HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-213
1
2
3
4
5
6 the public interest, convenience, and necessity required the formation of a landscaping
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
RESOLUTION NO.
2002-213
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO CONFIRMING THE
2002/2003 ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1025,
LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT, PALM AND WASHINGTON AREA.
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000-112, the Mayor and Common Council found that
maintenance district; and
WHEREAS, by said Resolution No. 2000-112, the Mayor and Common Council
formed an assessment district known as Assessment District No. 1025 for the purpose of
providing landscaping maintenance in the Palm and Washington area, pursuant to the provisions
of Chapter 12.90 of the San Bernardino Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2000-59, the Mayor and Common Council declared that
14 all the land included within the boundaries of said district receive a special benefit by the
15 maintenance of said landscaping except for those portions set forth as a General Benefit in the
16
17
Engineer's Report approved by said Resolution No. 2000-112, on file in the Office of the City
Clerk and the City Engineer of said City; and
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WHEREAS, said Resolution No. 2000-59 declared that an annual assessment shall be
levied on all land within the district to provide funding for said landscaping maintenance and the
administration thereof; and
WHEREAS, an Assessment Roll has been prepared totaling $5.664.28, which sets forth
the individual assessments to be levied on each ofthe parcels ofland within Assessment District
No. 1025 for the fiscal year 2002/2003; and
WHEREAS, the Assessment District was created pursuant to the provisions of Article
XIII D of the California Constitution, which provides for the levying of annual assessments
without the necessity of following the assessment ballot procedures as long as said assessments
06/24/02
2002-213
1
2
3
4
5
RESOLUTION CONFIRMING 2002/2003 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 1025 (pALM AND WASHINGTON
AREA)
do not exceed any prior approved assessment or the methodology of applying assessments is not
changed or rates are not increased.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE
6 CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
7
8
the assessments as set forth on said Assessment Roll No.1 025 are equal to or less than any prior
9
10
11
12
13
SECTION I. That the Mayor and Common Council do hereby find and determine that
approved assessments and comply with the procedural requirements of Article XIII D of the
California Constitution without the necessity of following the assessment ballot procedures as
set forth therein;
SECTION 2. That the Mayor and Common Council do hereby find and determine that
14 the proportionate costs to be levied against the parcels of land within Assessment District No.
15
16
17
18
19
1025 are correctly set forth on Assessment Roll No. 1025, for the fiscal year 2002/2003, on file
in the office of the City Clerk of the City of San Bernardino, and do hereby confirm said
assessments.
SECTION 3. That the City Clerk is directed to cause a copy of this Resolution to be
20 transmitted to the Office of the Auditor-Controller for the County of San Bernardino with the
21 request that the individual assessments be placed on the subject 200212003 property tax bills for
22 collection together with all other property taxes.
23
24
25
26
27
28
III
III
III
06124/02
2
2002-213
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION CONFIRMING 2002/2003 ASSESSMENT ROLL NO. 1025 (PALM AND WASHINGTON
AREA)
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and
Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a joint regular
meeting thereof
held on the 1st
day of
July
, 20 ---.J!L, by the following vote, to
wit:
Council Members: AYES NAYS ABSTAIN ABSENT
ESTRADA x
LIEN x
MCGINNIS X
DERRY X
SUAREZ X
ANDERSON X
MCCAMMACK X
sJ~~~ ~b:y-_
The foregoing resolution IS hereby approved this =$ (d day of July
20 02 .
Approved as to form
and legal content:
I VALLES, Mayor
ity of San Bernardino
JAMES F. PENMAN
City Attorney
By: 4'h~ 7/:':h.~~
{/
06/24102
3
<<l
's
..s
lr) ;;j
~~l
~ ~ :.
~ ~
< ~ ~
o U Q)
~~ ~
o~'C;
~ 0 f
o~U
~ffi
C5~
~U'J
~~
~U'J
U'J
<
~
~ o~ <
~~ ~eJ
hi ~Ii
[;~~~ s
~QO~ i
CI;l p"Ct; ~u:!
[; i; ~~~
8~ ~~~
Q '"
~
~ i;;
ld
. -I
I i ~
~I-I
.. i
~
2002-213
~s IS sdI~ I-
re pl'HI.
5 J:!oll"~~
i i WU~B~i
" j uhf 'g '.'
u, , I~AI I. II
I' ~ 11"1 ,- .!
'0 .0 ! El. -" C
~ll ~6 i * lid
H I~ HHPj1flllI
_d~A .h I
.
i
j
A
~t
!~
~5
~
..
:li
!;~
~::zo:
"
>
~
:I:
,..
~
o ..
:I: ~
'" =>
~ i=
!i1 ~
=> :I:
o '"
m w
~ ~
'" I"
is Z
ffi ~
" 0
'" w
:fl l'l
~ l\
o 0 g:
z w ~
W g 0
ffi " ~
...J .. "
]nN]^~ Wl~d
i
o'
=
;.;:;
~
Q)
tIl
!il
CI.l
......
o
C
.~
u
Q)
..c:
.....
.S
- .
.. .
~
"
[!@
'/;?"
"
g
~
o
...
...
o
~
o
g:
"
.
"
.
i
.