HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-Annoucement Handout
Entp.rp.d into Record at
Cnllncil/f:mvOevCms Mtg:
~~
Hilda Item t-{
- ~.--_._. -,- - --_.._---......---~'"
3 /]./ /05
!II
ASSOCIATION Of
WASHINGTON CITIES
h~
City Clerk/COC Secy
City of Sail Bernardino
Washington's deteriorating city
streets and bridges threaten our
economic future and quality of life
Jf'
.#'
Acti. . now to reverse the stea(ry';~~~lu1
will save taxpayers ffiHN8m 6'f"
,
.
c-A=<3:r. o:.w in g Tr an s po r tat ion
Seattle has increased
general fund spending on
transportation by 66%
over the past I 0 years,
but still faces a $500M
maintenance backlog.'
.
MountVernon, with I
a small annual budget
and $62 million
in transportation
project needs, will
require state and
federal grants.
Five cities and
King County
are investing
over $100
million on
capacity and
. HOV improvements on
15+ miles of Pacific High-
way (SR-99), a state facility.
WSDOT's investment on
this state highway is
limited to minor pavement
overlay expenditures.
Vancouver, a regional hub,
has an annual average of
$30M in transportation
investments over the past
four years. Despite this
large investment, they face
an annual deficit of $14M
. . I
In transportation costs.
Redmond: Microsoft
employment has gone
from less than 4,000
in 1990 to more than
25,000 today, resulting
in massive maintenance
issues. City funds cannot
keep pace.
!
_1
University Place lost
30% of its general fund
to 1-695. With only
$300,000 available for
street improvements, the
city faces a backlog of
$63 M for arterial street
improvement alone.
Crisis
Issaquah: Severe
congestion on 1-90 means
that its streets have seen
unprecedented wear
and tear with no funding
solution.
Spokane has a $200M
backlog in street repairs,
and an annual street repair
deficit of $13.2M.
Wenatchee has only 35% of the funds it needs to
pave its streets, creating a big maintenance backlog.
Pullman's street
maintenance reserves
are depleted, with the
city unable to budget
even half of what's
needed for street repair.
Yakima has a $2.8M
annual shortfall for street
maintenance. The city
is using cash reserves to
fund critical maintenance
projects, but will run out
of money by 2005.
Pasco subsidizes its street
fund yearly with $300,000
from the city's general
fund. The city faces major
capital project needs on
arterial streets exceed-
ing $18M with no defined
revenue funding source.
.:..Growing
c~eeds:
:.Ever:y City Affected, Regardless
cof Size or_ Location:
City population has grown 43%
since 1990, compared to 3.5% in
unincorporated areas. Washington's
cities are home to nearly two-thirds
of the state's population. Despite this,
transportation funding is increasingly
focused on state needs, while neglecting
city streets.
Eastern Washington cities face freeze/
thaw cycles that accelerate street
deterioration.
Streets in newly incorporated and
annexed cities need major investments
to meet urban standards.
Nearly 90% of the state GDP
is generated in the state's top 9
metropolitan areas, yet funding to
support transportation in these
employment centers continues to
decline.
Larger economic centers need major
improvements for congestion relief,
freight mobility, and earthquake
protection -requiring a level of
investment that local resources alone
cannot meet.
Many intermediate and smaller
cities serve as a through corridor
for commuting workers, resulting in
extraordinary congestion.
Small rural communities are unable
to fund the most basic resurfacing
projects and cannot afford even modest
improvements to their streets.
cWe:~eed-to Act, & Act Now.
The cost of inaction is high. As our city streets and arterials deteriorate, the cost to
repair or replace them doubles every 10 to 15 years.
:ion of Gas Tax v. Population
~~
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
er--Capita Distribution of Gas Tax in 1991 Dollars
Very Poor
III
>..
lC III
~ .!:
"C III
lC Co
o aI
...a:
........
o 0
C aI
.2 E
.. .-
'SI-
c ..
o lC
U
Poor
Fair
Good
/-
$1 To Rep
Very Good
. ~ -~ - .~~~.- ~- ~.... ,:,--;.,::'=.:
. .
.' . .......
$1
ctb~e:8:o1(Jtion
To solve these problems,Washington
cities need an injection of direct state
dollars and new local funding options. The
last such action by the State Legislature
was in 1990 - when Governor Booth
Gardner was still in office.
I
I
State legislative actions should include:
. At least 5 cents of new gas tax
distributions. Even with this addition,
it would take 6 yea~s to return state
baseline investment'to 1991 levels.
I
. Future gas tax distributions that ensure
a fairer return to cities, which handle a
disproportionate amount of the state's
employment and commuter traffic.
. A fund to provide pavement
assistance for 178 cities under 5,000.
Currently, it would take decades for
these smaller cities to fund a major
transportation project.
. Increase funds for the Transportation
Improvement Board (TIB), a key city
transportation funding partner.
. Dedicated funding for freight
mobility--critical to keeping our State
competitive in the global economy.
. Reinstating the Corridor Program to
assist with multi-jurisdictional corridor
needs.
Additionally, cities need new local trans-
portation funding options to meet urgent
and growing needs. These could include:
. Re-enactment of the $15 vehicle
license fee
. Local option gas tax for cities (if
counties and RTIDs do not utilize)
. Street utility authority
. Other locally implemented options,
including Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT)
charge, weight-based fees, etc.
Cost of Repair OverTime
Will Cost $4 to $5 Here
r Here
$3
Dollar Cost of Repairs
-
$4
"Our cities are where most of our
jobs are. As cities collaborate to
grow prosperity in every region of
au.' state, their ability to take care of
transportation basics is challenged as
never before. Investment in basic city
infrastructure is a requirement for our
state to be as competitive as it can be."
:;
Drewe/. Executive Director.
..ugetSound Regional Council
"
'the State is working to
rob/ems on our state
face an equally serious
city streets. Freight
'both a strong lacal road
goad highway network
roducts to market, get our
;~rk and stay competitive.
~'the system doesn't
network begins
. Executive Vice
shingt~n Trucking
.. nd roads need help
"state highways.
ew(uhding for local
;;;..";:>,;
'on.projects, maintenance
ntinue to grow and the
roads will fall further
$5
rA::Transp:ortation Crisis for
aWasbil1gtOl1_ Cities:
Washington cities are falling dangerously
behind in maintaining city streets and
bridges and meeting growing capacity and
mobility needs. Significant cuts in state
funding, coupled with the loss of revenue
sources, have created a crisis for our
local transportation systems.
In 2002, cities invested $936 million on
transportation -- $200 million for street
Dtow.:Did We
Biet:l::fere?
Drastic transportation funding cuts
from statewide initiatives, with city
losses projected at $1.2 billion
by 2007.
. Discontinuation of the Small City
Paving Program, which funded 157
cities and paved 160 miles of streets.
. Transportation Investment Board
revenues are limited - only $1 is
granted for every $8 requested.
. A 2003 Nickel Package with no new
gas tax distributions for cities, a
departure from past legislative practice.
. Loss of the Street Utility Fee, Vehicle
Licensing Fee and dedicated freight
mobility funds.
. When a state highway runs through a
city of 22,500 and over, state mandates
require the city to assume costs for
maintenance, signalization, ADA and
most traffic control.
. A 40% decrease in per capita state gas
tax distributions, requiring significant
increases in city transportation
spending.
maintenance alone. Yet this covers only
one-third of ongoing needs and does not
address a critical maintenance backlog.
A 1998 legislative study showed
Washington cities facing a $2.42 billion
shortfall in transportation infrastructure
funding. And the problem has grown
steadily worse.
'.;".'-if-,.
. . '''Iegislature, cities and
to have a reasonable
providing local
On funding options."
"One in four jobs in Washington is
dependent upon trade. More than
I 00,000 agricultural jobs depend on
the ability to move products efficiently
to our ports from other parts of the
state. We can't build a first rate
economy on second rate roads."
'!:IIle Dinsmore, Chief Executive
<JOfflcer, Port of Seattle
, every trip in this state begins
on a city street. If we continue
rther and further behind in the
.
, ,p,~eep of our local roads and
e ;.oLr citizens and our economy
'l!;>
a heavy price for decades to
City Per-Capita Oistribu
$24.54
Washington's fixed gas tax distribution is applied to a growin
..
1991
1992
1993
c
=> ~ (in millions)
1994
1995
1996
~
I:.
1~
r
,
~
I
For more information, contact:
Ashley Probart
Transportation Coordinator
Association of Washington Cities
360-753-4137
ashleyp@awcnet.org
AWC thanks the cities of Bellevue, Everett, Fe'deral Way, Kent,
Seattle and Tacoma for helping make this brochure possible through
their generous contributions.
ASSOCIATION Of
WASHINGTON CITIES