Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout05-13-1989 Minutes . . . City of San Bernardino, California May 13, 1989 This is the time and place set for an Adjourned Regular Meeting of the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at their Adjourned Regular Meeting held at 1:15 p.m., on Wednesday, May 10, 1989, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "0" Street, San Bernardino, California. The City Clerk has caused to be posted the Order of Adjournment of said meeting held on wednesday, May 10, 1989, and has on file in the Office of the City Clerk an affidavit of said posting together with a copy of said Order which was posted at 9:30 a.m., on Thursday, May 11, 1989, on the door of the place at which said meeting was held. The Adjourned Regular Council was called to order Council Chambers of City Bernardino, California. Meeting of the by Mayor Wilcox at Hall, 300 North Mayor and Common 9:27 a.m., in the "0" Street, San INVOCATION The Invocation was given by Council Member Pope-Ludlam. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Council Member Estrada. ROLL CALL Roll Call was taken by City Clerk Clark with the following being present: Mayor Wilcox; Council Members Estrada, Flores, Maudsley, Minor, pope-Ludlam, Miller; City Attorney Penman, City Clerk Clark, Acting City Administrator Robbins. Absent: Council Member Reilly. PUBLIC COMMENTS There were no public comments. GENERAL PLAN - LAND USE MAP AND TEXT Planning Director Kilger gave a brief overview of what was expected to be considered at this meeting. Primarily, there will be discussion on the Land Use Map. However, there may be some some people who wish to speak on the text who did not give their testimony at the meeting held on Wednesday, May 10, 1989. Planning Director Kilger stated it was important to know if people will be speaking on the text, as there are consultants here who can provide background information on why some of the goals, policies and objectives were prepared. If the testimony has been completed, then adjustments can be made and staff will start taking testimony from the public on the Land Use Map. - 1 - 5/13/89 . . . Bud Roberts - Verdemont Area - RL Designation Bud Roberts, Sierra Engineering 27007 Fifth Street, Highland, stated he would like to discuss the RL, 3.0 gross designation in the text. He explained that there is one map currently being processed by his firm that exceeds that. It comes up to 3.1. He felt that a use of 3.1 to 3.5 would be more appropriate because there would be some unique designs that could exceed the 3.0 designation in the text and still make the minimum 10,800 square lot use. Planning Director Kilger answered questions regarding the RL designation which allows for a minimum of a 10,800 square foot lot and currently, a maximum of three units per gross acre, as recommended by the Planning Commission. It was his understanding that the 3.0 would accommodate 95% of the current conditionally approved projects. However, Mr. Roberts has a project in line that would require 3.1. It has been discussed with the consultant. A.l addition would not be a major change in the RL designation. Mr. Kilger stated that presently, the RS, 10,800 would allow for a designation up to 4.5, which would not necessarily be achieved. It could be four dwelling units per acre. If RS 10,800 were used, instead of three dwelling units per acre, basically four dwellings units per acre would be allowed in that particular area. It is designated as RL. Most of the tracts in that area are designed at 10,800 square foot lots at three dwelling units per gross acre. Mr. Roberts' tract and a few others can achieve slightly higher if they are very efficient in their design. In his case, 3.1 would accommodate it. Woodie Tescher, Consultant from Envicom, referred to a chart previously distributed which explains the density ratios. John Edwins - Verdemont Area - RS - RL Zoning John Edwins, 445 South Arrowhead, Suite B, San Bernardino, 92408, stated he would like to address the RS over the RL, which was changed at an IPD Session, and suggested zoning everything in the Verdemont Area as 10,800. Mr. Edwins stated he has a tract that is approved and next week will be in the Final Plan Check to go into recordation. They are at 3.3 to almost 3.4. He stated that they are allowed only to build 10,800 lots and not allowed to use the standards and policies of the Verdemont Plan even though they were adopted and would have allowed them to move some of the lot sizes around to fit the topographical problems of the land. Mr. Edwins stated he had agreed to participate in financing for the Chestnut Storm Drain and other programs, because all of those programs were based on 10,800 lots or about 3.5 units to the acre. If the Council adopts the RL over the RS it would reduce density and it would also cause him to reconsider whether to participate in any financing of additional infrastructure because of the reduction in the amount of the net lots. - 2 - 5/13/89 . . . Planning Director Kilger stated that staff is prepared to get into a detailed discussion of gross vs. the net density at an appropriate time, at the pleasure of the Mayor and Council. Ted Sirkin - TABLE 3, Paqe 43 of Proposed General plan Ted Sirkin, 10312 Norris Avenue, Pacoima, CA 91331, referred to TABLE 3, page 43 of the strike-out, underlined version of the proposed General Plan Document, and stated he would be asking for an extension of the location for the CG-2 designation. Consultant Woodie Tescher answered questions regarding financing for the infrastructure in the Verdemont area, and all other areas of the City. He stated that because of the nature of the General Plan, this question has not been examined parcel by parcel, but only addressed on a cumulative Citywide scale. He explained that a subsequent analysis would have to consider specific subareas and locations in terms of the infrastructure. It is not a purview of the General Plan. Mr. Tescher explained the relationship between densities and uses. Planning Director Kilger explained two documents that have been prepared to facilitate the General plan Hearing process. He stated that Audit Trail I reflects changes that have been made since the Interim Policy Document was originally approved in May, 1988. The second handout is Audit Trail II which contains the Planning Commission's recommendations on the Draft General Plan Land Use Map. These are reflections of public testimony and recommendations by staff that were made before the Planning Commission. This is the document that will be referred to primarily in today's testimony. LAND USE MAP TESTIMONY Audit Trail II - Area 11 - Item 9 - Dennis Haensly Dennis Haensly, stated that he was speaking for the Kendall Drive feed store property, located at 2340 W. Kendall Drive, which is presently zoned RU. He is the owner of the property. He requested that the zoning be changed to establish the front of the parcel as commercial CG, and the rear as residential RU. He stated that the McGrews, 2358 Kendall, would like to change their zoning of RU to RM. He stated that any RU development is already standardized in the Verdemont Guide. Mr. Haensly stated that it appears to be the City's policy to have commercial in corridors and intersection nodes throughout the City and suggested that his request is in conformance with this policy. He spoke against the spot zoning on parts of the street. (See page 10 for further comments regarding zoning around the Kendall Drive feed store.) Planning Director Kilger answered questions non-conforming uses in the area. regarding - 3 - 5/13/89 . . . Principal Planner Bautista answered questions, and explained the Planning Commission actions on two other parcels of land included as Items 4 and 7 in Area 11, in Audit Trail II. He explained that the item under consideration, Item 9, Area 11, is a single family residential along with a commercial use, so the commercial use portion would be become non-conforming under the RU designation, as would the other two existing relatively new projects. Originally, the Council did approve a mixed use designation for that area. Audit Trail II - Area 5 - Item 49 - Ted Sirkin Ted Sirkin explained that his request was in regard to property located on the north side of Foothill Boulevard from Macy to Dallas. He stated that the Planning Commission had recommended approval for his request to change the zoning from RM to CG-l. He requested that the Council approve the Planning Commission's recommendation. Mr. Sirkin stated that the neighbors in the area had banded together to plan for a nice potential development of a total of nine and three-quarters acres. Audit Trail II - Area 4 - Item 37 - Diana Williams Diana Williams, 158 Rosa Court, Colton, spoke regarding property located at the northwest corner of Fifth and Ramona. She stated that there are quite a few business on Fifth Street, such as service stations, grocery stores and various other types, along with some older homes. She explained that the property in questions is now is escrow, and the new buyer wants the zoning to remain either CG-2 or CN, in order that he can build a small store. He will not build the property if he has to build a duplex or other residential unit. She stated that the area is not appropriate for residential units. Audit Trail II - Area 3 - Items 10, 11, 12 - Linden Malki Linden Malki, 565 West 9th Street, stated that her basic request is for the City to retain the original commercial zoning that has been in effect for a number of years along the Ninth Street corridor from "D" Street to the Freeway, and "F" Street from downtown to Tenth Street. She stated that their property would be worthless with RM zoning. Ms. Malki also mentioned ownership of an apartment complex on "F" Street above Ninth Street. She requested that the zoning remain commercial, or that the Council remove a demolition lien that was imposed by the City when the apartments were demolished. Ms. Malki complained about the lack of adequate notification of the hearing process. Ms. Malki spoke on behalf of the Independent Auto Dealers Association and requested that the commercial auto use be expanded on "E" Street. This is the old traditional auto row area and it was their opinion that this Ninth and "E" Street area is excellent for automotive uses, and urged that the expansion of the auto row be facilitated. - 4 - 5/13/89 . Mr. Kilger answered questions regarding commercial needs in the City. He stated that staff did two things: (1) They looked at what was the best mix of land uses from a purely health and safety standpoint; and (2) based on those calculations, they looked at the amount of commercial land use. Discussions with the consultants indicated there was approximately 300% - 400% more commercial than is currently needed to serve the eventual buildout of the City. A discussion ensued zoning in the traditional to residential. regarding the wisdom of changing the auto related businesses from commercial . Woodie Tescher, Consultant from Envicom, answered questions, stating that an economic analysis did not indicate that this was a viable commercial area. The analysis did indicate that the Plan as drafted has a substantial excess of commercial given to land uses and this is potentially a problem to the commercial viability of the City, as it doesn't provide a stimulus for the economic recovery of the areas that have declined. In respect to this particular geographic area, the CAC and the Planning Commission determined that the predominant use was not commercial. It may have had a historic zoning for commercial, but the primary use is residential. Planning Director Kilger stated that the issue is basically trying to provide the highest and best use by allowing the market to control. Mistakes have been made and they anticipate corrections will have to be made. However, over the years, the plan has provided enough commercial uses. . Planning Director Kilger answered questions regarding the zoning on Ninth Street, stating that it was a difficult zoning problem because of the intense mix of land uses. Audit Trail II - Area 12 - Item 40 and 41 - David Mlynarski David Mlynarski, 501 N. Placentia, Fullerton, spoke regarding the two items on the Audit Trail, Item 40, which is located on the south side of Ohio between Olive and Walnut, and Item 41, located on the north side of Ohio between Olive and Pine. He has requested a zone change on both parcels from RL to RS. He stated that he felt that the RS designation would be more consistent with the existing lotting patterns, and that the Master EIR would not be affected by the change in density due to the fact that there are existing larger lots already in the area. Item 40 is currently surrounded on three sides by similar development that was developed under RS land use designation. He felt that the additional units that could be allowed under the RS land use designation would provide additional revenue for drainage improvement, sewer, schools, parks and also provide additional revenue into the City's general budget by the increased number of building permits that would be issued for that property. - 5 - 5/13/89 . . . Item 41 is also known as Tentative Tract No. 11291. Currently, the Tentative Tract Map that is approved has a density of three units to the acre which is consistent with the RL land use. The lot sizes range from 7500 square feet to approximately 20,000 square feet. However, the density does not exceed three units to the acre. The problem is that the RL designation would make the current Tentative Tract Map inconsistent with the General Plan. Basically, they would have to scrap over $100,000 worth of engineering service that has already been spent. The first two phases are in Plan Check ready to record. Planning Director Kilger answered questions regarding the slope in the areas being discussed. Audit Trail II - Items 51 throuqh 56 - Jim Roe Jim Roe, 325 West Ninth Street, spoke first about Item 56 which is located on the northwest corner of 5th and Sierra Way. He stated that the planning process requirements should be the same for the City as it is for the private sector, and suggested that the City should be required to notify surrounding property owners of pending changes as is required for private citizens. He stated that the planning process being used for downtown is fine if it were dealing with a new downtown, but since it is an existing downtown, it is necessary to deal with existing and economic realities. He stated that the changes recommended by the Planning Department on Fifth Street between Sierra Way and Waterman, are not consistent with the existing lot densities. He requested that this area be reviewed and let it retain its Commercial, CG zoning. Mr. Roe requested that his property on the corner of Fifth and Sierra Way, plus the entire block be zoned CG. Mr. Roe spoke regarding Item 51, property located on the east side of "F" Street between Ninth and Tenth Streets. He requested the zoning be CG-l or CG-2. Mr. Roe spoke regarding Item 52, the northwest corner of Ninth and "F" Streets. He requested a CG designation. east side that the Mr. Roe referred to Item 53 which is located on the of "F" Street, between Union and 9th Streets, stating C-2 zoning is acceptable. Mr. Roe referred to Item 54, which is located on the west side of "F" Street between 6th and 7th Streets. He requested a commercial zoning, or at least high density. He also referred to property on the east side of Mt. View between 6th and 7th Streets. Three-fourths of the block is zoned commercial, but his small parcel is zoned residential. He felt the entire block should be zoned the same. - 6 - 5/13/89 . . . Planning Director Kilger explained the zoning on the property in question. Deputy City Attorney Empeno explained the notification process, and stated that the City has complied with State requirements regarding public notices for this General Plan process. He stated that in this case, public notice by newspaper advertisements are sufficient. Individual mailed notices are not required. Audit Trail II - Area 11 - Item 50 - Chet Anderson Chet Anderson requested that the Council correct an oversight that exists in the proposed General Plan regarding zoning in the area east of Valencia, west of Twin Creek Wash, south of Avery and north of Marshall. The proposed zoning for all existing property in the area is RL with a minimum lot size of 720 square feet. He felt this would be inconsistent with the existing development. He suggested that the zoning should not be more dense than RE, Residential Estate and that zoning which is presently zoned Open Space, should be retained as Open Space. All of the homes that front on Valencia Avenue in this area are on lots over one acre in size. He felt that the area is a real asset for the City and should not be down graded by inconsistent and inappropriate zoning. Mr. Anderson stated he had been told the proposed zoning was an oversight, and there was no reason given for the proposed RS zoning. He stated he had petitions with signatures of about sixty property owners objecting to the proposed RS zoning. He urged the the stable and language on page Council to correct this oversight and preserve significant neighborhood in accordance with 30 of the Draft General Plan. He also spoke about a parcel of 21.7 acres that was annexed into the City as an island in 1978. At that time, the Planning Commission, and City Council agreed to zone it Open Space because of the "rural and tranquil nature of the area which is rich in wild life". Mr. Anderson answered questions regarding access roads to the open space area. Planning Director Kilger stated that, based on the testimony at the Planning Commission, staff did an analysis of the area. Principal Planner Bautista answered questions, south of Avery, most the lots are between one-half one-half acres in size and one is four and one-half stating that and one-and acres. Principal planner Bautista explained that the designation of "0", Open Space, was done in error, as the land is not publicly owned, but privately owned, so Open Space designation would be improper. - 7 - 5/13/89 . Planning Director Kilger referred to State law regarding the use of Open Space, and stated that if RE is recommended for the zoning designation in this area, that the Open Space designated land also be zoned as RE. Planning Director Kilger answered questions non-conforming uses, and explained the requirements allow for a single family residence, or subdividing a regarding that would large lot. principal Planner Bautista answered questions, stating that a residential designation was given that was consistent with the surrounding area. Specific lot size was not considered, but he stated he had no problem with going to a larger lot size designation. A discussion ensued regarding the land use designations in the area in question and the various options. Mr. Anderson stated that there were people in the audience who agreed with his recommendations. It was his opinion that no one was in disagreement with these recommendations, as neither staff nor the CAC had expressed disagreement. Mayor Wilcox stated that a consensus had been reached that an RE designation would be appropriate, but would not include the "0" Open Space designation. . Planning schedule for is scheduled completed on be scheduled will then be Director Kilger answered questions regarding the public testimony on land use, stating that a hearing for May 17, 1989, at 1:00 p.m. If testimony is not that day, staff will recommend that other hearings until all testimony has been received. The hearing closed and deliberations will begin. RECESS MEETING - TEN MINUTE BREAK At 11:35 a.m., Mayor Wilcox declared a ten-minute break. RECONVENE MEETING At 11:45 a.m., the Adjourned Regular the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 Bernardino, California. Meeting reconvened in North "0" Street, San . ROLL CALL Roll Call was taken by City Clerk Clark with the following being present: Mayor Wilcox; Council Members Estrada, Flores, Maudsley, Minor, Pope-Ludlam, Miller; Deputy City Attorney Empeno, City Clerk Clark, Acting City Administrator Robbins. Absent: Council Member Reilly. Audit Trail II - Area 10 - Item 23 - Charles Goode Charles Goode, 1600 Arrowhead Avenue, spoke regarding property located south of 39th Street, at 3845 Ferndale. He requested a change of land use from RS to RMH24. The proposed land use category is RS single family, 4 1/2 units to the acre. He explained that there are medium high to high density - 8 - 5/13/89 . apartments to the south of his property, and to the north, a church which operates a pre-school and grade school during the week. He stated it didn't seem practical to build four or five residential units in an area surrounded with existing apartment projects. He stated that funding would be difficult to obtain for RS projects in that area, and a higher density designation would be best for the City from a tax base standpoint. principal Planner Bautista zoning in the area, stating that in the County, not the City, and units per acre. answered questions the apartments in that are zoned at twelve to regarding area are fourteen Mr. he was request gutters Goode explained the type of units in the area, and stated not asking for high density on his property, but would medium high or 24 units per acre. He stated curbs, and sidewalks are already in place. Audit Trail II - Area 12 - Items 38 and 39 - Bud Mr. Roberts, Sierra Engineering, 27007 requested a change in the proposed designation from two parcels of land, located on the southeast corner and Olive, and the southwest corner of Irvington and Roberts 5th Street, RL to RS on of Irvington Pine. . Regarding Item 39, the southeast corner of Irvington and Pine, he stated this parcel is bounded on all sides by RS zoning. There are existing homes in the area. He recommended the zoning of RS because of the character of the neighborhood which has already been established. Mr. Roberts described the rest of the area, and explained infrastructure development. Fourth and Sierra Way - Bird Refrigeration - Norris Greqory Norris Gregory, P. O. Box 7393, San Bernardino, CA 92411, representing Bird Refrigeration, located at 109 E. 4th Street, on the southeast corner of Fourth and Sierra Way, explained that the request from Bird Refrigeration for a change of zone had not been presented to the Planning Commission. He stated that the area generally is designated as C-O, Commercial Offices. Four of the parcels owned by Bird Refrigeration are zoned CO and five of the parcels have an RH designation. The County Credit Union, the County Central Library and the County Hall of Records are in the immediate area. Mr. Gregory requested to have the entire property zoned C-O, or the remaining parcels be zoned "T" Transitional, to allow for future conversion. Principal Planner Bautista answered questions, and explained the zoning in the area. . Planning Director Kilger answered not consider "T" zones. Instead, districts that are more homogeneous. questions, stating they do they are trying to create - 9 - 5/13/89 . . . Audit Trail - Area 11 - Item 7 - Everett McGrew Everett McGrew, 2358 Kendall Drive, stated that his original request was to change the land use designation from RU to RM on his property located on Kendall Drive, west of University Parkway, adjacent to the Flood Control Channel. He indicated he now wants the zoning to be CG-3 behind the Kendall Drive feed store (2340 W. Kendall Drive). (See page 3 for comments regarding the Kendall Drive Feed Store.) Planning Director Kilger explained that, based on the CAC's recommendation on that area, the feed store would need a CH or similar zoning. Even though it is an existing use, it would be a non-conforming use even with a CG-3 zoning. Basically, the desire is to have some kind of commercial zoning. This can be determined during deliberations. Consultant Woodie Tescher stated that a CG-3 designation would be more compatible in the area than the CH designation. Audit Trail II - Area 2 - Item 8 - Mark Ostoich Mark Ostoich, 600 North Arrowhead, Suite 300, San Bernardino, spoke regarding property bounded by Rialto Avenue on the north, Mill Street on the south, Sierra Way on the east and Arrowhead Avenue on the West. This property is designated generally CH, Commercial Heavy. He requested clarification on one issue. He stated that many of the existing uses in that area are office related, and wondered if the those uses would be contemplated in the amended designation. Planning Director Kilger stated that the CH designation was expanded, but it was not specifically stated that Office or Office-Commercial use would be allowed. He felt that would be acceptable, but when the text is discussed, the Mayor and Council will have to take specific action to amend the Planning Commission's recommendation to include Office uses within the overall utilization of the CH. Audit Trail II - Area 4 - Item 30 - John Liqhtburn John Lightburn, P. O. Box 1622, San Bernardino, CA 92402, spoke regarding property located at 272 S. Pico. He had requested a change of designation from RU to IL, which was recommended by the Planning Commission. He explained that in a letter dated April 10, 1989, he outlined another eight or nine lots which he wished to be included in the IL designation. He presented a copy of that letter to be included into the record today. Audit Trail II - Area 3 Roy Robertson, 258 E. spoke regarding two parcels Bryant, east of Allen, and and "H" Street. 35 and 36 - Roy Robertson Street, #3, San Bernardino, located on the north side of southeast corner of Magnolia - Items Bryant of land on the - 10 - 5/13/89 . . . He spoke first of Item 35, on the southeast corner of Bryant, east of Allen. He stated plans had been approved for development on that parcel. Then the IPD was put into place, and his plans no longer were in conformation. He stated he had circulated a petition among the adjoining property owners, and they were in favor of his going ahead with the development. Magnolia RMH 18. the IPD. He has He referred to Item 36, on the southeast corner of and "H" Street. He stated he would like that zoned Plans were approved, but could not be used because of He is ready to develop that property at this time. already invested approximately $30,000 in the property. Mr. Robertson explained that a letter from Mrs. Marguerite Evans had been distributed to the Council. He stated that he and Mrs. Evans own property across from the 7-Up Bottling Company, between Magnolia to 16th Street. He described the various types of developments in the area and stated that it would not be appropriate to put low density, single family dwellings in the area. David Schultz - Real Estate Broker - Chairman of the Local Government Affairs Committee of San Bernardino Valley Board of Realtors Mr. Schultz referred to a recent conference where planning matters were being discussed, and a remark was made that he felt was important to consider: That people select a community on the basis of what makes the community work for them. He spoke about the dilemma of revitalizing the residential area of the Central City. He stated that the CAC passed a motion that the zoning proposed under the IPD be upgraded to a higher residential use to promote the development of second units and infill four-plexes and tri-plexes on existing lots within that part of the City. That motion was subsequently passed onto the Common Council by the Planning Commission. It was called Alternative H, which is a series of statistics in the EIR. He urged on behalf of the give serious consideration to community to refocus on that clarify it in terms of zoning Board of Realtors that the Council the desires of the citizens of the Alternative H in a way that will designations. Mr. Schultz stated that the Board of Realtors supports the Chamber of Commerce's position as set forth in the document dated May 10, 1989. Included in that is the concern that the minimum lot size in RM and RU designations be eliminated in order to accommodate this zone of development. James Wirth - Revitalization of Inner Cit Mr. Wirth, 0 Sierra Way, re erre to a letter he had submitted on May 12, 1989, to the Mayor and Common Council, in which he made suggestions regarding lots sizes in the Inner City area. He stated that the problem of achieving revitalization of older deteriorating portions of the City has been resolved for two older portions of the City, but the problem remains for the - 11 - 5/13/89 . . . remainder of the deteriorating inner City. He stated the problem centers around minimum lot size. He explained that he had spoken to Council Member Reilly and gotten his support for the policy he had suggested. Dave Hawlev - On Behalf of Partner Hank Bickler - Shandin Hills Golf Course Area Mr. Hawley stated he was speaking on behalf of his partner Hank Bickler regarding the area covered in Area 11. Planning Director Kilger stated that Mr. Hawley and Mr. Bickler had appeared at meetings in January or February when the Draft Land Use Plan was put together. There was also a letter presented on March 24, 1989. Mr. Hawley stated that he was one of the owners of Shandin Hills Golf Course and he and Mr. Bickler are owners of 30 acres adjacent to the golf course. It was their intent to develop this property in coordination with the golf course and mitigate an existing uncontrolled runoff of storm water onto the golf course. A Tentative Tract Map was approved for this parcel in 1980, but was allowed to expire in 1982 for economic reasons. He stated that development of this property would not adversely impact the area in any way, and would help solve the runoff problem and increase the tax base of the Redevelopment Project Area. He stated they would like the property to be excluded from the Hillside zoning and be allowed to be developed under the PRD standards under RL zoning because of the prior approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the Master Plan. Mr. Hawley answered questions regarding the slope percentage, which varies from flat to 30% or 40% on the upper ends. He stated they were not suggesting it had to be the 45 units as previously approved, but they felt that some kind of planned unit development would be beneficial and consistent with the area. Planning Director Kilger stated that this is difficult properties that will have to tested Hillside Management Policy during deliberations. one of against the the RECESS MEETING - LUNCH BREAK At 12:25 p.m., Mayor Wilcox declared a one-hour lunch break. RECONVENE MEETING At 1:45 p.m., the Adjourned Regular Meeting of Common Council reconvened in the Council Chambers 300 North "D" Street, San Bernardino, California. the Mayor and of City Hall, ROLL CALL Roll Call was taken by Deputy City Clerk Reese with the following being present: Mayor Wilcox; Council Members Estrada, Flores, Maudsley, Minor, Miller; Deputy City Attorney Empeno; Deputy City Clerk Reese, Acting City Administrator Robbins. Absent: Council Members Reilly, pope-Ludlam. - 12 - 5/13/89 . GENERAL COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT GENERAL PLAN AND DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Leo Lyons - North side of Kendall Drive between "F" & "G" Leo Lyons, 2526 Lincoln Drive, stated his property is located between "F" and "G" on the north side of Kendall Drive. The property is being used for auto repair. It is in a CG-2 Automotive designation. His main concern that it is not a blighted area, as he planned this for his retirement income. Planning Director Kilger stated that area is designated CG-l, General Commercial. . Mr. Lyons answered questions, stating that the property is being used for auto repair, tune-up and a body and fender shop. Planning Director Kilger suggested that CH would be an appropriate designation for auto repair and body shop. Ted Yoshimura - Verdemont Area - Palm & Kendall Ted Yoshimura, Financial Research, Inc., 240 Fifth Ave., City of Industry, referred to his property which is approximately 1.6 acres located at Palm Avenue and Kendall. He stated that there are approximately 300 apartment units being developed to the north and east of the property. To the south there is commercial zoning. He stated that their concern involved the compatibility of their parcel. The Planning Commission is recommending RE, Residential Estates. He felt it would be inappropriate to have an estate home surrounded by all the other types of activity, and requested that their property be made more compatible with the surrounding area. Planning Director Kilger and Vince Bautista, Principal Planner, answered questions, and showed the area on the map. Planning Director Kilger explained the Planning Commission's action which designated both sides of Palm from Belmont to the Flood Control as Residential Estates. This action recognized existing lots, and did pick up Mr. Yoshimura's property. Mr. Yoshimura stated that currently they are in conversation with a number of entities. He stated they are talking about a senior care facility, which he felt would be appropriate. COUNCIL MEMBER At 1:50 p.m., Council Meeting. POPE-LUDLAM RETURNED Council Member pope-Ludlam returned to the . Mr. Kilger explained that the original recommendation on the Draft Plan was RL and then through some discussion on existing lots, the Planning Commission changed it to RE. A discussion ensued regarding the development in that area, and which came first - the apartments or the one acre lots. - 13 - 5/13/89 . . . Mr. Kilger stated that staff has indicated that prior to the Verdemont Plan, that site was designated for Multi-Family. The Verdemont Plan proposed to change it to estate lots or lower density lots. Following that, there was a lawsuit, the City settled, and the apartments are going in. Georqe Switzer - 331 W. 20th Street - Area 11 Mr. George Switzer, 2226 E. Highland Avenue, stated he was a real estate agent, representing a client who owns property at 331 W. 20th Street, west of Arrowhead Avenue. He stated his client wishes to sell this property to Continental Land Title Company, which is located directly behind that facility. The Title Company needs to expand their parking lot, and it is their intention to use the land for that purpose. He explained that the Planning Department had indicated that under the current zoning, a parking lot would not be possible. Therefore, he is asking that the zoning be changed from RU to CO-l which would allow the parking lot. The sale of the property is contingent upon the ability of the Title Company to put a parking lot on the property. Dana Panke - Three lots on Ninth Street between "F" and "G", an "G" and "H" - Fifth and Mt. Vl.ew Mr. Dana Pankey, P. O. Box 1644, Big Bear Lake, California, commended the Council on their interest in the property owners' concerns and explained that he had not appeared at earlier meetings, as he had no knowledge of them. He stated he had property on Baseline and on Highland along the west end of the City, and agreed with the Planning Commission's decision of CG-2 along those two areas. zoning of property he and Mt. View. He He expressed his concern regarding the owns near the northeast corner of Fifth requested CR-2 zoning instead of the CO-I. Mr. Pankey answered questions regarding the use of the property, stating he could not reveal the specific use, but would like a "store type" use. Mr. Pankey answered questions regarding the three properties he owns on Ninth Street. The properties are located between "F" and "G" and between "G" and "H". It was his opinion that both sides of Ninth Street between "F" and "H" Streets should be zoned commercial, CG-2. He spoke specifically about the southeast corner of "H" and Ninth, where he has a deep commercial lot. Paul Wieler - Area 3 - Northwest corner of Mt. View & 13th Mr. Wieler, on behalf of his partner, Vic Fenster, spoke regarding property located at 1300 N. Mt. View Avenue, which is the northwest corner of Mt. View and 13th Street. He stated their businesses are located at that site, and originally, it was zoned residential, but was later changed to AP, which is now called CO. The Master Plan calls for it to be changed back to - 14 - 5/13/89 . . . residential. He requested that the CO zoning be retained in order that they can continue conducting their businesses in that location. He stated there was not much demand for apartments or houses in that area. Bill Sikes - 1557, 1561, 1571 No. "E" Street - 1956 No. "E" - 1956 No. "E" Street - Area 3 Bill Sikes referred to a letter sent to the Planning Commission and the Council which was delivered earlier, containing details of his comments today. He also stated he would have additional information in writing to the Council for their consideration. He stated there were two areas he wished to talk about. The first is 1956 North "E" Street, where his tenant, Print Quik, is located. He stated he has a commitment to that tenant to build a more attractive facility in that location. He will provide additional data at a later date. He also spoke regarding 1557, 1561, 1571 North "E" Street. He has been the owner-operator of this facility for seventeen years. The proposed zoning has been changed from commercial back to residential, and those restrictions that would be imposed would not enhance the City nor the operations of his business. He stated he would provide the City with more information regarding this location. Planning Director Kilger explained that this area is zoned for high density apartments now, RMH. He stated that this is one of those areas discussed relative to trying to provide more multi-family on the thoroughfares with nodes of commercial. The issue was brought up at the Planning Commission and evaluated and they chose to stay with multi-family. Mr. Sikes answered questions regarding the location of his property. Principal Planner Bautista answered questions regarding the size of lots and densities allowed on various lots. Planning Director Kilger answered questions, stating it was the intent of staff to try wherever possible to provide for additional multi-family on major thoroughfares. It was the future land use policy decision to concentrate the node commercial into the major intersections. It may require transitioning existing commercial over to multi-family. ChOna Hak Kim - Area bordered by 40th Street, "E" Street, Floo Control Channel and Krauss Place - Area 11 Mrs. Kim spoke for Chong Hak Kim, regarding property at 40th and "E" Streets, which is located in Area 11. She stated that in 1988, Mr. Chong Hak Kim purchased the nine lots, which were zoned C3-A, intending to build a full service car wash. The proposed changes zoned the north one-fourth as CG-l and the south three-fourths RM. His plans for the car wash require the use of - 15 - 5/13/89 T . the entire property, not just the north one-fourth. The property is bounded in the west by a church, to the south a Flood Control Channel, to the east a gas station and to the north a public mini-storage. He felt his plans are appropriate for this area and splitting the property into CG-l and RM is not appropriate. . Principal Planner Bautista answered questions. Planning Director Kilger stated that this area was designated as Commercial, C3-A, prior to the IPD, and the IPD changed that to multi-family. He thought that this change was due to limited access to the property. Mr. Bautista explained the lack of access to 40th Street. He further stated that CG-l would be permitted with a C.U.P. A discussion ensued regarding the use of the parcels. Planning Director Kilger explained that this is a very difficult site to designate, because of the different uses in the area: light industrial, single family homes, and commercial. He recommended that if a decision were made to change this portion to commercial, it all should go commercial to avoid conflict. Mr. Kim stated that they needed all the property for the proposed car wash, and eventually perhaps a tune-up shop, tire shop, mini mart, for a total shopping center. Mr. Bautista stated least half of Krauss access. that in order to develop this parcel, at Way would have to improved to provide . Patricia Green - Sunset Group - 225 W. Hospitality Lane Patricia Green, representing the Sunset Group, 225 W. Hospitality Lane, referred to an area of approximately eighteen acres, bounded on the north by the Southern Pacific Railroad tracks, on the south by Commercial Road, on the east Waterman Avenue, and on the west Hunts Lane. She stated the land is now designated as CR-3. She stated that to make a good transition from CR-3 to the RU, which is directly south of the property, they would like to have a buffer of IL designation. They plan to do some type of R & D type of project, and some of those people may need to have some outdoor storage, so they would like a designation that would allow that. Ernest Fisher - Area 3 - 1554 N. Stoddard Mr. Ernest Fisher, spoke regarding property located at 1554 N. Stoddard. He stated that this property was purchased as commercial property in 1978, and the business located at the site was the Big "K" - Kedco Corporation, which does repair work on oxygen regulators, flow regulators, and welding equipment. He stated that this is a small business at present, but they hope to expand in the future. However, the proposed zone change from Commercial to Residential would jeopardize their plans. - 16 - 5/13/89 . . . Mr. Fisher had three questions: (1) Why~ (the zone change)~ 2) Who has interest in the new zoning of commercial property~ and (3) what Federal monies are being used in this change. He stated his concern is for future growth in San Bernardino, and that large businesses are treated better than small businesses. A discussion ensued regarding Mr. Fisher's questions, and he was told that there are no special interests in the new zoning, and there are no Federal monies involved. Mayor Wilcox assured Mr. Fisher that all businesses are welcome in the City. Planning Director Kilger stated because of the complexity of the area, staff has gone through that area twice. Many businesses were there before zoning was ever conceived. He spoke of certain requirements to minimize spot zoning and bring conformity to the neighborhood. He stated that staff will go back to that area for further research. Dennis Kelly - Audit Trail II - Area 8 - Item 78 - Council Member Reilly - 21st Street at Crestview Dennis Kelly, 549 E. 21st Street, stated he had previously sent a letter regarding this matter. Council Member Reilly has also made a request on this as indicated in Audit Trail II, Area 8, Item 78, which requests that the Planning Commission's recommendation of RS be changed to CO-I. He stated that several other home owners agree in this request. The zoning has allowed medical offices in the area, and he felt that a change to residential is not a good decision. He stated that because of the growth of the hospital across the street, traffic and parking have become a real problem. Mr. Kelly stated stated that the area is not conducive to residential use any more and requested that CO-I, Commercial-Office designation be given to the property to allow the current home owners to sell their property for office use. Mr. Kelly answered questions regarding the area. Don Townsend - Representinq Northwest PAC and citizens of the Wests ide Don Townsend, 1677 W. Baseline, representing the Northwest PAC Committee, the citizens of the Westside of the City, and his family, who own commercial and residential property in the Northwest Project Area, stated he would give the Planning Department a color coded map concerning his request. He spoke regarding the fact that there had not been anyone from the Westside to speak regarding zoning in that area, and referred to a discussion relative to high density on the main corridors of Baseline, Highland and Mt. Vernon. He requested that the Council take note of the recommendation of the community and of the Northwest Project Area. - 17 - 5/13/89 " . Lois Willis - 1336 North "0" Street - Area 3 Lois Willis, 3155 Sepulveda, stated that she had spoken with Mr. Bautista who suggested a CO-2 designation for the 1300 block of North "0" Street. She stated that was agreeable with her, although the petition that was presented earlier asked for CO-I. She stated that she spoke for most of the people on that block, who agreed that either CO-lor CO-2 was acceptable. RECESS MEETING - TEN MINUTE BREAK At 3:07 p.m., Mayor Wilcox declared a ten minute break. RECONVENE At 3:17 p.m., the Adjourned Regular Meeting of Common Council reconvened in the Council Chambers 300 North "0" Street, San Bernardino, California. the Mayor and of City Hall, . ROLL CALL Roll Call was taken by Deputy City Clerk Reese with the following being present: Mayor Wilcox; Council Members Estrada, Flores, Maudsley, Minor, Pope-Ludlam, Miller; Deputy City Attorney Empeno, Deputy City Clerk Reese, Acting City Administrator Robbins. Absent: Council Member Reilly. Antonio and Candelaria Atilano - Property north of Central Avenue, west of Foisy Street Senior Planner Valerie Ross spoke for Antonio and Candelaria Atilano, who own property north of Central Avenue, west of Foisy Avenue, between Central and Drake. Before purchasing the property they spoke to members of the Planning Department and were told that the property was designated for Commercial. Recently, they came in with plans for a used car lot and were told that the designation had been changed to IL, Light Industrial. They are requesting go ahead with their plans include only a used car they might have an auto auto related uses. a designation of Commercial so they can for a used car lot. The present plans lot, although possibly in the future, repair, auto upholstery shop and other . A discussion ensued regarding the zoning in the area. June Salomon - Southwest corner of Tenth and Western June Salomon, 6255 Palm Avenue, Whittier, California 90601, stated that she owned property on the southwest corner of Tenth and Western. She requested that the zoning on that property allow her to build a duplex there. She stated that in March of this year she had spoken to a member of the Planning staff and was told at that time, she could build a duplex on the property. She proceeded to arrange for a loan and had plans prepared. In April, she came in to submit the plans and was told about the change in the zoning that would not allow the construction of a duplex. - 18 - 5/13/89 . . . Leaque of Women Voters - Letter dated May 13, 1989 Mayor Wilcox referred to a letter dated May 13, 1989, from the League of Women Voters. In the letter, concern was expressed regarding several issues. One issue was whether or not the recommendations made by the CAC were given sufficient consideration. They also felt that there were too many changes to evaluate carefully, and suggested the extension of the public comments period. They questioned whether enough attention has been paid to social and environmental impacts, public facilities and services, and improving the City's aging infrastructure. The letter further stated that the Open Space designation in the Plan falls short of standards for a city of this size. It also questions the effects of allowing higher densities of housing in some areas of the City. Finally, they stated that their overall concern is that the Plan be a blueprint for orderly growth which considers the quality of life of the people who live and work in San Bernardino. MQlph Miller - East side of "D" Street from wabash nortn to within 145.12 feet of 14th Street - Area 3 Mr. Adolph Miller, 1859 Random Drive, Anaheim, California, described his property as Assessor's Parcel Number 145-212-10, 145-212-11, and 145-212-34, and requested that the zoning be changed from Single Family residential to Multi-Family Residential. He stated that his property is surrounded by land developed for multi-family residential. Rod MacDonald - Rancon Developers for Tri-City Corporation Rod MacDonald stated he was responsible for planning, design and architecture for Rancon Developers for Tri City Corporate Center. He stated they were pleased that the General Plan has identified their project as one of those areas for continued quality growth. He also agreed with the Planning staff that it would be in the best interest of the City and Rancon to immediately adopt a Specific Plan which would formalize the Master Plan they have been working from for over four years. Mr. MacDonald referred to an issue regarding floor area ratio and the manner in which they subdivided their property. He asked that staff have interpretive capabilities as they relate to this matter. He also spoke about providing a full range of food services businesses in the area. Presently, there are high and medium range restaurants, but no drive-through facilities. As part of the master planning, he believed they can handle the planning problems with proper architecture and screening. Mr. MacDonald stated the original General Plan did not provide for a height limit. The modifications that are before the Council have both a floor area ratio and height restriction. He felt they were not consistent and it would be difficult to - 19 - 5/13/89 ,- . . . 'I" agreement with We're asking complete the specific plan. They are fully in the floor area ratio alone under the new concept. that the four-story limit be reconsidered. Richard Bristow - 741 E. Baseline Richard Bristow, 5655 Edgemont Drive, spoke regarding property located at 741 E. Baseline. The property is located on the south side of Baseline, and is 146' wide and extends 950' south. Originally, it was used commercially. For the past ten or twelve years, it has been rented to the RV dealer whose main business is cross the street. He uses the front portion of the property to store and show RV's. The front portion is zoned CG-2, and the back portion is RM. He requested that the entire property be zoned CG, so that it would be more marketable in the event he decides to sell the property. Principal Planner Bautista answered questions, and explained why the property has two zoning designations. Planning Director Kilger answered questions, stating that the intent of the zoning was to provide access from Olive, which is at the rear of the property, for the multi-family portion. Mo Ghiassi - 2402 - 2402 1 2 Lero Mo Ghiassi, 8 03 S ypark Circ e, Suite "H", Irvine, California 92714, spoke regarding property located at 2402 - 2402 1/2 Leroy, and requested a higher density designation. He stated that there are two existing units on the property and he wished to construct five additional residential units. He explained that there were other developments in the immediate area with eleven to fourteen units each. He stated that when he first applied, he was told the zoning was RMH, and prepared plans. Later he was told that the zoning is not RMH, but is RS. Planning Director Kilger stated that because of the lot size, Mr. Ghiassi would probably be able to get only one additional unit on the property even with the RMH designation. Eric Aschemeyer - 4408 Fourth Street Mr. Eric Aschemeyer, 13355 Emerald Way, Chino, CA 91709, stated that recently, his associate and he acquired property in San Bernardino located at 4408 Fourth Street, which is 96 feet wide and 640 feet deep. It is now zoned R-l. He requested that the zoning be changed to CG so that they can construct a mini storage. He stated the property is next to a private school and a church. A single family dwelling is on the front of the property. Mr. Aschemeyer answered questions regarding the the property, and whether or not it was in the County. It is located off of Kendall Drive. location of City or the - 20 - 5/13/89 j . . . " Planning Director Kilger stated that the zoning for a mini storage would be CH or IL. He explained that prior to the IPD, this area was R3-3000. Under the IPD it was changed to RS. He recommended that the whole area be studied to determine the most appropriate designation. Frank Tracadas - Area 7 - East of Coneio, south of Baseline Frank Tracadas, 463 North Sierra Way, spoke regarding a nine acre parcel of property located east of Conejo, south of Baseline, and extends from the Flood Control Channel on the west past the Flood Control Channel on the south. The primary business is Moran Meats, and other businesses are Desert Industries and Pepper Tree Foods. The businesses, especially Moran Meats, want to expand, and also need outdoor storage, which is not possible with the CG-2 zoning. Therefore, a CH designation is requested to allow for the proposed expansion and outdoor storage. Frank Tracadas - Area 12 - Palm and Kendall Frank Tracadas, 463 North Sierra Way, also spoke regarding property located east of Palm, north of Kendall, south of Cable Creek. He stated that under the old zoning they were allowed fourteen units per acre. He described the zoning on adjacent parcels and requested that the zoning of CG-l or CG-2 be the designation for his property. He felt that the property meets all of the criteria for an upscale commercial development. M. Cisneros - 29th and Waterman Avenue Ms. Cisneros, 7512 Sterling, San Bernardino 92410, spoke regarding property located on the southwest corner of 29th and Waterman. She stated they had recently purchase two adjacent parcels, 50 they now have three adjoining parcels. She explained that during the term of former Mayor Al Ballard, the property was rezoned to commercial, but it was her understanding that it is now residential. It was her opinion that residential was not appropriate. She stated that the traffic in the area is horrendous, and there is commercial zoning in the areas surrounding her property. She would like it to remain as Commercial General. 21st the area Ms. Cisneros also commented on property at 531 E. Street. She agreed with Mr. Kelly who spoke earlier in meeting that the area should go back to AP, or CO-I, as that is not appropriate for residential. Helen Kopczynski - General Plan and EIR Document Helen Kopczynski, 8150 Cable Canyon, stated she was speaking as a private citizen, not a member of the CAC. She stated that she felt the proposed General Plan is more permissive than restrictive and that the City is doing more "encouraging" than "requiring". She also was not in favor of the higher densities in the Verdemont Area, and raised the question of whether the City is in compliance with the Foothill Community Greenbelt Study. She also questioned the lack of additional parks, and insufficient open space provisions. She stated she - 21 - 5/13/89 . . . '" was surprised that no one had responded to the Environment Impact Report, but suggested that would be difficult to do because of the constant changes being made to the document. ADJOURNMENT At 4:15 p.m., Council Member Minor made a motion, seconded by Council Member Estrada and unanimously carried, that the meeting be adjourned to 9:00 a.m., Monday, May 15, 1989, in the Council Chambers of City Hall, 300 North "0" Street, San Bernardino, California. ~fl;?~ / City C erk e~ci;~ No. of Items: 3 No. of Hours: 6~ - 22 - 5/13/89