HomeMy WebLinkAbout1998-002
['
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
26
27
28
12-15159-305
RESOLUTION NO. 98-2
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING THE POLICE
2 DEPARTMENT'S REVISED PURSUIT POLICY, STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
CHAPTER #36, PROCEDURE #3 IN ACCORDANCE WITH CVC 17004.7, PUBLIC
3 AGENCY IMMUNITY.
4 BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
5
6
The Mayor and Common Council of the City of San Bernardino
have reviewed and adopted the Police Department's amended pursuit
7
policy, SOP Chapter #36, Procedure #3, "Vehicular Pursuits" in
8
accordance with CVC 17004.7, "Public Agency Immunity".
9
The Council has reviewed the policy and agrees that it
complies with CVC 17004.7 (c) in that the policy provides for
supervisory control, a procedure for designating a primary pursuit
vehicle, and for determining the total number of vehicles to be
permitted to participate in the pursuit.
The policy provides procedures for coordinating operations
with other jurisdictions and provides guidelines for determining
when the interest of public safety and effective law enforcement
justify a vehicular pursuit and when a vehicular pursuit should
not be initiated or should be terminated.
T
98-2
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO ADOPTING THE POLICE
DEPARTMENT'S REVISED PURSUIT POLICY, STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
CHAPTER #36, PROCEDURE #3 IN ACCORDANCE WITH CVC 17004.7, PUBLIC
2 AGENCY IMMUNITY.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
3
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly
4
adopted by
the Mayor and Common Council of the City of
joint adjourned
at a regular meeting thereof, held on
5
Bernardino
6
7
12th
day of
January
, 1998, by the following vote, to wit:
COUNCILMEMBERS
AYES
NAYS
ABSTAIN
ABSENT
8
x
NEGRETE
9
CURLIN
x
ARIAS
x
OBERHELMAN
x
DEVLIN
x
ANDERSON
x
MILLER
x
C-JJ.cA../~
City Clerk
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this
/3/1.
of
January
, 1998.
51 fflr:~ 'J7J./tj~,
NORINE MILLER , MAYOR PRO TEM
21 Approved as to
form and legal content:
22
JAMES F. PENMAN
23 City Attorney
24
25
26
27
28
12-15159-305
San
the
day
98.-2
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
CHAPTER #36 PROCEDURE #3
VEHICULAR PURSUITS
REVISED 11-20-97
******************************************************************
PURPOSE:
Specific procedures for department personnel involved in any
vehicular pursuits.
POLICY:
A.
The essence of a successful pursuit
violator. It is unwise to take needless
dangerous activity. It is far better
arrest or abandon the pursuit rather
anyone needlessly, including the police
is to apprehend the
chances in an already
to either delay the
than injure or kill
officer.
B. It is our policy to apprehend all persons who are attempting
to evade arrest. However, it must be remembered that the
anticipated results must be worth the risk. Therefore, the
pursuing officer is not to consider that he/she must continue
a pursuit at all costs.
C. The instructions in this SOP are meant primarily for high
speed pursuits. At greatly reduced speeds, it is possible that
good judgment would allow for deviations from these
procedures.
INITIATING, CONTINUING, AND TERMINATING A PURSUIT:
A.
The following factors
whether any pursuit
terminated.
should be considered when determining
should be initiated, continued, or
1. The seriousness of the originating crime and its
relationship to community safety;
2. Safety of the public in the area of the pursuit;
3. Safety of the pursuing officer(s);
4. Volume of vehicular traffic;
5. Volume of pedestrian traffic;
6. Location of pursuit;
7. Speeds involved;
8. Time of day;
9. Weather conditions;
.
9'8-2
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
CHAPTER #36
PROCEDURE #3
VEHICULAR PURSUITS (REVISED) PAGE 2
*****************************************************************
10. Road conditions;
11. Familiarity of the officer and supervisor or watch
commander with the area of pursuit;
12. Quality of radio communications between pursuing unit(s)
and the dispatcher and supervisor; and
13. The capability of the police vehicles involved.
B. Once a pursuit is initiated, officers, field supervisors, and
watch commanders should continually question whether the
seriousness of the offense justifies continuing the pursuit.
PURSUING UNITS:
A.
A police unit
equipped with
continuously.
shall not be engaged in a pursuit unless
a red light and siren, activated and operating
B. In all pursuits, only two units and a supervisor shall be
involved in the pursuit at any time. The watch commander or
field supervisor may approve additional units if necessary.
The lead unit will be considered the primary unit. In the
event the primary unit cannot continue, the secondary unit
shall become the primary unit. Paralleling a pursuit is not
permitted unless approved by the watch commander or field
supervisor. This is not meant to discourage units from taking
positions along or near the pursuit route to relay
information.
C. When a plain unit or motorcycle has initiated a pursuit, it
shall be relieved when the first marked unit can practically
assume the pursuit.
D. Officers in all other units should remain alert to the
pursuit's progress and location, and unless cleared by a
supervisor, shall not become involved in the incident.
E. Non-sworn personnel shall not, at any time, drive any City
vehicle involved in a pursuit.
PURSUIT RADIO PROCEDURE:
A. The pursuing officer(s) shall remain on Channel One unless
directed otherwise.
"8-2 .
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
CHAPTER #36
PROCEDURE #3
VEHICULAR PURSUITS (REVISED) PAGE 3
*****************************************************************
B. During the pursuit, the suspect vehicle requires the absolute
attention of the lead or primary unit. Whenever possible, the
unit behind the lead unit shall "call the pursuit" as outlined
under the officer's responsibilities, allowing the lead unit
to give full attention to the suspect vehicle. All units in
the pursuit shall monitor the radio for messages directed to
them. Radios shall be turned up and strict compliance shall
be made with orders given. The use of automatic yelp of the
siren is discouraged as the high pitch has a tendency to drown
out any incoming message.
1. Once the pursued vehicle is observed and followed by the
helicopter, pursuing units shall remain in a Code 3
operation, decreasing speed; however, remaining close
enough to effect an arrest at the termination of the
pursuit. The aircraft is responsible for coordinating the
ground units.
PURSUING OFFICER'S RESPONSIBILITY:
A. The initiating pursuit unit shall indicate:
1. The known law violation or reason for the pursuit.
2. Description of the fleeing vehicle and suspects.
3. Location and direction of travel as changes take place.
4. Any other information which is necessary to ensure
effective pursuit tactics.
5. Report known or probable wants on the fleeing vehicle
and/or occupants.
a. If a license number is relayed, the dispatcher
shall determine registration/criminal want
information and relay same to pursuing officers as
soon as practical.
COMMUNICATIONS RESPONSIBILITY:
A. Inform other field units, a field supervisor, the watch
commander, and helicopter when a pursuit is initiated.
B. Shall relay to monitoring units:
1. Clear the air for emergency traffic, 10-3
98-2
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
CHAPTER #36
PROCEDURE #3
VEHICULAR PURSUITS
(REVISED)
PAGE 4
*****************************************************************
2. The direction of travel.
3. Street traveled upon.
4. The last intersection passed.
5. Any changes in direction of travel.
6. The reason for the pursuit.
7. A complete description of the vehicle being pursued and
the number of occupants.
8. A registration check on the pursued vehicle license (if
available) .
C. Notify affected agencies and specify if assistance is or is
not requested for the pursuit unit.
D. Provide back-up units as requested.
SUPERVISORY RESPONSIBILITY:
A. Upon being notified of the pursuit, the field supervisor will
assure himself of the following:
1. No more units than required or necessary are involved.
2. Available equipment is utilized.
3. Affected agencies are notified.
4. The field sergeant (watch commander in the absence of a
field sergeant) is responsible for the pursuit activities
as outlined and has the authority to cancel a pursuit at
any time it becomes necessary.
5. A supervisor shall proceed to the pursuit termination
point to provide guidance and necessary supervision.
6. The supervisor (s) invol ved shall provide a report in
writing to division commander; a critique and analysis of
the pursuit. The supervisor shall complete a Highway
Patrol Pursuit Report (CHP 187) and submit the report to
the Traffic Bureau.
98.-2
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
CHAPTER #36
PROCEDURE #3
VEHICULAR PURSUITS (REVISED) PAGE 5
*****************************************************************
B.
The watch commander will list on the Chief's Inspection
all pursuits identifying the reason or justification for
pursuit, length of the pursuit, officers involved,
coordinating field supervisor.
Log
the
and
1. The watch commander shall ensure that the supervising
officer monitoring the pursuit shall complete and submit
a CHP 187 pursuit report form to the Traffic Unit for
distribution and filing.
2 .
The watch
supervisor,
reports and
commander shall ensure that the field
and involved personnel submit the proper
memorandums to the division commander.
C. The di visional commander shall conduct an administrative
review of the pursuit to ensure that the pursuit was conducted
in compliance with departmental policies and California laws.
A.
A.
PURSUITS INTO OTHER JURISDICTIONS:
-
PURSUITS INTO SAN BERNARDINO BY OTHER JURISDICTIONS:
~~
PURSUIT TACTICS:
A. During a pursuit the involved officers should continually
evaluate the status of the pursuit and should continually
question whether the seriousness of the violation warrants the
continuation of the pursuit.
98-2
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
CHAPTER #36
PROCEDURE #3
VEHICULAR PURSUITS (REVISED) PAGE 6
*****************************************************************
1. At either the officer's or supervisor's discretion, the
pursuit may be terminated at any time.
B. The unit behind the suspect vehicle shall never be passed by
another unit unless the lead unit approves the maneuver.
C. All units while in pursuit, whether the vehicle in front of
the unit is a police vehicle or the suspect vehicle, shall
space themselves at a distance to ensure proper braking and
reaction time in the event the lead vehicle slows, stops, or
makes any other moves.
D. Employing lawful intervention when involved in pursuits:
1. Officers shall refrain from employing intervention
tactics when involved in a misdemeanor violation pursuit.
a. During pursuits, the preservation of human life,
especially innocent citizens from imminent great
bodily harm or death, shall be a primary motivating
factor.
b. Officers shall not discharge a firearm at or from a
moving vehicle except as the ultimate measure of
self defense or defense of another when the suspect
is using deadly force by means other than the
vehicle.
c. Barricading a roadway must be considered as a force
likely to result in death. Officers shall not
barricade a roadway to apprehend a suspect.
"Rolling" roadblocks are also prohibited, unless
specifically approved or requested by a supervisor.
2. Intervention techniques may be employed only when all
other reasonable options have been exhausted and when a
felony is involved.
3. A field supervisor or watch commander must first approve
such action and will designate which of the units
involved will perform the intervention.
a. It will become the designated officer's decision as
to when and where to conduct the intervention.
b. All other units involved should be warned prior to
implementing the intervention and they should
98-2 .
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
CHAPTER #36
PROCEDURE #3
VEHICULAR PURSUITS (REVISED) PAGE 7
*****************************************************************
adjust their driving tactics
Officers should not attempt to
vehicle traveling over 35 mph.
appropriately.
intervene with a
4. It is important for the officers and supervisors involved
to remember that lawful intervention equates to that
amount of force which may cause injury and/or death, and
careful consideration should be given prior to
implementing intervention.
E. Officers not assigned shall not respond, loiter, or drive by
the termination site of any pursuit.
1. Upon the termination of the pursuit, the station
commander or sergeant shall assign units that are to
remain outside the city limits of San Bernardino if the
termination is in another jurisdiction and their presence
or assistance is requested.
F. Lawful intervention reporting:
1. Per Section 2.1.32 of the collision manual, lawful
intervention is not a reportable traffic collision.
2. For reporting purposes, a collision investigation will be
conducted on all interventions where a police unit was
used to intervene with the suspect vehicle. The face page
of the investigation should be marked as "In House Only" .
ID shall be called to the scene for photographs. If the
action results in injury or death, the traffic
investigator and Risk Management will be notified.
* Risk Management will be notified for 'damage only'
accidents also.
VEHICLES INVOLVED IN PURSUITS:
A. If bottomed-out during a pursuit, routinely deadline the
vehicle at City Yards for inspection for possible damage,
notify supervisor and leave necessary documentation.
B. If vehicle does not suffer damage, still leave a vehicle
repair slip indicating vehicle was involved in pursuit, so
that preventative maintenance by City Yards may be scheduled.
98-2
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
CHAPTER #36
PROCEDURE #3
VEHICULAR PURSUITS (REVISED) PAGE 8
*****************************************************************
FORCED VEHICLE STOPS (LEGAL INTERVENTION)
A. The decision to attempt a forcible stop shall be based on
careful consideration of all facts apparent to the officer.
B. A forcible stop of a pursued vehicle may be undertaken only
under the following circumstances:
1. When the officer has reason to believe that the continued
movement of the pursued vehicle would place others in
imminent danger of great bodily harm or death AND
2. When the apparent risk of harm to a person or persons
other than the occupant of the pursued vehicle is so
great as to outweigh the apparent risk of harm involved
in making the forcible stop AND
3. After all other reasonable means of apprehension have
been considered and rejected as impractical such as
continue to follow, call for support, call for other
department and/or allied agency assistance.
C. An occupied privately-owned vehicle shall not be used to
forcibly stop another vehicle.
D. The following tactics may be used to stop a pursued vehicle.
The selection of the best method in each circumstance should
be preceded by an evaluation of all factors surrounding the
individual event. The method used should offer the greatest
probability of success with the least likelihood of injury to
the general public, the officer, and the suspect.
1. Channelization Officers may deliberately direct a
vehicle into a given path or location (i. e., unpaved
roadway, dead-end road, etc.) by using stationary objects
(pylons, barricades, vehicles) placed in the current path
of the pursued vehicle.
2. Rollinq Roadblocks - Officers may elect to use rolling
roadblocks with the concurrence of a supervisor. The use
of rolling roadblocks must be weighed against the
potential risks presented by continuing the pursuit.
3. Ramminq - Officers, as a last resort, may elect to use a
deliberate collision between a patrol vehicle and the
pursued vehicle to terminate a pursuit. Use of a vehicle
not equipped with a push bumper is discouraged. A
98-2 .
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
CHAPTER #36
PROCEDURE #3
VEHICULAR PURSUITS (REVISED) PAGE 9
*****************************************************************
supervisor's permission should be obtained prior to the
ramming. The guidelines below shall be followed:
a. Motorcycles:
1) Officers shall not ram motorcycles or similar
vehicles except:
a) When necessary in defense of the
officer's life or life of another or
b)
During
assault
vehicle
the
with
or
actual commission
a deadly weapon
of
with
an
a
c) When necessary to prevent the escape of a
person whom the officer reasonably
believes has committed a felony through
the use or threatened use of deadly force
or
d) When necessary to apprehend a person who
has committed an assault with a deadly
weapon with a vehicle which the officer
reasonably believes has resulted in
serious injury or death.
b. Vehicles other than motorcycles
1) To assure an officer is not left in a
vulnerable position, consideration should be
given to the final resting place of the patrol
car and its proximity to the violator's
vehicle prior to ramming.
2) Ramming should not occur when the pursued
vehicle is traveling in excess of 35 mph.
4 . Boxinq In - The use of boxing in as a technique for
terminating pursuits is discouraged. Under ordinary
circumstances, the potential hazard outweighs the chance
for a successful stop of a violator and therefore should
only be used at slow speeds or where 'the obvious risks
can be eliminated or appreciably reduced.
9.3-2
STANDARD OPERATING PROCEDURE
CHAPTER #36
PROCEDURE #3
VEHICULAR PURSUITS (REVISED) PAGE 10
*****************************************************************
5. Use of Firearms - Officers may use firearms only as a
last resort and shall be governed by Department Policy,
Chapter 37 regarding use of weapons.
E.
A supervisor
complete an
commander.
shall evaluate all
interoffice memo to
forced vehicle stops and
the appropriate division
.98-2
APPENoIX A'
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
for
INTER-AGENCY VEHICLE PURSUITS
L PURPOSE
This memorandum of understanding is intended to facilitate the effective
management of multiple jurisdictional vehicle pursuits.
IT. OBJECTIVES
To reduce the danger of pursuits while still reasonably assuring that fleeing
suspects are apprehended.
ill. AGREEMENT
A. Initiating, Continuing, Supervising and Terminating Pursuits
1.
Pursuits should be initiated, continued, supervised or
terminated in accordance with individual agency policies.
\
B. Pursuits into Allied Agency Jurisdictions
1. When a pursuit extends into an allied agency's jurisdiction, the
pursuing agency's supervisor-in-charge should ensure that the
allied agency is notified and determine if the other agency
should be requested to become involved in, or assume
supervision of, the pursuit. The following should be considered:
a. The type or extent of assistance required;
b. The pursuing agency's policy regarding pursuits into
other jurisdictions.
2.
When the allied agency becomes involved in a pursuit, the
allied agency should clearly communicate that it is becoming
involved in the pursuit, and it should clearly communicate the
extent to which it has become involved in the pursuit. This
information should be communicated to the units who have
been involved in the pursuit, as well as their supervisor.
-
-
a. Units from the agency relinquishing the pursuit will
terminate their active involvement when:
98-2
SOBN Co. Pursuit MOV
Effective 10-9-97
page 2 of 9
1. They are required to do so by their agency's policy;
or
2. Sufficient units from the assuming agency join the
pursuit; or
3. They are requested to do so by the agency assuming
the pursuit.
b.
It is recognized that allied agency personnel may be
assigned to a pursuit-related activity that does not involve
becoming directly involved in the pursuit itself.
Examples may be the controlling of an intersection while
a pursuit passes through or the blocking of freeway on-
ramps or exits. These are limited assignments generally
undertaken for the protection of innocent persons and are
not intended to authorize personnel to become further
involved in pursuit-related activities. Once such a
limited assignment has been performed, the involvement
of the personnel performing that assignment is
terminated unless there is an emergency situation
requiring further action.
\
C. Responsibilities of Initiating Agency After Relinquishing Pursuit
1. The officer initiating the pursuit should, if practical, proceed to
the termination point at a reduced and legal speed so as to
provide information which may be required for the arrest.
2. The agency having or witnessing the most serious crime should
take or retain custody of the violator and coordinate all
prosecution.
3. Once transfer of pursuit activities or supervision has occurred,
the previous agency should not re-enter a pursuit unless a
request to do so has been made by the agency then-in-charge, or ":.
an emergency condition so dictates.
D. Joining Pursuits by Allied Agencies
1. The mere notification by another agency of a pursuit in-progress
shall not be construed as a request to assist in the pursuit.
2. Units of allied agencies should not join a pursuit unless
specifically requested by the agency whose officers are in pursuit
and they have been assigned to become involved by their own
. 98-2
SOBN Co. Pursuit MOD
Effective 10-9-97
page 3 of 9
supervisor. However, this does not necessarily mean that
supervision of the pursuit itself has been shifted. There should
be a separately communicated request and acceptance to transfer
supervision of the pursuit itself.
3. Requests for assistance should be reviewed and approved by a
supervising officer from the agency from whom assistance is
sought, if available. The decision to assist will be made in
accordance with that agency's own pursuit policy.
. "Eo Supervisory Responsibilities
1. When it is likely that a pursuit will cross jurisdictional
boundaries, the supervisor-in-charge of the pursuit should
ensure that notification is made to the appropriate allied agency.
2. A supervisor from the agency who is in charge of the pursuit
when it terminates should proceed to the termination point, if at
all practical, to provide supervision and on-the-scene
coordination with allied agency personnel who may be present.
3.
A supervisor or officer from the agency in whose jurisdiction
the pursuit originates should proceed to the termination point,
if at all practical.
\
4. The supervisor from the agency in charge of the pursuit when it
terminates should determine each agency's responsibility for
transporting, booking, and prosecution of the suspect in
accordance with this memorandum of understanding. The
supervisor should attempt to obtain relevant information from
appropriate personnel from allied agencies.
F. Communications During a Pursuit
1. Communications personnel from the agency initiating a pursuit
should notify allied agencies of any pursuit which appears likely":.
to enter other jurisdictions and should ~ecity if assistance is or
is not requested by the pursuing units and/or supervisor.
2. Radio Channels
a. At the beginning of a multi-jurisdictional pursuit, the
initiating agency's communications personnel should
notify the San Bernardino County Sheriffs Department
(SBSD) communications center of the pursuit and request
9"8-2
SOBN Co. Pursuit MOU
Effective 10-9-97
page 4 of 9
that they assume communications responsibility for the
pursuit once it leaves the initiating agency's jurisdiction.
b. Once SBSD communications personnel have assumed
radio responsibility for the pursuit, they should maintain
such responsibility until the end of the pursuit, regardless
of whether the pursued vehicle re-enters the initiating
agency's jurisdiction or another jurisdiction.
c. Whenever a pursuit becomes a multi-jurisdictional
pursuit, the officers involved in the pursuit should switch
to one of the county-wide pursuit channels listed in the
below table:
Area of Coverage Old Talk Group New Talk Group
Victor Valley l-ATAC-l lCHASE
Barstow 2-ATAC-l 2CHASE
Lucerne Valley 3-ATAC-l 3CHASE
(mid-desert)
Morongo Basin 4-ATAC-l 4CHASE
Colorado River 5-ATAC-l 5CHASE ,
West Valley 6-ATAC-l 6CHASE
(Fontana west)
East Valley 7-ATAC-l 7CHASE
(Rialto east)
Colton 8-ATAC-l 8CHASE
Mountains 8-ATAC-l 8CHASE
ATAC-2 (1-8) have been designated as secondary pursuit
talk groups and will be used for multiple pursuits
occurring simultaneously.
d. Should additional mutual aid frequencies be required, the
SBSD's Valley Control Center Supervisor or the San
Bernardino County 800. Project Coordinator may designate-:'-
an alternative pursuit frequency.
e. It is recognized that, in most areas of the County, the
California Highway Patrol (CHP) will not have the ability
to switch to the frequencies set forth in this subsection.
Therefore, communications will necessarily have to take
place and be coordinated by the communications centers
who are involved in pursuit activities. Supervisors and
officers involved in pursuit activities should recognize
that this may create a delay in communications.
.98-2 .
SDBN Co. Pursuit MOU
Effective 10-9-97
page 5 of 9
f. If SBSD communications personnel are unable to assume
dispatch responsibilities for the pursuit, the initiating
agency's dispatch personnel should maintain control of
the pursuit until its conclusion.
g. Should a pursuit leave the Valley broadcast area and enter
the "High Desert" (Le. Victorville, Apple Valley, etc.),
SBSD valley Communications should coordinate radio
responsibilities with SBSD High Desert Communications
personnel. The opposite will occur when a pursuit leaves
the "High Desert" and enters the "Valley" area.
h. In the event of radio failures, radios should be switched to
"CLEMARS DIRECT." This will ensure inter-agency and
car-to-car communications.
L Officers involved in multi-jurisdictional pursuits should
attempt to use "clear text" in their radio transmissions, as
opposed to agency-specific codes or jargon, to avoid
miscommunications between officers, supervisors, and
communications personnel from different agencies.
G. Use of Law Enforcement Aircraft
1. When available, a helicopter or fixed wing airplane should be
used to minimize the hazards inherent in pursuits. The aircraft
should assist pursuing ground units by advising of the pursued
vehicle's direction of travel, potential traffic hazards, possible
cut-off routes, and/or other logistical information. It is
recognized that some agencies have policies governing the use
of aircraft in pursuits, and it is anticipated that such aircraft will
act in accordance with its own governing policy.
2. Sole coordination and/or supervision of the pursuit should not
be relinquished to aircraft personnel unless the primary pursuit _
unit, or a supervisor, directs that this action be taken. In these
instances, the decision to do so should be made with section
IIIG3 of this policy in mind.
3. Aircraft assisting in a pursuit cannot be designated as the
"primary pursuit vehicle" because it is not defined as a "vehicle"
under the California Vehicle Code. Therefore, the exemptions
outlined under CVC 17004.7(c) (4) may not apply if the aircraft
were designated as the "primary unit."
'98-2 .
. .
SDBN Co. Pursuit MOV
Effective 10-9-97
page 6 of 9
H. Pursuit Termination Tactics
1. It is recognized that agencies may have different definitions for
tactics that may be used to terminate a pursuit. It is also
recognized that not all agency policies will authorize all such
tactics.
2. Use of Pursuit Termination Tactics in Multi-jurisdictional
Pursuits
a. When officers from the agency-in-charge of the pursuit
intend to employ pursuit termination tactics as defined by
that agency's policies, in a multi-jurisdictional pursuit,
they should inform the other then-involved agencies of
their intentions to do so. . When communicating such an
intent, it is best to indicate what tactic will be used, as well
as when, where, how and who will use the tactic.
L Duties and Responsibilities at the Conclusion of a Pursuit
1.
When the pursued suspect vehicle Stops, or is stopped, officers
should attempt to utilize accepted "high risk vehicle stop"
procedures in taking the suspect into custody. When officers
from different agencies are involved in the arrest, they should
make every effort to communicate their intentions to each other
during the stop in order to avoid placing themselves in unsafe
positions.
,
2. At the conclusion of the pursuit, the supervisor-in-charge
should proceed to its termination point to provide guidance and
supervision consistent with that agency's policies.
3.
Officers involved in a pursuit that terminates in another
jurisdiction should remain at the scene until released by the on-
scene supervisor from the agency in charge of the pursuit when
it terminates.
-
-
J. Post-Pursuit Procedures
1. At the conclusion of a multi-jurisdictional pursuit, the
supervisor-in-charge of the pursuit at the time of termination
should attempt to organize an assessment of the pursuit, in
cooperation with the supervisor(s)-in-charge of the pursuit from
the other involved agencies. This assessment should include an
evaluation of the following factors:
98-2
soaN Co. Pursuit MOV
Effective 10-9-97
page 7 of 9
a. Adherence to the San Bernardino County Memorandum
of Understanding for Inter-Agency Vehicle Pursuits;
b. Employment of sound tactics;
c. Identification of training needs; and
d. Modifications and/or changes to the Memorandum of
Understanding for Inter-Agency Vehicle Pursuits.
2.
Multi-jurisdictional pursuit assessments should only address the
need for amendments or changes to the "memorandum of
understanding for inter-agency vehicle pursuits" and should not
serve as a basis to critique the judgments and/or actions of
personnel from another agency or the policy(ies) of another
agency.
.'
3. To avoid jeopardizing prosecution of pursuit-related crimes,
there should be an agreement between supervisors from the
involved agencies on which agency shall handle media advisaIs
and/ or inquiries and the nature and extent of the information to
be released.
K. Freeway Pursuits
'.
1. Whenever a pursuit enters onto one of the freeways located
within the County, and it appears that the suspect is likely to
remain on the freeway for an extended period of time, the
agency then-in-charge of the pursuit may request the assistance
of the California Highway Patrol (CHP) in assuming control of
the pursuit. When CHP units assume control of the pursuit, the
local agency then-in-charge of the pursuit shall relinquish
control to the CHP.
IV. Deviation from Departmental Policy
In those instances where a conflict arises between a department's pursuit
policy and the memorandum of understanding for vehicle pursuits, the
department's policy will take precedence. .
-
-
V. Review of the County-wide Memorandum of Understanding
The standing committee on the inter-agency pursuit MOU of the San
Bernardino County Law Enforcement Administrators' Association shall
periodically review the MOD and rnake recommendations concerning
updating or changes as necessary to association members. This memorandum
of understanding shall be reviewed at least once annually.
I
98-2 .
SDBN Co. Pursuit MOU
Effective 10-9-97
page 8 of 9
Signed and placed into effect on October 9, 1997 by the following
San Bernardino County Law Enforcement Agency Representatives:
//
....~.~
.;;/~
Chiet Lee Dean
San Bernardino Police
(
Marshall Keith Bushey
San Bernardino County Marsha's
Department
..
~~_..
Adelanto Police Department
/-::e~ ~.~
Acting Chief Thomas Mathison
Chino Police Department
cEk;S2z
-
-
Chief Lewis Nelson
Redlands Police Department
Sheriff ry Penrod
San Bernardino County
Sheriff's Department
~p2C/~/ (Y /e2!-
Chief Samuel Scott
Fontana Police Department
Chief Lloyd Scharf
Ontario Police Depar
"')8-2 .
SDBN Co. Pursuit MOU
Effective 10-9-97
page 9 of 9
Signed and placed into effect on October 9, 1997 by the following
San Bernardino County Law Enforcement Agency Representatives (cont):
'///~I'L
Chief Lowell Stark
Rialto Police Department
QgMAh~ ~
District Attorney Dennis Stout
San Bernardino County District
Attorney's Office
~ ~ ,~
Chief Martin Thouvenell
.>
~
.
Chief Probation Officer
Ray Wingerd
San Bernardino County
Probation Department
'.
Upland Police Department
-
-