HomeMy WebLinkAbout1997-158
RESOLUTION NO.
97-158
1
2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 96-13 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN
3 BERNARDINO.
4
5
6
7
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
Recitals
(a)
WHEREAS, the General Plan for the City of San Bernardino
was adopted by the Mayor and Common Council by Resolution
8
No. 89-159 on June 2, 1989.
9
(b) WHEREAS,
the
amendment
and
associated
proposal
10 development project was reviewed for compliance with the California
11 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and based upon the preliminary
12 review, the project was found to be exempt from CEQA pursuant to
13 CEQA Guidelines U5061(b) (3) which states that CEQA applies only to
14 projects that have the potential for causing a significant effect
15 on the environment.
16 (c) WHEREAS, on December 19, 1996, the city's Environmental
17 Review Committee concurred with the findings of staff's preliminary
18 review for CEQA and recommended that the Planning Commission
19 recommend to the Mayor and Common Council that a Notice of
20 Exemption be filed with the San Bernardino county Clerk of the
21 Board if the project is approved.
22 (d) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission conducted a noticed
23 public hearing on February 18, 1997 in order to receive pUblic
24 testimony and written and oral comments on General Plan Amendment
25 No. 96-13, a proposal to change the General Plan Land Use
26 Designation from RS, Residential Urban, and CG-l, Commercial
27 General, to RU-l, Residential Urban, on fourteen (14) parcels of
28
1
97-158
1 land generally located along Pear street between Mt. Vernon and
2 Eureka Avenues and Poplar and Mill streets and fully reviewed and
3 considered the Planning Division staff report and the
4 recommendation of the Environmental Review Committee.
5 (e) WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council held a noticed
6 public hearing and fully reviewed and considered proposed General
7 Plan Amendment No. 96-13 and the Planning commission and
8 Environmental Review Committee recommendations and Planning
9 Division Staff Report on April 7, 1997.
10 (f) WHEREAS, the adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 96-13
11 is deemed in the interest of the orderly development of the city
12 and is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the
existing General Plan.
13
SECTION 2. Environmental Determination
14
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND AND DETERMINED by the Mayor
15
and Common Council that the proposed amendment to the General Plan
16
of the City of San Bernardino is exempt from the California
17
Environmental Quality Act pursuant to the California Environmental
18
Quality Act Guidelines ~15061(b) (3) which states that CEQA applies
19
only to projects that have the potential for causing a significant
20
effect on the environment and as such, the proposed amendment is
21
hereby ratified, affirmed and adopted.
22
SECTION 3. Findinqs
23
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council of the
24
City of San Bernardino that:
25
A. The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the
26
General Plan in that it meets the General Plan's goal to
27
"allow existing mUlti-family units to remain as a conforming,
28
2
97-158
1
2
3 B.
4
5
6
7
8
9 c.
10
11
12
D.
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
A.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
permitted use in areas designated as Residential Urban (RU-1
and RU-2) (11.1 and 11.2)" (General Plan Policy 1.12,12).
The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public
interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City
in that the proposed land use designation is in accordance
with the existing mUlti-family residential land uses. In
addition, single-family residential land uses would remain
permitted in the RU-l land use designation.
The proposed amendment would not affect the balance of land
uses within the City in that the proposed amendment area will
remain as a residential district. No change to commercial,
industrial, or other type of designation is proposed.
The amendment site is physically suitable for the requested
RU-l land use designation in that over 50% of the proposed GPA
area is presently occupied by mUlti-family residential land
uses which were legally permitted and reviewed when first
constructed. Furthermore, no development is proposed at this
time.
SECTION 4, Amendment
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common council that:
The Land Use Plan of the General Plan of the City of San
Bernardino is amended by changing fourteen (14) parcels of
land from RS, Residential Suburban, and CG-l, Commercial
General, to RU-l, Residential Urban. This amendment is
designated as General Plan Amendment No. 96-13 and its
location is outlined on the map entitled Attachment A and
further described in Attachment B, copies of which are
attached and incorporated herein by reference.
3
97-158
1 B. General Plan Amendment No. 96-13 shall become effective
2 immediately upon adoption of this resolution.
3 SECTION 5. Map Notation
4 This resolution and the amendment affected by it shall be
5 noted on such appropriate General Plan maps as have been previously
6 adopted and approved by the Mayor and Common Council and which are
7 on file in the office of the city Clerk.
8 SECTION 6. Notice of Exemption
9 The Planning Division is hereby directed to file a Notice of
10 Exemption with the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino
11 certifying the City's compliance with California Environmental
12 Quality Act in determining that the project is exempt from the Act.
13 / / / /
14 / / / /
15 / / / /
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
97":158
-
1 RESOLUTION. . .ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 96-13 TO THE
2 GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO.
3 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly
4 adopted by the Mayor
5
6
7
and
Bernardino at a joint regular
day of May
Common Council
of the City of San
meeting thereof, held on the 19th
, 1997, by the following vote, to wit:
Council Members
8 NEGRETE
9 CURLIN
10 ARIAS
11 OBERHELMAN
12 DEVLIN
13 ANDERSON
14 MILLER
AYES NAYS
x
x
x
x
x
%
x
15
16
17
of
18
The foregoing resolution
May
, 1997.
19
20
Approved as to form
21 and legal content:
22
JAMES
23 City
F. PENMAN,
ttorney ()
Y>V- J -Ot-
24
25
26
27
28
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
f?{l{!/ul Cla!tf)
. 6'IVji~~!fit)~jJ/rim~~1 j)~,f3u
IS/hereby apptoved thIS .
day
-rim1ltj~~ .
T6m Minor, Mayor
city of San Bernardino
5
:J
1-i
CG
J
@
:J
@
,
97-158
ATTACHMENT A
Tax Rate Area 137-1~
7/67.70/2
CG-1..
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 96-13
RS PROPOSED AMENDMENT 1.
@ 1 FROM RS & CG-1 TO RU-1.\
REVISED: 2/18/97.
"
~
ffi
,.
'"
::e.,
'.#'.'"
2 BIROH STREET:
. .
'u " ,..1 "''''70lZ - . - 0' I @ .
\ @I' . I @ I I I 2",
~. -I 1
f@ j-,. f--- i\0 "
@ @ "
@If . 0 @ @ @I 2 @ ~
" " I 1'13 "
I
10 .@ 1 .3 @
-1 ~ 7 . RS;I 17 D
lQ I.D 4@) I,G; . @
~@ @ ll@ @)
. .@ I 5'@ ~
~. -- ,;,,' -. , - I" . --
~ POPLAR . - -----:-- - - STREfT ~
. . ~Sfl ~ /0 : j'SF:~~.J ~:.:~ ~
!LEX@ 10 .. , ;"'" " li-r
SF SF! ~~ SF: SF
\0 01 @jr@-i '@) I SF,\
OM.@ · ~ /I !@2 SF@'I ~ .)'~
/2 : , ESF ~~ (ii).
I, lSF~~f ~ . ~
t-'@ 8 'i - 3@SF ~
~ __L- I l
_Z IV: t?J i 1 =fi?lF
~@ , ',1m" 1 , ~"" ., .SFSF @.
, 7 " 4 @SF ~ .. ".,' ,- .... > "'. '- ~
~~ffJ .I~ ~J) ..J.iff~ ~ @ ... ~ · ,'"'-' 1-.
F.//~/ .. , n7[~ m
///,. / DUPlEX ' -'
'"'
.~ ~ U> .
~~x~
I"'" AP1S;~/7. ~~!
~~ ~~ II @
~~'//~ ~~~~ ' VACANT
or
't TRIPLEX f-€J
~~ '"
~ ~//? ~-
. ('tS' .~~,o '.
~.&'"/~,.<; '// V ~ /Ql];'~~~~'~
~ ~Y;;;6~1'~~~A~ ~
~M~~ ::;.12'UNIT~T~~ @ .:.SF :
! @ ~- @ @ @ @ @) @ ;@
.??,M. SF SF SF SF PUPLEX SF
. -
~MllL STREfT
I 1
r
<t
@
DUP
C
<t'
~I
"',
'I
~
~
<t
"4[
..
~.
~
"
~
'"
'3
'"
/7
c:
~
'"
:0
_4
,
.
.
Liill
CG-1+-1 .. W
r-RS
Not.-A.....o'.. 9/oc/r 8 lot
N","".,. !Il"(lwn III r,1,t.f..
Assessor's Mop
Book 137 Pag. 16
San Bernardino County
frEVIS
10-13-11:
,-,T.'"
/2....I11III
.
97-158
ATTACHMENT B
GPA-96-13 PROPOSED AMENDED PARCELS:
Assessor Parcel Numbers:
137-134-01
137-161-06
137-161-21
137-161-25
137-161-28
137-161-31
137-161-32
137-161-33
137-161-34
137-161-43
137-161-50
137-161-51
137-161-52
137-161-53
6