HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005-090
.
.
.
I,
1
Resolution No. 2005-90
2
3
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO APPROVING A SID
LETTER TO RESOLUTION NO. 2005-75, RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SA
BERNARDINO AND EMPLOYEES IN THE GENERAL BARGAINING UNIT OF TH
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO REPRESENTED BY THE SAN BERNARDINO PUBLI
EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION AMENDING ARTICLE III, COMPENSATION, SECTION 1
SALARIES.
4
5
6
7
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY 0
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
8
SECTION 1: The Mayor of the City of San Bernardino and the Director of Hum
9
10
Resources are hereby authorized and directed to execute on behalf of said City a Side Letter t
11
Resolution No. 2005-75, amending Article III, Compensation, Section I, Salaries, by addin
12
Subsections A, B, and C, a copy of which amendments are attached hereto and incorporate
13 herein marked as Exhibit A.
14 III
15 III
16 III
17 III
18 III
19
III
20
III
21
III
22
III
23
III
24
25
-1-
1
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO APPROVING A SID
LETTER TO RESOLUTION NO. 2005-75, . AMENDING ARTICLE III
COMPENSATION, SECTION 1, SALARIES.
2
3
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Commo
4
Council of the City of San Bernardino at a ;oint regular meeting thereof, held on th
5
18th
day of April
, 2005 by the following vote, to wit:
6
7
COUNCILMEMBERS:
ESTRADA
LONGVILLE
MC GINNIS
DERRY
KELLEY
JOHNSON
MC CAMMACK
AYES
NA YES
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
x
8
x
x
x
9
10
x
x
11
12
x
1(ct~1ui C.&.t:Vlb
'0 ~~~;~c;:tJlt~at1
is hereby appro7 . this ~:k --Q
o
13
14
15
The foregoing resolution
16
April , 2005.
17
18
'th Valles, Mayor
ty of San Bernardino
19
20
Approved as to form and
Legal content:
21
JAMES F. PENMAN,
City Attorney
22
23
{J+JlaJj~
By:
24
25
HR/ Agenda Items:Reso.Side.Ltr.GU .Class.Study.3-05
-2-
. 2005-90
EXHIBIT A
GENERAL UNIT
CLASSIFICATION STUDY
The following sets forth the Side Letter to Resolution No. 2005-75 for full-time, regular, General
Unit Employees. The term of this side letter shall be from April 19, 2005 through July 31, 2010.
ARTICLE III. COMPENSATION. SECTION 1. Salaries
A. The City shall conduct a salary survey of General Unit benchmark classifications to be
completed on or about 9/01/07. The City will use current job descriptions to determine
comparable positions in five similar size cities in our surrounding labor market. The City
will determine the benchmark positions to be surveyed. Salary levels for non-benchmark
classifications will be established using internal relationship guidelines among related job
classes.
I. Classifications with salaries below the survey median shall be increased as
follows:
o - 5% below median, corresponding salary increase- on or about 9/1/07
5 - 10% below median corresponding salary increase- on or about 7/1/08
10 - 15% below median corresponding salary increase- on or about 7/1/09
15% - 20% below median, corresponding salary increase- on or about 7/1/10
20% cap on salary increases
In no event shall any increase be greater than 5% in any fiscal year.
2. The following Cities are to be used for the classification study:
Riverside
Moreno Valley
Fontana
Ontario
Pomona
B. Notwithstanding the provisions set forth in Section A above, the implementation ofthe
proposed median salary survey may be postponed by one fiscal year commencing the
next fiscal year, if any of the following occur:
I. The City's actual General Fund expenditures and revenues being budgeted create
a financial anomaly as outlined below:
a. Unfunded state mandates that create a substantial financial anomaly;
b. Voter approved changes to the City's Charter that create a substantial
financial anomaly;
I
Side Letter to Resolution 2005-75
General Unit Classification Study - Page 2
c. Litigation that would create a substantial financial anomaly;
d. Federal, State, or County fees and/or take-aways that create a substantial
financial anomaly;
e. Natural disaster or other catastrophic event over which the City has little
or no control, e.g., economic recession and/or depression, terrorist attack,
act of war, which creates a substantial financial anomaly;
2. If the City's Budget Reserve must be used to balance the City's budget because of
a substantial financial anomaly (including staffing required by this MOV) causing
the City's Budget Reserve to fall below 5% of the total General Fund deductions.
C. In the event of a postponement, the implementation schedule set forth in Section A,
Subsection 1, shall move forward a period of time equal to the period of such
postponement.
DATE:
1/~o/IJS
I t
ATTEST:.0flndJJiVY'tk.dmI1J j~4ft
City Clerk ~ 6
FOR THE CITY:
REPRESENTATIVES OF:
GENERAL UNIT EMPLOYEES
JUDITH VA
City of San e
..e~.
~~STt!~~
Director of Human Resources
~-:;.~
r
~~
HR/Agenda Items:Side.Ltr.Gen.U.StudyJ-05