Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992-150Y 1 2 3 4 5 s 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION N0. 92-150 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A COUNTERPART OF THE FINAL NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) STORMWATER PERMIT IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT - SANTA ANA REGION, WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, THE SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, AND CITIES THAT ARE CO-PERMITTEES UNDER THE NPDES PERMIT, AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 92-129. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Mayor of the City of San Bernardino is hereby authorized and directed to execute, on behalf of said City, a counterpart of the final National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Permit Implementation Agreement - Santa Ana Region, with the County of San Bernardino, the San Bernardino County Flood Control District and cities that are co-permittees under the NPDES Permit. SECTION 2. This agreement and any amendment or modification thereto shall not take effect or become operative until fully signed and executed by both parties. The City shall not be obligated hereunder unless and until the agreement is fully executed and no oral agreement relating thereto shall be implied or authorized. SECTION 3. This resolution is rescinded if the parties to the agreement fail to execute it within sixty (60) days of the passage of this resolution. SECTION 4. Resolution No. 92-129 is hereby rescinded. //// 4-17-92 RESO: AUTHORIZATION TO EXECUTE FINAL AGREEMENT WITH COUNTY FLOOD CON'PROL DISTRICT RELATIVE TO DISCHARGE OF ~ STORMWATERS. 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly 2 adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of the City of San 3 Bernardino at a re gular meeting thereof, held on the 4 4th day of ~; 1992, by the following vote, to-wit: 5 Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT B ESTRADA x 7 REILLY x $ HERNANDEZ X J MAUDSLEY X 1Q MINOR X 11 POPE-LUDLAM x 12 MILLER X 13 14 ~c.~ Rac el Krasney° Cit Clerk 15 The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this 6th 16 day of Atay 1992. 17 ~ ~ -~ ~ ~ comb, Mayor 1~ C ty of an Bernardino Approved as to form 20 and legal content: 21 James F. Penman City Attorney 22 23 By ? ,~ 24 25 26 27 28 -z- a TRANSP0IRTATION/FLOOD CONTROL ' DEPARTMENT 825 East Third Street Sen Bernardino, CA 92415-0835 1714) 387-26D9 Fax No. 17141 387-2667 July 22, 1992 NPDES Representatives Santa Ana Region REFERENCE: IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT Dear Representatives: i `' ~ -- } COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO _ r - °`^'~ ` PUBLIC WORKS GROUP .u ece~revo~~o v 1 ~ KEN A. MILLER .~ Director File: 6(COM)-14.01-04 Enclosed is a certified copy of the Implementation Agreement. The set includes the text of the agreement, signature sheets of all the Co-Permittees and Appendix A. The copy was certified by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors. Should you have any further questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact Naresh P. varma of this office, or me at (714) 387-2515. very truly yours, CITY OF SAN BERNA`iDINO PUBLIC WORKS/ENGINEERING ~iO~ITING SLIP ATTN: ~z ~~ FROM: ~-~ vim---~ _ AHinnagw Aerion Mayor Animal Control Park, Rae, Comm. Serv. Cemabry Personnel Central Services Planning 8 Bldq. Serv. City Administrator Poliu _ Ciry Atlomey Purchuinq Ciry Cork Public Services Ciry Council Risk Management _ Ciril Service S.B.E.TA Data Proussinp Sign Shop Economic Developmem Signal Shop Fxiliges Management Smns Finance Survey Crew _ Fire Teleeommunieatlons Garage Treasuror Lihrary Water NOTE: r , 3rtment ;~ ;~; _ ', r -- ;~ r osure n, ENGR 2-dl (1-92) U,~RTY F(°p ? ,BJ9 °C o °s i P 0 a WB Y 4 _ ~~ ~a `~ ~4(IFOPMP 17 SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT FAS CONTRACT TRANSMITTAL FOR COUNTY U: VLY E an X New Change Cancel Vendor Code t+(~ Jl ~ dept. A /1 Contract Number 92-315 ' County Department Dept. Orgn. Transportation/Flood Control Contractor's License No. N/A Flood Control District Contract Representative Charles L. Laird Ph. Ext. 2799 Amount of Contract N/A Fund RFL Dept. 099 Organization Appr. ObjlRev Source Activity GRC/PROJ/JOB Number Commodity Code FY Estimated Payment Total by Fiscal Year Amount I/D FY Amount IID Project Name CONTRACTOR Co-Permittees: Cities of Big Bear Lake, Chino, Chino Hills, Colton, Fontana Grand Terrace, Highland, Loma Linda, Montclair, Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, Redlands Rialto San Bernardino, Upland, and Yucaipa Contractor's Representative Address Nature of Contract: (Briefly describe the general terms of the contract) Phone As a requirement of the NPDES No. CA8000200, Order No. 90-136, issued by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Santa Ana Region, an Implementation Agreement has to be signed between all the Co-Permittees listed in the Permit as well as the Implementation Agreement. This agreement outlines the responsibilities of each Co-Permittee and funding for the area-wide programs. Funding by each Co-Permittee each fiscal year will vary based on the projected costs for that fiscal year. The Implementation Agreement is made apart of this contract. 1, EARiENE S?BOAT, Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of tha fo~mty of San Bernardino, State cf California, hereby certify the foregoing instrument to he a full, true and correct copy of the crilinal now en file u: my office. Dated: Clerk of the Board . By _ ^ eputy r ~ SSC.e ~~~ ~'~ e;Y` r ~ ti -' rS ~ e>r.,yy S H ARn:MO Er ti^d, ' '~~,~- U ~y',~ oO ~r~'~tbYNO C' (Attach [his transmittal to all contracts not prepared on the "Standard Contract" /orm.) Approved as to Legal Farm .~ Count~~J 77 Date ~y ?~ ~~ ~7C Review s to Affir alive Action^ Date ~ _ ~ ~ "' r Reviewed for Processing Agency Administrator/CAO Date p1-19483-89] R4x. 1191 1 NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIII~IINATION SYSTEM 2 STORMWATER PIItNIIT IlISPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT 3 SANTA ANA REGION 4 5 6 7 This AGREEMENT entered into as of this q~iday of ~, 1992 by the County of 8 San Bernardino, (herein called the COUNTY), the San Bernardino County Flood Control 9 District (herein called the DISTRICT), and the Cities of Big Beaz Lake, Chino, Chino Hills, to Colton, Fontana, Grand Terrace, Highland, Loma Linda, Montclair, Ontario, Ranch 11 Cucamonga, Redlands, Rialto, San Bernardmo, Upland, and Yucazpa (herein called the CITIES) 12 establishes the responsibilities of each party with respect to compliance with National Pollutant 13 Dischazge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater regulations administered by the California 14 Regional Water Quality Control Boazd (RWQCB, SAR) by the authority granted by the Clean 15 Water Act (CWA) and its 1987 amendments and the Water Quality Act (WQA). 16 17 RECITALS 18 19 Whereas 20 Congress in 1987 amended Section 402 of the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.A. 21 1342 (p)) to require the federal Environmental Protection Agency to promulgate regulations for 22 applications for permits for stormwater discharges; and 23 2 a Whereas 25 These permit regulations will require the control of pollutants from stormwater 26 discharges by requiring a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for 27 the dischazge of stormwaters into water of the United States; and 28 29 WheieaS 3 o These EPA regulations will require NPDES permits for dischazges from municipal storm 31 sewers on a system-wide or jurisdiction-wide basis; and 32 33 Whereas 34 The State Legistature, in enacting the San Bernardino County Flood Control Act, created 3 5 the San Bernazdino County Flood Control District to provide for the control of flood and storm 3 6 waters; and 37 38 Whereas 39 The Powers granted to the DISTRICT include carrying on technical and other a o investigations, examinations, or tesu of all kinds, making measurements, collecting data, and 41 making analyses, studies, and inspections pertaining to water supply, control of floods, use of a2 water, water quality, nuisance, pollutron, waste, and contamination of water both within and 43 without the DISTRICT; and 44 45 Whereas 46 The CTITF.S, the COUNTY and the DISTRICT desire to develop an integrated 47 stormwater dischazge management program with the objective of improving water quality in the 48 County of San Bernardino; and 49 5o Whereas ' 51 The California State Water Resources Control Board (CSWRCB) as designee of the EPA 52 has delegated authority to the Regional Water Quality Control Boatel -Santa Ana Region (RWQCB, SAR) for administration of the NPDES Storm Water permit application process within the boundaries of their Regions; and Whereas The RWQCB, SAR issued NPDES Permit Number 8000200 on October 19, 1990 for the regulation of stormwaters; and Whereas The DISTRICT, COUNTY, and CITIES have been designated as co-permitiees by the RWQCB, SAR; and Whereas The DISTRICT has been designated as the Principle Permittee in the NPDES Permit; and Whereas The COUNTY and the CITIES have been designated as the Co-Permittees in the NPDES Permit; and Whereas Cooperation between the CITIES, the COUNTY, and the DISTRICT to jointly file applications for NPDES Storm Water Permits is in the best interest of the CITIES, the COUNTY, and the DISTRICT; and NOW TIiEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: I. Filing Status. The COUNTY, DISTRICT, and CITIES will file the applications for storm water permits as co-permittees. The COUNTY, the DISTRICT, and each individual CITY will be a co-permittee. II. Incomeradon of Federal Regulations. The terms of all applicable Federal and State guidelines, as presently written or as changed during the life of this AGREEMENT are hereby inwrporated by reference and made a part of this AGREEMENT and take precedence over any inconsistent terms of this AGREEMENT. III. Deleeation of Re.~onsibilities. The responsibilities of each of the parties shall be as follows: A. The DISTRICT, on a cost-shared basis, shall administer system compliance by: 1. Preparing and implementing an annual operating budget with the participation of the co-permittees. The budget year shall coincide with the fiscal year of the DISTRICT, July 1 -June 30. a. The co-permittees shall be permitted to review and approve the annual operating budget for the forthcoming year. Criteria for approval shall be an affirmative response from a majority of the co-permittees. The review period shall be from November 1 to November 30 of each year with approval of the final budget to be completed by December 15. z 105 2. Preparing compliance reports to the Regional Board and providing l06 copies to the co-permittees. 107 los 3. Preparing a draft system-wide Best Management Practices (BMP) 109 Program report for review and approval by the co-perrnittees. 110 111 4. Monitoring the implementation and ensuring the effectiveness of 112 system-wide BMPs. This will include field reconnaissance to 113 evaluate structural and procedural BMPs. 114 115 S. Preparing an annual report to the RWQCB, SAR presenting the 116 results of these evaluations. 117 118 B. The DISTRICT shall, to the maximum extent practicable and on a cost- 119 shared basis except in paragraph 3 below: 120 121 1. Perform the water quality and hydrographic monitoring for permit 12 2 compliance. 123 124 2. Develop uniform criteria for annual inspection of drainage 12 5 facilities. 126 127 3. Perform inspections, at no cast to the CITIES or the COUNTY, 12 8 on those facilities owned by the DISTRICT. Contract, for such 129 inspections within the CTITES or COUNTY may be undertaken 13 o at the sole expense of the requesting CITY or COUNTY. 131 132 C. The CITIES shall, to the maximum extent practicable and at no cost to 13 3 COUNTY or DISTRICT: 134 135 1. Implement a facility inspection program in accordance with the 136 uniform criteria developed by the DISTRICT, for all municipal 13 7 separate storm sewers as defined by the NPDES permit and within 13d the jurisdictional boundaries of that CITY. 139 140 2. Submit to the DISTRICT on an annual basis, storm drain maps 141 which reflect the modifications that were made to the storm drarn lax system during the past year. 143 144 3. Prepare watershed characteruadons, including: lay 146 a. Zoning designations. 147 148 b. Identification of areas where hazardous materials presently 1 a 9 are or are suspected to have been stored, manufactured, or 15o disposed of. This shall include sites at which a hazardous 151 material spill has occurred. 152 153 4. Review, approve, and implement system-side BMPs. 154 15 5 5. Eliminate or have eliminated, illegal/illicit connections to the storm 156 drain system. 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 6. Identify the legal authority for control of dischazges to the storm drain system. 7. Provide to the DISTRICT annual reports (on forms prepared by the DISTRICT) and anp other information, in a timely fas}uon, needed to satisfy annual reporting requirements of the RWQCB, SAR. 8. Adopt and enforce a water pollution control ordinance, which prohibits non-NPDFS permttted discharges to the municipal separate storm sewer system. D. The COUNTY shall, to the maximum extent practicable and at no cost to the CTTIES or the DISTRICT, undertake in the unincorporated azeas of the COUNTY, all activities required above of the CITIES that are not responsibilities of the DISTRICT as outlined in Section III.B. IV. Program Costs. The responsibilities for payment of all shared costs of equipment, sernces, contracted analytical services, and the cost of the NPDES Permit, shall be distributed among the DISTRICT, COUNTY, and CITIES as follows: Percent Contribution DISTRICT CITIES + COUNTY 5 95 Using the COUNTY'S Geographical Information System, the DISTRICT will determine the adjusted acreage for each CITY and the COUNTY from the land use, area, and run- off coefficients as contained in Appendix A on an annual basis. National forests, state pazks, airports, landfills, and military installations are excluded. These calculations shall be completed by November 1 of each yeaz and shall be included in the annual budget proposal. The total of shared costs shall not exceed $800,000 for fiscal year 199211993. A deposit which constitutes a share percentage according to Appendix A of the total anticipated first yeaz vests shall be required of each CITY and the COUNTY. The DISTRICT shall invoice each co-permittee on a quarterly basis with the first payment due within 45 days of the date of the invoice. If at any time during a subsequent fiscal year the program costs excxed the sum of the deposits, the DISTRICT shall submit invoices to the CITIES and the COUNTY to recover the deficit. The share for each CITY and the COUNTY shall be prorated according to the formula above. Each CITY and the COUNTY shall pay the invoice within 45 days of the billing date. The DISTRICT shall prepare a fiscal yeaz end accounting within 60 days of the end of each fiscal yeaz and distribute copies to the co-permrttees for their review. Co- permittees shall have forty-five calendar days from the date of their receipt of the fiscal yeaz end accounting to dispute in writing or concur with the findings. If the fiscal yeaz end accounting results in costs ezcxeding the sum of the deposits (mcluding interest earnings), the DISTRICT shall invoice each CITY and the COUNTY for its prorated 209 shaze of the excess cost. Each CITY and the COUNTY shall pay the billing within 45 21o days of the date of the invoice. If the fiscal yeaz end accounting results in the sum of 211 the deposits (including interest earnings) exceeding cosu, the excess deposits will carry 212 forwazd to reduce the billings for the following year. 213 214 After the initial billing for the program, the DISTRICT shall invoice each CITY and the 215 COUNTY for its annual deposit after July 1, the start of the fiscal year. Each CITY 216 and the COUNTY shall pay the deposit within 45 days of the date of the invoice. Each 217 CTTY's and the COUNTY'S deposit shall be based on their prorated share of the 218 approved annual budget, reducod for any surplus identified in the prior fiscal year-end 219 accounting. 220 2 z 1 Interest earned on the CITIES' and the COUNTY'S deposits will not be paid to the 2zz CITIES and the COUNTY, but will be credited against the CITIES' and the COUNTY'S 2 z 3 share of the program costs. 224 2 z 5 Upon termination of the program, a final accounting shall be performed by the 226 DISTRICT If costs exceed the sum of the deposits (including interest earnings), the 2 2 7 DISTRICT shall invoice each CITY and the COUNTY for its prorated share of the 228 excess. Each CITY and the COUNTY shall pay the invoice within 45 days of the date 2 2 9 of the invoice. If the sum of the deposits (including interest earnings) exceod the costs, 2 3 o the DISTRICT shall reimburse to each CITY and the COUNTY its prorated shaze of the 231 excess, within 45 days of the final accounting. Interest eaznings are used to offset the 23z CITIES' and the COUNTY'S share of program costs and will not be refunded to the 233 CITIES and the COUNTY. 234 235 Each CITY and the COUNTY shall beaz the financial responsibility for implementing 236 the program, within its jurisdictional boundaries, as outlined in Section III.C. and D. 237 238 The annual fee for the NPDF.S permit and the annual administrative costs incurred by 2 3 9 the DISTRICT shall be included in the total cost and paid according t0 Section TV and 2ao Appendix A. 241 242 The financial responsibility for this agreement will be effective beginning with the 243 1992/1993 fiscal yeaz. 244 245 V. Life of the AGREEMENT. The life of the AGR~I?Tv~NT shall be for an indefinite 246 period and such indefinite period shall end at such time as the Clean Water Act and/or 247 the RWQCB, SAR ceases to mandate compliance. 248 249 VI. Additional Parties. Any city or other entity which wishes to be a co-permittee on the 25o San Bernardino County Stormwater NPDES Permit that was issued by RWQCB, SAR 2 51 shall agree to the provisions in this funding agreement and shall sign thrs AGREEMENT 252 prior to be included in the ~ern-it. The date of initiation, for determining participant 253 costs for any new co-permrttee shall be the date of inclusion in the San Bernardino 254 County Stormwater NPDES Fermit issued by RWQCB, SAR. The cost for adding any 255 additional co-permittee to the program, including additional permit and processing fees, 256 shall be paid by the added co-permittee. Monies, if any, to be reimbursed to the 257 existing co-pernuttees shall be ctedrted to their respective annual program operating fees 258 for the following budget year. 259 2 6 o VII. Withdrawal from the AGREEMENT. A co-permittee may withdraw from this L~ 261 AGREEMENT' at the end of any fiscal year with written notice being received by the 26z DISTTtICT 90 days prior to the end of the fiscal year. T'he withdrawing co-permittee 263 shall agree to file for a separate NPDES permit and to comply with all of the z 64 requirements established by the RWQCB, SAR. T'he withdrawing co-permittee shall be 265 responsible for all lawfully assessed penalties as a consequence of withdrawal. The cost x66 allocations to the remaining members will be calculated in the following budget year. 267 268 VIII. Non-compliance with NPDES Permit Reauiremenrc, Any co-permittee found in non- 269 compliance with the conditions of the NPDES permit within their jurisdictional 27o responsibilities shall be solely liable for any lawfully assessed penalties, pursuant to 271 Section 13385 of the Water Code. Penalties that apply to all the permittees shall be 272 assessed according to the formula in Appendix A. 273 274 IX. j&gal Action/Costs/Attomey Fees. Where any legal action is necessary to enforce any x75 provision hereof for damages by reason of an alleged breach of any provisions of this 276 AGREEMENT, the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive from the losing party all 277 attorney's fees and costs incurred ut conjunction with such legal action. 278 279 X. Amendments to the AGRFF1~rFNT. This AGREEMENT may be amended by consent 280 of a two-thirds majority of the co-permittees (rounded to the nearest whole number) 2 81 2 8 2 . Amendments to this AGREEMENT may be adopted and executed concurrently, and shall become effective upon its execution by a majonty of the co-permittees as defined above 283 . 284 XI. Authorized S}ynatories. Each permittee and co-permittee will determine by either 285 resolution or ordinance who will be the authorized signatory. This person shall be 286 authorized to execute the application(s) for NPDES Stormwater permit(s) and take all j ~urai steps necessary to file the application(s) for NPDES Stonnwater ( 288 permit s 289 29o XII. All notices shall be deemed duly given if delivered by hand; or five (5) 291 working days after deposit in the U.S. Mail, certified mail, return receipt requested. 292 z 9 3 XIII. Governing Iaw. This AGREEMENT will be governed and construed in accordance with 29a laws of the State of Califontia. If any provision or provisions of this AGREEMENT 295 shall be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality, and 296 enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired 297 hereby. 298 x99 XTV. Consent to Breach not Waiver. No term or provision hereof shall be deemed waived 30o and no breach excused, unless such waiver or consent shall be in writing and signed by 3 01 any permittee t0 have waived or consented. Any consent by any permittee to, or waiver 302 of, a breach by the other, whether expressed or implied, shall not constitute a consent 303 to, waiver of, or excuse for any other different or subsequent breach. 304 305 XV. Applicabilily of Prior Ag m n Q. This document constitutes the entire AGREEMENT 306 between the co-pernittees with respect to the subject matter; all prior agreements, 3 07 representation, statements, negotiations, and undertakings are superseded hereby. 308 6 309 XVI. Execution of the AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT may be executed in counterpart 31o and the signed counterparts shall constitute a single instrument. 311 312 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the AGREEMENT has been executed as of the day and year first 313 above written. 314 315 PLEASE INSERT YOUR AGENCY'S STANDARD SIGNATURE PAGE. ~~ ~ f ~nso~ ~' r <. ~~ MAY 0 41992 92-315 ~'~ ,II~T A OOF1 ~~ THE SIB ~~~ y oF^ THE r~ _ct i~~,~s of t]'ie ~exX oof par~Y _ ~~'~~'ARDiiy~~t~, ~.) ~~~ if ~~ration, ~~, gy ~~oriz~ Sic~ture) - I73~ Title o~y ~ L D~cr W CR~Q/f~-" " of ~~~ a~ r MAY 0 41992 Datea ration, o~Y` etc.) State if ~~° gy t~horized Siy~tzu~e) ~~ CTfY OF BIG BEAR LAKE APPROVED AS TO FORM: Scott C. Smith .Wright Best, Best & Krieger City Manager City Attorney Date: Mav 6, 1992 ATTEST: Shirley A. Dig e City Clerk U IN WITNESS, WHEREOF, the AGREEMENT has been executed as of the day and year first above written. .CITY~MANAGE~ OF THE CITY OF CHINO ATTEST CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF CHINO APPROVED AS T2I.EGAL FORM: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the AGREEMENT has been executed as of the day and year f+rst above written. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this AGREEMENT as of the dates set out. Executed this 5th day of May, 1992. By . '~~ MARK LEWIS City Manager City of Colton Attest: ~"Q ..e~~ HELEN A. RAMOS, CMC City Clerk City of Colton IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this agreement as of the dates set out. ~ Executed this 30th day of April, 1992. By: Denn't§ Johnson, Mayor City of Highland Attest: %~Ll~.(...L.t-t.(_. ~~lL/~.F iILJ ebbie Anderson Deputy City Clerk Approved the 25th day of February 1492. Dated: May 4, 1992 ATTEST: Pamela Byrnes-O' amb, City Clerk CITY OF LOMA LINDA i l__ Robert H. Christman, Mayor 6AN BERNARDINO COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT By: Date: RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL: DIRECTOR O~ PITBL~C WORRS Date: ~~C~Q;C CITY OF NONTCLAIR A Municipal Corporation r By: MAYOR Date: ~ y ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: l~, ~ ~ . .---_ ~~'' ~Jf ri?y CITY ATTORNEYC' Date: ~~ / IN WTINESS Wi~REOF, the A(iREIIvvIENN'I' has been euwted as of the day and year first above written. Executed this 5th day of May 1992. ,,,,.-pF pNT~~..+, G~ .PpRAT~CO~ CITY OF ONTARIO = ""' •., / By: r ~. Ma or ATTEST: _ ~ 'c - ~L-~C.-,Cu~ '.,,7~ ~ ~ ~!~ ,, City Clerk ^••••••••"' APPROVED AS TO FORM: THIS 4th DAY OF --{tay 1992 ACCEPTED: ~"i1Ltt~ . U~~ ~ q 9~ CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION By: Mayor s-~- 9a Attest: ity er Approved: ~ ~ City orney 1 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the AGREEMENT has been executed as of the day and year first APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT: OBERT A. OWEN, CITY ATTORNEY IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this AGREEMENT. CITY OF REDLANDS By: .~ }^S. M or ~_ L ATTEST: Zi~~lerk ~ e./ May 5, 1592 Date i ~.~ 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 to 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27I 28 City of S sdno Res 92-150 adopted 5/4/92 AGREEMENT: NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEN STORM WATER PERMIT . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this AGREEMENT as of the dates set out. CITY OF SAN BERNARD 0 .' ;' ~~ i ~~/W. R L ~ ~, Mayor/ .. ,::. ATTEST: ,~e%C /Cze~~ RACHEL KRASNE'4. City Clerk ~,ru~ca. YY~e~2'~r~~Z, ~Gr` Approved as to form and legal content: James F. Penman City Attorney BY t ~,~ ~ /E-~r~~„ ,. IN WITNESS WI~REOF, the undersigned have executed this National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Permit Implementation Agreement Santa Ana Region as of the dates set out. Executed this 27th day of April, 1992. ~ ' By: ~OA /lti 1~~ Robert R. Nolan, Mayor CTTY OF UPLAND ATTEST: Sheryll Schroeder, City Clerk r~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have executed this AGREEMENT as of the date set out. Executed this 27th day of May 1992. ~"~ILLIAN C. EATON, MAYOR CITY OF YUCAIPA ATTEST: n J ITA BROW::, TY CLERK~~ ~. APPENDIX. A The following formula will be used by the District to deurmine the share costs as required in the "National Pollutant Discharge Elinrinanon System Stormwaur Permit Implementation Agreement, Santa Ana Region", Section N. 1. Total Program Costs will be determined by the DISTRICT and allocated to the CITIES and the COUNTY by the following formula: * x (annual cost x 0.95) =Agency's Conaibuaon Total AA** AA -Adjusted Acreage * -Each agency as listed below ** -Total adjusted acreage ty o an Bemardino Cities of: Big Bear Lake Chino Chino Hills Colton Fontana Grand Terrace Highland Loma Linda Montclair Ontario Rancho Cucamonga Redlands Rialto San Bernardino Upland Yucaipa 2. The Agency Adjusted Acreage will be determined by the DISTRICT using the following formula: [(Ilu 1 - Ulu i) x Clu 11 + [(Ilu 2 'Ulu 2) x Clu 2] +...+[(U 1 - 13) x C] Adjusted At~eage I - Improved acreage for each landuse as defined below U - Unimproved acreage for each landuse as defined below lu - landuse as defined in the following table C - Runoff coefficient as derived from the San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual ~' . Appendix A (continued) Landuse Formula Desi nation Runoff Coefficient (C) tng a amtly Residential acre lots lu 1 1 acre ots lu 2 wellings/acre lu 3 -4 dwe gs/acre lu 4 5 -dwe ngs/acre lu 5 we ngs/acre lu 6 • > dwellings/acre lu 7 ulttple amtly Residential on ttumums lu 8 Apartments lu 9 obtle ome arks lu 10 ommerctal, owntown Business or Industrial lu 11 c ool lu 12 u tc ark Ag-rcultural lu 13 .5 4 ndeveloped iJ 1-13 .547 Reference: San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual and SLAG modified Anderson landuse Classification (1992) City of S Bdno Res. 92-150 adopted 5/4/92 1 NATIONAL POLLUTANT DLSCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM 2 STORMWATER PERMTT IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT 3 SANTA ANA REGION 7 This AGREEMENT entered into as of this _ day of 1992 by the County of 8 San Bernardino, (herein called the COUNTY), the San Bernardino County Flood Control 9 District (herein called the DISTRICT), and the Cities of Big Bear Lake, Chino, Chino Hills, 10 Colton, Fontana, Grand Terrace, Highland, Loma Linda, Montclair, Ontario, Rancho 11 Cucamonga, Redlands, Rialto, San Bernardino, Upland, and Yucaipa (herein called the CITIES) 12 establishes the responsibilities of each party with respect to compliance with National Pollutant 13 Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) stormwater regulations administered by the California 14 Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB, SAR) by the authority granted by the Clean 15 Water Act (CWA) and its 1987 amendments and the Water Quality Act (WQA). 16 17 RECITALS 18 19 Whereas 20 Congress in 1987 amended Section 402 of the Federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.A. 21 1342 (p)) to require the federal Environmental Protection Agency to promulgate regulations for 22 applications for permits for stormwater discharges; and 23 24 Whereas 25 These permit regulations will require the control of pollutants from stormwater 2 6 discharges by requiring a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit for 27 the discharge of stormwaters into water of the United States; and 28 29 Whereas 3 0 These EPA regulations will require NPDES permits for discharges from municipal storm 31 sewers on a system-wide or jurisdiction-wide basis; and 32 33 Whereas 34 The State Legislature, in enacting [he San Bernardino County Flood Control Act, created 35 the San Bernardino County Flood Control District to provide for the control of flood and storm 3 6 waters; and 37 38 Whereas 39 The Powers granted to the DISTRICT include carrying on technical and other 40 investigations, examinations, or tests of all kinds, making measurements, collecting data, and a 1 making analyses, studies, and inspections pertaining to water supply, control of floods, use of a2 water, water quality, nuisance, pollution, waste, and contamination of water both within and 4 3 without the DISTRICT; and 44 a 5 Whereas 4 6 The CITIES, the COUNTY and the DISTRICT desire to develop an integrated 47 stormwater discharge management program with the objective of improving water quality in the 48 County of San Bernardino; and 49 50 Whereas 51 The California State Water Resources Control Board (CSWRCB) as designee of the EPA 52 has delegated authority to the Regional Water Quality Control Board -Santa Ana Region 1 53 (RWQCB, SAR) for administration of the NPDES Storm Water permit application process 54 within the boundaries of their Regions; and 55 56 Whereas 57 The RWQCB, SAR issued NPDES Permit Number 8000200 on October 19, 1990 for 58 the regulation of stormwaters; and 59 6o Whereas 61 The DISTRICT, COUNTY, and CITIES have been designated as Co-permittees by the 62 RWQCB, SAR; and 63 64 Whereas 65 The DISTRICT has been designated as the Principle Permittee in the NPDES Permit; 6 6 and 67 68 Whereas 69 The COUNTY and the CITIES have been designated as the Co-Permittees in the NPDES 7 o Permit; and 71 72 Whereas 73 Cooperation between the CITIES, the COUNTY, and the DISTRICT to jointly file 74 applications for NPDES Storm Water Permits is in the best interest of the CITIES, the 75 COUNTY, and the DISTRICT; and 76 77 NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto do mutually agree as follows: 78 79 I. Filing Status. The COUNTY, DISTRICT, and CITIES will file the applications for a o storm water permits as co-permittees. The COUNTY, the DISTRICT, and each s 1 individual CITY will be a co-permittce. sz a 3 II. Incorporation of Federal Regulations. The terms of all applicable Federal and State a4 guidelines, as presently written or as changed during the life of this AGREEMENT aze s 5 hereby incorporated by reference and made a pazt of this AGREEMENT and take s 6 precedence over any inconsistent terms of this AGREEMENT. 87 88 III. Delegation of Responsibilities. The responsibilities of each of the pazties shall be as s 9 follows: 90 91 A. The DISTRICT, on a cost-shazed basis, shall administer system 92 wmpliance by: 93 94 1. Preparing and implementing an annual operating budget with the 95 participation of the co-permittees. The budget yeaz shall coincide 9 6 with the fiscal yeaz of the DISTRICT, July 1 -June 30. 97 9 8 a. The co-permittees shall be permitted to review and approve 99 the annual operating budget for the forthcoming yeaz. loo Criteria for approval shall be an affirmative response from 101 a majority of the co-permittees. The review period shall 1 o z be from November 1 to November 30 of each year with 103 approval of the final budget to be completed by December 104 15. z 105 2. Preparing compliance reports to the Regional Board and providing 106 copies to the co-permittees. 107 l08 3. Preparing a draft system-wide Best Management Practices (BMP) 109 Program report for review and approval by the co-permittees. llo 111 4. Monitoring the implementation and ensuring the effectiveness of 112 system-wide BMPs. This will include field reconnaissance to 113 evaluate structural and procedural BMPs. 114 115 5. Preparing an annual report to the RWQCB, SAR presenting the 116 results of these evaluations. 117 11E B. The DISTRICT shall, to the maximum extent practicable and on a cost- 119 shared basis except in paragraph 3 below: 1zo 1 z 1 1. Perform the water quality and hydrographic monitoring for permit 12 2 compliance. 123 124 2. Develop uniform criteria for annual inspection of drainage 12 5 facilities. 126 127 3. Perform inspections, at no cost to the CITIES or the COUNTY, 12 s on those facilities owned by the DISTRICT. Contract, for such 129 inspections within the CITIES or COUNTY may be undertaken 13 o at the sole expense of the requesting CITY or COUNTY. 131 13 z C. The CITIES shall, to the maximum extent practicable and at no cost to 13 3 COUNTY or DISTRICT: 134 13 5 1. Implement a facility inspection program in accordance with the 13 6 uniform criteria developed by the DISTRICT, for all municipal 13 7 separate storm sewers as defined by the NPDES permit and within 13s the jurisdictional boundaries of that CITY. 139 140 2. Submit to the DISTRICT on an annual basis, storm drain maps 141 which reflect the modifications that were made to the storm drain 142 system during the past yeaz. 143 144 3. Prepaze watershed characterizations, including: 145 146 a. Zoning designations. 147 14 a b. Identification of areas where hazatdous materials presently 14 9 aze or aze suspected to have been stored, manufactured, or 15o disposed of. This shall include sites at which a hazazdous 151 material spill has occurred. 152 153 4. Review, approve, and implement system-side BMPs. 154 155 5. Eliminate or have eliminated, illegal/illicit connections to the storm 15 6 drain system. 3 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 1az 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 zoo 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 zos 6. Identify the legal authority for control of dischazges to the storm drain system. 7. Provide to the DISTRICT annual reports (on forms prepared by the DISTRICT) and any other information, in a timely fashion, needed to satisfy annum reporting requirements of the RWQCB, SAR. 8. Adopt and enforce a water pollution control ordinance, which prohibits non-NPDES permitted dischazges to the municipal separate storm sewer system. D. The COUNTY shall, to the maximum extent practicable and at no cost to the CITIES or the DISTRICT, undertake in the unincorporated areas of the COUNTY, all activities required above of the CITIES that are not responsibilities of the DISTRICT as outlined in Section III.B. IV. Program Costs. The responsibilities for payment of all shazed costs of equipment, services, contracted analytical services, and the cost of the NPDFS Permit, shall be distributed among the DISTRICT, COUNTY, and CITIES as follows: Participant DISTRICT CITIES + COUNTY Percent Contribution 5 95 Using the COUNTY's Geographical Information System, the DISTRICT will determine the adjusted acreage for each CITY and the COUNTY from the land use, area, and run- off coefficients as contained in Appendix A on an annual basis. Nadonat forests, state pazks, airports, landfills, and military installations are excluded. These calculations shall be completed by November 1 of each year and shall be included in the annual budget proposal. The total of shared costs shall not exceed $800,000 for fiscal year 1992/1993. A deposit which constitutes a share percentage according to Appendix A of the total anticipated first year costs shall be required of each CITY and the COUNTY. The DISTRICT shall invoice each co-permittce on a quarterly basis with the first payment due within 45 days of the date of the invoice. If at any time during a subsequent fiscal yeaz the program costs exceed the sum of the deposits, the DISTRICT shall submit invoices to the CITIES and the COUNTY to recover the deficit. The shaze for each CITY and the COUNTY shall be prorated according to the formula above. Each CITY and the COUNTY shall pay the invoice within 45 days of the billing date. The DISTRICT shall prepaze a fiscal yeaz end accounting within 60 days of the end of each fiscal yeaz and distribute copies to the co-permittees for their review. Co- permittees shall have forty-five calendaz days from the date of their receipt of the fiscal year end accounting to dispute in writing or concur with the findings. If the fiscal yeaz end accounting results in vests exceeding the sum of the deposits (including interest earnings), the DISTRICT shall invoice each CITY and the COUNTY for its prorated 4 209 shaze of the excess cost. Each CITY and the COUNTY shall pay the billing within 45 z1o days of the date of the invoice. If the fiscal yeaz end accounting results in the sum of 211 the deposits (including interest earnings) exceeding costs, the excess deposits will carry 212 forwazd to reduce the billings for the following yeaz. 213 214 After the initial billing for the program, the DISTRICT shall invoice each CITY and the zls COUNTY for its annual deposit after July 1, the start of the fiscal year. Each CITY z 16 and the COUNTY shall pay the deposit within 45 days of the date of the invoice. Each 217 CTTY's and the COUNTY'S deposit shall be based on their prorated share of the 218 approved annual budget, reduced for any surplus identified in the prior fiscal yeaz-end 219 accounting. 220 221 Interest eazned on the CITIES' and the COUNTY'S deposits will not be paid to the 2 2 z CITIES and the COUNTY, but will be credited against the CITIES' and the COUNTY'S x23 shaze of the program costs. 224 225 Upon termination of the program, a final accounting shall be performed by the z z 6 DISTRICT If costs exceed the sum of the deposits (including interest earnings), the 227 DISTRICT shall invoice each CITY and the COUNTY for its prorated shaze of the 228 excess. Each CITY and the COUNTY shall pay the invoice within 45 days of the date 229 of the invoice. If the sum of the deposits (including interest eanngs) exceed the costs, z 3 o the DISTRICT shall reimburse to each CITY and the COUNTY its prorated shaze of the 231 excess, within 45 days of the final accounting. Interest earnings aze used to offset the 232 CITIES' and the COUNTY'S shaze of program costs and will not be refunded to the 2 3 3 CITIES and the COUNTY. 234 235 Each CITY and the COUNTY shall beaz the financial responsibility for implementing 236 the program, within its jurisdictional boundaries, as outlined in Section III.C. and D. 237 238 The annual fee for the NPDES permit and the annual administrative costs incurred by x39 the DISTRICT shall be included in the total cost and paid according to Section IV and z 4 o Appendix A. 241 242 The financial responsibility for this agreement will be effective beginning with the 243 1992/1993 fiscal yeaz. 244 245 V. Life of the AGREEMENT. The life of the AGREEMENT shall be for an indefmite 246 period and such indefmite period shall end at such time as the Clean Water Act and/or 247 the RWQCB, SAR ceases to mandate compliance. 248 x49 VI. Additional Parties. Any city or other entity which wishes to be a co-permittee on the 25o San Bernazdino County Stormwater NPDES Permit that was issued by RWQCB, SAR 251 shall agree to the provrsions in this funding agreement and shall sign this AGREEMENT 252 prior to be included in the permit. The date of initiation, for determining participant 253 costs for any new cA-permittee shall be the date of inclusion in the San Bernazdino 254 County Stormwater NPDES Permit issued by RWQCB, SAR. The cost for adding any z 55 additional co-permittee to the program, including additional permit and processing fees, 256 shall be paid by the added co-permittee. Monies, if any, to be reimbursed to the 257 existing co-permittees shall be credited to their respective annual program operating fees 258 for the following budget yeaz. 259 z 6 o VII. Withdrawal from the AGREEMENT. A co-permittee may withdraw fmm this 261 AGRF.F.MRNT at the end of any fiscal year with written notice being received by the z62 DISTRICT 90 days prior to the end of the fiscal year. The withdrawing co-permittce 263 shall agree to file for a separate NPDF.S permit and to comply with all of the 264 requirements established by the RWQCB, SAR. The withdrawing co-pennittee shall be 2 65 responsible for all lawfully assessed penalties as a consequence of withdrawal. The cost z66 allocations to the remaining members will be calculated in the following budget year. 267 268 VIII. Non-compliance with NPDES Permit Requirements. Any co-pennittee found in non- 269 compliance with the conditions of the NPDFS peanut within their jurisdictional z 7 o responsibilities shall be solely liable for any lawfully assessed penalties, pursuant to z 7 i Section 13385 of the Water Code. Penalties that apply to all the pennittees shall be 272 assessed according to the formula in Appendix A. 273 274 1X. Legal Action/Costs/Attorngy Fees. Where any legal action is necessary to enforce any z75 provision hereof for damages by reason of an alleged breach of any provisions of this 2 7 6 AGREEMENT, the prevailing party shall be entitled to receive from the losing party all 277 attorney's fees and costs incurred in conjunction with such legal action. 278 279 X. Amendments to the AGREEMENT. This AGREEMENT may be amended by consent z s o of a two-thirds majority of the co-pennittees (rounded to the nearest whole number). z 81 z8z Amendments to this AGREEMENT may be adopted and executed concurrent) ,and shall become effective upon its execution by a majonty of the co-permittees as defined above. 283 284 XI. Authorized SiEnatories. Each pennittee and co-permittee will determine by either 285 resolution or ordinance who will be the authorized signatory. This person shall be z86 authorized to execute the application(s) for NPDFS Stormwater permit(s) and take all z s 7 other procedural steps necessary to file the application(s) for NPDES Stormwater 288 permit(s). 289 z 9 o XII. Notices. All notices shall be deemed duly given if delivered by hand; or five (5) 291 working days after deposit in the U.S. Mail, certified mail, return receipt requested. 292 293 XIII. Governing Iaw. This AGREEMENT will be governed and construed in accordance with z94 laws of the State of California. If~any provision or provisions of this AGREEMENT z95 shall be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable, the validity, legality, and 296 enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected or impaired 297 hereby. 298 299 XIV. Consent to Breach not Waiver. No teen or provision hereof shall be deemed waived 3 0o and no breach excused, unless such waiver or consent shall be in writing and signed by 3 01 any pennittee to have waived or consented. Any consent by any pennittee to, or waiver 3oz of, a breach by the other, whether expressed or implied, shall not constitute a consent 303 to, waiver of, or excuse for any other different or subsequent breach. 304 305 XV. Applicability of Prior Agreements. This document constitutes the entire AGREEMENT 306 between the co-permittees with respect to the subject matter; all prior agreements, 307 representation, statements, negotiations, and undertakings are superseded hereby. 308 AGREEMENT: NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM STORM WATER PERMIT 309 XVI. Execution of the AGREEMENT. This AGRF.F.MFNT may be executed in counterpart 31o and the signed counterparts shall constitute a single instrument. 311 31z IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the AGRFFIvIFNT has been executed as of the day and year first 313 above written. 314 315 PLEASE INSERT YOUR AGENCY'S STANDARD SIGNATURE PAGE. COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO By CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ~ ~/ / 'Ma or W. R. Holc ~mb 5/6 `92 ATTEST: City C erk Approved as to form and legal content: James F. Penman City Attorney By 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the AGREEMENT has been executed as of the day and year first above written. CITY OF CHINO HILLS / % ,' J Gweruf Norton-Perry, Mayor . ~ i' (~/ ATTEST: ity Clerk Approved as to form: ~~~.~ ~; ~ ~ ___ ~ City ttorney E02\AGREE:NPDES.CAV a APPENDIX A The following formula will be used by the District to determine the share costs as required in the "National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Stormwater Pemrit Implementation Agreement, Santa Ana Region", Section IV. Total Program Costs will be determined by the DISTRICT and allocated to the CITIES and the COUNTY by the following formula: ~ency AA* x (annual cost x 0.95) =Agency's Contribution Total AA** AA -Adjusted Acreage * -Each agency as listed below ** -Total adjusted acreage AGENCY: ay of San Bernardino Cities of: Big Bear Lake Chino Chino Hills Colton Fontana Grand Terrace Highland Lorna Linda Montclair Ontario Rancho Cucamonga Redlands Rialto San Bernardino Upland Yucaipa 2. The Agency Adjusted Acreage will be determined by the DISTRICT using the following formula: [(Ilu 1 -Ulu 1) x Clu ll + [(Ilu 2 -Ulu 2) x Clu 2j +...+[(U 1 - 13) x Cl = Adjusted Acreage I - Improved acreage for each landuse as defined below U - Unimproved acreage for each landuse as defined below lu - landuse as defined in the following table C - Runoff coefficient as derived from the San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual Appendix A (continued) Landuse Formula Desi nation Runoff Coefficient (C) mgle amtly Residential .5 acre lots lu 1 4 1 acre lots lu 2 dwellings/acre lu 3 •6 -4 dwellings/acre lu 4 5 5-7 dwellings/acre lu 5 5 - dwellings/acre lu 6 •7 >1 wellutgslacre lu 7 6 ulhple amily Residential ondomintums lu 8 Apartments lu 9 obtle ome arks lu 10 ommerctal, owntown Business or Industrial lu 11 0. 20 drool lu 12 0• ubltc ark Ag-rcultural lu 13 0.594 ndeveloped 1-13 .547 Reference: San Bernardino County Hydrology Manual and SCAG modified Anderson landuse classification (1992) AGENCY LAND USE ACREAGES AND COST SHARE VALUES I.i1® osE n~eevc mcastD® roTec 9H1.AIST® AGBNCI CITL 1 2 3 9 5 6 7 8 ACRBJIGR IICAP.iaGB ACR621G6 SH11RE BBLC 323 2259 22 32 400 26 175 760 49 4046 BBLC 192 1570 17 25 328 18 104 415 2669 S 10100 CNHC 411 3911 182 95 160 79 1778 13382 6759 26757 CHHC 294 2718 140 74 131 55 1056 7320 11738 S 49200 CHIC 362 3081 261 66 2101 259 9983 594 359 11562 CHIC 215 2142 200 51 1723 177 2663 325 7496 5 28200 CNTY 8262 9519 231 339 6018 393 20154 48219 308838 401975 CNTY 4908 6615 177 263 4939 275 11971 26376 55519 S 209100 COLC 260 2107 254 120 1803 167 665 4730 53 10158 COLC 154 1964 195 93 1478 117 395 2587 6483 S 24400 FONC 1110 5733 386 BO 2659 294 1922 11154 87 22919 FONC 659 3984 296 62 2176 205 894 6101 14327 S 54000 GRTC 398 731 99 35 229 44 139 642 0 2255 GRTC 206 508 72 27 1BB 31 BO 351 1463 S 5500 HIGC 526 2579 1,68 92 416 69 721 4074 41 8685 HIGC 312 1792 128 71 391 48 928 2229 5349 S 20200 LoMC 230 855 269 64 396 144 652 2109 5 4723 LOMC 136 594 206 49 324 100 387 1154 2950 S 11100 MTCC 72 1289 219 B2 1001 152 133 333 0 3282 MTCC 43 896 168 63 821 106 79 182 2358 5 8900 ONTO 407 6162 938 231 5fi11 398 2303 6171 1319 23540 ONTO 242 9282 719 179 4601 278 1368 3375 15049 S 56700 RCCC 896 8015 796 186 2894 492 1825 8930 152 29136 RCCC 532 5570 610 144 2332 394 1089 4885 15501 S 58400 REDO 1835 9253 641 146 1743 392 3550 10291 220 23070 REDO 1090 2956 491 113 1930 274 2109 5629 14092 5 53100 RIAC 347 5150 339 215 1820 296 474 5165 333 14139 RIAC 206 3580 259 167 1492 207 282 2825 9018 S 34000 SBOC 706 9944 1056 526 SBBS 1027 1006 11817 4994 36914 SBOC 919 6911 809 408 4826 718 597 6964 21152 S 79700 UPDC 62 4610 685 83 1159 193 936 2222 157 9602 UPDC 37 3204 525 64 947 135 259 1215 6386 5 24100 yUCC 2701 2098 74 512 606 205 1558 9268 11 17033 yOCC 1604 1458 57 397 497 143 926 5070 10152 5 38300 323327 644796 201697 $760,000 FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT 540,000 ssoD,ooo LAIOO~ rr~awe 4 ROliOFP C06PPIU~TS: 1 - Low Denalty Rea. - .594 5 - Commercial/Inducirlal - .820 2 - Xlgh Density Rea. - .695 6 - Learning Ina t. - .699 3 - Multi. Family Rea. - .766 7 - Public Parks/Aq. - .594 4 - Mobile Home Parke - .775 8 - Vacant/Undeveloped - .547