Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCDC/2000-12 See Companion Resolutions CDC 2000-11, 2000-115 1 RESOLUTION NO. CDC 2000-L2 2 RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF 3 AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH LSA ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL 4 IMPACT REPORT AND RELATED TRAFFIC STUDIES FOR THE TIPPECANOE IMPLEMENTATION AREA 5 6 7 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: 8 SECTION 1. The Chairperson of the Community Development Commission of the City of 9 San Bernardino is hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency 10 of the City of San Bernardino, an Agreement for Professional Services with LSA Associates, Inc., 11 for the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report and related traffic studies for the Tippecanoe 12 Implementation Area. A copy of said agreement for professional services is attached as Exhibit" A" 13 and made a part hereof. 14 SECTION 2. The authorization to execute the above referenced Agreement is rescinded if 15 the parties to the Agreement fail to execute it within sixty (60) days of the passage of this resolution. 16 III 17 III 18 III 19 III 20 III 21 III 22 III 23 III 24 Iii 25 /II 26 /II 27 III 28 III -1- 05-15-00 II II " CDC 2000-12 2 RESOLUTION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES WITH LSA ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR THE PREPARATION OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND RELATED TRAFFIC STUDIES FOR THE TIPPECANOE IMPLEMENTATION AREA 3 4 5 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Community Development Commission of the City of San Bernardirio at a j oil t regu~eeting thereof, held 6 7 9 on the 15th day of Kay Commission Members: Aves ESTRADA X - LIEN X MCGINNIS L- SCHNETZ A- SUAREZ ~ ANDERSON ~ MC CAMMACK ~ , 2000, by the following vote to wit: 8 Abstain Absent Nays 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ~~~h U~ Rache G. Clark, CIty Clerk 17 18 19 The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this /f.c; .h'-day of May ,2000. 20 <'t::zf /'J P'~ . ~ ~~~~ Betty Dean Anderson Vice Chairman 21 22 23 24 25 By: -2- 05-15-00 CDC 2000-12 .~ AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this 15tijayof May ,2000, by REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, a public agency, ("Agency"), and LSA Associates. Inc. , ("Consultant"): RECIT AL 1. PURPOSE The purpose of this Agreement is to allow the Agency to procure the service of an experienced professional firm to prepare a focused Environmental Impact Report and Traffic Studies for the Power Center Development (Tippecanoe Redevelopment Implementation Area). TERMS AND CONDITIONS 2. MISSION Agency hereby retains Consultant in the capacity as Consultant for provision of services described in Attachment 1. Consultant hereby accepts such responsibility as described herein. 3. TERMS This Agreement shall commence as of the day and year first above shown and shall remain in full force and effect for a period of twelve (12) months, unless terminated sooner as provided herein. 4. CONSULTANT RESPONSIBILITIES Upon the request of the Executive Director of the Economic Development Agency ("Executive Director") or designee, Consultant shall complete the work program described in accordance with the proposals to prepare a focused Environmental Impact Report and Traffic Studies for the Power Center Development (Tippecanoe Redevelopment Implementation Area) dated November 22, 1999. Consultant commits the principal personnel listed below to the project for its duration: Consultant: Lynn Calvert-Hayes 1 " CDC 2000-12 5. REPLACEMENT OF NAME PERSONNEL It has been determined that the individual(s) named in this Agreement is (are) necessary for the successful performance of this Agreement. No diversion or replacement of this (these) individual(s) shall be made by Consultant without written consent of the Executive Director or designee, provided that Agency may ratify, in writing, within ten (10) days of diversion or replacement and such ratification shall constitute the consent of Agency required by this clause. If the Executive Director or Agency fails to respond to Consultant within ten (10) days of notification by Consultant, said personnel diversion or replacement shall be deemed approved. 6. RELEASE OF NEWS INFORMATION No news release, including photographs, public announcements or confirmation of same, of any part of the subject matter of this Agreement or any phase of any program hereunder shall be made without prior written approval of the Executive Director or designee. 7. CONFIDENTIALITY OF REPORTS Consultant shall keep confidential all reports, information and data received, prepared or assembled pursuant to performance hereunder and that Agency designates as confidential. Such information shall not be made available to any person, firm, corporation or entity without the prior written consent of the Executive Director and Agency. 8. COMPENSATION During the term of this agreement, Agency shall pay Consultant on a monthly basis. Said compensation shall be considered full and complete reimbursement for all Consultant's costs associated with the services provided hereunder. The maximum compensation for services, including all Consultant's costs, under the terms of this Agreement, shall not exceed Eighty Five Thousand. One Hundred Seventy 00/1 00 DOLLARS ($85,170). Consultant shall be paid in accordance with Agency's standard accounts payable system. Invoices shall be approved by the Executive Director of the Economic Development Agency or Agency's designees. 9. RIGHT TO AUDIT Agency or any of its duly authorized representatives shall have access to any books, documents, papers and records of Consultant and/or its subcontractors which are pertinent to the specific program hereunder for the purpose of making an audit, an examination, excerpts and transcriptions. All books, records and supporting detail shall be retained for a period of five (5) years after the expiration of the term of this Agreement, or any extension thereof, or for any longer period of time as required by law. 2 CDC 2000-12 10. AUDIT EXCEPTIONS Consultant agrees that in the event the program established hereunder is subjected to audit exceptions by appropriate audit agencies, it shall be responsible for complying with such exceptions and paying Agency in full amount of liability resulting from such audit exceptions. 11. AGENCY SUPPORT Agency shall provide Consultant with any plans, publications, reports, statistics, records or other data or information pertinent to the services to be provided hereunder which are reasonably available to Agency. 12. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR Consultant shall perform the services as contained herein as an independent contractor and shall not be considered an employee of Agency or under Agency supervision or control. This Agreement is by and between consultant and Agency, and is not intended, and shall not be construed, to create the relationship of agent, servant, employee, partnership, joint venture, or association, between Agency and Consultant. 13. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Consultant agrees for the term of this agreement not to enter into any agreement that will inure to the detriment of the City of San Bernardino or its Economic Development Agency. 14. SUCCESSOR AND ASSIGNMENT The services as contained herein are to be rendered by Consultant whose name is as appears first above written and said Consultant shall not assign nor transfer any interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of Agency. 15. INDEMNIFICATION Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend (upon request by Agency) and hold harmless the Agency, its agents, officers and employees from and against any and all liability, expense including, but not limited to, bodily injury, death, personal injury or property damage and attorney's fees arising from or connected with Consultant's operations, or its services hereunder, including any workers' compensation suit, liability or expense, arising from or connected with the services performed by or on behalf of Consultant pursuant to this Agreement. The costs, salary and expenses of the City Attorney and members of his office in enforcing this Agreement on behalf of the Agency shall be considered as "attorney's fees" for the purposes of this paragraph. 3 CDC 2000-12 16. INSURANCE Without limiting Consultant's indemnification of Agency, Consultant shall provide and maintain at its own expense during the term of this Agreement the following program(s) of insurance covering its operation hereunder. Such insurance shall be provided by insurer(s) satisfactory to Agency and evidence of such programs satisfactory to Agency shall be delivered to the Executive Director or designee within ten (10) days of the effective date of this Agreement. General Liabilitv: A program including, but not limited to, comprehensive general liability with a combined single limit of not less than $1.000,000 per occurrence. Such insurance shall be primary to and not contributing with any other insurance maintained by Agency, and shall name Agency as an additional insured. 17. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The parties agree to be bound by applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations and directives as they pertain to the performance of this Agreement. 18. NON-DISCRIMINATION In the fulfillment of the program established under this Agreement, either as to employment, upgrading, demotion, transfer, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination, rates of payor other terms of compensation, selection for training, including apprenticeship or participation in the program or the receiving of any benefits under the program, Consultant agrees not to discriminate nor to allow any subcontractor to discriminate on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, natural origin, ancestry, sex, marital status or physical handicap. 19. SEVERABILITY In the event that any provision herein contained is held to be invalid, void or illegal by any court of competent jurisdiction, the same shall be deemed severable from the remainder of this Agreement and shall in no way affect, impair or invalidate any other provision contained herein. If any such provision shall be deemed invalid due to its scope or breadth, such provision shall be deemed valid to the extent of the scope or breadth permitted by law. 20. INTERPRETATION No provision of this Agreement is to be interpreted for or against either party because that party or that party's legal representative drafted such provision, but this Agreement is to be construed as if it were drafted by both parties hereto. 4 CDC 2000-].2 21. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement supersedes any and all other agreements, either oral or in writing, between the parties hereto with respect to the retention of Consultant by Agency and contains all the covenants and agreements between the parties with respect to such retention. 22. WAIVER No breach of any provision hereof can be waived unless in writing. Waiver of anyone breach of any provision shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other breach of the same or any other provision hereof. 23. CONTRACT EVALUATION AND REVIEW The ongoing assessment and monitoring of this Agreement is the responsibility of the Executive Director or designee. 24. TERMINATION This Agreement may be terminated by either party by giving written notice at least fourteen (14) days prior to the effective termination date in the written notice. 25. NOTICE Notices, herein shall be presented in person or by certified or registered U.S. mail, as follows: To Consultant: LSA Associates, Inc. 3403 lOt" Street, Suite 520 Riverside, California 92501 Attn: Lynn Calvert-Hayes To Agency: Director, Development Department Economic Development Agency of the City of San Bernardino 201 North "E" Street, Suite 301 San Bernardino, California 92401-1507 Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed to prevent the giving of notice by personal serVIce. 26. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement with attachments constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the parties. IIII 5 CDC 2000-12 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above shown. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY of the CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO By: ~'75~Q~ Betty Dean Anderson Vice Chairman Approved as to form and legal content: CONSULT ANT by: By: !J;(l!-1 L- 6 CDC 2000-12 CONSULTANT'S RESPONSIBILITIES CDC 2000-12 Prepared for City of San Bernardino Economic Development Agency 201 North "E" Street, Suite 301 San Bernardino, California 92401 Attention: Sue Morales Assistant Project Manager Prepared by LSA Associates, Inc. 3403 10th Street, Suite 520 Riverside, California 92501 Attn: Ms. Lynn Calvert-Hayes Tel: (909) 781-9310 November 22, 1999 CDC 2000~12 San Bernardino Economic Development Agenry Power Center Development EIR TABLE OF CONTENTS In troduction Project Understanding .......................... 1 Key Personnel ................................ 1 Staff Availability ............................... 2 Relevant Project Experience ..................... 2 Scope of Work Task 1: Project Initiation ......................4 Task 2: Initial Study/NOP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Task 3: CMP TIA Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Task 4: Tri-City Traffic Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Task 5: Environmental Impact Report. . . . . . . . . . . . 6 Task 6: Meetings & Public Hearings ... . . . . . . . . . . 8 Task 7.0: Project Administration ................ 8 Project Costs and Schedule Project Costs ............................... 8 Schedule .................................. 8 Insurance ................................. 8 Affirmative Action Policy ...................... 8 Appendix A - Resumes Appendix B - Sample Certificate of Insurance Appendix C - LSA Affirmative Action Policy LSA Associates. Inc. - i- November 22, 1999 San Bernardino Economic Development Agenry CDC 2000"';12 Power Center Development EIR INTRODUCTION Proiect Understandinl! The San Bernardino Economic Development Agency (Agency) is seeking a qualified environmental consulting firm to prepare an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the Power Center Develop- ment, Tippecanoe Implementation Area (Project). The 29- acre project site is located at the northwest corner of Tippecanoe Avenue and the Interstate-10 (1-10) Freeway. The Project is a proposed regional retail/commercial center with uses permitted in the CR-3 general plan and zoning, such as corporate and government offices, commercial retail, entertainment, restaurant, and hotel/motel uses. In addition to the EIR and associated TIA, the consultant will prepare an updated traffic study for the Hospitality East Area (HEA) (an area bounded by 1-10, Waterman Avenue, Tippecanoe Avenue, and the Santa Ana River). The evaluation of all pertinent evidence and documentation will be incorporated into an Initial Study prepared for the Project. The Initial Study and all supporting documents and/or studies will be the basis for LSA Associates, Inc.'s (LSA) recommendation regarding the scope of the EIR. A scope of work and cost estimate and schedule for an EIR and traffic studies have been provided in our proposal. LSA's role will be the preparation of appropriate environ- mental documentation for the Project. This effort will entail the following: Identification of potential physical impacts resulting from the project. Formation of adequate and appropriate mitigation mea- sures to reduce, where possible, physical impacts. . Identification of any unavoidable, irreversible, and/or cumulative environmental changes related to the pro- ject, as well as a project's potential to induce local and/or regional growth. An objective analysis of alternatives to the project, the potential impacts associated with each alternative, and the identification of the environmentally superior alter- native. Thus, our overall approach can be summarized as follows: Prepare an Initial Study. The Initial Study will identify and evaluate technical issues and relevant city and/or regional requirements, narrowing the scope of the EIR to those issues which may generate potentially signifi- cant environmental/physical impacts. Prepare a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) in compliance with Regional Congestion Management Plan (CMP) requirements. This TIA will be consistent with any traf- fic analysis included in the EIR. Prepare a Traffic Study Update for the Hospitality East Area (HEA). This study will update land use in the for- mer TriCity Traffic Study, identify existing "level of ser- vice" and system deficiencies, forecast circulation at HEA build out. identify necessary improvements and cost estimates, identify a practical methodology to correlate needed improvement with ongoing develop- ments, and develop an "Implementation Program" to be funded by future development within the HEA. Prepare a thorough and logically organized written assessment of project impacts that will withstand pub- lic and agency scrutiny, as required by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Work constructively with Agency and the applicant's project team to minimize project environmental im- pacts while attaining project objectives. Provide in-house review of all products by a technical editor and a Principal prior to submittal to the Agency, according to the LSA Quality Control Handbook. Serve as an extension of Agency staff to ensure that all Agency and CEQA procedural and notification re- quirements are met. Key Personnel LSA is an employee owned community planning, environmen- tal, and transportation planning organization with offices in Irvine, Riverside, Point Richmond, Berkeley, and Rocklin, California. Since its founding in 1976, LSA has advanced from a small firm of a few in-house specialists to a full service consulting firm with a staff of planners and engi- neers with expertise in land use, environmental, and transportation projects; civil and traffic engineers; air qual- ity, acoustical and hydrology specialists; archaeologists, cultural historians, and paleontologists; vegetation and wildlife management specialists; and professional forest- ers. The employee owned nature of the firm guarantees that each employee-owner sees the direct results of his or her efforts by contributing to the success of LSA. We pride ourselves on our ability to produce high quality work for difficult projects under tight deadlines. LSA is recognized as an innovator in the field of environ- mental assessments, and has developed a reputation among clients and professional peers as being thorough, innovative, and objective. LSA has prepared hundreds of environmental documents for a variety of public and pri- vate projects, including general plan amendments, com- munity, and specific plans. We are thoroughly familiar with CEQA, and have developed effective mitigation moni- toring programs pursuant to Public Resources Code Sec- tion 21081.6. One of our greatest strengths is developing consensus among varied interests and providing realistic mitigation measures, so that projects such as the Power Center Development can move beyond initial planning into adoption and implementation. LSA Associates, Inc. - 1 - November 22, 1999 San Bernardino Economic Development Agenry CDC 2000-12 Power Center Development EIR Lloyd Zola, Principal-in-Charge, will be responsible for overall management of the Initial Study and EIR, as well as interface with the Agency, Agency counsel, and applicant. Mr. Zola will provide his special expertise in site planning for special use projects, public policy, and resolution of complex issues. An accomplished researcher and technical writer, Mr. Zola has been called before the United States Supreme Court as an expert witness in planning. Mr. Zola has managed environmental analysis for large-scale commercial/industrial, recreation, and public works projects, including the Ontario Mills (1.9 million square feet discount mall in Ontario) and the Califomia Speedway near Fontana. Mr. Zola is the Principal in-Charge of LSA's Riverside office. Lynn Calvert-Hayes, AICP, EIR Project Manager, will be responsible for preparation of the EIR and coordination of the environmental evaluation within the EIR. Ms. Calvert- Hayes has extensive experience in the preparation of EIRs and other related environmental evaluations. She is cur- rently the project manager for the Martin Ranch EIR being processed in the City of San Bernardino and Corona's Green River Ranch EIR. As the project manager for the award winning City of Indio General Plan EIR, she pio- neered a system to evaluate the environmental impacts of a general plan and provide a mechanism for assuring the mitigation provided in the General Plan EIR is implemented. Ms. Calvert-Hayes is an Associate with LSA's Riverside office. M. Kevin Fincher, Task Manager, Traffic Anarysis, has successfully managed traffic impact analyses for develop- ment projects in highly urbanized areas in northem and southern California. Mr. Fincher has extensive experience with preparation of traffic impact analyses pursuant to the requirements of the San Bernardino County CMP. In this capacity, he has extensive experience using forecast traffic model data obtained from both SCAG and the City of San Bernardino, and coordinating with City staff to develop ap- propriate data for complex planning projects. Mr. Fincher also has extensive experience in the use of traffic modeling data to prepare comprehensive areawide circulation studies for entire cities, as large-scale developments. Mr. Fincher is an Associate with LSA's Riverside office. Tony-Chen Chung, Ph.D., INCE Bd Cert., Task Man- ager, Air Qualiry, will prepare the technical air quality anal- yses. Dr. Chung has over 13 years of experience in envi- ronmental studies, specializing in air quality impact analy- sis. Dr. Chung has performed more than 80 air quality stud- ies for projects such as transportation facilities, landfills, office buildings, and ocean bay enhancement/sediment management projects. Mr. Chung is an Associate with LSA's Irvine office. Deborah Gray, Historic Resources Task Manager, will be responsible for the historic evaluation of the structures that will be removed within the Project area. Ms. Gray worked on the data recovery at City of San Bernardino Superblock Project, a historic archaeological project in downtown San Bemardino for the Economic Development Agency. She is currently the historian, providing recommendations for historic buildings, objects, and structures that comprise Haskell Ranch at Oak Valley in Calimesa. Ms. Gray is a Principal Investigator with LSA's Riverside Office. Detailed resumes for each staff are provided in Appendix A. Staff Availabilitv LSA maintains a schedule of projects that is updated weekly to assure adequate staffing to meet client dead- lines. We will continue to give the Power Center Develop- ment Project the same attention and staffing as we give to all of our clients. Relevant Proiect Experience LSA has experience preparing environmental documents for specific plans and large community plans. Our rele- vant project experience is presented below. San Bernardino International Trade Center, Ciry of San Bernardino. LSA prepared an EIR and accompanying CMP TIA for the San Bernardino International Trade Cen- ter General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan. The Trade Center, located on 616 acres of the former Norton Air Force Base in the City of San Bernardino, comprised over 11 million square feet of industrial, office, retail, air- port related, and recreation uses. The Trade Center pro- ject sought to physically and economically integrate the former air base into the community. Project approvals analyzed in the EIR included a General Plan amendment and Specific Plan. Major issues discussed in the EIR in- cluded traffic generation, noise, groundwater contamina- tion, and impacts to sensitive species. Other issue ana- lyzed in the EIR included land use/relevant planning, air quality, and public services and utilities. Subsequently, LSA prepared the traffic analysis for the 1999 Trade Center Specific Plan Amendment (approved November, 1999). This addendum analysis focused on changes in traffic conditions with proposed changes in the Specific Plan land use development and provided greater detail regarding future traffic conditions at key intersec- tions internal to the Specific Plan area. Children' Services Center, Children's Fund. LSA volun- teered professional services to assist Children's Fund in establishing a Childrens' Services Center on South Tippecanoe Avenue in the City of San Bernardino. The center allows consolidated, multi-agency medical, social, and psychological evaluation of abused children. Professional services provided by LSA included preparation of environmen- tal documentation (Initial Study/Negative Declaration) required by CEQA, as well as processing of an amendment to the City's General Plan (to change the project site land use desig- nation from "Heavy Industrial" to "Office Industrial Park"), amendment to the Development Code (to add a definition of "Children's Services Center" to the Development Code and to permit such a facility in the "Office Industrial Park," subject to a Conditional Use Permit). LSA Associates, Inc. -2- November 22, 1999 San Bernardino Economic Development Agenry CDC 2000-12 Power Center Development EIR Martin Ranch, Montecito Equities, LTE. LSA has been retained to prepare an EIR for the 352-acre Martin Ranch development. This project, located in the foothills of the San Bernardino Mountains, consists of 359 single-family dwelling units, open space, mini parks, and associated in- frastructure. LSA will review and/or revise existing techni- cal studies, analyze potential environmental impacts, and draft adequate and appropriate mitigation measures. The EIR will address issues related to the annexation of the project into the City of San Bernardino including potential impacts related to traffic and circulation, noise, air quality, land use planning, biological and cultural resources, and public services and utilities. Green River Ranch, City of Corona, California. LSA is currently preparing an EIR for the Green River Ranch Spe- cific Plan for the City of Corona. The 171-acre project, lo- cated in the foothills of the Santa Ana Mountains, includes approximately 518,000 square feet of light industrial, com- mercial/retail, consumer serving uses, and up to 32 single- family residential dwellings. The EIR addresses issues re- lated to annexation of the project site into the City of Co- rona and adoption of General Plan and Specific Plan amendments. Issues analyzed in the EIR include land use/planning, traffic/circulation, air quality, noise, aesthet- ics/landform alteration, public services/utilities, biological, and cultural resources. Brea Mall/Civic Center Area Master EIR, City of Brea Redevelopment Agenry. The Brea Redevelopment Agency retained LSA to analyze potential development impacts from five proposed projects located throughout the City. Redevelopment proposals included office, hotel, commer- cial, residential and recreational land uses. In total, 25 ma- jor intersections and connecting roadway link segments were analyzed for existing roadway service levels. Traffic from the five projects were added to the roadway network, and resulting impacts on service levels calculated. Other issues focused on land use, noise, infrastructure, popula- tion, housing and dam inundation. Santa Anita Entertainment Center EIR, Ci!)1 of Arcadia. LSA prepared an EIR for a Specific Plan that includes up to 595.000 square feet of new entertainment and commercial uses on 78 acres adjacent to the Santa Anita Park race track. Proposed land uses within the Specific Plan include retail, entertainment, museum, sports and recreation, food and beverage, office and hotel. LSA also conducted a dual assessment of proposed land uses and their consistency with the existing General Plan and proposed General Plan Update which were under preparation by the City. Keyen- vironmental issues being addressed in the EIR include local and regional traffic circulation, land use compatibility with adjacent residential areas, alteration of the existing viewshed within the study area, and direct and indirect ef- fects to the historic Santa Anita Park race track. Extensive traffic, air, noise and cultural resources technical analyses were prepared for the EIR. Glendale Town Center/City Center 11, City of Glendale Redevelopment Agenry. The Glendale Redevelopment Agency has retained LSA to prepare environmental docu- mentation for two projects in the City. The Glendale Town Center EIR addresses issues related to the development of 830,000 square feet of mixed uses on 15.29 acres in downtown Glendale. Particular attention will be focused on potential related to traffic issues, noise, historical re- sources, and air quality. The City Center II project involves the development of approximately 408,000 square feet of office/retail space. LSA will undertake an in-depth analy- sis of potential traffic and air quality impacts associated with this project. For both projects, LSA has objectively analyzed consistency with the City's existing Greater Downtown Strategic Plan EIR and subsequent addendums. South Corona Community Facilities Plan, City of Co- rona, California. This study examined the access re- quirements for a proposed development comprised of 12,000 dwelling units and supporting commercial centers in the southern part of the City of Corona. Once access and internal circulation requirements were identified based on locations and levels of development, LSA worked with the project engineers to develop specific roadway align- ments and connections with existing facilities. Appropriate phasing of necessary transportation facilities were then examined and financing mechanisms established. includ- ing creation of assessment districts and creation of a road fee program. The project required identification and coor- dination of objectives and issues raised by various public agencies and private groups, including the City of Co- rona's planning staff. City Council, and affected landown- ers. Subsequent to completion of the original South Corona Community Facilities Plan (CFP) Circulation Study in 1989, LSA has prepared periodic updates of the study to account for changes in land development intensities and roadway alignments. The most recent updates were per- formed in 1998-99. These revisions involved development of a detailed traffic modeling procedure based on the City's General Plan traffic model. The modeling was used for forecasting future traffic conditions for various interim development scenarios for use in identifying phasing of roadway improvements. These data area was then used by City staff to update its fee program for the South Co- rona CFP area. Highland Hills North Traffic Impact Analysis, Rancho San Andreas Company. LSA prepared a traffic impact analysis pursuant to the provisions of the San Bernardino County CMP for the proposed development of 1,500 resi- dential units, a golf course, driving range, health club, ho- tel, and support commercial uses. The analysis used data developed using the City of San Bernardino's East Valley Traffic Model to forecast traffic conditions for year 2015, as well as interim conditions for the years 2000, 2005, and 2010. The analysis examined forecast conditions and pro- ject impacts on arterial roadways in the cities of San Bernardino and Highland, and on segments of the 1-10 and SR-30 freeways. LSA Associates, Inc. -3- November 22, 1999 San Bernardino Economic Development Agenry CDC 2000-12 Power Center Development EIR SCOPE OF WORK Task 1: Project Initiation 1.1 Kick-off Meeting With Agenry Staff A project kick-off meeting with Agency staff will be conducted after the approval of the environmental consultant selection by the Agency to: establish a mutual understanding of the EIR program objectives and key issues, explore the roots of community concerns regarding the project, and discuss Agency expectations for the consultant's work effort; . identify City department and governmental agencies; business, environmental, and service organizations and contact persons; and other individuals whose input will be vital to the successful completion of the EIR program; refine the scope of work to be performed for the EIR and related technical studies; . define protocols for requesting information of City staff; review the schedule for the public scoping meeting including organization, locations, times, documentation, and notification details for the meeting; . refine project timing, establish protocols for product review and coordination with the City and define project milestones and decision points; and . obtain relevant plans, reports, ordinances, and studies applicable to the project. Prior to the kick-off meeting, LSA will identify its document and information needs to assist City staff in accumulating the background information that are necessary to initiate the program. Output: Attend Project kick-off meeting. Task 2: Initial Study/NOP 2.1 Prepare Initial Study/Notice of Preparation LSA will prepare a draft Notice of Preparation (NOP) for the proposed project using standard City forms. We intend on preparing an Initial Study (IS) to circulate with the NOP. The NOP will include a brief description of the project, and will identify the process for completing the EIR. It is also our intent to include the location, time, and date of the public scoping meeting in the NOP. This will save costs by doing away with a separate mailing to announce the Public Scoping Meeting. The Initial Study will describe expected issues and analysis to be provided in the EIR and the reasons for determining that certain environmental effects would not be significant. The NOP will indicate that the EIR is in preparation, and will request guidance from each agency regarding the scope and content of the environmental information to be included in the EIR. The draft NOP will be submitted to the Agency for review and approval for distribution. Using the City's NOP distribution list, Responsible Agencies, Trustee Agencies (if any), and other interested parties that should receive the NOP will be identified. LSA will distribute and mail the required copies of the NOP. Output: Prepare mailing list. Mail and distribute 15 copies of the ISINOP for public review. One camera ready copy will be provided to the Agency for its files. 2.2 Scoping Meeting LSA will attend a public scoping meeting prior to the end of the 30-day public review period on the NOP. The purpose of the scoping meeting will be to provide the public the opportunity to have input into the proposed content of the focused EIR. The scoping meeting will also provide both LSA and the City the opportunity to explain the proposed project and answer questions if necessary. Output: Attend one Public Scoping Meeting to receive public input as to the content of the EIR. Task 3: CMP TIA Study A traffic study will be prepared to meet the requirements of the San Bernardino County CMP. The CMP TIA will also be used to satisfy CEQA requirements, and will be included in the EIR. The TIA will be prepared consistent with the Guidelines for CMP Traffic Impact Analysis Reports in San Bernardino County (Appendix C of the CMP). Based on the these guidelines, the TIA will examine p.m. peak hour traffic conditions for five analysis scenanos: (1) existing conditions, (2) opening day without project, (3) opening day with project, (4) year 2015 without project, and (5) year 2015 with project. Preparation of the TIA will require the following tasks: Coordination/Kick-Off Meeting - LSA will meet with City of San Bernardino Public Works Department staff to discuss specific aspects of the traffic study, analysis assumptions, data requirements, etc. LSA will also coordinate with City staff regarding the East Valley Traffic Model runs required for preparation of the TIA. Study Area Determination - Using the results of the select zone model runs for the project area (using the East Valley Traffic Model), the actual area of project impacts will be identified based on the CMP's analysis thresholds. For purposes of this scope of work, it is anticipated that up to 20 intersections will be identified for analysis. LSA Associates, Inc. -4 - November 22, 1999 San Bernardino Economic Development Agent)' CDC 2000-12 Power Center Development EIR Traffic Counts - Existing p.m. peak period counts will need to be collected at up to 20 intersections. Existing Conditions - Existing levels of service (LOS) for intersections identified for analysis will be calculated using City accepted LOS analysis methodologies. Project Trip Characteristics - Trip generation will be calculated for each phase of project development using rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation. Trip distribution and assignment patterns for the project will be developed using select zone model run data. Background Traffic Conditions - Background (without project) traffic volumes will be developed for the project opening day and year 2015 analysis time frames. 2015 volumes will be developed from the East Valley Traffic Model. The raw traffic model output will be refined for use in the traffic analysis using the NCHRP 255 methodologies. Volumes for opening day conditions will be interpolated using existing and year 2015 model volumes. Levels of service for analysis locations will be calculated for each scenario. Background Plus Project Conditions - Trip generations for the proposed project will be input into the East Valley Traffic Model. The resulting modeled volumes will be post-processed to develop background plus project volumes for use in the level of service analysis. The percentage of project contributions to total traffic volumes will be calculated using the select zone assignments for use in the TIA cost estimates and fair share analysis. Mitigation Measures - Measures to off-set project impacts will be identified. Cost estimates for build out mitigation measures and the project's fair share contributions to these costs will be identified. Meetings - I n addition to the coordination/kick-off meeting, representatives of LSA will attend two additional meetings with the Planning and Public Works staff. Output: Screencheck Draft TIA report - 1 reproducible and 5 bound copies, Draft TIA report - 1 reproducible and 15 bound copies Task 4: Tn-City Traffic Study A traffic study will be prepared to examine existing and future traffic conditions within the Hospitality East Area (HEA). Based on the results of the analysis, roadway improvements, cost estimates, and phasing for improvements will be identified. Based on conversations with City Traffic Engineering staff, it is anticipated that the study will examine traffic conditions for four time frames: (1) existing conditions, (2) year 2005 conditions, (3) year 2010 conditions, and (4) year 2015 conditions. The analysis will address a.m. and p.m. peak hour impacts for each analysis scenario. In addition, the City has requested that the analysis include analysis of mid-day conditions at a limited number of locations. Specific intersections to be examined in the traffic study will need to be identified in consultation with City staff. For purposes of this scope, it is anticipated that 20 intersections internal to the HEA will be examined. Preparation of the TriCity Area Traffic Study will require the following tasks: Coordination/Kick-Off Meeting - LSA will meet with City of San Bernardino Public Works Department staff to discuss specific aspects of the traffic study, including intersections to be examined, analysis assumptions, data requirements, etc. LSA will also coordinate with City staff regarding the East Valley Traffic Model runs required for preparation of the TIA. Traffic Counts - Existing a.m. peak period counts will need to be collected at up to 20 intersections, and p.m. peak period counts will be collected at up to 15 intersections (accounting for use of some p.m. peak hour counts performed for the CMP TIA). Existing mid-day counts will be collected for up to eight intersections. Existing Conditions - Existing levels of service (LOS) for intersections identified for analysis will be calculated using City accepted LOS analysis methodologies. Project Trip Characteristics - Trip generation will be calculated for each phase of project development using rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation. Trip distribution and assignment patterns for the project will be developed using select zone model run data. Year 2015 Traffic Volumes - LSA will work with City staff to prepare East Valley Traffic Model runs for year 2015 conditions. This will include identification of zone structure refinements for the HEA, addition of roadways within the HEA, and trip generation for the HEA zones. The raw traffic model output will be refined for use in the traffic analysis using the NCHRP 255 methodologies. Year 2005 and Year 2010 Traffic Volumes - Volumes for the interim analysis years (2005 and 2010) will be developed by interpolating between existing and year 2015 volumes. Level of Service AnalYsis - Levels of service for study area intersections will be calculated for each scenario using City accepted LOS analysis methodologies. . Mitigation Measures Measures to off-set unsatisfactory levels of service will be identified for each analysis scenario. Cost estimates will be calculated for the identified improvements. LSA Associates, Inc. -5- November 22, 1999 San Bernardino Economic Development Agenry CDC 2000:"'12 Power Center Development EIR Improvement Implementation Program - For intersections identified as requiring future improvements, a detailed analysis will be performed to determine the amount of traffic attributable to existing conditions, future through traffic, and future development within the HEA. This information will be used to develop a methodology to assist in the allocation of mitigation costs to future HEA development. Meetings-In addition to the coordination/kick-off meeting, representatives of LSA will attend two additional meetings with the Planning and Public Works staff, plus a workshop with City Management and the City Council. Output: Screencheck Draft TriCity Area Traffic Study - 1 reproducible and 5 bound copies Draft TriCity Area Traffic Study - 1 reproducible and 5 bound copies Task 5: Environmental Imvact Revort In this task, LSA will prepare appropriate environmental documentation pursuant to current CEQA requirements and the City's administrative guidelines for implementing CEQA. Key inputs to the EIR process will be generated during earlier portions of the work program, including responses received on the NOP and comments received at the Public Scoping Meeting. 5.1 Technical Studies For the topics listed below, technical reports, which will be summarized in the EIR text, will be prepared and provided in its entirety in the EIR appendices. The draft studies will be submitted to the Agency and appropriate City staff members as directed by the Agency for review prior to finalizing the Draft EIR. It is assumed that the applicant or the Agency is having a Relocation Study prepared which we will use in our analYsis tif housing in the EIR. Air Qualiry. LSA will prepare a technical air quality analysis consistent with guidelines by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) that will include the following tasks. . Baseline and project setting meteorological and air quality data will be utilized for the description of existing ambient air quality in the project vicinity. Most recent air quality data from local monitoring stations for the past three years will be included. . EPA-approved emiSSion factors (USEPA AP-42 emission factors) will be used for the construction equipment. Fugitive dust emissions would result from wind erosion of exposed soil and soil storage piles, grading operations, and vehicles traveling on paved and unpaved roads. These emissions will be calculated based on construction information provided by the applicant. . Emissions will be calculated for mobile sources associated with the proposed project, based on land use trips information. The CARB's regional mobile sources emissions model, URBEMIS7G, will be utilized to calculate the regional vehicular traffic emissions. . Emissions from long-term on-site stationary sources, such as natural gas consumption and electricity usage, will be calculated based on emission factors provided by the SCAQMD. Total long-term criteria pollutant emissions will be calculated to be assessed against the SCAQMD's emission level standards. . A CO hot spot analysis at up to eight key locations affected by the project traffic will be conducted. Caltrans CALlNE4 computer models, Caltrans 1996 CO Protocol, as well as methodology outlined in the SCAQMD's guidelines, will be utilized to calculate the one-hour and eight-hour CO concentrations. . A discussion for the analysis of conformance with the current San Bernardino conformity requirements will be provided. . LSA will identify feasible mitigation measures that are developed as indicated by the impact analysis. Output: Technical Air Quality study in sufficient detail for use in the EIR. Historic Resources Evaluation. Under CEQA (PRC 21002b, 21083.2 and 21084.1) the California Register is an authoritative guide to identify the State's historical resources and to indicate what properties are to be protected from substantive adverse change. Lead agencies have a responsibility to evaluate whether historical resources are present and could be impacted by a proposed project (PRC 21084.1, CEQA Guidelines 15064.5). Resources listed in or determined to be eligible for listing in the California Register are resources that must be given consideration in the CEQA process. Criteria for listing an historic property on the California Register generally follows the guidelines established by the National Register, following the Secretary of Interior's Standards and Guidelines for evaluation. The quality of significance in American History, architecture, archaeology, engineering, and culture is present in districts, sites, buildings, structures, and objects that possess integrity of location, design, setting, materials, workmanship, feeling, and association, and: 1. It is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of local or regional history, or the cultural heritage of California or the United States; 2. It is associated with the lives of persons important to local California or national history; 3. It embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction, or that LSAAssociates, Inc. - 6- November 22, 1999 San Bernardino Economic Development Agen0' CDC 2000-12 Power Center Development EIR represent the work of a master, or possess high artistic values, 4. It has yielded or may be likely to yield, information important to prehistory or history of the local area, California or the nation. In order to make the determination of eligibility of the houses that will be demolished, LSA will determine the built date of the buildings, usually through tax assessor records. If any of the structures are over 50 years of age they will be assessed according to their architectural style, integrity, and historical context within the context of California Register Criteria. A site visit by a qualified historian or architectural historian will be required to initiate this process. For all of the buildings, a primary site record form and Building Structure and Object form will be submitted to the State Office of Historic Preservation along with the results of the field survey. The results of the survey will be summarized in report form for inclusion in the EIR. Output: Historic Resources study in sufficient detail for use in the EIR. 5.2 Screencheck Draft EIR LSA will prepare appropriate environmental documentation pursuant to current CEQA requirements and the Agency's administrative guidelines for implementing CEQA. Key inputs to the EIR process will be generated during earlier portions of the work program, including responses received on the NOP. LSA will analyze the environmental consequences of the proposed changes in circumstances for those topics of focus identified in the Initial Study. LSA will incorporate the technical studies and will collect the necessary additional research materials to establish the environmental baseline for the proposed project. LSA will use the documentation of existing conditions to analyze the environmental issues related to the proposed project. This analysis will consist primarily of the following tasks: . Evaluation and analysis of specific characteristics of the project as they relate to the surrounding area. . Assessment of the short- and long-term impacts (construction and operation) of the proposed project as well as the effects of demolition of existing structures. . Assessment of environmental impacts which will be created by the proposed project, addressing: - traffic - air quality _ housing (loss of affordable units & relocation of residents) - historic resources. Graphic depiction of environmental and planning factors and their relation to the project. Identification of potential alternatives to the proposed project, including "no project" and comparative analysis of project related impacts and impacts of project alternatives. Formulation of appropriate mitigation measures. Analysis of residual impacts after implementation of mitigation measures. Additional sections of the report will include Growth Inducing Impacts and Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes Which Would Be Involved in the Proposed Action. Cumulative impacts will be addressed in a separate chapter by individual environmental topic (topics will reflect those contained in the body of the EIR). These work efforts will be compiled into a Screencheck Draft EIR, along with analysis topical issues required by CEQA, an introduction, and project description. The Screencheck Draft EIR will be submitted to the Agency for review and will then be modified based on the Agency's comments. Following these modifications, a Draft EIR will be provided to Agency staff that includes the appropriate revisions. Output: Screencheck Draft EIR for Agency review - 1 reproducible & 5 bound copies 5.3 Draft EIR Following review and modifications to the Screencheck Draft EIR, a Draft EIR and Notice of Completion will be prepared and submitted to the Agency for public distribution. Output: Preparation and distribution of a Draft EIR - 1 reproducible & 30 bound copies 5.4 Final EIR The Final EIR will include the Draft EIR, technical appendices, letters of comments and responses on the Draft EIR, Mitigation Monitoring Program, Facts and Findings, and Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Resolutions certifying the EIR and approving the land use amendments. a. Response to Comments At the close of the public review period for the Draft EIR, LSA will meet with Agency staff to review any comments on the Draft EIR that were received, and to discuss potential responses to these comments. LSA will then formulate responses to the comments on the Draft EIR. A maximum of 80 hours of professional staff time has been budgeted for responding to comments. Once draft responses to comments are completed, they will be submitted to Agency staff for review and comment. The Agency's comments will be incorporated into the response to comments document, which will be submitted to the Agency for use in public hearings. Output: Written responses to all comments on the Draft EIR. LSA Associates, Inc. .7- November 22, 1999 San Bernardino Economic Development Agenry CDC 2000-12 Power Center DnJelopment EIR b. Mitigation Monitoring Program Prior to Planning Commission hearings on the Project and EIR, lSA will prepare a mitigation monitoring plan to assist the Agency in implementing the mitigation measures contained in the EIR. Output: Prepare a mitigation monitoring program for inclusion in the Final EIR. c. Screencheck Final EIR lSA will prepare a Screencheck Final EIR that includes the Draft EIR, Response to Comments, findings and facts, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Mitigation Monitoring Program for City review and comment. Output: Prepare a Screencheck Final EIR for Agency review - 1 reproducible & 5 bound copies. d. Administrative EIR The Screencheck Final EIR will be revised per Agency staff comments and complied into a Final EIR prior to public hearings on the project and EIR. Output: Planning and environmental findings needed for Planning Commission and City Council actions on the Project (50 copies of Final EIR, 1 camera ready copy, and 1 electronic copy). Task 6: Meetinf{s & Public Hearinf{S 5.1 Meetings and Public Hearings LSA will attend up to six meetings with Agency staff in addition to those specifically included in the preceding scope of work. LSA will also attend up to three (3) Environmental Review Committee meetings, one (1) public scoping meeting, and five (5) public hearings before the Planning Commission and Mayor and Common Council. Hearings will include a power point presentation or presentation boards/hand outs on the EIR and project TIA. Output: LSA attendance and participation in meeting with Agency staff and at project public hearings. Task 7: Project Administration 7.1 Maintain Close Contact with Agenry Staff LSA will maintain continuous liaison with the Agency, and will participate in regular meetings to monitor progress and receive input. These meetings will also be used as project management tools to keep staff and City decision makers informed. Up to five (5) such liaison meetings will be held on a per meeting basis. Output: Ongoing coordination between consultant and Agency staff to ensure the smooth functioning of the EIR program. PROJECT COSTS AND SCHEDULE Project Costs Following is a table outlining our proposed costs for the EIR and CMP TIA and Tri-City Traffic Study. Included in the table are costs for each task and subtask proposed in our scope of work. Estimated costs for reimbursable expenses are provided. Hourly rates for LSA staff are as follows. Princivals Lloyd Zola Other Principals $130 $100-$165 AssociateslProiect Manafers Lynn Calvert-Hayes Kevin Fincher Tony Chung Deborah Gray Other Associates/Project Managers $95 $100 $125 $60 $65-$125 $45-$80 $40-$65 $25-$50 $65 $70 $50 Principal Investigator/Project Scientist Environmental Analysts/Planners Research Assistant/Technician Graphics Word Processing Office Assistant Schedule The schedule is provided in graphic form for all tasks identified in the scope of work. Insurance A copy of LSA's Insurance Certificate is contained in Appendix B. LSA's Federal Employer 10 Number is 94- 2341614. Affirmative Action Policy LSA is a 100 percent employee owned company. Women comprise 45 percent of the company and minorities comprise18 percent as of the company's last census. A copy of our affirmative action policy is contained in Appendix C. LSA Associates, Inc. .8- November 22, 1999 San Bernardino Economic Development Agenry CDC 2000-12 Power Center Development EIR Project Costs by Task Task 1 Project Initiation 1.1 Project Kick-Off Meeting Reimbursables $340 $20 Subtotal $360 Task 2 NOP/Initial Study 2.1 Notice of Preparationllnitial Study Printing Mailing/Distribution Reimbursables $6,000 $200 $200 $200 2.2 Scoping Meeting $900 Subtotal $7,500 Task 3 CMP/TIA 3.1 CMPITIA Report Reimbursables $17,910 $2,000 $19,910 Subtotal Task 4 Tri-City Traffic Study 4.1 Traffic Report Reimbursables $22,830 $500 Subtotal $23,330 Task 5 Environmental Impact Report 5.1 Technical Studies Air Quality Study Historic Resources $5,000 $6,500 Subtotal $11 ,500 5.2 Screencheck Draft EIR Reimbursables Printing MaillDistribution Subtotal $20,000 $300 $750 $100 $21,150 5.3 Draft EIR Reimbursables Printing MailinglDistribution $3,360 $100 $2,200 $700 Subtotal $6,360 5.4 Final EIR Response to Comments Mitigation Monitoring Program Screencheck Final EIR Administrative Record Final EIR $4,400 $2,420 $3,720 $1,000 Reimbursables Printing Mail/Distribution $100 $3,000 $200 Subtotal $14,840 Task 6 Public Hearings 6.1 Environmental Review Committee 6.2 Planning Commission 6.3 Common Council $360 $1,020 $1,020 Reimbursables $100 $2,500 Subtotal 7.0 Project Administration 7.1 Maintain Close Contact with Agency Reimbursables $1,000 $50 Subtotal $1,050 PROGRAM TOTAL $108,500 LSA Associates, Inc. - 9- November 22, 1999 CDC 2000-12. u E '" ~ 1ii .0 g '" '" '" "' -' '" '" ~~ ]jer> ~ ;:: '" . "' '" ~~ <:- ,,- .., j1J ... CI> ~l J :; ..., r ~ CI> s: u CluJ Ul II: W C CI> E ~ ~ Q. <: '" 0 tj E Gi ~ E > - U"" ::E " CI> "' c ! --ru I I I: CI> U :;; ru ~ 0 D.. ~ ~ ., ~ a: '" .2 '" '" :is <: " '" ll. "' ~ ." ~ ~ ." 5 <: I u. u. ." u. 5 0 ." 5 ." U. " " ::; ::E ~ ~ .... .... ::; ::; :;: en en en ~ ~ 0 0 .. en 0 ~ 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 8 en ~ en ~ Q 5; $ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "' "' ~ i;j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i;j S 51 i;j i;j '" ~ iO ~ ~ '" ." ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;, "' "' " "' ;:: " 5 ." U. " " ~ " <: " " ~ ." " " ." ~ " ~ ~ " .c: " " ~ 1> .f; ." " " 0 ~ ." ." .... .... " .... 0 0 .... " ~ .c: .c: ~ " .... " " .c: .... .c: .c: " ~ ~ .c: .c: ::; ::; :;: " ~ .... ::E ::; .... .... .... :;: .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ::; :;: .... .... ~ ~ " '" " ~ "' '" -' '" " <: 0 '" ii 0 '" .~ ,., " ~ ll. >= " '" '" -;;; 1ii C. ." l'l 0:: " 0 ,., ., > E ,;, <: = Z '" ~ UJ 0 ... " '" E >. ." '" 0 '" '" a: tl ,; E <: E .0 ." ~ >= E ." " ll. " 1; >= '" ,., ~ ,., iii a: '0 0 0 g 0 " '" 0 Iii ll. '" ., >= ." ." 0 iii ." tl 0 0 ~ " ., " " " " tl " en .E Z ll. " ~ ~ " ,., 0 ll. 0 ~ " tl .. 0.. ~ Z ~ Iii ~ 0 " S! " ;; >. 0 ti 0 e 0 Iii ,., ." ,., '" "' ~ ~ ::; .. ~ 0 " ~ .2 ~ 0 ." >. z ~ " ." " " ~ " ., .in 0 ::; ~ " :s ." ::; ~ "' e 0 " " Iii !l a: 1; '0 z " '" " '" ~ '" E N li " '0 if 1ii ., 0 -E a: Iii " ~ '" ~ liS Iii " " .. " " ~ .E E .. E '" ~ Iii '" ~ ." " ~ 0 0 : ~ ~ " " ~ 0. ~ l! ~ 0 0 " " a: a: g- a: .. "iii E 0 ~ E " ~ " ., ~ "iii e ~ " -" ., ~ " .15. '" t ., Ii: .... ., " 10 ., W .2 iii :z: E 0 tl ~ " Iii :s ~ ., 0 ~ ~ >- ~ I ~ " <I> <I> ::E <I> tl ." D ~ ~ " a: E " " ~ "' ct .. a: ., 0 a: ii: "' a: 0 :is a: u. .!! E '" " E "- <I> ii a: "' '" '" " '" ~ e ,., e i';' ~ e i';' e e e e i';' <I> ll. e e e :c " " ~2 13 E '" " <I> .2 .2 ::; '" " d'l >= '" '" a: '" '" '" ." '" '" '" e .2 (; ~ " " '" " '" " iii " a: " 0 .. 0.. "e- E 0. <I> ., :is :is 0 0. " ., " "iii ~ 0. <I> 0. 0. 0. 0. <I> "iii 0. 0. 0. 0.. ., " ,., Z z_ .. e '" <I> " " '" e '" " '" " ... e '" e on e e e '" " iii e e e .. " '" '" .... ll. .. ll. '" a: ll. ll. .. ll. '" a: "' ii: .. ll. '" ll. .. ll. ll. ll. '" ii: 0 ll. ll. ll. .. UJ 0:: ::; ;; 1 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. li .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Q ........ .... .... .... .... ....