Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2002-089
1
2
3
4
5
RESOLUTION NO. 2002-89
RESOLUTION OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SAN BERNARDINO RATIFYING THE SUBMITTAL OF A GRANT APPLICATION
FOR NON POINT SOURCE POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM FUNDS FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF VISION CREEK PROJECT.
WHEREAS, The City of San Bernardino in coordination with the proposed Caltrans
I-215 freeway widening project, and the San Bernardino Valley Municipal Water District is
proposing a rather unique cost effective water reclamation! water diversion project that qualifies
under the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) Nonpoint Source Pollution Control
Program. This grant will provide cost-share funding for construction of a channel east of the 1-
12 215 Freeway between Olive Street and Base Line.
13 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor and Common Council of the
14 City of San Bernardino ratify the submission of an application for a grant in the amount of
15
16
17
$3,000,000 from the State Water Resources Control Board's (SWRCB) Nonpoint Source
Pollution Control Program to help fund construction of a channel east of the I-215 Freeway
between Olive Street and Base Line. A copy of the Grant Application is attached as Exhibit "A"
18
19
and incorporated herein by reference.
20 fff
21 fff
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2002-89
1
2
3
4
5
6
RESOLUTION...RATIFYING THE SUBMITTAL OF A GRANT APPLICATION
FOR NONPOINT SOURCE POLLUTION CONTROL PROGRAM FUNDS FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF VISION CREEK PROJECT
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor
and Common Council ofthe City of San Bernardino at a joint reg. meeting thereof, held on
the 18th day of March
, 2002, by the following vote, to wit:
7 Council Members:
8 ESTRADA
ABSTAIN ABSENT
AYES
NAYS
x
----X-
x
~
SUAREZ
x
13
14
15
16
17
18
19 2002.
ANDERSON
x
x
MCCAMMACK
~tU-/W h. U~~
Rac I G. Clark, CIty Clerk
22 Approved as to
23 Form and legal content:
March
day of
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved thi
20
21
-
J di Valles, Mayor
i of San Bernardino
24 JAMES F. PENMAN,
City Attorney
25
26
27
28
By: ~/)yy~
U
1.~
2002-89
Application Number. 58e
CO;\'CEPT PROPOSAL FOR.'I
SF\" cOO I Costa-Machado Water Act of 2000
Water Code. Division 26, Chapter 6, Article 2, Watershed Protection Program
Water Code. Division 26, Chapter 7. Article 2, Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program
Water Code. Division 26, Chapler 7, Article 5. Coastal Nonpoint Source Control Program
Your concept proposal should contain no more than five pages (seven pages for watershed protection program
applications), and must include this two page concept proposal form, the two page project summary, and a one page
map (8 y," x II" paper) to indicate Ihe location of)'our watershed, project within it, and "small communily" (if
applicable), Applicants applying for funds as a "small community" must also include the Small Community
Designalion Form. Applicanls applying as a "small community." under the divisible segment category must include a
second map as described on the form.
Use 10 point or larger fonl, and margins no smaller Ihan y," on 8 y," x II" paper, Proposals received wilh smaller
prinllhat are judged unreadable will be returned wilhoul commcnl, Proposals Ihat exceed five pages will be reduced
to fi"e pages before being sent to Ihe re,'iew panel. [xlra brochures, Oyers, newslellers, elc. will be discarded before
sending Ihe proposals 10 the review panel, This form is available in electronic formal on Ihe Stale Water Resourees
Control Board web site: www.swrcb.ca...ov/oroll13/index.html.
Proposal proponenls.l!ll!.i.l submil one original, 7 copies, and lUl.!: eleclronic copy of Iheir projecl application 10 Ihe
SWRCB. Electronic copies can be on either a CDROM or 1.44 MB Ooppy disk. Electronic files in MS Word are
preferred; however, this is not a requirement. Applicants that cannot meet this requiremenl must call
1-866-415-3561 for assistance prior to submilling an application. This requiremenl does not apply to those submilling
electronic applications,
Application No.
(Call toll free 1-866.415-3561 to receive an application number.)
FUNDING SOURCE (you may check more than one.)
SWRCB Programs CALFED Programs
'Watershed Protection Program 'Prop 13.CALFED Watershed Program
Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program X Prop 13.CALFED Drinking Water Program
Coastal Nonpoint Source Control Program
Applicant must satisfy requirements listed in Attachment 2 "Special Considerations" and fill out the Small Community
Designation Form.
RESPONSIBLE
PROJECT
DIRECTOR (one
name only)
(Ms.,
Mr.,
Dr.):
Ravmond A, Case'
PRINT
2/1102
DATE
ELIGIBLE LEAD
APPLICANT OR
ORGANIZATION:
(one name only)
Citv of San BernardinolDe\'Clopment Services
TYPE OF ENTITY:
Municipality
Educationallnstitu!ion
Local Agency
x
Nonprofit( landowner)
Nonprofit(non landowner)
STREET ADDRESS:
CITY:
P.O. BOX:
COUNTY:
STATE:
300 N. "D" Street
San Bernardino
Zip Code:
Zip Code:
92418
CA
PHONE NO.:
(909) 384-5111
FAX NO.:
(909) 384-5 I 55
-1-
EXHIBIT "A"
2002-89
Applicalion Number: 582
casey_ra@.ci.san-
E-MAIL ADDRESS:bernardino.ca.us
FEDERAL TAX !D. NO.:
95-6000772
PROJECT TITLE:
PROJECT TYPE (See what activities
qualify. Attachment I)
Vision Creek Project
Diversion at control of urban (freeway) runoff
LEGISLATIVE INFORMATION CA Senate District 32nd
U.S. Congressional District
CA Assembly Districl
62"/63rd
\V A TERBODY(S)/W A TERSHED: Santa Ana River Watershed
(Refer to ARD, Seclion 5)
COUNTIES IN WHICH THE PROJECT WILL PRIMARILY TAKE PLACE:
San Bernardino
FISCAL SUMMARY:
Prop 13 Funds Requested
Other Projecl Funds (20% local malch)
Total Project Budget
$ 2,500,000.00
S . 500,000.00
$ 3.000,000.00
CERTIFICA TION
Please read before signing.
I certify under penalty of perjury that the information I have entered on this application is true and
complete to the best of my knowledge and that I am entitled to submit the application on behalf of the
applicant (if the applicant is an entity/organization). I further understand that any false, incomplete, or
incorrect statements may result in the disqualification of this application. By signing this application, I
waive any and all rights to privacy and confidentiality of the proposal on behalf of the applicant.
/
/
-z. (it /O"L-
Dale
Ravmond A, Casey, Deputv Director/ City En2ineer
Prinled Name of Applicant
- 2-
~-~
2002-89
VISION CREEK (Phase n: CONCEPT REPORT
I) The City of San Bernardino! Development Services in coordination with the proposed Caltrans 1-
215 freeway widening project, and the Municipal Water District is proposing a rather unique cost
effective water reclamation! water diversion project that qualifies under the State Water Resources
Control Board's (SWRCB) Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Program. The Vision Creek Project
proposes to divert 1-215 Freeway storm water and landscaping irrigation run off along the east side of
the freeway between Olive Street and Base Line. The TIm off will flow through a series of drainage
clarifiers located within the freeway right-of-way, into existing lateral drainage pipes, terminating into
the project's proposed concrete lined with rock and gravel riprap trapezoidal drainage channel (urban
stream). The urban stream concept will simulate actual creek bed flow on a constant basis, fed by a
water source that is provided from the project's planned retention pond in the vicinity of Base Line at
'"G" Streets. The stream is initially designed to flow adjacent to the freeway along the west side of"H"
Street, between Base Line and Olive Streets where it will terminate into an existing "H" Street storm
drain channel. Please review the attached project vicinity concept map.
The urban stream shall be multi-faceted in function, providing both year round water drainage
capability for 5-year flooding as well as 100-year flooding within the 100' right of way that is
proposed for the stream bed. The stream bed right-of-way shall also function as a landscaped
pedestrian/bicycle walkway that will complement the proposed Downtown Revitalization Project and
is planned to ultimately intersect the Santa Ana River Trail located a few miles southerly of this
location. The project will also provide a cost-effective alternative to the freeway widening project's
required underground drainage complex.
The Downtown Revitalization Project was conceived to alleviate the City's high groundwater table
in the area and possible subsequent liquefaction activity during earthquake moments. The Lakes and
Streams Project (Phase I) will be situated between Base Line and 9'h Streets and the 1-215 Freeway
and "E" Street. The project proposes to develop a series of retention ponds with connecting streams to
circulate and store groundwater that has been drawn to lower the previously mentioned high
groundwater table.
The project is located in the Santa Ana Watershed District and is specifically located within the San
Bernardino Basin area. This basin is one of the largest groundwater basins in southern California with
an estimated 5.5 million acre-feet of water. The basin area serves as a primary water supply for over
800,000 residents that reside and work in more than ten municipalities.
The basin has been degraded over time with man's interaction and developmental activities which
have contributed extensive contaminates in the groundwater, causing local! regional water agencies to
spend millions of dollars for clean up of the underground water supply. Contaminants in the basin
include TCE, PCE, DBPC, and perchlorate. Additionally, there are several LUST sites within the basin
area where remediation activities are underway to prevent the migration of hydrocarbons, MTBE, and
the breakdown products from further contaminating the drinking water supplies.
One area of additional contaminant contribution to the groundwater, which this project intends to
address, can be storm water runoff being percolated to groundwater, rather than discharges to surface
water systems without treatment. Runoff from roads and freeways contain significant amounts of
hydrocarbons and related contaminants that, if allowed to migrate to groundwater, will require
additional well-head treatment to insure that the groundwater will comply with all potable water
quality standards.
2002-89
. 2) The goals and objectives of the Vision Creek Project are consistent with the application criteria
set forth in Prop 13 Article 2. Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Prol!ram: 791lla: Best management
practices, c) Management measures; 79114 (a) 2. A broad-based nonpoint source project... (b) The
projects funded from the subaccount shall demonstrate a capability of sustaining water quality benefits
for a period of twenty years. Categories of nonpoint source pollution addressed by projects may
include: urban runoff. hydromodification are proiect Qualifiers. Projects to address nonpoint source
pollution include: engineered features to minimize impacts of nonpoint source pollution is a proiect
Qualifier.
3) The Vision Creek Project is compatible with the SWRCB Guidelines set forth for in Section 6 of
the ARD for: Manal!ement Measures for Urban Areas: 3.3 Runoff from Existing Development A)
Existing development; and F) Road, Highway and Bridge Runoff Systems. The project will
endeavor to alleviate the problems caused by urban (freeway) mnoff and subsequent pollution of
groundwater resources by developing strategies that augment source reduction practices
throughout the three specified phases of development which are I) design phase 2) construction
phase and 3) the post-development phase. The Vision Creek Project is also compatible with and
similar to the Inventory of Nonpoint Source Implementation Projects and Priorities (Santa Ana
Region) that are listed in Section 4 of the ARD (page 23). The projects that are specifically similar
are: The Fountain Valley List: 10) Projects that divert nuisance flows throughout the region. 19)
Reduce urban runoff, the transport conveyance mechanism... Loma Linda List: 9) Enhanced
storm water capture.. 22) drainage facilities to reduce/control runoff.
4) Scope of Work: Phase I : Base Line to Olive Street
$150,000. Design/Preliminary Engineering
$250.000. Construction Engineering
$750,000. Right-of-way costs/home acquisitions
$750,000. Grade and install concrete riprap stream channel
$500,000. Construction of detention desilting basins/ponds
$100,000. Storm drain construction
$2,500,000. Project Cost utilizing best management practices and measures
+ $500,000 (20%) Local Match: City/ Municipal Water District contributions
5) The success and impact of the project will be measured through water quality source testing of
nearby wells and the project's impact on the groundwater fluctuation levels at the retention basin
pump station to be located adjacent to the proposed location of the stream at Base Line and "G"
Streets. The aesthetic value of the pedestrian walkway and open space buffer between properties
and the 1-215 freeway corridor is also worth mentioning.
6) The project will ensure community and stakeholder outreach involvement through a continuing
series of public meetings related to the "water project". Also, local residents will see and read in the
local newspaper about their community being transformed in a positive manner that emphasizes
humanistic appreciation of open space and a healthier pollution-free environment.
u_~
"f~
*}
~l
r
2002-89
~ <'c.":;";:;::,':: "^,,' ".'.,-,..,c.
;',-,'-'.!~;-~',
City of San Bernardino, California
Department of Development Services/Public Works
Vision Creek
. .'~.;. ,.l\,(,H
~::;?:""i'
-=--~'O
~
g>
"-~
*
~
'"
ff'
~
"
- - '-"-----'-~' ------
,8, .
" ' , '- '~'c .~
_~_J;~
------r::, '---,-'~' -".- ,
t"
, ,j
"
, .
r-- ". ," ,"
~'--' -,---=-'.--'
-~q-, q'.','~" ;,,----=,
. ~Q, '; ,~ . .
, --d--8--.'-j, , '
'-~-~, g-l:"
- "';
,-,---~-_:.'~'\:j:'
----~
. - .-----,-, :--- '8,
'~ ,t!
11 "
-- .__.~::-~~~
----
:;<"'- >~
h
\...----"
".--1\'-' ~,
c' '" l,.'ty
--H../--':i ---
-TnT ---
~
-.....~--
-------
-----
"
-- s .=-.~.. -,- r~ :: ~,';;
-'::'~;'i ~:;:l::::~
;..~? >)' "'~ .,~ ~ '. .,-.,J-I. ' ....'-:~."
.- _~~.;.: .". '';'~....-1':.:t' e;::;. ~.:. ;.~, -..:.~;.,;".
'~."
-----------100.00'---------
["
\ '";.;'" S!'e~:
"~~~,
_,:~-"
""
--------==::;~.--------------
'."
"
-~~~-- .
-----~-
Section' "A "-"A "
>"};;:!;~"_'::,. ,- '.~ :'~ ~,"':-:'.,;i _: ';;"-:--;..,:~ ,\;",.2':~~[ '~':;'W$f '.: ,.~i..;..~;;~:;i~~~'1t,.::"tj;~.::-.
;......,
2002-89
SECTION 3
PROGRAM SPECIFIC TIMELINES
PROPOSITION 13 SWRCB PROCESS
RFP- TO-EXECUTION TIME LINE
CONCEPT RFP
MAILED TO
INTERESTED
PARTIES
(lJt!cember-MolUhJ)
APPLICANTS SUBMIT
CONCEPT PROPOSALS
TO SWRCB PROGRAM
FOR REVIEW AND
FEEDBACK
(February. Mot,rh J)
CRITIQUE AND
fEEDBACK ON
CONCEPT PROPOSALS
PROVIDED TO
APPLICANTS
(Man'h. MJllth 4)
SUBMITTAL OF
PROPOSALS
(Dlle June. MOllth "7
CAlFED-STATE
BOARD.RB
ELIGIBILITY REVIEW
(JIUle-Mnllth7)
REGIONAL BOARDS'
STATE WATER BOARD I
SUBMIT PRIORITY LISTS
TO PROGRAM
(Jrlly/Augu",t - Monlh 819)
STATE BOARD, ,
APPROVES RESOLVTION:& )"IuOlUTY
LIST
({klobo.MlHIlIIll)
WMI COMMITTEE
SELECTS PRlORJTY PROJECTS FOR
51 ATE W A TEll BOARD
CONSIDERATION
ptembt!r _ Mmrth JO
CIo(kS(ar1S1jCkinilhe~.'
Conlraclmustbeexeculed
wilhin one year of no lIce
oraward.
SELECTION
NOTIFICATION!
DEVl:WPMENT OF
PREUMINARY SCOPE
BEGINS
(.'Ymoembn'- MtJlitldz)"
Se[eclionLelftrand
PrtpilJlltionlnstructions
CO~LETEDCONTRACT
PACKAGES TO CONTRACT
OFFICE FOR PROCESSING
(DeL'emher.Momh/J)
CONTRACT OFFICE PROCESS/
CONTRACTOR SIGNATURE!
DEPT OF GENERAL SERVICES
REVIEW/SIGNATURE
(No Il!.'l.~ ,ha" ':10 Duy.~ 0 OJ
~"rtd'"
clInaotbeleu
than 90 da)"
from submittal
toConlract
Offi~
EXI:CUTED CONtRAcr
_ WORK CAN BEGIN
ON STIPULATED
START DATE".
WorltcillUlOtbeginuntilthecontractstalt
dale_ Malchcannotbeginal:t\Imulaling
unlillhecontrattslartdale
" This is a best-case scenario. The actual time is contingent upon the quick s4bmittal of the contract package by the Contractor.
.. This turn around time is contingent upon the number of contracts in the Cdntract Office during this timeframe.
... Contractors should not budget the funds for atleast 120 days after their submittal of the draft scope and budget. If the package is received inside the
timeframe. the date will either be chanl!.ed or the package will be returned to the Contract Manal!.er for correction. Be aware that. if the start date slips. it will