HomeMy WebLinkAbout14-Development Services
ORIGINAL
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Dept: Development Services
Subject: Resolution of Intention ---
Northpark Boulevard and Campus Parkway
area Landscape Maintenance Assessment
District No. 1036 (Tract No. 16509).
From: JAMES FUNK, Director
Date: December 15, 2004
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
File No. 14.40-126
MCC Date: 01-10-2005
05/06/2004 - Tentative Tract No. 16509 was approved with conditions.
06-07-2004 - Authorization was given to proceed with the formation of the Northpark
Boulevard and Campus Parkway area Landscape Maintenance Assessment District No.1 036
Recommended Motion:
Adopt Resolution
-k9-
Contact person: LASZLO "Les" FOGASSY
Phone: 5026
Supporting data attached: Staff Report, Maps,
Eng. Rep. Resolution
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: $4,000 (Processing fees to be paid by applicant)
$5,081 future maintenance costs to be funded by the
Citv as General Benefit nortion maintenance costs.
Ward:
5
Source: (Acct. No.) 254-000-2301-6023
(Acct. Description) Assessment District Deposits
Finance:
ouncil Notes:
dDO~~:J-
Agenda Item No.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
Staff Report
SUBJECT:
Resolution of Intention --- Northpark Boulevard and Campus Parkway area Landscape
Maintenance Assessment District No. 1036 (Tract No. 16509).
BACKGROUND:
On June 7, 2004, authorization was given to proceed with the formation of a Maintenance
Assessment District within Tentative Tract No. 16509 and adjacent area, located at the
southwesterly corner of Northpark Boulevard and Campus Parkway, known as the University
Park development. The District is being formed as a condition of approval for this tract, and
pursuant to a petition filed by University Park, LLC, the owner and developer of this
development. The petition included the required formation fee of$4,000.
This development is proposed to be recorded and built in phases. The current subdivision (Tract
Map No. 16509-1) consists of 31 single family lots and two additional larger vacant lots which
will be developed to include 3 additional single family lots and a proposed condominium
complex containing 22 to 24 single family detached dwellings. Subsequent development phases
will occur over the next year, and at final build out will include 159 single family lots, 22 to 24
detached dwellings in a proposed condominium complex and proposed commercial development
representing 76.20 assessment units. Additionally, the developer is in the process of acquiring a
parcel on the corner of Campus Parkway and Kendall Drive, which is proposed to be improved
as an open space-park area and is included in the Assessment District boundary. Only the
landscaping is proposed to be included in the maintenance under the Assessment District; the
tot-lot equipment and park amenities in the proposed park, if any, will need to be maintained by
the City. There is also an open space lot directly at the southwest corner of Campus Parkway and
Northpark Boulevard, which will be developed as an open space-passive park area. This lot is
owned by the State University, but an easement for maintenance purposes will be granted to the
City. There will also be a 2.38 parcel that will be developed as a City park, and will not be
included in the Assessment District due to is general use and benefit by the public.
The improvements to be maintained will consist of landscape maintenance for the areas stated
above and slope areas, parkways, medians, walking trails, gazebos, monument signs, and 35
recharge drains (known as "Maxwell Drains") throughout the development. All maintenance and
incidental costs (including water, energy and inspection) will be spread across the various parcels
within the District in accordance with the assessment spread formula. All of the details
regarding the maintenance areas, method of assessment and method of spread are detailed in the
Engineer's Report, on file in the office of the City Clerk. A copy of the Report has also been
attached for your review.
As stated in the Report, the estimated total annual assessment is $307,950.72. The costs per
single family lot or residence is estimated to be $1,192.37 per year, which is somewhat higher
Staff Report - Continued
Resolution of Intention - AD 1036
than a typical assessment district. The increased assessments are due to the fact that high-end
housing is being planned for the development, with larger lot sizes, and upscale landscaping
plans. The assessment amount for commercial lots will vary based on the size of each lot, and
will range from $2,394.64 to $26,077.63. Some ofthe area to be maintained has been deemed to
have some general benefit, as detailed in the Engineer's Report. In accordance with City policy,
a portion of those costs cannot be assessed to the District, and will need to be funded through
some other source, such as the General Fund. This amount is estimated to be $5,081 annually.
The Engineer's Report has two proposed assessment rolls. Exhibit 5 shows the proposed
assessment under the current lot configuration and Exhibit 5B shows the proposed assessment
estimated at full build out of the development. The actual assessment amount will depend on
how much of the site has developed and the quantity of landscape installed each year, up to full
build out.
The attached Reso]ution of Intention preliminarily approves the Engineer's Report and sets a
public meeting for February 21,2005 and a public hearing for March 7, 2005, at which time the
resolution approving the formation of the District will be presented for your action. All owners
of record will be given mailed notice relative to the public meeting and hearing and will also be
sent an assessment ballot, to indicate their support or opposition to the formation of the
Assessment District. Since all of the properties proposed to be assessed, are currently, or will be,
under one ownership, no protests are anticipated. Future homeowners and property buyers will
purchase the homes or lots subject to the Assessment District. All potentia] property owners will
be given a disclosure notice by the developer, advising them of the existence of an Assessment
District and the proposed annual cost.
FINANCIAL IMP ACT:
$5,081, estimated to be the Genera] Benefit amount for the Assessment District, will need to be
funded through a source other than the District on an ongoing basis. The applicant has paid the
$4,000 processing fee and all subsequent work carried out in the District will be assessed back to
property owners, except for the General Benefit amount stated.
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Reso]ution.
.
LOCA TION OF
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 1036
No Scale
5th st.
Mill St.
VICINITY MAP
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REAL PROPERTY SECTION
Proposed Maintenance Assessment
District No. 1036 - University
Park- Northpark Boulevard and
Campus Parkway.
~ indicates un-incorporated areas
~ within City's Sphere of Influence
Created by: Lo~,z/o F oQO'5?,Y
Date: /2//5/2004-
CC~~y
ENGINEER'S REPORT
for
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1036
(North park Boulevard and Campus Parkway Maintenance Assessment District)
in the
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
File No. 14.40-126
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
Prepared December 14, 2004
'ineers Report - AD 1036
ENGINEER'S REPORT
for
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1036
FILED in the office of the City Clerk of the City of San Bernardino on the_ day of
CITY CLERK
City of San Bernardino
PRELIMINARY approval by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino, County of San
Bernardino, State of California on the_day of
CITY CLERK
City of San Bernardino
FINAL approval by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino, County of San Bernardino,
State of California on the day of
..
CITY CLERK
City of San Bernardino
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing assessments, together with the Diagram of Assessment District No. 1037,
were approved and confirmed by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino, County of San
Bernardino, State of California on the _ day of
CITY CLERK
City of San Bernardino
ineers Report - AD 1036
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PUBLIC WORKS DIVISION
ENGINEER'S REPORT
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1036
(Northpark Boulevard and Campus Parkway Maintenance Assessment District)
PETITION -- On February 19,2004, a petition was received from the owner or the developer representing
the owner of property within the proposed assessment district for the establishment of an assessment district for
the maintenance of landscaping, monument signs and lighting, certain recreational facilities, hardscaped areas and
drainage facilities including concrete ditches and silt separation wells/drains, commonly known as Maxwell Drains.
These improvements are relative to the proposed development within Tentative Tract No. 16509, to be known as
University Park. The signatures on the petition represent 100% of the property owners of the parcels within the
proposed boundaries of the district. This petition was the result of a requirement placed upon the developer of
Tentative Tract No. 16509 by the City to relieve the City from having to maintain the areas of landscaping.
AUTHORIZATION -- On June 7, 2004, by action of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of
~an Bernardino, the City Engineer and City Clerk were authorized to initiate proceedings for the formation of
Assessment District No.1 036 (North park Boulevard and Campus Parkway Maintenance Assessment District)
pursuant to the provisions of San Bernardino City Municipal Code Chapter 12.90 and this Report has been
prepared and is hereby submitted pursuant to said provisions and in accordance with Resolution of Intention
No. adopted by the Mayor arid Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on the
day of
ADVANCE OF ESTIMATED COSTS OF PROCEEDINGS -- On February 19,2004, pursuant to Section
12.94.030 of the Municipal Code, the developer deposited $4,000 with the City to cover the estimated cost of
proceedings. At the conclusion of the proceedings and after confirmation of all costs, any amounts remaining will
be returned to the developer. If actual costs are more than the deposit, then the remainder can either be paid in a
lump sum by the developer or assessed against the properties involved.
..
EASEMENTS - All area to be maintained will be within City owned property, dedicated right of way, or
within easements granted to the City for maintenance purposes and no maintenance will be carried out on private
property.
DESCRIPTION OF IMPROVEMENTS -- The improvements to be maintained include, but are not limited
to the following:
Landscaping and all appurtenances (including adjacent hardscaped areas) within portions of:
a) Median and parkway landscaping within Campus Parkway, from Kendall Drive to Northpark Boulevard;
3
ineers Report - AD 1036
within Northpark Boulevard from Campus Parkway to University Parkway; Valles Drive, between Campus
Parkway and Sycamore Street; and Ash Street between Northpark Boulevard and Sycamore Street.
b) Slope and Open Space areas within Lots, "B", "C", "D", "E", "F", "H", "I", "J", "L", "M" ,"N" and the rear
slope within Lots 152 through 156 of said Tentative Tract No. 16509, and as said Lots may be re-
designated and/or reapportioned under future phases of said Tract No. 16509; and Lots "A" and "B" of
Tract No. 16509-1, as said lots are delineated on the map of said Tract.
c) Open space passive park at the comer of Campus Parkway and Northpark Boulevard (area includes
unimproved Northpark Boulevard right of way and within landscape easement on State University property.
d) Open space park area located on the northeast comer of Kendall Drive and University Parkway (landcaping
and hardscaping only; Park amenities, including "tot-lot" equipment, to be maintained by the City and
the costs thereof are not assessable to the District
2) Entry monuments and lighting, and hardscape and all appurtenances at:
a) Campus Parkway and Valles Drive;
b) Ash Street and Northpark Boulevard;
3) WalkinglHikinglBicycle trails:
a) Various locations within portions of the slope and open space areas as stated in 1) above.
Gazebos:
a) 2 concrete structure gazebos located at various locations
5) Benches (23) at various locations along trails and open space areas.
6) Drainage facilities including concrete "v" ditches:
a) Various locations within portions of the slope and open space areas as stated in 1) above.
7) De-silting dry-wells ("Maxwell Drains") - 35 wells at various locations throughout said Tentative Tract No.
16509.
The estimated costs associated with the various items of maintenance are shown in Table 1.
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS --Plans ~d Specifications for the landscaping have been prepared by
the developer according to the standards of the City and is subject to final approval by the City prior to the
installation of any landscaping.
DESCRIPTION OF BOUNDARIES -- The boundaries of the proposed district are shown on the
Assessment Boundary Map of Assessment District No.1 036 and are generally described as follows: The boundaries
of said Tentative Tract No. 16509 together with all of Campus Parkway right of way lying between Kendall Drive
and Northpark Boulevard; Northpark Boulevard right of way lying between Campus Parkway and University
. x.way, including the unimproved portion of Northpark Boulevard directly south of Campus Parkway; and that
. lying between the easterly line of improved Northpark Boulevard and the easterly line of said Tentative Tract
4
ineers Report - AD J 03 6
No. 16509, between the Campus Parkway and University Parkway, and Lot 14 of Tract No. 2404.
VICINITY MAP -- A vicinity map showing the general location of the proposed Assessment District is
attached as Exhibit" 1".
DISTRICT BOUNDARY MAP -- A proposed District Boundary Map has been prepared and is on file in
the office of the City Clerk. A reduced copy of the District Boundary Map is attached as Exhibit "2".
DISTRICT DIAGRAM -- A proposed Diagram of the Assessment District has been prepared and will be
filed with the City Clerk after preliminary approval of this Report and will be filed with the County Recorder and
recorded in the office of the City Engineer after final approval of this Report, confirmation of the Assessment Roll
and Resolution Ordering Work. A reduced copy of the Assessment District Diagram is attached as Exhibit "3".
NOTICE OF EXEMPTION -- a "Notice of Exemption" declaring a Categorical Exemption was prepared
and will be filed with the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of San Bernardino County upon formation of the
District. No further environmental proceedings will be necessary. A copy of the Notice of Exemption is attached
as Exhibit "4".
METHOD OF ASSESSMENT AND DETERMINATION OF BENEFIT -- Landscaping and its proper
intenance enhances the esthetics of any given area and the benefit received by the owners of properties in the
area is determined to be equal to the number of residential units that utilize the landscaped areas either as ingress
and egress or by actual physical use of the land as in the cases of large open areas. The boundaries of the proposed
district are drawn with this in mind and the Resolution of Intention delineates the specific areas of maintenance
which will benefit all of the properties within the boundaries. Thus, each residential lot or unit, be it a single family
lot, a condominium or an apartment will be assessed an equal share in the cost of maintenance (1 residential lot or
unit = 1 Assessment Unit).
Commercial lots within the District will be assigned assessment units based upon the number of single
family lots, as per the City's General Plan designation, that could be built within each parcel. The General Plan
designation for the adjacent area is RL , i.e., 10,800 square foot lots, thus each commercial lot will be divided by
10,800 to determine the appropriate Assessment Units to be assigned to each lot.
1
Based upon the proposed single family lots, commercial lots and condominiums proposed to be developed,
the total assessment units for the district will be 257.20 (159 single family lots + 76.20 commercial assessment units
+ 22 condominium units).
The benefit received by the parcels within the boundaries of the district is determined to be of more than
ordinary public benefit, thus each parcel within the district being assessed receives a special benefit from the
improvements. If property not within the boundaries of a district also receives some benefit from the improvements,
consideration must then be given to a general benefit given by the improvements, which may not be assessed to the
~els within the district. Since the installation and maintenance of the landscaping and establishment of an
.:ssment district for the maintenance of the landscaping is specific and incidental to this development, it is further
5
;neers Report - AD 1036
determined that the improvements to be maintained by the assessment district are of special benefit to the district
only and are 100% assessable to the parcels within the boundaries of the assessment district, except as follows:
1. Areas of maintenance that front on maior arterial streets, as determined by the Circulation Plan of
the City's General Plan, are determined to be 15% general benefit and the proportional costs thereof
are not assessable to the District.
2. Areas of maintenance that front on secondary arterial streets, as determined by the Circulation
Plan of the City's General Plan, are determined to be 10% general benefit and the proportional costs
thereof are not assessable to the District.
3. Areas of maintenance that front on collector streets, as determined by the Circulation Plan of the
City's General Plan, are determined to be 5% general benefit and the proportional costs thereof are
not assessable to the District.
4. Areas that front on local streets are determined to be 100% special benefit and are 100% assessable
to the District.
These percentages are based on the traffic circulation for the various street classifications.
Campus Parkway and Northpark Boulevard are both classified as major arterial streets within which
maintenance is proposed. The landscape maintenance area within these streets represents 12% (rounded) of the
total landscape maintenance area within the District and pursuant to the above determination of benefit, 15% of
costs of maintenance for these streets (i.e. 15% of 12% of total landscape maintenance costs) will NOT be
assessed to the District. These general benefit portion of these costs will need to be funded from the City's
General Fund or other non-district source of funding. The special benefit and general benefit costs are is
shown in said Table 1. Only the special costs may be assessed to the District.
Publicly owned lands within the Assessment District, if any, are subject to assessments, uhless they receive
no benefit with the exception of public right of way, which is not subject to assessments. The various publicly
owned lands within the district, including City owned open space lots, State of California open space lots portions
of County of San Bernardino owned parcels will not b,r assessed, since these parcels are either landscaped or within
right of way and will not be developed for either residential or commercial use and thus receive no benefit from the
proposed maintenance.
METHOD OF FINANCING -- The estimated cost of the first year's maintenance shall be assessed against
the properties involved within the current fiscal year or the fiscal year following the establishment of the district.
Depending upon when the costs are assessed and when the actual maintenance is assumed by the City, this assessed
amount can be used as a source of pre-funding the first year's maintenance contract and incidental costs. Once the
City has assumed the responsibility for the maintenance, the properties may be assessed in advance each year
~after to establish a source of pre-funding each year's costs, or may be assessed for the actual contract and
.dental costs plus interest. Interest will be included in the assessment costs for any amounts or portions not pre-
6
;ineers Report - AD 1036
funded through previous assessments. If there is a surplus from the estimated assessment in the event costs are pre-
funded through previous assessments, any such surplus shall be applied as a credit to the following year's
assessment or placed in a reserve fund to cover future increases or maintenance until such reserves are depleted.
The assessment, whether pre-funded or not, shall be levied, collected and enforced in the same manner, at the same
time, and with the same penalties and interest as in the case of taxes levied for property taxes. Table 1 sets forth the
estimated costs of the first year's maintenance. No Bonds will be sold relative to this Assessment District.
ASSESSMENT SPREAD -- The amount of each Assessment Unit is determined by dividing the total
maintenance costs, including all incidentals, by the total number of assessment units, as determined by the above
Met/rod of Assessment. Each parcel in the district is then assessed based upon the total number of Assessment Units
calculated for that parcel.
ASSESSMENT ROLL -- Development of this area is proposed to be accomplished in phases. Presently
there are 31 single family parcels proposed to be developed within the first phase of development of this subdivision.
Each single family parcel representing 1 assessment unit as described under Method of Assessment, and assessments
are spread accordingly. The remaining larger parcels will be assessed based upon the number of single family lots
that can, or are proposed to be built within each larger parcel when further subdivided, at which time assessments
will be reapportioned to each single family lot as described herein. The proposed Commercial lots will be assessed
<;tated above under Method of Assessment.
A proposed Assessment Roll representing the estimated first year's maintenance costs has been prepared
for the 34 parcels within the first phase, consisting of 31 single family lots, 1 larger residential lot to be subdivided
in a 3 residential lots in a future phase (Lot "C") , 1 vacant lot proposed for 22 condominium units (Lot 1 of P.M.
16307) and single remainder larger parcel (Lot 3 of P.M. 16307) representing 210.40 assessment units, which is to
be subdivided in future phases, and is shown as Exhibit "5". An assessment Roll representing the full annual
maintenance cost per lot for full build-out is shown as Exhibit "SA".
FUTURE APPORTIONMENT -- In the event that the assessment units, as determined under Method of
Assessment, change for any parcel(s) during the term of the Assessment District, the assessment amount for that
parcel(s) will change accordingly. Any increases based solely on change in parcel size, land use or density, which
would result in an increase of assessment units, will not be subject to a public hearing as long as the formula for
determining the assessments as described is applied.fursuant to Chapter 12.90 of the San Bernardino Municipal
Code, such reapportionment does not require the recording of an amended Diagram Map.
FUTURE INCREASES -- Due to the nature oflandscape maintenance, it is anticipated that there will be
future increases in assessments as contract, labor, water and energy costs are all subject to future increases. Annual
increases may be increased without further notice or public hearing by a percentage equal to the increase in the
Consumer Price Index (CPI) for all Urban Consumers in the Los Angeles-Orange County-Inland Empire area,
published by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics over the previous year, or 5%,
whichever is less. The CPI is typically used for maintenance districts. The rate varies from year to year, but in no
nt will an increase, if needed, exceed 5% without a majority approval of property owners in the district.
7
;neers Report - AD 1036
TABLE 1
ESTIMATED FIRST YEAR'S COST SUMMARY
Assessment District No. 1036
(Northpark Boulevard and Campus Parkway Maintenance Assessment District)
Description of Costs
Quantity
Unit CostlUnit Annual Cost
A
Maintenance of Tun / Irrigation 90,410 Sq.Ft 0.10 $ 9,041.00
Maintenance of Groundcover /Shruhs/Irrigation, including
non-Fuel-Mod slope areas and DG trails 991,022 SQ.Ft. 0.10 $ 99,102.20
Maintenance of Fuel-Mod slope areas /Irrigation
including drainage ditches and DG trails 533,750 Sq.Ft 0.05 $ 26,687.50
Maintenance of Trees / Irril!lltion 1 LS. 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00
Landscape Area Subtotal 1,615,182 Sq.Ft.
Maintenance of hanlscape areas, monument signs
and lighting energy costs 31,846 Sq. Ft. 0.05 $ 1,592.30
Irrigation Costs (water and energy) 1,615,182 Sq.Ft 0.08 $ 129,214.56
Weekly Inspection (Iabor,overhead) (Total Annual Hrs) 416 Hours 30.00 $ 12,480.00
Annual Assmt. Engineering (Iabortoverhead) 10 Hours 33.00 $ 330.00
Contract Adrninstration (Iabor+overhead) 15 Hours 22.00 $ 330.00
Incidentals (materials, supplies, other costs) 1 LS. 100.00 $ 100.00
Outside Department Services (labor+overhead) 1 LS. 400.00 $ 400.00
Subtotal (A thru L) $ 282,277.56
General Benefit Calculations:
Area of General Benefrt (Northpark; Campus
Pkwy; Park area at Kendall Dr. & Campus
Pkwy) 190,891 Sq.Ft.
Percent of Total Area (N / E) 12 %
Subtotal (M * 0) $ 33,873.31
General Benefit Percentage 15.00 %
General Benefit Amount Not Assessable (P * Q) $ 5,081.00 $ (5,081.00)
Maintenance of Maxwell Drains 35.00 ea. 295.00 $ 10,325.00
Maintenance of exercise stations (6), Gazebos (23) and
benches (23) 1.00 LS. 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00
Subtotal (MtR thru 1) $ 290,521.56
Estimated Interest for non-prefunded amounts* 6 Percent $ 17,431.29
Subtotal $ 307,952.86
Adjustment (Rounding for Assessment Roll) $ (2.14)
TOTAL FIRST YEAR'S FSTIMATED COSTS (Z+AI) $ 307,950.72
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
L
M
N
o
p
Q
R
S
T
U
V
W
X
8
ineers Report - AD 1036
ASSESSMENT CALCULA TION -- Applying the Method of Assessment and Assessment Spread described above,
the following formula is used to determine the assessment amount per Assessment Unit:
Total Costs + Total Assessment Units = Cost per Assessment Unit
thus
307,950.72 + 257.20 = $1,197.32 per Assessment Unit per year
~
9
:ineers Report - AD 1036
ENGINEER'S STATEMENT
This Report, together with the Assessment District Boundary Map, Assessment Diagram and Proposed Assessment
Roll has been prepared and is being filed pursuant to and in compliance with Chapter 12.90 of the San Bernardino
Municipal Code and also in compliance with the requirements set forth in Article XIIID of the California
Constitution for the establishment of Assessment District No. 1036.
r J"lt' ;t~f
{ILL ~uu~
Mark Lancaster, Deputy Director/City Engineer
Date
1
10
ineers Report - AD 1036
List of Exhibits
1. Vicinity Map..................................................... Exhibit "1"
2. Reduced copy of Boundary Map....................... Exhibit "2"
3. Reduced copy of Assessment District Diagram Exhibit "3"
4. Copy of"Notice of Exemption"......................... Exhibit "4"
5. Proposed Assessment Roll (FY 2005/2006)...... Exhibit "5"
6. Proposed Assessment Roll- Full Build-out...... Exhibit "5B"
..
11
LOCA TION OF
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 1036
No Scale
Highland Ave.'
5th St.
Mill St.
"
o
c:
o
u
"
Orange Show Rd. g;
;=
.. .
....
VICINITY MAP
EXHIBIT 1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REAL PROPERTY SECTION
Proposed Maintenance Assessment
District No. 1036 - Un iversity
Park- Northpark Boulevard and
Campus Parkway.
~ indicates un-incorporated areas
~ within City's Sphere of Influence
Created by: La~z/o F oqa~~v
Date: 1J./i~/2004
ASSESSMENT BOUNDARY
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1036
NORTHPARK BOULEVARD AND CAMPUS PARKWAY AREA
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Boundaries of
Tract. No. 16509-1
.
Filed in the office of the City Cent in the City of San Bemardino this_ day of
,20_"
RACHel ClARK.
City CIer1\:. City of San Bemartiino
I heteby certify that the within map showing the proposed boundaries of Assessment District
No. ~ of the City of San Bemardino, County of San Bemardino, State of California, was
approved by the City Council of the City of San Semarano at a regular meeting thereof,
helcl on the day of ,20_. by ResohJtion
No. . and was flied in the offa of the County Reeotder of San Bemarrlino
County, State of Califoml8, onthe_dayof .20_in~
_, page(s) of Maps of Assessment and Convnunity Facilities
Districts.
1
RACHEL CLARK,
City Clerk, City of San Bernardino
!..OC.UIO!'lOF
ASSCSSMEl'n' DISTRICT
ASSlSSWOlT D1STRtCT
ICUl)MY SHQMrt THUS: _ _ _
DA!HED LOT L.JCS 1ClICA1t nnut( .....SON a
PNItCIL MAP. NO. 1.307. '" 210110-76. TO IE
fCCaIJED IN N1\III PttASES 1.ICJUII 1RACT NO. 1.501
San BernllfOlflo Counly Recorclet's Cef1lficate
--
This IT'IlIp has been filed u~r 0clcurTwn1
Number Ihis
dayd 20_..t...=m;;-
Book_of
lllpege .lltMI~loI
II-
an_
inlh..mounlof$
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
OEPARTUENT Of OEVElClPUENT SEAVlCES
PUBUC WORKS DMSION
DRAWING
NO.
11360
_..J......
-1.-....
l.nyW.~er
AlldilOl'-contmllerlfWc:order
County of SIIn Bernardino
NORnlPARK BOUlEVARD
AND CAMPUS PARKWAY AREA
MAJmE."'lANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
By
Deputy Recorder
EXHIBIT 2
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1036
NORTHPARK BOULEVARD AND CAMPUS PARKWAY AREA
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
IN THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
F-.:l.., 1M off_of'" CityCl-".. ..CIlyol San 8emMlnl...._cIiIt 01
A
'"
RACHEL ClARk.
Cil)a.rt..CilylllS...hrnaniIwJ
I~CIInity,*u..lNf)aIDoinglhl~"""""klr~~ND. .lS!ain"Cltyols..e.tnInino.CCu1Iyols...
~. S/Mfol~. _~ by'" ""yar..,c.o.- Ccundllllhl Otrol Sane.m.nllrG..................
MId on"_cgy 01 :zo _"'~Nll MdhabeMltledin
-.oIIicaolltle c-y "--ols...e.m.dInoC-W:yon ,-__,af 20 _inecD
_pagao(.,-oIUaJrsal-'-.-ld~F""'~
RACHEL ClARK
CIty o.tIo. c.y ol San 8enwWo
A~in_g/I"_oI'''C.lYE,-'''_cb101
'"
CIlYENGlNEEFl
OIy0l5...........
An __Ift.d"'IIw~and c- c-ldI 01... City 01 San a.m.n:linoon ......... Pe<-.'" ~ 01,."",--,
onltW_ldi.- Said_I_lhiedon"_Oayol .20 ....._.......c
~and..-'d_......-.sItl...."..ol...OIyE...-afuidClyon.._.ay~
20 ,.............ID.._roI-'*'",ItIe*-af..Cit,e..- kIr"._~ol
.KIl_'--d....";l....parOIIoIlInd"-an...__~
RACHEL ClARK,
Ci!yCleft.Cilyols..8......ono
LQC'....TIOf-jOF
ASSESS~ENT OlSTRICf
~~
VICINITY MAP
LEGEND:
ASSESSWENT DlS1NC1'
IOUCJAIIY SHC*rI THUS: _
DASHED LOT LN:S 1OCA1E FU1\.lR[ ....'llISION C6
PNtaL MAP. NO. 1Q1. .... 100/70-76. 10 IE
AECClNJlD IN F1J1UIt[ PHASES UHDOl ntACT NO. 115Qt-X
AAlAS rs ..~1tNAHC[ SIfOlMII THUS:
---".,.,(j)
... ......." PNlCIlS _ ".,., @
S8n &emardlno Covnty Recorde(1 CertifICate
This !NIP has been filed under Document
Number INs
day d 20_..1....=m;:;--
800k Q(
.1~allherWJques!oI
-.a
'"-
an_
in Ih..mounl of S
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEPARTMENT OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
PUBUC WORKS DIVISION
NORTHPARKBOULEVARD
AND CAMPUS PARKWAY AREA
MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DlSTIUer
_\lING
NO.
11360A
-.....l.....
~OKQ
Br
L>ny -..
Auditor-controa.r~CClt'd.,
County of San 8emardino
Depu~ -
EXHIBIT 3
eo
C"')
o
..--
o
Z l.Ol
uu.
">: 0
iil NI
OQ5
..... Q)
C.s;:
Q)C/)
E
III
III
Q)
III
III
<(
------....~
..-- .....--
I __~
I ~ ~~
I
I
I
I
I
ttJ
I
I
I >-
I <(
I 3:
I ~
I 0::::
I <(
I 0..
I
I
I
I gj
I 0..
I ~
I <(
I U
I
I
I
I
I
I
>-
a::
<l:
o
Z
:J
o
lD
I-
(J
((
I-
en
Ci
I-
Z
w
:::E
en
en
w
en
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
.
o
0:
;;
0">-
,"..j~
155...
0:"'0
~~....
'" :t
... ;,;1'\2
.... "i!: 0:
.~ :5
~~;, ----
----..- - - - -PA-R-K- BOULEVARD
NORTH ~
OJ"
.zr
1!
.
..
;;
"
~
f-
LU
~
U)
ti1
~
Ii
1M'
; ~ @l:
.
.
.
. ~
,
,
,
,@
I _ ~ \
:--- i! '5 "": /~ II
>,0>
roo
"Ol.O
ceo
::l",",:
o ...,
CD~
(f: 133HS 33S)
(z 133HS 33S)
CD
(\')
o
'<""
( i'\~\~'
, I '" I \ \.:
II-"" ~ ----\
~ 0:. -- I
.-I?
_-- 101 ~
.: I U\ __-
_-...\ r ~
- \ u.l\
tJ \ 0:.\-_--
_-""\ 0\
- ~ \ ~\ :
_-\ U
-- 'r
~ \",
o. ,)..,V'
/'
/'/'
~
i:C)
I-
tlJ
:t
CI)
UJ
o
Z It)1
t5u..
EO
.!:!2 (\')1
0-
- Q)
c: Q)
Q)..r::
EU)
en
en
Q)
en
en
<(
(SEE SHEET 2)
's,
t District No. 1036
Assessmen t 4 OF 5
Shee
ZI
01
:;01
~I
\]1
)>1
:;01
^I
I
I
I
ClJI
01
cl
'I
fTll
~I
:;01
01
I
120' I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.
.
.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
--\
~~04~
t:>
t:> .J:~
.4f. 1Q,JO?
's,
<~ o4CllFs
r--
I
I
I
I@
.J
--- I
I
L__
",
'........._----
'S<
"0 .fCllFs
---------
'oSJ
<.10401>('s
~
S\\"<".
,\~\~"<
v". p.--~r-
---- ?
nt District No. 1036
Assessme t 5 OF 5
Shee _ _
(SEE SHEET 3)
f1""9////~
(If~/-\):~\ '~/ /
/ ~v loJ< //
/I~/;>:~ /'~
/ \ ~\ /
/ \ \./ /
// '." / \ \\ /
/ / '.J.l
//'f;> ~ '( //
//r \ '.IJ'~ 'oJ, _
// I '\ 4 _--
I." I 'fg \ _- '-b
\ \ \
\ I- -
I -- l<p
t ---
---
II 1~6_-r _
\ \ _-- I
\ \-- I~;> ~ I~S
\;~/~~ \ / .
I~ '~,,_-:;:/ LOT J
"" ~'\\~~f j
1
~
I-
LU
~
CI)
~
~
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
NOTICE OF EXEMPTION
r
""
FROM: CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
300 N. "0" STREET
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92418
TO:
OFFICE OF PLANNING AND RESEARCH
1400 TENTH STREET, ROOM 121
SACRAMENTO. CA 95814
X COUNTY CLERK
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
385 NORTH ARROWHEAD AVENUE
SAN BERNARDINO. CA 92415
Project Title: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1036
Project Location-Specific: PARCEL MAP NO. 16307 AND TRACT NO. 16509-1- NORTH PARK
BOULEVARD AND CAMPUS PARKYVAY AREA.
Project Location-City: SAN BERNARDINO
Project Location - County: SAN BERNARDINO
Description of project: SBMC 12.90 PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A MAINTENANCE
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Name of Public Agency Approving Project:
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Name of Person or Agency Carrying out Project:
Exem",Et Status: (check one)
D Ministerial (Sec. 21080(b)(1); 15268);
o Declared Emergency (Sec. 210BO(b)(3); 15269(a));
o Emergency Project (Sec.210BO(b)(4); 15269(b)(c));
ex Categorical Exemption. State type and section number: Class 115301(c) Res.90-217,Sec. B2c
o Statutory Exemptions. State code number:
Reason why project is exempt: ESTABLISHMENT PROCEEDINGS FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT TO
PROVIDE FUNDING SOURCE FOR MAINTENANCE OF LANDSCAPING AND OTHER FACILITIES
.
Lead Agency
Contact Person:
LASZLO FOGASSY
Area CodelTelephone/Extension: (909) 384-5026
If filed by applicant:
1. Attach certified document of exemption finding.
2. Has a notice of exemption been filed by the public agency approving the project? 0 Yes 0 No
Signature:
Date:
Title: Real Prooertv Suoervisor
[j Signed by Lead Agency
o Signed by Applicant
Date received for filing at OPR:
'"
..J
VVUTDTT "Ii"
PI 4~1n n,:;. {I;_am Qaov I=N~ t'i.Q7\ C~nA 1 nf 1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PROPOSED
2005 / 2006 ASSESSMENT ROLL - AD 1036
CAMPUS PARKWAY AND NORTHPARK BOULEY ARD AREA MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Assessment No. Parcel No. or Lot No. Assessment Amt.
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
I
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
II
12
TR.16509- I LOT B
TR.16509-1 LOT A
0151-311-05
0151-3 11-06
026 I -23 1-06
0151-311-07
0265-031-20
015 I -3 Il-04
TR. 16509 Lot-I
TR. 16509 Lot-2
TR. 16509 Lot-3
TR. 16509 Lot-4
TR. 16509 Lot-5
TR. 16509 Lot-6
TR. 16509 Lot-7
TR. 16509 Lot-8
TR. 16509 Lot-9
TR. 16509 Lot-IO
TR. 16509 Lot-II
TR. 16509 Lot-12
TR. 16509 Lot-13
TR. 16509 Lot-14
TR. 16509 Lot-15
TR. 16509 Lot-16
TR. 16509 Lot-17
Tj.. 16509 Lot.-18
TR. 16509 Lot-19
TR. 16509 Lot-20
TR. 16509 Lot-21
TR. 16509 Lot-22
TR. 16509 Lot-23
TR. 16509 Lot-24
TR. 16509 Lot-25
TR. 16509 Lot-26
TR. 16509 Lot-27
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1.197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$L197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
2\
22
23
24
25
26
27
1036 / 2005
EXHIBIT "5"
Page 1 of2
Assessment No.
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
TOTALS:
1036 / 2005
Parcel No. or Lot No.
TR. 16509 Lot-28
TR. 16509 Lot-29
TR. 16509 Lot-30
TR. 16509 Lot-31
TR.16509-1 LOT C
0151-311-01
0151-311-03
42 Parcels
1
EXHIBIT "5"
Assessment Amt.
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$1,197.32
$3,591.97
$26,341.04
$240,900.80
$307,950.72
Page 2 of2
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
AD 1036 - PROPOSED ASSESSMENT ROLL - FULL BUILD OUT
NORTHPARK BOULEVARD AND CAMPUS P ARKW A Y AREA MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
Assessment No. Parcel No. or Lot No, Assessment Amt.
0 TR.16509 LOT E $0.00
0 0151-311-04 $0.00
0 TR.16509 LOT D $0.00
0 TR.16509 LOT C $0.00
0 TR.16509 LOT B $0.00
0 TR.16509 LOT A $0.00
0 0261-231-06 $0.00
0 0265-031-20 $0.00
0 0151-311-05 $0.00
0 TR.16509 LOT F $0.00
0 TR.16509 LOT M $0.00
0 TR.16509-1 LOT B $0.00
0 0151-311-06 $0.00
0 TR.16509 LOT N $0.00
0 TR.16509LOTG $0.00
0 TR.16509 LOT L $0.00
0 TR.16509 LOT K $0.00
0 TR.16509 LOT J $0.00
0 TR.16509 LOT I $0.00
0 TR.16509 LOT H $0.00
0 TR.16509-1 LOT A $0.00
I TR. 16509 Lot-I $1,197.32
2 TR. 16509 Lot-2 $1,197.32
3 TR. 16509 Lot-3 $1,197.32
4 TR. 16509 Lot-4 $1,197.32
5 lR. 16509 Lot-5 $1,197.32
6 TR. 16509 Lot-6 $1,197.32
7 TR. 16509 Lot-7 $1,197.32
8 TR. 16509 Lot-8 $1,197.32
9 TR. 16509 Lot-9 $1,197.32
10 TR. 16509 Lot-IO $1,197.32
II TR. 16509 Lot-II $1,197.32
12 TR. 16509 Lot-12 $1,197.32
13 TR. 16509 Lot-13 $1,197.32
14 TR. 16509 Lot-14 $1,197.32
1036 / 2005 EXHIBIT "5B" Page I of5
Assessment No. Parcel No. or Lot No. Assessment Amt.
15 TR. 16509 Lot-15 $1,197.32
16 TR. 16509 Lot-16 $1,197.32
17 TR. 16509 Lot-17 $1,197.32
18 TR. 16509 Lot-18 $1,197.32
19 TR. 16509 Lot-19 $1,197.32
20 TR. 16509 Lot-20 $1,197.32
21 TR. 16509 Lot-21 $1,197.32
22 TR. 16509 Lot-22 $1,197.32
23 TR. 16509 Lot-23 $1,197.32
24 TR. 16509 Lot-24 $1,197.32
25 TR. 16509 Lot-25 $1,197.32
26 TR. 16509 Lot-26 $1,197.32
27 TR. 16509 Lot-27 $1, 197~32
28 TR. 16509 Lot-28 $1,197.32
29 TR. 16509 Lot-29 $1,197.32
30 TR. 16509 Lot-30 $1,197.32
31 TR. 16509 Lot-31 $1,197.32
32 TR. 16509 Lot-32 $1,197.32
33 TR. 16509 Lot-33 $1,197.32
34 TR. 16509 Lot-34 $1,197.32
35 TR. 16509 Lot-35 $1,197.32
36 TR. 16509 Lot-36 $1,197.32
37 TR. 16509 Lot-37 $1,197.32
38 TR. 16509 Lot-38 $1,197.32
39 TR. 16509 Lot-39 $1,197.32
40 TR. 16509 Lot-40 $1,197.32
41 TR. 16509 Lot-41 $1,197.32
42 TR. 16509 Lot-42 $1,197.32
43 TR. 16509 Lot-43 $1,197.32
44 TR. 16509 Lot-44 $1,197.32
..
45 TR. 16509 Lot-45 $1,197.32
46 TR. 16509 Lot-46 $1,197.32
47 TR. 16509 Lot-47 $1,197.32
48 TR. 16509 Lot-48 $1,197.32
49 TR. 16509 Lot-49 $1,197.32
50 TR. 16509 Lot-50 $1,197.32
51 TR. 16509 Lot-51 $1,197.32
52 TR. 16509 Lot-52 $1,197.32
53 TR. 16509 Lot-53 $1,197.32
1036 / 2005 EXHIBIT "5B" Page 2 of 5
Assessment No. Parcel No. or Lot No. Assessment Amt.
-- --~-~- .__._~
54 TR. 16509 Lot-54 $1,197.32
55 TR. 16509 Lot-55 $1,197.32
56 TR. 16509 Lot-56 $1,197.32
57 TR. 16509 Lot-57 $1,197.32
58 TR. 16509 Lot-58 $1,197.32
59 TR. 16509 Lot-59 $1,197.32
60 TR. 16509 Lot-60 $1,197.32
61 TR. 16509 Lot-61 $1,197.32
62 TR. 16509 Lot-62 $1,197.32
63 TR. 16509 Lot-63 $1,197.32
64 TR. 16509 Lot-64 $1,197.32
65 TR. 16509 Lot-65 $1,197.32
66 TR. 16509 Lot-66 $1,197.32
67 TR. 16509 Lot-67 $1,197.32
68 TR. 16509 Lot-68 $1,197.32
69 TR. 16509 Lot-69 $1,197.32
70 TR. 16509 Lot-70 $1,197.32
71 TR. 16509 Lot-71 $1,197.32
72 TR. 16509 Lot-72 $1,197.32
73 TR. 16509 Lot-73 $1,197.32
74 TR. 16509 Lot-74 $1,197.32
75 TR. 16509 Lot-75 $1,197.32
76 TR. 16509 Lot-76 $1,197.32
77 TR. 16509 Lot-77 $1,197.32
78 TR. 16509 Lot-78 $1,197.32
79 TR. 16509 Lot-79 $1,197.32
80 TR. 16509 Lot-80 $1,197.32
81 TR. 16509 Lot-81 $1,197.32
82 TR. 16509 Lot-82 $1,197.32
83 TR. 16509 Lot-83 $1,197.32
84 TR. 16509 Lot-84 $1,197.32
85 TR. 16509 Lot-85 $1,197.32
86 TR. 16509 Lot-86 $1,197.32
87 TR. 16509 Lot-87 $1,197.32
88 TR. 16509 Lot-88 $1,197.32
89 TR. 16509 Lot-89 $1,197.32
90 TR. 16509 Lot-90 $1,197.32
91 TR. 16509 Lot-91 $1,197.32
92 TR. 16509 Lot-92 $1,197.32
1036 / 2005 EXHIBIT "5B" Page 3 of 5
Assessment No. Parcel No. or Lot No. Assessment Amt.
93 TR. 16509 Lot-93 $1,197.32
94 TR. 16509 Lot-94 $1,197.32
95 TR. 16509 Lot-95 $1,197.32
96 TR. 16509 Lot-96 $1,197.32
97 TR. 16509 Lot-97 $1,197.32
98 TR. 16509 Lot-98 $1,197.32
99 TR. 16509 Lot-99 $1,197.32
100 TR. 16509 Lot-I 00 $1,197.32
101 TR. 16509 Lot-IO I $1,197.32
102 TR. 16509 Lot-I02 $1,197.32
103 TR. 16509 Lot-I03 $1,197.32
104 TR. 16509 Lot-I 04 $1,197.32
105 TR. 16509 Lot-105 $1,197.32
106 TR. 16509 Lot-I06 $1,197.32
107 TR. 16509 Lot-I07 $1,197.32
108 TR. 16509 Lot-I08 $1,197.32
109 TR. 16509 Lot-I09 $1,197.32
110 TR. 16509 Lot-I 10 $1,197.32
III TR. 16509 Lot-Ill $1,197.32
112 TR. 16509 Lot-1 12 $1,197.32
113 TR. 16509 Lot-I 13 $1,197.32
114 TR. 16509 Lot-I 14 $1,197.32
115 TR. 16509 Lot-l 15 $1,197.32
116 TR. 16509 Lot-I 16 $1,197.32
117 TR. 16509 Lot-I 17 $1,197.32
118 TR. 16509 Lot-I 18 $1,197.32
119 TR. 16509 Lot-I 19 $1,197.32
120 TR. 16509 Lot-l20 $1,197.32
121 TR. 16509 Lot-121 $1,197.32
122 TR. 16509 Lot-122 $1,197.32
123 TR. 16509 Lot-123 $10,775.88
124 TR. 16509 Lot-124 $1,197.32
125 TR. 16509 Lot-125 $1,197.32
126 TR. 16509 Lot-126 $1,197.32
127 TR. 16509 Lot-127 $1,197.32
128 TR. 16509 Lot-128 $1,197.32
129 TR. 16509 Lot-129 $1,197.32
130 TR. 16509 Lot-DO $1,197.32
131 TR.16509Lot-131 $1,197.32
1036 / 2005 EXHIBIT "5B" Page 4 of 5
Assessment No. Parcel No. or Lot No. Assessment Amt.
--.----- -------
132 TR. 16509 Lot-l32 $1,197.32
133 TR. 16509 Lot-133 $1,197.32
134 TR. 16509 Lot-134 $1,197.32
135 TR. 16509 Lot-135 $1,197.32
136 TR. 16509 Lot-136 $1,197.32
137 TR. 16509 Lot-137 $1,197.32
138 TR. 16509 Lot-138 $1,197.32
139 TR. 16509 Lot-139 $1,197.32
140 TR. 16509 Lot-140 $1,197.32
141 TR. 16509 Lot-141 $1,197.32
142 TR. 16509 Lot-142 $1,197.32
143 TR. 16509 Lot-143 $1,197.32
144 TR. 16509 Lot-144 $1,197.32
145 TR. 16509 Lot-145 $1,197.32
146 TR. 16509 Lot-146 $1,197.32
147 TR. 16509 Lot-147 $1,197.32
148 TR. 16509 Lot-148 $1,197.32
149 TR. 16509 Lot-149 $1,197.32
150 TR. 16509 Lot-150 $2.394.64
151 TR. 16509 Lot-151 $10,620.23
152 TR. 16509 Lot-152 $19,300.80
153 TR. 16509 Lot-153 $11,099.16
154 TR. 16509 Lot-154 $15,445.43
155 TR. 16509 Lot-155 $8,692.54
156 TR. 16509 Lot-156 $26,077.63
157 0151-311-01 $26,341.07
TOTALS: 178 Parcels $307,950.72
"
1036 / 2005
EXHIBIT "5B"
Page 5 of5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
(--'l[
, . ..:!J
RESOLUTION NO.l.~ \:..----'/ u=
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PRELIMINARILY
DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE
THE FORMATION OF A MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT LOCATED IN
THE NORTHPARK BOULEVARD AND CAMPUS PARKWAY AREA WITHOUT
COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION, LIMITATION
AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931; DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO
PROCEED TO ORDER WORK WITHIN THE DISTRICT, TO BE KNOWN AS
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1036; PRELIMINARILY APPROVING THE
ENGINEER'S REPORT A-l'I/D GIVING NOTICE OF A PUBLIC MEETING AND PUBLIC
HEARING.
WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino (hereinafter called "City") as an exercise of its
municipal affairs powers has enacted an Assessment District Ordinance (Municipal Code Chapter
12.90) to provide for the procedure for the formation of assessment districts within the City; and
WHEREAS, it has now become necessary to consider the formation of a maintenance
assessment district within the City, to be known as Assessment District No. 1036, Northpark
Boulevard and Campus Parkway area Maintenance Assessment District.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Pursuant to Chapter 12.90 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code, the
Mayor and Common Council of said City hereby preliminarily find and determine that the public
convenience and necessity require, and it is the intention of the Mayor and Common Council to
form Assessment District No. 1036, the boundaries of which are generally as follows:
The boundaries of said Tentative Tract No. 16509 together with all of Campus Parkway
right of way lying between Kendall Drive and the Northpark Boulevard; Northpark Boulevard right
of way lying between Campus Parkway and University Parkway, including the unimproved portion
of North park Boulevard directly south of Campus Parkway; and that area lying between the easterly
line of improved Northpark Boulevard and the easterly line of said Tentative Tract No. 16509,
between the Campus Parkway and University Parkway, and Lot 14 of Tract No. 2404.
Reference is hereby made to the Engineer's Report on file in the office of the City Clerk of said
City for a map of the boundaries of said district, a description of the maintenance, an estimated cost
12/14/04
1
~(~ /'U
II v. I
/ /10 I () ~;
1 RESOLUTION DECLARING THE INTENTION TO FORM A MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT WITHOUT COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION,
2 LIMITATION AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931, IN THE NORTHPARKBOULEVARD AND
CAMPUS PARKWAY AREA (AD 1036).
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
of the maintenance, and a proposed assessment roll which Report and Assessment District
Boundary Map are hereby preliminarily approved.
SECTION 2. It is the intention of said Mayor and Common Council to order
improvements within the district, which improvement shall consist of, but are not limited to, the
maintenance of landscaping and all appurtenances along portions of Campus Parkway, between
Kendall Drive and Northpark Boulevard; Northpark Boulevard, between Campus Parkway and
University Parkway, various slope and open space areas; the maintenance drainage ditches,
gazebos, hiking/walking trail, recharge drains, monument entry signs, and various hardscape areas
within the proposed boundaries of the Assessment District, and more particularly described in said
Engineer's Report. The estimated cost of said maintenance for the first full year of all maintenance
areas and items, including incidental costs, is $307.950.72.
SECTION 3. Said contemplated work and improvements is of more than local or ordinary
public benefit, and that said Mayor and Common Council do hereby make the expense of such
work and improvement chargeable upon the district, which district is hereby declared to be the
district benefited by said proposed work and improvement, and to be assessed to pay the cost and
expense thereof, except those portions deemed to be of a general benefit, as set forth in siad
Engineer's Report. All public streets or alleys, or portions thereof, within the proposed boundaries
of said Assessment District, are hereby excepted from said assessment, as set forth in said
Engineer's Report.
SECTION 4. The assessment benefit procedure to be followed and the amount to be
assessed against each particular parcel will be based upon the basis of a single residential unit being
12/14/04
2
1 RESOLUTION DECLARING THE INTENTION TO FORM A MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT WITHOUT COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION,
2 LIMITATION AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931, IN THE NORTHPARK BOULEVARD AND
CAMPUS P ARKW A Y AREA (AD 1036).
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
one assessment unit and the percentage of costs will be assessed proportional to the percentage of
the total assessment units on each parcel as it relates to the total number of assessments, actual or
by formula, within the district. Reference is hereby made to said Engineer's Report, on file in the
office of the City Clerk of said City, for full particulars and proposed assessment amount against
each parcel.
SECTION 5. The assessment financing alternative to be followed shall be as follows,
to-wit:
The estimated cost of the first year's maintenance, as set forth in said Engineer's report, shall be
assessed against the properties involved within the current fiscal year or the fiscal year following
the establishment of the district. Depending on when the costs are assessed relative to when the
maintenance is assumed by the City, this assessed amount can be used as a source of pre-funding
the first year's maintenance contract and incidental costs. Once the district has assumed the
responsibility for the maintenance, the properties shall be assessed each year thereafter to establish
a source of pre-funding each year's costs, or for the actual contract and incidental costs. If there
are surplus amounts in the event of pre-funding of costs, then such surplus may be applied as a
credit to the following year's assessment or retained in a reserve to offset future increases. Interest
will be charged on any portion of the assessments which are not pre-funded through previous
assessments. The interest rate shall be based upon the average rate of the City's current earnings
on invested funds during the period of expenditure. The assessment shall be levied, collected and
enforced in the same manner, at the same time, and with the same penalties and interest as in the
case of taxes levied for property taxes. Said assessments will be collected in perpetuity, or until
terminated by the Mayor and Common Council. Reference is made to said Engineer's Report for
12/14/04 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION DECLARING THE INTENTION TO FORM A MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT WITHOUT COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION,
LIMITATION AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931, IN THE NORTHP ARK BOULEVARD AND
CAMPUS PARKWAY AREA (AD 1036).
full particulars.
SECTION 6. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public meeting will be held before the
Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino on February 21, 2005, at the hour of
4:00 p.m., and that a public hearing will be held on March 7, 2005, at the hour of 4:00 p.m., both
in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 N. "D" Street, San Bernardino, California for the
purpose of determining whether the public convenience and necessity require the formation of the
proposed maintenance district without compliance with the Special Assessment Investigation,
Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931 and whether the Mayor and Common Council should
proceed with ordering the above described improvements. At said public meeting and public
hearing, any person may appear and file objections relative to the proposed district, the proposed
maintenance or the costs thereof. Any person owning property within the proposed district may
protest against said district, the proposed maintenance or the costs thereof, by filing a written
protest with the City Clerk, 300 N. "D" Street, San Bernardino, California, 92418, prior to 4:00
p.m., Match 7, 2005. Each protest must be signed by the owners thereof and must contain
sufficient information to properly identify said property. No action will be taken to approve the
formation of the district until the conclusion of said public hearing on March 7, 2005. All property
owners within the proposed district will also be mailed ballots which may be used to indicate
support of or opposition to the proposed assessment. A majority protest shall exist if the total
amount of assessments sho\vn on the ballots returned in opposition to the assessment is greater than
the total assessment amount of ballots returned in support of the assessment. All ballots must be
received in the Office of the City Clerk by no later than the time and date of the public hearing as
stated herein.
12/14/04
4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION DECLARING THE INTENTION TO FORM A MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT WITHOUT COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION,
LIMITATION AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931, IN THE NORTHPARK BOULEVARD AND
CAMPUS P ARKW A Y AREA (AD 1036).
If by the conclusion of said public hearing on March 7, 2005, protests have been filed and
not withdrawn by property owners representing over 50% of the assessment units to be assessed,
or ballots returned representing over 50% of the assessment amount of the returned ballots, these
proceedings shall be abandoned and no assessments shall be imposed.
Additional information may be obtained by contacting the Department of Development
Services, Real Property Section, at (909) 384-5026 or by writing to same at 300 N. "D" Street, San
Bernardino, California, 92418.
SECTION 7. A copy of this resolution and a map showing the exterior boundaries of the
proposed improvement district with relation to the territory immediately contiguous thereto and to
the proposed improvement will be on file with the City Clerk and will be available for inspection
by any person or persons interested. This map shall govern for all details as to the extent of the
proposed improvement district.
SECTION 8. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to publish a copy of this
Resolution in the San Bernardino County Sun, a newspaper of general circulation published in the
City, and shall cause Notice to be mailed as required by Section 12.90.040(C) of the San
Bernardino Municipal Code.
III
III
III
12/14/04
5
1 RESOLUTION DECLARING THE INTENTION TO FORM A MAINTENANCE ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT WITHOUT COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION,
2 LIMITATION AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931, IN THE NORTHPARK BOULEVARD AND
CAMPUS P ARKW A Y AREA (AD 1036).
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and
Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a
meeting thereof
held on the
day of
, 20_, by the following vote, to-wit:
Council Members: A YES
NAYS
ABSTAIN ABSENT
ESTRADA
LONGVILLE
MCGINNIS
DERRY
KELLEY
JOHNSON
MCCAMMACK
City Clerk
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this _ day of
,20_.
JUDITH V ALLES, Mayor
City of San Bernardino
Approved as to form
and legal content:
JAMES F. PENMAN,
City Attorney
By: L ?~
12404
6
** FOR OFFICE USE ONLY - NOT A PUBLIC DOCUMENT **
RESOLUTION AGENDA ITEM TRACKING FORM
M,,'ing D," (D," Adotd), I! I 0 I 0 ~ It,m #
Vote: Ayes ~ Nays
Change to motion to amend original documents 0
f) vJdt J-n.-fl4p .
NulI!V~J Afte . . days /
X l.R:~~~;; :;; 7'h;~~~ ~
tM-f. c;n. 'I (9IO~-
- Date Sent to Mayor: (9/ I IJ~
Date of Mayor's Signature: J t. 0 ~
Date of Clerk/CDC Signature: () i 0
fLI
Resolution #
td[)D~ ~ d-
Absent ~3
Abstain
Companion Resolutions
Note on Resolution of attachment stored separately: 0
RECORD W/COUNTY 0
By:
Reso. Log Updated:
Seal Impressed:
o
o
Date Memo/Letter Sent for Signature:
1st Reminder Letter Sent:
Date Returned:
2nd Reminder Letter Sent:
Not Returned: 0
Request for Council Action & Staff Report Attached:
Updated Prior Resolutions (Other Than Below):
Updated CITY Personnel Folders (6413,6429,6433, 10584, 10585, 12634):
Updated CDC Personnel Folders (5557):
Updated Traffic Folders (3985, 8234, 655, 92-389):
Yes No By_
Yes No By_
Yes No By_
Yes No By_
Yes No By_
Copies Distributed to:
Animal Control 0 EDA 0 Information Services 0
City Administrator 0 Facilities 0 Parks & Recreation 0
City Attorney (Y/ Finance 0 Police Department 0
Code Compliance 0 Fire Department 0 Public Services 0
Human Resources 0 Water Department 0
----
Ready to File: ~
Revised 12/18/03