Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1996-197 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION NO. 96-197 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO APPROVING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN OBSOLETE RECORDS BY THE SAN BERNARDINO POLICE DEPARTMENT. WHEREAS the Chief of San Bernardino Police Department has submitted a request for authority to destroy obsolete records and; WHEREAS said request is in accordance with the procedures and requirements of Sections 34090, 34090.5, and 34090.6 of the California Government Code; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. 1. Subject to written consent of the City Attorney, as provided in Sections 34090, 34090.5, and 34090.6 of the Government Code, the following city records, documents, instruments, books or papers may be destroyed: (a) Citizen/personnel complaints dated prior to January 1, 1991; (b) Internal investigations dated prior to January 1, 1991; (c) Police canine activity and bite reports dated prior to January 1, 1991; (d) Employee grievances dated prior to January 1, 1992; (e) Internal promotional tests and evaluations dated prior to January 1, 1987; (f) All personnel records of former employees who resigned or were terminated from City employment prior to January 1, 1991. WH,rmldes-recd.resJ RES 96-197 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO APPROVING THE DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN OBSOLETE RECORDS BY THE SAN BERNARDINO POLICE DEPARTMENT. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Major and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a regular 1st meeting thereof, held on the day of July , 1996 by the following vote, to wit: Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT NEGRETE x CURLIN x ARIAS x OBERHELMAN x DEVLIN x ANDERSON x MILLER x The foregoing resolution is ~~ hereby approved tb..is3i/l day of July , 1996. ~z :)f(~.~LP\ M MINOR, Mayor City of San Bernardino Approved as to form and legal content: I consent to the destruction of the records described in this resolution. JAMES F. PENMAN City lj.ttorney , , J ). by: :hJ~'''' / vC;""'M<.., JAMES F. PENMAN, City Attorney By: j?~? j~ (/ WH:rm(des-recd.res) RES 96-197 City of San Bernardino San Bernardino Police Department Interoffice Memorandum To: Assistant Chief Wayne Harp From: Sergeant M. Emoto Subject: Destruction of Obsolete Records Date: June 5, 1996 Copies: PROBLEM: The retention and storage of citizen/internal complaints and investigations, employee grievances, internal promotional tests and evaluations, and personnel records of former employees with non- retirement related separations more than five (5) years old presents storage and security problems for the police department. The police department's retention and storage of these outdated records and documents, more than five years old, is not in accordance with existing state laws. RECOMMENDATION: That the Mayor and Common Council approve the proposed resolution to destroy certain obsolete records. FINDINGS: 1. The Mayor and Common Council adopted Resolution #95-405 on November 20, 1995, which approved the destruction of certain obsolete police records dated prior to January 1, 1990. 2. The Government Code provided for the systematic destruction of records and documents that have outlived their usefulness as evidence. 3. The proposed policy for the destruction of such records meets the standards outlined in the Government Code, Penal Code, and Evidence Code. 4. Personnel complaints and investigations older than five years are not relevant in state litigation and therefore are not discoverable pursuant to Evidence Code 1045(b) (1). THE SBPD IS COMMITTED TO PROVIDING: PROGRESSIVE QUALITY POLICE SERVICE; A SAFE ENVIRONMENT TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE; A REDUCTION IN CRIME THROUGH PROBLEM RECOGNITION AND PROBLEM SOLVING RES 96-197 Destruction of Obsolete Records Page 2 5. Documents or records involved in pending litigation, especially if a subpoena or notice to provide such documents has been served on the City, are exempt from destruction pending adjudication of the litigation. 6. Huston Carlyle, Senior Assistant City Attorney, has reviewed the proposed resolution and agrees to the necessity of this resolution to protect the City and its employees. APPENDAGES: 1. Copy of Government Code sections 34090 and 34090.6. 2. Copy of California Evidence Code section 1045(b) (1). 3. Copy of California Penal Code sections 832.5(B) and 832.8. /rm ~-------