HomeMy WebLinkAbout02-06-2006 MinutesSan
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
300 N. "D "Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Website: www.sbcity.org
MINUTES
MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL
AND THE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
JOINT REGULAR MEETING
FEBRUARY 6, 2006
COUNCIL CHAMBERS
Mayor Judith Valles
Council Members:
Esther Estrada
Susan Longville
Gordon McGinnis
Neil Derry
Chas Kelley
Rikke Van Johnson
Wendy McCammack
The joint regular meeting of the Mayor and Common Council and Community
Development Commission of the City of San Bernardino was called to order by
Mayor/Chairman Valles at 1:37 p.m., Monday, February 6, 2006, in the Council
Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California.
Roll Call
Roll call was taken by City Clerk Clark with the following being present: Mayor/
Chairman Valles; Council Members/Commissioners Estrada, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley,
Johnson; City Attorney Penman, City Administrator Wilson, City Clerk Clark. Absent:
Council Members/Commissioners Longville, McCammack.
Council Member/Commissioner Longville Arrived
At 1:56 p.m., Council Member/Commissioner Longville arrived at the Council/
Commission meeting.
1. Closed Session
Pursuant to Government Code Section(s):
A. Conference with legal counsel - existing litigation - pursuant to
Government Code Section 54956.9(a):
Jennifer Vasquez v. City of San Bernardino, et al. - San Bernardino
Superior Court Case No. SCVSS 119021;
02/06/2006
Priscilla Darlene Wilson, et al. v. City of San Bernardino, et al. - San
Bernardino Superior Court Case No. SCVSS 124657;
City of San Bernardino v. Barber - San Bernardino Superior Court Case
No. SCISS 117517.
B. Conference with legal counsel - anticipated litigation - significant exposure
to litigation - pursuant to subdivision (b) (1), (2), (3) (A-F) of Government
Code Section 54956.9:
Traffic Signal Issue
C. Conference with legal counsel - anticipated litigation - initiation of
litigation - pursuant to subdivision (c) of Government Code Section
54956.9:
City of San Bernardino v. San Bernardino City Unified School District
D. Closed Session - personnel - pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.
E. Closed session with Chief of Police on matters posing a threat to the
security of public buildings or threat to the public's right of access to public
services or public facilities - pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.
F. Conference with labor negotiator - pursuant to Government Code Section
54957.6:
Negotiator:
Linn Livingston, Human Resources Director
Employee Organization:
San Bernardino Police Officers Association
G. Conference with real property negotiator - pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.8:
1. Property: Vacant land
APN Nos. 0261-172-21 and 0261-172-17
Negotiating Parties: Fred Wilson, City Administrator, on behalf of
the City of San Bernardino, and Maggie
Pacheco, Interim Executive Director, on
behalf of the Redevelopment Agency
Under Negotiation: Purchase price, terms and conditions
2 02/06/2006
Reading of Resolutions & Ordinances
Deputy City Clerk Sutherland read into the record the titles of all the resolutions and
ordinances on the regular agenda of the Mayor and Common Council and Community
Development Commission.
Invocation/Pledge of Allegiance
The invocation was given by Dr. Aloha Smith of St. Frances Episcopal Church, followed
by the pledge of allegiance, led by Jose Chinchilla of Bradley Elementary School.
Moment of Silence
Mayor/Chairman Valles expressed condolences to the families and requested a moment of
silence in memory of the following individuals who recently passed away: Jimmie Cartee,
longtime resident and architect for over 50 years; Amada Ceballos, resident of the City for
over 80 years who passed away at the age of 104; and Coretta Scott King, widow of Dr.
Martin Luther King, Jr.
2. Appointments
There were no commission appointments.
3. Proclamations & Presentations
A proclamation designating the month of February 2006 as Black History Month
was accepted by Frank Washington III.
A proclamation designating the week of February 12-18, 2006, as Child Passenger
Safety Week was accepted by Tom Hernandez, Health Education Specialist from
the County Health Department. Mr. Hernandez gave a brief presentation on the
importance of child passenger safety.
The Citizen of the Month Award was presented to Evelyn Alexander by Council
Member/Commissioner Derry.
Mayor/Chairman Valles and Council Member/Commissioner Kelley presented a
resolution of commendation to the California Cadet Corps of Shandin Hills Middle
School in appreciation of their outstanding contribution to the City.
Tom Marek, Director of Information Services, introduced the City's new website
and explained some of the features.
4. Announcements
Announcements were made by the Mayor, members of the Common Council,
elected officials, and a representative from the Chamber of Commerce regarding
various civic and community events and activities.
3 02/06/2006
Mayor/Chairman Valles indicated that she had asked Interim Chief Billdt to give a
report on the City's efforts to curb crime.
Interim Police Chief Michael Billdt provided an update of the crime impact teams.
He stated that six officers would be assigned to each of the five community
policing districts and that geographic areas have been selected that have the highest
incidents of crime within each of those districts.
In addition, Chief Billdt stated that they have targeted five locations in the
community that they believe are at -risk corridors. He stated that they have also
completed a windshield survey in each of the five geographic areas and have
developed problem solving matrices tailored specifically to the problems within
those areas.
5. Waive Full Reading of Resolutions & Ordinances
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner McGinnis, that full reading of the resolutions and
ordinances on the regular agenda of the Mayor and Common Council and
Community Development Commission, be waived.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members/
Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson. Nays:
None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
6. Council Minutes
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner McGinnis, that the minutes of the following meeting of the
Mayor and Common Council/Community Development Commission of the City of
San Bernardino, be approved as submitted in typewritten form: December 5,
2005.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members/
Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson. Nays:
None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
4 02/06/2006
7. Claims & Payroll
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner McGinnis, that the claims and payroll and the authorization
to issue warrants as listed on the memorandum dated January 31, 2006, from
Barbara Pachon, Director of Finance, be approved.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members/
Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson. Nays:
None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
8. Personnel Actions
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner McGinnis, that the personnel actions, as submitted by the
Chief Examiner, dated January 31, 2006 in accordance with Civil Service rules and
Personnel policies adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San
Bernardino, be approved and ratified.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members/
Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson. Nays:
None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
9. RES. 2006-29 — Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of
San Bernardino authorizing the Mayor to execute a Memorandum of
Understanding with California State University, San Bernardino, establishing
a partnership for the production and broadcast of community television
programming content.
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner McGinnis, that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. 2006-29 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson.
Nays: None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
10. RES. 2006-30 — Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of
San Bernardino approving the destruction of certain records no longer
required to be maintained by the San Bernardino City Attorney's Office.
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner McGinnis, that said resolution be adopted.
5 02/06/2006
Resolution No. 2006-30 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson.
Nays: None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
11. Review and take action regarding the need for continuing in effect the local
emergency caused by the Old Waterman Canyon Fire pursuant to Government
Code Section 8630 (c)(1)
Note: No backup materials were distributed.
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner McGinnis, that the Mayor and Common Council confirm
the need for continuing in effect the local emergency caused by the Old Waterman
Canyon Fire.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members/
Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson. Nays:
None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
12. Set workshop for Tuesday, February 21, 2006 at 12 noon in the Economic
Development Agency Boardroom relative to alluvial fans
Note: No backup materials were distributed.
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner McGinnis, that the Mayor and Common Council set a
workshop for Tuesday, February 21, 2006 at 12 noon in the Economic
Development Agency Boardroom relative to alluvial fans.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members/
Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson. Nays:
None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
13. RES. 2006-31 — Resolution of the City of San Bernardino approving a Services
Agreement for Professional Services with Stantec Consulting, Inc. (Stantec) to
provide sewer line capacity evaluations, including field flow tests and to make
recommendations for upgrades and improvements of sewer lines at various
locations in the City of San Bernardino, SW04-21, SW04-36, SW05-01, SW05-
02, SW05-05, SW05-06 and SW05-07, (City funded projects), and repealing
Resolution No. 2005-384.
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner McGinnis, that said resolution be adopted.
6 02/06/2006
Resolution No. 2006-31 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson.
Nays: None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
14. Item Deleted
15. RES. 2006-32 - Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of
San Bernardino approving the Final Map for Tract Map No. 16547, located at
the northeast corner of Pine and Ohio Avenues in the RL, Residential Low
land use district, accepting the public dedications as set forth on said map; and
authorizing execution of the Standard Form of Agreement for the
improvements in said subdivision, with time for performance specified.
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner McGinnis, that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. 2006-32 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson.
Nays: None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
16. RES. 2006-34 - Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of
San Bernardino authorizing the execution of Amendment No. 1 to the
Agreement for Consultant Services in collaboration with District for the CAPS
Program between the City and the San Bernardino Unified School District.
Council Member/Commissioner Kelley asked staff to provide an update relative to
the Cesar Chavez Middle School and the joint use facility.
Fred Wilson, City Administrator, stated that the City has been negotiating with the
district in an attempt to put together a joint use agreement with the school district
to provide a community center in the Verdemont area. However, because of some
concerns with the terms and conditions, the school district has elected to negotiate
separately with the University.
Mr. Kelley stated that he was disappointed and he hoped the school district would
reconsider their position.
Council Member/Commissioner Kelley made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Estrada, that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. 2006-34 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson.
Nays: None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
7 02/06/2006
17. RES. 2006-33 — Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of
San Bernardino authorizing the execution of a purchase order to Crest
Chevrolet for the purchase of two 2006 3/4 ton standard cab chassis complete
with Supreme Truck Service bodies, to be utilized by the Police Department.
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner McGinnis, that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. 2006-33 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson.
Nays: None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
18. An Ordinance of the City of San Bernardino amending Title 6 of the San
Bernardino Municipal Code relating to animals. FIRST READING
Ken Childress, Director of Animal Control, explained some of the proposed
changes to the current ordinance.
Council Member/Commissioner McGinnis made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Johnson, that said ordinance be laid over for final
adoption.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members/
Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson. Nays:
None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
19. An Ordinance of the City of San Bernardino amending Chapter 15.12 of the
San Bernardino Municipal Code concerning the mitigation of earthquake
hazards in unreinforced masonry buildings. FIRST READING
Council Member/Commissioner Estrada stated that she would be abstaining on this
item due to the fact that her employer occupies an unreinforced masonry building.
She left the Council Chambers and returned after the vote was taken.
Joe Lease, Building Official, stated that the proposed ordinance consists of two
sections. He stated that the first section relates to the provisions of Assembly Bill
2533, which amends State Government Code Section 8875.8, and requires owners
of Unreinforced Masonry (URM) buildings to post warning placards at the entrance
of their building to inform the public of potential hazards associated with such
buildings in the event of an earthquake. He stated that this requirement for the
posting of warning placards has been in effect Statewide since 1993.
Mr. Lease stated that the California Seismic Safety Commission has acknowledged
that Statewide compliance with the posting requirements has been in the range of
about 2 percent. He stated that in response to the low compliance rates and
8 02/06/2006
following several deaths in URM buildings during the San Simeon Earthquake of
2003, the State of California adopted AB 2533. This law strengthens the
requirements for posting warning placards and authorizes local jurisdictions to
impose administrative fines for noncompliance. Mr. Lease stated that Section 1 of
the proposed ordinance would codify these requirements into the San Bernardino
Municipal Code.
Mr. Lease stated that Section 2 of the proposed ordinance addresses vacant or
abandoned URM buildings. He stated that of the 102 remaining unstrengthened
URM buildings in the City, approximately 25 are currently vacant. He stated that
based on business registration records, the average period of vacancy is about 14
years. The proposed ordinance would require URM buildings that are vacant for
one year or more to be strengthened prior to reoccupancy and it also provides that
URM buildings vacant for three years or longer be declared public nuisances and it
requires them to either be strengthened or demolished.
Council Member/Commissioner Longville stated that she appreciated all the hard
work that has been done to address the vacant buildings, but she felt the City is
side-stepping the real public health threat, which is occupied URM buildings.
Council Member/Commissioner Kelley stated that he was concerned that residents
are living in unsafe, unreinforced buildings. He stated that he was willing to allow
this to go forward with the assurance that this is, in fact, just the first step. He
stated that he wanted to be sure they are not allowing a few businesses to slide just
because they are occupied and have employees and are therefore exempt to this.
He stated that they need to look at the whole picture and think holistically about the
safety of all residents whether the building is occupied or unoccupied. Mr. Kelley
asked what the next step was going to be and how they were going to address the
issue of unreinforced buildings that are currently occupied.
Mr. Lease stated that there are 102 buildings that have not been strengthened or
demolished. He stated that the next step is up to the City Council. He stated that
this is a first step and it is better than doing nothing, which is what the City has
been doing for the last six years.
Fred Wilson, City Administrator, stated that this is a baby step, but it is an
important first step. He stated that the City has options in addressing the issues
brought up by Councilwoman Longville, and he suggested that they take those back
to the Legislative Review Committee (LRC) as Phase 2 of this project.
Mayor/Chairman Valles stated that they get complaints about abandoned buildings
that have not been occupied because they are unsafe and unreinforced and she felt
the City should demolish them all and then move to the next step.
9 02/06/2006
Council Member/Commissioner Derry stated that this was a first step, but they had
requested that staff come back with other options such as low interest loans or
some kind of loan guarantee service.
Council Member/Commissioner Longville recommended that staff be directed to
come back within 90 days with a proposal to deal with the 102 buildings and a
timeline for when they will be retrofitted.
Council Member/Commissioner Derry made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Kelley, that said ordinance be laid over for final adoption,
and that staff be directed to return in 90 days with a proposal and timeline for
retrofitting the remaining 102 buildings.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members/
Commissioners Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson. Nays: None.
Abstentions: Council Member/Commissioner Estrada. Absent: Council Member/
Commissioner McCammack.
20. RES. 2006-37 - Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of
San Bernardino ratifying submittal of the application for Waste Tire
Enforcement Grant funds from the California Integrated Waste Management
Board.
Council Member/Commissioner Estrada made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner McGinnis, that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. 2006-37 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson.
Nays: None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
21. RES. 2006-38 - Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of
San Bernardino authorizing the Mayor or her designee to ratify the submittal
of a contract application for a Program Continuation Grant from the
Emergency Food and Shelter Program in the amount of $101,000 for the
continued operation of the Emergency Food and Shelter Program Local Board
FEMA XXIV and authorization to administer the grant funds if awarded.
Council Member/Commissioner Estrada made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner McGinnis, that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. 2006-38 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson.
Nays: None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
10 02/06/2006
22. RES. 2006-39 — Resolution of the City of San Bernardino authorizing the
obligation and expenditure of the allocated FY 06/07 Justice Assistance Grant
(JAG) funds and authorizing the signing of a JAG Interlocal Agreement with
the County of San Bernardino.
Council Member/Commissioner Estrada made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner McGinnis, that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. 2006-39 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson.
Nays: None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
23. Establish new position of Refuse Field Inspector, reclassify the position of
Account Clerk II to Account Clerk III and add additional positions to the
Public Services Department
Council Member/Commissioner McGinnis made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Johnson, that the Mayor and Common Council:
Add five (5) Refuse Operator II positions, Range 1358, $2,647-$3,217/month;
Add one (1) Sanitation Route Supervisor position, Range 2434, $3,867-
$4,700/month;
Add one (1) Senior Customer Service Representative position, Range 1359,
$2 , 660-$3 , 23 3 /month ;
Establish one (1) new position of Refuse Field Inspector, Range 1398, $3,231-
$3,928/month;
Add one (1) Equipment Mechanic II position, Range 1398, $3,231-$3,928/month;
Reclassify one (1) Account Clerk II position, Range 1331, $2,313-$3,812/month to
Account Clerk III, Range 1350, $2,543-$3,092/month;
Authorize the Human Resources Department to update Resolution Nos. 6413 and
97-244 to reflect these actions; and
Authorize the Director of Finance to amend the FY 2005/06 Refuse budget by
appropriating $184,542 from the Refuse Fund balance to Refuse salary and benefit
accounts to pay for 5 months of pay for positions outlined in the staff report dated
February 3, 2006, from Ken Fischer, Director of Public Services.
11 02/06/2006
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members/
Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson. Nays:
None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
24. Establish the position of Human Resources Analyst and Reclassify the position
of Personnel Assistant to Human Resources Technician in the Civil Service
Department
Council Member/Commissioner McGinnis made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Johnson, that the Mayor and Common Council:
Establish the position of Human Resources Analyst, Range 3467, $4,559-
$5,541/month;
Reclassify the position of Personnel Assistant, Range 1394, $3,168-$3,850/month
to Human Resources Technician, Range 1362, $2,700-$3,282/month;
Authorize the Human Resources Department to update Resolution Nos. 6413 and
97-244 to reflect these actions; and
Authorize the Director of Finance to amend the FY 2005/06 budget by increasing
the Civil Service personnel budget by $18,700 and increase the transfer from
Refuse to the General Fund by $9,400 and increase the General Fund expenditure
savings credit by $9,300.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members/
Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson. Nays:
None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
25. Public hearing - amend Chapter 13.32 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code
entitled Wastewater Facilities, to revise industrial limits for discharge into the
sewer system, to require compliance with Federal and State Wastewater
Standards and adopting an Enforcement Response Plan establishing
appropriate responses and penalties to non -compliant users who discharge
non -domestic wastewater to the San Bernardino Water Reclamation Plant
An Ordinance of the City of San Bernardino, California, amending Chapter
13.32 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code entitled Wastewater Facilities; to
revise industrial limits for discharge into the sewer system, to require
compliance with federal and state wastewater standards, to revise penalties for
violation of discharge standards and to make various technical corrections.
FIRST READING (25A)
12 02/06/2006
RES. 2006-35 — A resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of
San Bernardino adopting an Enforcement Response Plan establishing
appropriate responses and penalties to non -compliant users who discharge
non -domestic wastewater to the San Bernardino Water Reclamation Plant.
(25B)
Mayor/Chairman Valles opened the hearing.
Andy Coady, Environmental Control Officer with the Water Department,
explained the purpose for the ordinance revisions.
No public comments were received.
Council Member/Commissioner McGinnis made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Estrada, that the hearing be closed; that said ordinance be
laid over for final adoption; and that said resolution be adopted.
The motion carried and Resolution No. 2006-35 was adopted by the following
vote: Ayes: Council Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis,
Derry, Kelley, Johnson. Nays: None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner
McCammack.
26. RES. 2006-40 — Resolution of the City of San Bernardino amending Resolution
No. 655 entitled, in part, "A Resolution ... designating certain streets, or
portions thereof as through highways ..." and establishing a four way stop at
the intersection of California Street and Sixteenth Street. (Continued from
January 23,2006)
Council Member/Commissioner Derry made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner McGinnis, that said resolution be adopted.
Resolution No. 2006-40 was adopted by the following vote: Ayes: Council
Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson.
Nays: None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
27. Set a public hearing for proposed development impact fees
Dennis Baxter, 327 E. 17' Street, San Bernardino, CA, urged the Council to
move forward with the proposed development impact fees.
Don Rogers, 290 N. "D" Street, San Bernardino, CA, representative for the
Inland Valley Development Agency (IVDA) and the San Bernardino International
Airport, requested that the Council consider an amendment that would provide for
an exemption of the traffic portion of the fees for the San Bernardino International
Airport and for the San Bernardino International Airport Authority. He stated that
13 02/06/2006
they are requesting an exemption because this new fee would slow down their
development plans. Mr. Rogers stated that in order to provide incentives to bring
developers to the base, certain economic benefits were needed to offset the
extraordinary costs related to its reuse. He noted that relatively inexpensive land,
no traffic impact fees, and the use of their tax increment are a few of the incentives
offered to developers. In addition, he stated that the State of California enacted the
Local Area Military Base Recovery Act (LAMBRA) that provides additional
incentives to people coming into these closed military bases.
Mr. Rogers stated that the City agreed a number of years ago that no new traffic
infrastructure costs would be imposed on the Norton properties. Clearly, the
vehicle traffic for base activities was being handled by the infrastructure that was in
place at the time the base closed and replacement jobs coming onto that base should
not create a need for new street improvements.
Council Member/Commissioner McGinnis asked what specific areas of the airport
would be included in this exemption.
Mr. Rogers stated that their request was for a period of 20 years and would cover
all developable property.
Council Member/Commissioner McGinnis stated that he understood IVDA's
sphere of influence was three miles.
Mr. Rogers stated that they were not asking for an exemption for the entire sphere
of influence. He stated that they were asking for an exemption for the former
Norton Air Force Base, plus a couple of other parcels under 100 acres in which the
IVDA has a continuing economic interest.
Council Member/Commissioner Derry asked when IVDA staff had received a copy
of the initial fee study.
Mr. Rogers stated that they received the study about one or two weeks ago. He
pointed out that the Norton properties were not included as developable properties,
but were treated as Government -owned properties, and therefore exempt, so their
request would not change any of the calculations in the consultant's report as far as
the fee per acre or the projected income to be generated.
Council Member/Commissioner Derry stated that he had some concerns because
this process was supposed to involve the stakeholders.
Mayor/Chairman Valles stated that it was her understanding that most of that land
had already been developed.
Mr. Rogers stated that with regard to the IVDA property, that was correct. He
stated that the 130-acre former golf course property, which would be developed,
14 02/06/2006
and the two small out parcels, is substantially all of the IVDA property. He stated
that they still have about 500 acres on the airport side that could eventually be
developed. Mr. Rogers stated that they have a total acreage of about 1,700, but
1,200 of that is dedicated to runways, taxiways and tarmac, and no buildings will
be built there.
Mr. Wilson stated that staff believes the request is fair. He recommended that staff
bring back an agreement that would provide for the exemption with certain terms,
conditions and timeframes.
Don Baker, President of Stater Bros. Markets, stated that they relied on the fact
that they were not going to have any additional fees, and he requested that the
Council give positive consideration to Mr. Roger's comments.
John Magness, 275 N. Leland Norton Way, San Bernardino, CA, stated that they
spent a tremendous amount of time studying the consultant's report and found it to
be flawed in that it contained errors and omissions, and the consultant failed to
adequately address the new trip rates adopted by SANBAG. Mr. Magness stated
that they did not want to argue that the fees are inappropriate and unfair —they just
want them to be accurate.
Mr. Magness stated that traffic is a very complicated subject involving people who
really only understand the language of traffic, trip counting and industrial,
commercial and residential development. He recommended that the City slow
down, review each fee, and address the traffic fee in the presence of the
stakeholders. He stated that they are not against fees —they have paid almost $3
million in fees in the last three years. He urged the Council to table this matter,
continue discussions and address the fees one by one until there is a consensus that
the traffic fees are where they need to be, with the stakeholders' approval.
Carlos Rodriguez, Building Industry Association, Baldy View Chapter, 8711
Monroe Ct., Rancho Cucamonga, CA, stated that their concern was with the
accuracy of the fees to ensure affordability with respect to the housing market in
the City of San Bernardino. Mr. Rodriguez stated that a proposal of this
magnitude warrants precise and defined overview of where the funds will go, and
whether they're accurate. He stated that as an industry they have been more than
happy to pay for new roads, parks, new police and fire personnel and
infrastructure —they just want to make sure the fees are accurate from the
homebuyers' perspective.
Mr. Wilson stated that he understood the concerns relative to the City raising its
fees substantially. He stated that it has been 10-15 years since the City has looked
at these fees and currently they are the lowest in the area.
15 02/06/2006
Mr. Wilson stated that Mr. Magness had a number of concerns about trip
generation rates and he noted that the National Association of Industrial and Office
Properties had recently mailed out a letter that outlined similar issues. He stated
that he felt it was just a matter of sitting down with all the parties to work through
the issues and make sure they understand the methodology. He suggested that staff
schedule such a meeting, and he stated that he was confident the issues could be
resolved and this matter brought back to the Council in a couple of weeks.
Council Member/Commissioner Kelley stated that the proposed development fees
will not only affect businesses and the airport, but they will also affect several new
residential homes in the Verdemont area. He stated that he has received more
positive support from his constituents on this issue than any other matter he has
addressed. Mr. Kelley stated that his concern with these development impact fees
is not based on demographics. In fact, his concern on this issue is the fact that
some residents are being taxed on their new homes. He stated that it is not fair to a
new resident to assume these fees with a new house and at the same time assume
the cost of the Verdemont Infrastructure Fee plus a Landscape Maintenance
District only to have the fees collected and not spent where they were generated.
He stated that he is not opposed to raising fees on developers, and in fact, he has
been able to persuade developers to build new parks, a new trail system in his area,
and make sure they pay their fair share and build these amenities on their dime and
not on the taxpayer's dime. He stated that he could not support any kind of
increase until he was sure that all or most of the fees that will be collected in the
Verdemont area will be spent in the Verdemont area. He suggested that they wait
on this in order to give the public an opportunity to speak.
Council Member/Commissioner Derry stated that many new homeowners will be
paying up to 2-3 times the average property tax rate of a citizen who has lived here
ten years or more, so the idea of fair share over the long term really isn't that fair.
He stated that he didn't have a problem with an adjustment in fees, but he advised
that the City should proceed with caution. He stated that he did not feel two or
three weeks was enough time to prudently address all the concerns. He stated that
if they need to have a couple more meetings to hear the concerns of the
development community, he was ready to do that, because it is the businesses and
the people moving into those new homes that are actually going to be paying the
fee, not the developers.
Council Member/Commissioner Derry made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Kelley, to postpone this matter for two weeks prior to
setting a public hearing. (Note: No vote was taken.)
Council Member/Commissioner Estrada stated that she was confused as to what the
motion was.
16 02/06/2006
Mr. Wilson stated that his recommendation was to approve motions 1-3, but
Council Members/Commissioners Derry and Kelley indicated that they did not
want to take any action on this item and want staff to bring it back in two weeks.
City Attorney Penman stated that they were going to have to look into the
allegations about the study not being correct and they would have to conduct at
least one or two meetings in order to make the appropriate findings. He stated that
given the information presented today, he didn't think two weeks was enough time
for staff to prepare the appropriate resolutions and/or ordinances. He suggested
that the matter be continued for four weeks.
Mr. Wilson suggested that the matter be continued for 30 days and that a
meeting/workshop be held within two weeks with the business community and the
City Engineer to discuss the issues.
Council Member/Commissioner Derry made a substitute motion, seconded by
Council Member/Commissioner Estrada, that the matter be continued to the
Council/Commission meeting of March 6, 2006.
The motion carried by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members/
Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson. Nays:
None. Absent: Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
RES. 2006-41 — Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of
San Bernardino authorizing the Mayor to execute a Services Agreement with
Performance Management Partners to assist the City in defining and
implementing a fee for Communication Center Services.
Note: The consultant's name was incorrectly noted as Performance Measurement
Partners in the resolution and the staff report. The correct name is
Performance Management Partners.
Fred Wilson, City Administrator, stated that they had talked about adding 35 new
police officers and they had talked about a potential ongoing funding source as one
way to pay for it. The Police Department recommended that the City consider
adopting a Communication Center Services fee, or a 911 communication fee. He
stated that this fee was authorized by State law about 10 years ago and it allows
cities to charge a non -tax flat rate fee on telephone bills to cover expenses related
to the 911 system. He stated that the City's 911 system costs between $2.5 and
$2.7 million annually, so this fee would recoup the cost of the operation of the
dispatch center and some of that money could be used to fund the new police
officers.
Mr. Wilson stated that the first step would be to consider hiring a consultant to
study the Communication Center costs and develop the methodology for
17 02/06/2006
distributing those costs between cell phone users, land line users, and trunk line
users.
Council Member/Commissioner Estrada inquired as to what percentage of those
calls are actual calls for service.
Dodie Alsop, Dispatch Center Supervisor, stated that the Police Dispatch Center
takes about 550,000 phone calls per year, which includes 911 and other phone
lines. She stated that they enter approximately 104,000 calls for service and there
is about a 1 to 5 ratio between the telephone calls they actually answer and the calls
the officers are sent out on.
Council Member/Commissioner Estrada inquired as to whether a person would
have to pay prior to receiving emergency services.
Mr. Wilson stated that the City would provide that service to the citizens no matter
what. He stated that this is simply a way to pay for the dispatch center.
Council Member/Commissioner Derry stated that this is not a per call fee —this is a
flat fee that would be included every month on every phone bill.
Mr. Wilson stated that the monthly fee would range anywhere from $1.50 to about
$3.00 per month, per phone line.
Council Member/Commissioner Kelley stated that he had a serious issue with this
item because the resolution does not mention anything about a 911 fee. Mr. Kelley
stated that he felt the public needs to know that this is no more than another utility
tax —another tax on the residents. He stated that the City needs to manage its
budget better and should not put this on the backs of the residents to find another
way to fund something it should already be funding.
Council Member/Commissioner Estrada stated that the people who pay for the
services here are the residents, and if the residents don't pay for the services, who
will. She stated that they try to be as fair as they can when raising taxes and fees.
Council Member/Commissioner Derry stated that this money could be spent in any
number of ways and there is no guarantee that it would go to the Police
Department.
Council Member/Commissioner Johnson made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Longville, that said resolution be adopted; and that the
Director of Finance be authorized to amend the FY 2005/06 budget by increasing
Account No. 001-211-5502 by $35,000 and reducing the General Fund
Undesignated Balance by $35,000.
18 02/06/2006
The motion carried and Resolution No. 2006-41 was adopted by the following
vote: Ayes: Council Members/Commissioners Estrada, Longville, McGinnis,
Johnson. Nays: Council Members/Commissioners Derry, Kelley. Absent:
Council Member/Commissioner McCammack.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
R29. Joint public hearing - Amendment to the 2005 Meadowbrook Single Family
Residential Development Agreement with Meadowbrook Park Homes, Inc. -
(Central City East Redevelopment Project Area)
RES. 2006-36 - Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of
San Bernardino approving an Amendment to the 2005 Meadowbrook Single -
Family Residential Development Agreement by and between the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Bernardino and Meadowbrook Park
Homes, Inc. (Central City East Redevelopment Project Area). (R29A)
RES. CDC/2006-6 - Resolution of the Community Development Commission
of the City of San Bernardino approving and authorizing the Interim
Executive Director of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San
Bernardino to execute an Amendment to the 2005 Meadowbrook Single -Family
Residential Development Agreement by and between the Agency and
Meadowbrook Park Homes, Inc., and making certain findings and
determinations (Central City East Redevelopment Project Area). (R29B)
Mayor/Chairman Valles opened the hearing.
Maggie Pacheco, Economic Development Agency Interim Executive Director,
provided background information on this item and described the key components of
the amendment.
Pursuant to Resolution No. 2000-279, City Clerk Clark administered an oath to the
following individual that he would provide true and honest testimony:
Patrick Abitante, 1310 Morningside Drive, Burbank, CA, stated that he had
received a letter from the Agency informing him that his apartment building, which
he had owned for about ten years, was going to be taken by eminent domain. He
stated that he had no recourse other than to sell the property under the threat of
condemnation. Mr. Abitante stated that his first concern was with the removal of
the tenants and finding them adequate housing. He stated that he provided a rental
package for a lot of the tenants who are disabled, and these individuals are now
concerned about where they are going. He stated that he has been helping four of
the tenants purchase mobile homes. Mr. Abitante stated that eminent domain is a
form of communism where people don't have any rights, and he hoped that
someday it would be declared unconstitutional.
19 02/06/2006
Council Member/Commissioner McGinnis made a motion, seconded by Council
Member/Commissioner Estrada, that the hearing be closed; and that said
resolutions A&B, be adopted.
The motion carried and Mayor and Common Council Resolution No. 2006-36 and
Community Development Commission Resolution No. CDC/2006-6 were adopted
by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members/Commissioners Estrada,
Longville, McGinnis, Derry, Kelley, Johnson. Nays: None. Absent: Council
Member/Commissioner McCammack.
30. Public Comments
Stella Trevino Garcia, 1550 W. Walnut, San Bernardino, CA, stated that the City
was forcing her mother and her sister to sell their homes. She stated that it is
unfair that City government can take your property by eminent domain.
Deanna Adams, 1156 N. "F" Street, San Bernardino, CA, spoke about crime and
the North Lake Project.
Eric Avelar, 15214 Wright Court, Fontana, CA, urged the community to come
together to help stop crime in the City of San Bernardino.
Jo Stringfield, 22273 Barton Road, Grand Terrace, CA, asked the Council to
reconsider taking people's homes by eminent domain.
Sylvia Arias, 1330 Reece Street, San Bernardino, CA, talked about issues such as
crime and potholes and urged residents to vote for Jim Penman for Mayor.
31. Adjournment
At 5:50 p.m., the meeting adjourned. The next joint regular meeting of the Mayor
and Common Council/Community Development Commission is scheduled for 1:30
p.m., Tuesday, February 21, 2006, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300
North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California.
No. of Items: 31
No. of Hours: 4
RACHEL G. CLARK
City Clerk
B JA6� -)
Linda Sutherland
Deputy City Clerk
20 02/06/2006