Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout21-Development Services ORiGINAL CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION From: James Funk, Director Dept: Development Services Subject: Authorization to establish a 4- Way Stop at the intersection of Belmont Avenue and Magnolia Avenue. Date: October 25, 2005 File: 13.IR1 MCC Date: November 7, 2005 Synopsis of Previous Council Action: None Recommended Motion: f/9/t---James Funk, Development Services Director Contact person: Tony Lugo, Civil Engineering Asst. Phone: 'iOR4 Supporting data attached: Staff Report, Map. Reso & Warrants Ward: 5 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: $ 1,700.00 Source: (Acct. No.) 001-402-5111 Acct. Description: Street Maintenance Finance: Council Notes: ~i~' J,O{l~- 373 Agenda Item NO.~ IJ/1jDS CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION ST AFF REPORT Subject: Authorization to establish a 4- W ay Stop at the intersection of Belmont A venue and Magnolia A venue. Background: Development Services staff received a request, via the Council Office, from the residents of the area surrounding the intersection of Belmont Avenue and Magnolia Avenue. The requestors feel that installation of a 4-way stop at this intersection will enhance traffic and school pedestrian safety in the area of this intersection. Both Belmont A venue and Magnolia A venue are classified as local residential streets within this area. Belmont Avenue carries approximately 1,800 vehicles per day and Magnolia Avenue carries approximately 1,200 vehicles per day at this intersection. Consequently, the request was evaluated in accordance with City's Administrative Policy for Stop Sign Installation. The requestors circulated a petition that was prepared by staff and signed by residents in the vicinity of the intersection. Traffic Engineering section staff evaluated the request. Pursuant to the evaluation, staff has determined that this intersection meets Warrant "B" of the Administrative Policy (see attachment). This warrant is satisfied when sixty (60%) percent of the residents located within six-hundred (600) feet of the proposed stop signs, sign a petition agreeing to their installation and that at least two other criteria are met. In this case, criteria B-1 and B-ll are met. Part B-1 of the warrant is met when a school is located within six hundred (600) feet of the intersection and the intersection is on the suggested route to school. In this case, Caesar Chavez Middle School is located on the southwest corner of the intersection. Part B-ll is met when the vehicle volume entering the intersection exceeds 600 vehicles during anyone-hour period. In this case, the vehicle volume entering the intersection is 752 vehicles between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 a.m. Since this intersection meets Warrant "B" of the Administrative Policy for Installation of Stop Signs, staff recommends the installation of a 4-way stop at the intersection of Belmont A venue and Magnolia Avenue. Financial Impact: The estimated cost of $1,700.00 for installing the new stop signs will come from Account No. 001- 402-5111 (Street Maintenance). Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. 2 Belmont Avenue At Magnolia Avenue Authorization to Declare "Through Highway" o Location of Proposed 4-way stop , /,!{ \~'~,. '/ " wi ", "'" V -1 ' ,."i'<~, '- ! '~-........ ,:~t l)^ A.J...../ .~ ,<'u ~/ /~'I ~;~ /~'" Ii.... ..,./~l' "~<"I /~ U 4/1--,(N-,. ,iff " ''..,." '", /)1( ."'" /~) -'" .::". / '~~~ ';;//j> ~'-._. "'=t /',__~-; -.. ~l ~(l ~,/' /' c> r~- 0. . ~ '" / ""~.,,')/, ':: Q '"' ; ~/,(o ; :%;1.Rf't. ;>'f,~ ';:' I "~/ ""! S f 1:1.0 !"'~ '''~- Y;:. I" ~:'; w/ 1" ,'. Il?- ! IY '~-hi /' .Ji' <1;.';. ". <lI>+,.I::<Ii'M...... ""i I(/) i ~h \' h ,~ ", p. .go-: ~~"''{)iVr , /"'!~4#'J';: . :" '" ~. ,.iF L" ! "'1"~"j BE/lN4 I!'! ttJN.~Y::' is, ..~ $;Y B~RN~~~f~?O/1 ", . ~~ ~~~! ~~<iOSI / ,.,. iff; IY "'~':>' Ql';'" ;"" ~., ~ ~ 0'/ '~y(p.::.'~-z~ / 1;'..-----~ .:; 0 ..... ~ 4;/ 'I..:, ".. / "-"'" ~ ~ Cj/ !~,,; li'o; ~Y;:'" 6'1;; tic I" '" /. ~'~ IY "r.,,~ ~/ ~'~ /i~l?/ t; J',y <'+ '~(""I4(J ,II Ii'O<i i g' '$ ~ '~~qD/ l' #:~]lYcf"h/i%!3,'c i. '. Jij/IY Sr' <7't] .' .. Ifr,..4,.'" .,it; ~/'4t'1ib """ " , '-'It; St~' <#;111 Ii'O ""'/ .::". / ij/ i',~llt:l" (/i:( ~;" ","/~'; "<, IY.",- S7 'lY47] 0'"'("4> "'" ~! <:;' , ~ "'!S" " <'^'^ /,.41' "f f:J /~OS~ ;YN~I i.>" "'< ... 4" i' . "<""" V <,IY .....,~- ~, City of San Bernardino WARRANTS FOR STOP SIGN INSTAllATION Belmont Avenue at Magnolia Avenue 2-Way Stop A.A. lugo location Existing Control Prepared by/Date POLICY Stop sign may be warranted at an intersection where any of the following warrants A-1, A-2, B or C are met All 3 conditions listed to the right must be met to satisfy warrant A-1.3 A.1 STATE WARRANTS FOR MULTI.WAY STOP CONTROL Warrant is satisfied if any of the following criteria are met REQUIREMENTS y N CRITERIA A-1.1 Traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, as interim measure until signal is installed A-1.2 A1.3 Combined veh~'c1e d pede . volume on minor street during the same 8 hours averag 0+ Itlhr And Dela t . r street vehicles during the maximum hour of the same 8 hours averages 30 s 85th percentile approach speed exceeds 40 mph (64 km/h), min. vehicular volume warrant is 70% of the above requirements A.1: STATE WARRANT FOR MULTI.WAY STOP CONTROL SATISFIED? CRITERIA A.2 STATE WARRANTS FOR TWO/ONE.WAY STOP CONTROL Warrant is satisfied if any of the following criteria are met REQUIREMENTS REMARKS A-2.1 On the less important road at its intersection with a main road where accident history justifies the placement of Stop signs. A-2.2 A-2.3 A-2.4 A-2.5 e safe speed is less than 10 mph (16 km/h). A-2.6 A-2.7 intersections where a combination of high speed, restricted view and accident records indicates a need for control by the Stop sign. A.2: ATE WARRANT FOR TWO/ONE.WAY STOP CONTROL SATISFIED? 8.PETITION WARRANTS FOR LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS 8Y CITY ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY Use only at residential street intersections excluding arterials, collectors, local collectors, where ADT do not exceed 2,500 Vehicles on each Intersecting Street Warrant 8 is satisfied if 8 and any two of the criteria 8.1 through 8.10 are met CRITERIA REQUIREMENTS REMARKS y N Is there a petition signed by more than 60% of property owners/residents located B. within 600 feet of proposed stop sign; AND TWO OF THE FOLLOW/NG CRITERIA X ARE MET. B-1. School located within 600 feet of intersection and intersection is on "suggested X route to school". B-2. Streets leading to intersection do not intersect at right angles. B-3. One or more streets leading to intersection is at a grade of more than 5%. Where one or more of the approaches, requiring the stop sign(s), does not meet the B-4. required minimum sight distance, due to permanent view obstruction or roadway geometry. B-5. Intersection is abutting a park, major shopping center or other high pedestrian use facility. B-6. Pedestrian volume greater than 480 units/hr in any B hour period. The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume crossing the major street exceeds 125 B-7. units during at least two hours where at least 200 vehicles enter the intersection each hour from aI/ approaches during any B-hour period. B-B. One approach of the intersection is a driveway serving a commercial area. B-9. One approach of the intersection is a driveway servicing a residential property. Pass through (non-local traffic) on the subject residential street exceeds 50 vehicles B-lO. per hour and exceeds 40% of the vehicle traffic during the hours from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. on a non-holiday Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday, with local traffic defined as vehicles traversing/commuting through the neighborhood. B-11. The vehicle volume entering the intersection from aI/ approaches exceeds 600 units X during any hour at an intersection. Less than desirable pedestrian or vehicular conditions not listed above or contained B-12. in the criteria of the State of Califomia for the instal/ation of Stop signs exist at the intersection (as determined/verified by the City's licensed Traffic Engineer). 8: IS 8 PLUS ANY TWO OF THE CRITERIA 8.1 THROUGH 8.12 SATISFIED? >( C. ACCIDENTS AND SAFETY WARRANTS FOR LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS BY CITY ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY Use Only at Residential Street Intersections Where ADT do not exceed 2,500 Vehicles on each Inte~treet Warrant C is satisfied if C and any two conditions C.1 through C-10 are met CRITERIA REQUIREMENTS REMAjiKS' Y N Three or more accidents in a 12 month period susceptible to correction by stop / c. signs; or at least 200 vehicles enter the intersection each hour from all approaches during any consecutive 8 hour period; AND TWO OF THE FOLLOWING CRI7 ARE MET. C-1. School located within 600 feet of intersection and intersection is o?gested route to school". C-2. Streets leading to intersection do not intersect at right angles/ C-J One or more streets leading to intersection is at grade gr;;;ore than 5%. Where one or more of the approaches, requiring ~ sign(s), does not meet the C-4. required minimum sight distance, due to pew t view obstruction or roadway geometry. ^ 1/ C-5. Intersection is abutting a park, m :ic r~ing center or other high pedestrian use facility. C-6. Pedestrian volume is greate~ ~t1 'P '4 0 units/hr in the 8-hour period. The combined vehicular an fp! ldestrian volume crossing the major street exceeds 125 C-7. units during at least two ho Ii where at least 200 vehicles enter the intersection each hour from all approachey6uring any 8-hour period. C-8. One approa h c6hyfntersection is a driveway serving a commercial area. C-9. One ap A cgd'the intersection is a driveway servicing a residential properly. Pass th r1f. gh (non-local traffic) on the subject residential street exceeds 50 vehicles C-10. ~ and 40% of the vehicle traffic during the hours from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. a 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. on a non-holiday Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday, with cal traffic defined as vehicles traversing/commuting through the neighborhood. C-11. / The vehicle volume entering the intersection from all approaches exceeds 600 units during any hour at an intersection. :/ Less than desirable pedestrian or vehicular conditions not listed above or contained in the criteria of the State of California for the installation of stop signs exist at the intersection (as determined/verified by the City's licensed Traffic Engineer). C: ~ C PLUS ANY TWO CRITERIA C-1 THROUGH C.10 SATISFIED? / DID THIS LOCATION MEET ANY OF THE WARRANTS A.1, A.2, B OR C ABOVE? IF YES, CHECK WARRANTS MET D D 0 D A-1 A-2 B C IF ANY OF THE WARRANTS ARE MET, A STOP SIGN SHOULD BE INSTALLED AFTER APPROVAL BY MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL AND THE INTERSETION IS DESIGNATED A "STOP INTERSECTION" BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL. Good traffic engineering judgment must be exercised before installing stop signs at certain intersections (whether it meets the warrants or not) ** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - NOT A PUBLIC DOCUMENT ** RESOLUTION AGENDA ITEM TRACKING FORM Meeting D,te ("'te A-cr'dd ~ ,] /0<) Item' J. I Vote: Ayes Nays Jror-3-73 Abstain Resolution # Absent Note on Resolution of attachment stored separately: 0 By: Change to motion to amend original documents 0 Companion Resolutions NulI/Void After: days / Resolution # On Attachments: 0 PUBLISH 0 POST D?CORD W/COUNTY 0 I \/~"O~ _ i ~ l\)'C'S/_~ I \- I 0,- O~ Date Sent to Mayor: Date of Mayor's Signature: Date ofClerklCDC Signature: Date Memo/Letter Sent for Signature: 1 st Reminder Letter Sent: Date Returned: 2nd Reminder Letter Sent: Reso. Log Updated: ~ Seal Impressed: 6'/ Reso. # on Staff Report .0' Not Returned: 0 ./ Request for Council Action & Staff Report Attached: Updated Prior Resolutions (Other Than Below): Updated CITY Personnel Folders (6413, 6429, 6433, 10584, 10585, 12634): Updated CDC Personnel Folders (5557\ Updated Traffic Folders (3985, 823@2-389): Copies Distributed to: Animal Control 0 City Administrator City Attorney Code Compliance Development Others: Yes Yes Yes No By_ No/ By_ NO~ By_ No Rv -.- _-..I No / By = Yes / Yes~ EDA 0 Information Services 0 Facilities ~ Parks & Recreation 0 Finance Police Department 0 Fire Department Public Services 0 Water Department 0 Notes: I Ready to File: V / Date: i~ \ \.t C) Revised 12/18/03