Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-Development Services CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION From: James Funk, Director Subject: Authorization to declare Pumalo Street a "Through Highway" from Del Rosa Avenue to Date Place. Dept: Development Services Date: December 12, 20030R1G1NAL 13.IRI MCC Date: January 20, 2004 File: Synopsis of Previous Council Action: None Recommended Motion: Adopt Resolution. ~~~ James Funk Contact person: Anwar Wagdy, Traffic Engineer Phone: 5211 Supporting data attached: Staff Report, Map, Resolution, Warrants Ward: 7 FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: $ 400.00 Source: (Acc!. Nos.) 001-187-5111 Acct. Description: Signinl! & Strioinl! Materials Finance: Council Notes: \<t8::> ~ Z(D4.-l0 Agenda Item No. J ~ 1/ J.O!DL! CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION STAFF REPORT Subject: Authorization to declare Pumalo Street a "Through Highway" from Del Rosa Avenue to Date Place. Background: The Traffic Engineering Section of the Development Services Department received a request from the County of San Bernardino to concur with their recommendation to declare Purnalo Street a through highway from Del Rosa Avenue to Date Place. Declaring Pumalo Street a through highway basically means that stop signs will be installed on all approaches crossing the street within this area. The City has jurisdiction over two approaches to Purnalo Street within these limits. One of these approaches (Osbun Road) is already controlled by a stop sign. The other approach (Taylor Road) remains uncontrolled. Traffic Engineering staff evaluated the request. Pumalo Street is classified as a collector in the City's General Plan. Traffic counts, taken by the County, show that this street carries approximately 3,000 vehicles in a 24-hour period. Based on this data, staff recommends that the City concur with the County and declare this section of Pumalo Street a through highway. Approval of the proposed action will mean that the City will install a stop sign on Taylor Road's approach to Purnalo Street. All the other uncontrolled approaches to Pumalo Street, within this area, are under the jurisdiction of the County of San Bernardino. Consequently, installation of the stop signs on these approaches will be their responsibility. Financial Impact: The estimated cost of $ 400.00 for installing the new stop sign will come from Account No. 001-187-5111 (Signing and Striping Materials) Recommendation: Adopt Resolution. 2 . Pumalo Street between Del Rosa Ave. and Date PI. Authorization to Declare "Through Highway" 'f.. 'f.. Y. Location of Proposed "Through Highway" ~7 <( %8 D:: z ~ ~ - ~hV.Q_.._.._u trtii 2570C t; > <( ORCHiD DR " " E HIGHLA D AV SSF .. PLAZA Cl 1700 co< 21ST 20CC f-- L ICASL AV V'l .:0' ~, f3 VI, L.Ll zi:i5 t; - % ~ E '" 5T 20TH 19TH I @19ggThomas8ros. Maps City of San Bernardino WARRANTS FOR STOP SIGN INST ALLA TION Location Existing Control Prepared by/Date Checked by/Date u..""'..d L C;-,..., ~ ~--::- . /.~ fA' -4'~_ ~ ~ -~?~/-,. ''l POLICY Stop sign may be warranted at an intersection where any of the following warrants A-1, A-2, B or C are met A.1 STATE WARRANTS FOR MULTI.WAY STOP CONTROL Warrant is satisfied if any of the following criteria are met CRITERIA REQUIREMENTS REMARKS Y N A-l.l Traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, multi-way stop need to be installed as interim measure until signal is installed A-1.2 Five or more right angle andlor turning movement accidents in recent 12 months All 3 Combined vehicle volume on both streets during any 8 hours conditions averages 500+ vehlhr listed to Combined vehicle and pedestrian volume on minor street during the the right same 8 hours averages 200+ uniUhr, A1.3 must be And met to Delay to minor street vehicles during the maximum hour of the same satisfy 8 hours averages 30 seclhr warrant 85th percentile approach speed exceeds 40 mph (64 kmlh), min. A-1.3 vehicular volume warrant is 70% of the above requirements A.1: IS STA TE WARRANT FOR MUL TI-WA Y STOP CONTROL SA TlSFIED? A-2 STATE WARRANTS FOR TWO/ONE-WAY STOP CONTROL Warrant is satisfied if any of the following criteria are met CRITERIA REQUIREMENTS REMARKS Y N A-2.1. On the less important road at its intersection with a main road where accident history justifies the placement of Stop signs. A-2.2. On a county road or city street with its intersection with a Stare highY'ay. At the intersection with two main highways. The highway traffic to be A-2.3 stopped depends on the approach speeds, volumes and tuming movements. A-2.4 On a street entering a legally established through highway or street. "I- , A-2.5 On a minor street where the safe approach speed is less than 10 mph (16 km/h). A-2.6 At an un-signalized intersection in a signalized area. A-2.7 At intersections where a combination of high speed, restricted view and accident records indicates a need for control by the Stop sign. A-2: IS STA TE WARRANT FOR TWO/ONE-WA Y STOP CONTROL SA TISFIED? X r r . . B. PETITION WARRANTS FOR LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS BY CITY ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY Use only at residential street intersections excluding arterials, collectors, local collectors, where ADT do not exceed 2,500 Vehicles on each Intersecting Street Warrant 8 is satisfied if 8 and any two of the criteria 8.1 through 8.12 are met CRITERIA REQUIREMENTS REMARKS Y N Is there a pelilion signed by more lhan 60% of property B. owners/residents located within 600 feet of proposed stop sign; AND TWO OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA ARE MET. B-1. School located within 600 feet of intersection and intersection is on "suggested route to school". B-2. Streets leading to intersection do not intersect at right angles. B-3. One or more streets leading to intersection is at a grade of more than 5%. Where one or more of the approaches, requiring the stop sign(s), B-4. does not meet the required minimum sight distance, due to permanent view obstruction or roadway geometry. B-5. Intersection is abutting a park, major shopping center or other high pedestrian use facility. B-6. Pedestrian volume greater than 480 unitslhr in any B hour period. The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume crossing the major B-7 street exceeds 125 units during at least two hours where at least 200 vehicles enter the intersection each hour from all approaches during any B-hour period. B-B. One approach of the intersection is a driveway serving a commercial area. B-9. One approach of the intersection is a driveway servicing a residential property. Pass through (non-local traffic) on the subject residential street exceeds 50 vehicles per hour and exceeds 40"16 of the vehicle traffic B-10 during the hours from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m: on a non-holiday Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday, with local traffic defined as vehicles traversing/commuting through the neighborhood. B-11 The vehicle volume entering the intersection from all approaches exceeds 600 units during any hour at an intersection. Less than desirable pedestrian or vehicular conditions not listed B-12 above or contained in the criteria of the State of California for the installation of stop signs exist at the intersection (as determined/verified by the City's licensed Traffic Engineer. B: IS B PLUS ANY TWO OF THE CRITERIA B.1 THROUGH B-12 SATISFIED? . C. ACCIDENTS AND SAFETY WARRANTS FOR LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREETS BY CITY ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY Use Only at Residential Street Intersections Where ADT do not exceed 2,500 Vehicles on each Intersecting Street Warrant C is satisfied if C and any two conditions C.1 through C.10 are met CRITERIA REQUIREMENTS REMARKS Y N Three or more accidents in a 12 month period susceptible to correction C. by stop signs; or at least 200 vehicles enter the intersection each hour from all approaches during any consecutive B hour period; AND TWO OF THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA ARE MET. C-1. School located within 600 feet of intersection and intersection is on "suggested route to school". C-2. Streets leading to intersection do not intersect at right angles. C-3. One or more streets leading to intersection is at a grade of more than 5%. Where one or more of the approaches, requiring the stop sign(s), does not C-4. meet the required minimum sight distance, due to permanent view obstruction or roadway geometry. C-5. Intersection is abutting a park, major shopping center or other high pedestrian use facility. C-6. Pedestrian volume is greater than 480 unit/hr in the 8-hour period. The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume crossing the major street C-7. exceeds 125 units during at least two hours where at least 200 vehicles enter the intersection each hour from all approaches during any 8-hour period. C-B. One approach of the intersection is a driveway serving a commercial area: C-9. One approach of the intersection is a driveway servicing a residential property. Pass through (non-local traffic) on the subject residential street exceeds 50 vehicles per hour and 40% of the vehicle traffic during the hours from 7:00 C-10. a.m. to 9:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. on a non-holiday Tuesday, Wednesday, or Thursday, with local traffic defined as vehicles traversing/commuting through the neighborhood. C-1l The vehicle volume entering the intersection from all approaches exceeds 600 units during any hour at an intersection. Less than desirable pedestrian or vehicular conditions not listed above or C-12 contained in the criteria of the State of Califomia for the installation of stop signs exist at the intersection (as determinedlverified by the City's licensed Traffic Engineer. C: IS C PLUS ANY TWO CRITERIA C-1 THROUGH C-12 SATISFIED? DID THIS LOCATION MEET ANY OF THE WARRANTS A-1, A-2, B OR C ABOVE? IF YES, CHECK WARRANTS MET D [1J D D A-1 A-2 B C IF ANY OF THE WARRANTS ARE MET, A STOP SIGN SHOULD BE INSTALLED AFTER APPROVAL BY MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL AND THE INTERSETION IS DESIGNATED A .STOP INTERSECTION" BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL. Good traffic engineering judgment must be exercised before installing stop signs at certain intersections (whether I it meets the warrants or notl e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 e e r t(Q)~1 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BER:'\'ARDINO AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 655 ENTITLED, IN PART, "A RESOLUTION... DESIGNATING CERTAIN STREETS, OR PORTIONS THEREOF AS THROUGH HIGHWAYS..." AND DECLARING PUMALO STREET BETWEEN DEL ROSA AVENUE AND DATE PLACE A THROUGH HIGHWAY. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I: Resolution No. 655, which designates certain streets, or portions thereof, as through highways, Section One is amended by adding Subsection (14.23) PUMALO STREET to read as follows: "(14.23) PUMALO STREET (A) From Del Rosa Avenue to Date Place." 13 DERRY e 14 SUAREZ e 25 26 e' 27 28 p RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 655 ENTITLED, IN PART, "A RESOLUTION... DESIGNATING CERTAIN STREETS, OR PORTIONS THEREOF AS THROUGH HIGHWAYS..." A:\D DECLARING PUMALO STREET BETWEEN DEL ROSA AVENUE AND DATE PLACE A THROUGH HIGHWAY. 1 2 3 4 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor 5 and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a meeting 6 thereof, held on the , 2004 by the following vote, to- day of 7 8 9 10 11 12 MC GINNIS wit: NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBERS AYES ESTRADA LONGVILLE 15 ANDERSON 16 17 MC CAMMACK 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Approved as to form and legal content: Rachel Clark, City Clerk The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this day of ,2004. Judith Valles, Mayor City of San Bernardino 2