HomeMy WebLinkAboutDEIR Ch 05_07_HWQ
5. Environmental Analysis
5.7 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
This section of the EI R evaluates the potential for implementation of both the General Plan Update and the
Arrowhead Springs Specific Plan to impact the hydrology and water quality conditions in the City of San
Bernardino and within the Arrowhead Springs Specific Plan area. Hydrology deals with the distribution and
circulation of water, both on land and underground. Water quality deals with the quality of surface and
groundwater. Surface water is water on the surface of the land and includes lakes, rivers, streams, and
creeks. Groundwater is water below the surface of the earth. Water supply and wastewater treatment issues
are addressed in Section 5.15, Utilities and Service Systems.
The methodology used to prepare this section of the EI R included a review of information on water quality,
flooding, seiche and dam inundation hazards, and regulatory background as well as the preliminary
Drainage Study of the Arrowhead Springs project prepared by Transtech, Inc. The complete Drainage Study
is available in Volume III, Appendix F ofthe EIR. Current website information and pertinent documents from
the City of San Bernardino as well as other appropriate agencies was also used in preparation ofthis section
including the Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River. These agencies include the Southern
California Association of Governments (SCAG), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Santa Ana
Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the City of San Bernardino Municipal Water District.
5.7.1
Environmental Setting
Regulatory Background
Safe Drinking Water Act
The Federal Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) provides regulations on drinking water quality in San
Bernardino. The SDWA gives the EPA the authority to set drinking water standards, such as the National
Primary Drinking Water regulations (NPDWRs or primary standards). The NPDWRs protect drinking water
quality by limiting the levels of specific contaminants that are known to occur or have the potential to occur in
water and can adversely affect public health. All public water systems that provide service to 25 or more
individuals are required to satisfy these legally enforceable standards. Water purveyors must monitor for
these contaminants on fixed schedules and report to the EPA when a Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL)
has been exceeded. MCL is the maximum permissible level of a contaminant in water that is delivered to any
user of a public water system. Drinking water supplies are tested for a variety of contaminants, including
organic and inorganic chemicals (e.g., minerals), substances that are known to cause cancer (e.g., carcino-
gens), radionuclide (e.g., uranium and radon), and microbial contaminants (e.g., coliform and Escherichia
coli). Changes to the MCL list are typically made every three years, as the EPA adds new contaminants or,
based on new research or new case studies, revised MCLs for some contaminants are issued. The California
Department of Health Services, Division of Drinking Water and Environmental Management is responsible for
implementation of the Safe Drinking Water Act in the State of California.
Clean Water Act
The Clean Water Act (CWA) established the basic structure for regulating discharges of pollutants into the
waters ofthe United States and gives the EPA the authority to implement pollution control programs, such as
setting wastewater standards for industry. The CWA also continued requirements to set water quality
standards for all contaminants in surface waters and made it unlawful for any person to discharge any
pollutant from a point source into navigable waters, unless a permit was obtained under its provisions (see
discussion on the NPDES below). The CWA also funded the construction of sewage treatment plants and
recognized the need for planning to address non-point sources of pollution. The CWA is regulated through
the State/Regional Water Quality control Boards.
General Plan Update and Associated Specific Plans EIR
City of San Bernardino . Page 5. 7-1
~
5. Environmental Analysis
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
Under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), all facilities that discharge pollutants
from any point source into waters of the United States are required to obtain an NPDES permit. The term
pollutant broadly includes any type of industrial, municipal, and agricultural waste discharged into water.
Point sources are discharges from publicly owned treatment works (POTWs), discharges from industrial
facilities, and discharges associated with urban runoff. While the NPDES program addresses certain specific
types of agricultural activities, the majority of agricultural facilities are defined as non-point sources and are
exempt from NPDES regulation. Pollutant contributors come from direct and indirect sources. Direct sources
discharge directly to receiving waters, whereas indirect sources discharge wastewater to a POTW, which in
turn discharges to receiving waters. Under the national program, NPDES permits are issued only to direct
point source dischargers. Municipal sources are POTWs that receive primarily domestic sewage from
residential and commercial customers. Specific NPDES program areas applicable to municipal sources are
the National Pretreatment Program, the Municipal Sewage Sludge Program, Combined Sewer Overflows
(CSOs), and the Municipal Storm Water Program. Non-municipal sources include industrial and commercial
facilities. Specific NPDES program areas applicable to industrial sources are: Process Wastewater Dis-
charges, Non-process Wastewater Discharges, and the Industrial Storm Water Program. NPDES issues two
basic permit types: individual and general. Also, the EPA has focused on integrating the NPDES program
further into watershed planning and permitting.
The NPDES has a variety of measures designed to minimize and reduce pollutant discharges. All counties
with a storm drain system that serve a population of 50,000 or more, as well as construction sites one acre or
more in size, must file for and obtain an NPDES permit. The Santa Ana RWQCB has issued an individual
NPDES municipal storm water (MS4) permit for San Bernardino County. The City of San Bernardino is listed
as a participating co-permittee of the County NPDES permit and the Public Works Department is the local
enforcing agency of the NPDES within the City. Another measure is the EPA's Storm Water Phase II Final
Rule. The Phase II Final Rule requires an operator of a regulated small MS4 to develop, implement, and
enforce a program (e.g., Best Management Practices, ordinance or other mechanism) to reduce pollutants in
post-construction runoff to their MS4 from new development and redevelopment projects that result in the
land disturbance of greater than or equal to one acre.
Plans and Programs
Water Quality Control Plan
In the State of California, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and the nine RWQCBs are
responsible for implementing the California Porter-Cologne Quality Control Act (California Water Code),
which regulates water quality. The Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin (Basin Plan)
gives direction on the beneficial uses of the state waters within Region 8, describes the water quality that
must be maintained to support such uses, and provides programs, projects, and other actions necessary to
achieve the standards established in the Basin Plan. The Santa Ana River RWQCB implements the Basin
Plan by issuing and enforcing waste discharge requirements to persons, such as individuals, communities,
or businesses whose waste discharges may affect water quality. These requirements are state Waste Dis-
charge Requirements for discharge to land, or federally delegated NPDES permits for discharges to surface
water. The Basin Plan is subject to continuous review and update as necessary.
National Flood Insurance Program
The National Flood Insurance Act of 1968 and the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 mandates FEMA to
evaluate flood hazards. FEMA provides Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) for local and regional planners
to promote sound land use and floodplain development. FI RMs only identify potential flood areas based on
the conditions at the time of the study and do not consider the impacts of future development.
Page 5.7-2 . The Planning Center
july 2005
5. Environmental Analysis
To prepare FIRMs that illustrate the extend of flood hazards in a flood-prone community, FEMA conducts
engineering studies referred to as Flood Insurance Studies (FISs). Using information gathered in these
studies, FEMA engineers and cartographers delineate Special Flood Hazard Areas (SFHAs) on FIRMs.
SFHAs are those areas subject to inundation by a base flood, which FEMA sets as a 100-year flood. The
100-year recurrence interval represents only the long-term average period between floods of a specific
magnitude. Rare floods can in fact occur at much shorter intervals or even within the same year. The
500-year flood is used to indicate additional areas of flood risk in the community.
The base flood is a regulatory standard used by the National Flood Insurance Program (NIFP) as the basis
for insurance requirements nationwide. The Flood Disaster Protection Act requires owners of all structures in
identified SFHAs to purchase and maintain flood insurance as a condition of receiving Federal or federally
related financial assistance, such as mortgage loans from federally insured lending institutions.
The base flood is also used by Federal agencies, as well as most county and State agencies to administer
floodplain management programs. The goals of floodplain management are to reduce losses caused by
floods while protecting the natural resources and functions of the floodplain. The basis of floodplain manage-
ment is the concept of the floodway. FEMA defines this as the channel of a river or other watercourse, and
the adjacent land areas that must be kept free of encroachment in order to discharge the base flood without
cumulatively increasing the water surface elevation more than a certain height. The intention is not to
preclude development, but to assist communities in managing sound development in areas of potential
flooding. The community is responsible for prohibiting encroachments into the floodway unless it is
demonstrated by detailed hydrologic and hydraulic analyses that the proposed development will not
increase the flood levels downstream.
The NFl P is required to offer federally subsidized flood insurance to property owners in those communities
that adopt and enforce floodplain management ordinances that meet minimum criteria established by FEMA.
The National Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994 further strengthened the NFIP by providing a grant
program for State and community flood mitigation projects. The Act also established the Community Rating
System (CRS) , a system for crediting communities that implement measures to protect the natural and
beneficial functions of their floodplains, as well as managing the erosion hazard.
~
The City of San Bernardino has participated as a regular member of the NFl P since July 16, 1979. The City's
most current effective FIRM maps are dated January 17,1997.
Since the City is a participating ember of the NFIP, flood insurance is available to any property owner in the
City. In fact, to get secured financing to buy, build, or improve structures in SFHAs, property owners are
required to purchase flood insurance. Lending institutions that are federally regulated or federally insured
must determine if the structure is located in a SFHA and must provide written notice requiring flood
insurance. FEMA recommends that all property owners purchase and keep flood insurance.
5.7.1.1
San Bernardino General Plan Update
Existing Conditions Related to Surface Water
Existing Regional Drainage System
The City of San Bernardino lies within the Santa Ana River Basin (Region 8) of the Regional Water Quality
Control Board. Region 8 extends from the San Bernardino and San Gabriel Mountains in the north and east
to Newport Bay along the coast. This Santa Ana River Basin is geographically the smallest region, at 2,800
square miles, yet contains one of the largest populations with almost five million people. The region contains
460 miles of streams, 21,090 acres of lakes and 24 miles of coastline.
General Plan Update and Associated Specific Plans EIR
City of San Bernardino . Page 5. 7-3
5. Environmental Analysis
The Santa Ana River is the largest stream system in southern California, and is also the region's main surface
water body. The Santa Ana River transports more than 125 million gallons per day of reclaimed water from
Riverside and San Bernardino Counties for recharge into the Orange County Groundwater Basin. This
recharge provides 40 percent of the Orange County water demand.
The Santa Ana River has a number of tributaries in the vicinity of San Bernardino that contribute flow to the
main stem of the river including Lytle Creek, East Twin Creek, East Warm Creek and San Timoteo Creek.
In the San Bernardino Area, the San Jacinto Fault (Bunker Hill Dike) forces groundwater to the surface. At
present, perennial flows in the middle Santa Ana River begin at the confluence with East Warm Creek, a short
distance upstream. The rising water area associated with the fault, now relatively small, was historically a
much larger swampy area with many large springs. San Timoteo Creek, which the Corps of Engineers plans
to line with concrete in the near future, joins the river in this area, and its flows are predominantly reclaimed
wastewater from Yucaipa and other upstream dischargers.
East Warm Creek near San Bernardino carries small amounts of water from various non-point sources as
well as some rising water. The City of San Bernardino publicly-owned wastewater treatment plant currently
discharges to this creek just upstream of where it joins the Santa Ana River, but the City plans to move its
point of discharge downstream in the near future. The river passes under several major highways and rail-
roads in this area, and parts of the river bottom are lined with concrete. West Warm Creek, fully improved by
the USCOE for flood control (but is usually dry), also joins the river in this area.
The main stem of the Santa Ana River is divided into six reaches. Each reach is generally a hydrologic and
water quality unit described as follows:
Reach 6 includes the river upstream of Seven Oaks Dam, now under construction. Flows consist largely of
snowmelt and storm runoff. Water quality tends to be very high.
Reach 5 extends from Seven Oaks dam to San Bernardino, to the San Jacinto Fault, which marks the
downstream edge of the Bunker Hill Groundwater Basin. Most of this reach tends to be dry, except as a
result of storm flows, and the channel is largely operated as a flood control facility. The extreme lower end of
this reach includes rising water and intermittently, San Timoteo Creek flows. Stormwater run-off from the City
of San Bernardino would primarily discharge into the lower end of this reach.
Beneficial uses of water in the reach have been determined to be Municipal and Domestic Supply (MUN),
Agricultural Supply (AGR), Groundwater Recharge (GWR), Hydropower Generation (POW), Water Contact
Recreation (REC1), Non-contact Water Recreation (REC2), Warm Freshwater Habitat (WARM), Wildlife
Habitat (WILD), and Rare, Threatened and Endangered Species (RARE). The beneficial use classifications
help define and establish water quality standards which are detailed in the Water Quality Control Plan for the
Santa Ana River Basin.
Reach 4 includes the river from the Bunker Hill Dike down to Mission Boulevard Bridge in Riverside. That
bridge marks the upstream limit of rising water induced by the flow constriction in the Riverside Narrows.
Until about 1985, rising water from upstream and wastewater discharges percolated and the lower part of the
reach was dry. Flows are now perennial, but may not remain so as new projects are built. Much of this reach
is also operated as a flood control facility.
Reach 3 includes the river from Mission Bridge to Prado Dam. In the Narrows, rising water reeds several
small tributaries (Sunnyslope Channel, Tequesquite Arroyo, and Anza Park Drain) which are important
breeding and nursery areas for the native fish. Temescal, Chino, and MilljCucamonga Creeks in Prado Basin
are also important river tributaries.
Page 5.7-4 . The Planning Center
july 2005
5. Environmental Analysis
Reach 2 carries all the upstream flows down through Santa Ana Canyon to Orange County, where as much
of the water as possible is recharged into the Orange County groundwater basin. The downstream end of the
forebayjrecharge area and, therefore, the ordinary limit of surface flows, are at 17th Street in Santa Ana.
Reach 1 is normally dry flood control facility, presently being expanded and improved even further as part of
the USCOE Santa Ana River Project. This reach extends from 17th Street to the tidal prism at the ocean.
The primary water quality issue for the Santa Ana River watershed is degradation due to high concentrations
of nitrogen (primarily from past agricultural practices) and total Dissolved Solids (TDS).
Existing Local Drainage System
Storm drains and flood control facilities within the planning area include natural and man-made channels,
storm drains, street waterways, natural drainage courses, dams, basins, and levees. Storm drain and flood
control facilities are administered by City of San Bernardino, San Bernardino County Flood Control District,
Army Corps of Engineers, and San Bernardino International Airport and Trade Center. Design and construc-
tion of storm drain and flood control facilities are the responsibility of the City Public Works Department. The
Public Services Department is responsible for the operation and maintenance of storm drain and flood
control facilities. San Bernardino's planning area encompasses 71 square miles, much of which is paved and
impervious to stormwater.
The San Bernardino County Flood Control District divides the City into subareas for planning purposes
pursuant to the District's Comprehensive Storm Drain Plans No.3, 4, 6, and 7. The City uses the Flood
Control District's Comprehensive Storm Drain Plans for the development of the City's storm drain system.
The City of San Bernardino requires all 1 O-year frequency storm waters, except for street flows at intersection
points, be contained in the underground drain system. Storm flows in excess of the 1 O-year frequency storm
flow, but less than or equal to the 25-year storm flow, will be carried in the curbed portion of the street. Storm
flows associated with 100-year storms may be carried in the street right-of-way. One-hundred-year storm
flows may also be conveyed via a combination of storm drains sized to convey a 25-year storm in the curbed
part of the street with the balance of the flow conveyed in the street section.
~
The City of San Bernardino has established design criteria for both major and local drains within the City.
Major drains are systems using 36-inch or larger pipes (or equivalent channels) and are identified on the
comprehensive storm drain plans. Local drains are systems using less than 36-inch-diameter conduits.
Storm drains and flood control facilities within the City include: channels, storm drains, street waterways,
natural drainage courses, dams, basins, and levees. Some streets in the City of San Bernardino are
specifically designed to accommodate storm flow. Flows carried within the street right-of-way may cause
localized flooding during storms, possibly making some roads impassable during the storm event.
Flooding Hazards
San Bernardino, like most of southern California, is subject to unpredictable seasonal rainfall. Most years,
winter rains are scant. However, every few years the region is subjected to periods of intense and sustained
precipitation that result in flooding. Floods are natural and recurring events that become hazardous when
humans encroach onto floodplains modifying the landscape, increasing the amount of impervious surfaces,
and building structures in area meant to convey excess water during floods.
As part of the NFIP, Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) have been prepared which contain official
delineation of flood insurance zones and base flood elevation lines. FEMA periodically updates and refines
these maps. The 1 OO-year floodplain is confined to storm channels, debris basins, and between levees with a
few minor exceptions. A few isolated areas, including the Baseline Street and Sterling Avenue area, Mountain
View Avenue and Electric Avenue area, and south of Redlands Boulevard, east of Hunts Lane, are identified
as low areas within the 1 OO-year floodplain. The 1 OO-year flood plain is illustrated in Figure 5.7-1.
General Plan Update and Associated Specific Plans EIR
City of San Bernardino . Page 5. 7-5
5. Environmental Analysis
This page left intentionally blank.
Page 5.7-6 . The Planning Center
july 2005
5. Environmental Analysis
I DO-Year Flood Plain
,..1.
fIl
100- Year Flood Zone
IJ 500-Year Flood Zone
City Boundary
: Sphere of Influence Boundary
NOT TO SCALE
~
San Bernardin() Genefal Plan Update andAJJodated Sped/k Plans EIR
The Planning Center · FIgure 5.7-1
5. Environmental Analysis
This page left intentionally blank.
Page 5.7-8 . The Planning Center
july 2005
5. Environmental Analysis
Storms are not the only cause of flooding within the City. Basements and underground utility vaults may also
experience flooding in areas between the Santa Ana River and downtown due to the City's existing high
groundwater table (find additional discussion of naturally occurring springs in Section 5.5, Geology and
Soils).
The Santa Ana River Mainstem Project was designed to provide flood protection to the growing urban
communities in Orange, Riverside and San Bernardino Counties. The proposed improvements the system
cover 75 miles, from the headwaters of Santa Ana River east of San Bernardino to the mouth of the Pacific
Ocean between the cities of Newport Beach and Huntington Beach. The project increases levels of flood
protection to more than 3.35 million people within the three counties. The project includes seven inde-
pendent features, including Seven Oaks Dam, Mill Creek Levee, San Timoteo Creek, Oak Street Drain, Prado
Dam, Santiago Creek, and Lower Santa Ana River.
Dam Inundation
Seismically induced inundation refers to flooding that occurs when water retention structures (e.g., dams) fail
due to an earthquake. The California State Water Code contains statutes governing dam safety. These
statutes empower the California Division of Dam Safety to monitor the structural safety of dams that are
greater than 25 feet in dam height or have more than 50 acre-feet in storage capacity.
Seven Oaks Dam is a single purpose flood control project constructed by the USCOE. The dam is located on
the Santa Ana River in the upper Santa Ana Canyon eight miles northeast of the City of Redlands, which
borders the City of San Bernardino to the southeast. The dam is of earth and rock filled construction, is 550
feet in height and 2,600 feet wide.
~
The Dam operates in tandem with Prado Dam to provide flood protection to the region. During the early part
of each flood season, runoff is stored behind the dam in order to build a debris pool to protect the outlet
works. Small releases are made on a continual basis in order to maintain the downstream water supply. The
dam is designed to provide 350-year flood protection and withstand an earthquake of 8-plus magnitude.
During flood conditions, it creates a lake 500 feet deep extending three miles back into the canyon. In the
unlikely event of dam failure an inundation zone for the Seven Oaks Dam has been determined as shown on
Figure 5.7-2. The southeastern portion of the City would be affected.
Inundation from Aboveground Water Storage Reservoirs
Seismically induced inundation can also occur if strong ground shaking causes structural damage to
aboveground water storage reservoirs. If a water tank is not adequately braced and baffled, sloshing water
can lift the tank off its foundation, splitting the shell, damaging the roof, and bulging the bottom of the tank.
Movement can also shear off the pipes leading to the tank releasing water through the broken pipes. These
types of damage occurred during southern California's 1992 Landers, 1992 Big Bear, and 1994 Northridge
earthquakes. New standards for design of steel water tanks were adopted in 1994.
Seiches
A seiche is a free or standing-wave oscillation of the surface of water in an enclosed or semi-enclosed basin,
such as a lake, bay, harbor, pond, reservoir, swimming pool, and other body of water that is initiated chiefly
by local changes in atmospheric pressure, aided by winds, tidal currents, and earthquakes, and that con-
tinues, pendulum-fashion, for a time after cessation of the originating force. The hazard is dependent upon
specific earthquake parameters (e.g., frequency of the seismic waves, distance and direction from the
epicenter), as well as site-specific design of the enclosed bodies of water, and is thus difficult to predict.
Developments with homes near man-made lakes may be vulnerable to this hazard. Sloshing within steel
water tanks can cause damage or failure of the structure. Minor seiching in swimming pools can also occur.
General Plan Update and Associated Specific Plans EIR
City of San Bernardino. Page 5.7-9
5. Environmental Analysis
This page left intentionally blank.
Page 5.7-10 . The Planning Center
july 2005
5. Environmental Analysis
Seven Oaks Dam Inundation
'"1
Source: u.s. Army Corps of Engineers
Note: The inundated areas shown on this map reflect
events of an extremely remote nature. These results
are not in any way intended to reflect upon the integrity
of the Seven Oaks Dam. Flooded areas shown are based
on dam failure at lull pool elevation 2,580 feet. NGVD.
D Limit of Flooded Area with Dam Failure
City Boundary
: Sphere of Influence Boundary
NOT TO SCALE
~
San Bernardin() Genefal Plan Update andAJJodated Sped/k Plans EIR
The Planning Center · FIgure 5.7-2
5. Environmental Analysis
This page left intentionally blank.
Page 5.7-12 . The Planning Center
july 2005
5. Environmental Analysis
Mudflows and Debris Flows
A mudflow is a mass of water and fine-grained earth materials that flows down a stream, ravine, canyon,
arroyo, or gulch. If more than half of the solids in the mass are larger than sand grains (e.g., rocks, stones,
boulders), then the event is called a debris flow. Debris and mudflows are a combination of fast moving
water and a great volume of sediment and debris that surges down slope with tremendous force. They are
similar to flash floods and can occur suddenly without time for adequate warning. Most streams in the San
Bernardino area have the potential to carry large amounts of debris, or debris flow. Mudflows may also occur
near hills and mountains. Development at the base of the mountains and downstream from canyons has the
potential to convey mudflows.
Existing Conditions Related to Groundwater
Groundwater Supply
Groundwater is water that is found below the ground surface in water bearing formations called aquifers. An
aquifer is a geologic formation that is sufficiently permeable to conduct groundwater, and to yield significant
quantities of water to wells and springs. Perched ground water is a body of water located above a permanent
groundwater zone and separated from it by a soil or bedrock zone of low permeability.
Groundwater basins are areas with highly permeable soils that allow for the replenishment of the aquifers.
These basins are usually located along streambeds and in alluvial fans where permeable soils are generally
found. The quantity of groundwater found in an aquifer is dependent upon the specific geologic and
hydrologic conditions in an area. Most of the readily extractable groundwater is obtained from aquifers
consisting of recent alluvium, with smaller quantities of groundwater found in jointed bedrock and residuum.
Extensive groundwater basins underlie much of the San Bernardino region. San Bernardino overlies the
Upper Santa Ana Valley Groundwater Basin, Bunker Hill Subbasin. The Bunker Hill Basin consists of the
alluvial materials that underlie the San Bernardino Valley. This Basin is bounded by contact with consolidated
rocks of the San Gabriel Mountains, San Bernardino Mountains, Crafton Hills, and by several faults. The
Santa Ana River, Mill Creek and Lytle Creek are the main tributary streams in the Basin.
~
The Basin is filled from rain and snow melt that filters down through the San Bernardino Mountains.1
Recharge to the Bunker Hill Basin historically has resulted from infiltration of runoff from the San Gabriel and
San Bernardino Mountains. The Santa Ana River, Mill Creek and Lytle Creek contribute more than 60 percent
of the total recharge to the ground-water system. Lesser contributors include Cajon Creek, San Timoteo
Creek, and most of the creeks flowing southward out of the San Bernardino Mountains such as East Twin
Creek. Total groundwater storage of the Basin is 5,976,000 acre-feet,2 while as of 1998 the total amount of
water in the Basin was 5,890,300 acre-feet.
The water-bearing material in the Basin consists of Holocene and Pleistocene age alluvial deposits of sand,
gravel, and boulders interspersed with deposits of silt and clay. The water-bearing material has been divided
into upper and lower aquifers. In the central part of the Basin, a poorly permeable clay layer separates the
aquifers, creating confined conditions in the lower aquifer under about 25 square miles of the valley.
Maximum thickness of the upper aquifer is approximately 350 feet, and maximum thickness of the lower
aquifer is approximately 650 feet. Groundwater generally converges toward the Santa Ana River in the
southwestern part of the Basin and discharges over the San Jacinto fault at Colton Narrows.
1 City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department, Urban Water Management Plan Update for the planning period 2000-2020,
January 2002.
2 California's Groundwater Bulletin 118, February 27, 2004
General Plan Update and Associated Specific Plans EIR
City of San Bernardino . Page 5. 7-13
5. Environmental Analysis
San Bernardino gets one hundred percent of its water from the Bunker Hill Basin. San Bernardino Municipal
Water Department owns a total of 60 wells in the basin, some as much as 1,200 foot deep, that tap into the
aquifer. Portions of the Bunker Hill Basin, however, have been contaminated by certain chemical constituents
as discussed in Section 5.6, Hazards and Hazardous Materials. For additional discussion of water supply,
please see Section 5.15, Utilities.
5.7.1.2
Arrowhead Springs Specific Plan
Existing Conditions Related to Surface Water
Existing Drainage System
Arrowhead Springs is located within the West Twin Creek (Waterman Canyon) and East Twin Creek
watersheds, as shown in Figure 5.7-3, Arrowhead Springs Drainage Map. Both of these watersheds extend
well beyond to the north and east ofthe Arrowhead Springs property. There are three primary water courses
that flow through the Arrowhead Springs property, with a peak flow of over seven million gallons of water per
day passing through the Arrowhead Springs Specific Plan area. East Twin Creek out of Coldwater Canyon,
Strawberry Creek, and West Twin Creek, which flows through Waterman Canyon, compose the major
waterways. Each has numerous contributing un-named tributaries. Strawberry Creek joins East Twin Creek
near the eastern edge of the currently developed resort facilities. East Twin Creek and West Twin Creek
converge south of the property, where flows continue south toward 40th Street through the County of San
Bernardino Flood Control District percolation basins. Drainage then continues in a southerly direction
through the City along improved drainage channels, ultimately discharging into the Santa Ana River (see
Figure 3.1-2 for relationship to regional water systems). In addition, there are several locations where hot
thermal springs and cold springs spill out onto the ground due to the unique geology of the area which is
described in greater detail in Section 5.5, Geology and Soils, of this EIR. Known springs are named Granite
Springs, Penyugal Springs, the Steam Caves, and another abandoned hot spring exists near West Twin
Creek.
The developed area of the Arrowhead Springs property has a limited stormwater collection system that
consists of a combination of either curbed roads and/or gutters (water ways) that direct stormwater to an
underground piping system that discharges to either Lake Vonette, East Twin or West Twin Creek, or an
unnamed tributary west of the hotel sometimes referred to as Hot Springs Creek. Smaller roadways (local
streets) direct run-off into landscaped areas.
The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) is finishing construction of a pipeline (the
Inland Feeder Project) across West Twin Creek and East Twin Creek for delivery of State Water to southern
California. This construction has disturbed the natural conditions ofthese two drainages which can be seen
in the photos in Figure 5.1-5 (in theAesthetics section) and planned restoration has not been implemented at
this time.
East Twin Creek Watershed
The East Twin Creek Watershed includes the drainages of Strawberry Creek, Coldwater Canyon (source of
East Twin Creek) and unnamed streams contributing to East Twin Creek. The over 1,100 acres of this
watershed is within the eastern portion of the Arrowhead Springs Specific Plan area. The balance of the
watershed is within U.S. Forest Service property to the east and north of the Arrowhead Springs property
without human occupancy.
Page 5.7-14 . The Planning Center
july 2005
5. Environmental Analysis
Arrowhead Springs Area Drainage
/\I Drainage
Watershed Boundary
Arrowhead Springs Boundary
A = 6450 CFS Peak Flow
B = 1 ],714 CFS Peak Flow
SOUH.;f:;f, USGS TOPUYfij}JlJic; QUiiUfi:tflyltlS, NRA, fnf,;.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
San B,mardino General Plan Update an, Assodated Specific Plans ErR The Planning emter . Figure 5.7-3
~~
5. Environmental Analysis
This page left intentionally blank.
Page 5.7-16 . The Planning Center
july 2005
5. Environmental Analysis
Water had been diverted from Coldwater Canyon for many years to provide the domestic water for the hotels
and out-buildings currently existing on the project site. Use of that water as a source of drinking water has
been discontinued; however the water is still used for irrigation purposes. Water gage records show that
water from Coldwater Canyon maintains a minimum continuous flow of 0.5 million gallons per day. Water
from the East Twin Creek watershed varies during the year with highest flows during the winter months.
The Santa Ana River Basin Water Quality Control Plan of 1995 included the East Twin Creek watershed as
contributing to the Santa Ana River and thus determined beneficial uses for these streams. Those beneficial
uses are MUN, AGR, GWR, REC1, REC2, Cold Freshwater Habitat (COLD), WILD, and Spawning, Reproduc-
tion and Development (SPWN), which are waters that support high quality aquatic habitat. Only one water
quality objective for TSD has been established for this watershed of 475 milligrams per liter (mg/L).
West Twin Creek Watershed
The West Twin Creek watershed including Waterman Canyon runs north-south through the western edge of
the property, roughly parallel to SR-18 and extends more than a mile to the north of the Arrowhead Springs
property. Throughout this watershed and in close proximity to West Twin Creek are a number of residences
that rely on septic systems, which makes this watershed an undesirable source of drinking water. Addi-
tionally Waterman Canyon has experienced periodic rapid flooding conditions that produce considerable
turbidity.
Beneficial uses of the West Twin Creek watershed (Waterman Canyon Creek) were determined to be MUN,
GWR, REC1, REC2, COLD and WILD. The TSD level established for West Twin Creek was 250 mg/L.
Flooding Hazards
~
A specific 1 OO-year floodplain elevation has not been determined for all of East and West Twin Creeks within
the Arrowhead Springs Specific Plan area; however, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)
Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) depicts the flood plain boundaries to the north and south of the major
portions of the project site. There are a limited number of residences in Waterman Canyon, just outside the
Specific Plan boundary, that have experienced periodic flooding or threat of flooding. Potential "waters of the
U.S." as determined by Natural Resources Assessment, Inc., as part ofthe biological resources assessment
of the Arrowhead Springs property, are shown in Figure 5.3-4. This determination of "waters of the U.S." may
not necessarily show the extent of the 1 OO-year floodplain, but does given an indication that water can
spread from side to side of the creek canyons, especially Waterman Canyon.
Existing Water Rights
The West Twin Creek Mutual Water Company and the Del Rosa Mutual Water Company provide water for
domestic and/or irrigation water through either on-site wells or withdrawal from East or West Twin Creeks.
These mutual water companies have long standing water rights from these streams that are discussed in
Section 5.15.1, Water Supply and Distribution, and in Volume III, Appendix I. According to the Water Supply
Assessment in Appendix I, the recorded average annual production from on-site wells is 81.93 acre-feet for
domestic water supplies and an average of 1,733.33 acre-feet of water is withdrawn annually from streams
for irrigation.
Existing Conditions Related to Groundwater
The southern portion of Arrowhead Springs Specific Plan area is generally located within northernmost part
of the Bunker Hill (groundwater) Sub-basin, which is thought to extend as far north as the San Andreas Fault.
This basin has been described above in Section 5.7.1.1. The Del Rosa Mutual Water Company has an
existing service area that encompasses parts of the Bunker Hill Sub-basin and has retrieved water from wells
General Plan Update and Associated Specific Plans EIR
City of San Bernardino . Page 5. 7-1 7
5. Environmental Analysis
in the Basin in the past through shares held in the company by the City of San Bernardino, but no water is
currently withdrawn in the basin and the City no longer owns shares in the company.
Four on-site wells (Rod's Well, Football Filed Well, Rowan Well and Strawberry Creek Well) supply the
average total 81.93 acre-feet of water that is withdrawn for drinking water. These wells are relatively shallow,
according to the Water Supply Assessment, and are very low producers but are sufficient for present needs.
Two hot geothermal wells supply an average of 28.57 acre-feet of water per year that is primarily used for
heating of on-site structures.
5.7.2
Thresholds of Significance
According to Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines, a project would normally have a significant effect on the
environment if the project would:
HD-1
Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements.
HD-2
Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with
groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a
lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-
existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land
uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted.
HD-3
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in a
substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site.
HD-4
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through
the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or
amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site.
HD-5
Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or
planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff.
HD-6
Otherwise substantially degrade water quality.
HD-7
Place housing within a 1 OO-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood
Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation
map.
HD-8
Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or
redirect flood flows.
HD-9
Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving
flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam.
HD-1Q
Be subject to inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow.
Page 5.7-18. The Planning Center
july 2005
5. Environmental Analysis
5.7.3 Environmental Impacts
5.7.3.1 San Bernardino General Plan Update
The General Plan Update involves a minimal number of changes to existing land uses in San Bernardino and
its SOl with most changes reflecting the existing uses. The primarily focus of the update was to streamline
and simplify the document and update goals and policies to reflect actions already taken and include
contemporary laws and information. An analysis of the project impacts, as they relate to hydrology and water
quality in the San Bernardino area, is provided in this section of the EIR.
The following impact analysis addresses thresholds of significance for which the Initial Study disclosed
potentially significant impacts. The applicable thresholds are identified in parentheses after the impact
statement.
GP IMPACT 5.7-1:
FULL BUlLDOUT OF THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE WOULD RESULT IN AN
INCREASE IN CONSTRUCTION, CREATING THE POTENTIAL FOR SHORT-
TERM UNQUANTIFIABLE INCREASES IN POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS
FROM THE INDIVIDUAL PROJECT SITES. AFTER PROJECT DEVELOPMENT,
THE QUALITY OF STORM RUNOFF (SEDIMENT, NUTRIENTS, METALS,
PESTICIDES, PATHOGENS, AND HYDROCARBONS) MAY BE ALTERED.
[THRESHOLDS HD-1 AND HD-6]
Impact Analysis: The majority of land potentially available for development within the City of San Bernardino
has been urbanized; therefore, the implementation ofthe General Plan Update is not expected to result in a
significant increase in runoff volumes. The City's Sphere of Influence, however, does contain vacant and
undeveloped areas that with urbanization would contribute urban runoff and/or stormwater runoff to the local
drainage system through an increase in impervious surfaces. An increase in the amount of impervious
surfaces interrupts the natural cycle of gradual percolation of water through vegetation and soil. Instead of
natural percolation, large volumes of runoff are quickly routed from surfaces, such as asphalt and concrete,
to drainage systems. Effects of this process can include streambank scouring and downstream flooding,
both potential problems in the San Bernardino area. The Municipal Code, as well as the NPDES program
requires all future development of one acre or more to manage stormwater from construction sites in a
manner which would reduce impacts to water quality. Section 5.15.2, Wastewater Treatment and Collection,
contains additional discussion regarding potential discharge to the Santa Ana watershed from future
wastewater treatment facilities. The City will, however, examine all projects with soil disturbing activities.
~
GP IMPACT 5.7-2:
DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN UPDATE
WOULD NOT SUBSTANTIALLY INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF IMPERVIOUS
SURFACES THROUGHOUT THE CITY AND SOl AND THEREFORE IMPACTS TO
GROUNDWATER RECHARGE WOULD BE MINIMAL. [THRESHOLD HD-2]
Impact Analysis: The General Plan Update would not result in a significant reduction in groundwater
recharge due to the limited amount of vacant area available for development that could be turned into
impervious surfaces. As stated previously, an increase in the amount of imperious surfaces could interrupt
the natural cycle of gradual percolation of water through vegetation and soil in groundwater recharge areas.
The Bunker Hill Basin has a safe yield of 232,1 00 acre-feet annually. The Basin is not currently in overdraft
condition and is pumping water to relieve high groundwater conditions in some lower sections of the Basin.
Additionally, percolation basins have been established in several locations near the north boundary of the
City to capture mountain stream run-off for recharge to the Basin and control flooding. The Basin is the
primary supply of drinking water for the City and surrounding jurisdictions. In addition, the General Plan
Update contains goals, policies and programs encouraging water conservation and preservation of the
percolation basins. Additional discussion of water supply and demand can be found in Section 5.15.1 .
General Plan Update and Associated Specific Plans EIR
City of San Bernardino . Page 5. 7-19
5. Environmental Analysis
GP IMPACT 5.7-3:
DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO THE PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN BUILDOUT
WOULD NOT SIGNIFICANTLY ALTER EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS IN THE
CITY AND SOl BUT WOULD INCREMENTALLY INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF
IMPERVIOUS SURFACES. THE RESULTING INCREASE IN STORM WATER
FLOWS WOULD NOT SUBSTANTIALLY IMPACT EXISTING DRAINAGE
SYSTEMS WITHIN THE WATERSHED. [THRESHOLSD HD-3, HD-4, AND HD-5]
Impact Analysis: Buildout according to the General Plan Update is not likely to result in the alteration of the
course of a stream or river. However, implementation of the General Plan Update may alter the existing
localized (project level) drainage patterns within the San Bernardino area and increase the amount of
impervious surfaces through the continued development of vacant areas. New development would be
required to size storm water drainage facilities appropriately. The amount of vacant land available for
development is somewhat limited, however. Natural erosion processes are often accelerated through human
activities such as land development through grading and the reduction of surface area. The extreme
topographic relief between the valley and the surrounding mountains makes erosion and sedimentation an
important issue for some areas of San Bernardino. Erosion on steep or graded slopes especially in the
northern portion of the City can contribute to slope failure hazards in the City. The City does have a Hillside
Management Overlay Zone to regulate development that would alter slopes in these areas.
Any impact to the drainage pattern and potential erosion hazards would be mitigated on a project by project
basis by adherence to NPDES requirements as well as the City's Municipal Code, which includes provisions
for on-site stormwater retention for undeveloped properties of one acre or more in size. Additionally, the
General Plan contains methods to reduce erosion through goals, policies, and programs related to the
protection of the drainage systems. The General Plan policies also require compliance with the NPDES
program.
GP IMPACT 5.7-4:
PORTIONS OF THE CITY AND SOl ARE LOCA TED WITHIN A 100- YEAR FLOOD
HAZARD AREA. [THRESHOLDS HD-7 AND HD-8]
Impact Analysis: The San Bernardino area has the potential for flooding problems related to the Santa Ana
River and its tributaries. The United States Army Corps of Engineers (USCOE) has rated the potential of the
Santa Ana River system for disastrous flood damage as the greatest west of the Mississippi due to its large
drainage area (177 square miles). There have been 14significant floods in the Santa Ana Basin since 1900,
with the latest one occurring in 1978. Although significant strides have been made to reduce potential
flooding impacts due to the overflow of the Santa Ana River, such as the recently completed Seven Oaks
dam, there are some areas within the City that are still within the 100-year flood zone. They are primarily
limited to drainages flowing out of the mountains to the north, the percolation ponds, Lytle Creek, Cajon
Creek and areas adjacent the Santa Ana River, which can be seen in Figure 3.1-2. The mountain drainages
can contribute to flash-flooding, the most recent event occurring on Christmas Day in 2003. Most drainages
that are tributary to the Santa Ana River within the City have been confined to lined channels where flooding
can be reasonably controlled.
Future development of structures for human occupancy should be restricted or prohibited within the 100-
year flood zone and critical facilities should be restricted or prohibited within the 500-year flood zone,
contingent on whether acceptable engineering measures can be applied to reduce the hazard. Critical
facilities such as schools should have evacuation plans in place that cover the possibility of flooding.
Facilities using, storing, or otherwise involved with substantial quantities of on-site hazardous materials
should not be permitted in the flood zones, unless all standards of elevation, anchoring, and flood proofing
have been satisfied, and hazardous materials are stored in watertight containers that will not float. Camp-
grounds and other similar types of activities should also be prohibited in high-risk flood areas, at least during
the rainy season.
Page 5.7-20 . The Planning Center
july 2005
5. Environmental Analysis
The implementation of the General Plan Update has limited potential to expose people or structures to the
risk of flooding due to the confinement of most drainages in flood control devices and land use designations
that restrict residential development in flood prone areas. Flood prone areas (1 OO-year flood plain) outside of
the existing flood control devices are limited to a few isolated areas as shown in Figure 5.7-1 that are
surrounded by development. Development in these isolated flood-prone areas would increase impervious
surfaces, such as asphalt, and reduce the absorption of water into the ground, which results in runoff to
downstream areas. However, any additional development in these areas would be required to improve the
site (such as raising the elevation) and provide on-site storm drain systems to avoid the risk of isolated
flooding.
GP IMPACT 5.7-5:
PORTIONS OF THE CITY ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE INUNDATION AREA OF
THE SEVEN OAKS DAM. [THRESHOLD HD-9]
Impact Analysis: The Seven Oaks Dam is the closest dam to the City of San Bernardino. Several areas
within the City of San Bernardino are located within the inundation area of the Seven Oaks dam, which is
located eight miles northeast of the City of Redlands. Although failure of the dam would release a significant
amount of water (approximately 145,600 acre-feet of water during flood conditions) the dam is engineered to
withstand an earthquake measuring 8.0 on the Richter scale, with any point able to sustain a displacement of
four feet without causing any overall structural damage. The proposed General Plan contains policies that
prohibit land use development in inundation prone areas intended for human occupancy which would limit
risk to the population in the event of dam failure. The inundation zone is primarily limited to industrial uses.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE GENERAL PLAN UPDATE WOULD NOT RESULT IN
INUNDATION BY SEICHE OR TSUNAMI HOWEVER LOCALIZED MUDFLOWS
~g~~~A~~~~~~~;:~';~~":o1'NOUS AREA ON THE NORTHERN CITY ~
Impact Analysis: A seiche is a small tidal wave that occurs in a lake or other enclosed body of water.
Seiches may be generated by ground motion during an earthquake. A seiche may cause an overflow of a
lake, reservoir or lagoon. No features of this nature exist in San Bernardino or the SOl. A tsunami is a high
ocean wave generated by a submarine earthquake or volcanic eruption. San Bernardino is located inland
and would not be affected by tsunamis.
GP IMPACT 5.7-6:
The Santa Ana River and its tributaries especially those out of the mountainous areas have the potential to
carry large amounts of debris, or debris flow. Debris has the potential to fill or plug structures designed to
collect and convey runoff, forcing floodwaters into the adjacent areas. Rapidly moving flows heavily laden
with debris are also extremely dangerous. Mudflows are a potential hazard in San Bernardino, as well,
especially to development at the base of the mountains. However, development of vacant areas would be
required to adhere to the Hillside Management Overlay Zone and meet the requirements of the Santa Ana
Region Area-Wide Urban Strom Water Run-off permit (NPDES) which would limit the potential for mudflow.
Relevant General Plan Policies and Programs
The following City of San Bernardino General Plan policies and programs related to hydrology and water
quality include:
Land Use Element
Policy 2.6.3: Capitalize on the recreational and environmental resources offered by the Santa Ana River and
Cajon Wash by requiring the dedication and development of pedestrian and greenbelt linkages.
Policy 2. 7.2: Work with the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District to create additional water storage
capacity and take advantage of the abundant water supplies.
General Plan Update and Associated Specific Plans EIR
City of San Bernardino . Page 5.7-21
5. Environmental Analysis
Utilities Element
Policy 9.3.1: Provide for the construction of upgraded and expanded water supply, transmission,
distribution, storage, and treatment facilities to support existing and new development.
Policy 9.4.1: Ensure that adequate storm drain and flood control facilities are provided in a timely manner to
protect life and property from flood hazards.
Policy 9.4.2: Upgrade and expand storm drain and flood control facilities to eliminate deficiencies and
protect existing and new development.
Policy 9.4.4: Require that adequate storm drain and flood control facilities be in place prior to the issuance
of certificates of occupancy. Where construction of master planned facilities is not feasible, the Mayor and
Common Council may permit the construction of interim facilities sufficient to protect present and short-term
future needs.
Policy 9.4.5: Implement flood control improvements that maintain the integrity of significant riparian and
other environmental habitats.
Policy 9.4.6: Minimize the disturbance of natural water bodies and natural drainage systems.
Policy 9.4. 7: Develop San Bernardino's flood control system for multi-purpose uses, whenever practical and
financially feasible.
Policy 9.4.8: Minimize the amount of impervious surfaces in conjunction with new development.
Policy 9.4.9: Develop and implement policies for adopting Sustainable Stormwater Management
approaches that rely on infiltration of stormwater into soils over detention basins or channels. Sustainable
Stormwater Management techniques include use of pervious pavements, garden roofs, and bioswales to
treat stormwater, and reusing stormwater for non-potable water uses such as landscape irrigation and
toilet/urinal flushing.
Policy 9.4.10: Ensure compliance with the Federal Clean Water Act requirements for National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits, including requiring the development of Water Quality
Management Plans, Erosion and Sediment Control Plans, and Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans for all
qualifying public and private development and significant redevelopment in the City.
Policy 9.4.11: Implement an urban runoff reduction program consistent with regional and federal
requirements, which includes requiring and encouraging the following examples of Best Management
Practices (BMPs) in all developments:
. Increase permeable areas, install filtration controls (including grass lined swales and gravel beds),
and divert flow to these permeable areas to allow more percolation of runoff into the ground;
. Use natural drainage, detention ponds, or infiltration pits to collect and filter runoff;
. Prevent rainfall from entering material and waste storage areas and pollution-laden surfaces; and
. Require new development and significant redevelopment to utilize site preparation, grading, and
other BMPs that provide erosion and sediment control to prevent construction-related contaminants
from leaving the site and polluting waterways.
Page 5.7-22 . The Planning Center
july 2005
5. Environmental Analysis
Safety Element
Policy 10.4.1: Promote integrated inter-agency review and participation in water resource evaluation and
mitigation programs.
Policy 10.4.2: Protect surface water and groundwater from contamination.
Policy 10.4.3: Eliminate or remediate old sources of water contamination generated by hazardous materials
and uses.
Policy 10.4.4: Develop programs and incentives for prevention of groundwater contamination and clean up
of known contaminated sites.
Policy 10.5.1: Ensure compliance with the Federal Clean Water Act requirements for National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits, including developing and requiring the development of
Water Quality Management Plans for all new development and significant redevelopment in the City.
Policy 10.5.2: Continue to implement an urban runoff reduction program consistent with regional and
federal requirements, which includes requiring and encouraging the following:
. Increase permeable areas to allow more percolation of runoff into the ground;
. Use natural drainage, detention ponds or infiltration pits to collect runoff;
. Divert and catch runoff using swales, berms, green strip filters, gravel beds and French drains;
~
. Install rain gutters and orient them towards permeable surfaces;
. Construct property grades to divert flow to permeable areas;
. Use subsurface areas for storm runoff either for reuse or to enable release of runoff at predetermined
times or rates to minimize peak discharge into storm drains;
. Use porous materials, wherever possible, for construction of driveways, walkways and parking lots;
and
. Divert runoff away from material and waste storage areas and pollution-laden surfaces such as
parking lot.
Policy 10.5.3: Cooperate with surrounding jurisdictions and the County to provide adequate storm drainage
facilities.
Policy 10.5.4: Require new development and significant redevelopment to utilize site preparation, grading
and foundation designs that provide erosion control to prevent sedimentation and contamination of
waterways.
Policy 10.5.5: Ensure compliance with the requirements for Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plans or
Water Quality Management Plans for all new development or construction activities.
Policy 10.5.6: Coordinate with appropriate federal, state, and local resource agencies on development
projects and construction activities affecting waterways and drainages.
Policy 10.6.1: Maintain flood control systems and restrict development to minimize hazards due to flooding.
General Plan Update and Associated Specific Plans EIR
City of San Bernardino . Page 5.7-23
5. Environmental Analysis
Policy 10.6.2: Use natural watercourses as the City's primary flood control channels whenever feasible.
Policy 10.6.3: Keep natural drainage courses free of obstructions.
Policy 10.6.4: Evaluate all development proposals located in areas that are subject to flooding to minimize
the exposure of life and property to potential flood risks.
Policy 10.6.5: Prohibit land use development and/or the construction of any structure intended for human
occupancy within the 100-year flood plain as mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) unless adequate mitigation is provided against flood hazards.
Policy 10.6.6: Encourage new development to utilize and enhance existing natural streams, as feasible.
Policy 10.6.7: Utilize flood control methods that are consistent with Regional Water Quality Control Board
Policies and Best Management Practices (BMPs).
Policy 10.6.8: Review development proposals for projects within the City's Sphere of Influence and
encourage the County to disapprove any project that cannot be protected with an adequate storm drain
system.
Policy 10.6.9: Ensure major drains in developed areas have a pipeline capacity to comply with the Flood
Control District's Comprehensive Storm Drain Plans for development of the City's storm drain system.
Policy 10.6.10: Design local drains in foothill areas to convey 25-year storm flows where downstream
systems are lacking and street systems are not present.
Policy 10.6.11: Design major drains in foothill to convey 100-year flows within a pipe or channel areas
where downstream systems are lacking and street systems are not present.
Policy 10.6.12: Develop a process to study flooding issues and create appropriate regulations. This could
include the creation of "alluvial districts," local quasi-government entities designed to inform homeowners of
flood risks as well as advise the floodplain land use decisions of the City.
Energy and Water Conservation Element
Policy 13.2.1: Coordinate and monitor the City's water conservation efforts on an annual basis and modify
or expand them as necessary to ensure their effectiveness.
Policy 13.2.2: Require that development not degrade surface or groundwater, especially in watersheds, or
areas with high groundwater tables or highly permeable soils.
Policy 13.2.3: Consider the establishment of incentives, funding programs, or a rebate program for projects
that implement water conservation measures, such as replacing aging, leaking, and/or inefficient plumbing
with more efficient, water-saving plumbing.
Policy 13.2.4: Require the use of reclaimed water for landscape irrigation and other non-contact uses for
industrial projects, golf courses, and freeways.
Policy 13.2.5: Mitigate degradation of the groundwater basins that may have already occurred by existing
commercial, industrial, and other uses.
Policy 13.2.7: Require that new development incorporate improvements to channel storm runoff to public
storm drainage systems and prevent discharge of pollutants into the groundwater basins and waterways.
Page 5.7-24 . The Planning Center
july 2005
5. Environmental Analysis
Policy 13.2.8: Require that development in the City's watersheds incorporate adequate landscape and
groundcover to prevent slope erosion and significant sedimentation of canyon drainages.
5.7.3.2 Arrowhead Springs
The Arrowhead Springs Specific Plan area consists of approximately 1,916 acres, of which 506 acres would
be more intensively developed. Approximately 200 acres is currently developed as (former) resort facilities
including small office buildings and maintenance facilities.
AHS IMPACT 5.7-1:
DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT, THERE
IS THE POTENTIAL FOR SHORT-TERM UNQUANTIFIABLE INCREASES IN
POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS FROM THE SITE. AFTER PROJECT
DEVELOPMENT, THE QUALITY OF STORM WATER RUNOFF (SEDIMENT,
NUTRIENTS, METALS, PESTICIDES, PATHOGENS, AND HYDROCARBONS)
MAY BE ALTERED. [THRESHOLDS HD-1 AND HD-6]
Impact Analysis: The proposed project is located within the Waterman Canyon 0Nest Twin Creek) and East
Twin Creek watersheds. These water courses are tributary to the Santa Ana River and would also be the
source of irrigation water and drinking water for the development. The project would involve the construction
of new buildings, residences, golf course, utility relocations, and roadway construction. As part of the
proposed project, a portion of West Twin Creek in Waterman Canyon would be altered during construction
the golf course and residential areas. Construction of the proposed project and operation of planned land
uses could impact water quality on surface and ground water resources.
In the initial stages of project development, vegetation removal, earth moving activities and grading
associated with project construction would have the potential to increase pollutant concentrations from the
site. Implementation of the specific plan would require grading of approximately 300 acres of undisturbed
soil and redevelopment of the existing development footprint of approximately 200 acres. Excavation and
embankments would be required to construct the building pads, transportation improvements, and utilities
associated with project development. Additionally, retaining walls would be needed in some locations for cut
and fill purposes. Approximately 7,000,000 cubic yards of earth would be cut from undeveloped slopes and
moved as fill to establish a base grade for new development areas. Cut and fill would be balanced on-site,
with an additional 1,000,000 cubic yards potentially being moved to remediate landslide areas. Additional
grading may also be required to establish pad sites for drinking water reservoirs and access roads to reach
them. Within the specific plan area, many areas would be protected from disturbance to preserve open
space and the existing native vegetation. Due to the project's proximity to perennial waterways, during the
rainy season in particular, construction activities could lead to temporary impacts on surface water quarter
quality. Construction activities could result in an increase in sediment deposited in local streams, the release
of other pollutants associated with construction, and/or increased soil erosion that could adversely affect
these watercourses.
Within the existing facility area, vegetation would also be removed from some areas, demolition of buildings
would take place and some grading conducted to establish expanded roadways, parking areas and pads for
existing facility expansion. The conceptual grading plan is shown in Figure 3.3-6. Mass grading and the
removal of vegetation during project construction would expose site soils to rain, sheet-flow and gullying
erosion prior to development and revegetation of the site. The cleared, exposed surfaces and soil stockpiles
created during construction could create sedimentation in downstream waters.
Development of the site would urbanize a total of approximately 506 acres, including 199 acres for a golf
course, which would result in substantial alteration in the existing site conditions and the introduction of
urban pollutant sources. Urban runoff would typically contain oils, grease, fuels, by products of combustion
and other household pollutants. Additionally, runoff from the golf course could contain pesticides and
nitrates from fertilizers as a result of golf course operations. The nitrates could increase the nutrient loading
General Plan Update and Associated Specific Plans EIR
City of San Bernardino . Page 5.7-25
~
5. Environmental Analysis
in surface waters, encouraging algal booms, and disturbing the nutrient cycling process. Fertilizers and
pesticides could also percolate through the soil and contaminate local groundwater.
Ponding, detention and flood routing is proposed along the golf course as a method to mitigate peak
discharges of some stormwater from the development; however recycled water is also expected to be stored
in open lined reservoirs in the same areas. Unless specifically designed, recycled water could be com-
mingled with stormwater during flooding events with potential to impact downstream water quality. The use
of recycled water for irrigation around the development may also have the potential to reach the drinking
water intake of East Twin Creek. The location of the drinking water intake and areas to be irrigated with
recycled water has not been specifically identified.
Stormwater management is the key in the control and prevention of water quality degradation. There are
many Best Management Practices (BMPs) available for achieving the best possible water quality. BMPs are
required and would protect receiving waters from degradation and correct existing problems. Common
BMPs include structural control as well as nonstructural controls. Structural controls used in the manage-
ment of stormwater in commercial and residential areas are typically used for the purpose of restoring the
quality of water exiting the site to the quality existing before the project development. These systems could
provide pollutant removal as well as reduce peak flow rates. Typical structural controls for use with the
proposed land uses and site characteristics could include detention basins, water quality inlets or oil/grit
separators, grassed swales, filter strips, porous pavement, slope protection, storm drain system stenciling
and signage, proper trash storage area design, proper hazardous materials outdoor storage design efficient
irrigation and landscape design. Non-structural controls emphasize controlling the source of pollutants. The
two most frequently used source controls are erosion/sediment control ordinances and public education.
Others include activity restrictions, BMP maintenance, common area landscape management, spill
contingency management, street sweeping and common area catch basin inspection.
AHS IMPACT 5.7-2:
DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT WOULD
INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES ON THE SITE AND
UTILIZE SURFACE WATERS OTHERWISE DESTINED FOR GROUNDWATER
RECHARGE REDUCING OPPORTUNITIES FOR GROUNDWATER RECHARGE.
[THRESHOLD HD-2]
Impact Analysis: The proposed project is located in the San Bernardino Groundwater Basin (Bunker Hill
Sub-basin). I mplementation of the specific plan would involve the development of approximately 506 acres of
the Arrowhead Springs Specific Plan area. Project implementation would increase the amount of impervious
surfaces in the area, thus impacting the opportunity for groundwater recharge. Recharge to the Basin
historically has resulted from infiltration of runoff from the San Gabriel and San Bernardino Mountains, with
more than 60 percent of the recharge coming from the Santa Ana River, Mill Creek and Lytle Creek. Lesser
contributors include Cajon Creek, San Timoteo Creek and most of the creeks flowing southward out of the
San Bernardino Mountains. The proposed project site is located within the West Twin Creek (Waterman
Canyon) and East Twin Creek watersheds, which contribute to groundwater recharge through the perco-
lation basins south of the Arrowhead Springs property but have not been identified as a significant
groundwater recharge area by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board.
However, the proposed project would take significant quantities of water from the surface water streams in
the project area and/or retrieve through wells in the Basin excess water that would normally reach the
percolation ponds, which would reduce the amount of water available for groundwater recharge in the Basin.
No location has been established for these wells but they would be located nearby off-site, south of the
Arrowhead Springs property, with connecting infrastructure. The Arrowhead Springs project is estimated to
require a total of 4,035 acre-feet of water per year for domestic and irrigation purposes all derived directly or
indirectly (through wells in the Basin) from the West Twin and East Twin Creek watershed. Approximately
977 acre-feet would be recovered through reclamation of wastewater to be used for irrigation. Impacts to
Page 5.7-26 . The Planning Center
july 2005
5. Environmental Analysis
Waters of the United States due to taking water from the streams can be found in Section 5.4 of this EIR,
Biological Resources, and Section 5.15.1, Water Supply and Distribution Systems. As discussed in Section
3.3.4.3 and Section 5.15.1, the Del Rosa Mutual Water Company and the West Twin Creek Mutual Water
Company have rights to water in those streams. The potential impacts to stream hydrology from withdrawing
water for the project would be greatest whenever there are sustained periods of drought and low water flow.
It has not been established if resource agencies would require a minimum flow of water in drought years nor
has the facilities plan for the development established a minimum flow requirement.
AHS IMPACT 5.7-3:
DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT WOULD
INCREASE THE AMOUNT OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES ON THE SITE AND
WOULD THEREFORE INCREASE SURFACE WATER FLOWS INTO DRAINAGE
SYSTEMS WITHIN THE WATERSHED. [THRESHOLD HD-3, HD-4, AND HD-5]
Impact Analysis: As indicated in the conceptual grading plan, the existing drainage pattern of the site would
be substantially altered, particularly along West Twin Creek where the main stem of the water course would
be completely relocated for approximately 1.3 miles to construct the golf course and establish pad sites for
residential areas. Approximately 22,783 linear feet of potential jurisdictional waters3 out of a total of 85,936
linear feet of stream/drainage could be impacted by the project. As discussed in Section 5.3, Biological
Resources, an exact delineation of jurisdictional waters has not been completed and the impact described
here is conservative. A portion of these drainages has been previously impacted by the MWD inland feeder
project, which is depicted in Figure 5.3-3, Plant Communities, as "disturbed" vegetation. The amount and
type of runoff generated by the project would be greater than under existing conditions due to increases in
impervious surfaces as well as the introduction of a golf course.
The undeveloped 1 OO-year storm run off was calculated to be 17,695 cubic feet per second (cfs) including off
site storm run off associated with the site under moisture conditions. Upon completion of the proposed
project, the total storm water flow from the project would be 18,167 cfs including off site storm run off for 100-
year storm event under moisture conditions. Therefore the proposed project would increase the run off
amount by 472 cfs. The summary results of the hydrology analysis for this area are shown in Table 5.7-1. The
proposed hydrograph points, illustrating peak flows from the project site, are show in Figure 5.7-3. It should
be noted however that these calculations are based on conceptual grading plans. Waterman Canyon is
subject to flash flooding and it is anticipated that the design of the golf course would be engineered to
function as overflow basins for flood conditions with potential to reduce peak flow during those times.
~
Hydrograph Peak Flow
No. Watershed Area (Acres) (cfs)
A Waterman Canyon, Arrowhead Springs, Developed Condition 3,394 6,450
A Waterman Canyon, Arrowhead Springs, Undeveloped Condition 3,394 6,288
B East Twin Creek, Arrowhead Springs, Developed Condition 5,929 11,717
B East Twin Creek, Arrowhead Springs, Undeveloped Condition 5,929 11,407
Table 5.7-1
Unit Hydrograph Peak Flow Summary
Note: Developed Peak flows are based on AMC-III rnoisture condition.
Undeveloped Peak Flows are based on AMC-II rnoisture condition.
To protect the development and down stream properties from flood hazards as a result of increased amount
of impervious surfaces, the drainage system for Arrowhead Springs has been designed to transport storm
water runoff from each of the sub basins through the site to points where it would be discharged back into
3 See Section 5.3, Biological Resources for discussion of jurisdictional waters.
General Plan Update and Associated Specific Plans EIR
City of San Bernardino. Page 5.7-27
5. Environmental Analysis
the natural water courses as shown in Figure 3.3-10. The storm water infrastructure for Arrowhead Springs
would be sized and developed in compliance with all applicable ordinances as required by the local and
state agencies. A public street system improved with curbs and gutters and asphalt paving to City standards,
meeting the approval of the Public Works Department, would provide access to commercial areas and
residential lots, each graded to drain in a positive manner. The design of the golf course and relocation of
West Twin Creek would require careful coordination with resource agencies such as California State Fish and
Game, USCOE and the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board to ensure that all impacts
associated with the project from withdrawal of water from drainages to loss of riparian habitat are
successfully mitigated.
AHS IMPACT 5.7-4:
PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT SITE PROPOSED FOR DEVELOPMENT ARE
LOCATED WITHIN A 100-YEAR FLOOD HAZARD AREA. [THRESHOLDS HD-7
AND HD-8]
Impact Analysis: Portions of the specific plan area lying adjacent to West Twin Creek are subject to 100-
year flood plain inundation; however a specific 1 OO-year floodplain elevation has not been determined for all
of the property. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)
depicts the flood plain boundary of West Twin Creek as following along the water course with varying widths
as slope and channel characteristics change. Potential jurisdictional waters are depicted in Figure 5.3-4 in
Biological Resources. Project development along these areas would be primarily limited to golf course;
however small residential pad sites are planned along West Twin Creek in the northern portion of the
property. Grading would be designed to place structural/habitable development areas above any flood plain
areas associated with these water courses.
As mentioned previously, to reduce the potential for flooding in the project area, the fairways of the golf
course would be designed and graded to function as overflow basins as part of a flood control mechanism
for West Twin Creek. FEMA maps would need to be modified to reflect the redesigned 100-year flood
contour.
AHS IMPACT 5.7-5:
THE PROJECT SITE IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE INUNDATION AREA OF
THE SEVEN OAKS DAM. [THRESHOLD HD-9]
Impact Analysis: The residential areas planned for the Arrowhead Springs Specific Plan, located on the
northern border of the City in the San Bernardino Mountains, would be at a higher in elevation than all other
areas of the City and would be several miles away from the Seven Oaks Dam inundation zone. Therefore, no
people or structures would be affected by dam failure. However, the MWD water pipeline, which is 12 feet in
diameter, does run through the property. Rupture of the pipeline would result in localized flooding that would
primarily be confined to the West and East Twin Creek drainages. The probably of an event of this nature is
considered low. See Section 5.6, Hazards and Hazardous Materials for additional discussion.
AHS IMPACT 5.7-6:
THE SITE WOULD NOT BE SUBJECT TO INUNDATION BY SEICHE OR
TSUNAMI; HOWEVER THERE IS POTENTIAL FOR MUDFLOWS. [THRESHOLD
HD-l0]
Impact Analysis: East and West Twin Creeks have the potential to carry debris, or debris flow from
respective watersheds through the project area. Debris has the potential to fill or plug structures designed to
collect and convey runoff, forcing floodwaters into the adjacent areas. Rapidly moving flows heavily laden
with debris are also extremely dangerous. Mudflows are a potential hazard in the Arrowhead Springs area,
due to the hilly terrain, known landslide areas within the specific plan area and the extent of the watershed for
both East and West Twin Creeks.
A seiche is a small tidal wave that occurs in a lake or other enclosed body of water. Open pools and above
ground water storage reservoirs in the specific plan area can be susceptible to seiches. Seiches within a
Page 5.7-28. The Planning Center
july 2005
5. Environmental Analysis
storage tank could cause damage to their structures. If tanks are damaged during an earthquake, the water
released has the potential to impact structures down gradient. Many of the water storage tanks for the
development are planned for locations that are down gradient of structures and all are designed with an
outer containment tank in the event of breach thereby reducing potential for inundation of structures.
A tsunami is a high ocean wave generated by a sub-marine earthquake or volcanic eruption with potential to
affect coastal communities. Arrowhead Springs is located inland and at elevations that would not be affected
by a tsunami.
Arrowhead Springs Specific Plan Relevant Development Standards
The following general development standards contained within the Arrowhead Springs related to hydrology
and water quality for the Arrowhead Springs area include:
. On-site catch basins or siltation basins, as well as energy-absorbing devices, may be required as a
means to prevent erosion as well as to provide for ground water recharge.
. Natural drainage courses should be protected from grading activity.
. Where brow ditches are required, naturalize with plant materials and native rocks.
. Maximum coverage of the Arrowhead Springs Specific Plan Area (1,916 acres) by impervious
surfaces shall not exceed 10% of the gross land area.
. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a site specific drainage study, which meets the standards
of the City Engineer, will be prepared by a Civic Engineer registered in the State of California. All
recommendations from this analysis, including facilities necessary to mitigate drainage impacts,
maximize percolation and groundwater recharge to the extent feasible shall be incorporated in all
grading and site improvement plans.
~
. The applicant shall mitigate on-site storm water discharge sufficiently to maintain compliance with
the City's NPDES Storm Water Discharge Permit Requirements. A "Notice of Intent" (NOI) shall be
filed with the State Water Quality Control Board for construction disturbing one acre or more of land.
5.7.4 Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions
5.7.4.1 General Plan
. Future projects shall comply with applicable federal, state, and local regulations governing water
quality standards and waste discharge requirements. These include but are not limited to the
requirements of the CWA, SDWA, and NPDES. Waste discharge requirements have been estab-
lished for the incorporated cities of San Bernardino County, the County Flood Control District and
the remainder of the County within the Santa Ana Region Area-Wide Urban Storm Water Runoff
(NPDES) permit otherwise known as the San Bernardino County MS4 permit. The City has adopted
a Storm Water Drainage Systems ordinance (Title 8, Health & Safety, Chapter 8.80) that provides
measures for compliance with the MS4 permit including but not limited to protection of the storm
drainage system (8.80.205), prohibited discharges (8.80.206), compliance with Best Management
Practices (8.80.208), treatment of storm water runoff (8.80.209) and spill containment (8.80.211 ).and
established Water Quality Management Plan requirements for all new development. All new
development is required to submit for approval a Storm Water Quality Management Plan outlining all
structural and non-structural BMPs during and after construction in adherence with this ordinance.
General Plan Update and Associated Specific Plans EIR
City of San Bernardino . Page 5.7-29
5. Environmental Analysis
. Future projects encompassing an area one acre or more shall submit for approval to the State Water
Resources Control Board, a Notice of Intent to be covered under the General Construction Storm
Water Permit, in compliance with the NPDES program. In addition, future projects shall be required
to develop and implement a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which incorporates
Best Management Practices (BMPs) that address pollutant source reduction and provide
measures/controls necessary to mitigate potential pollutant sources. These include, but are not
limited to: erosion controls, sediment controls, tracking controls, non-storm water management,
materials and waste management, good housekeeping practices and monitoring.
5.7.4.2 Arrowhead Springs
. The applicant shall submit for approval to the State Water Resources Control Board, a Notice of
I ntent to be covered under the Storm Water Permit. Additionally, the project proponent shall prepare
a SWPPP which will: (1) require implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) so as to
prevent a net increase in sediment load in storm water discharges relative to preconstruction levels;
(2) prohibit during the construction period discharges of storm water or non storm water at levels
which would cause or contribute to an exceedance of applicable water quality standards contained
in the Basin Plan; (3) discuss in detail the BMPs planned for the project related to control of sedi-
ment and erosion, non sediment pollutants, and potential pollutants in non storm water discharges;
(4) describe post construction BMPs for the project; (5) explain the maintenance program for the
project's BMPs; (6) during construction, require reporting of violations to the Regional Board; and
(7) list the parties responsible for SWPPP implementation and BMP maintenance during and after
grading. The project proponent shall implement the SWPPP and will modify the SWPPP as directed
by the Storm Water Permit.
. The applicant shall develop a Water Quality Management Plan in accordance with the requirements
of the MS4 Permit and Chapter 8.80 (Strom Water Drainage System) of the Municipal Code and shall
submit the WQMP for review to the City. The City shall approve the WQMP prior to the granting of
land disturbing permits for the proposed development. The WQMP shall: 1) describe the routine and
special post construction BMPs to be used at the proposed development site (including both
structural and non structural measures); 2) describe responsibility for the initial implementation and
long term maintenance ofthe BMPs; 3) provide narrative with the graphic materials as necessary to
specify the locations of the structural BMPs; and 4) certify that the project proponent will seek to
have the WQMP carried out by all future successors or assigns to the property.
. Municipal Code Title 13, Public Utilities, Chapter 13.04 Wells contain provisions for documenting
amounts of water withdrawn from wells in the San Bernardino Basin.
. Municipal Code Title 13, Public Utilities, Chapter 13.24 Water System Supply contains requirements
for drilling water wells
5.7.5 Level of Significance Before Mitigation
5.7.5.1 San Bernardino General Plan Update
Upon consideration of General Plan policies and implementation of regulatory requirements and standard
conditions of approval, the following impacts would be less than significant:
GP Impact 5.7-1
The limited availability of vacant land to convert to impervious surfaces that would
increase the potential for water quality degradation and adherence to NPDES
requirements including local ordinances for Storm Water Drainage Systems would
reduce potential impacts of implementation of the General Plan update to less that
significant.
Page 5.7-30 . The Planning Center
july 2005
5. Environmental Analysis
GP Impact 5.7-2
GP Impact 5.7-3
GP Impact 5.7-4
GP Impact 5.7-5
GP Impact 5.7-6
There would be no substantial reduction to ground water recharge due to the
limited amount of vacant land to convert to impervious surfaces due and urban
uses.
Existing drainage patterns would not be significantly altered and impervious
surfaces would not be greatly increased through implementation of the General
Plan update with the exception of hillside areas near the San Bernardino Mountains
where vacant land could be converted to urban uses. The Hillside Management
Overlay Ordinance and NPDES requirements for the MS4 permits would limit
impacts of increased storm water flows.
The General Plan update limits potential for development of residential structures in
flood prone areas.
The policies and land use designations of the General Plan update limit develop-
ment of structures for human occupancy in inundation areas.
Potential for localized mudflows in hillside areas would be minimized by the Hillside
Management Overlay ordinance.
5.7.5.2
Arrowhead Springs
Upon consideration of development standards and implementation of regulatory requirements and standard
conditions of approval, the following impacts would be less than significant:
AHS Impact 5.7-5
AHS Impact 5.7-6
The project site is not located in a dam inundation zone.
~
Adherence to the project development standards and the Hillside Management
Overlay ordinance and standard engineering practice would limit potential for
mudflows to affect the project site.
AHS Impact 5.7-1
Without mitigation, the following impacts would be potentially significant:
AHS Impact 5.7-2
AHS Impact 5.7-3
AHS Impact 5.7-4
During the construction phase of the proposed project, there is the potential for
short-term unquantifiable increases in pollutant concentrations from the site. After
project development, the quality of storm runoff (sediment, nutrients, metals,
pesticides, pathogens and hydrocarbons) may be altered.
Development pursuant to the proposed project would increase the amount of
impervious surfaces on the site and would therefore impact opportunities for
groundwater recharge. Additionally water would be withdrawn from local streams
that would otherwise flow to percolation basins for aquifer recharge.
The proposed project would increase the amount of impervious surfaces on the
site and therefore increase surface water flows into drainage systems within the
watershed.
The project would alter the 1 OO-year flood plain elevation within close proximity of
proposed residential areas.
General Plan Update and Associated Specific Plans EIR
City of San Bernardino . Page 5. 7-31
5. Environmental Analysis
5.7.6 Mitigation Measures
5.7.6.1 San Bernardino General Plan Update
No significant impacts were identified and no mitigation measures are necessary.
5.7.6.2 Arrowhead Springs Specific Plan
AHS 5.7-1 A
Prior to the issuance of land disturbing permits, the applicant shall provide the City
Engineer with evidence that a Notice of Intent (NOI) has been filed with the State
Water Resources Control Board. Such evidence shall consist of a copy of the NOI
stamped by the State Water Resources Control Board or the Regional Water Quality
Control Board, or a letter from either agency stating that the NOI has been filed a
minimum of thirty days prior to commencing grading operations.
AHS 5.7-1 B
Prior to issuance of land disturbing permits and in compliance with the
requirements of the State General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit, the
project applicant shall prepare a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
that incorporates measures or comparable Best Management Practices which
describe the site, erosion and sediment controls, means of waste disposal,
implementation of approved local plans, control of post-construction sediment and
erosion control measures and maintenance responsibilities, and non-storm water
management controls. The SWPPP shall also be submitted to the City of San
Bernardino Public Works Department. The applicant shall require all construction
contractors to retain a copy of the approved SWPPP on each construction site.
Additionally, the SWPPP shall ensure that all water discharges are in compliances
with the current requirements of the California Regional Water Quality Control
Board, Santa Ana Region.
AHS 5.7-1C
Prior to issuance of land disturbing permits and in compliance with City of San
Bernardino Municipal Code Chapter 8.80, the applicant shall prepare a Storm Water
Quality Management Plan (SWQMP). The SWQMP shall implement all applicable
BMPs, as listed in the California Storm Water Best Management Practices
Handbooks or the current, San Bernardino County Storm Water Program's Report
of Waste Discharge, to reduce pollutants in storm water and runoff and reduce non-
storm water discharges to the City's storm water drainage system to the maximum
extent practicable. The SWQMP shall demonstrate compliance with California
Department of Health Services Section 60310 Use Area Requirements, which state
that "no impoundment of disinfected tertiary recycled water shall occur within 100
feet of any domestic water supply well," and "no irrigation with, or impoundment of,
disinfected secondary or disinfected secondary recycled water shall take place
within 1 00 feet of any domestic water supply well."
AHS 5.7-1 D
Prior to the issuance of land disturbing permits for the golf course, a Chemical
Application Management Plan (CHAMP) shall be submitted to and approved by the
City of San Bernardino. The CHAMP or similar management plan shall incorporate
but not be limited to the following:
. A description of chemicals authorized for use and approved by the State of
California, along with guidelines for their application. Guidelines shall
include restrictions on their application and their use near drainage sys-
tems. Chemicals include fertilizers, herbicides, fungicides, insecticides and
rodenticides. Guidelines on the application of fertilizers and soil amend-
Page 5.7-32 . The Planning Center
july 2005
5. Environmental Analysis
ments shall take into account consideration the physical characteristics
and nutrient content of the soil on the golf course site.
. Guidelines for the irrigation of the golf course that take into consideration
the field capacity of soil types and the timing with chemical applications;
and
. Chemical storage requirements and chemical spill response and chemical
inventory response plans shall be prepared and implemented.
AHS 5.7-1 E
A water quality monitoring system and program shall be developed and
implemented in conjunction with the CHAMP that provides for sampling of all
permanent surface water features on a quarterly basis and includes an analysis for
non-volatile synthetic organic chemicals, total dissolved solids, chloride, sulfate,
total phosphorus, boron, nitrogen as nitrate, total nitrogen, and iron. This moni-
toring program shall be implemented with consideration of the RWQCB water
quality objectives.
AHS 5.7 -2A
Prior to approval of the first Tentative Tract Map, evidence shall be provided to the
Development Services Department that appropriate water rights have been granted
including a determination of maximum and minimum withdrawal of water from East
and West Twin Creek watersheds (in conjunction with mitigation measure 5.15-1).
AHS 5.7-2B
Prior to approval of the first Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall secure a site for
the supplemental water wells in the San Bernardino Basin and obtain a drilling and
operation permit in accordance with Chapter 13.24 (Water Supply System) of the
Municipal Code.
~
AHS 5.7 -3A
Prior to issuance of land disturbing permits, the applicant shall submit a Final
Drainage Plan Report to the City of San Bernardino for review and approval in
conformance with the City of San Bernardino requirements that are in effect at the
time of submittal. The report shall be prepared by a qualified registered professional
civil engineer and shall, at a minimum, include the following:
. A written text addressing existing conditions, the effects of projects
improvements, all appropriate calculations, a watershed and hydrology
map, changes in downstream flows and elevations, proposed on and off-
site improvements (catch basins, inlets, vaults, swales, filters, etc. for
entrapment of sediment debris and contaminants), and features to protect
downstream uses and property. The project drainage features shall be
designed to ensure no change in downstream flow conditions that would
result in new or increased severity of flooding.
. The report shall provide evidence of compliance with all required approvals
from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (401 Water Quality Waiver)
and with USCOE 404 permitting for changes to "waters of the U.S."
AHS 5.7 -3B
Maintenance of the storm drainage facilities shall be the responsibility of the project
applicant until such time as the facilities are turned over to the City as a public
improvement, or included within a Landscape Maintenance District or project home-
owners or maintenance association. Easements shall be created and offered for
dedication to the City for maintenance and access to these facilities as necessary in
anticipation of possible City maintenance.
General Plan Update and Associated Specific Plans EIR
City of San Bernardino - Page 5.7-33
5. Environmental Analysis
AHS 5.7-4
Prior to issuance of building permits the project applicant shall prepare and file an
application with Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), a Letter of Map
Revision (LOMR) for Flood Insurance Rate Maps as necessary to reflect changes to
the floodway or flood plain resulting from the development to demonstrate that
all habitable structures are not subject to flooding in a 100-year storm. The
Department of Public Works shall be provided a copy of the LOMR.
5.7.7 Level of Significance After Mitigation
The mitigation measures identified above would reduce potential impacts associated with hydrology and
water quality to a level that is less than significant. Therefore, no significant unavoidable adverse impacts
relating hydrology and water quality have been identified.
Page 5.7-34 . The Planning Center
July 2005