HomeMy WebLinkAbout10-City AdministratorORIGINAL
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO -REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
From: Fred Wilson, City Administrator Subject: Resolution authorizing
execution of a Supplemental Settlement
Dept: City Administrator's Office Agreement relating to criminal justice
administrative fees with the County of
Date: October 18, 2005 San Bernardino
M/CC Meeting Date: November 7, 2005
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
May 21, 2001 -Resolution 2001-109 authorized execution of a Supplemental
Settlement Agreement with the County of San Bernardino freezing
Booking Fees at $159.72.
Recommended Motion:
Adopt resolution.
Contact person: .lan_. ~~a~ges Phone: 5122
Supporting data attached: S_R_, reso & Agmt. Ward:
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: No cost for this action.
Source:
Finance:
Council Notes:
Agenda Item No. 1~1-
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO -REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Staff Report
Subject:
Resolution of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino authorizing
execution of Supplemental Settlement Agreement between the City of San Bernardino and the
County of San Bernardino relating to criminal justice administrative fees.
Background:
The State legislature authorized counties to charge cities booking fees with the passage of Senate
Bill 2557 in 1991. The City of San Bernardino has been charged booking fees by the County of
San Bernardino since 1991.
In 1995 the City of San Bernardino entered into a booking fee settlement agreement with the
County in the case of City of Adelanto v. County of San Bernardino. The Settlement Agreement
called for an annual fee increase based upon the local area Consumer Price Index to be
implemented on February 11 `" of each year through the year 2000. The cities and the County
negotiated to work out an agreement pertaining to the "actual cost" calculation of the booking
fees that was set to begin on February 11, 2001, under the original Settlement Agreement.
On May 21, 2001, Council authorized execution of a Supplemental Settlement Agreement,
which froze booking fees at $159.72 for each qualifying booking. The freeze was subject to a
reopener by the County if its actual costs increased by 25% or more, and a reopener by the cities
if the State reimbursement for booking fees was reduced by 25% or more.
In November 2004 Senate Bill 1002 was enacted into law. This legislation amended California
Government Code Section 29550 to reduce the amount of booking fees that can be collected by
counties beginning in FY 2005-06 to fees no greater than one-half of actual administrative costs,
including overhead costs, and in no event greater than the fee charged by a county to cities on
January 1, 2004. Effective FY 2005-06, this legislation also repealed all state reimbursement to
cities for payments to counties for booking fees.
Based upon the legislative changes, the County performed an updated cost study in March of
2005, taking into account increased salary and benefit costs and the dramatic rise in the number
of bookings compared with previous years. Based on the results of this study, the County
calculated that current costs per booking were $192.92. This would have allowed the County to
impose a new fee of $96.46 for each booking, which represents one-half of the County's newly
calculated cost per booking. However, instead of imposing this permissible fee, representatives
of the cities and county met informally and agreed upon a booking fee of $79.85 to be charged
by the County to cities for a period of three years. This fee was enacted by the County Board of
Supervisors on May 17, 2005 to take effect on July 1, 2005 and ending on June 30, 2008. At that
time the Board of Supervisors also directed the County Administrative Officer and County
Counsel to prepare agreements with cities for later approval, and to continue meeting with a
committee of city managers to define a methodology for calculation of booking fees, and to
establish a process to adjust fees after expiration of the three-year period in which fees are to be
imposed at a rate of $79.86 per booking or other processing.
Financial Impact:
Booking fees were budgeted at $340,000 for FY 2005/2006 in Account No. 001-228-5178. This
amount was derived using the lower $79.85 cost per estimated number of qualified bookings.
Recommendation:
Adopt Resolution.
~~ D
1 p
RESOLUTION NO.
2
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY
3 OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUPPLEMENTAL
4 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND
THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO RELATING TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE
5 ADMINISTRATIVE FEES.
6
7 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
8 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
9 SECTION 1. Tliat the Mayor of the City of San Bernardino is hereby authorized to
10 execute a Supplemental Settlement Agreement relating to Criminal Justice Administrative Fees
11 v, ith the County of San Bernardino which freezes the booking fee at $79.86 for each qualifying
12
booking from July 1, 200 through June 30, 2008, a copy of which is attached hereto marked
13
Exhibit "A" and incorporated herein by reference as fully as though set forth at length.
14
15 SECTION 2. The term of this Agreement is from July 1, 200 through June 30, 2008;
16 therefore. anv action taken beri~een July 1, 200, and the date that this Agreement is executed
17 is hereby ratitled.
1$ SECTION 3. The authorization granted herewider shall expire and be void and of no
19 further effect if the agreement is not executed by both parties and returned to the office of City
20
C-erk within one hundred twenty (120) days following effective date of the resolution.
21
///
22
23 ///
24 ///
25 ///
26 ///
27 ///
28
~n . I D
~ ~ /~/~
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR ANll COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITE'
OF SAN BERNARllINO AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUPPLEMENTAL
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AND
THE COUNT' OF SAN BERNARDINO RELATING TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE
ADMINISTRATIVE FEES.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor
and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting thereof, held
on the day of
Council Members:
ESTRADA
LnNG~'ILLE
MCG1?vNIS
DERRY'
KELLEI"
.1OHNSON
MCCA\1MACK
2005, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
Rachel G. Clark, City Clerk
?00~.
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day of
Judith Valles, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Approved as to
Form and legal content:
26
27
28
JAMES F. PENMAN.
City Attorney
B
Exhibit "A"
SUPPLEMENTAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RELATING
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
osT zsaozt
Booking Fees S
TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
This Supplemental Settlement Agreement (hereinafter referred to as
"Agreement") is entered into between the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, for itself,
its employees, servants, representatives, officers, officials, agents and departments
(hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY") and the CITY OF ADELANTO, TOWN OF
~ APPLE VALLEY, CITY OF BARSTOW, CITY OF BIG BEAR LAKE, CITY OF CHINO,
CITY OF CHINO HILLS, CITY OF COLTON, CITY OF FONTANA, CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE, CITY OF HESPERIA, CITY OF HIGHLAND, CITY OF LOMA LINDA, CITY
~ OF MONTCLAIR, CITY OF NEEDLES, CITY OF ONTARIO, CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CITY OF REDLANDS, CITY OF RIALTO, CITY OF SAN
~ BERNARDINO, CITY OF TWENTYNINE PALMS, CITY OF UPLAND, CITY OF
VICTORVILLE, CITY OF YUCAIPA, and the TOWN OF YUCCA VALLEY (hereinafter
referred to as "CITIES AND TOWNS"). COUNTY and CITIES AND TOWNS are
collectively referred to herein as the "Parties". The Parties agree as follows:
All CITIES AND TOWNS other than the CITY OF NEEDLES have previously
entered into "the Settlement Agreement" with COUNTY concerning payment of booking
and processing fees (criminal justice administrative fees pursuant to California
Government Code section 29550, hereinafter referred to as "booking fees"), that was
incorporated as part of the judgment entered by the Sacramento County Superior Court
in City of Adelanto, et al., v. County of San Bernardino, Judicial Council Coordination
Proceedin~No. 2584. The CITY OF NEEDLES and COUNTY have previously entered
into "the separate Settlement Agreement" concerning payment of booking fees .
References to "Settlement Agreements" in this Agreement shall mean the agreements
identified in the preceding two sentences. These Settlement Agreements provided for
~ the COUNTY to charge actual costs for booking fees after February 10, 2001.
Thereafter, almost all of the parties comprising the CITIES AND TOWNS entered into a
supplemental settlement agreement with COUNTY for booking fees to be paid at the
Settlement Agreement
Page 1
rate of $159.72 for each booking and other processing (hereinafter referred to as
2
3
4
5
6
7,
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DST 264021
Booking Fees
~ "booking"), so long as CITIES AND TOWNS agreed to apply all realized savings to
expenditures for public safety, as referred to in California Government Code section
29950 and defined in the "ORDER" identified in the Settlement Agreements, performed
by the COUNTY in connection with arrests made within the jurisdictional boundaries of
~ CITIES AND TOWNS after February 10, 2001. This rate was to remain in effect unless
COUNTY's actual costs incurred for booking, as referred to in California Government
Code section 29550, and as defined by "the ORDER" identified in the Settlement
Agreements, increased by twenty-five percent (25%) or more over the COUNTY's
actual costs as of February 10, 2001, or in the event that the State of California's
reimbursement for booking fees incurred by the CITIES AND TOWNS within the County
of San Bernardino was reduced by twenty-five (25%) or more, in which alternative
event a new booking fee was to be negotiated by COUNTY and CITIES AND TOWNS.
In November of 2004 Senate Bill 1102 was enacted into law. This legislation
~ amended California Government Code section 29550 to reduce the amount of booking
fees that can be collected by counties beginning in Fiscal Year (FY) 2005-06 to fees no
greater than one-half of actual administrative costs, including overhead costs permitted
according to federal Circular A87 standards, and in no event greater than the fee
charged by a county to cities on January 1, 2004. Effective FY 2005-06, this legislation
also repealed all state reimbursement to cities for payments to counties for booking
fees.
Based on the above legislative changes, in March of 2005 the COUNTY
performed an updated cost study employing the same methodology that was used wher
earlier agreements between CITIES AND TOWNS and COUNTY were executed, and
taking into account increased salary and benefit costs, and a dramatic rise in the
number of bookings compared with previous years. Based on the results of this study,
COUNTY calculated that current costs per booking were $192.92, which would have
allowed COUNTY to impose a new fee for each booking in the amount of $96.46, which
Settlement Agreement
Page 2
represents one-half of the County's newly calculated cost per booking.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DST 264021
Booking Fees
But, instead of imposing such a permissible fee, representatives of CITIES AND
TOWNS and COUNTY met informally and agreed upon a booking fee to be charged by
COUNTY to CITIES AND TOWNS at the rate of $79.86 per booking for a period of
years. This fee was enacted by the COUNTY Board of Supervisors on May 17, 2005 to
~ take effect on July 1, 2005, at which time the Board of Supervisors also directed the
County Administrative Officer and County Counsel to prepare agreements with CITIES
AND TOWNS for later approval, and to continue meeting with city managers or other
representatives of CITIES AND TOWNS to define a methodology for calculation of
booking fees, and to establish a process to adjust the fees after expiration of the three-
yearperiod in which the fees are to be imposed at the rate of $79.86 per booking.
CITIES AND TOWNS and COUNTY agree that the booking fee to be charged by
~ COUNTY to CITIES AND TOWNS shall be at the rate of $79.86 per booking for a
period of three years beginning July 1, 2005 and ending on June 30, 2008.
CITIES AND TOWNS and COUNTY also agree that they shall meet with each
other from time to time to negotiate and recommend to the Parties by July 1, 2006 a
defined methodology for calculation of booking fees, and a process to adjust future
booking fees once the present enacted fee expires on June 30, 2008.
On or before December 1, 2005, COUNTY agrees to provide to CITIES AND
TOWNS a detailed written explanation of COUNTY's methodology and astep-by-step
explanation of the process used for calculating booking fees for CITIES AND TOWNS.
Within sixty (60) days of receipt of COUNTY's methodology and process used to
calculate booking fees, any one or more of CITIES AND TOWNS shall provide to all
other Parties a detailed written explanation of any alternative methodology and/or
process proposed by any one or more of CITIES AND TOWNS.
Following these exchanges of information, CITIES AND TOWNS and COUNTY
shall meet on or before July 1, 2006 for the purposes of negotiating and
recommending to the Parties a methodology to calculate booking fees, and a process to
Settlement Agreement
Page 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9~
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DST 264021
Booking Fees S
adjust the fees after expiration of the three-year period in which fees are to be imposed
~ at the rate of $79.86 per booking. Any such recommendations shall be included in a
proposed amendment to this Agreement and transmitted to each of the Parties for their
~ approval.
If, thereafter, COUNTY and CITIES AND TOWNS mutually agree upon a defined
methodology for calculation of booking fees, as well as a fee adjustment process and
implementation, the agreed upon methodology and process shall be implemented within
thirty (30) days of the date of the executed amendment to this agreement or other
agreement as the Parties deem appropriate.
If, instead, no agreement is reached by COUNTY and CITIES AND TOWNS on
either the methodology to be used to calculate booking fees, or on a process to adjust
booking fees in the future, or on both methodology and process, on or before January 1,
2008, an impasse shall be declared (unless COUNTY and CITIES AND TOWNS agree
on a further extension of time to attempt to reach agreement on these issues). In such
an event, after expiration of the three-year period in which fees are to be imposed at the
rate of $79.86 per booking, COUNTY may then employ a methodology for calculation
of booking fees and a process to adjust fees in the future as are allowable by law,
which methodology and process any one or more of CITIES AND TOWNS shall be free
to challenge in the Superior Court of the State of California if they so desire. If that
occurs, the final decision of the highest reviewing court shall thereafter be binding on
the Parties concerning methodology for calculation of booking fees and the process to
adjust such fees until such time as the law changes with respect thereto.
All provisions contained in judgments entered in City of Adelanfo, et al. v. County
~ of San Bernardino, Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 2584, and the original
Settlement Agreements and supplemental settlement agreements between the Parties
relating to booking fees that are not in direct conflict with the terms of this supplemental
settlement agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties are freely and voluntarily entering into and
Settlement Agreement
Page 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DST 264021
Booking Fees
signing this Agreement on the respective dates indicated below.
Approved as to form:
Dated: , 2005 RONALD D. REITZ
COUNTY COUNSEL
By:
DENNIS TILTON
Deputy County Counsel
Attorneys for COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Dated: , 2005 RICHARDS WATSON GERSHON
By:
MARGUERITE P. BATTERSBY
Dated: , 2005 COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
By:
BILL POSTMUS
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
Dated: , 2005 CITY OF ADELANTO
By:
Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY OF ADELANTO --
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
[mayors or city managers of all other cities and towns signing in counterpart
Page 5
Settlement Agreement
1'
2
3~
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DST 264021
Booking Fees
Dated: , 2005 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
By:
ATTEST:
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Rachel G. Clark, City Clerk
Judith Valles, Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL CONTENT:
James F. Penman, City Attorney
.Settlement Agreement 2 w sig pg
Page 23
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DST 264021
Booking Fees Su{
SUPPLEMENTAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT RELATING
TO CRIMINAL JUSTICE ADMINISTRATIVE FEES
This Supplemental Settlement Agreement (hereinafter referred to as
"Agreement") is entered into between the COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, for itself,
its employees, servants, representatives, officers, officials, agents and departments
(hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY") and the CITY OF ADELANTO, TOWN OF
APPLE VALLEY, CITY OF BARSTOW, CITY OF BIG BEAR LAKE, CITY OF CHINO,
CITY OF CHINO HILLS, CITY OF COLTON, CITY OF FONTANA, CITY OF GRAND
TERRACE, CITY OF HESPERIA, CITY OF HIGHLAND, CITY OF LOMA LINDA, CITY
OF MONTCLAIR, CITY OF NEEDLES, CITY OF ONTARIO, CITY OF RANCHO
CUCAMONGA, CITY OF REDLANDS, CITY OF RIALTO, CITY OF SAN
BERNARDINO, CITY OF TWENTYNINE PALMS, CITY OF UPLAND, CITY OF
VICTORVILLE, CITY OF YUCAIPA, and the TOWN OF YUCCA VALLEY (hereinafter
referred to as "CITIES AND TOWNS"). COUNTY and CITIES AND TOWNS are
collectively referred to herein as the "Parties". The Parties agree as follows:
All CITIES AND TOWNS other than the CITY OF NEEDLES have previously
entered into "the Settlement Agreement" with COUNTY concerning payment of booking
and processing fees (criminal justice administrative fees pursuant to California
Government Code section 29550, hereinafter referred to as "booking fees"), that was
incorporated as part of the judgment entered by the Sacramento County Superior Court
in City of Adelanto et al. v. County of San Bernardino, Judicial Council Coordination
Proceeding No. 2584. The CITY OF NEEDLES and COUNTY have previously entered
into "the separate Settlement Agreement" concerning payment of booking fees .
References to "Settlement Agreements" in this Agreement shall mean the agreements
identified in the preceding two sentences. These Settlement Agreements provided for
the COUNTY to charge actual costs for booking fees after February 10, 2001.
Thereafter, almost all of the parties comprising the CITIES AND TOWNS entered into a
supplemental settlement agreement with COUNTY for booking fees to be paid at the fla
Settlement Agreement
Page 1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8I
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
-- 22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DST 264021
Booking Fees S
rate of $159.72 for each booking and other processing (hereinafter referred to as
"booking"), so long as CITIES AND TOWNS agreed to apply all realized savings to
expenditures for public safety, as referred to in California Government Code section
~ 29950 and defined in the "ORDER" identified in the Settlement Agreements, performed
by the COUNTY in connection with arrests made within the jurisdictional boundaries of
~ CITIES AND TOWNS after February 10, 2001. This rate was to remain in effect unless
COUNTY's actual costs incurred for booking, as referred to in California Government
Code section 29550, and as defined by "the ORDER" identified in the Settlement
Agreements, increased by twenty-five percent (25%) or more over the COUNTY's
actual costs as of February 10, 2001, or in the event that the State of California's
reimbursement for booking fees incurred by the CITIES AND TOWNS within the County
of San Bernardino was reduced by twenty-five (25%) or more, in which alternative
event a new booking fee was to be negotiated by COUNTY and CITIES AND TOWNS.
In November of 2004 Senate Bill 1102 was enacted into law. This legislation
amended California Government Code section 29550 to reduce the amount of booking
fees that can be collected by counties beginning in Fiscal Year (FY) 2005-06 to fees no
greater than one-half of actual administrative costs, including overhead costs permitted
according to federal Circular A87 standards, and in no event greater than the fee
charged by a county to cities on January 1, 2004. Effective FY 2005-06, this legislation
also repealed all state reimbursement to cities for payments to counties for booking
fees.
Based on the above legislative changes, in March of 2005 the COUNTY
performed an updated cost study employing the same methodology that was used whet
earlier agreements between CITIES AND TOWNS and COUNTY were executed, and
taking into account increased salary and benefit costs, and a dramatic rise in the
number of bookings compared with previous years. Based on the results of this study,
COUNTY calculated that current costs per booking were $192.92, which would have
allowed COUNTY to impose a new fee for each booking in the amount of $96.46, which
Settlement Agreement
Page 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
represents one-half of the County's newly calculated cost per booking.
But, instead of imposing'such a permissible fee, representatives of CITIES AND
TOWNS and COUNTY met informally and agreed upon a booking fee to be charged by
COUNTY to CITIES AND TOWNS at the rate of $79.86 per booking for a period of three
years. This fee was enacted by the COUNTY Board of Supervisors on May 17, 2005 to
take effect on July 1, 2005, at which time the Board of Supervisors also directed the
County Administrative Officer and County Counsel to prepare agreements with CITIES
AND TOWNS for later approval, and to continue meeting with city managers or other
representatives of CITIES AND TOWNS to define a methodology for calculation of
booking fees, and to establish a process to adjust the fees after expiration of the three-
yearperiod in which the fees are to be imposed at the rate of $79.86 per booking.
CITIES AND TOWNS and COUNTY agree that the booking fee to be charged by
COUNTY to CITIES AND TOWNS shall be at the rate of $79.86 per booking for a
period of three years beginning July 1, 2005 and ending on June 30, 2008.
CITIES AND TOWNS and COUNTY also agree that they shall meet with each
other from time to time to negotiate and recommend to the Parties by July 1, 2006 a
defined methodology for calculation of booking fees, and a process to adjust future
booking fees once the present enacted fee expires on June 30, 2008.
On or before December 1, 2005, COUNTY agrees to provide to CITIES AND
TOWNS a detailed written explanation of COUNTY's methodology and astep-by-step
explanation of the process used for calculating booking fees for CITIES AND TOWNS.
Within sixty (60) days of receipt of COUNTY's methodology and process used to
calculate booking fees, any one or more of CITIES AND TOWNS shall provide to all
other Parties a detailed written explanation of any alternative methodology and/or
process proposed by any one or more of CITIES AND TOWNS.
Following these exchanges of information, CITIES AND TOWNS and COUNTY
shall meet on or before July 1, 2006 for the purposes of negotiating and
recommending to the Parties a methodology to calculate booking fees, and a process
Page 3
DST 264021
Booking Fees
Settlement Agreement
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
adjust the fees after expiration of the three-year period in which fees are to be imposed
at the rate of $79.86 per booking. Any such recommendations shall be included in a
proposed amendment to this Agreement and transmitted to each of the Parties for their
~ approval.
If, thereafter, COUNTY and CITIES AND TOWNS mutually agree upon a defined
methodology for calculation of booking fees, as well as a fee adjustment process and
implementation, the agreed upon methodology and process shall be implemented within
thirty (30) days of the date of the executed amendment to this agreement or other
agreement as the Parties deem appropriate.
If, instead, no agreement is reached by COUNTY and CITIES AND TOWNS on
either the methodology to be used to calculate booking fees, or on a process to adjust
booking fees in the future, or on both methodology and process, on or before January 1,
2008, an impasse shall be declared (unless COUNTY and CITIES AND TOWNS agree
on a further extension of time to attempt to reach agreement on these issues). In such
an event, after expiration of the three-year period in which fees are to be imposed at the
rate of $79.86 per booking, COUNTY may then employ a methodology for calculation
of booking fees and a process to adjust fees in the future as are allowable by law,
which methodology and process any one or more of CITIES AND TOWNS shall be free
to challenge in the Superior Court of the State of California if they so desire. If that
occurs, the final decision of the highest reviewing court shall thereafter be binding on
the Parties concerning methodology for calculation of booking fees and the process to
adjust such fees until such time as the law changes with respect thereto. --
All provisions contained in judgments entered in City of Adelanto, et al. v. County
of San Bernardino, Judicial Council Coordination Proceeding No. 2584, and the original
Settlement Agreements and supplemental settlement agreements between the Parties
relating to booking fees that are not in direct conflict with the terms of this supplemental
settlement agreement shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties are freely and voluntarily entering into and
Page 4
DST 264021
Booking Fees
Settlement Agreement
1
2
3
4
5'
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DST 264021
Booking Fees
signing this Agreement on the respective dates indicated below.
Approved as to form:
Dated: , 2005 RONALD D. REITZ
COUNTY COUNSEL
Dated:
2005
Dated: , 2005
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF ADELANTO
2005
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
By:
DENNIS TILTON
Deputy County Counsel
Attorneys for COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
RICHARDS WATSON GERSHON
By:
MARGUERITE P. BATTERSBY
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
By:
BILL POSTMUS
Chairman, Board of Supervisors
CITY OF ADELANTO
By:
Mayor
City Attorney
[mayors or city managers of all other cities and towns signing in counterpart
Page 5
Settlement Agreement
1
2
3
4
5
6
7'
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
I
21
22 ',
23
24
25
26
27
28
DST 264021
Booking Fees
Dated: , 2005 TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY
By:
ATTEST:
TOWN OF APPLE VALLEY
Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Town Attorney
Settlement Agreement
Mayor
Page 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18'
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: , 2005 CITY OF BARSTOW
By:
ATTEST:
CITY OF BARSTOW
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Mayor
Page 7
DST 264021
Booking Fees Su . Settlement Agreement
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: , 2005 CITY OF BIG BEAR LAKE
By:
Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY OF BIG BEAR LAKE
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Page 8
DST 264021
Booking Fees
1. Settlement Agreement
1
2
3
4
5
6;
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF CHINO
City Clerk
2005
By:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
CITY OF CHINO
Mayor
Page 9
DST 264021
Booking Fees Su . Settlement Agreement
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DST 264021
Booking Fees
I Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF CHINO HILLS
2005 CITY OF CHINO HILLS
By:
Mayor
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Settlement Agreement
Page 10
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20 'i
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: . 2005 ~ CITY OF COLTON
By:
ATTEST:
CITY OF COLTON
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Mayor
Page 11
DST 264021
Booking Fees Su Settlement Agreement
1~
2
31
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 I
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF FONTANA
City Clerk
2005 CITY OF FONTANA
By:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Mayor
Page 12
DST 264021
Booking Fees Su SettVement Agreement
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
I
24 j
25
26
27
28
Dated: , 2005 CITY OF GRAND TERRANCE
By:
Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY OF GRAND TERRACE
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Page 13
DST 264021
Booking Fees
I. Settlement Agreement
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DST 264021
Booking Fees
~ Dated: , 2005 CITY OF HESPERIA
By:
ATTEST:
CITY OF HESPERIA
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Settlement Agreement
Mayor
Page 14
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18 ~
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DST 264021
Booking Fees
~ Dated: , 2005 CITY OF HIGHLAND
By:
(ATTEST:
~ CITY OF HIGHLAND
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Settlement Agreement
Mayor
Page 15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 ~
11
12
13
14
15
16
17 I
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DST 264021
Booking Fees S
I Dated:
2005
By:
'ATTEST:
CITY OF LOMA LINDA
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Settlement Agreement
CITY OF LOMA LINDA
Mayor
Page 16
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15'
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
~ Dated: , 2005 ~ CITY OF MONTCLAIR
By:
ATTEST:
CITY OF MONTCLAIR
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
DST 264021
Booking Fees Su .Settlement Agreement
Mayor
Page 17
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
~ Dated: , 2005
By:
(ATTEST:
I CITY OF NEEDLES
9
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
CITY OF NEEDLES
Mayor
Page 18
DST 264021
Booking Fees Su Settlement Agreement
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 I
28
Dated:
ATTEST:
CITY OF ONTARIO
City Clerk
2005 CITY OF ONTARIO
By:
Mayor
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Page 19
DST 264021
Booking Fees Su I
r. Settlement Agreement
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated:
. 2005 CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
By:
Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Page 20
DST 264021
Booking Fees Su{
Settlement Agreement
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DST 264021
Booking Fees S
~ Dated: , 2005 CITY OF REDLANDS
By:
ATTEST:
CITY OF REDLANDS
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Settlement Agreement
Mayor
Page 21
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 i
14'
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated:
2005 CITY OF RIALTO
By:
Mayor
ATTEST:
CITY OF RIALTO
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Page 22
DST 264021
Booking Fees
~. Settlement Agreement
1
2
3
41
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
1
18
19
20 ~,
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
DST 264021
Booking Fees
Dated:
ATTEST:
2005 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
By:
Judith Valles, Mayor
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Rachel G. Clark, City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL CONTENT:
%,Z-r.~, ~ ._. err .~
3 ~"~
F. Penman, City Attorney
r Settlement Agreement 2 w sig pg
Page 23
1
2
3
4
5
6
7'~,
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22I
23
24
25
26
27
28
I Dated: , 2005 CITY OF TWENTYNINE PALMS
By:
ATTEST:
CITY OF TWENTYNINE PALMS
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Mayor
Page 24
DST 264021
Booking Fees Su Settlement Agreement
1
2
3
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
~ Dated: , 2005
4
~ ATTEST:
CITY OF UPLAND
By:
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
CITY OF UPLAND
Mayor
Page 25
DST 264021
Booking Fees Su Settlement Agreement
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
~ Dated: , 2005 CITY OF VICTORVILLE
ay:
(ATTEST:
CITY OF VICTORVILLE
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Mayor
Page 26
osr zeaozi
Booking Fees Su Settlement Agreement
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
~ Dated: , 2005 CITY OF YUCAIPA
By.
'ATTEST:
CITY OF YUCAIPA
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
City Attorney
Mayor
Page 27
DST 264021
Booking Fees Su . Settlement Agreement
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11 '~
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
-- 22
23
24
25
26
27
28
~ Dated: , 2005 TOWN OF YUCCA VALLEY
By:
ATTEST:
TOWN OF YUCCA VALLEY
Town Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Town Attorney
Mayor
Page 28
DST 264021
Booking Fees Su .Settlement Agreement