HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003-015
,
,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION NO. 2003-15
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO MAKING APPLICATION
TO THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF SAN
BERNARDINO FOR THE REORGANIZATION, TO INCLUDE ANNEXATION, OF
THREE NON-CONTIGUOUS UNINCORPORATED AREAS GENERALLY LOCATED
EAST OF CENTRAL A VENUE, NORTH OF ATLANTIC A VENUE.
WHEREAS, the City of San Bernardino desires to initiate proceedings pursuant to
Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Goyernment Reorganization Act of2000 (Section 56000 et. Seq.
of the Government Code) for the reorganization of three unincorporated non-contiguous areas
generally located east of Central Avenue, north of Atlantic A venue, more specifically shown on
the attached map as Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof and as described in Exhibit
"B" attached hereto and made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, said reorganization is to include annexation of said areas to the City of San
Bernardino and detachment from certain County of San Bernardino Seryice Areas; and
WHEREAS, the areas proposed to be annexed are consistent with the Sphere ofInfluence
of the City of San Bernardino; and
WHEREAS, the reason for this proposed reorganization IS the elimination of
unincorporated areas consisting of 75 acres or less within the City of San Bernardino's Sphere of
Influence pursuant to Section 56375.3 of the Government Code.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF SAN BERNARDINO AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Application is hereby made to the Local Agency Formation Commission
of the County of San Bernardino to initiate proceedings for the reorganization of three non-
contiguous unincorporated areas generally located east of Central A yenue, north of Atlantic
Avenue, more specifically shown and described in said Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "B".
SECTION 2. The Mayor of the City of San Bernardino is hereby directed and authorized
12/27/02
1
2003-15
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RESOLUTION MAKING APPLICATION TO LAFCO FOR REORGANIZATION OF THREE NON-
CONTIGUOUS UNINCORPORATED AREAS GENERALLY EAST OF CENTRAL AVENUE AND
NORTH OF ATLANTIC AVENUE.
to execute, on behalf of said City, the justification for proposal, a copy of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit "C" and made a part hereof, and supplemental form, a copy of which is attached
hereto as "Exhibit "D" and made a part hereof.
SECTION 3. The City Clerk of the City of San Bernardino is hereby authorized and
directed to file, or cause to be filed, a certified copy of this Resolution with the Executiye Officer
of the Local Agency Formation Commission of the County of San Bernardino.
SECTION 4. The Director of Development Seryices is hereby authorized and directed
to prepare and deliver, or cause to be prepared and delivered to the Executive Officer of the Local
Agency Formation Commission, all documents and maps necessary for the completion of said
proceedings.
1/1
1/1
11/
12/17/02
2
2003-15
.
RESOLUTION MAKING APPLICATION TO LAFCO FOR REORGANIZATION OF THREE NON-
CONTIGUOUS UNINCORPORATED AREAS GENERALLY EAST OF CENTRAL A VENUE AND
NORTH OF ATLANTIC AVENUE.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was duly adopted by the Mayor and
Common Council of the City of San Bernardino at a joint regular meeting thereof
held on the 6 th
day of January
, 20~, by the following Yote, to-wit:
Council Members: A YES
x
ESTRADA
x
LONGVILLE
MCGINNIS
x
DERRY
x
x
SUAREZ
x
ANDERSON
15 MCCAMMACK
16
17
18
19
20
x
NAYS
ABSTAIN ABSENT
~LLL. C--L~UL//G
City rk
The foregoing resolution is hereby approved this cl.... day of
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Approved as to form
and legal content:
JAMES F. PENMAN,
:;ry~
5p"ctc.1 ~""sel
12/17/02
January
,20~.
'~
'/
NEIL DERR' " ayor Pro Tern
City of San Bernardino
3
~~V'- I) Y ~
~ '-( 30"" "'38 - \ \
/ / ~ "-::::: 3 N "~
j / I 3nNl(v XN"d" , II-- II
i- II-- EEl
J... 1-.. ~ t- If- 833
/ r/I; '--- '---< '",,"" I '"'"
,J. Y... ____ / I - 833J
\ t---.-lf:. ;,1-- EEl
::::- "[: s 7-( 'O''''''' ~t= 833
-" t /I 0_ EEl
::j reW~r"111 I ~ = 833
~ -J ~8"'" g ~~ 3~"~^~_
(g -., 1_833
~.it' 1_1+1
... '" k 1_ ttJ
, 0':9;'" 'l' 3nN,",V !,,-mf""'
~I#O ~ ---W---tf:jL
~~( AI
r~'t-- L ~ fj II '""10 "'NOS I "-:j C ~
I-- I Z
'+- _ I-- - -" I If- ~
_ - - f-- ~ - 1-1S~31ND I~ <(
- I-- ~ -~-/ :t
. f- ~ ~ -t; I
~ I-- U -g-""- If-
~ I-- ~ - ~ -3^" }l:)mV3d I ~
'I I-- a. -. - /T Il~
I 3nN3J\V ______~... VII1Vd __I
\ !/)K\-- k \1 II
3~ D,:""'- ~ Y3NV1 SMoal/31'\1 8NI~dS ~ -
~ ~?~3'";\:::::t: ~;-
(h,.JIi ~~'~E
~ ,,~~ ~ ~ rr:;"
YiJR!:;; 7j: -- -"- A
~ '/ 'I T ~\ ~ I
r---------
I~
I
1_ w_
I
!=i
-------- I
I-
I "
I
w
Z
o
...J
W
U
oc
<(
a.
133H1S
38N\t'HO
-a.
~"::-
'10 .....&.. ~
v&.......<fl 9s:.
0-
w
w
OC
I
~
...J
W
U
OC
<(
a.
EXHIBIT "A"
"-..,
~ Ul Z
cwo
C::::~i=
<>u
~ ffi ~ t;;
w (f)t: l"l
III ~ 0:::
Z ~ ~ ~
< ~ 0
U) 0 cr ~
LL. -,0.. '2 i
o ~ <i! ~
>- Ww w8~
!:: 0 0:: ~ ~~
() 0(.......
III
r
!i Hi
~ ~
~ "11 1"5! j!
1: " -'.1- $
" .1..1. J I
~U H H n ~
~~... "j";fl ..
O"~ - , .h .
LUWlfl P,i '5..~ ~
~3~ .a..ifll I
~~" -ltitl-t~!< ~
i=1- 1:: a <II aC.Il ...
~~b;'j !i!li .
-t~() ..~~iH~~ ~
h~ l Jj~!hj ~
~(Q!
~'\ ,! JJ 0
x... .J! .
-
, ,
!ll
::f'bi
.~
J,i '.- p.Cj
t:;. I · 01,
II \1 ~~
~ 3nN3No' A033~
_tij [BJ g
-~ g
_tii g
g
g
tug
~g
:ng
g
g
g
g
g
[jlJ g
-
c-
-
-
-
-
e- -
~ ~ -
-'-
- -
L
--------
o
Z
<(
...J
I
52
I
"
~
"
-~
-~
-~
-
-
-
eo'
I
I
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
REORGANIZATION / ANNEXATION NO. 357
PARCEL ONE:
Those portions of Tract No. 7189 as per plat recorded in Book 94 of Maps, pages 85-87, in the
office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, State of California; and those portions
of Tract No. 7229 as per plat recorded in Book 98 of Maps, pages 28 and 29, records of said
County; and those portions of Tract No. 7230 as per plat recorded in Book 94 of Maps, pages 8-
10, records of said County; and those portions of Tract No. 7231 as per plat recorded in Book
100 of Maps, pages 45-49, records of said County; and those portions of Tract No. 7633 as per
plat recorded in Book 96 of Maps, pages 22 and 23, records of said County; and those portions of
the southwest one-quarter of Section 28, Township I North, Range 3 West, San Bernardino
Meridian, in said County, described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Orchid Drive and the west line of said Tract No.
7633, as said Orchid Drive is shown on the map of said Tract No. 7633, said point also being on
the corporate city limit line of the City of San Bernardino and following said corporate city limit
line, the following courses and distances:
(Ll) North 000 22' 06" West, along said west line and the west line of said Tract No. 7189, a
distance ofll87A3 feet to the most northerly corner of Lot 17 of said Tract No. 7189;
thence along the north line of said Lot 17 and Lots 16, 15, 14, 13, and 12 of said Tract No. 7189,
the following courses and distances:
(L2) South 520 40' 23" East, a distance of 139.64 feet;
thence (L3) South 480 IT 20" East, a distance of 125.28 feet;
thence (L4) South 40010' 40" East, a distance of 145.39 feet;
thence (L5) South 43004' 25" East, a distance of 81.18 feet;
thence (L6) South 450 10' 00" East, a distance of 5.51 feet to the most southwesterly corner of
Lot 1 of said Tract No. 7229;
thence (L 7) leaving said north line of Lot 12, along the southwesterly line of said Lot 1, North
00021' 20" West, a distance of9.74 feet;
thence (L8) North 40040' 50" East, a distance of 110040 feet to the most northerly corner of said
Lot I to a non-tangent curve, concave northeasterly, having a radius of 618 feet, a radial from
said point bears North 400 40' 50" East;
EXHIBIT "B"
thence (C I) northwesterly along said curve, an arc distance of 104.21 feet through a central
angle of 090 39' 41" to the westerly boundary of said Tract No. 7229;
thence, along the boundary of said Tract No. 7229, the following courses and distances:
(L9) North 000 21' 20" West, a distance of 455.47 feet;
thence (LlO) South 700 37' 56" East, a distance of22.64 feet;
thence (LlI) North 330 10' 22" East, a distance of 102.43 feet;
thence (L 12) North 000 21' 20" West, a distance of 112.68 feet;
thence (Ll3) North 43012' 00" East, a distance of 105.98 feet;
thence (L 14) South 500 59' 29" East, a distance of 130.56 feet;
thence (Ll5) South 610 00' 06" East, a distance of 129.12 feet;
thence (Ll6) South 710 00' 43" West, a distance of 129.12 feet;
thence (Ll7) South 130 56' 58" West, a distance of 190.00 feet;
thence (Ll8) South 11029' 35" West, a distance of 115.11 feet to the southeast corner of Lot 20
of said Tract No. 7229, said point also being the southwest corner of Lot 30 of said Tract No.
7231;
thence, leaving said Tract No. 7229 and along the south line of said Lot 30 and Lots 29, 28, 27,
26,25,24,23, and 22 of said Tract No. 7231, the following courses and distances:
(Ll9) South 800 48' II" East, a distance of215.75 feet;
thence (L20) South 720 52' 00" East, a distance of 227.36 feet;
thence (L21) South 59016' 36" East, a distance of 175.00 feet;
thence (L22) South 760 34' 57" East, a distance of95.06 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 20 of
said Tract No. 7231;
thence (L23) South 04053' 43" West, a distance of 96.42 feet;
thence (L24) South 14039' 49" West, a distance of 116.72 feet to the centerline of Croydon
Street as shown on the map of said Tract No. 7231, said point being on a non-tangent curve,
concave northerly with a radius of 500 feet, a radial from said point bears North 14039' 49" East;
thence (C3) northwesterly, along said curve and said centerline, through a central angle of 060
41' 05", an arc distance of 58.34 feet to the northeasterly prolongation of the westerly line of Lot
6 of said Tract No. 7231;
thence (L25) South 21020' 54" West, along said prolongation and the westerly line of said Lot 6,
and leaving said centerline of Croydon Street, a distance of 140.00 feet to the southwesterly
corner of said Lot 6;
thence westerly, along the south line of Lots 7, 8, 9, 10 and II of said Tract No. 7231, the
following courses and distances:
(L26) North 660 28' 40" East, a distance of 92.70 feet;
thence (L27) North 590 17' 00" East, a distance of284.32 feet;
thence (L28) North 760 01' 02" East, a distance of34.89 feet to the southeasterly corner of Lot
14 of said Tract No. 7229;
thence (L29) leaving said Tract No. 7231, North 760 01' 02" West, a distance of 295.89 feet to
the northwesterly corner of Lot 9 of said Tract No. 7229;
thence South 300 57' 59" West, along the west line of said Lot 9 and its southwesterly
prolongation, to the centerline of Piedmont Drive, as said street is shown on the map of said
Tract No. 7229, said point being on a non-tangent curve, concave northeasterly and having a
radius of 585.00 feet, a radius from said point bears North 300 57' 59" East;
thence (C4) southeasterly along said curve and said centerline, an arc distance of3.67 feet
through a central angle of 00021' 35" to its intersection with the centerline of Bradford Avenue,
as shown on the map of said Tract No. 7229;
thence (L31) South 300 36' 24" West, along said centerline, a distance of 50.80 feet to a tangent
curve, concave northwesterly having a radius of 250.00 feet;
thence (C5) southwesterly, along said curve, and arc distance of 45.35 feet through a central
angle of 100 23' 35";
thence (L32) South 41000' 00" West, a distance of 72.24 feet to the westerly prolongation of the
south line of Lot 2 of said Tract No. 7229;
thence (L33) , leaving said centerline, along said prolongation, South 650 55' 50" East, a
distance of 34.25 feet, more or less, to the easterly line of Bradford Avenue as said street is
shown on the map of said Tract No. 7229, said point also being the southwest corner of said Lot
2'
,
thence, along the south line of said Lot 2 and Lots 3, 4 and 5 of said Tract No. 7229, the
following courses and distances:
(L34) South 65055' 50" East, a distance 97.02 feet;
thence (L35) South 730 02' 40" East, a distance of 45.81 feet;
thence (L36) South 860 36' 30" East, a distance of 81.81 feet; to a non-tangent curve, concave
southwesterly, having a radius of 600.00 feet, a radial from said point bears South 160 18' 33"
West;
thence (C6) easterly, along said curve, an arc distance of 116.59 feet through a central angle of
11008' 02" to the southeasterly corner of said Lot 5, said point also being the southwesterly
corner of Lot 18 said Tract No.8486 as per map recorded in Book 114 of maps, pages 86 and 87,
records of said County and the beginning of a tangent curve, concave southwesterly, having a
radius of 600 .00 feet;
thence along the south line of said Lot 18 and Lots 17, 16, 15, 14, 13, 12, II and 10 of said Tract
No. 8486, the following courses and distance:
(C7) southeasterly, along said curve, an arc distance of 90.89 feet through a central angle of 080
40' 44";
thence (L37) South 320 02' 20" East, a distance of92.14 feet to a non-tangent curve, concave
northeasterly, having a radius of 246.13 feet;
thence (C8) southeasterly, along said curve, and arc distance of 179.45 feet through a central
angle of 41 0 46' 25 ";
thence (L38) South 830 48' 30" East, a distance of251.70 feet to the southeast comer of said Lot
10, said point also being the southwest comer of Lot 2 of said Tract No. 7231;
thence along the south line of said Lot 2 and the south line of Lot I of said Tract No. 7231, and
across portions of La Praix A venue, as said street is shown on map of said Tract No. 7231, and
along the south line of Lot 61 of said Tract No. 7231, the following courses and distances:
(L39) South 830 48' 30" East, a distance of 8.25 feet;
thence (L40) South 640 06' 00" East, a distance of 103.51 feet to a tangent curve, concave
northerly, having a radius of259.57 feet;
thence (C9) southeasterly, along said curve, an arc distance of 134.30 feet through a central angle
of290 38' 40";
thence (L41) North 86015' 20" East, a distance of 113.35 feet to the southeast comer of said Lot
61, said point also being on the east line of the Southwest one-quarter of Section 28, Township 1
North, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian;
thence (L42), leaving said Tract No. 7231 and along said east line, South 000 19' 47" East, a
distance of263.87 feet;
thence (L43) North 890 41' 55" East, a distance of 139.95 feet to the east line of Lot "C", as
shown on the map of said Tract No. 7230;
thence (L44) South 000 22' 06" West, a distance of30.00 feet the easterly prolongation of the
centerline of Orchid Drive, as said street is delineated on said map of Tract No. 7230;
thence (L45) South 890 41' 55" West, along said prolongation and the centerline of said Orchid
Drive, a distance of 1977 .00 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning.
Contains 33.38 acres, more or less.
PARCEL TWO:
Those portions of Tract No. 4986 as per plat recorded in Book 79 of Maps, pages 80 and 81, in
the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, State of California; and those
portions of Tract No. 7355 as per plat recorded in Book 94 of Maps, pages 55 and 56, records of
said County; and those portions of Tract No. 7752 as per plat recorded in Book 99 of Maps,
pages 7 and 8, records of said County; and those portions of the east one-half of Section 29,
Township 1 North, Range 3 West, San Bernardino Meridian, in said County, described as
follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Palm Avenue, as shown on the map of said
Tract No. 4986, and the centerline of Orchid Drive, shown as 23'd Street on the map of said Tract
No. 7752, said point also being on the corporate city limit line of the City of San Bernardino and
following said corporate city limit line, the following courses and distances:
(Ll) North 000 21' 26" West, along said centerline of Palm Avenue, a distance of 150 feet, more
or less, to the easterly prolongation of the south line of said Tract No. 4986;
thence, (L2) South 890 42' 49" West, along said prolongation and the south line of said Tract No.
4986, a distance of 1133.34 feet to the southwest corner of Lot 11 of said Tract No. 4986;
thence, along the westerly line of said Lot 11 and Lots 10 and 9 of said Tract No. 4986, the
following courses and distances:
(L3) North 550 28' 04" East, a distance of244.20 feet;
thence, (L4) North 250 28' 04" East, a distance of313.50 feet;
thence, (L5) North 160 13' 04" East, a distance of 13.66 feet to the northwest corner of said Lot
9, said point also being the southwest corner of Lot 2 of said Tract No. 7355;
thence, (L6) North 160 13' 04" East, along the westerly line of said Tract No. 7355, a distance
of751.12 feet to the northerly line of said Tract No. 7355;
thence, (L 7) North 890 42' 49" East, along said north line, a distance of 421.67 feet;
thence, (L8) leaving said north line and continuing North 890 42' 49" East, a distance of 164.00
feet to the centerline of said Palm A venue;
thence, (L9) South 000 21' 26" East, a distance of 470.69 feet, more or less, to the westerly
prolongation of the north line of said Tract No. 7752;
thence, (Ll 0) North 890 42' 44" East, along said prolongation and along the north line of said
Tract No. 7752, a distance of 661.46 feet to the east line of said Tract No. 7752;
thence, (LlI) South 000 20' 46" East, along said east line and its southerly prolongation, a
distance of 81 0.71 feet to the centerline of said Orchid Drive;
thence, (Ll2) South 890 41' 55" West, along said centerline of Orchid Drive, a distance of660.97
feet to the point of beginning.
Contains 32.76 acres, more or less.
PARCEL THREE:
Those portions of La Verne Tract Subdivision as per plat recorded in Book 15 of Maps, page II,
in the office of the County Recorder of San Bernardino County, State of California; and those
portions of the northeast one-quarter of Section 32, Township I North, Range 4 West, San
Bernardino Meridian, in said County, described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerline of Orange Street and Highland A venue, as said
streets are shown on the map of said La Verne Tract, said point also being on the corporate city
limit line of the City of San Bernardino and following said corporate city limit line, the following
courses and distances:
(Ll) West, along said centerline of said Highland A venue, a distance of 744 feet;
thence (L2) South 000 26' 05" East, 191.25 feet;
thence (L3) South 890 40' 05" West, a distance of21.00 feet;
thence (L4) South 000 26' 05" East, a distance of 111.97 feet, more or less, to the northeast
corner of Lot I of Tract No. 12758, as per plat recorded in Book 183 of Maps, pages and 22 and
23, records of said County;
thence along the boundary of said Lot 1, the following courses and distances:
(L5) South 000 04' 06" East (recorded South 000 26' 05" East), a distance of242.97 feet;
thence (L6) North 890 53' 16" West (recorded South 890 44' 45" West) a distance of 33.00 feet;
thence (L7) South 000 04' 06" East (recorded South 000 26' 05" East), a distance of 1.25 feet to
the northerly line of Tract No. 13335, as per plat recorded in Book 216 of Maps, pages II and
12, records of said County;
thence, leaving said Tract No. 12758 and along the boundary of said Tract No. 13335, the
following courses and distances:
(L8) South 000 IT 78" East (recorded South 000 26' 05" East), a distance of71.00 feet;
thence (L9) North 890 40' 32" East, a distance of 118.00 feet to the east line of Pepper Drive, 40
feet wide, shown as Victoria Street on the map of said La Verne Tract;
thence (LI 0) continuing North 890 40' 32" East, and leaving said Tract No. 13335, a distance of
20 feet, to the centerline of said Pepper Drive;
thence (LlI) South 000 IT 28" East, along said centerline, a distance of32 feet to the centerline
of Love Lane, 20 foot wide, shown as an unnamed street on the map of said La Verne Tract;
thence (Ll2) North 890 40' 32" East, along said centerline of Love Lane, a distance of 660 feet,
more or less, to said centerline of said Orange Street;
thence (Ll3) North, along said centerline of Orange Street, a distance of 650 feet, more or less,
to the point of beginning.
Contains 11.62 acres, more or less.
(FOR LAFCO USE ONLY)
Justification for Proposal and
Preliminary Environmental Description Form
INTRODUCTION: The questions on this form and its supplements are designed to obtain enough
data about the proposed project site to allow the Commission, its staff and others to adequately assess
the project. Bv takinq the time to fullv respond to the questions on the forms, YOU can reduce the
processinq time for your proiect. You may also include any additional information which you believe is
pertinent. Use additional sheets where necessary, or attach any relevant documents.
GENERAL INFORMATION
1.
NAME OF PROPOSAL:
REORGANIZATION OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO TO
INCLUDE THE ANNEXA nON OF THREE UNINCORPORATED ISLANDS.
2.
NAME OF APPLICANT:
MAILING ADDRESS:
300 N. "D" STREET
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92418
PHONE: ( 909 ) 384-5026
FAX: (~) 384-5155
E-MAiL ADDRESS: fogassy le@sbcity,org
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
3. GENERAL LOCATION OF PROPOSAL: PARCEL ONE: generallv iocated north of Ore hid Drive,
east of Bonita Drive: PARCEL TWO: generallv located north of Ore hid Drive, west of Bonita Drive:
PARCEL THREE: generallv located south of Highland Avenue west of Orange Street.
4. Does the application possess 100% written consent of each landowner in the subject territory?
YES _ NO L If YES, provide written authorization for change
5. Indicate the reasons that the proposed action has been requested. To eliminate unincorporated
islands pursuant to Section 56375.3 of the Government Code (Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local
Government Reorganization Act of2000)
6, Would the proposal create a totally or substantially surrounded isiand of unincorporated territory?
YES _ NO l If YES, please provide a written justification for the proposed boundary
configuration.
EXHIBIT "C"
(FOR LAFCO USE ONL V)
LAND USE AND DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL
1. Total land area (defined in acres):
PARCEL ONE: 33.38 Acres; PARCEL TWO: 32.76 Acres; PARCEL THREE: 11.62 Acres
2. Current dwelling units in area:
PARCEL ONE: 88; PARCEL TWO: 58; PARCEL THREE: 53
3. Approximate current population in area:
PARCEL ONE: 337; PARCEL TWO: 245; PARCEL THREE: 129 (Per 2000 Census Data)
4. Indicate the General Plan designation(s) of the affected city (if any) and uses permitted by this
designation(s):
PARCEL ONE: RS (Residential Single); PARCEL TWO: RS (Residentiai Single); PARCEL THREE:
RU-I (Residential Urban); RM (Residential Medium); CG-I (Commercial General)
San Bernardino County General Plan designation(s) and uses permitted by this designation(s):
PARCEL ONE: RS-9M (Residential); PARCEL TWO: RS-9M and RS-15M (Residential); PARCEL
THREE: RM-3M and RS (Residential) and CG and CN (Commercial)
5. Describe any special land use concerns expressed in the above plans.
N/A
6. Indicate the existing land use.
PARCEL ONE: Residential; Vacant; Public Facilitv . PARCEL TWO: Residential. PARCEL THREE:
Residential; Commercial; Vacant
What is the proposed land use?
SAME AS EXISTING LAND USE OR DESIGNATION
7. For a city annexation, State law requires pre-zoning of the territory proposed for annexation.
Provide a response to the following:
Has pre-zoning been completed? YES ~ NO_
If the response to "a" is NO, is the area in the process of pre-zoning? YES
a.
b.
NO
Identify below the pre-zoning classification, title, and densities permitted. If the pre-zoning process
is undelWay, identify the timing for completion of the process.
RS: Residential Sinqle- 4.5 Units/Gross Acre: RM-Residential Multi-14.0 Units/Gross Acre: CG-1:
Commercial General- 0.25-1.0 Floor Area Ration (FAR)
2
(FOR LAFCO USE ONLY)
8. On the following list, indicate if any portion of the territory contains the following by placing a
checkmark next to the item:
o Agricultural Land Uses 0 Agricultural Preserve Designation
o Williamson Act Contract 0 Area where Special Permits are Required
o Any other unusual features of the area or permits required:
9. If a Williamson Act Contract(s) exists within the area proposed for annexation to a City, please
provide a copy of the original contract, the notice of non-renewal (if appropriate) and any protest to
the contract filed with the County by the City. Please provide an outline of the City's anticipated
actions with regard to this contract.
N/A
10. Will the proposal require public services from any agency or district which is currently operating at
or near capacity (including sewer, water, police, fire, or schools)? YES _ NO ~ If YES,
please explain.
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION
1.
Provide general description of topography.
GENERALLY FLAT
PARCEL ONE, TWO AND THREE ARE ALL
2. Describe any existing improvements on the site as % of total area.
PAR. ONE PAR. TWO PAR. THREE
Residential 98% 100% 80%
Commercial 0% 0% 4%
Industrial 0% 0% 0%
Agricultural 0% 0% 0%
Vacant 1% 0% 16%
Other 1% (Well Site) 0% 0%
3
(FOR LAFCO USE ONLY)
4. Describe site alterations that will be produced by improvement projects associated with this
proposed action (installation of water facilities, sewer facilities, grading, flow channelization, etc.).
N/A
5 Will service extensions accomplished by this proposal induce growth on this site? YES_
NO JL Adjacent sites? YES _ NO ~ Unincorporated _ Incorporated_
6.
Is this project a part of a larger project or series of projects? YES
explain.
NO ~ If YES, please
NOTICES
Please provide the names and addresses of persons who are to be furnished mailed notice of the
hearing(s) and receive copies of the agenda and staff report.
NAME
Laszlo "Les" Fogassy, Real Property SupervisorTELEPHONE NO. (909) 384-5026
ADDRESS: City of San Bernardino
300N. "D" Street, San Bernardino, CA 92418
NAME
Fred Wilson, City Administrator
TELEPHONE NO. (909) 384-5122
ADDRESS: City of San Bernardino
300 N. "D" Street, San Bernardino, CA 92418
NAME
Rachel Clark, City Clerk
TELEPHONE NO. (909) 384-5002
ADDRESS: City of San Bernardino
300 N "0" Street San Bernardino CA 92418
4
(FOR LAFCO USE ONLY)
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached supplements and exhibits present
the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts,
statements, and information presented herein are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
I understand that if this proposal is approved, the Commission will impose a condition requiring the
applicant to indemnify, hold harmless and reimburse the Commission for all legal actions that might be
initiated as a result of that approval. ,~
l / d ([ C~'
hlGNATURE OF APPLICANT
JUDITH V ALLES
I PRINTED NAME OF APPLICANT
,
DATE
MAYOR. CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
TITLE
PLEASE CHECK SUPPLEMENTAL FORMS ATTACHED:
j ANNEXATION, DETACHMENT, REORGANIZATION SUPPLEMENT
SPHERE OF INFLUENCE CHANGE SUPPLEMENT
CITY INCORPORATION SUPPLEMENT
FORMATION OF A SPECIAL DISTRICT SUPPLEMENT
ACTIVATION OF LATENT POWERS SUPPLEMENT
APPLICATION TO BE SUBMITTED TO:
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION
175 WEST FIFTH STREET, SECOND FLOOR
SAN BERNARDINO, CA 92415-0490
PHONE: (909)387-5866. FAX: (909) 387-5871
E-mail address: lafco@lafco.sbcountY.90v
KRM - REV
5
(FOR LAFCO USE ONLY)
SUPPLEMENT
ANNEXATION, DETACHMENT, REORGANIZATION PROPOSALS
INTRODUCTION: The questions on this form are designed to obtain data about the specific
annexation, detachment and/or reorganization proposal to allow the Commission, staff and others to
adequately assess the project. You may also include any additional information which you believe is
pertinent. Use additional sheets where necessary, and/or include any relevant documents.
1. Please identify the agencies involved in the proposal by proposed action:
ANNEXED TO
DETACHED FROM
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO
CSA 38L
2. Will the territory proposed for change be subject to any new or additional special taxes, any
new assessment districts, or fees?
CITY REFUSE SERVICE-- RESIDENTS HAVE OPTION TO RETAIN EXISTING
SERVICE FOR FIVE YEARS FROM ANNEXATION DATE. CURRENT CITY RATE
IS$17.60 PER MONTH FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
3. Will the territory be relieved of any existing special taxes, assessments, district charges or
fees required by the agencies to be detached?
CSA 38L (COUNTY PARAMEDIC FEE) WILL NOT BE ASSESSED AFTER
ANNEXATION. CURRENT ASSESSMENT IS $19.30 ANNUALLY, PER RESIDENCE
4. Provide a description of how the proposed change will assist the annexing agency in
achieving its fair share of regional housing needs as determined by SCAG.
AREA IS ESSENTIAL Y DEVELOPED AS RESIDENTIAL
EXHIBIT "0"
(FaR LAFCa USE aNL Y)
5. PLAN FOR SERVICES:
Far each item identified far a change in service pravider, a narrative "Plan fer Service"
(required by Gavernment Cede Sectien 56653) must be submitted. This plan shall, at a
minimum, respend to. each ef the fellewing questiens and be signed and certified by an afficial
ef the annexing agency er agencies.
1. A descriptien ef the level and range af each service to. be previded to. the affected
territery.
2. An indicatien af when the service can be feasibly extended to. the affected territary.
3. An identificatien ef any imprevement er upgrading ef structures, reads, water er sewer
facilities, ether infrastructure, er ether cenditiens the affected agency weuld impese
upan the affected territary.
4. The estimated cast ef extending the service and a descriptien ef hew the service er
required imprevements will be financed. A discussien ef the sufficiency ef revenues
fer anticipated service extensiens and aperatiens is also. required.
5. An indicatien ef whether the annexing territery is, er will be, prepesed fer inclusien
within an existing er prepesed impravement zene/district, redevelepment area,
assessment district, er cemmunity facilities district.
6. If retail water service is to. be previded threugh this change, provide a descriptian ef
the timely availability af water fer prejected needs within the area based upen factars
identified in Gevernment Cede Sectian 65352.5 (as required by Gevernment Cade
Sectian 56668(k)).
CERTIFICATION
I hereby certify that the statements furnished abave and the decuments attached to. this farm present
the data and infarmatian required to. the best ef my ability, and that the facts, statements, and
infermatien presented herein are true and cerrect totn~ best ef my knewledge and belief.
I
I
,/ I ( (
I .
SIGNATURE OF A~PLlCANT
/
(
( ,',-
_. l.,.-. "
Judith Valles, Mayer
City ef San Bernardino.
DATE
/krm - 12/8/2000
2
(FOR LAFCO USE ONLY)
3
PLAN FOR SERVICES
Reorganization of the City of San Bernardino to include the annexation of
three islands of unincorporated territory generally located east of Central Avenue,
north of Atlantic Avenue.
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICES
. Fire Protection Services: The three islands are currently served by the City of San
Bernardino Fire Department pursuant to an agreement with the County of San Bernardino.
The City will continue to provide fire services for this area after annexation. The City
currently has II fire stations. A new fire station is also planned for the Verdemont area. Each
fire station is staffed with I paramedic per shift. The nearest fire station to the three islands
is located at the northwest comer of Orange Street and Highland A venue. In addition to fire
and paramedic services, City wide services include disaster preparedness and emergency
operations. No additional fees are charged for fire services.
. Police Protection Services: The islands are presently served by the San Bernardino County
Sheriff. After annexation, police services will be provided by the City of San Bernardino
Police Department. The Department currently has approximately 453 personnel, including
222 patrol/traffic officers, 76 investigation officers and 35 vice & narcotics officers. The
department also offers "Crime Free" and other crime prevention services. No additional fees
are charged for routine services.
. Water & Sewer Services: Water delivery and sewage disposal is presently provided by the
East Valley Water District. East Valley Water will continue to provide these services after
annexation.
. Public Services/Re{use: Pursuant to City of San Bernardino policy, residents of a newly
annexed areas may continue to use their current refuse provider for a period of up to five
years after the date of annexation, or may have refuse services provided by the City anytime
prior to the five years. The current residential rate is $17.60 per month for once a week pick
up and includes the provision of three containers (normal, recycle-able and green waste).
Commercial rates vary depending on the type and frequency of pick up. Additional services,
such as old appliance pick up or special pick up for large and hard to handle items is
available for an additional fee. The City also has a comprehensive recycling program
including the collection of used oil and tires.
. Public Services/Streets: The street division provides monthly street sweeping,
street/sidewalk repair and street tree trimming. No additional fees are charged for these
services.
. Develovment Services: The Development Services Department provides planning, building
and engineering services related to land development, including new development and
additions. The permit fees vary, depending on the type of development.
. The Public Works Division also provides services such as street rehabilitation and storm
drain installation! repair. These types of projects are normally part of the City's five year
Capital Improvement Program and funding is normally provided by either the general fund or
various transportation funds such as gas tax funds. The division also provides other services
that include street light maintenance, traffic signals and street signs and striping. No
additional fees are charged for these services.
. Code Comv/iance/Enforcement: Currently the City of San Bernardino has a staff of 32
personnel that administer code compliance services. These services include code compliance,
housing improvement, neighborhood revitalization and weed abatement. Abatement costs are
normally billed or assessed to the owners of property on which abatement activity occurs.
. Animal Control: Animal control services will be provided by the City of San Bernardino. No
additional fees will be charged for these services.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF SERVICES.
. All City services will available to property owners and/or residences on the effective date of
annexation.
IMPOSITION OF INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS or OTHER CONDITIONS.
. The area is primarily developed; no immediate need for infrastructure improvements have
been noted. Streets within the islands will be included in the City-wide pavement
management program.
COST OF EXTENSION OF SERVICES
. Basic City services, as outlined above, will be extended to the three islands at no additional
costs other then as indicated above. These services are paid for through the general fund, or
other sources, and will be provided with current staffing levels.
IMPROVEMENT ZONES/DISTRICTS; ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
. Island No. Three (southwest corner of Highland Avenue and Orange Street) is within the
Inland Valley Development Agency's (IVDA) Project Sub-area no. 2., and will not change
as a result of this annexation. This may impact future tax increment revenues to the City but
will have no adverse economic effect on the properties within the island. There are presently
2
,----- ---
no other improvement areas, redevelopment areas, assessment districts or community
facilities districts affecting any of the islands.
. The City of San Bernardino currently collects an eight percent (8%) Utility Users Tax. This
fee will not be assessed to the three islands, unless approved by voters within the islands at
some time in the future. At this time, it has not been determined if and when that will ever
occur.
3
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
Inter-Office Memorandum
,I
. FRED WILSON. City Administrator
TO:
FROM: JAMES FUNK, Development Services Director
By: Laszlo "Les" Fogassy, Real Property Official
SUBJECT: Proposed Annexation of Three County Islands under AB 1555
DATE: May 21,2002
COPIES: File No.: 12.01-343; Reading
Overview of Recent Lel!.islation Rel!:ardinl!: Annexations.
AB 1555
On January 21,2000, Assembly Bill 1555 became effective, allowing for the annexation of
unincorporated territory of 75 acres or less, without the need to obtain property owner and/or registered
voter approval. The purpose of this bill is to facilitate the elimination of irregular boundaries that exist in
many Cities, which often causes confusion and inefficiency in the delivery of services between the
affected agencies. AB 1555 provides for a seven-year window, after which time it will expire.
AB 2838
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 2838, which became effective January 1,200 I, and codified under
Government Code Section 56000, et. Seq., (known as the Cortese-Knox-Hertzberg Local Government
Reorganization Act of 2000), the procedures for annexations and reorganizations has changed
substantially from the previous requirements. In substance, the Local Agency Formation Commission
(LAFCO) is the lead and conducting agency for the proceedings, including notifications to property
owners and/or registered voters and also conducts the public hearing. Under the new law, notification
must include all property owners and registered voters within 300 feet of the external boundaries of a
proposed annexation. The only responsibilities of the City for the proceedings, are the preparation and
filing of the application and various appurtenant documents, maps, etc., and payment of fees.
Oualifvinl!. Islands Under AB 1555
The City of San Bernardino has three islands within its current Sphere of Influence that would qualify
for annexations proceedings under AB 1555. All three islands are located in the northeast portion of the
City and are depicted on the attached maps. Exhibit" 1" is a vicinity map of the islands and Exhibit "2"
is a detailed map. Islands one and two are fully developed with single family residential use. Island three
is mixed, with two small commercial properties and the remainder being residential uses. Exhibit "3"
gives a summary of the characteristics of the three islands.
Filinl.! Fees / Proceedinl.!s
Although normal tiling fees for the annexation of the three islands would exceed $19,000, LAFCO has
advised us that the initial filing fees for Island Annexations under AB 1555 would be waived, if the City
requested. This is to encourage Cities to eliminate eligible to eliminate islands qualifying under AB
1555. The other various fees will be determined by the affected agencies, and whether or not they
combine fees as one annexation or separate fees for each island. Since no precedent has been set in this
area, the table below shows the minimum and maximum fees the City could expect to pay, and will be
determined once the filing has taken place.
Initial Filing Fee
Environmental Fee Deposit
Landowner/Registered Voter Notifications:
Board of Equalization Fee
GIMS (County Mapping Fee)
Min.
$ 0
750
3,600
1,500
300
Max.
$ 0
750
3600
3,200
900
Total Fees
$6,150
$8,450
As stated previously, LAFCO would be the conducting Agency for the proceedings under this
annexation, including the mailing of notices and conducting the public hearing. LAFCO's executive
officer has stated that the actions of the Commission are non-discretionary for proceedings under AB
1555, and approval of the annexations is mandated.
Provision of Citv Services
Upon annexation, the residents and/or property owners within the islands would receive all City services
available to current City residents, with the following exceptions: water and sewer service, which is
currently provided by East Valley Water, would continue to be provided by East Valley after annexation.
Refuse service would be available, but under a current City ordinance, residents may continue to use
their existing refuse hauler for up to five years after annexation.
Financial Impact of Annexation-Revenues vs. Expenses
As part of the filing proceedings, it will be required that the City and the County negotiate the amount of
the County's portion of the property tax that would be transferred to the City upon annexation. Since the
general formula for determining these amounts was agreed upon between the City and County in the
early 1980's, the "negotiation" process consists of the County and the City each adopting a resolution
applying the previously approved formula. The Utility Users Tax issue is subject to Proposition 218
guidelines, which will require further review by the City Attorney.
The City currently provides paramedic and fire suppression services to II County islands, including the
three small islands proposed for annexation, through an agreement with the County for $250,000 per
year. There would be no new costs associated with the annexation for fire services, but the revenue from
the County for the 3 islands would be lost. Although no formal amount has been agreed upon with the
County at this time, based on percentage of area and population of these islands in relation to all the
islands as a whole, the lost revenue is estimated at 7.5 %, or $18,750.
The Police Department conducted a "windshield survey" of the three small islands, and indicated that
they anticipate that Island One and Island Two would require minimal police services. (See attached
letter from the Interim Chief of Police). They did indicate that Island Three would present some blight-
rdated challenges. However, due to the small size of these islands, it was felt that routine police calls for
services could be absorbed within current budget resources. Thus, no additional costs for police services
would be needed as a result of annexing the three islands.
Exhibit "4" shows a summary of estimated revenues from major sources. The annual revenue is
estimated to be $85,945.61. If the Utility Users Tax does apply, revenue would be $133,705.26.
Estimated costs range from $199,400.04 to $284,857.20, depending on the level of infrastructure
investment made to the annexed area.
The pros and cons of these island annexations are summarized in Exhibit "5".
Community Outreach
In order to assist staff with community outreach efforts, it is proposed to use the services of a community
outreach firm. The services of the consultant would include preparation of collateral materials (Fact
Sheet, Q&A, etc.); drafting and distributing community meeting correspondence, drafting media
materials, assisting with a community meeting and preparing a post meeting summary letter to residents.
The cost to provide the outreach services is estimated at $5,000.00.
I :
.AQ\.'
'i~,_
.;..-., '
City of San Bernardino
San Bernardino Police Department
Interoffice Memorandum
To:
Fred Wilson, City Administrator
From:
Mike Billdt, Interim Chief of Police 7) l)
Annexation/County Islands
Subject:
Date:
3 January, 2002
Copies:
We have taken a "windshield survey" of the proposed annexation areas in the Highland
and Orange areas. Our conclusion is:
Islands I and 2 would present a favorable addition to the city. These areas have some
desirable properties and anticipated calls for police services would be minimal.
Island 3 will present a challenge to the city, primarily to code enforcement. The area is
not well maintained and it is evident this area presents significant blight-related
challenges. However, the size of the proposed annexation is small enough to represent a
minimal increase in calls for police services.
We can absorb the costs of routine police calls for service within current budget
resources. However, due to unknown variables, absorbing costs of blight reduction
efforts can not be estimated at this point.
I support, from a police perspective, annexation of the three areas.
-
~I \.J ~:~.
- --.-- -.. *,
.t
JAW -1 .
"
I
.------......!
. ',c, - '~: r, :J
;:'.
THE SBPD IS COMMITTED TO PROVIDING:
PROGRESSIVE QUALITY POLICE SERVICE;
A SAFE ENVIRONMENT TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF LIFE;
A REDUCTION IN CRIME THROUGH PROBLEM RECOGNITION AND PROBLEM SOL VING
40th SI. '_
Island Two
Island Three
Highland Ave. ,
Base Line 51.
5th 51.
Mill 51.
.--/
(
" .
o
VICINITY MAP
EXHIBIT "1"
No Scale
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
REAL PROPERTY SECTION
PROPOSED ISLAND ANNEXATIONS
UNDER AB 1555
~ indicates un-incorporated areas
~ within City's Sphere of influence
Created by: L, Foqo??y Date: 01/08/2002
I I l p.:
N' , =~
I -r N' '''d~
3""1" F[;' X<~ EEl
I J II-- EEl
I' 1- EEl
/;; I--}-<", 6.J 1:"'-'- EEl
I! / I '''30
t:~ ~ 1 h=1
--,!L -l 'I\. ... ..,,':~! ffi
&"U kf([!jJ'!L L \:::: 1;1- I+l
~~~ ~ ~ I~ ~
~~ ~~, l - """'''"'^I-= EEl
1 'ij:iJ T)" ~"'~~ L.. 1= EW
-A~~f if "-I~ :
~~ 71: GlA ~ 3"""" I Em
""<i!3''( ~ I """0'."
.:~ (J I I I II IT . II ffil
I ~ tt: '- --lNI ri' ..~. 6 T
~ '-- ~ 0- " ,,\=, E~
== I- l-- 1-).- I!~ z
-} ~ I- "'C I- ~ _ ""\." ""..0' I f- ~
~ I- c: I-~ 1/ 1- <(
~ _ lI:l ,-~_"I 11'-
I I J I-- Vl 1-' \,.J I
~ _ _ ) I-- ~ :.- -("" lOOOY3d II- -
1m 3nN"" ___ /1 I ,1=
f.... \...3~ j-(F 1-1\. ii-I" I .'Vd--
T ?JJ:. ::::t cmtrFhl'-- r-
. '-~._ L
Cj,@ i' ' r,;~::
:$W1 li" _I -IJR'"
m~,~ I I H,tr ~\ ~ h
.- -- .,.---,
~ ,/\ / V ')..
-\ '\ tJ tffJ
TI\ \ 7
r~L_ ?'
1Z?2:;..L1
N
~L
~ "-
..-
"'C
c:
lI:l
Vl
I
(
-a.
-t-~"::-
o .....&.. <t->
v&..~ 9s:.
0-
OJ
OJ
'-
.c:
I-
"'C
c:
lI:l
~
----"
o
z
<(
...J
J:
Cl
I
o
~U)Z
CWO
0::: CJ -
<_I-
>u
zO::W
o:::WU)
wU)>-
mI-l-
zo::
ZWW
<~a.
Cl)a.O
00::
LL...Ja.
OW...J
>Gj<C
... Cl W
_ 0::
o
'0 ~ '0 Ii - .
~ o.
.c ii :;!:: .c:-
~~ ~1 b~
z_ z z
c . .
i 0 "2 v "g-
o e 01 ~ 0
u: g ~ Bc5
.20:: -::I ..2-
>,_ ~ >,0
'50 gO '5-;;
t-.t b.. III
CU fi- i
~11: "'~ 00-
>.t >.. >.~
~_ ~~ ~t
:-::15 :e~ =::<<
~ 0 ,! 0 ,'U
~1 :'::.....5
"0 'i S "2
,!CD am ..!.2'
~o :So ~:
l';; G"~ ...
oo-u. 15~
.!lw-H!Rj';'E"-
5 ..'c :5 ~ it
..~~~t;..cn.
8a~J;!i~I"~
_,,10'"" ~S.c:
i~aJ,!~li3
_IL~_
,JIJ
/ R!~
~t).
. ~ iiii'--
~- ~~.
//7- ~ ..." \.
~ ..!!! .il~"D
~~ ~"
'\., 0 J: -
'\~ I) z ~!~~
~ ~f\
~.--- .. ;:.
Zi"
~I
!~
uo
lIP tlIJ
1
-
- ,
"
-~
-
.,..
~
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.-----;:: ~
II--'
if--
I
________Ip '111' .
I-lIT
I r
I
II~.
_ ~ IlIP tlIJ laD
-~f-
I-- "
~ 1ll'i1
~~ ~
-~ ~
~ 0
1= C
lIP I
,-
'=
-
-
~-
~-
--
~-
--
.
~
i
~
.
.
~
~
z
Q
~
~
.
~
5
/1
Summary of Characteristics
County Islands Qualifying for Annexation Under AD 1555
Description Island One Island Two Island Three Total
Area 33.38 Acres 32.76 Acres 11.62 Acres 77.67 Acres
Land Use by Parcel
Residential (Single) 88 Parcels 58 Parcels 37 Parcels 183 Parcels
Residential (Duplex) 0 0 4 4
Residential (Quad) 0 0 2 2
Commercial 0 0 2 2
Vacant 2 0 9 II
Total parcels 90 58 54 202
Total Dwelling Units 88 58 53 199
Population 337 245 129 711
Linear feet of Asphalt 6,000 5,400 3,250 14,650
Linear feet of curb 12,000 10,800 0 22,800
Linear feet of sidewalk 9,600 5,400 0 15,000
Overall condition of streets Poor Poor Poor
Overall property maintenance Good Fair Poor
EXHIBIT "3"
CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO
ESTIMATED REVENUES
ANNEXATION OF THREE COUNTY ISLANDS PROPOSED UNDER AB 1555
Property Tax
State Aid-Libraries
Traffic Congestion Relief (AB 2928)
Special Gas Tax Fund
Motor Vehicle In Lieu
Sales Tax Safety
TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUES
Utility Users Tax
TOTAL ESTIMATED REVENUES IF
U.U.T. DOES APPLY
Total Assessed Value
Tax Revenue (1 % of AV)
City's average of 14.3244% of Tax Revenue
2001-02 Budget:
Per Capita Cost (Current 185,272)
Per Capita Extension to Islands
(Additional Population of 711)
2001-02 Budget:
Per Capita Cost (Current 185,272)
Per Capita Extension to Islands
(Additional Population of 711)
2001-02 Budget:
Per Capita Cost (Current 185,272)
Per Capita Extension to Islands
(Additional Population of 711)
2001-02 Budget:
Per Capita Cost (Current 185,272)
Per Capita Extension to Islands
(Additional Population of 711)
2001-02 Budget:
Per Capita Cost (Current 185,272)
Per Capita Extension to Islands
(Additional Population of 711)
Total utility bills based on monthly average of
$250 for 199 residential units (phone,
electric, cable, gas) 8% tax
EXHIBIT "4"
$22,171,92100
$221,719.21
$31,759.95
$309,00000
$1.67
$1,18737
$560,000.00
$3.02
$2,147.22
$3,499,00000
$18.89
$13,43079
$9,750,00000
$52.63
$37,419.93
$650,000.00
$3.51
$2,495.61
$31,759.95
$ 1,187.37
$ 2,147.22
$13,430.79
$37,419.93
$ 2,495.61
$85,945.26
$47,760.00
$133,705.26
SUMMARY OF PROS AND CONS OF 3 ISLAND ANNEXATIONS IN THE
NORTHEAST AREA OF THE CITY OF SAN BERNARDINO UNDER AB 1555.
PROS
· Increased clarity of the boundaries of the City limits between City and County and clarity of
the responsibility for provision of services.
. Initial net annual revenue estimated at $30,399.23, which could be utilized to improve the
physical condition of the islands.
. Additional future revenues could be generated from the islands to upgrade infrastructure.
. Better code enforcement and improved property maintenance could result in increased
property values, thus generating additional tax revenues.
. Citizens and property owners would benefit from being in a smaller, more accessible
municipal government rather than the larger County government.
. Delivery of services to the islands would be more efficient.
. The City of San Bernardino would likely do a superior job of maintaining the improvements
in the public right-of-way.
CONS
· The City of San Bernardino would become responsible for maintaining the streets, curbs,
gutter, sidewalk, street light maintenance, street tree trimming and street sweeping within
the islands.
. The property owners might be subject to the City's Utility Users Tax.
EXHIBIT "5"