The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About30-City Administrator CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO — REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION From: Fred Wilson, City Administrator Subject: Workshop of the Mayor and Common Council to discuss development Dept: City Admininstrator's Office impact fees Date: November 14, 2005 M/CC Meeting Date: November 21, 2005 Synopsis of Previous Council Action: Recommended Motion: No action is needed at this time. Signature Contact person: Lori Sassoon Phone: 5122 Supporting data attached: staff report, draft study Ward: all FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: none Source: (Acct. No.) (Acct. Description) Finance: Council Notes: 41;/agel Item No. STAFF REPORT Subject: Workshop of the Mayor and Common Council to discuss development impact fees Background: Development continues to move ahead at a record pace throughout the City. At this time, approximately 2,000 new homes are in various stages of development, along with a large amount of commercial development. This rate of growth continues to drive the demand for municipal services, which in turn generates the need for expansion of the City's public facilities in order to provide those services. Years ago, the State recognized the need for cities to be able to meet infrastructure demands created by development, and passed AB 1600. This bill specifically authorizes the imposition of impact fees. In order to justify these impact fees, a nexus study is required to demonstrate the P J Y P connection between development and the need for capital projects. The City has charged impact fees for traffic systems, park and recreation, and storm drains for many years. These fees have not been adjusted for a considerable amount of time. It is staff's belief that a new nexus study will demonstrate a need to increase these fees in order to provide funds for capital projects necessitated by development throughout the community. In addition, new impact fees for police and fire facilities and equipment may be proposed to help fund capital equipment related to the provision of public safety services, which are also strained by new development. To that end, a consultant was retained to develop the study, and the study began in July. At the workshop, the City's consultant will make a presentation and answer questions during this workshop. A draft copy of key parts of the study is attached. Financial impact: None by this action Recommendation: No action is needed at this time. • Chapter 1 Background and Introduction The City of San Bernardino has retained Revenue & Cost Specialists' to update a few of the City's existing impact fees and to add a few that have not yet been addressed. The City has further expressed a desire that its Development Impact Fees (henceforth referred to as DIFs) be calculated in such a manner that all possible efforts be undertaken to support the amount of the fees. Continued periodic review and adjustment of the City's DIFs, such as this effort, would be appropriate and warranted in order to improve the City's ability to support future residents and businesses developing in the City with the infrastructure the need. This DIF Calculation Report is dissimilar to other such efforts in that it includes a significant amount of collateral detail such as a list of all projects to be financed by impact fees, by infrastructure.' The information contained in the Development Impact Fee Calculation Report and the Master Facilities Plan offers greater information to undertake policy matters will improve understanding by the development community and will provide an easier tracking (and updating) system for the staff. One additional component of this Report is that it includes a proportional analysis of the infrastructure needs required to support continued development of the City as compared to the existing infrastructure. The addition of the proportional analysis will assist the City Council in adopting a fee structure that recognizes inter- generational equity and increase the lay-person's understanding of what is fair. Lastly, this Report provides the documentation of the City's costs which serve as the basis for calculating Development Impact Fees (DIFs). The updated Development Impact Fees and related information can be found in Chapters 3 through 9 and Appendices A and B of this Report. Appendix C is the Master Facilities Plan which contains the specifics about the projects that support of the fee calculation. RCS has met with City staff from the Police, Fire, Planning, Community Services and Public Works Departments staff to review the supporting data which forms the calculation of DIFs. The results of this review can be found on the schedules located at the end of each Chapter. Inclusion of the "Proportional Analysis." As stated earlier, this Report includes a proportional analysis. This analysis is intended to recognize and reconcile the difference between the City's desired level of service required of new development, per statements in the various General Plan elements, with that of the de facto or actual level of service provided to the existing community. This addition will assist the Council in making the difficult policy decisions regarding the required additions of new development. City of San Bernardino Developnent Impact Fee Calculation and News Report 1 o o o Impact Fee Structure. The General Plan provides a range of potential densities for residential development, as such, the DIFs for residential uses need to be calculated on a per dwelling unit basis to reflect more accurately the impacts from a specific development. For example, a property zoned as detached dwelling residential development may contain from three to six units per acre. If fees are calculated on an acreage basis, the developer proposing three units per acre will pay the same amount as a developer constructing six units per acre. Similarly, fees are calculated on a square footage basis for commercial and industrial properties to reflect the impacts of different building intensities for this type of development. A second reason for the proposed DIF fee structure recommended in this Report involves the issue of building expansion or intensification of commercial and industrial areas. For example, if a property owner of commercial or industrial property proposes an expansion to his building, the question exists about how to charge this proposed expansion for its impact on the City's streets, storm drainage system, and other infrastructures. A fee calculated on a building square footage basis will simplify this calculation. CALCULATION OF DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES In California, State legislation sets certain legal and procedural parameters for the charging of these fees. This legislation was passed as ABI600 by the California Legislature and is now codified as California Government Code Sections 66000 through 66009. This State law went into effect on January 1, 1989. ABI600 requires documentation of projects to be financed by Development Impact Fees prior to their levy and collection, and that the monies collected actually be committed within five years to a project of "direct benefit" to the development which paid the fees. Many states have such controlling statutes. Specifically, ABI600 requires the following: 1. Delineation of the PURPOSE of the fee. 2. Determination of the USE of the fee. 3. Determination of the RELATIONSHIP between the use of the fee and the type of development paying the fee. 4. Determination of the relationship between the NEED for the facility and the type of development project. NOTE: Numbers 2 & 4 will be reversed throughout the chapters in this Report because it is apparent that need should be identified before use. 5. Determination of the relationship between the AMOUNT of the fee and the COST of the portion of the facility attributed to the specific development project. 2 City of San Bernardino Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report o o o This Report, with some additions, utilizes the basic methodology consistent with the above requirements of ABI600. Briefly, the following steps were undertaken in the calculation of impact fees for the City and are listed below: I. Define the level of service needed within the General Plan area for each project or acquisition identified as necessary. In some areas, certain statistical measures are commonly used to measure or define an acceptable level of service for a category of infrastructure. Street intersections, for instance, are commonly rated based on a Level of Service scale of "A" to "F" developed by transportation engineers. 2. Review the Land use map and determine the existing mix of land uses and amount of undeveloped and developed land. The magnitude of growth and its impacts can thus be determined by considering this land use data when planning needed infrastructure. The inventory can be found in Table 2-1. 3. Identify all additions to the capital facilities or equipment inventory necessary to maintain the identified levels of service in the area. Then, determine the cost of those additions. 4. Identify a level of responsibility, identifying, as termed in this Report, the relative need (or as referred to in the accompanying schedules as "PERCENT NEED") for the facility or equipment necessary to accommodate "growth" as defined, and as opposed to current needs. 5. Distribute the costs identified as a result of development growth on a basis of land use. Costs are distributed between each land use based on their relative use of the capital system. For example, future street costs were distributed to each land use based on their trip generation characteristics. OTHER ASSUMPTIONS OF THE REPORT In addition to the land use assumptions contained in the next Chapter of this Report, other . important assumptions of this study include the following: "Normal" Subdivision Improvements Omitted. Not included in either of the project lists or consequent calculations are the "local" public improvements generally associated with and identified as being the sole responsibility of the developer through the subdivision or development review process. This type of "on site" improvement would include all capital construction within the boundaries of any development, such as street lights, curb, gutter, City of San Bernardino Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report 3 o c c sidewalks and neighborhood "local" streets. These improvements would continue to be the direct responsibility of the developer, with or without the addition of Development Impact Fees. Land Costs. Land acquisition cost estimates were developed after discussions with City officials. Arguments for higher or lower costs can be made; however, the herein contained per acre amounts appear to be the most appropriate current figures for the purposes of this study. "Zone-based" Fees for DIFs. In some categories of infrastructure, primarily storm drainage, the DIFs may need to recognize subregion or smaller portions of the City with extraordinary service costs or infrastructure needs. Subregions are generally the result of some geographical feature such as a river or hilly terrain that creates a differing need for infrastructure in the subregion. A reservoir that must be built at substantial costs to allow a small area of the City, above the current level of other reservoirs, to be developed, while there is no benefit to any other area of the City would be a prime example. A specific overlay or surcharge fee may be necessary in order to eliminate the possibility of others who will not receive any benefit from the reservoir from being required to assume responsibility for payment of that reservoir. As will be explained in later chapters in this Report, RCS is recommending only the limited use the a zone-based fee for fire suppression services for the Arrowhead Springs area. Exclusion of Tax "Credits" for Undeveloped Land. It has been argued by some that a credit for capital-related revenues, such as gas taxes, should be made against the development impact fees calculated or imposed by a city. Using the state gas tax as an example, proponents of a DIF credit argue that a city will receive increased annual gas taxes because of the additional population generated by future residential development. It is therefore argued that a developer should receive a credit for any associated gas tax revenues collected as a result of the residents or businesses that occupy the new dwellings against any Circulation System impact fee imposed by the City based on either of two separate arguments. The first argument for a gas tal' cre<iit supposes that the additional gas taxes created by residential development are used to pay for the maintenance of existing streets, which is the responsibility of existing development. Since the new streets constructed via impact fees will not require rehabilitation or reconstruction for another 10 to 20 years, the gas tax generated by new development is therefore a windfall to the City and should be credited against the DIP. What this argument fails to consider is that any new resident or business to the City will begin to contribute immediately to the use and deterioration of all City streets. A cursory review of City finances will reveal that the portion of the State gas tax received by cities falls far short of meeting the City's needed street improvements and repairs in any given year. The gas taxes "generated" by new development simply cannot meet the maintenance costs of either the new streets associated with the development or the existing streets which the new resident uses on a daily basis. City of San Bernardino Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report 4 o o o The second argument proposes that the developer pays his "full share" of constructing new roads whenhe pays the City's Circulation System DIF and that the gas taxes generated by his development are unfairly used to make improvements to the existing street system. It is most cities' experience that gas taxes are barely adequate to meet streets-related operational costs, and if they are sufficient to meet these costs, the remainder is used for capital-related maintenance projects. The amount of gas tax revenues used for expansion of the existing street system is usually, and specifically in San Bernardino's case, a nominal amount of the total. For these reasons, a credit is not considered for Circulation DlF in this Report. A similar discussion can be made for the other fees considered herein, and therefore no credits against such fees are included in this calculation of impact costs. Financinl!; Costs. Since financing costs reflect an actual, and generally significant, outlay of funds for an agency, they are included in the project costs where debt financing will likely be necessary due to the immediacy of the need for the facility or infrastructure to show the full costs of such facility or infrastructure and insure that new development also pays its "fair share" of these costs. These costs are indicated on the project "detail" spreadsheets (3.1, 4.1, 5.1, etc.). Appropriate Expansion. Debt service is a reasonable cost of construction of many, but not necessarily all, public facilities and infrastructure. The following example illustrates. DIFs are collected in incremental amounts, but facilities are not expanded in those same incremental amounts. As an example, a community center fee, based upon a standard of 1.2 square feet per Detached Dwelling, may be collected for each residential dwelling in the City, but after collecting the fee for a 100-unit subdivision, it would be impractical to expand the community center 120 square feet. Fees are collected, placed in a separate fund, generating interest until such a time that a 2,000 to 3,000 square foot expansion is possible. During that build-up time, the community center will experience some temporary overcrowding as the standard drops from 1.2 S.F./dwelling to about 0.9 S.F./dwelling. This "temporary oven;apacity" clearly may be an inconvenience, bringing about some crowding and an increased unavailability for rental or event reservation until enough DIFs have been collected for a practical expansion to bring the community center facility back up to the original standard. In short, a development of 120 homes may be brought "on-line" (occupancy approved) and bring about a temporary reduction in community center facility standards without endangering the citizens' health and safety. However, such a "temporary overcapacity" in storm water collection is not at all possible. Capacity for the collection/removal of storm water must be available prior to the construction that increases the impervious surface (and thus storm water runoff) of the parcel. If the local storm collection line is currently at capacity (peak or otherwise), no additional units may be brought on line until additional collection capacity canbe created. Again, there is a practical size of addition to construct and it is not likely practical for developers to wait until there is enough added demand (and fees) to pay for the facility addition. As a result, financing City of San Bernardino Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report 5 o o o through some type of debt instrument may be the only alternative. Circumstances vary from city to city as to what facility expansions are critical and which can absorb temporary overcapacity for limited periods of time. Financing would only be included for facilities where, based upon staff's estimate, the immediacy of need for the facility requires debt financing. In such cases, the debt service payments would be discounted to today's cost to account for the diminishing value of the dollar and would be in keeping with the cost methodology used in this study to show projects in current costs. To consider the face value of bond payments when determining costs, on the other hand, would be inaccurate as it would treat the value of a dollar today the same as the value of a dollar twenty years from now. Such an approach would tend to overvalue the costs of debt service requirements and therefore cause an agency to overcharge on its development impact fees. No project requiring debt service has been included in the Master Facilities Plan. REQUIRED PROPORTIONALITY TEST A test for proportionality is important, if for no other reason, than because it attempts to achieve community inter-generational equity, i.e., fairness in balancing the infrastructure investment made by existing residents and businesses with the investment asked of new residents and businesses that will benefit from the existing infrastructure. In short, previous generations of businesses and residents have contributed to the development of the City's existing infrastructure and this fact should be recognized by future residents and businesses by contributing a like (but no more than) amount towards completing the various infrastructure systems. It is one thing to identify the many public improvement projects needed through build- out. It is an entirely different thing to assume that all of the identified improvements are required to meet the demands of the new development. Clearly, some projects are replacements of the existing infrastructure as opposed to capacity increasing projects. Within the category of the latter, they may also be further classified into two categories; 1. Projects dealing with existing deficiencies, i.e., projects required regardless of whether there is additionEoI de'/elopment or not. An exampleJ would be a traffic intersection currently controlled by stop signs that meets traffic warrants for a traffic signal, but is unfunded. An additional example would be the replacement of an existing, but aged facility. 2. Projects that are required as a result of development. An example of this would be a signal that is currently controlled quite adequately by stop signs, but because of development in the near and "downstream" areas, will ultimately need to be signalized. All impact fee calculations claim to be fair. Most DIF calculations will identify the desired or needed capital projects, explained as required as a result of the new development. But, what is fair and equitable? Is it fair to require future residents and businesses in a city to construct, via payment of impact fees, a new Police Station when the current station is merely rented or leased space? On the other hand, if a City of San Bernardino Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report 6 o o c community already has all of the parks they will need at build-out, are they precluded from imposing an impact fee to recoup some of that expenses incurred in constructing the maximum needed park improvements prior to the maximum demand? These are difficult questions that may be made clearer and easier by reviewing the following examples. Comoarison of Needed Infrastructure with Existina Infrastructure. The answer to these difficult questions may best be answered by comparing various infrastructure scenarios. This can be accomplished by looking closely at the planned community of Happy Vallel for a few scenarios to explain the three possible conditions that can occur regarding the agency's current infrastructures and the demand upon them. We will use the provision of fire protection, a service that most of us as nonprofessional firefighters can somewhat understand. These three "conditions" include, the fire suppression system infrastructure construction: 1. is On-target, 2. has been Deficient, or; 3. has created Excess Service Capacity. Adoption of a Standard - According to the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), a standard two-bay fire station (estimated for purposes of this example to cost about $3,000,000) can meet the needs of 5,000 homes or 10,000,000 square feet of business pad. If these standards were adopted as Happy Valley's- public safety element of the City's General Plan, they would be known as the de jure or stated (or desired) standard (Le., the standard the community would like to meet). The inductive impact fees (or cost per proportional unit served) for this de jure standard would then be: Table 1-1 Calculation of N.F.P.A. Impact Cost Land Use Station Units Impact Fee Cost Served Residential $3,000,000 5,000 $600.00 per Units home Business S.F. $3,000,000 10,000,000 $0.30 per S.F. City of San Bernardino Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report 7 o o o Service Base - Happy Valley's General Plan indicates that there will be 10,000 residential units and about 20,000,000 square feet of commercial/industrial space at build-out, creating a need for four stations. The station impact cost calculation is following: Table 1-2 Determination of Required Number of Stations Number Units served Stations of Units by One Required Station Residential 10,000 5,000 2 Stations Units Business S.F. 20,000,000 10,000,000 2 Stations Required Stations at General Plan Build-out 4 Stations Infrastructure is "On-target" - The need for four stations appears simple and the Happy Valley Council need only impose the impactfees identified in Table 1-1. Currently, Happy Valley has 6,250 residential units and 7,500,000 square feet of commercial/industrial building pad and is half "built-out" (in terms of fire calls-for- service). The existing development in Happy Valley is generating half of its ultimate (General Plan build-out) fire calls-for-service. This is demonstrated in Table 1-3 on the following page: [This space left vacant to place the following table on a single page]. City of San Bernardino Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report 8 o o o Table 1-3 Development of Current Infrastructure is "On-Target" Number Units served Stations of Units by One Required Station Residential 6,250 5,000 1.25 Stations Units Business S.F. 7,500,000 10,000,000 0.75 Stations Total Number of Stations Required Currently 2.00 Stations Conversely, Happy Valley has the remaining half of its fire demand (in terms of calls- for-service) yet to come. Left to build are 3,750 detached dwelling units and 12,500,000 square feet of business floor space, and when constructed would generate the following capital needs identified on Table 1-4 following: Table 1-4 Remaining Development and Station Requirement Number Units served Stations of Units by One Required Station Residential 3,750 5,000 0.75 Stations Units Business S.F. 12,500,000 10,000,000 1.25 Stations # of New Stations Required from Land to be Devel- 2.00 Stations oped If the development impact costs calculated in Table 1-1, ($600 per residence and $0.30 per square foot of business pad) were adopted and imposed as fees, The city of Happy Valley would collect, by General Plan build-out, enough capital revenues to construct the remaining two stations and proportionality, between existing and future residents and businesses, would be evident. Table 1-5, on the following page, demonstrates this: City of San Bernardino Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report 9 o o c Table 1-5 Remaining DIF Collection Number Impact Amount of Units Fee Collected Residential 3,750 $600.00 $2,250,000 Units Business S.F. 12,500,000 $0.30 $3,750,000 Amount Collected in Imoact Fees $6,000,000 Cost of a One New Station $3,000,000 Stations to be Built with Impact Fees 2.00 And everyone in the community of Happy Valley is adequately served by the four stations having been reasonably financed by the entire community. Infrastructure is in Deficient Condition - Consider, however, the implications if the current Happy Valley residents and businesses had shown the earlier limited commitment to contribute enough financing to construct only one station when, based upon their own adopted standards and level of development, they should have two stations? Clearly three more stations would be needed on the path to General Plan "build-out." Initially, we can easily dismiss as completely inequitable the possibility of requiring the remaining future home and business owners to finance all three remaining stations. But would it be fair and equitable to charge new residents the $600 per home and new businesses the $0.30 per business square foot in order to build the remaining two stations required to meet the N.F.P.A. standards? The simple and direct answe~ is !'l0. The Happy Valley community has not (with only one station constructed at half build-out) demonstrated their full and complete commitment to meeting the N.F.P.A. standards, and as a result would not have a strong case to assert that others who build after them need to contribute towards the construction of multiple (two) fire stations at a higher service rate by including the "missing" second station, especially when the community has been served by the lower level of service with one station. The service provided by the single existing station is the community's de facto (or "in fact") standard service level. With one station, the contributed equity to build the single station would be half of the impact fee proposed in Table 1-1, or $300/residential unit and $0. 15/square foot of business space, respectively (see Table 1-6, on the following page). City of San Bernardino Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report 10 o Table 1-6 Impact Fee at Deficient Condition Number Existing Amount of Units Contribu- Collected tion Residential 3,750 $300.00 $1,125,000 Units Business S.F. 12,500,000 $0.15 $1,875,000 Amount Contributed by ExistinQ Community $3,000,000 Cost of One New Station $3,000,000 Station(s) built with Community's Contribution 1.00 o If Happy Valley has only built one station at half General Plan build-out, we would be forced to conclude that the City is currently deficient by one station. If the future residents were asked to pay at a rate that would build two stations (the $6001$0.30 rates) the City would have three stations at General Plan build-out, one financed and built by the first half of the community, and two financed and built by the second half of the community. The first half of the community would, in effect "inherit" one half of a station at no cost to themselves. In short, Happy Valley's impact fees would fail the proportionality test. The inequity would then be exacerbated when the community decides to build the final "missing" last station (of four) from a City-wide assessment or from annual General Fund receipts, paid for by the entire community, including those who just paid for the two new stations via the adopted fire impact fees. The only truly and completely eQuitable option is for the City to adopt .impact fees at the $300/residence and $O.15/sQuare foot rates. Adoption of this fee would be referred to as the Community Financial Commitment or Equity-based Impact Fees. Admittedly, the City will go further into a deficit position in terms of the number of required stations, from being deficient by one station at half General Plan build-out to a deficiency of two stations at General Plan build-out, but the ratio of deficiency (or overall proportionality) would remain a constant 50% of the stations needed at either time. The community, if they are truly serious about meeting the NFPA recommended standard, would then need to assess the entire community to raise the needed money in some fashion for financing the remaining two stations either in the form of an assessment or dedication of general receipts of the City. o Infrastructure - "Excess Capacity" - One final but important scenario remains and must be considered. In this scenario the existing residents of Happy Valley were the industrious sort and (at half General Plan build-out) had constructed three stations when they were at the point when they only needed two stations. Clearly there is City of San Bernardino Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report 11 o o o excess capacity in each of the three existing stations. In this case, the Happy Valley's current de facto standard would be well above the de jure or target standard. Statistically, each of the three stations would have 1/3 excess capacity (for providing services) and should be busy only about two-thirds of the time. Should the impact fee be limited only to the marginal $300 per residence and $0.15 per business square foot required to construct the one remaining required station? If so, the future residents receive a gift of the extra (third) station. There will be tough decisions ahead to be made by the Happy Valley City Council. Marainal or Recoupment Fee? The Happy Valley City Council should adopt, at a minimum, the $300/residence and $0.15/square foot business space rates to insure that the fourth station would be built. This would be referred to as the marginal needs- based fee. This would be a benevolent gesture, giving the new residents a free ride on the cost of the (already built and paid for) third station. Or in the alternative, the Council can recognize that the $3,000,000 used to build the third station was a loan from the existing community's General Fund receipts, and needs to be repaid by the future community receiving an instantaneous level of fire protection the day they receive their occupancy permit5, through the imposition and collection of impact fees.6 In this case, the $600/residence and $0.30/square foot of business space impact fees should be adopted, imposed and collected. The impact fee would accumulate $6,000,000 through build-out, with $3,000,000 required to repay the General Fund in delayed revenue (for Station #3) and $3,000,000 necessary to construct the fourth station. This would be referred to as the fair share or recoupment-based at General Plan build-out fee. And more importantly, at General Plan built-out, long term equity would be achieved as each home and business would have contributed the same $600 per residence and $0.30 per square foot. Exceptions to Proportionality Test. The previous discussion applies particularly well to above ground or facility-based services such as public-use centers, pools, police and fire stations, civic centers maintenance yards or other fixed location and fixed capacity facilities that serve the entire population.. However, it does not necessarily work well on ground level or below system infrastructure such as streets, utilities, and storm drainage, where the continuation of a deficient system into the future is not at all possible and the lack of additions would ensure the complete inability to approve any further private construction without creating unsafe conditions to a specific area. As an example, if the agency's storm drainage system is currently deficient and creates some period flooding but not necessarily in dangerous amounts, the agency may not be able to approve and allow any more future development unless the storm drainage run-off created by the new development, is properly collected and released at a river or flood control channel. Additionally, a currently deficient water system, i.e one with only the most minimal of distribution pipes, may not be able to serve any more future development without a substantial increase in the capacity of the water distribution system. Specific Plan or Benefit to a Specific Area. An additional exception occurs when the need or benefit from a specific facility is generated by a finite or easily defined area City of San Bernardino Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report 12 o o o such as a specific plan or a new area of the agency that is significantly outside of the existing agency's urban in-fill service area or the specific plan is primarily the sole. beneficiary of the infrastructure to be constructed. An example may be a small area of the City, proposed for say 2,000 homes, but separate from the rest of the City in such a way that, to meet the General Plan's stated fire suppression standard level of service of a five minute.response time, it requires a separate fire station but serving less than any of the other stations, which on average serve 5,000 homes. There is little argument as to why the remaining residents and businesses should not need to finance that higher station cost per home served. This is not uncommon in an area geographically separated from the major, or urban, part of the community. An example would be a small area separated by a river or up on a hillside or in a canyon. The Arrowhead Springs area may well fit this definition and in fact, the proposed Station #223 would not be needed were it not for the more isolated, very low density/high open space acreage Arrowhead Springs development. Densitv may also be a factor. Fire infrastructure system improvements to date may be spread over a more compact density (say 6-7 homes per acre) than the remaining development in town (say 2-3 homes per acre). Most likely, the fire system infrastructure costs per home for the lesser density will be far higher than the infrastructure costs required to serve the more compact but higher density. Again, the Arrowhead Springs area meets this exception in that the existing twelve fire stations serve a compact density of about 5.4 detached dwellings per acre, while the future residential development will result in about 2.7 detached dwellings per acre. Public Utilities. The impact fee treatment for municipal utilities is particularly clear in that the utility's operating and capital funds do not receive any General Fund financial support and they do not typically charge stand-by fees to vacant property. This means that the entire utility system has been supported only by user fees (payments by the utility's customers). Or stated in another way, it is user-financed. In many cases the utility may have significant extra capacity because most infrastructure cannot be expanded in small defined portions that exactly match the pace of new development, (e. g. water reservoirs are generally expanded on 1.0 million gallon portions, not 1,000 gallons at a time). Should not this excess capacity be paid for by new users that connect to the system who will benefit from the excess capacity has been constructed and identified? A water distribution system may also have significant distribution system capacity to reach homes and businesses in more outlying areas. RCS recently assisted with a city where the existing water users, currently representing only 55% of the water use demand at General Plan build-out, had already constructed nearly 70% of the entire water system. The 15% difference amounted to just over $7.0 million. Does this mean the excess capacity paid for by the existing users should be a gift to the future users? Does the Government Code 966000 et. seq. prevent this city from recouping the advanced costs invested by the current users that will be the direct benefit of future users? Simply stated, excess capacity can and should be identified wherever possible. and recovered? The excess capacity must be identified in terms of "existing project segment" and how it will benefit the future users must be identified. Any recoupment must be placed back in the fund that financed the excess capacity, in this case the City of San Bernardino Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report 13 o o o Water Fund. Equity, such as between existing and future users and between users that require additional infrastructure not required of others, is the attempt of this Report. Excess capacity is often difficult to identify and even more difficult to convince others of. The City is probably much like Happy Valley, with excess or overcapacity in some areas of infrastructure, and perhaps slightly deficientS in others, as you will see in the remainder of the Report OTHER ISSUES Some members of the building industry have claimed that the addition of impact fees unfairly creates an inflated resale price for existing homes. The argument is that if the public agency adopts a $15,000 to $20,000 impact fee per detached dwelling home, then the price for an existing home is "artificially" increased by the same amount. We will use the example of a detached dwelling that cost the developer $200,000 to construct and complete to a point that the occupancy permit is approved. Full Cost of a Residential Detached Dwelling. The $200,000 represents only the above ground costs. The true and actual cost of a new home is the cost of acquiring the parcel, necessary govermnent approvals and permits, construction supplies, labor, debt service on the above, on-site" public improvements, and the hidden cost of extendin~ public servicesJO to that home! These public service extension costs include (but are not limited to): . The addition of law enforcement personnel requiring the expansion of the police station space and miscellaneous emergency response vehicles . Additional fire stations and emergency fire, rescue and paramedic response vehicles. . Arterials and collector road widenings, additional signalization and bridges. . Additional capacity in downstream storm drainage pipes and outfalls. . Additions to water delivery capability, including source, treatment, storage and delivery . City of San Bernardino Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report 14 o · Additions to the sewage capability, including collection, treatment and disposal. · Additions to the maintenance capabilities (Le., municipal corporation yard and maintenance vehicles) necessary to maintain the above added infrastructure. · Additional parks, library, and public meeting space for recreational/social purposes. Thus while the cost of constructing the above ground portion of a detached dwelling home may be $200,000, the "downstream" costs identified above may be in the area of $15,000 to $20,000 per detached dwelling home or in the area of7.5% to 10.0% of the above ground cost. If this argument is not clear, picture a 2,800 square foot home, costing approximately $200,000 to construct the above ground structure, located in the middle of an empty square mile, no roads, no utility service, no public safety response, no flood control and no recreational facilities. What is the market value of this home? Probably not even the $200,000 that it cost to construct the structure. All of a sudden, the $20,000 impact fee for all the infrastructure needed to support that one home, seems like a reasonable choice, assuming one can find an public agency capable of providing infrastructure support to the newly developed residential dwelling. o The true and complete cost of a new detached dwelling is the cost of building the structure and the cost of extending the municipal services to the dwelling regardless of who pays for the actual costs of extending those services. To some degree these service-related infrastructure costs have been recognized, the only question remaining is who should for pay them? Effect on Market Price. Again, let us assume that a cumulative (i.e. all infrastructure provided by a city) $20,000 impact fee imposed upon new detached dwelling home construction increases the market price of an existing detached dwelling. Wouldn't this just be the recognition that the existing detached dwelling already has those physical links to the municipal services? A slightly different way of looking at this argument is that the existing family homes each have a "share" it! a municipal corporationll and the share is valued at the cost of the connection to the various municipal utilities, transportation system, flood protection and public safety. It is a logical step then to require any newly constructed home to purchase a "share" at an equal cost. CHAPTER ORGANIZATION Within each infrastructure Chapter there will be a minimum of three and a maximum of four cost/fee tables. They will be: o The first schedule, the Allocation of Project Cost Estimates identifies the project, its costs and the relationship, in a percentage, to development. "Marginal Needs "-based Impact Fee - This schedule will identify the impactfees that would City of San Bernardino Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report 15 o need to be adopted to meet the basic capital needs identified in the Report (on the first schedule at the end of the Chapter, i.e., 3.2,4.2,5.2 etc.) for that infrastructure. With adoption of this level of impact fees, one could claim that new development is occurring without any additional cost to the existing residents and businesses. You could not, however, claim that new development is paying its "fair share." Existing Commitment or "Equity"-based Impact Fee - This schedule will identify the cost (in current nominal dollar value) of the existing infrastructure, including land, physical improvements and capital equipment. This is the average amount that has been"invested"by the current community of residents and businesses. This equity will be expressed in terms of the cost to construct or acquire the assets at current costs. If the average "equity" (for detached dwellings for example) on this table is greater then the average cost on the previous "Marginal Needs" table, then the infrastructure system is "front- ended" or has excess capacity. Earlier residents and businesses of the community have put more of the system into place than will the remaining unbuilt portions of the community, (as they build). The existing community has advanced money to build capacity into the infrastructure system to meet the needs of residents and businesses not yet there! The scenario where Happy Valley had already built three fire stations while it only had the current demands for two stations is an example of a front-ended system. o Adoption of this level of impact fee would allow the City to claim that new development is not being required to pay to eliminate existing deficiencies. Fair Share at General Plan Build-out Average-based Impact Fee or (existing capacity fee)- When a system is front-ended, or where there is evidence of greater equity than of the marginal needs-based costs, there will be a third table (4.4 or 5.4) that will identify the average cost of the system required at "build-out" (the cost of the existing infrastructure system plus the cost of the future system needs). It will be the average of the "marginal" and the "equity" tables combined and then divided by the General Plan built-out community that would represent an amount, that if ~dopted, would equalize the cost of the system between the future community with that of the existing community. The difference between the "marginal" amount and the larger "equity" amount would be "recoupment" of front-ended or advanced costs (or of delayed revenues). o However, if the average equity (again using a detached residential dwelling as an example) is less than the average cost on the previous marginal-needs table (for the same detached dwelling), it is an indication that system construction has been lagging or is currently deficient. When the marginal needs are greater than the equity, the fees are limited to the equity figures, based upon the argument that it would be inequitable to require future residents and businesses to contribute greater amounts than have the existing residents and businesses. Where marginal needs are greater than current equity, there is no need for the third table (Fair Share at General Plan Build-out) in these cases. In short, if the existing community has not been inclined to construct an infrastructure system proportionally as the community developed, what basis does City olSan Bernardino Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report 16 o o o the community" have to require the future residents to invest more, thus by eliminating, to some degree, the deficiencies created by the existing community? There can be no such rational argument. Adoption of this level of fee would allow the City to claim that development is paying its fair share. CHAPTER ENDNOTES l. The firm had been previously known as Management Services Institute, but the same partners reorganized as Revenue & Cost Specialists. L. L. c.. 2. For greater detail of each project, refer to the City's Master Facilities Plan.. 3. Examples using other infrastructure will be used from time to time in this report. 4. "Happy Valley" has been used as an imaginary community for purposes ofDIF example for about nine years. Clearly no insult is intended to any real or imagined community of Happy Valley. It is also a Happy Valley because there is no inflation and the value of a dollar remains nominal. 5. Actually, the permitted structure receives tire protection services as it is being constructed. 6. This example assumes that each of the existing three stations is debt.free and owned out-right. 7. This action would be more supportable with a recent appraisal of the existing utility assets. 8. Not necessarily in a manner that indicates a danger, just below the standard being asked of the future residents. 9. On-site improvements include local streets and medians, curbs and sidewalks, sewer lines, water lines, street tights, storm gutter or drainage pipes, electrical power lines and all of the other requirements of the City's building requirements on the privately held property, hence the "on.site" reference. "Off.site" improvements are increased capacity needs that occur "down. stream" from the private property. The on.site public improvements generally become a city asset upon acceptance of the on. site public improvements made by the developer while the property upon which the on-site improvements. are still privately owned. . 10. The City of San Bernardino does not necessarily provide all of these services. They are only highlighted to make a point about the types of municipal services typically required to support a residential dwelling. 11. Not unlike a share in a corporation such as l.B.M. or A.T. & T. City of San Bernardino Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report 17 CitY of San Bernardino City Sphere of Influence La .ched Dwelling Units ched Dwellina Units Mobile Home Units Commercial Lodging Commercial/Office KSF I Industrial Uses KSF 7,566.0 40,663 1,613.0 19,415 746.0 4,475 98.2 2,455 2,403.0 54,508 2,631.0 45,843 Un~oped I I Acres l'ofUnlts 4,516.0 12,354 811.0 8,599 1.0 6 126.0 625 1,594.0 31,783 2,795.0 48,700 Total Acres I' of Units 12,082.00 53,017 2,424.00 28,014 747.00 4,481 224.20 3,080 3,997.01 86,291 5,426.00 94,543 Total-CitySphere 1115,057.2 __I 9,843.00 __124,900.21__ Private Residences Commercial Lodging Rooms Business Square Feet Land-use Database Area '1 - Urban "in-fill' Detached Dwelling Units Attached Dwelling Units Mobile Home Units Commercial Lodging Commercial/Office KSF Industrial Uses KSF 9,925.0 64,553 98.2 2,455 5,034.0 100,350 7,566.0 40,663 1,613.0 19,415 746.0 4,475 88.2 2,205 2,403.0 54,431 2,631.0 45,843 5,328.0 20,959 126.0 625 4,389.0 80,483 Undeveloped Acres , of Units 4,428.0 11,889 745.0 8,041 1.0 6 1.0 25 1,357.0 30,738 2,795.0 48,700 15,253.0 85,512 224.2 3,080 9,423.0 180,833 Total Acres I' of Units 11,994.00 52,552 2,358.00 27,456 747.00 4,481 89.20 2,230 3,760.00 85,169 5,426.00 94,543 Sub-totat Urban In-fill Area 1115,047.2 _I 9,327.00 _ I 24,374.20_ ld-use Database Area '2 rrowhead Springs S.P.A. Detached Dwelling Units Attached Dwelling Units Mobile Home Units Commercial Lodging Commercial/Office KSF Industrial Uses KSF ( Sub-total Arrowhead SPA 1 1 ~ 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 10.0 250 0.0 n 0.0 0 327 II 516.00 1 2,668 I I 526.01 1 2,9951 10.0 I Undeveloped Acres I it of Units 88.0 465 66.0 558 0.0 0 125.0 600 237.0 1,045 0.0 0 Total I Acres I it of Units 88.00 465 66.00 558 0.00 0 135.00 850 237.01 1,122 0.00 0 ~ ~ * c L, III :; '0 III .c '-' cn - ~'-' -OS Oe. ~E Ill- Ill.- IllOSC: u.,,1ll _ CTE ocne. III enS! e.enlll >0, III > 1-c:1ll 'iijC >0,"'0 alallll en.en III 0 OS III ..0 u...'!::' I u:5'~ OS " e.ClCT E.5W -= ~ _IllO C:!l:'O o ~C III ,5 e.Oi gj 'OO";:::i"C ~-Cl OS III III '0 e>'CQ) III c3 'iij III aJ_Q)Z c:oa:- OS~.OS cn <-ill,S OSe.Cl oECI)~ ~E8lE .- ::J LL- tlcn~os ~ ~ .. 'c .. ." 'c ~ ~ ~ ~ " " " " " " -" ~ 8- 8- 8- !. 8- 8- i ~ I I 5 ... ~. ~ co 8-~ Ii '" ... O! II ~ .. .; a - = - .. .. .. .. E" - ~ .. ~ ;: N ~ .. ~ - 3 a ~ - i .. ~ Z ill ., .. ~ i l ~ ! oti . . ~ l i c;, OJ III i ,: I i .. .. i ~ .. .. - i - .. I ~ en III ~ ~ .. lil a a a 3 '" a a ., i .. .. t:: ., .. .. ~ ! ~ oti ':i .,; S - ill N N N .. :R i Ii .,; !! .. .. .. .. .. .. .. N " .. a a a ~ N a a N i ill III ... .. lil "! .... N r.: .. - ;; 1li ~ ... '., ::l .. .. N N Ii .. ~ lfi ..; .. ~ '" .. a a a co co a a ., ~ " N '" '" N ... " - .. N .. i ~ .; g !! N iil ::l .. '" .; .. .; .; .. .. .. .. .. N '" " a a a i co .. a ... N ~ III .. ~ .. '" ;; r.: ..; N oti oti 0 ~ .. <I .. Vi Vi Vi .. Ii i N N N .. .. .. .. iD .. ., iil ., ~ ~ a .. .. ~ ~ ;; ... ~ g .. .. i .. Ii 't :i ~ ~ i g ~ I r.: ... .. ;::: " ~ ~ i i .. 8 8i N .. .. .. .. .. l)l ;t .. ii " ~ 1I g ~ 11! a g .. ... OJ III .. I .. .. i .. r.: N Ii r.: ~ .; l ! .; :i co ... .. " '" .. " l)l .. .. Ii ti Ii ... ~ g ':i ~ N .. .. ~ ~ .. N ., ., ~ ! ! a a ~ ~ N .. 1lI l)l .. N on on N on N f:! ~ i g .; .. '" .. N ;; ! .. co N l)l ... .. Ii i .. .. a N N .. N N .. .. g . ! 1 'i .. . .. ~ ," 12 8 " ~ co ~ ~ " .. Iii III '" . t ~ 12 .5 co .. I ;! 'i .. ~ ~ is ! ! " ~ . . ~ I I .s ~ ~ " I " " If e ~ ~ 1 'll '2 'j! " -8 ~ .! ~ ~ i 1 go s :g ~ .c E E ~ l j 8 ~ ~ 'liI 'i Ii <'l '-' l1 '-' s 8 '-' ~ t:: .. .., ~ g - .. (; cO Ii :i :i !l'i ~ . ~ ~ ~ If '5 u. Iii- 'll 0 0 0 - ij: z z z ~ 0 .c ell ~ .. ill - N OJ .. . . .; .. .. t~ .l! ~ . ~ If If . ~ u. 'll 0 0 0 ~~ .c Z Z Z ell &; &; .. - a ... III r.: .. .. J!.~ .! . ~ . ~ '5 If If If ~n 'll 0 0 0 ::Ii u. .c Z Z Z ell '" ... ill ., Vi . g ;; ~ ... .. .. in ~ . ~ . '5 If If If ~~~ 'll 0 0 0 .c Z Z Z .. ell t i- ., ~ ~ ., N .. .. ., ~ O! N .. q ... en &1 on N .. .. .. N .. ~ .. .. g 1Il.. '5 ih 1 ~. a . ell 0- " ill ~ ~ &; .. g " .. ~ ~ '" N g ~ .. .. .. a a .. ;; ! . ~ ~ .. '5 II: ~ .! 'll 8:= .c Dl~ ell .. ... ... a lil .. c " '" ;z &; a N g ~ Ii .; .. .. a a ~ E . ~ S 8 . '5 .d 'll .c .li~ ell u. . :! . ." u. u. ~ 'c 12 ~ " " '" u. '" . ~ I '" .- ';;, ~ 12 I ~ ~ " . <3 . ~ I l 8 " " .., 'e '2 ~ 'll " .. ~ ~ 'j '5 .c .c ~ E E ~ j l ~ ~ ~ ~ .., ::Ii .5 to u.~ ! ~ . ~ ~ . Ii~ i~ 'N co . -... -- .- - . .q e '0 o.~ ..~ '(3.!! ~ ii E , ~~ ~.li - . ~ ~ ~ ~ . . I a o ~ " '" '". . 8- 8-;j! h ,,- _ 0 0.., 3!Qi .~; .., . l!.o. . . . . ~ ~ E .. E ii go , i!; = . . . - ~ . Q ~ IS R.e iil;j .ija~,; :~ ~ 0 Iii -g ~ g' E "~:o~ .:! lB =:g 'c E g 2 _ .- u - ~ . ~ "i ii.- '::I 'u"ii c . ;; .;: -3 Ii E .. " 'ji ::J E oS f3.!Ii<3.5 1-;::-(;;(;';;:- 0____ Z c Appendix C Master Facilities Plan c L <: Guide to the Master Facilities Plan Project Cost Summary Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Cost SI1111111My LE-01 Expand Law Enforcement Facilities Space LE-02 Acquire Additional Patrol/DetcctivelSpecialty Vehicles LE-03 Acquire Officer Assigned Equipment LE-<J4 Acquire Advanced Computer/Data Sharing Systems Fire Suppression Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Fire Suppression Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Cost SI1111111My FD-01 New Fire Station #233 FD-02 New Fire Station #233 Response Fleet FD-03 Relocate Fire Station #221 FD-04 Relocate Fire Station #226 FD-05 Relocate Fire Station #229 FD-06 Relocate Fire Station #230 FD-07 Renovate Station #221 as AdministrativeIMaintenance Facility FD-08 Construct a Vehicle Storage Building FD-09 Construct Training Facility FIr10 Acquire Two Command Vehicles FIr 11 Acquire Four Squad Vehicles Circulation System (Streets, Signals and Bridges) Circulation System Cost Summary ST -01 40th Street, Acre Lane to Electric A venue ST -02 5th Street, Sterling to Victoria ST -03 5th Street, Warm Creek to Pedley ST -<J4 Alabama Strteet, 3rd to City Limits ST -05 Campus Parkway (Pepper-Linden), Kendall to ]-215 ST -()6 Central (Palm Meadows), Tippecanoe to Mpuntain View ST -07 Coulston, Tippecanoe to Mountain View ST -08 Connector, 3rd Street to 5th Street ST -09 Del Rosa, 6th Street to 9th Street ST -10 Electric, Mountain View to Nortbpark ST -11 "G" Street, Mill to Rialto A venue ST-12 "H" Street, Kendall to 40th 1 7 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 c L Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 c c Kendall, Cambridge to Pine ST-14 Lena Road, Mill to Orange Show ST-15 Little League Drive, Palm to [-215 ST-16 Little League Drive, [-215 frontage to Belmont ST-17 Little Mountain, Devil Creek Channel to 48th ST -18 Mill, Pepper to Meridian ST-19 Mount Vernon Bridge ST -20 Mountain View, Thompson to Electric ST-21 Mountain View Bridge at Mission Creek ST-22 Mountain View, Riverview to Central ST-23 Mountain View, [-10 to San Bernardino Ave. ST-24 Mountain View Avenue Railroad Grade Crossing ST -25 Palm, Cajon to [-215 SB Ramp ST-26 Pine, Kendall to Belmont ST -27 Penis Jli11 Park Road, 21stto Pacific ST -28 Rancho, Colton City Limits to 5th ST-29 Rialto, Sierra to Waterman ST -30 Rialto, Lena to Tippecanoe ST - 31 State Street, 16th to Footbill ST-32 State Street. Footbill to [-215 ST -33 Tippecanoe, Mill to Harriman ST - 34 University Parkway, Hallmark to BNSF Grade Separation ST-35 Watenmm, 5th to Baseline ST - 36 Victoria, Richardson to Mountain View ST - 37 Traffic Signal @ Little League Drive and [-215 Frontage ST-38 Traffic Signal @ Little League Drive and Belmont ST - 39 Traffic Signal @ Palm and Cajon ST -40 Traffic Signal @ Palm and Industrial ST-41 Traffic Signal @Palmand[-215ramps ST -42 Traffic Signal @ Palm and Irvington ST -43 Traffic Signal @ Palm and Belmont ST -44 Traffic Signal @ Campus Parkway (Pepper-Linden) and Industrial ST -45 Traffic Signal @ Campus Parkway (Pr;ppo;r Linden) and I 215 Ramps ST -46 Traffic Signal @ Campus Parkway and Nortbpark ST -47 Traffic Signal @ Sierra (CSUSB) and Nortbpark ST -48 Traffic Signal @ Kendall and 48th L 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 c c (- ST -49 Traffic Signal @ Little Mountain and 30th ST-SO Traffic Signal @ Little Mountain and 48th ST -51 Traffic Signal @ Little Mountain and Nortbpark ST-52 Traffic Signal @ State and [-210 ST-53 Traffic Signal @MerdianandRialto ST -54 Traffic Signal @ Macy and Mill ST-55 Traffic Signal @ Rancho (State) and Foothill ST-56 Traffic Signal @Miramonteand 27th ST-57 Traffic Signal @Mountain and Kendall ST -58 Traffic Signal @ Mountain and 48th ST-59 Traffic Signal @Mountain and Northpark ST -60 Traffic Signal @ "[" Street and Center ST -61 Traffic Signal @ "H" Street and Marshall ST -62 Traffic Signal @ Auto Plaza and Fairway ST -63 Traffic Signal @ "E" Street and Century ST -64 Traffic Signal @ "E" Street and Orange Show Lane ST -65 Traffic Signal @ Arrowhead and Orange Show Lane ST -66 Traffic Signal @ Arrowhead and Central ST -67 Traffic Signal @ Mountain View and 13th ST -68 Traffic Signal @ Mountain View and Marshall ST -69 Traffic Signal @ Electric and 48th ST -70 Traffic Signal @ Dolittle and Mill ST-71 Traffic Signal@LenaandOrangeShowRoad ST -72 Traffic Signal @ Lena and Central ST-73 Traffic Signal @LenaandRialto ST-74 Traffic Signal@Lenaand3rd ST -75 Traffic Signal @ East Carnegie and Hospital Lane ST -76 Traffic Signal @ Tippecanoe and Rialto ST -77 Traffic Signal @ Del Rosa and Marshall ST -78 Traffic Signal @ Del Rosa and 6th ST-79 Traffic Signal @SterlingandMarshall ST-80 Traffic Signal@SterlingandLynwood ST-81 Traffic Signal @Sterlingand6th ST-82 Traffic Signal @ S. Mountain View and Central (Palm Meadows) ST-83 Traffic Signal @S. Mountain View and [-10 Westbound Ramp ST -84 Traffic Signal @ Guthrie and Pacific 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 c c (- . ST-85 IntercbangclRamps @[-215andPalmAvenue (SB, County) 118 ST-86 IntercbangclRamps @ [-215 and Pepper Linden (Campus Parkway) (SB) 119 ST -87 IntercbangclRamps @ [-215 and University Parkway (SB, County) 120 ST-88 IntercbangclRamps @ [-210 and Waterman (SB, Highland, County) 121 ST-89 IntercbangelRamps @[-210and Del Rosa (SB, Highland, County) 122 ST -90 IntercbangclRamps @ [-210 and Victoria (SB, Highland, County) 123 ST-91 IntercbangclRamps @[-210and5th (SB, Highland, Redlands) 124 ST-92 IntercbangclRamps @ [-10 and Tippecanoe 125 ST-93 IntercbangclRamps @ [-10 and Pepper (SB, County, Colton) 126 ST -94 IntercbangelRamps @ [-10 and Mountain View (SB, Loma Linda, Redlands, Co 127 ST-95 Grade Separation @PalmAvenue (SB) 128 ST-96 Grade Separation @Rialto (SB) 129 ST-97 Grade Separation @ State Street/University (SB) 130 Public Use Facilities 131 Public Use Facilities Cos SUl1HIJ1JT)' 132 CC-{)l Verdemont Community Center 133 CC-<J2 Delmann Heights Gymnasium 134 CC-{)3 Nicholson Community Center 135 CC-{)4 Construct Additional Public Use Space 136 Aquatic Facilities 137 Aquatic Facilities Cost SUl1HIJ1JT)' 138 AQ-01 Construct Water Pool/Attraction 139 AQ-02 Construct Locker/Administration Building 140 Park Land Acquisition and Development 141 Park Land Acquisition and Development Cost SUl1HIJ1JT)' 142 PK-{)l Construct Six 5.0 Acre Neighborhood Parks 143 PK -{}2 Construct Seven 10.0 Acre Passive Community Parks 144 PK -{}3 Construct Four 25.0 Acre Active (sports) Community Parks 145 PK-{)4 Miscellaneous Park Improvements 146 PK-{)5 Open Space Acquisition (159.4 acres) 146 Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 , o o o CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO GUIDE TO THE MASTER FACILITIES PLAN The Master Facilities Plan is a compilation of projects identified by City staff as being needed by the City of San Bernardino through theoretical General Plan build-out of the City. The Plan is based on input from City staff, recommended projects contained in City planning documents for infrastructure and an occasional recommendation from RCS staff. The Master Facilities Plan provides for three major types of projects. The first group of projects provides for the maintenance, repair and rehabilitation of the City's varied infrastructure, including its streets, storm drains and other public facilities. These projects represent a portion of the needed replacement of the City's General Facilities fixed assets identified below, as more than $1.284 billion in depreciable fixed assets, which are being consumed, conservatively over fifty years, at a rate of nearly $20.8 million annually (after the removal of $245.7 million in non- depreciating parkland). Keep in mind that the hundreds of millions of dollars currently invested in locall streets, storm drainage improvements, utility systems are not represented in this list. The following table indicates the replacement values of the various infrastructure owned by the City. Table MFP-l Replacement Value of Existing City Infrastructure Infrastructure Replacement Value Law Enforcement $56,055,587 Fire Suppression $62,947,026 Circulation Svstem $625,570,000 Librarv Facilitv /Collection $36,943,997 Public Use Facilities $54,620,225 Aquatics Facilities $19,015,237 Parkland/Improvements $428,855,011 Sub-total All Assets $1,284,007,083 Less Non-depreciating Park ($245,668,817) Land Total Depreciable Assets $1,038,338,266 C-l . o o o The second type of projects are needed to serve future development and include such projects as widening of streets, creation of additional parkland or construction of a new fire station. These projects are proposed to be funded through the development impact fees recommended in the companion to this document called Development Impact Fee Calculation and Nexus Report for the City of San Bernardino. The last type of projects is proposed to enhance the quality of life for all City residents and spur economic growth in the community. These projects would include the construction of a community center or library expansion. Goal of the Master Facilities Plan. The Master Facilities Plan is not intended to be the final word on capital improvement projects needed for the City, but rather a starting point for discussions between City management staff, decision-makers (Le., the City Council) and the public prior to the formulation of a two or three Year Capital hnprovement Plan (CIP). The Master Facilities Plan begins the process of identifying all needed projects for the City through build-out. This document, as all capital improvement programs should be, is rooted in the philosophy that for the document to have any meaningful value to future residents and staff members, it must be constantly updated and revised as new legislation is adopted and as the enviromnent and the City itself changes over the years. In short, the Master Facilities Plan is intended as a fluid, not static, document. Thus, it is essential that periodic updates be performed to add new projects or delete completed or no longer needed proiects. The Master Facilities Plan represents the starting point for fulfillment of the following purposes: Planning - The Plan implements the standards and goals contained in the City's General Plan when applicable and proposes improvement projects which are constructed and located in conformance with the General Plan. Financial Planning - A Facilities Plan or CIP should consider the scheduling and availability of fmancing sources in order to achieve an orderly and comprehensive process. Individual project descriptions in this document detail the project's relationship to other recommended improvements and other scheduling constraints. This effort should always be a high priority of the City in order to insure that efforts between departments are coordinated and to avoid construction made more costly by duplication of construction efforts (i.e. a water pipe installed one year after a road is constructed). A sound capital planning process can also help to rationally plan projects for the purposes of long-term financing. Taxpayers can accrue savings when capital financing is coordinated such that long-term financing can be sized and timed to achieve the lowest possible financing costs. C-2 . o o c Guide to the Master Facilities Plan Budgeting - The following projects should provide the outline for preparation of the Five- Year Capital Improvement Plan in the future. The first year of the CIP then is incorporated into the City's Annual Budget. Note: The current effort does not include the identification of what year the projects will be needed, therefore the project costs default to the last column. However, the project costs are defined in terms of 2006-07 dollar values. Master Facilities Planning Process. The Master Facilities Plan represents an interdepartmental effort to identify needed projects through the theoretical point of build-out of the City. Management staff were then asked to allocate projects as a first step towards prioritizing all projects for the Plan. Criteria considered by the management team in evaluating projects included: . Does the project generate operating savings or otherwise enhance the ability of the department to deliver services? . Does the project reduce or eliminate safety or health hazards? . Is the project needed to provide adequate levels of service to future residents or prevent deterioration of service to existing residents? . Was the project recommended in any of the City's engineering or planning master plans, the Corporate Plan or any other adopted City document? . Does the project have a significant positive effect on the community? Funding Analysis. The following summary section of this Plan includes a projection of historical, as well as potential, revenue sources for the fmancing of the listed capital improvement projects. Development impact fee revenues were estimated based on the proposed rates recommended in the Development Impact Fee Report. Also, it was assumed for the purposes of this Report and the Development Impact fee Report that development will occur evenly over the period of build- out for the City. In actuality, new development is expected to maintain the current rate over the next ten years and then decrease during the second ten-year period. Other revenue sources were projected based on discussions with City staff, but are shown only for informational purposes. Given the magnitude of costs shown in this Report, RCS recommends that a more detailed financial strategy for construction of these improvements (i.e., a Capital Financing Plan) be conducted by the City within the immediate future. Such a document would seek to further identify and quantify potential financing sources for the City of San Bernardino. C-3 . o o o Guide to the Master Facilities Plan Also, it should be noted that the Master Facilities Plan emphasizes the total capital needs of the City, in contrast to the more traditional Capital Improvement Program approach which places more of an emphasis on reducing total needs to only reasonably assured revenue sources. The process of further scheduling projects on a year-to-year basis should continue onward during the Capital Improvement Program process. Orl!;anization of the Master Facilities Plan. The Master Facilities Plan is divided into six major sections, according to the category of capital improvement and each will ultimately be quantified as a separate development impact fee in the companion document. The ten types of improvements are: Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment - These are projects needed for the City's Police Department, including expansion of the Police Station and acquisition of additional equipment and vehicles. Fire Suppression Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment - This program includes facilities necessary to support the level of service recommended by the City's Fire Department. This section contains an explanation of the need for one additional station and the relocation of four existing fire station, vehicles and assigned equipment for needed fire- fighters. Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System - These projects include future street widening's and additional intersection/signal improvements and regional circulation improvements. Community Library Facilities and Collection - This section explains the proportional expansion of the existing library square feet and number of items in the collection per resident. Public Use (Community Centers) Facilities - These projects include the construction of additional community centers for classes, meetings and general public use. Aquatic Facilities - These projects include the construction of additional public pools and the requisite support buildings. Parks/Open Space and Recreation Facilities - The acquisition and development of new parks, construction of recreational facilities for the City and improvement of existing undeveloped parklands are accomplished through this program. There is a summary list of the proposed projects and project costs found at the beginning of each of these sections. Next, you will fmd an individual project description for each project submitted C-4 '" o o c Guide to the Master Facilities Plan detailing the proposed scope of the project, the submitting deparnnent, justification and the supporting reference document. The Table on the following page indicates the total project expenditures ($722,923,891) identified as necessary through build-out. Table MFP-2 Cost of Required Expansions to City Infrastructure Infrastructure Type Project Totals Law Enforcement Facilities $22,840,549 Fire Suppression Facilities $40,348,863 Circulation Svstem $459,969,000 Librarv Facility/Collection $12,510,347 Public Use Facilities $18,340,025 Aquatics Facilities $5,232,932 Parkland/Improvements $163,693,175 Total $722,934,891 Fairness and reason (as well as the more important State statutes and Federal court decisions) dictate that not all of the projects will qualify for impact fee funding (i.e. some projects are replacements or service level increasing, etc.). There are no existing impact fee fund balances and thus they will not finance any of the total project needs. Any remaining amount of the total project costs would have to be financed by other sources such as fees, existing taxes or voter approved additional taxes, inter-governmental transfers and the occasional grant. Relationship to Development Impact Fee Report. The Master Facilities Plan was prepared in conjunction with the City's Development Impact Fee (DIF) Report, also prepared by RCS. Projects listed in the DIF Report correspond to projects found in this document and contain the same numbering sequence as the Master Facilities Plan. The DIF Report is also divided into fourteen major chapters according to the same order of projects described on the previous page. Thus, a reader who wants more information on Law Enforcement project #1 (police station expansion) found on Schedule 3.1 of the DIF Report should turn to Project No. LE-Ol of the C-5 . o o o Guide to the Master Facilities Plan Master Facilities Plan. For readers of the Master Facilities Plan who wish to understand the determination of impact fee funding more fully, refer to the Development Impact Fee Report. End of Guide Endnotes 1. Local" infrastructure is defined as infrastructure within neighborhoods or within the footprint of the development as opposed to spine infrastructure.. As an example, 6" sewer collection lines are generally limited to neighborhoods while 12" lines (spine) collect wastewater from neighborhood to transmit it to the treatment plant. C-6 . ,~- C I~"J , D'__ m....~' I. All. 1 ii~1 LE -lJ2 Acquire AdditiOlllll Patro1lDet1:ctive/SpecWty Vehicles $4,031,420 LE-03 Acquire Officer Assigned EquipmeIlt $643,608 LE-()4 Acquire Advanc<ld Computer/Data Sharing Systems S2,500,OOO FD-Ol New Fire Station #233 $5,363,371 FD-02 New Fire Station #233 Response Fleet S650,OOO FD-03 Relocate Fire Station #221 $7,157,347 FD-04 Relocate Fire Station #226 $5,363,371 FD-05 Relocate Fire Station #229 $5,363,371 FD-06 Relocate Fire Station #230 $5,363,371 FD-07 Renovate Station #221 as Adminislrative/Maintenance Facility S3,309,869 FD-08 Construct a Vehicle Storage Building $1,089,101 FD-09 Construct Training Facility $4,690,822 FD-lO Acquire Two Command Vehicles $90,000 FD-lI Acquire Four Squad Vehicles $480,000 FD-12 Acquire Three Sedans lUld a Utility Truck $94,500 FD-13 Acquire a Reserve Engine $I,275,OOO FD-14 Acquire Additional Assigned Fire-fighter EquipmeIlt $58,740 ST-ol 40th Street, Acre LlUle to Electric A VeIlue S2,170,OOO C ST -02 5th Street, Sterling to Victoria S3,200,OOO ST -03 5th Street, Warm Creek to Pedley $480,000 ST -()4 Alabluna Street, 3rd to City Limits $1,600,000 ST -OS Campus Parkway (Pepper-Linden), Kendall to ]-215 $4,800,000 ST -06 CeIltral (Palm Meadows), Tippecanoe to Mountain View S3,200,OOO ST -07 Coulston, Tippecanoe to Mountain View S3,520,OOO ST -08 Cmmector, 3rd Street to 5th Street S3,200,OOO ST -09 Del Rosa, 6th Street to 9th Street $1,600,000 ST-lO Electric, Mountain View to Nortbpark S3,200,OOO ST-lI 'G'Street, Mill to Rialto AVeIlue $1,600,000 ST-12 'H' Street, KeIldaH to 40th S640,OOO ST-13 Kendall, Cambridge to Pine S3,500,OOO ST-14 LeIla ROBd, Mill to Onmge Show $6,400,000 ST-15 Little League Drive, Palm to ]-215 S2,400,OOO ST-16 Little League Drive, ]-215 frontage to Belmont $1,600,000 ST-17 Little Mountain, Devil Creek Channel to 48th S4OO,OOO ST-18 Mill, Pepper to MeridilUl $800,000 ST-19 Mount Vernon Bridge S3,200,OOO ST-20 Mountain View, Thompson to Electric S640,OOO ST-21 Mountain View Bridge at Mission Creek $1,152,000 ST-22 Mountain View, Riverview to Central $6,912,000 ST-23 Mountain View, ]-10 to San BeIllJU'dino Ave. $1,200,000 ST-24 Mountain View A venue Railroad Grade Crossing S24O,OOO 0 ST-25 Palm, Cajon to ]-215 SB Ramp $760,000 ST-26 Pine, Kendall to Belmont ,000 Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 c ..~ C ~::y u, D'.~ - .,,, ~~ - ST-27 Perris Hill PMk ROIJd, 21st ID Pacific . $1,280,000 ST-28 Rsncbo, ColtoIJ Cit;y Limits ID 5th $2,240,000 ST-29 Rialto, Sierra ID Watenna.o $1,600,000 ST-30 Ria11D, l.AUJ ID Tippecanoe $2,400,000 ST-31 State Street, 16th ID FootbiH $7,400,000 ST-32 State street. FootbiH ID 1-215 $8,000,000 ST-33 Tippecanoe, MilI ID Harrimtm $5,600,000 ST-34 Universit;y PMkway, Hallmark ID BNSF Grade Separatioo $1,200,000 ST 35 Watenna.o, 5th ID BaseJjlll! $5,760,000 ST-36 ViclDria, Ric1uudaOIJ ID Mountain View $200,000 ST-37 Traffic Signal @ little League Drive and 1-215 Fronfll8e $200,000 ST-38 Traffic Signal @ little League Drive IUld Belmont $200,000 ST-39 Traffic Signal@PalmlUldCajon $200,000 ST-40 Traffic Signal @ Palm and Industrial $120,000 ST-41 Traffic Signal @ Palm and 1-215 ramps $330,000 ST-42 Traffic Signal @ Palm and IrvingIDn $150,000 ST-43 Traffic Signal @ Palm and Belmont $200,000 ST -44 Traffic Signal @ Campus PMkway (Pepper-Linden) and Industrial $200,000 ST -45 Traffic Signal @ Campus PMkway (Pepper-Linden) and 1-215 Ramps $350,000 ST -46 Traffic Signal @ Campus Parkway and Nortbpark $200,000 ST-47 Traffic Signal @ Sierra (CSUSB) and Nortbpark $200,000 ST -48 Traffic Signal @ Kenda11lUld 48th $175,000 ST-49 Traffic Signal @ little Mountain and 30th $200,000 ST-50 Traffic Signal @ little Mountain IUld 48th $175,000 ST-51 Traffic Signal @ little Mountain IUld Nortbpark $175,000 ST-52 Traffic Signal@StatelUldl-21O $350,000 ST-53 Traffic Signal @MerdianlUldRialto $200,000 ST-54 Traffic Signal @ Macy and MilI $2O(},OOO ST-55 Traffic Signal @ Rsncbo (State) IUld FootbiH $250,000 ST-56 Traffic Signal @ MiramoDte and 27th $200,000 ST-57 Traffic Signal @ Mountain and Kendall $200,000 ST-58 Traffic Signal @ Mountain and 48th $200,000 ST-59 Traffic Signal @ Mountain and Nortbpark $175,000 ST -60 Traffic Signal @ "[" Street IUld Center $200,000 ST-61 Traffic Signal @ "W Street and Marsba1l $200,000 ST -62 Traffic Signal @ Auto Plaza IUld Fairway $200,000 ST -63 Traffic Signal @ "E" Street IUld Century $200,000 ST -64 Traffic Signal@ "E" Street and Orange Show Lane $200,000 ST -65 Traffic Signal @ Arrowhead and Orange Show Lane $150,000 ST-66 Traffic Signal @ Arrowhead IUld Central $175,000 ST-67 Traffic Signal @ Mountain View and 13th $200,000 ST -68 Traffic Signal @ Mountain View and Marsba11 $200,000 ST -69 Traffic Signal @ Electric and 48th $200,000 .1' o Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 ......I';:~!:~E:f;tN '};;\""",,",,:':"':': {::g:.:t:.::".:.:. :\\\..:::::tfnWY't'l"...:.:.:::.:;:.:.:. :.:.:.'.".:.:.ii.".'.:.i.'.:'..:'.i.i,',W:b::;; ;:;::0::;::;; :ni:::;: )SrvzuD/lr}'=.~~!::~w. . .' ,:,?:=:t=:::{::=}:=::::?}:; ... t~:~;t~::::~:::f::g1W:;: :::;}~{::~~::i:i:#:rr@Wf::::rHMM:ri:::::~:::::;:{~:~::::~::::~:::8:;:~;~~;;:dhnr:::;:~;~:::~;:::;::};:;:;:;:;;:::~;;:;N~;;b::.:8;;;~;;;;:;:;:; ;'3~;?=f'~"""'" ,. ST-71 Traffic SigJJa1@u.n. and 0ntJge Show ROBd :. ST -72 Traffic SigJJa1 @ u.n. and Central :: ST -73 Traffic Sigosl @ u.n. and Rislto ST-74 Traffic Sigosl @u.n.and3rd :; ST -75 Traffic Sigosl @ East Carnegie and Hospital LIlI1e .: ST -76 Traffic Sigosl @ TippectllJOt' and Rislto .. ST -77 Traffic Signal @ Del Rosa and Msrsball .' ST -78 Traffic Sigosl @ Del Rosa and 6th ; ST -79 Traffic Sigosl @ Sterling amJ Msrsball ST -80 Traffic Sigosl @ Sterling amJ Lynwood :; ST -81 Traffic Sigosl @ Sterling amJ 6th '. ST -82 Traffic Sigosl @ S. MountailJ View and Central (Palm M-rows) .. ST-83 Traffic Sigosl@S. MountailJ View amJ [-10 Westbound Rsmp .. ST -84 Traffic Signal @ Guthrie amJ Pacific ST-85 bJterchangelRamps@[-215andPalmAvenue(SB, County) '. ST-86 bJtercbangelRsmps@[-215andPepper Linden (Campus Parkway) (SB) :; ST-87 bJterchangelRamps @[-215 amJ University Parkway (SB, County) .: ST-88 bJtercbangelRsmps@[-210amJ Watennan (SB, Higbland, County) :; ST-89 bJterchangeIRamps @ I 210 and Del Rosa (SB, Highl.nd, County) 0...:..'.......... STST =9901 bJtercbaDge/Ramps@[-210amJVictoria(SB,Highland,County) bJtercbange/Ramps @ [-210 and 5th (SB, Highland, Redlands) :. ST-92 bJterchangeIRamps @[-10amJ Tippecanoe :; ST -93 bJterchangelRamps @ [-10 amJ Pepper (SB, COunty, COlton) .:. ST -94 bJterchangelRamps @ [-10 amJ MountailJ View (SB, Loma Linda, Red1ands, County) .:: ST-95 Grade Separation@PalmAvenue(SB) ... ST -96 Gradll Separation @ Rislto (SB) ':: ST -97 Gradll Separation @ SlJJte StreetlUniversity (SB) :.; ST -98 Gradll Separation @ Hunts LIlI1e (SB, Colton) .:: LB-ol General Library Square Foot Expansion .:: LB-02 Expansion of Library Collection CC-ol Verdemont Community Center ::: CC-02 Delmatm Heights Gymoasium ::. CC-03 Nicholson Community Center :.' CC-04 Construct Additional Public Use Space .; AQ-Ol Construct Water Pool/Attraction ::. AQ-02 Construct Locker/Administration Building '.' PK -01 Construct Six 5.0 Acre Neighborhood Parks :.: PK-02 Construct Seven 10.0 Acre Passive Community Parks ... PK-03 Construct Four 25.0 Acre Active (sports) Community Parks '.:. PK -04 Miscellaneous Park Improvements ... PK -05 Open Space Acquisition (159.4 acres) I 1 i 'I , I , I I I , I i I I I 1 , I I l I I I j , I , I i I i , I i J , :f\\}:}\\::{(}::t:: :;:::;:;,;::-:::.;.;::::::::::::::.:-:...:.: -.-. ....... ..1.."..... TotJJl ..;~ ~:;:: .:.:.: .......:.:.:.~r't:.::'JMmtmIJd1~Jn~~J1fHHtr;~t:::~ . :::...... :::...... $150,000 ...... ~EI $200,000 ...... $200,000 ; $200,000; $200,000 '::::: ::::.... :::...... $40,000,000 .. $28,000,000 ...... $30,000,ooot :::...... $27,000,000 ...... $40,000,000 ...... $[8,000,000\ $17,100,000 ...... $16,400,000; $14,000,000 ...... $7,427,306; $5,083,041 ...... $4,125,000 ...... $1,925,000 .:.:.. $1,925,000 ...... $10,365,025 ...... $3,224,863 I $2,008,069 ...... $23,296,374::: $54,358,213 ...... $77,654,600 ...... $1,000,000 ...... $7,383,988 :: .:.: ".:' ';:: .::: .:~ I ....... ......... ...... ......... .. . ...... ...... ... ., ~......,.. ...., .... , .. .........'...........:...:.:...:.:.;.:.:.:.:..:.:~.w.................;.......,.. .'..............,.'...........,..,..... ::-::::::;:::::;::,::::;::;::::;}:;:::::::::::: .,..:.:.:..~":::::~;:~:;:;:::::':::::::':::Y:::::?:::~::t"r;tt~:~6i;~:,t~:::nt:::r:::;: :':;:':':':':':':::'::::.._.::::::::::;::::::::::~:::\:~:~:HMM#MMjj~~H:mr.r: ,:::::::::::::::..:.:.:.:,::::'...:.;................. . .............,...........:..->... ... ....... ,..... O.....................'.".:ii;i%;;.t:::::~:...~=;::::!I.;;:'.~:;::;::~.:i. Revenue & Cost Specialists, L.L.C. Fullerton, CA 92831 o City of San Bernardino Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment o o C-lO ~ C') co '" en <( U c o - ~ .!J? :s 11. ~ E ~ u . ! ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ -S .2 'is J! {l :! u .~ e Q. '" ~ ~ ~ - - '" ~ U ~ .! ..,j -S ..,j , iii Q .. ~ ~ i ai "u Q Q) U a. - en '6 'in . .! 0 '" U . "0 ~ c 1l as .~ Q) ". Q ::> ;ct c lD ~....: > lD a: City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Expand Law Enforcement Facilities Space Program: Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Submitting DcpBTtIDcnt(s): Police Dcpsrtmcnt Project No.: LE-Ql Project Description: Acquire land for and expand facilities to house the City's additional law enforcement services. The added space would need to be approximately 32,308 square feet to be able to maintain the current levels of service afforded to the existing community by the current 80,000 square foot facUity. The additional space would house the additional administration, patrol, investigation, records, traffic control, analytical and support staff, short-term evidence storage, report writing space, training, meeting and locker/shower facilities and other space needs required to maintain current building standards. Included in the cost estimate is the acquisition of about five and half acres for the building and additional visitor/employee parking. Justification/Requirement for Project: The ultimate-use law enforcement building will be required to house the build-out staff as the full impact of development of all currently undeveloped acreage in the City occurs. The current 80,000 square feet of the facilities dedicated to law enforcement affords approximately 256.4 square feet of building space for each of the existing 312 officers (and defmes the current building standard of spacelofficer) and the new facility will extend that standard into the future by acquiring about 32,308 square feet for the additional 126 offlcers need to maintain the existing levels of service. No decision has been made regarding the location or configuration of the additional space but the Department intends on constructing two decentralized stations, one on the north and one in the south areas of the City. Consequences of Not Completing Project: The capital items contained in these Master Facility Plans is not meant to imply that either the additional"space or officers to be added as a result of development is neither adequate or sufficient. It is only implied that these MFP projects contained within the Law Enforcement Chapter would allow the City to maintain the level of service (LOS) at General Plan Build-out with 438 officers (in 112,308 SF) as is currently afforded with the 312 officers (in 80,000 SF). Reference Document: None, the proposed space needs are limited to impact-based needs and are defmed by the "proportionality" requirement of the impact fee calculation. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 througb all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years $0 $0 $0 $0 $1.248,489 $1,248,489 Land AcquisitionlRigbl of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,257,795 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,370,262 $11,370,262 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $674,349 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,114,626 $1,114,626 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,665,521 $15,665,521 Potential Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Law Enforcement Impact Fees or potentially a specifically-defmed tax measure. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Acquire Additional PatrollDetcctivelSpecialty Vehiclea Program: Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Submitting Department(s): Police Department Project No.: LE-G2 Project Description: Acquire 95 miscellaneous additional response vehicles required by law enforcement including a combination of patrol, unmarked and specialty vehicles at an average of $42,436 per equipped vehicle. These 95 additional vehicles are necessary to maintain the current O.7S vehicles per officer ratio with the addition of 126 officers, The current standard of O.7S vehicles per officer is based upon the 234 vehicles divided by the existing 312 officers. Justification/Requirement for Project: As the residential and business community continues to grow I the Police Department will receive 8 statistically determined increase in the number of law enforcement calls for service. The expansion of the police station is discussed in LE-o 1. As the law enforcement force expands, additional vehicles are needed to equip the additional officers consistent with the pro-rata expansion of the sworn staff and building Consequences of Not Completing Project: Inability to maintain the current ratios of vehicles per officer will severely reduce the City's ability to maintain current beat strength and a reduced level of services would result. Reference Document: None, the proposed vehicle needs are limited to impact-based needs and are defmed by the "proportionality" requirement of the impact fee calculation. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build--out" column. PROpOSED 2006-07 2007-GS EXPENDITURES Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 Equipment/Other $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 201(}-lJ Tots! 200S-09 2009-10 through all Build-out Years $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,031,420 $4,031,420 $0 $0 $4,031,420 $4,031.420 Potential Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Law Enforcement Impact Fees or potentially a spccifically-defmed tax measure. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Projea Title: Acquire Officer Assigned Equipment ProgI'tUIl: Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Submitting Department(s): Police Department Project No.: LE-03 Project Description: Additional equipmcnlassigned to 126 officers necessary maintain the existing level of service. The list includcs, but is not limited to: protective vest, handgun, badges/patches/name tags, flashlight, nylon beltlattachements. uniforms, etc. The cost includes an amount for undertaking the back-ground check, psychological exam, physical/medical exam, and polygraph for the successful candidates. Justification/Requirement for Project: The equipment is necessary for an officer to function in the field. The list is mostly safety and communications equipment but also includes the significant recruiting costs. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Officer safety would be compromised and the ability to function would be impaired. Reference Document: None, the proposed space needs are limited to impact-based needs and are defmed by the "proportionality" requirement of the impact fee calculation. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through sl1 EXPENDITURES BWld-out Years Design/lnspection! AdministrtJtion $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $643,608 $643,608 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $643,608 $643,608 Potential Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Law Enforcement Impact Fees or potentially a specifically-defmed tax measure. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Acquire Advanced Computer/Data Sharing Systems Program: Law Enforcement Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Submitting Department(s): Police Department Project No.: LE-04 Project Description: Acquire Specialty and Communications Equipment/Improvements and Computer Data Sharing Equipment Acquire hardware and software for advanced fmgerprint. DNA, dispatch, jail management, crime analysis. field report writing and record keeping systems. These new systems are necessary to allow the Department to maintain services to an ever increasing population and business community. Also included is the acquisition of additional hand-held communications equipment (pagers/radios) for the 126 additional officers and communications equipment (radios/MDCs/modems) for the 95 additional vehicles. Justification/Requirement for Project: The amount and sophistication of crime is ever increasing. The City will need to acquire new computer software designed to provide new information sharing tools and greater investigatory capability. The transfer of information gathered from computer systems to officers in the field as well as proper and necessary cammunications with those same officers is an absolute requirement for the safety of the City's citizens and the officers themselves. Again, nothing is implied regarding the sufficiency of the proposed additions. The proposed additions are limited to capital required to maintain the existing level of service, be it the City's desired Level of Service or not. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure to acquire new advances in electronic data processing and communications equipment would force the City to operate without the assistance of other agencies. Reference Document: None, the proposed space needs are limited to impact-based needs and are defmed by the "proportionality" requirement of the impact fee calculation. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2006-07 2007-D8 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 201G-1I Total 200S-Q9 2009-10 through all Build-out Years $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 $0 $0 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way Contingency Equipment/Other TOTAL COST Potential Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Law Enforcement Impact Fees or potentially a specmcally-defmed tax measure. o City of San Beul8rdino Fire Suppression Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ~ '" - '" . - . - ~ - ... .. l:l ... l:l l:l ;;; ~ ;;; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '"'I ~ ;3; I'I'l "' I'I'l OQ ... Oli ~ i!5 \Pi i!5 K ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ '" u .:: I ~ l if ~ I R ! ij ~ ~ ~ ~ J f l~ I j i } ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. 1 ~ I ~~Ii!Ii!Ii!Ii!~i:~ ~ L Ii! Ii! ~ ~ ~ ~ Ii! ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ . e~.!l.!l.!l.!luJj .-.: ~ ; i I ~ J i I I I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... o o N .: '" .0 E '" > o Z ~ ~ . 1 ~ II - 'i " ~ ~ S II '5 ~ -l: .!l ~ ... 1i ., ~ ~ . . '"' <C U c: o - ~ .!!! "3 u. g ...J ui .i iii .<:; '" C- oo t .!!, ~ ... . s '(; ~ i . '6 ~ .~ '" .S ~ i .. 0 : t ~...: - en o U o!l '" :l c: ~ '" a: City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Fire Suppression Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Submitting Department(s): Fire Department Project No.: FD-ol Project Description: Acquire land for and construct a 6.700 square foot station capable of housing a response company in the Arrowhead Springs Specific Plan Area. The 2 X 2 floor configuration would consist of two 20' wide by 80' deep response vehicles bays (3,200 S.F.) in order to adequately house a standard Type ( pumper/engine and a Type III engine. The remaining 3,500 square feet would be used for living quarters. utility/storage and a staff conference room for up to four flrcfighters. Justification/Requirement for Project: The specific plan area is projected to consist of the construction of 465 detached dwellings, SS8 attached dwellings. a 600 room hotel and approximately 1,045,000 square feet of conference/commercial space. Typically, this limited amount of development would not warrant the need. for a separate station. However I given the somewhat geographic separation from the rest of the City and its close interface with the contiguous wildland, a station is required. Most likely, the construction of this station and acquisition of the response vehicles would be required as condition of approval in the Development Agreement. Consequences of Not Completing Project: The proposed development could not be approved due to the poor response time from the City's existing stations. Reference Document: Fire Department staff planning. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus aU project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROpOSED 2006-07 2007-oS 200S-09 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $327.429 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,600,830 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,008,466 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,823 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $265,823 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,363,371 Potential Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax measure. Total all Years $1,600,830 $3,008,466 $160,823 $265,823 $5,363,371 City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: New Fire Station #233 Response Fleet Program: Fire Suppression Facilitics, Vehicles and Equipment Submitting Department(s): Fire Department Project No.: FD-02 Project Description: Acquire a Type I engine and Type III engine for assignment to Station #233. Given the continuous growth of brush in the contiguous wildland areas and trees on privately owned property, additional wildland interface equipment ~ill be necessary. Justiflcation/Requirement for Project: The station requires response fleet consistent with the needs and risks posed by the area it will serve. Property owners typically plant small trees on their new property as part of the initial landscaping efforts. As these trees mature and grow. they become potential conduits for spreading fire from adjacent wildland areas into developed areas. The Department needs additional resources to have a fast strike capability to deflect such fires. Consequences of Not Completing Project: The proposed development could not be approved due to the poor response time from the City's existing stations. Reference Document: Fire Department staff planning. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2010-11 Total 2OO7-OS 2OOS-Q9 2009-/0 through all Build-out Years $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,000 $650,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $650,000 $650,000 2006-07 Design/Inspectionl Administration Land Acquisition/Right of Way Contingency Equipment/Other TOTAL COST Potential Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax measure. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ProgrtU1J: Fire Suppression Facilities, VehiCles and Equipment Submitting Department(s): Fire Department Proj."t No.: FD-Q3 Project Description: Acquire land for and construct an 8.700 square foot station capable of housing two response companies near 9th Street and Waterman Avenue. The 3 X 2 floor configuration would consist of three 20' wide by 80' deep bay. (4,800 S.F.) in order to adequately house a standard pumper/engine and a second front-line vehicle. The remaining 4,900 square feet would be used for living quarters, utility/storage and a staff conference room. The station is required to relocate the engine companies from the existing Station #221 location. Justification/Requirement for Project: It is proposed that the existing Station #221 complex become (only) the Fire Administrative headquarters/maintenance/storage facility. The existing rue fleet maintenance shops (14,492 S.F) must be demolished to allow for the proposed 1-215 widening. The existing bays at Station #221 are suitable to function as the new fue fleet maintenance operation. To make room for the relocation of the maintenance operation, the Station #221 rue/medic rciponse capabilty will need to be relocated to a suitable nearby loca.tion. Consequences of Not Completing Project: The maintenance facility will have to relocated regardless and the City would not be able to relocate the Station to a more advantageous location. Lastly, the additional traffic expected from the intensification willlike1y increase response time from Station ff7. Reference Document: Fire Department staff planning. Projoct Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-QS EXPENDITURES Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 Land Acquisition!Rigbt of Way $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 Equipment/Other $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 2010-11 Total 2008-1J9 2009-10 througb all Build-out Years $0 $0 $463,181 $463,181 $0 $0 $1.829,520 $1,829,520 $0 $0 $4,246,965 $4,246,965 $0 $0 $232,833 $232,833 $0 $0 $384,848 $384,848 $0 $0 $7,157,347 $7,157,347 Potential Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax measure. . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program ; Fire Suppression Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Submitting Department(s): Fire Department Project No,: FD-{)4 Project Description: Acquire land for and construct a 6,700 square foot station capable of housing a relocated single response company (roughly three four fire-fighters). The 2 X 2 floor configuration would consist of two bays 20' wide by 80'dcep bays (3.200 S.F.) in order to adequately house a standard pumper/engine and a back-up. The remaining 3,500 square feet would be used for living quarters, utility/storage and conference room. The facility would be in the vicinity of Del Rosa Avenue and Date Avenue. Justification/Requirement for Project: The addition of approximately 21,000 residential dwelling units and 80.5 million square feet of business space will result in an approximateley 39% increase in calls at General Plan build-out. Typically, such an increase would statistically result in requiring four new stations. However, staff and a Committee have determined that the anticipated new development could be accommodated with one new station and the relocation of four others. This is significant in that it allows for the accommodation of nearly 40% more calls-for-service with a minor increase (about 8%) in on-going staff costs. An additional factor is the continual incease in traffic from probable residential intensification, response times from the existing responding stations, will likely increase due to the additional traffic load. Consequel1ces of Not Completing Project: Additional stations would have to constructed, a counter productive step to maiximizing staff costs. Reference Document: Fire Department staff planning. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus aU project cost default to the "Build-out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2~7 2010-11 Total 200S-{)9 2009-10 through sJ1 Build-out Years $0 $0 $327,429 $327,429 $0 $0 $1,600,830 $1,600,830 $0 $0 $3,008,466 $3,008,466 $0 $0 $160,823 $160,823 $0 $0 $265,823 $265,823 $0 $0 $5,363,371 $5,363,371 2007-oS Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 Potential Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax measure. . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Fire Suppression Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Submitting Deportment(s): Fire Department Project No.: FD-05 Project Description: Acquire land for and construct a 6.700 square foot station capable of housing a relocated single response company (roughly three four fire-fighters). The 2 X 2 floor configuration would consist of two bays 20' wide by SO'deep bays (3.200 S.F.) in order to adequately house 8 standard pumper/engine and a back-up. The remaining 3,500 square feet would be used for living quarters, utility/storage and conference room. The facility would be in the vicinity of Rialto Avenue and Rancho Drive. Justification/Requirement for Project: The addition of approximately 21.000 residential dwelling units and 80.5 million square feet of business space will result in an approximatcley 39% increase in calls at General Plan build-out. Typically, such an increase would statistically result in requiring four new stations. However, staff and a Committee have determined that the anticipated new development could be accommodated with one new station and the relocation of four others. This is significant in that it allows for the accommodation of nearly 40% more calls-for-service with a minor increase (about 8%) in on-going staff costs. An additional factor is the continual incease in traffic from probable residential intensification, response times from the existing responding stations, will likely increase due to the additional traffic load. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Additional stations would have to constructed, a counter productive step to maiximizing staff costs. Reference Document: Fire Department staff planning. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2006-07 2010-11 ToIIl1 2008-<J9 2009-10 through all Build-out y cars $0 $0 $327,429 $327.429 $0 $0 $1.600,830 $1.600,830 $0 $0 $3.008,466 $3,008,466 $0 $0 $160,823 $160,823 $0 $0 $265,823 $265,823 $0 $0 $5,363,371 $5,363,371 2007-G8 Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 Land AcquisitionlRight of Way $0 $0 Contingency Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 Potential Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax measure. . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ProgrlU1J: Fire Suppression Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Submitting Dcpartmt:JJt(s): Fire Department Project No.: FD-06 Project Description: Acquire land for and construct a 6.700 square foot station capable of housing a relocated single response company (roughly three four fire-fighters). The 2 X 2 floor configuration would consist of two bays 20' wide by SO'deep bays (3,200 S.F.) in order to adequately house a standard pumper/engine and a back-up. The remaining 3.500 square feet would be used for living quarters, utility/storage and conference room. The facility would be in the vicinity of Waterman Avenue and Mill Street. Justification/Requirement fOT Project: The addition of approximately 21 ,000 residential dwelling units and 80.5 million square feet of business space will result in an approximate1ey 39% increase in calls at General Plan build-out. Typically. such an increase would statistically result in requiring four new stations. However, staff and a Committee have determined that the anticipated new development could be accommodated with one new station and the relocation of four others. This is significant in that it allows for the accommodation of nearly 40% more calls-for-service with a minor increase (about 8%) in on-going staff costs. An additional factor is the continual incease in traffic from probable residential intensification, response times from the existing responding stations, will likely increase due to the additional traffic load. Consequences of Not Completing Pr~;ect: Additional stations would have to constructed, a counter productive step to maiximizing staff costs. Lastly, the additional traffic expected from the intensification will likely increase response time from Station #7. Reference Document: Fire Department staff planning. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein. was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. $0 $0 201o-11 ToW 2008-09 2009-10 through all Build-out Years $0 $0 $327.429 $327,429 $0 $0 $1,600,830 $1,600,830 $0 $0 $3,008.466 $3,008.466 $0 $0 $160,823 $160,823 $0 $0 $265,823 $265,823 $0 $0 $5,363.371 $5,363,371 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2006-07 2007-08 Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Acquisition/Right of Way Contingency Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 PotelJtiaJ Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax measure. . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Renovate Station #221 as Administrative/Maintenance Facility Program: Fire Suppression Facilities. Vehicles and Equipment Submitting Department(s): Fire Department Project No.: FD-07 Project Description: Convert the existing station #221 to function 8S the department's headquarters. maintenance and supply facility. The station current supports the administration function and would continue to do so. The project consists of converting the vacated frre operations space into the fire fleet maintenance, storage and supply center. The facility owuld probably need approximately 3,200 additional square feet (see FD-QS). Justification/Requirement for Prq,ject: The Department would have to fmd other resources for this function becuase the current maintenance facilities will be acquired by the State for the 1-215 widening. Consequences of Not Completing Project: The Department would be limited to current limited public awareness equipment. Reference Document: Fire Department staff planning. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition describ'ed herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 ToI8l 2006-07 2OO7-OS 2OOS-()9 2009-10 through all Build-out Yesrs $0 $0 $0 $0 $286,628 $286,628 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,606,848 $2,606,848 $0 $0 $0 $0 $156,958 $156,958 $0 $0 $0 $0 $259.435 $259,435 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,309,869 $3,309,869 PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Land Acquisition/Right of Way Contingency Equipment/Other TOTAL COST Potenti81 Flinding Sources: General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax measure. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Construct a Vehicle Storage Building Program: Fire Suppression FacUities, Vehicles and Equipment Submitting Dopartment(s): Fire Department Project No.: FO-Q8 Project Description: Construct an 3,200 square foot vehicle storage building to store the Department's various reserve vehicles, minor fleet repair, warehouse operations and medical/station supplies. The facility is plarmcd to be located at the proposed combined Headquarters Facility (ex-Station #221). Justification/Requirement for Project: The relocation of the maintenance operations from the current "H" Street location will require some additonal space for parts storage and vehicle maintenance. The existing bays would function as the major repair areas and would probably house the lifts/hoists. Additionally, the City has a number of reserve vehicles or vehicles not assigned to any specific station and they need to be stored in a covered facility to increase the vehicle longevity. Consequences of Not Completing Project: The maintenance function would not have enough space. Reserve vehicles would need to be stored or at existing stations. Reference Document: Fire Department staff planning. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-GS EXPENDITURES Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 Land AcquisitionlRigbt of Way $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 Equipment/Other $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 2010-11 TotJJl 200S-09 2009-10 througb all Build-out Years $0 $0 $94,354 $94,354 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $858,900 $858,900 $0 $0 $51,207 $51.207 $0 $0 $84,640 $84,640 $0 $0 $1.089,101 $1,089,101 Potential Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax measure. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Construct Training Facility Program: Fire Suppression Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Submitting Departmen'(s): Fire Department Project No.: FD-09 Project Description: Acquire about three acres for and construct 8 training facility. No specific location has been determined but industrial use areas work well. The facility would include a "live fue" training facility for "hands-on" manipulated training. The project would include 8 multi-story "burn" training tower/hose rack. Probable improvements would include 8 drafting pit, pipe/trench, classrooms, observation tower and other numerous situation devices or props including potential aircraft response. Justification/Requirement for Project: The proposed facility would enable the Fire Department to continue to meet mandated and recommended training requirements. Training while on-site and on-duty is cost-effective. Additionally, squads undergoing training would be available as 2nd alarm response crews. Lastly, the pumping capabilities of ea~h pumper can continue to be tested without risk to the pumps. Consequences of Not Completing Proj~: Training would continue in its current ad hoc manner at various locations. Reference Document: Fire Department staff planning. Project Timiug: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the ooBuUd-outOO column. PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-()S EXPENDITURES Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 Equipment/Other $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 2010-11 TotsJ 2008-09 2009-10 througb sl1 Build-out Yesrs $0 $0 $290,149 $290,149 $0 $0 $1.372,140 $1,372,140 $0 $0 $2,691,483 $2,691,483 $0 $0 $127,050 $127,050 $0 $0 $210,000 $210,000 $0 $0 $4,690,822 $4,690,822 Potential Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax measure. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Acquire Two Command V chicles Program: Fire Suppression Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Submitting Department(s): Fire Department Project No.: FD-IO Project Description: Acquire two command vehicles. Justification/Requirement for Project: The need for additional command vehicles is the result of a growing department potentially culminating up to thirteen stations and almots 170 rue-fighters. The additional growth from residential and business development in the community will increase the likelihood of simultaneous responses necessitating additional command vehicles. Consequences of Not Completing Project: The existing number of command vehicles would have to be sufficient. Reference Document: Fire Department staff planning. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "BuUd-out" column. 201D-ll PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through , i EXPENDITURES Build-out I Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 , I I Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I j Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000 I I TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $90,000 ToW all Years Potential Funding Sour"",,: General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax measure. $0 $0 $0 City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Acquire Four Squad Vehicles Program: Fire Suppression Facilitics, Vehicles and Equipment Submitting Departmeut(s): Fire Department Project No.: FD-ll Prq]ect Description: Acquire four squad vehicles. Justification/Requirement for Project: ? Consequences of Not Completing Project: ? Reference Document: Fire Department staff planning. Prop Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement. thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Tots! PROPOSED 2006-07 2OO7-OS 2OOS-<J9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $480,000 $480,000 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $480,000 $480,000 Potenti81 Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax measure. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ProJect Title: Acquire Three Sedan. and a Utility Truck Program: Fire Suppression Facilities. Vehicles and Equipment Submitting Department(s): Fire Department ProJect No.: FD-12 Project Description: Acquire Fire Administrative Vehicles Acquire three sedans for inspections servees and a utility truck for fleet maintenance. Justification/Requirement for Project: There will be an increase in the number of 8IU1ual inspections. Additionally I there is need for an additional utility vehicle for routine pick-up and delivery of needed supplies and fleet maintenance parts. Increased fire suppression response capabilities by improving the f:rre-fighting conditions. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Inspectors and fleet maintenance staff would not be able to work under optimum conditions. Reference Document: Fire Department staff planning. ProJect Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2006-1J7 20!t}-J/ Total 2007-1JB 200B--1J9 2009-10 through all Build-out Years $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $94.500 $0 $0 $0 $0 $94,500 $94,500 Design/Inspection! Administration Land Acquisition/Right of Way Construction TOTAL COST Potentia} Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax. measure. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Fire Suppression Facilities. Vehicles and Equipment Submitting DepMtment(s): Fire Department Project No.: FD-13 Project Description: Acquire a reserve engine/pumper at $425,000. Justification/Rcqukcment for Project: The addition of the proposed stations requires the addition of six front-line engine/pumpers to be assigned to the new stations. Three additional engine/pumpers are required to maintain a SO% reserve capability. Consequences of Not Completing Project: The front-line vehicles would become over-used and subject to a greater rate of break-down without routine and scheduled maintenance, requiring back-up vehicles. Reference Document: Fire Department staff planning. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement. thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2006-07 2010-11 Total 2008-{)9 2009-10 through sl1 BuiJd-out Years $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,275,000 $1,275,000 $0 $0 $1,275,000 $1,275,000 2007-()8 DesignlInspection/ Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Potential Funding SQurccs: General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax measure. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Projoct Title: Acquire Additional Assigned Fire-fighter Equipment Program: Fire Suppression Facilities, Vehicles and Equipment Submitting Department(s): Fire Department Project No.: FD-14 Project Description: Acquisition of equipment assigned to each fIrefighter. It costs the City some $4,895 to recruit/outfit each frrefighter and there will be 8 need for 12 additional firefighters assigned to the proposed Station #223. plus four additional firefighters for required leave coverage requires the addition and outfitting of 100 rlTe-fighters (96 + 4 = 100). Justification/Requirement for Project: Firefighters require specialty equipment and cannot perform their unusual or specific duties without it. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Sharing of personal equipment is not an option. Reference Document: Fire Department staff planning. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2~7 2010-11 ToW 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all Build-out Yesrs $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $58,740 $58,740 $0 $0 $0 $0 $58,740 $58,740 Design/Inspectionl Administration Land Acquisition/Right of Way Construction Equipment/Other TOTAL COST Potentia] Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Fire Suppression Development Impact Fees and potentially a voter-approved tax measure. o City of San Bernardino Circulation System Streets, Signals and Bridges c o , C}l! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ & ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ I i ~ i :! '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0: ~ .. :; ::i ;;; It ::i ::i ::i ;;i ::i ;;i ::i ~ :; ;;i ::i ;;i ~ ;;i .. ;;i :; ;;i ~'S(.'; Ql ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~lg ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ I i ~ i I)[ '" ~ ~ ~ i ~ * ~ ~ '" ~ 0: ~ .. oa 0 ~ :; ::i ;;i It ::i ::i ::i ;;i ::i ;;i ::i ,.; '" ;;i ::i ;;i ~ ;;i ;;i :; ;;; 8~'S .. .. '" Ql a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 00 ~ ~ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a "- <::> I ~ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ~ 8 '" r II a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ~ -- I ~ ........ } ~ . '" :i: ~ ;:: I '" .!, I r j s i ~ .. I ! .. u ~ s . s ~ ~ oll .1 :i: 1! S ~ 's ! Ql .. .~ J f '" f ~ G IS 's f .e I I ;:: .~ ! ~ !i 1 ! I I ~ I ~ :i .!, s s ! s s G' " !i .. ~ s ~ ~ ~ .~ c 1 s 1 ~ s ~ I ~ '" I . ~ I s '" ~ t s s . ~ ;:: t '" .~ s ~ J ;:: ! ~ s s :i: s .!, i t I s ~ I .I I s t ~ " ~ ..; I ) t ~ .g /l ~ ~ 6' ;; 1~"'. .~ .e s s ::Ii ill .!, S ~ I f 1 ~ i'.l ~ .. .!, II ll:; l!l ~ ;; ~ ::Ii c J II J .~ .~ . .' . II ~ ~ II .. .!l 1A ~ } } I :i: :i: :i: l ! I ~~~ I ol: ~ " I I J '" :.; I I j l J 1 '1 .e .e .e I a ~ ! ! .g ! ::Ii I 1 1 1 I ! ~ ! ~ ~ . ! ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ '5 ~ ~.~ !i !i ~ ~ ?= ::Ii ::Ii .e ~ o ~s~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t:! :! " '" .. ... .. "' !l ;:: !:I !:l 1\ :Q ~ l:; III Rl }8~a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t; ~ .!. ~ J!. ~ ~ ~ ~ ,!, ~ ~ ~ ,!, ~ ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ~ '" co C\I '" <I: U c: o - ~ .!!! "3 u. . e .g u . ! ~ II - ~ ~ ~ ;; II .. . J! ~ !!J u .!!, e 0. .. - ~ ~ ~ ~ .. t .!l. U ~ ~ ~ :s ~ - .; 0 " - ~ .!!! i OJ '0 CI) Q. ~ C/) '5 - . CI) .~ 0 '" u .S '0 .~ c: ., 1:; CI) .!!, " 0 ::> %1\: c: ~'" CI) > CI) a: . c - ~ ~ ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - 6 ~ ~ g ~ ~ g ~ ! ! ! ~ g ~ ! ! ~ ! ! " ! ti " ~ ! ! ~ ! ! ! " " '~i ~ '" ;;; l:l ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; ti t; :; ~ ;;i ~ ... - ~'a~ Ql 811 ':l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $f ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ti ~ " " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " " ~ ~ ti " :; ::i ~ ... ;;; l:l ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; l:l ... ... ... ~d 'a .. ;;; "l~Ql a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a 00 ~ ~ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a "- ~ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a II ~ ~ <11 a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ~ I ~ 1\ 1\\ I ! ::: ~ f :!: ~ i 1 1 ~ ) J J I . '" ~ ~ J I if ... ! ! ~ ~ i ~ ~ . 1 1 t ';:: ~ ~ ~ I 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 ~ I @ ll:l ;S ;S ) t t I @ 1 s I l ~ i ~ 1 1 1 .. iil 1 .. ,I '<! J J ;:; ~ i 1 1 .. 13 ... 1 ... 1 i ! ;:; . ol: ol: J 1 i ~ ~ ,~ 1 1 1 1 1 ~ 1 ,a 1 ... ill ~ ! ! ! i ~ ~ ~ ! ~ J J i s ill J s :Ii :Ii ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ ~ i s ! s f I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ . ~ ;;; s .. .. 'ill 'ill 'ill 'ill .. .. .. .. IlII IlII .. .. .. .. 'ill 'ill 'ill 'ill 'ill 'ill ] ! s ~ ~ ~ J J J J J J J J J I I J J J I II I I I I I ! I I .I b I ~;.:::~ " '@ 'l! ~ ~ is is is ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " is ~ is is ~ is fils ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ,! ..... ~ '., .. ~ ;; ~ ,! ,! ,! .. .. ,! ,! ,! ~.\d ~ ~ ~ l:l ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j J .. ~ " - ~ ~ :;; t! i;l lI; ~ ~ ~ lli ~"a C ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C') <Xl C\l 0> <( CJ c: o t:: Q) = ::J U. " E ~ " . ~ 11 ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ 'S J! {l l!l " ,~ e .. '" - ~ e - " "" I' CJ e .. ..i ,~ ..i s , <Ii . ~ .~ i <a 'u Q) 0 Co - en '5 0; ~ ,~ 0 .~ CJ "0 ~ c: i ca Q) " 0 ::J "01: c: ~ ' Q) "'~ > Q) It . III ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g g g ~ ~ ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; ;;; !Ii ~ a ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ " ! ~ ! g ~ ! ! ! ~ ! ! ~ ! ! ! ~ ! ! g g g ~ J~ ~ ;;; ... ;;; ;;; ... ;;; ... ;;; ;;; !Ii ~ n 8 1i "l ll:\ I a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a .., ~ ~ I a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a "- Q ~ I a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ~ >b ~ a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a a ~ I !I ~ ~ 1 >: i ! i ~ I 01: ~ J ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ J <Il ~ J l ~ ~ i i I '" I ~ t 'l! I .r ~ ... t ! I I ~ :Ii 1 .a I i I 1 1 ... ! "I: S 1 1 " ~ ll:\ It; ~ '" I ~ 1 ~ ~ .~ ~ is ~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 :Ii ~ :> ~ ~ 1 1 1 1 1 ~ ~ ~ "2 1 1 I ~ I ) 1 1 g 1 1 1 1 "' 1 1 '" ~ ~ o 1 "' I I I i "q 1 1 1 1 ! ! " I "i ~ f f f i ... ... ... !- ~ ~ ~ ~ a ! ! ! ! I ~ ~ :; :; ~ ~ ~ 1~~ :; ... ... :; Ii! ol ol I I I ~ ~ .. ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ .. .. .. .. ~ .. .. ~ .. .. ~ .. .. o j ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ll:\~~ ill " ill ill ill ill ~ ~ ~ ill ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ill ill ill ~ ~ ~"~ ! .. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ~si lli ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ R t:: ~ i:! i'!: ~ ~ !:: I! Il: Ii ;; l:I I:l I II ~ 10 "~~ "~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u u ., ., ., ., o c ~ '" co C\l Ol <C t) c:: B ~ ~ :; LL ~ ~ u . ~ ~ &l II - ~ ~ . 5 II ., ~ -!! {l :! l ~ ., . ~ ~ . ~ ... ~ "~ cj e ... .J ~ :s .J - ui Q 1; .~ . 6 0; ~ "u Q) u 0- . en 15 1il . "~ 0 '" t) !; "0 ~ c:: 13 os "~ Q) :> :.t c:: ~..; ~ Q) a: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g g g g g g g g g ~ g ~- ~ a- · ~- ~- ~- ~ ~ ~ · No... ... .... .... .... .... ~ ... ... ~ .... ~ '" CI) '" (l) <( (.) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g g g g g g g g g ~ g ~- ~ a- · ~. ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ..~ .... N 9 .... .... .... .... ~ ~ ~ .... .... fo\ ~ c: o ~ - .!!2 :; u. ~ ~ Q . ~ :!! ~ .2 - ~ ~ . S .2 '5 f J!! ,!l J!! Hil i .~ e " '" III, ~~ . ~ e ... I ! ~ . ftftft. .~ !i . "< 1 I!jftl~.a~ .~~ <.:i e ~~;;:S!;=JI~ ift " .J .~ ! ! ! ! 1 1 1 I ~ ~ S .J - 0 !i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ & s fi .. . -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i OJ iiiiHIiHi '1) Q l!i . CJl ~ - U) .~ 0 '" (.) ~ ~ ~~~~~ .s -c Jj c: J as CD = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::l it c: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~....: CD fI) Ill) fill) fI) fI) fI) r" > CD a: City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: 40th Street, Acre Lane to Electric Avenue ProgrU11: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-oI Prq}ect Description: Widen 40th Street from two lanes to four lanes for from Acre Lane to Electric Avenue adding approximately 0.35 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All oCthe proposed additional major road segments contained in 81-01 through 5T-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58% increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been d~splaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57 % increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project TUniog: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 TotBl PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-(J9 2009-10 through all EXPENDiTURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $260,400 $260,400 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,736,000 $1,736,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $173,600 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,170,000 $2,170,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: 5th Strcc:t, Sterling to Victoria Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting DcJNUfmcnt(s}: Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-Q2 Project Description: Widen Sth Street from two lanes to four lanes from Sterling to Victoria adding approximately 2.0 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.321ane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in ST-Ql through ST-36 will represent. mere 6.4% of thetota! 735,21 .t General Plan build-out while the exiating community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an a}.tcrnative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57 % increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an incr.... of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary "to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restr~ct or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-QS 200S-09 2009-10 througb EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $384,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,560,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $256,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 Total all Years $0 $2,560,000 $256,000 $0 $3,200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: 5th Street, Warm Creek to Pedley Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-Q3 Project Description: Widen Sth Street from two lane to four lanes from Warm Creek to Pedley adding approxi.mately 1.0 lane mile of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 68B.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional mojor road segments contained in ST-Ql through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out wbile the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the mojor road miles. Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of dally trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923.6B5 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-/1 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/ Admin.istration $0 $0 $0 $0 $57,600 $57,600 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $384,000 $384,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $38,400 $38,400 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $480,000 $480,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of Unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Alabama Street. 3rd to City Limits Program: Circulation (Str..... Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -()4 ProJect Description: Widen Alabama Street from two lanes to four lanes from 3rd Street to City Limits adding approximately 1.0 lane mile of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.321ane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in ST-01 through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community bas generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justiflcation/ReqWrelDeD.t for Proj<<t: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan buiId-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923.685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the CitY's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 .Total PROPOSED 2006-07 21X!7-oS 200S-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $192,000 $192.000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $\,280.000 $\,280.000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $128.000 $128.000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $\'600,000 $\,600.000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Campus Parkway (pepper-Linden), Kendall to 1-215 Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Dcpartment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-05 Project Description: Construct the four lane Campus Parkway Extension from Kendall to [-215. Also construct a partial diamond interchange. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in ST-ol through ST-36 will represent a more 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for ProJect: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current5,OSO,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an incrcssc of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane mlles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mlle configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane mlles of existing collectors/arterials. ConsequCDces of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES BuiJd-out Design/Inspection! AdJDinjstration $0 $0 $0 $0 $576,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,840,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $384,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,800,000 ToW all Ycsrs $384,000 $0 $4,800,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ~;oct Title: Central (palm Mcadows), Tippecanoe to Mountain View Program: Circulation (Strcc:t.s, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Depsrtmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-06 Project Description: Widen Central Avenue from tow lane to four lanes from Tippecanoe to Mountain View adding approximately 2.0 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in ST -0 I through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing commuoity has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requircment for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan buUd--out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fInd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from tho current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure' or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to' the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years DesignlInspection/ Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $384,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,560,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $256,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 Potentjal Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Coulston, Tippecanoe to Mountain View Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-07 Project Description: Widen Coulston from tow lane to four lanes from Tippecanoe to Mountain View adding approximately 2.2 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.321ane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments containad in ST-ol through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justi/icationlRequircment for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58% increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan buUd-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow. creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 201J6-{)7 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $422,400 Land AcquisitioolRight of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,816,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $281,600 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,520,000 Total all Years $2,816,000 $281,600 $0 $3,520,000 Potential Funding SourCes: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Connector, 3rd Street to 5th Street ProgrtU1J: Circulation (Streets, Signal. and Bridges) System Submitting Departmcnt(s): Development Services Dcpsrtment (Engineering) Project No.: ST -08 Project Description: Construct a four lane connector from 3rd Street to Sth Street adding approximately 2.0 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major load segments contained in ST-oI through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the tolll! 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community bas generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of Mmajor" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alt~mative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57 % increase in the number of daily trip-mile. from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-mile., an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip mile.. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified 8S "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restric~ or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through EXPENDiTURES Build-out Design/Inspection/Administration SO SO SO SO $384,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 SO SO SO SO Construction SO SO SO $0 $2,560,000 Contingency SO SO SO $0 $256,000 SO SO SO SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO $0 $3,200,000 Total a11 Years SO $2,560,000 $256,000 $0 $3,200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Del Rosa, 6th Street to 9th Street Program: Circulation (Strec:ts, Signal. and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -09 Project Description: Widen Del Rosa from two lanes to four lanes from 6th Street to 9th Street adding approximately 2.0 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City'. existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in ST -01 through ST - 36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community bas generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document.. Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore aU projects default to the "Build-out" column, Total all Years 2010-11 PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-oB 200B-09 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $192,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,280,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $128,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,600,000 $1,280,000 $128,000 $0 $1,600,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received, $0 City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Pr~jcct Tide: Electric, Mountain View to Northpark ProgrlUJJ: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting DepartmOJlt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-1O Project Description: Widen Electric Avenue from two lanes to four lanes from Mountain View to Northpark adding approximately 2.0 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in ST -01 through 5T-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) ofthc major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fInd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57 % increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles). thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets. construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build--out Years Design/1nspection/ Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $384,000 $384,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,560,000 $2,560,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $256,000 $256,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 $3,200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ProJect Title: "0" Street. Mill to Rialto Avenue Program: Circulation (Streets, Signal. and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-ll Project Description: Widen "0" Street from two lanes to four lanes from Mill Street to Rialto Avenue adding approximately 1.0 lane mile of arterial/collector to the City'. existing inventory of 688.321ane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in ST-QI through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the tots! 735,21 at General Plan build.."ut while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-mile. from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an incrcsse of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane mUes), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "Eu is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues ofvehic1es waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "lammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Tots! PROPOSED 2006-{)7 2007-08 2008-09 2009- JO througb aJJ EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/ Ad.m1oistratiou $0 $0 $0 $0 $192,000 $192,000 Laud Acquisition/Rigbt of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,280,000 $1,280,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $128,000 $128,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,600,000 $1,600,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impAct fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) Systcm Submitting Depsrtm<nt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-12 Project Description: Widen "H" Street from two lanes to four lanes from Kendall to 40th Street adding approximately 0.4 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688,32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in ST-Ql through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out wbile the existing community bas g<nerated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major Toad miles. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the curr<nt 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and neeaed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $76,800 $76,800 Land Acquisition/Right of W.y $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $512,000 $512,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $51,200 $51,200 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $640,000 $640,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Pr~ject Title: Kendall. Cambridge to Pine ProgTI/JIJ: Circulation (Streets, Signal. llJld Bridges) System Submitting Deparrmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-13 Project Description: Widen Kendall Drive from two lanes to four lanes from Cambridge to Pine adding approximately 1.5 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in ST-Ql through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) afthe major road miles. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% 9f construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, llJl increase of 2,923,685 daily trip mile.. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level"E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing' Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the '"Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through a11 EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $420,000 $420,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,800,000 $2,800,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $280,000 $280,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,500,000 $3,500,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Lena Road, Mill to Orange Show Program: Circulation (Strccls. Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Dcpartmcn/(s): D~d~m~Se~wesD~~(~~M~ Project No.: ST-14 Project Description: Construct Lena Road as a four lane roadway from Mill Street to Orange Show Drive. adding approximately 4.0 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.32lanc miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in 51-01 through 51-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735.21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58% increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the cu~ 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7.973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2.923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary toO complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Prq.iect: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection M. Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 TotJJl PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through B11 EXPENDITURES Build-out Y cars Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $768,000 $768,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,120,000 $5.120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $512,000 $512,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $6.400,000 $6.400,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fces, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Little League Drive, Palm to 1-215 ProgrtUTJ: Circulation (Streets, Signal. and Bridgea) System Submitting Department{s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-15 Project Description: Widen Little League Drive from two lanes to four lanes from Palm Avenue to the 1-215 Frontage Road adding approximately I.Slane miles of arterial/collector to the City' 5 existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in ST -01 through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency bas been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57 % increase in the number of daily trip-mile. from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is KUnstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues ofvehieles waiting upstream. of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Pr~iect Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2OO7-OS 2OOS-D9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $288,000 $288,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,920,000 $1,920,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $192,000 $192,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,400,000 $2,400,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Little League Drive, 1-215 frontage to Belmont Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-16 Prqject Description: Widen Little League Drive from two lanes to four lanes from the 1-215 Frontage Road to Belmont Avenue adding approximately 1.0 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in ST-Ol through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58% increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, uForced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" c?lumn. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2010-/1 Tot8l 2006-07 2(J()7-oS 2(J()S-09 2009-10 rhrough all Build-out Years $0 $0 $0 $0 $192,000 $192,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,280,000 $1,280,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $128,000 $128,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,6(J(),000 $1,600,000 Land Acquisition/Rjght of W.y Equipment/Other TOTAL COST Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Prqject Title: Little Mountain, Devil Creek Channel to 48th Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-17 Project Description: Widen Little Mountain Drive from two lanes to four lanes from Devil Creek Channel to 48th Street adding approximately O.251ane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in ST-ol through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735.21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles w~ing upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2(}()6-o7 2007-oS 200S-09 2009-10 througb EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $48,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $320,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $400,000 Total aI1 Years $320,000 $32,000 $0 $400,000 PotentW Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required. as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) Systcm Submitting Dcparrmenr(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-18 Project Description: Widen Mill Street from two lanes to four lanes from Pepper to Meridian adding approximately 0.5 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's cxisting inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in ST -01 through ST - 36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735.21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58% increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan buUd-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure'or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Pr~;ect Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to1he "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years DesignllnspecUon/ Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $96,000 $96,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $640,000 $640,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $64,000 $64.000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 $800,000 Porential FwuIiug Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from 8 variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ProgrlU11: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Dcpsrtment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-19 Project Description: Widen the Mt. Vernon Bridge to four lanes. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in 51-01 through 51-36 will represent 8 mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. LeveI"E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues ofvehic1es waiting upstream of the intersection", Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement", Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007...(}8 2008-{)9 2009-10 througb all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $384,000 $384,000 Land Acquisition/Rigbt of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,560,000 $2,560,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $256,000 $256,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 $3,200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of fl,lnds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Mountain View. Thompson to Electric ProgrtUD: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Depsrtmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-20 Project Description: Widen Mountain View Avenue from two lanes to four lanes from Thompson Place to Electric Avenue adding approximately 0.4 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in 51-01 through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the tolJII 735,21 at General Plan huild-out while the existing community baa ganerated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now flnd at maximum carrying ca.pacity. The City can expect an additional 57 % increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the currant 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Prq,;ect: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project TUning: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2(}()5-07 2(}()7-oS 2(}()S-()9 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $76,8(}() Land A<9uisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $512,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $51,200 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $640,000 To/1Il all Years $512,000 $51,200 $0 $640,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specifIC agreements. The construction of IOIDC' projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Projoct Title: Mountain View Bridge at Mission Creek ProgrllDJ: Circulation (Str...., Signal, and Bridges) System Submitting DepartmMt(S): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-21 Project Description: Widen the Mountain View Bridge at the Mission Creek Channel. The project consists of widening the roadway and shoulders. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in 51-01 through 51-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major Toad miles. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. JustificationlRequirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General. Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the .urrent5,050,289 daUy trip-mile, to roughly 7,973,974 daUy trip-miles, an in.rea,e nf 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Prqiect: Failure .or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Projoct Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to .the "Build-out" column. 201Q-U Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 througb sJ1 EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $138,240 $138,240 Land AcquisitionlRigbt of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $921,600 $921,600 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $92,160 $92,160 EquipmMtlOtlJer $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $1.152,000 $1.152,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The coDJtrudion of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Mountain View. Riverview to Central Program: Circulation (Strccls, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Deportment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-22 Project Description: Construct Mountain View Avenue from Riverview Drive to Central Avenue adding approximately 0.5 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contsincd in ST-01 through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist: in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57 % increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Prqicct: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level liE" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2(J(J7-oS 200S-Q9 2009-10 througb all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/ AdministraJion $0 $0 $0 $0 $829,440 $829,440 Land Acquisition/Rigbt of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,529,600 $5,529,600 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $552,960 $552,960 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,912,000 $6,912,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fccs, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Mountain View I 1-10 to San Bernardino Ave. Program: CircuJation (Streets, Signals and lIridges) System Submitting Dq>artment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-23 Project Description: Widen Mountain View Avenue from two lanes to four lanes from the 1-10 to San Bernardino Avenue adding approximately O.141ane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in ST-QI through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community bas generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to us~ but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57 % increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 dally trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 dally trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 dally trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additiona11ane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary!o complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. LeveI"E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Row" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movementN. Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. Total llil Y cars 201o-11 PROPOSED 201J6-07 2()(J7-oS 2()(J8-<J9 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $144,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $960,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $96,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,2()(J,000 $960,000 $96,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Prq;ecl Title: Mountain View Avenue Railroad Grade Crossing ProgrtU1J: Circulation (Streets, Signal. and Bridges) System Submitting DepsrtmtJIt(.): Development Services Department (Engineering) Prq;ecl No.: ST-24 P~;ect Description: Widen the Mountain View Railway Grade Crossing from 1,500 feet north of the railway grade crossing from one lane North and South to two lanes North and South. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in 81-01 through 81-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 mile.) of the major road All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in 81-01 through 81-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735.21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly S8 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the eurrent 5,050,289 daily trip-mile. to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles). thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing P~iect: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "For~ed Flow" creates "Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. P~iect Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 TotJJl PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-oS 200S-G9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Year. Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $28,800 $28,800 Land Acquisition/Righl of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $192,000 $192,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $19,200 $19,200 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $240,000 $240,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety cif funds. development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Palm, Cajon to 1-215 SB Ramp ProgTtUll: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Prq,ject No.: ST-25 Project Description: Widen Palm Avenue from two lanes to four lanes from Cajon Boulevard to the ]-215 Southbound access/egress ramp. adding approximately 0.5 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.321anc miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in 51-01 through 51-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) "is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the neady 58% increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. Ther. are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level liE" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues ofvehic1es waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the Cil):'s Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-oS 200S-G9 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $91,200 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $608,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $60,800 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $760,000 Total all Years $0 $608.000 $60,800 $0 $760,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Circu1ation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-26 Prq.iect Description: Widen Pine Avenue from two lanes to four lanes from Kendall Drive to Belmont Avenue adding approximately 0.5 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in 51-01 through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be construCted (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Prqjt:ct Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "BuUd-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2~7 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 througb EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $96,000 Land Acquisjtion/Rigbt of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $640,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $64,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 Total all Years $640,000 $64,000 $0 $800,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety.of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. $0 City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Perris Hill Park Road, 21st to Pacific ProgT1J1l1: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-27 Project Description: Widen Perris Hill Park Road from two lanes to four lanes from 21st Street to Pacific Street adding approximately a.Slane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained. in 81-01 through 81-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to ~e "Build-out" column. 20/0-11 ToW PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-oS 200S-D9 2009-/0 througb sl1 EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $153,600 $153,600 Land AcquisitionlRigbt of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,024,000 $1,024,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $102,400 $102,400 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,280,000 $1,280,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Pr~iect Title: Rancho, Colton City Limits to 5th Prognun: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-28 Project Description: Widen Rancho Avenue from two lanes to four lanes from the Colton City Limits to 5th Street adding approximately 1.4 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in ST -0 1 through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58% increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57 % increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 dsily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 dsily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project TimbJg: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore aU projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201o-IJ PROpOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-1J9 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $268,800 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,792,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $179,200 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,240,000 Total all Years $268,800 $179,200 $0 $2,240,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Projcet mie: Rialto, Sierra to Waterman Prognun: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Projcet No.: ST-29 Projcet Description: Widen Rialto Avenue from two lanes to four lanes from Sierra Way to Waterman Avenue adding approximately 1.0 lane mile of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All ofthc proposed additional major road segments contained in ST-Ql through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735.21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58% increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use. but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 dally trip-mil.. to roughly 7,973,974 dally trip-mil.., an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip mil... There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary t? complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-/1 PROPOSED 2()()(j-{)7 2OO7-OS 2OOS--<J9 2009-10 through EXPENDlTURES Build-out Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $192,000 Land Acquisition/Rigbt of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,280,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $128,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,600,000 ToW all Years $192,000 $128,000 $0 $1.600,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Progrom: Circulation (StrcclB, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting DeptUtmMI(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-30 Project Description: Widen Rialto Avenue from two lanes to four lanes from Lena Road to Tippecanoe Avenue adding approximately 1.5 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.321ane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in 51-01 through 51-36 will represent 8 mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing a.nd project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the eurrenl 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection", Level F, "For~ Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Projecl Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" coluOU1. 2010-/1 Tot8l PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 througb all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years DesignlInspectionl Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $288,000 $288,000 Land Acquisition/Rigbl of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $1.920,000 $1,920,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $192,000 $192,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,400,000 $2,400,000 Potential Funding Sources: A 'combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, developmeAt impact fees, and spccUlC. agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals ond Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-31 Project Description: Construct two lanes of roadway along State Street from 16th Street to Foothill Boulevard. The project will connect State Street to Rancho Avenue (new road). The project would be undertaken in four phases. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in 51-01 through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General PIon build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Pr~iect: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City'~ Circulation Element. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-Q9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $888,000 $888,000 Land Aequisition/Rigbt of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,920,000 $5,920,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $592,000 $592,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,400,000 $7,400,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, developDlCllt impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received.. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Depsrtmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-32 Project Description: Widen State Street from two lanes to four lanes from Foothill Boulevard to the 1-21S. adding approximately 8.0 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in 81-01 through 51-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735.21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of Nmajor" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57 % increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the eurrent 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles). thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2006-{)7 2007-08 2008_ 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $960,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,400,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $640,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000,000 Total all Years $960,000 $6,400,000 $640,000 $0 $8,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The constructiOn of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received, City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Titl.: Tippecanoe, Milito Harriman Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-33 Project Description: Widen Tippecanoe from four lanes to six lanes from Mill Street to Harriman adding approximately 3.5 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.321ane miles. All of the proposed addilioJUl1 major road segments contained in ST-ol through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community bus generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58% increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. Tbere are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure-or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Row" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, ~Forced Flow" creates .. Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to.the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-D9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Balld-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $672,000 $672,000 Land AcquisitionlRight of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,480,000 $4,480,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $448,000 $448,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,bOO,OOO $5,bOO,OOO Potentia] Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail PTC!ject Title: University Parkway. Hallmark to BNSF Grade Separation Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submilling Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-34 Project Description: Widen University Parkway from two lanes to four lanes from Hallmark Parkway to the BNSF Grade Separation adding approximately 0.75 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in 8T-ol through 8T-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735.21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57 % increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Tots! PROPOSED 2006-07 2OO7-OS 2OOS-()9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out YClll"S Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $144,000 $144,000 Land Acquisition/Right of W.y $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $960,000 $960,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $96,000 $96,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,200,000 $1,200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Circulation (Strccls, Signals and. Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-35 Project Description: Widen Waterman Avenue from four lanes to six lanes from 5th Street to Baseline Street adding approximately 3.6 lane miles of arterial/collector to the City's existing inventory of 688.32 lane miles. All of the proposed additional major road segments contained in ST -01 through ST-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community bas generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This section of "major" roadway (arterial or collector) is required to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58% increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to u~ but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessa~ to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document; Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with thc City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 ToW PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through a11 EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $691.200 $691.200 Land AC9uisi/ionJRight of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 SO Construction $0 $0 $0 SO $4,608,000 $4,608,000 Contingency SO $0 $0 $0 $460,800 $460,800 Equipment/Other $0 $0 SO SO $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 SO SO S5,76O,000 $5,760,000 Potential Funding Sources; A combination of unobligated monica from a variety of funds. development impact fees. and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Prq;ect Title: Victoria, Richardson to Mountain View Program: Circulation (Str<:c:ls, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department{s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-36 Project Description: Widen Victoria Avenue and make various improvements from Richardson to Mountain View. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. All aCthe proposed additional major road segments contained in 5T-ol through 5T-36 will represent a mere 6.4% of the total 735,21 at General Plan build-out while the existing community bas generated 92.6% (688.32 miles) of the major road miles. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have heen included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Pr~iect: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 51% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed (46.8 additional lane miles), thus optimum lane mile configuration is absolutely necessary to complement the existing 668 lane miles of existing collectors/arterials. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and instaU signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Fo:rced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Tots! PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-oS 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24.000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. w City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Little League Drive and (-215 Frontage Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Departm<JJt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Proj<<t No.: ST-37 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Little League Drive and 1-215 Frontage Road. This signal. when developed, will be one of 48 new signals and will represent 16.2% of the City's total 297 signals at General Plan build-out. All of the proposed signal projects contained in 51-37 through 51-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justiflcation/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973.974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There arc limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed. thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is ~Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 21109-10 through all EXPENDiTURES Build-out Y cars Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Little League Drive and Belmont Program: Circulation (Strccls, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Deparrmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-38 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Little League Drive and Belmont Avenue. This signal, when developed, will be one of 48 new signals and will represent 16.2% of the City's total 297 signals at General Plan build-out. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. JustificationlRfXJuirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now flOd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57 % increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to rOJ.lghly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 20/o-JJ Tot1Il 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-/0 through all Build-out Years $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way Construction Equipment/Other TOTAL COST Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Traffic Sip @ Palm and Cajon Program: Circulation (Streets, Sips and Bridges) System Submitting Departmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-39 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Palm Avenue and Cajon Boulevard. This signal. when developed, will be one of 48 new signals and will represent 16.2% of the City's total 297 sips at General Plan build-out. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent 8 only 16.2% of the tota1297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles. an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default <<! the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-oS 200S-(}9 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Total all YtarS $24,000 $16,000 $0 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Palm and Industrial l'r!>gnun: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Dcpartmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) l'r!>jcct No.: ST -40 Prqject Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Palm Avenue and Industrial Parkway. This signal, when developed. will be one of 48 new signals and will represent 16.2% of the City's total 297 signals at General Plan build-out. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the tota1297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community bss generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of dally trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Prqiect: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. l'r!>jcct Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 ToW PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out YC4tS Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,400 $14,400 L8nd Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $96,000 $96,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,600 $9,600 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $120,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The conatruction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project tide: Traffic Signal@Palmand 1-2!5 ramp' ProgTlU11: Circulation (Strccls, Signal. and, Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-4l Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Palm Avenue and 1-215 Ramps. This signal. when developed. will be one of 48 new signals and will represent 16.2% of the City's total 297 signals at General Plan build-out. All of the proposed signal projects contained in 81-37 through 51-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capac}ty. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973.974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2.923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits .. to how many additional!ane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level"E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element, Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201D-ll ToIlIl PROPOSED 21JQ6-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through sJJ EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/lnspection/ Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $39,600 $39,600 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $264.000 $264,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $26,400 $26,400 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $330,000 $330,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specifIc agreements. The construction of BOme projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Palm and Irvington Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-42 Project /)ascription: Construct 8 traffic signal at the intersection of Palm Avenue and Irvington Avenue. This signal, when developed, will be one of 48 new signals and will represent 16.2% of the City's total 297 signals at General Plan build-out. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through 5T -84 will represent a only 16.2 % of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justiflcation/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "For~ Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-/1 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-<J8 2008--G9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/lnspectionl Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,000 $18,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $120,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000 $12,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $150,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ProJect Tide: Traffic Signal @ Palm and Belmont Progrom: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -43 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Palm Avenue and Belmont Avenue. This signal, when developed, will be one of 48 new signals and will represent 16.2% of the City's total 297 signals at General Plan build-out. Al1 of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort, Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20!()-1l PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Total all Years $160,000 $16,000 $0 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated. monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Campus Parkway (Pepper-Linden) and Industrial Prognun: Circu1ation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Dcpartmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -44 ProJect Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Campus Parkway and Industrail Parkway. This signal. when developed, will be one of 48 new signals and will represcnt 16.2% of the City's total 297 signals at General Plan build-out. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represcnta only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community bas generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justmcation/Requirement for Pro.iect: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an incr.... of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additionallan. miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and i's identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201()-1l ToIJJJ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-<J8 2008--()9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. Thc construction of somc projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: ProgrlJJD: Traffic Signal @Campus Parkway (Pepper-Lindon) and (-215 Ramps Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST--45 Project Description: Construct 8 traffic signal at the intersection of Campus Parkway and 1-215 Ramps. This signal, when developed. will be one of 48 new signals and will represent 16.2% of the City's total 297 signals at General Plan build-out. All of the proposed signal projects contained in S1-37 through 51-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the tota1297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7.973,974 daily trip-miles. an increase of 2,923.685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. TOTAL COST Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to !he "Build-out" column. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 20J(Hl TotBi 2006-07 2007...()8 2008...()9 2009-10 through a11 Build-out Yoars $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,000 $42,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $280,000 $280,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $28,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way Contingency Equipment/Other Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Campus Parkway and Northpark ProgrtUll: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-46 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Campus Parkway and Northpark Boulevard. This signal, when developed, will be one of 48 new signals and will represent 16.2 % of the City's total 297 signals at General Plan build-out. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Prqiect: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodatfug the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. I 201Q-ll Total 1 , PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-D9 2(}(}9-JO througb all 1 I EXPENDITURES Build-out Years I Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 I I Land AcquisitionlRigbt of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I I Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Sierra (CSUSB) and Northpark Program: Circulation (Streets. Signals andBridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-47 Project Description: Construct 8 traffic signal at !:he intersection of Sierra (CSUSB) and Northpark Boulevard. This signal. when developed. will be one of 48 new signals and will represent 16.2% of the City's total 297 signals at General Plan build-out. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the loW 297 signals at General Plan buUd-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be si~ized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-mUes at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacjty. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050.289 daily trip-miles 10 roughly 7,973.974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2.923.685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many sddilionallane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing co~ector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted. and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "EN is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream. of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates N Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 20/0-11 TotJJl 2006-07 21X17-oS 21X1S-09 2009-/0 through ai/ Build-out Years $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Land Acquisition/Right of W.y Equipment/Other TOTAL COST Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of ~an Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Proj<xt Title: Traffic Signal @ Kendall and 48th Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Depsrtment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -48 Prqject Description: Construct 8. traffic signal at the intersection of Kendall Drive and 48th Street. This signal. when developed, will be one of 48 new signals and wUi represent 16.2% of the City's total 297 signals at General Plan build-out. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 wUi represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973.974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2.923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed. thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection ". Level F, "For~ Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 tbrougb sJJ EXPENDiTURES BuUd-out Yesrs Design/inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $21,000 $21,000 Land Acquisjtion/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $140,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,000 $14,000 Equipment/Otbor $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 $175,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail ~;.ct Title: Traffic Signal @ Little Mountain and 30th Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.; ST -49 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Little Mountain Drive and 30th Street. This signal, when developed, will be one of 48 new signals and will represent 16.2% of the City's Iotal297 signals at General Plan build-out. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the Iotal297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use hut now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Prq.iect Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2oo8-1J9 2009-]0 through a11 EXPENDITURES Build-out YOM_ Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Porential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, devclopmeat impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Project Tide: Traffic Signal @ Little Mountain and 48th Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-50 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Little Mountain Drive and 48th Street. This signal, when developed. will be one of 48 new signals and will represent 16.2% of the City's total 297 signals at General Plan build-out. All of the proposed signal projects contained in 5T-37 through 5T-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to construct bridge widths where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues ofvehic1es waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expecl an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. 20lo-n Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2ooB-G9 2009-10 through Bll EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $21.000 $21,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $140,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,000 $14,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Traffic Signal @ Little Mountain and Northpark Prognun: Circulation (Streets, Signal. and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-51 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Little Mountain Drive and Northpark Boulevard. This signal, when developed, will be one of 48 new signals and will represent 16.2% of the City's total 297 signals at General Plan build-out. All of the proposed signal projects contained in 51-37 through 81-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5.050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973.974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to construct bridge widths where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of SCl'Vice (lOS) traffic flow at the interseCtions of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to ,the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Tot8l PROPOSED 21XJ6...{)7 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through a1J EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $21,000 $21,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a'"ariety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Slate and 1-210 Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Dcpartmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -52 ProJect Description: Construct a traff1c signal at the intersection of State Street and 1-210 Ramps. This signal, when developed, will be one of 48 new signals and will represeot 16.2% of the City's total 297 signals at General Plan build-out. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through 5T-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additionol57% increase in the uumber of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There arc limits as to how many additionollane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Prq}ect: Failure or inability to construct bridge widths where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not 8 component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2(}()6-(}7 2007-()8 2008-09 21XJ9-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $42,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $280,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $28,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $350,000 Total all Years $42,000 $28,000 $0 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from 8 variety of funds, development. impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Merdian and Rialto Progrom: Circulation (Streets, Signals and I'lridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -53 ProJect Description: Construct 8 traffic signal at the intersection of Meridian Avenue and Rialto Avenue. This signal. when developed. will be one of 48 new signals and will represent 16.2% of the City's total 297 signals at General Plan build-out. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2.923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing col1~tor/arterial roads. Consequenct:8 of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to widen streets, construct bridge widths and install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets with bridges to Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "En is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement". Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 ToI8l PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-<J9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of ~an Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Macy and Mill PrognuD: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-54 Prq]ect Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Macy Street and Mill Street. The projea: consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan buUd-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58% increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates II Jammed conditions, back-~ps from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-D9 2009-JO through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOT AI. COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potentia} Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Rancho (Stale) and Foothill Program: Circu1ation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -55 Project Description: Construct 8 traffic signal at the intersection of Rancho Avenue (State) and Foothill Blvd. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic si~s. All of the proposed signal projects contained in 51-37 through 51-84 will represent 8 only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City.'s Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column, 201D-11 PROPOSED 2()()6-{)7 2007-08 2008-D9 2009-10 through EXPENDlTURES Build-out Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $20,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $250,000 Total all Years $30,000 $0 $0 $250,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Prq]ect Tide: Traffic Signal @ Miramonte and 27th Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -56 Project Description: MConstruct a traffic signal at the intersection of Miramonte Drive and 7th Street. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in 81-37 through 51-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Prqiect: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923.685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maYim;7e the General Plan maximum 73S.21ane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008_ 2009-10 through EXPENDlTURES Build-out Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Total all Years $16,000 $0 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction cif some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Proj<<:t Title: Traffic Signal @ Mountain and Kendall Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -57 Proj<<:t Descrjption: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Mountain Drive and Kendall Drive. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through 81-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community bas generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an 8lternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now ftnd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973.974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923.685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure, or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference DocumCJJt: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to.the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 TotJJl PROPOSED 2(}()(j-{)7 2007-QS 200S-09 2009-10 througb till EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 Land Acqujsjtion/Rigbt of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Titl~: Traffic Signal @ Mountain and 48th PrognuD: Circulation (Streets. Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -58 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Mountain Drive and 48th Street. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and instulling traffIC signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) oftbe total signals. Engineering plan check. inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973.974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level NEN is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20/0-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-/0 through B11 EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24.000 Land Acquisition/Rigbt of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of lIODIC projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Pr~;ect Tide: Traffic Signal @ Mountain and Northpark Program: Circulation (Streets, Signal. and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -59 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Mountain Drive and Northpark Boulevard. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and. installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in 5T - 37 through 5T -84 will represent a only 16.2 % of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have heen included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capoci!):. The City can expect an additional 5711 incr.... in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles. an incr.... of 2,923.685 daily trip miles. There ore limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing coll~tor/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-GS 200s-Q9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES BuiJd-out Years Design/lnspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $21.000 $21.000 Land A<9ulsltion!Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $140,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14.000 $14,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 $175.000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligat.d monies fTOD! a variety of funds. deve1op=nl impact f.... and specific agreements. The constructioIl of 50_ projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ "I" Street and Center Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Dep8rtment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -60 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of "I" Street and Inland Center Drive. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community bas generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 135.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20l(}-1l Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-D8 2008-D9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Desigu//nspection/ Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from- a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction. of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ "H" Stroot and Marshall Program: Circulation (Stroc:ls, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Departmont(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-61 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of "H" Street and Marshall Boulevard. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in 81-37 through 51-84 will represent a only 16.2 % of the tota1297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General PlIUl build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-milcs, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additiona11ane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Projtx:t: Failure or inability to insta1.l signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queucs of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010--/1 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009--10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Auto Plaza and Fairway Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-62 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Auto Plaza Drive and Fairway Drive. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST - 37 through ST -84 will represent a only 16.2 % of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community bas generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly S8 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan huild-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fUld at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increasc in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an incresse of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level NE" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ "Eoo Street and Century Program: Circulation (Streets, Signal. and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -63 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of "E" Street and Century Avenue. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% ofth.e total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failur~ or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to. the "Build-out" column. 20/0-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-{)7 2007-08 2008-09 2009-/0 tbtougb all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction-of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ "E" Street and Orange Show Lane Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -64 Prop Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of ME" Street and Orange Show Lane. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST - 37 through ST -84 will represent a only 16.2 % of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justiflcation/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2tXJ6-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES BW1d-out Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Total all Years $160,000 $16,000 $0 $200,000 Potential Funcling Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as 8. condition of approval, for which 8. credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Projoct Title: Traffic Signal @ Arrowhead and Orange Show Lane Program: Circulation (Strccls, Signals an4 Bridges) System Submitting Departmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Projoct No.: ST -65 Projoct Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Arrowhead Avenue and Orange Show Lane. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and instlllling trafflc signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST - 37 through ST -84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8 % (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now find at maximum carrying capas:ity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973.974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2.923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing c~Uector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20lo-Jj PROPOSED 2006-07 2()()7-GS 2008-09 2009-10 tlu:ough EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 Total all Years $18.000 $120,000 $12,000 $0 $150,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Traffic Signal @ Arrowhead and Central Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -66 ProJect Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Arrowhead Avenue and Central Avenue. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing trafflc signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in 8T - 37 through 5T -84 will represent a only 16.2 % of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly S8 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many sdditionallane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project; Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the level of Service (lOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. level "E" is "Unstable Row" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 21J06-{)7 2007-oS 200S-D9 2009-10 tJuougb all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $21,000 $21,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $140,000 $140,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,000 $14,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $175,000 $175,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Mountain View and 13th Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Departmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-67 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Mountain View and 13th Street. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects conuiined in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. level "EM is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. I 2010-11 Toflll PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through a1J 1 EXPENDITURES Build-out Years I I Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 I Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 I $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 1 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 I Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 i TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Mountain View and Marshall ProgrlUlJ: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-68 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Mountain View and Marshall Boulevard. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in 51-37 through 51-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to inst.all signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City' s Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore aU projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201o-11 To/JJJ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-G9 2009-10 througb all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 Land Acquisition!Rigbt of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project mle: Traffic Signal @ Electric and 48th Procram: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Deportment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -69 P"!iect DescrIption: Construct a trafflc signal at the intersection of Electric Avenue and 48th Street. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the toUll 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure pr inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to !he "BuUd-out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2010-11 ToUIl 201J6-07 2007-DS 200S-D9 2009-10 through all Build-out Y cars $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Land AcquIsition/Right of Way Construction Contingency Equipment/Other TOTAL COST Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. ~ City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Traffic Signal @ Dolillle and Mill Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-70 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Doolittle Street and Mill Street. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) ofthc total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to he widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additiona157% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.21ane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Row" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Row" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010--11 PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-0& 2008-09 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $80,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Total all Years $0 $80,000 $8,000 $0 $100,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Lena and Orange Show Road Progrom: Circulation (Strccls. Signals and .Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-71 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Lena Road and Orange Show Road. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8 % (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for ProJect: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily. trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an edditionol57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050.289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973.974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2.923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additionollane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing coQector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F. "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "8uild-out" column. 2010--11 PROPOSED 200H)7 2007-()8 2008-09 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200.000 Total all Years $24,000 $16,000 $0 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Traffic Signal @ Lena and Central ProgrlUlJ: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-72 , i I I i Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Lena Road and Central Avenue. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requiremcnt for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% incrca.sc in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Prqiect: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level"E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project TUning: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2006-()7 Total all Years Design/Inspection/Administration $24,000 Land Acquisition/Rigbt of Way Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Lena and Rialto ProgrtU1J: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submittiog Departmeot(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-73 ProJect Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Lena Road and Rialto Avenue. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represeot a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals, Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soUs testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of dally trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City) Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-oS 200S-1J9 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Total all Years $16,000 $0 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Lena and 3rd ProgTtll1J: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-74 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Lena Road and 3rd Street. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2006-07 2OO7-OS 2OOS-09 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection! AdmJnjstration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 TotIIl a1J Y cars $0 $160,000 $16,000 $0 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ East Carnegie and Hospital Lane Prognrm: Circulation (Str..... Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Dcpartmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-75 Project Description: Construct 8 traffic signal at the intersection of East Carnegie Drive and Hospitality Lane. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST - 37 through ST -84 will represent a only 16.2 % of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materiols/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort, Therefore all projects default to, the "Build-out" column. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58% increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles. an increase of 2,923.685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure. or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level Ear F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2010-11 Total 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-/0 through all Build-out Ycsrs $0 $0 $0 $0 $1 s.ooo $18,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $120.000 $120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000 $12,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150.000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way Contingency Equipment/Other TOTAL COST Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @Tippecanoe and Ria1to Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Departmont(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-76 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Tippecanoe and Rialto Avenue. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" , Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element, Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "8uild-out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 20Jo-ll Total 21XJ6-o7 2007-08 2008--09 2009-10 through B1l Build-out Years $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way Construction Contingency Equipment/Other TOTAL COST Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received, City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Del Rosa and Marshall Program: Circulation (Slrccls, Signal. and B,ridges) System Submitting Departmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No,: ST-n Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Del Rosa Avenue and Marshall Boulevard. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in 51-37 through 51-84 will represent a only 16.2 % of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. JustificationIRequirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan buUd-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2.923,685 daily trip miles. There arc limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to ma~imi7e the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing coU~tor/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-oS 200S-D9 2009-10 through aJJ EXPENDITURES BuiJd-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development: impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some; projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @ Del Rosa and 6th Progrom: Circulation (Streets, Signal. and Bridges) System Submitting Dcpartment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-78 ProJect Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Del Rosa Avenue and 6th Street. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in 81-37 through 81-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-~es from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-oS 200S-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,000 $18,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $120,000 $120,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,000 $12,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $150,000 $150,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Projoct Title: Traffic Signal @ Sterling and Marshall ProgrtUD: Circulation (Streets, Signal. and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-79 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Stcring Avenue and Marshall Boulevard. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in 51-37 through 51-84 will represent a only 16.2 % of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check. inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Prqjcct: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58% increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments. unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles. an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to.install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that arc consistent with the City'.s Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not 8 component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 ToraJ PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Adminisrration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOT AI. COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title:. Traffic Signal @ Sterling and Lynwood Progrom: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Dcpartment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -80 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Sterling Avenue and Lynwood Drive. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in 81-37 through 8T-84 will represent 8 only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing commWlity has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923.685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 TotJJl PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-()9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOT AI.. COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination. C?f unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Proj<<t Title: Traffic Signal @ Sterling and 6th Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Departmont(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-8l Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Sterling Avenue and 6th Street. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% afthe total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly S8 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now flOd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7.973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure ~r inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Row" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to !he "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-oS 200S-09 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Desigullnspection/ Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 Land AcquisitionlRight of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Total all Years $0 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Traffic Signal @S. Mountain View and Central (Palm Meadows) Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -82 P~;ect Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of South Mountain View and Central (Palm Meadows). The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All aCthe proposed signal projects contained in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community bas generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck.. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates" Jammed conditions, back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-<J9 2009-10 through ail EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Traffic Signal @S. Mountain View and (-10 Westbound Ramp Program: Circu1ation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-83 Project Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of South Mountain View and Westbound 1-10 Ramp. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contained in 5T - 37 through 5T -84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) of the total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection. materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened. that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed. thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing coll~tor/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Flow" creates "Jammed conditions. back-ups from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City' s Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2~7 2007-GS 2008-09 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 Land A"9uisitionlRight of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Total all Years Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. $0 $200,000 City of Sl!Jl Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Traffic Signal @ Guthrie and Pacific Prognun: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -84 ProJect Description: Construct a traffic signal at the intersection of Guthrie Street and Pacific Street. The project consists of constructing intersection improvements and installing traffic signals. All of the proposed signal projects contalned in ST-37 through ST-84 will represent a only 16.2% of the total 297 signals at General Plan build-out while the existing community has generated 83.8% (249 signals) oCthe total signals. Engineering plan check, inspection, materials/soils testing and project administration costs have been included at 15% of construction costs and contingency has been included at 10% of construction costs. Justification/Requirement for Project: This intersection needs to be signalized to complete the General Plan Circulation System and will assist in accommodating the nearly 58 % increase in daily trip-miles at General Plan build-out resulting from new development. This segment of roadway will provide an alternative for drivers who have been displaced from roadway segments, unable to be widened, that they have previously been able to use but now fmd at maximum carrying capacity. The City can expect an additional 57% increase in the number of daily trip-miles from the current 5,050,289 daily trip-miles to roughly 7,973,974 daily trip-miles, an increase of 2,923,685 daily trip miles. There are limits as to how many additional lane miles can be constructed, thus optimum traffic signal configuration is absolutely necessary to maximize the General Plan maximum 735.2 lane miles of existing collector/arterial roads. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Failure or inability to install signals where warranted and needed would reduce the Level of Service (LOS) traffic flow at the intersections of streets to a Level E or F by acting as a bottleneck. Level "E" is "Unstable Flow" and is identified as "long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection". Level F, "Forced Row" creates "Jammed conditions, back-1:Ips from other locations restrict or prevent movement" . Reference Document: Staff cost estimates that are consistent with the City's Circulation Element. Project Timing: Project timing is.not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20JQ-1I PROPOSED 2006-.()7 2007-.()S 200S-09 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $160,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $200,000 Total a11 Years $0 $160,000 $16,000 $0 Potentia) Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received.. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail P~;ect Title: Interchange/Ramps @ 1-215 and Palm Avenue (SB, County) Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -85 Prq]ect Description: Construct interchange improvements at 1-215 and Palm Avenue. This project is considered of regional importance and is to be financed by a number of sources. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. tvlt.J- t.~"/"f t"~~ -I,. ? Justifiestjon/Requirement for Project: ,.... - ;;r-.ar,(" 17' 1<( L J I ...._ " 'v," (.I tvl4l(/( -vz.. ~ a/lit! _6 A dGfi",/~."" I~ r Consequences of Not Completing Project: 7 "'5.......... - ......L.. "" ::1.-1"::::; frt. ~r-B~. 6-r-tj<{, 1I1of-/.<.rt~ Reference Document: Project Timing: Project timing is not 8. component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2006-{)7 2007-{)S 200S-D9 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/lnspection/ AdmbUstration $0 $0 $0 $0 $960,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,400,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $640,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,000,000 Total all Years $960,000 $640,000 $0 $8,000,000 Potentia! Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Interchange/Ramps @ 1-215 and Pepper Linden (Campus Parkway) (SB) Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Project No.: ST -86 Project Description: Construct interchange improvements at 1-215 and Pepper Linden (Campus Parkway). This project is considered of regional importance and is to be fmanced by a number of sources. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. Just.if1cation/Requiremcnt for Project: Consequences of Not Completing Project: Reference Document; Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through Bl1 EXPENDlTURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,800,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development i.mpI.ct fees, and specific agrcc:ments. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: InterchangelRamps @ 1-215 and University Parkway (SB, County) Program: Circulatinn (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Departmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -87 Project Description: Construct interchange improvements at 1-215 at University Parkway. This project is considered of regional importance and is to be fInanced by a number of sourccs. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. Justification/Requirement for Project: Consequences of Not Completing Project: Reference Document: Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default tO,the "Build-out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 201(}-1l Total 2006-<J7 2007-08 2OO8-D9 2009-10 through all Build-out Year. $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,760,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,840,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,000,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way Contingency Equipment/Other TOTAL COST Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Interchange/Ramps @ 1-210 and Waterman (SB, Highland, County) Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-88 Project Description: Construct interchange improvements at 1-210 at Waterman Avenue. This project is considered of regional importance and is to be ftnanced by a number of sources. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. Justification/Requirement for Project: Consequences of Not Completing Project: Reference Document: Project Timiag: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2010-11 Total 2006-{)7 2oo7-{)8 2oo8-fJ9 2009-10 tluough all Build-out Years $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,800,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,000,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way Contingency Equipment/Other TOTAL COST Putential FWICling Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Interchange/Ramps @ 1-210 and Del Rosa (58, Highland, County) Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -89 Project Description: Construct interchange improvements at 1-210 at Dcl Rosa Avenue. This project is considered of regional importance and is to be fmanced by a number of sources. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. Justification/Requirement for Project: Consequences of Not Completing Project: Reference Document: Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2()()6-o7 2007-oa 2008-09 2009-10 through a11 EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,360,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,400,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,240,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $28,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of ~an Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: IntcrchllllgclRamps @ 1-210 IIlld Victoria (SB, Highllllld, County) Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals IIlld Bridges) System Submitting Dcpartmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-90 Project Description: Construct interchange improvements at at 1-210 at Victoria Avenue. This project is considered of regional importance and is to be fmanced by 8 number of sources. This portion represents the City's share afthe total project. Justification/Requirement for Project: Consequences of Not Completing Project: Reference Document: Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 201G-J/ TotJJl PROPOSED 2()()6-{J7 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDiTURES Build-out YCIltS Design/inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,600,000 $3,600,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $24,000,000 $24,000,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,400,000 $2,400,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOT AI. COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,000,000 $30,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as 8 condition of approval, for which 8 credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Titl.: InlerchangelRamps @ [-210 and 5th (SB, Highland, Rcd1ands) Program: Circulation (Streets, Sigoals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No,: ST-91 Project Description: Construct interchange improvements at 1-210 at 5th Street. This project is considered of regional importance and is to be fmanced by a number of sources. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. Justification/Requirement for Project: Consequences of Not Completing Project: Potential Funcling Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds. development impact fees. and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. Reference Document: 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,680,000 $1,680,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,200,000 $11,200,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,120,000 $1,120,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,000,000 $14,000,000 City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Interchange/Ramps @ 1-10 and Tippecanoe Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-92 Project Description: Construct interchange improvements at 1-10 at Tippecanoe Avenue. This project is considered of regional importance and is to be fmanced by a number of sources. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. Justification/Requirement for Project: Consequences of Not Completing Project: Reference Document: Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 20JD-JI TotJJ1 PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,800,000 $4,800,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,000,000 $32,000,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 $3,200,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000,000 $40,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail I'n!ject Title: InterchangelRamps@I-lOand Pepper (SB, County, Colton) Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Dcpartment(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-93 Project Description: Construct interchange iprovements at ]-10 at Pepper. This project is considered of regional importance and is to be fmanced by a number of sources. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. Justification/Requirement for Project: Consequences of Not Completing Project: Reference Document: Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-{J7 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through a11 EXPENDITURES Build-out Y cars Designllnspectionl Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,240,000 $3,240,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $21.600,000 $21,600,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,160,000 $2,160,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $27,000,000 $27,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval. for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Interchange/Ramps@)-10and Mountain View (58, Loma Linda, Rcdlands, County) Submitting Departmcnt(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Program: Circulation (Streets. Signals and Bridges) System Project No.: 5T -94 Project Description: Construct interchange improvements at 1-10 at Mountain View Avenue. This project is considered of regional importance and is to be fmanced by a number of sources, This portion represents the City's share of the total project. Justification/Requirement for Project: Consequences of Not Completing Project: Reference Document: Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-<J9 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection/ AdministrlJtjon $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,800,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $32,000,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,200,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $40,000,000 Total all Y cars $40,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Grade Separation @ Palm Avenue (SB) Program: Cireulation (Streets. Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -95 Project Description: Construct a grade separation at Palm Avenue. This project is considered of regional importance and is to be fmanced by a number of sources. This portion represents the City's share of the total projeet. u/'-~ {c...J"f' 1/".t- :s~,~h"..-f, ~? Justification/Requirement for Project: -'- J '" I ~.m ~-1'S- 7'> Sf--~g ~"'SE 1'''.- __.. de:5(;,eN"~"/O< J_ Consequences of Not Completing Project: '5,4........ - Cf>W- '~?'-~ ?t->..J. ~:S ""'- S"r;.. '1:'- -1-0 s>,- rr. Reference Document: Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,160,000 Land AcquisitionlRight of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14.400,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,440,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of S!lD Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Titla: Grado Separation @ Riallo (SB) Program: Circulation (StroolS, Signals and Bridges) Systom Submilling DepartmOllt(S): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-96 Project Description: Constrct a grade separation at Rialto Avenue. This project is considered of regional importancc and is to be fmanced by a number of sources. This portion represents the City I S share of the total project. Justification/Requirement for Project: Consequences of Not Completing Project: Reference Document: Project Timing: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2oo6-{}7 2007-08 2008-09 2009-}o through EXPENDITURES Build"",ut Dosign/lnspoctionl Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,052,000 Lsnd Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,680,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,368,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $17,100,000 ToW all Years $0 $17,100,000 Potential Funding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Pr~i<<t Title: Grade Separation @ Slate StrcctlUniversily (SB) Program: Circulation (Streets. Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST -97 ProJect Description: Constuct a grade separation at State Street/University. This project is considered of regional importance and is to be ftnanced by a number of sources. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. Justification/Requirement for Project: Consequences of Not Completing Project: Reference Document: Project TimbJg: Project timing is not a component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDiTURES 2010-11 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through Build-out $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,968,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $13,120,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1.312,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $16,400,000 Total all Years Land AcquisjtionlRight of Way Construction Potential Funding Sourc~: A combination of unobligated moni.cs from a variety of funds, development impact fees. and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which Ii credit would be received. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Grade Separation @ Hunts Lane (SB, Colton) Program: Circulation (Streets, Signals and Bridges) System Submitting Department(s): Development Services Department (Engineering) Project No.: ST-98 . Project Description: Construct 8. grade separation at Hunts Lane. This project is considered of regional importance and is to be fmanced by a number of sources. This portion represents the City's share of the total project. Justification/Requirement for Project: Consequences of Not Completing Project: Reference Document: Project Timing: Project timing is not 8. component of this current effort. Therefore all projects default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 TotIJ! PROPOSED 2()(}6-{)7 2007-08 2008-<J9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES BaIld-out Years Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,680,000 $1,680,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,200,000 $11,200,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,120,000 $1,120,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOT AI. COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,000,000 Potential FWlding Sources: A combination of unobligated monies from a variety of funds, development impact fees, and specific agreements. The construction of some projects listed may be required as a condition of approval, for which a credit would be received. o City of San Bernardino Library Facilities and Conection o o e "- ~ c ~ 0 0 . ~ 11 ~ 2 - 'i " ~ e S 2 '5 J!! ~ J!! 0 .~ a " e of a <( e u ~ ~ c: "< 0 ~ - ~ 0 .!!! .~ a "3 .!! u.. S U - Q ..J 1: ..J e u; i - .!!! 0 OJ ~ '0 '5 (I) 0 ~ a. .J!! en '" - .S II) .~ 0 () 1 oil '. Q (I) ~cl: '" c ,,- (I) > (I) a: c .... I ~ . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: General Library Square Foot Expansion Program: Library Facilities and Collc:ction. Submitting Department(s): Public Library Project No.: LB-01 Prq;ect Description: Acquisition of land and construction of a total of 27,509 square feet of library expansion in one or more locations in order to maintain pace with new development-generated residential pouIation growth. existing community by the current 80,000 square foot facility. The additional space would house the additional administration. patrol. investigation. records, traffic control. analytical and support staff, short-term evidence storage, report writing space. training. meeting and locker/shower facilities and other space needs required to maintain current building standards. Included in the cost estimate is the acquisition of about five and half acres for the building and additional visitor/employee parking. JustiflcationlRei/uirement for Project: The proposed expansion will provide the square footage nCCC5sary to maintain the current ratio of floor space to residential patrons as is offered at this point in time. The current level of service standard is 0.0.41 square feet of library space per resident. Should the library not be expanded, the space per resident would drop by about 25% to about 0.30 square feet at build-out. The additional 27,509 square feet represents the amount of square feet.necessary to maintain the current levels of service provided by the existing building space. Consequences of Not Completing Project: This proposed project docs not assume expansion of the current library or construction of a branch library, it merely represents the cost of the additional square footage necessary to maintain current levels. Additionally, it does not represent that the current 0.41 square feet per resident as currently adequate or insufficient, merely a statement of the actual standard. Reference Document: None. Project Timing: The impact fee revenue would be collected over a long period of time, thus no specific time frame for the construction of the additional square feet is offered. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-1J9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years $0 $0 $0 $0 $742,731 $742,731 Land AcquisitionlRight of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,237,884 $1,237,884 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,951,537 $4,951,537 $0 $0 $0 $0 $495,154 $495,154 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,427,306 $7,427,306 Potential Funding Sources: General Fund, or if adopted, the proposed development impact fees. . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Expansion of Library Collection ProgrtJJ1J: Library Facilities and Collection Submitting Department(s): Public Library Project No.: LB-02 Project Description: Acquisition and processing of approximately 79,482 additional books or other items to increase the Pub~ic Library's collection in order to maintain pace with new residential home construction and occupancy. These 9S additional vehicles are necessary to maintain the current O.7S vehicles per officer ratio with the addition of 126 officers. The current standard of O. 7S vehicles per officer is based upon the 234 vehicles divided by the existing 312 officers. Justification/Requirement for Project: The proposed expansion will provide the additions to the collection of library "items" necessary to maintain the current ratio of books to residential patrons Bsis offered at this point in time. The current level of service standard is 1.19 "items" per resident based upon 236,980 items and 199,803 potential patrons. Should the current collection of items not be expanded, the number of items per patron standard would drop by about 25% to about 0.89 books per person. The 79,842 additional books that could be acquired if the impact rees was adopted, represents the additional collection items necessary to maintain the current levels of service provided by the existing collection. Consequences of Not Completing Project: The proposed purchase of books/volumes does not represent that the current 1.19 books/resident as currently adequate or insufficient, merely a statement of the actual standard. Reference Document: None. Project Timing: The impact fee revenue would be collected over a long period of time, thus no specific time frame for the construction of the additional square feet is offered. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-1)9 2009-10 through sl1 EXPENDITURES BuiJd-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,083,041 $5,083,041 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,083,041 $5,083,041 Potential Funding Sources: General Fund, or if adopted, the proposed development impact fees. o City of San Bernardino Public Use Facilities o o ~ <') co C\I 01 <I: U c: o t:: ~ :; u.. City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Construct Additional Public Use Space Program: Public Use Facilities (community centers) Submitting Department(s): Community Services Project No.: CC-oI Project Description: The City's existing standard of public use space is 0.994 square foot per resident. This is based upon the inventory of 198,619 square feet of public use space for the City's 199,803 residents (199,619/199,803 = 0.993). Based upon this existing standard and the potential for 67,094 additional residents at General Plan build-out, the City could adopt and impose impact fees that would construct an additional 66,691 square feet of public use space. The 66.691 additional square feet would maintain the 0.994 S.F. per resident standard. Justification/Reqwrement for Project: The City has a public use facilities standard of 0.994 square feet per resident based upon the total 199,619 square foot dedicated to community and recreation services for the existing 199,803 residents. To maintain that standard through General Plan build-out the City would need to construct an additiona166,691 square feet of community service or recreation center space for use by the fInal projected 266,897 plus population. Consequences of Not Completing PrC?iect: Without adding (something) to the City's inventory of space available for community groups of all sizes and needs, the standard of 0.994 square foot per" person would drop to about 0.744 square foot per person and the existing facilities would have too many competing needs to meet the full demands of anyone group. PROpOSED EXPENDITURES Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition describ~ herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 througb .u Build-out Years $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,200,803 $2,200,803 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $14,672,020 $14,672,020 $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,467,202 $1,467,202 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,340,025 $18,340,025 Design/lnspection/ Administration Land Acquisition/Rigbt of Way Construction Contingency Equipment/Other TOTAL COST Potential Funding Sources: Gene.tal Fund revenues, Public Use Development Impact Fees, miscellaneous state and federal grants. . o City of San Bel'tlardino Aquatics Facilities o o . ~ '" co '" '" < () c: o - ~ ~ :; u. ~ .g 0 . '5 ? l1 ;S 2 - ~ ~ . S 2 '5 J! ~ l!! l e "- 'iii ~ e . . "" ~ .~ e "- 0 .~ s ..J 'Q ..J ~ <Ii i .~ OJ .. U . Q) "ei 0. . CJl .~ 7il .~ 0 ! () 1 all Q) .. .. ::> :01: c: "ei . ~ ~- Q). a: . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Construct Water PooII Attraction Program: Aquatics Facilities Submitting Department(s): Parks. Recreation and Community Services Project No.: A~I Project Description: The City's existing standard of pool surface space is 0.309 square foot per resident. This is based upon the provision of 61,690 square feet of pool surface space for the City's 199,803 residents (61,690/199,803 = 0.309). Based upon this existing standard and the potential for 67,094 additional residents at General Plan build-out, the City could adopt and impose impact fees that would construct an additiona120,732 square feet of pool surface space. The addition of 20,732 square feet would be adequate fot a 50 meter (by 25 yard) competition pool (12,188 square feet of surface) and 8 30 yard by 30 yard general purpose pool (8,100 square feet) or for perspective, it could be used to construct three pools the size of the one at the Mills aquatic center. Justification/Requirement for Project: The 20,732 additional pool surface square feet would maintain the 0.309 square feet of pool surface per resident standard. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Without adding to the City's inventory of pool space available for its residents, the standard of 0.309 square foot per person would drop 25% to about 0.231 square foot per person and the existing facilities would become more crowded and the experience would be decreased in value. Reference DocU11lent: Staff planning. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein. was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-D9 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $386,984 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,579,890 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $257,989 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,224,863 Total sJJ Years $3,224,863 Potential FwuJing Sources: General Fund revenues, Aquatics Program Development Impact Fees, miscellaneous state and federal grants. . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Construct Locker! Administration Building Program: Aquatics Facilities Submitting Deportment(s): Parks, Recreation and Community Services Project No.: AQ-02 Project Description: The City's existing standard of pootlocker/maintenance building space is 0.484 square foot per resident. This is based upon the provision of 2,563 square feel of pool building space for the City's 5,300 residents (2,563/5,300 = 0,484), Based upon this existing standard and the potential for 67,094 additional residents at General Plan build-out. the City could adopt and impose impact fees that would construct an additional 8,118 square feet of pool building space. Justification/Requirement for Project: The 8,118 additional pool building square feet would maintain the 0.121 ofbuUding square feet per resident standard. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Without adding to the City's inventory of locker room building available for its residents, the standard of 0.121 square foot per person would drop 25% to about 0.090 square foot per person and the existing facilities would become more crowded and the experience would be decreased in value. Reference Document: Staff planning. Project Timing: The timing of the capital construction or acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project costs default to the "Build-out" column. All costs arc at nominal, or current dollar value. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES Build-out Design/lnspection/ AdrrtinistratiOll SO SO $0 SO $240,968 L/lJ1d Acquisition/Right of Way SO SO $0 SO SO Construction SO $0 SO SO $1,606,455 Contingency SO $0 SO $0 $160,646 Equipment/Other $0 SO $0 SO SO TOTAL COST SO SO SO $0 $2,008,069 Total all Years $1,606,455 $2,008,069 Potential Funding Sources: General Fund revenues, Aquatics Program Development Impact Fees, miscellaneous state and federal grants. . . o City of San BC17mrdino Parkland Acquisition and Facilities Improvements o o . It~~sqg ~ ~ ig ~ 0\ ,.; ~ .~...... ~ t\'\ :a <'S ~ aa~;;t; It ~ ~ ~ ::g "'" <"It ~ ~ 0\ ~- ~- :a- ~- ~ "",- .. ~- _- 1:'-.... ~~~..,...,. ~ '" <Xl N en <C U c: o 1:: .!!1 "5 u. ~ "0 u . "il ? ~ = Ol .!l - - .!:, - c l" u '5 .!l "3 ~ ." l! .~ 0 a. 'il "3' ~ ~ ~ .~ O. a. ~ u '<l .J 5 .J iii ~ .~ ~ <ii u .0 ~ CD "C C- o (J) .~ u; J 0 U "0 I c: as ~ CD ::l c: ..; ~ CD a: . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Construct Six 5.0 Acre Neighborhood Parks Program: Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Submitting Department(s): Community Services Department Project No.: PK-ol Project Description: Acquire land for/develop six 5.0 acre neighborhood parks designed to meet neighborhood access to youth and adults for nearby non-programmed sports and activity use. Examples of improvements would include 8 turfed sports field, 8 small scale baseball backstop for "pick-up" play, 8 concrete basketball court, a small playground climbing apparatus, a drinking fountain, small restroom, and picnic tables and benches, Project design, project administration and inspection costs are included in the $340,945 per acre construction cost. Land costs are included at $10.00 per square foot. Justification/Requirement for Project: A neighborhood park, according to the National Parks and Recreation Association, is "Easily accessable to neighborhood population- geographically centered with safe walking and bike access. May be developed as a school-park facility." There are no specific plans for the possible combinations of parks (e.g. neighborhood, community or sports parks) to be configured from the 200 acres of parks that could be fma.nced by a park development impact fees. Such pllUlB would be All park improvements must meet the American with Disabilities Act requirements of access for all. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Demands for local and acessable park facilities would go unmet for this area. Reference Document: None, the future needs are merely based upon the standards representing Quimby Act provisions and users statistics. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-oS EXPENDITURES Design/Inspectionl Administration $0 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 Construction $0 Contingency $0 Equipment/Other $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 2010-11 Total 200S-09 2009-10 through all Build-out Years $0 $0 $2,508,846 $2,508,846 $0 $0 $13,068,000 $13,068,000 $0 $0 $6,432,942 $6,432,942 $0 $0 $1,286,586 $1,286,586 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,296,374 $23,296,374 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Potential Funding Sources: Park Impact Fees, Quimby Fees, General Fund contributions, State Park grants and occasional federal grants . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Construct Seven 10.0 Acre Passive Community Parks Program: Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Submilling Departmeut(s): Community Services Department Project Nu.: PK -()2 Project Description: Acquire land for/develop seven 10.0 acre community parks designed to meet area-wide passive needs for nearby non-programmed sports, activity and picnicing use. Community parks are intended to meet passive uses for families and groups. Improvements would include informal sportsfields, play areas with playground apparatus, restrooms, numerous picnic tables a number of them under shade structures, bllI'beques, benches and non-lighted tennis, basketball and volleyball courts. Passive parks may also have a concrete stage, bandshell or a large gazebo. There would also be sidewalks, security lighting and park signage. Project design, project administration and inspection costs arc included in the $340,945 per acre construction cost. Land costs are included at $10.00 per square foot. Justification/Requirement for Project: A community park, according to the National Parks and Rccreation Association as an II Area of diverse environmental quality. May include areas suited for intense recreational facilities, such as atheletice complexes, large swimming pools. May be an area of natural quality for outdoor recreation, such as walking, viewing, sitting, picknicing. May be any combination of the above, depending upon site suitability and community need. There arc-no specific plans for the possible combinations of parks (e.g. neighborhood, community or sports parks) to be configured from the 200 acres of parks that could be financed by park development impact fees. Such plans would be All park improvements must meet the American with Disabilities Act requirements of access for all. Consequences of Not Completing Project: The City currently maintains a 2.69 acres per 1.000 person standard. 1m light of the addition of 12,354 detached homes and 8,599 attached homes, additional parks will need to be constructed. There are no specific plans for the possible 200 acres of parks that couldbe fmanced by park impact fees. Failure to maintain existing park acres will ultimately decrease the usage and viability of the parks reducing the accessability of recreational activities. Reference Document: None, the future needs are merely based upon the standards representing Quimby Act provisions and users statistics. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein. was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 TotJJl PROPOSED 2006-<J7 2oo7-<J8 2oo8-<J9 2009-10 through all EXPENDITURES Build-out Years Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,853,974 $5,853,974 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $30,492,000 $30,492,000 Construction $0 $0 $0 $0 $15,010,198 $15,010,198 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $3,002,041 $3,002,041 EquipmeutlOther $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOT AI.. COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $54,358,213 $54,358,213 Potential FWlding Sources: Park impact Fees, Quimby Fees, General Fund contributions, State Park grants and occasional federal grants . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Title: Construct Four 25.0 Acre Active (sports) Community Parks Program: Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Submitting Department(s): Community Services Department Project No.: PK-Q3 Prq}ect Description: Acquire land for/develop four 25.0 acre sports parks designed to meet area-wide active needs for nearby programmed sports, activity and minor picnicing use. Sports parks are intended to meet active uses for associations and large groups. Improvements would include lighted baseball and softball fields. lighted soccer/footboll fields. Other improvements typically include groups fo five or six full-sized basketball courts and a number of lighted tennis courts. Project design. project administration and inspection costs are included in the $340.945 per acre construction cost. Land costs are included at $10.00 per square foot. Justification/Requirement for Project: A community park. according to the National Parks and Recreation Association as an "Area of diverse environmental quality. May include areas suited for intense recreational facilities, such as atheletice complexes. large swimming pools. May be an area of natural quality for outdoor recreation, such as walking. viewing. sitting, picknicing. May be any combination of the above, depending upon site suitability and community need. There are no specific plans for the possible combinations of parks (e.g. neighborhood, community or sports parks) to be configured from the 200 acres of parks that could be fmanced by park development impact fees. Such plans would be All park improvements must meet the American with Disabilities Act requirements of access for all. Consequences of Not Completing Project: The City currently maintains a 2.69 acres per 1,000 person standard. 1m light of the addition of 12,354 detached homes and 8.599 attached homes, additional parks will need to be constructed. There are no specific plans for the possible 200 acres of parks that couldbe financed by park impact fees. Failure to maintain existing park acres will ultimately decrease the usage and viability of the parks reducing the accessability of recreational activities. Reference Document: None, the future needs are merely based upon the standards representing Quimby Act provisions and users statistics. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" column. PROPOSED EXPENDITURES 2010-11 2006-07 2OO7-OS 2OOS-D9 2009-10 through Build-out $0 $0 $0 $0 $8,362,828 $0 $0 $0 $0 $43,560,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $21,443,144 $0 $0 $0 $0 $4,288,628 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $77,654,600 Land Acquisition/Right of Way Contingency Equipment/Other TOTAL COST Potential Funding Sources: Park Impact Fees, Quimby Fees, General Fund contributions, State Park grants and occasional federal grants Total all YCIl/'S $8,362,828 $4,288,628 . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Miscellaneous Park Improvements ProgrllDl: Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Submitting DepsrtmMt(s): Community Services Department Project No.: PK -()4 Prq;ect Description: Improvements could include, hut would not be limited to: basketball courts, playground climbing apparatus, drinking fountains, restrooms, picnic tables, barbeques and benches. basketball courts, playground climbing apparatus, drinking fountains, restrooms, picnic tables, barbeques and benches. Park construction costs are estimated at $357,437/acre for the 39.5 acres of mixed active/passive parkland development. Project design, project administration and inspection costs are included in the $340,945 per acre construction cost. Land costs are included at $10.00 per square foot. Justification/Requirement for Project: Some of the 537.3 acres of existing parks are in need of additional facilites to meet local needs that could not have been anticipated at the time the park was designed and constructed. Additionally, changes in the demographics of the area surrounding the various parks may have also changed the way the park is used or could allow the park to reach fuller use. All park improvements must meet the American with Disabilities Act requirements of access for all. Consequences of Not Completing Prqiect: The City currently maintains a 2.69 acres per 1,000 person standard. 1m light of the addition of 12,354 detached homes and 8,599 attached homes, additional parks will need to be constructed. There are no specific plans for the possible 200 acres of parks that couldbe ftnanced by park impact fees. Failure to maintain existing park acres will ultimately decrease the usage and viability of the parks reducing the accessability of recreational activities. Reference Document: None, the future needs are merely based upon the standards representing Quimby Act provisions and users statistics. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein, was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost def~ult to the "Build-out" column. 2010-11 Total PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through 811 EXPENDITURES Build-out Y cars Design/Inspection! Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $800,000 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $100,000 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $1,000,000 Potential Funding Sources: Park Impact Fees, Quimby Fees, General Fund contributions, State Park grants and occasional federal grants . City of San Bernardino Master Facilities Plan Project Detail Project Tide: Open Space Acquisition (159,4 acres) Program: Parkland Acquisition and Park Facilities Development Submitting Dcpartm<Jlt(s): Community Services Department Project No,: PK -05 Project Description: Acquire approximately 169.5 acres of open space in order to maintain the existing ratio of open space to developed space within the City's limits. The open space land could be in either large tracts or linear strips that could be used to COMcct the City's many trails. Justification/Requirement for Project: The construction of new homes, condominiums, apartments and businesses will eliminate what are now open spaces. The impact fee, if adopted and imposed uniformly, would enable the City to acquire 169.5 acres of open space at approximately $1,00 per square foot, There arc no costs for development of the open space but natural trails and minimal improvements like trailheads could be expected. Consequences of Not Completing Project: Open space would not be acquired and perhaps many of the existing trails could not be COJUlccted. Reference Document: None. the future needs are merely based upon the standards representing current space and users statistics. Project Timing: The timing or scheduling of the capital construction or capital outlay acquisition described herein. was not included in the scope of this engagement, thus all project cost default to the "Build-out" coluDUl. 2010-11 PROPOSED 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 through EXPENDITURES BuiJd-out Design/Inspection/Administration $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Land Acquisition/Right of Way $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,383,988 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Contingency $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Equipment/Other $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL COST $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,383,988 Total all y cars $7,383,988 Potential Funding Sources: Park Impact Fccs, Quimby Fees. General Fund contributions, State Park grants and occasional federal grants $0 $0 $0