HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990-019
1
RESOLUTION NO.
90-19
2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE PLANNING CENTER TO PREPARE A
3 FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO.
14112, COMMONLY CALLED STERLING HEIGHTS.
4
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY
5 OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
6
SECTION 1.
The Mayor is hereby authorized and directed to
7 execute on behalf of said City an Agreement with The Planning
8 Center, to prepare a focused Environmental Impact Report for
9 Tentative Tract No. 14112, commonly called "Sterling Heights", a
10 copy of said agreement is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "1",
11 and incorporated herein by reference as fully as though set forth
12 at length.
13
SECTION 2.
The authorization to execute the above-
14 referenced agreement is rescinded if the parties to the
15 agreement fail to execute it within sixty (60) days of the
16 passage of this resolution.
17 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly
18 adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Bernardino at a
meeting thereof, held on the 8th
reqular
day of
January , 1990, by the fOllowing vote, to wit:
Council Members:
AYES
NAYS
ABSTAIN
ESTRADA
REILLY
FLORES
MAUDSLEY
MINOR
POPE-LUDLAM
MILLER
x
x
x
x
x
~.uA.d.#'~..(
Ci t~ Clerk
HE/dys
December 21, 1989
1
.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1 RESOLUTION...AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE
PLANNING CENTER TO PREPARE A FOCUSED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
2 FOR TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 14112, COMMONLY CALLED STERLING HEIGHTS.
3
'16.L day
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved
4
of
January
, 1990.
5
6
7
8 Approved as to
form and legal content:
9
JAMES F. PENMAN,
City Attorney
By: Oa'VM lfe?~l
o
HE/dys
December 21, 1989
2
/1/ .~/4'
"
AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this
Gldit.<4U1 .
va~ua~~ 1990 by and between
oR&tL
-&th
day of
the CITY
OF SAN
BERNARDINO,
a
municipal
corporation
.
(hereinafter
referred to as "City"), and the Planning Center, a
California corporation, whose address is
1300 Dove
Street. Newport Beach. CA (hereinafter referred to as
"Consultant"), is made with reference to the following:
R E C I TAL S
WHEREAS, the city is a municipal corporation duly
organized and validly existing under the laws of the
State of California with the power to carryon its
business as it is now being conducted under the Statutes
of the State of California and the Charter of the City.
WHEREAS, the City and Consultant desire to enter
into an agreement for consultant services for the
preparation
of
an
Environmental
Impact
Report
(hereinafter referred to as a Focused "EIR") on the
Sterlinq Heiqhts project upon the terms and conditions
herein.
WHEREAS, Consultant declares that he shall perform
the services herein contemplated in compliance with
Federal and California laws, including but not limited
to minimum hours and wages, fair employment, and
occupational safety and health, to the extent same are
applicable herein.
Exhibit "1"
1
"
,
l. TERM.
The term of this Agreement shall commence on the
8th day of Januarv. 1990. and shall terminate
on the 2nd day of April 1990 unless terminated
earlier as set forth herein.
2. SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED BY CONSULTANT.
Consultant shall prepare a legally adequate EIR on
the Sterlinq Heiqhts (Tentative Tract 141121 project
as described in the request for proposal, attached
hereto as Exhibit "A" and incoporated herein bv
reference.
The Consultant shall submit twelve ~ typed copies
of a preliminary Draft EIR to city for approval on or
before 8 weeks from authorization to proceed.
Contractor shall submit sixtv (601 copies of the
approved Draft EIR on or before two weeks from
transmittal by city of comments on the preliminary Draft
EIR. Consultant shall prepare responses to comments on
the Draft ErR and submit them for city review on or
before two (2) weeks after the close of the public
comment period. Consultant shall submit up to
thirtv-five (351 copies of the approved Final ErR
consisting of the Draft EIR, comments on it, responses
to comments and other appropriate information within one
week after City authorizes Consultant to prepare the
approved Final EIR.
2
"
3. COLLECTION OF FEES.
All fees to be collected from any applicant in
connection with the carrying out of the functions as set
forth in this agreement shall be collected by City.
4. COMPENSATION TO CONSULTANT.
a. The Consultant shall be compensated by the City
with funds deposited by the applicant.
b. The City shall pay Consultant an amount not to
exceed $43.590.
5. NOTICES.
All notices, demands, requests or approvals to' be
given under this Agreement, shall be given in writing
and shall be deemed served when delivered personally or
on the second business day after the deposit thereof in
the united States mail, postage prepared, registered or
certified, addressed as hereinafter provided.
All notices, demands, requests, or approvals from
Consultant to city shall be addressed to City at:
San Bernardino city Hall
300 North "0" street, Third Floor
San Bernardino, California 92418
ATTN: Director of Planning
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
3
"
All notices, demands, requests or approvals from
city to Consultant shall be addressed to Consultant at:
The Planning Center
1300 Dove street, suite 100
Newport Beach, California 92660
6. RELATIONSHIP TO PARTIES.
Consultant is acting as an independent contractor,
and not as an employee of the city. In the performance
of personal services pursuant to the provisions of this
Agreement, Consultant shall not be supervised, directed,
or under the control or authority of any City officer or
employee, except and to the extend as may be expressly
or implicitly required by the terms and provisions of
this Agreement. Any direction or control so required
under this Agreement shall be limited to broad
objectives or goals of the project or program to be
accomplished and not to the details and procedures to
accomplish such objectives and goals. Consultant shall
not be obligated to conform to the supervision or
direction of city officers or employees which are not
authorized herein. Changes or modifications of said
objectives and goals may be made by written
recommendations of either party subject to the
concurrence of the other party in writing.
7. ENTIRE AGREEMENT.
This contract constitutes the entire Agreement
between city and Consultant and may be modified only by
4
r
further written agreement between the parties.
8. ATTORNEY'S FEES.
In the event that an action is filed by either
party to enforce rights under this agreement, the
.
prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable
attorney's fees in addition to any other relief granted
by the court.
9. WARRANTY.
Consultant expressly warrants that its work will be
performed with care, skill, reasonable expedience, and
faithfulness and, that work performed shall be fit and
proper for its intended use.
10. INDEMNIFICATION.
Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold
harmless City, its agents, officers, and employees from
and against any and all liability, expense and claims
for damages of any nature whatsoever, including, but not
limited to, bodily injury, death, personal injury, or
property damages
arising from
or connected
with
Consultant's operations, or its performance under this
Agreement.
III
III
III
III
III
III
III
5
11. INSURANCE.
without limiting Consultant's indemnification of
City as stated in Paragraph 10, above, Consultant shall
provide and maintain at its own expense during the term
of this Agreement the
.
following policy or policies of
insurance covering its performance under this Agreement:
a. General Liabilitv and Professional Liabilitv
Such insurance shall include, but not be limited to,
comprehensive
general
liability
and
professional
liability coverages with a combined single limit of not
less than Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($500,000) per
occurrence.
Such insurance shall name the City of San
Bernardino as an additional insured.
b. Workers' Compensation: Consultant shall
cover its employees with Workers' Compensation insurance
in an amount and
form to
meet
all
applicable
requirements of the Labor
Code of
the State of
california.
12. PROHIBITION AGAINST TRANSFERS.
Consultant shall not assign, sublease, hypothecate,
or transfer this Agreement or any interest therein
directly or indirectly, by operation of law or otherwise
without the prior written consent to the City; any
attempt to do so without said consent shall be null and
void, and
any assignee, subleasee, hypothecate or
transferee shall acquire no right or interest by reason
of such attempted assignment, hypothecation or transfer.
6
Tne sale, assignment, transfer or other disposition
of any of the issued and outstanding capital stock of
Consultant, or of the interest of any general partner or
joint venturer or syndicate member or cotenant if
.
Consultant is a partnership or joint venturer o~
syndicate or cotenancy, which shall result in changing
the control of Consultant, shall be construed as an
assignment of this Agreement. Control means fifty (50)
percent or more of the voting power of the corporation.
13. COUNTERPARTS.
This Agreement may
be
executed
in
several
counterparts, each of which is an original, and all of
which together constitute one and the same document.
14. PERMITS AND LICENSES.
Consultant, at its sole expense, shall obtain and
maintain during
the term
of this Agreement, all
appropriate permits, licenses and certificates that may
be required in connection with the performance of
services hereunder.
15. WAIVER.
A waiver by the city of any breach of any term,
covenant, or condition contained herein shall not be
deemed to be
a waiver of any subsequent breach of the
same or any other term, covenant, or condition contained
herein whether of the same or a different character.
7
16. TERMINATION.
The City or Consultant may terminate this Agreement
for any reason at any time by mailing by certified mail
prior written notice of termination to the other party.
,
In this event, the Consultant shall be paid the
reasonable value of services rendered to the date of
termination.
In the event of any such termination,
Consultant shall provide to City, without charge, all
documents, notes, maps, reports and data accumulated to
the date
of such termination.
Consultant further
covenants to give its good-faith cooperation in che
transfer of the work to the City or to any other
consultant
designated
by
City
following
such
termination, and to attend and participate in any
meetings at no cost to City as shall be deemed necessary
by the Planning Director to effectively accomplish such
transfer.
17. REPORTS.
Each and every deliverable report, draft, work
product, map, record and other document reproduced,
prepared or caused to be prepared by Consultant pursuant
to or in connection with this Agreement shall be the
exclusive property of the City.
18. ANTI-DISCRIMINATION.
Consultant certifies and agrees that all persons
employed by Consultant, its affiliates, subsidiaries or
holding companies are and will be treated equally by
8
Consultant without regard to or because of race,
religion, ancestry, national origin, or sex and in
compliance with state and Federal Anti-Discrimination
laws. Consultant further certifies and agrees that it
will deal with its SubContractors, Bidders and Vendors
without regard to or because of race, religion,
ancestry, national origin or sex.
19. CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
a. The Consultant or its employees may be subject
to the provisions of the California Political Reform Act
of 1974 (the Act), which (1) requires such persons to
disclose financial interests that may foreseeably be
materially affected by the work performed under this
Agreement, and (2) prohibits such persons from making or
participating in making decisions that will foreseeably
financially affect such interests.
b. Consultant shall conform to all requirements of
the Act. Failure to do so constitutes a material breach
and is grounds for termination of this agreement by the
city.
c. Consultant agrees that during the term of this
agreement, he shall not enter into any contract for work
to be performed within the City of San Bernardino with
private parties who may foreseebly be materially
affected by the work to be performed under this
Agreement.
d. Consultant agrees that he shall comply with all
9
other applicable conflict of interest laws, including
local, state, federal, and common law.
20. INSPECTION.
The City, in reference to any request for payment
submitted by the Consultant
for
.
servl.ces
under this
Agreement, shall have the right to examine and audit the
records of the Consultant pertaining to this Agreement,
to verify such payment.
21. AUTHORITY.
Each of the parties to this Agreement represents
that the person signing on behalf of such party has
authority to do so.
/II
/II
/II
///
///
/II
/II
/II
/II
/II
///
///
///
/II
/II
/II
/II
10
22. CONSULTANT TO ABIDE BY LAW.
Consultant is required to abide by all Federal,
State and Local law applicable to its performance of
services under this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHERE OF, the city Council of the City
of San Bernardino has caused this Agreement to be
subscribed by the Mayor, and the seal of said Council to
be hereto affixed and attested by the Clerk thereof, and
Consultant has executed this Agreement, the day, mohth
and year first above written.
ATTEST:
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
,
~4d/~AV
"
')/'7- /YJ
.<;><y.-",'..;-, /c-
City Clerk
::~ r)J~r;:~~
Approved as to form
and legal content:
James F. Penman
city Attorney
By:
GP:EIRGENERICCON.
11
EXHIBIT "A"
CITY OF
San I)ernardino
P LAN N I N G 0 E PAR T MEN T
BRAD L KILGER
Di>'lEC :]R 0" ;>~...~N 'JG
October 2, 1989
Dear Consultant:
This is a Request for Proposal (RFP) to prepare a Focused
Environmental Impact Report (EIR) on Tentative Tract 14112
(Sterling Heights) (see attached materials). The proposed
projec~ consists of establishment of a 56-lot single family
subdivision on 50.51 acres located northwest of the
intersection of Sterling Avenue and Foothill Drive, San
B~rnardino.
The EIR will be required to address the issues identified in
~he draft Initial Study for the project and any additional
issues s~t forth in the RFP. The EIR must meet State and
~ity of San Bernardino CEQA requirements. The EIR must be an
integrat~d, comprehensive analysis of the proposed project
!.nf;luding 3n executi':e summary, a project description, review
of potential impacts, an analysis of the significance of each
of the potential impacts, and an identification of possible
mitigdtion measures, and an analysis of alternatives to the
project.
Scope of EIR
The primary environmental issues of concern in the proposed
project are identified in the enclosed draft Initial Study
for the project. Please review and consider these primary
issues carefully when responding to this RFP.
The EIR must also include an assessment of cumulative effects
from related projects over an extended time period. The EIR
must include a section describing neighborhood-specific
impacts.
The EIR shall provide analysis of traffic impacts on the
project area. Intersections to be analyzed in the EIR are
identified as each intersection along Sterling Avenue between
Foothill Drive and Route 30. In addition the following need
to be analyzed:
('; ,l" L I ~ 0 =l ~~ 1 ,..
J 'J: '
5 A ~~ 6 ERN A R 0 I N 0
7 1 4 I 3 8 4 . 5 0 5 7
~ \~);<':~-/'~.
.'.;.l\.. .". -::--_>/..:;!
,-~/
3 0 0
~l 0 R T H
D
~ 2 J I 'l
5 r =I ~ E T
REQUEST
OCTOBER
PAGE 2
FOR PROPu~AL - FOCUSED EIR ON TT 14112
2, 1989
A.
How is the neighborhood to the northeast affected?
B. How adequate is the future access to the north?
Alternatives?
C. How do Cul-de-Sacs tie in with existing surrounding
streets?
Any intersection analysis shall be performed in accordance
with the attached City of San Bernardino Department of Public
Works Traffic Policy.
Also required is an analysis of impacts on the line-of-sight
viewshed from Del Rosa; and the feasibility of public water
supply to the subdivision; retention of as many mature trees
as possible and relocation or replacement of those not
retained and relocation and/or replacement of the large
cactus stands on-site. Several preliminary studies have been
conducted. While these studies MAY be used, the adequacy of
the studies has not been determined.
For information on the type and scope of these studies
contact Mark Landers, Melcorp Investment, Inc., The Tahiti
Group, P. O. Box 5441, San Bernardino, CA 92412, (714) 882-
1278.
Other Services Reauired
- The consultant will be required to attend 'up to three
public meetings which may include hearings before the
Planning Commission, City Council, and neighborhood
meetings. Submit proposal for additional meetings.
- The consultant will provide twelve
screencheck draft EIR on or before
authorization to proceed. Ability
this schedule is essential.
typed copies of a
eight' weeks from
to meet or exceed
The deadline for submitting the
two weeks from transmittal of
preliminary draft EIR. This is
draft EIR to the
City comments
a firm deadline.
City is
on the
- The consultant will provide 60 copies of the draft EIR
after a final draft is approved by the City.
- The consultant will prepare responses to comments on the
draft EIR and submit them for City review by or before
two weeks after the close of the public comment period.
- The consultant will prepare up
EIR, a single document which
comments on it, responses
appropriate information.
to 35 copies of the
includes the draft
to comments and
Final
EIR,
other
REQUEST FOR PROP~~AL - FOCUSED EIR ON TT 141~2
OCTOBER 2, 1989
PAGE 3
ProDosal Reauirements
Your response to this RFP is requested no later than 4:00
p.m. on October 23, 1989.
You are advised that the City reserves the right to retain an
expert to evaluate your work if you are chosen as consultant.
Additionally, any contract entered into will be subject to
termination at any stage if in the judgment of the City, such
termination is in the best interest of the City. In the
event such decision is made, appropriate written notice would
be given before any termination and the consultant would be
paid on a pro-rata basis for work performed.
ProDosal Content
Your proposal shall include the following in summary form:
I. Statement of the task.
II. Approach to the task:
a. General description of methodology to be used.
b. Statement of tasks to be performed; number of hours
allocated for each task; methods of information
gathering and analysis to be used; anticipated
extent of City staff participation; project
management and liaison with city staff; project
schedule.
III. Deliverable Products:
A list of documents to be delivered to the City during
the completion of the project.
IV. Fee Proposal and Form of Contract:
Proposed fees must be based on calculations of time and
materials necessary to accomplish the proposed scope of
services. Upon final selection of the consultant, the
City will enter into a standard contract. A copy of a
sample contract is attached.
Other Information
All proposals must be received by the City Planning
Department, City Hall, 300 North "0" Street, San Bernardino,
CA 92418 no later than 4:00 p.m. October 23, 1989.
By submitting a response to this Request for Proposal,
prospective consultant waives all rights to protest or seek
any legal remedies whatsoever regarding any aspect of this
Request for Proposal. The city reserves the right to select
---,
REQUEST FOR PROP~_AL - FOCUSED 'EIR'ON TT 1411l
OCTOBER 2, 1989
PAGE 4
the number of qualified finalists. In addition, the City
reserves the right to issue written notice to all
participating firms of any changes in the proposal submission
schedule, should the City determine in its sole and absolute
discretion that such changes are necessary. Acceptance of
any proposal submitted pursuant to this Request for Proposal
shall not constitute any implied intent to enter into a
contract for consulting services. The City reserves the
right to reject any and all proposals.
Consultant selection will be made by the Planning Department.
The consultant selected will be under contract to the City of
San Bernardino.
If you have any questions, please call Sandra Paulsen, Senior
Planner, at (714) 384-5057.
Sincerely,
of Planning
City
/ke
Attachments:
A. Summary Project Description
B. city of San Bernardino Department of
Public Works, Traffic Policy
C. Standard Contract (Form 22A)
o. Initial Study
E. Standard Traffic Impact Outline (Form 4B)
F. Cumulative Impact Analysis Guidelines
(Form 40)
JM:ke
9/28/89
DOC:MISC
CEQA22
R
N
A TTl\,t
TIN
.'
:\
w
A
K
E
w
R
A
I
G
H
T
Alrhltcr1\Jre
P!~lIflll:Y
Inlet'lorObyn
Urn"Il11l:!SI~li
August 30, 1989
l1f11 r. ~lrlljJllll)llti
I:U:'lis 'Jlt:::J !:;.. ~lb2r.
/1.1.';'Slo!.h;j
STERLING HEIGHTS
SUMMARY PROJECT DESCRIPTION
Sterling Heights is a proposed 50
represents a careful! y considered
approach to hillside development.
acre hillside development that
and environmentally appropriate
The land use plan (site plan) and grading plan are
the environmental analysis which identified
development based on these criteria:
directly responsive to
areas sui table for
A. Surrounding land uses
B. Retention of native trees wherever possible
C. Avoid grading on the steepest slopes
D. Maximize advantages of ground forms for view capture
E. Develop in areas of suitable soils
F. Avoid seismic/fault areas with appropriate setbacks
The Developer's program requirements were as follows:
A. 56 lots minimum
B. 7,000 s.f. pads minimum
C. Private streets and drives
D. Maximum off-site view capture
E. Avoid "engineered" grading approach
F. Avoid split pads
G. Create strong sense of identity for project as a whole
Preliminary discussions with the Planning Staff focused on the following
issues:
A. Sterling Avenue - nature of proposed improvements
B. Buffers (landscape and land form) from adjacent development
C. Access to County land to the North
D. Public vs. private street standards: paved section, grades, curve
radii
_II
E. Environmental studies
(1) Archeo/Paleo Survey
(2) Biology Survey
Botany - Tree Survey
Animal Migration/Species I.D.
(3) Soils/Geo. Report
(4) Slope Zone Analysis
F. Opportunities and constraints resulting from the environmental
analysis.
The design response has been to propose development on the least sloping
portions of the site while preserving much of the natural growth,
particularly at the perimeter of the site. Where steep areas are
proposed for development, they occur at zones resulting from erosion and
the proposed grading plan will correct these problems.
The private street system winds its way up the terrace in a curvilinear
form that reduces cut/fill and respects the natural land form. Short
cul-de-sacs serve the majority of the lots and the remainder front onto
the middle section of the primary street. Both Sterling Avenue and Daley
Canyon Road provide fully improved access to the site at which point the
private street system takes over. An easement or dedication will be
provided. across the northern boundary line for construction of an access
to the County land to the northeast.
Areas iden t if i ed
possessing large
providing natural
left in a natural
as unstable
numbers of
buffers to
condition.
soils conditions, seismic activity zones,
established trees, being very steep or
the adjoining properties are virtually all
.
This approach results in two areas of proposed development:
1) The TERRACE; a large, gently sloping area with gteat off-site
view potential that was originally graded to support citrus
orchard product ion. 45 lots are plotted on this terrace in
benches that follow the natural land form. All but 6 lots have
primary off-site views. the remaining 6 have overlook
capability.
2) The MEADOW; a smaller. relatively flat area nestled behind the
dominant land form of the terrace with very limited off-site
view potential. These lots are typically the largest pads
(several are larger than 10,000 s.f.) and could be developed as
ungraded custom lots.
We propose to design entry monumentation at the point that private
streets begin to identify the project and to announce the eKistence of
such streets.
-2-
The proposed grading plan provides for a virtual balance of cut/fill of
approximately 250,000 cubic yards.
The following tabulation documents the pad area of each lot:
LOT NO.
PAD AREA
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
8,200
8,100
9,000
12,700
11,000
18,200
8,800
8,500
11,900
10,700
8,600
8,300
8,800
13, 100
9,800
8,800
11,900
12,400
19,400
8,200
9,100
8,100
8,200
8,100
9,600
8,900
8,200
7,200
6,700
7,100
8,600
8,900
8,200
7,100
9,500
9,300
9,500
7,500
10,000
-3-
LOT NO. PAD AREA
40 8,200
41 7,300
42 7,000
43 7,200
44 7,200
45 5,100
46 9,000
47 8,700
48 10,100
49 6,800
50 9,400
51 9,700
52 9,200
53 10,400
54 15,900
55 18,100
56 13,900
I
-4-
1ST Draft 3/30(
2nd Draft 5/9/8_
3rd Draft 6/9/88
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
TRAFFIC POLICY
DIVISION I. AUTHORITY
DIVISION II. DESIGN CRITIERIA
DIVISION III. GUIDELINES AND FORMAT FOR REPORTS
DIVISION IV. GUIDELINES AND FORMAT FOR PLANS
DIVISION V. REVIEW AND APPROVAL
DIVISION VI. CHECKLIST
"
.--..
It does not replace the standard drawings and is not intended
to be all inclusive. It provides the minimum level expected
on a project but all projects must be based on sound
engineering judgement and be acceptable to the Director of
Public Works/City Engineer.
Authority for the traffic policy is contained in the City of
San Bernardino Municipal Code in the following sections:
Section 2.14
Section 3.26
Title 10
Title 12
section 18.44.
In addition to the above, the city of San Bernardino has
adopted a General Plan with the Circulation Element, area
plans, overlay zoning, the "Standard specifications for
Public works Construction" (Green Book), Caltrans Standard
specifications and its own Standard Drawings for Public Works
Improvements. Also, the city uses as a standard reference
the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices, the ITE Trip
Generation Manual, the ITE Parking Manual, caltrans Traffic
Design Manual, 1985 Highway Capacity Manual, ASSHTO manuals,
WATCH manual, CAPSSI and PASSER programs: and its own
transportation planning program, based on TRANPLAN.
The referenced code sections also
resolutions and ordinances adopted by
Council in which fees are established
refer to many
the Mayor and
for services or
varied
Common
impacts
This authority is established as the minimum requirement of
the city of San Bernardino with all material subject to the
review and approval of the director of Public Works/City
Engineer for conformance to acceptable design practices and
sound engineering judgement. All plans and reports must
receive approval of the Director of Public Works/City Engin-
eer prior to approval of the project and for the recordation
of any maps.
DIVISION II. DESIGN CRITERIA
A. Design
1. Street widths shall be per the adopted city standards and
circulation element of the master plan of streets.
2.
city stand, ' travel lan~ widths shoul ,e
a. Traffi~ ~ne on arterial or collec~ur
b. Traffic Lane on arterial or collector
adjacent to curb
c. Traffic Lane on residential street
d. Left Turn Lane
e. Two way Turning Lane
f. Parking Lane
as follows:
12 feet
14 feet
10 feet
12 feet
12 feet
8 feet
3. The minimum acceptable.lane width in the city shall not
be less than 10 feet unless written approval is obtained
from the Director of Public Works/city Engineer.
4. In areas where there is a raised median island, no
openings shall be permitted in the median other than at
street intersetions. Medians are established for the
control of traffic.
5. Transitions between differing curb widths or as required
for pavement joins shall conform with standard Caltrans
computational methods as detailed in Section 6-25 of the
Caltrans Design Manual.
6. Sight distance at intersections shall be as detailed in
Table A. No fencing, planting materials or obstructions
of any kind will be permitted to be over 30 inches high,
as measured from the flow line of the curb and gutter,
in the front or side yard setback area or in the sight
distance areas as detailed in Table A.
7.
Plantings or signs in median islands
visual obstructions resulting from
of the proposed improvements.
must be checked for
temporary alignment
B. Traffic Reports
As a part of the project review process, the Enviormental
Review Committee or the Development Review Committee may
identify concerns for the need for a traffic study and
report. The Traffic Engineer under the authority of the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer will make the .final
decision on the need for a traffic study or report as a
condition of the development. These reports are made
necessary by the size, configuration or impact of the
proposed development.
Listed below are some basic criteria that may be used to
assess the probability of having to compelte a traffic report
as a part of the project review process. It is not a complet
or exhaustive list but is intended to give guidelines as to
when such an extensive report is to be prepared and to assist
in the development of such a report by indicating the neces-
sary components of the sumbitted report.
.'~111- .
1. Genera ;riteria
a. Any project that adds more than 10' additional
trip ends to the adjacent street syst~m at full
build out of the project.
b. Any project that generates more than 500 daily
trip ends residential or 1000 trip ends
commercial or industrial as determined by the
average trip rate as contained in the ITE Trip
Generation Manual.
c. Any project that has the potential to degrade the
existing street system or signal system to level
of service 0 or lower during peak hour using
operational analysis on any selected movement.
d. Any project that generates more than 40' of its
total traffic in the form of truck traffic.
e.
Any project that intensifies
site above the level currently
codes and requires a CUP, zone
discretionary permit.
the usage
allowed by
change or
of-the
zoning
other
f. Any project that has a peak hour volume exceeding
75 trip ends.
2. Report Contents
Traffic Reports submitted for review and approval
must contain the following items as a minimum:
a. Total number of trips anticipated from the
project based on the average trip generation
rates as contained in the ITE Trip Generation
Manual, for total build out of the ~roject.
b. Project traffic on the adjacent street system
projected for five (5) years or to project
build out, whichever is longer.
c. Traffic projections on the adjacent street system
for both the project and "normal" background
growth (5\ per year or as detailed in the general
plan) .
d. Traffic projections shall include the additional
impact of undeveloped land within
or as detailed in the general plan
e. Impacts on adjacent intersections
intersection capacity analysis.
using
an
f.
Trip distrubution and assignment
justification on the percentages
travel and/or turning movements.
analysis with
for directional
g.
Analysis
ation and
facilities.
of pedestrain movement and/or gener-
need for additional crossings or
h.
Parking requirements and information
loading of the transportation network if
ble.
on peak
applica-
i. Existing and proposed signal phases, progression
and/or coordination.
j.
Traffic
(within
suitable
counts. Traffic counts must be current
one year) and must be machine counts of
length for analysis of the project.
k. Recommendations and conclusions of the report
with the proposed mitigation measures listed in
priority order.
1. Signal warrents shall be established using
existing traffic at the intersection plus the
project traffic, using a m~n~mum of an 8 hour
actual count at the intersection.
.-,/P"'O -
III. GUIDELINES _10 FORMAT FOR REPORTS
A. Reports
Generally, traffic reports will be submitted under seperate
cove~ in an acceptable 8 1/2 x 11 inch format. Reports are
generally typewritten with diagrams for traffic distribution
assignment or intersection analysis. The report needs to be
properly identified and related to the project by reference
to the Review of Plan Number, Tract Number, CUP number,
Parcel Map, Variance or other identifying city reference
numbers in addition to the project description. The report
must be prepared by and signed by a Registered Engineer or
Registered Traffic Engineer and carry the seal and original
signature of the engineer preparing the report and taking
responsibility for the informtion contained therein. A
preliminary review with the City Traffic Engineer is encou-
raged. Focused reports may be justified but must be coordin-
ated with the City Traffic Engineer.
In general, the following should be included in the report:
a. Identification of project and reference to city
identification numbers such as CUP, RP or Tract.
b. Seal and original signature of engineer preparing
report and taking responsibility for the report.
c.
Executive
contents.
summary of the project and report
This should be one half page or less.
d. Identification of existing traffio and transpor-
tation system and level of service.
e. Traffic to be generated by developement.
f.
Projected background growth and combined
growth plus developement with level of
listed for streets and intersections.
total of
service
g. Identified impacts on transportation system from
any source. Identify degradation of system below
level of service C.
h. Mitigation measures recommended to address
impacts of the development or development plus
backgroud growth.
1.
Conclusion
project,
background
which covers the alternatives
project alone and project
growth.
of no
with
.---
-~
j. Subll' ':al shall be made to the' 'ector of "Public
Work~/city Engineer. Three ~vpies of drafts
shall be submitted. Three copies of the final
report shall be submitted after notification by
the Traffic Engineer that the report is acceptabl
k. All backup data used in the preparation of the
report should be included in the submittals.
1.
A listing of all assumptions used
with special identification of
conditions from the project or area
in the report
any unusual
identified.
....-...
IV. GUIDELINES
~ FORMAT FOR.~ONSTRUCTION -ANS
a. Sheet size is 24 x 36 inches.
b. Plan to show the following (minimum)
1. Vicinity Map
2. North Arrow.
3. Scale
4. Existing improvements and proposed signing
marking and signal improvements.
5. Legend - Topo and Construction
6. General Notes
7. Engineer's Signature
8. License number and expiration date
9. Details
10. Stationing and Dimensions.
c. Submit 2 sets of plans for checking
C.
General
1.
Notes (on all Plans)
All work shall be in accordance with the Standard
Specifications for Public Works Construction
(Green Book) latest edition with all supplements
and City of San Bernardino Standard Drawings.
2. Approval of this plan by the City of San Bernard-
ino does not constitute a representation as the
the accuracy of the location or of the existence
or non-existence of any underground utility pipe
or structure within the limits of this project.
The contractor shall assume full ~esponsibility
for the protection of all utilities within the
limits of the project. Contractor shall contact
Underground Service Alert 48 hours prior to start
of work.
3.
Inspection
Department
inspection
advance of
shall be by the City of San Bernardino
of Public Works. All requests for
shall be made at least 24 hours in
the proposed construction.
4.
All existing pavement markings that
relocated or removed shall be removed
blasting. No black over painting of
permitted in the City.
are being
by sand-
lines is
5. During the period of construction, the Contractor
shall furnish, erect and maintain such warnings,
signs, stop signs, barricades and other safety
measures in conformance with the W.A.T.C.H manual
or other city reference manuals listed.
.1
.-.-,-
0,
Additic l notes tha.t may be user's warrent'ed l:iy
specific rrojects.
1.
The Contractor
passage for
traffic at all
shall
local
times.
provide safe and
pedestrain and
continuous
vehicular
2. Should any of the existing utilities or any other
facilities conflict with the proposed improvement
the Contractor shall notify the Engineer and
await the relocation and/or provide an alternate
design.
3.
his operations as
obstruction and
The Contractor shall so conduct
to offer' the least possible
inconvenience to the public.
4. In accordance with generalyy accepted constsruc-
tion practices, the Contractor shall be solely
and completely responsible for conditions of the
job site, including safety of all persons and
property during performance of the work, and the
Contractor shall fully comply with all State and
Federal laws, rules, regulations, and orders
relating to safety to the public and workmen.
5. Dust shall be controlled at all times by approved
methods.
6. Public streets shall be kept clean and free from
dirt and/or debris. The Contractor shall be
responsible for all costs incurred in street
cleaning necessitated by his operations.
7. Full street closure will not be permitted unless
prior written approval is obtained from the
Director of Public Works/City Engineer. Detour
plans must be submitted for approval for all
street closures and may be required for other
types of detours under some circumstances. 48
hour notice will be required to the city and
affected property owners prior to any closure.
8. On arterial streets, all full lane closures will
require submittal of detour plans and/or signing
plans with prior written approval by the Director
of Public Works/City Engineer.
Any such additional notes ,that may be required for the
completion of the plans and construction.
,~-
V. REVIEW AND It. ~OVAL
Reports or plans shall be submitted to the Department of
Public Works for review and approval. Plans and reports need
to be submitted in a timely manner to insure adequate review
and comment prior to Enviormental Review, Development Review
or submission to the planning Commission or Mayor and Common
Council.
Generally, Traffic reports require a minimum of two (2) weeks
of review time before the scheduled meeting. Items continued
pending submission of the report still require two weeks
review time. Failure of the developer or his agent to submit
in a timely manner will result in the continuance of the
matter to the next regular meeting.
Two copies need to be submitted for review to the Public
Works Department. Additional copies may be required by other
departments for file copies. Materials must be submitted to
the Director of Public Works/City Engineer and it shall be
the responsibility of the city to insure the city Traffic
Engineer receives his copy. Consultants may wish to discuss
the traffic report or obtain information from the city
Traffic Section during the preparation phase of their
project. The should contact the Traffic Engineer or Traffic
Engineering Section Directly for information and or design
criteria.
I
-~
PLAN REVIE;W
Show on plans:
Vicinity Map
Scale
Proposed Signing
Legends
Engineer's Signature
Details
Dimensions
North Arrow'
Existing Improvements
Proposed Signal
General Notes
Engineer's License f
Stationing
Right of Way
Street Names in conformance with approved maps
Pavement markings in accordance with standards
Sight distance per policy guidelines
Intersection seperation in accord with policy
Quantities of signs and striping shown or provided
Driveway lication in relation to BCR checked
Traffic report submitted if required
Mitigation measures listed in report shown
FEES AND PERMITS
Pay plan check fee
Pay permit fee
Inspection Fee
Pay mitigation fee if required
Traffic Systems Fee
Permit issued
other department notified
Plan approved by City Engineer
COMMENTS:
--.
TABLE "A"
MINIMUM SIGHT DISTANCES AT INTERSECTIONS
20 MPH
30 MPH
MINIMUM SIGHT DISTANCE
200'
300 '
400'
500'
600'
DES IGN SPEED
40 MPH
50 HPH
60 MPH
Sight di stance is the df stance measured from a point on the minor road
at least 15 feet behfnd the project curb line of the major road at eye
level (3.5') above the surface to an object 4.5' high on the major
road.
-
~
~
~I
~
,;
+
MAJOR 1..
/'
C"... ,~,
.so....
.-..w.-
r"
Applicant(s)
Address
City, state
Zip
MISC:
IS PREPARATION
ke/9-1-89
ca I Y OF SAN BERNARIJINO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY
Initial Study for Environmental Impacts
For IT /4/ , -z...
Project Number
proj ect description/Location -sb ~ Lof
;;:v1-~ew~:r ~~'<1 ~~~~~'7_;'ll~~ ~ ~k;:-:;<'
Ave..V1l.{e """,d ~i-1i11 Dn'v€.
Date
1-1-1.
Prepared for: /'
MelCDYF 1Y1v'~l':.vt-k./VlG'1 /2{11,-h L:1T'Ol-lp
J2c o,~ 743:1
'5:l.vl f3ey-VlAV'"<:hVlOj LA q z ~ I z..
~repared by:
/("Ad O. -n;:,rashev
~ame 1L
Ic:l VI Vle.r'
Title
City of San Bernardino
Planning Department
300 N. "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
"""Ill
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST
~
.....
Location: J370.&?/ ~C:--Vt:6 V1b(+hW~+ Or +-k. iVlky-,
~~:h~~~t,~.~~'~~. ~~:j/.~~l~'~/'OIHtr<(~8
Environmental Constraints Areas: H'ji1 W,itdj .,it fiJ.t!./
@;~';!+ t8%~I~~L::~~~tJ?;;fo" ~t~AA u>t~~~1
General :Plan D signation:"" /Ot:>-t.t r'" Fi ad Ar'"~
fZ-L- I ee$,deJ1hal J-<Jw 1 H(/{~/::J.e. Mjl11kt chtrlto/ t:1~fnt--f
Zoning Designation: ~~~t3
B. ~HVIBONM~NTAL IMPACTS Explain answers, where appropriate, on a
separate attached sheet.
1. Ea~th Resources Will the proposal result'in:
Yes
No
Maybe
a. Earth movement (cut and/or
fill) of 10,000 cubic yards or
more?
><
b. Development and/or grading on
a slope greater than 15%
natural grade?
~
c. Development within the
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies
Zone?
)(
d. Modification of any unique
geologic or physical feature?
x
.
"'-
REVISED 12/87
~
PAGE 1 OF 8
r
Yes
No
Maybe
""II
e. Soil erosion on or off the
project site?
x
f. Modification of a channel,
creek or river?
x.
g.
Development
subject
mudslides,
other similar
within an area
to landslides,
or
hazards?
x
h. Other?
2. ~IR_RESOURCES: Will the proposal
result in:
a.
air
upon
emissions or
ambient air
x
Substantial
an effect
quality?
b. The creation of objectionable
odors?
x
c. Development within a high wind X:
hazard area? -
3.
WATEB___RESOURCES:
proposal result in:
Will
the
a. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface runoff
due to impermeable surfaces?
)(
b. Changes in the course or flow
of flood waters?
x
.
c. Discharge into surface waters
or any alteration of surface
water quality?
x
d. Change in the quantity or
quality of ground waters?
e. Exposure of people or property
to flood hazards?
f. Other?
x
)(
~ ~
REVISED 12/87 PAGE 2 OF 8
..',~.
1----,
4.
Could the
Yes
No
Maybe
"'"
><
x
x
~ ~
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE~:
proposal result in:
a.
Change
unique,
species
habitat
trees?
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of plants or their
including stands of
)(
-x
x
x
x
x
,
b.
Change
unique,
species
habitat?
in the number of any
rare or endangered
of animals or their
REVISED 10/87 PAGE 3 OF 8
c. Other?
5. NOISE: Could the proposal result
in:
a. Increases in existing noise
levels?
6.
b. Exposure of people to exterior
noise levels over 65 dB or
interior noise levels over 45
dB?
c. Other? -r;;~n. 'Vlt-Y. cluYr'm
~tylA6t1~
LAND_ USE: Will the proposal
result in:
a.
A change in
designated
Plan?
the land use as
on the General
b. Development within an Airport
District?
c. Development within "Greenbeltft
Zone A@ or C?
d. Development within a high fire
hazard zone?
e. Other?
...~.".. .
Maybe
"
,.
7.
MAN-MADE HA~~Nl~:
project:
Will
the
a. Use, store, transport or
dispose of hazardous or toxic
materials (including but not
limited to oil, pesticides,
chemicals or radiation)?
b. Involve the release
hazardous substances?
of
c. Expose people to the potential
health/safety hazards?
d. Other?
8. HOUSING: Will the proposal:
a.
Remove
create a
housing?
existing housing or
demand for additional
b. Other?
9. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION: Could
the proposal result in:
a. An increase in traffic that is
greater than the land use
designated on the General
Plan?
b. Use of existing, or demand for
new, parking facilities/
structures?
c. Impact upon existing public
transportation systems?
d. Alteration of present patterns
of circulation?
e. Impact to rail or air traffic?
f. Increased safety hazards to
vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians?
\...
REVISED 10/87
Yes
No
x
x
x
)(
x
x
x
x
x
)(
~
PAGE 4 OF 8
Maybe
"'"
,.
g.
A disjointed pattern
roadway improvements?
of
h. Other?
10.
PUBLIC SERVICES Will the proposal
impact the following beyond the
capability to provide adequate
levels of service?
a.
Fire protection?
b.
Police protection?
c.
Schools (Le. attendance,
boundaries, overload, etc.)?
d.
Parks or other recreational
facilities?
e.
Medical aid?
f.
Solid waste?
g. Other?
11. UTILITIES: Will the proposal:
a. Impact the following beyond
the capability to provide
adequate levels of service or
require the construction of
new facilities?
1. Natural gas?
2. Electricity?
3. Water?
4. Sewer?
5. Other?
b.
Result in a
pattern of
extensions?
disjointed
utility
c.
Require the construction of
new facilities?
lio...
REVISED 10/87
Yes
No
x
><
'X
.x
X
X
X
X
"
x
x
X
><
x
~
PAGE 5 OF 8
I
tr
Yes
No
Maybe
""'IIIl
12. AESTHETICS:
a. Could the proposal result in
the obstruction of any scenic
view?
><
b. Will the visual impact of the
project be detrimental to the
surrounding area?
'X
c. Other?
13.
~P~~URA~--FESQURCES:
proposal result in:
Could the
a. The alteration or destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
x
b. Adverse physical or aesthetic
impacts to a prehistoric or
historic site, structure or
object?
c. Other? A:r(A, o~ ArL-heolo0\c.o-.L )(
GoI1~V'l
Mandatory Findings of Significance
(Section 15065)
x
14.
"'-
The California Environmental
Quality Act states that if any of
the following can be answered yes
or maybe, the project may have a
significant effect on the
environment and an Environmental
Impact Report shall be prepared.
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop
below self sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant
or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the
range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate
~
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 6 OF 8
.;<:r- 4
---I
~
Yes
No
Maybe
...,
important examples of the
major periods of California
history or prehistory?
b. Does the project have the
potential to achieve short
term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental
goals? (A short-term impact
on the environment is one
which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of
time while long-term impacts
will endure well into the
future.)
x
x
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually
limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may
impact on two or more separate
resources where the impact on
each resource is relatively
small, but where the effect of
the total of those impacts on
the environment is
significant. )
x
d. Does the project have
environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings,
either directly or indirectly?
x
C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION' MEASURES
(Attach sheets as necessary.)
I. "- '
prp(/Uf prt> poses t\
'2-~OOO C4. ~dS ,
~/~ of tLpPYOXt'vt-tA~
oF QAt).};'/I.
J. b>.
a.PPYO)(/'/lk.Atel ~ 2--; tlCk'es of
-sik. lAA-s 0.. slOF ~ v-~Jev
+ht. ~po;eJ ?,-fe p{~V1 de~~te:) ~ppVZl:t'IMA.L
Ic?u..~ ~ StVl ~v&...~ .~t;.lt UJV1~ _vtd .
Y~UI'Vec::\ vie.A.V'" ~~ . ~
~ ~D a.c...I'"e..
t-kA.'1
15%
,
/. ?
.....
REVISED 10/87
PAGE 7 OF 8
I
I
rL("JJ-':t...:1... lWer II ';1:'1 I C-.
. Date q- It -?1
C. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation
Measures (contined)
/. d . A~[,,~V\+ ''AI'. +k VI":.lA""-.\ t2e.sou..y-c.e..S
Mtcp WOWl ~I u~~ Te4tiltlCA.1 ~4aroL-\.V\o\
~orf~tJ",-~. liB!?). l:deMtJ~ +k 5d~-
A? Wtt-Y1tVl ~ FVo+0;IVGAV1YoVl z.one-
W(+~ 1tV1.~r- Vc;\ lJey VI ews.
I. e.. '5~~,,-vd eVo~dJ.1 ~Vlh-C)( VVteASUve-<::.
vvl1l be ~ d.LAY(1ILj ~/I\.':.fyuoh()V)
fktt~:,. H,11s,h ~e.lor ~Ul~lIy
V~UIV"e.S .0I1-5olv:J e,r-O'zriovt COLAf-y" ( ~res..
lP Bon1 ~jYr tZ~ Vt-t/vlor- dy-~,'~ e,\(/~t
~Y\ +he "S,k-, ;V1c)LAd I'~ 0. U. S.u .s.. ~F
, b( lAc-II VfL ,. ("' Xe.e..k:- .
~. PVe.IIVl1IMV, ?/tL-ve-Vle'wveV&;t-!S ?eVO'"C1..(
c:tVU\.s ~t ~V~ e-X F'v",ivtc.e.d I~Vtd slides
crY -:70{rF/(/(~1 -fkd uVe. }'/1 +8u pa-sf-.
Z- . v S:-.e. ?tH-ACh ~ t- "B.A
3?t. 1l-1l. c1--"'\~e. pJt-evvt":> LViii ~ cJv...":j~
bC-.f~ pror4?d~ areA-So /2<AV/-off
wi"! I 1V\c.-VeA.->L \'/11 ~+"OV1 +0 ~
1'~1C.Yf'1?...<;'< "VI 1Wtre..r-I41€C1..b(e...
3..:..b.je. See. o:t-IztclJ VI1 e-vt + '(:" (BEd:::l WlAF
"'5u.:h i:1Y1 WOV\.1 FE rjA) .
MIse:
EVALUATIONMIT.M
.'~.
pro) ect' 'lber If (+11 z:- .
'Date 14 -';<;"7
C. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation
Measures (contined)
4.~h. f},e.. F~ 61k- i~ w,'t-A tt'u BfdOJ"u:>-1
a~UVU.S MtlVl~~vt: OVe..v~ tL'S
ck..h~ ~ Cd~ s C1-e)1.LVo-.\ Ela-n
411.d -we, ~ a,YeA oJZ:o ~ hA.v~ .
~'f~.v, At/I Wy},",dov-s (5,ee o-.~~ 1M.L-11.+- t3 )
~ V. L.ohj +-uW1 oVe.yrtl..ILJtO(~ 1~(!.,r-eASe IS
. O-vt.h01'p"'-teJ -tv be- Vlejl I;:Y b~. rtoltJe,Ve.Y;
?lwd~:_J--.e-VVl1 V1 ol~ "VlGrmseS VV\~
o~v duv,,~ GOl1str-u.c...noVl,
0. C/.
TIu proJUk 'Olk ls wi-tRiM Zol1e ~
H1j[" (fir--e..) ctttZAvd O-..S S~OWV1 on Hte
VV1A f"? ?\.GLO~FV1 vr I ~ ~ '" ~ I s
CoWl W1W1f~ B--okc.hve. yy~bdt- ,
Ft-Oj rt\ 1M 'I tt Vt.~ 4",-11 <;-ovvcpl L(~ w ( ~
~ ~FFI (;-- Able... deveILft41e.vtt S-M.~~d'S.
"See.- ~~c..h Wle.vrl--=-~"
b.d.
'7"/PIj ~ u~"-~& ~,~~, MS
Vev ewe.d ~Oju..f 4 wi de-!evi1r{,i-tecj
~+ 0., ty~f'~'c... '~F.d- s~
IS VCOUivd.
MIse:
EVALUATIONMIT.M
. ~J!!IIII'-
proJect N""'ber 111411'2-,
Date q-J4-~'i
c. Oiscussion of Environmental Evaluation, and Mitigation
Measures (contined)
/0. ~ ,Ib, Au.ess\' 61 \ d-'t1 yoo.c\ ~rM-e..s.
I, 7) ~,
01. Vld 'fe.~FV{ se CbI.. F bl'l i' tf ~~ ~
bo ~ T~ iVl,u ~ Vld F', (&- !&F-dYVtetL k
-?vtct-~\d be, e-.va.\ lA.attcl
JD v' /d, &-H, t-ke. scl1cd dJ2+n'c+ ~ V1cl
. I
pav~<s ~'LLhes. cif~ ~ecI
\ V1 tkl~ ~ ~ . I VI - 1I'e./;{ pee::, o.vtd/or
l~ Vld ded i U?..+lOVl V\hILbe- Y~u.(r€d.
J2,tJ../b ~ a~lM~V1+ -A",
I
/3, t?t/b/D 'See- o...t\ad1V'r1.e-vtt "P"
/ I
14,
AVl ~,I, ~ 4tcd I be- '('&.:1 u.;Y'~d '
L;
MIse:
EVALUATIONMIT.M
."f3Ii"P-
1__
~
DETERMINAT]:ON
On the basis of this initial study,
D
The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
o
The proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, although there will not be a significant effect in
this case because the mitigation measures described above have
been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
The proposed project ~1AY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
D
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
-.Jo VI V\ L.t::1:znJ-EJ 0\'\1 e.yU , fh V1t:--1 F \ "P[a.. vt V\e.Y"
Name and Title I
Signature
Date:
Ii..
~
REVISED 12/87
PAGE 8 OF 8
I
.
,
I
I
I
~o.PI~.
a ~
~ II l! ~
011. III
(,) 'i :il .f.
~ s= Q. l')
.! .. CI) :!
> ~ C Q.
jjj .! : :!
III > .. ell
->-Clo
c.. Q.
::I . 'i 0
~ ~ .. ...
~"l;s
o .sl. .l:l .-
~ ~ :s 2
r--
It)
w
a:
;:,
g
Ii.
(/)
w
(,)
a:
;:,
o
CI)
w
a:
.....
4(
;:,
!!!
>
~,-o
-.-,/
~? I
I _:
/'-_/
I
\
,
,
(~Y'/
!.._,
.
c
o
N
c
o
>0
C
III
(,)
...
-
::c
-
o
o
Ii.
.
#
~
; l/
~
'" .
. '"
CI) III
Q.
CI)
c
.
Q.
o
'l:l
.
.l:l
...
.
>
a:
II
~ I
11.>0
C i
~.i
... ...
;:'11.
A~,I1MeY\T
1\
!""-l
"
"
,
."
~.,.of'
..,
'A'IIII'd i
"
-I,
~il
..;.....
'Nil,
i ~f-
--it
r C1.!
" 't-'"
-, r,
'---"';! -
~"Y "'OI:llJl...1
,
I
I I
.. ril_J
'.
'-
I
.", WIIl'IS'
L"J I-~-~--,
i '__J
r ~__.
-'
ft,
~ ..I
'~_ 00_
4-41
.
IS .\Utill"
-,
_J
!
c
l_-;..
UYClIf'lfl"
~I'
IS IIdOtd
.;;1
=,
:II
-g
8'
-~.
_0:
I
I
i
e ~I
~ il
:1
I
-.;:;;z
2:
o
;:::
~
~
8
~
o
~
>
~
-, I
....--
:
c
.2
-
~
~
o
o
E
o
.Sl
>
c
w
>.
.c
't:I
.i
a.
E
o
o
.Hi
Aft~d1m01t :'B"
~~
"'m
a::
III
>..
~ ~ ~.
ell!:
ell)
a:: 0
Ca.
N:E
CO
:z:u
i
I
II II
. III I
i I I I
. J Dl11 .
~
it!
Zo'
.
".
:d
. -=- t,~~;.
/
...
cn~
w
(J
r a: . &
. ::JI II
I. '.- 0 I I I
f.A~ ~j
i. ~ 1111
A /' c';i.._._:: ~r.r,';::" ,j- ..~.. . ~ ~ ,&! I
.--J . U".. -..- ~. -- -"" . -/..... . S:! II
( :. - '>~;. J~:; ;i=::;:-~~ -. ~~-~::.: ~. .-, ~ -, <..,~ it
. . - -,,=",....... ." ..... ,. '1 ,~".~ III i
'.~~::,.: ;<Uf:t_'_-<~~::I ~ ,.:~..;;~: :.-:-:-......... \ W
:" ~..:..,:==.,..- '.f':'. 1,:'1"'" , .~
..- , - - '. . V. 2 . lib ~ 0
,,:.:. " .c;.:':. r.': j;'-" __ Ijl Z C
. ~ . c _ .-.. . . \. . .................. i -'. c:c .-
-.. ::E"E
...J~
~ G5.
Zalc
~ ~.m
ZCI)c..
o -"'0 ~
g; CD
> ~c
Z~CD
wOe)
. --_._-~--
-'
l~
.,
j
. .
}_ _I-
"
.......... ,,>=='
:~~...;..."I"
. .,,"- -"
.-- .
~ - ~:
'."c
"
-- -
.~. ~ i
~\~
-.,~::.
!"''''~
-
.~
,0
~f'\j'TA ~
""-..,
~
.~':..
)0 "~-f
.
.
.~.
"
,- ~ '. ~
.
o
39 rM ST
. . -- ~-
.-----
.
"
Cc.A OR -
.....,,).--- ,
. .!
> >'
i i:
0 01
< 0'
0 Z
. Z .'
> "
~ u <,
0 < "'
. .
.'
/'" ALTO
.'~
. ' 011I
~
~"Ot: O.
"
Z
>
.
J:.:!$ ",,-ORES :I"
1:-
, 0"
011II'.. >
.-
I ~a
, ST
) .I.;~U~ Z
011I C
~
. z
H I~
:~2
.
3 !RLUCA
~
~
.
(,.I . EUJIlIKA
1270
Del Rosa ChDMtl
ZONE B
1260
RUA
:y
~)~; ~
1430 o"'~
:CHO __c." _ \
"9'
,,~ "0
".;> 00' "9'
", ;90 <'0 ~,-'.'"' ~~
.....,> . ..
o ~SA_ _VE~O . ~
13601380 [
1I00THILL., 0........" :;
~
"'IS,..
.
>
.
Dcl Rvsa
C"ann~1
A rto.c.M 11-1 evrr '-'
FIRM
COM~'HU,jjJ'(_ f"~L. ili.
Db oz.~ I ool~ A
JL\.h1 ''-, l't 1q
CORPORA TE
LIMITS
"
o
\(0
ZON E C
D II.!:'}
'51'-~
CORPORATE
LIMITS
o.
'0-
\ZONee
ZONE C
-~~,~~~,~ ;
/
_v'
0"
s..
~ 0 1.$',.
o .,1,."
~v .
~.
{.lllI.
o.
ZONE AS
ZONE B
San Bernardino County
AREA NOT I:\iCLUOED
1,o~S'. .."
OCJ,,.
. A'O' t'
:; 0,. 0..
~ ~ ~/((
"'''Iv,
/1i.f'~/q~<I~'
(-,....
q~~.
SA.\
" .
!: "0
ZONE C
',' . '.~. ~
~.; '....
fL,
.
. .
f/)
w
i=
:;
i=
in
z
w
f/)
~
8
GO i5
; g
II. ~
I ~ I IV --- .. , "'- , " l
v
. I ~
~ I Ii ~I
~i ~ ~ ~ I ~i
~ ~l5a Eo
i ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~j
II Ii
~.:':;::~~L:
::~~::ii:j:'r ,
~ilil~1i'~~~~ -'
I -.
I
E...
q
~ :'..f\;rP --,-: ,-~
\..41" "
f'CH
,,;
c
r
f ....
t;::;;;;: "
U~:..~
,'.
f
..-:--, ,,/
~ ...... ~,..'..o:
~l~.:......i...
~)Jf .:.".
,
-'
,"
..., ,-;I'
,
, I
,,-
I
i! .
N' ....
.'1,-1:11
J '
I
I
,J
--
..,
,
':f~: .~
! 1-; !
,-
,
~,-
-,
I,
r-''''
IS lint
j
-
,
.:'--
..":
.' c
,," i
..... ..
.'
;--~. ......
. ...........
:
.
:
.
.
.........
.'
J!.....
"".'
........
~
.'
.'
.......
........
---~ ,
v.
o
!
,'I
, ,
,
,
j
..
II...."
.
!
c-
I
......
-
cl
-I
=1
--
~ .
... "
~.
4?:
o
;::
~
o
&
8
~
o
SJ
;:.;
~
-,
I
.
i
t
.
---,
I
,
3-5
:!
...,~
I \
.- I
11.,-",_...
I "
"
N, ....".
,
-
,-
,
J
r'H'
I.H HI '" ......
rib
,.
--
.
r jiUS
~
~
II IMM.
j
I
~
~ 4W11'f'f
.- ....,.".."'~
aoMtlY~.....
.
,
< .
~~
4W'I'_.....-~J'W
--
~O~U[f:!]~~W ~Of~ [P[b~!M
ES.
" .......
.....
.-.-
lA~
^
r.
Form 4.B
,
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Traffic Impact Outline
I. Executive Summary
II. Introduction
A. project Description
B. Study Scope
III. Existing Conditions
A. Circulation System
1. Street and Highway network
a. Description
2. Traffic Volumes & LOS
a. ADT for streets
b. Parking hours for intersections
B. Public Transit
C. On-street parking
IV. Future Traffic Projections
A. Future Street System
B. Areawide Traffic Growth
l. Traffic Generation
2. Traffic Distribution
a. Local
b. Regional
3. Traffic Assignment
D. Traffic of Related Projects
l. Traffic Generation
2. Traffic Distribution
- 1 -
E. Total Future Traffic
1. Without proposed project & related projects
2. With related projects
3. With related projects and proposed project
V. Traffic Impact Analysis
A. Intersection Capacity Analysis
B. Initial Study Issues
C. Analysis of On-site Project Circulation Design
D. Summary of Impact Analysis
VI. Circulation Element
A. Relationship of proposed project to policies of the
City's Circulation Element of the General Plan
VII.
Mitigation Measures
A. Proposed Mitigation Measures
B. Impact of Proposed Measures
1. Alternative Measures
2. Conclusion
csj/6-21-88
- 2 -
0"::-_.4
.
Attachment F
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CUmulative ImDact Methodoloav
CUmulative impact analysis is a critical component of
environmental analysis for Initial Studies and Environmental
Impact Reports. CUmulative impacts must be explicitly
considered and analyzed throughout the environmental
documentation.
Related proiects
The consultant shall obtain a list of San Bernardino projects
from the City case planner. This list shall include projects
which have received discretionary approvals but have not
completed construction, projects for which applications have
been submitted but which have not received all discretionary
approvals, and specific projects for which the Planning staff
has reason to believe applications will be submitted within
three months. If necessary, the consultant shall contact the
Citv of Los Anaeles to obtain a list of projects located in
that City which may have cumulative effects which should be
considered in the environmental analysis.
Generally, the consultant's list of related projects included
in the environmental document should include all new
construction projects of 15,000 sq. ft. or greater that are
within a reasonable -impact radius of the project site.
Projects should be listed by address and application number,
and should describe square footage by use. A map showing
location of related projects should be provided.
The list of projects should distinguish between known
projects which have not received discretionary approvals, and
projects which have received discretionary approvals. If
anticipated construction of a project would not be completed
within three years, project phasing should be noted.
Backaround Growth
The cumulative impact analysis shall also consider background
growth which may impact the environment. The City of San
Bernardino Traffic Engineer shall be contacted regarding
assumptions concerning background traffic growth. The City'S
Land Use and Circulation Elements shall be reviewed and cited
regarding its projections and conclusions concerning the
effects of City-wide growth.
9/29/89
DOC:MISC
CEQA4D
I
22. CONSULTANT TO ABIDE BY LAW.
Consultant is required to abide by all Federal,
State and Local law applicable to its performance of
services under this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHERE OF, the City Council of the City
of San Bernardino has caused this Agreement to be
subscribed by the Mayor, and the seal of said Council to
be hereto affixed and attested by the Clerk thereof, and
Consultant has executed this Agreement, the day, month
and year first above written.
ATTEST:
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
City Clerk
W.R. HOLCOMB, MAYOR
THE PLANNING CENTER
By:
Approved as to form
and legal content:
James F. Penman
City Attorney
By: i'1r~ 9.!~~
(J
GP:EIRGENERICCON.
I _
11