HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-082
,----
1
98-82
RESOLUTION NO.
2 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 97-04 TO THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN
3 BERNARDINO.
4
5
6
7
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Recitals
(a) WHEREAS, the General Plan for the city of San Bernardino
was adopted by the Mayor and Common Council by Resolution
8
9
10
11
No. 89-159 on June 2, 1989.
(b)
WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 97-04 to the General
Plan of the City of San Bernardino was considered by the Planning
commission on January 27, 1998, after a noticed public hearing, and
12
the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval has been
13
considered by the Mayor and Common Council.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
(c) WHEREAS, an Initial Study was prepared on November 27,
1997 and reviewed by the Environmental Review Committee who
determined that General Plan Amendment No. 97-04, would not have a
significant effect on the environment and therefore, recommended
that a Mitigated Negative Declaration be adopted.
(d) WHEREAS, the proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration
21 received a 21 day public review period from December 3, 1997
22 through
in
compliance with the
California
December
24,
1997
23 Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and local regulations and no
24
25
26
27
28
comments from the public were received relative thereto.
e) WHEREAS, the Planning commission conducted a noticed
public hearing on January 27, 1998 in order to receive public
testimony and written and oral comments on General Plan Amendment
No. 97-04, (a proposal to change the General Plan Land Use
1
98-82
1
98-82
of 24.61
acres
Residential
to
RS,
Designation
Low
from
RL,
2 Residential Suburban) and fully reviewed and considered the
3 Planning Division staff report and the recommendation of the
4 Environmental Review Committee.
5 f) WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council held a noticed
6 public hearing and fully reviewed and considered General Plan
7 Amendment No. 97-04 and the Planning Commission and Environmental
8 Review Committee recommendations and Planning Division Staff Report
9 on March 16, 1998.
10
11
(g)
WHEREAS, the adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 97-04
is deemed in the interest of the orderly development of the City
12 and is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the
13 existing General Plan.
14
SECTION 2. Mitiqated Neqative Declaration
15 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, FOUND AND DETERMINED by the Mayor
16
and Common Council that the proposed amendment to the General Plan
17 of the City of San Bernardino will have no significant effect on
18 the environment, and the Mitigated Negative Declaration heretofore
19 prepared by the Environmental Review Committee as to the effect of
20
21
22
this proposed amendment is hereby ratified, affirmed and adopted.
SECTION 3.
Findinqs
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council of the
23 City of San Bernardino that:
24
A.
25
26
27
28
B.
The proposed amendment is internally consistent with the
General Plan provisions contained in Objective 1.11 pertaining
to promoting the development of single-family detached units
in a high quality urban setting.
The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public
2
1
2
3
4
5 c.
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 D.
14
15
16
17
18
19 A.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
B.
27
28
IIII
98-82
interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City
in that the proposal will not result in any increase in
allowable density. Lot sizes have been limited to a minimum
of 7,200 square feet.
The proposed amendment to change the land use designation on
the 24.61 acre site, from RL, Residential Low to RS,
Residential Suburban would not significantly affect the
balance of land uses within the City in that the proposal will
not result in any increase in allowable density for the site
and both the RL, Residential Low and RS, Residential Suburban
designation are intended for the development of residential
single-family homes.
The subject site is physically suitable for the RS,
Residential Suburban designation. The anticipated land use
development will remain as single family with no increase in
allowable density.
SECTION 4. Amendment
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Mayor and Common Council that:
The Land Use Plan of the General Plan of the City of San
Bernardino is amended by changing approximately 24.61 acres of
land from RL, Residential Low to RS, Residential Suburban.
This amendment is designated as General Plan Amendment No. 97-
04 and its location is outlined on the map entitled Attachment
A and further described in Attachment B, copies of which are
attached and incorporated herein be reference.
General Plan Amendment No. 97-04 shall become effective
immediately upon adoption of this resolution.
3
98-82
1
2
SECTION 5.
Map Notation
This resolution and the amendment affected by it shall be
3 noted on such appropriate General Plan maps as have been previously
4 adopted and approved by the Mayor and Common Council and which are
5 on file in the office of the City Clerk.
6
7
SECTION 6.
Notice of Determination
The Planning Division is hereby directed to file a Notice of
8 Determination with the County Clerk of the County of San Bernardino
9 certifying the city's compliance with California Environmental
10 Quality Act in preparing the Mitigated Negative Declaration.
11 IIII
12 I I I I
13 I I I I
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
98-82
1 RESOLUTION. .ADOPTING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-04 TO THE
2 GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO.
3
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly
4 adopted by the Mayor and
Common
Council
of the city of
San
Bernardino at a joint regular
5
16th day of March
6
7 to wit:
8 Council Members: AYES NAYS
ESTRADA x
9
LIEN x
10
ARIAS x
11
SCHNETZ x
12
DEVLIN x
13
ANDERSON x
14
MILLER x
15
meeting thereof, held on the
, 1998, by the following vote,
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
16
17
18
19 of
20
21
22
Approved as to form
23 and legal content:
k. c.L~uJ<-/
March
, 1998.
this
--1lli
day
The foregoing resolution is
t Valles, Mayor
y of San Bernardino
24 JAMES
city
25
26
27
28
F. PENMAN,
ttorney
1
I
.,c-~
5
98-82
ATTACHMENT A
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING
AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
CASE GPA 97-04 TT 15759
LOCATION CUP 97-25
. HEARING DATE 3/16/98
AGENDA
ITEM #
t!__
R.~
-
f"
m..:.~..!.~~
PlNI-a.n p_ 1 Of' 1 (<-till
-,
98-82
ATTACHMENT B
ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBERS
0261-201-15
0261-201-16
98-82
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
Parcels I and 2 of Parcel Map No. 6985, in the City of San Bernardino,
County of San Bernardino, State of California, as per map recorded in Book
72 of Parcel Maps, pages 53 through 55, inclusive, in the Office of the
County Recorder of said county.
98-82
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study for:
General Plan Amendment No. 97-{)4
Conditional Use Permit No. 97-25
Tentative Tract 15759
Page 5 of 18
November 17, 1997
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
INITIAL STUDY
for
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-04
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-25
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15759
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION
ON THE BASIS OF THIS INITIAL STUDY,
o The proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment and a
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
. The proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, although there will not
be significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures have been added to the project.
A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
o The proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CALIFORNIA
Name and Title
Date
Signature
98-82
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study for:
General Plan Amendment No. 97-04
Conditional Use Permit No. 97-25
Tentative Tract 15759
Page 6 of 18
November 17, 1997
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO PLANNING AND BUILDING SERVICFS DEPARTMENT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT CHECKLIST
A. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS "Yes" and "Maybe" answers are explained at the end of this
checklist under "Discussion of Environmental Evaluation and Mitigation Measures". "No" answers are
explained on this checklist. See Attachment "A" Preliminary Environmental Description Form, where
necessary. (SECTION 6)
Yes
No
Maybe .
1. Earth Resources: Will the proposal
result in:
a. Earth movement (cut and/or fill)
on slopes of 15% or more based on
information contained in the
Preliminary Environmental
Description Form No. D.(3)?
JL
b. Development and/or grading on a
slope greater than 15 % natural
grade based on review of General
Plan HMOD map, which designates
areas of 15 % or greater slope in
the City?
x
c. Development within the Alquist-
Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone as
defined in Section 12.0-Geologic
& Seismic, Figure 47, of the
City's General Plan?
x
d. Modification of any unique geologic
or physical feature based on field
review?
x
e. Development within areas defined
for high potential for water or
wind erosion as identified in
Section 12.0-Geologic & Seismic,
Figure 53, of the City's General
Plan?
JL
98-82
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study for:
General Plan Amendment No. 97.{)4
Conditional Use Permit No. 97-'15
Tentative Tract 15759
Page 7 of 18
November 17, 1997
Yes No Maybe
f. Modification of a channel, creek
or river based on review of
USGS Topographic Map (T6, R4W)
San Bdno. No. Ouadranl!le ? ..x.
g. Development within an area
subject to landslides, mudslides,
subsidence or other similar
hazards as identified in Section
12.O-Geologic & Seismic,
Figures 48, 51, 52 and 53 of the
City's General Plan? ..x.
h. Development within an area
subject to liquefaction as shown
in Section 12.0-Geologic &
Seismic, Figure 48, of the
City's General Plan? ..x.
i. Other? ..x.
2. Air Resources: Will the proposal
result in:
a. Substantial air emissions or an
effect upon ambient air quality
as defined by South Coast Air Quality
Management District, based on
meeting the threshold for significance
in the District's, "CEQA Air Quality
Handbook"? ..x.
b. The creation of objectionable
odors based on information
contained in Preliminary
Description Form, No. G.(3)? ..x.
c. Development within a high wind
hazard area as identified in
Section 15.0-Wind & Fire, Figure
59, of the City's General Plan? ..x.
98-82
Yes
3. Water Resources: Will the proposal
result in:
a. Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface runoff
due to impermeable surfaces
that cannot be mitigated by
Public Works Standard
Requirements to contain and
convey runoff to approved
storm drain based on review
of the proposed site plan?
b. Significant alteration in the
course or flow of flood waters
based on consultation with
Public Works staff?
c. Discharge into surface waters
or any alteration of surface
water quality based on
requirements of Public Works
to have runoff directed to
approved storm drains?
d. Change in the quantity or
quality of ground water?
e. Exposure of people or property
to flood hazards as identified
in the Federal Emergency
Management Agency's Flood
Insurance Rate Map,
Panel Number 06071C7930 & 40 F,
and Section 16.0-Flooding,
Figure 62, of the City's General
Plan?
f. Other?
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study for:
General Plan Amendment No. 97-Q4
Conditional Use Permit No. 97-25
Tentative Tract 15759
Page 8 of 18
November 17, 1997
No
Maybe
..x.
..x.
..x.
..x.
....L
..x.
98-82
4. Biological Resources: Could the
proposal result in:
a. Development within the Biological
Resources Management Overlay, as
identified in Section 10.0-
Natural Resources, Figure 41,
of the City's General Plan?
I. Change in the number of any
unique, rare or endangered
species of plants or their
habitat including stands of
trees based on information
contained in the Preliminary
Environmental Description
Form No. B.(l) and verified
by on-site survey/evaluation?
2. Change in the number of any
unique, rare or endangered
species of animals or their
habitat based on information
contained in the Preliminary
Environmental Description
Form No. E.(8) and verified
by site survey/evaluation?
3. Impacts to the wildlife
disbursal or migration corridors?
b. Removal of viable, mature trees
based on site survey/evaluation
and review of the proposed site
plan? (6" or greater trunk
diameter at 4' above the ground)
c. Other?
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study for:
General Plan Amendment No. 97-04
Conditional Use Permit No. 97-25
Tentative Tract 15759
Page 9 of 18
November 17. 1997
Yes
No
Maybe
x
x
x
x
2L
x
98-82
S. Noise: Could the proposal result in:
a. Development of housing, health
care facilities, schools,
libraries, religious facilities
or other noise sensitive uses
in areas where existing or
future noise levels exceed an
Ldn of 65 dB(A) exterior and an
Ldn of 45 dB(A) interior as
identified in Section 14.0-Noise,
Figures 57 and 58 of the City's
General Plan?
b. Development of new or expansion
of existing industrial,
commercial or other uses which
generate noise levels above an Ldn
of 65 dB(A) exterior or an Ldn of
45 dB(A) interior that may affect
areas containing housing, schools,
health care facili ties or other
sensitive uses based on
information in the Preliminary
Environmental Description Form
No. G.(1) and evaluation of
surrounding land uses No. C., and
verified by site survey/evaluation?
c. Other?
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study for:
General Plan Amendment No. 97-<l4
Conditional Use Permit No. 97-25
Tentative Tract 15759
Page 10 of 18
November 17, 1997
Yes
No
Maybe
..x.
..x.
..x.
98-82
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study for:
General Plan Amendment No. 97-04
Conditional Use Permit No. 97-25
Tentative Tract 15759
Page 11 of 18
November 17. 1997
Yes No Maybe
6. Land Use: Will the proposal result in:
a. A change in the land use as
designated based on the review
of the General Plan Land Use
Plan/Zoning Districts Map? JL
b. Development within an Airport
District as identified in the
Air Installation Compatible Use
Zone (AICUZ) Report and the Land
Use Zoning District Map? ..x..
c. Development within Foothill Fire
Zones A & B, or C as identified
on the Development Code Overlay
Districts Map? ..x..
d. Other? ..x..
7. Man-Made Hazards: Based on
information contained in Preliminary
Environmental Description Form,
No. G.(l) and G.(2) will the project:
a. Use, store, transport or dispose
of hazardous or toxic materials
(including but not limited to
oil, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation)? ..x..
b. Involve the release of
hazardous substances? ..x..
c. Expose people to the potential
health/safety hazards? ..x..
d. Other? ..x..
98-82
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study for:
General Plan Amendment No. 97-04
Conditional Use Permit No. 97-25
Tentative Tract 15759
Page 12 of 18
November 17, 1997
Yes No Maybe
8. Housing: Will the proposal:
a. Remove existing housing as verified
by a site survey/evaluation? .x.
b. Create a significant demand for
additional housing based on the
proposed use and evaluation of
project size? .x.
c. Other? .x.
Yes No Maybe
9. Transportation/Circulation: Could
the proposal, in comparison with the
Circulation Plan as identified in
Section 6.0-Circulation of the City's
General Plan and based on the
conclusions of the City Traffic
Engineer and review of the Traffic
Study if one was prepared, result in:
a. A significant increase in traffic
volumes on the roadways or
intersections or an increase that
is significantly greater than the
land use designated on the General Plan? .x.
b. Use of existing, or demand for
new, parking facilities/structures? .x.
c. Impact upon existing public
transportation systems? ...x.-
d. Alteration of present patterns of circulation? .x.
e. Impact to rail or air traffic? .x.
98-82
f. Increased safety hazards to
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians?
g. A disjointed pattern of roadway
improvements?
h. Other?
10. Public Services: Based on the
responses of the responsible
agencies or departments, will the
proposal impact the following
beyond the capability to provide
adequate levels of service?
a. Fire protection?
b. Police protection?
c. Schools (i.e., attendance,
boundaries, overload, etc.)?
d. Parks or other recreational facilities?
e. Medical aid?
f. Solid Waste?
g. Other? San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District
Metropolitan Water District
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study for:
General Plan Amendment No. 97-04
Conditional Use Permit No. 97-25
Tentative Tract 15759
Page 13 of 18
November 17, 1997
...X-
x
x
Yes
No
Maybe
x
x
x
x
x
x
...X-
98-82
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study for:
General Plan Amendment No. 97~
Conditional Use Permit No. 97-25
Tentative Tract 15759
Page 14 of 18
November 17, 1997
Yes
No
Maybe
11. Utilities: Will the proposal:
a. Based on the responses of the
responsible Agencies, Departments,
or Utility Company, impact the following
beyond the capability to provide adequate
levels of service or require the
construction of new facilities?
I. Natural gas?
.x.
2. Electricity?
.x.
3. Water?
.x.
4. Sewer?
.x.
5. Other?
.x.
b. Result in a disjointed pattern
of utility extensions based on review of
existing patterns and proposed extensions.
.x.
Yes No Maybe
12. Aesthetics:
a. Could the proposal result in the
obstruction of any significant or
important scenic view based on
evaluation of the view shed
verified by site survey/evaluation? .x.
b. Will the visual impact of the
project create aesthetically
offensive changes in the
existing visual setting
based on a site survey and
evaluation of the proposed
elevations? .x.
98-82
c. Other?
13. Cultural Resources: Could the
proposal result in:
a. The alteration or destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site by
development within an
archaeological sensitive area
as identified in Section 3.0-
Historical and Archaeological,
Figure 8, of the City's General Plan?
b. Alteration or destruction of
a historical site, structure
or object as listed in the
City's Historic Resources
Reconnaissance Survey?
c. Other?
City of San Bemanlino
Initial Study for:
General Plan Amendment No. 97-04
Conditional Use Permit No. 97-25
Tentative Tract 15759
Page IS of 18
November 17, 1997
x
Yes
No
Maybe
JL
x
x
98-82
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study for:
General Plan Amendment No. 97-()4
Conditional Use Permit No. 97-25
Tentative Tract 15759
Page 16 of 18
November 17, 1997
14. Mandatory Findings of Significance
(Section 15065)
The California Environmental Quality Act states that if any of the following can be answered
yes or maybe, the project may have a significant effect on the environment and an
Environmental Impact Report shall be prepared. Based on this Initial Study:
Yes
No
Maybe
a. Does the project have the
potential to degrade the
quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat
of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
..x..
b. Does the project have the potential
achieve short-term to the disadvantage
of long-term, environmental goals?
(A short-term impact on the
environment is one which
occurs in a relatively brief,
definitive period of time
while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
..x..
c. Does the project have impacts
which are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable?
(A project may impact on two
or more separate resources where
98-82
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study for:
General Plan Amendment No. 97-D4
Conditional Use Permit No. 97-25
Tentative Tract 15759
Page 17 of 18
November 17. 1997
Yes
No
Maybe
the impact on each resource is
relatively small, but where the
effect of the total of those
impacts on the environment is
significant. )
.x.
d. Does the project have
environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly?
.x.
C. DISCUSSION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION AND MITIGATION MEASURES
(SECTION 7)
1. EARTH RESOURCES
b. The site is located in the Hillside Management Overlay District. Approximately 19% of the site has
slopes 15 % or greater. No development is proposed for this portion of the site; although this area will
be used for the backyards of some of the lots in phases one and two it is not considered to have an
impact on the project
e. Approximately 34,731 cubic yards of cut and 29,560 cubic yards of import fIll is anticipated for the
project. Grading may result in erosion and dust impact to surrounding properties. To mitigate the
potential impacts, the Standard City Public Works/Engineering requirements shall apply.
g. The southwestern portion of the site is identified in Figure 52 of the General Plan. The area is located
in an area of low to moderate potential for slope instability or landslides. The area identified has slopes
greater than 15 %. No development is proposed for this portion of the site, but will be in the backyards
of some of the lots in phases one and two and is not considered to have an impact on the project.
2. AIR RESOURCES
c. The site is located in a high wind hazard area. Standard requirements from the Planning and Building
Services Department shall apply. Those requirements pertain to building exposure and orientation and
building roof construction resisting 80 MPH winds. The requirements serve to reduce potential wind
impacts to a level of non-significance at the time a Development Permit is submitted for the construction
of the homes.
98-82
City of San Bernardino
Initial Study for:
General Plan Amendment No. 97~
Conditional Use Permit No. 97-25
Tentative Tract 15759
Page 18 of 18
November 17, 1997
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
a. In October 1997 a Biological Resources survey was completed by John F. Wear for the project area.
No sensitive biological resources were found to occur on the site. The removal of the limited existing
vegetation is not considered significant and no mitigation measures were proposed.
6. LAND USE
a. The applicant has proposed a General Plan Amendment to change the land use district from RL,
Residential Low to RS, Residential Suburban and a Conditional Use Permit because the project is in
the Hillside Management Overlay District. The current land use district RL, permits construction of
up to 3.1 units per acre. The proposed General Plan Amendment to the RS land use district would
permit construction of up to 4.5 units per acre. The applicant through the Tentative Tract Map,
proposes to subdivide 2 parcels consisting of 24.61 acres, into 69 single-family lots with a minimum
lot area of 7,200 square feet. The area of the project site with slopes 15 % and greater are not proposed
for development in this project, but is included in some of the lots in phases one and two. The
development of this project with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet, would be consistent with the
surrounding area development and density and is not considered to be significant.
10. PUBLIC SERVICES
There are two easements located on the site and both are identified on the Tract Map. The Metropolitan
Water District (MWD) has a 120 foot fee right-of-way for a 121.5" water line. The MWD right-of-
way, generally follows New Pine Avenue. The San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District has a 40'
right- of-way for a 54" water line that follows the east side of the MWD right-of-way. Devil Creek
Flood Control Channel and California State University San Bernardino are to the East of the site. Both
the MWD and the SGVMWD have proposed conditions for the project and the Planning Division is in
concurrence with those conditions. The conditions of approval proposed by the MWD are incorporated
into this Initial Study as Attachment 2 and the conditions of approval from SGVMWD are incorporated
as Attachment 3.
13. CULTURAL RESOURCES
a. The project area is identified in Section 3.0-Historical and Archaeological Resources, Figure 8, of the
Cities General Plan. As a result an Archaeological Resource Review was completed for the project area
by the San Bernardino County Museum, Archaeological Information Center. Through their review it
was determined that no Archaeological resources were known to exist within or adjacent to the site.
No further research was required, but two recommendations were made for site grading and the
Planning Division is in agreement with those recommendations. Those recommendations are
incorporated into this Initial Study as Conditions of Approval in Attachment 4.
~
E-o
Z
r.:l
~
U
-<
E-o
E-o
-<
98-82
,:;
:i
~ H:
( i ii~
Ll ;.: L ij
n' 1%' a f' I II
i;'l~ i:p ;~ ~ 'ih! :~~: i
~:,! ;~;i H i n~ i ~ !i i; !
t: ! ~ -
I,; ,"
*i!ik:
I .1 ~ ill!
: ~ ~ ~ ~1!
"
! ~!
II .~
. 'I'
~ .~; :;; l
! 11$_ ".
r
, ~I
r"%
Jll,jg
4.\i
"i.
~j i{~~r~ j
~"""'"
., '
i
,
I
.....,;;,;J;;.;-----
i'
II
10
r-.
II
-
i i:-"
,
W~
-,' ~
rJi
'i .~
'-:[j'
il'!
i'
~\
'~'t'
;. ...- .
I ,
, '\.
.
i
!
j
,"
I':
Iii:
~\J
",
!'.
'.,
IH
;;j
b
! :ji
1- t) ~
;~!
~ !I~
:11 ;!
lq i~
1"' .~
:H
;:: a
~li ;;
,-, '1 i
,1:1 ;, !
,.-!,'"
Ill:;" i
! i.h,,-. .
g
H
~i
I'
a
!~
p
,I
II!: I:!
I !l ,~
: ~ ,I
d
.
!
;
!:
I. '"
; "i
..' Iii;
, ~ll-
,. ~i
I
; ~ I H
"
"
11
'.
I!I,
!lll
h
,; il!
~"'.
"':F
,~)
il ~'~
1---'
.; ~
'I ~..
, .'
, '
L
, .
,
~jl
~
. '~t-:::-
:,1
:1' 01
~~ Ii
,,:~~-
j J \
;
-'-- ~
,
:~ I
c'''',
1 ,:r'
, 'I
j;-, ~~" ~I'
:~!:
: -~a ~I
~ 1~!
ii-
:~i
[, i;~
~11'i
',,1"
" In
:~
Ii
'I
'Ii
:----r--..:io..- W
,.
il!
; ~
:i
"
~~
i
~.I rD.'.::' ._
!!II ~ _ - ,;LtJ 'c.f7~~-~ '::-' .' l'-..... ~,v '---.;,.I', ."'._
.. L. ~:z. .-.......-....1- ,>....o.oc...,_. _-O-"'-:Jo._.,_....__ ~ '-h i€E.i-0N~.u
! r- i~ ~~L-~;,~ 'c:.~"~~~~"
"U ~J;g .- 'ii~-:'~3 -:.."-,.-....----....-::'-. .~~~~~., 'iC':~ '.
~ j:;:; _\..____ .7'""",~"~ - ....;... ~. "r-,"'" ~~---
: ~ ~i~l.l" .,-
. "".~ r .0'~< '.'
i""ll3 0;-1,..-
;~:! "'~!
. r- ~; ~:'\!1r
~ . i ----,,,~:"
~ ~ ~ ~-_.-.\..J:
'... I~ '-." ,;,
. . ~.'t_'J
. :. ~'.~11.
~ ~ - ~~,
~ > ~; 1::,~~~il . {-
::: ~~ I"" ~l ~
; i= I~ ~r~';t" ~:
fIIfI/I ; "" \ "'~ :... ""~
.... iii~ ~ ~'-f! 1 ~
I- If'F, ',"-,'S
Z - :, ~F~{I:
---r'! 'r'., !
1.1 ~I! if: ,,:-:'
... : j,., ,-.
...
I i ~I i ~i n~!I!~; !!!!!~~~~~!~~~~ !~~~~~~!~! ~!~~!~~~~!~!~!~!~~!~ !!~~~~~~ ~!~~
.
hii
/}
,:
, !i
i; d i i j i i Iii;; Ii
iili11iiiiiliHi
<,.::,.,_. .
:.'~,~,'
.~
Jrbi~"
~ 'Yi ~ i
r-l~"
I -I ,/
-.., 1 '
-k-2:i I if~-
.-_~:
,-r"J
:-r~;l :
-+1
r>:"': ,j
*!~:~ I
i -'_il.l.
c_r'i
. '.'''~
~":;-'
~
<
.
>
~
~
o
;:
I......
L_:
, '!I~ . -'.,
i~':"':l~~- .1~:' '!"lJ t~i~.;fI~. I tl~i~ !,~~'"
'\~ '-.1./, '- -..... i't ~~:"11"
~--V~
L i
, ~.J
,-'"-'--f.
.J '~
I
o
~-,I:4f-~~-'~
"f" ,l;. ;: ,--,'-1. (
:/
JD)~~~U~~~ID\
Uu t-:~, "_ 'wi ~
mrR' O'''~~RO~N20
TM LANNING &
UIL RVICES
METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
ATTACHMENT 2
Offic? :: the Ga.:'F3! ..~r_?:;2g3:
HAY 0 2 fIiI
MWD Rialto Pipeline
Sta. 4053+00 to 4070+00
R/w Parcel 1606-29-9 (Fee)
Substr. Job No. 4045-97-006
City of San Bernardino
Planning & Building Services Department
300 Nort.h liD" Street
San Bernardino, California 92418
Attention Ms. Margaret Park
Associate Planner
Gentlemen:
Tentative Tract No. 1S759
Thank you for your Agency Comment Sheet dated April 24,
1997, and a print of the tentative tract map concerning the
proposed development of the above-referenced tract into single
family residential lots in the City of San Bernardino.
The locations of Metropolitan's 121 1/2-inch-inside-
diameter welded steel Rialto Pipeline and 120-foot-wide fee
right-of-way, as shown on Tentative Tract Map No. 15759, are
generally in agreement with our records.
As detailed in Section A-A on the tract map,
Metropolitan is concerned with the 2:1 fill slope proposed
inside its property. This proposal should be modified to
conform with the provisions described in Section 3.a of our
"Guidelines for Developments in the Area of Facilities, Fee
Properties, andlor Easements of the Metropolitan Water District
of Southern California," copy enclosed. We request that prints
of the plans for any proposed activity in the vicinity and within
Metropolitan's fee right-of-way be submitted for our review and
written approval prior to construction. Please instruct the
project proponent to submit the plans to Metropolitan as they
become available.
98-82
THE METROPOUTAN WATER OISTRICT OF SOIlTHERN CAliFORNIA
City of San Bernardino
-2-
MAY 0 2 1997
Metropolitan has no objections to the 6-foot-high block
wall proposed adjacent to its property boundary. As indicated in
Sections A-A and B-B on the tract map, we note that no part of
the block wall or foundation encroaches within Metropolitan's fee
right-of-way.
Appropriate entry rights andlor easement will
be required for any proposed activity outside the street
right-of-way of New pine Avenue within Metropolitan's fee
property. Depending on the impact of the proposed development
to Metropolitan's facilities, we may also require deposit from
the developer andlor project proponent to cover our engineering
review and inspection costs.
For any further correspondence with Metropolitan
relating to this project, please make reference to the MWD
Substructures Job Number shown in the upper right-hand corner
of the first page of this letter. Should you require any
additional information, please contact Mr. Jose Bautista,
telephone (213) 217-6092.
Very truly yours,
Gary M. Snyder
Chief Engineer
BY~~ 4 I~~a
Leslie J. ~rr~ P.E.
Substructures Section Manager
LJB/JB/km
DOC#: KM482t15759-1
Encl. 702
cc: MAPCO
680 South Waterman Avenue
Building A
San Bernardino, California 92408-2353
98-82
ATTACHMENT 2
Guidelines for Developments in the
Area of Facilities, Fee Properties, and/or Easements
of The Me~ropolitan Water District of Southern California
1. Introduction
a. The following general guidelines should be
followed for the design of proposed facilities and
developments in the area of Metropolitan's facilities, fee
properties, and/or easements.
b. We require that 3 copies of your tentative and
final record maps, grading, paving, street improvement,
landscape, storm drain, and utility plans be submitted
for our review and written approval as they pertain to
Metropolitan's facilities, fee properties and/or
easements, prior to the commencement of any construction
work.
2. Plans, Parcel and Tract Maps
The following are Metropolitan's requirements for the
identification of its facilities, fee properties, and/or
easements on your plans, parcel maps and tract maps:
a. Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easements and
its pipelines and other facilities must be fully shown and
identified as Metropolitan's on all applicable plans.
b. Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easements
must be shown and identified as Metropolitan's with the
official recording data on all applicable parcel and
tract maps.
c. Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easements
and existing survey monuments must be dimensionally tied
to the parcel or tract boundaries.
d. Metropolitan's records of surveys must be
referenced on the parcel and tract maps.
.--...
v
"
98-82
- 2 -
3. Maintenance of Access Alonq Metropolitan's Riqhts-of-Way
a~ Proposed cut or fill slopes exceeding 10 percent
are normally not allowed within Mecropolitan's fee
properties or easements. This is required to facilitate the
use of construction and maintenance equipment, and provide
access to its aboveground and belowground facilities.
b. We require that 16-foot-wide commercial-type
driveway approaches be constructed on both sides of all
streets crossing Metropolitan's rights-of-way. Openings
are required in any median island. Access ramps, if
necessary, must be at least 16-feet-wide. Grades of ramps
are normally not allowed to exceed 10 percent. If the slope
of an access ramp must exceed 10 percent due to the
topography, the ramp must be paved. We require a
40-foot-long level area on the driveway approach to access
ramps where the ramp meets the street. At Metropolitan's
fee properties, we may require fences and gates.
c. The terms of Metropolitan's permanent easement
deeds normally preclude the building or maintenance of
structures of any nature or kind within its easements, to
ensure safety and avoid interference with operation and
maintenance of Metropolitan's pipelines or other facilities.
Metropolitan must have vehicular access along the easements
at all times for inspection, patrolling, and ior maintenance
of the pipelines and other facilities on a routine basis.
We require a 20-foot-wide clear zone around all above-ground
facilities for this routine access. This clear zone should
slope away from our facility on a grade not to exceed
2 percent. We must also have access along the easements
with construction equipment. An example of this is shown on
Figure 1.
d. The footings of any proposed buildings adjacent to
Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easements must not
encroach into the fee property or easement or impose
additional loading on Metropolitan's pipelines or other
facilities therein. A typical situation is shown on
Figure 2. Prints of the detail plans of the footings for
any building or structure adjacent to the fee property or
easement must be submitted for our review and written
approval as they pertain to the pipeline or other facilities
therein. Also, roof eaves of buildings adjacent to the
easement or fee property must not vverhang into the fee
property or easement area.
,
98-82
- 3 -
e. Metropolitan's pipelines and other facilities,
e.g. structures, manholes, equipment, survey monuments, etc.
within' its fee properties and/or easements must be protected
from damage by the easement holder on Metropolitan's
property or the property owner where Metropolitan has an
easement, at no expense to Metropolitan. If the facility is
a cathodic protection station it shall be located prior to
any grading or excavation. The exact location. description
and way of protection shall be shown on the related plans
for the easement area.
4. Easements on Metropolitan's Property
a. We encourage the use of Metropolitan's fee rights-
of-way by governmental agencies for public street and
utility purposes, provided that such use does not interfere
with Metropolitan's use of the property, the entire width of
the property is accepted into the agency's public street
system and fair market value is paid for such use of the
right-of-way.
b. Please contact the Director of Metropolitan's
Right of Way and Land Division, telephone (213) 250-6302,
concerning easements for landscaping, street, storm drain,
sewer, water or other public facilities proposed within
Metropolitan's fee properties. A map and legal description
of the requested easements must be submitted. Also, written
evidence must be submitted that shows the city or county
will accept the easement. for the specific purposes into its
public system. The grant of the easement will be subject to
Metropolitan's rights to use its land for water pipelines
and related purposes to the same extent as if such grant had
not been made. There will be a charge for the easement.
Please note that, if entry is required on the property prior
to issuance of the easement, an entry permit must be
obtained. There will also be a charge for the entry permit.
5. Landscaping
Metropolitan's landscape guidelines for its fee
properties and/or easements are as follows:
a. A green belt may be allowed ~ithin Metropolitan's
fee property or easement.
b. All landscape plans shall
size of Metropolitan's fee property
location and size of Metropolitan's
facilities therein.
show the location and
and/or easement and the
pipeline or other
~
98-82
- 4 -
c. Absolutely no trees will be allowed within 15 feet
of the centerline of Metropolitan's existing or future
pipelines and facilities.
d. Deep-rooted trees are prohibited within
Metropolitan's fee properties and/or easements. Shallow-
rooted trees ar~ the only trees allowed. The shallow-rooted
trees will not be permitted any closer than 15 feet from the
centerline of the pipeline, and such trees shall not be
taller than 25 feet with a root spread no greater than
20 feet in diameter at maturity. Shrubs, bushes, vines, and
ground cover are permitted, but larger shrubs and bushes
should not be planted directly over our pipeline. Turf is
acceptable. We require submittal of landscape plans for
Metropolitan's prior review and written approval. (See
Figure 3).
e. The landscape plans must contain provisions for
Metropolitan's vehicular access at all times along its
rights-of-way to its pipelines or facilities therein.
Gates capable of accepting Metropolitan's locks are
required in any fences across its rights-of-way. Also,
any walks or drainage facilities across its access route
must be constructed to AASHTO H-20 loading standards.
f. Rights to landscape any of Metropolitan's fee
properties must be acquired from its Right o~ Way and
Land Division. Appropriate entry permits must be obtained
prior to any entry on its property. There will be a charge
for any entry permit or easements required.
6. Fencing
Metropolitan requires that perimeter fencing of its fee
properties and facilities be constructed of universal chain
link, 6 feet in height and topped with 3 strands of barbed
wire angled upward and outward at a 45 degree angle or an
approved equal for a total fence height of 7 feet. Suitable
substitute fencing may be considered by Metropolitan.
(Please see Figure 5 for details).
7.
Utilities in Metropolitan's Fee Properties and/or Easements
or Ad;acent to Its Pipeline in Public Streets
Metropolitan's policy for the alinement of utilities
permitted within its fee properties and/or easements and
street rights-of-way is as follows:
,
98-82
- 5 -
a. Permanent structures, including catch basins,
manholes, power poles, telephone riser boxes, etc., shall
not be"located within its fee properties and/or easements.
b. We request that permanent utility structures
within public streets, in which Metropolitan's facilities
are constructed under the Metropolitan Water District
Act, be placed as far from our pipeline as possible, but
not closer than 5 feet from the outside of our pipeline.
c. The installation of utilities over or under
Metropolitan's pipelinelsl must be in accordance with the
requirements shown on the enclosed prints of Drawings
Nos. C-11632 and C-9547. Whenever possible we request a
minimum of one foot clearance between Metropolitan's pipe
and your facility. Temporary support of Metropolitan's
pipe may also be required at undercrossings of its pipe
in an open trench. The temporary support plans must be
reviewed and approved by Metropolitan.
d. Lateral utility crossings of Metropolitan's
pipelines must be as perpendicular to its pipeline
alinement as practical. Prior to any excavation our
pipeline shall be located manually and any excavation
within two feet of our pipeline must be done by hand.
This shall be noted on the appropriate drawings.
e. Utilities constructed longitudinally within
Metropolitan's rights-of-way must be located outside the
theoretical trench prism' for uncovering its pipeline and
must be located parallel to and as close to its rights-
of-way lines as practical.
f. When piping is jacked or installed in jacked
casing or tunnel under Metropolitan's pipe, there must be
at least two feet of vertical clearance between the
bottom of Metropolitan's pipe and the top of the jacked
pipe, jacked casing or tunnel. We also require that
detail drawings of the shoring for the jacking or
tunneling pits be submitted for our review and approval.
Provisions must be made to grout any voids around the
exterior of the jacked pipe, jacked casing or tunnel. If
the piping is installed in a jacked casing or tunnel the
annular space between the piping and the jacked casing or
tunnel must be filled with grout.
~
98-82
- 6 -
g. Overhead electrical and telephone line
requir~ments:
1) Conductor clearances are to conform to the
California State Public Utilities Commission, General
Order 95, for Overhead Electrical Line Construction or
at a greater clearance if required by Metropolitan.
Under no circumstances shall clearance be less than
35 feet.
2) A marker must be attached to the power pole
showing the ground clearance and line voltage, to help
prevent damage to your facilities during maintenance or
other work being done in the area.
3) Line clearance over Metropolitan's fee
properties and/or easements shall be shown on the
drawing to indicate the lowest point of the line
under the most adverse conditions including
consideration of sag, wind load, temperature change,
and support type. We require that overhead lines be
located at least 30 feet laterally away from all
above-ground structures on the pipelines.
4) When underground electrical conduits,
120 volts or greater, are installed within
Metropolitan's fee property and/or easement, the
conduits must be incased in a minimum of three inches
of red concrete. Where possible, above ground warning
signs must also be placed at the right-of-way lines
where the conduits enter and exit the right-of-way.
h. The construction of sewerlines in Metropolitan's
fee properties and/or easements must conform to the
California Department of Health Services Criteria for the
Separation of Water Mains and Sanitary Services and the
local City or County Health Code Ordinance as it relates to
installation of sewers in the vicinity of pressure
waterlines. The construction of sewerlines should also
conform to these standards in street rights-of- way.
i. Cross sect~ons shall be provided for all pipeline
crossings showing Metropolitan's fee property and/or
easement limits and the location of our pipelinels). The
exact locations of the crossing pipelines and their
elevations shall be marked on as-built drawings for our
information.
.,
98-82
- 7 -
j. Potholing of Metropolitan's pipeline is required
if the vertical clearance between a utility and
Metropdlitan's pipeline is indicated on the plan to be one
foot or less. If the indicated clearance is between one and
two feet, potholing is suggested. Metropolitan will provide
a representative to assists others in locating and
identifying ita pipeline. Two-working days notice is
requested.
k. Adequate shoring and bracing is required for the
full depth of the trench when the excavation encroaches
within the zone shown on Figure 4.
1. The location of utilities within Metropolitan's
fee property andlor easement shall be plainly marked to
help prevent damage during maintenance or other work done
in the area. Detectable tape over buried utilities
should be placed a minimum of 12 inches above the utility
and shall conform to the following requirements:
1) Water pipeline: A two-inch blue warning
tape shall be imprinted with:
'CAUTION BURIED WATER PIPELINE"
2)
two-inch
with:
Gas, oil, or chemical pipeline: A
yellow warning tape shall be imprinted
"CAUTION BURIED
PIPELINE"
3) Sewer or storm drain pipeline: A
two-inch green warning tape shall be imprinted with:
"CAUTION BURIED
PIPELINE"
4) Electric, street lighting, or traffic
signals conduit: A two-inch red warning tape shall
be imprinted with:
"CAUTION BURIED
CONDUIT"
5)
two-inch
with:
Telephone, or television conduit: A
orange warning tape shall be imprinted
"CAUTION BURIED
CONDUIT"
,
98-82
- B -
m. Cathodic Protection requirements:
1) If there is a cathodic protection station
for Metropolitan's pipeline in the area of the proposed
work, it shall be located prior to any grading or
excavation. The exact location, description and manner
of protec~ion shall be shown on all applicable plans.
Please contact Metropolitan's Corrosion Engineering
Section, located at Metropolitan's F. E. Weymouth
Softening and Filtration Plant, 700 North Moreno
Avenue, La Verne, California 91750, telephone (714)
593-7474, for the locations of Metropolitan's cathodic
protection stations.
2) If an induced-current cathodic protection
system is to be installed on any pipeline crossing
Metropolitan's pipeline, please contact Mr. Wayne E.
Risner at (714) 593-7474 or (213) 2S0-50B5. He will
review the proposed system and determine if any
conflicts will arise with the existing cathodic
protection systems installed by Metropolitan.
3) Within Metropolitan's rights-of-way,
pipelines and carrier pipes (casings) shall be coated
with an approved protective coating to conform to
Metropolitan's requirements, and shall be maintained in
a neat and orderly condition as directed by Metropolitan.
The application and monitoring of cathodic protection
on the pipeline and casing shall conform to Title 49 of
the Code of Federal'Regulations, Part 195.
4) If a steel carrier pipe (casing) is used:
(a) Cathodic protection shall be provided
by use of a sacrificial magnesium anode (a sketch
showing the cathodic protection details can be
provided for the designers information).
(b) The steel carrier pipe shall be
protected with a coal tar enamel coating inside
and out in accordance with AWWA C203 specification.
n. All trenches shall be excavated to comply with the
CAL/OSHA Construction Safety Orders, Article 6, beginning
with Sections 1539 through 1547. Trench backfill shall be
placed in 8-inch lifts and shall be compacted to 95 percent
relative compaction (ASTM D698) across roadways and through
protective dikes. Trench backfill elsewhere will be
compacted to 90 percent relative compaction (ASTM D698).
,
98-82
- 9 -
o. Control cables connected with the operation of
Metropolitan's system are buried within streets, its fee
properties and/or easements. The locations and elevations
of these cables shall be shown on the drawings. The
drawings shall note that prior to any excavation in the
area, the control cables shall be located and measures
shall be taken~y the contractor to protect the cables in
place.
p. Metropolitan is a member of Underground Service
Alert (USA). The contractor (excavator) shall contact
USA at 1-800-422-4133 (Southern California) at least 48
hours prior to starting any excavation work. The contractor
will be liable for any damage to Metropolitan's facili t'ies
as a result of the construction.
8. Paramount Riqht
Facilities constructed within Metropolitan's fee
properties and/or easements shall be subject to the
paramount right of Metropolitan to use its fee properties
and/or easements for the purpose for which they were
acquired. If at any time Metropolitan or its assigns
should, in the exercise of their rights, find it necessary
to remove any of the facilities from the fee properties
andlor easements, such removal and replaceme~t shall be at
the expense of the owner of the facility.
9. Modification of Metropolitan's Facilities
When a manhole or other of Metropolitan's facilities
must be modified to accommodate your construction or recons-
truction, Metropolitan will modify the facilities with its
forces. This should be noted on the construction plans. The
estimated cost to perform this modification will be given to
you and we will require a deposit for this amount before the
work is performed. Once the deposit is received, we will
schedule the work. Our forces will coordinate the work with
your contractor. OUr final billing will be based on actual
cost incurred, and will include materials, construction,
engineering plan review, inspection, and administrative
overhead charges calculated in accordance with Metropolitan's
standard accounting practices. If the cost is less than the
deposit, a refund will be madel however, if the cost exceeds
the deposit, an invoice will be forwarded for payment of the
additional amount.
~--
I
,
98-82
- 10 -
10. Drainage
a; Residential or commercial development typically
increases and concentrates the peak storm water runoff as
well as the total yearly storm runoff from an area, thereby
increasing the requirements for storm drain facilities
downstream of ~he development. Also, throughout the year
water from landscape irrigation, car washing, and other
outdoor domestic water uses flows into the storm drainage
system resulting in weed abatement, insect infestation,
obstructed access and other problems. Therefore, it is
Metropolitan's usual practice not to approve plans that show
discharge of drainage from developments onto its fee
properties andlor easements.
b. If water must be carried across or discharged onto
Metropolitan's fee properties andlor easements, Metropolitan
will insist that plans for development provide that it be
carried by closed conduit or lined open channel approved in
writing by Metropolitan. Also the drainage facilities must be
maintained by others, e.g., city, county, homeowners association,
etc. If the development proposes changes to existing drainage
features, then the developer shall make provisions to provide
for replacement and these changes must be approved by Metropolitan
in writing.
11. Construction Coordination
During construction', Metropolitan's field representative
will make periodic inspections. We request that a stipulation
be added to the plans or specifications for notification of
Mr. of Metropolitan's Operations Services Branch,
telephone (213) 250- , at least two working days prior to
any work in the vicinity of our facilities.
12. Pipeline Loading Restrictions
a. Metropolitan's pipelines and conduits vary in
structural strength, and some are not adequate for
AASHTO H-20 loading. Therefore, specific loads over the
specific sections of pipe or conduit must be reviewed and
approved by Metropolitan. However, Metropolitan's pipelines
are typically adequate for AASHTO H-20 loading provided that
the cover over the pipeline is not less than four feet or
the cover is not substantially increased. If the temporary
cover over the pipeline during construction is between three
and lour feet, equipment must restricted to that which
.,
98-82
- 11 -
imposes loads no greater than AASHTO H-IO. If the cover is
between two and three feet, equipment must be restricted to
that o! a Caterpillar D-4 tract-type tractor. If the cover
is less than two feet, only hand equipment may be used.
Also, if the contractor plans to use any equipment over
Metropolitan's pipeline which will impose loads greater than
AASHTO H-20, it will be necessary to submit the specifications
of such equipment for our review and approval at least one
week prior to its use. More restrictive requirements may
apply to the loading guideline over the San Diego Pipelines
1 and 2, portions of the Orange County Feeder, and the
Colorado River Aqueduct. Please contact us for loading
restrictions on all of Metropolitan's pipelines and
conduits.
b. The existing cover over the pipeline shall be
maintained unless Metropolitan determines that proposed
changes do not pose a hazard to the integrity of the
pipeline or an impediment to its maintenance.
13. Blastinq
a. At least 20 days prior to the start of any
drilling for rock excavation blasting, or any blasting, in
the vicinity of Metropolitan's facilities, a two-part
preliminary conceptual plan shall be submitted to
Metropolitan as follows:
b.
complete
storage,
Part 1 of the conceptual plan shall include a
summary of proposed transportation, handling,
and use of explosions.
c. Part 2 shall include the proposed general concept
for blasting, including controlled blasting techniques and
controls of noise, fly rock, airblast, and ground vibration.
14. CEQA Requirements
a. When Environmental Documents Have Not Been
Prepared
1) Regulations implementing the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) require that
Metropolitan have an opportunity to consult with the
agency or consultants preparing any environmental
documentation. We are required to review and consider
the environmental effects of the project as shown in
the Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) prepared for your project before committing ,
Metropolitan to approve your request.
98-82
- 12 -
2) In order to ensure compliance with the
regulations implementing CEQA where Metropolitan is not
the Lead Agency, the following minimum procedures to
ensure compliance with the Act have been established:
a) Metropolitan shall be timely advised of
any ~etermination that a Categorical Exemption
applies to the project. The Lead Agency is to
advise Metropolitan that it and other agencies
participating in the project have complied with
the requirements of CEQA prior to Metropolitan's
participation.
b) Metropolitan is to be consulted during
the preparation of the Negative Declaration or
EIR.
c) Metropolitan is to review and submit any
necessary comments on the Negative Declaration or
draft EIR.
d) Metropolitan is to be indemnified for
any costs or liability arising out of any
violation of any laws or regulations including but
not limited to the California Environmental
Quality Act and its implementing regulations.
b. When Environmental Documents Have Been Prepared
If environmental documents have been prepared for your
project, please furnish us a copy for our review and files
in a timely manner so that we may have sufficient time to
review and comment. The following steps must also be
accomplished:
1) The Lead Agency is to advise Metropolitan
that it and other agencies participating in the project
have complied with the requirements of CEQA prior to
Metropolitan's participation.
2) You must agree to indemnify Metropolitan, its
officers, engineers, and agents for any costs or
liability arising out of any violation of any laws or
regulations including but not limited to the California
Environmental Quality Act and its implementing regulations.
15. Metropolitan's Plan-Review Cost
a. An engineering review of your proposed facilities "
and developments and the preparation of a letter response
98-82
- 13 -
giving Met~opolitan's comments, requirements anc/or approval
that will require 8 man-hours or less of effort is typicallv
performed at no cost to the developer, unless a facility -
must. be modified where Metropolitan has superior rights. If
an engineering review and letter response requires more than
8 man-hours of effort by Metropolitan to determine if the
proposed facility or development is compatible with its
facilities, ~r if modifications to Metropolitan's manhole Is)
or other fac'ili ties will be required, then all of
Metropolitan's costs associated with the project must be
paid by the developer, unless the developer has superior
rights.
b. A deposit of funds will be required from the
developer before Metropolitan can begin its detailed
engineering plan review that will exceed 8 hours. The
amount of the required deposit will be determined after a
cursory review of the plans for the proposed development.
c. Metropolitan's final billing will be based on
actual cost incurred, and will include engineering plan
review, inspection, materials, construction, and
administrative overhead charges calculated in accordance
with Metropolitan's standard accounting practices. If the
cost is less than the deposit, a refund will be made;
however, if the cost exceeds the deposit, an invoice will be
forwarded for payment of the additional amount. Additional
deposits may be required if the cost of M~tropolitan's
review exceeds the amount of the initial deposit.
16. Caution
We advise you that Metropolitan's plan reviews and
responses are based upon information available to
Metropolitan which was prepared by or on behalf of
Metropolitan for general record purposes only. Such
information may not be sufficiently detailed or accurate for
your purposes. No warranty of any kind, either express or
implied, is attached to the information therein conveyed as
to its accuracy, and no inference should be drawn from
Metropolitan's failure to comment on any aspect of your
project. You are therefore cautioned to make such surveys
and other field investigations as you may deem prudent to
assure yourself that any plans for your project are correct.
.',
98-82
- 14 -
17. Additional Information
Should you require additional information. please contact:
'.
Civil Enaineerina Substructures Section
Metropolitan Water District
~ of Southern California
P.O. Box 54153
Los Angeles. California 90054-0153
(213) 217-6000
JEH/MRW/lk
Rev. January 22. 1989
'Encl.
,
98-82
.. z
~ 0 w
.. l- t a:
.,
Q u =>
~. :> c.:l
lo< :!i a: i
l- i 1 ...
u i~ III III
=> z:::
0:: . 01- .
... ~. u 0 I
~. -
0.. -! :t it
:I: ~! 0 . ..
=>", '" n~
'" Oz ek 0::
z :5
C( Olo< ~ H:
0:: III a: 0 i :.
u '" r-
..JC( ~ 0:: ..
C(o.. IIi.
0..
ON
:::
... en
o III
Z..J
'"
..J 0
= 0
00
.' .
00
N III 00
X... .1
""
0::: N
-'0
=0 j;j
.' ~ .0
"" .1
..
..
a::
'"
:::
u .
z a:: :
'" 0 :
a:: &..0
... :::'" .
.
a:: ...a: .
0'" .
0 -Ill .
~:I: .
'" :l:i=::: :
g .
0 .
'" =>)-U !
X 0 :I:....Z .
U -..J'" .
C( '" ~=>o:: . .
'" .
III Z :1:&..1- of
.
.
:
.... ..na..c....... c....._... I._
98-82
:1
I
i
''NO PERMANENT STRUCTURES PERMITTEO
MoW.O. PERMANENT RIGHT OF WAY
: ~
NO ROOF OVERHANG PERMITTED-C
I '/lAJ._1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FOOTING MUST NOT
ENCROACH INTO
RIGHT OF WAY.
8UILOING
AOJACENT
TO RIGHT
OF WAY
:::
~I
~
FINISHED
SURFACE
1""- REOUIRE!)
I DEPTH OF
I FOOTING
I
45- I
TYPICAL I
I
I
I
ntt: MrT7fO~OLtTAN WATER IJISTJrCT
.--
REQUIREMENTS FOR
BUILDINGS AND FOOTINGS
ADJACENT TO M.W.D.
RIGHT OF WAY
NOTE: MoW.a. PIPELINE SIZE,DEPTH,LOCArtON
ANO WIDTH OF PERMANENT RIGHT OF
WAY VARIES.
It... .................... -. r ...
~... ~
CIIIIraa._ _ --.....
FIGU Z
I
i
I
!
I
I
i
I
98-82
~ .., I
.. ! !
It :.... '"
:: ~ ~ i: c:
. : :::l I
~ ~ : : ~
, .
i; ...
~I ~ ll.. ~ ! I
~ I
il 1:llt:1-. I
:t ~~~ Ii
~I ll.ll..~
l::t "t It:
..~ ~ ill
~, <t) c:i
~ l:) z
~ ~ t.i!
~ ..
..., .Ii
ow
l;J
ll.~
l:j~
~
'~ ~
I ~~
~
:.... ~
I
I ~
I !I'\
I ~ ~~
I ~<t)
I I-. :j~ ~
~ tI)~\:l
,
I ..... lu Ir)~
It: I.!J
I I-. ~~<t)
~ I-.::::O;~
I ~!l:
~ ~~~
~
~"t\:l . ~
I ei ~
I :....~
I ll. ~Io;; it
~ I:)~
c:i ~ ~
z ~
~ .
.. II') \,6J
~ !
~!t:
.
~~ .
.
Ql:) .
\:)~ .
.
~~ .
.
~ :
!
.
:
, .
.
.
.
~
II.c.. .,nc..ca.,...' C~,,_"T ,...
98-82
.. . ...
~ ~ '"
~ '"
.. :>
a ~~ ~
...
~I ~~ I
I-. is ~~
~ ~I ~~
~ ~! ~:::l r
~~ .,
lJ) ~. ..
Q;ll:: ..
le.I ~ ~ ::
t ~ :t I'"
lJ) ah
~
.
3N17 )..J.d3t10Iltl
..... "ETlAtC_.-"" CloAa_wt ....
/
~
~
~
~~
~~~~
~~~~
~~~~
1ll..,:>\:lJ)
l:l "-';t
<::~~lo;
~"'-;t
~~lo;~
~~~~
ll:: :::!"'"
~ll::~=
:t~~
lJ)~:t:1:l
~~~~
~!.!:~~
~:::l ll::
" ~H~~~
',,)~'"
"
/
/
..,
~
!t
~
I-.
"-
"
:
.
.
.
f
.
.
.
.
f
.
.
.
..
" Ii
.
~ ... .~.
., .. to"
.. , . ~
o ~ .. p" \.
:z: ~,l~ ~ I
: ~, ~... ~
~ ,,,,,, oJ
.~."'~l'1J.
~ ;,,;, '..
~ - \. ' . .
,..:.~....
~:' "
..':~
98-82 'I
...: "I~~~ i I
~.~.. ;,.:~~
:.~:,I", .~~,~
~.:'~,i:~:-~. ','
~ ~,," ~..fH:..
....,..." '",",-'
~ k .~~~...~
~''\ ..~'.~ -'
>
.,
Ii r;-',
\.' ,... i
'.. I....-J
~:- "'"
~
\." ~
a,..
','
.~~"'~
, , ~
. v~
~. """,
L" ~c::; ~
!", IJ~
~.... 't~
--~ ~
t, -:" -
. I
.... .1
,
~
:z ..
g ~ 2'
...
O!
~
U
il:
~
..,;..j"
,
~.("
<
zz
~
.
, i
l' ~
\~.
,,'-
"
.
f
~
,
.
,
..
f ~
~~~I
--. ~I
) ti
',.\
.!~:...t'
~~R"
~. ~..!
. "\'
~!1~ "6
" -.. Ii ~
a)~.~;.l
tt'Qtf:r
t
l
,
f
~ t
l.
tf
fe
.,
r.
~.~
~
~
.
-
t<:il1
~Qr
j~
-
;,
,
-:1
.
.
".
<
t~t ~~ t;~ 1~t )
.. &.,.~..,~ ~~ ~I!l"l'~
;""t ... t.., '<Ii: ,.\.,
~t~\"llo ."no" ~ t.(\..:.
" !":~~SJ;'t:~';"J\t!
~ ~t:it\ ~t;"ri ~.:t!i
[~,a.t~ [i~ l: ~ ~ll:'.t t
"'\...t':' ..ll."i\" '..~..\,
l"'~~"~~toi' ..llto' ~"l
...&..t..f'..!l. :+.aL t!o'l:
*~, .
. i~ i
~.t ~i
~~t ~..
\O...~ '!oo~
~~ ~!
~t -i"
"'. -
:t..;
;:
~
..
i f! I
: ~ .~ ~
~{l..n.
~ ~ 'J" ,
~~ t I:'
..." .... "I
" ,
--- ---- - ,
I
I
I
~t "
~.' 1; i
:!l t.. r
.... ~~ ,
!to.. il it ..
~~ ~1Io ~ t
~~ ~_.. :
~
1- - "
i ~j :!
, l~" ~
: \.c.~ ....
" (~C e..:-.
It l~" i11
;,: t! ~:
lUi it!
;i~ I
f
t
! I
;,
,
I
,
l~ I!
I! ..
l' ..
If ~
t, !
'"
Iii
2/..~
~
I~ ~~
~I'~~&'f!~~
. I~~ , '
~~! !l\!I!ll~..
"it." "Ii .Ilo:ji ..!<<
1!
,
sl
t\ t<" ;.....
!PH, 1\.. ~;. ~~.
.. ,(,' "'". ~ '~
u.. ' ,.~..:t. ~,
f:'..... ~..,....
..'t. ,,~t ......1:...
~ll &,... \~1, ..
-rt!ttt~ f:.~.. f~
,.,,\\ "I'i~ ,;,
.6~"oIlo. .. .."'
t".~I.t l.. ~ lr
'\ , .... I'
. ~lH .,
..'
It'
~
l1t
~
otlo;.
.. ~ ..
,{ "' ~ ~ II~:
.. t ( .. ~ .. t t" ..
t ~~ ~)\l::L i.~ .
~t It ~t~:..tt f;t I
to,; .. ... "t ~. " i t
l" '" t ). Il\.. -.. 'C""l!
\> : ~ .: ~.. c ...... '" ;
; ~.l . ..t.,f ~ ,t
1, ~.. '!~Htr '}>1 i
.. '.. l :1.. . 1..1 ~
.h -r! IE .. .. .....
~ f{;i U{:I!l ~'~\}i
l ~l"r l.h'i!i' ..:~l~n
U t~~ hltt~h nil ti
~.a ~]~ ~.ll~:;~ ~ ut~..
..... .....
.. ~
5 "
.. ..
" !i! -
" " t
l!. ~ :
lI:! i"
~ u!
~~
1- 1
U!
t. ~l ~l-t
..~(i:_H
Ihw ~l
~: ~....! ~l
Ii ..I ~_
{
'l J
~h
.1
t~
I!
!
(
H'
It
t!
..
At
. ----
J... 'U'"
.))<1'__
i
3
I
i
.
~,
l...J
., ~
~
~ -
~~ II : \.:l
~~ .....
~ Ii..
~i:l I !
c~ !
"-
I,d
i! It
:t
'.
,f
I, il
I: .
.
"
, :1
, , ':
! I ,:
,t
\
,
il ..
l\ -
~ ~-
'j 01 ~
<< 1
I~ I t
..I 1
i
...
98-82
(
7
8~
$" "
'4 x 6 pr~mold~d
.xpansion joint
fill~
.
.
C #
t
\
.,. ".'
:
~
.
M.'II.o. P.!-,?~'in~
II~
I J ...,-------...
J
I
-I
-!!
.F:
~
Concnt~ support wall to
M plac~d against IIndis-
tllrD,d grollnd
Ap~rtllr~s (IS dir,cMd by ,
'''' EnginHr,total IIollll1W
fl()f to .Jlc"d J ,'" If()llIm~
of th. slIpparting wtl/l
SECTION "A-A"
I Supporting woll shall hall. a firm Maring (In th.
sUDgrad~ ond against th~ sid. of fh. .xcallation.
2. Pr.mold.d 'Jlpansion joint fill.r /Hr ASTM D-IT51-73
to '" IIs~d in SlIpport for st,,' pi/H only.
3. If tr.nch widfh is 4 fHt tJr gna,.r,1Nt1Sund alang
c'nf"lin~ tJf M. 'II. D. pip~, conc,.f, SIIPptll'f mllsf
D~ construcftld.
4. If frtlnch widfh is ItI" fhtl/1 4 f.f, cltltJn MInd /Jack-
fill, compact~d fo 90% d~nslfy in tJccordanc. with
thtl provisions of ASTM Standard D-1557-70 may
D~ IIstld in litlu af fh' conc"ttl support wall.
e
D
~
CROSS SECTION
:~':::...: :.~, o:o.~. ~ :.~~.
SECTION "S-8"
'nIE ~AN WATZIP IJIST1fICT
.--
TYPICAL SUPPORT FOR
M.W-D. PIPELINE
--
,....~.-
-
II..' ."...c....,~.,. ....
..~.
C-9!T47
i
i
I
I
I
I
,
I
, ..
98-82
.1
.
.
.
,
.
.
.
i
.
:
.
.
.
.
.
e Trench widlh
::.
E:~
:S .,~
~~
. I ::
(:)(/)
M.W.D. pipe
,
SECT/ON A
A
0.750
r 3" Preformed exponsion
-L joinl filler
V/ NOTES
I. rhis m~/hod 10 /)~ 'us~d wh~r~ Ih~
ulilily lin~ is 24" or fJr~o/~r in
diom~/~r ond Ih~ c/~oronc~
/)~/wnn Ih~ ulility Iin~ ond M.W. O.
pip~ is 12" or I~ss.
2. Sp~ciol pro/~clion moy /)~ r~quir~d
if Ih~ ulilily lin~ diom~/u is
fJr~OlU Ihon M.w. D. pip~ or il Ih~
COIfU Olf~r Ih~ ulilily lin~ 10 Ih~
slr~~I surloc~ is minimol ond Ih~r~
is 12" or Ins c/~oronc~ /)~/w~~n III.W.O.
pip~ ond Ih~ ulilily lin~.
3, Pr~lorm~d ~rponsion joinl liflu 10
comply wilh AsrM dnignotion
0-/751-73.
4. M. W O. r~qu~sts 12" minimum
c/~oronc~ wh~n~1f4r possi/)/~.
bcoWllion limits
Sand backfill Preformed exponsion
joint filler
CROSS SECT/ON
I"'" ..~.......-..- ..r,.....
TItIC .rl.1'h_l.fTAN WAnIP IJIST7fIt:T
-
TYPICAL EXPANSION JOINT
FILLER PROTECTION FOR
OVERCROSSING OF
MoW-D. PIPELINE
.-~
--
~- ....
C'II632
i
,
,
I
I
1
,
~:f.IIAP=
I~"
jl~.:~ ~
I _ -~, '.,' :;:.
l\ '" ~
= c
= -
\~ ~
'*-'- $
'\.,-J' '/
~ I"'ca",gl~'\'lo
~1.\1J~\
98-82 ATTACHMENT 3
SAN GABRIEL VALLEY MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICT
549 East Sierra Madre Avenue P,O, Box 1299 Azusa. California 91702-1299
fD)~~~DW[!l1jine (818)969.7911 Facsimile (818)969-7397
lJU MAY 23 1997 l!!l May 20, 1997
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING &
Ms. Margaref~r~G SERVICES
City of San Bernardino.
Planning & Building Services Dept
300 North "D" St
San Bernardino, CA 92418
Re: SUBJECT: AGENCY COMMENT SHEET TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 15759
AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-04
Dear Ms. Park:
As indicated on the tentative tract map, the San Gabriel Valley Municipal
Water District holds right-of-way, grant deed easements within the proposed
tract. The purpose of this easement is for the operation and maintenance of a
high pressure water transmission main. Along with the pipeline, there are (2) 8"
blowoff valves, a 2" air release valve, and a manhole (see attached as built
drawings for exact locations and details of these facilities) located within the
easement. In order for the District to properly maintain and operate, the following
conditions must be met:
1. No permanent structures, including overhangs, shall be located within the
easement.
2. Lots 32, 33, 34, 37, 38, and 39 must be accessible to District personnel at
all times. We recommend that the proposed 6' block wall (section B-B)
along New Pine Avenue be constructed with removable sections or gates
to allow access into each of the above lots. The District shall be provided
with keys to all gates. Curb depressions along New Pine Avenue should
also be provided to facilitate vehicular access.
3, The 8" blowoff located at District station 1940 + 10, should be connected
to the proposed trapezoidal channel at the developers expense.
4. The curb depression and access road to the 2" air release valve located in
lot 32 must be maintained.
5. The manhole located in lot 37/38 shall be adjusted to grade at the
developers expense. Also, no construction, including fence or wall will be
allowed over the manhole.
Board of Directors and Officers
LEROY E. MOELLER JOHN S. LEUNG JOSEPH C. REICHENBERGER CBAllLES L CORP CAllOL A. MONTANO JAMI!S E. FREI
Divisiool Division D Division m Divisioo IV Divisioo V GeoenI ~
, .
98-82
SGVMWD Page 2
5/20/97
In order to protect potential property owners, and also to protect the
District's facilities, the following conditions must also be met:
1. The developer must fully disclose, both in writing and by means of visual
identification to each prospective buyer, all easements and right-of-way
encumbering lots 32, 33, 34, 37, 38, and 39. Prospective buyers of these
lots shall provide written acknowledgment of the disclosure to the
developer.
2. At the time of grading, identification tape shall be buried under any fill on
lots 32, 33, 34, 37, 38, and 39 identifying the area as being a pipeline
easement.
3. Prior to conducting any phase of grading or construction on-site, the
applicant shall provide seven (7) days written notice to the San Gabriel
Valley Municipal Water District at: P.O. Box 1299, Azusa, CA 91702-1299,
4. Prior to issuance ot Certificates of Occupancy for homes on lots 32, 33,
34, 37, 38, and 39, the developer shall install signage within the San
Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District's easement identifying the pipeline,
its owner, and that no digging shall occur over it.
5. At the time a development permit is processed for construction, the
applicant shall design a fence acceptable to the San Gabriel Valley
Municipal Water District across the District's easement.
6. Prior to issuance ot building permits on lots 32,33,34, 37, 38, and 39, a
deed restriction shall be recorded on said lots requiring the notification of
all potential future buyers of the pipeline location, potential hazards of a
pipeline rupture, and the building restrictions within the San Gabriel Valley
Municipal Water District right-at-way.
Very truly yours,
.o~,!J ~
Darin J. ~moto
Assistant Manager
DJK:lf
Enclosure
'98-82
".
INO PLANNING & ntm..DING :sID{ VICES DE2AR'I'MENr . .
ODO STREET, SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92418 (909) 384-5OS?
. rp-y O~ r
r-~r'\\ .. "':-'''''llJ'
L'.-~-'.'-'-'" ..,
:J r. -, t."'
.".""-"..-............ .....,.
GENCYCOM:MENT.SHEET
APRIL 24th 1997
-
PRoJIi&hL;~ci~~tRACT NO. 15759 AND GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-04
BUILomt;' ~IM'
DESCRIPTION: A request to change the land use designation from RL. Residential Low to RS, Residential Low; a
re'luest to sUbdivide. a 24.61 acre. propeny . into 70 single familyresldential lots.
..:....-...:...,.,_. . .:' '.: ..-......,....:...:.-....-:...::....,-..
LOCATION: (APN #261-201-15 & 16): South side of Irvington Avenue, west side of Old Pine
Avenu~ approximately 500' north of Kendall Drive in the RL, Residential Low hl1ld use district.
FROM: MARGARET PARK. ASSOCIATE PLANNER
THIS APPLICATION HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE CITY PLANNIN(' ANn BUILDiNG SERVICES
;"'",. ;.;" .....,1;; .. i'w;J\l>!> Kl> ~lEW i tiE ~"'LV:>Jo1J iNFu,uVlAuON AND ~TUktiI THIS SHEET
WITH YOUR COMMENTS AND/OR RECOMMENDATIONS WITHIN 21 DAYS OF RECEIPT 01' .
THIS FORM. IF WE RECEIVE NO COMMENT. WE WILL ASSUME NO CONCERNS. KEEP tHE
ATI ACHMENT FOR YOUR FILES IF YOU SO DESIRE. This project will be reviewed by the
DRC on MAY 15, 1997. .
THE FOLLOWING RECOMMENDATIONS APPLY TO THE ABOVE REFERENCED ITEM(S):
Prior to the construction of any residential, commerc-ial, or
industrial project, school facility fees as established by
the Board of Education shall be paid to the San
Bernardino City Unified School District.
C--' .-
" ~c: 1/ ;:i'
'-.......-J ..?;1lutA. ~/
(SIGNATURE)
-Ii
-II
San Bernardino City
Unified School District
(AGENCY)
April 25, 1997
(DATE)
Robin E. Laska
Acting Center Coordinator
18 July 1997
Date
-; '..
98-82
ATTACHMENT 4
Planning Number: TI15759, APN #261-201-15 & 16
Potential for the Presence of Historical Resources:
Based on available information, the potential for the presence of historical
resources within the project area is:
Prehistoric Archaeological Resources: Low
Historic Archaeological Resources: Low to Moderate
Historic Resources: Low
Cultural Landscapes: Low
Ethnic Resources: Unknown
Comments: APE is within the boundaries of Rancho Muscupiabe
Recommendations: (following CEQA and NEPA guidelines)
No farther archaeological work is recommended. however, if prehistoric or historic artifacts
over 50 ye..... in age are encountered during land modification, then activities in the
immediate are of the finds should be halted and an on-site inspection should be perfonned
by a qualified archaeologist. This professional will be able to assess the find. determine its
significance, and malc:e recommendations for appropriate mitigation measure within the
guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act and/or the Federal National
Environmental Policy Ad
If human remains are encountered on the property, then the San Bem.udino County
Coroner's OffICe MUST be contacted within 24 hoU18 of the find. and all work halted until a
deiiUlUlCe is given by th;at office and any other involved agencies. Conlact the County
Coroner at 175 South Lena. Road. San Bernardino, CA 92415-0037 or (909) 387-2989.
If you have any farther questions, please, contact me at (909) 792-1497, Tuesday through
Friday between 8 AM and 4 PM.
98-82
ATTACHMENT G
MITIGATION MONITORINGIREPORTING PROGRAM
FOR
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 97-04
TENTATIVE TRACT 15759
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 97-25
A 69 UNIT SUBDIVISION
This mitigation monitoring and compliance program has been prepared for use by the City of
San Bernardino as it implements mitigation measures for the 69 Unit subdivision proposed by
MAPCO. This Program has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and the State and City CEQA Guidelines.
CEQA Section 21081.6 requires adoption of a reporting and/or monitoring program for those
measures or conditions imposed on a project to mitigate or avoid adverse effects of the
environment. The law states that the monitoring or reporting program shall be designed to
ensure compliance during project implementation.
The Mitigation Monitoring/Report Program (MMRP or Program) contains the following
elements:
1. The mitigation measures are recorded with the action and procedure necessary to
ensure compliance. The program lists the mitigation measures contained within
the Initial Study.
2. A procedure for compliance and verification has been outlined for each mandatory
mitigation action. This procedure designates who will take action. what action
will be taken and when, and to whom and when compliance will be reported.
3. The Program contains a separate Mitigation Monitoring and Compliance Record
for each action. On each of these record sheets, the pertinent actions and dates
will be logged, and copies of permits, correspondence or other data relevant will
be retained by the City of San Bernardino.
4. The Program is designed to be flexible. As monitoring progresses, changes to
compliance procedures may be necessary based upon recommendations by those
responsible for the Program. If changes are made, new monitoring compliance
procedures and records will be developed and incorporated into the Program.
The individual measures and accompanying monitoring/reporting actions follow. They are
numbered in the same sequence as presented in the Project Initial Study.
98-82
Mitigation Measures Identified in the Initial Study
MITIGATION MEASURES
Attachment 2
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) letter dated May 2, 1997 and
Guidelines for Development in the Area of Facilities, Fee properties, and/or Easements of the
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.
l. Submitting the tentative tract map plans outlining any proposed activity in the vicinity
and within MWD's fee right-of-way for their review and written approval, prior to
construction.
IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION
The applicant shall follow the guidelines for development outlined in the May 2, 1997 letter, for
the Areas of Facilities, Fee properties, and/or Easements of the Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California. Completed plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Civil Engineering
Substructure Section of the MWD prior to construction. The Compliance Record will be
completed with the appropriate information and filed with the Planning Division and the Public
Works Department in the project file.
COMPLIANCE RECORD
WHEN REQUIRED: The written verification by the Civil Engineering Substructure Section of
the MWD shall be completed and submitted prior to construction.
WRITTEN VERIFICATION PREPARED BY:
DATE PREPARED:
INSPECTION NOTES PREPARED BY:
DATE FILED:
FOLLOW-UP REQUIRiID/COMPLETED:
98-82
Mitigation Measures Identified in the Initial Study
MITIGATION MEASURES
Attachment 2
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD) letter dated May 2, 1997 and
Guidelines for Development in the Area of Facilities, Fee properties, and/or Easements of the
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.
2. Obtaining the appropriate entry right and/or easements for any activity within the MWD
right-of-way
IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION
The applicant shall follow the guidelines for development outlined in the May 2, 1997 letter, for
the Areas of Facilities, Fee properties, and/or Easements of the Metropolitan Water District of
Southern California. The easements are required prior to any activity occurring on the site. The
Public Works Department will verify that all required easements are obtained prior to any
activity. The Compliance Record will be completed with the appropriate information and filed
with the Planning Division and the Public Works Department in the project file.
COMPLIANCE RECORD
WHEN REQUIRED: The written verification shall be submitted to the Planning Department
prior to any activity in the MWD right-of-way.
WRITTEN VERIFICATION PREPARED BY:
DATE PREPARED:
INSPECTION NOTES PREPARED BY:
DATE FILED:
FOLLOW-UP REQUIRED/COMPLE'l'ED:
98-82
Mitigation Measure Identified in the Initial Study
MITIGATION MEASURE
Attachment 3
San Gabriel Valley Municipal Water District (SGVMWD) letter dated May 20, 1997
IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION
The applicant shall be responsible for:
The applicant shall comply with conditions I through 5 on page I and conditions I through 6
on page 2 of the SGVMWD letter dated May 20, 1997. The applicant shall provide the
SGVMWD with a construction schedule prior to any activity occurring on the site. The
Compliance Record will be completed with the appropriate information and filed with the
Planning Division and the Public Works Department in the project file.
COMPLIANCE RECORD
WHEN REQUIRED: The written verification of compliance by the SGVMWD shall be
submitted prior to the final inspection.
WRITTEN VERIFICATION PREPARED BY:
DATE PREPARED:
INSPECTION NOTES PREPARED BY:
DATE FILED:
FOLLOW-UP REQUIRED/COMPLETED:
98-82
Mitigation Measure Identified in the Initial Study
MITIGATION MEASURE
Attachment 4
San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center comments dated July 18, 1997
If prehistoric or historic artifacts over 50 years in age are encountered during land modification,
then activities in the immediate area of the find shall be halted.
IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION
If prehistoric or historic artifacts over 50 years in age are encountered during land modification,
an on site inspection shall be preformed by a qualified Archaeologist certified by the Society of
Paleontologist and Archaeologists (SOPA). The mitigations and recommendations made by the
Archaeologist shall be completed prior to any work resuming. Pinal inspection by a
representative of the San Bernardino County Museum/Archaeological Information Center will
serve as written verification of condition compliance. The Compliance Record will be completed
with the appropriate information and filed with the Planning Division and the Public Works
Department in the project file.
COMPLIANCE RECORD
WHEN REQUIRED: If any artifacts are encountered.
WRITTEN VERIFICATION PREPARED BY:
DATE PREPARED:
INSPECTION NOTES PREPARED BY:
DATE FILED:
FOLWW-UP REQUIRED/COMPLETED:
98-82
Mitigation Measure Identified in the Initial Study
MITIGATION MEASURE
Attachment 4
San Bernardino County Archaeological Information Center comments dated July 18, 1997
If human remains are encountered on the property, then the San Bernardino County Coroner's
Office MUST be notified within 24 hours.
IMPLEMENTATION AND VERIFICATION
If human remains are encountered on the property, the San Bernardino County Coroner's Office
MUST be contacted within 24 hours of the find and all work halted until clearance is given by
that office and any other agency involved. The County Coroner's office can be contacted at
(909) 387-2989 or at 175 South Lena Road, San Bernardino CA 92415-0037. The mitigations
and recommendations made by the Coroner shall be completed prior to any work resuming.
Pinal inspection by the Public Works Department will serve as written verification of condition
compliance. The Compliance Record will be completed with the appropriate information and
filed with the Planning Division and the Public Works Department in the project file.
COMPLIANCE RECORD
WHEN REQUIRED: If any human remains are encountered.
WRITTEN VERIFICATION PREPARED BY:
DATE PREPARED:
INSPECTION NOTES PREPARED BY:
DATE FILED:
FOLWW-UP REQUIRED/COMPLETED: