HomeMy WebLinkAboutPlanning #42
. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
.
.
From: James Funk, Director
Dept: Development Services
Subject: Tentative Tract Map No. 16947 to
subdivide approximately 6.78 acres into 29
single-family residential lots and
Development Permit (Type III ) No. 04-44 to
construct 28 detached single-family homes.
The project site is located on the north side of
7th Street, between San Carlos Avenue and
San Anselmo Avenue in the RS, Residential
Suburban land use district.
Date: March 21,2005
MCC Date: April 18, 2005
Synopsis of Previous Council Action:
None
Recommended Motion:
That the hearing be closed and that the Mayor and Common Council:
1) Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program
(Attachment F), and
2) Approve Tentative Tract Map No. 16947 and Development Permit (Type III) No. 04-44
based upon the Findings of Fact contained in the Staff Report and subject to the Conditions
of Approval (Attachment C) and Standard Requirements (Attachment D), which includes
initiation of eminent domain proceedings.
YmWu J<m-r JF-
James Fu
Contact Person:
Aron Liang, Senior Planner
384-5057
Phone:
Supporting data attached: Staff Report
Ward:
6
FUNDING REQUIREMENTS: Amount: N/A
Source: (Ace!. No.)
Finance:
Council Notes:
Agenda Item No.
32"
--..
~lltfo5
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO - REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION
STAFF REPORT
SUBJECT: Tentative Tract Map No. 16947 to subdivide approximately 6.78 acres into 29
single-family residential lots and Development Permit (Type III) No, 04-44 to
construct 28 detached single-family homes. The project site is located on the north
side of 7th Street, between San Carlos Avenue and San Anselmo A venue in the RS,
Residential Suburban land use district.
OWNER
Etiwanda SB Investment
2190 Hornet Road
San Mateo, CA 91108
(626) 943.8199
APPLICANT:
Kevin Roberts
Spectra Homes, LLC
521-1/2 Myrtle, No.7
Monrovia, CA 91016
(626) 305.9444
BACKGROUND
The applicant requests that the Mayor and Common Council approve Tentative Tract Map No.
16947 to subdivide approximately 6.78 acres into 29 single-family residential lots and
Development Permit (Type III) No. 04-44 to construct 28 detached single-family homes. The
project site is located on the north side of 7'h Street, between San Carlos Avenue and San Anselmo
Avenue in the RS, Residential Suburban land use district (Exhibit I).
Specifically, approval of this tract map would authorize the City to initiate its eminent domain
proceedings pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act, Section 66462.5. The proceedings would
allow the City to utilize its power to acquire certain needed right-of-way from Ms. Kenia
Canales (Property owner of APN: 0142-032-03) for Cleveland Street extension. The needed
right-of-way, approximately 3,948 square feet (42' x 94'), is to allow Cleveland Street (60 feet in
width) to connect with the existing Cleveland Street east of the proposed tract. The needed right-
of-way from Ms. Kenia's backyard leaves her property with no setback problem and noise.
The City has 120 days (4 months) to acquire by negotiation the interest in the land that will
permit the improvements to be made. The 120 days starts at the time of filing of the final map
(presentation to the Mayor and Common Council for final approval). In the event that the City
fails to meet the time limitation, the applicant shall be required to construct a knuckle at the
intersection of Cleveland Street and San Benito Avenue. Please refer to the Planning
Commission Staff Report for additional discussion (Exhibit 2).
At their me~ting of February 8, 2005, the Planning Commission opened the public hearing and
received public testimony on this matter. At the hearing, the project applicant stated that he
has been unsuccessful in attempts to acquire the needed right-of-way for extension of
Cleveland Street and is requesting that the City initiate its eminent domain power in order to
resolve and facilitate this matter.
.
.
.
Ms. Canales asserted that although the project applicant had made a few attempts to acquire the
needed right-of-way, a suitable offer price had not been put forth for her consideration. She was
also concerned that the eminent domain proceedings would remove her rights to a fair
compensation for her property.
Additionally, Ms. Charlesetta Jacobs, a local resident, spoke on drainage problems located
generally on 7"' Street, approximately 60 feet south of the project site. Apparently, ponding
occurs quite often along 7"' Street. She was concerned that this development could compound
the drainage problems and pose a serious public health and safety issue in this neighborhood.
Councilman Rikke Van Johnson told the Planning Commission that he was aware of the
drainage issues and had reported the problems the to City (See Exhibit C for details).
After considerable discussion, the Planning Commission made a motion to recommend approval
of Tentative Tract Map No. 16947 and Development Permit (Type III) No. 04-44, which
includes initiation of eminent domain proceedings. Commissioners Brown, Coute, Durr,
Heasley, Morris, and Sauerbrun voted 6 to 0 in support of the proposals. Commissioner Enciso
was absent.
In an effort to acquire the needed right-of-way, Mr. Kevin Roberts, project applicant, made
additional contacts with Ms. Canales after the Planning Commission hearing. To date, Mr.
Roberts has been unsuccessful and is requesting that the City utilize its power pursuant to the
Subdivision Map Act to help settle this matter.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
None. The applicant paid the Tentative Tract Map and Development Permit (Type III) filing
fees and will be required to pay all costs associated with the eminent domain proceedings.
RECOMMENDATION
That the hearing be closed and that the Mayor and Common Council:
1. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program
(Attachment F), and
2. Approve Tentative Tract Map No. 16947 and Development Permit (Type III) No. 04-44
based upon the Findings of Fact contained in the Staff Report and subject to the Conditions
of Approval (Attachment C) and Standard Requirements (Attachment D), which includes
initiation of eminent domain proceedings.
EXHIBITS
1. Location Map
2. Planning Commission Staff Report dated February 8, 2005
3. Interoffice Memorandum from Mr. Michael Grubbs, Engineering Manager, on field
investigation of drainage problems on 71h Street dated February 25,2005
.
i i
'i Iji:. ! i,' i ; I ~, III ATIACHMENT"B"
I. ! III ~I :!' ~ ;! i!! !~: l~1 Ii! i Ii !
_L'li I -II i'l ' -II Ii II, II> ,I, i I ! ,'!,
I '.'1 'I" ~ i . . ,','Ii!i ,Si ; c I UI.
.,1 - - J' I I ," " I. 'i' I '
J II' II I I I: j' 'I' !II' ;,: i' 'I i;!: Iii ;
i 'II I,' I I ". I ,I I j' I; ,II,' I Ii;! ii I'" ,:
" ", _ III' ., ' I I ii- II ,i I Ill" " I
filii III: ! I' I, II';' ii~ I,ll'" i I ; 'Ii, I
1'1' ., I 'il I, I ii' 'f 'j' " I I' i' -, ", , ;
~! ~ i'P: I;! I~P';~ ~i!l:11 ;,1: il I d ,!!: ilP ;
~ ! it"!! I! l Ii' I~ Ie r! i!i! ii!: i i i! ,: ! ! II !jj i I
~ i ~ J,1l II Ii II I;! I! Ii I!~ I!I; l!li I III i l! : ; l! Iii l !
I
I :;
- ~
~
.--"-
,
'-cl L.
.~~ J", t
~..: -' ~~
"'z __ ~;;
~ _ . ti
,>:l~"\Z06' .
-4 \, ON
".i~
. " g I ~ I
,,~~ )i ,. . U;'. ' 1
~:<:::-'~':'~ it! i" ~ i II. 1!?1~i' i !
_of E fi ~ ""I ~ ".~"O\ ..'
\ . <<1.1." \ ~ 1..
'i ..'" '. ,''In..
-T--
Ii,
~Ii
a
.,f<? ~
~:~ '"
,i 1 I ii ,'"I : ~; Iii
.. u ::1
Jlri-! :> Ii
'1irh
~iii!
- '\~
~I!IIII I'i I' ~ ~ L
SI ~. 1"1,1 I ' i
IhUiul .Ishii I
o a a 0 a'a
'4'
r
,O?"',L 31'QS
r
"r~
! +-'~
: ,i
: 1 ..!
" I \
I.,
:L~
3.\V
_____---1-__
Otn3SN't'
NVS
I
i
.
--
. ,i
I I:! ~ ~
I I
~
.
; ...u ~a
!
.
,m'
z
,
,
\.
-----
_' :-s o;;,1I;~ ..,.. \'0..,...1;. Ij)-rl(.
-v
_,:; .~C .: C" -: ,-
.< 0"'.
~~
~6
,..
':1
(j'
~
~~
"
, .
!jJr
. I
, .
! j
: i
~I.
:'$, I
:tit
~i
~ 1"1
, I
o
~
<:r
)(
-N
~
-&-
!
~
.
)<
~
~
i
.-
ct.
1
~
..
o
j
EXHIBIT 1
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PROJECT: TT 16947 (SUB 04-15)
PLANNING DIVISION DPIII No. 04-44
LOCATION MAP
LAND USE DISTRICTS HEARING DATE: 2/8/05
u
NORTH
'.
ItUltlTA
LINt.
'-
..
1
I
n
~
.
z
z
..
r
==F
.. sr
{'fv
I
l ~ it;
m~ I
-..
v((""
.~
,\
I
.
.
.
EXHIBIT 2
SUMMARY
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING DIVISION
CASE:
Tentative Tract Map No. 16947 (Sub No. 04-15) &
Development Permit (Type III) No. 04-44
6
2/8/05
6
AGENDA ITEM:
HEARING DATE~
WARD:
OWNER:
Etiwanda SB Investment
2190 Hornet Road
San Mateo, CA 91108
(626) 943.8199
APPLICANT:
Kevin Roberts
Spectra Homes, LLC
521-1/2 Myrtle, No.7
Monrovia, CA 91016
(626) 305.9444
REQUEST/LOCATION:
Tentative Tract Map:
. Subdivide approximately 6.78 acres parcel into 29 single-family residential lots. The lots range
from a minimum lot size of 7,205 square feet to a maximum of 9.889 square feet.
Development Permit:
. Construct 28 single-family dwellings. The site contains one existing single-family home for a total
of 29 homes.
The project site is located on the north side of 7'" Street, between San Carlo A venue and San Anselmo
Avenue in the RS. Residential Suburban land use district.
CONSTRAINTS/OVERLAYS:
Flood Zone X Area.
ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS:
o Exempt from CEQA
::J No Significant Effect
o Negative Declaration
~ Potential Effects, Mitigation Measures and Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Plan
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
o Approval
o Conditions
::J Denial
::J Continuance to:
17TM No. 16947
DPlll No. 04-44
Page 2
.
REQUEST AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION
This request is for approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 16947 under the authority of
Development Code Section 19.66.070 to subdivide approximately 6.78 acres into 29 single-
family residential lots. The residential lots will have a minimum lot size of 7,205 square feet.
Development Permit No. 04-44 is for approval to construct 28 single-family homes. The site
contains one existing single-family home for a total of 29 homes. The project site is located on
the north side of 7th Street. between San Carlo A venue and San Anselmo A venue in the RS,
Residential Suburban land use district (Attachment A).
The tract circulation has been designed to extend San Carlo Avenue and San Benito Avenue
northerly approximately 281 feet connecting to Cleveland Avenue to provide a through traffic
circulation pattern. The proposed project will be developed in one phase with the density of 4.3
units per acre (Attachment B).
The proposed project offers a I-story and 2-story housing style with 3 different model plans.
Each model plan offers 2 variations of finishes that includes a stucco look, masonry veneer,
stone veneer and other style for a total of 12 variety choices. A 6-foot vinyl fence will be
constructed for the perimeter fencing and for each house (Attachment B).
The layouts are as follows:
. Home square footage
Plan 1. I-story, 1,910 square feet (living area) with a 2-car garage (400 square feet).
Plan 2, 2-story, 1,932 square feet (living area) with a 3-car garage (588 square feet).
Plan 3, 2-story, 2,102 square feet (living area) with a 3-car garage (588 square feet).
Tract composition
Plan 1 (4bd/3ba) 10 homes (35%)
Plan 2 (4bd/2.5ba) 8 homes (30%)
Plan 3 (4bd/3ba) 10 homes (35%)
Total..........................28 homes (100%)
Plans 1, 2, and 3 offer some extra features for personal preferences to convert a loft into a
bedroom/retreat area or to convert a fireplace into a fountain. The homes are wood-
frame/stucco construction with concrete tile roofs. Architectural treatments include variations
in roof style, front entry projection and garage door designs. The homes include window
treatments on all four sides, metal roll up garage doors and fully landscaped front-yards for all
the houses.
.
.
.
.
TITM No. 16947
DPlll No. 04-44
Page 3
SETTING/SITE CHARACTERISTICS
The project site is occupied with one residential structure located on Lot 20. The remainder is
vacant. Etiwanda Avenue forms the northern project site boundary. The site can be accessed
through Eitwanda Avenue, San Carlo Avenue, San Benito Avenue and Cleveland Street. The
site is located in the RS, Residential Suburban land use district and surrounded by single-
family residential pevelopment in all directions.
BACKGROUND
The Development/Environmental Review Committee (D/ERC) initially reviewed the proposed
tract on November 18, 2004. The D/ERC determined that the project applicant should make
every effort to obtain the right-of-way from the property identified as APN: 0142-032-03 for
Cleveland Street. The needed right-of-way is approximately 3,948 square feet (42' x 94'). The
right-of-way is to allow Cleveland Street (60 feet in width) to connect with the existing
Cleveland Street east of the proposed tract. Public Works also prefers Cleveland Street
extension to allow a through traffic flow. In the event that the project applicant is unable to
acquire the right-of-way, the City may file an eminent domain action against the property
owner of APN: 0142-032-03 pursuant to the State Subdivision Map Act or require the project
applicant to construct a knuckle at the intersection of Cleveland Street and San Benito Avenue.
To date. the project applicant has been unsuccessful in acquiring the right-of-way for
Cleveland Street from the property identified as APN: 0142-032-03 which is approximately .64
acres (27.730 square feet - 94' x 295'), and contains a single-family structure fronting
Etiwanda Avenue. The reduction of the 42' x 94' (3,948 square feet) area from the backyard
leaves the lot with .54 acres (23.782 square feet), with no setback problems and noise.
Several attempts were made including sending an offer letter and a personal visit. The owners
of APN: 0142-032-03 are not interested in selling part of their portion (Attachment G).
Pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act. Section 66462.5, the applicant is requesting that the City
initiate eminent domain proceedings against the property owner of APN: 0142-032-03-0000 to
permit the necessary improvements to be made. Per the above Section, the City has 120 days
(4 months) to acquire by negotiation the interest in the land that will permit the improvements
to be made. This time frame includes proceedings for immediate possession of the property.
The 120 days starts at the time of filing of the final map. In the event that the City fails to
meet the time limitation, the applicant shall be required to construct a knuckle at the
intersection of Cleveland Street and San Benito A venue.
CEQA STATUS
Tom Dodson prepared an Initial Study on behalf of the project applicant. The Environmental
Review Committee independently reviewed, analyzed, and exercised judgement in reviewing
the Initial Study and mitigation measures and making its determination. Pursuant to the Public
Resources Code and CEQA guidelines, a Notice of Intent was filed with the County and the
Initial Study was made available to the public for review and comment beginning on November
24,2004, and ending on December 15, 2004. No comment was received on the Initial Study.
.
.
.
rITM No. /6947
DPIIl No. 04-44
Page 4
On December 16, 2004, the D/ERC determined that the proposed Initial Study adequately
addressed the environmental issues and recommended that a Mitigated Negative Declaration be
adopted and moved Tentative Tract Map No. 16497 to Planning Commission.
Additionally, the D/ERC first heard Development Permit (Type III) No. 04-44 for construction
of homes on December 2, 2004, and moved the project to the Planning Commission. The
D/ERC determined that the Initial Study included action measures to properly mitigate and
monitor any potential significant negative impacts relating to development and construction of
this site.
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP
1.
Is the proposed map consistent with the General Plan?
Yes, the proposed map is consistent with the General Plan and Development Code as
shown in Table A below. The RS, Residential Suburban land use district allows single-
family residential units at a maximum density of 4.5 units per gross acre. The proposal
is for single-family development at 4.3 units per gross acre. All lots created meet the
minimum lot size, width and depth requirements.
TABLE 'A' -- DEVELOPMENT CODE AND GENERAL PLAN CO
NFORMANCE
GENERAL
PLAN
Permitted
7,200square
foot min.
CATEGORY
PROPOSAL
DEVELOPMENT CODE
Permitted Use
Lot Size
Permittetd
Residential
7,205 sq. ft. min.
60 feet min.
66 foot min. corner lot
100 feet minimum,
4.3 units
2 standards mean of access
7,200 sq. ft. min.
60 feet - interior lots
66 foot minimum corner lots
100 feet
4.5 units
2 standards mean of access
- N/A
N/A
4.5 units
N/A
Lot Width
Lot De
Densit
Access
2. Is the design of the proposed subdivision consistent with the General Plan?
Yes, the proposal is consistent with the objectives and policies of the General Plan as
follows:
.
.
.
TITM No. 16947
DPlll No. 04-44
Page 5
General Plan Objective I.W states: "Promote the development of low-density,
large lot, high quality single-family detached residential units."
The proposed tract complies with Development Code requirements and will enhance the
existing residential development in this surrounding area. This project will promote
and implement the objectives and policies of the General Plan.
3. /s the site physically suitable for the type of proposed development?
Yes. the site of the proposed project is physically suitable for the proposed development
in that the division of land is consistent with the Subdivision Map Act. The tentative
tract map conforms to the subdivision design standar<;Is specified by the Development
Code in that it meets the minimum lot size for the RS, Residential Suburban land use
district. All of the proposed lots will have access to a dedicated roadway and
infrastructure that will provide water, sewer, power, gas, telephone, and cable to the
site.
4.
/s the site physically suitable for the proposed density of development?
Yes, the site is physically suitable for the proposed development in that the division of
land is consistent with the Subdivision Map Act and the proposed lots will be
compatible in design with the existing residential lots in all four directions to the east,
north, west and south. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the RS development
standards. The proposed density at 4.3 units per gross acre is lower than that of the RS
district requirements at 4.5 units per gross acre.
5.
/s the design of the subdivision likely to cause substantial environmental damage. or
substantially and unavoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat?
No, as described in the CEQA Section of this report, based on the Initial Study
prepared by Tom Dodson & Associates on November 2004, no evidence of sensitive
habitats for plant or animal species were observed, and none were expected due to the
fact that no native or natural habitat remains on the site.
6. /s the design of the subdivision likely to cause serious public health problems?
No, all lots proposed to be created will have access to a dedicated street. The design of
the proposed subdivision meets all of the applicable requirements for the RS land use
district. The circulation layout has been reviewed by the City Engineer and designed to
accommodate the type of traffic forecast to be generated by the proposed subdivision
and is unlikely to result in any serious public health problems.
.
TITM No. 16947
DPlll No. 04-44
Page 6
Additionally, should the right-of-way property acquisition for Cleveland Street proven
to be unsuccessful pursuant to the State Subdivision Map Act, the applicant shall be
required to construct a knuckle at the intersection of Cleveland Street and San Benito
Avenue. Based on this, the design of the subdivision is unlikely to cause serious public
health problems.
7.
Will the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements conflict with any
easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use oj, property
within the proposed subdivision?
No, the easements identified in the Preliminary Title Report relate to electrical lines and
other utilities. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements will not
conflict with these easements, because any existing easements would be abandoned or
relocated as determined by the Public Works/Engineering Division through processing
of the Final Map.
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
1.
Is the proposed development permitted within the subject zoning district and does it
comply with all of the applicable provisions of the Development Code. including
prescribed development/site standards and any/all applicable design guidelines?
.
Yes. the proposed homes are consistent with the General Plan and Development Code,
in that the RS, Residential Suburban land use district allows single-family residential
units at a maximum density of 4.5 units per gross acre. The proposal is for single-
family development at a density of 4.3 units per gross acre. All units created meet
minimum unit size, lot coverage, and setback criteria as shown in Table "A" below.
TABLE "A" - Development Code/General Plan Conformance
.
,
I CATEGORY PROPOSAL DEVELOPMENT CODE GENERAL PLAN
i -
Permitted Use Single-Family Residential Permitted Consistent
Density 4.3 du/ac. 4.5 du/ac. 3.1 du/ac.
Setbacks
- Front 25' averaging 25' averaging N/A
- Side I 5' min. I 5' min. N/A
- Rear 18' min.l25' averaging I 15' min. I N/A
- Side Street IS' 15' I N/A
Lot Coverage 21 % to 26% 35% max. N/A
,
Unit Size 1,910 s.f. to 1,500 S.f. min. N/A
2.102 s.f.
.
.
.
177M No. /6947
DPllI No. 04-44
Pa.~e 7
I
I I story (15 feet)
1 Height 2 story (35 feet) N/A
i & 2 story (24 feet)
i D. U. Separation 15' min. 15' min. N/A
,
2. Is the proposed development consistent with the General Plan?
Yes, the proposal is consistent with the General Plan objective and policy as follows:
General Plan Objective 1.11 states: "Promote the development of single-family
detached units in a high quality suburban setting."
General Plan Policy 1.11.10 states: "Permit the development of single-family detached
residential units at a density of up to 4.5 units per gross acre........in areas designated as
"Residential Suburban (RS)"
This proposal is for single-family dwelling units located in the RS land use designation.
The development of the site will provide this area with needed improvements
surrounded by single family homes. The proposed single-family detached residential
units will be compatible with the adjacent residential units in the surrounding areas to
the east direction.
3.
Is the proposed development harmonious and compatible with eXIsting and future
developments within the land use district and general area, as well as the land uses
presently on the subject property?
Yes, the proposed project is consistent with the residential character of the surrounding
land uses as well as future residential development. The proposed single-family units
are compatible with and will complement the existing single-family units in this area.
The residential character of the proposed development is similar to that of recently
completed single-family homes in this neighborhood.
The home designs and treatment elements are designed to provide continuity with
neighboring single-family structures. Architectural treatments include variations in roof
style, entry area and garage door designs. All windows and doors and side and rear
elevations will be architecturally treated.
.
.
.
4.
ITTM No. 16947
DPlll No. 04-44
Page 8
/s approval of the Development Permit for the proposed development in compliance
with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and Section
/9.20.030(6) of the Development Code?
Yes, the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration that were prepared for Tract
No. 16947 included the development and construction of this site with 28 single family
dwellings. . Approval of this Development Permit is in compliance with the
requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and Development Code
Section 19.20.030 (6) pertaining to environmental resources and constraints. Approval
of the proposed project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic,
noise, air quality or water quality. This is because all the necessary infrastructure is
already in place to handle the anticipated capacity resulting from this proposed project.
It is anticipated that the impacts relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality
will be less than significant.
5.
Will there be potential significant negative impacts upon environmental quality and
natural resources that could not be properly mitigated and monitored?
No significant harmful effects on the quality of the environment or on natural resources
will exist as a result of this project. The project site is not located in geological hazard
area and occurs within city limits and the site has no habitat value for endangered or
threatened species. The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and
public services. The proposed projeci complies with the RS land use development
standards and is consistent with Development Code.
6.
/s the subject site physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of use being
proposed?
Yes, the site is physically suitable for the type and density/intensity of the project being
proposed as evidenced by project compliance with all applicable Development Code
Standards as noted in Table" A". The proposed project complies with the density
requirement at 4.3 du/ac from 4.5 as permitted by the Code for the RS district.
7. Are there adequate provisions for public access. water, sanitation, and public utilities
and services to ensure that thiproposed use would not be detrimental to public health
and safety?
Yes, all agencies responsible for reviewing access, and providing water, sanitation and
other public services have all had the opportunity to review the proposal, and none have
indicated an inability to serve the project. The proposal will not be detrimental to the
public health and safety in that all applicable Codes and will apply to the construction
of this project.
.
.
.
8.
ITTM No. 16947
DPlIl No. 04-44
Page 9
Are the location. size design and operating characteristics of the proposed development
detrimental 10 the public illlerest, health, safety, convenience. or welfare of the City?
No, the proposal is consistent with all provisions of the Development Code. The
proposed size and design of the units will be compatible with the single-family units
developed in the area. The location and operating characteristics of the proposed
project will not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety. convenience, or
welfare of the City.
CONCLUSION
The proposals meet all applicable Findings of Fact for approval of Tentative Tract Map No.
16947 and Development Permit (Type III) No. 04-44.
RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission independently review, analyze, and exercise
judgement in reviewing the Initial Study in making its determination and recommend that the
Mayor and Common Council:
I) Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting
Program (Attachment F),
2) Approve Tentative Tract Map No. 16947 and Development Permit (Type III) No. 04-44
based upon the Findings of Fact contained in- the Staff Report and subject to the Conditions
of Approval (Attachment C) and Standard Requirements (Attachment D), which includes
initiation of eminent domain proceedings.
Respectfully Submitted,
y~C. ;0;+t- ~ J'F
James Funk !)
Director of the Development Service Department
~
Aron Liang
Senior Planner
Attachment A
Attachment B
Attachment C
Attachment" D
Attachment E
Attachment F
Attachment G
Location Map
Tentative Tract Map, Site, Floor and Elevations Plans
Conditions of Approval
Standard Requirements
I ni tia1 Study
Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program
Offer Letters
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PROJECT: TT 16947 (SUB 04-15)
PLANNING DIVISION DPIII No. 04-44
LOCATION MAP
LAND USE DISTRICTS HEARING DATE: 2/8/05
u
NORTH
ACMITA
....Sf
tsA::> LINt.
~
,
n
.,
~
z
..
..
==F
ffv
~ ~ :..: :;
Irn1 ~ I
--
'~
, l ;
. .
, ~ , i
, /
,
, .~~~ "'"",
, / ,
, a ...: h . ,
, . .. ",...~ , i ~
" . ili : i
, - .
,
,
, .
" . i --t
'" , ~ II: i
,"
,
. ,
i I ~ , ;-,. ,----------,
_ " ,~o:~ '/
~"'~ i~ii: ,)(
I; .-<;::1 il!:--" 0: i
~ ~,LJD/" ~ :",.
, /
.
~~
,~
'li~:' <:
:::;;
~-
.1
i5]!ig
g!'
- I
~a
-. , ,
IJ ~ !Y ! :
,
,w -
,
;= ~ "",i
~z ~il'
u .
:> ~i;
sl..
~i,h
~ iii!
~
i'li " I
~IU,~! I.i I! ; !!!
gl...d"i il~ ;$! ! ! !
I mUm i.lshi Ii
o e a e 8- e-
'-!'
~~..,......-:--
.
r
~~
, .,1'
" ' '(
." J..,
- '\1
:-~
.-'--....i.-..f--
~
,
r--..
~
m
<.0
.
o
z
,
,
,
0' ,
z'
I-- is : """':?.'t
U~,: ,pr,
<(:3:.' "
a:ll, ~
,0::: z ~ '
d-~:'
~
'"
.
-9'1
---;;-g---r-':-
'"
\
"
..,
,
'.
I ;;, . '. . I' I" ATTACHMENT "B"
I ~.... _~. i! i :z 11 I"
!' ill" I. I ,I ,I ,'il l;i 'II !. i ;;, I
" '1 1., "I '-, 10, II . I Ii '
.. .~.. 1''' ..I . ~ .... .. I ' .
j -~, i! 1 : >;~ I r :;11 ~~~ i~Q i! ~ ;~; I
I Il' ,i, ~ II j ,'III.!. II' I, 'I '. I' ,
J "I!.I' " I' - I' ~ II' .l' " I' -,,,,' :
'I' I I . I 'I~ ~!1 II, - . ~i! il'
~ :ii ; il~ I ji : I 'i. 51; ~, : ~ ~ ~ ill !lll ~
j ~ il'I' I ". 1 ,I I ; iil .111 ~ I II I j i :111' :
I',' 'I i 1:1' ,j :1 I,' ii- il'; I Ii r -;1',
j :,j' 1'1- i ' 1:1 i, Iii !l' ii:, II!,' " " Ii: . .: "~I' ! I
!'I~ .I! I! I ,s" (I -fa a. B ~ ~ ~ I~~ JR . ~
~. ~ ,',,':: I' I b,' i; i! I~i I!I~I :11: n II: !I ::1:: i I
~: , I I I; ,I J' ;1 ii I n" I. . Il. I J I-Ie $II.~ ; I
~I i ill;; l!i U: I' !~ II! :!ij Ii!:; I I liL H, 'jj !l
~i . ,! 1.11 II Ii " Ii! ,! ii I!: ,!I: Ill! III ! i II I : I! Iii I !
.
l
! J
'-?
: ~
. .
, i
I ,
, i
i _
i i
; l:.;o:;.::~;;::'~~:'::l
l!J~55.i;;r~l.l.l1. I
II .......,----'-1
, ~:::~!l~U:;;.I;!
,Of"',' JNJS
'~
. ,
<
'Ivl
%1":
gz
"
~
r
'{'
.~
.~
\::i
----------- -------:=:!!'
_____.--a__
Ol'f13SNY --'-NVS
..
"
~
'vi
Z''';
~:i
U
:;l
"'.
~'
"\ l06. 'ON ' ~
. >-- 10'''''''
, , _'" , ,--,-, r ----c., ,1
~1' . '" o~. ,,',.~::i
:;. , I:; I = = rf'..., <(
.' ~'. ' II " ' " . .
~ _. ,-;' ' , I, ~
/5 ~ ~. ~ L:---,j ~ ~l~":\:
.,,"" JJ( ! lit.. ~ .::::,"
': sri'
i
;~ i.' ~
.-
, ,
. i,;,,"
".. ~
?
""
,~-
.j;
;U i
"/
"
:IX4
'I
""'! ::
,I '
~ /""
. \
""
--';h~;~
or-'
'Hi
..
""
'-,... .-'
o~
i:i....E
,
i
,"'"
i! ~
,oj;?';'
'.. i !
~
\-",.,.
,
...n.
..
· .; L,-'~ ';
-:~ i :;
"- -
,
lI'" \,
a.<t
'1 !
" "
"I~'
. I
.
;1_
!~ ~:::' Fl D~"
~JLL-r
'1iI)-~ [? 1Il
~"-
-~-----~-------- -- ----
-,- - - ---.---~~- -_....-:~----------
\ 133W.S-~~1....a---.-.-Wb ----
- ~,
\
-
-----
....--.
~'~
,f:. 'T
vO
i~!
iffl
r-
,.
(j'
j
(]J)~
'Q i
, I
; i.tr-
, I'
. ,
, '
: ti
: II
~il i
:'!i!'1
:ill~'
r i.
, '
. < i
: II
., : I
1---
~~. .__::~~<_-_,;'"-~ ~... .....WiOo)' 60-.&.1.
_", .~_ : L--
;;i ~~~ H I :::1: --
IS~ ::::;;' "
~:: i~ : ~ :t n ;;~
Ii !!" ~!i
d . j .,,1
au. . aIr". . :' ~
i Ii! i .1 ili I ,!' !
~ ~ ~. i~i ~ ~i" ,." i 3 8 r
. ' 1 ...~ ~ ~o~ :r ~ .. .. ;~
~ ..~e ~ t~o .~ , ~ ~ .
___._ .l."'" ji
-- .
-...-............-
h-"_.......-..............
I
, " : I
i;,';:: :
1;' ~, . :
i!,~j- ~L j
;;,1 Q II, ~~ ' . j
;~: Cl.l ,i ~ ~ 1 :
; ~~, i 5 i~ J~~~~J ~ ~~
iJ1i r ~ It ~~~~Jj i~jl
__'_"'_ L;IV)I~ 97"7 ,- i~""
.__.._____ - I," ..,,~~ tl..i I ~
-~,,""'_..-....,......, -
...-...--.,......."....,..
_~O<l'<@
~ -~
~
I' -"
- i'l i'j
I Q. 1 ~ '1' ~
~~~~ ~;i~
~jH ~~H
o
.5 G
"\:: c"
~
~~
;:: ~
t s
~~
;::~
..? ~ ~"
.~ fJJ ~
~ . .a
.::! fJ'J . E
~~~
V; ;: ~
00 ,..... ~
~'WV}
~~ ~
(/) 0+..:
C ~ V}
~~~
;.......... ~
~u~
~ ~
~.::!
fJJU
;..:
~
(/)
~
U
~
~
....
.~
:.::::
.
.l!
HI
,-l
..,
list
I .it.! i f ,ff
_ ;g i~
I ! ! !
I [tli!]d rn
I
".
,.",'"
""
>0,",
i i
"
"
!I
~i
ii
II
i I
"
I'
"
; i
) I
I
~
I
I
i
,
I
I
!
,
I
I
i
i
I
I
I
I
I
!
"
_ i
, i
i i~
',i"
Ii
: !
~I
~I
~i
i i
i I
! ,
i i
i I
, i i
__L__
"..
'N
t
I
I
i
I
I
I I
-~
II
II
I i
I
0:
.:
qn
.......r~ : ~ - .
I : r ,..-'!. i
I . L., ,..., , r~ i
! .' ,! J----"I
'.-J U-lS ~ i-' =!
~~
~
svnv,
~~
~
, i s ~
~ ,_-----"Q't'Kl.-~~
~,! ! III : I ~, '
'-) J --.J
LI" ~~.?
,
I
t
I
,
,
~
I
1JJOl1'
I
C
I
~
.s
"-
~
~
Cii
i c::::::::;',
-J
,'J!1:!J
~
=
{!I1fl :::
fry >--
, J
f'D
~::
?
?
I
;
od-
:::>
:::>
""
~~~
=" >
Z'
Z...lI
~~~
...c~
c.'
>;.
l.'-
I~-''''-'
.~--~
E7
z
<
~l
ifi~
"". ~
~i
Ii! :
l1')
I
~
~
;:;
0-
_c..
0...
NC
C
;::
--~.._..._......-...~""",-,.............,_...,......_.__.._...~-,,-_...,.........._ __~_''''''_'''',r...o:.,__.._,____'-J><lOl@
;:
<:::
-
0..
Q
....
Q
<'t
ii;i
!H~
r
,;
1~
,
I
r---------------
,
,
iJ
!
~l
I
~! I:
..
Ii;
Iii
'Ii
;11
mml
,
;i!
,!i
/
o
l3
::!
~:~
.,:
ii!;
~,
~I'
~,;
"
,
,
"
i~
'Ii
:!
'!,
:i!
"
;i~
'I
~l.
!:;
:"
<>
i
~~';J
i
\!
!
"
"
"
"
"
"
'\ II
~':J
~
~
~
~
N
I >~'~ ~
,I "'" ~~ ~.
~I ~ '. x.. ::s::
I 1,. ~ ~
:t&~~~~'j
----r
,
<
t
I
.!!
~.
--
.'
~,
,.,
:iL
",,
"l'
: ~~ .
~h !
I I
"
.!!
"-
.
c
c
'"
~~
~~
cL
~~
~
;:;
t. 1 ~ !
.k! ;
~
I
~
No>
'" -
o-;~
--
<-b"-
"-
CO
-0
a,-
-"'-
__~"_"'-"""'''''_'''"",,",,,lLOI_......_.....~..........._.__._loo~_.__..........____..___...,.........._..-___ho_@
"1
o
"
"
"
"
"
~ "
;;"
~;Il
~;II
u"
~ "
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
~1
!/
1 "
I
i
I:""
I
;1
.
,
,
~
D ~I ~I ~
~
8 a, ~1
0 a,
~ ~I
0 0' ::J
~, ~ 0
0i
~
~I ~I ~ ~~
;:: '" <I ~I ~I ~~
~ ~ ~,
- ~I
Q., ,------.-- ~ -~--
~I r;;.l...c,l ;1-
Q ~ ZI Z'
Zi Wi. "A C:::' ~,' ;~
..... I; jl
0'\ ~ 6[ v:~
H.. c '::1 f
..... li' w' O' ,i
" ...:?, n
<I Lo.I~
~ ~I
<I
Ii>
~. ~i
8i
" 0!
ffil N
"
~I
.
;::
~
-
Q.,
'"
rt'J
0'\
.....
"
"
.
W'
5,
~I'
",'
---------....,;:-------
~I'
~~
~I
.
-'!
..
.
o
o
"'
~;
~~
u~.::~
UU
i!31!
I
j
H-
.J~
~1.
>1'
",
;f;"
~,
i': 0
~I~
:V
::Ji~
~
o
"
~
:;!~I
""
>
~I
~I..
wi::
"I'
~I~ ,
_mm~~n_J:J
1--
.d
,.
.;;
..
.
c
e
"'
gl'
t,
V)I~
. ,
~'-'
..../
'-
'- -
'-r
""'. ~;j
~I 0J'-
~?
- ..::.)
~ ~
e
:: ~
:' II
" <
~
<-<_.<..~"_.
. .' -.' ~z
'-'.~~')~~~i~;~ - .'. ~.,,:;_
e
fr f ~-~"
_-l.;;;:;;..~~.---o
~. ~_ i<
O~
, I
I ,
]{J1
! ~j
~:::! I
.; '" ~ iii!
i-t! :t i
'~j .
~ Vl" ~
..
:: 1'"
" r
<I
~j
~i
~"
f,~
~
, "
~
>-=--'
;
-
-
~
Q
...
Q
'"
.
I
d
If
~ I
I
1
I
I
.
r
.
I
i
i
,
.
~ I
I i
I i
I
I
.
I
,
i
,
I
l
.
.
1
~ I
I i
I I
j
t
I
1
I
I
I
1
I
i
I
I
I
i
€l
.
.
I
.~ V
,/
.....
....._f
........ r- f
-1'" ~ n
>~
- '..J
::: ~
~
o
(".l
I
~
i
! ~ ~
! ~j
l:;~ I
i.t;:.- ~ J!
~ "'1)- i
~~! :
::
'"
Q;
~
0\
.....
---...-...---...-...---................--..........-......-"".------.---...-.-.----....-(:ll
.,.,
J 11 I II
., ~
" ,
< Dl
,
'i
~i 'i
I .
pI i
~' I
i 1
,
It
,
,
o.
co==
=
. OCJc::J
,
"
, " "
, ~j~ ~'
" " ..
~ ,
" ,
"
~\ ff
" "
~" "
'"
~
~~
"~ >ti .,~ -
,
~', ',.,
~:,=I
t-,
!li
~,
'.
I~
.' J
-t------:=---'t
I ·
.
.
. ,
~ ~
..../
....
....-
......r
~V'::
-';'1. :'-
~(
- -
~ .... J
::: ~
o
~
,
~
1 ,
. .
~~~
- ~. ~ ll!
,'U*
.';1'1 ..
:::
..
Q;
Q
-
0>
....
-_........-..---':"-...--_...._........._'-_.._..."'_.~-........_---"'--_......,......-...----.....-=
li'
,,'
.(,
~;
~
~
.....'~
.,~~_t.;
li'
,,!,
~I'
~:;
f:!
I
i
~
~
i
.,J
"'\
'::-.-1
,
!
\
.
.
.
"ATTACHMENT C"
CONDITIONS OF APPRO V AL
Tentative Tract Map No. 16947 &
Development Permit (Type III) No. 04-44
1. This approval is for subdivision of Tentative Tract Map No. 16947 to subdivide
approximately 6.78 acres into 29 residential lots and Development Permit for construction of
28 dwellings on Tract No. 16947. The project site is located on the north side of 7th Street,
between San Carlos Avenue and San Anselmo Avenue in the RS, Residential land use
district.
2. Tentative Tract Map No. 16947: Within two years of this approval, the filing of the final map
with the Council shall have occurred or the approval shall become null and void. Expiration
of a tentative map shall terminate all proceedings and no final map or parcel map shall be
filed without first processing a new tentative map. The City Engineer must accept the final
map documents as adequate for approval by Council prior to forwarding them to the City
Clerk. The date the map shall be deemed filed with the Council is the date on which the City
Clerk receives the map. The review authority may, upon application filed 30 days prior to
the expiration date and for good cause, grant an extension to the expiration date pursuant to
Section 19.66.170 of the Development Code and the State Map Act.
Expiration Date: February 8, 2007
3. Development Permit (Tvpe Ill) No. 04-44: Within two years of development approval,
commencement of construction shall have occurred or the permit/approval shall become null
and void. In addition, if after commencement of construction, work is discontinued for a
period of one year, then the permit/approval shall become null and void. However, approval
of this application does not authorize commencement of construction. All necessary permits
must be obtained prior to commencement of specified construction activities included in the
Conditions of Approval and Standard Requirements.
Expiration Date: February 8, 2007
4. The review authority may, upon application being filed 30 days prior to the expiration date
and for good cause, grant one time extension not to exceed 12 months. The review authority
shall ensure that the project complies with all current Development Code provisions.
Tell/al;ve Tract J 6443
Page J
. 5. In the event that this approval is legally challenged, the City will promptly notify the
applicant of any claim or action and will cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. Once
notified, the applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City, the Economic
Development Agency, the Redevelopment Agency, their affiliates, its officers, agents and
employees from any claim, action or proceeding against the City of San Bernardino. The
applicant further agrees to reimburse the City, the Redevelopment Agency and the Economic
Development Agency of any costs and attorneys' fees which the City, the redevelopment
Agency or the Economic Development Agency may be required by a court to pay as a result
of such action, but such participation shall not relive applicant of his or her obligation under
this condition.
The costs, salaries, and expenses of the City Attorney and employees of his office shall be
considered as "attorneys fees" for the purpose of this condition.
As part of the consideration for issuing this permit, this condition shall remain in effect if the
Tentative Tract Map and Development Permit are rescinded or revoked, whether or not at the
request of applicant.
.
6. The final map, grading plan, and site improvement plans shall be in substantial conformance
with the Tentative Map approved by the Planning Commission. Minor modifications to the
planes) shall be subject to approval by the Director of Development Services through a minor
modification permit process. Any modification which exceeds 10% of the following
allowable measurable design/site considerations shall require the re-filing of the original
application and a subsequent hearing by the appropriate hearing review authority if
applicable: "
a. On-site circulation and landscaping.
b. Placement and/or height of walls, fences and structures.
c. Minor lot line adjustments, provided the lot area of each approved lot shall not be
reduced below the minimum lot area permitted in the Development Code,
d. A reduction/increase in density, intensity or number of lots of a development project.
e. Reconfiguration or architectural features, including colors, and/or modification of the
finished materials that do not alter or comprise the previously approved theme.
7. No vacant, relocated, altered, repaired or hereafter erected structure shall be occupied or no
change of use of land or structure(s) shall be inaugurated, or no new business commenced as
authorized by this permit until a Certificate of Occupancy has been issued by the
Development Services Department. A temporary Certificate of Occupancy may be issued by
the Development Services Department subject to the conditions imposed on the use, provided
that a deposit is filed with the Development Services Department prior to the issuance of the
Certificate. The deposit or security shall guarantee the faithful performance and completion
of all terms. conditions and performance standards imposed on the intended use by this
permit.
.
Temative Tract 16443
Page 3
. 8. This permit or approval is subject to all the applicable provisions of the Development Code
in effect at the time of approval. This includes Chapter 19.20 - Property Development
Standards, and includes: dust and dirt control during construction and grading activities;
emission control of fumes, vapors, gases and other forms of air pollution; glare control;
exterior lightning design and control; noise control; odor control; screening; signs, off-street
parking and off-street loading; and, vibration control. Screening and sign regulations
compliance are important considerations to the developer because they will delay the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy until they are complied with. Any exterior structural
equipment, or utility transformers, boxes, ducts or meter cabinets shall be architecturally
screened by wall or structural element, blending with the building design and include
landscaping when on the ground.
9. At least one tree shall be planted for each tree removed (of significant value as determined by
the City) in the course of grading and construction, unless determined otherwise through a
pre-approved tree replacement plan submitted to the Parks, Recreation and Community
Services Department pursuant to Development Code Section 19.28.090 REMOVAL OR
DESTRUCTION OF TREES.
.
10. Submittal requirements for permit applications (building, site improvements, landscaping,
etc.) to Building Plan Check and/or Public Works/Engineering shall include all Conditions of
Approval and Standard Requirements issued with the Development Review Committee
approval.
II. A 6-foot vinyl fence shall be constructed for the project boundary fencing and for each home.
12. The developer shall construct decorative block wall (both sides) along rear property line of
APN: 0142-032-03 if Cleveland Street is extended.
13. Any change in elevation or building pad height of 6" or more along the perimeter of the
tract/parcel map will require approval by the Planning Commission. Any change in elevation
or building pad height of I" or more on interior lots will require approval by the Planning
Commission. The applicant's/owner's engineer will certify the elevation of the building pads
to the City Engineer, prior to construction of the building foundation.
14. This project is located in the Building Safety Enhancement Area and is subject to all
requirements contained in Chapter 15.11 of the City of San Bernardino Municipal Code.
15. All mitigation measures contained in the Mitigation Monitoring/Reporting Program
(Attachment E) shall be applicable.
.
16. Construction-related activities may not occur between the hours of 8 pm and 7 am. No
construction vehicles, equipment, or employees may be delivered to, or arrive at the
construction site before 7am or leave the site after 8 pm. Construction activities may only
occur Monday through Friday.
Tentative Tract 16443
Page 4
. 17. This permit or approval is subject to the attached conditions or requirements of the following
City Departments or Divisions:
a. Plan Check Division
b. Public Works Division
c. Fire Department
d. Parks and Recreation Department
e. Public Services
f. Parks, Recreational and community Services Department
g. Water Department
.
.
.
.
.
f.t 't
~&.\\1::>.
,\!'~
~@ <<..
" t:f{
....--.~-~-~ -
City of San Bernardino
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
Development Services/Plan Check Division
Sail Bel'lIar ino
~
Property address.:
DRC/CUP/DP:
DATE:
NOTE; NO PLANS WILL BE ACCEPTED
PLAN CHECK WITHOUT CONDITIONS
APPROVAL IMPRINTED ON PLAN SHEETS.
FOR
OF
Submit 6 sets of plans, minimum size 18" x 24". drawn to scale. If plan check is for
expeditious review, submit 6 sets. The plans shall include (if applicable):
a. site plan (include address & assessors parcel number)
b. foundation plan
c. floor plan (label use of all areas)
d. elevations
e. electrical, mechanical, & pi'iimbing plans
f. detail sheets (structural)
g. cross section details
h. show compliance with Title 24/Accessibility (disabled access)
i. a plan check deposit fee will be required upon submittal of plans.
Call Development Services (plan check) 909-384-5071 for amount.
1. The title sheet of the plans must specify the occupancy classification, type of construction, if
the building has sprinklers, & the current applicable codes.
2. The person who prepares them inust sign the plans. Also, provide the address & phone
number of that person. Some types of occupancies require that the plans are prepared,
stamped, and signed by an architect, engineer, or other person licensed by the State of
California.
3. F or structures that must include an engineers design, provide 2 sets of stamped/wet signed
calculations prepared by a licensed architect/engineer.
4.
Provide 2 sets of Title 24/Energy compliance forms and calculations. Some compliance
forms are required to be printed on the plans.
300 N 'D' Street San Bernardino CA 92418
909-384-5071 Office
909-384-5080 Fax
.
.
.
5.
Submit grading, site, and/or landscape plans to Public Works/Engineering for plan check
approval and permits. For more information, phone 909-384-5111.
6. Fire sprinkler plans, fires suppression system plans, etc., shall be submitted to the Fire
Department for plan check approval and permits. For information, phone 909-384-S388.
7. Signs require a separate submittal to the Planning Division for plan check approval and
permits. For information, phone 909-384-5057.
8. Restaurants, food preparation facilities. and some health related occupancies will require
clearances and approved plans from San Bernardino County Health Department. For
information, phone 909-387-3043.
9. Occupancies that include restaurants, car washes, automotive repair/auto body, dentist
offices, food preparation facilities or processing plants, etc. may require approvals and
permits from San Bernardino Water Reclamation. For information, phone 909-384-S141.
10. An air quality permit may be required. Contact South Coast Air Quality Management
Division for information, phone 909-396-2000.
11. State of California Business & Professions Code/Contractors License Law requires that
permits can be issued to licensed contractors or owner-builders (that are doing the work).
Contractors must provide their State license number, a city business registration, and
workers compensation policy carrier & policy number. Owner-builders must provide
proof of ownership.
NOTE: PLAN CHECK TIME ON THESE TYPES OF PROJECTS IS APPROXIMATELY 4-6
WEEKS FOR 1ST CORRECTIONS. EXPEDITIOUS REVIEW IS APPROXIMATELY 10 WORKING
DA YS. THE DEVELOPMENT REV[EW PROCESS IS NOT THE BUILDING PLAN CHECK AND
DOES NOT IMPL Y THAT THE DESIGN AS SUBMITTED WILL BE APPROVED WITHOUT
CORRECTIONS.
Comments:
300 N 'D' Street San Bernardino CA 92418
909-384-5071 Office
909-384-5080 Fax
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Development Services Department - Public Works Division
Standard Requirements
Description: Subdivide 6 acres into 28 SFR Lots
Applicant: Spectra Homes LLC
Location: N/S 7th Street between Dallas Street & San Anselmo Avenue
Case Number: Tract No. 16947 (Sub 04-15)
1. Drainal!e and Flood Control
a) A local drainage study will be required for the project. Any drainage
improvements, structures or storm drains needed to mitigate downstream
impacts or protect the development shall be designed and constructed at
the developer's expense, and right-of-way dedicated as necessary.
b)
All drainage from the development shall be directed to an approved public
drainage facility. If not feasible, proper drainage facilities and easements
shall be provided to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
c) If site drainage is to be outlened into the public street, the drainage shall
be conveyed through a parkway culvert constructed in accordance with
City Standard No. 400. Conveyance of site drainage over the Driveway
approaches will not be permitted.
d) The applicant shall submit a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan
(SWPPP) and Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP). The City
Engineer, prior to issuance of any permits authorizing land-<iisturbing
activities shan approve these plans. (Refer to the City's web page at
www.ci.san-bemardino.ca.us - Departments - Development Services -
Public Works for templates of these plans).
e) A "Notice of Intent (NOl)" shall be filed with the State Water Quality
Control Board for construction disturbing 1 acre or more ofland.
t)
Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the City Engineer shall approve an
Erosion Control Plan. The plan shall be designed to control erosion due to
water and 'Yind, including blowing dust. during all phases of construction.
including graded areas which are not proposed to be immediately built
upon.
.
.
.
Project: Subdivide 6 Acres into 28 SFR Lots
Case No. TR 16947 (Sub 04-15)
Page 2 of6
2.
Gradinl! and Landscaninl!
a) If more than J' of fill or 2' of cut is proposed, the site/plot/grading and
drainage plan shall be signed by a Registered Civil Engineer and a grading
permit will be required. The grading plan shall be prepared in strict
accordance with the City's "Grading Policies and Procedures" and the
.city's "Standard Drawings", unless otherwise approved by the City
Engineer.
b) If more than 5 trees are to be removed from the site, a tree removal permit
conforming to the requirements of Section 19.28.090 of the Development
Code shall be obtained from the Department of Development Services-
Planning Division prior to issuance of any grading or site development
permits.
c) If more than 5,000 cubic yards of earthwork is proposed, a grading bond
will be required and the grading shall be supervised in accordance with
Section 7012(c) of the uniform Building Code.
d)
If more than 1,000 cubic yards of earth is to be hauled on City Streets then
a special hauling permit shall be obtained from the City Engineer.
Additional conditions, such as truck route approval, traffic controls,
bonding, covering of loads, street cleaning, etc. may be required by the
City Engineer.
e) An on-site Improvement Plan is required for this project. Where feasible,
this plan shall be incorporated with the grading plan and shall conform to
all requirements of Section 15.04-167 of the Municipal Code (See
"Grading Policies and Procedures").
f)
One 4' x II' PCC pad at least 4" thick shall be provided in the rear or side
yard area of each lot for storage of recycling containers. The pad shall be
screened from public view and a 3' wide concrete walkway shall be
provided from the driveway to the pad. All gates along the access way
shall have a clear width of 3'-6" minimum. A minimum clearance of 3
feet shall be provided around the pad.
Retaining walls, block walls and all on-site fencing shall be designed and
detailed on the On-site Improvement Plan. This work shall be part of the
On-site Improvement permit issued by the City Engineer.
The project Landscape Plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer prior to issuance of a grading permit. Submit 5 copies to the
Engineering Division for Checking.
An easement and covenant shall be executed on behalf of the City to allow
the City to enter and maintain any required landscaping in case of owner
g)
h)
i)
.
.
.
Project: Subdivide 6 Acres into 28 SFR Lots
Case No. TR 16947 (Sub 04-15)
Pagd of 6
neglect. The Real Property Section for execution by the property owner
and shall ensure that. if the property owner or subsequent owner(s) fail to
properly maintain the landscaping, the City will be able to file appropriate
liens against the property in order to accomplish the required landscape
maintenance. A document processing fee in the amount of $200.00 shall
be paid to the Real Property Section to cover processing costs. The
property owner, prior to plan approval, shall execute this easement and
'covenant unless otherwise allowed by the City Engineer.
3.
Utilities
a) Design and construct all public utilities to serve the site in accordance with
City Code, City Standards and requirements of the serving utility,
including gas, electric, telephone, water, sewer and cable.
b) Each parcel shall be provided with separate water and sewer facilities so
. the City or the agency providing such services in the area can serve it.
c) Backflow preventers shall be installed for any building with the finished
floor elevation below the rim elevation of the nearest upstream manhole.
d) Sewer main extensions required to serve the site shall be constructed at the
Developer's expense.
e) This project is located in the sewer service area maintained by the City of
San Bernardino therefore, any necessary sewer main extension shall be
designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Sewer Policy and
Procedures" and City Standard Drawings.
g) Utility services shall be placed underground and easements provided as
required.
h) A street cut permit, from the City Engineer, will be required for utility cuts
into existing streets where the street is not being repaved as part of the
required improvements.
j)
All existing overhead utilities adjacent to or traversing the site on either
side of the street shall be undergrounded in accordance Section 19.30.110
(subdivisions) of the Development Code.
Existing Utilities which interfere with new construction shall be relocated
at the Developer's expense as directed by the City Engineer, except
k)
4.
Project: Subdivide 6 Acres into 28 SFR Lots
Case No. TR 16947 (Sub 04-15)
Page 4 of6
overhead lines, if required by provisions of the Development Code to be
undergrounded. See Development Code 19.30.110 (subdivisions).
Mappin!!
a) A Final Map based upon field survey will be required.
b) All street names shall be subject to approval of the City Engineer prior to
.Map approval.
c) Additional survey and map information including, but not limited to,
building setbacks, flooding and zones, seismic lines and setbacks, geologic
mapping and archeological sites shall be filed with the City Engineer in
accordance with Ordinance No. MC-592.
.
5. Improvement Completion
a) Street, sewer, and drainage improvement plans for the entire project shall
be completed, subject to the approval of the City Engineer, prior to the
Map recordation.
.
If the required improvements are not completed prior to Map recordation,
an improvement security accompanied by an agreement executed by the
developer and the City will be required.
Street light energy fee to pay cost of street light energy for a period of 4
years shall be paid. Exact amount shall be determined and shall become
payable prior to map recording;
6. Street Improvement and Dedications'
b)
a)
a) All public streets within an adjacent to the development shall be improved
to include combination curb and gutter, paving, handicap ramps, street
lights, sidewalks and appurtenances, including, but not limited to traffic
signals, traffic signal modifications, relocation of public or private
facilities which interfere with new construction, striping, - shall be
accomplished in accordance with the City of San Bernardino "Street
Improvement Policy" and City "Standard Drawings," unless otherwise
approved by the City Engineer. Street lighting, when required, shall be
designed and constructed in accordance with the City's "Street Lighting
Policies and Procedures." Street lighting shall be shown on street
improvement plans except where otherwise approved by the City
Engineer.
b)
For the streets listed below, dedication of adequate street right-of-way
(R.W.) to provide the distance from street centerline to property line and
placement Of the curb line (C.L.) in relation to the street centerline shall be
as follows:
.
.
.
Project: Subdivide 6 Acres into 28 SFR Lots
Case No. TR 16947 (Sub 04-15)
Page 5 of6
Street Name
Curb Line(ft)
Ril!ht of Wav(ft.)
San Carlos Avenue
30'
18'
Cleveland Street
30'
18'
San Benito Avenue
30'
18'
d) Cleveland Street shall be dedicated and constructed full width between
San Benito A venue and the easterly subdivision boundary to join existing
Cleveland Street east of the tract. The subdivider shall 'make every effort
as required by the State Subdivision Map Act to obtain the right of way
from the property identified as Assessor's Parcel No. 0142-032-03.
e) In the event the subdivider is unable to acquire and dedicate right-of-way
for Cleveland Street from the above parcel, the City may file an eminent
domain action against the property owners or require construction of a
knuckle at the intersection of Cleveland Street and San Benito Avenue.
Construct 8" Curb and Gutter per City Standard No. 200 adjacent to the
site. Widen pavement adjacent to the site to match new curb and gutter.
Construct approach and departure transitions for traffic safety and
drainage as approved by the City Engineer.
Construct sidewalk adjacent to the site in accordance with City Standard
No. 202, Case "A" (6' wide adjacent to curb).
Construct Driveway Approaches per City Standard No. 203. Remove
existing driveway approaches that are not part of the approved plan and
replace with full height curb & gutter and sidewalk.
All Curb return radii shall be 25 feet minimum.
t)
g)
h)
i)
j) Construct all cul-de-sac's and knuckles in accordance with City Standard
Drawing No. 101.
k) Install Street Lights adjacent to the site in accordance with City Standard
Nos. SL-l and SL-2.
8. Required Enl!ineerinl! Plans
.
a) The rough grading plan may be designed and submitted in combination
with the precise grading plan.
b)
All plans submitted for plan check purposes shall be prepared on the
City's standard 24" X 36" sheets.
.
.
.
c)
Project: Subdivide 6 Acres into 28 SFR Lots
Case No. TR 16947 (Sub 04-15)
Page 6 of6
Provide the City with an electronic file of all improvement
plans/drawings. This file shall be compatible with AutoCAD 2000, and
shall be submitted with the plans for final approval.
d) Copies of the City's design policies and procedures and standard drawings
are available at the Public Works Counter for the cost of reproduction.
They are also available at no charge at the Public Works Web Site
'htto:/ /www.ci.san-bemardino.ca.us/site/ow/default.htm
9. ReQuired Enl!ineerinl! Permits
a) Grading permit (If applicable.).
b) On-site improvements construction permit (except buildings - see
Development Services-Building Division), including landscaping.
c) Off-site improvement construction permit.
10. Applicable Enl!ineerinl! Fees
a)
All plan check, permit, inspection, and impact fees are outlined on the
Public Works Fee Schedule. A deposit in the amount of 100% of the
estimated fee for each set of plans will be required at time of application
for plan check.
b) The current fee schedule is available at the Public Works Counter and at
http://www.ci.san-bemardino..ca.us/site/ow/default.htm
c) Please check with the development review section of the Public Works
Division at 909-384-5110 for current in-house plan check turn-around
times.
d) Expedited plan checking is available. A deposit in the amount of 150% of
the estimated plan check fee for each set of plans will be required at time
of application' for expedited plan check.'
CITY 0
~ :5~ I SAN Gvl~,
GENERAL REQUIREMENTS:
B PnlVido one addIUOIlllI HI 01 consb\lCllan
Contacllhe CIty 01 San BemanlIno
o The developer ahall provide for adeq
Infonnalion a_1led by 1118 develope
F SAN BERNARDINO FIRE DEPARTMENT
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS Case: PAT<. 04.07
Date:
A.ki A NSFLMC'J Reviewed By: GF'12/
plans to IlulIdiIg and SsIely lor Are Department... al time 01 plan check.
Are Department II (909) 384-5585 lor speclfic detailed requirements.
uale fire ftow. Minimum fire flow requirements sheB be based on squa,,'OOl8ge. c:onstructIon f..tu.... and exposure
rand muat be avelJable 1!!12! to placing combustible materials on sfte. .
ROTECTION:
1118 .... 0I1h1l projeclls provided by:
lleperlrnenl-Eng (909) 384-5391
(909) 888-8988
Phone:
IUTlES:
etreeta at intervaJs not to exceed 300 feet for commercial and muttkesk:lenttal areas and at intervals not to exceed
,
1.500 gpm lie 20 psi mlnmum ...imJlIl pressure 110 required lor commerclsl and muIIl-..._ ar.... Minimum lira
20 pal minimum ...- pressure 110 required lor _I......
ahaI be jointly detennlned by 1118 CIty 01 San Bemanfino A.. Depattmenlln conjunction \\flh 1118 water purveyor. Fire
confonn to 1118 _Ida and apecllk:eIIona 0I1he weter purveyor.
public weler 1_ _IV to meet Are Department requirements are the develope(s fInanclal responoI>IIIty and
r or by the developer at the water purveyor's dlscretion. Contact the waler purveyor Indicated above for actSItionaJ
eo of Ingresslegresa to the property entrance. The routes shaD be paved, aD weather.
Udlng for fire apparatus. Access roadway shall have an all-weather drMng surface of not less than 20 teet of ~
ell portions of Ihe exterior wall of III single story buildings.
1118 e>derior -" of aU mullipla-sloty buildings.
er parlclng 01 vehicles would possible reduce the clearance of access roadways to Iesslhan 1118 required width. Signs
K1H~C. Bee. 15.16".
leet In Ianglh and ahaI heve e minimum 40 1001 radius tumaround.
or private) ahaD be submitted to the Are OepIf1menllor approval.
"-
be constructed and usebIe prior to combustllle construction.
to protect each bulking located morelhan 150 leet from Ihe curb line. No II.. hydl8nla should be _In 40 leet 01 any
Wet _ type, _ one 2Y, Inch and 4 inch outlet. and approved by the Fire O_rtment. Areas a~ to fire
o PARIONG" zone by painting en 8 Inch _, red stripe for 151eetln each dlrectlon In front 01 the hydrent in such a
parl<8d vehicles. LetIaring to be In white 6" by Y,".
on the bukIng at the front or other approved location In such a manner as to be visibte from the frontage street. Com.
..... shaD be 6 inchaa tall. single family address numarale shall be 4 Inches tall. The color 01 the numerels shall con-
_ the number 01 the unit. serv...
prior to 1118 building being occupied. l1l8 minimum rating lor any fire eldlnguisher ia 2A 10BIC. Minimum _ 01
no Int8rfor p8It of Ihe building II over 75 feet treveI dIslance from a fire extinguisher.
unlta. _ (rnoteIs) _ 20 or more units. or llpalIments or hotele (motels) Ihtee stories or more In height shall be
dealgnedtoNFPA_
_ be equipped wIIh en alAOmallc lire sprinker system designed to NFPA standards. This Includes existing buildings
system to the Fire Department prior to beginning construction of the system. Penntl required.
buildings 110 to be _ed by the Are Department prior to slart 01 construction. Pennft reqUired.
). Plana must be _ed by 1118 Fire Department prior to start 01 inataUation. Pannft required.
r ayatem/atendplpe ayatem. ahen be required at Fire Department approved location.
200 NOt 3rd street, (909) 384-5388.
Plena must be approved by the Ftre Department prior to the s1art of construction. Pennn required.
Ing. any ch8ngea to Are Department requirements.
---~-_.
WATER PURVEYOR FOR FIRE P
o The lire protection weier aarvlce for
o . San BemerdIno Municipal W_
o East Valley Water Olstrlct-Englna8rIng
o 0tI>ar Wiler purveyor.
~BLlC FIRE PROTEcnON FAC
!,lfl PublIc fire hydranta 110 requtred aJong
)"r 5OO188Ilor_......
y" Are hydrant minimum ftow rat.. of
hydrant ftow rates 0/1.000 gpm lie
'Of' Are hydrant type and apec:lftc location
/"" hydrant materi8la and Inat8fI8lIon ahaN
"" PublIc lire hydranta. fire _, and
r shell be inalaIIod by the waler purveyo
infonnation.
ACCESS:
8 Provlde two separele. dedicet8d rout
Provlde an _ road to each bu
structed widIh.
o Extend roadwey to within 150 feet 01
o Extend roadwey to within 50 IaaI 01
. Provlde"NO PARIONG" signs__
110 to read "fiRE LANE-HO PAR
Dead-end s_ shall not ellC88d 500
. The names 01 eny new st_ (public
~IJE:
~ Atl access roads and streets are to
o Private fire hydranta shall belnatall8d
e>derior -". The hydranta _ be
hydranta shall be designated as a "N
monner lhet n will not be blocked by
BUILDINGS:
o Add.... numerals ahaI be Installed
merclal and multllamlIy _ num
O treat - the color 011118 beckgmund
Identify each gas and _ mater
o Are e>dIngutahata must be_
fi.. 8XIIngulshe" must be such th8t
o Apartment '- _ 16 or more
equipped _ automatic fire sprInIders
o AU buildings, over 5.000 _ I_
vecanl over 365 deya.
o SulImlt plana for 1118 lire protecllon
o Tenant improvemanIa In" aprtnIdered
8 Provlde fire aJann (required throughout
Are Department connecuon to sprtnkle
a Fire Code Pennn requII8d, eppIy at
Are Spri_ monltortng ~
Nota: l1l8 app/lcanI must request, In wrtt
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
.
FPBI70(0243)
.
.
.
City of San Bernardino Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department
Standard Requirements
Case:DP III 04-44
Date: 11-29-04
Reviewed by:J.G.
General Requirement:
) Commercial Industrial and Multi-Unit
() Assessment District
( x) Residential
() Purpose, Guidelines and submittal procedure
( x) Irrigation and Landscaping Plans.
() Contact the City of San Bernardino Parks, Recreation and Community Services
Department at (909) 384-5217 or 384-5314 for specific detailed requirements.
Specific Requirements:
)
)
( )
( x )
( )
( x )
( )
( x )
( )
Maintenance oflandscape areas
Planter Areas
Interior Planter Areas
Irrigation Systems
Setback Areas
Slope Areas
Ground Cover and Bedding Material
Erosion Control
Weed Control
Plant Materials:
() Plant list and climatic conditions
( x) Street Trees
(x) Plant Material Size Requirements and Ratios
Inspection and other Requirements:
( x) Irrigation System
( x) Landscaping
() Hardscape Items
(x) Street tree Specifications
(x ) Arborist Report
( x) Removal or destruction of trees
() Screening Requirement (City, Dev. Code)
Note: The applicant must request, in writing, any changes to the Parks, Recreation and Community
Services requirements. Additional information:
Tree Removal Permit needed if 5 or more trees are to be removed. Standard requirements for the
landscaping and irrigation of each home and slope area.
.
City of San Bernardino Public Services Department
Development Project Conditions of Approval
300 North D Street - 4th Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92418
.
Project Number; TPM 16947 Project Planner: Aron Liang Review Date: 4.20.04
Project Description/Business Name: subdivide 6.78 acres into 29 residential lots
Project Location/Address: North of 7th between San Carlo Avenue & San Service Account:
Anselmo Avneue
Reviewed By: e-mail: Phone:
Michelle Dyck- Turner dyck -tu rner _m i@ci.san-bernardino.ca.us 909.384.5549 #3162
. Standard Development Requirements
Project shall meet all applicable Standard Development Requirements as attached.
. Integrated Waste Management Survey
Applicant shall submit an Integrated Waste Management Survey for each of the activities marked below
with the initial application to Planning for approval by the Public Services Department Refuse and Recycling
Division prior to issuance of permits for each activity.
The information contained in the Survey as well as any related comments and mitigation provided by Public
Services shall be summarized in the Initial Study an'd~IR if required for the project under CEQA.
! prepa~ion Demolition & Site D Construction I Renovation D Business Operations or Event
I . Additional Requirements or Recommendations
I
I -
.
MD/PS 6.27.2003
MO/PS
Recycling
rvice cart
2 cubic
ing
lic right-
storage
PLANS.
h 4-foot
tio area.
ct. These
nce must
ce of all
nd 5 PM
6.27.2003
.
City of San Bernardino Public Services Department
Standard Development Requirements
300 North D Street - 4th Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92418
RESIDENTIAL TRACTS & LOTS
Collection Services
1. Residential refuse and recycling services are to be provided by the City of San Bernardino Refuse &
Division a minimum of once weekly.
2. The City shall provide upon request one set of a blue, green, and black 96 or 64-gallon automated se
to each single family unit, OR one set to every 2 units in multi-unit dwellings up to 8 units.
3. Commercial requirements shall apply to all multi-unit dwellings over 8 units, unless otherwise approved
4. Nonresidential establishments such as small offices. shops, meeting halls, or churches, which generate
yards or less of non-bulky waste per week and are located on the same side of a residential block receiv
automated cart service shall meet residential rather than commercial requirements.
Automated Cart Storage & Access
.
Residential units shall construct a minimum 4 feet by 11 feet concrete pad located out of view of pub
of-way for storage of each set of up to 4 automated carts. If visible from the public right-of-way, the
area shall be screened by landscaping, or masonry orsoiid wood fencing. SHOW ON GRADING AND SITE
6. The path of travel from the storage pad to street shall be continuously paved without step or curb wit
minimum gate openings in walls and fencing. The path of travel may include a paved driveway or pa
SHOW ON GRADING AND SITE PLANS.
Service Vehicle Access
7. Projects shall meet City Engineering vehicle access requirements on all streets within a r~sidential tra
requirements shall not limit requirements for Fire vehicle access.
Curbside Service Area
8. A minimum 14-foot linear space on the street along the curb adjacent to the driveway of each reside
be clear for automated service carts. with a minimum 2-foot setback and 13-foot vertical c1earan
obstructions such as structures, fences. and raised landscaping.
Gated Access
i 9. Gated properties that are locked and unmanned on service days anytime between the hours of 5 AM a
I Monday through Saturday shall provide access code or key to Public Services.
~PN~ lll:l.-O~:{ -o~ IJ.Jp
SAN BERNARDINO MUNICIPAL WATER DEPARTMENT
STANDARD REQUIREMENTS
.
Review of Plans: ~nz. A- QC1\C"I it. Oll-O
OwnerlDeveloper: E ti"lQ J 1.13. JIlVeJ1f'1QltJ
Type of Project: S ~bJi>lde G lIcre.r i~t., ~r
Location: ~ori-k rile 7U. J\te+ bQ-tvee"
WATER DEPARTMENT ENGINEERING:
Contact: )l)l\'t L ;tc.l-f i~t.p
Date Compiled: ~ -~p-O ~
S edr4 ~ef Compiled By: M~# 13.
.r~le l.n Number of Units: JIf ~f ~:.~k.{'.nI'7
S"", ("/piS.." A^reIYl'
Phone: Jr~ - S39 I
Fax: 38'~ - SSJ~
Nole: All Water Services are Subjecllo the Rules & Regulations of tho Water Department.
~ Size of Main Adjacentlhe Projecl: g rt (J 11~ 7H , /, l. J 0" 5...~ (.'1., a.1 &" ~ FW"el~o
"Approximate Water Pressure: 70 Elevalioo of Water Slorqe: /31 J Hydrant F1ow@ 20 poi:
II Type, Size, Location, and Distance to Nearest Fire Hydrant: ~ ~_ '" 6 alt 1i1 !;- '" C.rtlQ(
~G1" ~hi\() 4..~ 7ik "')(~~l" JheJ '" 6'" at S-'v (ortler (Ie_e/ll.
o Pressure Regulator Required on Customer's Side on the Meter.
o Off-sile Water Facilities Required.
o Area Not Served by San Bernardino Municipal Water Department.
o Comments: ""-....1..., t.. t IoJ fL... ~~"r~f'J~I",.;) fl..E.-Qu IJZ.>I-~ I C-nkJ"'\tz.... r ::toIL
--yN~TkvVl-O t.~~ l!\...~ R-~ct>-.J\J'L.ft.J::::.. ~c-)\.-,E.-S~
.'''TER OUALITY CONTROL: ,to L.oC;-#, '1.-D
"ontact: CO" ~ flie\q Phone: 'H; ~ - !:)f3q Fax: 3rq - S"~sf
~ R.P.P. Ilackflow Device Required at Service Conneclion. f.., ,Q,II;1ertiC. &" lj>'i"~
l;l Double Check Backflow Device Required al Service COlU1OCtion. fo, :r rrij 'lti"" i f. Ie SerflLe
~BllCkflow Device to be Inspected Before Water Service can be Activated.
o No Backflow Device Required at This Time.
ENVIRONMENTAL C:ONTROLIINDUSTRIAL WASTE:
Contact: (1"',),7 Col, Phone: 1rq -s13. Fax: 3~l\~'S~S"~
NoIe: No Brine Regenerative Water Softeners May he Inslalled. Unless Holding and Hauling is Provided for the Brine. All Interceptors
will he a 1200 Gallon Capacity with a Sample Box Included.
o Industrial Waste Penuit Required.
o Grease Interceptor Required.
o Pre-treatment Required.
o Sand/Oil Interceptor Required.
o No Issues at tlus Time.
SEWER CAPACITY INFORMATION:
Contact: N e \I Ilo*,? ["'I
Phone: Sfl\ - So'\:3
Fax:3&'Q- Ssq~
Note: Proof of Payment Mllst be Submitted to the Building & Safely Deportment Prior to Issuance of the Building Permit.
o No Sewer Capacity Fee Applicable al This Time.
~wer Capacity Fee Mllst Be Paid to the Witter Department for - Gallo';' Per Day, Equivalenl Dwelling Units: d!f
. Subject to Recalculation of Fee Prior to the Issuance of Building Pennit.
nl~down of EstlllUtlcJ Gcti;uns P~r Dtt):;
S1l:lREQt'!3_FRM !~"nl
.
.
e
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
INITIAL STUDY FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 16947
NOVEMBER 2004
PREPARED BY
Tom Dodson & Associates
2150 North Arrowhead Avenue
San Bernardino, California 92405
(909) 882-3612
PREPARED FOR
City of San Bernardino
Development Services Department
300 North "D" Street
San Bf;'lrnardino. California 92418
(909) 384-5057
ATTACHMENT "E"
~.
REVIEWED BY
Independent reviewed. analyzed and exercised judgement
~ making the determination. by the DevelopmenVEnvironmental Review Committee on
;, I~! iL \~i '.1t\ ~ '7cckoursuant tq Section 21082 of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
I I ~Ijr
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction . . . . . . . .'. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1
Environmental Factors Potentially Affected. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3
Determination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3
Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
I. Aesthetics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
II. Agriculture Resources ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
III. Air Quality .........................................................
IV. Biological Resources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
V. Cultural Resources ..................................................
VI. Geology and Soils ...................................... . . . . . . . . . . . . .
VII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
VIII. Hydrology and Water Quality. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
IX. Land Use and Planning ......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
X. Mineral Resources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
XI. Noise. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
XII. Population and Housing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
XIII. Public Services .....................................................
XIV. Recreation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
XV. Transportation I Traffic ...............................................
XVI. Utilities and Service Systems. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
XVII. Mandatory Findings of Significance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 33
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1
Figure 2
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
-ii-
I
I
I
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires the preparation of an Initial Study when a
proposal must obtain discretionary approval from a governmental agency and is not exempt from CEQA.
The purpose of the Initial Study is to determine whether or not a proposal, not exempt from CEQA.
qualifies for a Negative Declaration or whether or not an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) must be
prepared.
1. Project Title: Tentative Tract Map 16947
2. Lead Agency Name: City of San Bernardino
Address: 300 North "0" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418
3. Contact Person: Aron Liang
Phone Number: 909-384-5057
4. Project Location (Address/Nearest cross-streets):
The proposed project is located within the Inland Empire Region of southern California in the City of San
Bernardino, San Bernardino County. The site is located east of Dallas Street, north of Seventh Street,
south of Etiwanda Avenue, and west of San Anselmo Avenue. Specifically, the project site is located within
the southwest corner of Section 6, Township 1 South. Range 4 West. in the San Bernardino meridian.
Refer to Figures 1 and 2.
5. Project Sponsor:
Address:
Spectra Homes, LLC
521% Myrtle #10
Monrovia, CA 91016
6. General Plan Designation: Residential Suburban (RS)
7. Description of Project (Describe the whole action involved, including, but not limited to, later
phases of the project and any secondary, support, or offsite feature necessary for its
implementation. Attach additional sheets, if necessary):
Implernentation of the proposed project will result in the development of a 29 unit single-family residential
subdivision located within an already established residential community. The site encompasses about
6.78 acres and the allowable density is 4.5 units per acre. or 30 units. The proposed project also includes
the extension of San Carlo Avenue and San Benito Avenue north through the project site, and the
extension of Cleveland Street west across the project site. Construction activities are also to include the
provision of all project related appurtenances, including curb and gutter improvements, installation of water
and sewer lines, etc.
The 6.78-acre site lies within an already urbanized setting, and is contiguous with the surrounding
residential developments. The site i~ currently vacant, with no structures existing onsite. The site
presently slopes to the south with runoff from the site flowing to Seventh Street and then to the through
the area drainage system to the Lytle Creek channel. The northerly lots will be elevated through grading
so they will drain to Etiwanda Avenue. On existing home on the project site will remain on a newly created
C5-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 1
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
lot (lot 20) in the subdivision. Based on existing grading calculations, about 250,000 cubic yards of grading
cut and fill will occur, with about 6,500 cubic yards of fill material needed to be imported to the project site
to accomplish the ultimate elevations of the project site. The grading for each pad will incorporate
sufficient detention to retain about three-quarters of an inch of rain over each parcel. Thus, retention will
occur on each of the 29 lots and will ensure that storm runoff will not increase when the project site is fully
developed.
The utilities provided at the site are provided by:
Water: San Bemardino Municipal Water Department
Sewer/Wastewater Treatment: San Bernardino Municipal Water Department
Electricity: Southern California Edison
Natural Gas: The Gas Company
Telephone: SBC Telephone
Cable: Adelphia Cable Company
All of these utilities are available in adjacent streets, particularly Seventh Street.
8. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
The 6.l8-acre project site is currently occupied with one residential structure located in the north central
portion of the project site. The remainder of the site is vacant. The site is surrounded by residential
development in all directions. Etiwanda Avenue forms the northern project site boundary. Currently,
access to the site exists at the northern, southern, anaeastern site boundaries from Etiwanda Avenue. San
Carlo Avenue, San Benito Avenue, and Cleveland Street, all streets located within the City of San
Bernardino.
9. Other agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, finance approval, or participation
agreement):
Since the proposed development is greater than one acre. the developer must submit a Notice of Intent
(NOI) to the State Water Resources Control Board for a General Construction Permit, NPDES Permit
(National Pollution Discharge Elimination System) permit. This permit is granted automatically by submittal
of an NOlto the State Board. but is enforced through a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP)
that identifies construction best management practices for the site. The Regional Board enforces the
SWPPP. Other than this permit, no other permits have been identified for the development of this site.
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 2
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
D Aesthetics
D Biological Resources
. Hazards & Hazardous Materials
D Mineral Resources
D Public Services
D Utilities I Service Systems
D Agricultural Resources
D Cultural Resources
. Hydrology I Water Quality
. Noise
D Recreation
D Mandatory Findings of Significance
. Air Quality
. Geology I Soils
D Land Use I Planning
D Population I Housing
D Transportation I Traffic
DETERMINATION
On the basis of this Initial Study, the City of San Bernardino, Environmental Review Committee finds:
~.
Signature
. ~,J \ ~.(.~f~
Printed Name
\
o
.
.
o
o
o
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and
a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made
by or agreed by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially
significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been
adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has
been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached
sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must-analyze only the
effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR
or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or
mitigated pursuant to that EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required.
\ \ . \ ~ "/..0 <' 4-
Date
For
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 3
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Significant
""eact
less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
No
,,,,,,,,,
Less Than
Significant
_ct
I. AESTHETICS - Would the project:
a.
Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista as
identified in the City's General Plan?
o
o
o
.
b.
Substantially damage scenic resources, including but not
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway?
o
.
o
o
c.
Substantially degrade the existing visual character or
quality of the site and its surroundings?
o
.
o
o
d.
Create a new source of substantial light or glare which
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
o
o
o
.
e.
Other?
o
o
o
.
Discussion:
I.a The project site is relatively flat and is surrounding on all sides by existing residential development that disrupt
any important scenic views. The viewshed in all directions is dominated by man-made structures. The project
facilities will all be constructed at one or two stories. Based on the lack of important scenic views and the
proposed height of structures, the proposed project will not result in a significant impact on the existing
viewshed.
I.b-c The project site will be contiguous with the existing residential development which will be developed on the
project site. The site does not contain important scenic resources onsite, other than trees. Many of the trees
will have to be removed because they are old and pose a safety risk. No potential exists to create an
aesthetically offensive significant change in the visual setting. No mitigation is required.
I.d The proposed project is a residential development, which will be contiguous with the existing surrounding
residential development. The project will install street lights in accordance with City requirements but these
lights are not forecast to create substantial light and glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views
in the area, or expose residential properly to unacceptable levels of light or glare. They will be consistent with
surrounding night lighting. No mitigation is required.
I.e No other project related design issues have been identified that could cause significant adverse aesthetic
impacts. No mitigation is required.
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS4
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Less Than
Significant
Potentially With less Than
Significant Mitigation Signiticanl No
,,,,,,,,, Incorporation I~act ,,,,,,,d
II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES:
a. Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of 0 0 0 .
Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitor-
ing Program of the California Resources Agency, to a non-
agricultural use?
b. Other? 0 0 0 .
Discussion:
Il.a-b The project site is currently a vacant field surrounded on all sides by residential development. No agricultural
is practiced on this properly and implementation of the proposed project has no potential to adversely impact
any farmland or significant agricultural resources. No mitigation is required.
CS-166 (Spectra tS)
IS 5
.
.
e
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Significant
Irrpacl
less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
No
,,,,,,,ct
less Than
Significant
Impact
III. AIR QUALITY - Will the proposal:
a.
Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable
air quality plan? (South Coast Air Basin)
o
o
.
o
b
Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially
to an existing or projected air quality violation based on
the thresholds in the SCAQMD's "CEQA Air Quality
Handbook"?
.
o
o
o
c.
Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria poliutant for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air
quality standard (including releasing emissions which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)?
o
o
o
.
d.
Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concen-
trations?
o
o
o
.
e.
Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number
of people based on the information contained in Project
Description Form?
o
o
.
o
f.
Other?
o
o
o
.
Discussion:
IIl.a-
d Air quality in the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB) is currently in nonattainment for two pollutants: ozone and
particulates. The South Coast Air quality Management District (SCAQMD) adopted its most recent Air Quality
Management Plan (AQMP) is 2003, and it is designed to bring the SoCAB into attainment with all federal air
quality standards by 2010. It is in this context that emissions from individual projects are considered under
CEQA. The AQMP and related plans adopted by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG),
such as the Regional Comprehensive Plan and Guide (RCPG), are being implemented in such a manner that
existing emissions within the SoCAB, plus those emissions associated with forecast growth that is consistent
with these regional plans over the next six years, will allow the SoCAB to be in attainment by 2010.
The proposed project includes the development of approximately 6.78 acres of land owned by the project
proponent. Development of this property is proposed to include up to 29 units of single-family residential.
Building construction assumes the following structures will be built during the construction phase on the project
site: 29 single-family residential units and associated roadways.
The SCAQMD establishes a 177 acre quarterly area of disturbance. The proposed project will be graded over
a period of 30-60 days with an estimated total of 6.78 acres of disturbance. Assuming 26 Ibs/day of PM10
emissions per acre, seven acres would generate 182 Ibs. of PM10 emissions without any mitigation.
Implementation of the following measures can reduce fugitive dust emissions by at least 50%, or to 911bs/day
of PM10 emissions well below the threshold.
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 6
.
.
e
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
l/I.a-1
Use appropriate emission control devices on gasoline and diesel construction equipment
and maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them tuned.
l/I.a-2 Prohibit extended idling (more than 10 minutes) and other unnecessary operation of
equipment.
l/I.a-3 Utilize existing electrical power sources (i.e., temporary power poles) and avoid onsite
power generation to the extent feasible.
l/I.a-4 Have sufficient equipment at the site to carry out dust-control measures in all areas
covered by the contract work (not just the immediate area of construction).
l/I.a-5 Employ construction activity management techniques, such as: configuring the
construction parking to minimize traffic interference; extending the construction period;
reducing the number of pieces of equipment used simultaneously; increasing the distance
between the emission sources; and reducing or changing the hours of construction to
minimize construction activity emissions.
lII.a-6 Cover loaded trucks used in construction operations with tarpaulins or maintain at least
2 feet of freeboard and wash off trucks leaving the site.
l/I.a-7 Sweep streets if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares.
l/I.a-8 The City will require contractors to apply water to the disturbed portions of the project site
at least two times per day. On days where wind speeds are sufficient to transport fugitive
dust beyond the working area boundarY; the City will require contractors to increase
watering to the point that fugitive dust no longer leaves the property (typically a moisture
content of 12%), and/or the contractor will terminate grading and loading operations.
l/I.a-9 The project will comply with regional rules such as SCAQMD Rules 403 and 402 which
would assist in reducing short-term air pollutant emissions. Rule 403 requires that
fugitive dust be controlled with best available control measures so that the presence of
such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the
emission source. Rule 402 requires dust suppression techniques to be implemented to
prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off site. These dust suppression techniques
are summarized below.
a. Portions of the construction site to remain inactive longer than a period of three
months will be seeded and watered until grass cover is grown or otherwise stabilized
in a manner acceptable to the City.
b. All onsite roads will be paved as soon as feasible or watered periodically or chemically
stabilized.
c. All material transported from or to the site will be either sufficiently watered or
securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust.
d. The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations will
be minimized at all times.
IIl.a-10 All material stockpiles subject to wind erosion during construction activities, that will not
be utilized within three days, will be covered with plastic, an alternative cover deemed
equivalent to plastic, or sprayed with a nontoxic chemical stabilizer.
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 7
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
IIl.a-11 All vehicles on the construction site will travel at speeds less than 15 miles per hour. This
will be enforced by including this requirement in the construction contract between the
City and the contracted construction company with penalty clauses for violation of this
speed limit.
/II.a-12 Where vehicles leave the construction site and enter adjacent public streets, the streets
will be swept daily or washed down at the end of the work day to remove soil tracked onto
the paved surface.
/II.a-13 All engines will be properly operated and maintained. These measures will be enforced
through the monthly submission of certified mechanic's records.
/II.a-14 All diesel-powered vehicles and equipment will be operated with the fuel injection timing
retarded 2 degrees from the manufacturer's recommendation and use high pressure
injectors.
The operation of the proposed development will result in a minimal increase air emissions. Increased criteria
pollutant air emissions will result from the following operational sources. SCAQMD uses 166 residential units
as being the threshold for potentially significant air emissions. The proposed project with 29 units would
generate a maximum of 290 vehicle trips per day and area source emissions would be very low for an infill
residential project of this site. No potential exists for significant project specific or cumulative air emissions to
be generated by this proposed project. No operational air pollutant mitigation measures will be required for this
project.
Both the construction and operation emissions of the proposed project will fall below SCAQMD significance
thresholds and will not individually or cumulatively contribute to significant air quality impacts.
IIl.e During construction, the proposed project includes operations that will have diesel odors associated with
equipment and materials. None of these odors are permanent, nor are they normally considered so offensive
as to cause sensitive receptors to complain. Diesel fuel odors from construction equipment and new asphalt
paving fall into this category. Both based on the short-term of the emissions and the characteristics of these
emissions, no significant odor impacts are forecast to result from implementing the proposed project.
IIl.f No other air quality issues are known to be of concern for this routine residential subdivision project.
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 8
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Less Than
Significant
Potentially With less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporation l"llact ,,,,,,,,,
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a. Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through 0 0 0 .
habitat modifications, on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
b. Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or 0 0 0 .
other sensitive natural community identified in local or
regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California
Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service?
c. Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected 0 0 0 .
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
. (including. but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal,
etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interrup-
tion, or other means?
d. Interfere substantially with the movement of any native 0 0 0 .
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with esta-
blished native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites?
e. Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conser- 0 0 0 .
vation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or
other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation
plan?
f. Other? 0 0 0 .
Discussion:
IV.a The project site is not located within an area shown on the Biological Resources Management Overlay as a
sensitive area. Therefore, no conflict with the Overlay will result from project implementation.
IV.b The project site is a plowed field that has no vegetation other than some mature trees (13) and non-native grass
cover. There is not habitat that would support any state or federal listed species and no such species can occur
on this site without suitable habitat. No adverse impacts to listed or sensitive species if forecast to occur an no
mitigation is required.
e IV.c The project site is bounded on all sides by existing development. No wildlife dispersal or migration corridors
occur on the project site, so no adverse impact to such corridors can occur from project implementation. No
mitigation is required.
CS.166 (Spectra IS}
IS 9
.
.
e
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
IV.d No wetland habitat occurs on the project site, so no adverse impact to wetland habitat can occur from project
implementation. No mitigation is required.
IV.e Four of the thirteen mature non-native trees onsite will be removed as part of the proposed project development.
Many of these trees are no longer productive and should be replaced. The developer will replace all trees
removed with new trees in accordance with City standards.
IV.! No other biological resource resources of concern are known to occur on the project site, so no other biological
resource impacts can occur.
C$-166 (Spectra 1$)
IS 10
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Significant
,,,,,,,,,
less Than
Significant
With
Miligation
Incorporation
less Than
Significant
,,,,,,,,,
No
IlTlliIct
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a.
Be developed in a sensitive archaeological area as identi-
fied in the City's General Plan?
o
o
o
.
b.
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of
an archaeological resource pursuant to ~15064.5 of
CEOA?
o
o
.
o
c. Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a 0 0 . 0
historical resource as defined in ~15064.5 of CEOA?
d. Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological 0 0 0 .
resource or site or unique geologic feature?
e. Disturb any human remains, including those interred 0 0 . 0
outside of formal cemeteries?
. f. Other? 0 0 0 .
Discussion:
V.a According to the City of San Bernardino General Plan Figure 8, the project site is not located within an area of
known archaeological sensitivities. The project site is located east of Dallas Street, north of Seventh Street,
south of Etiwanda Avenue, and west of San Anselmo Avenue, in the City of San Bernardino. The site has been
highly disturbed by grading and weed control in the past. No potential exists for adverse impacts to
archaeological resources. No mitigation is required.
V.b Please refer to V.a. No significant archaeological resources are known to occur at the project site so no
alteration or destruction of a prehistoric site can result from project implementation on this_site. No mitigation
is required.
V.c Please refer to V.a. No significant historical resources are known to occur at the project site so no alteration
or destruction of a historic site or properly can result from project implementation on this site. No mitigation is
required.
V.d Given the underlying alluvial soil and the past disturbance due to plowing and grading the project site, the
potential for paleontological resources to occur on the project site is considered less than significant.
V.e No evidence of human burials has been identified in the investigations to date. State law requires notification
of the County Coroner if human remains are exposed during site grading. The potential for adverse impact is
considered less than significant and based on mandatory notification requirements if human remains are
discovered, no additional mitigation is required.
. V.f
No other cultural resource issues have been identified in relation to the project site. No mitigation is
required.
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 11
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
less Than
Significant
Potentially Wilh less Than
Significant MiUgation Significant No
Impact Incorporation JfTllact ,,,,,,,,,
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project:
a. Involve earth movement (cut and/or fill) based on informa- 0 0 . 0
tion included in the Project Description Form?
b. Expose people or structures to potential substantial 0 . 0 0
adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death?
c. Be located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone? 0 0 . 0
d. Result in substantial soil erosion or the ioss of topsoil? 0 . 0 0
e. Be located within an area subject to landslides, mudslides, 0 0 . 0
subsidence, or other similar hazards as identified in the
City's General Plan?
. f. Be located within an area subject to liquefaction as 0 0 . 0
identified in the City's General Plan?
g. Modify any unique physical feature based on a. site 0 0 0 .
survey/evaluation?
h. Result in erosion, dust, or unstable soil conditions from 0 . 0 0
excavation, grading, fill, or other construction activities?
I. Other? 0 0 0 .
Discussion:
Vl.a
The proposed project site is relatively flat. No portion of the proposed project site exceeds a 15 percent slope.
Therefore, substantial cut and fill activities will be required to prepare this site for future residential development.
No significant impact can be identified and no mitigation is required.
Vl.b-
c According to the City's General Plan, the proposed project is located west of the San Jacinto Fault System,
which is an Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zone. To date no site specific geotechnical investigation has been
conducted, but the City's Special Studies Zone map indicate that the site will not be subject to significant fault
rupture hazard. On the other hand the project will be exposed to significant ground shaking hazards from
regional seismic events. primarily on the San Jacinto and San Andreas Fault systems. To address this
potentially significant fault hazard on the property, the following mitigation measure will be implemented:
.
VI.b-1 The developer shal/'provide the City a geotechnical study that identifies the degree of
groundshaking exposure on the project site and demonstrate that the structures will be
safe for humans during a major regional earthquake. This study shall at a minimum
provide the following design guidelines for acceptable damage to places of ordinary risk
tolerance:
CS-166 "Spectra IS}
IS 12
.
. VI.I
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
a. buildings resist minor earthquakes without damage;
b. buildings be able to resist moderate earthquakes without structural damage, but with
some non structural damage; or
c. buildings resist major earthquakes, of the intensity or severity of the strongest
experienced in California, without collapse, but with some structural, as well as
nonstructural damage.
Construction of the new residences in conformance with the above mitigation measures is sufficient to reduce potential
environmental impacts to a less than significant impact level.
VI.
d&h Due to grading associated with construction activities, there will be temporary construction impacts that might
cause dust or erosion. Please refer to the detailed discussion and mitigation measures addressing water and
wind-related soils erosion (fugitive dust) in the Air Quality and Hydrology sections of this document. Mitigation
measures required in these sections of the document will control potential erosion and dust generation from
project implementation. No further mitigation is required under this item.
Vl.e The project site is essentially flat and there is no potential for landsliding. mudslides, or subsidence at this
location. No impact is identified and no mitigation proposed.
Vl.g The project site is not located in a zone identified with potential for liquefaction. No adverse impact due to this
constraint is identified and no mitigation is required.
No other impacts to Geology and Soil are expected to occur as a result of the proposed project.
CS-166 {Spectra IS)
IS 13
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Ll!SsThan
Significant
Potentially With less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
I~ct Incorporation Impact ,,,,,,,,,
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the
project:
a. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment 0 0 . 0
through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
b. Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment 0 . 0 0
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident
conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into
the environment?
c. Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely 0 0 0 .
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-
quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
d. Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous 0 0 . 0
. materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the environment?
e. For a project located within an airport land use'plan or, 0 0 0 .
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles
of a public airport or public use airport, would the project
result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
f. Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an 0 0 0 .
adopted emergency response plan or emergency
evacuation plan?
g. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, 0 0 Cl .
injury or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wiidlands?
h. Other? 0 0 0 .
Discussion:
VILa The proposed project is a residential development. The proposed residential uses are not associated with the
need for routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials in sufficient quantity to pose a significant
hazard to people. This project is not forecast to cause any significant environmental impacts related to activities
. related to routine delivery, management or disposal of hazardous materials.
CS.166 (Spectra IS)
IS 14
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
VII.b
Since the quantities of hazardous materials on the project site after development will be household Quantities,
not large volumes, the potential for a significant release of hazardous materials due to an accident after
development is considered to be a less than significant impact. During construction there is a potential for
accidental release o()f petroleum products in sufficient Quantity to pose a significant hazard to people and the
environment. The following mitigation measure has been incorporated below to reduce this potential accidental
release to a nonsignificant level:
VII.b All spills or leakage of petroleum products during construction activities shall immediately
contained; the hazardous material identified; the material be remediated in compliance with
applicable state and local regulations regarding cleanup and disposal of the contaminant
released. The contaminated waste shall be collected and disposed of at an appropriately
licensed disposal or treatment facility.
Vll.c This project is a residential subdivision and therefore has no potential to generate substantial quantities oftoxic
pollutants.
Vll.d A review of records indicates that this site does not contain any known contaminated sites.
Vll.e-
f The project site is not near any private or public airports. so no potential exists to adversely impact airports or
for future residences to be impacted by any airport operations.
Vll.g The project site is in an urban area with no wildland fire hazards designated for this area.
Vll.h No other hazards were identified in association with the proposed project.
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 15
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
less Than
Significant
Potentially With less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
lrrpact InCOfpOl"8tion ,,,,,,,01 ''''''''''
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project:
a. Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge 0 . 0 0
requirements?
b. Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere 0 0 . 0
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the
local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of
pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would
not support existing land uses or planned uses for which
permits have been granted)?
c. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site 0 0 . 0
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, in a manner which would result in
substantial erosion or siltation onsite or offsite?
. d. Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site 0 0 . 0
or area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the!ate or amount
of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding
onsite or offsite?
e. Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the 0 0 . 0
capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage
systems or provide substantial additional sources of
polluted runoff, such as from areas of material storage,
vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing or
detailing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or
storage, delivery areas, loading docks, or other outdoor
areas?
f. Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? 0 . 0 0
g. Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as 0 0 0 .
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
(Panel No. )
h. Place within a 1 OO-year flood hazard area structures which 0 0 0 .
would impede or redirect flood flows?
e I. Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, 0 0 0 .
injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failure of a levee or dam?
C$-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 16
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
j.
Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow?
o
o
.
o
k.
Other?
o
o
o
.
Discussion:
VilLa The proposed project is not forecast to generate any wastewater, other than domestic wastewater. The
domestic wastewater will be delivered into the existing sewage system serving the existing residences. The
domestic sewage will be delivered to the City's regional wastewater reclamation facility located south of the
intersection of Arrowhead Avenue and Orange Show Road. This plant discharges to the RIX facility in south
Colton which currently operates in conformance with its existing discharge requirements. The proposed project
will not result in a potential for violating water quality standards or waste discharge requirements from the
domestic wastewater that will be generated by future residential development.
The second area where this project has a potential to cumulatively contribute to violation of water quality
standards is through the discharge of storm water runoff from a proposed urban residential development. The
proposed project will discharge storm water runoff (at least that not detained on individual lots) initially to the
local streets and ultimately to Lytle Creek and the Santa Ana River. Both during construction and after
occupancy, the proposed project has a potential to contribute urban pollutants (sediment, fertilizers, trace
metals, pesticides, oil, grease and trash and other materials) to these streams and cause violations of water
quality standards established for these streams in the Water Quality Control Plan (Basin Plan) adopted by the
Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board in 1995. As for all new project, the proposed project must
comply with Storm Water Regulations for new developments. Construction-related water quality impacts are
regulated through the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program that is managed
through the implementation of a Storm Water Pollullgn Prevention Plan (SWPPP).
The SWPPP is a mandatory component for complying with the General Construction Permit (Penmit) issues
through the State Water Resources Control Board through the submittal of a Notice of Intent. Since the SWPPP
is mandatory, a mitigation measure is not required to ensure that it is prepared. The SWPPP must include a
visual monitoring program, a chemical monitoring program for "non-visible" pollutants to be implemented if there
is a failure of BMPs, and a sediment monitoring plan. However, the specific best management practices (BMPs)
to control pollutant discharges during construction and the degree of control over pollutants, such as trash or
sediment, are not specified. Therefore, the following mitigation measure will be implemented to control potential
level of pollutant discharges from the project site to a less than significant level.
VIII.a-1 The project proponent will select best management practices from the'City's standard
BMP measures. These BMPs. shall achieve an 80-percent reduction in sediment relative
to an uncontrolled condition. The SWPPP and specific BMPs shall be approved by the
City prior to ground disturbance.
Potential long-term water quality impacts generated from new urban development are regulated through a water
quality management plan implemented to confonm with City and County requirements for the Middle Santa Ana
Watershed Management Area established by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional
Board). If the proposed project contributes substantial urban pollutants to stonm water runoff after it is
developed and occupied, it could cause a violation of the MS4 permit issued to the County and City for non point
source discharges, I.e., those discharges from the land, whether developed or not. To ensure that the proposed
project will not make a cumulatively considerable contribution of water pollutants after the site is developed and
occupied, the following mitigation measure will be implemented.
VllI.a-2 The project proponent will select long-term best management practices (detention basin,
storm drain filters, or other comparable measures) that will be installed during con-
CS.166 (Spectra IS)
IS 17
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
struction to control the discharge of pollutants from the occupied residential subdivision.
These shall be presented to the in a storm water quality management plan report and the
City will r'1view and approve the measures to be incorporated into the project to ensure
control of future pollutants generated from the project.
VlIl.b This project is located in an area where the groundwater table is between 125 to 175 feet below the ground
surface. No potential exists to directly intercept the groundwater table from grading activities and no wells are
proposed to be installed on the property.
The proposed project will obtain water from the City of San Bernardino Municipal Water Department, which has
a water line adjacent to the properly in Seventh Street. The project's use of domestic water from the
Department is not forecast to result in any significant effects on groundwater as the City must limit pumping to
allocated water rights, plus imported water offsets. At this time the City has adequate water supplies to ensure
that the groundwater table is not significant lowered. Further, the project site does not serve as a major
groundwater recharge site and the conversion of the site to residential use will not cause a substantial loss of
water recharge to the groundwater aquifer. No mitigation is required.
VIII.c The project site is located in an upland area, so no potential exists for the implementation of the project to alter
the course of a stream or river. All on-site flows will be captured within the proposed lots or the curb and gutter
system. The Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) has been prepared and will be implemented to
ensure that both short- and long-term storm runoff discharges are not unacceptably degraded by sediment or
other pollutants.
VIII.d The project will result in changes in absorption rates and the rate and amount of surface runoff from the project
site. With the introduction of concrete slabs and pavement, there will be a decrease in surface permeability by
impermeable surfaces. Design measures, including the detention of rainfall on the individual lots and as
identified in the project SWPPP, will be incorporated on the site to ensure that downstream flows will not be
significantly increased, so that no significant impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. A portion of
Development Impact Fees will be utilized for required storm water management systems downstream. No
potential for significant impact from the increased runoff from the site is forecast to occur. No mitigation is
required.
VlIl.e Please refer to the substantiation under VlIl.c and d; the proposed project will not significantly increase the rate
or amount of surface runoff in a manner that could result in flooding on- or off-site. No mitigation is required.
VlIl.f The SWPPP document prepared specifically for this project defines which best management practices (BMPs)
will be applied to this project and their implementation will ensure that significant erosion and sedimentation, nor
other water quality degrading impacts will occur from implementing the proposed project.
VlIl.g No other activities associated with this project have a potential to otherwise degrade surface water or
groundwater quality or the beneficial uses of such water. No additional mitigation is required.
VlIl.h This project site is not located within any flood hazard zone based on Figure 83 of the General Plan. A review
of Community Panel ?? verifies that the site is not exposed to the 100-year flood hazards. No mitigation is
required.
VilLi The project site is not located within a 1 DO-year flood hazard area. Therefore, no structures will be placed within
such a hazard area that could impede or redirect flood flows. No mitigation is required.
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 18
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
VlIl.j The project site is not located near any water body which could expose it to seiche, tsunami or mudflow. No
mitigation is required.
VlIl.k No other hydrology'or water issues are known to affect the project site or to be affected by the proposed project.
Potentially
Significant
,,,,,,,ct
less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
IncorporaUon
No
'moact
lesslhan
Significant
,,,,,,,,,
IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project:
a.
Physically divide an established community?
o
.
o
o
b.
Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
.
o
o
o
c.
Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural community conservation plan?
.
o
o
o
d.
Be developed within the Hillside Management Overlay
District?
o
.
o
o
e.
Be developed within Foothill Fire Zones A, B, or C as
identified in the City's General Plan?
o
.
o
o
f.
Be developed within the Airport Influence Area as adopted
by the San Bernardino International Airport Authority?
o
.
o
o
g.
Other?
o
o
o
.
Discussion:
IX.a-
b The current land use designation for the proposed project site is Residential Suburban, which allows 4.5 units
per acre, or 30 units on this 6.78 acre parcel. The project site would be developed as a residential subdivision
consistent with the existing land use designation. Adjacent land uses include residential development in every
direction. Thus, this project can be considered an infill project consistent with General Plan development
objectives. No physical division of a community can result from this project's implementation, and the proposed
project will not result in any conflicts with current land use or zoning designations. No mitigation is required.
IX.c No habitat or natural community conservation plans apply to the project site; therefore, no adverse impact can
occur.
CS-166 (~pectra IS)
IS 19
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
IX.d The proposed project is not located within the City's Hillside Management Overlay District. No adverse impact
can result from project implementation.
IX.e The proposed projtlct site is not located within Foothill Fire Zones A & B, or C. Therefore, no potential for
adverse conflict between the proposed use and the Foothill Fire Zone can occur. No mitigation is required.
IX. f The proposed project is to be located within an already urbanized residential setting within the City of San
Bernardino; it is not located within an Airport District or any AICUZ zone according to the General Plan.
Surrounding land uses are residential. No land use conflicts are forecast to result from implementing the
proposed project. No mitigation is required.
IX.g No other impacts to Land Use and Planning are expected to occur as a result of the proposed project.
CS.166 (Spectra IS)
IS 20
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
less Than
Significant
Potentially With less Than
Significant Miligation Significant No
,,,,,,,, Illcorporalion ,,,,,,,,, -oj
X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a. Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral 0 0 0 .
resource that would be of value to the region and the
residents of the state?
b. Result in the loss of availability of a locally important 0 0 0 .
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general plan. specific plan or other land use plan?
c. Be located in a Mineral Resource Zone as adopted by the 0 0 0 .
State Mining and Geology Board and identified in the City's
General Plan?
Discussion:
e
X.a-
c
The project site is located just west of an area known to contain sand and aggregate resources. However,
Figure 53 of the General Plan Technical Background Report indicates that the project site is not located within
any regionally significant mineral resource area. No mitigation is required.
.
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 21
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Le.ssThan
Significant
Potentially With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Sigrlificant No
,,,,,,,,, klcorporation ,,,,,,,01 ,,,,,,,01
XI. NOISE - Would the project result in:
a. Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in 0 0 . 0
excess of standards established in the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies?
b. Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive 0 0 0 .
ground borne vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c. A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in 0 0 . 0
the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
d. A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient 0 . 0 0
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
. e. For a project located within an airport land use plan or 0 0 0 .
Airport Influence Area, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to excessive noise
levels?
f.
Other?
o
o
o
.
Discussion:
XI.a The proposed project consists of the construction of a 29 unit single-family residential development. No formal
noise study has been prepared for the proposed project. Implementing the proposed development will generate
noise during construction and following occupancy of the site. The background noise level at the project site
is presently dominated by traffic on adjacent roadways; the Union Pacific and Burlington Norther Santa Fe Cajon
Pass Rail Line; and existing residential developments. Existing background noise levels based on these noise
sources is expected to be about 60-70 dB CNEL, which is considered conditionally acceptable for noise-
sensitive residential uses. The residential uses proposed by this project is not forecast to substantially alter this
existing background noise condition.
Xl.b No construction or occupancy activities are forecast to generate significant groundborne noise or vibration. No
mitigation is required.
Xl.c The permanent occupancy of the site will result in typical residential subdivision noise activity patterns, where
community noise typically occurs at about 55-60 dBA CNEL. This project will not significant alter the existing
background noise.
.
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 22
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
X.d
The proposed project will generate construction noise adjacent to existing residences. Since the proposed
project will be contiguous with the surrounding residential developments, the only expected noise impacts will
be temporary due to construction activities. Implementation of the following constnuction noise mitigation
measures can red~ce potential noise impacts to a level of nonsignificance.
X.c-1 Construction shall be limited to the hours of 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. on Monday through Friday,
and between 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Saturday, and shall be prohibited on Sundays and federal
holidays, except in emergencies.
X.c-2 Utilize construction methods or equipment that will provide the lowest level of noise
impact, i.e., use newer equipment that will generate lower noise levels.
X.c-3 All construction vehicles and fixed or mobile equipment shall be equipped with properly
operating and maintained mufflers or sound attenuation devices, as specified in regula-
tions at the time of construction.
X.c-4 Schedule the construction such that the absolute minimum number of equipment would
be operating at the same time.
X.c-5 All employees that will be exposed to noise levels greater than 75 dB over an 8-hour
period shall be provided with adequate hearing protection devices to ensure no hearing
damage will result from construction activities.
X.c-6 If equipment is being used that can cause hearing damage at adjacent noise receptor
locations (distance attenuation shall be taken into account), portable noise barriers shall
be installed that are demonstrated to be adequate to reduce noise levels at receptor
locations below hearing damage thresholds. This may include erection of temporary
berms or plywood barriers to create a break in the line-of-sight, or erection of a heavy
fabric tent around the noise source.
Implementation of the above measures can control potential construction noise to a less than significant impact
level.
Xl.e No airport operations generate noise at or in the vicinity of the project site. No impact can occur and no
mitigation is required.
Xl.f No other noise issues have been identified in relation to this standard residential subdivision project.
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 23
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Significant
'"..,ac'
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
No
_ct
Less Than
Significant
,,,,,,,01
XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project:
a.
Induce substantial population growth in an area, either
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and busi-
nesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)?
o
.
o
o
b.
Remove existing housing and displace substantial numbers
of people, necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
o
o
.
o
c.
Other?
o
o
o
.
Discussion:
Xll.a-
b The proposed project involves the construction of a 29 unit single-family residential development. The project
will not create any significant demand for housing, as it will provide housing for existing demand in the area.
Since, the project will result in the provision of housing, it is not forecast to result in creation of any additional
demand for housing. No adverse impact is identified and no mitigation is required. The proposed project would
result in the construction of 29 single-family residential units within an already urbanized neighborhood, i.e., the
project is an infilj residential deveiopment. The propo'sed project is being developed at a density consistent with
the General plan. The City's per person occupancy rate per single-family residential development is 2.7 persons
per household. Therefore, the project is forecast to provide residences for about 78 persons. This is wholly
consistent with the General Plan and City build-out population forecast. Further, the proposed project will not
require major physical expansion of any infrastructure that would be growth-inducing. No adverse growth
inducing impact is identified and no mitigation is required.
Xll.b The site is currently vacant, with the exception of one structure existing on-site; This structure will be retained
on iot 20 of the proposed subdivision. Therefore, this project has no potential to result in the removal of any
existing housing. No impact is identified and no mitigation required.
Xll.c No other impacts to population and housing are expected to occur as a result of the proposed project.
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 24
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
SigOlficant
I~cl
less Than
Signiflcant
With
Miliga~on
lncorporalioo
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
_ct
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES
a.
Would the project result in substantial adverse physical
impacts associated with the provision of new or physically
altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to
maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other
performance objectives for any of the public services:
o
o
.
o
Fire protection? 0 0 . 0
Police protection? 0 0 . 0
Schools? 0 0 . 0
Parks or other recreational facilities? 0 0 . 0
Other governmental services? 0 0 . 0
b. Other? 0 0 0 .
.
Discussion:
XlIl.a The project site is served by the City of San Bernardino Fire Department. The closest station to the project site
is Fire Station #9, located at 202 Meridian Avenue. This station is on the south side of Foothill Boulevard and
within three miles of the project site. Implementation of the proposed project will result in a less than significant
impact to fire services. The project will incrementally add to the existing demand for fire services. However,
an infill residential project constructed in accordance with current building standards is not forecast to cause a
cumulatively considerable significant impact on fire protection services in the City.
The City of San Bernardino and surrounding area have a high quality of emergency response resources that
can provide rapid medical aid should an accident occur at the project site. In addition, the area has several
hospitals that are equipped to provide emergency medical response. These include: Loma Linda Hospital;
Arrowhead Regional Medical Center; Community Hospital; and St. Bernardine's Hospital. All of these facilities
have adequate emergency response capabilities to provide medical aid for residents without experiencing a
significant impact to their capacity to provide such aid. No mitigation is required. The City of San Bernardino
Police Department would provide law enforcement service to the project site. The proposed project is a
residential development to be located within an already urbanized community. The proposed project would have
law enforcement services available from the City of San Bernardino's Police Department. The project area is
served by the Community Services Office located on Foothill Boulevard. Implementation of the proposed project
will result in a less than significant impact to police services. The project will incrementally add to the existing
demand for police services and/or the need for new facilities. But the demand created by an infill residential
project is not forecast to cause significant adverse environmental impacts on the law enforcement service
system.
.
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 25
.
.
e
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
The proposed project is located within approximately five miles of five schools: Casey Elementary School, Bemis
Elementary School, Myers Elementary School, Frisbie Intermediate School, and Eisenhower High School.
Implementation of the proposed project will result in a less than significant impact to schools. The impact to
schools from the proposed project is a maximum increase of 29 single-family units and an assumed 10 new
students. These impacts must be mitigated through the payment of the mandatory School Mitigation Fees to
the San Bernardino School City Unified School District. No additional mitigation is required
The proposed project is a residential project to be located within an existing residential community. Although
the proposed project is expected to incrementally increase the demand on park and recreation resources within
the City, the proposed development is not expected to have a significant impact on local parks or recreational
facilities due to the limited size of the project. However, the proposed project must pay fees for areawide park
and recreation facilities. These fees are used to create new park area and general fund dollars are used to
provide for ongoing maintenance and operation of the parks.
XlIl.b No other governmental services have been identified that may be adversely impacted by the proposed project.
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 26
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Significant
,,,,,,,ct
Less Than
Significant
With
MiligatiOll
InCOl'pOfalion
No
''''''''''
less Than
Significant
_d
XIV. RECREATION
a.
Would the project increase the use of existing neighbor-
hood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such
that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would
occur or be accelerated?
.
o
o
o
b.
Does the project include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on the environment?
o
.
o
o
c.
Other?
o
o
o
.
Discussion:
XIV.a
c The proposed project is a residential project to be located within an existing residential community. Although
the proposed project is expected to incrementally increase the demand on park and recreation resources within
the City, the proposed development is not expected to have a significant impact on local parks or recreational
facilities due to the limited size of the project. However, the proposed project must pay fees for areawide park
and recreation facilities (Quimby Act fees). These fees are used to create new park area and general fund
dollars are used to provide for ongoing maintenance and operation of the parks. With payment of fees, the
project's impacts on recreation facilities is considered a less than significant impact.
No existing recreational uses occur on the project site, so project implementation cannot adversely affect any
existing recreational opportunities. No mitigation is required.
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 27
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
less Than
Significant
Potentially With less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
lf1"9act Incorporation ,,,,,,,ct ,,,,,,,,,
XV. TRANSPORTATION I TRAFFIC - Would the project:
a. Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation 0 0 . 0
to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system
(I.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of
vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or
congestion at intersections)?
b. Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of 0 0 . 0
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
c. Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an 0 0 . 0
increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results
in substantial safety risks?
d.
Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
o
.
o
o
.
e.
Result in inadequate emergency access?
o
o
.
o
f.
Result in inadequate parking capacity?
o
o
.
o
g.
Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
o
o
.
o
h.
Other?
o
o
o
.
Discussion:
XV.a-
b The proposed project is a 29-lot residential subdivision. Assuming 10 trips per residence per day, the maximum
trip generation would be 290 trips per day, with about 30 trips during the AM and PM peak hours. This volume
of trips is considered de minimus; therefore, the proposed project does not have a potential to cause a
significant project specific or cumulative impact on the City's circulation system.
XV.c No airports occur near the project site and no potential exists to impact airport operations or flight paths.
The proposed project will have four access points at the northern, southern, and eastern site boundaries from
Etiwanda Avenue, San Carlo Avenue. San Benito Avenue, and Cleveland Street. The present pattem of
.
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 28
.
.
e
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
circulation in the project area is well established. The proposed projecl has no potential to significantly alter
the existing pattern of circulation. No mitigation is required.
XV.d-
e The proposed project also includes the extension of San Carlo Avenue and San Benito Avenue north through
the project site, and the extension of Cleveland Street west across the project site. These are logical
modifications in the roadways, so no disjointed pattern of roadway improvements will occur and no unusual
hazards will be created. More than adequate access will be provided by the local road system. Temporary
circulation impacts resulting from construction activities may occur. During construction activities, the traffic
flow will be maintained to the highest level possible with the use of standard traffic control devices. The following
mitigation measure will be implemented.
XV.f.1 The City of San Bernardino shall require that a construction traffic management plan for
work in public roads that complies with the Work Area Traffic Control Handbook or other
applicable City standards to provide adequate traffic control and safety during
construction activities. The standard of measurement for the plan shall be the provision
of safe, albeit inconvenient, traffic "ow during construction and the provision of adequate
access through construction areas, or adequate detour routes, to meet safety and
emergency vehicle access and transit through construction areas at all times when
construction is underway for any components of the proposed project.
Implementation of traffic control measures will provide guidance and navigational tools throughout the project
area in order to maintain traffic flow and levels of safety during construction.
xv.!
The proposed project is not forecast to result in inaElequate parking capacity. Each residence and the local
streets will provide adequate parking for single-family residences in accordance with Chapter 19.14 of the City
Development Code. No mitigation is required.
XV.g This project has no potential to conflict with any mass transit facility plans or operations. It is an infill residential
project with no demand for or no effect on such policies or plans regarding alternative transportation.
XV.h No other transportation issues have been identified that would be affected by the proposed project.
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 29
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Less Than
Significant
Potentially Wi!h Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
,,,,,,,01 Ifl(XlllXlI'alion '- _01
XVI. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project:
a. Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the Santa 0 0 . 0
Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b. Require or result in the construction of new water or 0 0 . 0
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
c. Require or result in the construction of new stormwater 0 0 . 0
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
d. Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project 0 0 . 0
from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or
. expanded entitlements needed?
e. Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment 0 0 . 0
provider which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projei:led demand
in addition to the provider's existing commitments?
f. Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to 0 0 . 0
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
g. Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and 0 0 . 0
regulations related to solid waste?
h. Other? 0 0 0 .
Discussion:
XVI.
a-e Implementation of the project will result in an incremental system capacity demand for energy systems,
communication systems, water distribution systems, storm water drainage systems, street lighting systems,
maintenance of public facilities, including roads and potentially other govemmental services. These impacts
are considered less than significant based on the availability of existing public facilities (drainage facilities) that
support local systems. Specifically, adequate eleclricity, natural gas and communications systems are available
for the proposed project and the distribution systems are located in adjacent roadways. Water and sewer
distribution or collection systems are available in the adjacent streets and the regional treatment plant has
adequate capacity for a 29-lot subdivision. Stormwaler is collected in the adjacent street and delivered through
.
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS30
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
the area drainage system to Lytle Creek, the regional collection system which connects to the Santa Ana River.
No mitigation is required for any of these utility systems.
XVl.e-
f The project will generate a minor amount of organic matter from rough grading of the site. This material will be
delivered to a landfill and incorporated into the County's green waste management program. The one structure
on the site will be demolished and the demolition waste will be recycled to the extent feasible. After developed,
the project will generate typical domestic solid waste that will be taken to existing landfills (MidValley and San
Timoteo) with capacity extending more that the five year planning period into the future. No significant solid
waste issues or impacts are posed by the proposed project. No mitigation is required as recycling requirements
are mandated by local jurisdictions in accordance with adopted Source Reduction and Recycling programs.
Xll.g All required utility infrastructure is available either adjacent to the site or nearby. No major extension of utility
infrastructure will be required to support this project, so no adverse pattern of utility extensions can result from
project implementation. No mitigation is required. No other utility issues have been identified that may be
impacted by the proposed project.
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 31
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
Potentially
Significant
_ct
less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
No
,,,,,,,01
less Than
Significant
,,,,,,,01
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a.
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of
the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to
drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict
the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
o
o
o
.
b.
Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively consider-
able" means that the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of
past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects.)
o
o
o
.
c.
Does the project have environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
o
o
o
.
Discussion:
XVI.
a-c The City of San Bernardino is considering a 29-lot subdivision that will be constructed on an approximate 6.78
acre lot in southwest portion of the City. The site is surrounded by residential development (all directions) and
represents an infill parcel of residential development. Most of the impacts associated with the proposed project
are related to constructing the new subdivision. Once occupied it will be consistent with the surrounding
residential development. The potential impacts of implementing the proposed project have been evaluated in
this Initial Study. Based on the analysis in this document, Tentative Tract Map 16947 can be implemented
without causing significant adverse environmental effects with implementation of mitigation measures outlined
above. The City will require the implementation of all identified mitigation measures to ensure that potentially
significant impacts from constructing and occupying the proposed project will not impact any of the following
resource values or physical conditions that occur at the project site: earth resources, hydrology and water
quality, air quality, transportation/circulation, hazards, and noise.
With mitigation, the proposed project is not forecast to cause any significant adverse environmental impacts to
any of the environmental resource issues addressed in this Initial Study. The City proposes to issue a Negative
Declaration with mitigation as the appropriate environmental determination for this project to comply with the
California Environmental Quality Act. A Notice of Intent to adopt a Negative Declaration will be published and
a 21 day public review will be conducted. After review and response to any comments, the City will adopt a
Negative Declaration unless the comments identify a significant adverse impact not yet identified in this Initial
Study.
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS 32
.
.
.
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
INITIAL STUDY
REFERENCES
The following references cited in the Initial Study are on file in the Development Services Department.
1. City of San Bernardino General Plan
2. City of San Bernardino General Plan Land Use Plan/Zoning Districts Map
3. City of San Bernardino Development Code (Title 19 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code)
4. City of San Bernardino Historic Resources Reconnaissance Survey
5. Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones Map
6. South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook
7. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Flood Insurance Rate Maps
8. Public Works Standard Requirements - Water
g. Public Works Standard Requirements - Grading
CS-166 (Spectra IS)
IS33
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT "F"
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 16947
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
This Mitigation and Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared to implement the
mitigation measures outlined in the Environmental Assessment for Tentative Tract Map
16947, Subdivision 04-15. This program has been prepared in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State of California and City of San Bernardino
CEQA Guidelines.
CEQA Section 21081.6 requires adoption of a monitoring and/or reporting program for those
measures or conditions imposed on a project to mitigate or avoid adverse effects on the
environment. The law states that the monitoring or reporting program shall be designed to
ensure compliance during project implementation.
The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program contains the following elements:
1.
The mitigation measures are recorded with the action and procedure necessary
to ensure compliance. The program lists the mitigation measures contained
within the Initial Study.
A procedure for compliance and verification has been outlined for each
mandatory mitigation action. This procedure designates who will take action,
what action will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be
reported.
The program contains a separate Mitigation Monitoring and Compliance Record
for each action. On each of these record sheets, the pertinent actions and dates
will be logged, and copies of permits, correspondence or other data relevant will
be retained by the City of San Bernardino.
The program is designated to be flexible. As monitoring progresses, changes to
compliance procedures may be n necessary based upon recoml1)endations by
those responsible for the program. If changes are made, new monitoring
compliance procedures and records will be developed and incorporated into the
program.
2.
3.
4.
The individual measures and accompanying monitoring/reporting actions follow.
.
.
.
MITIGATION MEASURES
AIR QUALITY
/II.a-1 Use appropriate emission control devices on gasoline and diesel construction equipment
and maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them tuned.
/II.a-2 Prohibit extended idling (more than 10 minutes) and other unnecessary operation of
equipment.
IIka-3 Utilize existing electrical power sources (i.e., temporary power poles) and avoid onsite
power generation to the extent feasible.
111.a-4 Have sufficient equipment at the site to carry out dust-control measures in all areas
covered by the contract work (not just the immediate area of construction).
lII.a-5 Employ construction activity management techniques, such as: configuring the
construction parking to minimize traffic interference; extending the construction period;
reducing the number of pieces of equipment used simultaneously; increasing the distance
be!ween the emission sources; and reducing or changing the hours of construction to
minimize construction activity emissions.
III.a-6 Cover loaded trucks used in construction operations with tarpaulins or maintain at least
2 feet of freeboard and wash off trucks leaving the site.
,
,
lII.a-7 Sweep streets if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares.
lII.a-8 The City will require contractors to apply ~aterto the disturbed portions of the project site
at least !WO times per day. On days where wind speeds are sufficient to transport fugitive
dust beyond the working area boundary, the City will require contractors to increase
watering to the point that fugitive dust no longer leaves the property (typically a moisture
content of 12%), andlor the contractor will tenninate grading and loading operations.
/II.a-9 The project will comply with regional rules such as SCAQMD Rules 403 and 402 which.
would assist in reducing short-tenn air pollutant emissions. Rule 403 requires that
fugitive dust be controlled with best available control measures so that the presence of
such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the properijt line of the
emission source. Rule 402 requires dust suppression techniques to be.implemented to
preventfugitive dust from creating a nuisance off site. These dust suppression techniques
are summarized below. .
a. Portions of the construction site to remain inactive longer than a period of three
months will be seeded and ....,atered until grass cover is grown or otherwise stabilized
in a manner acceptable to the City.
b. All onsite roads will be paved as soon as feasible or watered periodically or chemically
stabilized.
c. All material transported from or to the site will be either sufficiently watered or
securely covered to prevent excessive amounts of dust.
d. The area disturbed by clearing, grading, earth moving, or excavation operations will
be minimized at ill times.
lII.a-10 All material stockpiles subject to wind erosion during construction activities, that will not
be utilized within three days, will be covered with plastic, an alternative cover deemed
equivalent to plastic, or sprayed with a nontoxic chemical stabilizer.
1-
.
.
.
IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION
1. These requirements will be made a part of the Standard Requirements for the
project through the Public Works and Building Services Divisions. The applicant
will be required to comply with all Public Works and Building Services Standard
Requirements regarding grading, erosion control and dust abatement.
2. The City shall verify that the recommendations contained in the mitigation
measure (notes 1 - 10) are incorporated as notes on the grading plans approved
for the project.
3. The City Engineer will review all grading plans prior to issuing a grading permit.
Compliance shall be verified during construction inspections.
COMPLIANCE RECORD
1. The City and the applicant shall maintain copies of any approved grading plans
in the project file.
2.
Copies of the inspections reports shall be kept in the project file of the applicant
and the City.
WRITTEN VERIFICATION PREPARED BY:
DATE PREPARED:
.
GEOLOGY I SOilS
VI.bo1 The developer shall provide the City a geotechnical study that Identifies the degree of
groundshaklng exposure on the project site and demonstrate that the structures will be
safe for. humans during a major regional earthquake. This study shall at a minimum
provide the following design guidelines for acceptable damage to places of ordinary risk
tolerance:
IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION
Public Works staff shall review this development project.
COMPLIANCE RECORD
When Required: The verification shall be completed prior to project approval.
WRITTEN VERIFICATION PREPARED BY:
. DATE PREPARED:
.
I
.
HAZARDS & HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
V11.b All spills or leakage af petroleum products during canstructian activities shall immediately
cantalnecl:.the hazardaus material Identified; the material be remediated in campllance with
applicable state and lacal regulatlans regarding cleanup and disposal af the cantamlnant
released. The cantamlnated waste shall be callected and dispased af alan appropriately
licensed dispasal ar treatment facility.
IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION
Public Works staff shall review this development project.
COMPLIANCE RECORD
When Required: The verification shall be completed prior to project approval.
. WRITTEN VERIFICATION PREPARED BY:
DATE PREPARED:
.
.
.
.
,
HYDROLOGY I WATER QUALITY
VlII.II-f The project proponent will select best mllnllgement prlcUces from the City's standard
BMP mell$ures. These BMPs shill/achieve an SO-percent reduction In sediment re/lllln
to In uncontrolled condition. The SWPPP and specific BMPs shall be approved by the
City prior to ground disturbance.
V111.a-2 The project proponent will serecl long-term best management practices (detention baIn,
slomr drain ntters, or other comparable menures) thllt will be Instlll/ed during c0n-
struction to control the dlscha'l1e of pollutants from the occupied resldentill/sulxllvWon.
These shill be presented to the In II storm water qU1l11ty mllna"ement pllln report IIIfI "'e
City will review IInd IIpprove the measures to be Incorpol'ilted Into the project to ensure
control of future pol/utllnb gen.,."ted from the project
IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION
Public Works staff $all review this development project.
COMPLIANCE RECORD
When Required: The verification shall be completed prior to project approval.
WRITTEN VERIFICATION PREPARED BY:
DATE PREPARED:
. NOISE
X.c-1 Construction shall be limited to the hours of 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. on Monday through Friday,
and between 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. on Saturday, and shall be prohibited on Sundays and federal
holidays, except In emergencies.
X.c-2 Utilize construction methods or equipment that will provide the lowest level of noise
impact, I.e., use newer equipment that will generate lower noise levels.
X.c-3 All construction vehicles and fixed or mobile equipment shall be equipped with properly
operating and maintained mufflers or sound attenuation devices, as specified in regula-
tions at the time of construction.
X.c-4 Schedule the construction such that the absolute minimum number of equipment would
be operating at the same time.
X.c-5 All employees that will be exposed to noise levels greater than 75 dB over an B-hour
period shall be provided with adequate hearing protection devices to ensure no hearing
damage will result from construction activities.
.
X.c.6 " equipment is being used that can cause hearing damage at adjacent noise receptor
locations (distance attenuation shall be taken into account), portable noise barriers shall
be Installed that are demonstrated to be adequate to reduce noise levels at receptor
locations below hearing damage thresholds. This may include erection of temporary
berms or plywood barriers to create a break in the line-of.sight, or erection of a heavy
fabric tent around the noise source.
'..
IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION.
Planning Staff staff shall review this development project.
COMPLIANCE RECORD
When Required: The verification shall be completed prior to project approval.
WRITTEN VERIFICATION PREPARED BY:
DATE PREPARED:
e
A TI ACHMENT G
~iSPECTRA
e.IHOMES,LLC
'c:: i ~ '\
~C, i '1 .
" ,
iUi
-".;,..:
letS
January 5, 2005
Mr. Aron Liang
Development Services Department
City of San Bernardino
300 North "D" Street
San Bernardino, CA 92418-00 I
RE: Tract 16947
Dear Aron.
Per your request, attached are copies of written correspondence from our files regarding
Spectra Homes' attempts to acquire land required for the completion of Cleveland Drive
on Tentative Tract Map 16947.
.
We have utilized two sources to contact Mr. Louis Loza and Ms. Kenia Canales, owners
of 2423 Etiwanda A venue, San Bernardino, our realtor representatives at Baldwin Realty
Services, as well as a representative from our. Civil Engineer, Law Offices of Loren
PhilipslPhillips and Associates, Inc.
As you will see our first contact was in March 2004. Initially a letter was sent in early
March, then when no response was received, a personal visit to the owners in late March.
Then, after our meeting with the DER/C in November, an attorney of similar Hispanic
background visited and met with the owners in late November.
The results of all contact to date is consistent, the owners state they are not interested in
selling off a part of the rear portion of their lot, APN 0142-032-03.
We have not made any attempts to communicate with the owners since late November
and will await notification from the City on how they would like us to move forward.
[fyou have any further questions on this marter, please call me.
tds,
Kevin J. oberts
e
521'(, S. Myrtle Ave., Ste. 7
Monrovia, California 91016
Phone: 16261 305. 9444
Fax: (626) 305. 9422
.
.
.m
Baldwin
R'l' al E, '..I t S IE r. i t c s
Corporal< Scrvicts
March 12,2004
Mr. Louis Loza and
Ms. Kenia Canales
2423 Etiwanda Avenue
San Bernardino, CA 92410
Dear Mr. Loza and Ms. Canales;
I represent Spectra Homes, LLC who wishes to purchase the rear portion of your
property at 2423 Etiwanda Avenue in San Bemardino, Califomia.
Spectra proposes to extend Cleveland Avenue West and create a new lot from
the southerly portion of your property. They would need to acquire approximately
143 feet of the southerly (rear) portion of your property in order to create the new
lot. Spectra would be willing to pay you for the land and would install a 6 foot
high block wall along the dividing line at no cost to yoU.' I have enclosed a map
showing the proposed lot split for your review and approval.
Please contact rne if you should havlJ'any questions or if you are interested in
selling the rear portion or all of your property.
Sincerely yours,
BALDWIN REAL ESTATE SERVICES
Gordon H. Maddock
President
GHM/cg
Enclosure
--
900 StJUth First AW/l"'. Arcadia, California 91006-3976. (626) 821-5250
Baldwin
Real Estale Services
.-./
_d.unis""lift ~I
-
March :29, 2004
Mr Louis Lou and .
Ms. Kenia Canales
2423 Etiwanda Avenue
San Bernardino, CA 92410
Subject;
2423 EtiwandaAvenue
San Bernardino, CA
.
Dear Mr. Loza and Ms. Canales:
It was a pleasure meeting both of you. I am sorry your house interfered with the sale of
the rear portion of your property. We would have liked to have made the purchase and
reSolved the extension of Cleveland Avenue. We will be submitting our plans for
development 10 the City of San Bernardino excluding your property. If you should
change your mind we can always inCOlpOrateyour lot in our plans.
I promised you the phone number of the building contractor who will be building the new
homes on our development. His name is Gary French and his phone number is 626-824-
2925. He will not be building on the tract WItH the City approves all development plans.
This process should take about six IDonths {Q. one y.:ar. If you choose one of the standard
plans that are being built on the tract, it will probably be less expensive if you build at the
time he is building the others. .
I have attached a copy of our location map for your reCords,
Please call if I can be of further assistance.
Very truly yours,
H. MaddOCk
President
GHMlcg
Attaclunent .
.03
3('z...q ~'1 L ." fV\c.'~ d ~ 'Sp<c~
goo S01lIh FinlA_ . AI'aIdia, CaljfiJmiD 91006-3976. (626) 82/-5200
. .....-.~
. '
e:fl VJ AND,... .A.'J't;NUE
. '0
."'f
CW
I
,
.
, .
. "J;; .
~
'"
"
,....
....
.
e
t.
1t\
~
'('1
,
I,
. 1
,
,
~17'T ~
I~~-l ff..
; 1t54. 'l.'! "-
..,
Ill"
rt-f"
"..
o:i
lJo
-.1-.
c\..relJCE:.
qA-
.~
.~
~
g;
rf\
t-
'1'01
)J\
'1:'1
oj
(}
'"
-
-
0-rt2.EET
'Df'4. lJ4-C
.
.
.
LAW OFFICES OF
LOREN C. PHILLIPS
(VOl) 3!l6-!l636
(1109) 396.'658 (FAX)
Z2632 GOLDEN SPRINGS DRIVE
SUITE 3SCI
DIAMOND BAli. CA 8'705
VIA F ACSlMILE TRANSMISSION AND US MAIL
(626) 305-~22
November 24, 2004
Troy Roberts
Spectra Homes, LLC
521 V. S. Myrtle Ave.
Monrovia, CA 91016
RE: Tentative Tract No. 16947,
Vicinity of Etiwanda Ave. & Seventh St., SSP. Bernardino, CA
SUBJ: Results of Visit to APN 0142-032-03 (Loza & Canales)
Dear Mr. Roberts,
At your n:quest, I visited the subject property on the evening of Novero.ber 23,2004. and
spoke with a couple who indicated that they were husbmd and wife and that they owned
the property. They declined to provide any other personal information.
'"
I indicated to them that I represented the developer of the adjacent property and the
en&incering company that had been retained to prepare a proposed Tentative Tract Map.
I explained to them that the City had requested that they be contacted about dedicating a
portion of their jlI"(lPerty to the City in order to allow for the completion of Cleveland
Street from San Carlo to San Aneaelmo.
I explained to them that this would result in the installation of utilities on the dedicated
portion of their property along with stRet pavement, curb and gutter at no cost to them
and that this would benefit their property. In addition, I mentioned that the City had
eminent domain rights that the Gity could poreutiaJly exercise to obtain this portion of
their property. It was streslied to them that we knew of no sueh plan.
The owners indicated that they had been previously contal:ted your represenJatives and
that at this time they were not interested in dedicating any portion of their property for
any purpose. I asked if they were certain of this position and they stated that they did not
wish to discuss the matter any further.
EliwandaLetter-26cc-III2412004
.
.
.
~ORENPHILLIPS
,^",~'nno:)o
I I"" u-t '~.G."" 11U..IYJ ~,V&.
I thanked them for their time and stated that I would coovey their position to you so that
you could convey this decision to the City. In addition, I also stated that IIIIIlicrstood
their decision to be final and that we would not bother them any more about this issue.
Please advise if you need any further information and/or services.
Sincerely,
jp;-~
f/ Joe A. Leyva
cc: Gordon Maddock
Mike Humason
Baldwin Realty (via facsimile only)
(626) 447-8667
Etiw8l'd.t etter-26cc-1112412004
2
.
.
.
EXHIBIT 3
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Valerie Ross, Deputy Director/City Planner
FROM:
Michael Grubbs, Engineering Manager/Field Engineer
SUBJECT: Proposed Tentative Tract No. 16947 29-SFR Lots Located North
of ih Street along San Benito Avenue and San Carlos Avenue
DATE:
February 25, 2005
CC:
James Funk, Director of Development Services
On February 9, 2005, we received your e-mail advising that several residents
had voiced concern at the Planning Commission regarding drainage problems
along ih Street which they feel will be aggravated by construction of the
proposed tract.
We visited the site and talked with Ms. Jacob's, a resident at 2430 W. ih
Street. She pointed out ponding in the gutter in front of her house. Uplifting of
the curb by tree roots causes the ponding. She stated that the ponding never
goes away due to nuisance drainage from existing properties to the west. She
said the she fears the new subdivision, when completed, will compound the
problem.
I've asked the Public Services Department to review the problem and
determine if they can remove and reconstruct the curb and gutter at Ms.
Jacob's property so that is will drain properly.
7th Street is an existing residential street, which runs east west. It was
constructed in 1956 on a very flat grade of 0.30%. Current design standards
would require a minimum grade of 0.50%; however, the desirable minimum
longitudinal street grade is 1.0%.
During our field review, ponding at various locations along the street was
observed. Ponding at some locations was worse than the ponding observed in
from of Ms. Jacob's house. The flatness of the street grade is such that tree
leaves or other debris in the gutter will cause ponding of the nuisance drainage
water.
I reviewed the Initial Study for proposed Tentative Tract No. 16947 and found
paragraph IV.I that states "No other hydrology or water issues are known to
affect the project site or to be affected by the proposed project". The City
Engineer concurred with this assessment since there is enough street capacity
available to carry drainage that will be generated by proposed Tentative Tract
.
e
.
Page 2
No. 16947. It is possible that the street may be partially flooded during major
storms, however, that is not an unusual occurrence.
Based on the flatness of the street, there is no easy fix for the ponding
problems. The area-wide solution to the drainage problem is construction of
Master Plan storm drain Project No. 3-2 in 6th Street and in Meridian Avenue.
The cost of such a storm drain is estimated to be $3,600,000; however, the
nuisance ponding will still be a problem.
Unfortunately, ponding problems such as this are common in the older areas of
town where tree roots have uplifted the curbs. More frequent street sweeping
may alleviate the problem somewhat. It is usually requested that adjacent
residents along impacted streets assist by keeping the gutter cleaned of debris;
however, there is no easy permanent solution to the problem.
C:\DOCUME-I \lianL ar\LOCALS-I \Temp\Memo re Drainage TR 16947 02-25-05.doc