Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-253 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 RESOLUTION NO. 96-253 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO FILE A LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE (BJA) ON BEHALF OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF REPLACEMENT COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCH (CAD) AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RMS) COMPUTER SYSTEMS. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Mayor of the City of San Bernardino is hereby authorized and directed to submit an application to accept on behalf of the City a Local Law Enforcement Block Grant award in the amount of $1,114,251 from the u.s. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance for the acquisition of replacement Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) and Records Management System (RMS) computer systems. SECTION 2. The Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino hereby commit $123,805 as the mandatory 10- percent cash match requirement for this The total grant. project amount will be $1,238,056. 19 20 /1//// 21 / / / / / / 22 /////1 23 ////1/ 24 /1//// 25 ////// 26 27 28 RES 96-253 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO FILE A LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION WITH THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF JUSTICE ASSISTANCE (BJA) ON BEHALF OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF REPLACEMENT COMPUTER AIDED DISPATCH (CAD) AND RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (RMS) COMPUTER SYSTEMS. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and Common Council of San Bernardino at a regular meeting thereof, held on the 5th day of 1996, by the following vote, to wit: COUNCILMEMBERS AYES NAYS ABSTAIN NEGRETE x CURLIN ARIAS OBERHELMAN x DEVLIN x ANDERSON MILLER x r;)__~_f) Cf~ ~y Clerk . August ABSENT x x x The foregoing resuluUon is hereby c:pproved this of August , 1996. ~/~~~4{~ TOM MI OR, Mayor City of San Bernardino Approved as to form and legal content: JAMES F. PE~~, City Attorney By: ?; rC:'/I/tc?}1..~- 3d day RES 9~~3 253 LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANTS PROGRAM LOCAL APPLICATION FORM 95-600772 City I Municipality July, 1996 City of San Bernardino 300 North 'D' Street San Bernardino CA 92401 x Mr. Tom Minor Mayor 909-384-5133 909-384-5067 Captain Robert w. Curtis 909-384-5606 Ms Barbara Pachon ACH HHS A. Federal B. Match $1,114,251 $123,805 7-18-96 7-18-96 c. EQUIPMENT x $1,114,251 a. HIRING b. OVERTIME (1) SWORN (2) CIVILIAN (1) SCHOOLS (2) OTHER (1) ESTABLISH (2) SUPPORT (1) ADULTS (2) JUVENILES (1) RURAL AREA State and local government /ht{~(tu~ 3/W1 b RES 96-253 96-253 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO APPLICATION FOR LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM City of San Bernardino Profile The City of San Bernardino currently has an estimated official population of 184,397, with the numbers exceeding 250,000 during daytime hours. The city has roughly 60 square miles and serves as the county seat, with the San Bernardino Police Department as its municipal law enforcement agency. In the last three decades San Bernardino has experienced significant demographic and economic changes. The once family oriented community composed of mostly middle- class working people now has nearly 40% of its population receiving government assistance. Its reputation for agricultural and industrial contributions has changed to that of the "murder capital" of the nation or, as recently stated in a Newsweek article, "187 Champions". (187 is the California penal code section for murder.) In 1970, there were 8 murders, in 199568 - a 750% increase. Industrial flight by major employers such as Santa Fe Railroad, May Company, Circle K, and the closure of Norton AFB, have contributed to the general decline and transformation of vibrant business corridors and well-kept residential areas into a "ghost town" atmosphere with at least one vacant and boarded up business or house on every block, and numerous "For Sale" signs posted. VIOLENT CRIME PROBLEM The resident population of San Bernardino includes approximately 13,000 known probationers, 3,000 parolees, and 1,500 sex and narcotics registrants. Combined, this accounts for roughly 10% of the total population of the city. Statistics identify San Bernardino as having a serious violent crime problem. Between 1992 and 1994, the three most recent years for which local, state, and nationwide crime statistics are available at this time, San Bernardino's population remained at .6% of California's population while its violent crimes made up 1.54% of California's violent crime index. A more long term view of the problem shows a 64% population increase between 1970 and 1994, but a six-fold increase in violent crime. Besides the already mentioned murder statistics, the most significant changes are in aggravated assaults, which are almost 9 times higher, a 700% increase in rapes and a quadrupling of robberies. Among the 47 California cities with populations of more than 100,000 listed in the FBI's 1994 Uniform Crime Report, which contains the most recent official crime data, San Bernardino ranks 17th in population, but 11th in raw Part I crime numbers. RES 9!)-653 2 5 3 SAN BERNARDINO RANKS NUMBER ONE IN VIOLENT CRIME PER CAPITA, to include California's largest cities. Violent crimes are increasingly being committed by gang members or their associates, and the severity and brutality of crimes has escalated at an alarming rate. It is estimated that a minimum of 2,100 individuals belong to 10 of the major gangs with 90 subsets within the city. A comparison of 1994 and 1995 homicides revealed that gang-related killings have increased 150% (25 cases in 1995 versus 10 cases in 1994). A recent example of the severity of the gang problem is the case of five family members including parents and three children brutally tortured and murdered in a home invasion robbery. The suspects, later determined to be members of a local Asian gang, are linked to at least 4 other murders and numerous crimes throughout the state and the country. Proposed Proaram Purpose Area The far-flung connections of gangs throughout the city, state and country and their impact on local violent crimes has placed increased focus on technology as a weapon in the fight against crime and improvement of public safety. It is our goal to provide police officers and support personnel with the technological tools and data to do their jobs in the safest and most efficient manner given today's criminal activities. The San Bernardino Police Department has therefore targeted the replacement of its major automated systems, CAD and RMS, as its program purpose area. 1. Technoloav Investment - Historical Records Manaqement System: In 1984, the Police Department utilized $390,000 obtained as part of a CCAP grant to purchase its first automated Records Management System (RMS). This mini-computer allowed the Police Department to begin to automate the collection and analysis of crime data. The system was enhanced in 1991, using $100,000 from the City General Fund Budget to upgrade the RMS software and add several terminals in various department units. The Department has since then outgrown even the updated version and is experiencing significant problems in dealing with growth issues and day-to-day operations. Slowdowns are common, a complete shut-down of 12 hours a month is routine, and obstacles to accurate data retrieval jeopardize crime analysis, investigative, and records efforts. Part of these problems are due to the vendor's stated difficulty in maintaining an outdated system. Although the year 2000 is still on the horizon, it is rapidly becoming another RES ~tJ153 2 5 3. obstacle to automated record keeping. The vendor has advised us RMS will not recognize the year 2000 without upgrading this system. Even today, important data cannot be entered into RMS because of this limitation. Computer Aided Dispatch Svstem: In 1986, a new Computer Aided Dispatch System (CAD) was coupled with the RMS System to automate the public safety dispatch center located at SBPD. The new CAD system, including hardware and software, was purchased with $320,000 from the City's General Fund. Based on 1994 and 1995 statistics, police calls for service account for over 94% of all entries. One major upgrade to CAD was made in 1993, when a software module and 153 Mobile Data Terminals were added to the system. They were placed in all police vehicles to enable dispatching via MDT, which eased the overcrowding on voice radio frequencies, and provided officers a direct link to make remote inquiries into criminal databases and the RMS System. Funding for this $1 million upgrade came from a street lighting and sweeping assessment district that freed up general fund revenue for additional police services. Operationally CAD hardware and software have exceeded system life expectancy. Hardware and software management is labor intensive because of the age and obsolescence of the entire system. The CAD software program language is so outmoded the vendor cannot continue to support our system. They are no longer able to locate or hire staff programmers who are familiar with the software language. Additionally, Crime Analysis cannot run custom reports to establish crime "hot spots" or areas with specific or unusually high criminal activity. Functionally, public and officer safety is jeopardized by the system interruptions which often leave dispatchers unable to determine officer status or call activity. Citizen safety is compromised because calls in the pending and holding queues cannot be dispatched until the information can be retrieved. Officer safety is potentially compromised because computer monitors freeze or loose unit locations and activity status. Interruptions in service are particularly critical when emergency events are occurring simultaneous to a computer crash. The loss or delay in accessing data and consequent slowdown in response time always has the potential for detrimental outcomes that could have been avoided. Several problems contribute to, or cause these frequent system failures. A primary factor is the fact that CAD and RMS represent two different vendors which oftentimes results in "fingerpointing" when software problems occur. RMS processes and Crime Analysis searches are also problematic, causing slowdowns that lead to CAD failures through system overloads. Overall, CAD is a limited information source. IRES 96-253 96 253 2. Technoloav - Future Needs The most significant reason for focusing on a technology program is the fact that our aged RMS and CAD systems can no longer meet the demands of today's law enforcement environment. Advanced technology is essential for the reliable delivery of safe and efficient law enforcement services. Records Manaaement Svstem Replacement RMS software will ensure the San Bernardino Police Department has a functional records management system on January 1, 2000. New software is expected to be more user-friendly in data entry and retrieval functions; eliminate the need for shutdown to perform routine backup; improve the interface with CLETS; allow report generation without slowdown of other system operations; and provide reliable data from all systems. In addition, new software and hardware will provide a needed jail management system. Our new jail facility opened January 15, 1996, minus an automated means of booking or tracking prisoners. Computer-Aided Dispatch Currently available CAD technology will solve the assorted list of problems associated with our aged system. Non-propriety software written in a user-friendly language will reduce system management needs, and allow crime analysis to develop and run reports without system restrictions or interference with real-time operations. More importantly, the new CAD system will provide (1) a reliable communications link between the 911 Dispatch Center and field personnel; (2) accurate and timely calls for service data for optimal deployment of field resources; and (3) a means of interfacing the new 911-PSAP (public safety answering point) system with CAD. Advanced technology will provide the Police Department with a tool that is essential in fighting the war on gangs and crime. The combined CAD/RMS replacement system cost is expected to be $1,300,000.00. The City of San Bernardino has committed itself to the 10% matching-fund requirement, a contribution of $123,805.00. RES gf)253253 OMB APPROYAL NO.1 121-0140 EXPIRES: 1/31/96 ASSURANCES The Applicant hereby assures and certifies compliance w~h all Federal statutes, regulations, policies, guidelines and requirements, includong OMS Circulars No. A-21 , A-11 0, A-122, A-128, A-87; E.O. 12372 and Un~orm Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements-28 CFR, Part 66, Common Rule, that govern the application, acceptance and use of Federal funds for this federally-assisted project. Also the Applicant assures and certifies that: 1. It possesses legal authority to apply for the grant: that a reso- lution, motion or similar action has been duly adopted or passed as an official act of the applicant's governing body, authorizing the filing of the application, including all under. standings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person identified as the official repre- sentative of the applicant to act in connection with the appli- cation and to provide such additional information as may be required. It will comply with requirements of the provisions of the Uni- form Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions ACI of 1970 P.l. 91.646) which provides for fair and equi- table treatmenl of persons displaced as a result of Federal and federally-assisted programs. It will comply with provisions of Federal law which limit cer- tain political activities of employees of a State or local unit of government whose principal employment is in connection with an activity financed in whole or in part by Federal grants. (5 USC 1501, et seq_) It will comply with the minimum wage and maximum hours pro- visions of the Federal Fair labor Standards Acl if applicable. It will establish safeguards to prohibit employees from using their positions for a purpose that is or give the appearance of being motivated by a desire for private gain for themselves or others, particularly those with whom they have family, busi- ness, or other ties. 2. 3. 4. 5. II will give the sponsoring agency or the Comptroller General, through any authorized representative, access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related 10 the gren!. II will comply with all requirements imposed by the Federal Sponsoring agency concerning special requirements of law, program requirements, and other administrative requirements. It will insure that the facilities under its ownership, lease or supervision which shall be utilized in the accomplishment of the project are not listed in the Environmental protection Agency's (EPA-Iist of Violating Facilities and that il will notify the Federal grantor agency of the receipt of any communica- lion from Ihe Pirector of the EPA Office of Federal Activities indicating that a facility to be used in the project is under con- sideration for listing by the EPA. It will comply with the flood insurance I'urchase requirements of Section 102(a) of the Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973, Public Law 93.234, 87 Slat. 975, approved December 31, 1976. Saction 102(a) requires, on and after March 2, 1975, the purchase of flood insurance in communities where such insurance is available as a condition for the receipt of any Federal financial assistance for construction or acquiSition purposes for use in any area that had been identified by the Secretary of the Department of Housing and Urban Develop- ment as an area having special flood hazards. The phrase "Federal financial assistance" includes any form of loan, grant, 9uaranty, insurance payment, rebate, subsidy, disas- ter assIstance loan or grant, or any other form of direct or indirect Federal assistance. 10. It will assist the Federal grantor agency in its compliance 6. 7. 8. 9. with Section 106 of the Nalional Hisloric Preservation Act 01 1966 as amended (16 USC 470j' Executive Order 11593, and the Archeological and Historica Preservalion Act of 1966 (16 USC 569a-l et seq.) by (a) consulting with the State Historic Preservation Officer on the conduct of investigations, as nec- essary, to identify properties Iisled in or eligi~le for inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places that are subject to edverse effecls (see 36 CFR Part 800.8) by the activity, and notifying the Federal grantor agency of the existence of any such properties, and ~y (bl complYing with all requirements established by the Federa grantor agency to avoid or miti- gate adverse effects upon such properties. 11. II will comply, and assure the compliance of all its su~rantees and contractors, with the applicable provisions of Title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act, or the Victims of Crime Act, as appropriate; the provisions of the current edition of the Office of Justice Programs Financial and Administrative Guide for Grants, M71 00.1; and all other applicable Federal laws, orders, circulars, or regulations. 12. II will comply with the provisions of 28 CFR applicable to grants and cooperative agreements including Part 18, Administrative Review Procedure; Part 20, Criminal Justice Information Sys. tems; Part 22, Confidentiality of Identifiable Research and Sta- tistical Information; Part 23, Criminal Intelligence Systems Operating Policies; Part 30, Intergovernmental Review of De- partment of Justice Programs and Activities; Part 42, Nondis- crimination/Equal Employment Opportunity Policies and Pro- cedures; Part 61, Procedures for Implementing the National Environmental Policy Act: Part 63, Floodplain Management and Wetland Protection Procedures; and Federal laws or regula- lions applicable 10 Federal Assistance Programs. 13. It will comply, and all ils contraclors will comply, with Ihe non- discrimination requirements of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended, 42 USC 3789(d), or ViClims of Crime Act (as appropriale): Title VI of the Civil RiQhts Act of 1964, as amendad: Section 504 of the Reha- bilitation Act of 1973, as amended: Subtitle A, Title II of the Americans Wilh Disabilities Act (ADA) (1990): Tille IX of the Education Amendments of 1972; the Age Discrimination Act of 1975; DeF?8rtment of Justice Non-DIscrimination Regula- tions, 28 CFR Part 42, Subparts C, D, E, and G: and Depart- ment of Justice regulations on disability discrimination, 28 CFR Part 35 and Part 39. 14. In the event a Federal or State court or Federal or State ad. ministrative agency makes a finding of discrimination after a due process hearing on the grounds of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, or disability against a recipient of funds, the recipient will forward a copy of the finding to the Office for Civil Rights, Office of Justice Programs. 15. It will provide an Equal Employment Opportunity Program if required to maintain one, where the application is for $500,000 or more. 16. It will comply with the provisions of the Coastal Barrier Re- sourcas Act (P.L. 97-348) dated October 19, 1982 (16 USC 3501 et seq.) which prohibits the expenditure of most new Federal funds within the units of the Coastal Barrier Re- sources System. Signature Date OJP FORM 40000"3 (Rlirt. 1-93) PREVIOUS EDITIONS ARE OBSOLETE. ATTACHMENT 10 SF-424. RES 9~53 25 3 . U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF JUSTICE PROGRAMS OFFICE OF THE COMPTROLLER CERTIFICATIONS REGARDING LOBBYING; DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION AND OTHER RESPONSlBIUTY MAlTERS; AND DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS Applicants should refer to the regulations citad below to determine the certification to which they are required to allest. Applicants should also review the instructions for certification included in tha regulations before completing this form. Signature of this form provides for compliance with certification requirements under 28 CFR Part 69, 'New Restrictions on Lobbying" and 28 CFR Part 67, "Government-wide Pebarment and Suspension (Nonpro.curement) and Government-wide Requirements for Prug-Free Workplace (Grants)." The certifications shall be treated as a material representation of fact upon which reliance will be placed when the Pepartment of Justice determines to award the covered transaction, grant, or cooperative agreement. 1. LOBBYING As required by Section t352, Tide 31 of the U.S. Code, and implemented at 28 CFR Pert 69, for persons entering into a grant or cooperative agreement over $100,000, as defined at 28 CFR Part 69, the applicant cartifies that: (a) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for in- fluencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in con- nection with the making of any Federal grant, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal. amendment, or modification of any Federal grant or cooperative agreement; (b) If any funds other then Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or at- tempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in conneetion with this Federal grant or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form - LLL, "Pisclosure of Lobbying Activities: in accordance with its instructions; (c) The undersigned shall require that the language of this car- tification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subgrants, contracts under grants and cooperative agreements, and subcontracts) and that all sub- recipients shall cartify and disclose accordingly. 2. DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER RESPONSIBIUTY MATTERS (DIRECT RECIPIENT) As required by Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension, and implemented at 28 CFR Part 67, for prospac- tive participants in primary covered transactions, as defined at 28 CFR Part 67, Section 67.510- A. The applicant cartifies that it and its principals: (a) Are not presendy debarred, suspended, proposed for debar- ment, declared ineligible, sentenced to a denial of Federal benefits by a State or Federal court, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal departmant or agency; (b) Have not within a three-year period precading this applica- tion been convicted of or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connec- tion with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public (Federal. State, or local) transaction or contract under a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement, theft, torgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; (c) Are not presendy indicted for or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a govemmental entity (Federal, State, or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (1)(b) of this cartification; and (d) Have not within a three-year period precsding this applica- tion had one or more public transactions (Federal, State, or local) terminated for cause or default; and B. Where the applicant is unable to csrtify to any of the statements in this certification, he or she shall attach an explanation to this application. 3. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (GRANTEES OTHER THAN INDIVIDUALS) As required by the Drug-Free Workplaca Act of 1988, and implemented at 28 CFR Part 67, Subpart F, for grantees, as defined at 28 CFR Pert 67 Sections 67.615 and 67.620- A. The applicant certifies that it will or will continua to provide a drug-free workplaca by: (a) PUblishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; (b) Establishing an on-going drug-free awareness program to inform employees about- (1) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplacs; (2) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; (3) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; ande (4) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; (c) Making it a requirament that each employee to be engaged in the performanca of the grant be 9iven a copy of the state- ment required by paragraph (a); (d) Notifying the employee in tha statement required by paragraph (a) that. as a condition of employment under the grant. the employee will- OJP FORM 4081/8 (3-11) REPlACES OJP FORM$4081I2, 0408113 AND .4081/4 WHlm..j ARE OBSOLETE. RES 96 . (t) Abide by the terms of the statement: and (2) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five caJendar days after such conviction; (e) Notifying the agency, in writing, within 10 calendar days aher receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such convic- tion. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position tide, to: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, ATTN: Control Desk, 633 Indiana AIiIlnue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20531. Notice shell include the idan- tificetion number(s) of each affected grant; (I) Taking one of the following actions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph (d)(2), with respect to any employee who is so convicte<l- (1) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination, consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended: or (2) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforce- ment, or other appropriate agency: (g) Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug- free wor1<place through implementation of paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (eI), (e), and (f). B. The grantee may insert in the space provided below the site(s) for the performance of work done in connection with the speclfic grant: Place of Performance (Street address, city, county, state, zip code) San Bernardino Police Department 710 North '0' Street San Bernardlno CA 92401 Check ~ if thera are workplaces on file that are not indentified here. Section 67, 630 of the regulations provides that a grantee that is a State may elect to make one certification in each Federal fiscal year. A copy of which should be includad with each ap- plication for Department of Justice funding. States and State agencies may elect to use OJP Form 406117. Check 0 if the State has elected to complete OJP Form 406117. DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE (GRANTEES WHO ARE INDIVIDUALS) As required by the Drug-Free Workplace Act of 1988, and implementad at 28 CFR Part 67, Subpart F, for grantees, as definad at 28 CFR Part 67; Sections 67.615 and 67.62G- A. As a condition of the grant, I certify that I will not engage in the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, posses- sion, or use of a controlled substance in conducting any activity with the grant; and B. If convicted of a criminal drug offense resulting from a violation occurring during the conduct of any grant activity, I will report the conviction, in writing, within 10 calendar days of the conviction, to: Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, ATTN: Control Desk, 633 Indiana Avenue, N.W.. Washington, D.C. 20531. As the duly authorized representative of the applicant, I hereby certify that the applicant will comply with the above certifications. 1. Grantee Name and Address: Local Law Enforcement Block Grant Program 2. Application Number and/or Project Name ,Tom Mi nor 4. Typed Name and Tide of Authorized Representative -r'f'n()111 it~ 5. Signa(ure 95-600772 3. Grantee IRSlVendor Number ;?/i/1 b I 6/Date RES ~~53 253 . DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES Approved by OMB 0348-0046 Complete this form to disclose lobbying activijies pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352 (See reverse for public burden disclosure.) ** NOT APPLICABLE ** 1. Type of Federal Action: 2, Status of Federal Action: O a. b. c. d. contract grant cooperative agreement loan e. loan guarantee I. loan insurance o a. bid/offer/application b. initial award c. post-award 3. Report Type: O a. initial filing b. material change For Material Change Only: year quarter date of last report o Prime o Subawardee 5. If Reporting Entity in No.4 is Subawandee, Enter Name and Address of Prime: 4, Name and Address of Reporting Entity: Tier _, if~own: Congressional District, if known: Congressional District, if known: 6. Federal Department/Agency: 7. Federal Program Name/Description: CFDA Number, if applicable: 8. Federal Action Number, if known: 9. Awand Amount, if known: $ 10. a. Name and Address of Lobbying Entity (if individual, last name, first name, MI): b. Individuals Performing Services (including address if different from No. lOa) (last name, first name, MI) 11. Infonnallon requested through this form Is euthorlzed by title 31 U.S.C. section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying activities is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed by the tier above when this transaction was made or entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352. ThIs Infonnation will be reported 10 the Congress sernJ. annually and will be available lor public InspacIIon. Ar'f person who fails 10 file the requlrad disclosure shall be subject to a civil penally of not less that $10,000 and not more than $100.000 for each such faUure. ~. lJ \ Signature: / 1Jz ~ 1.. Y{"U_.L~ , Print Name: Tom Minor Title: Telephone No.: Mayor 909-384-5133 Date: fig/fib Authortzed lor Local ReprodUClion StandaRl Form - LLL RES 96-253 96 -253. . INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETION OF SF-LLL, DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES' This disclosure form shall be completed by the reporting entity, whether subawardee or prime Federal recipient, at the initiation or receipt of a covered Federal action, or a material change to a previous filing, pursuant to title 31 U.S.C. section 1352. The filing of a form is required for each payment or agreement to make paymenllo any lobbying entity for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with a covered Federal action. Use the SF-LLL-A Continuation Sheet for additional information if the space on the form is inadequate. Complete all items that apply for both the initial filing and material change report. Referto the implementing guidance published by the Office of Management and Budget for additional information. 1. Identify the type of covered Federal action for which lobbying activity is and/or has been secured to influence the outcome of a covered Federal action. 2. Identify the status of the covered Federal action. 3. Identify the appropriate classification of this report. If this is a followup report caused by a material change to the information previously reported, enter the year and quarter in which the change occurred. Enter the date of the last previously submitted report by this reporting entity for this covered Federal action. 4. Enter the full name, address, city, state and zip code of the reporting entity. Include Congressional District, if known. Check the appropriate classification of the reporting entity that designates if it is, or expects to be, a prime or subaward recipient. Identity the tier of the subawardee, e.g., the first subawardee of the prime is the 1 st tier. Subawards include but are not limited to subcontracts, subgrants and contract awards under grants. 5. If the organization filing the report in item 4 checks "Subawardee," then enter the full name, address, city, state and zip code of the prime Federal recipient. Include Congressional District, if known. 6. Enter the name of the Federal agency making the award or loan commitment. Include at least one organizational level below agency name, if known. For example, Department of Transportation, United States Coast Guard. 7. Enter the Federal program name or description for the covered Federal action (item 1). If known, enter the full Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number for grants, cooperative agreements, loans, and loan commitments. 8. Enter the most appropriate Federal identitying number available for the Federal action identified in item 1 (e.g., Request for Proposal (RFP) number; Invitation for Bid (IFB) number; grant announcement number; the contract, grant, or loan award number; the application/proposal control number assigned by the Federal agency). Include prefixes, e.g., "RFP-DE-90-001." 9. For a covered Federal action where there has been an award or loan commitment by the Federal agency, enter the Federal amount of the award/loan commitment for the prime entity identified in item 4 or 5. 10. '(a) Enter the full name, address, city, state and zip code of the lobbying entity engaged by the reporting entity identified in item 4 to influence the covered Federal action. (b) Enter the full names of the individual(s) performing services, and include full address if different from 10 (a). Enter Last Name, First Name, and Middle Initial (MI). 11. The certifying official shall sign and date the form, print his/her name, title, and telephone number. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 30 minutes per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0348-0046), Washington, D.C. 20503.