recommended improvement.
The costs will tabulated with unit prices shown.
C. Draft copies of the report will be submitted to the City for review and
comment. It is assumed that two (2) draft report submittals will be
needed prior to the final report completed. City review times are
assumed to be two (2) weeks.
5. Meetings
A. Meetings will be necessary to appropriately complete the project. For
budgetary purposes a total of three (3) meetings is assumed, each for a
duration of two (2) hours. The three meetings will include a project
kickoff meeting, progress review and improvement recommendations
meeting, and report review meeting. The kickoff meeting will be used
to establish project goals, schedule, lines of communication, and
points of contact. The second meeting ""ill include appropriate staff to
discuss preliminary improvement recommendations. The third
meeting will be held to discuss City's review comments and
modifications to the report.
P j.W) {, 8/29/05
~~~?'F"'.-
"'e Ke,cc CC'~, 0' ,es I T1<C
I
PROJECT TEAM
ORGANIZA TION CHART
E2l
=
CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO
Robert S. Reid, PE
Jeffrey Dunn, PE
Upon notice to proceed on this project, the project team will be fully available to
spend the necessary time on this project for a successful completion and meet the
schedule as illustration on the proposed project schedule provided.
PI459 7 8/29/05
,\.":' .....
i " -: ,:: ...., \, : '. I ~' ...
The Ke'tn Compenlel!5 -rl<"C
: L!' l \, " r'd, ; t \ 1 \.1 \ ll.lIl. '1:" l l"~: 1 ,ll~ t.. .1.; oJ '::';,. "', i.'
RESUMES
Robert S. Reid, P.E. - Principal-In-Charge
Education:
MBAlI986/Business/University of Michigan
BS/1984lMechanical Engineering/University of Michigan
1 992/Professional Civil Engineer/CA #C049624
1 989/Certified Public Accountant/CA #52171 E
Registration:
Qualifications: Mr. Reid has 20 years of diversified experience in water
resources engineering and consulting for the public sector. He is responsible for
managing all phases of water resource projects including conceptual planning,
feasibility stuJies, facility design, and construction management. Mr. Reid has also
been responsible for evaluating numerous water distribution and wastewater
collection systems, and has developed facility plans to meet projected future needs.
These plans have involved major infrastructure projects related to water
transmission, treatment, and storage facilities, and wastewater collection facilities.
Mr. Reid has extensive experience with preparing preliminary and final designs as
well as providing construction management services for water distribution and
wastewater collection facilities. He has managed design teams and construction
inspectors for a wide array of projects which include water reservoirs, water booster
pump stations, pressure-reducing stations, water .and wastewater flow monitoring
stations, wastewater lift stations, force mains, and pipelines. He has been directly
responsible for the design and construction support for over 100 miles of capital
water and sewer pipelines with over 50 miles of these pipelines located along
existing roadways.
Improvement District No.6, Sewer Collection Study; Aliso Viejo, California
(Moulton Niguel Water District): Project Engineer for a wastewater collection
system facility master plan for the 6,OOO-acre improvement district known as Aliso
Viejo. This project included the 'collection of sewage generation data for different
types of land use, the review of the existing and proposed collection systems, the
identification of potential deficiencies, and the evaluation of system modifications to
correct over-loaded sewer mains.
Irvine Center Drive Water and Sewer Relocations; Irvine, California (Irvine
Ranch Water District): Project Manager responsible for the preliminary design
report, final design, and construction support services for the relocation of 1,800
linear feet of IS-inch diameter sewer trunk line and 1,400 linear feet of IS-inch
diameter water transmission pipeline. The project was coordinated with the
preparation of the street widening plans. The roadway remained open to traffic
during all phases of construction.
PI459 H 8/29/05
The Ke.cn compsn...1 Tl<"C
f", ;~:-:.: .J ~: t ''-.
. r' ~
, I':'
IRWD Capital Improvements, Trabuco and Jeffrey Roads and Bryan A nnue;
Irvine, California (Irvine Ranch Water District): Principal-in-Charge of design,
and preparation of plans and specifications, as well as coordination \vith the agency
and other consultant groups. The project included the design and preparation of
detailed plans for 12,800 feet of 12-inch domestic water pipeline along with a
pressure-reducing station; 2,900 feet of 3D-inch pipeline, 9,200 feet of 12-inch
pipeline, and 800 feet of 8-inch pipeline of reclaimed water: and 1,300 feet of 18-
inch and 6,700 feet of IS-inch sanitary sewer line.
Jeffrey Road Reclaimed Water Pipeline and Trunk Sewer; Irvine, California
(Irvine Ranch Water District): Principal-In-Charge of providing engineering
services for the project that extended from Irvine Center Drive to Trabuco Road. The
trunk sewer and reclaimed water pipeline project encompassed approximately 9,000
feet of each pipeline, including crossing the Metro Link railroad tracks and the
Interstate 5 rights-of-way. The initial portion of the project required close
coordination with the city of Irvine's Jeffrey Road Grade Separation Project.
Additionally, various water and sewer facilities associated with the grade separation
construction project were relocated. The scope of services included the preparation
of a preliminary design report; evaluating environmental concerns and identifying
necessary measures to mitigate impacts of the construction; performing necessary
geotechnical investigations; obtaining permits; and the preparation of construction
plans and technical specifications. This project included close coordination with
Caltrans, the city of Irvine, and The Irvine COITlR~ny.
Joint Regional Treatment Plant Effluent Pipeline; Laguna Niguel, California
(Moulton Niguel Water District): Project Manager responsible for the design,
construction inspection, and staking for a 24-inch ductile iron secondary effluent
disposal pipeline at the A WMA Joint Regional Treatment Plant. The pipeline was
routed through a regional park and in close proximity to a dam. Various alignment
studies were performed to minimize the impact to the park guests, the dam, the trees,
and landscaping. Aerial photography was used to generate base maps. The project
required coordination with the State of California Department of Harbors, Beaches-
and Parks.
Katella Smart Street, Domestic Water Main Relocation, Phase 2; Anaheim,
California (City of Anaheim, Public Utilities Department): Project Manager
responsible for preparing the preliminary design report and final design plans for
replacing approximately 2, 100 linear feet of an existing 6-inch diameter asbestos
cement pipe (ACP) and 2,100 linear feet of a 12-inch diameter cast iron pipe with a
single 12-inch diameter ductile iron pipe. These domestic water improvements were
a part of the overall infrastructure improvements to transform Katella Avenue, which
is a central arterial access, into a "Smart Street." All existing laterals and services
were reconnected to the new 12-inch water main. This project included extensive
utility research and was bundled with additional street and storm drain
improvements.
PI459 Y 8/29/05
llu.i: )1',-:" l ;),~l,dl . ,;;-;..1 :l
The Ke,th co~pen~'1 'n<'C
'~~ ..., ,:', '. ! \ l. "
:'t",
Jeffrey T. Dunn, P.E. - Project l\lanager
Education:
BS/ I 995/Civil Engineering/California Polytechnic University,
Pomona
1998/Civil Engineer/California #58455
American Water Works Association
Orange County Water Association
Qualifications: Mr. Dunn has a wide variety of experience in water resource
planning and engineering involving domestic water, reclaimed water. and sewer
facilities. His planning experience includes more than 24 facility master-planning
projects, as well as computer F1etwork modeling and analysis, and preparation of
urban water management plans. His planning projects have included developments
as large as 35,000 acres and over 12,000 residential dwelling units. Ranging in size,
he has designed over 2,700 pipe networks and modeling projects for domestic,
reclaimed, and sewer systems. Other experience includes planning and design of
water, reclaimed water, and sewer pipelines; pump station analysis and design;
pressure-reducing stations; reservoir storage analysis; and construction support
services.
Registration:
Affiliations:
Baseline, Archibald, and Hellman Sewer Analysis; Rancho Cucamonga,
California (Cucamonga Valley Water District): Project Manager currently
responsible for a hydraulic sewer analysis for three sewer improvement locations
based on the current sewer master plan. The project consists of flow monitoring,
model analysis, development of future flows, and making recommendations as to
improvements required.
Kraemer Boulevard Sewer Repairs; Placentia, California (City of Placentia):
Project Engineer responsible for preparing the plans for repair of ten- and twelve-
inch sewer mains in five locations. Mr. Dunn's tasks included research of utilities,
base map preparation, plan and profile of repair locations, repair details, and
construction notes.
Garden Grove Festival Sewer Capacity Analsysis; Garden Grove, California
(Gary Coursey & Associates): Project Engineer for performing a sewer capacity
study on the existing sewer system within the City of Garden Grove. City standards
and requirements were utilized, with reviews with the City staff. Flow monitoring
was performed which included a flow monitoring plan to be approved by the City. A
network model analysis was performed using the flow monitoring data to determine ~~.
capacity of existing sewer to accommodate a new commercial development.
Utility Plan for Former Marine Corps Air Station, EI Toro; Orange County,
California (Irvine Ranch Water District): Project Manager responsible for the
preparation of a utility plan for the domestic water, reclaimed water, and sewer
collection facilities required to serve the proposed Orange County Great Park. The
Great Park Plan includes approximately 3,400 new homes, 2.9-million-square-feet of
PIW} 10 8/29/05
, '
'L "'.'""
Tne '<.eoth CompanieS TKC
1-1 ~ \I :-~ "
commercial and industrial space. central park. sports parks, golf courses. educational
facilities, transit-oriented district. and habitat preserve. Regional water and reclaimed
water hydraulic network analyses \vere performed, including extended-period
simulations to determine facility sizing, as well as storage and pumping
requirements. Project costs were provided and a funding plan was developed for the
formation of water and sewer improvement districts.
Vista Del Verde Village III, Master Water/Sewer Plan; Yorba Linda, California
(Yorba Linda Water District): Project Engineer responsible for the preparation of
the Water and Sewer Facilities Master Plan document. Tasks included coordination
with the Yorba Linda Water District to determine design and development
requirements. Other tasks included writing of the report document, preparing
exhibits, and hydraulic model analyses of the Water and Sewer Systems Master
Plans.
Vista Del Verde Village IV, Master Water/Sewer Plan; Yorba Linda, California
(Yorba Linda Water District): Project Manager responsible for the preparation of
the Water and Sewer Facilities Master Plan document. Responsibilities included
coordination with the District as well as the Metropolitan Water District. Other tasks
included writing the report document, preparing exhibits, and hydraulic model
analyses of the Water and Sewer Systems Master Plans.
Sub-Area Master Plan, Planning Areas 1 & 2; Irvine, California (Irvine Ranch
Water District): Project Manager responsible for the preparation of a Sub-Area
Master Plan for domestic water, wastewater, non"potable water, and telemetry
systems to serve approximately 4,600 dwelling units in Planning Areas I and 2
within the city of Irvine's sphere of influence. A regional sewer study was performed
for two of the District's large-trunk sewer systems. Domestic and reclaimed water
network analyses were performed, as well as a Zone 3 and 5 Storage Zone analyses.
The hydraulic analyses included extended-period simulations where pumping
capacities and water-age characteristics were investigated.
Sub Area Master Plan, Planning Area 6; Irvine, California (Irvine Ranch
Water District): Project Manager responsible for the preparation of a Sub-Area
Master Plan for domestic water, sewer, and non-potable water to serve
approximately 4,500 dwelling units within Planning Area 6 of the city of Irvine's
sphere of influence. The SAMP included a storage analysis for the domestic and
reclaimed water systems to determine proposed reservoir sizes and locations.
Additional tasks for the SAMP included preparing probable opinion of estimated
construction costs for the proposed water and sewer systems separated by IRWD and
developer- funded facilities.
Sub-Area Master Plan, Planning Areas 5B, 8A, 9A, and Spectrum 8; Irvine,
California (Irvine Ranch w.ater District): Project Engineer for the preparation of a
Sub-Area Master Plan for domestic water, wastewater, non-potable water, and
telemetry systems to serve approximately 12,350 units in Planning Areas 58, 8A. 9,
9A, and Spectrum 8 of the city of Irvine's sphere of influence. A regional sewer
PI459 II 8:29/05
"q'.l( 1!\ j".ihl..t!I,.ll> \ rfr.1\.;l ,: ,,; 111"11'\ l '~'<!~'"
The Ke,th Compen'e5 TKC
:\ i! rn~~l!~l~'l i[;~':' "';,_:, II l'...
study was performed of the existing trunk sewer systems to determine capacity for
the new sewer flows. The regional sewer study included nearly 70% of the entire
district. GIS data was utilized to develop land uses information and sewer tributary
areas.
Springbrook Estates Off-Site Sewer Study; Riverside, California (Springbrook
Investments, LP): Project Manager for off-site sewer engineering services.
Springbrook Estates included the development of 184 acres in the Highgrove
Community of Riverside, as well as off-site sewer from the project along Spring
Street to Iowa Avenue, then south to Palmyrita A venue where it joins the City of
Riverside's existing sewer system.
Tonner Hills Water and Sewer Facilities Plan; Brea, California (Nuevo Energy
Company): Project Engineer responsible for the Water and Sewer Master Facility
Plan for the Tonner Hills development, a master-planned community of
approximately 823 acres owned by Nuevo Energy Company. Water and sewer
service was provided by the City of Brea. The project consisted of the addition of
two reservoir tanks and pump stations to the City's water distribution system. Close
coordination was required with the City's Distribution Master Plan document. The
sewer collection included one lift station and force main along with the gravity
sewers that connect to the existing collection system.
Vista Del Verde Village III, Bastanchury Sewer Pipeline; Yorba Linda,
California (Yorba Linda Water District): Project Engineer responsible for the
preparation of the preliminary design report and construction documents for
approximately 800 feet of ten-inch gravity PYC sewer. The sewer profile design
required the ability to go under an existing 6O-inch diameter storm drain facility and
36-inch water transmission main. Coordination was necessary with other consultants
to determine tie-in points to a new 60-inch diameter manhole located in the middle
of an intersection.
Irvine BoulevardlLambert Road Sewer Capital Facilities; Irvine, California
(Irvine Ranch Water District): Project Manager responsible for preparing the
preliminary design report and final design of the sewer pipelines in Irvine Boulevard
and Lambel1 Road within the city of Irvine. The project included the design of 2,751
linear feet of 12-inch PYC sewer pipe and 3,646 linear feet of IS-inch PYC sewer
pipe. Due to the nature of traffic on Irvine Boulevard. the alignments were carefully
studied to not only avoid other utilities, but to consider traffic control during
construction and maintain the most number of travel lanes open as possible. The
project involved coordination with several other consultants to ensure all design
requirements and pipe clearances were met.
P 1459 12 8/29/05
;....:..:;-.1\.> '. _I :J 1 :,.;,
Tee Ke.'" Com""nee I T1<C
Adelina Pirijanyan, EIT - Assistant Engineer
Education:
BSI2003/Ci\il Engineering
Registration: 2002/EITI16736
Qualifications: Ms. Pirijanyan. prior to graduating and receiving her Bachelor
of Science degree in Civil Engineering, had interned in the water resources industry
for a few years and gained valuable experience. Since earning her degree. she has
worked as an assistant engineer on projects such as wastewater treatment plants, a
portable aeration plan, GIS sewer line update for City of Santa Monica, Trunk Sewer
Mapping for Orange County Sanitation District, master planning, computer network
modeling, domestic water pipeline design, gravity sewer, force main design, and
reclaimed water pipeline design. Her pipeline design projects have included plan and
profiles for pipe diameters up to 24-inches. Her software experience includes
H20NET, H20MAP SEWER, GIS ARC INFO, and AutoCAD.
Trunk Sewer Mapping; Orange County,California (Orange County Sanitation
District): Associate Engineer assisting the project engineer and team members with
the preparation of an electronic map of Orange County Sanitation District's (OCSD)
sewer system, Trunk Sewer Mapping: Project included mapping of OCSD owned
and maintained sewers, data collection of sewer information, compiling data into a
database and connecting the database to the map of the sewers. The final product was
a GIS map of the OCSD sewer system. Hard copies of these maps were also created,
similar to the Thomas guide.
Moorpark Wastewater Treatment Plant 5.0 MGD Expansion; Ventura County,
CA (City of Moorpark): Aide Project Engineer with design of Moorpark Expansion
of Wastewater Treatment Plant
OCSD WDR CMOM 02-04 Compliance Portable Aeration Plan; Orange
County, CA (Orange County Sanitation District): Prepare a GIS map of the
bodies of water in Orange County. The map contained bodies of water data (area,
depth, location, size, etc...) to be used in creating an Aeration Plan for the Orange -
County Sanitation District, to meet water quality standards set by Regional Water
Qualitv Control Board.
OCSD WDR CMOM 02-04 Compliance, Tustin Area Spill Control (Orange
County Sanitation District): Research Sanitary Sewer Overflow/Capacity,
Management, Operation and Maintenance (SSO/CMOM) regulations.
GIS Sewer Data Update; Santa Monica, CA (City of Santa Monica): City of
Santa Monica's Sewer system was previously created in GIS; however their data set
had errors and new line work needed to be added. Updated their GIS data and
mapped the additional sewer lines. The project included running multiple queries to
identify missing links and errors using Arc Info and Microsoft Database.
Water and Sewer System Master Plan; Banning, California (City of Banning):
Associate Engineer responsible for the hydraulic and sewer analyses, model
PI459 13 8/29/05
t'r"i \....~llll.., I;!<,\ lllt' \. 1\ Ii i !l~1!11't-'1IqF "';',_1 \ ill."
'.. ~i:i,_",l" .....\'\\l'l i ill(' 11q'l..' '. ~1t',~,'it\ F\.Jh:.lti":1.'- I ;'~:.tl~('" .1i',.! 1:-i~l'l \l illc':~r.
The Ke,th Compen,ee I T1<C
calibration, planning and report preparation for the Water and Sewer System Master
Plan.
Headlands Domestic Water and Sewer Hydraulic Analysis; Dana Point,
California (City of Dana Point): Associate Engineer responsible for the hydraulic
and sewer analyses, model calibration, planning and report preparation for the water
system master plan.
Sewer Area Study for Golden Valley Ranch; Santa Clarita, California (City of
Santa Clarita):
Associate Engineer responsible for the sewer analyses. model calibration, planning
and report preparation for the Sewer System Master Plan.
URP 12 and 13 Hydraulic Analysis; Irvine, California (City of Irvine ):
Associate Engineer responsible for the hydraulic analyses, model calibration,
planning and report preparation for the Water System Master Plan.
PI459 14 8/29/05
PI('p~H"dl( Pji-\Ic1\ i.')\il f-:i~!llt\'llilS"";'t'r\kt'"
\-Jril1U" ";t'\l,l'~ ll~~(' F~~~t. ,--,!}'d., H\ F\~lluJtk\n~ I pgLl,jl"~ cl:l~llr::r)'
Tre Kelt.r Compen1es ~
\,'1',,:','"
SUBCONSUL TANT PROFILE
Downstream Services Inc. is full service company providing efficient and consistent
inspection. installation, maintenance, and repair of all wet utilities since 1996.
Downstream Services is an industry leader in handling, storage, and delivery of
digital information. Downstream Services utilizes the latest technology available to
the wastewater industry. Advanced technologies enable Downstream to gather and
deliver high quality digital inspection data for our clients, and to required
specifications.
Downstream provides the following services:
. Flow Monitoring
. CCTV Sewer Inspection and Cleaning
. Storm Drain Maintenance
. Storm Drain Repair and Slip Lining
. Storm Water Filter Sales and Service
. Municipal Repairs and Emergency Response
. Underground Utility Installation
Downstream maintains full time facilities for maintaining, servicing. repairing
equipment, and fabricating required components. Most repairs are conducted in
house resulting in minimal equipment down time.
. Downstream Services understands that every sewer is unique. We take into
account flow hydraulics, silt level, accessibility, and surcharge. Downstream
uses the best meter for each individual application. Our inventory of meters
include Sigma, ISCO, and FlowDar technology.
. Downstream also has a full fleet of CCTV and Cleaning trucks that may be used
to facilitate flow monitoring projects by cleaning lines prior to install if needed.
We place a sediment retention tool in the upstream manhole to prevent
sedimentation of submerged sensors to ensure continuous uninterrupted data.
. A complete manhole inspection is conducted for every site. Deliverables of this
inspection will include digital video clips. still photo's and brief condition
assessment of the manhole.
PI4)'.J 15 8/29/05
!l"'~r~"
. ,!:i\.'u-. \t:\I.t] ii\1l" ['i~'t' \, ,q-'.i.it\ F\.ttU.i!l,-.],:, ! f....:-:.1.J'j," ,~:Ll ~:1~r~ ,,:' :':--
The Ke..t.n Compen.ee -n<"C
'. , ;-"""\\ t,l l'rl'\ Ide' (_ ]\ Ii t'll,2,invt" l!:,~ "\.(",Il ,'",
Key Personnel
Wilma Roberts offers 25 years of experience in construction and general engineering. In a
variety of management positions and as principal and co founder of Downstream Services
inc. Mrs. Roberts is responsible for day to day operation and executive administrative duties.
Victor Roberts is the founding principal and Vice President of Downstream Services Inc.
Victor is responsible for overseeing day to day operations including financial and asset
management. He pos,es extensive knowledge of the laws and regulations governing general
engineering, contracting. and the treatment and disposal of hazardous materials.
Jake Jacobson as Principal in Charge offers II years of experience in the environmental
industry. Mr. Jacobson holds the responsibilities of Business/Project development, ensuring
adequate assets are available. including trucks, equipment. and personnel. Jake will also
monitor, project cost, and overall progress.
Richard Delgadillo as Project Manager brings 21 years of experience in the wastewater
industry. Richard has managed WW collection systems, and WWTP Maintenance
operations as a municipal employee. Richard has also worked as a project manager in the
private sector managing flow monitoring and condition assessment projects in Southern
California, Las Vegas, Reno, Phoenix, and Hawaii. His responsibilities include business
development, project management, and technical training.
Dave Johnson is the Field Superintendent and project coordinator. His responsibilities
include CCTV inspection crew management, field data recording, chain of custody
sampling, reporting of spills. protection of property;' and general employee training. He also
maintains certification in HAZWOPER, confined space entry, 1st aid, and CPR.
Downstream Services has never had an injury due to confined space entry with Dave as
Safety Coordinator.
Maggie Minnamon as Manager of Information Systems will oversee data administration
and quality control. Ms. Minnamon possesses extensive experience in electronics, and
computer systems. Ms. Minnamon will facilitate the processing and refll1ement of by field
personnel as quality control manager. Her responsibilities include data processing, delivery
preparation, development and maintenance of database, and data warehousing.
PI459 16 8/29'05
Pli\p\1<;"d 1,\ ]i;l"\ i...k" i\ Ii L.1'1~!n\'l'l'in~ "1..."1"\1.'1'-'
\ ari1lu,,; "'~t'\\r-'I 1 lIlt.' !)q'I.:' l ,1~',\I'it~ 1"\~lI11~Hi~)n" l l',;.!,l".id{', ,11hi !tLll'l""\'.'I~h'ill'
The r<elt.r CompenleB TK"C
COMPANY PROFILE
Established in 1983, The Keith Companies (TKC) provides integrated planning,
engineering, and design services for private and public sector projects. TKC is proud
to provide comprehensive consulting services to an array of clients and strives to
respond to client expectations by providing them with paramount service today and
into the future.
With approximately 850 professionals, TKC operates from] 7 divisions throughout
Arizona, California, Michigan. Nevada, Oregon. Texas. and Utah. The company
offers specialized services in the following disciplines:
. Civil Engineering
. Land Planning
. Surveying & Mapping
. Site Acquisition
. Water Resources
. Environmental Services
. Cultural Resources
. Construction Management
. Electrical Engineering
. Mechanical Engineering
. Fire Protection
· Chemical/Process Engineering
· Instrumentation/Control Systems Integration
· Power Plant Commissioning and Startup Services
· Power Plant Operations, Training, and Plant Documentation Services
· Power Plant Manpower Services
TKC's clients benefit from the synergy created from the multi-disciplinary team
approach that combines particular talents and experience to achieve client goals. The
firms technical excellence, creativity, and unparalleled client responsiveness spans
across all disciplines. Behind the successes of every TKC project stands dedicated
relationships between our staff and client and agency representatives. Exceptional
service is TKC's trademark. The firm is committed to the philosophy that to provide
the best planning. engineering, and design services requires an intimate
understanding of the process~s and continual and personal communication. From
electronic data collection and GPS technology to automated design through
scheduling and project close-out, TKC uses modern technology and resources to
deliver a product with minimal costs in a timely manner.
1'1459 17 8/29:05
1;1
r'I(~l~l)....d ll\ !"'nl\ ill\..' I...i\ li I-.ll.2il1t't.'rll~~ ....l'l"\ kt'"
\ ~lri(lL1" St:'\\l'J I illt' Plpt: \. Jpch"1t\ 1-'\.l\L,ltj.\:~... l j1~ '.l~!l"'" ',l1: ~ ~~'.';': '\l:'l:"!"l~
T"'-'e Ke'tn COrT'lp&nIeS T1<C
TKC believes in setting and continually meeting the highest possible standards when
it comes to the stability which clients require. these include individual relationships
and technical proficiency. The firm is known for its meticulous selection of
personnel. and dedicates itself to finding qualified people and creating an
environment in which they can thrive. By developing professionals who combine
specialized skills with broad-based knowledge as well as management skills, the
TKC staff is able to manage projects through teamwork to achieve the most
beneficial results for its clients. TKC professionals are your most valuable resource
for providing creative. cost-sensitive solutions in an ever-changing environment.
P 1459 I R 8/29/05
i ! (~rt ',.d t, 1 t: r,.\ Ili i.:' \. 1"' j \ t" [;::-:: 1~1 " ["\ ;:,=": "l :-\ : c' t"
The Ke't.n Compeniee TKC
'-, dri',~'.i" ~(\\,,-': i 11':\- f'li"- ( ,:;'d, 11\ F\,:!ll,l:h\~i'< l ri,r,Ll~'" .111<] Im;'](' \T:1t ;;1'-
SaD
REFERENCES
Irvine Ranch Water District Wide Reservoir Storage Analysis
Irl'ine Ranch Water District
Michael Hoolihan, P.E.
15600 Sand Canyon Ave.
Irl'ine, CA 92618
(949) 453-5553
A water storage analysis was performed for IRWD's potahle and non-potable water
systems to update their current Water Resources Master Plan. The project consisted
of incorporating and utilizing IRWD's GIS data, which included demands and water
facility information. Pressure zone service areas were identified and used to develop
storage service areas. USGS data was utilized to develop the pressure zone service
areas. For each water system, the demands were calculated and totaled by storage
areas out to Year 2025, in five year increments. Surpluses and shortfalls were
analyzed to determine recommendations for new storage or operational adjustments.
Updated tables and exhibits were created for use in preparing a revised Chapter 5 of
the Water Resources Master Plan Update.
Jeffrey Road Reclaimed Water Pipeline and Trunk Sewer
In'ine Ranch Water District
Steve Malloy, PE
15600 Sand Canyon A I'e.
Irvine, CA 92618
(949) 453-5570
Engineering services were provided for a 30-inch diameter trunk sewer and a 30-inch
diameter reclaimed water transmission main project that extends from Irvine Center
Drive to Trabuco Road. The project encompasses approximately 9,000 feet of each
pipeline, including crossing the Metro Link railroad tracks and the Interstate 5 rights-
of-way. The District divided this project into two construction packages. The first_
package will be constructed with the City of Irvine's Jeffrey Road Grade Separation
Project. In addition to the two pipelines, responsible for the design of the relocations
of various water and sewer facilities associated with the grade separation
construction project. The second construction package included the remainder of the
pipelines and required routing the two pipelines through Caltrans' rights-of-way with
a portion being open cut and the remainder utilizing a bore-and-jack under Interstate
5. The scope of services included the preparation of a preliminary design report;
evaluating environmental concerns and identifying necessary measures to mitigate
impacts of the construction; obtaining permits; and the preparation of construction
plans and technical specifications. Close coordination was required with Caltrans
and the City of Irvine.
Irvine Center Drive Water and Sewer Relocations
Irvine Ranch Water District
PI459 19 8/29/05
Iii
f'r<'p,,'...,d (,', Frl"\ ii..k ~ .]\ i! l-']1~ilH'lTlr:; "';\.'! \ 1\ t'...
\ ,!!i('~~', ~c\\,'l 1 il'.< ijipt'; Jj1dl it'. F\~tlu,\tlt\n.... l l\2.:.i,ir" l~d !;ri' \\ iT', !.l...
The Ke,r;r Companres n<c
AI Drson. P.E.
15600 Sand Canyon Are.
ir\'ine, CA 92618
(949) 453-5595
Prepared preliminary design report and final design, and provided construction
support services for the relocation of 1,800 linear feet of a IS-inch diameter sewer
trunk line and 1,400 linear feet of an 18-inch diameter water transmission pipeline in
the City of Irvine. Existing pipelines remained in service while new pipelines were
constructed. Projects were coordinated to coincide with street widening plans.
Roadway remained open to traffic during all phases of construction.
Northern Sphere Area Construction Management Program
Irvine Rallch Water District
Billy A. Stewart
15600 Sand Canyon Ave.
irvine, CA 92618
(949) 453-5610
TKC's Tettemer division is currently serving as the Construction Program Manager
for five District designed construction projects and six ICDC development projects
situated within The Irvine Company's Northern Sphere Area. Duties include review
of shop drawings; coordination between the District, ICDC and affected agencies:
attending weekly and monthly progress meetings; respond to "Requests for
Information" (RFIs); review daily reports, change orders and progress payment
estimates; coordinate survey and testing subconsultants; preparation of final as-built
plans; and other tasks as directed by the District.
East Orange Utilities Study; Orange County, California
Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO)
Kim Koeppen
12 Civic Center Plaza, Rm. 235
Santa Alla, CA 92701
(714) 834-2556
ICDC owns a large area of property that is located within the City of Orange's sphere
of influence. The portion of this property east of State Route 241, the Foothill
Transportation Corridor, has been divided into two planning areas, called East
Orange Area I and East Orange Lake Village. The majority of East Orange Area I is
currently within the boundaries of Irvine Ranch Water District (IRWD). A small
portion of East Orange Area I and all of the proposed East Orange Lake Village are
currently within the boundaries of Santiago County Water District (SCWD). IRWD
and SCWD have both expressed a willingness and desire to provide municipal water
and wastewater services to atleast portions of the same development areas. It is
LAFCO's responsibility to determine the best service provider to these new
development areas. To assist the Orange County LAFCO in determining the most
P14~9 20 8129'05
PI \ Tt,,,,tl {\' h C\ lLit' \.; i j 1- 1',~: I; 1'. 'l : (i~~: '" ! '.
\, .1~\;_\li'" <-:t'\\'~' l il~\' I'i;~, ~i~,l, It'. ~ \~l!~l..!!j,'l~'- i ;'\~:-~"k... .~n.,llll~j'r, \~-:'-:~'I1;.~
The Kelm Companies n<c
appropriate provider, Tettemer was retained to objectively review the probahle
engineering and financial implications of the varioLls service provider options.
Buck Gully, Linda Isle, and Carnation Pump Station Rehabilitation
City afNewport Beach
Michael 1. Sinacori. P.E.
3300 Newport Blvd.
Ne\\part Beach, CA 92658
(949) 644-3342
TKC's Tettemer division was responsible for the design of a buried 400 gpm duplex
pump sewer lift station to replace an existing 50 year old Buck Gully station in the
city of Newport Beach. The project includes the demolition of the existing station,
installation of a new below grade dry well and partial wet well structure. roof slab
over existing wet well, and retaining wall, upgrades to electrical controls and
SCADA system, site drainage and grading, and other associated improvements. For
the Linda Isle and Carnation pump stations, the improvements included new
electrical and instrumentation facilities housed in above grade architecturally
aesthetic enclosures, new access hatches, force main bypass facilities, and associated
hardscape improvements.
PI~'il) 21 8/29/0)
\')1 (\i',l....a II (~ p,( ',\ Il1\ \ : \. :; i ,.
\ ~Jri('Ll.... ~t."\\-t'r 1 i:ll' !'q~'_ \. ,.'
T~e Keltn CompBrues -n<"C
, '
" ;"'~Lllh:''''' .J;:
~ It, 1 .. ,
,
"".':l:('i::'
BUDGET
City of San Bernardino
Various Sewer Line Locations Pipe Capacity Evaluations and
Proposed Man-Hours Budget
TKC Man-Hours
Task Dcscrintion
Principle-in-
Charge
Pmject
Managt:f
Assist
Engineer! TOlal T A
CADD Stafr :l>lan-Hours
I Data Collection and Review
n_~ FlowI~~t0gn_~_nu __~ _ _ - __
n3___!!~.ct.':aulic An~lysis__ um
4 Prepare Report
--'~i--Meeting~-- ----- -- -~-- ~----
8
I 8
__._,~ ______ ___nn_
2 16 60
u'" _ n_ _,
4 24 32
___ _~_ -I--------n --------- ---.-.
6 6
Total 13 62
12
8
----~~
20
17
---~~
78
60
----
12
187
112
PI459 22 8/29/05
"'0
c:
III
III
CI)
"'0
III
"-
Cl
C.
::::l
"'0
o CI)
c:-g
.- CI)
"E E
~ E
"- 0
CI) u
lXlCl)
c:D::
lll"'O
CIlc:
- III
o c:
~O
U:;
:l
IV
>
W !:
~ 'E
"ij u:
III
C.
III
(,)
CI)
c.
ii
CI)
c:
::i
III
...
c:
CI)
E
CI)
>
o
"-
c.
.E
"-
CI)
~
CI)
CIl
(;j<n
::J-
~N
'"
"'en
LL~
N
~
<n
'"
>-
(;j~
::J
e~
"'-
....,~
<n
N
N
'"
~
N
~
;UN
"'~
E"
",-
UN
"'~
0.....
~
o
~
~
M
Qj."'"
"'..,
E;::
"'~
E;o'
Z~
--.0
M
N
o
~ I]:
0> t::: 1 (~
~~!:! ~
~~l.
-"I,()"
N
en
<n <n <n
o 0 e
M r::: ..-
~ a a
a U:
~ ~
t::
'"
ii5
<n <n <n
o 0 0
M ;: 0
25 23
e
o
:2
,
,
, I
- "--r'
n-
n
I ,
I I
U
i
-I..
I
I
------i
egg ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
..- M m M a ~ M 0 ~ M
~ NN- N N ~N- ..- ..- ~ ~ N
..- T'"""'" 'C
..- ~ ~ T'"" ~ U: ~ ~ ~
U: ~ ~
o
If) <n
o 0
;: ~
o ~
~
I,{) I,() CD to <0 CD CD
000 0 000
~ ~. ~ g : ~ ~
e
c: ~ J:
o
:2
<n
o
en
N
e
o
:2
e
o
:2
~
e
o
:2
?:
(j
B
:::
'"
o
~ 15
u: 0
:;=
'"
';;
'"
irE ~
"0 '" -
-g ~ .~ ~ ~ ~
"'Ole >.,t::~",
g .~ 0 Cl ~ QJ 0 "V .-
~ ~ ~ .5 < ~ ~ ~ ~
QJ~(;) era.a::
g ~ ~ QJ .2 ~ ~ QJ ~
.~_ :t: U I- ~ mOl.... ro a: u
~rn~.ooc.
C;u(;io>. Q)
Z 'i' 0 u: I !t !t
'"
E
'"
z
-""
IJ)
'"
f-
.t
e
o
:2
e e
o 0
:2 ::;:
e
o
::;:
01
.S;
OJ
'"
::;:
:;=
'"
';;
'"
Ir
?:
(j
B
~ t::
o 8.
"0 ::: '"
5 t1l a::
~ 0 ~
~ -g u:
E 8 'E
.1:J '" .1:J
::J (/l "
(/l :;= (/l
o/l Ql o/l
Q) .~ l1J
Co a:: cu
g Z' i
a:: u Q:
IJ)
'"
IJ)
'"
f-
ro
e
ffi
x
w
.
III
e
o
V;
~
~
-""
IJ)
'"
f-
.
Ql
e
o
V;
~
~
ro
e
ffi
x
w
'"
!;;
15
'"
Ql
o
~
'"
E
E
::J
en
~
'"
E
E
::J
(/)
U
'"
'0
!t
a.
en
IJ)
<Il
'"
C,
e
a.
'"
-S
"0
Ql
!:
U
en
?:
'13
t1l
c.
'"
U
~If)
"0
:;=-
",Ol
en~
roCO
(/) 5
13:2
'" ..
.52
~ t1l
a.o
Pr()p\~,,~d III Pnn Ilk \..i\il Ll1~jlln! ;1,;: <., 1
'-"ri0U-' St.'\\t:'II,int" ~)ip(' (,.IF.klt' t \.l:U.ltl l:',
The Ke,th Cornpenles n<c
,..
I -
INSURANCE
ClienUl: 5191
KEITHCOMP
1 OAT'EIMMIOOI'NI
12128/04
I THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION
ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE tERTIFIC'" TE
HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR
ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW.
A CORD_
CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE
PflODLlCE~
Dealey, Renton & Asaocilltes
P. O. Box 10550
San" Ana, CA 92711-0550
714427-6810
INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE
lHSUAEO
INS:.JREfl" Hartford Fir. Ins. Co.
;NSURE"R B American Automobile Ins. Co.
iNSURER C XL Specialty Insurance Co.
INSuRER 0
IN'hJRERE
The Keith Companies, Inc.
dba Keith Engine.rlng, Inc.J Irvine
19 Technology Drive
Irvina, CA 92618-2334
COVERAGES
THE POLICIES Of INSURANCE LISTED BelOW HAVE BEEN IssueD TO THE INSURED NAMED A.BO\.'E FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED NOfWITHSTANDING
ANY REQUIREMENT TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WtTH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR
MAY PERTAIN THE INSURANCE AfFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SU5JECT TO ALL THE TERMS EXCLUSIONS AND CONomONS OF SUCH
POLICIES AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REOUCED BY PAID CLAIMS
SA TYPE OF INSURANCE POUC'tJolUMBEFl ~~C~'t~~~E ~fJ',fy":J:~~N LIMITS
T1l
A GENERAL UABIUTY 57CESOA 1665 12/31/04 12131/05 EACH 0CCURRENCE '1,000,000
__~ _~~MERCIAL GENE~l~IABllIrv ~~~~_DAM"'0.~ I",n~ ~_~'.e_1 s_1--,099.JJ9Q_
__.U_'_ CLAIMSWDf IC_ OCCUFl INDP. CONTRACTORS MED EXP (Any 0""' ~'~"".\.. ._stfL.Q.QQ _
X CONTRACTUAL INCLUDED PERSONAL 3. I>.DV 'NJURY '1,000,000
X BFPD,XCU GENERA~ A"GREG.. TE '2,000,000
.~~'l AQGFlEGATt: LIMIT ....~~_s PER PRODUCTS -CQMP/OF AGG ~~,0_QQ1Q9.9.
POliCY X ~g X 'oc
A AUTOIII08lLELIAIflITY 57UENTL0698 12/31/04 12/31/05 COM~INfO SII'<c.,e l;"m
X ANY"UTO 'E;iicc>oe'" '1,000,000
ALL OINNEO AUTDS BODILY iNJURY
,
SCHEDULED ....UTOS Peroerscr
X HIFlEDA\.JTOS BOOIV, 'Nj'J"Y
X Pe'acc,~erll ,
NON-O~ED "'UTQS
PRQPEW'< Dl.,fAA:'~ ,
Per .JC~,d..'"
GARAGE llAltlllTY .1.U~C.0Nl " Ell.A:C:QENT ,
ANY AUTO OTHER THAN EA"CC , - -- .-------- -
'IU-r-OONl'< AGG ,
- --.
EXCESS U....ItILlTY EA;:rl QCCURREN:e ,
OCCUR CLAIl.'S MADE AGGFlEGATE' ,
S
DEDUCTIBLE ,
RETENTION . ,
B WORKERS COMPENSATION "NO WZP80927777 12/31/04 12131/05 X we STATU. OTH.
TORY LIMITS ..
EMPLOYERS' lI"8ll1TY El EACH ACC1DE"'-T ,1,000,000
El DISEASE -EAE"-'PlOYEE s1,OOO,OOO
10 l DISEASE . PQlICYlI....IT ,1 000000'
C OTHER Professlonll DPR9406588 12131/04 12131/05 $1,000,000 per claim
liability $2,000,000 annl aggr.
DESCRIPTION OF OPEIiIATIONSllOCA,TIONSNEHICLES/tXClUSIONS .1.00100 81' ENoORSEMENTISPECIAL PROVISIONS
General Liability policy excludes claims arising out of the performance of professional
services.
Evidence of coverages in force
CERTIFICATE HOLDER
ADOI1lON.....IHSUFlEO :INSUFlER lE~R
CANCELLATION
FOR PROPOSAL USE ONLY
SHOULD AHYOFTliEASOVE DESCFl18EO PQlIClES8ECAHCELLED 8EFCXU: TttE EllPtAAnoN
DAn: THEREOF. THE ISSUING INSURER WILL.1I....X)pM..ll3D OA,YSWRITTEN
NOTlCeTOTHE CERTlFICATE HOlDER NAMED TO THE lEfT. 8~...n."~x
ACORD 25-5 {7f9711 of 1
tl:M117]g7
@ ACORD CORPORATION 1988
PI459 24 8/29'05